ABSTRACT
Introduction
Cesarean section is one of the common obstetric procedures done when the childbirth is not anticipated to occur by the normal vaginal delivery. There has been increased rate of cesarean section globally as well as in our country in recent decades.
Methods
This descriptive cross-sectional study has been carried out by reviewing a year of data from maternity ward of Paschimanchal Community Hospital, Prithvi Chowk, Pokhara. The total number of delivery, their modes either vaginal or cesarean, indications for the cesarean section and their outcomes were analyzed. The obtained data was entered and analyzed in Microsoft Excel.
Results
Total of 257 cases underwent delivery during the study period and 174 (63.27%) were by cesarean section. Oligohydramnios is the most common indication for cesarean section. Around 25 (14.36%) of the women underwent repeat cesarean section.
Conclusions
The rate of cesarean section was quite high in our study and further studies are recommended for understanding of causes and other associated factors with it.
Keywords: cesarean section, community hospital, indications, prevalence
INTRODUCTION
Cesarean Section is one of the commonly done operative obstetric procedures when done with appropriate indication is a lifesaving procedure and helps in significant reduction of maternal mortality.1
According to the consensus made by WHO and other healthcare community on 1985, the ideal rate of cesarean section is supposed to be 10–15%.2 There has been worldwide increase in the trend of cesarean section to unprecedented levels in recent decades.3 In Nepal also, the rate of cesarean section has increased in recent years and is variable in different hospitals starting from 15% up to 81%.4 Women undergoing cesarean section in first pregnancy are more likely to deliver by cesarean section too in subsequent pregnancies and are in the risk of different operative and pregnancy related complications. 5
This study has been undertaken with an objective to find out the different indications of cesarean section and its outcome in a Community Hospital in Western Region of Nepal.
METHODS
This descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out in the Paschimanchal Community Hospital, Prithivi Chowk, Pokhara, Kaski, a community based hospital with low cost for cesarean section and normal vaginal delivery among the other private hospitals in western region of Nepal. The hospital records of the patients who underwent normal delivery and cesarean section during the period of Baisakh 2074 to Chaitra 2074 was taken from hospital records section. Number of patients who have undergone normal vaginal delivery, cesarean section and their outcomes were reviewed. Convenience sampling was done to select the sample size. Ethical approval was taken from the respective authority. The obtained data was entered in Microsoft Excel and the descriptive statistical analysis was done.
RESULTS
Total of 275 cases underwent the delivery during the study period. Among them 174 (63.27%) were done via cesarean delivery while remaining 101 (36.72%) were done via normal vaginal delivery (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Percentage of vaginal and cesarean delivery.

The common indications of cesarean section were oligohydramnios, cephalopelvic disproportion, non progress of labor, previous CS, fetal distress and so on. Oligohydramnios accounts for 41 (23.56%) and hence the most common indication (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Different indications of cesarean section during the study period._.

Similarly, among the total cases, 149 (85.63%) of the cases are primary cesarean section and 25 (14.36%) are repeat cesarean section (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Primary and repeat CS during the study period.

There was no any maternal mortality during the study period but two cases of vaginal delivery were intrauterine fetal deaths.
DISCUSSION
Cesarean section has been boon for the mothers and newborn child in sense of preventing life threatening complications of pregnancy since nineteenth century.6 The increasing trend of cesarean among the pregnant women have negative future consequences and has the risk of increased maternal and pregnancy related complications in the subsequent days to come.7, 8 Following the international trends, there has been increase of cesarean section in Nepal too in last few decades.9–11 The rate of cesarean section is variable and ranges from 15% to 81% in various government and private hospitals of Nepal.4
Our study shows the rate of cesarean section among the total delivery as 63%. This rate is quite high among the similar study conducted in India as well as other hospitals of Nepal.10–2 The cause of high rates of cesarean in our center may be that Pokhara being the city with major hospitals in western region, the complicated cases from peripheral health institutions requiring cesarean section are referred here. Also due to the lack of beds and large number of patients in government hospital of Pokhara, those requiring the immediate surgery for delivery are referred to this hospital.
The most common indications for cesarean section in our study is oligohydramnios-23.56%, CPD-19.54%, non-progress of labor-16.67%, fetal distress-12.06% and so on in the decreasing order. Interestingly, other studies in similar settings in Nepal have meconium stained liquor, previous CS and fetal distress as the common indications. 9–11
Also, in our study among the total, around 14.36% of the cesarean section are repeated ones. This is also quite higher than the results in other similar studies. 10, 11
There has been controversy and debate regarding the usefulness and high increasing trend of cesarean section in recent years. A study by Barber et al. has suggested that the subjective indications like: arrests of dilation of cervix, non-reassuring fetal status are the causes for increasing primary cesarean section.13 However, serial sonographic monitoring for oligogydramnios, para cervical amino infusion for fetal distress, monitoring labor through partograph can be dome for reduction of primary cesarean section and promoting normal delivery. 14 Defensive obstetric practice and cesarean delivery on maternal request are also a significant factor not to be forgotten for the increase in its rate.15, 16
As this study was conducted in one hospital in Pokhara, so these results cannot be generalized for the whole country and the city, Pokhara. As this study uses convenience sampling, there could have been selection bias in selection of participants as participants with complications are usually referred from other hospitals to this community hospital. The main source of data in the study is from the hospitals records so there can be reporting bias in this study and some extent of error can also be present while entering the data to the analyzing software. To minimize such bias in the study, we have reviewed our results with results of previous studies and large sample size has also been taken. Rechecking was also done after entering the data. Furthermore studies are recommended in our settings to explore much regarding indications and the cause of increasing cesarean sections.
CONCLUSIONS
The rate of cesarean section is found to be quite higher in our study than studies conducted in similar settings. Most of the cases underwent cesarean sections and on further analysis, we found oligohydraminos to be the most common indication of the cesarean section.
Conflict of Interest
None.
REFERENCES
- 1.Souza JP, Gülmezoglu A, Lumbiganon P, et al. Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatol Health. BMC Medicine. 2010;8:71. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.World Health Organization . WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. Sep 21, cited. 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Betrân AP, Ye J, Moller A, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu A, Torloni M. The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990–2014. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Laxmi T, Goma DNS, Kumariniraula H, Roshnitui T, Binod A. Rising Cesarean Section Rates in Nepal: Question of safety and Integrity on Obstetric Emergency Practice. J Gynecol Women's Health. 2017;7(4):555716. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jacob L, Taskan S, Macharey G, Sechet I, Ziller V, Kostev K. Impact of caesarean section on mode of delivery, pregnancy-induced and pregnancy-associated disorders, and complications in the subsequent pregnancy in Germany. GMS German Medical Science. 2016;14:Doc06. doi: 10.3205/000233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Teguete I, Traore Y, Sissoko A, Djire MY, Thera A, Dolo T, Mounkoro N, Traore M, Dolo A. Determining factors of cesarean delivery trends in developing countries: lessons from point G National Hospital (Bamako-Mali) In Cesarean Delivery. 2012. InTech.
- 7.Gilliam M, Rosenberg D, Davis F. The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;99(6):976–80. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02002-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gilliam M. Cesarean delivery on request: reproductive consequences. Semin Perinatol. 2006 Oct;30(5):257–60. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chhetri S, Singh U. Caesarean section: its rates and indications at a tertiary referral center in Eastern Nepal. Health Renaissance. 2011;9(3):179–183. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Prasad A, Bhandari G, Saha R. Profile of Caesarean Section at Kathmandu Medical College. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2017;15(2):110–113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Subedi S. Rising rate of cesarean section - a year review. Journal of Nobel Medical College. 2012;1(2):72–76. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Das R, Subudhi K, Mohanty R. The rate and indication of caesarean section in a tertiary care teaching hospital eastern India. International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2018;5(5):1733–1739. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Barber EL, Lundsberg L, Belanger K, Pettker CM, Funai EF, Illuzzi JL. Contributing Indications to the Rising Cesarean Delivery Rate. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(1):29–38. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821e5f65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Begum T, Rahman A, Nababan H, Hoque DM, Khan AF, Ali T, Anwar I. Indications and determinants of caesarean section delivery: Evidence from a population-based study in Matlab, Bangladesh. PloS one. 2017 Nov 20;12(11):e0188074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cheng YW, Snowden JM, Handler SJ, Tager IB, Hubbard AE, Caughey AB. Litigation in obstetrics: does defensive medicine contribute to increases in cesarean delivery? The J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Nov 1;27(16):1668–75. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.879115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Akintayo AA, Ade-Ojo IP, Olagbuji BN, Akin-Akintayo OO, Ogundare OR, Olofinbiyi BA. Cesarean section on maternal request: the viewpoint of expectant women. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Apr 1;289(4):781–5. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-3063-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
