Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Veterinary Medicine and Science logoLink to Veterinary Medicine and Science
. 2021 Dec 15;8(2):864–876. doi: 10.1002/vms3.686

Isolation and antibiogram of Escherichia coli O157: H7 from diarrhoeic calves in urban and peri‐urban dairy farms of Hawassa town

Haben Fesseha 1,✉, Mesfin Mathewos 1, Saliman Aliye 1, Endale Mekonnen 1
PMCID: PMC8959283  PMID: 34910854

Abstract

Background

Calf diarrhoea is the most serious issue in the livestock industry, resulting in significant financial losses.

Methods

A study was undertaken in 32 urban and peri‐urban dairy farms of Hawassa town to isolate E. coli from diarrhoeic calves, assess associated putative factors related to the occurrence, and the evaluate antibacterial susceptibility patterns of isolates. A convenience sampling technique was performed for the selection of these dairy farms and calf samples. A total of 68 faecal samples were collected directly from the rectum of diarrhoeic calves. The faecal samples were confirmed as E. coli O157: H7 positive using the latex agglutination test.

Results

In this study, 47(69.1%) samples were positive for E. coli, of which 22 (46.8%) were identified as E. coli O157:H7 strains based on their latex agglutination character. Factors such as frequency of calf house cleaning, type of supplement provided, and method of colostrum feeding were significantly correlated (p < 0.05) with calf diarrhoea, while the other risk factors had no significant association. Antibiogram of E. coli O157:H7 isolates showed that the isolates were highly sensitive to gentamycin, ceftriaxone, trimethoprim‐sulphamethoxazole, and ciprofloxacin and were found to be resistant to tetracycline, kanamycin and amoxicillin.

Conclusion

Our findings revealed that calf diarrhoea is still a major health problem of calves in the study area. Hence, improved calf and farm management practice, an ad libitum quantity of colostrum, and good farm hygienic practices should be ensured. This study also revealed that some antibiotic‐resistant E. coli O157:H7 isolates need to be further investigated for their public health implications.

Keywords: antibiogram sensitivity, calf diarrhoea, E. coli O157: H7, isolation, risk factors

The occurrence of E. coli O157:H7 from diarrhoeic calves is high in the dairy farms of the study area and causes significant financial losses in the livestock industry. E. coli O157:H7 were responsible for pathogen for calf diarrhoea and isolates showed that isolates were highly sensitive to gentamycin, ceftriaxone, trimethoprim‐sulphamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin and were found to be resistant to tetracycline, kanamycin and amoxicillin. Hence, improved calf and farm management practice, an ad libitum quantity of colostrum and good farm hygienic practices should be ensured.

graphic file with name VMS3-8-864-g003.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Ethiopia is the largest livestock resourceful country on the African continent, with approximately 57.8 million cattle, 29.33 million sheep and 29.11 million goats (Central Statistical Agency, 2015). In addition, this sector contributes 16.5% of the national Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and 35.6% of the agricultural GDP (Behnke, 2010; Metaferia et al., 2011). Dairying is a form of livestock production that is practiced almost everywhere in the world, including Ethiopia, and involves a large number of small‐, medium‐ or large‐scale, subsistence or market‐oriented farms, with herd size being the primary determinant. It is the primary source of income for dairy farmers in Ethiopia's urban and peri‐urban settlements (Chagunda et al., 2006; Hadgu et al., 2021).

Newly born calves are a significant source of livestock production for beef and breeding worldwide. However, calves have encountered many complications, such as diarrhoea, pneumonia, joint disorders, umbilical infections, trauma and congenital abnormalities (Heinrichs & Radostits, 2001). Calf morbidity and mortality were ranked next to mastitis as the second largest problem for dairy production in Ethiopia (ILCA, 1994). The mean annual birth‐to‐weaning mortality in calves was reported to be in the range of 2–18.5% in the mixed crop‐livestock system in different parts of Ethiopia (Fentie et al., 2016; Fentie et al., 2020; Hadgu et al., 2021). Non‐infectious causes such as trauma to the different parts of the gastrointestinal tract (hardware disease due to metallic foreign bodies, oesophageal and bowel obstruction such as intussusception and volvulus due to various types of foreign bodies), metabolism (simple indigestion, ruminal acidosis and alkalosis) (Fubini & Divers, 2008), malnutrition, other non‐specific or miscellaneous causes, and poor husbandry practices are responsible for calf diarrhoea as well as calf mortality and morbidity in general in different parts of Ethiopia (Hadgu et al., 2021; Romha, 2014).

One of the most common causes of calf mortality and morbidity in the dairy industry is neonatal calf diarrhoea or scour (Fentie et al., 2020; Hadgu et al., 2021; Tajik et al., 2012). Calf diarrhoea is caused by a variety of infectious (bacteria, viruses and parasites) and non‐infectious agents (poor quality and quantity of colostrum, environmental stress due to extreme weather and poor husbandry) (Cho & Yoon, 2014), especially in calves under the age of 12 days (El‐Seedy et al., 2016). Some of these infectious agents have been linked to food‐borne disease zoonosis in humans (El Ayis et al., 2015). Bovine rotavirus (BoRV), Cryptosporidium parvum, Bovine coronavirus (BoCV), Salmonella, and E. coli are some of the most common enteropathogens that cause calf diarrhoea (Meganck et al., 2015). Although E. coli is a minor pathogen in most studies of developed countries, such as the United States and Australia, in Ethiopia, it is among the major pathogens in most dairy farms due to poor hygienic conditions and the handling of feeding utensils, calving areas and calf pens (Gebregiorgis & Tessema, 2016; Kidane, 2014; Mohammed et al., 2020; Yeshiwas & Fentahun, 2017).

E. coli is a cause of calf diarrhoea, also known as white scour (Kolenda et al., 2015), and causes diarrhoea, haemorrhagic colitis, and dysentery in weak, malnourished, debilitated and immunosuppressed calves, particularly calves that do not receive maternal antibodies through colostrum feeding (Ellaithi, 2004; Mailk et al., 2013; Mohamed, 2009). The incidence of diarrhoea in calves under 30 days of age varies between 10% and 20%. Calf diarrhoea has a detrimental effect on calves' health, herd survival and production, resulting in substantial financial losses (Bazeley, 2003).

Treatment costs, time spent on medication and resulting chronic illness, thrift and reduced growth efficiency, loss of genetic capacity both from the loss of the calf and the farmer's unwillingness to invest in higher priced semen in the face of a calf mortality crisis and impair adequate heifer replacement are all factors that contribute to economic losses (Bazeley, 2003). Heifer substitution has a significant impact on dairy farmers' ability to maximise productivity by enabling them to cull low‐producing cows selectively. Calf mortality is a major economic problem for all dairy farmers, especially those who farm intensively (Moran, 2011).

E. coli is a Gram‐negative, rod‐shaped, flagellated, non‐sporulating and facultative anaerobic bacterium of the family Enterobacteriaceae. It is the most genetically versatile bacteria and supplies both plasmid and phage‐mediated genes. E. coli produces septicaemia and diarrhoea in a wide range of hosts including humans and animals (Hemashenpagam et al., 2009). Diarrhoeagenic E. coli strains are classified into six main pathotypes based on their distinct virulence determinants (virulence mechanisms), namely, enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC)/Shiga toxin‐producing E. coli (STEC), enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) and diffusively adherent E. coli (DAEC) (Xia et al., 2010). Among the six major diarrhoeagenic E. coli pathotypes, ETEC is the most common cause of diarrhoea in dairy and beef calves in the first few days of life. The other diarrhoeagenic classes, EHEC and EPEC, are important causes of disease in humans (Bartels et al., 2010; Kolenda et al., 2015; Moxley & Smith, 2010).

Escherichia coli O157: H7 is the most important bacterial pathogen that causes life‐threatening infections such as haemorrhagic colitis (HC), abdominal pain, bloody diarrhoea, haemolytic uremic syndrome and kidney failure, particularly in humans worldwide (Mersha et al., 2010; Pal et al., 2016). Milk and other dairy products are mostly contaminated with E. coli O157: H7 during direct exposure to faeces due to poor handling systems and cause intestinal or extra‐intestinal disease (Bacon et al., 2000; Bélanger et al., 2011). The high prevalence of E. coli O157: H7 in dairy products may be due to improper milking hygiene, poor house hygiene, lack of post milking teat dipping and practicing of milk by contact labour use of lubricants, and absence of order in milking cows of different ages. Moreover, its occurrence was high in dairy farms without noticeable farm treatment (Radostits et al., 2016).

Antibiotic‐resistant strains of this bacterium cause longer and more serious diseases in susceptible animals. Numerous studies have shown that the impact of E. coli on antibiotic resistance increases over time for various antimicrobials (Cortés et al., 2010; Orden et al., 2000; Tadesse et al., 2012). Inappropriate or irrational use of antimicrobial drugs against diarrhoeal infection in humans and animal has presumptively assumed possible causes of antibiotic resistance. This may pose a possible health danger to humans and animals with regard to the growth of resistant bacterial strains and drug residues. With certain scientific expertise and antibiotic profiles of various diarrhoeal bacterial isolates, effective therapeutic steps for managing diarrhoea of calves have to be regularly studied (Kaura et al., 1988).

In Ethiopia, particularly in Hawassa city, the isolation, identification of E. coli from diarrhoeic calves and evaluation of antibacterial sensitivity patterns of E. coli have not been widely studied. As a result, the study aimed to isolate E. coli, assess antibiotic susceptibility patterns and determine the factors that contribute to the occurrence of E. coli from a diarrhoeic calf in Hawassa City's urban and peri‐urban areas.

2. METHODS

2.1. Study area

The current study took place at selected dairy cattle farms in Hawassa town from November 2017 to March 2018. It is approximately 275 km south of Addis Ababa. Hawassa is located at an elevation of 1750 m above sea level and is roughly located between 6°83′ to 7°17′ N and 38°24′ to 38°72′ E. Hawassa has a total area of around 50 km2 and is divided into eight sub‐cities and 32 kebeles (kebeles are the smallest administrative unit below the sub‐city/woreda level). It receives an average annual rainfall of 955 mm and has an average annual temperature of 20°C (Fesseha et al., 2020) (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Open in a new tab

Geographical location of Hawassa, ArcGIS software, 2018

2.2. Study animals and sampling technique

The study animals were local and Holstein Friesian cross‐breed calves of both sexes up to 3 months of age that were kept under different management systems (extensive, semi‐intensive and intensive) and clinically affected with diarrhoea and exhibited indicators of systemic disease (e.g., low appetite, fever, dehydration, weakness and impaired suckling reflex) and excreted different types of diarrhoea having diverse colours. The faecal consistency or type of diarrhoea was classified into watery (presence of profuse water‐logged faecal particles), bloody (faeces with blood or blood clots), mucoid (presence of viscous mucous within the faecal) and mixed (presence of blood or particles of undigested food, blood clots or pieces of intestinal tissue) (Graham et al., 2018; Renaud et al., 2020).

During the study, 32 dairy farms were selected using convenience sampling from total dairy farms in the study areas on the basis of accessibility and willingness of the farm owners to participate in the study and grouped into smallholder (≤5 heads of milk cow), medium‐sized farms (6–50 heads of milk cow) and large‐scale (>50 heads of milk cattle) farms depending on the number of cows available in the selected farms (Lema et al., 2001). In addition, 15 small, 15 medium and 2 large‐scale dairy farms located in urban and peri‐urban areas were involved in the study. The study farms practice semi‐intensive and intensive management systems. The ages of diarrhoeic calves were categorised into five age groups: 1–7 days, 8–15 days, 16–30 days, 31–60 days and 61–90 days according to Gebregiorgis and Tessema (2016). Different factors related to the onset of diarrhoea, such as floor type, the practice of having a separate pen and colostrum feeding time and its duration, were recorded before samples were collected.

2.3. Study design and sample size determination

A cross‐sectional study design was employed from October 2019 to May 2020 in large‐, medium‐ and small‐scale dairy farms in Hawassa city and its surrounding farms. Non‐probability convenience and purposive sampling were used for the selection of farms and faecal samples from each diarrhoeic calf. Thus, a total of 68 diarrhoeic calves (aged between 1 and 90 days) were sampled based on convenience sampling. In addition, factors such as the proportion of the calf population on each farm, case availability and the willingness of the farm owners were considered during the study.

The health status of each calf was evaluated through a detailed clinical examination using different types of clinical signs and parameters. Calves that showed poor appetite, rough hair coat, fever, dehydration, sunken eye, reduced suckling reflex, non‐treated, weakness and abnormal faecal consistency (diarrhoea) were considered for the present study.

2.4. Study methodology

2.4.1. Questionnaire survey

The dairy owners were given a semi‐structured questionnaire to evaluate the overall husbandry of calves via face‐to‐face discussions. Generally, the questionnaire contains the following sorts of diarrhoea: calf health, hygiene, health issues, colostrum feeding times and periods. In addition to the surveys, housing, farm hygiene and barn floor direct observational evaluations were carried out. Housing hygiene was graded from 1 to 4: 1 – very clean, 2 – clean, 3 – poor and 4 – very poor according to the previous work of Yibrah and Tsega (2017).

2.4.2. Sample collection and processing

Faecal samples were collected from both clinical and subclinical (mild) cases during farm visits based on the findings of clinical signs and parameters. Shortly after the onset of diarrhoea, approximately 32 g of faecal samples were collected straight from the rectum of a non‐treated diarrhoeic calf by using a disposable latex glove. During the farm visit and an emergency call by the farm owners, faecal specimens were gathered. Faecal samples were placed into sterile wide‐mouth screw‐capped bottles, and the samples were cooled in an icebox containing ice packs and transported to the microbiology laboratory for sample processing. Until processing time, faeces were kept at 4°C. During sampling, the farm husbandry practices evaluated, including identification number, sampling date, age, breed, sex, farm type, faecal consistency and farm housing (separate housing, floor type, cleaning and disinfection), provision of supplement feedstuffs to calves, colostrum feeding and history of diarrhoea, were documented in recording format.

2.4.3. Isolation and identification of E. coli from diarrhoeic calves

Bacteriological culturing and examination: Suspicious colonies were further subcultured in nutrient media (HiMedia, India) and aerobically incubated for 24–48 h at 37°C. Pure colonies were sub‐cultured on MacConkey agar for 24–48 h at 37°C following a morphological evaluation with Gram staining features. In the isolation and identification of E. coli, growth on MacConkey agar was used as the primary criterion. In addition, MacConkey agar colonial features were employed to divide putatively isolated bacteria into two groups: lactose fermenter and non‐lactose fermenter. E. coli colonies suspected of further sub‐cultured on agar media with Eosin methyl blue (EMB) for selective identification of E. coli. The colonies that appeared green‐black with a metallic sheen, which differentiates E. coli on EMB, were chosen and kept on nutrient agar for additional biochemical analyses after 24 h.

Primary identification of bacterial isolates: Under the oil immersion objective, all of the isolates were stained with Gram stain to detect cell shape, Gram response, and purity (100× magnification). Primary biochemical tests were also conducted via, catalase test, triple sugar iron (TSI) test, potassium hydroxide (KOH), sulphur indole motility (SIM) test and oxidation‐fermentation (O‐F) test. Standard bacteriological procedures were used to identify suspected E. coli colonies and purified E. coli cultures were kept in nutrient broth for subsequent identification using biochemical testing as described in Quinn et al. (2002).

Secondary identification of bacterial isolates: Indole, methyl red (MR), Voges‐Proskauer (VP) and citrate utilisation biochemical assays were used to identify E. coli isolates preliminarily after overnight incubation at 37°C on each of the four tests (Quinn et al., 2002). On the other hand, E. coli isolates were further cultured on Sorbitol MacConkey agar for 24–48 h at 37°C to identify pathogenic and non‐pathogenic E. coli strains. Lactose is replaced by sorbitol in sorbitol MacConkey agar. E. coli bacteria that are not pathogenic ferment sorbitol to generate acid. Because pathogenic E. coli cells are unable to ferment sorbitol, this strain grows on peptone. This raises the medium's pH, allowing the pathogenic strain to be distinguished from other E. coli strains using the medium's pH indicator (Novicki et al., 2000).

Screening test by E. coli O157 Latex agglutination test: For the screening of E. coli O157:H7, a latex agglutination test was used with a latex kit. Sorbitol‐negative (clear) colonies with colony morphology similar to E. coli O157:H7 were selected and spread plated on Cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey plates (CT‐SMAC). After a 24‐h incubation period, a single colony of the non‐sorbitol fermenter was selected from sorbitol MacConkey agar and treated with latex agglutination using an E. coli O157 latex kit. For all latex agglutination tests, an isolate suspected of being E. coli O157:H7 was cultivated on nutrient agar (NA) for antibiotic susceptibility testing.

2.5. Antibiotic susceptibility tests

Antibiotic susceptibility profiles were conducted for E. coli O157:H7 isolates using the disc diffusion method (Kirby–Bauer method) on Mueller–Hinton agar (Oxoid, England) according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, 2012, 2014). Pure colonies on nutrient agar were taken with a wire loop and transferred to a tube containing 5 ml of saline water and emulsified. The broth culture was incubated at 37°C for 4 h until it achieved the 0.5 McFarland turbidity standards. A sterile cotton swab was dipped into the suspension and the bacteria were swabbed uniformly over the surface of a Muller–Hinton agar plate within a sterile safety cabinet. The plates were held at room temperature for 15 min to allow drying. Antibiotic discs with a known concentration of antibiotics were placed and the plates were incubated for 18–24 h at 37°C.

Each isolate was tested for a series of 10 antibiotic discs (Oxoid, England), namely, amoxicillin (AML; 25 μg), amikacin (AK; 30 μg), ceftriaxone (CRO; 5 μg), chloramphenicol (C; 30 μg), gentamycin (CN; 10 μg), streptomycin (S; 10 μg), kanamycin (K; 30 μg), ciprofloxacin (CIP; 5 μg), tetracycline (TE; 30 μg) and trimethoprim‐sulphamethoxazole (SXT; 25 μg). A ring of discs (Oxoid, England) containing single concentrations of each antibiotic agent was then placed onto the inoculated surface using sterile forceps, and gently pressed with the point of the forceps to ensure complete contact with the agar surface. The discs were placed no greater than 24 mm (centre to centre), and the plates were then inverted. After 18–24 h of incubation at 35°C ± 2°C, aerobically, clear zones produced by antibiotic inhibition of bacterial growth were measured in mm using a measuring calliper and then classified as resistant, intermediate or sensitive according to the published interpretive chart of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoints (CLSI, 2014).

2.6. Data analysis

Data describing the calves' sex, age, breed, management system, type of diarrhoea, method of colostrum feeding, time of first colostrum feeding, duration of colostrum feeding, calf house cleaning frequency, type of supplement, floor type and separate housing were coded and entered into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet 2019. The data were then exported to STATA, version 13, for appropriate statistical analysis. The prevalence of E. coli isolates from the total diarrhoeagenic calves was determined by using descriptive statistics. In addition, multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the correlation between the occurrence of E. coli isolates and the associated risk factors. All results were reported as statistically significant if the p value was less than 0.05. The antibiotic efficacy of each drug was determined by comparing the zone of inhibition of each drug with the standard.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Distribution of E. coli isolates from different farms

During this study, the samples were collected from diarrhoeic calves in an aseptic manner. Almost all calves showed disease signs such as elevated temperature, depression, dehydration, reduced suckling reflex, rough hair coat, loss of weight, weakness, soiling of the hindquarter and tail with diarrhoeic faeces. Out of 68 faecal samples collected, 47 (69.1%) of the isolates were E. coli positive. Out of 47 positive isolates, 46.8% (22/47) were E. coli O157:H7 isolates since the isolates were not able to ferment sorbitol that showed colourless colonies, and the isolates were also tested for latex agglutination using a latex kit for the screening of E. coli O157:H7 (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Open in a new tab

Proportion of E. coli and E. coli O157:H7 isolates from diarrhoeic calves

In the present study, about 49%, 45% and 6% of the E. coli isolates were isolated from diarrhoeic calves located in medium‐, small‐ and large‐scale dairy farms, respectively. The isolation of E. coli was not significantly correlated with either the medium‐ (p = 0.804) or large farm type (p = 0.331). However, there was a higher negative correlation between the isolation of E. coli O157: H7 and medium (r = −0.03, 95% CI: −0.27 to −0.21) and large‐sized farm types (r = −0.16, 95% CI: −0.50 to −0.17), while small‐sized farms held constant (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Distribution of E. coli isolates from different farms

Farm type No. calves examined No. +ve for E. coli Prevalence (%) RR (95% CI) p Value
Small‐sized farm 31 12 44.7 Ref Ref
Medium‐sized farm 28 23 48.9 –0.03 (–0.27 to −0.21) 0.804
Large‐sized farm 9 3 6.4 –0.16 (–0.50 to −0.17) 0.331
Total 68 47 69.1
Open in a new tab

3.2. Major risk factors related to the occurrence of E. coli in diarrhoeic calves

In the present study, factors such as sex, age, breed, management system, type of diarrhoea, method of colostrum feeding, time of first colostrum feeding, duration of colostrum feeding, frequency of cleaning calf house, type of supplement, floor type and separate housing were analysed for their influence on the occurrence of E. coli from diarrhoeic calves. The frequency of calf house cleaning, type of supplement provided and method of colostrum feeding were significantly correlated (p < 0.05) with the occurrence of E. coli from diarrhoeic calves.

The cleaning of the calf's house every day was significantly correlated with the isolation of E. coli from diarrhoeic calves (p ≤ 0.001). However, there was a significantly higher negative correlation between the isolation of E. coli and cleaning of the calf house every day (r = −0.47, 95% CI: −0.71 to −0.23). About 68% of the dairy farm owners provided milk for their calf using hands or buckets and this had a significantly positive correlation with the occurrence of E. coli (r = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.054–0.51). Moreover, calves that were provided with a mixture of milk and other concentrate feedstuffs were infected with E. coli (74.5%) compared with claves only provided with milk (25.5%). The type of feed supplement had a significantly positive correlation with the occurrence of E. coli (r = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.16–0.69).

According to the current study, about 40% of the E. coli isolates were recovered from 1‐week‐old calves compared with calves between 16‐ and 30‐day old (21.3%) and 8‐ and 15‐day‐old (17.02%). Based on this study finding, isolation of E. coli was not statistically correlated (p > 0.05) with age, sex, type of diarrhoea, breed, management system, method of colostrum feeding, duration of colostrum feeding, floor type, separate housing and first colostrum feeding time. Additionally, factors such as duration of colostrum feeding, floor type and separate housing were found to have very little association with the isolation of E. coli from diarrhoeic calves. However, other factors, such as age, sex, type of diarrhoea, breed, management system, method of colostrum feeding and first colostrum feeding time, were not directly associated with the occurrence of E. coli from calves with diarrhoea (Table 2).

TABLE 2.

Multivariate logistic regression analyses of isolation rate of E. coli with host and management factors

Variable Category No. of sample Frequency of E. coli O157: H7 N (%) RR (95% CI) p Value
Sex Male 15 13 (27.7) Ref Ref
Female 53 34 (72.3) –0.12 (–0.36 to −0.11) 0.295
Age 1–7 days 23 19 (40.4) Ref Ref
8–15 days 8 8 (17.02) –0.02 (–0.34 to −0.29) 0.880
16–30 days 15 10 (21.3) –0.09 (–0.35 to −0.17) 0.488
31–60 days 8 4 (8.5) –0.15 (–0.50 to −0.20) 0.391
61–90 days 14 6 (12.8) –0.19 (–0.46 to −0.06) 0.137
Breed Local 47 34 (72.3) Ref Ref
Cross 21 13 (27.7) –0.13 (–0.37 to −0.12) 0.300
Management system Intensive 26 19 (40.4) Ref Ref
Semi‐intensive 27 22 (46.8) –0.08 (–0.36 to −0.19) 0.536
Extensive 15 6 (12.8) –0.16 (–0.44 to −0.11) 0.239
Type of diarrhoea Watery 49 34 (72.3) Ref Ref
Bloody 6 4 (8.5) –0.08 (–0.42 to −0.26) 0.630
Mucoid 4 2 (4.3) –0.19 (–0.63 to −0.24) 0.378
Mixed 9 7 (14.9) 0.09 (–0.19 to −0.38) 0.485
Method of colostrum feeding Suckling 33 15 (31.9) Ref Ref
Hand/bucket feeding 35 32 (68.1) 0.28 (0.054 to −0.51) 0.016
Time of first colostrum feeding < 12 h 53 37 (78.7) Ref Ref
12–24 h 9 6 (12.8) –0.14 (–0.47 to −0.19) 0.390
>24 h 6 4 (8.5) 0.16 (–0.19 to −0.50) 0.372
Duration of colostrum feeding <12 h 44 28 (59.6) Ref Ref
12–24 h 18 15 (31.9) 0.12 (–0.12 to −0.35) 0.318
24–48 h 6 4 (8.5) 0 –
Calf's house cleaning frequency Once per week 20 18 (38.3) Ref Ref
Every other day 20 17 (36.2) –0.05 (–0.31 to −0.21) 0.705
Every day 28 12 (25.5) –0.47 (–0.71 to −0.23) 0.0001
Type of supplement Milk 28 12 (25.5) Ref Ref
Mixed* 40 35 (74.5) 0.43 (0.16 to 0.69) 0.002
Floor‐type Concrete 50 33 (70.2) Ref Ref
Soil 18 14 (29.8) 0.02 (–0.21 to −0.24) 0.890
Separate housing Yes 27 17 (36.2) Ref Ref
No 41 30 (63.8) 0.004 (–0.23 to −0.23) 0.974
Open in a new tab
*

Represents calves that receive milk together with different concentrate feed stuffs.

3.3. Antibiotic susceptibility patterns

In the present study, 22 E. coli O157:H7 isolates were tested against 10 commonly used antibiotics using the disc diffusion method (Kirby–Bauer method). The antibiotic susceptibility profiles of the isolates showed that all isolates were 100% sensitive to gentamycin. In addition, ciprofloxacin (95.5%), ceftriaxone (86.4%), trimethoprim‐sulphamethoxazole (81.8%) and streptomycin (59.1%) were effective against isolates of Escherichia coli O157: H7. On the other hand, Escherichia coli O157: H7 isolates were 86.4%, 77.3% and 72.7% resistant to tetracycline, kanamycin and amoxicillin, respectively (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of E. coli isolates from diarrhoeic calves

Antibiotics discs Disc potency (μg) Antibiotic susceptibility patterns
S (%) I (%) R (%)
Amikacin (AK) 30 17 (77.3) 1 (4.5) 4(18.2)
Amoxicillin (AML) 25 2 (9.1) 4 (18.2) 16 (72.7)
Ceftriaxone (CRO) 5 19 (86.4) 0 (0.00) 3 (13.6)
Chloramphenicol (C) 30 11 (50.0) 7 (31.8) 4 (18.2)
Ciprofloxacin (CIP) 5 21 (95.5) 0 (0.00) 1 (4.5)
Gentamycin (CN) 10 22 (100.0) 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00)
Kanamycin (K) 30 2 (9.1) 3 (13.6) 17 (77.3)
Streptomycin (S) 10 13 (59.1) 7 (31.8) 2 (9.1)
Tetracycline (TE) 30 2 (9.1) 1 (4.5) 19 (86.4)
Trimethoprim‐sulphamethoxazole (SXT) 25 18 (81.8) 3 (13.6) 1 (4.5)
Open in a new tab
*

S (Sensitive), I (intermediate), R (resistance).

4. DISCUSSION

In this research, the isolation and identification of Escherichia coli O157: H7 from diarrhoeic calves were performed using standard bacteriological procedures and different precipitating factors that were responsible for the occurrence of the disease were assessed through a questionnaire survey. Furthermore, the isolates of E. coli O157: H7 were tested against different antibiotic discs. According to various study findings, calf diarrhoea was found to be a major health issue in dairy farms, causing high mortality and morbidity in calves. Calf diarrhoea has also resulted in significant economic losses, including money invested in care/treatment, loss of genetic potential due to the loss of calves and farmers' inability to invest in higher‐priced semen in the face of calf mortality. It has also hampered proper heifer replacement, which affects dairy farmers' ability to increase productivity by encouraging them to cull low‐producing cows selectively (Fubini & Divers, 2008; Hadgu et al., 2021; Radostits et al., 2007; Svensson et al., 2003).

In the current study, out of 68 diarrhoeic sampled calves, the isolation of Escherichia coli was 69.1% (47/68). This result was comparable with other previous research findings of Yeshiwas and Fentahun (2017) who reported 53 (70.7%) of 75 diarrhoeic sampled calves in Debre‐Zeit, Majeed et al. (2011) 64% in Kuwait and Dawit (2012) 64% in Addis Ababa and Debre Zeit, Ethiopia and Nazir and Hussain (2007), who reported 60%.

However, our study finding was higher than previous reports of Masud et al. (2012), who reported 44%, Dereje (2012) 43.1% and Gebregiorgis and Tessema (2016) 36.8%. Additionally, the current research was higher than the report of Razzaque et al. (2006) who reported 24%, Megersa et al. (2009), who reported 37%, Darsema (2008) 13.5%, Lanz Uhde et al. (2008) 5.5%, Aggernesh (2010) 38% in Debre Zeit and Demissie (2007) 43.1% from Addis Ababa dairy farms.

On the other hand, this study result was lower than previous research findings of Mohammed et al. (2020), who reported 93.75% of 16 diarrhoea cases, Paul et al. (2010) who reported 76% of 100 samples, and Dubie et al. (2014) 82% of 100 diarrhoeic calves’ samples. This heterogeneity in E. coli prevalence may be due to differences in climatic environments, sample size, age groups tested, colostrum feeding methods, environmental quality and inadequate sanitation, which also causes pathogenic strains to grow up in the ecosystem of young animals. Furthermore, a high dose of pathogenic E. coli could be enough to suppress colostral immunity (Quinn et al., 2002; Radostits et al., 2007).

The phenotypic detection of E. coli from most other serotypes was based on its inability to ferment sorbitol sugar on sorbitol MacConkey (SMAC) agar and a latex agglutination test using a latex kit for the screening of E. coli O157:H7. The present study also revealed that out of positive E. coli O157:H7 isolates, 46.8% (22/47) were not able to ferment sorbitol, which showed colourless colonies. The current study finding was much higher than the previous study report of Lee and Choi (2006), who reported 4% (8/200) from hamburger samples, Tadese et al. (2021) who reported 9.1% (18/197) from raw beef samples and Ababu et al. (2020), who reported 5.2% (11/210) from raw milk samples. This variation in the occurrence of pathogenic E. coli could come from the sample type and the number of samples examined and the laboratory protocol used to isolate and identify E. coli.

In the present study, some factors were investigated for their association with the occurrence of E. coli from calves showing diarrhoea. Accordingly, factors such as the frequency of calf house cleaning, type of supplement provided, and method of colostrum feeding were significantly correlated (p < 0.05) with the occurrence of E. coli from diarrhoeic calves. However, isolation of E. coli was not directly significantly correlated (p > 0.05) with age, sex, type of diarrhoea, breed, management system, method of colostrum feeding and first colostrum feeding time.

The current study revealed that the cleaning of the house of calves every day was significantly correlated with the isolation of E. coli from diarrhoeic calves (p ≤ 0.001). However, there was a significantly higher negative correlation between the isolation of E. coli and the cleaning of the house of calves every day (r = −0.47). Radostits et al. (2007) also indicated that the different stressing factors and the type of infection strain they face right after birth are responsible for numerous types of neonatal infections that are more common during their early years. In addition, young neonates below 1 week of age are the most vulnerable as their intestinal flora is not fully established compared with older age (Charles et al., 2003).

The study also revealed that the highest percentage (40.4%) of E. coli isolates were recovered from newly born calves (1–7 days age group) compared with other age categories. This study finding is in agreement with previous reports of different studies that revealed that younger calves were mostly clinically affected (Gebregiorgis & Tessema, 2016; Lorino et al., 2005; Maddox‐Hyttel et al., 2006; Muktar, 2014; Muktar et al., 2015; Santın et al., 2004). This study finding was also supported by reports of Villarroel (2009), who noted that as the age of the calves increased, the incidence of calf diarrhoea decreased. This could be due to the days‐old calves' immune system's inability to fight disease‐causing agents compared to older calves (Darsema, 2008). This finding was also consistent with the findings of Wudu (2004), Aggernesh (2010) and Dereje (2012), who reported that calves aged between 0 and 30 days were at great risk of calf diarrhoea, particularly during the first week. In contrast to the aforementioned research findings, Gebremedhin (2014) reported that as the age of the calves increased, the occurrence of E. coli had no significant association with neonatal calf diarrhoea (NCD). This disparity in research results may be attributed to sample size differences, poor husbandry practice or the study area's environmental conditions.

