Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2022 Mar 24;12:5106. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09000-7

Cerebral aneurysms at major arterial bifurcations are associated with the arterial branch forming a smaller angle with the parent artery

Bu-Lang Gao 1,✉, Hong Hao 1, Weili Hao 1, Chun-Feng Ren 2, Lei Yang 1, Yongfeng Han 1
PMCID: PMC8948358  PMID: 35332228

Abstract

Currently, the relationship of bifurcation morphology and aneurysm presence at the major cerebral bifurcations is not clear. This study was to investigate cerebral arterial bifurcation morphology and accompanied hemodynamic stresses associated with cerebral aneurysm presence at major cerebral arterial bifurcations. Cerebral angiographic data of major cerebral artery bifurcations of 554 anterior cerebral arteries, 582 internal carotid arteries, 793 middle cerebral arteries and 195 basilar arteries were used for measurement of arterial diameter, lateral and bifurcation angles and aneurysm deviation. Hemodynamic stresses were analyzed using computational fluid dynamic simulation. Significantly (P < 0.001) more aneurysms deviated toward the smaller branch and the smaller lateral angle than towards the larger branch and larger lateral angle at all four major bifurcations. At the flow direct impinging center, the total pressure was the greatest while the dynamic pressure, wall shear stress (WSS), vorticity and strain rate were the least. Peak 1 and Peak 2 were located on the branch forming a smaller and larger angle with the parent artery, respectively. The dynamic pressure (175.4 ± 18.6 vs. 89.9 ± 7.6 Pa), WSS (28.9 ± 7.4 vs. 15.7 ± 5.3 Pa), vorticity (9874.6 ± 973.4 vs. 7237.8 ± 372.7 1/S), strain rate (9873.1 ± 625.6 vs. 7648.3 ± 472.5 1/S) and distance (1.9 ± 0.8 vs. 1.3 ± 0.3 mm) between the peak site and direct flow impinging center were significantly greater at Peak 1 than at Peak 2 (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). Moreover, aneurysms deviation and Peak 1 were always on the same side. In conclusion, the branch forming a smaller angle with the parent artery is associated with abnormally enhanced hemodynamic stresses to initiate an aneurysm at the bifurcation apex.

Subject terms: Computational biology and bioinformatics, Neuroscience, Diseases, Medical research, Neurology

Introduction

Cerebral aneurysms occur in 2–4% of the general population, and the most dreaded complication of aneurysms is rupture1. Despite advances in microinvasive and invasive surgical techniques and post-operative management, the mortality and morbidity of aneurysm rupture remain high. Increasing evidence shows that enhanced hemodynamic insult is the initiating factor for aneurysm formation, and hemodynamic stress-induced inflammatory progress is the leading factor in the pathogenesis of aneurysm formation2–5. However, aneurysm initiation site which experiences abnormal hemodynamic stresses and inflammatory progress remain unclear even though some destructive remodeling of arterial wall has been observed to associate with aneurysm initiation4.

Cerebral arterial bifurcation apexes are the most frequent location of aneurysm formation, and the bifurcation wall is exposed to the maximal hemodynamic stresses, which are not only affected by arterial diameter, but also by the bifurcation angle formed between two branches and the lateral angles formed between the parent artery and one branch artery. Our previous studies have shown that both anterior communicating artery and basilar apex (BA) aneurysms are not only deviated to the smaller branch forming a smaller lateral angle with the parent artery but also associated with wider bifurcation angles and narrower lateral angles6,7. Enlarged anterior cerebral artery (ACA) bifurcation angles possibly induce abnormally enhanced hemodynamic stresses to initiate aneurysms8. In clinical setting, stent-mediated coiling of wide-necked aneurysms significantly increases the lateral angle formed between the parent artery and stented daughter branch but decreases the bifurcation angle and the pressure at the bifurcation apex. These changes in the arterial angles subsequently displace and attenuate the flow impingement zone at the neck of bifurcation aneurysms, leading to decreased wall shear stress (WSS) and total pressure at the bifurcation as well as reduced damage to the arterial wall caused by the WSS and total pressure9–11.

Better understanding of the relationship between hemodynamic stresses and arterial bifurcation morphology at the aneurysm initiation site is crucial for development of new preventive and therapeutic strategies. It has been reported that the region enclosed by the aneurysm neck is the aneurysm initiation site12, however, the hemodynamic stresses within this area have not been specified to induce an aneurysm. We hypothesized that the specific hemodynamic stresses at the location of aneurysm neck were associated with presence of saccular aneurysms at four major cerebral arterial bifurcations, including the internal carotid artery (ICA), ACA, middle cerebral artery (MCA) and BA. This study was consequently performed to analyze the hemodynamic stresses before and after aneurysm formation at the bifurcation apex and possible factors affecting arterial diameter, lateral and bifurcation angles by using patients’ specific cerebral angiographic data coupled with computational fluid dynamic (CFD) analysis so as to elucidate the possible arterial morphology and hemodynamic stresses favoring aneurysm formation.

Materials and methods

Subjects

This retrospective case–control one-center study was approved by the ethics committee of Shijiazhuang People’s Hospital, and all patients had given their signed informed consent to participate. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. Between March 2004 and February 2015, consecutive patients who had three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography in our hospital were reviewed in this study. All volumes showing a clear view of major arterial bifurcations were included, and those with unclear imaging data were excluded. CFD analysis was performed in 318 patients with saccular cerebral aneurysms at the major cerebral arterial bifurcations, including the ICA (n = 35), ACA (n = 115), MCA (n = 109) and BA (n = 59) bifurcations. The symptoms of these patients included subarachnoid hemorrhage, headache, confusion, face numbness, double vision and nonspecific neurological symptoms. Control none-aneurysmal subjects with no cerebral aneurysms were also evaluated in 1806 patients (439 ACA, 547 ICA, 136 BA and 684 MCA bifurcations) who had digital subtraction angiography for suspected cerebrovascular diseases for comparison with the aneurysmal group (Table 1). Data on patients’ age, gender, symptoms and aneurysm status were collected from a prospectively maintained database. There was no statistically (P > 0.05) significant difference in the mean age or gender percentage between the aneurysmal and control groups.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of patients.

ACA bifurcations (n = 554) ICA bifurcations (n = 582) BA bifurcations (n = 195) MCA bifurcations (n = 793)
Gender
Female 335 403 110 554
Male 219 179 85 239
Mean age in years 52.6 ± 14.5 (11–92) 55.4 ± 13.9 (11–92) 53.0 ± 14.5 (18–82) 55.3 ± 13.9 (11–92)
Bifurcations character
Normal 439 547 136 684
With aneurysms 115 35 59 109
Aneurysm type
Type C 85 17 52 68
Type D 30 16 7 41
φ2 formation
Between D1 and D2 75 (65.2%)*** 28 (80%)*** 38(64.4%)* 99(90.8%)***
Between D1 and D3 40 (34.8%) 7(20%) 21(35.6%) 10(9.2%)
Open in a new tab

Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation.

ACA anterior cerebral artery, ICA internal carotid artery, BA basilar artery, MCA middle cerebral artery.

Type C, the parent vessel centerline crosses the aneurysm neck, and type D, the parent vessel centerline does not cross the aneurysm neck. D1, D2 and D3 indicate the diameter of the parent vessel, smaller and larger daughter branch, respectively. *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001 indicate significant differences of angle φ2 formed between D1 and D2, D1 and D3, respectively.

Measruement of vascular diameter, angle and stresses

Three-dimensional rotational angiography data were reconstructed for surface rendering by using Amira software (version 5.2.2, Visage Imaging, San Diego, CA, USA). The vascular diameter at the bifurcations was measured in the way similar to the approach used by Ingebrigtsen et al.13 and our previous studies6,7. The parent vessel diameter was defined as D1, and those for the smaller and larger vessels as D2 and D3, respectively (Fig. 1A). The lateral angles (smaller one was defined as φ2, and the contralateral larger one as φ3) at the four major cerebral arterial bifurcations were measured. As reported in our previous reports6,7, the angle was measured by use of 3 dots after the central point was placed at the tip of the bifurcation in line with the central axis of one daughter artery, and the other 2 dots marked the central axis of the parent artery and the other daughter branch (Fig. 1A). A sphere was used to sample the hemodynamic stresses on the aneurysm dome and at the aneurysm initiation site after virtual aneurysm removal (Fig. 1C1, C2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Measurement of arterial morphology. (A) Schematic drawing shows the definition of D1–D3, and φ1–φ3. The diameter of the parent artery is D1, and the bifurcation angle between branching arteries is φ1. The larger lateral angle and larger daughter branch are defined as angle φ3 and D3, respectively, whereas the samller contralateral lateral angle and branch artery are termed as φ2 and D2, respectively, with D3 > D2 and φ3 > φ2. (B1–B2) Types of aneurysms based on the aneurysm neck. (B1) Classical aneurysms (type C aneurysms) are those in which the parent vessel centerline passes through the aneurysm neck. The aneurysm neck is divided into 2 sections: L1 and L2. If L1 is greater than L2, the aneurysm deviates towards the L1 side. Otherwise, it dviates towards the other side. (B2) Type D aneurysms are those with a deviating neck in which the parent vessel centerline does not pass through the aneurysm neck. (C1, C2) Sphere sampling is shown. (C1) A sphere is used to sample the hemodynamic stresses on the aneurysm dome. (C2) A sphere is used to sample the hemodynamic stresses on the aneurysm initiation site after virtual aneurysm removal.

Aneurysm neck and deviation

According to the neck location of aneurysms, aneurysm necks were classified into two types as previously reported14. The neck that was located on the extension of the parent artery centerline was defined as the classic neck (type C); when it was not, it was termed as the deviating neck (type D). For neck type C, the measurement method of aneurysm deviation was in line with our previous study6 as shown in Fig. 1B1. Briefly, the length of neck was divided into two sections by the parent artery centerline, defined as L1 and L2. If L1 was greater than L2, aneurysm deviation was towards the L1 side. If L2 was greater than L1, the aneurysm was deviated towards L2. For neck type D, aneurysm deviation was evaluated based on the location of the aneurysm (Fig. 1B2).

CFD analysis

CFD analysis was performed using three-dimensional cerebral angiographic datasets which were reconstructed for surface rendering with the Amira software. Surface smoothing, virtual removal and surface reconstruction of the aneurysm were all performed with the Meshlab software (Meshlab v1.3.3, Visual computing Lab, ISTI, CNR) similar to a previous report11. Finite-volume solution was performed with the Fluent software (version 12.0.16, Ansys, Lebanon, NH, USA) in the laminar double-precision unsteady manner with assumption of constant flow input, rigid nonslip wall conditions, blood density of 1070 kg/m3 and blood viscosity of 3.5 cP as previously described15. The inflow rate was set at 0.1 m/s, and the outlet pressure was set at zero. Preliminary CFD analysis which was performed at the peak systole using time-dependent runs for five patients demonstrated similar outcomes to the steady-state analysis, and the CFD analysis was consequently conducted using the steady-state mode for minimizing variability.

Line sampling of vascular hemodynamic stresses

Post-processing was performed with the Ensight software (Version 10.1; CEI, Apex, NC, USA). One longitudinal and seven transverse lines were drawn for sampling of hemodynamic stress parameters on the bifurcation apex after aneurysm virtual removal (Figs. 2 and 3). The longitudinal line was drawn in the middle of the distal bifurcation apex wall, and the seven transverse lines were drawn according to the WSS profile on the bifurcation apex. The WSS profile in the longitudinal line on the distal bifurcation apex wall had one direct flow impinging center (location of transverse line 4) and two peak values of hemodynamic stress parameters (WSS, dynamic pressure, vorticity and strain rate), with Peak 1 on the smaller branch and Peak 2 on the larger branch. The longitudinal line was through the direct impinging center and two peaks of stresses. Peak 1 was at the location of transverse line 3 while Peak 2 at the transverse line 5. Lines 1 and 2 were located on the distal wall of the smaller branch while lines 6 and 7 on the larger branch, with lines 1 and 7 locating outside the aneurysm profile. Line 2 was located in the middle between lines 1 and 3, whereas line 6 between lines 7 and 5, with a 2 mm distance between these lines. Both lines 2 and 6 were to sample hemodynamic stresses at locations other than the direct flow impinging center and two peaks.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Line sampling of hemodynamic stresses on the bifurcation apex wall. (A1–H1) An unruputred anterior communicating artery (Acom) aneurysm and sampling on the bifurcation apex after virtual aneurysm removal. (A1) The Acom aneurysm was shown. L1 was larger than L2, and the aneurysm deviated towards the L2 side. B1-C1. After the aneurysm was virtually removed (B1), a longitudinal line was drawn on the top of the bifurcation apex across the flow direct impinging center (DFIC), Peaks 1 and 2 (C1) to sample the hemodynamic stresses including the dynamic pressure, total pressure, wall shear stress (WSS), vorticity, and strain rate. (D1–H1). The profiles of hemodynamic stresses on the longitudinal line were shown. There were two peaks of stresses on the line: Peaks 1 and 2. Dis represented the distance from the DFIC to Peak 1 or 2. Distance 0 indicated the DFIC where the flow direction was perpendicular to the wall. Beyond Peak 1 or 2, the flow direction was parallel to the arterial wall. (A2–H2). An unruputred Acom aneurysm in a 580 year-old man. (A2) The Acom aneurysm was shown. (B2–C2) After virtual aneurysm removal (B2), a longitudinal line was drawn on the bifurcation apex to smaple the hemodynamic stresses (C2). D2–H2. The profiles of hemodynamic stresses on the longitudinal line were shown, similar to those in (D1–H1).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Demonstration of hemodynamic stresses on a type C aneurysm (anterior communicating artery aneurysm) before (A1–F1) and after (A2–F2) virtual aneurysm removal. L1 and L2 in A1 represent the length of aneurysm neck divided by the parent vessel axial line, and L1 was greater than L2, indicating deviation of the aneurysm toward the L1 side (A1). Seven transverse lines were drawn on the bifurcation apex for sampling hemodynamic stresses after aneurysm removal (A2). Transverse line 4 was located at the direct flow impinging center (DFIC, arrowhead), line 1 at the daughter branch forming a smaller lateral angle with the parent vessel, and line 7 at the contralateral branch artery. Lines 1 and 7 were located outside of the aneurysm neck. The shear stress (A1, A2), vorticity (B1, B2), dynamic pressure (C1, C2) and total pressure (D1, D2) were significantly smaller on the aneurysm dome (A1–D1) than at the aneurysm initiation site after aneurysm removal (A2–D2). The dynamic pressure, total pressure and velocity magnitude were significantly smaller inside the aneurysm than in the arterial lumen near the bifurcation apex. Blood flow gets in the aneurysm and two branching arteries before aneurysm removal and hits directly at the direct flow impinging center (DFIC) on the bifurcation apex after aneurysm removal (E, F). Arrowheads indicate the DFIC.

Statistical analysis

All data were presented as mean ± standard deviation. The JMP statistical software (version 10.01.2, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) was used for statistical analysis. The angle and arterial diameter between two groups were compared using the t test. Hemodynamic stress differences at bilateral arterial branches were determined using the t test. Aneurysm deviation and smaller lateral angle morphology were analyzed using the chi-square test. P value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

In ACA bifurcations, D3 was significantly larger than D2 (P < 0.001) in both aneurysmal and control groups. Similar differences were also observed in ICA, BA and MCA bifurcations (P < 0.001). Moreover, angle φ3 was significantly greater than φ2 in both aneurysmal and control groups in ACA, ICA, BA and MCA bifurcations (P < 0.001) (Table 2). The smaller lateral angle φ2 was formed significantly (P < 0.001) mostly between the smaller branch (D2) and the parent artery, including 65.2% (n = 75) at the ACA, 80% (n = 28) ICA, 64.4% (n = 38) BA and 90.8% (n = 99) MCA bifurcations. Significantly (P < 0.001) few numbers of the smaller lateral angle φ 2 were formed between the larger branch D3 and the parent artery, including 34.8% (n = 40) at the ACA, 20% (n = 7) ICA, 35.6% (n = 21) BA and 9.2% (n = 10) MCA bifurcations.

Table 2.

Analysis of arterial diameter and lateral angles at major arterial bifurcations.

ACA bifurcations ICA bifurcations BA bifurcations MCA bifurcations
All An
D2 (mm) 2.1 ± 0.9 (0.8–5.6) 2.7 ± 1.3 (1.0–5.5) 2.8 ± 1.2 (0.9–6.6) 1.6 ± 0.6 (0.9–4.6)
D3 (mm) 2.7 ± 0.9*** (1.4–5.7) 3.4 ± 1.5*** (1.3–7.0) 3.5 ± 1.3*** (1.3–8.0) 2.4 ± 0.9*** (1.3–7.1)
φ2 (°) 94.0 ± 13.2 (60.9–125.1) 65.5 ± 17.9 (36.2–107.2) 91.5 ± 15.6 (49.6–117.7) 76.6 ± 22.9 (38.7–163.3)
φ3 (°) 114.0 ± 13.3*** (79.5–154.4) 134.5 ± 15.0*** (87.6–161.4) 116.6 ± 15.8*** (76.3–147.1) 122.2 ± 24.1*** (58.8–169.5)
Control subjects
D2 (mm) 2.5 ± 1.0 (0.6–5.9) 2.5 ± 1.1 (0.7–7.5) 3.0 ± 1.3 (0.6–6.5) 1.9 ± 0.7 (0.6–5.2)
D3 (mm) 4.1 ± 1.3*** (1.4–10.6) 3.2 ± 1.4*** (1.6–9.4) 3.7 ± 1.5*** (1.2–7.5) 2.5 ± 0.9*** (1.0–8.2)
φ2 (°) 103.4 ± 5.6 (46.1–148.3) 76.4 ± 17.3 (22.2–154.2) 115.5 ± 15.2 (62.4–165.5) 111.3 ± 19.3 (43.7–173.8)
φ3 (°) 126.8 ± 13.6*** (75.2–164.9) 138.0 ± 12.2*** (75.2–172.7) 133.3 ± 11.6*** (103.1–171) 138.2 ± 14.8*** (58.4–212.7)
Open in a new tab

Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation.

An aneurysms, ACA anterior cerebral artery, ICA internal carotid artery, BA basilar artery, MCA middle cerebral artery.

