Abstract
Serological analysis is an integral part of laboratory practice nowadays. The present study was aimed to develop and validate a modified Enzyme linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for determination of IgG antibody against Hepatitis E Virus (HEV) using dried blood spots (DBS) and corresponding plasma samples. A total of 65 samples (45 HEV patients, 20 healthy controls) were analyzed.
DBS and plasma samples demonstrated equivalent optical densities for detecting anti-HEV IgG. A highly significant correlation was observed between plasma and DBS sample absorbances (R2 = 0.98; p <0.001) at dilution 1:200, indicating true agreement between the two procedures. The assay exhibited decent linearity and showed no effect of physiological hematocrit on assay performance.
Data suggested recommendable promise in using DBS as a suitable alternative to plasma samples to determine HEV IgG antibody evidenced by significant correlation with plasma results. Therefore, identical method for processing DBS specimens including it’s proper storage is recommended for implementation of a modified ELISA in different settings.
Keywords: HEV IgG antibody, ELISA, DBS
1. Introduction
Hepatitis E virus often causes epidemic forms of acute viral hepatitis that is one of the major public health concern for low and middle income countries including Bangladesh [1]. It is a small non-enveloped, single stranded, positive sense, RNA virus commonly transmitted through feco-oral route [2, 3]. Among the four major HEV genotypes (HEV1, HEV2, HEV3, and HEV4), HEV1 and HEV2 are prevalent in developing countries and outbreaks resulting from sewerage contamination of drinking water supplies are the common scenario in those regions. In contrast, the transmission of HEV3 and HEV4 genotypes to humans occurs mainly through consumption of contaminated or undercooked meat from infected animals. Pig is supposed to be the main reservoir, although wild boars, rabbits, goats, sheep, deer can be considered as potential zoonotic sources of transmission to humans and they are mostly encountered in developed countries [4–7]. Globally, the virus is found to affect > 20 million individuals annually with symptomatic cases (three million) and HEV-related (~56,000) deaths [8]. A diverse spectrum of clinical manifestations are being observed with HEV infection including acute and self-limiting hepatitis, acute-on-chronic liver disease, chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and liver failure though chronic HEV infection may occur among immunocompromised patients (e.g., solid-organ transplant recipients) [9]. This infection is generally self-limiting in both men and non-pregnant women with very rare reports of fatality (<0.1%) [10]. However, the most striking feature is the aggressiveness of HEV infection during pregnancy; the severity of morbidity of pregnant mothers resulting in very high mortality (5–25%) distinguishes it from the infection caused by other hepatitis viruses [11]. The acute phase of the disease can be detected by sero diagnosis of HEV IgM with or without HEV IgG, whereas presence of HEV IgG only is indicative of previous exposure to infection and also a state of immunity [12]. The proposition of collecting blood specimens on a filter paper and subsequently using the dried blood spot (DBS) for diagnosis of infectious diseases started more than a century ago [13]. DBS regarded as a minimally invasive sampling method that enables researchers’ suitable collection, storage and testing procedures with reduced risk of bacterial contamination and hemolysis [14]. DBS samples eliminate the need for venipuncture, especially in infant, young children and hard-toreach individuals. Moreover, amount of required volume of blood is less, also suitable for newborn screening for inherited metabolic disorders in remote settings [15].
ELISA protocols were initially optimized by using serum or plasma specimens although need to be optimized and validated for DBS specimen [16]. Optimal performance of DBS-based ELISA method need to be ensured with a standard validation protocols that include: (1) the type of filter paper used to prepare the DBS, (2) the size of the DBS punch, (3) the quality of the DBS specimens used for testing, and (4) the appropriate elution procedure (including choice of elution buffer, right dilution of eluted material, elution temperature, and time) to minimize background without compromising the sensitivity of the assay [17]. Actual use of DBS in laboratory diagnosis of a number of infectious diseases is now recognized as a reliable sampling strategy for conducting many epidemiological surveys. An outstanding diagnostic performance of HCV screening in DBS samples has appeared as a promising approach reported by a meta-analysis study [18]. For HIV screening, determination of HIV antibody by ELISA is used as first conventional technique where western blotting (WB) as a complementary assay for confirmation of positive result also uses DBS[19]. DBS offer a highly sensitive and specific sampling technique for detecting HIV viral load and early infant diagnosis, that seems to be more accessible in remote settings [15]. Validation of a commercially-available ELISA to assess Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) antibody in dried blood spots (DBS) was demonstrated by another group of researchers [20].
Since, in different countries, dried blood spot based assay has been used to support in the diagnosis of infectious diseases, metabolic disorders, screening for systemic diseases, it can also be used to monitor the level of immunity (IgG) in naturally infected as well as in vaccinated individuals [21]. Therefore, this study has demonstrated the practicability of adapting an ELISA by validating DBS as a suitable method for detecting HEV IgG antibody instead of using plasma/serum specimens. It will again focus on the usefulness of DBS-based ELISA methods for diagnosis of human diseases of public health significance and also help to determine the feasibility of using DBS specimens for accurately detecting the antibody level in pre and post vaccination phases in urban people of Bangladesh.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Participants
Female patients (45 cases) with confirmed acute viral hepatitis, age range 18–45 years from Dhaka Medical College Hospital and apparently healthy 20 female subjects of similar age range through personal contact were recruited (within a week) in this study. Clinical symptoms of hepatitis were manifested with nausea, vomiting, low-grade fever, upper abdominal pain, and yellow colored urine. Patients revealing increased inflammatory markers for acute hepatitis (serum bilirubin and alanine transaminase) and HEV antibody (IgM only or both IgM and IgG) by ELISA (Wantai, China) were included as cases. The study was approved by the institutional ethical review committee of International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b) and Bangladesh University of Health Sciences (BUHS) and Dhaka Medical College Hospital (DMCH), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
2.2. Sample collection, processing and preservation
Blood sample (5 ml from each patient/ healthy control) was collected aseptically by venipuncture:4 ml was taken in a plain Vacutainer (Red-top tube) and 1ml in an EDTA tube. Collected blood samples were secured in cold chain box and transported to the Institute for developing Science and Health initiatives (ideSHi) Laboratory. Blood in EDTA tubes mixed thoroughly by gentle shaking and transferred to the Mucosal Immunology and Vaccinology Laboratory (MIVL), icddr,b. Blood in Red-top Vacutainer was allowed to clot and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes. Separated serum aliquoted in microcentrifuge tubes for biochemical tests (eg, serum bilirubin and alanine transaminase) and determination of HEV IgM and HEV IgG. All these biochemical and serological analysis were done under an approved HEV viral load and genotype study.
In the MIVL, icddr,b DBS card (Whatman 903) was prepared from EDTA sample tubes by pipetting 50 μl blood in each of the 5 circles, left in biosafety cabinet air for 4 hours for air-drying. And rest of the blood sample centrifuged to prepare plasma, aliquoted in microcentrifuge tube and along with DBS card secured in Zipper bag and stored at −80°C until analysis (for long term storage).
2.3. Laboratory methods
Biochemical liver function tests e.g., estimation of serum bilirubin, alanine transaminase (ALT) were carried out instantaneously after collection by using biochemistry autoanalyzer (Dimension EXL 200, Siemens, USA). HEV IgM and HEV IgG antibodies in serum samples were initially determined by ELISA (Wantai Biological, China) to confirm the presence or absence of hepatitis E antibodies in both the patients and healthy controls. Later, HEV IgG antibodies in plasma and DBS were determined by minor modification of manufacturer’s procedure using HEV IgG ELISA Kit (Wantai Biological, China).
2.4. Elution of DBS samples
A semi-automated DBS hole-punch machine (1296–071DELFIA®, Perkin Elmer, USA) for excision of blood spots was used for obtaining DBS disc diameter of 3.2 mm that contained 1.5 μl plasma [16]. Calculated volume of Wantai ELISA sample diluent was taken in microcentrifuge tubes according to manufacturer instructions. From DBS preparation desired numbers of 3.2 mm circle DBS disc were punched out and added into the microcentrifuge tubes containing required volume of diluent buffers that yielded different ranges (10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 80, 100, 200 and 500) of sample dilution. Microcentrifuge tubes containing diluent and DBS disc were incubated at 4°C for overnight. On the next morning, the contents were mixed thoroughly using shaker (Bioshaker XP, QInstruments, Germany) followed by centrifugation at 1677g (Sigma, Germany) for 5 minutes at room temperature and supernatant was removed.
Corresponding plasma sample was subjected to similar serial dilution to that of DBS elution. DBS elute and plasma preparations were subjected to ELISA in duplicate for the detection of anti-HEV IgG antibodies using Wantai HEV IgG, Beijing, China kits.
2.5. Validation of the modified ELISA procedure
Sixty five plasma samples (45 hepatitis cases and 20 healthy controls) were validated for anti-HEV IgG antibody detection by ELISA (Wantai, China) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. DBS specimens were analyzed using the same kit with minor modification in the manufacturer’s procedure. For each assay, negative control in triplicates and positive controls in duplicates and one blank were used. In order to validate the present study and to obtain quantitative HEV IgG results, samples absorbance values calibrated against the standard curve of WHO reference serum (WHO 95/584, 100WHO units/ml). A serial dilution of 125, 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000, 8000, 16000 of the reference serum was prepared which had following concentration 0.8, 0.4, 0.2, 0.1, 0.05, 0.025, 0.0125 and 0.006 WU/ml. The WHO reference reagent serves as a biological reference preparation for antibodies to hepatitis E virus and free from HBsAg, anti-HIV and HCV-RNA.
HEV IgG antibody was determined from DBS elutes and serial dilution preparation of corresponding plasma samples by indirect ELISA method using Wantai Kits. In the assay procedure 100 μl of diluted WHO reference serum, DBS elute preparations and serially diluted plasma samples were used. Plasma specimens were diluted at 1:100; however, if the absorbances were beyond the range of the standard curve, they were run again at dilutions ranging from 1:200 to 1:500. Plates were read at a wavelength of 450 nm by EON (BioTek) ELISA reader.
2.6. Calculation of Cut-off Values (COV)
In conventional ELISA methods, Cut-off values are established for plasma or serum samples that may not be compatible for DBS elutes. It is very much crucial to determine the COV, basically applicable for use with DBS specimens. Earlier investigators have determined the mean Cut-off values for DBS-based ELISA and calculated assay accuracy using ODs of positive and negative DBS controls in multiple runs [17, 22]. However, the absorbance value for the DBS samples above which samples were considered positive in this study was calculated by the kit manufacturer’s recommendation for the calculation of Cut-off value (COV). The results are calculated by comparing each specimen absorbance value to the Cut-off value of the assay plate. The Cut-off value is calculated by adding a kit recommended factor (0.16) with the mean absorbance value of three negative controls (eg, COV= NC+0.16).
Sensitivity
The test sensitivity was determined by the analysis of 37 HEV-positive DBS samples (31 strongly reactive and 6 weakly reactive), confirmed with clinical and laboratory based diagnosis of HEV infection.
Specificity
In order to verify specificity of the test, 20 HEV IgG-negative DBS samples (including 12 healthy controls) of the HEV project for viral load and genotype study were used.
Limit of detection (LOD)
In order to determine the assay limit of detection, three HEV IgG positive DBS was diluted in series (1:11 to 1: 500) in sample diluents. Similarly, corresponding plasma specimens were diluted. All the specimens were run in parallel to minimize the assay variation. The LOD was set as the highest plasma dilution that has given the absorbance to meet the positivity criteria for IgG antibodies to HEV.
2.7. Statistical analyses
Linear regression analysis has been done for performing correlation in assays between DBS and plasma specimens. All the statistical analyses were carried out using the software SPSS (SPPSS Inc.; version 15.0 for Windows) and Graph Pad Prism (version 6.0).
3. Results
3.1. Demographic information
Blood samples of 45 women with acute HEV infection and 20 healthy controls women were analyzed in the study. Of the 45 hepatitis subjects, 37 were positive for both anti-HEV IgM and anti-HEV IgG antibodies and 8 were positive for anti-HEV IgM antibody only but negative for anti-HEV IgG antibody. Of the 20 healthy controls, 8 were positive for anti-HEV IgG only and 12 were negative for both the HEV antibodies (IgM and IgG) (Fig. 1). Age, distribution of hepatitis and healthy control subjects, serum bilirubin and alanine transaminase levels of the participating women were shown in table 1.
Figure 1:
Stratification of HEV IgG positive and negative samples of the hepatitis cases and healthy controls. Y axis shows the numbers. Numbers over the bars indicate number of subjects in each group.
Table 1:
Age, serum bilirubin and ALT of the subjects on the basis of anti-HEV IgG antibody status
| Variables | HEV IgG + ve | HEV IgG -ve |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Hepatitis/Healthy control woman | ||
| Numbers (n) | 45 | 20 |
| Hepatitis | 37 | 8 |
| HC | 8 | 12 |
|
| ||
| Age (median, years) | ||
| Hepatitis | 28 | 27 |
| HC | 26 | 27 |
|
| ||
| Serum bilirubin (mg/dl) | ||
| Hepatitis | 9 (1–37) | 9 (2–20) |
| HC | 0.7 (0.4–0.9) | 0.3 (0.2–0.5) |
|
| ||
| Serum ALT (U/l) | ||
| Hepatitis | 614 (19–4730) | 83 (10–277) |
| HC | 22 (13–29) | 19 (15–25) |
HEV, hepatitis E virus; IgG, Immunoglobulin G; HC, healthy control; ALT, alanine transaminase; HEV IgG +ve, positive for IgG antibodies to HEV; HEV IgG-ve, negative for IgG antibodies to HEV.
Data were shown in mean (range) for serum bilirubin and ALT.
3.2. Cut-off Value (COV), Sensitivity, Specificity, Limit of detection (LOD)
A standard curve was generated in each assay by using WHO reference serum (WHO 95/584, 100 WHO units/ml) as assay control for accepting unknown specimen OD values as well as for quantification of HEV specific antibodies in unknown samples. We have determined the result of each specimen by considering the COV for assay according to the specification (WE-7296, Wantai, China). COV was calculated by taking mean absorbance of three negative controls OD that was added with kit recommended factor 0.16. Analyses of sensitivity and specificity between ELISA from plasma and DBS specimens showed 100% similarity in the assay. LOD of the assay equipment was between 0.00 to 3.99 (data not shown). Sample optical densities (SOD) for measurement of anti-HEV IgG in DBS and corresponding plasma of HEV IgG positive and negative participants showed comparable responses including healthy controls (Fig. 2).
Figure 2:
Comparison of optical densities for measurement of anti-HEV IgG antibody in DBS and corresponding plasma of the patients with HEV and healthy control subjects. Y axis showed the mean absorbance (optical densities) at 450 nm with SEM.
3.3. Interpretation of the results
Results were interpreted by following manufacturer’s instructions (WE-7296, Wantai, China). Samples were defined as negative, positive and borderline if absorbance (A) value to Cut-off (CO) ratio(A/CO) was <1, ≥1 and 0.9–1.1 respectively. Samples giving a value less than the cut-off value are negative for the assay, which indicates that no IgG antibody to HEV (8/45 and 12/20) have been detected by Wantai HEV-IgG ELISA kit. Therefore, there are no serological indications for development of IgG antibody for HEV. Similarly, HEV-IgG positive (37/45 and 8/20) and borderline (0/65) specimens were detected.
3.4. Agreement between analysis of DBS and corresponding plasma samples in determination of HEV IgG antibody
The mean (range) HEV IgG titers for DBS and plasma samples were 39.9 WU/ml (1.25–160) and 46.09 WU/ml (1.25–160) respectively at 1:200 dilution which were statistically comparable. Correlation between DBS and corresponding plasma samples (n= 65) was evaluated. Optical densities for measurement of anti-HEV IgG between DBS and corresponding plasma showed significantly high linear correlation (R2= 0.98; p <0.001) at the same dilution with a slope of 1, indicating true agreement between the two procedures (Fig. 3).
Figure 3:
Correlation between DBS and corresponding plasma samples for determination of HEV IgG antibody of the study subjects. Optical densities (OD) of DBS are shown in X-axis and optical densities (OD) of corresponding plasma are shown in Y-axis that were measured at 450 nm.
4. Discussion
DBS samples have been used successfully for many years for screening of metabolic diseases in neonates and also for the diagnosis of infectious diseases [23], surveillance of disease, molecular studies, determination of resistance pattern, investigation and strain typing in viral hepatitis outbreak [24]. Since reliable laboratory diagnosis primarily depends on its pre-analytic stage, the choice of the correct sample and the conditions at which sample are being transported to the laboratory should be emphasized [19]. Collection of venous blood from targeted populations, researchers/technicians biosafety, processing of blood and preservation of specimens may be major obstacles in field settings where there is scarcity of skilled laboratory personnel (e.g., phlebotomist, technician) [16, 25, 26]. However, the DBS preparation method is relatively economic requiring less quantity of blood, easy to transport from one place to another keeping in ziplock plastic bags and cold chain is not mandatory during shipping. The stability of DBS in extreme environmental conditions (i.e., elevated ambient temperature and high humidity) and loss of infectivity of viruses after drying of blood spot on filter paper matrix makes it an ideal specimen type for antibody assays such as ELISA [27]. A DBS study for HEV-RNA amplification during a HEV epidemic has shown 90.6% concordance with serum samples [28]. However, it lacks validation of DBS samples for anti-HEV IgG. The present study reports a modified ELISA method that has been optimizing at 1:200 dilution of DBS elutes and corresponding plasma samples in parallel and thus validating the modified protocol for using dried blood spots, so that quantitative detection of anti-HEV IgG antibody can be done for assessment of immunogenicity and diagnosis of Hepatitis E virus. However, challenges with developing the ELISA method by using DBS samples and validating the result with plasma in parallel (by comparing the sample absorbance/ optical density of both sample types) for remote settings have impacted testing outcome in certain populations. To alleviate these challenges, dried blood spot (DBS) samples have been validated for use in a variety of settings and for testing of multiple biomarkers using ELISA. We believe this will help us to develop and validate high-throughput assays and to enable us to conduct large nationwide clinical trials in future in an emergency situation. In addition, few other groups had also reported not only antibody measurement but also measured naïve T cell population from DBS [29]. Earlier, different serological assays performance has been evaluated using dried blood spots as a surrogate specimen and found similar observation to those of serum and/or plasma specimens [16, 20].
The objective of the study was to evaluate and confirm a commercially available ELISA assay for determination of HEV IgG using dried blood spot that can be comparable to that seen in matched plasma samples. Through a long procedure, we developed this assay by minor modification of a commercially available ELISA kit that provides acceptable measurement of HEV IgG antibodies against the viral antigen in blood spots that were prepared directly from venous blood. In our study, DBS sample absorbance were found higher than that of matched plasma samples in the initial dilution (1: 11) that is not consistent with the study done by Eick et al., [20] where plasma antibody titers were higher than that of DBS. DBS has not yet been suggested as biological sample to be analyzed in the employed ELISA diagnostic reagent kit, there remains every possibility of interference (matrix-induced effect and hematocrit effect) that might be the possible explanation for the higher value in DBS in our study. Again, 3.2 mm punch from a 50 μl dried blood spot is assumed to contains ~ 1.5μl of serum at a hematocrit of 55 percent [16], the exact volume cannot be ascertained from DBS sample. However, a strong positive correlation has been found between sample absorbance derived from DBS and plasma HEV IgG antibody assay that explored good concordance with DBS elutes when the samples were diluted 200 times in kit diluents for samples (R2=0.975).
Since limited data are available for comparative assay performance using DBS with plasma samples for detection of HEV IgG antibody, the present study offers a highly sensitive and specific sampling strategy to detect antibody and monitoring the level of antibodies in remote settings, thus provides a great opportunity for screening mass population. Evaluation of immune responses from DBS in other infections and vaccination has recently been accomplished [23]. It showed very good agreement between conventional collected blood specimens and DBS. Large clinical trial can easily be designed by following such kind of collection in remote and less facilitated area. Though some other technical aspects (eg: volume of blood in DBS, temperature and duration of storage of DBS etc) should be properly handled to get comparable and robust results from the field settings.
Therefore, the commercially-available ELISA assay that detected HEV IgG antibody in this study was validated for use with DBS. Hopefully, in future it will facilitate continued investigation of HEV IgG antibody titers in DBS, though the use of DBS is not a new idea and has already been applied for diagnosis of many infectious diseases. However, for successful implementation of this easy and more comfortable procedure for measuring HEV antibodies in low- and middle-income country, a standardized approach for sampling, storage, and processing DBS samples can be considered essential since this is not always feasible to draw blood from every location of Bangladesh especially from children. All the subjects analyzed in the present study were female that will justify the necessity of HEV IgG detection before and after mass vaccination of the women of child bearing age, though initially seemed to be a limitation of the study. In summary, dried blood spot platform can have extreme 324 potential for massive future use and to add more parameters that is applicable to global health concerns in an endemic setting.
Acknowledgement
This research was supported by the Global Emerging Leader Award (K43TW010362 [T.R.B]), R01 AI130378 [T.R.B.] of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and icddr,b. icddr,b is grateful to NIH for its research support. icddr,b is also grateful to the Governments of Bangladesh, Canada, Sweden and the UK for providing core/unrestricted support.
Footnotes
Potential conflicts of interest
All authors: No reported conflicts.
All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References:
- [1].Devhare PB, Desai S, Lole KS. Innate immune responses in human hepatocyte-derived cell lines alter genotype 1 hepatitis E virus replication efficiencies. Sci Rep 2016;6:26827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Reyes GR, Purdy MA, Kim JP, Luk KC, Young LM, Fry KE, et al. Isolation of a cDNA from the virus responsible for enterically transmitted non-A, non-B hepatitis. Science 1990;247:1335–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Tam AW, Smith MM, Guerra ME, Huang CC, Bradley DW, Fry KE, et al. Hepatitis E virus (HEV): molecular cloning and sequencing of the full-length viral genome. Virology 1991;185:120–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Doceul V, Bagdassarian E, Demange A, Pavio N. Zoonotic Hepatitis E Virus: Classi fi cation, Animal Reservoirs and Transmission Routes. Viruses 2016;8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Izopet J, Dubois M, Bertagnoli S, Lhomme S, Marchandeau S, Boucher S, et al. Hepatitis E virus strains in rabbits and evidence of a closely related strain in humans, France. Emerg Infect Dis 2012;18:1274–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Schlosser J, Eiden M, Vina-Rodriguez A, Fast C, Dremsek P, Lange E, et al. Natural and experimental hepatitis E virus genotype 3-infection in European wild boar is transmissible to domestic pigs. Vet Res 2014;45:121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Yan B, Zhang L, Gong L, Lv J, Feng Y, Liu J, et al. Hepatitis E Virus in Yellow Cattle, Shandong, Eastern China. Emerg Infect Dis 2016;22:2211–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].van Tong H, Hoan NX, Wang B, Wedemeyer H, Bock CT, Velavan TP. Hepatitis E Virus Mutations: Functional and Clinical Relevance. EBioMedicine 2016;11:31–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Aslan AT, Balaban HY. Hepatitis E virus: Epidemiology, diagnosis, clinical manifestations, and treatment. World J Gastroenterol 2020;26:5543–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Navaneethan U, Al Mohajer M, Shata MT. Hepatitis E and pregnancy: understanding the pathogenesis. Liver Int 2008;28:1190–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Teshale EH, Hu DJ. Hepatitis E: Epidemiology and prevention. World J Hepatol 2011;3:285–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Begum N, Devi SG, Husain SA, Ashok K, Kar P. Seroprevalence of subclinical HEV infection in pregnant women from north India: a hospital based study. Indian J Med Res 2009;130:709–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Gruner N, Stambouli O, Ross RS. Dried blood spots--preparing and processing for use in immunoassays and in molecular techniques. J Vis Exp 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Dokubo EK, Evans J, Winkelman V, Cyrus S, Tobler LH, Asher A, et al. Comparison of Hepatitis C Virus RNA and antibody detection in dried blood spots and plasma specimens. J Clin Virol 2014;59:223–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Smit PW, Sollis KA, Fiscus S, Ford N, Vitoria M, Essajee S, et al. Systematic review of the use of dried blood spots for monitoring HIV viral load and for early infant diagnosis. PLoS One 2014;9:e86461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Mei JV, Alexander JR, Adam BW, Hannon WH. Use of filter paper for the collection and analysis of human whole blood specimens. J Nutr 2001;131:1631S–6S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Dowd JB, Aiello AE, Chyu L, Huang YY, McDade TW. Cytomegalovirus antibodies in dried blood spots: a minimally invasive method for assessing stress, immune function, and aging. Immun Ageing 2011;8:3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Vazquez-Moron S, Ardizone Jimenez B, Jimenez-Sousa MA, Bellon JM, Ryan P, Resino S. Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of laboratory-based screening for hepatitis C in dried blood spot samples: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2019;9:7316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Castejon ML, Rosillo MA, Montoya T, Gonzalez-Benjumea A, Fernandez-Bolanos JG, Alarcon-de-la-Lastra C. Correction: Oleuropein down-regulated IL-1beta-induced inflammation and oxidative stress in human synovial fibroblast cell line SW982. Food Funct 2017;8:2341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Eick G, Urlacher SS, McDade TW, Kowal P, Snodgrass JJ. Validation of an Optimized ELISA for Quantitative Assessment of Epstein-Barr Virus Antibodies from Dried Blood Spots. Biodemography Soc Biol 2016;62:222–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Melgaco JG, Pinto MA, Rocha AM, Freire M, Gaspar LP, Lima SM, et al. The use of dried blood spots for assessing antibody response to hepatitis A virus after natural infection and vaccination. J Med Virol 2011;83:208–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Judd A, Parry J, Hickman M, McDonald T, Jordan L, Lewis K, et al. Evaluation of a modified commercial assay in detecting antibody to hepatitis C virus in oral fluids and dried blood spots. J Med Virol 2003;71:49–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Bhuiyan MS, Hossain M, Sharmin S, Shirin A, Khanam F, Chowdhury F, et al. Assessment of disease specific immune responses in enteric diseases using dried blood spot (DBS). PLoS One 2019;14:e0218353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Singh MP, Majumdar M, Budhathoki B, Goyal K, Chawla Y, Ratho RK. Assessment of dried blood samples as an alternative less invasive method for detection of Hepatitis E virus marker in an outbreak setting. J Med Virol 2014;86:713–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Boemer F, Vanbellinghen JF, Bours V, Schoos R. Screening for sickle cell disease on dried blood: a new approach evaluated on 27,000 Belgian newborns. J Med Screen 2006;13:132–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Chaillet P, Zachariah R, Harries K, Rusanganwa E, Harries AD. Dried blood spots are a useful tool for quality assurance of rapid HIV testing in Kigali, Rwanda. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2009;103:634–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Kalou M. Dired blood spots: Applications and Techniques. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2014;First Edition:Edited by Wenkui Li Lee Mike S. [Google Scholar]
- [28].Merens A, Guerin PJ, Guthmann JP, Nicand E. Outbreak of hepatitis E virus infection in Darfur, Sudan: effectiveness of real-time reverse transcription-PCR analysis of dried blood spots. J Clin Microbiol 2009;47:1931–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Lang PO, Mitchell WA, Govind S, Aspinall R. Real time-PCR assay estimating the naive T-cell pool in whole blood and dried blood spot samples: pilot study in young adults. J Immunol Methods 2011;369:133–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



