Skip to main content
Journal of Insect Science logoLink to Journal of Insect Science
. 2022 Mar 29;22(2):8. doi: 10.1093/jisesa/ieac003

Host Plant-Based Artificial Diets Enhance Development, Survival and Fecundity of the Edible Long-Horned Grasshopper Ruspolia differens (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae)

Alfonce Leonard 1,2,3, James P Egonyu 1, Chrysantus M Tanga 1, Samuel Kyamanywa 2, Sunday Ekesi 1, Fathiya M Khamis 1, Sevgan Subramanian 1,
Editor: Christos Athanassiou
PMCID: PMC8963679  PMID: 35349685

Abstract

Wild swarms of the long-horned grasshoppers Ruspolia differens (Serville) which are widely harvested for consumption and sale in Africa are seasonal and unsustainable, hence the need for innovative ways of artificially producing the insects. We investigated the development, survival, and reproduction of R. differens in the laboratory on diets mixed with host plants [Digitaria gayana Kunth, Cynodon dactylon (L.) and Megathyrsus maximus Jacq (Poales: Poaceae); Ageratum conyzoides L. (Asterales: Asteraceae)] identified from guts of their wild conspecifics with a view to developing a suitable diet for artificial mass rearing of the edible insect. A standard diet comprising ground black soldier fly, Hermetia illucens L. (Diptera: Startiomyidae) larvae, soybean flour, maize flour, vitamin premix, and ground bones was tested for rearing R. differens as a control against the same ingredients incorporated with individual powders of the different host plants. Whereas R. differens developed more slowly in the diet mixed with D. gayana than in the control diet; its development was faster in the diet mixed with C. dactylon. Mortalities of R. differens in host plant-based diets were 42.5–52.5%, far lower than in the control diet with 71% mortality. The insects raised on the diet mixed with M. maximus laid approximately twice more eggs compared to R. differens fecundities from the rest of the diets. However, inclusion of host plants in the diets had no detectable influence on R. differens adult weight and longevity. These findings support inclusion of specific host plants in artificial diets used for mass rearing of R. differens to enhance its survival, development, and fecundity.

Keywords: mass rearing, diet formulation, development time, mortality, fecundity


The long-horned grasshopper Ruspolia differens (Serville) is an important edible insect in Eastern and Southern Africa (Agea et al. 2008, Kinyuru et al. 2010, Valtonen et al. 2018). R. differens has substantial nutritional value for humans as it contains 43–44% protein, 46–48% fat, 3% ash, and 4–5% crude fiber (Kinyuru et al. 2010). These insects are composed of essential minerals such as phosphorous (426–673 mg/100 g), potassium (446–673 mg/100 g), calcium (34.9–128 mg/100 g), iron (8.0–116.0 mg/100 g), and zinc (5.7–12.9 mg/100 g) (Kinyuru et al. 2018, Ssepuuya et al. 2019). They also contain vitamins such as A (0.69–2.8 μg/g), E (135.9–201.0 μg/g), B3 (0.12–3.30 mg/100 g), B2 (0.84–2.80 mg/100 g), C (0.01–3.01 mg/100 g), B12 (0.73–1.35 μg/100 g), B9 (0.10–0.90 mg/100 g) and B6 (0.14–0.41 mg/100 g) (Kinyuru et al. 2018, Ssepuuya et al. 2019). R. differens is also composed of essential amino acids like histidine (15.0–51.4 mg/g), isoleucine (30.0–51.1 mg/g), leucine (59.0–78.3 mg/g), lysine (45.0–54.2 mg/g), methionine (16.0–27.5 mg/g), cysteine (6.0–18 mg/g), threonine (23.0–35.0 mg/g), tryptophane (6.0–14.3 mg/g) and valine (39.0–73.3 mg/g) (Kinyuru et al. 2018). Owing to their distant relationship with humans, grasshoppers have minimum risk of transmitting zoonotic diseases compared to livestock (Paul et al. 2016). Besides being a source of healthy food, R. differens provides employment for improved livelihoods in both rural and urban areas (Agea et al. 2008). In 2008, R. differens had a value of US$ 2.8 per kg in Kampala, a price which was 40% higher than that of beef (Agea et al. 2008).

R. differens occurs in swarming and nonswarming phases in tropical Africa and some Indian Ocean islands (Bailey and McCrea 1978, Massa 2015, Opoke et al. 2019). Swarms occur during peak rains, for instance around April–May and in November–December in Uganda (Bailey and McCrea 1978, Opoke et al. 2019). Wild swarms of R. differens are commercially harvested using light traps during swarming seasons only (Mmari et al. 2017, Okia et al. 2017, Opoke et al. 2019).