In the present study, a high isolation rate of E. coli was recorded in female calves (72.3%) than in male calves (27.7%). However, breed and sex do not correlate with the occurrence of calf diarrhoea due to E. coli. This agreed with the report of Yenehiwot (2008) and Gebremedhin (2014). Gebregiorgis and Tessema (2016) also reported that sex does not correlate with the occurrence of calf diarrhoea. Male calves, according to the author, do not receive much attention or care because their position on the farm is regarded as irrelevant, especially as replacement stock. In contrast with our findings, Debnath et al. (1995) and Mansour et al. (2014) reported that the sex of the calves has a significant effect on the calf mortality rate.

In the present study, most (68.1%) dairy owners used hand or bucket systems to provide milk for their calf, and there was a significant positive correlation with the occurrence of E. coli (r = 0.28, p = 0.016). Moreover, most (74.5%) dairy owners provide a mixture of milk with other concentrate feedstuffs as a feed supplement for their calves. This had a significantly positive correlation with the occurrence of E. coli (r = 0.43, p = 0.002). This might have contributed to the decreased colostrum transfer that provides better passive immunity. In their first week of life, calves have a passive immune system as well as receptors for E. coli adhesions (Villarroel, 2009). As Stoltenow and Vincent (2003) stated that the high risk of diarrhoea in calves could be due to inadequate passive transfer of colostral immunity. The research findings of Trotz‐Williams et al. (2007) and Lorino et al. (2005) also revealed that delayed colostrum intake, especially in the first 6 h of age, predisposes the calf to a higher risk of E. coli prevalence.

Furthermore, Olsson et al. (1993) found that with every hour of delay in the first 12‐h colostrum feeding, the risk of calf infection increased by 10%. In contrast, in our investigation, the calves that obtained colostrum within the first 12 h (78.7%) had a higher degree of calf diarrhoea than calves who obtained colostrum between 12 and 24 h (12.8%). This variation might be due to calves feeding on colostrum through hand and bucket, poor sanitation of the equipment and barns. This finding was supported by Shiferaw et al. (2002), who reported that the microenvironment hygiene of the farm has a great effect on the occurrence of calf mortality and morbidity in Holeta, Ethiopia and Bendali et al. (1999), who stated that unclean calf barns might be linked with a higher risk of calf scour in southwest, France. Additionally, calves with irregular bedding changes, inadequate living conditions and insufficient sanitation have an elevated chance of morbidity (Charles et al., 2003; Perez et al., 1990).

Antibiotic use is an important factor in maintaining human and animal health worldwide (World Health Organization, 2014). Recently, the development of antibiotic resistance in most bacterial species has become a serious threat to global public health (Acar & Moulin, 2013; Heuer et al., 2006; Merle et al., 2012).

According to the current study, E. coli O157:H7 isolates were susceptible to gentamycin, ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, trimethoprim‐sulphamethoxazole, streptomycin and chloramphenicol. The sensitivity of the isolates to gentamycin was comparable with that of the Ababu et al. (2020), who stated that all isolates were highly susceptible to the list of antibiotic discs. The isolates' chloramphenicol sensitivity matched the findings of Guerra et al. (2006), who found that most bacteria isolated from diarrhoeal calves were chloramphenicol susceptible. In contrast, Abdullah et al. (2013) and Ahmad et al. (1986) reported that E. coli O157:H7 isolates were resistant to chloramphenicol. In this study, E. coli isolates were also sensitive to ciprofloxacin, which was comparable with the findings of Ababu et al. (2020), Muktar et al. (2015), Werckenthin et al. (2002), Aksoy et al. (2007) and Yenehiwot (2008), whose isolated bacteria were highly susceptible to ciprofloxacin.

The current research revealed that E. coli O157:H7 isolates were susceptible to streptomycin, which was in contrast to the report of Ababu et al. (2020), who stated that E. coli O157:H7 isolates were highly resistant to streptomycin. In the present research, E. coli isolates were resistant to tetracycline, kanamycin and amoxicillin. The presence of resistance against kanamycin is in agreement with the previous findings of Hiko et al. (2008), Minda Asfaw and Shimelis (2021) and Joon and Kaura (1993), whose isolated bacteria were less sensitive to kanamycin. Nonetheless, this was against the report of Tassew et al. (2010) and Taye et al. (2013), in which all the E. coli isolates were found to be susceptible to kanamycin. The resistance of the isolates to tetracycline was comparable with the report of Ababu et al. (2020), who stated that isolated E. coli species were resistant to tetracycline.

This variation might be due to sample size variation, sample type used, laboratory procedures and the number of antibiotics (n = 10) used during the current study compared to antibiotics used (7–8) in other studies conducted in Ethiopia. The difference may be because of the expression of the resistance gene code via the pathogen, which is correlated with existing and emerging isolated features of various agroecological aspects (Reuben & Owuna, 2013).

The finding of high resistance of E. coli O157:H7 isolates to amoxicillin agreed with the previous results of Abdullah et al. (2013), Abd‐Elrahman (2011), Ansari et al. (2014), Edrington et al. (2006) and Nazir and Hussain (2007). The high resistance of these drugs in Gram‐negative bacteria might be due to the transfer of resistance genes from Gram‐positive bacteria of β‐lactamase genes. Al‐Assil et al. (2013) also explained that among the 25 E.coli isolates, the most prevalent β‐lactamase gene was βlaCTX‐M, which was detected in all of the isolates, whereas the βlaTEM gene was found in eight isolates of E. coli. This may also be attributed to the unregulated and improper use of these agents in veterinary clinics and farms and throughout the world. This is supported by the lack of policy on antibiotic use and the accessibility of antibiotics in the region. Since E. coli is an integral part of normal faecal flora, it is a potential indicator of resistance trends in humans and animals (Werckenthin et al., 2002).

5. CONCLUSION

In the present study, the occurrence of E. coli O157:H7 from diarrhoeic calves was high in the dairy farms of the study area. Of the 69.1% E. coli‐positive isolates, 46.8% were E. coli O157:H7 strains that could cause calf diarrhoea. Factors such as the method of colostrum feeding, hygiene of calves’ barn and type of feed supplement provided were found to be significantly (p < 0.05) correlated with the occurrence of E. coli in calves. Observational and questionnaire surveys revealed that simply being aware of the benefits of colostrum feeding is insufficient; the cleanliness of the material used for colostrum administration as well as the hygiene of the calves' barn are critical for the ultimate success of E. coli O157:H7 control. Antibiotic susceptibility results revealed that most E. coli O157:H7 isolates were highly sensitive to gentamycin, chloramphenicol, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin trimethoprim‐sulphamethoxazole and streptomycin. However, some E. coli isolates were found to be resistant to tetracycline, kanamycin and amoxicillin.

In conclusion, further study on the usefulness of the strain identification approach for E. coli O157:H7 strains should be carried out in comparison with PCR and serotyping. Special emphasis should be given to the time, method, and duration of colostrum feeding to the newborn calves (colostrum should be provided before 6 h in an aseptic manner). Antibiotics that are sensitive to E. coli isolates should be the drugs of choice. The treatment of this disease should be designed based on the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the isolates.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

All authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest in this work.

DECLARATIONS

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

As the study was not experimental, no ethical approval was needed. However, before collecting samples, verbal consent was also pursued from the cattle owners to take faecal samples from their cattle and adopt strict hygienic measures.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

HF was involved in conceptualisation, data analysis, preparing an original draft and review & editing; MM contributed by searching resources, data collection, data analysis and manuscript review & editing; SA involved in data collection, laboratory investigation, methodology, searching resources and review & editing the manuscript; EM involved in the data collection, investigation and article review & editing. All authors have read and approved the revised version of the manuscript.

FUNDING INFORMATION

The current study was conducted without the support of funding sources.

PEER REVIEW

The peer review history for this article is available at https://publons.com/publon/10.1002/vms3.686

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to acknowledge all dairy cattle owners who kindly collaborate during sampling.

Fesseha, H. , Mathewos, M. , Aliye, S. , & Mekonnen, E. (2022). Isolation and antibiogram of Escherichia coli O157: H7 from diarrhoeic calves in urban and peri‐urban dairy farms of Hawassa town. Veterinary Medicine and Science, 8, 864–876. 10.1002/vms3.686

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data will be provided upon the request of the corresponding author.

REFERENCES

  1. Ababu, A. , Endashaw, D. , & Fesseha, H. (2020). Isolation and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Escherichia coli O157: H7 from raw milk of dairy cattle in Holeta District, Central Ethiopia. International Journal of Microbiology, 2020, 8. [Google Scholar]
  2. Abd‐Elrahman, A. H. (2011). Colibacillosis in newly born buffalo calves and role of Lacteol Fort in preventing recurrence of calf diarrhea. Life Science Journal‐Acta Zhengzhou University Overseas Edition, 8, 497–502. [Google Scholar]
  3. Abdullah, M. , Akter, M. R. , Lutful Kabir, S. , Abu Sayed Khan, M. , Saleh Ibne, S. , & Aziz, M. (2013). Characterization of bacterial pathogens isolated from calf diarrhoea in Panchagarh district of Bangladesh. Journal of Agriculture and Food Technology, 3, 8–13. [Google Scholar]
  4. Acar, J. , & Moulin, G. (2013). Integrating animal health surveillance and food safety: The issue of antimicrobial resistance. Revue Scientifique et Technique, 32, 383–392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Aggernesh, A. (2010). Isolation and identification of Enterobacteria species from diarrheic calves in Debre Zeit dairy farms. Addis Ababa University, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ahmad, R. , Amin, S. , & Kazmi, E. (1986). Studies on the bacterial causes of calf mortality. Pakistan Veterinary Journal, 6, 116–118. [Google Scholar]
  7. Aksoy, A. , Yildirim, M. , Kacmaz, B. , Apan, T. Z. , & Goecmen, J. S. (2007). Verotoxin production in strains of Escherichia coli isolated from cattle and sheep, and their resistance to antibiotics. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 31, 225–231. [Google Scholar]
  8. Al‐Assil, B. , Mahfoud, M. , & Hamzeh, A. R. (2013). Resistance trends and risk factors of extended‐spectrum β‐lactamases in Escherichia coli infections in Aleppo, Syria. American Journal of Infection Control, 41, 597–600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ansari, A. , Rahman, M. M. , Islam, M. Z. , Das, B. C. , Habib, A. , Belal, S. , & Islam, K. (2014). Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile of Escherichia coli and Salmonella isolated from diarrheic calves. Journal of Animal Health and Production, 2, 12–15. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bacon, R. , Belk, K. , Sofos, J. , Clayton, R. , Reagan, J. , & Smith, G. (2000). Microbial populations on animal hides and beef carcasses at different stages of slaughter in plants employing multiple‐sequential interventions for decontamination. Journal of Food Protection, 63, 1080–1086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bartels, C. J. , Holzhauer, M. , Jorritsma, R. , Swart, W. A. , & Lam, T. J. (2010). Prevalence, prediction, and risk factors of enteropathogens in normal and non‐normal faeces of young Dutch dairy calves. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 93, 162–169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bazeley, K. (2003). Investigation of diarrhoea in the neonatal calf. In Practice, 25, 152–159. [Google Scholar]
  13. Behnke, R. (2010). The contribution of livestock to the economies of IGAD member states study findings, application of the methodology in Ethiopia, and recommendations for further work. IGAD LPI Working Paper 02–10. Odessa Centre, IGAD Livestock Policy Initiative, Great Wolford, UK. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bélanger, L. , Garenaux, A. , Harel, J. , Boulianne, M. , Nadeau, E. , & Dozois, C. M. (2011). Escherichia coli from animal reservoirs as a potential source of human extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli . FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology, 62, 1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bendali, F. , Sanaa, M. , Bichet, H. , & Schelcher, F. (1999). Risk factors associated with diarrhoea in newborn calves. Veterinary Research, 30, 509–522. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Central Statistical Agency (2015). Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Agricultural Sample Survey. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chagunda, M. , Msiska, A. , Wollny, C. , Tchale, H. , & Banda, J. (2006). An analysis of smallholder farmers’ willingness to adopt dairy performance recording in Malawi. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 18. [Google Scholar]
  18. Charles, L. , Stoltenow, L. L. , & Vincent, M. S. (2003). Calf scour: Cause, prevention, and treatment. Extension Service, North Dakota State University, http://www.ag.adsu.edu/pubs/ansci/beet/as776.pdf [Google Scholar]
  19. Cho, Y.‐I. , & Yoon, K.‐J. (2014). An overview of calf diarrhea‐infectious etiology, diagnosis, and intervention. Journal of Veterinary Science, 15, 1–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. CLSI (2012). Clinical and laboratory standards institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 17th Informational Supplement Vol. M100‐S17 27. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. [Google Scholar]
  21. CLSI (2014). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twenty‐fourth informational supplement. Vol. CLSI document M100‐S24. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Washington, DC, USA. [Google Scholar]
  22. Cortés, P. , Blanc, V. , Mora, A. , Dahbi, G. , Blanco, J. E. , Blanco, M. , López, C. , Andreu, A. , Navarro, F. , & Alonso, M. P. (2010). Isolation and characterization of potentially pathogenic antimicrobial‐resistant Escherichia coli strains from chicken and pig farms in Spain. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 76, 2799–2805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Darsema, G. (2008). Major causes of calf mortality in dairy farms and two cattle ranches in western Amhara region, northwestern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Veterinary Journal, 12, 59–68. [Google Scholar]
  24. Dawit, M. (2012). Isolation and identification of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli strengthen from diarrheic calf feces in Addis Ababa and Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. MSc thesis, Addis Ababa University Bishoftu, Ethiopia. [Google Scholar]
  25. Debnath, N. , Taimur, M. , Saha, A. , Ersaduzaman, M. , Helaluddin, M. , Rahman, M. , Roy, D. , & Islam, M. (1995). A retrospective study of calf losses on the central dairy cattle breeding station in Bangladesh. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 24, 43–53. [Google Scholar]
  26. Demissie, D. (2007). Microbial pathogens associated with calf diarrhea in dairy farms in and around Addis Ababa. MSc thesis, Addis Ababa University, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. [Google Scholar]
  27. Dereje, W. (2012). Isolation and identification of Enterobacteria species from diarrheic calves in and around Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. MSc thesis, Addis Ababa University, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. [Google Scholar]
  28. Dubie, T. , Sisay, T. , & Mukitar, Y. (2014). A one health concept to assess biosecurity issues on dairy farms: The impact of diarrhea on Escherichia coli contaminated dairy environment and beyond in Debre Zeit, Ethiopia, Addis Ababa University, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. [Google Scholar]
  29. Edrington, T. , Callaway, T. , Ives, S. , Engler, M. , Welsh, T. , Hallford, D. , Genovese, K. , Anderson, R. , & Nisbet, D. (2006). Effect of ractopamine HCl supplementation on fecal shedding of Escherichia coli O157: H7 and Salmonella in feedlot cattle. Current Microbiology, 53, 340–345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. El‐Seedy, F. , Abed, A. , Yanni, H. , & Abd El‐Rahman, S. (2016). Prevalence of Salmonella and E. coli in neonatal diarrheic calves. Beni‐Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5, 45–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. El Ayis, A. A. , Elgaddal, A. A. , & Almofti, Y. A. (2015). Isolation, identification, and enterotoxin detection of Escherichia coli isolated from calf diarrhea and their virulence characteristics. Journal of Applied and Industrial Sciences, 3, 141–149. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ellaithi, S. (2004). Characterization of E. coli isolated from diarrhoeic calves in Sudan. PhD thesis, University Khartoum, Sudan, Khartoum, Sudan. [Google Scholar]
  33. Fentie, T. , Guta, S. , Mekonen, G. , Temesgen, W. , Melaku, A. , Asefa, G. , Tesfaye, S. , Niguse, A. , Abera, B. , & Kflewahd, F. Z. (2020). Assessment of major causes of calf mortality in urban and periurban dairy production system of Ethiopia. Veterinary Medicine International, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Fentie, T. , Wudu, T. , Achenef, M. , Getachew, A. , Shimelis, T. , Feyissa, F. , Zemene, A. , Ayalew, N. , Bosenu, A. , Fikre, Z. , Birhanu, H. , Sentayehu, G. , & Gebreyes, M. (2016). Assessment of young stock mortality in major livestock production systems of Ethiopia. University of Gondar, USAID and Agriculture Knowledge, Learning, Documentation, and Policy (AKLDP), Gondar, Ethiopia. [Google Scholar]
  35. Fesseha, H. , Aliye, S. , Kifle, T. , & Mathewos, M. (2020). Chemical and drug use in dairy farms of Hawassa Town, Southern Ethiopia. Veterinary Medicine – Open Journal, 5, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  36. Fubini, S. , & Divers, T. J. (2008). Noninfectious diseases of the gastrointestinal tract. In Erb H., Smith D., & Rebhun W. (Eds.), Rebhun's diseases of dairy cattle (pp. 130–199). Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  37. Gebregiorgis, A. , & Tessema, T. S. (2016). Characterization of Escherichia coli isolated from calf diarrhea in and around Kombolcha, South Wollo, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 48, 273–281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Gebremedhin, R. (2014). Major causes of calf mortality in intensive dairy farms, central Ethiopia – A cohort study. International Journal of Livestock Research, 4, 9–16. [Google Scholar]
  39. Graham, A. , Renaud, D. , Duffield, T. , & Kelton, D. (2018). Calf cleanliness does not predict diarrhea upon arrival at a veal calf facility. Journal of Dairy Science, 101, 3363–3366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Guerra, B. , Junker, E. , Schroeter, A. , Helmuth, R. , Guth, B. E. , & Beutin, L. (2006). Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli O111 isolates. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 57, 1210–1214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Hadgu, A. , Lemma, A. , Yilma, T. , & Fesseha, H. (2021). Major causes of calf and lamb mortality and morbidity and associated risk factors in the mixed crop‐livestock production system in Jamma District, South Wollo, Ethiopia. Veterinary Medicine International, 2021, 14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Heinrichs, A. , & Radostits, O. (2001). Health and production management of dairy calves and replacement heifers. In Radostits O.M. (Ed.), Herd health – Food animal production medicine. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company. [Google Scholar]
  43. Hemashenpagam, N. , Kiruthiga, B. , Selvaraj, T. , & Panneerselvam, A. (2009). Isolation, identification, and characterization of bacterial pathogens causing calf diarrhea with special reference to Escherichia coli . International Journal of Microbiology, 7, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  44. Heuer, O. E. , Hammerum, A. M. , Collignon, P. , & Wegener, H. C. (2006). Human health hazards from antimicrobial‐resistant enterococci in animals and food. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 43, 911–916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Hiko, A. , Asrat, D. , & Zewde, G. (2008). Occurrence of Escherichia coli O157: H7 in retail raw meat products in Ethiopia. The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, 2, 389–393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. ILCA (1994). ILCA Annual Program Report 1993/1994 (pp. 73–74). International Livestock Center for Africa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  47. Joon, D. , & Kaura, Y. (1993). Isolation and characterization of some of the enterobacteria from diarrhoeic and non diarrhoeic calves. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences (India), 63, 373–383. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kaura, Y. , Bhargava, D. , Pruthi, A. , & Prasad, S. (1988). Pathology and isolation of multiple antibiotic‐resistant strains of Escherichia coli from an outbreak of colibacillosis in turkey poults. Indian Journal of Poultry Science, 23, 9–13. [Google Scholar]
  49. Kidane, Y. B. (2014). A study on major enteropathogens of calf diarrhoea in dairy farms of Assela and its surroundings Arsi Zone Oromiya Region, Ethiopia. MSc thesis, Addis Ababa University, Bishoftu, Ethiopia. [Google Scholar]
  50. Kolenda, R. , Burdukiewicz, M. , & Schierack, P. (2015). A systematic review and meta‐analysis of the epidemiology of pathogenic Escherichia coli of calves and the role of calves as reservoirs for human pathogenic E. coli . Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 5, 23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Lanz Uhde, F. , Kaufmann, T. , Sager, H. , Albini, S. , Zanoni, R. , Schelling, E. , & Meylan, M. (2008). Prevalence of four enteropathogens in the faeces of young diarrhoeic dairy calves in Switzerland. Veterinary Record, 163, 362–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Lee, J. H. , & Choi, S.‐J. (2006). Isolation and characteristics of sorbitol‐fermenting Escherichia coli O157 strains from cattle. Microbes and Infection, 8, 2021–2026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Lema, M. , Kassa, T. , & Tegegne, A. (2001). Clinically manifested major health problems of crossbred dairy herds in urban and periurban production systems in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 33, 85–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Lorino, T. , Daudin, J.‐J. , Robin, S. , & Sanaa, M. (2005). Factors associated with time to neonatal diarrhoea in French beef calves. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 68, 91–102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Maddox‐Hyttel, C. , Langkjær, R. B. , Enemark, H. L. , & Vigre, H. (2006). Cryptosporidium and Giardia in different age groups of Danish cattle and pigs‐occurrence and management associated risk factors. Veterinary Parasitology, 141, 48–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Mailk, S. , Kumar, A. , Verma, A. K. , Gupta, M. K. , Sharma, S. D. , Sharma, A. K. , & Rahal, A. (2013). Incidence and drug resistance pattern of collibacillosis in cattle and buffalo calves in Western Uttar Pradesh in India. Journal of Animal Health and Production, 1, 15–19. [Google Scholar]
  57. Majeed, Q. A. , Al‐Batel, M. K. , Abdou, N.‐E. M. , El‐Azazy, O. M. , Sami, A. M. , & El‐Said, H. (2011). Infectious causes of neonatal diarrhea in cattle in Kuwait with special reference to cryptosporidiosis. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 10, 2282–2286. [Google Scholar]
  58. Mansour, A. E. , Abdelgadir, A. E. , & El, Zubeir , I E. (2014). Major causes and risk factors associated with calf mortality in dairy farms in Khartoum State, Sudan. Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health, 6, 145–153. [Google Scholar]
  59. Masud, M. , Fakhruzzaman, M. , Rahman, M. , Shah, M. , & Nazir, K. (2012). Isolation of Escherichia coli from apparently healthy and diarrheic calves in Dinajpur area in Bangladesh and their antibiogram. Journal of the Bangladesh Society for Agricultural Science and Technology, 9, 45–48. [Google Scholar]
  60. Meganck, V. , Hoflack, G. , Piepers, S. , & Opsomer, G. (2015). Evaluation of a protocol to reduce the incidence of neonatal calf diarrhoea on dairy herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 118, 64–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Megersa, B. , Yacob, A. , Regassa, A. , Abuna, F. , Asmare, K. , & Amenu, K. (2009). Prevalence and incidence rates of calf morbidity and mortality and associated risk factors in smallholder dairy farms in Hawassa, Southern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Veterinary Journal, 13, 59–68. [Google Scholar]
  62. Merle, R. , Hajek, P. , Käsbohrer, A. , Hegger‐Gravenhorst, C. , Mollenhauer, Y. , Robanus, M. , Ungemach, F.‐R. , & Kreienbrock, L. (2012). Monitoring of antibiotic consumption in livestock: A German feasibility study. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 104, 34–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Mersha, G. , Asrat, D. , Zewde, B. , & Kyule, M. (2010). Occurrence of Escherichia coli O157: H7 in faeces, skin, and carcasses from sheep and goats in Ethiopia. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 50, 71–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Metaferia, F. , Cherenet, T. G. , Abnet, F. , Tesfay, A. , Abdi, J. , & Gulilat, W. (2011). A review to improve estimation of livestock contribution to the national GDP (pp. 21–29). Ministry of Finance and Economic Development and Ministry of Agriculture, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. [Google Scholar]
  65. Minda Asfaw, G. , & Shimelis, R. (2021). Escherichia coli O15: H7 from food of animal origin in Arsi: Occurrence at catering establishments and antimicrobial susceptibility profile. The Scientific World Journal, 2021, 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Mohamed, S. M. E. (2009). Escherichia coli associated with neonatal calf diarrhea in Khartoum. Khartoum, Sudan: North Sudan, University of Khartum. [Google Scholar]
  67. Mohammed, R. , Kefyalew, H. , & Kassaye, D. (2020). Incidence of calf morbidity and its predictors in North Shewa, Amhara, Ethiopia. Veterinary Medicine International, 2020, 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Moran, J. B. (2011). Factors affecting high mortality rates of dairy replacement calves and heifers in the tropics and strategies for their reduction. Asian‐Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 24, 1318–1328. [Google Scholar]
