Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1999 Dec;43(12):3001–3004. doi: 10.1128/aac.43.12.3001

Comparative In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities of the Newly Synthesized Quinolone HSR-903, Sitafloxacin (DU-6859a), Gatifloxacin (AM-1155), and Levofloxacin against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium Complex

Haruaki Tomioka 1,*, Katsumasa Sato 1, Tatsuya Akaki 1,2, Hiroko Kajitani 1, Shin Kawahara 3, Mitsunori Sakatani 4
PMCID: PMC89602  PMID: 10582897

Abstract

We compared the in vitro antimycobacterial activity of a new fluoroquinolone, HSR-903, with strong activity against gram-positive cocci with those of levofloxacin (LVFX), sitafloxacin (STFX), and gatifloxacin (GFLX). The MICs of the quinolones for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium complex were in the order STFX ≈ GFLX < LVFX ≦ HSR-903 and STFX ≦ GFLX ≦ HSR-903 ≦ LVFX, respectively. HSR-903 effectively eliminated intramacrophagial M. tuberculosis, as did LVFX, and exhibited bacteriostatic effects against M. tuberculosis replicating in type II alveolar cells.


The recent increase in AIDS-associated intractable mycobacterial infections, including multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infections, has caused serious problems around the world (4, 7, 28). New quinolones are recommended for use as second-choice drugs in treatment of MDR-TB, since they have potent anti-Mycobacterium tuberculosis activity and good pharmacokinetics, in terms of tissue and cellular distribution, and have few adverse effects (1, 5, 6). Ciprofloxacin (CPFX), ofloxacin (OFLX), sparfloxacin (SPFX), and levofloxacin (LVFX) have good therapeutic efficacies against experimental M. tuberculosis infection in mice (9, 11) and are efficacious in clinical control of tuberculosis, including MDR-TB, when given in combination with other antituberculous drugs (1, 26).

HSR-903, a new fluoroquinolone [(S)-(−)-5-amino-7-(7-amino-5-azaspiro [2,4]hept-5-yl)-1-cyclopropyl-6-fluoro-1,4-dihydro-8-methyl-4-oxoquinoline-3-carboxylic acid methanesulfonate], has a broad spectrum of action against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. HSR-903 has more potent activity against Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecalis, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Helicobacter pylori than do other fluoroquinolones, including CPFX, SPFX, and LVFX (20, 24, 27). In pharmacological studies with mice, the levels of HSR-903 in the lungs were much higher than those in the plasma after oral administration, and concentrations of HSR-903 in lung were higher than those of CPFX and LVFX (13). In humans, the maximum concentration of drug in serum (Cmax) of HSR-903 at 200 mg/kg of body weight was 0.86 μg/ml at 1.3 to 2.4 h (time to Cmax [Tmax]), and the half-life (T1/2β) and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0–24) of HSR-903 were 18.0 h and 12.8 μg · h/ml, respectively (13a, 23). HSR-903 also exhibited potent therapeutic efficacy against experimental murine infections caused by penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae (27). In the present study, the in vitro antimicrobial activity of HSR-903 against M. tuberculosis and MAC was compared with those of several other fluoroquinolones, including LVFX, sitafloxacin (STFX; DU-6859a), and gatifloxacin (GFLX; AM-1155), which possess potent in vitro and in vivo antimycobacterial activities (9, 11, 1418, 21).

M. tuberculosis (45 strains), M. avium (20 strains), and Mycobacterium intracellulare (20 strains) were isolated from sputum specimens of non-human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with sporadic tuberculosis or MAC infection in several hospitals in Japan and grown in 7H9 medium. Each strain was isolated from a different patient. The M. tuberculosis isolates were divided into MDR M. tuberculosis with resistance to both rifampin (RMP) and isoniazid (INH) (MICRMP of ≧1.56 μg/ml and MICINH of ≧0.4 μg/ml) and non-MDR M. tuberculosis (MICRMP of ≦0.78 μg/ml and MICINH of ≦0.2 μg/ml) strains, according to the criteria of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (10). Alternatively, the M. tuberculosis isolates were divided into LVFX-susceptible (MICLVFX of ≦0.78 μg/ml) and LVFX-resistant (MICLVFX of ≧1.56 μg/ml) strains (17).

In this study, the activities of the following drugs were measured: HSR-903 (Hokuriku Pharmaceutical Co., Fukui, Japan), LVFX (Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co., Tokyo, Japan), STFX (Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co.), GFLX (Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co., Tokyo), RMP (Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co.), clarithromycin (CAM) (Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Tokyo), and INH (Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co.).

MICs of test drugs were determined as previously reported (18) by either the agar dilution method with Middlebrook 7H11 medium (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) or the broth dilution method in microculture wells with 7HSF medium as described by Yajuko et al. (25).

The activities of test drugs against intracellular M. tuberculosis were measured as follows. The Mono Mac 6 human macrophage (Mφ)-like cell line (MM6-Mφs; German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, Mascheroder, Germany) and A-549 human type II lung epithelial cell line (A-549 cells; American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, Md.) were used as host cells for M. tuberculosis infection. Cultured MM6-Mφs and A-549 cells (4 × 104 cells) suspended in RPMI 1640 medium and Ham’s F-12K medium containing 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (BioWhittaker Co., Walkersville, Md.), respectively, were seeded on round-bottom microculture wells. The resulting cells were then infected with M. tuberculosis “Kurono” [MICRMP(7H11) of ≦0.05 μg/ml and MICINH(7H11) of ≦0.05 μg/ml] at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 30 for 3 h and at an MOI of 10 for 2 h, respectively. (These conditions yielded comparable loads of mycobacterial infection for MM6-Mφs and A-549 cells.) After being washed with 2% FBS–Hanks’ balanced salt solution, M. tuberculosis-infected cells were cultured in corresponding medium (0.2 ml) containing 1% FBS in the presence or absence of test drugs for up to 7 days. At intervals, the cells were lysed with 0.07% sodium dodecyl sulfate and washed with distilled water by centrifugation, and the number of recovered CFU was counted on 7H11 agar plates.

Table 1 summarizes the MICs at which 50 and 90% of the test strains were inhibited (MIC50 and MIC90, respectively) of HSR-903, STFX, GFLX, LVFX, RMP, INH, and CAM for M. tuberculosis and MAC. The MIC50 and MIC90 of test quinolones were distributed over a range from 0.1 to 0.78 μg/ml and 0.39 to 25 μg/ml for non-MDR M. tuberculosis and MDR M. tuberculosis strains, respectively. Their MICs were in the order STFX ≈ GFLX < LVFX ≦ HSR-903. The MICs of RMP and INH were lowest among test drugs for non-MDR M. tuberculosis strains, but markedly increased in the case of MDR-M. tuberculosis strains. The MICs of CAM were high for both non-MDR-M. tuberculosis and MDR-M. tuberculosis strains.

TABLE 1.

MICs of HSR-903, STFX, GFLX, LVFX, RMP, INH, and CAM for M. tuberculosis and MAC strainsa

Strains No. of strains MIC50 (μg/ml)
MIC90 (μg/ml)
HSR-903 STFX GFLX LVFX RMP INH CAM HSR-903 STFX GFLX LVFX RMP INH CAM
M. tuberculosis
 Non-MDRb 23 0.78 0.1 0.1 0.39 ≦0.05 ≦0.05 25 0.78 0.1 0.2 0.39 0.39 1.56 50
 MDRc 22 3.13 0.39 0.39 3.13 50 12.5 6.25 25 1.56 1.56 6.25 100 >100 25
 LVFX-Sd 27 0.78 0.1 0.1 0.39 ≦0.05 0.1 25 1.56 0.1 0.2 0.78 100 6.25 50
 LVFX-Re 18 6.25 0.78 0.78 3.13 12.5 25 6.25 50 1.56 3.13 12.5 100 >100 25
M. avium 20 6.25 1.56 3.13 6.25 50 6.25 12.5 25 6.25 6.25 25 >100 12.5 25
M. intracellulare 20 12.5 6.25 6.25 25 3.13 6.25 6.25 12.5 6.25 12.5 25 6.25 100 12.5
a

MICs were determined by the agar dilution method with 7H11 medium. 

b

Either MICRMP of ≦0.78 μg/ml or MICINH of ≦0.2 μg/ml. 

c

MICRMP of ≧1.56 μg/ml and MICINH of ≧0.4 μg/ml. 

d

LVFX-S, LVFX susceptible (MICLVFX of ≦0.78 μg/ml). 

e

LVFX-R, LVFX resistant (MICLVFX of ≧1.56 μg/ml). 