***P < 0.001 between D2 and D3 and between φ2 and φ3. AN represents aneurysm. D2 and D3 indicate smaller and larger daughter branch, respectively. φ2 and φ3 represent smaller and larger lateral angle, respectively.

In 115 patients with ACA bifurcation aneurysms, 84.3% (97 cases) and 75.7% (87 cases) aneurysms deviated towards the smaller angle φ2 and the smaller daughter branch D2, respectively, which were significantly (P < 0.001) more than those deviating towards the larger angle φ3 or the larger branch D3 (P < 0.001). Furthermore, 67.0% (77 cases) aneurysms deviated towards both the smaller daughter vessel and smaller lateral angle (Table 3).

Table 3.

Aneurysms deviation.

Bifurcation Towards D2 (Cases) Towards D3 (Cases) Towards φ2 (Cases) Towards φ3 (Cases) Towards φ2 and D2 (Cases)
ACA 75.7% (87)*** 24.3% (28) 84.3% (97)*** 15.7% (18) 67.0% (77)
ICA 77.1% (27)*** 22.9% (8) 91.4% (32)*** 8.6% (3) 74.3% (26)
BA 62.7% (37) 37.3% (22) 88.1% (52)*** 28.8% (17) 57.6% (34)
MCA 81.7% (89)*** 18.3% (20) 94.5% (103)*** 5.5% (6) 78.0% (91)
Open in a new tab

ACA anterior cerebral artery, ICA internal carotid artery, BA basilar artery, MCA middle cerebral artery.

***P < 0.001 between D2 and D3 and between φ2 and φ3. D2 and D3 indicate smaller and larger daughter branch, respectively. φ2 and φ3 represent smaller and larger lateral angle, respectively.

Similarly, 91.4% (32 cases) and 77.1% (27 cases) ICA bifurcation aneurysms deviated towards the smaller angle φ2 and the smaller branch D2, respectively, significantly (P < 0.001) more than thoses deviating towards the larger angle φ3 or larger D3. 74.3% (26 cases) aneurysms deviated towards both the smaller angle φ2 and the smaller branch D2 (Table 2). In MCA bifurcations, significantly more aneurysms deviated towards φ2 (94.5%, 103 cases) and D2 (81.7%, 89 cases) (P < 0.001) than aneurysms deviating towards φ3 (5.5%, 6 cases) and D3 (18.3%, 20 cases), respectively, whereas 78.6% (85 cases) aneurysms deviated towards both angle φ2 and D2. In BA bifurcations, 88.1% (52 cases) aneurysms deviated towards the smaller angle φ2, significantly more than aneurysms deviating towards the greater angle φ3 (P < 0.001), however, no significant difference (P > 0.05) existed in aneurysm deviation towards D3 or D2 (Table 3). 57.6% (34 cases) aneurysms deviated towards both angle φ2 and D2 at BA bifurcations.

On the bifurcation apex wall, there were one direct flow impinging center and two peaks of hemodynamic stresses on the longitudinal line at the bifurcation apex after virtual aneurysmal removal (Fig. 2). At the direct flow impinging center, the total pressure was the greatest while the dynamic pressure, WSS, vorticity and strain rate were the minimal. As blood flowed from the direct flow impinging center towards both branches, the total pressure decreased rapidly but the other parameters increased quickly and reached the peak value (Peak 1 and Peak 2) in the region immediately adjacent to the direct impinging center. Peak 1 and Peak 2 were located on the daughter branch forming a smaller and larger angle with the parent artery, respectively. The dynamic pressure (152.4 ± 16.3 vs. 91.7 ± 9.2 Pa), WSS (19.9 ± 8.5 vs. 13.8 ± 4.8 Pa), vorticity (9869.6 ± 982.2 vs. 7000.1 ± 469.4 1/S), strain rate (9860.1 ± 618.4 vs. 7122.8 ± 416.7 1/S) and distance (1.8 ± 0.9 vs. 1.2 ± 0.5 mm) were significantly greater at Peak 1 than at Peak 2 (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01, Table 4). Moreover, aneurysms deviation and Peak 1 were always on the same side when using the parent vessel centerline as the reference, regardless of aneurysm type (Fig. 2). The distance from the flow direct impinging center (where the flow direction was perpendicular to the bifurcation apex) to the peak site implied the accelerating area. Dis 1 (the distance between the direct impinging center and Peak 1) was significantly longer than Dis 2 (the distance between the direct impinging center and Peak 2) at the bifurcations for both types C and D aneurysms (P < 0.01, Table 4).

Table 4.

Hemodynamic stresses at Peak 1 and Peak 2 of artery bifurcations (mean ± SD).

Dynamic pressure (Pa) Total pressure (Pa) Wall shear stress (Pa) Vorticity (1/S) Strain rate (1/S) Dis(mm)
Peak1 175.4 ± 18.6** (32.7–552.3) 435.4 ± 26.3 (75.2–1567.3) 28.9 ± 7.4** (4.2–51.4) 9874.6 ± 973.4* (1896.8–24,532.5) 9873.1 ± 625.6* (1934.7–25,686.3) 1.9 ± 0.8** (0.4–5.1)
Peak2 89.9 ± 7.6 (13.7–425.7) 493.5 ± 61.4 (98.3–1748.6) 15.7 ± 5.3 (3.4–42.3) 7237.8 ± 372.7 (1238.3–18,973.8) 7648.3 ± 472.5 (1378.3–21,468.8) 1.3 ± 0.3 (0.3–2.6)
Open in a new tab

SD standard deviation.

Dis represents the distance from the peak site to the flow direct impinging center. Peak1 is on the daughter vessel forming a smaller angle with the parent artery, whereas Peak 2 is on the contralateral daughter artery. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 indicate significant differences in hemodynamic stresses between peak 1 and peak 2.

Among the seven transverse lines on the bifurcation apex wall, transverse line 4 at the direct flow impinging center had the highest total pressure but lowest dynamic pressure, WSS, vorticity and strain rate (Fig. 3 and Table 5). From transverse line 4 to line 1 or 7, the total pressure quickly decreased but the dynamic pressure, WSS, vorticity and strain rate rapidly increased. The dynamic pressure, total pressure, WSS, vorticity and strain rate were significantly (P ˂ 0.01) greater on line 3 (at Peak 1) than on line 5 (at Peak 2). Significantly (P < 0.001) greater hemodynamic stress parameters (dynamic pressure, WSS, vorticity and strain rate) also existed on lines 2 and 1 than on lines 6 and 7, respectively (Table 5).

Table 5.

Hemodynamic stresses on 7 transverse lines at the ACA bifurcation after virtual aneurysm removal (mean ± SD).

Transverse lines Dynamic pressure (Pa) Total pressure (Pa) WSS (Pa) Vorticity (1/S) Strain rate (1/S)
1 229.5 ± 107.1 (78–396) 196.7 ± 50.9 (113–273) 21.1 ± 7.2 (9.7–31.9) 9272.2 ± 3460.4 (5400–19,800) 9188.6 ± 3248.2 (5630–19,400)
2 219.9 ± 32.4 (153–266) 293.1 ± 38.5 (207–351) 22.0 ± 4.1 (16.6–29.9) 9730.0 ± 2168.6 (5940–16,900) 9766.9 ± 2135.6 (6010–16,600)
3 196.2 ± 42.2 (130–268) 448.2 ± 33.9 (351–491) 21.5 ± 2.7 (16.8–28) 10,639.4 ± 2336.6 (5680–15,600) 10,872.7 ± 2186.6 (6300–15,600)
4 20.2 ± 7.3 (0.7–53.3) 548.9 ± 59.4 (409–609) 6.2 ± 2.3 (1.8–11.4) 2772.1 ± 1318.7 (1000–4900) 3520.6 ± 1414.3 (1650–5600)
5 123.5 ± 18.9*** (63.6–138) 358.3 ± 40.5** (411–522) 17.2 ± 1.3*** (14.2–19.2) 8032.9 ± 2174.9*** (5290–13,800) 8268.6 ± 2110.0*** (5710–13,900)
6 127.4 ± 40.0*** (19–183) 358.3 ± 40.5*** (265–405) 15.2 ± 2.4*** (5.8–18) 6854.1 ± 1379.2*** (3810–10,100) 6743.7 ± 1193.0*** (3830–9550)
7 81.0 ± 16.7*** (58.2–110) 263.5 ± 50.4*** (206–339) 12.3 ± 2.0*** (8.2–15.9) 5759.1 ± 1233.4*** (3430–7850) 5636.6 ± 1081.0*** (3610–7420)
Open in a new tab

SD standard deviation.

Blood flow direct impinging center is on line 4. **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 represent significant differences in hemodynamic parameters between lines 1 and 7, lines 2 and 6, and between lines 3 and 5.

Sphere sampling analysis of hemodynamic parameters on the aneurysm dome and at the aneurysm initiation location following virtual aneurysm removal (Fig. 1C1, C2 and Table 6) demonstrated that the dynamic pressure (23.1 ± 0.6 vs. 249.2 ± 5.3 Pa), total pressure (532.7 ± 1.2 vs. 743.7 ± 8.1 Pa), vorticity magnitude (2961.9 ± 33.9 1/S vs. 11182.7 ± 209.7 1/S), WSS (5.3 ± 0.1 Pa vs. 23.4 ± 0.3 Pa) and strain rate (3105.2 ± 33.5 1/S vs. 11142.6 ± 199.2 1/S) were all significantly (P < 0.0001) decreased on the aneurysm dome compared with those at the aneurysm initiation site.

Table 6.

Hemodynamic stresses on the aneurysm dome and initiation site after virtual aneurysm removal.

Hemodynamic parameters Aneurysm dome Aneurysm initiation site
Dynamic pressure (Pa) 23.1 ± 0.6*** (0.26–138.3) 249.2 ± 5.3 (175.1–337.8)
Total pressure (Pa) 532.7 ± 1.2*** (431.3–619.4) 743.7 ± 8.1 (639.0–884.3)
Vorticity (1/S) 2961.9 ± 33.9*** (758.1–8971.8) 11,182.7 ± 209.7 (7583.2–17,671.1)
WSS (Pa) 5.3 ± 0.1*** (0.9–16.6) 23.4 ± 0.3 (18.2–28.5)
Strain rate (1/S) 3105.2 ± 33.5*** (641.0–8838.9) 11,142.6 ± 199.2 (7795.7–17,760.5)
Open in a new tab

***P < 0.0001, significant compared with aneurysm initiation site after virtual aneurysm removal.

Discussion

It has been reported that the aneurysm initiation site most consistently coincided with high WSS and WSS gradients12,16–19, and combination of high WSS and positive WSS gradients in the adjacent region of flow acceleration triggers pathological remodeling and subsequent aneurysm formation4,20. Based on our previous findings that most ACA and BA aneurysms deviated to the smaller lateral angle and smaller daughter branch6,7, we hypothesized that formation of cerebral aneurysms was associated with both arterial bifurcation geometry and hemodynamic stresses, particularly the arterial branch forming a smaller lateral angle with the parent artery. It has been reported that the region enclosed by the aneurysm neck was the “aneurysm initiation site”12. However, the direct flow impinging center which is enclosed by the aneurysm ncek has the least WSS and is consequently not the site of aneurysm initiation8,12. The aneurysm initiation site is very small and is probably in the flow accelerating region adjacent to the direct flow impinging center, where pathological remodeling is initiated by abnormally-enhanced hemodynamic stresses for aneurysm formation4,20. In our study, we explored the possible location of aneurysm initiation by investigating aneurysm deviation towards the smaller lateral angle and smaller branch and magnitude of hemodynamic stresses on the bifurcation apex at four major cerebral arterial bifurcations. We found that Peak 1 on the branch forming a smaller lateral angle with the parent vessel had significantly greater hemodynamic stresses than Peak 2 on the contralateral side and was probably the aneurysm initiation site. Our study showed that most aneurysms at the four major cerebral arterial bifurcations deviated towards the smaller lateral angle and smaller branch, which confirmed previous finding that most ACA and BA aneurysms deviated toward the smaller branch and smaller lateral angle6,7. This may indicate that a smaller-diameter branch with a smaller lateral angle formed between the branch and the parent artery may induce abnormally-enhanced hemodynamic stresses to initiate an aneurysm. It was further found that 65.2%, 80%, 64.4% and 90.8% smaller lateral angles were formed between the smaller branch and the parent artery in ACA, ICA, BA and MCA bifurcations, respectively, significantly more than those formed between the larger branch and the parent artery (P < 0.001). Because bifurcation angle changes are associated with significant hemodynamic stress alterations on the bifurcation apex8,13,21 and aneurysmal MCA bifurcations tend to be asymmetrical22, aneurysm initiation is associated with asymmetrical arterial bifurcation structure, including asymmetrical lateral angles and branches, smaller lateral angles and smaller branches inparticular, which may consequently result in abnormally-increased hemodynamic stresses on the bifurcation apex to initiate an aneurysm.

Sampling analysis of the hemodynamic parameters in the longitudinal line on the bifurcation apex wall with virtual aneurysm removal demonstrated that the total pressure was the greatest but the other parameters (dynamic pressure, WSS, vorticity and strain rate) were the least at the direct flow impinging center, which confirmed previous findings8,10,11,23. As blood flowed distally towards branching arteries, the total pressure decreased quickly while the other hemodynamic parameters increased rapidly to reach the peak at the branching arteries. Peak 1 with greater hemodynamic stresses was on the same side as aneurysm deviation and was also on the smaller lateral angle side when using the parent vessel centerline as the reference. Seven transverse lines were drawn on the bifurcation apex for sampling hemodynamic stresses, with lines 3–5 for sampling the direct flow impinging center and two peaks while lines 1, 2, 6 and 7 for sampling places further down the branch in order to analyze changes of hemodynamic stresses with distance. Comparison of the hemodynamic stresses at these lines was performed to find the location with significantly different hemodynamic stresses and possible aneurysm initiation site. Transverse lines 1 and 7 were located on the vessel wall outside of the aneurysm, indicating that these areas with their characteristic hemodynamic stresses were not the aneurysm initiation site. Line 4 was located at the flow direct impinging center and has the hemodynamic characteristics of maximal total pressure but least dynamic pressure, WSS, vorticity and strain rate. Lower WSS can only induce artery intimal thickening rather than destruction24 and thus, line 4 could not be the location of aneurysm initiation. Transverse lines 2, 3 and 5, 6 were located within the aneurysm scope and were possibly the site of aneurysm initiation. The mean total pressure, dynamic pressure, WSS, vorticity and strain rate on lines 2 and 3 were significantly greater (P ˂ 0.001) than those on lines 5 and 6, respectively, which probably indicates that the hemodynamic stresses characteristic of the region around line 3 or between lines 2 and 3 on the smaller branch are great enough to initiate an aneurysm. Line 3 indicated Peak 1 in the accelerating region adjacent to the direct flow impinging center and may consequently be the site of aneurysm initiation. After aneurysm formation, the hemodynamic parameters (dynamic and total pressure, WSS, vorticity and strain rate) on the aneurysm dome were significantly decreased compared with those at the aneurysm initiation site following virtual aneurysm removal. This indicates that aneurysm formation is to decrease the abnormally-enhanced hemodynamic stresses on the vascular wall so as to maintain these stresses within a certain physiological range8,25,26.

At the bifurcation apex, the flow is perpendicular to the apex wall and is divided at the flow impinging center. As flow moves rapidly towards branches, the hemodynamic stresses other than the total pressure reach their peaks before the flow becomes laminar with the flow direction parallel to the arterial wall. The direct impingement center of flow and its adjacent region up to the peak site are the flow acceleration region where turbulent flow forms vortices and eddies to injure the arterial wall8. At the arterial bifurcation apex, some densely packed ligaments exist to protect the bifurcation apex from being damaged by abnormally-increased hemodynamic stresses caused by turbulent flow8,27. On the branch forming a smaller angle with the parent artery, the blood flow takes a greater distance to become laminar, and the peak site of hemodynamic stresses was located farther downward beyond the protection of these densely packed ligaments at the bifurcation apex. Consequently, the hemodynamic stresses at the peak site on the smaller branch forming a smaller angle with the parent artery will damage the arterial wall and induce an aneurysm. At the direct impingement center of flow, the kinetic energy carried by the rapidly moving blood flow will be converted to the potential energy of pressure after the flow hits the bifurcation apex, resulting in the maximal total pressure at the direct impinging center. Because the speed of flow is decreased to the minimal at the direct impinging center of flow, the other hemodynamic stresses like WSS, dynamic pressure, vorticity and strain rate are also significantly decreased. In the direct impinging center, the blood flow direction is perpendicular to the wall; when the blood flow moves away from the direct impinging center, the blood flow is sped up and becomes laminar where the flow direction is parallel to the branch arterial wall. As the flow speed increases, the total pressure decreases while the other hemodynamic stresses (WSS, dynamic pressure, vorticity and strain rate) are increased quickly to the peak values (Peak 1 and Peak 2) in the region immediately adjacent to the direct impinging center. At the direct flow impinging center, the shear stress is the least which can only induce intimal hyperplasia and wall thickening24,28, and the direct impinging center is consequently not the site of aneurysm initiation. At the peak site especially Peak 1, the WSS, dynamic pressure, vorticity and strain rate are the maximal, whereas the total pressure remains very high. High shear stress will damage the vascular wall endothelial cells and predispose the artery to destructive aneurysmal remodeling29–31. After arterial destructive damage at the peak site, concomitant high pressure at this site will cause the arterial wall to expand outward to form an aneurysm. Consequently, pressure, shear stress and other hemodynamic stresses work together to initiate an aneurysm8.

Based on this analysis, some measures can be taken clinically to better treat cerebral aneurysms. For example, stenting can be used as a major measure rather than just a tool for assisting embolization of cerebral aneurysms. Gao et al. have studied the effect of stenting with one or two stents in assisting embolization of cerebral aneurysms at arterial bifurcations9–11. Stent deployment at arterial bifurcations can significantly increase the stented lateral angle, decrease the bifurcation angle, displace and attenuate the flow impinging zone, and decrease the WSS and total pressure at the bifurcation apex. The attenuation of hemodynamic stresses on the bifurcation apex caused by stent deployment may decrease the stresses for aneurysm recurrence. Recent CFD studies investigating hemodynamic stresses for aneurysm recurrence supported this theory, and recurrent aneurysms had greater WSS and flow velocity besides formation of small vortex at the aneurysm neck than non-recurrent aneurysms32–35. To be specific, stenting can displace the site of aneurysm initiation according to our study and decrease the abnormally-enhanced hemodynamic stresses and subsequent wall damage on the branch. With displacement of aneurysm initiation site and decrease of hemodynamic stresses, the rate of aneurysm recurrence and further expansion is consequently decreased, leading to better clinical outcome. Thus, a better approach for treating cerebral aneurysms at arterial bifurcation is to deploy a stent into the branch artery forming a smaller angle with the parent artery so as to enlarge the smaller lateral angle, displace the site of aneurysm initiation and decrease hemodynamic stresses and subsequent aneurysm recurrence.

In our study, we used some virtual techniques to remove the aneurysm for restoring the arterial bifurcation morphology to the state before aneurysm formation. Virtual removal of cerebral aneurysms has been applied by many authors in the cerebral aneurysm research for investigating hemodynamic stresses before and after aneurysm formation8,10,11,23,36–38, including researchers from our lab8,10,11,23. This is because a saccular cerebral aneurysm is only a localized pathological outpouching of a weakened arterial wall with local disruption of elastic lamina, apoptosis of medial smooth and inflammatory cell infiltration39,40. A saccular cerebral aneurysm only affects a small part of the vessel wall in pathology and is quite different from a fusiform aneurysm which involves the entire arterial wall along a certain distance like a deformed cigar40,41. Therefore, virtual removal of the local aneurysm will not affect the whole bifurcation morphology and can reflect the status of the arterial bifurcation before aneurysm formation.

In our study, we did not evaluate pathological changes at the aneurysm initiation site, namely, the Peak site of hemodynamic stresses, and the adjacent region at the bifurcation apex. Analysis of the pathological changes at these sites may add potent evidence for aneurysm initiation. Moreover, this study was limited to the Chinese population without involvement of other ethnicities or races. Interpretation and generalization of the results should be cautious to other races or ethnicities. These may be the limitations of this study and have to be solved in the future work.

In summary, the bifurcation arterial branch forming a smaller angle with the parent artery may cause abnormally-enhanced hemodynamic stresses to initiate an aneurysm on the bifurcation apex.

Author contributions

Study design: B.G. Data collection: H.H., W.H., C.-F.R., L.Y., Y.H. Data analysis: B.G. Supervision: H.H. Writing of the original version: W.H. Revision of the original version: B.G.

Funding

This work was funded by grants from China National Natural Scientific Funding (NO. 81901184), Key Program of Medical Science Research in Hebei Province (20191473), and Hebei Health Department Plan (NO. 20191459).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Vlak MH, Algra A, Brandenburg R, Rinkel GJ. Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:626–636. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70109-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brunasso L, Alotta G, Zingales M, Iacopino DG, Graziano F. Can biomechanical analysis shed some light on aneurysmal pathophysiology? Preliminary study on ex vivo cerebral arterial walls. Clin. Biomech. 2021;81:105184. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Koseki H, Miyata H, Shimo S, Ohno N, Mifune K, Shimano K, et al. Two diverse hemodynamic forces, a mechanical stretch and a high wall shear stress, determine intracranial aneurysm formation. Transl. Stroke. Res. 2020;11:80–92. doi: 10.1007/s12975-019-0690-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Meng H, Wang Z, Hoi Y, Gao L, Metaxa E, Swartz DD, et al. Complex hemodynamics at the apex of an arterial bifurcation induces vascular remodeling resembling cerebral aneurysm initiation. Stroke. 2007;38:1924–1931. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.481234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tanaka K, Takao H, Suzuki T, Fujimura S, Uchiyama Y, Otani K, et al. Relationship between hemodynamic parameters and cerebral aneurysm initiation. Ann. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2018;2018:1347–1350. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8512466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang XJ, Gao BL, Hao WL, Wu SS, Zhang DH. Presence of anterior communicating artery aneurysm is associated with age, bifurcation angle, and vessel diameter. Stroke. 2018;49:341–347. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang XJ, Gao BL, Li TX, Hao WL, Wu SS, Zhang DH. Association of basilar bifurcation aneurysms with age, sex, and bifurcation geometry. Stroke. 2018;49:1371–1376. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhang XJ, Li CH, Hao WL, Zhang DH, Ren CF, Gao BL. Enlarged anterior cerebral artery bifurcation angles may induce abnormally enhanced hemodynamic stresses to initiate aneurysms. World Neurosurg. 2018;120:e783–e791. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gao B, Baharoglu MI, Cohen AD, Malek AM. Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial bifurcation aneurysms leads to immediate and delayed intracranial vascular angle remodeling. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2012;33:649–654. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gao B, Baharoglu MI, Cohen AD, Malek AM. Y-stent coiling of basilar bifurcation aneurysms induces a dynamic angular vascular remodeling with alteration of the apical wall shear stress pattern. Neurosurgery. 2013;72:617–629. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182846d9f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gao B, Baharoglu MI, Malek AM. Angular remodeling in single stent-assisted coiling displaces and attenuates the flow impingement zone at the neck of intracranial bifurcation aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2013;72:739–748. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318286fab3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Geers AJ, Morales HG, Larrabide I, Butakoff C, Bijlenga P, Frangi AF. Wall shear stress at the initiation site of cerebral aneurysms. Biomech. Model Mechanobiol. 2017;16:97–115. doi: 10.1007/s10237-016-0804-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ingebrigtsen T, Morgan MK, Faulder K, Ingebrigtsen L, Sparr T, Schirmer H. Bifurcation geometry and the presence of cerebral artery aneurysms. J. Neurosurg. 2004;101:108–113. doi: 10.3171/jns.2004.101.1.0108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sadatomo T, Yuki K, Migita K, Taniguchi E, Kodama Y, Kurisu K. Morphological differences between ruptured and unruptured cases in middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2008;62:602–609. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000311347.35583.0C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schirmer CM, Malek AM. Critical influence of framing coil orientation on intra-aneurysmal and neck region hemodynamics in a sidewall aneurysm model. Neurosurgery. 2010;67:1692–1702. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181f9a93b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Frosen J, Cebral J, Robertson AM, Aoki T. Flow-induced, inflammation-mediated arterial wall remodeling in the formation and progression of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurg. Focus. 2019;47:E21. doi: 10.3171/2019.5.FOCUS19234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kono K, Fujimoto T, Terada T. Proximal stenosis may induce initiation of cerebral aneurysms by increasing wall shear stress and wall shear stress gradient. Int. J. Numer. Method Biomed. Eng. 2014;30:942–950. doi: 10.1002/cnm.2637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kulcsar Z, Ugron A, Marosfoi M, Berentei Z, Paal G, Szikora I. Hemodynamics of cerebral aneurysm initiation: The role of wall shear stress and spatial wall shear stress gradient. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2011;32:587–594. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nordahl ER, Uthamaraj S, Dennis KD, Sejkorova A, Hejcl A, Hron J, et al. Morphological and hemodynamic changes during cerebral aneurysm growth. Brain Sci. 2021;11:520. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11040520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dolan JM, Kolega J, Meng H. High wall shear stress and spatial gradients in vascular pathology: A review. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2013;41:1411–1427. doi: 10.1007/s10439-012-0695-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Baharoglu MI, Lauric A, Safain MG, Hippelheuser J, Wu C, Malek AM. Widening and high inclination of the middle cerebral artery bifurcation are associated with presence of aneurysms. Stroke. 2014;45:2649–2655. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sadatomo T, Yuki K, Migita K, Imada Y, Kuwabara M, Kurisu K. Differences between middle cerebral artery bifurcations with normal anatomy and those with aneurysms. Neurosurg. Rev. 2013;36:437–445. doi: 10.1007/s10143-013-0450-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang XJ, Li CH, Hao WL, Zhang DH, Gao BL. The optimality principle decreases hemodynamic stresses for aneurysm initiation at anterior cerebral artery bifurcations. World Neurosurg. 2019;121:e379–e388. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Friedman MH, Hutchins GM, Bargeron CB, Deters OJ, Mark FF. Correlation between intimal thickness and fluid shear in human arteries. Atherosclerosis. 1981;39:425–436. doi: 10.1016/0021-9150(81)90027-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kamiya A, Togawa T. Adaptive regulation of wall shear stress to flow change in the canine carotid artery. Am. J. Physiol. 1980;239:H14–21. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1980.239.1.H14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zarins CK, Zatina MA, Giddens DP, Ku DN, Glagov S. Shear stress regulation of artery lumen diameter in experimental atherogenesis. J. Vasc. Surg. 1987;5:413–420. doi: 10.1016/0741-5214(87)90048-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tutuncu F, Schimansky S, Baharoglu MI, Gao B, Calnan D, Hippelheuser J, et al. Widening of the basilar bifurcation angle: Association with presence of intracranial aneurysm, age, and female sex. J. Neurosurg. 2014;121:1401–1410. doi: 10.3171/2014.8.JNS1447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ford MD, Alperin N, Lee SH, Holdsworth DW, Steinman DA. Characterization of volumetric flow rate waveforms in the normal internal carotid and vertebral arteries. Physiol. Meas. 2005;26:477–488. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/26/4/013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Meng H, Metaxa E, Gao L, Liaw N, Natarajan SK, Swartz DD, et al. Progressive aneurysm development following hemodynamic insult. J. Neurosurg. 2011;114:1095–1103. doi: 10.3171/2010.9.JNS10368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Szymanski MP, Metaxa E, Meng H, Kolega J. Endothelial cell layer subjected to impinging flow mimicking the apex of an arterial bifurcation. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2008;36:1681–1689. doi: 10.1007/s10439-008-9540-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Takeuchi S, Karino T. Flow patterns and distributions of fluid velocity and wall shear stress in the human internal carotid and middle cerebral arteries. World Neurosurg. 2010;73:174–185. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2009.03.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Misaki K, Takao H, Suzuki T, Nishimura K, Kan I, Yuki I, et al. Estimated pretreatment hemodynamic prognostic factors of aneurysm recurrence after endovascular embolization. Technol Health Care. 2017;25:843–850. doi: 10.3233/THC-160495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Park W, Song Y, Park KJ, Koo HW, Yang K, Suh DC. Hemodynamic characteristics regarding recanalization of completely coiled aneurysms: Computational fluid dynamic analysis using virtual models comparison. Neurointervention. 2016;11:30–36. doi: 10.5469/neuroint.2016.11.1.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Qian Z, Kang H, Li C, Wu Z, Liu A. Effect of hemodynamics on the recurrence of posterior communicating artery aneurysm: A computational fluid dynamics simulation study. Int. Angiol. (2015). [PubMed]
  • 35.Schonfeld MH, Forkert ND, Fiehler J, Cho YD, Han MH, Kang HS, et al. Hemodynamic differences between recurrent and nonrecurrent intracranial aneurysms: Fluid dynamics simulations based on mr angiography. J. Neuroimaging. 2019;29:447–453. doi: 10.1111/jon.12612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ford MD, Hoi Y, Piccinelli M, Antiga L, Steinman DA. An objective approach to digital removal of saccular aneurysms: Technique and applications. Br. J. Radiol. 2009;82(special_issue_1):S55–S61. doi: 10.1259/bjr/67593727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Karmonik C, Arat A, Benndorf G, Akpek S, Klucznik R, Mawad ME, et al. A technique for improved quantitative characterization of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2004;25:1158–1161. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Shimogonya Y, Ishikawa T, Imai Y, Matsuki N, Yamaguchi T. Can temporal fluctuation in spatial wall shear stress gradient initiate a cerebral aneurysm? A proposed novel hemodynamic index, the gradient oscillatory number (gon) J. Biomech. 2009;42:550–554. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Frosen J, Tulamo R, Paetau A, Laaksamo E, Korja M, Laakso A, et al. Saccular intracranial aneurysm: Pathology and mechanisms. Acta Neuropathol. 2012;123:773–786. doi: 10.1007/s00401-011-0939-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yong-Zhong G, van Alphen HA. Pathogenesis and histopathology of saccular aneurysms: Review of the literature. Neurol. Res. 1990;12:249–255. doi: 10.1080/01616412.1990.11739952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Barletta EA, Ricci RL, Silva RDG, Gaspar R, Araujo JFM, Neves MWF, et al. Fusiform aneurysms: A review from its pathogenesis to treatment options. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2018;9:189. doi: 10.4103/sni.sni_133_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES