Abstract
The NADPH Oxidases (NOX) catalyze the deliberate production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and are established regulators of redox-dependent processes across diverse biological settings. Proper management of their activity is controlled through a conserved electron transfer (ET) cascade from cytosolic NADPH substrate through the plasma membrane to extracellular O2. After decades-long investigations of their biological functions, including potential as drug targets, only very recently has atomic-resolution information of NOX enzymes been made available. In this graphical review, we summarize the present structural biology understanding of the NOX enzymes afforded by X-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy. Combined molecular-level insights predominantly informed by DUOX1 full-length Cryo-EM structures suggest a general structural basis for the control of their catalytic activity by intracellular domain-domain stabilization.
1. Introduction
The NADPH Oxidase (NOX) family of enzymes catalyze the reduction of O2 to reactive oxygen species, superoxide or hydrogen peroxide, coupled to the oxidation of NADPH [[1], [2], [3]]. The seven mammalian enzyme isoforms in the NOX Family (NOX1-5, DUOX1-2) are often found uniquely expressed in specific cell types and tissues highlighting their particular roles in specific functional circumstances [4,5], and relevance in disease [[6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]]. While much is known about their biological functions, considerably less is understood concerning the structural basis by which their activity is controlled. With the first reports of atomic-resolution structures of NOX5 [12] and DUOX1 enzymes [13,14], molecular-level information has very recently informed the structural basis for their regulation (Table 1). This structure-focused graphical review presents the current understanding of protein domain architecture and the molecular nature that governs NOX enzyme activity.
Table 1.
NOX Enzyme | Organism | PDB | Overall High resolution (Å) | Domains | Method | Notes | Citation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOX2 | Homo sapiens | 3A1F | 2.00 | DH (NBL only) | X-ray crystallography | – | – |
NOX5 | Cylindrospermum stagnale | 5O0X | 2.20 | DH | X-ray crystallography | C-terminal Mutant binds to the NADPH binding side | [12] |
NOX5 | Cylindrospermum stagnale | 5O0T | 2.05 | TM | X-ray crystallography | – | [12] |
NOX5-Calmodulin | 6SZ5 | 2.23 | – | X-ray crystallography | [16] | ||
DUOX1-DUOXA1 | Mus musculus | 6WXU | 2.70 | TM, PHD | Cryo-EM | dimer-of-dimer inactive form | [13] |
DUOX1 | Mus musculus | 6WXR | 3.20 | TM PHD DH | Cryo-EM | dimer no NADPH |
[13] |
DUOX1 | Mus musculus | 6WXV | 3.30 | TM PHD DH (NADPH diff) | Cryo-EM | dimer with bound NADPH active form | [13] |
DUOX1 | Homo sapiens | 7D3E | 2.80 | TM PHD DH PHLD EF | Cryo-EM | Dimer-of-dimer low-calcium inactive form | [14] |
DUOX1 | Homo sapiens | 7D3F | 2.60 | TM PHD DH PHLD EF | Cryo-EM | Dimer-of-dimer high-calcium active form | [14] |
2. Overall primary structure
As membrane-associated proteins, all NOX enzymes consist of a cytosolic dehydrogenase (DH) domain and 6-pass-transmembrane heme-coordinating transmembrane (TM, blue in Fig. 1) domain [1,15]. The DH domain (orange in Fig. 1) comprises an N-terminal lobe that binds the FAD co-factor (FAD Binding Lobe, FBL) and a C-terminal NADPH binding lobe (NBL). The calcium-dependent NOX5 and DUOX1/2 enzymes contain four and two calcium-binding EF-hand (EF) domains, respectively, N-terminal to the TM domain [16]. Both DUOX1/2 contain an N-terminal peroxidase-homology domain (PHD), an additional transmembrane helix (0) and a pleckstrin homology-like domain (PHLD). The activity of the majority of NOX enzymes is initiated by binding of specific proteins, such as p22phox, Rac, and others, whereas NOX4 is the only isoform proposed to be constitutively active as well as negatively regulated by ATP binding [17,18]. Specifically, DUOX1/2 stability and subcellular trafficking is dependent on co-expression and complexation with their corresponding maturation factors DUOXA1/2, [19]; [20] which will be discussed in the context of the DUOX1-DUOXA1 dimer structures (Section 4).
3. NADPH substrate binding to the dehydrogenase (DH) domain
An initial deposited X-ray crystal structure of human NOX2 defined the overall fold of the NADPH binding lobe (NBL) of the DH domain (Fig. 2A). Pioneering efforts by Mattevi and co-workers reported the complete DH domain X-ray crystal structure from Cylindrospermum stagnale (cs)NOX5 defining the FBL with bound FAD as well as the NBL containing a C-terminal mutant peptide (red -PWLELAAA in Fig. 2B) [12]. The csNOX5 DH domain NBL fold is practically identical to the NBL of NOX2 (Fig. 2A) as well as the full DH domains characterized in the full-length DUOX1 complexes determined with Cryo-EM (Fig. 2C) [13,14]. Definition of the NADPH binding mode is prevented in the DH domain due to the inclusion of a stabilizing C-terminal insertion -PWLELAA mutation (red in Fig. 2B&D), which positions a non-natural Trp695 in the NADPH binding site adjacent to FAD. More recently, cryo-EM structures of DUOX1-DUOXA1 complexes contain additional structural information on DH domain architecture, including NADPH binding. Structural studies by Sun show bound NADPH (PDB: 6WXV), but lack the nicotinamide group due to insufficient electron density [13]. Cryo-EM structures of human (h)DUOX1-DUOXA1 complexes from Chen and co-workers define the complete NADPH molecule expectedly anchored to the NBL with the C-terminal residues above the nicotinamide as well as previously unresolved sections, such as the EF-hands binding segment (Fig. 2C and E) [14,21]. With respect to function, the NADPH nicotinamide and FAD flavin in this structure are separated by a significant distance that is not conducive for ET (∼10 Å, Fig. 3E) implying that a structural change is necessary for catalysis. Given the high degree of conservation of the C-terminal residues, and their apparent flexibility, this segment may play a role as a regulatory toggle switch by influencing the position of NADPH that allows for efficient ET [12,22]. Furthermore, since NADPH-competitive inhibitors represent promising drug candidates, including VAS2870 that forms a covalent bond with the conserved C668 cysteine (csNOX5 sequence numbers) [23], these collective structures represent efficient starting points for structure-guided drug design.
4. Coupling NADPH and O2 redox through electron transfer in the transmembrane domain
All NOX enzymes comprise a six-pass transmembrane ɑ-helix domain that complex two b-type hemes responsible for transferring electrons from NADPH through the cell membrane [15,22]. The first structure of the csNOX5 TM domain was solved with X-ray crystallography defining the fold of the transmembrane helices and the Fe heme cofactors [12] (Fig. 3A). Subsequent cryo-EM studies showcased the TM domain as the central focal point in the DUOX1-DUOXA1 complex making interactions with nearly every component of the full-length DUOX1 protein as well as DUOXA1 (Fig. 3B) [13,14]. The TM domain appears virtually identical in all available TM-containing NOX enzyme cryo-EM structures and csNOX5 crystal structure indicating that the TM domain is structurally rigid. The oxygen-reducing center can be identified by a highly ordered water molecule bound by two histidine residues and an arginine adjacent to the Fe-atom consistent with an outer-sphere ET process. Both mouse and human DUOX1 structures contain the PHD at the extracellular surface, however without bound hemes but cation binding sites (CBS) [13,14]. Expectedly, the PHD domain is located at the extracellular surface covering the outer surface of the TM domain and makes contacts with the extracellular domains of DUOXA1. However, several questions remain regarding this domain as no hemes are found in these domains, as consistent with previous recombinant proteins studies [24], and their binding sites are defined by cation binding sites (CBS in Fig. 3B). Functional information from site-directed mutagenesis of residues within the CBS prevents proper hDUOX1-DUOXA1 assembly suggesting a role for PHD in protein stability [14]. Additionally, previous studies have implicated the potential roles of protein-protein intermolecular cysteine disulfides bonds in protein maturation and oligomerization [25], however no such disulfides are observed in the cryo-EM complex structures (Section 5). It seems plausible that the PHD may function to promote hydrogen peroxide production from DUOX1 via superoxide dismutation by delaying diffusion from the TM domain oxygen-reducing center, which has likewise been proposed in the case of the extracellular E-loop of the NOX4 TM domain [26]. Importantly, the hDUOX1 high calcium cryo-EM structure showcases all components in the context of the active state needed to describe the flow of electrons from NADPH to the oxygen-reducing center. Accumulated evidence from the DUOX1-DUOXA1 cryo-EM studies indicate that the DH domain is dynamic, and stabilization of the DH-TM domain interface is critical for activation (Section 5) [13,14]. Therefore, the domain-domain interfacial association of FAD and Heme 2 represents the most important step in the catalytic ET cascade responsible for NOX activity. Additionally, an aromatic amino acid side chain (Phe in DUOX1, Trp in csNOX5) is present in all available TM domains indicating the role of electron hopping to facilitate rapid ET rates across the long intramembrane distance from NADPH to O2 [27].
5. Structure-based regulation of DUOX1: A prototype for understanding the NOX family enzymes
Full-length cryo-EM structures of mouse and human DUOX1-DUOXA1 have allowed for the most comprehensive picture of NOX structure and function, including the association of DUOXA1 maturation factor as well as domains unique to DUOX, including the PHD, two EF-hands (EF), and pleckstrin homology-like domain (PHLD). Purification of mDUOX1-DUOXA1 complexes yields either a 1:1 heterodimer (“dimer” in Fig. 4A) or a 2:2 dimer of heterodimers (“dimer-of-dimers” in Fig. 4B and C). The most significant difference in these structures is the apparent flexibility of the cytosolic domains. In the study by Sun, DH domain flexibility depends on the dimer status of mDUOX1-DUOXA1 complex since it is resolvable in the dimer but not dimer-of-dimer (Fig. 4A versus B) [13]. Generally, the more flexible a domain the weaker electron density and local resolution for that domain, often preventing accurate placement of atoms. On the other hand, both active and inactive hDUOX1-DUOXA1 cryo-EM structures by Chen and co-workers are characterized as dimer-of-dimers and the electron density maps allow for modeling of all intracellular domains (Fig. 4C) [14]. Both studies indicate that the cytosolic DH domains of DUOX1 are dynamically flexible and can be rigidified through dimerization [13] or binding of calcium [14]. A closer examination of the structural differences between the high and low calcium hDUOX1-DUOXA1 complexes reveals the direct impacts of calcium-dependent EF-hand conformation on DH domain stabilization (Fig. 4D). The low calcium structure shows the EF-hands in an extended conformation away from the DH domain (Fig. 4D green), which are brought into contact with the DH domain through a large scale (∼40 Å) swing upon calcium binding (Fig. 4D brown). This movement of the EF hand domains additionally induces a tilt in the PHLD toward the TM domain producing new salt bridge interdomain interactions (light blue versus dark blue in Fig. 4D). The influence of these calcium-dependent structural changes straightforwardly aids to rigidify the DH domain and very likely allow for effective ET from FAD to HEME 2 (Fig. 3C) [28]. Importantly, while there are no structural changes to the DH domain in the hDUOX1-DUOXA1 complex structures, the low local resolution of the DH domain in the low calcium structure is consistent with a more dynamic DH domain and correspondingly higher resolution in the high calcium structure supports the enhanced domain stability in the high calcium structures [14]. It should be noted that the cellular relevance of DUOX1-DUOXA1 dimer-of-dimers is unclear and may be a consequence of producing well-behaved purified and cryo-EM amenable protein complexes. Nevertheless, the collective insights from structural biology indicate that DH domain flexibility is controlled in a structure-based mechanism that enables NOX activity by stabilizing the DH and TM domains.
6. Conclusions
Only recently has information on the structural biology of the NOX enzyme family been made available allowing for the visualization of many critical elements that influence their well-recognized biological functions. A combination of X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM have defined catalytic DH and TM domains enabling for atomic-resolution detail of ET from intracellular NADPH to extracellular O2. Important insights into NOX enzyme activity are evident from inspections of variations in the apparent flexibility of the DH domains of DUOX1-DUOXA1 complexes and their correlation to altered conformations in accompanying cytosolic domains. This general depiction of DUOX1 activation by structural stabilization of the DH-TM interface can be applied across the NOX enzyme family as well-established protein-protein interactions are known drivers of activity likely by enabling proper rigidification of otherwise flexible cytosolic domains. Despite these broad implications, comprehensive structural information on these enzymes is lacking further motivating structural studies to definitively characterize the molecular mechanism of relevance to each NOX enzyme and their roles in human health and disease.
Declaration of competing interest
DEH and AvdV are listed on US Patent No. 10,143,718, “Covalent inhibitors of Dual Oxidase 1 (DUOX1)”.
Acknowledgements
The authors recognize start-up support from The State University of New York (DEH), NIH grants HL085646 and AG075491 (AvdV), and from Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (IG19808) (AM).
References
- 1.Bedard K., Krause K.H. The NOX family of ROS-generating NADPH oxidases: physiology and pathophysiology. Physiol. Rev. 2007;87(1):245–313. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00044.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lambeth J.D. NOX enzymes and the biology of reactive oxygen. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2004;4(3):181–189. doi: 10.1038/nri1312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Vermot A., Petit-Härtlein I., Smith S.M., Fieschi F. NADPH oxidases (NOX): an overview from discovery, molecular mechanisms to physiology and pathology. Antioxidants. 2021;10(6):890. doi: 10.3390/antiox10060890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Krause K.-H. Tissue distribution and putative physiological function of NOX family NADPH oxidases. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 2004;57(5):S28–S29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sirokmany G., Donko A., Geiszt M. Nox/duox family of NADPH oxidases: lessons from knockout mouse models. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2016;37(4):318–327. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2016.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Drummond G.R., Selemidis S., Griendling K.K., Sobey C.G. Combating oxidative stress in vascular disease: NADPH oxidases as therapeutic targets. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2011;10(6):453–471. doi: 10.1038/nrd3403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gao H.M., Zhou H., Hong J.S. NADPH oxidases: novel therapeutic targets for neurodegenerative diseases. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2012;33(6):295–303. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2012.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhang Y., Murugesan P., Huang K., Cai H. NADPH oxidases and oxidase crosstalk in cardiovascular diseases: novel therapeutic targets. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2020;17(3):170–194. doi: 10.1038/s41569-019-0260-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Panday A., Sahoo M.K., Osorio D., Batra S. NADPH oxidases: an overview from structure to innate immunity-associated pathologies. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2015;12(1):5–23. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2014.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.O'Neill S., Brault J., Stasia M.J., Knaus U.G. Genetic disorders coupled to ROS deficiency. Redox Biol. 2015;6:135–156. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2015.07.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.van der Vliet A., Danyal K., Heppner D.E. Dual oxidase: a novel therapeutic target in allergic disease. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2018;175(9):1401–1418. doi: 10.1111/bph.14158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Magnani F., Nenci S., Millana Fananas E., Ceccon M., Romero E., Fraaije M.W., Mattevi A. Crystal structures and atomic model of NADPH oxidase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2017;114(26):6764–6769. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702293114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sun J. Structures of mouse DUOX1-DUOXA1 provide mechanistic insights into enzyme activation and regulation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2020;27(11):1086–1093. doi: 10.1038/s41594-020-0501-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wu J.X., Liu R., Song K., Chen L. Structures of human dual oxidase 1 complex in low-calcium and high-calcium states. Nat. Commun. 2021;12(1):155. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20466-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sumimoto H. Structure, regulation and evolution of Nox-family NADPH oxidases that produce reactive oxygen species. FEBS J. 2008;275(13):3249–3277. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06488.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Millana Fananas E., Todesca S., Sicorello A., Masino L., Pompach P., Magnani F., Pastore A., Mattevi A. On the mechanism of calcium-dependent activation of NADPH oxidase 5 (NOX5) FEBS J. 2020;287(12):2486–2503. doi: 10.1111/febs.15160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Schroder K. NADPH oxidases: current aspects and tools. Redox Biol. 2020;34:101512. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Shanmugasundaram K., Nayak B.K., Friedrichs W.E., Kaushik D., Rodriguez R., Block K. NOX4 functions as a mitochondrial energetic sensor coupling cancer metabolic reprogramming to drug resistance. Nat. Commun. 2017;8(1):997. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01106-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Grasberger H., Refetoff S. Identification of the maturation factor for dual oxidase: evolution of an eukaryotic operon equivalent. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281(27):18269–18272. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C600095200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Luxen S., Noack D., Frausto M., Davanture S., Torbett B.E., Knaus U.G. Heterodimerization controls localization of Duox-DuoxA NADPH oxidases in airway cells. J. Cell Sci. 2009;122(8):1238–1247. doi: 10.1242/jcs.044123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tirone F., Radu L., Craescu C.T., Cox J.A. Identification of the binding site for the regulatory calcium-binding domain in the catalytic domain of NOX5. Biochemistry. 2010;49(4):761–771. doi: 10.1021/bi901846y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Magnani F., Mattevi A. Structure and mechanisms of ROS generation by NADPH oxidases. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2019;59:91–97. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2019.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Reis J., Massari M., Marchese S., Ceccon M., Aalbers F.S., Corana F., Valente S., Mai A., Magnani F., Mattevi A. A closer look into NADPH oxidase inhibitors: validation and insight into their mechanism of action. Redox Biol. 2020;32:101466. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Meitzler J.L., de Montellano P.R.O. Caenorhabditis elegans and human dual oxidase 1 (DUOX1)“peroxidase” domains: insights into heme binding and catalytic activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284(28):18634–18643. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.013581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Meitzler J.L., Hinde S., Bánfi B., Nauseef W.M., de Montellano P.R.O. Conserved cysteine residues provide a protein-protein interaction surface in dual oxidase (DUOX) proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288(10):7147–7157. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.414797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Takac I., Schröder K., Zhang L., Lardy B., Anilkumar N., Lambeth J.D., Shah A.M., Morel F., Brandes R.P. The E-loop is involved in hydrogen peroxide formation by the NADPH oxidase Nox4. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286(15):13304–13313. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.192138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shih C., Museth A.K., Abrahamsson M., Blanco-Rodriguez A.M., Di Bilio A.J., Sudhamsu J., Crane B.R., Ronayne K.L., Towrie M., Vlcek A., Jr., Richards J.H., Winkler J.R., Gray H.B. Tryptophan-accelerated electron flow through proteins. Science. 2008;320(5884):1760–1762. doi: 10.1126/science.1158241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li X.J., Grunwald D., Mathieu J., Morel F., Stasia M.J. Crucial role of two potential cytosolic regions of Nox2, 191TSSTKTIRRS200 and 484DESQANHFAVHHDEEKD500, on NADPH oxidase activation. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280(15):14962–14973. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500226200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]