  69. Moxley, R. A. , & Smith, D. R. (2010). Attaching‐effacing Escherichia coli infections in cattle. Veterinary Clinics: Food Animal Practice, 26, 29–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Muktar, Y. (2014). Major Enteropathogenes associated with calf diarrhea, with an emphasis on E. coli and salmonella species in dairy farms of Muke Turi, Debre Tsige and Fitche Towns North Shewa, Ethiopia, Addis Ababa University Bishoftu, Ethiopia. [Google Scholar]
  71. Muktar, Y. , Mamo, G. , Tesfaye, B. , & Belina, D. (2015). A review on major bacterial causes of calf diarrhea and its diagnostic method. Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health, 7, 173–185. [Google Scholar]
  72. Nazir, K. , & Hussain, N. (2007). Plasmid profiles and antibiogram pattern of Escherichia coli isolates of calves feces and diarrheagenic stool of infants. Journal of Bangladesh Social Agricultural Science and Technology, 4, 149–152. [Google Scholar]
  73. Novicki, T. J. , Daly, J. A. , Mottice, S. L. , & Carroll, K. C. (2000). Comparison of sorbitol MacConkey agar and a two‐step method which utilizes enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay toxin testing and a chromogenic agar to detect and isolate Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli . Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 38, 547–551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Olsson, S.‐O. , Viring, S. , Emanuelsson, U. , & Jacobsson, S.‐O. (1993). Calf diseases and mortality in Swedish dairy herds. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 34, 263–269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Orden, J. , Ruiz‐Santa‐Quiteria, J. , Garcia, S. , Cid, D. , & De La Fuente, R. (2000). In vitro susceptibility of Escherichia coli strains isolated from diarrhoeic dairy calves to 15 antimicrobial agents. Journal of Veterinary Medicine, Series B, 47, 329–335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Pal, M. , Mulu, S. , Tekle, M. , Pintoo, S. V. , & Prajapati, J. (2016). Bacterial contamination of dairy products. Beverage and Food World, 43, 40–43. [Google Scholar]
  77. Paul, S. , Khan, M. , Rashid, M. , Hassan, J. , & Mahmud, S. (2010). Isolation and characterization of Escherichia coli from buffalo calves in some selected areas of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 8, 23–26. [Google Scholar]
  78. Perez, E. , Noordhuizen, J. , Van Wuijkhuise, L. , & Stassen, E. (1990). Management factors related to calf morbidity and mortality rates. Livestock Production Science, 25, 79–93. [Google Scholar]
  79. Quinn, P. , Markey, B. K. , Carter, M. , Donnelly, W. , & Leonard, F. (2002). Veterinary microbiology and microbial disease. Blackwell Science. [Google Scholar]
  80. Radostits, M. , Hinchcliff, K. W. , Done, S. H. , & Grünberg, W. (2016). Mastitis in veterinary medicine (9th edn.). London, UK: Elsevier Health Sciences. [Google Scholar]
  81. Radostits, O. M. , Gay, C. C. , Hinchcliff, K. W. , & Constable, P. D. (2007). Veterinary medicine E‐book: A textbook of the diseases of cattle, horses, sheep, pigs, and goats. Elsevier Health Sciences. [Google Scholar]
  82. Razzaque, M. , Bedair, M. , & Abbas, S. (2006). Dairy calf rearing in hot arid environment of Kuwait, Paper II: Impact of interventions on health performance of pre‐weaned calves. Report No. KISR7651, Kuwait.
  83. Renaud, D. , Buss, L. , Wilms, J. , & Steele, M. (2020). Is fecal consistency scoring an accurate measure of fecal dry matter in dairy calves? Journal of Dairy Science, 103, 10709–10714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Reuben, R. , & Owuna, G. (2013). Antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli O157: H7 from Nigerian fermented milk samples in Nasarawa State, Nigeria. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science Invention, 2, 38–44. [Google Scholar]
  85. Romha, G. (2014). Major causes of calf mortality in intensive dairy farms, central Ethiopia – A cohort study. International Journal of Livestock Research, 4, 9–16. [Google Scholar]
  86. Santın, M. , Trout, J. M. , Xiao, L. , Zhou, L. , Greiner, E. , & Fayer, R. (2004). Prevalence and age‐related variation of Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in dairy calves. Veterinary Parasitology, 122, 103–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Shiferaw, Y. , Yohannes, A. , Yilma, Y. , Gebrewold, A. , & Gojjam, Y. (2002). Dairy husbandry and health management at Holleta. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the Ethiopian Veterinary Association (pp. 103–119). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Ethiopian Veterinary Association. [Google Scholar]
  88. Stoltenow, C. L. , & Vincent, L. L. (2003). Calf Scours: Causes, prevention, treatment. Available at www.Ag.Adsu.Edu/pubs/ansci/beefas776.pdf, Fargo, North Dakuta. [Google Scholar]
  89. Svensson, C. , Lundborg, K. , Emanuelson, U. , & Olsson, S.‐O. (2003). Morbidity in Swedish dairy calves from birth to 90 days of age and individual calf‐level risk factors for infectious diseases. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 58, 179–197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Tadese, N. D. , Gebremedhi, E. Z. , Moges, F. , Borana, B. M. , Marami, L. M. , Sarba, E. J. , Abebe, H. , Kelbesa, K. A. , Atalel, D. , & Tessema, B. (2021). Occurrence and antibiogram of Escherichia coli O157: H7 in raw beef and hygienic practices in abattoir and retailer shops in Ambo Town, Ethiopia. Veterinary Medicine International, 2021, 12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Tadesse, D. A. , Zhao, S. , Tong, E. , Ayers, S. , Singh, A. , Bartholomew, M. J. , & McDermott, P. F. (2012). Antimicrobial drug resistance in Escherichia coli from humans and food animals, United States, 1950–2002. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 18, 741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Tajik, J. , Nazifi, S. , Naghib, S. M. , & Ghasrodashti, A. R. (2012). Comparison of electrocardiographic parameters and serum electrolytes and microelements between single infection of rotavirus and coronavirus and concurrent infection of Cryptosporidium parvum with rotavirus and coronavirus in diarrheic dairy calves. Comparative Clinical Pathology, 21, 241–244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Tassew, H. , Abdissa, A. , Beyene, G. , & Gebre‐Selassie, S. (2010). Microbial flora and food‐borne pathogens on minced meat and their susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences, 20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Taye, M. , Berhanu, T. , Berhanu, Y. , Tamiru, F. , & Terefe, D. (2013). Study on carcass contaminating Escherichia coli in apparently healthy slaughtered cattle in Haramaya University slaughterhouse with special emphasis on Escherichia coli O157: H7, Ethiopia. Journal of Veterinary Science and Technology, 4, 132. [Google Scholar]
  95. Trotz‐Williams, L. A. , Martin, S. W. , Leslie, K. E. , Duffield, T. , Nydam, D. V. , & Peregrine, A. S. (2007). Calf‐level risk factors for neonatal diarrhea and shedding of Cryptosporidium parvum in Ontario dairy calves. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 82, 12–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Villarroel, A. (2009). Scours in beef calves: Causes and treatments. Retrieved from http://whatcom.wsu.edu/ag/documents/beef/ScoursBeefCalves_OSUem8977‐e.pdf [Google Scholar]
  97. Werckenthin, C. , Seidl, S. , Riedl, J. , Kiossis, E. , Wolf, G. , Stolla, R. , & Kaaden, O. R. (2002). Escherichia coli isolates from young calves in Bavaria: In vitro susceptibilities to 14 anti‐microbial agents. Journal of Veterinary Medicine, Series B, 49, 61–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. World Health Organization (2014). Antimicrobial resistance: Global report on surveillance. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar]
  99. Wudu, T. (2004). Calf morbidity and mortality in dairy farms in Debre Zeit and its environs. Ethiopia, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. [Google Scholar]
  100. Xia, X. , Meng, J. , McDermott, P. F. , Ayers, S. , Blickenstaff, K. , Tran, T.‐T. , Abbott, J. , Zheng, J. , & Zhao, S. (2010). Presence and characterization of Shiga toxin‐producing Escherichia coli and other potentially diarrheagenic E. coli strains in retail meats. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 76, 1709–1717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Yenehiwot, B. (2008). Epidemiological and microbiological studies of calf diarrhea and pneumonia in Debre Zeit, Holeta, and Muke Turi dairy farms (MSc thesis). Addis Ababa University, Bishoftu, Ethiopia.
  102. Yeshiwas, T. , & Fentahun, W. (2017). The prevalence of E. coli from diarrheic calves and their antibiotic sensitivity test in selected dairy farms of Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. Advances in Biotechnology & Microbiology, 6, 555680. [Google Scholar]
  103. Yibrah, T. , & Tsega, B. (2017). Cross‐sectional study on calf health and management problems on small‐scale dairy farms of Sidama and Gedio zones, Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Veterinary Science & Medicine, 5, 5. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data will be provided upon the request of the corresponding author.

Articles from Veterinary Medicine and Science are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES