Abstract
Perturbed in utero hormone milieu leads to intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), a known risk factor for left ventricular (LV) dysfunction later in life. Gestational testosterone (T) excess predisposes offspring to IUGR and leads to LV myocardial disarray and hypertension in adult females. However, the early impact of T excess on LV programming and if it is female specific is unknown. LV tissues were obtained at day 90 gestation from days 30–90 T-treated or control fetuses (n = 6/group/sex) and morphometric and molecular analyses were conducted. Gestational T treatment increased cardiomyocyte number only in female fetuses. T excess upregulated receptor expression of insulin and insulin-like growth factor. Furthermore, in a sex-specific manner, T increased expression of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) while downregulating phosphorylated mammalian target of rapamycin (pmTOR)-to-mTOR ratio suggestive of compensatory response. T excess 1) upregulated atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), markers of stress and cardiac hypertrophy and 2) upregulated estrogen receptors1 (ESR1) and 2 (ESR2), but not in androgen receptor (AR). Thus, gestational T excess upregulated markers of cardiac stress and hypertrophy in both sexes while inducing cardiomyocyte hyperplasia only in females, likely mediated via insulin and estrogenic programming.
NEW & NOTEWORTHY The present study demonstrates sex-specific effects of gestational T excess between days 30 and 90 of gestation on the cardiac phenotype. Furthermore, the sex-specific programming is likely secondary to perturbation in both estrogen and insulin signaling pathways collectively. These findings are supportive of the role of androgen excess to serve as early biomarkers of CVD and could be critical in identifying therapeutic targets for LV hypertrophy and predict long-term CVD.
Keywords: cardiovascular disease, DOHAD, hyperplasia, insulin signaling, left ventricle, testosterone
INTRODUCTION
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death worldwide, with a prevalence rate of 49.2% increasing with age in males and females (1). Pathological cardiac remodeling and left ventricle hypertrophy (LVH), typically preceding progression to heart failure, account for a substantial portion of CVD morbidity and mortality (2–4). Despite significant advances in identifying CVD risk factors and their therapeutics, the morbidity and mortality from CVD remain high (5, 6). Of note, sex differences exist in both prevalence and burden of CVD. Despite it being the leading cause of death in both men and women, men have a higher age-adjusted rate of CVD mortality (7). Men are more prone to pathological LV remodeling, and heart failure outcomes are worse in men compared with women (8). Furthermore, with aging, there is a sex-specific decrease in cardiomyocyte number and an increase in myocytes size, more pronounced in males than in females (9). Of relevance, alteration in sex steroid levels impacts cardiovascular function in a sex-specific manner (10). Although estrogen is considered cardioprotective in women (10), androgens are linked to CVD risk in both sexes (11, 12). However, the underlying molecular mechanisms and sex-specific impact of CVD-related pathological cardiac remodeling and associated morbidity and mortality are not well understood.
Epidemiological data points to obesity (13), hyperglycemia (14), hypertension (15), and physical inactivity (16) as major CVD risk factors that contribute to morbidity and mortality (17). Substantial evidence from human, animal, and epidemiological studies indicates that early life insults in utero lead to intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) and adversely program the cardiovascular system, thereby predisposing to CVD later in life (18–20), including LVH (21, 22). Interestingly, many of these insults are associated with androgen excess (23, 24), a well-known risk factor for the development of pathological LVH and CVD in offspring (25–27). For instance, a recent epidemiological study noted that an elevated third-trimester androgen level was positively correlated with a 4.84-fold increased risk of hypertension in female offspring (28). Moreover, higher fetal testosterone (T) levels in late pregnancy were also associated with higher blood pressure in young adults (29). Similarly, offspring of hyperandrogenic women with PCOS were reported to have alteration in blood pressure, left ventricular dilation, and increased carotid intima thickness (30).
Animal studies have corroborated the adverse impact of excess prenatal T exposure on cardiovascular health. Using our well-characterized sheep model of prenatal T excess (31), we previously found exposure to excess T during fetal life results in mild hypertension and pathological cardiac remodeling in adult female offspring (32, 33) (the impact in male offspring remain to be determined). In rodent studies, where both sexes were investigated, prenatal T excess induced hypertension in both males and females with greater effect seen in males (34).
Although the detrimental effects of exposure to excess T during fetal life on cardiometabolic phenotype are well validated in several species (35–37), the early perturbations leading to pathological cardiac remodeling and LVH are not well understood. Relative to mediators of cardiovascular programming, estrogen and T play a key role in cardiac growth (38, 39), exerting their action by binding to their cognate estrogen and androgen receptors that are present on cardiomyocytes of several species, including human (40–42). Inappropriate androgen and estrogen levels enhance progression to heart failure (42), and T can mediate cardiac hypertrophy in cultured cardiomyocytes (39). Although the exact molecular mechanisms underlying the mediation of cardiac hypertrophy by T are poorly understood, studies suggest T may mediate hypertrophy via activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling pathway (43). Both T and estrogen also activate the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)–AKT signaling pathway that is also activated by insulin and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) (40, 44). In this context, gestational T excess from days 30–90 of gestation was found to induce maternal hyperinsulinism (45), increase fetal estrogen (46), and reduce fetal IGF1 levels at fetal day 140 (47) culminating in IUGR (48). Considering low birth weight as a risk factor for the development of CVD (49) and prenatal T excess leads to low birth weight in both sexes (48), both males and females are at risk of adverse cardiac programming. A recent study by Jonker et al. found prenatal T treatment of sheep from gestational days 30–59 reduced cardiomyocyte maturation and proliferation at birth more so in male than female offspring (50), thus providing some support of sexually dimorphic cardiac programming. However, the adult cardiovascular phenotype with 30- to 59-day window of T exposure used in Jonker’s study is not characterized. Importantly, whether the extended exposure period from days 30 to 90 of fetal life that results in adult hypertension in the female (32) leads to a more severe cardiomyocyte phenotype early in life is also unclear.
Considering CVD outcomes differ between men and women and the limited information available on the sexually dimorphic impact of prenatal T excess, especially the early cardiac perturbations that contribute to adverse programming of LVH, the objective of this study was to investigate the impact of exposure to excess T from days 30–90 of gestation on sex-specific early cardiac effects using the sheep model. Because T fetuses are exposed to high androgen, estrogen, insulin, and altered IGF during fetal life, we hypothesized that the impact of prenatal T excess on LV remodeling involved early changes in androgen/estrogen/insulin/IGF signaling pathways leading to alterations in cardiomyocyte morphology.
METHODS
Experimental Animals, Prenatal T-Treatment, and Tissue Collection
All experimental animal procedures were approved by the University of Michigan Animal Care and Use Committee. All methods were performed in accordance with the National Research Council’s Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The study was carried out in compliance with ARRIVE guidelines. Animals were bred at the University of Michigan Sheep Research Facility (Ann Arbor, MI). The date of mating was determined by paint markings left by the ram on the rumps of ewes. Pregnant ewes were assigned randomly between control (control) and T-treatment (T-treated) groups adjusting for body weight (means ± SE: control 83.41 ± 31 vs. T-treated 81.64 ± 4.2 kg) and body score (control 2.55 ± 0.17 vs. T-treated 2.76 ± 0.16). For generating T-treated fetuses, pregnant ewes were injected twice weekly im. with 100 mg (∼1.2 mg/kg) testosterone propionate (T; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) suspended in 2 mL corn oil from gestational days 30–90; term: 147 days (Fig. 1). Controls received 2 mL of corn oil vehicle. At the end of T treatment (means ± SE: 91.9 ± 0.2) of gestation, ewes were euthanized as previously described (46). Briefly, sedation was induced with 20–30 mL of pentobarbital sodium intravenously (Nembutol Na solution, 50 mg/mL iv; Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL), and anesthesia was maintained with 1%–2% halothane (Halocarbon Laboratories, River Edge, NJ). The gravid uterus was exposed through a midline incision, and male and female fetuses were collected, and the hearts removed. The dam was the experimental unit with only one randomly selected male or female fetus used from each dam if there were more than one fetus. Fetal body and heart weights were recorded. LV tissues were separated, snap-frozen, and stored at –80°C until used for mRNA and Western blot analysis or fixed in formaldehyde in PBS pH 7.4 and paraffin-embedded for molecular and histological analyses.
Figure 1.
A: schematic diagram of experimental design. Pregnant sheep were used to produce day 90 males and female fetuses treated with either control or T. At end-point day 90 of gestation, fetuses were necropsied, and heart LV tissues were harvested either flash frozen and kept in −80°C for molecular analysis or fixed for histological analysis. B: fetal heart weight. C: fetal heart weight-to-body weight ratio at day 90 of gestation. Values are means ± SE. (n = 6 animals/sex/group). Data analyzed by two-way ANOVA. Cohen effect sizes (d = 0.2, small), (d = 0.5, medium), and (d ≥ 0.8, large). CON, control; LV, left ventricle; T, testosterone.
RNA Extraction and Quantitative RT PCR Analysis
Real-time PCR (RT-PCR) was used to examine gene expression in the myocardial tissue (n = 6 controls and 6 T-treated males and females). LV tissue was used to extract total RNA using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Following isolation, RNA was treated with DNAse to digest DNA and purified using the RNAeasy kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD) to obtain high-quality RNA according to the manufacturers’ instructions. RNA quality was determined spectrophotometrically using NanoDrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) by measuring the OD260-to-OD280 ratio with a ratio of 2.0 indicative of good quality RNA. cDNA was prepared from 1 μg of RNA using the SuperScript VILO cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen). In consideration that steroids can module cardiomyocyte development (40), T can be aromatized to estrogen and prenatal T excess leads to fetal T and estradiol excess (46), the sex-specific effects of gestational T excess on ESR1, ESR2, and androgen receptor (AR) were determined. As gestational T excess induces maternal hyperinsulinemia (51) and has an impact on the fetal IGF system (47), the effects of prenatal T excess on insulin signaling pathway [IR, insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS1), IRS2, PI3K, glucose transporter protein type-4 (GLUT4), AKT, mTOR, IGF1, and IGF1 receptors (IGF1R)] were examined. In addition, the effects of prenatal T excess on LV hypertrophy and stress mediators (α-myosin heavy chain (α-MHC), β-myosin heavy chain (β-MHC), ANP, and BNP were also examined. The mRNA levels were measured using A SYBR Green-based QRT-PCR assay and performed using a Bio-Rad IQ5 Real-time-PCR Reaction System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). All primer sequences for genes investigated were previously published and are shown in Table 1. Each gene was tested in triplicate, averaged, and the expression was determined after normalization with an expression of the housekeeping gene glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). The relative amount of each transcript (in fold) was measured by using the ΔΔCT method (52).
Table 1.
Forward and reverse primer sequences (5′–3′) of genes expression
| Gene ID | Forward Primer | Reverse Primer | Accession No. |
|---|---|---|---|
| ESR1 | ACTGTGCAGTGTGAATGAC | TATAAAACCAAGCCTCACCT | AY033393.1 |
| ESR2 | GATGTGGGTACCGCCTTGTGC | GGCCAACTTGGTCAGGGACA | AF110817 |
| AR | GCCCCTGACCTGGTTTTCA | TTCGGACACACTGGCTGTACA | KF227907 |
| a-MHC | ACATTGCTCACTACAGCCTTGTG | GGTCCAAGGAGAGAAACATGCT | NM_001123398 |
| β-MHC | TCTCCTCCCAGCAGCAATCC | GGTCACTGCTCCATCGTTGC | NP_001116874 |
| ANP | GCTCCTAACGGGCAATTTGTT | CCTCCACTCCAGCCTGATGA | AF037465 |
| BNP | GACCCAGAAGTGGCTCTAATGG | CGCATTCCCACTGCA | AF037466 |
| IR | GACGCAGGCCGGAGATGACCA | GCTCCTGCCCGAAGACCGACTC | XM_590552.4 |
| IRS-1 | CGCTCCAGCGAGGATCTAAG | AGGTCCTCTGGCTGCTTCTG | XM_004004977 |
| IRS-2 | CCCGAGAAGGTGGCCCGCATCA | AGCAACACGCCCGAGTCCATC | NM_003749.2 |
| PI3K | TTGTCCAGCCACCATGATGT | TGAGCAAGAGGCTTTGGAATATT | M93252.1 |
| AKT | CGGCTCCCTCTCCTGTTAGG | GGGATTTTCCAGCCAAGAGTACT | AF207873 |
| mTORC1 | ATCACCCTTGCTCTCCGAACTCTC | CCAGCTCCCGGATCTCAAACACCT | NM_001145455 |
| Glut-4 | GCTTGGCTTCTTCATCTTCACCTT | TGCTCAGACCACCCTTCCCTCCAG | NM_174604.1 |
| IGF1 | TTGGTGGATGCTCTCCA GTTC | AGCAGCACTCATCCACGAT TC | DQ152962 |
| IGF1R | TTAAAATGGCCAGAACCTGAG | ATTATAACCAAGCCTCCCAC | NM-001244612 |
Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis
Frozen LV tissues were homogenized in radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (Pierce RIPA buffer; Thermo Scientific) containing protease inhibitors (Thermo Scientific) and phosphatase inhibitor (Thermo Scientific). The homogenized extracts were centrifuged at 10,000 g for 15 min at 4°C, and the whole cell protein extract was used for the analysis. Equal amounts of protein (15 µg) were resolved on SDS-PAGE and transferred into a nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad). Membranes were incubated in blocking buffer (5% nonfat milk diluted in Tris-buffered saline) for 1 h at room temperature and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies (all previously published and are shown in Table 2). Primary antibodies including mTOR, P-mTOR, glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK3β), P-GSK3β, GLUT 4, and the housekeeping-gene GAPDH were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA). Levels of phosphorylated and total forms of proteins, as well as the corresponding loading controls, were determined in the same membrane after stripping and reblotting. Samples from all experimental groups were distributed through two SDS-PAGE gels that were run under the same conditions at the same time three times. Protein was visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence (Pierce ECL Western Blotting Substrate; Thermo Scientific, and the density of bands was quantified using the ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health). The specificity of the antibodies was confirmed by visualization of protein bands of the correct size.
Table 2.
List of antibodies used for Western blot analysis
| Peptide/Protein Target | Name of Antibody | Cat. No. | Species Raised in, Monoclonal or Polyclonal | Dilution Used |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mTOR | mTOR (7C10) antibody | 2983 | Rabbit, polyclonal | 1:500 |
| GSK-3β | GSK-3β (27C10) antibody | 9315 | Rabbit, polyclonal | 1:500 |
| P-mTOR (Ser2448) | Phospho-mTOR (Ser2448) antibody | 2971 | Rabbit, polyclonal | 1:500 |
| P-GSK-3β (Ser9) | Phospho-GSK-3β (Ser9) antibody | 9323 | Rabbit, polyclonal | 1:500 |
| Glut 4 | Anti-GLUT4 antibody | Ab33780 | Rabbit, polyclonal | 1:500 |
| GAPDH | Anti-GAPDH (14C10) antibody | 2118 | Rabbit, monoclonal | 1:5,000 |
Cardiomyocyte Morphometry
LV tissues were collected and fixed in formalin in PBS pH 7.4 for 48 h, dehydrated with ethanol, cleared in xylene, and embedded in paraffin. Tissue sections were cut at 5 µm. To determine cardiomyocyte number and diameter, two LV sections per animal separated by 100 µm were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The number and diameter of cardiomyocytes were quantified by measuring the short axis of nucleated cardiomyocytes (∼300 cardiomyocytes per animal) from six counting frames (3 per section) per animal. The location of three counting frames (50.10 × 50.10 µm) were fixed and same grid applied across all sections from all animals. Images were acquired by Leica DM 1000 LED microscope at ×63 magnification and quantified using ImageJ software. To assess development of fibrosis in LV tissues, three sections, 100 µm apart, were stained with Masson’s trichrome staining (Abcam, Cat. No. ab150686) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Fibrotic tissue quantification was performed as previously described (53). They were imaged on Zeiss microscope and analyzed using ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD).
Statistical Analysis
After testing for homogeneity of variance, data were log-transformed when needed and analyzed using two-way ANOVA with fetal sex (males; female), treatment (T; control), and their interaction as the main effects. Statistical outliers were excluded from the analysis using Grubbs’ test (https://www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs/grubbs1/). Analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism (Prism 9.0, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Data are presented as means ± SE, and differences were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05, tendencies at P ≤ 0.10. A post hoc test using Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons analysis was performed when there was either a significant (P < 0.05) effect or a trend toward significance (P ≤ 0.10) in sex by treatment interaction was evident. In addition, due to the small sample size, data were also analyzed by Cohen’s effect size analyses (54). Cohen’s d values of 0.5–0.8 represent medium and large effect size differences between the T-treated and control groups.
RESULTS
Impact of Gestational T Excess on Fetal Body and Heart Weights
Analyses of body weights revealed no sex (P = 0.52), treatment (P = 0.93), or sex by treatment interaction (P = 0.18). Two-way ANOVA showed no significant sex (P = 0.7) or treatment (P = 0.56) effect in heart weights, although a trend (P = 0.07) for sex by treatment interaction was evident. This trend in interaction was reflected as a large magnitude decrease in heart weight (Cohen’s d = 0.85) in T females compared with control females as opposed to a medium magnitude increase (Cohen’s d = 0.65) in heart weight in T male fetuses compared with control fetuses (Fig. 1B). However, analysis of heart weight to body weight ratio revealed no effect of sex (P = 0.92), treatment (P = 0.28), or sex by treatment interaction (P = 0.15; Fig. 1C).
Impact of gestational T excess on cardiomyocyte number, diameter, and collagen content.
Two-way ANOVA showed significant sex, treatment, and sex by treatment interaction in cardiomyocyte number. T-treated females exhibited a significant increase in cardiomyocyte number compared with control females (Fig. 2, A and B). Cohen’s effect size analysis also revealed a large magnitude increase in cardiomyocyte number in T-treated female fetuses (Cohen’s d =2.93) but not male (Cohen’s d =0.02). In contrast, two-way ANOVA showed a significant sex effect but no treatment (P = 0.11) or sex by treatment interaction (P = 0.17) in cardiomyocyte diameter (Fig. 2C). There was no significant impact of sex, treatment, and sex by treatment interaction in collagen accumulation (Fig. 3, A and B).
Figure 2.

A: representative LV sections stained with H&E at 90 days of gestation. B: quantification of number of cardiomyocytes in the LV tissues. C: diameter of cardiomyocytes. Values are presented as means ± SE (2 sections/animal; 3 images per section; n = 6 animals/sex/group). Data analyzed by two-way ANOVA. *P ≤ 0.05, Cohen effect sizes (d = 0.2, small), (d = 0.5, medium), and (d ≥ 0.8, large). H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; LV, left ventricle; T, testosterone.
Figure 3.

A: representative LV sections stained with Masson’s trichrome at 90 days of gestation. B: quantification of collagen contents (blue) in the LV tissues. Values are presented as means ± SE (4 sections/animal; 5 images/section); (n = 6 animals/sex/group). Data analyzed by two-way ANOVA. Cohen effect sizes (d = 0.2, small), (d = 0.5, medium), and (d ≥ 0.8, large). LV, left ventricle; T, testosterone.
Impact of Gestational T Excess on Steroid Receptors
Two-way ANOVA of ESR1 found no sex effect (P = 0.46), a significant T treatment effect, and no significant sex by treatment interaction (P = 0.38). Cohen’s effect size analysis revealed a large magnitude increase in T males (Cohen’s d = 0.99) and T females (Cohen’s d = 1.73) relative to their sex-matched controls (Fig. 4A). Similarly, although there was no significant sex difference in ESR2 expression (P = 0.28), there was a significant T treatment effect. Consistent with the lack of sex by treatment interaction, Cohen’s effect size analysis revealed an increase in ESR2 expression in T female fetuses (Cohen’s d = 1.6) as well as the T-treated males (Cohen’s d = 1.03; Fig. 4B) relative to their sex-matched controls. In contrast to effects of T treatment on ESR1 and 2 expressions, there were no significant sex (P = 0.8), treatment (P = 0.6), or interaction effects (P = 0.8) relative to AR expression (Fig. 4C).
Figure 4.

mRNA expression of steroid receptors ESR1 (A), ESR2 (B), and AR (C) in LV tissue. Data are analyzed by two-way ANOVA. Values are means ± SE; n = 6 animals/sex/group. Cohen effect sizes (d = 0.2, small), (d = 0.5, medium), and (d ≥ 0.8, large). CON, control; LV, left ventricle; T, testosterone.
Impact of Gestational T Excess on Markers of LV Hyperplasia and Stress
Two-way ANOVA of α-MHC gene expression showed no sex effect (P = 0.2), a significant T treatment effect, but no significant sex by treatment interaction (P = 0.31). Relative to treatment effects, Cohen’s effect analyses also revealed a large increase in T-treated males (Cohen’s d = 1.15) and T females (Cohen’s d = 1.01) compared with their sex-matched controls (Fig. 5A). Similarly, as opposed to a lack of sex effect but a treatment effect with α-MHC, there was a significant sex effect but no treatment (P = 0.44) effect with β-MHC expression. There was also no significant sex by treatment interaction with both α-MHC (P = 0.31) and β-MHC (P = 0.21) expression (Fig. 5B). There were no sex (P = 0.23), treatment (P = 0.54), or sex by treatment interaction (P = 0.86) in β-MHC-to-α-MHC expression ratio (Fig. 5C).
Figure 5.

mRNA expression of hypertrophy and stress mediators α-MHC (A), β-MHC (B), β-MHC-to-α-MHC ratio (C), ANP (D), and BNP (E) in LV tissue. Data are analyzed by two-way ANOVA. Values are means ± SE; n = 6 animals/sex/group; *P ≤ 0.05. Cohen effect sizes (d = 0.2, small), (d = 0.5, medium), and (d ≥ 0.8, large). LV, left ventricle; T, testosterone.
ANP gene expression showed significant sex and treatment effect, although sex by treatment interaction was not significant (P = 0.10). Cohen’s effect size analyses revealed a large effect size difference in ANP expression between control and T-treated females (Cohen’s d = 1.44) that reached significance, but only a medium magnitude difference (Cohen’s d = 0.73) between control and T-treated males that did not achieve significance (Fig. 5D). In contrast, BNP gene expression showed no sex effect (P = 0.21) although there was a significant treatment effect with Cohen’s effect analysis revealing a large effect size increase in T-treated males (Cohen’s d = 1.27) and a medium effect size increase (Cohen’s d = 0.5) in T-treated females (Fig. 5E). There was no sex by treatment interaction (P = 0.22).
Impact of Gestational T Excess on Insulin Signaling Mediators
Two-way ANOVA showed a trend in sex (P = 0.058), a significant treatment, and a trend in sex by treatment interaction (P = 0.067) in IR gene expression. Cohen’s effect size analyses revealed a large magnitude increase (Cohen’s d = 1.40) in IR expression in T-treated female fetuses that achieved statistical significance by post hoc analyses and only a medium magnitude increase (Cohen’s d = 0.63) in T-treated males relative to corresponding controls that did not achieve significance (Fig. 6A). IRS1 gene expression showed no significant sex (P = 0.65), treatment (P = 0.45), or sex by treatment (P = 0.69) effects (Fig. 6B). In contrast, IRS2 showed no significant sex (P = 0.11) or treatment (P = 0.29) effect, although a trend in sex by treatment effect was evident (Fig. 6C). Cohen’s effect analyses revealed a large effect size increase (Cohen’s d = 1.07) only in T-treated females compared with controls that did not reach statistical significance due to the small sample size. Similar to IRS2, PI3K expression also showed no sex (P = 0.22) or treatment (P = 0.11) effect but revealed significant sex by treatment interaction. The directionality of T treatment effects differed between sexes, with Cohen’s effect size analysis revealing a large magnitude increase (Cohen’s d = 1.11) in T females as opposed to a large magnitude decrease (Cohen’s d = 1.11) in T-treated males compared with their respective controls (Fig. 6D). There were no significant sex (P = 0.91), treatment (P = 0.54), or sex by treatment interaction (P = 0.88) with AKT gene expression (Fig. 6E). In contrast, there was a trend for a sex (P = 0.07) and treatment (P = 0.07) effect with mTOR gene expression although the interaction (P = 0.19) was not significant. The trend for treatment effect was reflected with Cohen’s effect size analyses revealing a large effect size increase in mTOR in T-treated females (Cohen’s d = 1.01) and a medium effect size increase in T-treated males (Cohen’s d = 0.60) relative to their controls (Fig. 6F). Directionality of changes in GLUT4 expression followed that of mTOR with a trend for a sex effect (P = 0.08), significant treatment effect, and no sex by treatment (P = 0.64) effect. Cohen’s analyses also revealed a large magnitude increase in GLUT4 in T-treated females (Cohen’s d = 0.88) as well as T males (Cohen’s d = 1.68) relative to corresponding sex-matched controls (Fig. 6G).
Figure 6.

mRNA expression of insulin signaling pathway IR (A), IRS1 (B), IRS2 (C), PI3K (D), AKT (E), mTOR (F), and GLUT4 (G) in LV tissue. Data are analyzed by two-way ANOVA. Values are means ± SE; n = 6 animals/sex/group; *P ≤ 0.05. Cohen effect sizes (d = 0.2, small), (d = 0.5, medium), and (d ≥ 0.8, large). LV, left ventricle; T, testosterone.
Changes in protein expression of pmTOR showed no significant sex (P = 0.64), treatment (P = 0.27), or sex by treatment interaction (P = 0.48) in the LV (Fig. 7A, top). In contrast, although there was no significant sex (P = 0.88) or treatment (P = 0.80) effects, a significant sex & treatment interaction was evident with protein expression of total mTOR (Fig. 7B, top). Post hoc analyses showed a significant reduction in mTOR protein expression in T-treated males (P = 0.026) and a trend for an increase (P = 0.058) in T-treated females compared with their control groups. Cohen’s effect size analyses also revealed a large effect size difference between control and T-treated males (Cohen’s d = 2.97) and control and T-treated females (Cohen’s d = 1.30; Fig. 7B, top). Ratio of pmTOR-to-mTOR showed no sex effect (P = 0.16), a trend for treatment effect (P = 0.096) and a significant sex by treatment interaction. Post hoc analyses showed a significant reduction in protein expression in T-treated females only (P = 0.036). Cohen’s effect size analyses revealed a large effect size difference only between control and T-treated females (Cohen’s d = 1.56) (Fig. 7C, top). As opposed to lack of sex effect with mTOR, two-way ANOVA showed a significant sex effect (P = 0.006) in GLUT4 protein expression but no treatment (P = 0.37) or sex by treatment interaction (P = 0.78; Fig. 7D, top). Examination of GSK-3β protein expression downstream of mTOR in the insulin signaling pathway followed by two-way ANOVA showed a significant sex and treatment effects but no sex by treatment interaction effect in pGSK-3β protein expression with Cohen’s effect size analyses revealing a large magnitude increase in T-treated females (Cohen’s d = 0.98) and a medium magnitude increase (Cohen’s d = 0.73) in T-treated males compared with their sex-matched controls (Fig. 7A, bottom). There were no significant sex (P = 0.9), treatment (P = 0.9), or sex by treatment interaction (P = 0.53) with total GSK-3β protein expression (Fig. 7B, bottom). Ratio of pGSK-3β-to-GSK-3β showed a significant sex effect but no treatment (P = 0.19) or sex by treatment interaction P = 0.52; Fig. 7C, bottom).
Figure 7.

A: protein expression of insulin signaling pathway pMTOR (a), mTOR (b), PmTOR-to-mTOR ratio (c), and GLUT4 (d) in LV tissue. Data are analyzed by two-way ANOVA. Values are means ± SE; n = 6 animals/sex/group; *P ≤ 0.05; #P = 0.058. Cohen effect sizes (d = 0.2, small), (d = 0.5, medium), and (d ≥ 0.8, large). Full-length blots/gels are presented in Supplemental Fig. S7A. B: protein expression of insulin signaling pathway, pGSK-3β (a), GSK-3β (b), and pGSK-3β-to-GSK-3β ratio (c) in LV tissue. Data are analyzed by two-way ANOVA. Values are means ± SE; n = 6 animals/sex/group; *P ≤ 0.05. Cohen effect sizes (d = 0.2, small), (d = 0.5, medium), and (d ≥ 0.8, large). F-C, female control, M-C, male control, F-T, female T-treated, M-T, male T-treated. Full-length blots/gels are presented in Supplemental Fig. S7B (at https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19287437). CON, control; LV, left ventricle; T, testosterone.
Impact of Gestational T Excess on IGF1 Signaling
Two-way ANOVA of IGF1 expression showed no sex difference (P = 0.55), a trend for a treatment effect (P = 0.05), and no sex by treatment interaction effect (P = 0.51). Reflective of increased trend, Cohen’s effect analyses revealed a large effect size increase in IGF1 in T females (Cohen’s d = 0.97) as well as T-treated males (Cohen’s d = 1.06) compared with the corresponding control (Fig. 8A). IGF1R expression showed a trend for a sex effect (P = 0.06), a significant treatment effect, and a trend for sex by treatment interaction (P = 0.08). Cohen’s effect analyses revealed a large effect size increase in T-treated females (Cohen’s d = 1.64) that achieved statistical significance and a large effect size increase T-treated males (Cohen’s d = 1.31) that did not achieve statistical significance (Fig. 8B).
Figure 8.
mRNA expression of IGF signaling pathway IGF1 (A) and IGF1R (B) in LV tissue. Data are analyzed by two-way ANOVA. Values are means ± SE; n = 6 animals/sex/group; *P ≤ 0.05. Cohen effect sizes (d = 0.2, small), (d = 0.5, medium), and (d ≥ 0.8, large). LV, left ventricle; T, testosterone.
DISCUSSION
Major findings from the present study include the impact of gestational T excess in inducing 1) significant increase in cardiomyocytes number in female but not male day 90 fetuses indicative of sex-specific effects; 2) significant increase in expression of IR and IGFR with T treatment with higher levels in T-treated female fetuses compared with controls and female-specific upregulation in expression of PI3K; 3) significant increases in ANP and BNP, markers of cardiac stress and hyperplasia with T treatment in both sexes; and 4) upregulation of ESR1 and -2 but not AR in the fetal LV of both sexes suggestive of a role for estrogenic programming. Overall, findings from this study provide evidence that gestational T excess alters the developmental trajectory of LV morphology and molecular signaling mechanisms mediating cardiac growth during early fetal life in a sex-specific manner.
Impact of Gestational T Excess on Fetal Myocardial Morphology
During fetal development, cardiomyocytes grow initially by cellular hyperplasia, with cardiomyocytes initiating the transition to hypertrophy toward the end of gestation (55). Changes in in utero hormonal milieu during the critical period of cardiac development have the potential to alter the trajectory of the developing cardiomyocytes.
Studies with animal models of in utero perturbation of hormonal milieu have documented adverse programming of cardiomyocyte morphology (56–59), the impact of which differs depending on the timing of exposure, fetal sex, and the developmental time point of the investigation. For instance, studies of Jonker et al. noted exposure to T excess between days 30 and 59 of fetal life reduced cardiomyocyte maturation and proliferation in day 135 sheep fetuses, impacting males more than females (50). In contrast, exposure to T from days 30–90 gestation (this study) led to female-specific cardiomyocyte hyperplasia at day 90 of fetal life. Furthermore, although the Jonker study found reduced heart weight in both sexes at day 135 gestation, studies detailed in this investigation found diametrically opposite outcomes in male and female fetuses on day 90 of fetal life reflected as decreased heart weight in females as opposed to an increase in heart weight in males. These differences between studies may be a function of the time point in fetal life studied (day 135 in Jonker et al. and day 90 in present study), duration of T treatment (days 30–59 in Jonker et al. vs. days 30–90 in the present study) or a function of the sheep breed used (Polypay breed in Jonker et al. and Suffolk in the present study). To what extent the cardiac hyperplasia evident in day 90 Suffolk female fetuses in the present study contributes to the adult cardiovascular phenotype (32, 33) is unclear. Furthermore, since cardiomyocyte hyperplasia/hypertrophy can be adaptive versus maladaptive response to stimuli (59), the increase in cardiac stress markers (BNP and ANP) in our study suggests early fetal life maladaptive LV response. Functional studies addressing sex differences in postnatal cardiovascular function will assist in determining if the molecular changes seen in fetal life in the current study are adaptive versus maladaptive programming.
Impact of Gestational T Excess on the Fetal Myocardium: Underlying Mechanisms
Alterations in steroidal and metabolic signaling pathways resulting from gestational testosterone treatment could be contributing to the changes in cardiomyocyte morphology and molecular changes seen in this study. Previously, we found gestational T treatment, in addition to increasing T levels, induced maternal hyperinsulinemia (45), increased fetal levels of estrogen in both male and female fetuses (46), and transiently increased plasma IGF1 and IGFBP-3 concentrations at fetal day 90 (47), providing evidence in support of the potential for impact on cardiomyocyte via androgenic, estrogenic, insulin/IGF signaling pathways.
Gestational T excess on fetal myocardial steroidal signaling.
Despite the presence of both estrogen and androgen receptors in mammalian cardiomyocytes (40), the role of estrogen/androgen signaling pathways in cardiomyocyte proliferation and maturation is not well understood. Systemic sex-specific changes in the steroids milieu may modulate myocardial estrogen and androgen receptor expression with their activation eliciting both genomic and nongenomic actions (40). Nongenomic action of both estrogen and androgen can be via activation of PI3K/AKT signaling (40). Our earlier studies have shown increases in fetal estrogen levels in day 90 fetuses (46) following exposure to T excess supportive of the potential for mediation via estrogenic signaling pathways. Although the potential for involvement of androgenic or estrogenic pathways in the activation of PI3K in female fetuses exists, our finding of upregulation of both estrogen receptor isoforms (ESR1 and ESR2) coupled with lack of changes in expression of AR suggests that effects of gestational T excess are likely mediated via estrogenic rather than androgenic signaling pathways. In fact, there is some evidence for adverse fetal molecular programming of LV with exposure to an estrogen mimetic chemical in utero; gestational treatment with estrogenic mimetic bisphenol A (BPA) altered fetal LV transcriptome in rhesus monkey involved with cardiac pathologies, including myosin heavy chain 6 (Myh6), a gene coding for α-MHC (60). In agreement with this finding, an alteration in α-MHC gene involved in the contractile function of the heart (61) was evident in gestational T-treated fetuses (this study). Coupled with upregulation of ESR1 and ESR2 in the LV, these findings support the potential for estrogenic signaling in cardiomyocyte development.
Gestational T excess on fetal myocardial insulin and insulin-like growth factor signaling.
Insulin signaling. Insulin is one of the key mediators of fetal growth. Perturbation in insulin homeostasis and organ-specific signaling leads to insulin resistance, a known risk factor for pathological cardiac remodeling, including LVH and CVD (62, 63). For instance, maternal diabetes mellitus predisposes fetal myocardial hypertrophy (64, 65). Fetal hyperinsulinism and upregulation of insulin receptors have been shown to lead to cardiomyocytes proliferation and hypertrophy in infants (66, 67). The finding from the present study documenting a female-specific increase in PI3K and trend in the increase of IRS is consistent with the involvement of insulin signaling pathway in the sex-specific mediation of cardiac hyperplasia in the female. Our earlier finding that gestational T excess leads to maternal hyperinsulinemia (45) supports enhanced insulin signaling at the ligand level as well. It is well recognized that PI3K/mTOR pathway downstream of IR activation is a key mediator of cardiac growth and adaptation to cardiac stress (3, 68, 69). The decrease in the pmTOR/mTOR protein expression ratio in the female despite an increase in cardiomyocyte hyperplasia may represent a compensatory response to prevent ongoing cardiac perturbation. Lack of change in protein expression of GLUT 4 under basal condition suggests that early cardiomyocyte changes seen in LV may not alter myocardial insulin sensitivity at this early stage of programming.
IGF1 signaling. Parallel with insulin, the IGF system also plays a key role in cardiomyocytes proliferation and maturation during cardiac development (70). IGF1 induces its action by binding to IGF1R and activating downstream signaling pathways including activation of PI3K/mTOR (71). Involvement of the IGF1 signaling pathway in cardiac development is evident from both in vitro and in vivo animal studies. Fetal sheep infused with IGF1 exhibit increased size and binucleated cardiac myocytes in females compared with males (72). Similarly, activation of IGF1R resulted in stimulation of myocyte proliferation but not cellular hypertrophy in vitro in the rat (73). As such the increase in IGF1 and IGF1R expression at fetal day 90 following gestational T excess and a trend toward higher expression in female fetal LV suggests that IGF1 signaling could act in concert with insulin in mediating sex-specific cardiomyocyte hyperplasia in female fetuses. In the context of involvement of the IGF axis, prenatal T excess increases IGF1 levels in day 90 female fetuses (male levels unknown) (47). The finding of Jonker et al. that T exposure from days 30–59 gestation decreases IGF1 levels in day 135 fetus (50) while at odds with our finding may be a function of differences in duration of excess T exposure, the breed of sheep used, and differences in gestational age studies.
Sexually dimorphic effects with gestational T excess.
Sexually dimorphic LV morphology and molecular signaling in early fetal life. Our findings revealed sex-specific differences in cardiomyocyte diameter with an increase in males compared with day 90 female fetuses. Although sex-specific differences in cardiomyocyte size are not known during mid-gestation for ovine fetuses, evidence points to an increase in cardiomyocyte size in near-term females compared with males (72), opposite of what was seen in our study during day 90 fetal life. Because sheep are precocial with primordial ovarian follicular differentiation occurring beginning day 90 of life and mature follicles differentiating in late gestation fetuses (74), to what extent does the increase in estrogen in near-term fetuses contribute to this female-specific increase in cardiomyocyte diameter is unclear. The increase in GLUT 4 in male LV compared with females is suggestive of increased reliance of male LVs on glucose for energy metabolism during mid-gestation.
Apart from sex differences in cardiac morphology and metabolic molecular markers, we also noted sex differences in proteins involved in cardiac contractile machinery. Female fetal LV expresses higher β-MHC compared with male fetuses. Since β-MHC is less reliant on ATP compared with α-MHC (61), female hearts are likely to be less reliant on ATP for contraction compared with male hearts. Lack of differences in estrogen and androgen receptor expression between male and female fetal LV suggests inputs from sex steroidal signaling in the heart are comparable at early fetal life. As such the sex differences in LV molecular phenotype seen in fetal life may be a function of their metabolic milieu.
Sexual dimorphic effect of T on fetal LV morphology and molecular signaling in early gestation.
Apart from the sexually dimorphic trend in heart weight proportionate to the body weight between male and female fetuses and female-specific increase in cardiomyocyte hyperplasia with prenatal T excess, sex differences in molecular markers responsible for such differences were evident (Fig. 9). For instance, mTOR that is central to cardiac growth (68, 69) was downregulated in LV of T female fetuses at this early gestational time point, potentially signifying a compensatory response to overcome the hyperplasia in the female. Of importance, sex-specific alteration in cardiomyocyte size and numbers during fetal life is a reported risk factor for cardiovascular disease later in life (59).
Figure 9.

Proposed schematic of molecular pathways underlying fetal cardiac programming with gestational T excess in cardiomyocyte. Dark green, significant increase in expression. Light green, trend increase in expression. Yellow, no change; orange, decreased ratio pmTOR-to-mTOR; box, gene expression; circle, protein expression; purple circle, increase maternal/fetal hormone ligands. Figure partially created with Biorender and published with permission.
Female-specific upregulation in markers of insulin signaling, namely PI3K, and trend in IRS2 as well as higher magnitude increase in IR and IGFR suggest that insulin/IGF signaling pathway may be major contributors in the sexually dimorphic cardiomyocyte hyperplasia. To what extent the sex-specific differences in LV morphological and molecular phenotype seen in the heart of T fetuses would translate to adult cardiovascular differences is unknown. Although information is available on the impact of fetal exposure to T excess on cardiac morphology and molecular markers in adult females following gestational days 30–90 T treatment (33), data are lacking in males. Nonetheless, a large body of evidence prevails that points to sex differences in cardiovascular physiology and pathophysiology (75–77), such as higher left ventricular (LV) mass in boys compared with girls (77) during the peripubertal period and women having smaller hearts compared with men (78). As such, it is conceivable sex differences in cardiac phenotype will likely be the outcome in this model as well.
Translational relevance.
Animal models have been long used to gain mechanistic insights into the developmental origin of diseases. Sheep are excellent large animal models to study the developmental origin of adult cardiovascular pathologies. Like humans, sheep are precocial species and most organ system differentiation occurs before birth (74). Of relevance to this manuscript, cardiomyocyte differentiation during fetal development in sheep is also like humans (55, 57, 79). Importantly, sheep have emerged as a suitable widely used model for cardiovascular studies due to the similarity in the cardiovascular system between humans and sheep (80, 81). Prenatal T-treated sheep have served as excellent model systems to understand adverse programming of multiple metabolic organ systems (31, 82–85). Furthermore, considering prenatal T excess leads to IUGR (48) and the female offspring recapitulates the PCOS phenotype (86) both risk factors for cardiovascular dysfunction (30, 87), our findings in the present study have translational relevance relative to the developmental origins of CVD in offspring.
Integration of sex/gender as a biological variable has become an essential requirement in clinical and animal studies including those in the field of cardiovascular research (88). In this regard, determining the early histological and molecular alteration in the LV of both males and females from prenatal T excess allows designing sex-specific early interventions to prevent CVD onset.
In conclusion, findings of the present study demonstrate sex-specific effects of gestational T excess between days 30 and 90 of gestation on the cardiac phenotype. Furthermore, the sex-specific programming is likely secondary to perturbation in both estrogen and insulin signaling pathways collectively. These findings are supportive of the role of androgen excess to serve as early biomarkers of CVD and could be critical in identifying therapeutic targets for LV hypertrophy and predict long-term CVD.
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA
Supplemental material may be found at https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19287437.
GRANTS
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants R01-HL-139639 (to A.V. and V.P.) and P01-HD-44232 (to V.P.).
DISCLOSURES
No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
A.V. conceived and designed research; A.G. performed experiments; A.G. analyzed data; A.G., V.P., and A.V. interpreted results of experiments; A.G. prepared figures; A.G. drafted manuscript; V.P. and A.V. edited and revised manuscript; A.G., V.P., and A.V. approved final version of manuscript.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Douglas Doop for valuable assistance in breeding and animal care; Dr. Almudena Veiga-Lopez, Dr. Bachir Abi Salloum, James Lee, Carol Herkimer, and the student support through the University of Michigan Undergraduate Research Opportunity Program for help provided with administration of treatments and tissue collection.
REFERENCES
- 1.Virani SS, Alonso A, Aparicio HJ, Benjamin EJ, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2021 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 143: e254–e743, 2021. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Talib A, Roebroek YGM, Paulus GF, van Loo K, Winkens B, Bouvy ND, van Heurn ELWE. Left ventricular geometrical changes in severely obese adolescents: prevalence, determinants, and clinical implications. Pediatr Cardiol 42: 331–339, 2021. doi: 10.1007/s00246-020-02487-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Heineke J, Molkentin JD. Regulation of cardiac hypertrophy by intracellular signalling pathways. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7: 589–600, 2006. doi: 10.1038/nrm1983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Berenji K, Drazner MH, Rothermel BA, Hill JA. Does load-induced ventricular hypertrophy progress to systolic heart failure? Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 289: H8–H16, 2005. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01303.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kochanek KD, Murphy SL, Xu JQ, Arias E. Deaths: Final data for 2017.pdf icon. National Vital Statistics Reports, vol. 68, no. 9, Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db355.htm. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.GBD 2016 Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 390: 1151–1210, 2017. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32152-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mosca L, Barrett-Connor E, Wenger NK. Sex/gender differences in cardiovascular disease prevention: what a difference a decade makes. Circulation 124: 2145–2154, 2011. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.968792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ghali JK, Krause-Steinrauf HJ, Adams KF, Khan SS, Rosenberg YD, Yancy CW, Young JB, Goldman S, Peberdy MA, Lindenfeld J. Gender differences in advanced heart failure: insights from the BEST study. J Am Coll Cardiol 42: 2128–2134, 2003. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Olivetti G, Giordano G, Corradi D, Melissari M, Lagrasta C, Gambert SR, Anversa P. Gender differences and aging: effects on the human heart. J Am Coll Cardiol 26: 1068–1079, 1995. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00282-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pérez-López FR, Larrad-Mur L, Kallen A, Chedraui P, Taylor HS. Gender differences in cardiovascular disease: hormonal and biochemical influences. Reprod Sci 17: 511–531, 2010. doi: 10.1177/1933719110367829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Patel SM, Ratcliffe SJ, Reilly MP, Weinstein R, Bhasin S, Blackman MR, Cauley JA, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Robbins J, Fried LP, Cappola AR. Higher serum testosterone concentration in older women is associated with insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94: 4776–4784, 2009. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-0740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Laughlin GA, Goodell V, Barrett-Connor E. Extremes of endogenous testosterone are associated with increased risk of incident coronary events in older women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95: 740–747, 2010. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-1693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wilding JPH, Jacob S. Cardiovascular outcome trials in obesity: a review. Obes Rev 22: e13112, 2021.doi: 10.1111/obr.13112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rodriguez-Araujo G, Nakagami H. Pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Endocrinol Metab 7: 4–9, 2018. doi: 10.1097/XCE.0000000000000141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mills KT, Stefanescu A, He J. The global epidemiology of hypertension. Nat Rev Nephrol 16: 223–237, 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41581-019-0244-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lippi G, Sanchis-Gomar F. An estimation of the worldwide epidemiologic burden of physical inactivity-related ischemic heart disease. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 34: 133–137, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s10557-019-06926-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Francula-Zaninovic S, Nola IA. Management of measurable variable cardiovascular disease' risk factors. Curr Cardiol Rev 14: 153–163, 2018. doi: 10.2174/1573403X14666180222102312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Govindsamy A, Naidoo S, Cerf ME. Cardiac development and transcription factors: insulin signalling, insulin resistance, and intrauterine nutritional programming of cardiovascular disease. J Nutr Metab 2018: 8547976, 2018. doi: 10.1155/2018/8547976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Thornburg KL. The programming of cardiovascular disease. J Dev Orig Health Dis 6: 366–376, 2015. doi: 10.1017/S2040174415001300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Van De Maele K, Devlieger R, Gies I. In utero programming and early detection of cardiovascular disease in the offspring of mothers with obesity. Atherosclerosis 275: 182–195, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hietalampi H, Pahkala K, Jokinen E, Rönnemaa T, Viikari JS, Niinikoski H, Heinonen OJ, Salo P, Simell O, Raitakari OT. Left ventricular mass and geometry in adolescence: early childhood determinants. Hypertension 60: 1266–1272, 2012. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.194290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Osmond C, Barker DJ. Fetal, infant, and childhood growth are predictors of coronary heart disease, diabetes, and hypertension in adult men and women. Environ Health Perspect 108, Suppl 3: 545–553, 2000. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108s3545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gitau R, Adams D, Fisk NM, Glover V. Fetal plasma testosterone correlates positively with cortisol. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 90: F166–F169, 2005. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.049320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mossa F, Carter F, Walsh SW, Kenny DA, Smith GW, Ireland JL, Hildebrandt TB, Lonergan P, Ireland JJ, Evans AC. Maternal undernutrition in cows impairs ovarian and cardiovascular systems in their offspring. Biol Reprod 88: 92, 2013. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.112.107235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Abbott D, Dumesic D, Levine J, Dunaif A, Padmanabhan V, Azziz R, et al. Contemporary Endocrinology: Androgen Excess Disorders in Women: Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Other Disorders. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Langley-Evans SC. Fetal programming of CVD and renal disease: animal models and mechanistic considerations. Proc Nutr Soc 72: 317–325, 2013. doi: 10.1017/S0029665112003035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vuguin PM. Animal models for small for gestational age and fetal programming of adult disease. Horm Res 68: 113–123, 2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Huang G, Cherkerzian S, Loucks EB, Buka SL, Handa RJ, Lasley BL, Bhasin S, Goldstein JM. Sex differences in the prenatal programming of adult metabolic syndrome by maternal androgens. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 103: 3945–3953, 2018. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-01243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Le-Ha C, Beilin LJ, Burrows S, Keelan JA, Hickey M, Mori TA. Prenatal testosterone associates with blood pressure in young adults: a prospective cohort study. Hypertension 77: 1756–1764, 2021. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.16256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wilde MA, Eising JB, Gunning MN, Koster MPH, Evelein AMV, Dalmeijer GW, Uiterwaal CSPM, Eijkemans MJC, Ent CKV, Meijboom FJ, Fauser BCJM. Cardiovascular and metabolic health of 74 children from women previously diagnosed with polycystic ovary syndrome in comparison with a population-based reference cohort. Reprod Sci 25: 1492–1500, 2018. doi: 10.1177/1933719117749761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Padmanabhan V, Veiga-Lopez A. Sheep models of polycystic ovary syndrome phenotype. Mol Cell Endocrinol 373: 8–20, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2012.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.King AJ, Olivier NB, Mohankumar PS, Lee JS, Padmanabhan V, Fink GD. Hypertension caused by prenatal testosterone excess in female sheep. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Physiol 292: E1837–E1841, 2007. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00668.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Vyas AK, Hoang V, Padmanabhan V, Gilbreath E, Mietelka KA. Prenatal programming: adverse cardiac programming by gestational testosterone excess. Sci Rep 6: 28335, 2016. doi: 10.1038/srep28335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chinnathambi V, Balakrishnan M, Yallampalli C, Sathishkumar K. Prenatal testosterone exposure leads to hypertension that is gonadal hormone-dependent in adult rat male and female offspring. Biol Reprod 86: 137,1–7, 2012. .doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.111.097550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cardoso RC, Padmanabhan V. Prenatal steroids and metabolic dysfunction: lessons from sheep. Annu Rev Anim Biosci 7: 337–360, 2019. doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-020518-115154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Blesson CS, Chinnathambi V, Hankins GD, Yallampalli C, Sathishkumar K. Prenatal testosterone exposure induces hypertension in adult females via androgen receptor-dependent protein kinase Cδ-mediated mechanism. Hypertension 65: 683–690, 2015. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.04521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Padmanabhan V, Veiga-Lopez A. Animal models of the polycystic ovary syndrome phenotype. Steroids 78: 734–740, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2013.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Grohé C, Kahlert S, Lobbert K, Stimpel M, Karas RH, Vetter H, Neyses L. Cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts contain functional estrogen receptors. FEBS Lett 416: 107–112, 1997. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(97)01179-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Marsh JD, Lehmann MH, Ritchie RH, Gwathmey JK, Green GE, Schiebinger RJ. Androgen receptors mediate hypertrophy in cardiac myocytes. Circulation 98: 256–261, 1998. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.3.256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Bell JR, Bernasochi GB, Varma U, Raaijmakers AJ, Delbridge LM. Sex and sex hormones in cardiac stress–mechanistic insights. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 137: 124–135, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2013.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Pugach EK, Blenck CL, Dragavon JM, Langer SJ, Leinwand LA. Estrogen receptor profiling and activity in cardiac myocytes. Mol Cell Endocrinol 431: 62–70, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2016.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zacharski M, Tomaszek A, Kiczak L, Ugorski M, Bania J, Paslawska U, Rybinska I, Jankowska EA, Janiszewski A, Ponikowski P. Catabolic/anabolic imbalance is accompanied by changes of left ventricular steroid nuclear receptor expression in tachycardia-induced systolic heart failure in male pigs. J Card Fail 27: 682–692, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2020.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Altamirano F, Oyarce C, Silva P, Toyos M, Wilson C, Lavandero S, Uhlén P, Estrada M. Testosterone induces cardiomyocyte hypertrophy through mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 pathway. J Endocrinol 202: 299–307, 2009. [Erratum in J Endocrinol 202: 485, 2009]. doi: 10.1677/JOE-09-0044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Myers MG Jr, Sun XJ, Cheatham B, Jachna BR, Glasheen EM, Backer JM, White MF. IRS-1 is a common element in insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I signaling to the phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase. Endocrinology 132: 1421–1430, 1993. doi: 10.1210/endo.132.4.8384986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Abi Salloum B, Veiga-Lopez A, Abbott DH, Burant CF, Padmanabhan V. Developmental programming: exposure to testosterone excess disrupts steroidal and metabolic environment in pregnant sheep. Endocrinology 156: 2323–2337, 2015. doi: 10.1210/en.2014-2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Veiga-Lopez A, Steckler TL, Abbott DH, Welch KB, MohanKumar PS, Phillips DJ, Refsal K, Padmanabhan V. Developmental programming: impact of excess prenatal testosterone on intrauterine fetal endocrine milieu and growth in sheep. Biol Reprod 84: 87–96, 2011. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.110.086686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Crespi EJ, Steckler TL, Mohankumar PS, Padmanabhan V. Prenatal exposure to excess testosterone modifies the developmental trajectory of the insulin-like growth factor system in female sheep. J Physiol 572: 119–130, 2006. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.103929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Manikkam M, Crespi EJ, Doop DD, Herkimer C, Lee JS, Yu S, Brown MB, Foster DL, Padmanabhan V. Fetal programming: prenatal testosterone excess leads to fetal growth retardation and postnatal catch-up growth in sheep. Endocrinology 145: 790–798, 2004. doi: 10.1210/en.2003-0478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Pfab T, Slowinski T, Godes M, Halle H, Priem F, Hocher B. Low birth weight, a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases in later life, is already associated with elevated fetal glycosylated hemoglobin at birth. Circulation 114: 1687–1692, 2006. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.625848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jonker SS, Louey S, Roselli CE. Cardiac myocyte proliferation and maturation near term is inhibited by early gestation maternal testosterone exposure. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 315: H1393–H401, 2018. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00314.2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Jackson IJ, Puttabyatappa M, Anderson M, Muralidharan M, Veiga-Lopez A, Gregg B, Limesand S, Padmanabhan V. Developmental programming: prenatal testosterone excess disrupts pancreatic islet developmental trajectory in female sheep. Mol Cell Endocrinol 518: 110950, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2020.110950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25: 402–408, 2001. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wang D, Patel VV, Ricciotti E, Zhou R, Levin MD, Gao E, Yu Z, Ferrari VA, Lu MM, Xu J, Zhang H, Hui Y, Cheng Y, Petrenko N, Yu Y, FitzGerald GA. Cardiomyocyte cyclooxygenase-2 influences cardiac rhythm and function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 7548–7552, 2009. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805806106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull 112: 155–159, 1992. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Burrell JH, Boyn AM, Kumarasamy V, Hsieh A, Head SI, Lumbers ER. Growth and maturation of cardiac myocytes in fetal sheep in the second half of gestation. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 274A: 952–961, 2003. doi: 10.1002/ar.a.10110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.de Vries WB, van der Leij FR, Bakker JM, Kamphuis PJ, van Oosterhout MF, Schipper ME, Smid GB, Bartelds B, van Bel F. Alterations in adult rat heart after neonatal dexamethasone therapy. Pediatr Res 52: 900–906, 2002. doi: 10.1203/00006450-200212000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Jonker SS, Louey S. Endocrine and other physiologic modulators of perinatal cardiomyocyte endowment. J Endocrinol 228: R1–R18, 2016. doi: 10.1530/JOE-15-0309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lumbers ER, Boyce AC, Joulianos G, Kumarasamy V, Barner E, Segar JL, Burrell JH. Effects of cortisol on cardiac myocytes and on expression of cardiac genes in fetal sheep. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 288: R567–R574, 2005. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00556.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Porrello ER, Widdop RE, Delbridge LM. Early origins of cardiac hypertrophy: does cardiomyocyte attrition programme for pathological 'catch-up' growth of the heart? Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 35: 1358–1364, 2008. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2008.05036.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chapalamadugu KC, Vandevoort CA, Settles ML, Robison BD, Murdoch GK. Maternal bisphenol a exposure impacts the fetal heart transcriptome. PLoS One 9: e89096, 2014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Morano I. Tuning the human heart molecular motors by myosin light chains. J Mol Med (Berl) 77: 544–555, 1999. doi: 10.1007/s001099900031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kendall DM, Harmel AP. The metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease: understanding the role of insulin resistance. Am J Manag Care 8: S635–S653, 2002. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Miettinen H, Lehto S, Salomaa V, Mähönen M, Niemelä M, Haffner SM, Pyörälä K, Tuomilehto J. Impact of diabetes on mortality after the first myocardial infarction. The FINMONICA Myocardial Infarction Register Study Group. Diabetes Care 21: 69–75, 1998. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.1.69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Gandhi JA, Zhang XY, Maidman JE. Fetal cardiac hypertrophy and cardiac function in diabetic pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173: 1132–1136, 1995. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)91339-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Hornberger LK. Maternal diabetes and the fetal heart. Heart 92: 1019–1021, 2006. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.083840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Breitweser JA, Meyer RA, Sperling MA, Tsang RC, Kaplan S. Cardiac septal hypertrophy in hyperinsulinemic infants. J Pediatr 96: 535–539, 1980. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(80)80862-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Buchanan TA, Kitzmiller JL. Metabolic interactions of diabetes and pregnancy. Annu Rev Med 45: 245–260, 1994. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.45.1.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Sciarretta S, Forte M, Frati G, Sadoshima J. New insights into the role of mTOR signaling in the cardiovascular system. Circ Res 122: 489–505, 2018. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Sciarretta S, Volpe M, Sadoshima J. Mammalian target of rapamycin signaling in cardiac physiology and disease. Circ Res 114: 549–564, 2014. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Sundgren NC, Giraud GD, Schultz JM, Lasarev MR, Stork PJ, Thornburg KL. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase and phosphoinositol-3 kinase mediate IGF-1 induced proliferation of fetal sheep cardiomyocytes. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 285: R1481–R1489, 2003. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00232.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Troncoso R, Ibarra C, Vicencio JM, Jaimovich E, Lavandero S. New insights into IGF-1 signaling in the heart. Trends Endocrinol Metab 25: 128–137, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2013.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Lumbers ER, Kim MY, Burrell JH, Kumarasamy V, Boyce AC, Gibson KJ, Gatford KL, Owens JA. Effects of intrafetal IGF-I on growth of cardiac myocytes in late-gestation fetal sheep. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Physiol 296: E513–E519, 2009. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.90497.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Kajstura J, Cheng W, Reiss K, Anversa P. The IGF-1-IGF-1 receptor system modulates myocyte proliferation but not myocyte cellular hypertrophy in vitro. Exp Cell Res 215: 273–283, 1994. doi: 10.1006/excr.1994.1343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Padmanabhan V, Veiga-Lopez A. Reproduction symposium: developmental programming of reproductive and metabolic health. J Anim Sci 92: 3199–3210, 2014. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-7637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Beale AL, Meyer P, Marwick TH, Lam CSP, Kaye DM. Sex differences in cardiovascular pathophysiology: why women are overrepresented in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation 138: 198–205, 2018. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.de Simone G, Devereux RB, Roman MJ, Ganau A, Chien S, Alderman MH, Atlas S, Laragh JH. Gender differences in left ventricular anatomy, blood viscosity and volume regulatory hormones in normal adults. Am J Cardiol 68: 1704–1708, 1991. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90333-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.de Simone G, Devereux RB, Daniels SR, Meyer RA. Gender differences in left ventricular growth. Hypertension 26: 979–983, 1995. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.26.6.979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Prabhavathi K, Selvi KT, Poornima KN, Sarvanan A. Role of biological sex in normal cardiac function and in its disease outcome—a review. J Clin Diagn Res 8: BE01–BE04, 2014. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/9635.4771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Oparil S, Bishop SP, Clubb FJ Jr.. Myocardial cell hypertrophy or hyperplasia. Hypertension 6: III38–III43, 1984. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.6.6_pt_2.iii38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.DiVincenti L Jr, Westcott R, Lee C. Sheep (Ovis aries) as a model for cardiovascular surgery and management before, during, and after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 53: 439–448, 2014. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Klatt N, Scherschel K, Schad C, Lau D, Reitmeier A, Kuklik P, Muellerleile K, Yamamura J, Zeller T, Steven D, Baldus S, Schäffer B, Jungen C, Eickholt C, Wassilew K, Schwedhelm E, Willems S, Meyer C. Development of nonfibrotic left ventricular hypertrophy in an ANG II-induced chronic ovine hypertension model. Physiol Rep 4: e12897, 2016. doi: 10.14814/phy2.12897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Cardoso RC, Puttabyatappa M, Padmanabhan V. Steroidogenic versus metabolic programming of reproductive neuroendocrine, ovarian and metabolic dysfunctions. Neuroendocrinology 102: 226–237, 2015. doi: 10.1159/000381830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Recabarren SE, Lobos A, Figueroa Y, Padmanabhan V, Foster DL, Sir-Petermann T. . Prenatal testosterone treatment alters LH and testosterone responsiveness to GnRH agonist in male sheep. Biol Res 40: 329–338, 2007. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Recabarren SE, Rojas-García PP, Recabarren MP, Alfaro VH, Smith R, Padmanabhan V, Sir-Petermann T. Prenatal testosterone excess reduces sperm count and motility. Endocrinology 149: 6444–6448, 2008. doi: 10.1210/en.2008-0785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Rojas-García PP, Recabarren MP, Sir-Petermann T, Rey R, Palma S, Carrasco A, Perez-Marin CC, Padmanabhan V, Recabarren SE. Altered testicular development as a consequence of increase number of sertoli cell in male lambs exposed prenatally to excess testosterone. Endocrine 43: 705–713, 2013. doi: 10.1007/s12020-012-9818-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Cardoso RC, Padmanabhan V. Developmental programming of PCOS traits: insights from the sheep. Med Sci (Basel) 7: 79, 2019. doi: 10.3390/medsci7070079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Barker DJ. Deprivation in infancy and risk of ischaemic heart disease. Lancet 337: 981, 1991. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91618-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Lindsey ML, LeBlanc AJ, Ripplinger CM, Carter JR, Kirk JA, Hansell Keehan K, Brunt KR, Kleinbongard P, Kassiri Z. Reinforcing rigor and reproducibility expectations for use of sex and gender in cardiovascular research. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 321: H819–H24, 2021. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00418.2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplemental material may be found at https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19287437.


