Abstract
Penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) are involved in the regulation of β-lactamase expression by determining the level of anhydromuramylpeptides in the periplasmatic space. It was hypothesized that one or more PBPs act as a sensor in the β-lactamase induction pathway. We have performed induction studies with Escherichia coli mutants lacking one to four PBPs with dd-carboxypeptidase activity. Therefore, we conclude that a strong β-lactamase inducer must inhibit all dd-carboxypeptidases as well as the essential PBPs 1a, 1b, and/or 2.
The production of β-lactamase is the major mechanism of bacterial resistance to β-lactam antibiotics. These enzymes hydrolyze the β-lactam ring and hence inactivate the antibiotics before they reach their target, the penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) (8). In members of the family Enterobacteriaceae the inducible production of the chromosomal AmpC β-lactamase is mediated by the genes ampC, ampR, ampD, and ampG (18–23) and is closely linked with the recycling of the peptidoglycan (5, 11, 14–17, 40; D. Pfeifle, H. Dietz, E. Janas, I. Wiegand, and B. B. Wiedemann, Abstr. 38th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. C-003, 1998). β-Lactam antibiotics differ markedly in their induction potentials. Imipenem and cefoxitin are strong inducers, while aztreonam and ceftazidime are not (5). As these two groups of β-lactam antibiotics differ in their affinities for the PBPs, it was hypothesized that one or more PBPs act as a sensor in the β-lactamase induction pathway (5, 27, 30, 31, 35, 40; Pfeifle, 38th ICAAC).
After addition of a strong inducer like imipenem NAcGlc-anhMurNAc-tripeptide (N-acetylglucosaminyl-1,6-anhydro-N- acetylmuramyl-l-alanly-d-glutamyl-meso-diaminopimelicacid), NAcGlc-anhMurNAc-tetrapeptide (N-acetylglucosaminyl-1,6-anhydro-N-acetylmuramyl-l-alanly-d-glutamyl-meso-diaminopimelic-acid-d-alanine), and especially, NAcGlc-anhMurNAc-pentapeptide (N-acetylglucosaminyl-1,6-anhydro-N-acetylmuramyl-l-alanly-d-glutamyl-meso- diaminopimelic-acid-d-alanyl-d-alanine) accumulate in the periplasmatic space (5, 14). Jacobs et al. (16) demonstrated that anhydromuramyl (aM)-tripeptide and aM-tetrapeptide convert the transcriptional factor AmpR into an activator of β-lactamase expression. We believe that the aM-pentapeptide plays an important role in the induction process, because we could demonstrate a clear correlation between the amount of the aM-pentapeptide, the amount of the β-lactamase, and the induction capacity (5).
The PBPs are cytoplasmic membrane enzymes involved in peptidoglycan biosynthesis (8, 36, 37). Up to 12 PBPs have been identified in Escherichia coli (1, 8, 10). They are able to bind to β-lactam antibiotics covalently at a conserved active serine residue because of their structural homology with the natural substrate d-alanine-d-alanine for transpeptidation. High-molecular-weight PBPs 1a, 1b, 2, and 3 are essential for growth and survival of the bacterial cell. PBPs 1a and 1b are believed to be dual transpeptidases-transglycosylases which catalyze glycan chain elongation and peptidoglycan cross-links, while PBP 2 and PBP 3 act only as transpeptidases. PBP 3 is essential for the formation of the septum during cell division (8, 36, 37). PBP 2, encoded by the gene pbpA, is required for lateral cell wall elongation and the maintenance of the rod shape (37). The activity of PBP 2 accounts for about 70% of peptidoglycan synthesis during elongation, indicating that PBP 2 is a major factor in net synthesis (32). Inhibition of PBP 2 with mecillinam leads to spherical cells and causes cell lysis after some generations (28). Mutations in the pbpA gene abolish β-lactamase induction (30).
Low-molecular-weight PBPs 4, 5, 6a, 6b, and 7 are dispensable, as their inactivation by mutation does not affect the vitality of the cells (1, 7). Most of the nonessential PBPs function as dd-carboxypeptidases. The dd-carboxypeptidases PBPs 4, 5, and 6 account for about 50% of the penicillin-binding capacity of bacterial cells (6). These enzymes are responsible for the degradation of the pentapeptide side chains to tetrapeptide in the peptidoglycan (1, 4, 36). Only newly inserted murein components carry pentapeptide side chains, which are rapidly degraded by transpeptidases and carboxypeptidases (4, 9). The inhibition of dd-carboxypeptidase leads to an increased level of pentapeptide side chains in the murein sacculus (1, 4, 7).
