Error in Figure
In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Figure 2 as published. A boxplot at 3 months of average choroidal thickness in the central area was not printed in Figure 2. The corrected Figure 2 appears below.
Figure 2.
Boxplot graphs of average choroidal thickness before and after treatment. The post-treatment average choroidal thickness showed a significant reduction from baseline at all time points after the PDT, including both the irradiated central area and nonirradiated peripheral areas. NS = not significant, ** p < 0.01.
The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Reference
- 1.Sato-Akushichi M., Ono S., Klose G., Song Y. Choroidal Volume Evaluation after Photodynamic Therapy Using New Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging Algorithm. Pharmaceuticals. 2021;14:1140. doi: 10.3390/ph14111140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

