Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 30.
Published in final edited form as: Enzymes. 2021 Jul 24;49:305–314. doi: 10.1016/bs.enz.2021.06.009

Watching the bacterial RNA polymerase transcription reaction by time-dependent soak-trigger-freeze X-ray crystallography

Yeonoh Shin 1, Katsuhiko S Murakami 1,*
PMCID: PMC8965730  NIHMSID: NIHMS1787266  PMID: 34696836

Abstract

RNA polymerase (RNAP) is the central enzyme of gene expression, which transcribes DNA to RNA. All cellular organisms synthesize RNA with highly conserved multi-subunit DNA-dependent RNAPs, except mitochondrial RNA transcription, which is carried out by a single-subunit RNAP. Over sixty years of extensive research elucidated the structures and functions of cellular RNAPs. In this review, we introduce a brief structural feature of bacterial RNAP, the most well characterized model enzyme, and a principle of novel experimental approach known as “Time-dependent soak-trigger-freeze X-ray crystallography” which can observe RNA synthesis reaction at atomic resolution in real time for elucidating the fundamental mechanism of cellular RNAP transcription.

Keywords: RNA polymerase, Transcription, Time-dependent soak-trigger-freeze X-ray crystallography, Structural biology, RNA


Transcription – copying genomic DNA to RNA – in all three domains of life, bacteria, archaea and eukaryote, is performed by DNA-dependent RNAP [16]. Except single-subunit mitochondrial RNAP, which is related to bacteriophage single-subunit RNAP [7], all other cellular RNAPs are multi-subunit complexes. The overall architecture of multi-subunit RNAPs and the catalytic mechanism of RNA synthesis are highly conserved from bacteria to human [814]. In bacteria, the catalytic core enzyme consists of five subunits (α1, α2, β, β’, ꞷ) and binding of transcription initiation factor σ [1518] forms a holoenzyme to synthesize RNA from specific DNA sites called promoters [19, 20] (Figure 1A). The cleft between β and β’ subunits forms a DNA binding main channel for loading a template strand DNA (tDNA) entry into the active site where RNA synthesis takes places via two Mg2+ mediated catalysis of nucleotidyl transfer reaction [8, 1013, 2123]. Ribonucleoside triphosphates (rNTPs), substrate of RNA synthesis, are delivered to the active site through a funnel shaped secondary channel [24], which also serves as a binding site and access route to the RNAP active site for proteins such as elongation factors GreA/GreB and a transcription regulator DksA [2527]. After a few rounds of abortive transcription, a nascent RNA and/or DNA scrunching trigger dissociation of the σ factor from the core enzyme for escaping from promoter DNA and RNA continues to extend toward RNA exit channel to form a stable transcription elongation complex. During transcription elongation, transcription factors NusA and NusG associate with RNAP to regulate transcription speed, RNA folding and recuring other regulatory factors and enzymes such as ribosome for the transcription and translation coupling. During the nucleotidyl transfer reaction, RNAP changes its conformation including trigger loop (TL)/trigger helix (TH) and bridge helix (BH). TL/TH undergoes conformational change from a disordered loop (TL) to two α helices (TH) upon binding of a cognate rNTP at the active site, which facilitates the nucleotidyl transfer reaction. The conformational change of TL/TH coordinates the movement of BH, which locates near the active site and separates a single-stranded tDNA at the active site from a downstream double-stranded DNA [2833] (Figure 1B).

Figure 1. Structural overview of T. thermophilus RNAP-σA holoenzyme.

Figure 1.

A) Orthogonal views of T. thermophilus RNAP-σA holoenzyme – DNA complex. RNAP subunits and DNA are shown as a surface model and labeled (α,α’: light gray, β: cyan, β’: pink, ꞷ: dark gray, σA: orange, template DNA: dark green, non-template DNA: light green). Locations of the DNA binding main channel, the NTP entry secondary channel, and the product RNA exit channel are indicated.

B) Close up view of the RNAP active site. β subunit is removed for clarity. The bridge helix (BH, red), trigger loop (TL, blue), DNA and active site Mg (yellow sphere) are shown and indicated.

Biochemical methods provide invaluable insights in deducing mechanisms of transcription. For example, kinetics of transcription and dynamics of RNAP motion have been investigated by quantification of 32P -labeled RNA separated by gel electrophoresis and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) using fluorescence labeled RNAP and/or DNA, respectively [3439]. However, these assays require labeling for detections and intensive control experiments to validate experimental results. The analysis is also often hampered by heterogeneities of RNA product and RNAP conformation as well as unsynchronized reaction. Determining atomic-resolution structures of RNAP by X-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy (Figure 2) provide unprecedented detail of transcription reaction and provide valuable platforms to explain the results of biochemical experiments.

Figure 2. Representative electron density maps of the RNAP active site engaged in the NTP binding and RNA synthesis captured by time-dependent soak-trigger-freeze X-ray crystallography [51].

Figure 2.

A) The 2Fo-Fc electron density map corresponding trigger loop of RNAP, DNA, RNA, incoming NTP and Mg2+ are shown as gray mesh (1.0 σ) together with the final model of tDNA (green) and TL (blue) (PDB: 6OY5).

B) The 2Fo-Fc electron density map showing PPi remains binding at the active site of RNAP after RNA synthesis (PDB: 6OY7).

RNAP from thermophilic bacteria including Thermus aquaticus and Thermus thermophilus (Figure 1) has been a primary choice for crystallization due to its thermostability [4, 4044]. Later, Escherichia coli RNAP became an alternative for crystallization, which can investigate not only wild-type but also RNAP derivatives prepared by a plasmid-based over-expression system [4548]. A crystalline state of bacterial RNAP and DNA complex contacts with neighboring molecules, it remains active for RNA synthesis and undergoes conformational changes during the nucleotidyl transfer reaction. Solvent contents of bacterial RNAP and DNA complex crystals are in range of 50 – 80%, which can be used as a channel for delivering rNTP substrates to the RNAP active site (Figure 3A). The substrate delivery is achieved by simply soaking the RNAP-DNA complex crystal into a cryoprotectant solution containing desired substrates and co-factors (e.g., Mg2+), and RNAP synthesizes RNA in crystallo.

Figure 3. Experimental scheme of the time-dependent soak-trigger-freeze X-ray crystallography.

Figure 3.

A) A fully grown T. thermophilus RNAP – DNA complex crystal showing the arrangement of molecules (green) inside of the crystal with solvent space (white) between molecules for delivering substrates.

B) A scheme of time-dependent soak-trigger-freeze X-ray crystallography experiment. Multiple RNAP-DNA complex crystals are grown in a hanging drop. The crystals are transferred into a cryoprotectant such as butanediol or glycerol. The crystals are sequentially transferred into the same cryoprotectant containing rNTPs to trigger in crystallo transcription and frozen by liquid nitrogen (LN2) at desired time points.

To observe real-time motions of enzymes during their reactions, structural biologists including us have combined X-ray crystallography and rapid mixing kinetic techniques to employ an experimental approach called “Time-dependent soak-trigger-freeze X-ray crystallography” also known as in crystallo transcription reaction (Figure 3B). Due to the constraints formed by interactions between neighboring molecules, the enzyme-substate interaction obeys classical “lock and key model” instead of “induced fit” catalytic reaction thereby the reaction speed of in crystallo transcription becomes substantially slower (seconds to minutes) than in solution (milliseconds). Furthermore, highly concentrated RNAP and DNA complex (5 mM) in the small volume of crystals (~0.5 nl) allows complete diffusion of substate to all RNAPs in the crystal before the reaction starts [8]. Therefore, in crystallo transcription reaction provides opportunities of trapping elusive intermediates and determining the atomic resolution structures that are not easily observed by other methods.

Experimental procedure of the time-dependent soak-trigger-freeze X-ray crystallography is simple and doesn’t require any special equipment: crystals of RNAP-DNA complex are sequentially transferred into a cryoprotectant solution followed by exposing the crystals into a same cryoprotectant solution plus rNTPs that delivers rNTPs to the RNAP active site and triggers RNA synthesis (Figure 3B). The reaction is stopped by freezing the crystals with liquid nitrogen at desired time points (seconds to minutes). After X-ray data collection and quick structure determination of the RNAP-DNA complex by molecular replacement, new electron densities corresponding to NTP and RNA appeared at the RNAP active site at the different time points allow us to determine the substrate binding and/or RNA extension. Further structure refinement of the RNAP-DNA complex can capture the conformational change of RNAP and the DNA translocation during the substate binding and RNA synthesis (Figure 2).

Using the time-dependent soak-trigger-freeze X-ray crystallography with the T. thermophilus RNAP and DNA complex crystal, we have imaged many key moments of the RNA synthesis for understanding the molecular mechanism of nucleotidyl transfer reaction such as NTP and catalytic metal bindings at the active site of RNAP, RNA extension and PPi formation as well as the conformational change of RNAP and DNA [8]. We also determined a structure of T. thermophilus RNAP-DNA complex engaged in reiterative transcription [49] which showed an unique RNA extension pathway for the first time to understand how RNAP carries out unusual RNA extension reaction [50]. In a following study, early stages of reiterative transcription complexes were solved by time-dependent soak-trigger-freeze X-ray crystallography which showed an alternative base-paring that allows unusual reiterative transcription [51]. These two studies expanded our understanding of the flexibility of transcription and shed light on the mechanism of transcript slippage.

Radioactively or fluorescence labeled nucleotides have been used in biochemical experiments for detecting RNA synthesis. In contrast, time-dependent soak-trigger-freeze X-ray crystallography can use any nucleotides of interest since the substate binding and RNA synthesis can be visualized as electron density of atomic-resolution X-ray structure. For example, a recent comparative analysis of RNAP-DNA complex with CMPCPP, 2’-dCTP and 3’-dCTP binds at the active site of RNAP revealed that a conserved Arg residue (β ‘Arg425) interacts with a different position of OH group of a sugar moiety of nucleotide and thus favor a different sugar conformation [52]. This work demonstrated how multi-subunit cellular RNAPs select a cognate ribonucleotide during the nucleotidyl transfer reaction.

A simple X-ray crystallographic approach described here is able to trace any enzyme reaction pathway at ambient temperatures without any modification of enzyme and substrate. This method has been used for other polymerases including virus and became a general method for directly looking into biological reactions [8, 23, 5356].

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the staff at the Macromolecular X-ray science at the Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source (MacCHESS) for support of crystallographic data collection. This work was supported by NIH grant (R35 GM131860 to K.S.M.)

REFERENCES

  • 1.Borukhov S and Nudler E, RNA polymerase: the vehicle of transcription. Trends Microbiol, 2008. 16(3): p. 126–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jun SH, et al. , Archaeal RNA polymerase and transcription regulation. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol, 2011. 46(1): p. 27–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cramer P, et al. , Architecture of RNA polymerase II and implications for the transcription mechanism. Science, 2000. 288(5466): p. 640–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Murakami KS, et al. , Structural basis of transcription initiation: an RNA polymerase holoenzyme-DNA complex. Science, 2002. 296(5571): p. 1285–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ebright RH, RNA polymerase: structural similarities between bacterial RNA polymerase and eukaryotic RNA polymerase II. J Mol Biol, 2000. 304(5): p. 687–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Archambault J and Friesen JD, Genetics of eukaryotic RNA polymerases I, II, and III. Microbiol Rev, 1993. 57(3): p. 703–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Arnold JJ, et al. , Human mitochondrial RNA polymerase: structure-function, mechanism and inhibition. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2012. 1819(9–10): p. 948–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Basu RS and Murakami KS, Watching the bacteriophage N4 RNA polymerase transcription by time-dependent soak-trigger-freeze X-ray crystallography. J Biol Chem, 2013. 288(5): p. 3305–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gleghorn ML, et al. , X-ray crystal structures elucidate the nucleotidyl transfer reaction of transcript initiation using two nucleotides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2011. 108(9): p. 3566–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cheung AC and Cramer P, A movie of RNA polymerase II transcription. Cell, 2012. 149(7): p. 1431–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Brueckner F, Ortiz J, and Cramer P, A movie of the RNA polymerase nucleotide addition cycle. Curr Opin Struct Biol, 2009. 19(3): p. 294–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Steitz TA, A mechanism for all polymerases. Nature, 1998. 391(6664): p. 231–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Steitz TA and Steitz JA, A general two-metal-ion mechanism for catalytic RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1993. 90(14): p. 6498–502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yang W, Lee JY, and Nowotny M, Making and breaking nucleic acids: two-Mg2+-ion catalysis and substrate specificity. Mol Cell, 2006. 22(1): p. 5–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Feklistov A and Darst SA, Structural basis for promoter-10 element recognition by the bacterial RNA polymerase sigma subunit. Cell, 2011. 147(6): p. 1257–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Feklistov A, et al. , Bacterial sigma factors: a historical, structural, and genomic perspective. Annu Rev Microbiol, 2014. 68: p. 357–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Paget MS and Helmann JD, The sigma70 family of sigma factors. Genome Biol, 2003. 4(1): p. 203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sutherland C and Murakami K, An Introduction to the Structure and Function of the Catalytic Core Enzyme of Escherichia coli RNA Polymerase. EcoSal Plus, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Murakami KS and Darst SA, Bacterial RNA polymerases: the wholo story. Curr Opin Struct Biol, 2003. 13(1): p. 31–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gross CA, et al. , The functional and regulatory roles of sigma factors in transcription. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, 1998. 63: p. 141–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Feklistov A, et al. , RNA polymerase motions during promoter melting. Science, 2017. 356(6340): p. 863–866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chakraborty A, et al. , Opening and closing of the bacterial RNA polymerase clamp. Science, 2012. 337(6094): p. 591–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nakamura T, et al. , Watching DNA polymerase eta make a phosphodiester bond. Nature, 2012. 487(7406): p. 196–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nickels BE and Hochschild A, Regulation of RNA polymerase through the secondary channel. Cell, 2004. 118(3): p. 281–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Opalka N, et al. , Structure and function of the transcription elongation factor GreB bound to bacterial RNA polymerase. Cell, 2003. 114(3): p. 335–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Molodtsov V, et al. , Allosteric Effector ppGpp Potentiates the Inhibition of Transcript Initiation by DksA. Mol Cell, 2018. 69(5): p. 828–839 e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shin Y, et al. , Structural basis of ribosomal RNA transcription regulation. Nat Commun, 2021. 12(1): p. 528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Da LT, et al. , Bridge helix bending promotes RNA polymerase II backtracking through a critical and conserved threonine residue. Nat Commun, 2016. 7: p. 11244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tan L, et al. , Bridge helix and trigger loop perturbations generate superactive RNA polymerases. J Biol, 2008. 7(10): p. 40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mishanina TV, et al. , Trigger loop of RNA polymerase is a positional, not acid-base, catalyst for both transcription and proofreading. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2017. 114(26): p. E5103–E5112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhang J, Palangat M, and Landick R, Role of the RNA polymerase trigger loop in catalysis and pausing. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 2010. 17(1): p. 99–104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang D, et al. , Structural basis of transcription: role of the trigger loop in substrate specificity and catalysis. Cell, 2006. 127(5): p. 941–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mazumder A, et al. , Closing and opening of the RNA polymerase trigger loop. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2020. 117(27): p. 15642–15649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pupov D, et al. , Region 3.2 of the sigma factor controls the stability of rRNA promoter complexes and potentiates their repression by DksA. Nucleic Acids Res, 2018. 46(21): p. 11477–11487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Revyakin A, et al. , Abortive initiation and productive initiation by RNA polymerase involve DNA scrunching. Science, 2006. 314(5802): p. 1139–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Duchi D, et al. , RNA Polymerase Pausing during Initial Transcription. Mol Cell, 2016. 63(6): p. 939–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Haugen SP, et al. , rRNA promoter regulation by nonoptimal binding of sigma region 1.2: an additional recognition element for RNA polymerase. Cell, 2006. 125(6): p. 1069–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sreenivasan R, et al. , Fluorescence-Detected Conformational Changes in Duplex DNA in Open Complex Formation by Escherichia coli RNA Polymerase: Upstream Wrapping and Downstream Bending Precede Clamp Opening and Insertion of the Downstream Duplex. Biochemistry, 2020. 59(16): p. 1565–1581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Henderson KL, et al. , RNA Polymerase: Step-by-Step Kinetics and Mechanism of Transcription Initiation. Biochemistry, 2019. 58(18): p. 2339–2352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Vassylyev DG, et al. , Crystal structure of a bacterial RNA polymerase holoenzyme at 2.6 A resolution. Nature, 2002. 417(6890): p. 712–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhang G, et al. , Crystal structure of Thermus aquaticus core RNA polymerase at 3.3 Å resolution. Cell, 1999. 98(6): p. 811–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Murakami KS, Masuda S, and Darst SA, Structural basis of transcription initiation: RNA polymerase holoenzyme at 4 A resolution. Science, 2002. 296(5571): p. 1280–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Campbell EA, et al. , Structural mechanism for rifampicin inhibition of bacterial RNA polymerase. Cell, 2001. 104(6): p. 901–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhang Y, et al. , Structural basis of transcription initiation. Science, 2012. 338(6110): p. 1076–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Murakami KS, X-ray crystal structure of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase sigma70 holoenzyme. J Biol Chem, 2013. 288(13): p. 9126–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Molodtsov V, et al. , Structural basis for rifamycin resistance of bacterial RNA polymerase by the three most clinically important RpoB mutations found in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol Microbiol, 2017. 103(6): p. 1034–1045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mosaei H, et al. , Mode of Action of Kanglemycin A, an Ansamycin Natural Product that Is Active against Rifampicin-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol Cell, 2018. 72(2): p. 263–274 e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Artsimovitch I, et al. , Co-overexpression of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase subunits allows isolation and analysis of mutant enzymes lacking lineage-specific sequence insertions. J Biol Chem, 2003. 278(14): p. 12344–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Turnbough CL Jr., Regulation of gene expression by reiterative transcription. Curr Opin Microbiol, 2011. 14(2): p. 142–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Murakami KS, et al. , X-ray crystal structure of a reiterative transcription complex reveals an atypical RNA extension pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2017. 114(31): p. 8211–8216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Shin Y, Hedglin M, and Murakami KS, Structural basis of reiterative transcription from the pyrG and pyrBI promoters by bacterial RNA polymerase. Nucleic Acids Res, 2020. 48(4): p. 2144–2155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Makinen JJ, et al. , The mechanism of the nucleo-sugar selection by multi-subunit RNA polymerases. Nat Commun, 2021. 12(1): p. 796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Fang J, et al. , Crystallographic Snapshots of the Zika Virus NS3 Helicase Help Visualize the Reactant Water Replenishment. ACS Infect Dis, 2019. 5(2): p. 177–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Shu B and Gong P, Structural basis of viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase catalysis and translocation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2016. 113(28): p. E4005–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Yin YW and Steitz TA, The structural mechanism of translocation and helicase activity in T7 RNA polymerase. Cell, 2004. 116(3): p. 393–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Vyas R, et al. , Viewing Human DNA Polymerase beta Faithfully and Unfaithfully Bypass an Oxidative Lesion by Time-Dependent Crystallography. J Am Chem Soc, 2015. 137(15): p. 5225–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES