Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 7;65(5):790–799. doi: 10.1007/s00125-022-05653-1

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Illustration of the two-stage study design and the two-step Mendelian randomisation for mediation model used for stage 2. (a) Summary of how evidence from univariate Mendelian randomisation analyses of the risk factor, liability to type 2 diabetes, and liability to atherosclerotic CVD are assessed in stage 1. Here, estimates that met the arbitrary FDR threshold of 5% were deemed to lend ‘supportive’ evidence, while all other estimates were considered to provide ‘limited’ evidence. Depending on the evidence obtained in stage 1, a trait may progress to stage 2 (i.e. the two-step Mendelian randomisation for mediation). (b) The model for two-step Mendelian randomisation is shown. Red arrow represents the direct (i.e. independent of the mediator) effect and the blue arrow represents the indirect (i.e. via the mediator) effect. ASCVD, atherosclerotic CVD; T2D, type 2 diabetes; UVMR, univariate Mendelian randomisation; MR, Mendelian randomisation