Efforts have been intensified to develop protocols for mass rearing as an alternative to wild harvests of R. differens, especially during nonswarming phase (Malinga et al. 2018a, Malinga et al. 2018b, Lehtovaara et al. 2018, Lehtovaara et al. 2019). Previous attempts to develop diets for artificial rearing of R. differens relied on testing acceptance of plants on which the insects roost in the wild and other ingredients like dog biscuits, dried blood, lucerne meal, Pro-Nutro (a well-balanced protein), Chicken super feed egg buster and simsim cake (Brits and Thornton 1981, Malinga et al. 2018a). R. differens have been reared under temperatures ranging from 25 to 30°C and relative humidity of 50–73% (Hartley 1967, Brits and Thornton 1981, Malinga et al. 2018a, Valtonen et al. 2018). These efforts have yielded low survival rate of about 38% (Malinga et al. 2018a), which may be attributable to lack of important plant nutrients (Behmer and Joern 1993). Limited knowledge on natural host plants of R. differens could be a hindrance to successive captive rearing of the insect (Rutaro et al. 2018, Opoke et al. 2019).

Both immature and adult R. differens have strong chewing mouth parts that enable them to feed on a variety of food (Matojo and Hosea 2013). Although these insects are polyphagous in the wild, they prefer feeding on grasses to other plants (Valtonen et al. 2018, Opoke et al. 2019, Leonard et al. 2020). R. differens selectively feeds on specific plant parts, preferring seeds and flowers followed by stems and leaves (Hartley 1967, Valtonen et al. 2018). Its preference for seeds and flowers could be attributed to higher protein content in these plant parts compared to stems and leaves (Opoke et al. 2019). Nutrient levels such as proteins, carbohydrates, and minerals in plants influence survival, development, growth, and reproduction of grasshoppers (Nayar 1964, Joern and Behmer 1998). Grasshoppers can maintain the required nutrient levels in their body tissues by manipulating the digestion time of ingested plants or by selecting plants with high-quality proteins (Joern and Behmer 1998, Cammack and Tomberlin 2017). At nymphal stage, grasshoppers require almost 1:1 ratio of digestible carbohydrates and proteins (Joern and Behmer 1998). Nutrient levels of 4% proteins and 15–26.7% carbohydrate in diets have been reported to increase egg production in short-horned grasshoppers Melanoplus sanguinipes (Fabricius) (Orthoptera: Acrididae) and Phoetaliotes nebrascensis (Thomas) (Orthoptera: Acrididae) (Joern and Behmer 1997, Joern and Behmer 1998).

Natural host plants have essential amino acids such as phenylalanine which is important for cuticle formation in insects for enhanced survival (Behmer and Joern 1993). These amino acids and sterols concentration in host plants also enhance fecundity in insects (Awmack and Leather 2002). Opoke et al. (2019) observed R. differens roosting on 19 grasses and 2 sedges during nonswarming phase, and considered these as its host plants. Leonard et al. (2020), analyzed plant materials from the guts of swarming R. differens using molecular tools and found that they were dominated by species in Poaceae family, mostly Digitaria gayana Kunth (Poales: Poaceae). Other plant families identified in R. differens guts were Fabaceae, Asteraceae, Myrtaceae, Polygonaceae, and Rutaceae. It is however foolhardy to assume that what the insects naturally feed on provides the best results in mass rearing (Lattanzio et al. 2006). The performance of R. differens on diets incorporated with their identified host plants, therefore, needs to be investigated.

Diet formulation for phytophagous insects require components like B-vitamins, amino acids, lipids, organic ions, carbohydrates, and water (Nayar 1964). These diet components can be mixed with several plants to improve the performance of insects (Bernays et al. 1994, Singer and Bernays 2003, Malinga et al. 2018a, Malinga et al. 2018b, Opoke et al. 2019). A high proportion of protein is required in grasshopper diets for growth and development (Nayar 1964). Black soldier fly larvae with up to 50% crude protein (Tschirner and Simon 2015, Shumo et al. 2019), or soybeans (48%) (Yamka et al. 2003), are good sources of protein for insect rearing. Many grass plants have low dry matter protein of up to 2% (Berner et al. 2005). Therefore, evaluation of the performance of R. differens on known artificial diets mixed with host plants identified from its gut was warranted.

This study aimed at investigating the performance of R. differens on diets incorporated with different host plants for improving their artificial mass rearing. We hypothesized that incorporation of host plants into artificial diet influences development time, mortality, adult longevity, fecundity, and adult weight of R. differens.

Materials and Methods

Colony Initiation

The nymphs of R. differens for this study were obtained from a laboratory colony at icipe. The colony was established with about 1,000 R. differens adults collected in November 2018 in Uganda. Locally available plants were selected from identified host plant species of R. differens (Leonard et al. 2020) and from Opoke et al. (2019). Selected plants were D. gayana, Cynodon dactylon L. (Poales: Poaceae), Ageratum conyzoides L. (Asterales: Asteraceae), and Megathyrsus maximus Jacq. (Poales: Poaceae). Apart from D. gayana, which was collected in Moyo, in northern Uganda, experimental host plants were collected at icipe, Nairobi, Kenya. The GPS data for R. differens and host plants collection sites were subjected to QGIS to construct a map (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Insects and host plant collection sites in Uganda and Kenya.

Preparation of Host Plants

The plant materials were weighed and dried at 65°C in a dry heat oven (Model VT6130M, Heraeus Instrument Vacutherm, Germany). The weights before drying were 280 g, 150 g, 150 g, and 144 g; and after drying were 43.12 g, 42.69 g, 39.98 g, and 33.70 g for A. conyzoides, C. dactylon, D. gayana, and M. maximus, respectively. Dried plants were ground using a mixer grinder (Preethi Trio, India).

Diet Formulation and Experimental Design

In the preliminary study on development and survival of R. differens, single ground dry host plant diets showed that the insects could not survive beyond 3 d for all four plants. Hence, the host plants were assessed by mixing with other ingredients composed of proteins, carbohydrates, minerals, and vitamins. The ratio of the ingredients was adopted from Nayar (1964) with slight modifications according to the various treatments as outlined in Table 1.

Table 1.

Diet formulations tested for rearing Ruspolia differens

Treatments Diet composition
Control (C) Ground black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens (L.)—30 g
Soybean flour—30 g
Maize flour—22 g
Vitamin premix—4 g
Ground cow bones—3.4 g
CD Control diet + 22 g of dried and ground Digitaria guyana
CC Control diet + 22 g of dried and ground Cynadon dactylon
CA Control diet + 22 g of dried and ground Ageratum conyzoides
CM Control diet + 22 g of dried and ground Megathyrsus maximus

The formulation was repeated as need arose. Ten R. differens nymphs (≤24 h old) were separately placed in 6 cm deep × 6 cm diameter plastic containers and replicated 4 times to make a total number of 40 insects per diet. The treatments were arranged in a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) under ambient conditions of 28 ± 1°C, 50–55% RH, and a photoperiod of 12:12 h L:D. The diets were offered ad libitum to all insects and were refreshed after 3 d. Individual insects were monitored daily until senescence. Live weights of adults were measured within 24 h after molting (Malinga et al. 2018a). Nymphal developmental durations were computed.

To determine adult fecundity, all adult females which reached adult stage were paired with males from the same diet. When the male died before the female, it was replaced with another male from the same diet or the main colony in case there were no more males from the same diet (Azrag et al. 2017). In all treatments, a small ball of moist cotton wool (approximately 50 mm diameter) was provided as a source of water and an oviposition substrate for female R. differens. Additionally, a stem of M. maximus was provided in each experimental unit as an oviposition substrate. Eggs were collected by opening the leaf sheath of grasses and by detaching them from inside and outside the cotton wool. Mortality was determined by considering the initial number of nymphs and the number of insects that reached the adult stage in each treatment.

Data Analysis

Data were analyzed in R software (version 3.3.0) (R Core Team 2016) via the interface R studio (version 1.2.5). Data on R. differens development time, adult longevity, and fecundity were subjected to a log-linked poisson distribution. Over dispersion of data was assessed using the ratio of residual deviances to degrees of freedom; and where detected, it was corrected by fitting a negative binomial GLM-nb.glm using the MASS package (Venables and Ripley 2002). Mortality data were analyzed by logit-linked binomial GLM. Tukey’s test was used in pairwise multiple mean separation among treatments using emmeans package (Lenth and Lenth 2018).

Data on R. differens adult weight were normally distributed (Shapiro-Wilk test: P > 0.05) and their variances were homogenous (Levene’s test: P > 0.05). Therefore, these data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA), and posthoc mean separation was performed using the Student–Newman–Keuls (SNK) test using the package “agricolae” (de Mendiburu 2020). All the statistical significances were determined at P < 0.05.

Results

Development of R. differens on Different Diets

There was a significant effect of mixing host plants with artificial diet on nymphal development time (χ 2 = 92.2, df = 87, P = 0.020). The longest nymphal development of 105.9 ± 3.6 d (range from 79 to 140 d) was recorded on the diet mixed with D. gayana while the shortest development time of 88.8 ± 3.7 d (range from 63 to 116 d) was recorded in the diet mixed with C. dactylon (Fig. 2). The significant difference was between diets mixed with D. gayana and that mixed with C. dactylon.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Mean developmental times of Ruspolia differens nymphs on different diets. Bars with the same letters are not significantly different (α = 0.05). Error bars represent standard errors of the mean. C = control diet; and CD, CC, CA, and CM = diet containing ingredients in the control diet plus Digitria gayana, Cynodon dactylon, Ageratum conyzoides, and Megathyrsus maximus, respectively.

Mortality of R. differens on Different Diets

Incorporation of host plants into artificial diet significantly affected mortalities of R. differens (χ 2 = 30.87, df = 15, P < 0.001). The highest mortality of 70.5 ± 2.3% was recorded in the control diet while the lowest mortality of 42.5 ± 0.4% was recorded in C. dactylon incorporated diet (Fig. 3). A significantly higher mortality was observed between the control diet and all other diets with host plants. Apart from the control diet, significant difference was also observed between diets containing D. gayana and C. dactylon.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Mean mortality of Ruspolia differens on different diets. Bars with the same letters are not significantly different (α = 0.05). Error bars represent standard errors of the mean. C = control diet; and CD, CC, CA, and CM = diet containing ingredients in the control diet plus Digitria gayana, Cynodon dactylon, Ageratum conyzoides, and Megathyrsus maximus, respectively.

Adult Longevity of R. differens in Diets Mixed with Host Plants

There was no significant effect of inclusion of host plants in the diet on longevity of both male and female R. differens (Females: χ 2 = 50.06, df = 44, P = 0.156, Males: χ 2 = 40.4, df = 35, P = 0.965) (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Mean adult longevity of Ruspolia differens on different diets. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean. C = control diet; and CD, CC, CA, and CM = diet containing ingredients in the control diet plus Digitria gayana, Cynodon dactylon, Ageratum conyzoides, and Megathyrsus maximus, respectively.

Fecundity of R. differens on Different Diets

Host plant diets significantly affected the fecundity of R. differens (χ 2 = 36.79, df = 30, P = 0.005) (Fig. 5). The highest fecundity of 45.6 ± 10.7 eggs (range 31 to 95 eggs) was recorded in M. maximus based diet while the lowest fecundity of 15.8 ± 4.6 eggs (range 5 to 32 eggs) was recorded in the control diet. A significant difference was observed between M. maximus mixed diet and the control diet.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Mean fecundity of Ruspolia differens on different host plant diets. Bars with the same letters are not significantly different (α = 0.05). Error bars represent standard errors of the mean. C = control diet; and CD, CC, CA, and CM = diet containing ingredients in the control diet plus Digitria gayana, Cynodon dactylon, Ageratum conyzoides, and Megathyrsus maximus, respectively.

Adult Weight of R. differens on Different Diets

There was no significant difference in R. differens adult weight among different host plant diets (F4,92 = 0.920, P = 0.450), ranging from 0.46 ± 0.02 g on the control to 0.51 ± 0.02 g (range 0.30 to 0.68g) on C. dactylon (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Mean adult weight of Ruspolia differens on different diets. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean. C = control diet; and CD, CC, CA, and CM = diet containing ingredients in the control diet plus Digitria gayana, Cynodon dactylon, Ageratum conyzoides, and Megathyrsus maximus, respectively.

Discussion

Finding a solution to low survival of R. differens during artificial mass rearing remains a subject of intensive research (Brits and Thornton 1981, Malinga et al. 2018a). In this regard, factors that influence development, survival, and reproduction of R. differens under captive mass rearing such as optimum temperatures, host plants, and oviposition substrates have been determined (Lehtovaara et al. 2019, Opoke et al. 2019, Leonard et al. 2020, Egonyu et al. 2021, Leonard et al. 2021). Despite all these efforts, more work remains to be done to develop protocols for efficient mass production of the insect. For instance, although host plants of R. differens have been determined, effect of their inclusion in the diets on the performance of the insect has not yet been investigated.

In this study, we recorded the shortest R. differens development in the diet mixed with C. dactylon; while the longest development time was recorded in D. gayana based diet. The difference in development time recorded in different hosts could be attributed to naturally occurring chemical components of plants that vary greatly across species (Blanco et al. 2009). Addition of some naturally occurring plant components such as gossypol and nicotine to artificial diets negatively influences development in Chloridea (=Heliothis) virescens (F.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and Campoletis sonorensis (Cameron) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) (Gunasena et al. 1988, Gunasena et al. 1990, Blanco et al. 2009). The gossypol and nicotine are mainly found in cotton and tobacco, respectively (Gunasena et al. 1990, Blanco et al. 2009). The plant components which might have influenced R. differens development time in this study ought to be elucidated. Behmer and Elias (2000) reported that five species of acridid grasshoppers developed optimally on diets containing 28% protein, 28% digestible carbohydrate, 39.7% cellulose, 2.4% minerals, 0.5% linoleic acid, 0.3% ascorbic acid, 0.2% vitamin, and 0.2% phenylalanine. Further probing is required to determine whether this proposition holds for grasshoppers from other families such Tettigoniidae.

Nutrient-deficient diets have been reported to prolong the development time of grasshoppers including R. differens (Bernays and Bright 1991, Miura and Ohsaki 2004, Malinga et al. 2018a). The development times of R. differens in all diet treatments in this study were shorter than 150 d reported by Malinga et al. (2018a) in a single diet, but partially comparable to 100 d in the mixed diet of six and eight plant and nonplant food components. The enhanced development in the current study could be attributed to inclusion of black soldier fly and soybean meals as protein-rich supplements which reportedly boost insect development rates (Yamka et al. 2003, Berner et al. 2005, Tschirner and Simon 2015, Shumo et al. 2019).

Our data demonstrate a significantly lower mortality of R. differens (42.5–52.5%) in all diets mixed with host plants compared to the control diet which recorded over 70% mortality. The high survivorship in the host plant-based diet could be attributed to occurrence of aromatic plant amino acids such as phenylalanine which is essential for cuticle composition (Behmer and Joern 1993). However, chemical analysis of the plants used in feeding R. differens in the current study is required to verify contents of essential nutrients.

The lowest mortality (42.5%) of R. differens in diets mixed with host plants was lower than the lowest mortality of 46.7% reported by Ssepuuya et al. (2018) in R. differens reared on single live plants of C. dactylon and M. maximus. The mortality of R. differens in this study was also lower than the average mortality of 61.9% reported by Malinga et al. (2018a) in the diet of two (rice seed heads and finger millet seed heads) and eight (rice seed heads, finger millet seed heads, wheat bran, chicken superfeed egg booster, sorghum seed heads, germinated finger millet, simsim cake, and dog biscuit pellets) components. Foieri et al. (2020) also recorded high influence of host plants (Poaceae) on survival of Notozulia entreriana Berg (Hemiptera: Cercopidae), whereby 2.5, 22.5, and 95% survivals were recorded when the nymphs were reared on Zea mays L. (Poales: Poaceae), Chloris gayana Kunth (Poales: Poaceae), and Brachiaria decumbens Stapf (Poales: Poaceae), respectively. Improved R. differens survival in this study could be due to high carbohydrate levels from maize flour. Joern and Behmer (1997) reported that the white-whiskered grasshopper Ageneotettix deorum Scudder (Orthoptera: Acrididae) reared on the diet with 26.7% carbohydrates survived for 50.2 d but could only survive for 28.5 d on the diet comprising 4.3% carbohydrate. Also, survival differences in insects reared on different host plants could be attributed to nitrogen contents in host plants (Berner et al. 2005). Some insects such as grasshoppers can balance nitrogen levels in their body by compensatory feeding or through selecting host plants with high nitrogen and carbohydrate contents (Berner et al. 2005, Mayntz et al. 2005). Their strong chewing mouth parts (Matojo and Hosea 2013) could facilitate their wide selection of nutrient-rich host plants.

The highest and lowest R. differens fecundity were recorded in M. maximus and the control diets, respectively. Differences in fecundity among the treatments could be attributed to the concentration of amino acids and sterols in host plants (Awmack and Leather 2002). Phloem amino acid concentration has been reported to influence the fecundity of aphids (Myzus persicae Sulzer [Hemiptera: Aphididae]) in potatoes. Low levels of plant sterols in artificial diets decreased fecundity of the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella Linnaeus (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). It is notable that the fecundity of R. differens (21.8 to 45.5 eggs/female) in this study was markedly lower than the average fecundity of ~188 eggs reported by Leonard et al. (2021) under variable temperatures and diet composition. The current finding also disagrees with other studies by Brits and Thornton (1981) and Malinga et al. (2018a) who reported R. differens fecundity of 257 eggs and 148 eggs, respectively. The differences in R. differens fecundity between these studies could be attributed to the diet composition; as the diets by Malinga et al. (2018a) and Brits and Thornton (1981) comprised live plant seed heads, balanced protein, and formulated chicken and dog food, while our study involved diets containing powders of dry host plants, protein, carbohydrate, minerals, and vitamins. The dried host plant diets used in the current study would be preferable for storage of feed under a commercial mass production, but the effect of drying on host plant chemistry which may influence fecundity in the insect should be investigated. Nutritional requirements of nymphal and adult stages can also influence the fecundity of insects (Adams 2000, Wittmeyer et al. 2001). The nutritional requirements of R. differens nymphal and adult stages have not yet been investigated, hence further research is warranted to elucidate this.

The results show that inclusion of host plants in diets had no effect on longevity of R. differens. The adult longevity across the diets ranged from about 31 to 42 d, which closely concurs with the finding by Leonard et al. (2021) in which maximum R. differens adult longevity of 39 d was recorded. However, the R. differens adult longevity in the current study was much shorter than the highest female longevity of 72 d and 88 d reported by Brits and Thornton (1981) and Malinga et al. (2018a), respectively. The contradicting adult longevities could be contributed by the levels of protein in diets (Cammack and Tomberlin 2017). Runagall-McNaull et al. (2015) reported that whereas the banana stalk fly, Derocephalus angusticollis Enderlein (Diptera: Neriidae) lived for 97.7 d on the diet containing moderate protein level of 11 g/L, its lifespan was only 56.5 d on the diet with low (3 g/L) or high (30 g/L) protein content.

Inclusion of host plants in diets had no significant effect on R. differens adult weigh, which ranged from 0.46 ± 0.02 g to 0.51 ± 0.02 g. This range closely corroborates the finding by Ssepuuya et al. (2018) that the highest R. differens adult weight, when reared on Eleusine indica L. (Poales: Poaceae), was 0.586 g. However, Ssepuuya et al. (2018) found that R. differens adult weight varied significantly when reared on live C. dactylon, E. indica, M. maximus, and a combination of the three plants. In this study, protein was supplied by black soldier fly and soybean flour while the study by Ssepuuya et al. (2018) included no other protein sources besides the live plants.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that some natural host plants of R. differens identified from the guts of wild conspecific are critical in the development, survival, and reproduction of the insects and therefore should be included in diet formulations for its artificial mass rearing. Further analysis of the host plants to determine chemical components facilitating these favorable attributes of the insects during rearing is required.

Acknowledgments

We thank Miti Mathew, Judy Gitonga and Olivia Wanyanna for their technical assistance. Leonard, A. was supported by a German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) In-Region Postgraduate Scholarship. This work received financial support from the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) commissioned and administered through the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) Fund for International Agricultural Research (FIA), grant: 012345678; the BioInnovate Africa Programme (INSBIZ - Contribution ID No. 51050076); The Canadian International Development Research Centre and the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (Grant: 108866-001), the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Grant: RAF-3058 KEN-18/0005); UK’s Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO); the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida); the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC); the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia; and the Government of the Republic of Kenya. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the donors. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: A.L., S.S., F.M.K., J.P.E., S.K., S.E. and C.M.T. Methodology: A.L., J.P.E., and C.M.T. Validation: C.M.T., J.P.E., S.S., F.M.K., S.K., and S.E, Formal analysis: A.L. Investigation: A.L. Resources: S.S. and C.M.T; Data curation: A.L. Writing original draft: A.L. Writing review and editing: J.P.E., C.M.T., S.S., S.K., F.M.K., and S.E. Supervision: S.S., J.P.E., S.K., F.M.K., S.E. and C.M.T. Project administration: S.S. Funding acquisition: S.S., C.M.T., S.K. and S.E.

References Cited

  1. Adams, T. S. 2000. Effect of diet and mating status on ovarian development in a predaceous stink bug Perillus bioculatus (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 93: 529–535. [Google Scholar]
  2. Agea, J. G., Biryomumaisho D., Buyinza M., and Nabanoga G. N.. . 2008. Commercialization of Ruspolia nitidula (nsenene grasshoppers) in central Uganda. Afr. J. Food Agric. Nutr. Dev. 8: 319–332. [Google Scholar]
  3. Awmack, C. S., and Leather S. R.. . 2002. Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47: 817–844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Azrag, A. G., Murungi L. K., Tonnang H. E., Mwenda D., and Babin R.. . 2017. Temperature-dependent models of development and survival of an insect pest of African tropical highlands, the coffee antestia bug Antestiopsis thunbergii (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). J. Therm. Biol. 70: 27–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bailey, W. J., and McCrae A. W. R.. . 1978. The general biology and phenology of swarming in the East African tettigoniid Ruspolia differens (Serville) (Orthoptera). J. Nat. Hist. 12: 259–288. [Google Scholar]
  6. Behmer, S. T., and Elias D. O.. . 2000. Sterol metabolic constraints as a factor contributing to the maintenance of diet mixing in grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 73: 219–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Behmer, S. T., and Joern A.. . 1993. Diet choice by a grass-feeding grasshopper based on the need for a limiting nutrient. Func. Ecol. 7: 522–527. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bernays, E. A., and Bright K. L.. . 1991. Dietary mixing in grasshoppers: switching induced by nutritional imbalances in foods. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 61: 247–253. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bernays, E. A., Bright K. L., Gonzalez N., and Angel J.. . 1994. Dietary mixing in a generalist herbivore: tests of two hypotheses. Ecology. 75: 1997–2006. [Google Scholar]
  10. Berner, D., Blanckenhorn W. U., and Körner C.. . 2005. Grasshoppers cope with low host plant quality by compensatory feeding and food selection: N limitation challenged. Oikos. 111: 525–533. [Google Scholar]
  11. Blanco, C. A., Portilla M., Abel C. A., Winters H., Ford R. D., and Streett D.. . 2009. Soybean flower and wheat germ proportions in artificial diet and their effect on the growth rates of the tobacco budworm, Heliothis virescens. J. Insect Sci. 9: 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Brits, J. A., and Thornton C. H.. . 1981. On the biology of Ruspolia differens (Serville) (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) in South Africa. Phytophylactica 13: 169–174. [Google Scholar]
  13. Cammack, J. A., and Tomberlin J. K.. . 2017. The impact of diet protein and carbohydrate on select life-history traits of the black soldier fly Hermetia illucens (L.)(Diptera: Stratiomyidae). Insects. 8: 56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Egonyu, J. P., Miti M. M., Tanga C. M., Alfonce L., and Subramanian S. S.. . 2021. Cannibalism, oviposition and egg development in the edible long-horned grasshopper, Ruspolia differens (Orthoptera Tettigoniidae) under laboratory conditions. J. Insects Food Feed. 7: 89–97. [Google Scholar]
  15. Foieri, A., Virla E. G., Maciá A., and Marino de Remes Lenicov A. M.. . 2020. Effect of host plant on the fitness of the spittlebug Notozulia entreriana: alternative method for rearing. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 168: 618–625. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gunasena, G. H., Vinson S. B., Williams H. J., and Stipanovic R. D.. . 1988. Effects of caryophyllene, caryophyllene oxide, and their interaction with gossypol on the growth and development of Heliothis virescens (F.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 81: 93–97. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gunasena, G. H., Vinson S. B., and Williams H. J.. . 1990. Effects of nicotine on growth, development, and survival of the tobacco budworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and the parasitoid Campoletis sonorensis (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 83: 1777–1782. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hartley, J. C. 1967. Laboratory culture of a Tettigoniid, Homorocoryphus nitidulus vicinus (Wlk.) (Orthoptera). Bull. Entomol. Res. 57: 203–205. [Google Scholar]
  19. Joern, A., and Behmer S. T.. . 1997. Importance of dietary nitrogen and carbohydrates to survival, growth, and reproduction in adults of the grasshopper Ageneotettix deorum (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Oecologia. 112: 201–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Joern, A., and Behmer S. T.. . 1998. Impact of diet quality on demographic attributes in adult grasshoppers and the nitrogen limitation hypothesis. Ecol. Entomol. 23: 174–184. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kinyuru J. N., Kenji G. M., Muhoho S. N., and Ayieko M.. . 2010. Nutritional potential of longhorn grasshopper (Ruspolia differens) consumed in Siaya district, Kenya. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. 12: 32–46. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kinyuru, J. N., Nyangena D., Kamau E., Nderitu A., Muniu J., Kipkoech C., Weru J., Ndung’u N., and Mmari M.. . 2018. The role of edible insects in diets and nutrition in East Africa, pp. 93–108. InHalloran A.et al. (eds.), Edible insects in sustainable food systems. Springer, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lattanzio, V., Lattanzio V. M., and Cardinali A.. . 2006. Role of phenolics in the resistance mechanisms of plants against fungal pathogens and insects. Adv. Res. 661: 23–67. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lehtovaara, V. J., Roininen H., and Valtonen A.. . 2018. Optimal temperature for rearing the edible Ruspolia differens (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 111: 2652–2659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lehtovaara, V. J., Tahvanainen J., Sorjonen J., Valtonen A., and Roininen H.. . 2019. Space and shelter requirement of nymphs in the mass-rearing of the edible Ruspolia differens (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 112: 1651–1657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lenth, R., and Lenth M. R.. . 2018. Package ‘lsmeans’. Am. Stat. 34: 216–221. [Google Scholar]
  27. Leonard, A., Khamis F. M., Egonyu J. P., Kyamanywa S., Ekesi S., Tanga C. M., Copeland R. S., and Subramanian S.. . 2020. Identification of edible short-and long-horned grasshoppers and their host plants in East Africa. J. Econ. Entomol. 113: 2150–2162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Leonard, A., Egonyu J. P., Tanga C. M., Kyamanywa S., Tonnang H. Z., Azrag A. G., Khamis F. M., Ekesi S., and Subramanian S.. . 2021. Predicting the current and future distribution of the edible long-horned grasshopper Ruspolia differens (Serville) using temperature-dependent phenology models. J. Therm. Biol. 95: 102786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Malinga, G. M., Valtonen A., Lehtovaara V. J., Rutaro K., Opoke R., Nyeko P., and Roininen H.. . 2018a. Mixed artificial diets enhance the developmental and reproductive performance of the edible grasshopper, Ruspolia differens (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 53: 237–242. [Google Scholar]
  30. Malinga, G. M., Valtonen A., Lehtovaara V. J., Rutaro K., Opoke R., Nyeko P., and Roininen H.. . 2018b. Diet acceptance and preference of the edible grasshopper Ruspolia differens (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 53: 229–236. [Google Scholar]
  31. de Mandimburu, F. 2020. agricolae: Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research. R package version 1.3–2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=agricolae. Accessed on May 20, 2020.
  32. Matojo, D. N. and Hosea K. M.. . 2013. Phylogenetic Relationship of the Long-horned Grasshopper Ruspolia differens Serville (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) from northwest Tanzania based on 18S ribosomal nuclear sequences. J. Insects. Article id 504285, 5 p. [Google Scholar]
  33. Massa, B. 2015. Taxonomy and distribution of some katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) from tropical Africa. ZooKeys. 524: 17–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mayntz, D., Raubenheimer D., Salomon M., Toft S., and Simpson S. J.. . 2005. Nutrient-specific foraging in invertebrate predators. Science. 307: 111–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Miura, K., and Ohsaki N.. . 2004. Diet mixing and its effect on polyphagous grasshopper nymphs. Ecol. Res. 19: 269–274. [Google Scholar]
  36. Mmari, M. W., Kinyuru J. N., Laswai H. S., and Okoth J. K.. . 2017. Traditions, beliefs and indigenous technologies in connection with the edible longhorn grasshopper Ruspolia differens (Serville 1838) in Tanzania. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomedicine. 13: 60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Nayar, J. K. 1964. The nutritional requirements of grasshoppers: I. rearing of the grasshopper, Melanoplus bivittatus (Say), on a completely defined synthetic diet and some effects of different concentrations of b-vitamin mixture, linoleic acid, and β-carotene. Can. J. Zool. 42: 11–22. [Google Scholar]
  38. Okia, C. A., Odongo W., Nzabamwita P., Ndimubandi J., Nalika N., and Nyeko P.. . 2017. Local knowledge and practices on use and management of edible insects in Lake Victoria basin, East Africa. J. Insects as Food Feed. 3: 83–93. [Google Scholar]
  39. Opoke, R., Nyeko P., Malinga G. M., Rutaro K., Roininen H., and Valtonen A.. . 2019. Host plants of the non-swarming edible bush cricket Ruspolia differens. Ecol. Evol. 9: 3899–3908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Paul, A., Frederich M., Uyttenbroeck R., Hatt S., Malik P., Lebecque S., Hamaidia M., Miazek K., Goffin D., Willems L., and Deleu M.. . 2016. Grasshoppers as a food source? A review. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 20: 337–352. [Google Scholar]
  41. R Core Team . 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R–project.org/ [Google Scholar]
  42. Runagall-McNaull, A., Bonduriansky R., and Crean A. J.. . 2015. Dietary protein and lifespan across the metamorphic boundary: protein-restricted larvae develop into short-lived adults. Sci. Rep. 1: 1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Rutaro, K., Malinga G. M., Lehtovaara V. J., Opoke R., Nyeko P., Roininen H., and Valtonen A.. . 2018. Fatty acid content and composition in edible Ruspolia differens feeding on mixtures of natural food plants. BMC Res. Notes. 11: 687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Shumo, M., Osuga I. M., Khamis F. M., Tanga C. M., Fiaboe K. K., Subramanian S., Ekesi S., van Huis A., and Borgemeister C.. . 2019. The nutritive value of black soldier fly larvae reared on common organic waste streams in Kenya. Sci. Rep. 9: 1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Singer, M. S., and Bernays E. A.. . 2003. Understanding omnivory through food mixing behavior. Ecology. 84: 2532–2537. [Google Scholar]
  46. Ssepuuya, G., Tanga C.M., Yekko I., Sengendo F., Ndagire C.T., Fiaboe K.K.M., Karungi J., and Nakimbugwe D.. . 2018. Suitability of egg hatching conditions and commonly available food plants for rearing the long-horned grasshopper Ruspolia differens Serville (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). J. Insects Food Feed. 4: 253–261. [Google Scholar]
  47. Ssepuuya, G., Smets R., Nakimbugwe D., Van Der Borght M., and Claes J.. . 2019. Nutrient composition of the long-horned grasshopper Ruspolia differens Serville: effect of swarming season and sourcing geographical area. Food Chem. 301: 125305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Tschirner, M., and Simon A.. . 2015. Influence of different growing substrates and processing on the nutrient composition of black soldier fly larvae destined for animal feed. J. Insects as Food Feed. 1: 249–259. [Google Scholar]
  49. Valtonen, A., Malinga G. M., Junes P., Opoke R., Lehtovaara V. J., Nyeko P., and Roininen H.. . 2018. The edible katydid Ruspolia differens is a selective feeder on the inflorescences and leaves of grass species. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 166: 592–602. [Google Scholar]
  50. Venables, W. N., and Ripley B. D.. . 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S. 4th ed. Springer, New York, USA. [Google Scholar]
  51. Wittmeyer, J. L., Coudron T. A., and Adams T. S.. . 2001. Ovarian development, fertility and fecundity in Podisus maculiventris Say (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae): an analysis of the impact of nymphal, adult, male and female nutritional source on reproduction. Invertebr. Reprod. Dev. 39: 9–20. [Google Scholar]
  52. Yamka, R. M., Jamikorn U., True A. D., and Harmon D. L.. . 2003. Evaluation of soyabean meal as a protein source in canine foods. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 109: 121–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Insect Science are provided here courtesy of University of Wisconsin Libraries

RESOURCES