Notably, the MICs of test quinolones for MDR-M. tuberculosis isolates were 4 to 32 times higher than their MICs for non-MDR-M. tuberculosis strains. This finding is not surprising, since in the present study, most MDR-M. tuberculosis strains with increased quinolone resistance were isolated from patients who had been treated with antituberculous regimens containing fluoroquinolones, such as OFLX and CPFX. Moreover, certain MDR-M. tuberculosis isolates with susceptibility to quinolones as high as those of non-MDR-M. tuberculosis strains were isolated from patients who had never undergone quinolone treatment. Indeed, it was previously reported that MICs of these quinolones were not increased in MDR-M. tuberculosis isolates (8). Similarly, the MICs of HSR-903, STFX, and GFLX for LVFX-resistant M. tuberculosis strains (MICLVFX of ≧1.56 μg/ml) were 8 to 32 times higher than those for LVFX-susceptible M. tuberculosis strains (MICLVFX of ≦0.78 μg/ml).

The MIC50 and MIC90 of test quinolones for M. avium were distributed over a range from 1.56 to 25 μg/ml and in the order STFX ≦ GFLX < HSR-903 = LVFX. Their MICs for M. intracellulare were distributed from 6.25 to 25 μg/ml and in the order STFX ≦ GFLX ≦ HSR-903 < LVFX. Thus, the activities of these quinolones against MAC can be ranked as STFX ≧ GFLX ≧ HSR-903 ≧ LVFX. The activities of both HSR-903 and LVFX are poor against MAC. Notably, the MIC50s of the quinolones for M. avium tended to be lower than those for M. intracellulare, as previously reported (22). In contrast, the MICs of RMP and CAM for M. avium were higher than those for M. intracellulare.

Next, we examined the antimicrobial activity of HSR-903 against intracellular M. tuberculosis. Figure 1 shows the effects of HSR-903 and LVFX on the mode of intracellular growth of M. tuberculosis “Kurono” residing in MM6-Mφs and A-549 cells, when these drugs were added to the culture medium at the Cmax in blood (0.86 and 2.0 μg/ml, respectively) (3, 23). The M. tuberculosis bacteria in MM6-Mφs were progressively killed in similar fashions by HSR-903 and LVFX during a 7-day cultivation. While gradual but progressive killing by LVFX was noted for M. tuberculosis bacteria residing in A-549 cells, HSR-903-mediated bacterial elimination was somewhat incomplete for the organisms in A-549 cells. In separate experiments, when these drugs were added at the MIC (7HSF medium) (0.25 μg/ml each for HSR-903 and LVFX), HSR-903 displayed bacteriostatic activity against the organisms residing in MM6-Mφs, while LVFX did not (data not shown). In the case of A-549 cells, only weak bacteriostatic effects were observed for the two quinolones against intracellular M. tuberculosis (data not shown).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1

Antimicrobial activity of HSR-903 (●) and LVFX (▴) against M. tuberculosis “Kurono” residing in MM6-Mφs (A) and A-549 cells (B). These drugs were added to culture medium of M. tuberculosis-infected cells at the Cmax in blood (0.86 and 2.0 μg/ml, respectively) after oral administration (HSR-903, 4 mg/kg; LVFX, 20 mg/kg). The numbers of cells recovered were increased by 2.0 and 2.9 times during a 7-day cultivation of MM6-Mφs and A-549 cells, respectively. Each symbol indicates the mean ± standard error (n = 3 [error bars were omitted when values were <0.1]). ○, control culture without addition of drugs. Asterisks indicate significant differences between the number of bacterial CFU recovered from drug-treated cells versus that recovered from untreated cells (∗, P < 0.01; ∗∗, P < 0.05 [Student’s t test]).

In this study, we compared the in vitro activity of a newly synthesized fluoroquinolone, HSR-903, with those of LVFX, STFX, and GFLX as reference drugs. First, the MICs of HSR-903 for M. tuberculosis isolates were the same as or twice as high as those of LVFX. HSR-903 exhibited a broader MIC distribution for MDR M. tuberculosis isolates than did LVFX, with a peak around 3.13 μg/ml, the same as that of LVFX (data not shown). It thus appears that HSR-903 has somewhat weaker but comparable activity against M. tuberculosis compared to LVFX. In any case, the activities of both HSR-903 and LVFX are poor against MDR-M. tuberculosis. Second, both STFX and GFLX exhibited much more potent anti-M. tuberculosis activity than did LVFX and HSR-903. Notably, STFX and GFLX were eight times more active against MDR-M. tuberculosis strains than LVFX in terms of MIC50, suggesting that these new quinolones might be useful in clinical control of MDR-TB. Third, HSR-903 at Cmax displayed the same level of bactericidal activity as LVFX against M. tuberculosis organisms residing in MM6-Mφs. Thus, HSR-903 may be as efficacious as LVFX in displaying in vivo antimicrobial activity against intramacrophagial M. tuberculosis at sites of infection. HSR-903 added at the MIC exhibited more marked bacteriostatic activity against M. tuberculosis within MM6-Mφs than did LVFX added at the MIC. This finding suggests that the efficacy of HSR-903 delivery to phagosomes containing bacteria in M. tuberculosis-infected Mφs may be greater than that for LVFX.

The antimicrobial activities of HSR-903 and LVFX against M. tuberculosis residing in A-549 alveolar cells, which are nonprofessional phagocytes, were significantly lower than those against M. tuberculosis within MM6-Mφs, which are professional phagocytes (Fig. 1). M. tuberculosis replicates in A-549 cells more vigorously than in Mφs (2, 12), presumably because of the inability of A-549 cells to produce nitric oxide, an important antimycobacterial effector molecule (19). Therefore, mobilization of nitric oxide-dependent antimicrobial mechanisms in host cells may be critical for quinolone-mediated elimination of intracellular M. tuberculosis. Alternatively, it is also possible that the delivery of quinolones to internalized M. tuberculosis is less efficient in A-549 cells than in MM6-Mφs; this may lead to reduced anti-M. tuberculosis activity by drugs in the case of A-549 cells. Further studies to examine the profiles of quinolone delivery in MM6-Mφs and A-549 cells are currently under way.

Acknowledgments

This study was partly supported by grants from the Ministry of Public Welfare of Japan and the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan.

We thank Hokuriku Pharmaceutical Co., Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co., Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co., and Taisho Pharmaceutical Co. for providing HSR-903, STFX and LVFX, GFLX, and CAM, respectively.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Alangaden G J, Lerner S A. The clinical use of fluoroquinolones for the treatment of mycobacterial diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25:1213–1221. doi: 10.1086/516116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bermudez L E, Goodman J. Mycobacterium tuberculosis invades and replicates within type II alveolar cells. Infect Immun. 1996;64:1400–1406. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.4.1400-1406.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chien S-C, Wong F A, Fowler C L, Callery-D’Amico S V, Williams R R, Nayak R, Chow A T. Double-blind evaluation of the safety and pharmacokinetics of multiple oral once-daily 750-milligram and 1-gram doses of levofloxacin in healthy volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:885–888. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.4.885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Falkinham J O., III Epidemiology of infection by nontuberculous mycobacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1996;9:177–215. doi: 10.1128/cmr.9.2.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Garcia-Rodriguez J A, Garcia A C G. In-vitro activities of quinolones against mycobacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993;32:797–808. doi: 10.1093/jac/32.6.797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Grassi C. New drugs for tuberculosis. Exp Opin Investig Drugs. 1997;6:1211–1226. doi: 10.1517/13543784.6.9.1211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hart C A, Beeching N J, Duerden B I. Tuberculosis into the next century. J Med Microbiol. 1996;44:1–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hoffner S E, Gezelius L, Olsson-Liljequist B. In-vitro activity of fluorinated quinolones and macrolides against drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997;40:885–888. doi: 10.1093/jac/40.6.885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ji B, Lounis N, Truffot-Pernot C, Grosset J. In vitro and in vivo activities of levofloxacin against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:1341–1344. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.6.1341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kent P T, Kubica G P. Public health mycobacteriology: a guide for the level III laboratory. Atlanta, Ga: Centers for Disease Control; 1985. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Klemens S P, Sharpe C A, Rogge M C, Cynamon M H. Activity of levofloxacin in a murine model of tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:1476–1479. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.7.1476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.McDonough K A, Kress Y. Cytotoxicity for lung epithelial cells is a virulence-associated phenotype of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun. 1995;63:4802–4811. doi: 10.1128/iai.63.12.4802-4811.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Murata M, Takahara E, Nagata O, Kato H, Tamai I, Tsuji A. Abstracts of the 35th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology; 1995. Carrier-mediated tissue distribution and pharmacokinetics of HSR-903, a new quinolone, abstr. F203; p. 148. [Google Scholar]
  • 13a.Okezaki, E. Personal communication.
  • 14.Rastogi N, Goh K S, Bryskier A, Devallois A. In vitro activities of levofloxacin used alone and in combination with first- and second-line antituberculous drugs against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:1610–1616. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.7.1610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rastogi N, Goh K S, Bryskier A, Devallois A. Spectrum of activity of levofloxacin against nontuberculous mycobacteria and its activity against Mycobacterium avium complex in combination with ethambutol, rifampin, roxithromycin, amikacin, and clofazimine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:2483–2487. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.11.2483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Saito H, Sato K, Tomioka H, Dekio S. In vitro antimycobacterial activity of a new quinolone, levofloxacin (DR-3355) Tuber Lung Dis. 1995;76:377–380. doi: 10.1016/0962-8479(95)90001-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Saito H, Tomioka H, Sato K, Dekio S. In vitro and in vivo antimycobacterial activities of a new quinolone, DU-6859a. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:2877–2882. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.12.2877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sato K, Akaki T, Tomioka H. Antimicrobial activities of benzoxazinorifamycin KRM-1648, clarithromycin and levofloxacin against intracellular Mycobacterium avium complex phagocytosed by murine peritoneal macrophages. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1998;41:77–83. doi: 10.1093/jac/41.1.77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sato K, Tomioka H. Antimicrobial activities of benzoxazinorifamycin (KRM-1648) and clarithromycin against Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex residing in murine peritoneal macrophages, human macrophage-like cells and human alveolar epithelial cells. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999;43:351–357. doi: 10.1093/jac/43.3.351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Takahashi Y, Masuda N, Otsuki M, Miki M, Nishino T. In vitro activity of HSR-903, a new quinolone. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:1326–1330. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.6.1326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tomioka H, Saito H, Sato K. Comparative antimycobacterial activities of the newly synthesized quinolone AM-1155, sparfloxacin, and ofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37:1259–1263. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.6.1259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tomioka H, Sato K, Saito H, Yamada Y. Susceptibility of Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare to various antibacterial drugs. Microbiol Immunol. 1989;33:509–514. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1989.tb02000.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Umemura K, Mizuno A, Nakashima M. Abstracts of the 36th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology; 1996. Pharmacokinetics and safety of HSR-903 in healthy volunteers, abstr. F60; p. 110. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Watanabe A, Tokue Y, Takahashi H, Kikuchi T, Kobayashi T, Gomi K, Fujiwara S, Nukiwa T. In vitro activity of HSR-903, a new oral quinolone, against bacteria causing respiratory infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:1767–1768. doi: 10.1128/aac.43.7.1767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yajuko D M, Nassos P S, Hadley W K. Broth microdilution testing of susceptibilities to 30 antimicrobial agents of Mycobacterium avium strains from patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987;31:1579–1584. doi: 10.1128/aac.31.10.1579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yew W W, Au K F, Lee J, Chau C H. Levofloxacin in treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1997;1:89. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yoshizumi S, Domon H, Miyazaki S, Yamaguchi K. In vivo activity of HSR-903, a new fluoroquinolone, against respiratory pathogens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:785–788. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.4.785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Young L S. Mycobacterial infections in immunocompromised patients. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 1996;9:240–245. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES