Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2000 Jan;44(1):186–189. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.1.186-189.2000

Postantibiotic Effects of Grepafloxacin Compared to Those of Five Other Agents against 12 Gram-Positive and -Negative Bacteria

Sheila K Spangler 1,, Saralee Bajaksouzian 2, Michael R Jacobs 2, Peter C Appelbaum 1,*
PMCID: PMC89651  PMID: 10602746

Abstract

The postantibiotic effect (PAE) (10× the MIC) and the postantibiotic sub-MIC effects (0.125, 0.25, and 0.5× the MIC) were determined for six compounds against 12 strains. Measurable PAEs ranged between 0 and 1.8 h for grepafloxacin, 0 and 2.2 h for ciprofloxacin, 0 and 3.1 h for levofloxacin, 0 and 2.2 h for sparfloxacin, 0 and 2.4 h for amoxicillin-clavulanate and 0 and 4.8 h for clarithromycin. Reexposure to subinhibitory concentrations increased the PAEs against some strains.


The past decade has witnessed a dramatic worldwide increase in the incidence of pneumococci and other respiratory pathogens such as Haemophilus influenzae which are resistant to β-lactam and non-β-lactam agents (4, 5, 10). Newer agents are required to treat these infections (7, 10).

Grepafloxacin is a broad-spectrum quinolone with improved activity against pneumococci and is also very active against Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and other organisms responsible for community-acquired respiratory tract infections, such as chlamydia, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Legionella (9, 12, 15, 18).

Postantibiotic effects (PAEs) and postantibiotic sub-MIC effects (PAE-SMEs) are pharmacodynamic phenomena which, if present, may influence antimicrobial dosing regimens (3, 14). We examined the PAEs and PAE-SMEs of grepafloxacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, sparfloxacin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and clarithromycin against two strains each of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus; penicillin-susceptible, -intermediate, and -resistant pneumococci; H. influenzae; and Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Microdilution MICs were determined according to standard recommendations (13) with freshly made Haemophilus test medium (HTM), which was used within 2 weeks of preparation, for H. influenzae.

The PAE was determined by the viable plate method (3, 16, 17) with Mueller-Hinton broth supplemented with 5% lysed horse blood for pneumococci; for H. influenzae, freshly prepared HTM was used. Bacterial inocula were prepared by suspending growth from an overnight agar plate (blood agar plates for gram-positive organisms and K. pneumoniae; chocolate agar plates for H. influenzae) in broth. The broth was incubated at 35°C for 2 to 4 h in a shaking water bath until the turbidity matched that of a no. 1 McFarland standard (approximately 3 × 108 CFU/ml). An additional control culture containing bacteria and antibiotic at a concentration of 0.01× the MIC was prepared to confirm that after dilution the antibiotic was no longer bacteriostatic (3, 16, 17).

Viability counts (3, 16, 17) were determined before exposure and immediately after dilution (0 h) and then every 2 h until the turbidity of the tube reached that of a no. 1 McFarland standard (maximum of 8 h). The PAE was defined as described by Craig and Gudmundsson (3). For each experiment, viability counts, expressed as log10 CFU per milliliter, were plotted against time. Results were expressed as the mean of two separate assays.

In cultures designated for PAE-SME determination (14), the PAE was induced, and experiments for determination of PAE-SMEs were performed as described previously (16, 17) with subinhibitory concentrations of 0.125, 0.25, and 0.5× the MIC. Viability counts were determined before exposure, immediately after dilution, and then every 2 h (maximum 8 h) until the turbidity reached that of a no. 1 McFarland standard, as described above for the PAE. Experiments (14) for determination of sub-MIC effects (SMEs; exposure of strains to subinhibitory drug concentrations) were not performed. The PAE-SME was defined as described by Odenholt-Tornqvist (14) and others (16, 17). Results were plotted (as described above for PAE) and are expressed as the arithmetic means of two separate assays.

Grepafloxacin MICs were all ≤0.25 μg/ml (range, 0.004 to 0.25 μg/ml). The MICs of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and sparfloxacin ranged between 0.016 and 8.0, 0.016 and 1.0, and 0.004 and 0.5 μg/ml, respectively. Amoxicillin-clavulanate inhibited all strains at ≤8.0 μg/ml (range, 0.06 to 8.0 μg/ml), and clarithromycin inhibited all strains at ≤16.0 μg/ml (range, 0.03 to 16.0 μg/ml). For all H. influenzae strains tested, quinolone MICs were ≤0.016 μg/ml (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

PAEs of inhibitory and subinhibitory concentrations of compoundsa

Organism and drug MIC (μg/ml) PAE (h)b PAE-SME (h)c
0.125× the MIC 0.25× the MIC 0.5× the MIC
Methicillin-susceptible S. aureus
 Grepafloxacin 0.12 1.3 3.1 6.5  NMd
 Ciprofloxacin 1 0 0 0 0
 Levofloxacin 1 0 4.2 NM NM
 Sparfloxacin 0.25 0 0.4 NM NM
 Amoxicillin-clavulanate 8 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.8
 Clarithromycin 0.25 0 0 0 0
Methicillin-susceptible S. aureus
 Grepafloxacin 0.06 0 0.2 2.0 NM
 Ciprofloxacin 8 0.5 1.7 1.7 NM
 Levofloxacin 1 2.4 2.5 NM NM
 Sparfloxacin 0.25 1.3 1.6 1.8 NM
 Amoxicillin-clavulanate 1 0 0.2 0.7 0.7
 Clarithromycin 0.016 0.9 0.9 1.6 2.7
Penicillin-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae
 Grepafloxacin 0.25 1.2 3.6 NM NM
 Ciprofloxacin 2 1.8 3.9 NM NM
 Levofloxacin 1 1.7 2.3 3.0 NM
 Sparfloxacin 0.25 1.5 1.7 2.8 6.4
 Amoxicillin-clavulanate 0.016 1.3 1.7 2.1 3.9
 Clarithromycin 0.06 3.9 NM NM NM
Penicillin-susceptible S. pneumoniae
 Grepafloxacin 0.25 1.7 5.9 NM NM
 Ciprofloxacin 2 2.1 3.9 NM NM
 Levofloxacin 1 1.3 1.5 2.2 6.0
 Sparfloxacin 0.25 1.5 2.0 3.5 NM
 Amoxicillin-clavulanate 0.06 2.2 2.2 4.0 6.2
 Clarithromycin 0.12 4.8 NM NM NM
Penicillin-intermediate S. pneumoniae
 Grepafloxacin 0.25 0.6 0.6 2.5 NM
 Ciprofloxacin 1 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.7
 Levofloxacin 1 3.1 3.3 5.0 6.5
 Sparfloxacin 0.25 0 0 1.0 6.4
 Amoxicillin-clavulanate 0.12 2.4 2.4 4.9 NM
 Clarithromycin 0.25 2.9 5.0 NM NM
Penicillin-intermediate S. pneumoniae
 Grepafloxacin 0.12 0.7 1.7 3.3 NM
 Ciprofloxacin 1 1.9 2.6 5.2 NM
 Levofloxacin 1 1.5 1.5 2.7 NM
 Sparfloxacin 0.5 1.3 3.1 7.5 NM
 Amoxicillin-clavulanate 0.06 1.2 3.8 NM NM
 Clarithromycin 0.03 4.2 NM NM NM
Penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae
 Grepafloxacin 0.12 1.3 1.7 1.7 3.3
 Ciprofloxacin 2 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
 Levofloxacin 1 0 0 0.9 1.8
 Sparfloxacin 0.25 0.2 0.5 1.5 3.4
 Amoxicillin-clavulanate 2 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.5
 Clarithromycin 0.12 3.8 NM NM NM
Penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae
 Grepafloxacin 0.25 1.8 6.2 NM NM
 Ciprofloxacin 2 2.2 4.6 NM NM
 Levofloxacin 1 2.2 2.6 3.4 NM
 Sparfloxacin 0.5 2.2 5.1 NM NM
 Amoxicillin-clavulanate 1 1.0 3.2 3.7 NM
 Clarithromycin 4 NM NM NM NM
H. influenzae
 Grepafloxacin 0.004 NM NM NM NM
 Ciprofloxacin 0.016 NM NM NM NM
 Levofloxacin 0.016 NM NM NM NM
 Sparfloxacin 0.004 NM NM NM NM
 Amoxicillin-clavulanate 1 0.8 0.8 NM NM
 Clarithromycin 8 NM NM NM NM
H. influenzae
 Grepafloxacin 0.008 NM NM NM NM
 Ciprofloxacin 0.016 NM NM NM NM
 Levofloxacin 0.016 NM NM NM NM
 Sparfloxacin 0.008 NM NM NM NM
 Amoxicillin-clavulanate 1 0.2 0.2 NM NM
 Clarithromycin 8 NM NM NM NM
K. pneumoniae
 Grepafloxacin 0.06 0 0 1.0 1.7
 Ciprofloxacin 0.5 0 0.04 0.3 1.3
 Levofloxacin 0.5 1.8 2.1 7.8 NM
 Sparfloxacin 0.12 0.7 1.0 1.7 2.0
 Amoxicillin-clavulanate 8 0 0 0 0
 Clarithromycin 16 0.6 1.0 1.3 1.3
K. pneumoniae
 Grepafloxacin 0.12 0.3 0.8 NM NM
 Ciprofloxacin 0.5 0 0 0.5 1.4
 Levofloxacin 0.5 2.6 2.0 NM NM
 Sparfloxacin 0.25 1.3 NM NM NM
 Amoxicillin-clavulanate 4 0 0 0 0
 Clarithromycin 8 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.7
a

Values are the means of two experiments. 

b

Exposure for 1 h to 10× the MIC; drug was removed by 1:1,000 dilution. 

c

Strains were exposed to 10× the MIC for 1 h, drug was removed (as for the PAE experiments), and then the strains were exposed to 0.125, 0.25, and 0.5× the MIC. 

d

NM, not measurable. 

The results of tests for PAEs and PAE-SMEs are presented in Table 1. Exposure of bacteria to antibiotics at 0.01× the MIC did not lead to bacteriostatic activity. Grepafloxacin PAEs range from 0 to 18 h, with this compound having no PAEs against one methicillin-susceptible S. aureus strain and one K. pneumoniae strain. The ranges of PAEs of the other quinolones were similar to those of grepafloxacin. Ciprofloxacin showed no PAE against one methicillin-susceptible S. aureus strain and both K. pneumoniae strains tested, and levofloxacin showed no PAE against one methicillin-susceptible S. aureus strain and one penicillin-resistant pneumococcal strain. Sparfloxacin had no PAE against one methicillin-susceptible S. aureus strain and one penicillin-intermediate pneumococcal strain. Quinolone PAEs against H. influenzae could not be measured owing to rapid bactericidal activity. Amoxicillin-clavulanate had no PAEs against one methicillin-susceptible S. aureus strain and both K. pneumoniae strains tested, with PAEs ranging between 0 and 2.4 h. Clarithromycin PAEs ranged between 0 and 4.8 h, with no PAE against one methicillin-susceptible S. aureus and rapid bactericidal activity against both H. influenzae strains. The differences in PAEs in the two separate assays were between 0.1 and 0.5 h for all drugs tested, and no statistical difference between the results could be shown.

PAE-SMEs were generally longer than PAEs, especially at higher sub-MICs. PAE-SMEs at 0.125, 0.25, and 0.5× the MICs ranged between 0 and 6.2, 1.0 and 6.5, and 1.7 and 3.3 h, respectively, for grepafloxacin; 0 and 4.6, 0 and 5.2, and 0 and 1.7 h, respectively, for ciprofloxacin; 0 and 4.2, 0.9 and 7.8, and 1.8 and 6.5 h, respectively, for levofloxacin; 0 and 5.1, 1.0 and 7.5, and 2.0 and 6.4 h, respectively, for sparfloxacin; 0 and 3.8, 0 and 4.9, and 0 and 6.2 h, respectively, for amoxicillin-clavulanate; and 0 and 5.0, 0 and 1.6, and 0 and 2.7 h, respectively, for clarithromycin. The PAE-SMEs of all drugs except amoxicillin-clavulanate at 0.125× the MIC could not be measured against H. influenzae because of rapid bactericidal activity. With the exception of ciprofloxacin against one strain of S. aureus, amoxicillin-clavulanate against both K. pneumoniae strains tested, and clarithromycin against one S. aureus strain, the drugs which did not have PAEs had PAE-SMEs, especially at higher subinhibitory concentrations.

The microdilution MICs of grepafloxacin were similar to those reported by us and other workers (9, 12, 15). The PAE-SMEs were generally longer than the PAEs. Complete killing of strains in PAE-SME tests, especially at higher subinhibitory concentrations, could have been due to drug-induced lysis; alternately, PAE-SMEs could have been longer than the 8-h period which was tested (16, 17). However, the SMEs (14) of the drugs against the strains were not tested. Thus, it is not possible to say whether the longer PAE-SMEs were due to the subinhibitory concentration itself or the subinhibitory concentration following prior exposure.

A single 400-mg oral dose of grepafloxacin yields a maximum concentration in serum of 1.5 ± 0.3 μg/ml, with an area under the curve value of 12.4 ± 2.4 mg · h/liter (1). Trough levels increase significantly over the first 3 days, reaching approximately 80% of the steady-state levels. The mean plasma elimination half-life is 12 h (6). Serum grepafloxacin concentrations are significantly exceeded in bronchial mucosa (mean ratio, 3.13), epithelial lining fluid (mean ratio, 12.21), and macrophages (mean ratio, 194.52) (2). Despite the latter increased concentrations in tissue and fluid, it is recognized that the exposure concentrations for organisms such as pneumococci were higher than the achievable concentrations in serum. In the past, many workers have used 10× the MIC as the PAE exposure concentration, and exposure time and inoculum density differ (3, 16, 17); these require standardization. However, with different exposure concentrations and exposure periods, the PAEs of different quinolones and also macrolides against pneumococci are very similar (3, 8, 11, 15, 16).

The results of MIC and pharmacokinetic tests suggest that grepafloxacin should be used clinically as treatment for infections caused by susceptible strains. This is particularly the case for empiric therapy of community-acquired respiratory tract infections. Results of PAE testing support once-daily dosing.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from Glaxo Wellcome, Inc., Research Triangle Park, N.C.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Child J, Andrews J M, Wise R. Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of the new fluoroquinolone grepafloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:513–515. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.2.513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cook P J, Andrews J M, Wise R, Honeybourne D, Moudgil H. Concentrations of OPC-17116, a new fluoroquinolone antibacterial, in serum and lung compartments. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995;35:317–326. doi: 10.1093/jac/35.2.317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Craig W A, Gudmundsson S. Postantibiotic effect. In: Lorian V, editor. Antibiotics in laboratory medicine. Baltimore, Md: The Williams & Wilkins Co.; 1996. pp. 296–329. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Doern G V, Brueggeman A, Holley H P, Jr, Rauch A M. Antimicrobial resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae recovered from outpatients in the United States during the winter months of 1994 to 1995: results of a 30-center national surveillance study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:1208–1213. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.5.1208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Doern G V, Brueggeman A B, Pierce G, Holley H P, Jr, Rauch A. Antibiotic resistance among clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae in the United States in 1994 and 1995 and detection of β-lactamase-positive strains resistant to amoxicillin-clavulanate: results of a national multicenter surveillance study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:292–297. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.2.292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Efthymiopoulos C, Bramer S L, Maroli A. Pharmacokinetics of grepafloxacin after oral administration of single and repeat doses in healthy young males. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997;33(Suppl. 1):1–8. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199700331-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Friedland I R, McCracken G H., Jr Management of infections caused by antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:377–382. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199408113310607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fuursted K, Knudsen J D, Petersen M B, Poulsen R K, Rehm D. Comparative study of bactericidal activities, postantibiotic effects, and effects on bacterial virulence of penicillin G and six macrolides against Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:781–784. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.4.781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Imada T, Miyazaki S, Nishida M, Yamaguchi K, Goto S. In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of a new quinolone, OPC-17116. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992;36:573–579. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.3.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jacobs M R, Appelbaum P C. Antibiotic-resistant pneumococci. Rev Med Microbiol. 1995;6:77–93. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Licata L, Smith C E, Goldschmidt R M, Barrett J F, Frosco M. Comparison of the postantibiotic and postantibiotic sub-MIC effects of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin on Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:950–955. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.5.950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Marco F, Jones R N, Hoban D J, Pignatari A C, Yamane N, Frei R. In-vitro activity of OPC-17116 against more than 6000 consecutive clinical isolates: a multicentre international study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994;33:647–654. doi: 10.1093/jac/33.3.647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. 4th ed. 1997. Approved standard. NCCLS publication no. M7-A4. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Odenholt-Tornqvist I. Studies on the postantibiotic effect and the postantibiotic sub-MIC effect of meropenem. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993;31:881–892. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.6.881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pankuch G A, Jacobs M R, Appelbaum P C. Activity of CP 99,219 compared to DU-6859a, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, lomefloxacin, tosufloxacin, sparfloxacin and grepafloxacin against penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995;35:230–232. doi: 10.1093/jac/35.1.230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Spangler S K, Lin G, Jacobs M R, Appelbaum P C. Postantibiotic effect of sanfetrinem compared with those of six other agents against 12 penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:2173–2176. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.10.2173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Spangler S K, Lin G, Jacobs M R, Appelbaum P C. Postantibiotic effect and postantibiotic sub-MIC effect of levofloxacin compared to those of ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, azithromycin, and clarithromycin against 20 pneumococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:1253–1255. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.5.1253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wise R, Andrews J M, Brenwald N. The in-vitro activity of OPC-17116, a new 5-methyl substituted quinolone. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993;31:497–504. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.4.497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES