Abstract
Scientific research originates from curiosity and interests. Translational research of biomaterials should always focus on addressing specific needs of the targeted clinical applications. The guest editors of this special issue hope that the included articles have provided cutting-edge biomaterials research as well as insights of the translation of biomaterials from bench to clinic.
Keywords: Biomaterials, Translation, Bench-to-clinic
The definition of biomaterial has been updated from “a nonviable material used in a medical device, intended to interact with biological systems” [1] to “a material designed to take a form which can direct, through interactions with living systems, the course of any therapeutic or diagnostic procedure” [2]. Such an update represents the expansion and development of biomaterials science and engineering. The definition also characterizes the nature of biomaterials as multi-disciplinary, cross-functional and translational.
The ultimate goal of biomaterials’ translation is to develop safe and effective medical products that could benefit human healthcare [3]. It is important to clarify that biomaterials are not equal to final medical products. The translation of biomaterials is to define and develop medical products based on biomaterials technologies.
The translation process of biomaterials from basic/applied research to successful clinical applications and commercial products needs to go through multiple phases. The translational research needs to first identify and address unmet clinical needs. Positive lab results should be further confirmed through validated and large-scale industrial setting. Medical products based on such research need to be designated to medical devices, combination devices, or drugs/biological products with a clear understanding of clinical mode of actions. A robust quality management system is required to regulate the research, development, and manufacturing processes of the products towards commercialization. Physicochemical and non-clinical bench performance tests, biocompatibility and biosafety evaluations and pre-clinical animal studies need to be conducted with the compliance and potential development of standards, tools, and methods as-needed. Clinical trials guided by regulations and good clinical practices need to be executed with the appropriate indications, inclusion criteria, control group and endpoints. Post-market surveillance would also require strong scientific understanding after regulatory approval and commercialization. Taken together, the safety and efficacy of medical products translated from biomaterials technologies should be validated with solid scientific evidence for targeted clinical applications.
The objectives of this special issue are to report the followings: (1) State-of-the-art research on biomaterials, with an emphasis on novel materials, processing, and evaluation methods to facilitate clinical translation; (2) Processes, issues and lessons-learned for the translation of biomaterials; (3) Regulatory science and evidence-based research for the translation of biomaterials.
A total of 24 articles [[4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]] are included in this special issue. These articles can be categorized in terms of authors, biomaterials and targeted clinical areas, and article types. Authors from China, Finland, Korea, Germany, and United States include leading scientists in the field, clinicians, young scientists as well as regulatory scientists. Metallic, ceramic, polymeric and composite biomaterials are reported with targeted orthopedic, cardiovascular, dental, microsurgery, general surgery, nanomedicine, and sports medicine applications. As an emerging field, regulatory science has been gradually developed to play an important role during the translation of innovative biomaterial-based medical products. Several articles in this special issue are on regulatory science and discuss the new standards, tools, and approaches to evaluate the safety, efficacy, quality, and performance of medical products [10,13,17,19]. This special issue also covers a wide range of article types including research article [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9],11,12,15,16,[18], [19], [20],[23], [24], [25], [26]], reviews [14,17,21,22,27], perspectives [10,13] and opinion paper [18].
Scientific research originates from curiosity and interests. Translational research of biomaterials should always focus on addressing specific needs of the targeted clinical applications. The guest editors of this special issue hope that the included articles have provided cutting-edge biomaterials research as well as insights of the translation of biomaterials from bench to clinic.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Peer review under responsibility of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
Contributor Information
Kai Zhang, Email: kaizhang@scu.edu.cn.
Antonios G. Mikos, Email: mikos@rice.edu.
Rui L. Reis, Email: rgreis@i3bs.uminho.pt.
Xingdong Zhang, Email: zhangxd@scu.edu.cn.
References
- 1.Williams D.F. Elsevier Science Limited1987; Chester, England: March 3-5, 1986. Definitions in Biomaterials: Proceedings of a Consensus Conference of the European Society for Biomaterials. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhang X., Williams D. Definitions of biomaterials for the twenty-first century. Elsevier. 2019:15–23. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ratner B., Hoffman A., Schoen F., et al. Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine. 3rd. Academic Press; 2013. Biomaterials Science: an Evolving Multidisciplinary Endeavor Biomaterials Science; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hurle K., Maia F.R., Ribeiro V.P., et al. Osteogenic lithium-doped brushite cements for bone regeneration. Bioact. Mater. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.12.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tang Y., Hu M., Tang F., et al. Easily-injectable shear-thinning hydrogel provides long-lasting submucosal barrier for gastrointestinal endoscopic surgery. Bioact. Mater. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.11.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Li J., Wang C., Gao G., et al. MBG/PGA-PCL composite scaffolds provide highly tunable degradation and osteogenic features. Bioact. Mater. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.11.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kim J.-Y., Choi W., Mangal U., et al. Multivalent network modifier upregulates bioactivity of multispecies biofilm-resistant polyalkenoate cement. Bioact. Mater. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.11.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Navara A.M., Kim Y.S., Xu Y., et al. A dual-gelling poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-based ink and thermoreversible poloxamer support bath for high-resolution bioprinting. Bioact. Mater. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.11.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jenkins D., Salhadar K., Ashby G., et al. PoreScript: semi-automated pore size algorithm for scaffold characterization. Bioact. Mater. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Liu W., Lin H., Zhao P., et al. A regulatory perspective on recombinant collagen-based medical devices. Bioact. Mater. 2022;12:198–202. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.10.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang J., Qiu H., Xu Y., et al. The biological effect of recombinant humanized collagen on damaged skin induced by UV-photoaging: an in vivo study. Bioact. Mater. 2022;11:154–165. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhang Y., Dou X., Zhang L., et al. Facile fabrication of a biocompatible composite gel with sustained release of aspirin for bone regeneration. Bioact. Mater. 2022;11:130–139. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.09.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cheng M., Liu W., Zhang J., et al. Regulatory considerations for animal studies of biomaterial products. Bioact. Mater. 2022;11:52–56. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.09.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yan Y., Yao R., Zhao J., et al. Implantable nerve guidance conduits: material combinations, multi-functional strategies and advanced engineering innovations. Bioact. Mater. 2022;11:57–76. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.09.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhi W., Wang X., Sun D., et al. Optimal regenerative repair of large segmental bone defect in a goat model with osteoinductive calcium phosphate bioceramic implants. Bioact. Mater. 2022;11:240–253. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.09.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Liu B., Ma Z., Li J., et al. Experimental study of a 3D printed permanent implantable porous Ta-coated bone plate for fracture fixation. Bioact. Mater. 2022;10:269–280. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tian J., Song X., Wang Y., et al. Regulatory perspectives of combination products. Bioact. Mater. 2022;10:492–503. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pinchuk L. The use of polyisobutylene-based polymers in ophthalmology. Bioact. Mater. 2022;10:185–194. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yang J., Kang Y., Zhao W., et al. Evaluation of patches for rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on animal studies. Bioact. Mater. 2022;10:474–491. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.08.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Feng F., Chen M., Wang X., et al. Translation of a spinal bone cement product from bench to bedside. Bioact. Mater. 2022;10:345–354. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.08.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang L., Guo X., Chen J., et al. Key considerations on the development of biodegradable biomaterials for clinical translation of medical devices: with cartilage repair products as an example. Bioact. Mater. 2022;9:332–342. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.07.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wu L., Zhou W., Lin L., et al. Delivery of therapeutic oligonucleotides in nanoscale. Bioact. Mater. 2022;7:292–323. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.05.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jing Z., Ni R., Wang J., et al. Practical strategy to construct anti-osteosarcoma bone substitutes by loading cisplatin into 3D-printed titanium alloy implants using a thermosensitive hydrogel. Bioact. Mater. 2021;6(12):4542–4557. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhao F., Sun J., Xue W., et al. Development of a polycaprolactone/poly(p-dioxanone) bioresorbable stent with mechanically self-reinforced structure for congenital heart disease treatment. Bioact. Mater. 2021;6(9):2969–2982. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.02.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nie M., Kong B., Chen G., et al. MSCs-laden injectable self-healing hydrogel for systemic sclerosis treatment. Bioact. Mater. 2022 doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wang L., Zhu T., Kang Y., et al. Crimped nanofiber scaffold mimicking tendon-to-bone interface for fatty-infiltrated massive rotator cuff repair. Bioact. Mater. 2022 doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.01.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Song G., Zhao H.Q., Liu Q., et al. A review on biodegradable biliary stents: materials and future trends. Bioact. Mater. 2022 doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.01.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]