On the basis of our experiments we postulate that the 1,6-anhydromuramyl-pentapeptide is the main signal molecule for β-lactamase induction (5), for which it sends a signal by converting AmpR from a repressor into an activator (16). Strong inducers of β-lactamase like imipenem and cefoxitin bind to the dd-carboxypeptidases besides the essential PBPs and lead to conservation of pentapeptide side chains in the murein (5).
Here we describe induction studies performed with E. coli mutants lacking PBPs with carboxypeptidase activity (Table 1) which were transformed with the Enterobacter cloacae ampR-ampC operon.
TABLE 1.
Bacterial strains used in the study
Strain | Genotype and/or phenotype | PBP deletion | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
MC4100 | F− Δ(argF-lac)U169 araD139 deoC1 flbB5301 ptsF25 relA1 thiA rpsL150 | 1 | |
UGM599 | MC4100 ΔdacA::Km | 5 | 1 |
UGM600 | MC4100 dacD1 | 6b | 1 |
UGM601 | UGM599 dacD1 | 5, 6b | 1 |
JBS200 | his supF srl::Tn10 recA56 | 3 | |
JBS1002 | JBS200 ΔdacC1 ΔdacA::Km | 5, 6a | 1 |
UGM602 | JBS1002 dacD1 | 5, 6a, 6b | 1 |
UGM603 | UGM602 dacB::spc | 4, 5, 6a, 6b | 1 |
Culture conditions.
The E. coli strains were grown in M9 medium supplemented with glucose (0.2%), Casamino Acids (0.1%), thiamine (1 μg/ml), uracil (50 μg/ml), nicotinamide (5 μg/ml), and MgSO4 (1 mM) at 37°C. When required, sulfamethoxazole (1,000 μg/ml), neomycin (50 μg/ml), and tetracycline (50 μg/ml) were added.
The various antibiotics, which were tested for their capacity to induce the AmpC β-lactamase, were kindly provided by the following companies: cefotaxime by HMR Hoechst, Frankfurt, Germany; imipenem by Merck Sharp & Dohme, West Point, Pa.; mecillinam by Leo Pharmaceutical Products, Ballerup, Denmark; and aztreonam and cefsulodin by Grünenthal, Aachen, Germany.
Antibiotic susceptibility testing.
Antibiotic susceptibility was tested by a microdilution procedure in Iso-Sensitest broth (Oxoid). MICs were determined with a photometer for microtiter plates (Labsystems Multiscan Multisoft) after inoculation of antibiotic-containing microtiter plates (Merlin-Diagnostika, Bornheim, Germany) with 100 μl of an appropriate bacterial suspension (≈105 CFU/ml) and incubation for 24 h at 36 ± 1°C.
Determination of β-lactamase activity.
We performed induction studies with E. coli PBP deletion mutants transformed with plasmid pBP131 containing the E. cloacae genes (ampC and ampR) required for the expression of E. cloacae β-lactamase (19). The cells were grown to an optical density at 546 nm (OD546) of 0.5, and various antibiotics were added at concentrations that were half the MIC for 40 min. As a positive control imipenem was added at 1 μg/ml. Then, the cells (10 ml) were harvested by centrifugation at 4°C. The cells were resuspended in 1 ml of 0.05 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and were frozen overnight. Sonication on ice with a Branson sonifier yielded the cell extract for β-lactamase determination. The β-lactamase activity was quantified as described by Peter et al. (33), with nitrocefin (50 μM) used as the substrate (29). The protein content of each sample was determined by the method of Lowry et al. (26), with bovine serum albumin used as the standard.
Role of PBPs for initiation of β-lactamase induction.
The MICs of most of the β-lactamase-sensitive antibiotics were increased only for UGM602 (PBP 5, 6a, and 6b negative) and the quadruple PBP deletion mutant UGM603 (PBP 4, 5, 6a, and 6b negative) (1) (Table 2). These results were a hint that the basal β-lactamase activity had changed.
TABLE 2.
MIC of β-lactams for E. coli strains lacking dd-carboxypeptidasesa
Antibiotic | MIC (μg/ml)
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MC4100 | UGM599 (Δ5)b | UGM600 (Δ6b) | UGM601 (Δ5, Δ6b) | JBS200 | JBS1002 (Δ5, Δ6a) | UGM602 (Δ5, Δ6a, Δ6b) | UGM603 (Δ4, Δ5, Δ6a, Δ6b) | |
Amoxicillin | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 16 | 64 |
Cefaclor | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 64 |
Cefazolin | 2 | 0.5 | 4 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 256 |
Cefuroxime | 1 | 0.5 | 2 | 0.5 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 16 |
Cefotaxime | 0.0625 | <0.0625 | 0.125 | <0.0312 | <0.0312 | <0.0312 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Cefsulodin | 32 | 16 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 64 |
Mecillinam | 0.075 | 0.075 | 0.075 | 0.0362 | 0.075 | 0.0362 | 0.0362 | 0.075 |
Aztreonam | <0.0312 | <0.0312 | 0.0625 | <0.0312 | <0.0312 | <0.0312 | 0.0625 | 1 |
Imipenem | 0.125 | 0.0625 | 0.125 | 0.0625 | 0.0625 | 0.125 | 0.0625 | 0.0625 |
All strains carry plasmid pBP131, which contains E. cloacae genes ampC and ampR.
Designations in parentheses indicate the PBPs that have been deleted.
The inactivation of one or two dd-carboxypeptidases has no influence on the basal β-lactamase level. However, the basal β-lactamase level is increased in the triple mutant UGM602 and is especially increased in the quadruple mutant UGM603. The basal β-lactamase activity is elevated 2- to 3-fold in the triple mutant UGM602 compared to that in the wild type or the mutants with only one or two deletions of dd-carboxypeptidases and is elevated 10-fold in the quadruple mutant (Table 3).
TABLE 3.
Influence of β-lactam antibiotics on β-lactamase induction in mutants of E. coli lacking dd-carboxypeptidasesa
Antibioticsb | β-Lactamase activity (μmol/mg/min)c
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MC4100 | UGM599 (Δ5)d | UGM600 (Δ6b) | UGM601 (Δ5, Δ6b) | JBS200 | JBS1002 (Δ5, Δ6a) | UGM602 (Δ5, Δ6a, Δ6b) | UGM603 (Δ4, Δ5, Δ6a, Δ6b) | |
None | 0.45 (0.18)e | 0.4 (0.06)e | 0.48 | 0.36 (0.06)e | 0.46 (0.05) | 0.67 (0.22)e | 1.65 (0.25)e | 5.40 (1.5)e |
Cefsulodin | 0.43 (0.17)e | 0.22 | 0.60 | 0.34 | 0.56 (0.05) | 0.61 (0.24)e | 2.66 (0.25)e | 9.10 (1.5)e |
Mecillinam | 0.44 (0.08)e | 0.21 | 0.44 | 0.28 | 0.44 (0.17)e | 0.66 (0.21)e | 1.68 (1)e | 14.00 (5.5)e |
Mecillinam-cefsulodin | 0.49 (0.21)e | 0.57 | 1.23 (0.55)e | 0.48 (0.12)e | 0.52 (0.05) | 0.60 (0.2)e | 1.76 (0.5)e | 18.86 (7.3)e |
Imipenem | 0.50 (0.19)e | 0.58 | 0.53 | 2.20 | 0.53 (0.04) | 0.67 (0.18)e | 2.96 (0.37)e | 8.50 (1.6)e |
Cefotaxime | 0.75 (0.38)e | 0.23 | 0.42 | 0.21 | 0.75 (0.38)e | 0.76 (0.43)e | 2.07 (0.35)e | 5.75 (1.7)e |
Aztreonam | 0.15 (0.09)e | 0.21 | 0.35 | 0.20 | 0.15 (0.09)e | 0.42 (0.27)e | 1.00 (0.77)e | 5.50 (2.0)e |
Imipenem (1 μg/ml) | 12.31 (1.33) | 26.59 (5.26) | 16.14 (3.29) | 33.52 (5.57) | 11.08 (1.27) | 18.06 (9.75) | 12.91 (2.18) | 24.9 (5.78) |
All strains are carrying the plasmid pBP131, which contains the E. cloacae genes ampC and ampR.
The antibiotic was added for 40 min after the cells reached an OD546 of 0.5. The concentration of each antibiotic was half the MIC.
Data are means from two or three experiments.
See footnote b of Table 2.
Values in parentheses in the table body are standard deviations for three experiments.
The simultaneous inhibition of the essential PBPs 1a and 1b by cefsulodin and PBP 2 by mecillinam (24) led to a strong β-lactamase induction only in UGM603. The use of higher concentrations of mecillinam and cefsulodin results in the same effect (data not shown). The inhibition of PBP 3 by aztreonam (24) had no consequence for the β-lactamase induction (Table 3). Also, we have tested a mutant that lacks PBPs 4, 5, and 6a, the effect for that mutant was the same as that for UGM603 (data not shown).
These results suggest that only the deletion of three or four dd-carboxypeptidases and the concomitant inhibition of the essential PBP 1a, 1b, and/or 2 results in an increased level of β-lactamase induction. Thus, a strong inducer must inhibit all dd-carboxypeptidases as well as essential PBPs 1a, 1b, and/or 2. In contrast, Sanders et al. (35) suggested a major role for PBP 4 in the induction of AmpC, as in PBP 4-negative and in PBP 4- and PBP 7-negative mutants the inducibility decreases.
On the basis of these results we favor a modified model of the induction of β-lactamase that emphasizes the involvement of PBPs in this process (5, 17). In the periplasmic space the β-lactam antibiotics bind to PBPs, causing an imbalance in the equilibrium of peptidoglycan synthesis and hydrolysis reactions (12). Four different lytic transglycosylases in E. coli are known to be associated with PBPs that bind to multienzyme complexes. These lytic transglycosylases hydrolyze glycosidic bonds to allow murein expansion, releasing muropeptides containing anhydromuramic acid. All four enzymes function as exomuraminidases which cleave the glycan strands in a processive manner starting at the nonreducing glucosamine end. Three enzymes (MltA, MltB, and MltC) are lipoproteins bound to the outer membrane, while Slt70 is a soluble protein (12, 13, 25, 34, 39). Slt70 interacts with the high-molecular-weight PBPs 1a, 1b, and 2 (39). The three-dimensional structure of Slt70 revealed by X-ray crystallography is doughnutlike, with the active site facing the inside (38). It is suggested that peptide cross-links prevent access of Slt70 to the glycan chains and therefore slow down the activity of this enzyme (2). Inhibition of Slt70 leads to a decrease in the level of β-lactamase induction (Pfeifle et al., 38th ICAAC; D. Pfeifle, I. Wiegand, and B. Wiedemann, Program Abstr. 9th Eur. Congr. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., abstr. 01174, 1999).
Inactivation of dd-carboxypeptidases PBP 4, 5, 6a, and 6b leads to an increase in the level of pentapeptide side chains in the peptidoglycan. Inhibition of PBP 1a, 1b, and/or 2 leads to inactivation of the transpeptidase function, causing a decrease in the level of cross-links in the murein. The reduced amount of cross-links allows further degradation of the murein by the lytic transglycosylases especially by Slt70 (39, 40). Therefore, degradation of the murein sacculus is followed by an accumulation of aM peptides in the periplasm. The most important degradation product, aM-pentapeptide, is transported into the cytoplasm (5), where it probably converts AmpR from a repressor into an activator of ampC expression by displacing the UDP-NAcMur-pentapeptide (uridine diphosphate-N-acetylmuramyl-l-alanyl-d-glutamyl-meso-diaminopimelic acid-d-alanyl-d-alanine) from AmpR (16).
Although the process of β-lactamase induction is much better understood in the context of peptidoglycan degradation and recycling, we still lack knowledge about some essential steps of β-lactamase initiation. Studies will be needed to assess the links between inhibition of PBPs, lytic transglycosylases, and β-lactamase induction. Inhibition of the lytic transglycosylases, especially Slt70, could be a possible means of disturbing β-lactamase induction (Pfeifle et al., 9th ECCMID).
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to M.-R. Baquero, M. Bouzon, J. C. Quintela, J. Ayala, J. A. Ayala, and J. Moreno, for bacterial strains. We thank J. V. Höltje, Helgard Dietz, Irith Wiegand, and Volker Hüllen for active support and discussion.
This work was supported by a grant (grant WI 361/15-2) from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; by Pfizer AG, Karlsruhe, Germany; and by Pinguin Stiftung, Düsseldorf, Germany.
REFERENCES
- 1.Baquero M-R, Bouzon M, Quintela J C, Ayala J A, Moreno F. dacD, an Escherichia coli gene encoding a novel penicillin-binding protein (PBP 6) with dd-carboxypeptidase activity. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:7106–7111. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.24.7106-7111.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bramhill D. Bacterial cell division. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1997;13:395–424. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.13.1.395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Broome-Smith J K. Construction of a mutant of Escherichia coli that has deletions of both the penicillin-binding protein 5 and 6 genes. J Gen Microbiol. 1985;131:2115–2118. doi: 10.1099/00221287-131-8-2115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.De Pedro M A, Schwarz U. Heterogeneity of newly inserted and preexisting murein in the sacculus of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1981;78:5856–5860. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.9.5856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dietz H, Pfeifle D, Wiedemann B. The signal molecule for β-lactamase induction in Enterobacter cloacae is the anhydromuramyl-pentapeptide. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:2113–2120. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.10.2113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dougherty T J, Kennedy K M, Kessler R E, Pucci M J. Direct quantification of the number of individual penicillin-binding proteins per cell in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:6110–6115. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.21.6110-6115.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Edwards D H, Donachie W D. Construction of a triple deletion of penicillin-binding proteins 4, 5, and 6 in Escherichia coli. In: De Pedro M A, et al., editors. Bacterial growth and lysis. New York, N.Y: Plenum Press; 1993. pp. 369–374. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ghuysen J-M. Serine β-lactamases and penicillin-binding proteins. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1991;45:37–67. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.45.100191.000345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Glauner B, Höltje J-V, Schwarz U. The composition of the murein of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1988;263:10088–10095. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Henderson T, Young K, Denome S, Elf P. AmpC and AmpH, proteins related to the class C β-lactamases, bind penicillin and contribute to normal morphology of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:6112–6121. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.19.6112-6121.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Höltje J-V, Kopp U, Ursinus A, Wiedemann B. The negative regulator of β-lactamase induction AmpD is a N-acetyl-anhydromuramyl-l-alanine amidase. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1994;122:159–164. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb07159.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Höltje J-V. From growth to autolysis: the murein hydrolases in Escherichia coli. Arch Microbiol. 1995;164:243–254. doi: 10.1007/BF02529958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Höltje J-V. A hypothetical holoenzyme involved in the replication of the murein sacculus of Escherichia coli. Microbiology. 1996;142:1911–1918. doi: 10.1099/13500872-142-8-1911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jacobs C, Huang L, Bartowsky E, Normark S, Park J T. Bacterial cell wall recycling provides cytosolic muropeptides as effector for β-lactamase induction. EMBO J. 1994;13:4684–4694. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06792.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jacobs C, Joris B, Jamin M, Klarsov K, Van Beeumen J, Mengin-Lecreulx D, van Heijenoort J, Park J T, Normark S. AmpD, essential for both β-lactamase regulation and cell wall recycling, is a novel cytosolic N-acetylmuramyl-l-alanine amidase. Mol Microbiol. 1995;15:553–559. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.tb02268.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jacobs C, Frère J M, Normark S. Cytosolic intermediates for cell wall biosynthesis and degradation control inducible β-lactam resistance in gram-negative bacteria. Cell. 1997;886:823–832. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81928-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jacobs C. Life in the balance: cell walls and antibiotic resistance. Science. 1997;278:1731–1732. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5344.1731b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Korfmann G, Sanders C C. ampG is essential for high-level expression of AmpC β-lactamase in Enterobacter cloacae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989;33:1946–1951. doi: 10.1128/aac.33.11.1946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Korfmann G, Wiedemann B. Genetic control of β-lactamase production in Enterobacter cloacae. Ref Infect Dis. 1998;10:793–799. doi: 10.1093/clinids/10.4.793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lindberg F, Normark S. Common mechanism of ampC β-lactamase induction in enterobacteria: regulation of the cloned Enterobacter cloacae P99 β-lactamase gene. J Bacteriol. 1987;169:758–763. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.2.758-763.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lindberg F, Lindquist S, Normark S. Inactivation of the ampD gene causes semiconstitutive overproduction of the inducible Citrobacter freundii β-lactamase. J Bacteriol. 1987;169:1923–1928. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.5.1923-1928.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lindquist S, Galleni M, Lindberg F, Normark S. Signaling proteins in enterobacterial AmpC β-lactamase regulation. Mol Microbiol. 1989;3:1091–1102. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1989.tb00259.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lindquist S M, Lindberg F, Normark S. Binding of the Citrobacter freundii AmpR regulator to a single DNA site provides both autoregulation and activation of the inducible ampC β-lactamase gene. J Bacteriol. 1989b;171:3746–3753. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.7.3746-3753.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Livermore D M, Williams D. β-lactams: mode of action and mechanisms of bacterial resistance. In: Lorian V, editor. Antibiotics in laboratory medicine. 4th ed. Baltimore, Md: The Williams & Wilkins Co.; 1996. pp. 502–578. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lommatzsch J, Templin M, Kraft A, Vollmar W, Höltje J-V- Outer membrane localization of murein hydrolases: MltA, a third lipoprotein transglycosylase in E. coli. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:5465–5470. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.17.5465-5470.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lowry O H, Rosenbrough N J, Farr A L, Randall R J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951;193:265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Martin M H, Schmidt B, Bräutigam S, Noguchi H, Matsuhashi M. Initiation of induction of chromosomal β-lactamase in gram-negative bacteria by binding of inducing β-lactam antibiotics to low molecular weight penicillin-binding proteins. In: Actor P, Daneo-Moore L, Higgins M L, Salton N R J, Shockmann G D, editors. Antibiotic inhibition of bacterial cell surface assembly and function. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology; 1988. pp. 494–501. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Matsuhashi S T, Kamiryo P M, Blemberg P, Linnet E, Willoughby S, Strominger J L. Mechanism of action and development of resistance to a new amidino penicillin. J Bacteriol. 1974;117:578–587. doi: 10.1128/jb.117.2.578-587.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.O'Callaghan C H, Muggleton P W, Ross G W. Effects of β-lactamase from gram-negative organisms on cephalosporins and penicillins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1969;68:57–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Oliva B, Bennett P M, Chopra I. Penicillin-binding protein 2 is required for induction of the Citrobacter freundii class 1 chromosomal β-lactamase in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989;33:1116–1117. doi: 10.1128/aac.33.7.1116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ottolenghi A C, Ayala J A. Induction of class I β-lactamase from Enterobacter cloacae in Escherichia coli requires active ftsZ but not ftsA or ftsQ products. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991;35:2359–2365. doi: 10.1128/aac.35.11.2359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Park J T. An overview of the assembly, turnover and recycling of the murein sacculus. In: De Pedro M A, editor. Bacterial growth and lysis. New York, N.Y: Plenum Press; 1993. pp. 369–374. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Peter K, Korfmann G, Wiedemann B. Impact of the ampD gene and its product on β-lactamase production in Enterobacter cloacae. Rev Infect Dis. 1988;10:800–805. doi: 10.1093/clinids/10.4.800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Romeis T, Vollmer W, Höltje J-V. Characterization of three different lytic transglycosylases in Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1993;111:141–146. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1993.tb06376.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sanders C, Bradford B A, Ehrhardt A F, Bush K, Young K D, Henderson T A, Sanders W E., Jr Penicillin-binding proteins and induction of ampC β-lactamase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:2013–2015. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.9.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Spratt B G. Distinct penicillin binding proteins involved in the division, elongation, and shape of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1975;72:2999–3003. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.8.2999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Spratt B G. Properties of the penicillin-binding proteins of Escherichia coli K 12. Eur J Biochem. 1977;72:341–352. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1977.tb11258.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Thunnissen A-M, Dijkstra W H, Kalk A J, Rozeboom K H, Engel J, Keck H W, Dijkstra W. Doughnut-shaped structure of a bacterial muramidase revealed by X-ray crystallography. Nature. 1994;367:350–353. doi: 10.1038/367750a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Von Rechenberg M, Ursinus A, Höltje J-V. Affinity chromatography as a means to study multienzyme complexes involved in murein synthesis. Microb Drug Resist. 1996;2:155–157. doi: 10.1089/mdr.1996.2.155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wiedemann B, Pfeifle D, Wiegand I, Janas E. β-Lactamase induction and cell wall recycling in gram-negative bacteria. Drug Resist Updates. 1998;1:223–226. doi: 10.1016/s1368-7646(98)80002-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]