Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 29.
Published in final edited form as: J Addict Med. 2020 Dec;14(6):502–509. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000662

Do Sex Differences Among Adults With Opioid Use Disorder Reflect Sex-specific Vulnerabilities? A Study of Behavioral Health Comorbidities, Pain, and Quality of Life

Taeho Greg Rhee 1, MacKenzie R Peltier 2, Mehmet Sofuoglu 3, Robert A Rosenheck 4
PMCID: PMC8962823  NIHMSID: NIHMS1788242  PMID: 32371659

Abstract

Objectives:

Studies suggest that men and women have different vulnerabilities to a number of substance use disorders (SUDs). We examined whether differences between women and men with opioid use disorder (OUD) are significantly different from those without OUD for selected sociodemographic and health outcomes.

Methods:

We used a cross-sectional survey design using data from 2012 to 2013 National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions Wave III, which surveyed nationally representative samples of non-institutionalized adults (n = 36,309 unweighted). Past-year OUD and other behavioral co-morbidities were defined using DSM-5 criteria. In bivariate analyses, we investigated sex differences in socio-demographic factors, behavioral co-morbidities, pain, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between women and men with past-year OUD, and then those without past-year OUD. We further used logistic regression analyses to evaluate interactions between effect of sex and past-year OUD status on behavioral co-morbidities, pain, and HRQOL.

Results:

When extrapolated, about 2.1 million US adults met diagnostic criteria for past-year OUD. Women with OUD had a higher likelihood of having several past-year psychiatric disorders, and a lower likelihood of having any past-year SUDs compared to male counterparts. However, similar relationships were observed among those without OUD and significant interaction effects were not found on behavioral co-morbidities, pain, and HRQOL, indicating that general sex differences are not specific to OUD.

Conclusions:

Although sex differences are not specific to OUD, concurrent disorders are not uncommon among women, as well as men, with OUD. There is a need to treat concurrent behavioral health conditions from a multimorbidity perspective in the treatment of OUD in both sexes.

Keywords: co-morbidities, opioid use disorder, pain, quality of life, sex disparities


Opioid use disorder (OUD) and overdose deaths represent a significant public health crisis in the US, with recent data showing that over 2 million individuals have an OUD and approximately 130 individuals die daily from opioid-related drug overdoses.1,2 Although opioid use is more prevalent among men than women, women use heroin at increasing rates with concurrent increases in rates of opioid-related overdose deaths.3 Given this evidence, there is a need to examine sex differences across the progression of OUD, including its initiation, maintenance, and treatment as well as prevention efforts.4-6

Among the hypothesized sex-sensitive factors for OUD are the role of psychiatric and substance use comorbidities, as well as pain experience among women,4 and the subsequent impact of such experiences on quality of life. It has been previously observed that women with substance use disorders (SUDs), including OUD, have higher prevalence of psychiatric co-morbidities, specifically mood and anxiety disorders than men, while men with any SUDs have greater odds of co-occurring SUDs.7-9 Additionally, women are reported to experience greater sensitivity to pain and higher prevalence of chronic pain than men, and studies have suggested that women are more likely than men to use opioids to manage both pain and increased psychological distress from concurrent psychiatric disorders.4,8,10,11

Furthermore, research suggests that women with any SUDs frequently report greater overall functional impairment than men across employment, social/family, and medical/psychiatric domains.8,9,12 For instance, 1 study reported that in a sample of patients in methadone treatment, women reported more unmet needs and lower quality of life in several functional domains than men.13 In another study of patients dependent on prescription opioids, while both sexes demonstrated overall diminished physical and mental quality of life, women had poorer mental quality of life than men.14 The relationship between opioid use and both poor functioning and lower quality of life has been hypothesized to reflect their higher pain sensitivity and depressive symptoms,7-10 both suggested to be more prevalent in women than men with any SUDs, and both associated with poorer health-related quality of life.15

However, while such differences between men and women with OUD have been previously examined, it is not clear whether the identified sex differences are specific to adults with OUD or represent more generally prevalent differences between men and women that occur regardless of the presence of OUD (ie, observed throughout the population). Further, studies have not yet examined whether differences between women and men with OUD are significantly different from differences between women and men without OUD.

Accordingly, the present study hypothesized that, as in previous studies, women with OUD would have increased likelihood of mood and anxiety disorders, self-reported pain and poorer quality of life than men with OUD, while men, would have increased likelihood of concurrent SUDs. In addition to confirming these previously observed sex differences among adults with OUD, we further hypothesized that these differences between women and men with past-year OUD would be magnified among those with OUD and would therefore be less pronounced, although still present, among adults without OUD. Accordingly, we, first compared women and men with OUD to each other, and then compared women and men without OUD in order to evaluate the significance and magnitude of sex differences between those with and without OUD. Finally, we conducted a series of analyses testing the significance of the interaction of OUD and sex to determine whether the magnitude of male-female differences differed in the hypothesized directions among those with and without OUD.

METHODS

Data Source and Study Sample

The present study used data from the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions Wave III (NESARC-III).16,17 Sponsored by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), NESARC-III was a nationally representative survey, conducted from April 2012 through June 2013, that collected comprehensive information regarding physical and mental health diagnoses, well-being and disabilities among non-institutionalized civilian adults aged 18 or older with a focus on alcohol and other substance use disorders among non-institutionalized civilians aged 18 or older in the US.17,18 In this study, we grouped our sample in 4 groups by sex and by past-year OUD status, based on the criteria set forth in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5)19: (1) male adults with OUD (n = 154 unweighted); (2) female adults with OUD (n = 176 unweighted); (3) male adults without OUD (n = 15,708 unweighted); and (4) female adults without OUD (n = 20,271 unweighted). We did not include past-year heroin use disorder (n = 41), which is distinct from OUD in NESARC, because 36.6% (n = 15) of those with heroin use disorder also met criteria for past-year OUD and the sample size for heroin use disorder alone would have been too small (n = 26) for analyses. The overall survey response rate of NESARC-III was 60.1%.16,17 Further details of the survey, including descriptions, questionnaires, sampling methodology and datasets, are available on the NESARC-III website.16 The study procedures for this secondary analysis of restricted data were approved by the Institutional Review Board (#2000022543) at Yale School of Medicine.

Measures

Socio-demographic Characteristics

Socio-demographic variables surveyed by NESARC-III included the following categorical variables20-23: age (18–44, 45–64, or 65+), race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, or other), marital status (married, never married or other), family income (<$20,000, $20,000–39,999, or ≥$40,000), education (<high school, high school or equivalent, some college, or ≥bachelor’s degree), insurance coverage (private, Medicare, Medicaid, or other), and urbanity (rural or urban residence).21-23 Additionally, we included self-reported pain (never, a little bit, moderately, quite a bit, or extremely) given its established link with opioid use/misuse across sexes.

Behavioral Health Diagnoses

NESARC-III utilized the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disability Interview Schedule (AUDADIS) to evaluate DSM-5 diagnostic criteria of lifetime, past-year and prior to past-year diagnosis of the following psychiatric disorders: major depressive disorder, persistent depressive disorder (PDD, previously known as dysthymia in earlier DSM versions), bipolar I disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and pain disorder.20-23 The present study utilized past-year diagnoses of these disorders. Of note, major depressive disorder, PDD, and bipolar I disorder were treated as hierarchical variables such that the presence of one precludes a diagnosis of the others.21 Additionally, we constructed a dichotomous variable to represent a diagnosis of any of these past-year psychiatric disorders.22 We also included the following past-year SUDs based on DSM-5 criteria: alcohol use disorder, tobacco use disorder, and other illicit substance use disorders (ie, sedative, cannabis, cocaine, stimulant, hallucinogen, inhalant/solvent, or club drug).20-23 Lifetime personality disorders (antisocial, borderline, and schizotypal) were also included. In view of the recent interest in behavioral multimorbidity which suggests that having multiple psychiatric disorders or SUDs is associated with especially serious dysfunction,24-26 we included measures reflecting the presence of more than one psychiatric disorder or SUD.

Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)

The Standard Short Form-12 (SF-12v2), was collected in NESARC-III and utilized in the present study as a multi-dimensional measure of physical and mental well-being.27-29 The SF-12v2 includes 12 items that form the basis for 2 continuous component summary scores: Physical component summary and mental component summary scores. Standard scoring algorithms were applied, where each 10 points represents a 1 standard deviation difference, with 50 representing the US national average physical and mental HRQOL.28 A lower score indicates worse HRQOL, and a higher score means better HRQOL.

Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)

Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), on the other hand, represent a patient-reported, preference-based indicator of health state desirability on a cardinal scale where 0 indicates a state worse than or equal to death, and 1 indicates perfect health.30 Using published algorithms,31 we constructed a continuous QALYs variable, that is also in line with the widely used EuroQOL-5D approach using data included in the SF-12.

Data Analysis

First, bivariate logistic regression analyses were used to investigate sex differences in socio-demographic factors between women and men with past-year OUD, and then separately between women and men without past-year OUD. In view of the much smaller sample size of those with OUD as compared to those without OUD, we attended not only to statistical significance (ie, the likelihood that differences were due to chance) but also to the magnitude of these differences as represented by odds ratios. We repeated the same analyses for psychiatric and substance use disorders.

In order to investigate sex differences in the association of past-year OUD with socio-demographic factors and behavioral co-morbidities, further logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the significance of the interaction of sex and past-year OUD status. These analyses included main effects for sex and past-year OUD in addition to the interaction term. These analyses thus addressed the significance of differences between men and women in each characteristic or diagnosis, as well as the significance of differences between people with and without past-year OUD in the total population. The interaction of sex and OUD on each characteristic tested whether the association of sex and the salient other factors was significantly different between those with OUD and those without OUD.

Finally, the magnitudes of HRQOL and QALYs between women and men with and without OUD were also estimated. Since HRQOL and QALYs are continuous measures, Cohen d (ie, the difference in means divided by the pooled standard deviation)32,33 was calculated to evaluate the effect size of differences in HRQOL and QALYs between sexes with and without OUD, respectively. Interaction analyses were then conducted to determine the significance of differences between sexes in the association of OUD with reduced HRQOL and QALYs.

All statistical analyses were conducted in STATA MP/6-Core 15.1 and were weighted/accounted for NESARC-III survey design (eg, unequal probability of selection, clustering and stratification) using the “svy” commands.17,34 We used P < 0.05 as the test of statistical significance.

RESULTS

Study Sample and Characteristics

Altogether, 330 respondents, representing about 2.1 million adults nationally, met diagnostic criteria for past-year OUD (Table 1). Of these, 49.5% were male and 50.5% were female. Among adults with OUD, no significant difference by sex was found in demographic factors, except that women with OUD were less likely to live in urban areas than men (odds ratio [OR] = 0.47; 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 0.24, 0.90). Among adults without OUD, all demographic factors were statistically significantly different by sex, except living in urban areas. Of those without OUD, women were more likely to be aged 65 or older and non-Hispanic black, covered by Medicare or Medicaid, and have pain than men (P < 0.001 for all). On the other hand, women without OUD were less likely to be never married, employed, and have household income of $40,000 or greater (P < 0.001 for all).

TABLE 1.

Socio-demographic Characteristics of US Adults by Past-year Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) Status and Sex

With OUD
Without OUD
Total Male Female Bivariate Odds Ratio Total Male Female Bivariate Odds Ratio
Sample size
 Unweighted sample 330 154 176 35,979 15,708 20,271
 Weighted population (Row %) 2,092,822 (100.0%) 1,036,696 (49.5%) 1,056,126 (50.5%) 233,319,135 (100.0%) 112,175,123 (48.1%) 121,144,012 (51.9%)
Age
 18–44 1,159,112 56.9 53.9 Reference 110,439,302 48.6 46.2 Reference
 45–64 771,317 38.6 35.1 0.96 81,689,655 35.2 34.9 1.04
 65+ 162,393 4.5 11.0 2.60 41,190,179 16.2 19.0 1.23
Race/ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic white 1,489,043 73.8 68.5 Reference 154,324,773 66.6 65.7 Reference
 Non-Hispanic black 288,042 10.7 16.8 1.69 27,463,740 11.0 12.5 1.15
 Hispanic 242,317 10.5 12.7 1.31 34,449,514 15.3 14.3 0.95
 Other 73,420 5.1 2.0 0.43 17,081,108 7.1 7.5 1.08
Marital status
 Married 678,649 30.7 34.1 Reference 119,840,001 53.5 49.4 Reference
 Never married 556,573 28.1 25.1 0.81 52,454,065 25.1 20.1 0.87
 Other§ 857,600 41.2 40.8 0.89 61,025,069 21.5 30.5 1.54
Family income
 <$20,000 986,168 52.9 41.5 Reference 52,691,275 19.9 25.1 Reference
 $20,000–$39,999 490,614 20.0 26.8 1.71 56,270,149 23.4 24.8 0.84
 ≥$40,000 616,040 27.1 31.7 1.49 124,357,712 56.8 50.1 0.70
Employment
 No 904,828 41.3 45.1 Reference 69,644,719 24.4 34.9 Reference
 Yes 1,187,994 58.7 54.9 0.86 163,674,416 75.6 65.1 0.60
Education
 <High school 455,229 23.6 19.9 Reference 30,174,070 13.3 12.6 Reference
 High school or equivalent 733,136 39.0 31.2 0.95 59,947,543 26.8 24.7 0.97
 Some college 714,840 28.9 39.3 1.62 77,130,322 31.3 34.7 1.17
 ≥Bachelor’s degree 189,616 8.5 9.7 1.36 66,067,200 28.7 28.0 1.03
Insurance coverage
 Private (%) 798,190 32.9 43.3 1.55 135,283,214 57.8 58.2 1.02
 Medicare (%) 600,790 26.3 31.1 1.26 49,704,734 20.2 22.4 1.14
 Medicaid (%) 525,835 25.7 24.6 0.94 23,698,278 7.3 12.8 1.87
 Other (%) 788,982 33.4 42.0 1.45 104,700,513 44.9 44.9 1.00
Self-reported pain
 Never 398,176 18.5 19.6 Reference 135,770,032 60.9 55.8 Reference
 A little bit or moderately 753,534 36.1 36.0 0.94 73,125,412 29.8 32.8 1.20
 Quite a bit or extremely 941,112 45.5 44.5 0.92 24,303,116 9.4 11.4 1.33
Urbanity
 Rural 441,944 14.9 27.3 Reference 49,585,999 21.1 21.4 Reference
 Urban 1,650,878 85.1 72.7 0.47* 183,733,136 78.9 78.6 0.98
*

<0.05.

<0.001.

Indicates Native American or Asian.

§

Indicates living with partner/being widowed, divorced or separated.

Indicates that each insurance type has a response of yes or no.

Indicates public health insurance programs other than Medicare and Medicaid.

Behavioral Co-morbidities

Among adults with OUD, women were more likely to have past-year generalized anxiety disorder (OR = 2.64; 95% CI = 1.25, 5.58) and post-traumatic stress disorder (OR = 2.69; 95% CI = 1.21, 5.96) than men (Table 2). Women with OUD were also more likely to have 2 or more psychiatric disorders than men with OUD in the past year (OR = 2.25; 95% CI = 1.16, 4.39), but were less likely to have alcohol use disorder, cannabis use disorder, and cocaine use disorder than men with OUD (P < 0.05 for all). Of personality disorders, women with OUD were less likely to have antisocial personality disorder than men with OUD (OR = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.20, 0.90).

TABLE 2.

Psychiatric and Substance Use Co-morbidities of US Adults by Past-year Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) Status and Sex

With OUD
Without OUD
Total Male Female Bivariate
Odds Ratio
Total Male Female Bivariate
Odds Ratio
Sample size
 Unweighted sample 330 154 176 35,979 15,708 20,271
 Weighted population (row %) 2,092,822 (100.0%) 1,036,696 (49.5%) 1,056,126 (50.5%) 233,319,135 (100.0%) 112,175,123 (48.1%) 121,144,012 (51.9%)
Lifetime personality disorder
 Any personality disorder (%) 1,018,357 50.9 46.4 0.84 27,753,395 12.5 11.4 0.90*
 Antisocial personality disorder (%) 300,998 19.6 9.3 0.42* 5,752,622 3.6 1.4 0.38
 Borderline personality disorder (%) 942,055 44.8 45.2 1.02 22,836,586 9.6 10.0 1.04
 Schizotypal personality disorder (%) 458,285 23.5 20.3 0.83 9,849,443 4.2 4.2 1.00
Past-year psychiatric disorder
 Any psychiatric disorder (%) 1,275,195 54.1 67.7 1.78 42,249,248 13.4 22.5 1.88
 Major depressive disorder (%) 637,954 24.4 36.5 1.78 23,825,610 7.0 13.2 2.02
 Persistent depressive disorder (%) 394,034 20.5 17.2 0.81 8,322,745 2.7 4.4 1.66
 Bipolar 1 disorder (%) 242,730 13.0 10.2 0.76 3,385,904 1.5 1.4 0.90
 Generalized anxiety disorder (%) 353,739 10.3 23.4 2.64* 12,146,610 3.8 6.6 1.80
 Post-traumatic stress disorder (%) 467,788 14.0 30.5 2.69* 10,505,198 3.1 5.9 1.97
 Panic disorder (%) 326,324 13.3 17.9 1.43 6,895,771 1.8 4.1 2.34
Total number of past-year psychiatric disorders
 None 817,626 45.9 32.3 Reference 191,069,887 86.6 77.5 Reference
 1 598,110 29.1 28.1 1.37 27,559,224 9.1 14.3 1.75
 ≥2 677,086 25.0 39.6 2.25* 14,690,024 4.3 8.2 2.16
Past-year substance use disorder
 Alcohol use disorder (%) 886,305 49.7 35.2 0.55* 31,761,385 17.3 10.2 0.54
 Any substance use disorder (%) 771,643 40.7 33.1 0.72 6,856,433 3.9 2.1 0.52
  Sedative use disorder (%) 381,015 18.5 17.9 0.96 498,041 0.2 0.3 1.73
  Cannabis use disorder (%) 490,919 29.1 18.0 0.53* 5,490,937 3.3 1.5 0.46
  Cocaine use disorder (%) 149,077 10.8 3.6 0.30* 671,764 0.4 0.2 0.57*
  Stimulant use disorder (%) 193,309 11.2 7.3 0.63 560,973 0.2 0.3 1.07
  Hallucinogen use disorder (%) 51,203 3.0 1.9 0.65 62,878 0.0 0.0 0.56
  Inhalant/solvent use disorder (%) 39,011 3.8 0.0 -§ 58,653 0.0 0.0 0.21
  Club drug use disorder (%) 52,886 3.6 1.5 0.40 226,668 0.2 0.1 0.33
 Tobacco use disorder (%) 1,326,481 67.7 59.2 0.69 45,821,118 22.9 16.7 0.67
Total number of past-year substance use disorders
 None 1,321,178 59.3 66.9 Reference 226,462,702 96.1 98.0 Reference
 1 478,946 22.6 23.1 0.91 6,368,118 3.7 1.9 0.50
 ≥2 292,697 18.1 10.0 0.49 488,316 0.2 0.2 0.85
*

<0.05.

<0.01.

<0.001

§

Cannot be calculated due to no observation in female adults with OUD.

In contrast to those with OUD, among adults without OUD, women were significantly more likely to have all past-year psychiatric disorders than men, except bipolar disorder (P < 0.001 for all) albeit with odds ratios in the same direction on most comparisons and of generally comparable magnitudes. Women were also more likely to have two or more psychiatric disorders than men in the past year (OR = 2.16; 95% CI = 1.89, 2.46). As among those with OUD, women without OUD were less likely to have alcohol use disorder, tobacco use disorder, and any substance use disorder (P < 0.001 for all). Of individual drug use disorders, women without OUD were less likely to have cannabis use disorder (P < 0.001), cocaine use disorder (P < 0.05), and club drug use disorder (P < 0.01) than men without OUD, respectively. Of personality disorders, women without OUD were less likely to have antisocial personality disorder than men without OUD (OR = 0.38; 95% CI = 0.33, 0.45).

When bivariate interaction analyses were conducted to determine the significance of differences sex and OUD status on self-reported pain and behavioral co-morbidities (Table 3), the only significant interaction involved PDD (OR = 0.49; 95% CI = 0.25, 0.95), and suggested that women with past-year OUD demonstrated a lower likelihood of having past-year PDD than men as compared to adults without OUD. Thus, such sex differences reflect a stronger association of sex and PDD among those without OUD.

TABLE 3.

Association of Sex and Past-year OUD Status on Psychiatric and Substance Use Comorbidities Among US Adults

Independent Variable
Dependent Variable Being Female Having an OUD Interaction of Sex and OUD
Self-reported pain
 Moderately, quite a bit, or extremely 1.28 7.75 0.84
Lifetime personality disorder
 Any personality disorder 0.90* 7.28 0.93
 Antisocial personality disorder 0.38 6.52 1.09
 Borderline personality disorder 1.04 7.63 0.98
 Schizotypal personality disorder 1.00 6.98 0.83
Past-year psychiatric disorder
 Any psychiatric disorder 1.88 7.62 0.95
 Major depressive disorder 2.02 4.29 0.88
 Persistent depressive disorder 1.66 9.33 0.49*
 Bipolar I disorder 0.90 9.62 0.85
 Generalized anxiety disorder 1.80 2.96 1.47
 Post-traumatic stress disorder 1.97 5.20 1.36
 Panic disorder 2.34 8.47 0.61
Number of past-year psychiatric disorder § 1.79 4.83 0.79
Past-year substance use disorder
 Alcohol use disorder 0.54 4.70 1.02
 Tobacco use disorder 0.67 7.07 1.03
 Any substance use disorder 0.52 16.93 1.39
  Sedative use disorder 1.73 146.73 0.55
  Cannabis use disorder 0.46 12.17 1.17
  Cocaine use disorder 0.57* 32.36 0.54
  Stimulant use disorder 1.06 53.98 0.59
  Hallucinogen use disorder 0.56 87.59 1.15
  Inhalant/solvent use disorder 0.21 91.61 -
  Club drug use disorder 0.33 25.13 1.20
Number of past-year substance use disorder § 0.55 18.83 1.15

For coding, being female=1 versus being male = 0 and having an OUD = 1 and not having an OUD = 0.

*

<0.05.

<0.01.

<0.001.

§

Indicates that the incidence rate ratio was reported using Poisson regression modeling.

Cannot be calculated due to no observation in female adults with OUD.

Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL)

Regardless of OUD status, men demonstrated slightly better physical and mental health-related quality of life than women (Table 4). As determined by the Cohen d, however, the effect sizes for differences between sexes, which ranged from 0.04 to 0.29 were small, or not significant. In addition, we found no significant interaction effect of OUD and sex on HRQOL, indicating that the adverse OUD effects were not differed by sex on HRQOL.

TABLE 4.

Quality of Life (QOL) and Interaction Effects of Sex and Past-year Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) on QOL Among US Adults

With OUD
Without OUD
Interaction
Male Female Cohen d Male Female Cohen d Coefficient P
Health-related Quality of Life
 Physical component summary (PCS) 40.4 ± 13.5 38.3 ± 12.0 0.16 50.0 ± 10.2 49.6 ± 10.6 0.04 1.74 0.322
 Mental component summary (MCS) 41.9 ± 11.0 39.9 ± 12.5 0.17 51.6 ± 9.4 49.7 ± 10.5 0.19 −1.38 0.328
Quality-adjusted Life Year
 EuroQOL-5D (EQ-5D) 0.75 ± 0.15 0.71 ± 0.14 0.29 0.90 ± 0.11 0.88 ± 0.12 0.17 0.00 0.897

For coding, being female = 1 versus being male = 0 and having an OUD = 1 and not having an OUD = 0.

DISCUSSION

The present study sought to explore whether the previously established sex differences observed in adults with OUD7-12 are specific to OUD or are indicative of general differences between men and women. Based on previous findings, we hypothesized that women with OUD would have an increased likelihood of mood and anxiety disorders, pain and a lower quality of life than males with OUD and that these differences would be significantly greater among those without OUD. However, our findings showed that there was only one significant sex difference among men and women with OUD as compared to those without OUD, and that interaction suggested the association of psychiatric co-morbidity and female sex was weaker among those with OUD for PDD than among those without OUD and that there was no significant interaction on other concurrent behavioral co-morbidities.

A previous study suggested that women with OUD have higher rates of psychiatric comorbidities than men with OUD,7 our findings are in line with such evidence for those with OUD. In particular, Grella and colleagues7 demonstrated an association between lifetime diagnoses of OUD and presence of a lifetime Axis I disorder. Women with lifetime OUD were observed to be approximately twice as likely to have a lifetime diagnosis of a mood or anxiety disorder, whereas men were more likely to have a co-occurring SUD. Our findings are fully consistent with these findings among adults with OUD even when we focused on past-year, rather than lifetime, behavioral co-morbidities. In addition, our findings are also consistent with another previous study that highlighted sex-specific co-morbid burden among those with OUD.35

Using odds ratios as measures of effect size, our study also found that sex differences in the odds ratio of psychiatric comorbidities observed in OUD were similar in magnitude to sex differences in the general population (ie, among those without OUD) even when differences were not statistically significant in the OUD group. For instance, on 2 psychiatric diagnoses, women both with and without OUD had odds ratios greater than 2.0 as compared to men, and on 2 others, they had odds ratios greater than 1.5 even though the OUD group odds ratios were not statistically significant. In addition, women were 2.25 times more likely than men to have 2 or more psychiatric disorders within the OUD population, and 2.16 times more likely than men to have 2 or more psychiatric disorders among those without OUD, both of which were statistically significant.

Women without OUD also had a higher likelihood of psychiatric co-morbidities than men without OUD, while men without OUD also had a higher likelihood for SUDs than women without OUD. However, given the elevated rates of psychiatric comorbidies in both men and women with OUD, their clinical significance becomes more pressing. For example, almost one third of women with OUD have PTSD, compared to about 14% for men. These rates are much higher than those without OUD, 5.9% and 3.1% for women and men, respectively. Although many of these behavioral co-morbidities were more often significant among those without OUD than among those with OUD; such differences reflect the greater sample size of those without OUD, and the direction of the odds ratios was most often the same with similar effect sizes.

In addition, our findings are in line with research demonstrating that women, in general, are more likely to meet diagnostic criteria for internalizing disorders, especially mood/anxiety disorders, compared to males.36 Thus, previous research detailing sex differences in co-morbidities among individuals with OUD may be illustrating generally observed sex differences in psychiatric symptoms, among males and females. These results highlight the need to screen for and target psychiatric symptomatology among both women and men with OUD, with the expectation that women with OUD will have higher comorbidity rates than men with OUD. However, the epidemiological data do not support distinct sex-related risk factors for OUD among women, at least as reflected by diagnostic co-morbidities. It is especially important to note that these findings do not rule out sex differences in psychological distress specific to OUD measured in ways not addressed in this study.

While previous research has also postulated that sex differences in pain sensitivity may impact the etiology of OUD,36 in that women experience greater sensitivity to pain and more chronic pain than men, the present study did not find significant sex differences between men and women with past-year OUD on measures of self-reported pain in the past 4 weeks, but unexpectedly did find substantial differences in pain experience among those without OUD. A recent review noted that while the underlying mechanisms of the sex different in pain have yet to be elucidated, females are more sensitive to experimental pain, as modelled and assessed in the laboratory.11 The failure to find the expected sex differences in pain response may reflect the analgesic effect of opioids among both men and women who regularly use these drugs. Thus, future studies are warranted to explore the role of sex in pain sensitivity among individuals with OUD, utilizing experimental pain paradigms with more sensitive measures.

We observed sex differences in quality of life of small to moderate magnitude with lower scores of similar magnitudes among women than men—both with and without OUD. Both males and females with past-year OUD had lower QALYs and HRQOL when compared to non-OUD counterparts, consistent with recent evidence that adults with OUD have significant reduction in mental and physical health.22 Furthermore, such reductions in HRQOL among adults with current OUD have been associated with concurrent psychiatric and SUDs,24 thus illustrating the impact of multiple concurrent behavioral health diagnoses on quality of life among individuals with OUD, regardless of sex. Again, sex differences were no greater among those with OUD than those without OUD.

While the present data are cross-sectional in nature and thus limits the ability to examine the role of sex differences in the etiology of OUD, this study does importantly demonstrate that females with OUD exhibit similar difficulties relative to men as their counterparts without OUD in rates of behavioral health morbidities.

The lack of sex-specific differences associated with OUD should not be taken as minimizing the importance of these concurrent disorders. Recent data advocate for the treatment of disorders, such as OUD, from a multimorbidity perspective, as these disorders often clinically present with multiple concurrent behavioral health and medical conditions that likely impact the screening and treatment of OUD.24,25 Given the extensive multi-morbidities associated with OUD in both sexes and their subsequent negative impact on quality of life and functioning, this study suggests the need to treat OUD from a multimorbidity perspective regardless of sex; thus, importantly incorporating psychiatric and medical care into OUD management interventions to improve treatment outcomes.1,37-40 Our data merely suggest that the greater presence of these concurrent disorders among women does not appear to be specific to those with OUD. Treatment of these concurrent disorders may be critical in effectively treating OUD.

Several limitations of the present study warrant mention. First, the small sample size limited statistical power for comparison between men and women with OUD on some co-morbidities. However, effect size trends were similar among those with and without OUD diagnoses. Second, the NESARC-III survey excludes active duty military, as well as homeless and incarcerated individuals, or institutionalized elsewhere. These factors may limit the generalizability of the present results to these demographic groups. Finally, temporal sequences of behavioral co-morbidities and quality of life in relation to OUD were not able to be explored and thus warrant subsequent investigation using longitudinal data and methods. Finally, the survey was conducted in 2012 to 2013 and the opioid epidemic has accelerated rapidly since then. While circumstances may have changed, we believe that it is likely that the epidemiological sex relationships observed here have probably persisted.

Despite these limitations, the present study has several strengths, including the use of data from a nationally representative dataset which included psychiatric and SUD diagnoses that were based upon DSM-5 diagnostic criteria, and measures of other validated, standardized variables (eg, pain and health-related quality of life). Overall, the present results highlight the fact that sex differences observed among men and women with OUD are not dissimilar from those observed among men and women without OUD suggesting that such differences, at least those measured here, may not be distinct sex-related risk factors for OUD. Nevertheless, concurrent disorders do exist among the OUD population in both men and women and there is a clear need to treat concurrent behavior health conditions from a multimorbidity perspective in the treatment of OUD in both sexes.

Footnotes

The authors have no conflicts of interests to disclose.

Contributor Information

Taeho Greg Rhee, VA New England Mental Illness, Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT; Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT; Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Care, Farmington, CT.

MacKenzie R. Peltier, VA New England Mental Illness, Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT; Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT; Psychology Service, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT.

Mehmet Sofuoglu, VA New England Mental Illness, Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT; Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

Robert A. Rosenheck, VA New England Mental Illness, Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT; Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Volkow ND, Collins FS. The role of science in addressing the opioid crisis. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(4):391–394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Opioid overdose: Understanding epidemic. 2018; https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/epidemic/index.html. Accessed February 28, 2019.
  • 3.Marsh JC, Park K, Lin YA, Bersamira C. Gender differences in trends for heroin use and nonmedical prescription opioid use, 2007–2014. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018;87:79–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mazure CM, Fiellin DA. Women and opioids: something different is happening here. Lancet. 2018;392(10141):9–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Becker JB, Mazure CM. The federal plan for health science and technology’s response to the opioid crisis: understanding sex and gender differences as part of the solution is overlooked. Biol Sex Differ. 2019;10(1):3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rhee TG, Rosenheck RA. Buprenorphine prescribing for opioid use disorder in medical practices: can office-based out-patient care address the opiate crisis in the United States? Addiction. 2019;114(11):1992–1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Grella CE, Karno MP, Warda US, Niv N, Moore AA. Gender and comorbidity among individuals with opioid use disorders in the NESARC study. Addict Behav. 2009;34(6–7):498–504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.McHugh RK, Devito EE, Dodd D, et al. Gender differences in a clinical trial for prescription opioid dependence. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013;45(1):38–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.McHugh RK, Votaw VR, Sugarman DE, Greenfield SF. Sex and gender differences in substance use disorders. Clin Psychol Rev. 2018;66:12–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bartley EJ, Fillingim RB. Sex differences in pain: a brief review of clinical and experimental findings. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111(1):52–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fillingim RB, King CD, Ribeiro-Dasilva MC, Rahim-Williams B, Riley JL 3rd. Sex, gender, and pain: a review of recent clinical and experimental findings. J Pain. 2009;10(5):447–485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Back SE, Payne RL, Wahlquist AH, et al. Comparative profiles of men and women with opioid dependence: results from a national multisite effectiveness trial. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2011;37(5):313–323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Byrne P, Ducray K, Smyth BP. The impact of sex upon needs and quality of life within a population on methadone treatment. J Addict Med. 2016;10(1):60–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Griffin ML, Bennett HE, Fitzmaurice GM, Hill KP, Provost SE, Weiss RD. Health-related quality of life among prescription opioid-dependent patients: results from a multi-site study. Am J Addict. 2015;24(4):308–314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jones JD, Vogelman JS, Luba R, Mumtaz M, Comer SD. Chronic pain and opioid abuse: factors associated with health-related quality of life. Am J Addict. 2017;26(8):815–821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III (NESARC-III). 2017; https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/research/nesarc-iii. Accessed August 15, 2018.
  • 17.National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III (NESARC-III): Source and accuracy statement. 2018; https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/sites/default/files/NESARC_Final_Report_FINAL_1_8_15.pdf. Accessed August 15, 2018.
  • 18.Grant BF, Saha TD, Ruan WJ, et al. Epidemiology of DSM-5 drug use disorder: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions-III. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73(1):39–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Fifth ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rhee TG, Barry LC, Kuchel GA, Steffens DC, Wilkinson ST. Associations of adverse childhood experiences with past-year DSM-5 psychiatric and substance use disorders in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;67(10):2085–2093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rhee TG, Rosenheck RA. Comparison of opioid use disorder among male veterans and non-veterans: disorder rates, socio-demographics, co-morbidities, and quality of life. Am J Addict. 2019;208(2):92–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rhee TG, Rosenheck RA. Association of current and past opioid use disorders with health-related quality of life and employment among US adults. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019;199:122–128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rhee TG, Rosenheck RA. Use of drug treatment services among adults with opioid use disorder: rates, patterns, and correlates. Psychiatr Serv. 2019;70(11):992–999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bhalla IP, Rosenheck RA. A change in perspective: from dual diagnosis to multimorbidity. Psychiatr Serv. 2018;69(1):112–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Iheanacho T, Stefanovics E, Rosenheck R. Opioid use disorder and homelessness in the Veterans Health Administration: The challenge of multimorbidity. J Opioid Manag. 2018;14(3):171–182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.MacLean RR, Sofuoglu M, Rosenheck R. Tobacco and alcohol use disorders: evaluating multimorbidity. Addict Behav. 2018;78:59–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bray JW, Aden B, Eggman AA, et al. Quality of life as an outcome of opioid use disorder treatment: a systematic review. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017;76:88–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220–233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Oppezzo MA, Michalek AK, Delucchi K, Baiocchi MT, Barnett PG, Prochaska JJ. Health-related quality of life among veterans in addictions treatment: identifying behavioral targets for future intervention. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(8):1949–1957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Neumann PJ, Cohen JT. QALYs in 2018-advantages and concerns. JAMA. 2018;319(24):2473–2474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gray AM, Rivero-Arias O, Clarke PM. Estimating the association between SF-12 responses and EQ-5D utility values by response mapping. Med Decis Making. 2006;26(1):18–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cohen J Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates; 1988. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cohen J A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(1):155–159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Stata Statistical Software: Release 15 [computer program]. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kerridge BT, Saha TD, Chou SP, et al. Gender and nonmedical prescription opioid use and DSM-5 nonmedical prescription opioid use disorder: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions - III. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;156:47–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hasin DS, Grant BF. The National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) Waves 1 and 2: review and summary of findings. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015;50(11):1609–1640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Volkow ND, Jones EB, Einstein EB, Wargo EM. Prevention and treatment of opioid misuse and addiction: a review. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76(2):208–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Volkow ND, Frieden TR, Hyde PS, Cha SS. Medication-assisted therapies–tackling the opioid-overdose epidemic. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(22):2063–2066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kawa I, Carter JD, Joyce PR, et al. Gender differences in bipolar disorder: age of onset, course, comorbidity, and symptom presentation. Bipolar Disord. 2005;7(2):119–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cavanagh A, Wilson CJ, Kavanagh DJ, Caputi P. Differences in the expression of symptoms in men versus women with depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2017;25(1):29–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES