Skip to main content
BMC Infectious Diseases logoLink to BMC Infectious Diseases
. 2022 Mar 29;22:306. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07288-4

Cerebral nocardiosis in a patient treated with pembrolizumab: a first case report

Paul Petitgas 1,2,, Mathieu Lesouhaitier 1, Sarrah Boukthir 3, Vincent Cattoir 3, Pierre Tattevin 1, François Bénézit 1
PMCID: PMC8962086  PMID: 35351017

Abstract

Background

Checkpoints inhibitors (CPIs) are increasingly used for the treatment of several malignancies. The most common side effects are Immune Related Adverse Events, while infectious complications are rare, especially cerebral nocardiosis.

Case presentation

Here, we report the first clinical case of a cerebral nocardiosis revealed after seizure in a patient treated by pembrolizumab for a metastatic lung cancer, in the absence of any additional immunosuppressive therapy or risk factors for cerebral nocardiosis. The extended evaluation including a brain CT-scan did not reveal any lesion before pembrolizumab. Nevertheless, the 3-month delay between the start of Pembrolizumab and the diagnosis of cerebral nocardiosis suggests that the infection occurred prior to the CPI. Unfortunately, the patient died during treatment for cerebral nocardiosis, while the lung cancer tumor mass had decreased by 80% after the sixth cycle of pembrolizumab.

Conclusions

This case report emphasizes that clinicians should consider diagnoses other than metastasis in a patient with a brain mass and metastatic cancer treated with CPI, such as opportunistic infections or IRAE.

Keywords: Nocardiosis, Pembrolizumab, IRAE, Case report

Background

By enhancing natural immunity against malignancies, immune checkpoints inhibitors (CPIs) have opened a new era in the treatment of cancer [14]. These CPIs include anti-CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocytes antigen 4), anti-PD-1 (programmed cell death 1) and anti-PD-L1 (programmed cell death-ligand 1) antibodies. They are approved for the treatment of various solid cancers (metastatic melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, head and neck squamous cell cancer and urothelial carcinoma), and Hodgkin lymphoma.

These treatments upregulate the immune system, which may be associated with immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). These toxicities can affect multiple organs (skin, liver, kidney, digestive tract), and are often managed with corticosteroid therapy [5]. Infectious complications have been reported in less than 10% of patients receiving CPI, primarily common bacterial infections [6]. We report the first case of cerebral nocardiosis in a patient treated by a CPI.

Case presentation

A 65-year-old-man was admitted in the emergency department for seizures. His medical history included diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, and smoking. Four months before admission, a chest X-Ray performed because of a persistent cough revealed a lung mass. The lung biopsy yielded a squamous non-small-cell lung cancer with 80% expression of PD-L1. Extended evaluation including a brain CT (Fig. 1A), thoracic CT, abdominal MRI and whole-body PET-scan showed a unique hepatic metastasis. Following consultation with the institutional multidisciplinary team in charge of lung cancer, the patient was treated with intravenous pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1 antibody), started 3 months before admission, as a single-drug regimen, 200 mg every three weeks, with no tolerability or adherence issues.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Brain CT before pembrolizumab start, and brain MRI at the time of cerebral nocardiosis diagnosis. A Brain CT before pembrolizumab start (no abnormality). B T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced brain MRI at the time of cerebral nocardiosis diagnosis: 18 mm right frontal lobe round-shaped lesion with perilesional edema and wall enhancement

On admission, the patient was afebrile, and clinical examination was normal. Routine biochemical and hematology tests were normal, with blood leukocytes count of 7.8 G/l, and serum C reactive protein at 1.1 mg/l. The electroencephalogram performed 12 h after seizures was normal. Brain CT scan found a focal hypodense lesion in the right frontal lobe, further characterized by brain MRI as an intracranial round-shaped lesion with a maximal diameter of 18 mm, low signal intensity on T1-weighted and intermediate signal intensity on T2-weighted images, associated with perilesional edema and wall enhancement on T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced images (Fig. 1B), suggestive of brain abscess, while brain metastasis could not be ruled out. The patient was transferred to the neurosurgical department for a total removal of the lesion (excision with craniotomy), both for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Per-operative macroscopic findings were also suggestive of brain abscess, and empirical antimicrobial therapy was started after surgery with a combination of intravenous ceftriaxone and metronidazole. Microscopic examination revealed numerous filamentous-branching Gram-positive rods. Cultures yielded Nocardia farcinica, identified by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Antibiotic treatment was modified to meropenem 1 g every 8 h associated with cotrimoxazole 1600 mg/400 mg every 8 h and folinic acid. Body-CT did not show any other localization of nocardiosis, while the mass tumor had decreased by 80% after the sixth cycle of pembrolizumab. Drug susceptibility testing found a meropenem MIC of 32 mg/L, while linezolid MIC was 4 mg/L, and cotrimoxazole MIC was 0.5 mg/L. Meropenem was replaced by linezolid 600 mg every 12 h, in combination with cotrimoxazole. Following the diagnosis, additional risk factors for cerebral nocardiosis were ruled out.

After 2 months, the patient was asymptomatic, except for asthenia. Antibiotics were well tolerated. He did not receive additional dose of pembrolizumab. At 10 weeks of treatment, he developed thrombocytopenia due to linezolid. He died 3 months after the diagnosis of cerebral nocardiosis, because of a major upper-gastrointestinal bleeding probably related to a peptic ulcer disease and thrombocytopenia.

Discussion and conclusions

To our knowledge, we report the first case of a cerebral nocardiosis in a patient treated by CPI. Nocardia spp are a rare cause of cerebral abscess, primarily among immunocompromised patients. Main risk factors include immunosuppressive drugs, cancer, organ transplant, HIV infection, anti-GM-CSF antibodies, and uncontrolled diabetes mellitus [7]. Cerebral nocardiosis has also been rarely reported in patients with no identified risk factors [8]. In the observation reported herein, the patient had been recently diagnosed with a metastatic lung cancer, a known risk factor for cerebral nocardiosis, but he did not receive any immunosuppressive treatment, and had no clinical or imaging features suggestive of cerebral nocardiosis before pembrolizumab was initiated. As a limitation, anti-GM-CSF were not investigated.

CPIs are not considered as risk factors for opportunistic infection. A retrospective study of 740 patients treated by CPI for a metastatic melanoma found that 7.3% presented at least one episode of serious infection [6]. Among them, 79% had a bacterial infection. Patients treated with pembrolizumab were at lower risk of infections as compared to patients treated with other CPIs. Of note, the concomitant use of immunosuppressive agents, especially infliximab and corticosteroids was the main risk factor for serious infections in that cohort, while these drugs are often used for the control of IRAE associated with CPI. Less common infections have been reported in patients treated with CPI, including tuberculosis reactivation [9], invasive aspergillosis, pneumocystosis or cytomegalovirus disease [10]. However, these complications have mostly been reported in patients with concomitant use of immunosuppressive agents, primarily corticosteroids for the management of IRAE. Hence, the role of CPIs in these opportunistic infections remains hypothetical. In our observation, the development of cerebral nocardiosis after 3 months of pembrolizumab treatment could also be related to IRAE, with a pathophysiology similar to the unmasking immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome reported in HIV-infected patents: this hypothesis would imply that cerebral nocardiosis was already evolving by the time pembrolizumab was initiated, but was not identified despite the extensive diagnostic workout performed for cancer staging, in the context of an immune system altered by metastatic cancer. Following the dramatic oncologic response to pembrolizumab, the patient immune system recovered, and cerebral nocardiosis would hence be the manifestation of immune reconstitution. Equally plausible is that pembrolizumab enhanced anti-inflammatory immune responses and this led to manifestation of cerebral nocardiosis, or even pembrolizumab had no impact on the development of nocardiosis.

Whatever the mechanisms behind this severe adverse event, this case report outlines that the investigations for a cerebral mass in a patient with metastatic cancer treated with CPI should not be restricted to cerebral metastases, and also include opportunistic infections, as well as IRAE.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the patient’s family for allowing us to share his story.

Abbreviations

CPI

Checkpoint inhibitor

CTLA-4

Cytotoxic T lymphocytes antigen 4

PD-1

Programmed cell death 1

PD-L1

Programmed cell death ligand 1

IRAE

Immune-related adverse event

Authors’ contributions

PP and ML wrote the case report. PT and FB co-directed this work and helped to analyze the data and performed substantive modifications for this case report. VC and SB reviewed, improved the case report and assisted in the acquisition of data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

No financial support was received for this study.

Availability of data and materials

The data used during the study are available from the corresponding author.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Patient’s next-of-kin gave written consent for their parent’s personal and clinical details and any identifying images to be published in this study.

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

The authors identified that the given names and family names were erroneously transposed. The incorrect authors’ names list is: Petitgas Paul1,2*, Lesouhaitier Mathieu1, Boukthir Sarrah3, Cattoir Vincent3, Tattevin Pierre1 and Bénézit François1. The correct authors’ names list is: Paul Petitgas1,2*, Mathieu Lesouhaitier1, Sarrah Boukthir3, Vincent Cattoir3, Pierre Tattevin1 and François Bénézit1. The original article has been corrected

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Change history

4/12/2022

A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1186/s12879-022-07343-0

References

  • 1.Hodi FS, Chesney J, Pavlik AC, Robert C, Grossmann KF, McDermotte. DF, et al. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma: 2-year overall survival outcomes in a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(11):1558–68. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30366-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ferris RL, Blumenschein GB, Fayette J, Guigay J, Colevas AD, Licitra L, et al. Nivolumab for recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. 2016;10(19):1856–67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L, Spigel DR, Steins M, Ready NE, et al. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(17):1627–39. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1507643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ansell SM, Lesokhin AM, Borrello I, Halwani A, Scott EC, Gutierrez M, et al. PD-1 blockade with nivolumab in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(4):311–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Champiat S, Lambotte O, Barreau E, Belkhir R, Berdelou A, Carbonnel F, et al. Management of immune checkpoint blockade dysimmune toxicities: a collaborative position paper. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(4):559–74. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Del Castillo M, Romero FA, Argüello E, Kyi C, Postow MA, Redelman-Sidi G. The spectrum of serious infections among patients receiving immune checkpoint blockade for the treatment of melanoma. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63(11):1490–1493. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lerner PI, Nocardiosis. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;22(6):891–903; quiz 904-5. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 8.Fleetwood IG, Embil JM, Ross IB. Nocardia asteroides cerebral abscess in immunocompetent hosts: report of three cases and review of surgical recommendations. Surg Neurol. 2000;53(6):605–10. doi: 10.1016/S0090-3019(00)00242-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Picchi H, Mateus C, Chouaid C, Besse B, Marabelle A, Michot JM, et al. Infectious complications associated with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in oncology: reactivation of tuberculosis after anti PD-1 treatment. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24(3):216–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kyi C, Hellmann MD, Wolchok JD, Chapman PB, Postow MA. Opportunistic infections in patients treated with immunotherapy for cancer. J Immunother Cancer. 2014;18:19. doi: 10.1186/2051-1426-2-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data used during the study are available from the corresponding author.


Articles from BMC Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES