Abstract
Allylic amination enables late-stage functionalization of natural products where allylic C–H bonds are abundant, and introduction of nitrogen may alter biological profiles. Despite advances, intermolecular allylic amination remains a challenging problem due to reactivity and selectivity issues that often mandate excess substrate, furnish product mixtures, and render important classes of olefins (for example functionalized cyclic) not viable substrates. Here we report that a sustainable manganese perchlorophthalocyanine catalyst [MnIII(ClPc)] 2 achieves selective, preparative intermolecular allylic C–H amination of 32 cyclic and linear compounds, including ones housing basic amines and competing sites for allylic, ethereal, and benzylic amination. Mechanistic studies support that the high selectivity of 2 may be attributed to its electrophilic, bulky nature and stepwise amination mechanism. Late-stage amination is demonstrated on five distinct classes of natural products generally with >20:1 site-, regio- and diastereoselectivity.
Alkenes are the second most frequent functional group in natural products, present in approximately 40% of molecules.1 Their pervasiveness presents the opportunity to introduce functionality in a targeted fashion at allylic C—H bonds, with nitrogen holding special significance as it can alter small molecules’ biological profile.2 Traditional methods to introduce amine functionality proceed via alcohol derivatives or carbonyls that are among the most challenging functional groups to react selectively in natural product environments.3,4 Despite advances, challenges that persist for intermolecular allylic aminations in such settings are the paucity of methods with reactivity and/or selectivity in topologically and functionally complex olefin environments.
Metal-catalyzed C(sp3)–H activation via π-allyl metal (Pd, Ir, Rh) intermediates as well as photocatalytic methods are powerful approaches for allylic C—H amination of terminal olefins and emerging ones for linear internal olefins (Scheme 1a).5–10 However such methods often have limited applications in natural product settings, likely due to a narrow scope with cyclic olefins.9,11 The other major approach involves group transfer reactions via metal-nitrenes. Rhodium catalysis is demonstrated for benzylic and aliphatic C(sp3)–H amination in complex substrates;12 however, for allylic aminations in both intra- and intermolecular settings, olefin aziridination is generally favored.13–15 Elaborate, chiral rhodium and iridium catalysts, sometimes paired with chiral and/or bulky nitrogen reagents, have been most successful in achieving chemoselectivity in allylic aminations.16–23 However, these reactions show limited scope and high synthetic overhead without catalyst controlled asymmetric induction in chiral molecule settings.19 Iron, manganese, cobalt, and ruthenium catalysts promote intramolecular allylic C–H aminations;24–27 however, face selectivity and reactivity challenges in intermolecular catalysis generally limiting scope to unfunctionalized, symmetrical olefins used in large excess.28–31
Scheme 1.

Approaches for Allylic C—H Amination
Commercial manganese-perchlorophthlocyanine [MnIII(ClPc)] 1 was recently demonstrated in its cationic form 2 as a catalyst for preparative, site-selective, late–stage intermolecular benzylic amination.32,33 Although allylic and benzylic C–H bonds have comparable bond strengths (BDE ca. 82–85 kcal/mol), allylic C–H amination presents a formidable chemoselectivity challenge of competing olefin aziridination.34 In porphyrin, salen and even phthalocyanine ligand frameworks, manganese nitrene-based systems operating under excess olefin effect mixtures of allylic amination products and aziridines(Scheme 1a).31, 35–38 We questioned if [MnIII(ClPc)] 2 aminations proceeding via a bulky, electrophilic metallonitrene may favor reactivity with an electron rich C–H bond over a more electron deficient and sterically demanding π-system. Additionally, aminations likely proceed via a step-wise pathway that should disfavor formation of an unstabilized secondary radical leading to aziridination. Herein we report the discovery that [MnIII(ClPc)] 2 catalysis effects a highly chemo-, site-, and regioselective allylic C–H amination of linear internal and cyclic olefins including ones housing dense functionality, heterocycles, basic amines, styrenyl olefins, and competing allylic, benzylic, and ethereal sites (Scheme 1b). Late-stage allyic amination is demonstrated in olefin containing natural products that include amino alcohol lipids, glycosides, terpenes, and macrolides.
We began our investigation by exposing 3 to iminoiodinane oxidant (PhI=NTces) in benzene at 40 °C in the presence of [MnIII(ClPc)] 2 (Table 1a, b). Using molecular sieves and standard Schlenk benchtop techniques C–H aminated product 4 could be isolated in 63% yield (limiting olefin) with high site-selectivity (>20:1 s.s., dictated by C–H cleavage) and regio-selectivity (6:1 r.r., dictated by rebound) at the site most remote from the electron withdrawing group (EWG). In contrast, Rh catalysis using a commercial Rh2(esp)2 furnishes aziridine product 4a in 55% yield.13 When allylic amination with 2 was run without precautions to exclude O2 or water, lower yields and mass balance are observed. Benzylic amination under these conditions furnish ketone bi-products, suggesting pathways involving other manganese oxidants may diminish mass balance (see supporting information).39 Significantly, the reaction can be run with commercial catalyst 1 to afford a useful yield of allylic amine 4 (46%).
Table 1.
[MnIII(ClPc)] Allylic C—H Amination of Linear and Cyclic Olefinsa
|
Additional linear olefins with EWGs, like para-toluenesulfonyl (OTs) and esters, are aminated with 2 in high site- and regioselectivity to favor remote allylic amination (5 and 6) whereas rhodium catalysis furnishes aziridine (Table 1c). Chemoselectivity issues may arise with styrenyl olefins due to aromatic stabilization of benzylic radicals in aziridination.40 With electronically deactivated styrenyl derivatives, [MnIII(ClPc)] 2 amination affords regioisomerically pure allylic amination products 7 and 8 with trace aziridine (6–8%), whereas rhodium catalysis again affords primarily aziridine. Styrenyl substrate with chloro groups at the ortho-positions, which may force the olefin and aryl π-systems out of conjugation, affords only allylic amine 9. A coumarin derivative prone to electrophilic epoxidation,41 also proceeds chemoselectively to afford allylic amine 10. In substrates housing allylic and benzylic sites, selectivity can be achieved via electronic or steric effects. Consistent with an electrophilic metallonitrene, tetralone and electron deficient tetralins containing exocyclic olefins underwent selective allylic C–H amination (11, 12a-b). Analogous electron rich tetralins afford selective benzylic amination (12c, 70% yield, >20:1 B:A, see SI). An ibuprofen analogue with two hindered benzylic sites was aminated by 2 at the more accessible allylic site (13).
Despite their prevalence in natural products and some pharmaceuticals, C–H amination is not well demonstrated for functionalized cyclic olefins (>50% of cyclic olefins reported are simple cycloalkenes n = 5–8).9,11,15,17–23,28,30,31,35,37,38 [MnIII(ClPc)] 2 was successful in aminating an electronically biased cyclohexene derivative to produce 14 as one regio-isomer (Table 1d). Dihydrovalencene, a sterically biased terpene, is selectively aminated to afford allylic amine 15. The Tces group is removed under mild hydrolysis to a free amine for further derivatization (4-bromobenzoyl 16). Prenylated motifs are abundant in terpene natural products. Consistent with a step-wise mechanism, 2-catalyzed amination of α-cedrene affords a mixture of 1° and 2° allylic amine products 17a and 17b (1.5:1). [MnIII(ClPc)] 2, an effective catalyst for ethereal aminations (see ambroxide SI, 72% yield, 18a), prefers allylic amination when competing ethereal sites are electronically (18) or sterically deactivated (19). For example, a cyclopentene substrate is aminated at the most sterically accessible 2° allylic site to furnish 19 despite the presence of two doubly activated allylic ethereal sites. Notably, all of these cyclic olefin aminations, only one regioisomer was observed.
Weakly basic nitrogen heterocycles, like a 5-alkylated barbituric acid derivative, undergo [MnIII(ClPc)] 2 allylic C–H amination in good yields and excellent selectivities (20, Table 1e). Basic amines must be deactivated towards oxidation and/or catalyst inhibition with Lewis or Brønsted acid complexation or via covalent modification with EWGs. A fused-ring cyclopentene trifluoroacetamide pyrrole 21 underwent site-, regio-, and diastereoselective allylic amination from the most exposed convex face. Selective removal of the trifluoroacetyl group in the presence of the Tces amine afforded 22. BF3 complexation of azaspirocyclic system 23 affords a column and bench stable piperidine—BF3 complex that enables 2-catalyzed remote allylic C–H amination (24) followed by base-mediated hydrolysis to the free amine (25). For Lewis basic N-heterocycles and tertiary amines, a BF3 or HBF4 complexation strategy is uniquely effective for enabling C–H amination.32,42 In tetrahydroquinoline, BF3 complexation promotes remote allylic over benzylic C–H amination and a mild tetramethymethelenediamine (TMEDA) workup preserves the hydrolytically labile ester to afford 26. In tertiary amines like 27, steric hinderance blocks effective BF3 complexation and renders HBF4 protonation more effective in allylic amination to furnish 28. Notably, [MnIII(ClPc)] 2 C–H aminations have been unique in demonstrating tolerance for basic amines using this strategy.12,23,32
A central advantage of [MnIII(ClPc)] 2 allylic C–H amination is that the reactivity and selectivity trends observed for simple substrates are generally enhanced in complex olefin containing natural product settings (Scheme 2a–c). A linear amino alcohol lipid, sphingosine analogue 29, housing a densely functionalized, contiguous amino 1,3-diol adjacent to the olefin was regioselectively aminated at the most electron rich site to afford 30. Pentacyclic triterpenoid α-amyrin 31, with two sterically differentiated 2° and 3° allylic C–H bonds is selectively aminated at the more sterically accessible 2° site to afford 32 as a single isomer. Amination occurs diastereoselectively from the alpha face circumventing beta face 1,3-diaxial interactions with C10/C8 angular methyls. The sulfamate is readily hydrolyzed to primary amine 33. Geniposide is an iridoid glycoside possessing six ethereal sites, including an oxidatively labile glycosidic bond, and a cyclopentene-[C]-pyran skeleton housing two olefins having multiple 2° and 3° allylic sites. Bulky O-silyl groups deter ethereal C—H amination, enabling allylic amination of silylated geniposide 34 at the 2° allylic site from the most sterically accessible convex face of the molecule to afford 35 as a single isomer.
Scheme 2.

Late-Stage Allylic C–H Amination on Five Classes of Olefin-containing Natural Productsa
Rigid, cyclic systems position allylic C–H bonds in well-defined chemical environments and restrict free rotation, enabling remarkably diastereoselective aminations with 2. Zearalenone, an estrogenic mycotoxin, is a resorcyclic acid macrolide housing a styrenyl olefin that is perpendicular to the aryl moiety that defines the plane of the ring (Scheme 2d).43 This conformation disfavors olefin aziridination and affords steric and stereoelectronic differentiation of the allylic C–H bonds where Ha is positioned on the sterically more accessible peripheral face of the π-system capable of stabilizing an incipient allylic radical.44 Consistent with this analysis, amination of 36 occurs at Ha to furnish 37 as one isomer with no observed aziridination.
Brefeldin A is a storied 13-membered macrolide investigated extensively in chemical synthesis and biology.45 Structures of brefeldin A show a trans relationship between the vicinal hydrogens at C9 and C10 that places the plane of the isolated olefin perpendicular to the plane of the macrocycle (Scheme 2e).46 We again postulated that the macrocyclic conformation of silylated brefeldin A 38 places allylic hydrogens in distinct chemical environments where Ha is more sterically accessible and able to achieve more facile π-system overlap upon abstraction.44 [MnIII(ClPc)] 2 amination of 38 occurred selectively at the isolated trans alkene to afford aminated 39 as one isomer. Despite the well-defined conformations of many macrocyclic structures, selective C–H functionalizations have rarely been reported outside of enzymatic catalysis.47,48
To distinguish between a radical rebound and a concerted insertion event, we examined [MnIII(ClPc)] 2-catalyzed amination of symmetrical trans-5-decene 40 (Scheme 3a). Only one allylic aminated product is expected under a concerted C–H insertion pathway; however, nearly equal mixtures of regioisomers 41 (1.7: 1 r.r.) resulted from amination onto an undifferentiated allyl radical intermediate. Such a pathway favors allylic amination over aziridination due to generation of a stabilized allylic radical. Additionally, sequential amination at the metal limits radical engagement in off-cycle pathways to afford preparative yields with limiting substrate.
Scheme 3.

Mechanistic Insights Probing Reaction Pathway (a), and Reactivity Properties (b, c, d)a
We probed the reactivity properties of the aminating species by examining [MnIII(ClPc)] 2 catalyzed C–H amination in substrates having two labile sites distinguished electronically, sterically, or stereoelectronically (Scheme 3b, c, d). Substrate 42 has two electronically distinct olefins, and we observed amination only at the most electron rich site (43). Orthogonal site-selectivity is observed in cobalt-catalyzed intermolecular allylic C–H aminations that show reactivity only with electron deficient arylcrotonate esters.49
The steric nature of the transition structure for amination was examined by conducting intra- and intermolecular competition studies with substrates housing electronically unbiased benzylic and allylic sites. Previous studies with [MnIII(ClPc)] 2 benzylic aminations did not examine substrates containing olefins.32 The high energy barriers required to achieve C–H bond cleavage contrast the small energetic differences between the two bond types (ca. 3 kcal/mol). In the absence of steric bias, we expected only minor differences in the allylic-to-benzylic product ratios (A:B).25 Consistent with this, 2 catalyzed intramolecular amination of 44, where the metallonitrene intermediate is formed on the substrate prior to C–H cleavage, afforded only a modest preference for allylic amination 45 (A:B = 3:1, Scheme 3c). In contrast, 2 catalyzed intermolecular amination of 46 afforded high site-selectivity for allylic amination 47 (A:B = 16:1). This is consistent with a bulky metallonitrene sensing the steric difference between a phenyl (A value ~ 2.8 kcal/mol) versus an allyl (A value ~ 1.7 kcal/mol) in an intermolecular C–H cleavage event.50
The impact of stereoelectronic stabilization of substrate radical intermediates on selectivity was probed by examining a series of hydroaromatics of varying ring sizes (Scheme 3d). In tetralin 48a, aromatic π-system overlap with an incipient benzylic radical results in minimal ring strain and affords a mixture of allylic and benzylic amination (49a, Scheme 3d). In larger ring sizes 48b and 48c, where torsional strain is introduced during aromatic radical stabilization,51 only products of allylic C–H amination 49b and 49c are observed. Electronics can override both steric and stereoelectronic effects. Consistent with 2-catalyzed aminations proceeding via an electrophilic metallonitrene, incorporation of a para-aryl methoxy group in 46 and 48b affords predominantly benzylic amination products in 62% and 58% yield, respectively (47S, 49bS see SI). It is notable that among reagents capable of allylic and benzylic C–H functionalization, none have previously been shown to preparatively distinguish between these bond types.52
[MnIII(ClPc)] 2 catalyzed late-stage allylic amination enables the atomistic change of allylic C–H to C–N in complex natural products and their derivatives. By generating an electrophilic, bulky metallonitrene amination catalyst, 2 distinguishes C–H bonds, even ones of closely matched BDEs, based on subtle differences in their electronic, steric and stereoelectronic environments. We anticipate that the facile access to aminated complex molecules using this method will enable broader interrogation of natural products as new sources of drugs.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We acknowledge Dr. Lingyang Zhu for assistance with NMR spectroscopy, Dr. Danielle Gray and Dr. Toby Woods for X-ray crystallographic studies. We thank R. Chambers for checking the experimental procedures and Z. Firestein for suggestion experiment furnishing 47S. We thank the Burke lab for the use of their prep HPLC and A. Blake, A. Laporte for assistance. The data reported in this paper are tabulated in the Supporting Information.
Funding Sources
Financial support for this work was provided by the NIH NIGMS Maximizing Investigators’ Research Award MIRA (R35 GM122525).We are grateful to The Uehara Memorial Foundationand Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. for fellowships to T.I., the Qingdao University of Science and Technology, and the Graduate Department of Shandong Provincial Education Bureau for fellowships for D.T., and the China Scholarship Council for a fellowship to W.H. J.R.C. was funded by an NIH Ruth Kirschstein Postdoctoral Fellowship (1 F32GM112501-01A1).
Footnotes
Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.1c06335.
All experimental procedures, analysis, and compound characterization data (PDF)
Accession Codes
Crystallographic data for the structures reported in this Article have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC), under deposition number CCDC 2103085 for (–)-17b, CCDC 2048925 for (–)-40 and CCDC 2048926 for (–)-47. Copies of the data can be obtained free of charge from www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures/.
The University of Illinois has a patent (US 10,611,786 B2) on the [MnIII(ClPc)] catalysts 1 and 2 for intermolecular C—H functionalization. The [MnIII(ClPc)] catalyst 1 is offered by MilliporeSigma through a license from the University of Illinois (product # 901425).
Contributor Information
Takafumi Ide, Department of Chemistry, Roger Adams Laboratory, University of Illinois, 505 S Mathews Ave, Urbana IL 61801 USA.
Kaibo Feng, Department of Chemistry, Roger Adams Laboratory, University of Illinois, 505 S Mathews Ave, Urbana IL 61801 USA.
Charlie F. Dixon, Department of Chemistry, Roger Adams Laboratory, University of Illinois, 505 S Mathews Ave, Urbana IL 61801 USA.
Dawei Teng, Department of Chemistry, Roger Adams Laboratory, University of Illinois, 505 S Mathews Ave, Urbana IL 61801 USA.
Joseph R. Clark, Department of Chemistry, Roger Adams Laboratory, University of Illinois, 505 S Mathews Ave, Urbana IL 61801 USA.
Wei Han, Department of Chemistry, Roger Adams Laboratory, University of Illinois, 505 S Mathews Ave, Urbana IL 61801 USA.
Chloe I. Wendell, Department of Chemistry, Roger Adams Laboratory, University of Illinois, 505 S Mathews Ave, Urbana IL 61801 USA
Vanessa Koch, Department of Chemistry, Roger Adams Laboratory, University of Illinois, 505 S Mathews Ave, Urbana IL 61801 USA.
M. Christina White, Department of Chemistry, Roger Adams Laboratory, University of Illinois, 505 S Mathews Ave, Urbana, IL 61801 USA.
REFERENCES
- (1).Ertl P & Schuhmann T A Systematic Chemoinformatics Analysis of Functional Groups Occuring in Natural Products. J. Nat. Prod 2019, 82,1258–1263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).Richter MF; Drown BS; Riley AP; Garcia A; Shirai T; Svec RL; Hergenrother PJ Predictive compound accumulation rules yield a broad-spectrum antibiotic. Nature 2017, 545, 299–304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Roughley SD; Jordan AM The medicical chemist’s toolbox: An analysis of reactions used in the pursuit of drug candidates. J. Med. Chem 2011, 54, 3451–3479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Shugrue CR; Miller SJ Applications of Nonenzymatic Catalysts to the Alteration of Natural Products. Chem. Rev 2017, 117, 11894–11951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).Ma R; White MC C–H to C–N cross-coupling of sulfonamides with olefins. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 3202–3205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).Burman JS; Blakey SB Regioselective intermolecular allylic C–H amination of disubstituted olefins via rhodium/π-allyl intermediates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2017, 56, 13666–13669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).Harris RJ; Park J; Nelson TAF; Iqbal N; Salgueiro DC; Basca J; MacBeth CE; Baik M; Blakey SB The Mechanism of Rhodium-Catalyzed Allylic C–H Amination. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2020, 142, 5842–5851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).Lei H; Rovis T A site-selective amination catalyst discriminates between nearly identical C–H bonds of unsymmetrical disubstituted alkenes. Nat. Chem 2020, 12, 725–731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Gephart RT III; Huang DL; Aguila MJB; Schmidt G; Shahu A; Warren TH Catalytic C–H amination with aromatic amines. Angew. Chem 2012, 124, 6594–6598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Knecht T; Mondal S; Ye J-H; Das M; Glorius F Intermolecular, branch-selective, and redox-neutral Cp*IrIII-catalyzed allylic C–H amidation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2019, 58, 7117–7121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).Cheng Q; Chen J; Lin S; Ritter T Allylic amination of alkenes with iminothianthrenes to afford alkyl allylamines. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2020, 142,17287–17293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).Chiappini ND; Mack JBC; Du Bois J Intermolecular C(sp3)–H amination of complex molecules. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2018, 57, 4956–4959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).Roizen JL; Harvey ME; Du Bois J Metal-catalyzed nitrogen-atom transfer methods for the oxidation of aliphatic C–H bonds. Acc. Chem. Res 2012, 45,911–922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (14).Lebel H; Huard K; Lectard S N-Tosyloxycarbamates as a source of metal nitrenes: rhodium-catalyzed C–H insertion and aziridination reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2005, 127, 14198–14199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Guthikonda K; Wehn PM; Caliando BJ; DuBois J Rh-catalyzed alkene oxidation: a highly efficient and selectiveprocess for preparingN-alkoxysulfonyl aziridines. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 11331–11342. [Google Scholar]
- (16).Zalatan DN; DuBois J A chiral rhodium carboxamidate catalyst for enantioselective C–H amiantion. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008, 130, 9220–9221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).Collet F; Lescot C; Dauban P Catalytic C–H amination: the stereoselectivity issue. Chem. Soc. Rev 2011, 40, 1926–1936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18).Liang C; Robert-Peillard F; Fruit C; Müller P; Dodd RH; Dauban P Efficient diastereoselective intermolecular rhodium-catalyzed C–H amination. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2006, 45, 4641–4644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (19).Lescot C; Darses B; Collet F; Retailleau P; Dauban P Intermolecular C–H Amination of Complex Molecules: Insights into the Factors Governing the Selectivity. J. Org. Chem 2012, 77, 7232–7240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Collet F; Lescot C; Liang C; Dauban P Studies in catalytic C–H amination involving nitrene C–H insertion. Dalton Trans 2010, 39, 10401–10413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).Lebel H; Spitz C; Leogane O; Trudel C; Parmentier M Stereoselective Rhodium-Catalyzed Amination of Alkenes. Org. Lett 2011, 13, 5460–5463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (22).Nishioka Y; Uchida T; Katsuki T Enantio- and Regioselective Intermolecular Benzylic and Allylic C-H Bond Amination. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2013, 52, 1739–1742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (23).Li J; Cisar JS; Zhou C-Y; Vera B; Williams H; Rodríguez AD; Cravatt BF; Romo D Simutaneous structure-activity studies and arming of natural products by C–H amiantion reveal cellular targets of eupalmerin acetate. Nat. Chem 2013, 5, 510–517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (24).Lu H; Jiang H; Hu Y; Wojtas L; Zhang XP Chemoselective intramolecular allylic C–H amination versus C=C aziridination through Co(II)-based metalloradical catalysis. Chem. Sci 2011, 2, 2361–2366. [Google Scholar]
- (25).Paradine SM; White MC Iron-catalyzed intramolecular allylic C–H amination. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2012, 134, 2036–2039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (26).Paradine SM; Griffin JR; Zhao J; Petronico AL; Miller SM; White MC A manganese catalyst for highly reactive yet chemoselective intramolecular C(sp3)–H amination. Nat. Chem 2015, 7, 987–994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (27).Harvey ME; Musaev DG; DuBois J A diruthenium catalyst for selective, intramolecular allylic C–H amination: reaction development and mechanistic insight gained through experiment and theory. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133, 17207–17216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (28).Hennessy ET; Liu RY; Iovan DA; Duncan RA; Betley TA Iron-mediated intermolecular N-group transfer chemistry with olefinic substrates. Chem. Sci 2014, 5, 1526–1532. [Google Scholar]
- (29).Harden JD; Ruppel JV; Gao G-Y; Zhang XP Cobalt-catalyzed intermolecular C–H amination with bromamine-T as nitrene source. Chem. Commun 2007, 4644–4646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (30).Gephart III RT; Warren TH Copper-catalyzed sp3 C–H amination. Organometallics 2012, 31, 7728–7752. [Google Scholar]
- (31).Mahy JP; Bedi G; Battioni P; Mansuy D Allylic Amination of Alkenes by Tosyliminoiodobenzene: Manganese Porphyrins as Suitable Catalysts. Tetrahedron Lett 1988, 29, 1927–1930. [Google Scholar]
- (32).Clark JR; Feng K; Sookezian A; White MC Manganese-catalyzed benzylic C(sp3)–H amination for late-stage functionalization. Nat. Chem 2018, 10, 583–591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (33).Xie W; Heo J; Kim D; Chang S Copper-catalyzed direct C–H alkylation of polyfluoroarenes by using hydrocarbons as alkylating source. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2020, 142, 7487–7496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (34).Luo Y-R Handbook of Bond Dissociation Energies in Organic Compounds CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- (35).Yu X-Q; Huang J-S; Zhou X-G; Che C-M Amidation of Saturated C-H Bonds Catalyzed by Electron-Deficient Ruthenium and Manganese Porphyrins. A Highly Catalytic Nitrogen Atom Transfer Process. Org. Lett 2000, 2, 2233–2236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (36).Nishikori H; Katsuki T Catalytic and highly enantioselective aziridination of styrene derivatives. Tetrahedron Lett 1996, 37, 9245–9248. [Google Scholar]
- (37).Kohmura Y; Katsuki T Mn(salen)-Catalyzed Enantioselective C–H amination. Tetrahedron Lett 2001, 42, 3339–3342. [Google Scholar]
- (38).Yan S-Y; Wang Y; Shu Y-J; Liu H-H; Zhou X-G Nitrene transfer reaction catalyzed by substituted metallophthalocyanines. J. Mol. Catal. A. Chem 2006, 248, 148–151. [Google Scholar]
- (39).Mahy J-P; Bedi G; Battioni P; Mansuy D Aziridination of Alkenes catalysed by Porphyrinirons: Selection of Catalysts for Optimal Efficiency and Stereospecificity. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans 2 1988. 1517–1524. [Google Scholar]
- (40).Jia Z-J; Gao S; Arnold FH Enzymatic Primary Amination of Benzylic and Allylic C(sp3)–H Bonds. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2020, 142, 10279–10283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (41).Moretti RA; Du Bois J; Stack TDP Manganese(II)/picolinic acid catalyst system for epoxidation of olefins. Org. Lett 2016, 18, 2528–2531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (42).Howell JM; Feng K; Clark JR; Trzepkowski LJ; White MC Remote oxidation of aliphatic C–H bonds in nitrogen-containing molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137, 14590–14593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (43).Drzymala S; Kraus W; Emmerling F; Koch M (3S)-14,16-dihydroxy-3-methyl-3,4,5,6,9,10,11,12-octahydro-1H-2-benzoxacylotetradecine-1,7(8H)-dione (zearalenone) monohydrate. Acta Cyst 2012, E68, o1577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (44).Still WC (±)-Periplanon-B. Total synthesis and structure of the sex excitant pheromone of the American cockroach. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1979, 101, 2493–2495. [Google Scholar]
- (45).Bartlett PA; Green III FR Total sythesis of brefeldin A. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1978, 100, 4858–4865. [Google Scholar]
- (46).Weber HP; Hauser D; Sigg HP Structure of brefeldin A. Helv. Chim. Acta 1971, 54, 2763–2766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (47).Gilbert MM; DeMars II MD; Yang S; Grandner JM; Wang S; Wang H; Narayan ARH; Sherman DH; Houl KN; Montgomery J Synthesis of diverse 11- and 12-membered macrolactones from a common linear substrate using a single biocatalyst. ACS. Cent. Sci 2017, 3, 1304–1310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (48).Li J; Zhang Z; Wu L; Zhang W; Chen P; Lin Z; Liu G Site-specific allylic C–H bond functionalization with a copper-bound N-centred radical. Nature 2019, 574, 516–521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (49).Jin L-M, Xu P, Xie J, Zhang XP Enantioselective Intermolecular Radical C–H Amination. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2020, 142, 20828–20836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (50).Eliel EL; Wilen SH; Mander LN Stereochemistry of Organic Compounds Wiley, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- (51).Miller RB; Gutierrez CG Synthesis of 9,9-dimethyl-2-methoxy-5-benzosuberone. An unexpected failure of benzylic oxidation. J. Org. Chem 1978, 43, 1569–1573. [Google Scholar]
- (52).Brunard E, Boquet V, Van Elslande E, Saget T, Dauban P Catalytic Intermolecular C(sp3)–H Amination: Selective Functionalization of Tertiary C–H Bonds vs Activated Benzylic C–H Bonds. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2021, 143, 6407–6412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
