Abstract
Enterococcal cytolysin is a hemolytic virulence factor linked to human disease and increased patient mortality. Produced by pathogenic strains of Enterococcus faecalis, cytolysin is made up of two small, post-translationally modified peptides called CylLL” and CylLS”. They exhibit a unique toxicity profile where lytic activity is observed for both mammalian cells and gram-positive bacteria that is dependent on the presence of both peptides. In this study, we performed alanine substitution of all residues in CylLL” and CylLS” and determined the effect on both activities. We identified key residues involved in overall activity and residues that dictate cell type specificity. All (methyl)lanthionines as well as a Gly-rich hinge region were critical for both activities. In addition, we investigated the binding of the two subunits to bacterial cells suggesting that the large subunit CylLL” has stronger affinity for the membrane or a target molecule therein. Genome mining identified other potential two-component lanthipeptides and provides insights into potential evolutionary origins.
Keywords: lantibiotic, lanthipeptide, RiPP, peptide stapling, liver disease, E. faecalis, hemolysis, antibiotic
Graphical Abstract

Introduction
The enterococcal cytolysin (Figure 1) is a two-component lanthipeptide virulence factor produced by opportunistic pathogens.1 Cytolysin is made up of two subunits, CylLL” and CylLS”, which work together in a 1:1 ratio to lyse both mammalian and bacterial cells.2 In addition to serving as toxin, cytolysin has quorum sensing activity.3–5 Enterococci are a major source of nosocomial infections and are the causative agent for a number of disease states, including endophthalmitis, endocarditis, and non-alcoholic hepatitis.1, 6–7 Recently, cytolysin was directly linked to hepatic cell death and severity of liver disease in human populations.6 The chemical and three-dimensional structures of the polycyclic CylLL” and CylLS” peptides have been reported (Fig. 1),8–9 with CylLL” unexpectedly showing alpha helical secondary structure in solution. The stable helical structure for a short peptide containing three cyclic thioethers is reminiscent of synthetic stapling methods to enforce helicity.10–11 In contrast to the knowledge about cytolysin structure, the molecular basis of its unique dual activity remains unknown.1, 12
Figure 1.

(A) Schematic structure of CylLL” with rings A-C and hinge region highlighted in dashed ellipses. See Figure 2 for full chemical structure. (B) Schematic structure of CylLS” with rings A and B highlighted in dashed ellipses. (C) Lowest energy NMR structure of CylLL” in the compact conformation (PDB: 6VGT). (D) NMR structure of CylLL” in an extended conformation (PDB: 6VGT). (E) Lowest energy NMR structure of CylLS” (PDB: 6VE9). (F) Schematic structure of cerecidin A7.
CylLL” and CylLS” belong to a group of natural products called ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides (RiPPs).13 Typically, RiPPs derive from linear precursor peptides that contain an N-terminal leader peptide and a C-terminal core peptide (Figure 2). The leader peptide serves as a recognition motif for the post-translational modification enzymes, which catalyze modifications in the core peptide. CylLL” and CylLS” contain a total of 16 modified residues that are installed by a single class II lanthipeptide synthetase, CylM.8, 14 Select serine and threonine residues in the core peptide are first phosphorylated, followed by phosphate elimination to form dehydroalanine (Dha) and dehydrobutyrine (Dhb), respectively (Figure 2A). A subset of the dehydroamino acids then undergo cyclization via Michael-type addition by cysteine thiols, yielding lanthionine or methyllanthionine (Figure 2).
Figure 2.

(A) Schematic representation of class II lanthipeptide biosynthesis. (B) Structures of CylLL” and CylLS” with non-canonical LL-(methyl)lanthionine macrocycles highlighted in orange and canonical DL-lanthionine macrocycles highlighted in blue.
Cytolysin was the first lanthipeptide for which it was shown that the stereochemistry of the Michael-type addition resulted in the noncanonical LL configuration of three of the five thioether crosslinks (Figure 2B),8, 15 as all previously stereochemically characterized lanthipeptides had the DL-stereochemistry. Chemical synthesis of analogs in which the LL stereochemistry in cytolysin was changed to the DL stereochemistry displayed a 10-fold decrease in minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) against bacteria, but no change in hemolytic activity,2 suggesting that structure-activity relationships might be different for the two activities, a notion previously suggested in the literature.16
During the biosynthesis of cytolysin, the majority of the leader peptide is cleaved and the polycyclic peptide exported out of the cell by CylB, a peptidase domain-containing ABC transporter.14, 17 The remaining six residues of the leader peptide are removed by an extracellular serine protease, CylA,18–19 to produce the mature CylLL” and CylLS” peptides. The biosynthesis of cytolysin has been successfully reconstituted in Escherichia coli as a heterologous host.8 In the heterologous expression system, the linear CylLL or CylLS peptides were co-expressed with CylM, and the CylM-modified peptides were isolated and proteolyzed in vitro with recombinant CylA, yielding the mature products. Prior to the development of the heterologous expression platform, cytolysin was isolated from the native producer organism through co-culturing with mammalian erythrocytes.3
Cytolysin-like two-component peptides are also produced by other bacteria such as the lactic acid bacterium Carnobacterium maltaromaticum C2.20 C. maltaromaticum has been used to inhibit growth of Listeria monocytogenes in fish and meat products;21 unlike cytolysin, carnolysin does not have hemolytic activity.20 Recent large scale bioinformatic analysis of predicted lanthipeptides encoded in the bacterial and archaeal genomes revealed that CylLS-like precursor peptides are the third most abundant amongst all lanthipeptides.22 Unexpectedly, CylLL-like precursor peptides are of significantly lower abundance, implying that a large number of CylLS-like peptides function in a stand-alone manner. Indeed, investigation of the cerecidins, CylLS-like peptides produced by Bacillus sp. that do not encode a CylLL-like subunit (Figure 1), demonstrated antimicrobial activity at mid to low micromolar range without the need of a partner peptide.23
Cytolysin is highly potent with MICs in the nanomolar range against many gram-positive bacteria. This degree of potency is often thought to require a molecular receptor rather than non-specific membrane lysis of antimicrobial peptides, which typically occurs at micromolar concentrations.24 Other examples of lanthipeptides with specific molecular receptors are nisin,25 mersacidin,26 nukacin ISK-1,27 and a group of two-component lantibiotics that all bind to lipid II,28–29 and the duramycin group of compounds that recognize phosphatidylethanolamine.30–31 In an effort to understand the structure-activity relationships of cytolysin, we performed in this study individual alanine substitution of every residue in both subunits. Each His6-tagged mutant precursor peptide (CylLL and CylLS) was post-translationally modified by CylM in E. coli, purified by metal affinity chromatography, and its leader peptide removed by CylA. The peptides were characterized by mass spectrometry and evaluated for lytic activity against rabbit erythrocytes and antibacterial activity against Lactococcus lactis sp. cremoris. This strategy identified key motifs and residues that are required for bioactivity and cell-type specificity. Additionally, we performed sequential binding studies to determine which subunit binds first to the bacterial cell membrane and hence may interact with a putative specific receptor. Finally, we show the distribution of these peptides in the currently sequenced bacterial genomes.
Results and Discussion
Variant peptide library preparation
Single alanine substitution variants were generated using recombinant expression in E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells.8 The gene encoding each mutant precursor peptide was purchased as a double-stranded DNA fragment (Table S1) and assembled into the first multiple cloning site of pRSFDuet that encoded the cytolysin lanthipeptide synthetase, CylM, in the second multiple cloning site. The sequence of each assembled plasmid was confirmed by Sanger sequencing and the plasmids were used to transform the E. coli expression host. After co-expression, the CylM-modified His6-tagged precursor peptide was isolated from cells and purified by immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography (IMAC). The purified peptide was next treated with recombinant CylA protease18–19 to liberate the mature modified core peptide. The post-translationally modified core peptide was further purified using semi-preparative reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) and analyzed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS, Table S2). CylM demonstrated remarkable substrate tolerance as all Ser/Thr residues that are dehydrated in the wt peptides were also dehydrated in the variants (Figures S1–S47). All variants, except for CylLL”-G23A, were isolated in sufficient quantities for bioactivity determination. CylLL”-G23A could not be isolated as co-expression of CylLL-G23A with CylM resulted in no detectable product by MALDI-TOF MS after IMAC (see Methods). All peptides that had significantly reduced biological activities (see below) were also further analyzed to ensure full cyclization by reaction with the Cys-selective alkylation agent N-ethylmaleimide (Figures S49–S73).32
Residues that control bioactivity and specificity of cytolysin
CylLL” and CylLS” exhibit synergistic lytic activity against mammalian and bacterial cells. Therefore, all purified mutant peptides were tested in triplicate with the wild-type counterpart subunit. The hemolytic activity was assessed by first determining the dose-response curve of the wild-type (wt) peptides (Figure S74). The Hill slope of the dose-response curve for hemolytic activity was 1.5 ± 0.3, perhaps suggesting weak positive cooperativity, but it is difficult to distill mechanistic information given the complexity of the molecular events that may underlie cell lysis. For comparison, the hemolytic activity of all peptide variants were tested at the EC80 of 0.28 μM for wt cytolysin. The MIC of wt cytolysin against L. lactis sp. cremoris as indicator strain was determined in GM17 liquid growth media (32 nM, Table 1), and all subsequent antibacterial activity assays of the variants were conducted using peptide concentrations ranging from 2 to 256 nM. CylLL” alone did not inhibit bacterial growth at concentrations up to 10 μM. However, CylLS” alone inhibited bacterial growth with an MIC of 5 μM.
Table 1.
Bioactivity profiles of alanine-substituted cytolysin peptides when combined with the wt partner peptide. n.a. not accessible. Peptides in bold font are mutants of ring forming residues. Residues 6, 8, 9, 11–13, 16, and 17 are Ala in wt CylLL” and therefore were not mutated. Similarly, residues 4, 14, and 18 are Ala in CylLS”. Green fields are arbitrarily set as within one dilution of the wt MIC and as 80–125% of wt for hemolytic activity. Red fields are for MIC values >2 dilutions of the MIC of wt cytolysin and for hemolytic activity <40% of wt. Yellow fields are used for intermediary values. For the hemolytic experiments, all peptide concentrations were 0.28 μM.
| Peptide | MIC (nM)a | Relative Hemolysis (%)b | Peptide | MIC (nM)a | Relative Hemolysis (%)b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CylLL” | 32 | 100 ± 4 | CylLS” | 32 | 100 ± 4 |
| CylL L ”-T1A | > 256 | 12 ± 1 | CylL S ”-T1A | > 256 | 25 ± 11 |
| CylLL”-T2A | > 256 | 12 ± 0 | CylLS”-T2A | 128 | 95 ± 8 |
| CylLL”-P3A | 128 | 104 ± 3 | CylLS”-P3A | 32 | 120 ± 0 |
| CylLL”-V4A | > 256 | 55 ± 1 | CylL S ”-C5A | >256 | 17 ± 1 |
| CylL L ”-C5A | > 256 | 13 ± 0 | CylLS”-F6A | 64 | 45 ± 14 |
| CylLL”-V7A | 32 | 108 ± 5 | CylLS”-T7A | 32 | 114 ± 3 |
| CylLL”-T10A | 128 | 123 ± 6 | CylLS”-I8A | 128 | 14 ± 1 |
| CylL L ”-S14A | > 256 | 35 ± 9 | CylLS”-G9A | 256 | 74 ± 7 |
| CylLL”-S15A | 256 | 82 ± 10 | CylLS”-L10A | 64 | 78 ± 6 |
| CylL L ”-C18A | > 256 | 12 ± 1 | CylLS”-G11A | 32 | 102 ± 7 |
| CylLL”-G19A | 16 | 109 ± 5 | CylLS”-V12A | 16 | 60 ± 9 |
| CylLL”-W20A | 64 | 34 ± 1 | CylLS”-G13A | 32 | 62 ± 14 |
| CylLL”-V21A | 256 | 96 ± 4 | CylLS”-L15A | 64 | 94 ± 13 |
| CylLL”-G22A | 256 | 112 ± 8 | CylLS”-F16A | 256 | 13 ± 2 |
| CylLL”-G23A | n.a. | n.a. | CylL S ”-S17A | >256 | 22 ± 11 |
| CylLL”-G24A | > 256 | 12 ± 0 | CylLS”-K19A | 128 | 111 ± 3 |
| CylLL”-I25A | 32 | 48 ± 4 | CylLS”-F20A | 64 | 92 ± 6 |
| CylLL”-F26A | 32 | 117 ± 12 | CylL S ”-C21A | >256 | 12 ± 0 |
| CylLL”-T27A | 16 | 124 ± 1 | |||
| CylLL”-G28A | 256 | 106 ± 1 | |||
| CylLL”-V29A | 64 | 60 ± 13 | |||
| CylLL”-T30A | > 256 | 45 ± 8 | |||
| CylLL”-V31A | 16 | 82 ± 9 | |||
| CylLL”-V32A | 8 | 107 ± 2 | |||
| CylLL”-V33A | 32 | 96 ± 7 | |||
| CylL L ”-S34A | > 256 | 12 ± 1 | |||
| CylLL”-L35A | 128 | 60 ± 8 | |||
| CylLL”-K36A | 16 | 63 ± 17 | |||
| CylLL”-H37A | 64 | 70 ± 14 | |||
| CylL L ”-C38A | 128 | 13 ± 0 |
Minimum inhibitory concentration against L. lactis sp. cremoris.
Relative hemolytic activity against rabbit red blood cells compared to wt peptides. Values shown are mean ± standard deviation of the mean for experiments performed in triplicate.
Substitution of the ring-forming residues in both peptides with Ala (CylLL”-T1A, C5A, S14A, C18A, S34A, C38A and CylLS”-T1A, C5A, S17A, C18A) revealed that the (methyl)lanthionine rings are essential for both antibacterial and hemolytic activities (Table 1). CylLL”-C38A appeared to retain modest antibacterial activity, but mass spectral analysis demonstrated the addition of glutathione (Figure S1), likely to Dha34 that can no longer form the lanthionine-containing C-ring, with the effect of such addition unknown. However, replacement of Ser34 with Ala, which also prevented formation of the C-ring, resulted in a variant (CylLL”-S34A) that did not show any bioactivity. Hence, all five rings in the two peptides appear essential for antibacterial and cytolytic activities.
Two additional non-ring forming residues, CylLL”-Thr2 and CylLL”-Gly24, also appeared to be critical for both biological activities of CylLL” (Table 1). Sequence alignment of all ten unique CylLL-like core peptides encoded in the genomes revealed that the amino acids at positions 2 and 24 are always Thr and Gly, respectively (Figure 3A). Thr2 is likely important for activity because after dehydration to Dhb, this residue is important for driving the stereochemistry of the A-ring.8, 15 Interestingly, CylLL-G24 is fully conserved within the “hinge region” of CylLL” that spans Gly22-Gly23-Gly24. The solution NMR structures of CylLL” revealed two unique conformations of the peptide, a compact conformation and an extended conformation, that can interconvert through the flexibility of the Gly3 hinge region (Figure 1C and D).9 The extended conformation spans a length of 45–49 Å, about the size of a bacterial lipid bilayer. Abolishment of both bioactivities in CylLL”-G24A suggests that flexibility of the hinge region may be crucial for cytotoxic activity. The hinge region also appeared important for the biosynthesis because CylLL”-G23A was the only variant out of 48 prepared in this study that could not be obtained. We infer that the corresponding precursor peptide is a poor substrate for CylM and/or that the unmodified peptide is degraded in the cell by proteases. Indeed, attempts to isolate the His6-CylLL-G23A precursor peptide for in vitro modification by CylM were unsuccessful due to observed truncation of the peptide during expression (see Methods). Two other residues in the large subunit, Val4 and Thr30, are important for antibacterial activity but less so for hemolytic activity. Position 4 is always Val/Ile in the alignment of CylLL” peptides and position 30 is always Ser/Thr.
Figure 3.

(A) Sequence alignment of all unique CylLL-like core peptide sequences in the currently sequenced genomes. (B) All unique CylLS-like core peptides encoded near genes coding for CylLL-like peptides. (C) CylLS core peptide alignment for all unique cerecidin-like core peptides that do not have a CylLL peptide encoded in the same genome. Fully conserved residues are colored in green and moderately conserved residues are colored in lime. Also shown is the designed cerecidin-like variant of CylLS, CerLS.
In CylLS”, two non-ring forming residues, Ile8 and Phe16, appeared important for both antibacterial and hemolytic activity as replacement with Ala had clear detrimental effects (Table 1). Alignment of all unique CylLS-like core peptides in the genomes that are associated with a CylLL partner peptide shows that position 8 is typically a bulky, aliphatic amino acid, whereas the amino acid identity at position 16 is more divergent (Figure 3B).
In addition to residues that abolish or negatively affect both activities when mutated, we observed that mutation of certain residues resulted in differential activity, where one biological activity was mostly retained while the other was reduced or eliminated. Such differential effects were most obvious for CylLL”-P3A, CylLL”-T10A, CylLL”-S15A, CylLL”-V21A, CylLL”-G22A, and CylLL”-G28A in the large subunit and CylLS”-T2A and CylLS”-K19A in the small subunit, which all retained near full hemolytic activity whereas the antibacterial MIC was increased at least 4-fold. More subtle effects were observed for CylLL”-W20A, CylLL”-I25A, CylLL”-V29A, CylLS”-F6A, CylLS”-L10A, CylLS”-V12A, and CylLS”-G13A for which hemolytic activity was reduced whereas antibacterial activity was less strongly affected. CylLS”-G9A suffered an 8-fold increase in antibacterial MIC, and a minor reduction in hemolytic activity.
Several residues in CylLL” (Val7, Gly19, Phe26, Thr27, Val31, Val32, and Val33) and CylLS” (Pro3, Thr7, Gly11, Leu15, and Phe20) do not appear important for either activity. Overall, antibacterial activity appears to be more sensitive to amino acid perturbations than hemolytic activity (Table 1), although it must be noted that the two assays measure different aspects of activity. In general, substitution of the highly conserved amino acids resulted in loss of biological activity.
Finally, mutation of several highly or completely conserved amino acids had only minor effects on activity (Table 1). The most surprising of these was mutation of the completely conserved Lys36 in CylLL”, which was anticipated to be important as it is the only amino acid with a positively charged side chain in the large subunit. Despite complete conservation and similarity in position to Lys19 in CylLS”, which is important for antibacterial activity (see below), Lys36 in CylLL” was not critical for antibacterial nor hemolytic activity. Clear effects were also observed for some residues that are not conserved. CylLL-Trp20 and CylLS-Lys19 lack high sequence conservation (Figure 3A,B), but were previously suggested to possibly interact with the target membrane.9 We observed that CylLL”-W20A and CylLS”-K19A lose hemolytic or antibacterial activity, respectively. Despite low sequence conservation, these residues appear to be important for the specificity of cytoxicity for different cell types.
Structure activity relationship studies of cerecidin A7 (CerA7) were previously reported.23 In general, the analogous mutations in CylLS” resulted in similar effects on antibacterial activities as those in CerA7 with a few notable exceptions. CylLS”-T2A exhibited reduced activity, whereas CerA7-T2A appears to be completely inactive. CylLS”-F16A displayed reduced antibacterial activity whereas in CerA7 the corresponding position is alanine in the wt peptide. Lastly, CerA7-T13A exhibited 4-fold higher antimicrobial activity than wt CerA7, but CylLS” possesses leucine at position 15 and substitution by Ala did not affect either activity.
In summary, through single alanine substitution, we identified residues that are important for the biological activity and cell-type specificity of enterococcal cytolysin. These results with cytolysin variants suggest that the molecular targets in bacteria and mammalian cells may be related molecules that have small differences in structure or abundance in different cell types.
CylLL” associates with the bacterial cell membrane
Previous studies on two-component lanthipeptide systems demonstrated that one subunit is responsible for target engagement, while the other subunit facilitates pore formation.28–29, 33–35 Thus, we examined the order of binding for cytolysin as previously described for other two-component systems.33–34 The sequential binding experiment was conducted side-by-side with the two-component antibacterial haloduracin. Haloduracin is composed of two subunits, Halα and Halβ (Figure 4A),36 with Halα binding to the cell wall precursor lipid II, followed by binding of Halβ to the initial complex to induce pore formation.29, 34 When CylLL” was added to Lactococcus lactis sp. cremoris cells followed by washing and subsequent addition of CylLS”, with the concentration of both peptides at the MIC (32 nM), no strong growth inhibition phenotype was observed (Figure 4B). Reversing the order of the experiment did not change the outcome. A similar experiment with Halα and Halβ (64 nM) showed a growth delay only when Halα was added first (Figure 4C), consistent with previous studies. Both sets of experiments were then repeated at a concentration corresponding to eight times the MIC. For both Halα and CylLL” cell growth was completely inhibited up to 16 h if they were added first followed by washing the cells and addition of the second component. Importantly, without adding the second subunit, no growth inhibition was seen even at 8x MIC.
Figure 4.

Schematic structures of (A) haloduracin α and (B) haloduracin β. (C) Sequential binding assay for cytolysin against Lactococcus lactis sp. cremoris with CylLL” added first at 1X MIC (32 nM, black square), CylLS” added first at 1X MIC (32 nM, red circle), CylLL” added first at 8X MIC (256 nM, purple diamond), and CylLS” added first at 8X MIC (256 nM, gold triangle); in all cases the cells were washed and the partner peptide was added at the same concentration. Alternatively, CylLL” was added without CylLS” (256 nM, cyan triangle), and CylLS” was added without CylLL” (256 nM, brown hexagon). (D) Sequential binding assay for haloduracin with Halα added first at 1X MIC (64 nM, black square), Halβ added first at 1X MIC (64 nM, red circle), Halα added first at 8X MIC (512 nM, purple diamond), and Halβ added first at 8X MIC (512 nM, gold triangle); then the cells were washed and the partner peptide was added at the same concentration. Alternatively, Halα was added without Halβ (512 nM, cyan triangle), and Halβ was added without Halα (512 nM, brown hexagon).
When Halβ was added first at 8x MIC (512 nM), followed by washing and addition of Halα, a more modest growth delay was observed; Halβ does not bind to lipid II on its own.29 Similarly, when CylLS” was added first at 8x MIC (256 nM) followed by washing of the cells and addition of CylLL”, a modest growth delay was observed. Our data therefore suggest that CylLL” binds to the membrane, followed by CylLS” binding and subsequent pore formation. These data may indicate that CylLL” binds to a specific target in the membrane but potentially with less affinity than Halα binding to lipid II, which has been estimated to have a KD of ~14 nM.29 Alternatively, the larger size of the mostly hydrophobic CylLL” peptide may explain a higher affinity for the membrane. A previous study also reported higher affinity of CylLL” towards artificial lipid membranes compared to CylLS”.3
Based on sequence homology to the cerecidins and their reported bioactivity in the absence of a CylLL peptide, we had initially predicted that CylLS” would be the subunit that might have affinity to a target. This would be analogous to the putative lipid II binding motif in ring B of Halα being found in single component lantibiotics such as nukacin II27 or mersacidin.37 But our findings in this work suggest that it may be CylLL” that binds a membrane bound receptor molecule and that may have increased the antibacterial activity and broadened the spectrum of activity. To further investigate the factors that differentiate the activities of the one-component cerecidins and the two-component cytolysin, we generated a variant of CylLS” that is similar to cerecidin A7 by encoding a C-terminal Lys and deletion of Phe6 and Thr7. This variant was fully dehydrated when co-expressed with CylM and termed CerLS” (Figure 3C, S48). We tested its activity by itself against L. lactis sp cremoris resulting in an MIC of 10 μM, similar to the MIC of 5 μM of CylLS”. When CylLL” was added to the assay, no antibacterial activity was observed in stark contrast to the strong potentiation observed upon adding CylLL” to wt CylLS”. Additionally, hemolytic activity was not observed for CerLS” with or without the addition of CylLL”. Thus, the synergistic activity of the cytolysin peptides is highly specific.
Cytolysin and cerecidins diverged from a common ancestor
In an effort to understand the evolutionary relationship between the highly potent two-component cytolysin that has activity against both bacterial and mammalian cells and the much less potent cerecidins that only display antibacterial activity, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum likelihood method with sequences for the respective class II lanthipeptide synthetases (Figure S75).38–39 CinM, a distantly related lanthipeptide synthetase, was defined as the outgroup.40 The resulting tree contains three distinct main clades. One clade (blue, Figure S75) is made up of the lanthipeptide synthetases that produce cytolysins as defined by two distinct substrate peptides of different length (CylLS and CylLL orthologs) that are encoded nearby, one that will generate a product with two (methyl)lanthionines and one with three (methyl)lanthionines. In some cases, extra copies of CylLL and/or CylLS-like peptides were found. One cluster encoded in Enterococcus caccae is an exception and encodes just a single CylLS subunit. The organisms encoding these systems are mostly enterococci but also other Firmicutes. Another clade (purple) contains the cerecidins. Although their biosynthetic gene clusters often have multiple precursor peptides, they are highly similar in sequence and length and resemble CylLS” (e.g. Figure 3C). A third clade consists of enzymes in Bacillus species that again have two precursor peptides of distinct length. This clade can be further subcategorized into two groups based on the identity of the core peptide sequences of the substrates (Figure S75B). To the best of our knowledge no characterized examples of these peptides have been reported. We suggest the name bibacillins I and II (“bi-” as in two precursors, “-bacillin” as all current members are in Bacillus species) to describe these groups of lanthipeptides. Whether they are two-component systems and whether they have activity against both bacteria and mammalian cells are interesting questions for future investigation. The tree shows that the biosynthetic enzymes involved in producing cytolysin and cerecidins evolved from a common ancestor, whereas they are more distantly related to the lanthipeptide synthetase involved in biosynthesis of the bibacillins (Figure S75A).
Conclusion
In this study we identified key residues required for the biological activity of enterococcal cytolysin, a molecule with direct links to human disease. Cytolysin can lyse both mammalian and bacterial cells with high potency, the only such example amongst currently known lanthipeptides. Some residues are required for both hemolytic and antibacterial activity, which include all ring forming residues, and a Gly in the hinge region of the large subunit. Other residues were identified that endow the peptides with specificity against one cell type over the other. Our data is consistent with a model in which CylLL” associates with a presumed membrane target, followed by binding of the CylLS” subunit and pore formation. Further studies will be required to identify this putative target.
Methods
Cloning of single alanine mutant library
Plasmid assembly and propagation were conducted in chemically component NEBTurbo cells (New England Biolabs). Expression of recombinant peptides and proteins was performed after transformation of chemically competent BL21 Star (DE3) cells (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with the appropriate plasmid. Single stranded DNA primers were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies and double stranded DNA gene fragments were purchased from Twist Biosciences. Individual linear DNA fragments were amplified from the single alanine substitution library with compatible homology arms for plasmid assembly using Phusion DNA polymerase. Either pRSFDuet-CylM or pET28b was linearized by PCR using Phusion DNA polymerase. The PCR products were purified by QIAprep spin column (Qiagen) and the concentration of DNA was quantified by Nanodrop absorbance assay (Thermo Fisher). The linear DNA fragments were mixed at 1:10 molar ratio backbone to insert and assembled using NEB HiFi Master Mix at 50 °C for 1 h. The assembly reaction was directly used to transform chemically competent NEBTurbo cells and plated on LB agar + kanamycin (50 μg/mL). All plasmids were confirmed by Sanger sequencing.
Peptide expression and purification
Terrific Broth (TB; 1.5 to 3.0 L) supplemented with 50 μg/mL kanamycin was inoculated with 1:100 dilution of overnight E. coli BL21 Star (DE3) cells containing the plasmid of interest. The cultures were grown at 37 °C with shaking to an OD600 of 0.8. The peptide expressions were induced by addition of 0.3 mM IPTG, followed by incubation at 18 °C for an additional 16 h. The cells were harvested by centrifugation (6,000xg for 12 min), and the pellets were stored at −70 °C. Frozen cell pellets were thawed and resuspended in 50 – 100 mL of LanA Buffer B1 (6.0 M guanidinium hydrochloride, 0.5 mM imidazole, 0.5 M NaCl, 20 mM NaH2PO4, pH 7.5) and lysed by homogenization (Avestin). The lysate was clarified by centrifugation (25,000×g for 45 min) and applied onto a pre-equilibrated gravity column containing 1 mL of His60 SuperFlow resin (Takara Bio). The resin was washed with 15 mL of LanA Buffer B2 (4.0 M guanidinium hydrochloride, 30 mM imidazole, 0.3 M NaCl, 20 mM NaH2PO4, pH 7.5), followed by 15 mL of LanA co-expression Wash Buffer (30 mM imidazole, 0.3 M NaCl, 20 mM NaH2PO4, pH 7.5). The peptide was eluted with 15 mL of LanA co-expression Elution Buffer (0.5 M imidazole, 0.3 M NaCl, 20 mM NaH2PO4, pH 7.5) and stored at −20 °C. Because co-expression with CylM did not produce any product, CylLL-G23A was also expressed as the linear precursor peptide and purified as described above to attempt in vitro modification with purified CylM. The elution fraction was desalted using Peptide Cleanup C18 Pipette Tips (Agilent) and analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS. The major peak corresponded to a peptide ending at Thr30, either because of incomplete translation or proteolytic degradation. Thus, it did not prove possible to access CylLL”-G23A.
Peptide cleavage and HPLC purification
Recombinant CylA protease was expressed and purified as previously described.19 The peptide solution was thawed and treated with 100 μL of CylA (0.1 mg/mL) overnight at ambient temperature. The digested peptide solution was acidified with addition of 2% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), centrifuged at 4500xg for 10 min, filtered through a 0.45 μm PVDF syringe filter and subjected to HPLC purification. Semi-preparative HPLC was performed on an Agilent 1260 Infinity II preparative liquid chromatography system connected to a 1260 Infinity II VWD and a 1260 Infinity II fraction collector. The peptides were purified on a Phenomenex Jupiter Proteo column (4 μm, 90 Å, 10 × 250 mm) using 0.1% TFA in H2O (solvent A) and 0.1% TFA in CH3CN (solvent) running at 4 mL/min. A gradient method was utilized with the following steps: 2% B for 10 min, ramp to 76% B over 25 min, ramp to 100% B over 5 min, hold at 100% B for 5 min, and ramp to 2% over 5 min.
Mass spectrometry and NEM alkylation assay
Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) experiments were performed on a Bruker UltrafleXtreme MALDI-TOF/TOF MS. HPLC purified samples were spotted onto a MALDI target plate using 1 μL of 25 mg/mL super DHB (Sigma) in 80% CH3CN/H2O + 0.1% TFA. For N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) alkylation, peptides (1 μM) were reduced in citrate buffer (100 mM, pH 3.5) containing TCEP (0.1 mM) at 30 °C for 15 min. The solution containing the reduced peptides was adjusted to pH ~ 8 and NEM (0.1 mM) was added to initiate the alkylation reaction, which was allowed to proceed at 30 °C for 30 min. The samples were desalted using Peptide Cleanup C18 Pipette Tips (Agilent) prior to MALDI-TOF MS analysis.
Antibacterial assay for MIC determination
Minimum inhibitory concentration was determined in 96-well microtiter plates. Overnight cultures of L. lactis sp. cremoris were diluted to 105 CFU/mL in GM17 media (M17 + 0.5 % glucose). In each well, 50 μL of cell suspensions were added followed by each peptide. The peptides were serially diluted to reach a final concentration of 256, 128, 64, 32, 16, 8, 4, and 2 nM. The cells were incubated at 30 °C for 18 h and OD600 was measured on a Synergy H4 Hybrid Multi-Mode Microplate Reader (BioTek).
Hemolysis assay
Defibrinated rabbit erythrocytes (Hemostat) were washed in cold PBS by centrifugation at 1000×g for 3 min, decanting, and resuspension in fresh PBS until the supernatant remained colorless. Washed erythrocytes were diluted to a final concentration of 5% v/v. In a 96-well microtiter plate, 90 μL of diluted cells were added and pre-incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. To determine the EC80, the wild type cytolysin peptides were serially diluted to reach a final concentration of 2, 1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, 0.0625, 0.0312, and 0.0156 μM in a final volume of 150 μL. As positive hemolytic control, Triton X-100 was added to a final concentration of 0.03% v/v in a final volume of 150 μL. For negative hemolytic control PBS was added to a final volume of 150 μL. Both cytolysin peptides were added at 1:1 molar ratio and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. The cells were centrifuged at 1000×g for 10 min and 20 μL of the supernatant was removed. The supernatant was diluted in 180 μL of PBS and absorbance was measured at 415 nm. The % hemolysis was calculated with the following equation: . The data for the wt cytolysin was fit to a simple dose-response equation in OriginPro 2020: where p = the Hill slope and y = % hemolysis, providing p=1.5 ± 0.3. When the Hill equation was used , which assumes binding of n ligands to a receptor and a measured response E, a Hill coefficient of 1.3 ± 0.1 was obtained. Given the potentially complex relationship between the measured entity (release of hemoglobin from red blood cells) and a molecular binding event, it is not clear whether the cooperativity suggests an oligomeric complex involving multiple cytolysin molecules. All peptide variants were then tested as described above at a single concentration of 0.28 μM.
Sequential binding assay
Sequential binding experiments were performed as previously described.34 Briefly, an overnight culture of L. lactis sp. cremoris was diluted 1:20 in fresh GM17 media (~107 CFU/mL). In a 96-well microtiter plate, 75 μL of cells were added to 25 μL of serially diluted peptides. The cells were incubated with peptides at ambient temperature for 20 min. The cells were centrifuged at 4500×g for 10 min. The supernatant was removed, and the cells were washed two additional times with fresh media. After washing, the cells were resuspended in 75 μL of fresh GM17 media and transferred to a new 96-well microtiter plate containing 25 μL of the corresponding subunit at equal molar concentration. The OD600 was measured in 30 min intervals for 18 h at 30 °C.
Supplementary Material
Figure 5.

Summary of structure-activity relationship studies of CylLL” and CylLS” where red represents reduction/loss of both biological activities, green represents loss/reduction of only antibacterial activity, and yellow represents loss/reduction of only hemolytic activity. * Not assessed (see text).
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. I.R.R. is a recipient of a K. Westcott fellowship and was supported by a NIGMS-NIH Chemistry-Biology Interface Training Grant (5T32-GM070421). A.S. was supported by a Summer Undergraduate Research Scholarship from the Department of Chemistry at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Funding Sources
This study was supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. I.R.R. is a recipient of a K. Westcott fellowship and was supported by a NIGMS-NIH Chemistry-Biology Interface Training Grant (5T32-GM070421). A.S. was supported by a Summer Undergraduate Research Scholarship from the Department of Chemistry at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. A Bruker UltrafleXtreme mass spectrometer used was purchased with support from the National Institutes of Health (S10 RR027109).
Footnotes
Supporting Information. Supporting figures and tables. This material is available free of charge via the Inter-net at http://pubs.acs.org.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
References
- 1.Van Tyne D; Martin MJ; Gilmore MS, Structure, function, and biology of the Enterococcus faecalis cytolysin. Toxins (Basel) 2013, 5 (5), 895–911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mukherjee S; Huo L; Thibodeaux GN; van der Donk WA, Synthesis and bioactivity of diastereomers of the virulence lanthipeptide cytolysin. Org. Lett 2016, 18 (23), 6188–6191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Coburn PS; Pillar CM; Jett BD; Haas W; Gilmore MS, Enterococcus faecalis senses target cells and in response expresses cytolysin. Science 2004, 306 (5705), 2270–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ali L; Goraya MU; Arafat Y; Ajmal M; Chen JL; Yu D, Molecular mechanism of quorum-sensing in Enterococcus faecalis: its role in virulence and therapeutic approaches. Int. J. Mol. Sci 2017, 18 (5), 960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Haas W; Shepard BD; Gilmore MS, Two-component regulator of Enterococcus faecalis cytolysin responds to quorum-sensing autoinduction. Nature 2002, 415 (6867), 84–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Duan Y; Llorente C; Lang S; Brandl K; Chu H; Jiang L; White RC; Clarke TH; Nguyen K; Torralba M; Shao Y; Liu J; Hernandez-Morales A; Lessor L; Rahman IR; Miyamoto Y; Ly M; Gao B; Sun W; Kiesel R; Hutmacher F; Lee S; Ventura-Cots M; Bosques-Padilla F; Verna EC; Abraldes JG; Brown RS Jr.; Vargas V; Altamirano J; Caballeria J; Shawcross DL; Ho SB; Louvet A; Lucey MR; Mathurin P; Garcia-Tsao G; Bataller R; Tu XM; Eckmann L; van der Donk WA; Young R; Lawley TD; Starkel P; Pride D; Fouts DE; Schnabl B, Bacteriophage targeting of gut bacterium attenuates alcoholic liver disease. Nature 2019, 575 (7783), 505–511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Garcia-Solache M; Rice LB, The Enterococcus: a model of adaptability to its environment. Clin. Microbiol. Rev 2019, 32 (2), e00058–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tang W; van der Donk WA, The sequence of the enterococcal cytolysin imparts unusual lanthionine stereochemistry. Nat. Chem. Biol 2013, 9 (3), 157–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bobeica SC; Zhu L; Acedo JZ; Tang W; van der Donk WA, Structural determinants of macrocyclization in substrate-controlled lanthipeptide biosynthetic pathways. Chem. Sci 2020, 11, 12854–12870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Walensky LD; Bird GH, Hydrocarbon-stapled peptides: principles, practice, and progress. J. Med. Chem 2014, 57 (15), 6275–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fairlie DP; Dantas de Araujo A, Review stapling peptides using cysteine crosslinking. Biopolymers 2016, 106 (6), 843–852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Huycke MM; Sahm DF; Gilmore MS, Multiple-drug resistant enterococci: the nature of the problem and an agenda for the future. Emerg. Infect. Dis 1998, 4 (2), 239–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Montalbán-López M; Scott TA; Ramesh S; Rahman IR; van Heel AJ; Viel JH; Bandarian V; Dittmann E; Genilloud O; Goto Y; Grande Burgos MJ; Hill C; Kim S; Koehnke J; Latham JA; Link AJ; Martínez B; Nair SK; Nicolet Y; Rebuffat S; Sahl H-G; Sareen D; Schmidt EW; Schmitt L; Severinov K; Süssmuth RD; Truman AW; Wang H; Weng J-K; van Wezel GP; Zhang Q; Zhong J; Piel J; Mitchell DA; Kuipers OP; van der Donk WA, New developments in RiPP discovery, enzymology and engineering. Nat. Prod. Rep 2021, 138 (1), 130–239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gilmore MS; Segarra RA; Booth MC; Bogie CP; Hall LR; Clewell DB, Genetic structure of the Enterococcus faecalis plasmid pAD1-encoded cytolytic toxin system and its relationship to lantibiotic determinants. J. Bacteriol 1994, 176 (23), 7335–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tang W; Jiménez-Osés G; Houk KN; van der Donk WA, Substrate control in stereoselective lanthionine biosynthesis. Nat. Chem 2015, 7 (1), 57–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cox CR; Coburn PS; Gilmore MS, Enterococcal cytolysin: a novel two component peptide system that serves as a bacterial defense against eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci 2005, 6 (1), 77–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gilmore MS; Segarra RA; Booth MC, An HlyB-type function is required for expression of the Enterococcus faecalis hemolysin/bacteriocin. Infect. Immun 1990, 58 (12), 3914–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Segarra RA; Booth MC; Morales DA; Huycke MM; Gilmore MS, Molecular characterization of the Enterococcus faecalis cytolysin activator. Infect. Immun 1991, 59 (4), 1239–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tang W; Bobeica SC; Wang L; van der Donk WA, CylA is a sequence-specific protease involved in toxin biosynthesis. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol 2019, 46 (3–4), 537–549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lohans CT; Li JL; Vederas JC, Structure and biosynthesis of carnolysin, a homologue of enterococcal cytolysin with D-amino acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 13150–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Leisner JJ; Laursen BG; Prévost H; Drider D; Dalgaard P, Carnobacterium: positive and negative effects in the environment and in foods. FEMS Microbiol. Rev 2007, 31 (5), 592–613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Walker MC; Eslami SM; Hetrick KJ; Ackenhusen SE; Mitchell DA; van der Donk WA, Precursor peptide-targeted mining of more than one hundred thousand genomes expands the lanthipeptide natural product family. BMC Genomics 2020, 21 (1), 387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang J; Zhang L; Teng K; Sun S; Sun Z; Zhong J, Cerecidins, novel lantibiotics from Bacillus cereus with potent antimicrobial activity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 2014, 80 (8), 2633–2643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Huang HW, Molecular mechanism of antimicrobial peptides: the origin of cooperativity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2006, 1758 (9), 1292–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Breukink E; Wiedemann I; van Kraaij C; Kuipers OP; Sahl HG; de Kruijff B, Use of the cell wall precursor lipid II by a pore-forming peptide antibiotic. Science 1999, 286 (5448), 2361–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Brötz H; Bierbaum G; Leopold K; Reynolds PE; Sahl HG, The lantibiotic mersacidin inhibits peptidoglycan synthesis by targeting lipid II. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 1998, 42 (1), 154–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Islam MR; Nishie M; Nagao J; Zendo T; Keller S; Nakayama J; Kohda D; Sahl HG; Sonomoto K, Ring A of nukacin ISK-1: a lipid II-binding motif for type-A(II) lantibiotic. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2012, 134 (8), 3687–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wiedemann I; Bottiger T; Bonelli RR; Wiese A; Hagge SO; Gutsmann T; Seydel U; Deegan L; Hill C; Ross P; Sahl HG, The mode of action of the lantibiotic lacticin 3147--a complex mechanism involving specific interaction of two peptides and the cell wall precursor lipid II. Mol. Microbiol 2006, 61 (2), 285–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Oman TJ; Lupoli TJ; Wang T-SA; Kahne D; Walker S; van der Donk WA, Haloduracin a binds the peptidoglycan precursor lipid II with 2:1 stoichiometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133, 17544–17547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Iwamoto K; Hayakawa T; Murate M; Makino A; Ito K; Fujisawa T; Kobayashi T, Curvature-dependent recognition of ethanolamine phospholipids by duramycin and cinnamycin. Biophys. J 2007, 93 (5), 1608–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Märki F; Hanni E; Fredenhagen A; van Oostrum J, Mode of action of the lanthionine-containing peptide antibiotics duramycin, duramycin B and C, and cinnamycin as indirect inhibitors of phospholipase A2. Biochem. Pharmacol 1991, 42 (10), 2027–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Li B; Cooper LE; van der Donk WA, In vitro studies of lantibiotic biosynthesis. Methods Enzymol 2009, 458, 533–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Morgan SM; O’Connor PM; Cotter PD; Ross RP; Hill C, Sequential actions of the two component peptides of the lantibiotic lacticin 3147 explain its antimicrobial activity at nanomolar concentrations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 2005, 49 (7), 2606–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Oman TJ; van der Donk WA, Insights into the mode of action of the two-peptide lantibiotic haloduracin. ACS Chem. Biol 2009, 4, 865–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Huo L; van der Donk WA, Discovery and characterization of bicereucin, an unusual D-amino acid-containing mixed two-component lantibiotic. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138 (16), 5254–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Cooper LE; McClerren AL; Chary A; van der Donk WA, Structure-activity relationship studies of the two-component lantibiotic haloduracin. Chem. Biol 2008, 15 (10), 1035–1045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Szekat C; Jack RW; Skutlarek D; Farber H; Bierbaum G, Construction of an expression system for site-directed mutagenesis of the lantibiotic mersacidin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 2003, 69 (7), 3777–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nguyen LT; Schmidt HA; von Haeseler A; Minh BQ, IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol 2015, 32 (1), 268–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Letunic I; Bork P, Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhang Q; Yu Y; Velásquez JE; van der Donk WA, Evolution of lanthipeptide synthetases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2012, 109 (45), 18361–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
