Skip to main content
Microbial Biotechnology logoLink to Microbial Biotechnology
. 2021 Sep 27;15(4):1152–1167. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13925

Genomic insights on fighting bacterial wilt by a novel Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain Cas02

Depeng Chu 1, , Naila Ilyas 1, , Lijuan Peng 2, Xiaoqiang Wang 1,, Dongkun Wang 1, Zongchang Xu 1, Qiang Gao 3, Xiaolei Tan 3, Chengsheng Zhang 1, Yiqiang Li 1,, Yuan Yuan 1,
PMCID: PMC8966013  PMID: 34570959

Summary

Bacterial wilt, caused by the Ralstonia solanacearum, can infect several economically important crops. However, the management strategies available to control this disease are limited. Plant growth‐promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) have been considered promising biocontrol agents. In this study, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain Cas02 was isolated from the rhizosphere soil of healthy tobacco plants and evaluated for its effect on plant growth promotion and bacterial wilt suppression. Strain Cas02 exhibited several growth‐promoting–related features including siderophore production, cellulase activity, protease activity, ammonia production and catalase activity. Moreover, strain Cas02 showed a significant inhibitory growth effect on R. solanacearum, and its active substances were separated and identified to be macrolactin A and macrolactin W by HPLC‐DAD‐ESI‐MS/MS. Both greenhouse and field experiments demonstrated a good performance of Cas02 in plant growth promotion and bacterial wilt suppression. To explore the underlying genetic mechanisms, complete genome sequencing was performed and the gene clusters responsible for antibacterial metabolites expression were identified. Overall, these findings suggest that the strain Cas02 could be a potential biocontrol agent in bacterial wilt management and a source of antimicrobial compounds for further exploitation.


Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain Cas02 isolated from the plant rhizosphere exhibited significant plant growth promotion activity and antimicrobial activity against Ralstonia solanacearum both in vitro and in vivo. Its active substances were separated and identified to be macrolactin A and macrolactin W. Complete genome sequencing was performed and the gene clusters responsible for antibacterial metabolites expression were identified.

graphic file with name MBT2-15-1152-g009.jpg

Introduction

Soil‐borne pathogens pose a serious threat to global agricultural production (Gu et al., 2020). Bacterial wilt, caused by the betaproteobacterium Ralstonia solanacearum, is one of the most overwhelming soil‐borne diseases that can infect hundreds of plant species, including economically important crops such as tomato, potato and tobacco crops (Jiang et al., 2017). Ralstonia solanacearum enters the plant roots through wounds, root tips or cracks, colonizes the cortex and invades the xylem vessels. It spreads systemically and blocks water transport, resulting in plant wilting and eventual death. Only for potato crops, $1 billion are estimated to be lost annually due to this pathogen worldwide (Kwak et al., 2018). Despite the inflicted damage, limited management strategies are available to control this pathogen. As the use of pesticides and agrochemicals poses a health and environmental risk, wherein toxic residues accumulate in the soil and enter the food supply (Cao et al., 2018), a better method to control these pathogens is urgently needed to ensure crop production and reduce economic loss.

Biocontrol of bacterial wilt has gained importance as an environment‐friendly disease management strategy in recent years (Wang et al., 2019; Batista and Singh, 2021). Plant growth‐promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are considered promising biocontrol agents. Principally, the biological control mechanisms include antibiotics, competition for nutrients, plant growth induction and plant resistance (Berlanga‐Clavero et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2021). The most studied microbes against R. solanacearum have been derived from the genera of Pseudomonas spp., Streptomyces spp., Bacillus spp. and phages (Álvarez and Biosca, 2017; Jiang et al., 2017; Cao et al., 2018; Le et al., 2020). Bacillus species are gram‐positive, spore‐forming bacteria that are widely distributed in the environment (Han et al., 2016). Bacillus species, such as B. subtilis, B. amyloliquefaciens, B. brevis and B. cereus, have been demonstrated to exert beneficial effects on plant growth and disease suppression in tomato, cotton, cucumber, tobacco and lettuce (Chowdhury et al., 2015, 2015,2015, 2015; Saravanakumar et al., 2019). In particular, the B. amyloliquefaciens strain PMB05 was reported to intensify plant immune responses to confer resistance against bacterial wilt in tomato (Ho et al., 2020). B. amyloliquefaciens strain FJAT‐2349 can produce non‐ribosomally synthesized lipopeptides (e.g. surfactin, iturin and fengcin) with strong antimicrobial activity (Chen et al., 2019, 2019, 2019). Additionally, Bacillus spp. offer better stability and higher acid tolerance during heat processing and low‐temperature storage (Elshaghabee et al., 2017). Therefore, Bacillus species are good candidates for biological control purposes.

Although some biocontrol studies have been conducted for R. solanacearum, limited performance efficiency in the field has hindered the commercialization of the studied biological control agents (Jiang et al., 2017). It is, thus, necessary to explore new biological control strains with strong and stable control effects on bacterial wilt. Therefore, the objectives of the present study were to fully characterize a new isolated bacterial strain, Cas02, based on physiological assays and antagonism against R. solanacearum both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, the complete genome sequence of Cas02 was analysed to reveal the biocontrol mechanisms and to provide a scientific basis for the optimization of the field applications of this strain.

Results and discussion

Antagonistic activity against bacterial pathogens

To obtain the candidate antagonistic bacterial strains from the rhizosphere soils, 35 soil samples were used for bacterial isolation, and 246 bacterial isolates that showed antibacterial activity were selected for further analysis. Of these, isolate Cas02 showed the highest antibacterial activity against R. solanacearum, with a strong inhibitory zone (30 mm) (Fig. 1). In addition to the R. solanacearum, strain Cas02 also exhibited strong antagonistic activity against Escherichia coli FM3, Pectobacterium carotovorum EC101, Burkholderia glumae 291, Pseudomonas syringae B301D and Xanthomonas campestris MSCT1, with inhibition zones all greater than 20 mm (Fig. 1). An important biocontrol mechanism of biological control agents (BCAs) involves the secretion of antibacterial substances and inhibition of pathogen growth (Zhou et al., 2021). Among the top 10 bacterial species listed based on their scientific and economic importance in plant diseases, Pseudomonas syringae pathovars and Ralstonia solanacearum were ranked as the first and second most important bacterial pathogens respectively (Mansfield et al., 2012). In this study, strain Cas02 exhibited strong antibacterial activity against these pathogens, indicating its broad‐spectrum antibacterial abilities. It also provides a new microbial resources for preventing and controlling plant diseases.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Antagonistic effect of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Cas02 on pathogens (a. Escherichia coli; b. Pectobacterium carotovorum; c. Xanthomonas campestris; d. Ralstonia solanacearum; e. Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci; f. Colletotrichum acutatum).

Biocatalytic activity

The plant growth‐promoting potential of Cas02 was characterized in vitro using enzyme assays. Cas02 was confirmed to produce siderophores, as indicated by colour change from blue to orange on the CAS agar plate (Fig. S1A). Siderophores produced by PGPR may reduce iron deficiency in plants (Saha et al., 2016), and sequester iron from phytopathogens that require iron for growth and establishment (Gu et al., 2020), thereby achieving the purpose of plant disease protection. Cas02 also showed a significant ability to produce lytic enzymes such as cellulases and proteases (Fig. S1B,C), which could be linked to its ability to degrade the cell wall of phytopathogens (Durairaj et al., 2018). Ammonia production was observed for Cas02, as indicated by a brown/yellow colour compared with the control (Fig. S1D). A previous study reported that the ammonium produced by bacteria could induce the synthesis of various plant polyphenols such as flavonoids, phenylpropanoids and lignins to protect plants from pathogen attacks (Babalola, 2010). Catalase enzyme production was also observed for Cas02, as indicated by oxygen release upon adding hydrogen peroxide to the bacterial growth (Fig. S1E). This enzyme can help the bacterium to protect itself from the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) under stress conditions, thereby indirectly promoting plant growth (Bumunang and Babalola, 2014). Furthermore, β‐1,3‐glucanase activity and phosphate solubilization were also tested; however, neither activity was observed for Cas02.

Strain Cas02 identification

The 16S rRNA gene is frequently used for phylogenetic classification of microorganism species (Woo et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2016). However, the resolving power of rDNA gene is often limited, particularly at the species level within Bacillus genus. A multi‐locus sequence typing (MLST) scheme using different housekeeping genes is a more suitable method to study the phylogenetic relationships between Bacillus strains (Kamada et al., 2015; Le et al., 2019). In this study, MLST based on the sequences of internal fragments of seven housekeeping genes (glpF, ilvD, ptA, purH, pycA, rpoD and tpiA) was selected for MLST analysis (www.pubmlst.org/bsubtilis). The obtained sequences were concatenated into one sequence for each strain using the Geneious Prime (2019.2.1). A neighbour‐joining phylogenetic tree based on concatenated sequences (Fig. 2) was constructed using Mega X software. MLST analysis showed that strain Cas02, B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum FZB42 and B. amyloliquefaciens ALB69 were tightly clustered on the same branch, which indicated that strain Cas02 was a member of the species of B. amyloliquefaciens.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Neighbour‐joining phylogenetic tree based on concatenated MLST DNA sequences of strain Cas02 and representative Bacillus reference strains. The bootstrap consensus tree, inferred from 1000 replicates, was constructed using neighbour‐Joining method, and GenBank accession numbers were indicated.

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Cas02 could promote the plant growth and confer protection against bacterial wilt

To investigate the plant growth‐promoting effect of strain Cas02, pepper seedlings were grown under the set environmental conditions, and the agronomic parameters including stem height, leaf number, maximal leaf length, maximal leaf width and biomass dry weight were measured. As shown in Fig. 3A and B, except for the leaf number, other agronomic parameters were significantly increased after the application of strain Cas02 compared with the control (P < 0.05). Bacillus species have been shown to promote plant growth (Chen et al., 2019, 2019, 2019). In many cases, the plant growth‐promoting activity is linked with the ability to suppress soil‐borne plant pathogens via production of antimicrobial substances such as siderophores, lytic enzymes, cellulase, protease and catalase (Chowdhury et al., 2015, 2015,2015, 2015). In addition to its plant growth‐promoting activity, Cas02 can significantly reduce the severity of bacterial wilt caused by R. solanacearum in pepper plants. Pepper seedlings treated with strain Cas02 exhibited fewer disease symptoms (Fig. 3C), and the control efficacy was 67.86% after 7 days of inoculation with R. solanacearum. The incidence and disease indices were significantly decreased compared with those in the control (Fig. 3D). These results indicate that strain Cas02 has potential use as a biological control agent for controlling bacterial wilt caused by R. solanacearum.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Pepper growth promotion and biocontrol effect of strain Cas02 in green house condition.

A. The images of pepper seedling growth with or without Cas02 treatment.

B. The leaf number, leaf size, stem height, fresh and dry weight and chlorophyll of the pepper seedlings with or without Cas02 treatment.

C. The images of pepper plant wilt disease symptoms with or without Cas02 treatment.

D. The disease rate and disease index of pepper plant with or without Cas02 treatment.

The field pot assay was conducted in Linyi City, Shandong Province. The agronomic traits of tobacco plants were measured 30 days after the final treatment with Cas02, when tobacco was in the rapid growth phase. The agronomic characteristics indicated that the strain Cas02 had promoting effect on tobacco growth under field conditions, with plant height, leaf number and maximum leaf length increased significantly compared with those in the control (Fig. 4). The greenhouse and field pot assays indicated that strain Cas02 has good potential to promote plant growth and suppress plant disease.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Agronomic traits (plant height, stem girth, leaf number, maximum leaf length and maximum leaf width) and disease incidence of tobacco in the field condition. Two groups were included: control, normal operation only; Cas02, normal operation + strain Cas02 treatment.

Soil physical and chemical analyses indicated that application of strain Cas02 can alter the physical and chemical properties of rhizosphere soil. Soil enzymes are mainly derived from rhizosphere microbes and are the most active part of the soil organic components (Zhao et al., 2020). As an important indicator for the conversion of soil nutrients, soil enzyme activity can reflect the circulation and health of soil nutrients (Baćmaga et al., 2021). Catalase (CAT), NH4+, available phosphorous and soil alkaline phosphatase activities were significantly increased compared with the control (P > 0.05) (Fig. 5). CAT can enhance the soil nitrogen cycle and reduce the toxic effects of hydrogen peroxide on organisms. The increase in available phosphorus and soil alkaline phosphatase has a direct promoting effect on plant nutrient absorption and soil fertility improvement (Oliveira Filho et al., 2021). The results indicated that the strain Cas02 could be able to improve the rhizosphere soil enzyme activity and nutrient metabolism.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Effect of strain Cas02 on soil properties. Two groups were included: control, normal operation only; Cas02, normal operation + strain Cas02 treatment.

Root colonization of strain Cas02

The ability to colonize plant roots is essential for rhizobacteria to be effective for plant growth promotion and disease suppression. As shown in Fig. 6A, laser confocal microscopic images showed high fluorescence signals on the tobacco root, suggesting effective colonization by the Cas02‐GFP strain. Cell recovery counting also demonstrated that Cas02 successfully colonized the roots of tobacco seedlings, and that the populations were stable within 13 days (Fig. 6B). However, after 20 days of inoculation, the population density of Cas02 began to decrease, possibly because of competition with indigenous microorganisms (Han et al., 2016). Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen its effect with an additional inoculation of the strain after 20 days to maintain a certain population for antagonism.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Root colonization of strain Cas02.

A. LSCM image of colonization by Cas02‐GFP on the 4th day after inoculation.

B. The colonization of Cas02 cells on tobacco root determined by counting colony‐forming unit (cfu) per gram root.

Identification of the active compounds from strain Cas02 against bacterial wilt

To identify the antibacterial metabolites of Cas02, a crude fermentation extract was purified using macroporous adsorption resins, which are frequently employed for isolating various natural products (Tang et al., 2021). The XAD‐16 resin was used in this work because of its ideal physical properties to adsorb large amounts of uncharged compounds (Yuan et al., 2012). The results (Fig. 7) demonstrated that washing with water followed by a 40% methanol solution excluded most impurities without the loss of active compounds. The purified metabolites were then eluted using 100% methanol, and showed significantly higher inhibitory activity against R. solanacearum compared with the original crude extract. Five peaks with retention times of 17.29, 20.01, 24.09, 25.70 and 39.56 min were observed in the HPLC spectrum of 100% methanol washing elutes (Fig. 7D), which were potentially responsible for the antibacterial effects against R. solanacearum. Among these, peaks 1, 3 and 4 showed similar UV spectra with a λ max of 277 nm, whereas peaks 2 and 5 showed UV spectra with a λ max of 228 nm and 264 nm respectively (Table S1).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

HPLC profiles and antagonistic effect of (A) crude extracts; (B) water washing elutes; (C) 40% methanol washing elutes; (D) 100% methanol washing elutes; (E) authentic reference standard of iturin A.

The molecular weights and molecular formulae of the five compounds were analysed by ESI‐MS/MS, and the results are shown in Fig. 8. The spectrum of peak 1 showed molecular ions of 1043.56 Da [M + H] + and 1065.54 Da [M + Na]+, and was identified as iturin A (C‐14) with a molecular weight of 1042 Da by comparing with published studies (Yuan et al., 2011). The spectrum of peak 2 exhibited a molecular ion of 687.30 Da [M + Na]+, which was identified as C34H48O13. In addition, fragment ions with m/z ratios of 647.31 Da [M‐H2O+H]+, 551.25 Da [M‐succinic acid‐H2O+Na]+, 529.27 Da [M‐succinic acid‐H2O+H]+, 511.26 Da [M‐succinic acid‐2H2O+H]+ and 367.23 Da [M‐C6H12O6‐succinic acid+H]+ were found and helped to identify the peak 2 as macrolactin W (Table S1) (Mojid Mondol et al., 2011). The mass spectra of peaks 3 and 4 exhibited the same molecular ions of 1057.57 Da [M + H]+ and 1079.55 Da [M+Na]+, both of which were assigned a molecular formula of C49H76N12O14. The MS/MS spectra of the ion products of these two compounds also had the same patterns (Fig. S2A–D), indicating that peaks 3 and 4 could be the isomers of iturin A (C‐15) with similar structures. The possible structures of the two compounds are shown in Fig. S2E. The spectrum of peak 5 revealed molecular ion peaks at m/z 425.23 Da [M + Na]+, 385 Da [M‐H2O+H]+ and 367.23 Da [M‐2H2O+H]+. Based on these data, the molecular formula of this compound was inferred to be C24H34O5, and was identified as macrolactin A, according to previous literatures (Kim et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2019, 2019, 2019; Salazar et al., 2020).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

MS spectrums of (A) peak 1; (B) peak 2; (C) peak 3; (D) peak 4; (E) peak 5.

Iturins are a class of lipopeptides composed of C14 to C17 β‐amino fatty acids and heptapeptides. They often contain several structural homologs with identical amino acid sequences of heptapeptides and different fatty acid chains (C14, C15 or C16) (Zhou et al., 2020). In this work, it is likely that two C‐15 iturin A molecules with different fatty acid chains were isolated from the fermentation extracts as they showed the same MS/MS patterns. Iturins are well known for their antifungal activity and exhibit limited antibacterial activity according to previous literature records (Yuan et al., 2011; Chowdhury et al., 2015, 2015,2015, 2015; Zhou et al., 2020). The inhibitory effect of iturin A against R. solanacearum was, thus, tested using an authentic reference standard (Sigma‐Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA). The results (Fig. 7E) indicated that iturin A showed no activity against R. solanacearum. Furthermore, the retention times of the reference standard were 17.29, 24.09 and 25.70 min, which were identical to the retention times in the 100% methanol washing elutes, thus verifying the presence of iturin A in the metabolites. Macrolactins, an important group of 24 membered macrolides, have been described as one of the most producing clinical antibiotic resources (Li et al., 2016). Macrolactins have been reported to exhibit antibacterial activity against human clinical pathogens, cytotoxicity against B16‐F‐10 murine melanoma cancer cells and antiviral activities against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (Li et al., 2016; Salazar et al., 2020). In recent years, the antibacterial activity of macrolactins against plant pathogenic bacteria has also been studied. Chen et al. (2021) revealed that macrolactins contribute to the biocontrol activity of crown gall disease caused by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Yuan et al. (2012) demonstrated that macrolactin exerts an efficient antagonistic effect on R. solanacearum. Therefore, the activity against R. solanacearum observed in this work is most likely attributed to the macrolactins. However, further work is necessary to isolate each compound and identify its activities.

Genomic analysis of strain Cas02

To better understand the genetic background of strain Cas02, we further analysed its complete genome (Fig. 9). The complete genome of Cas02 was 3.93 Mb with an average GC content of 47.33% in the chromosome. In total, 3957 CDSs were predicted. The Cas02 genome contained 27 rRNA, 86 tRNA and 31sRNA genes. The general features are shown in Table S2. Furthermore, one 1.4 kb plasmid was found when assembling the genome sequence of this strain.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Circular map of the genome of the B. amyloliquefaciens strain Cas02. The distribution of the circle from the outside to the inside indicates the forward tRNA, rRNA and sRNA, (second circle) forward COG, (third circle) reverse COG, (forth circle) reverse tRNA, rRNA and sRNA, (fifth) GC ratio (black, taking the average GC as the baseline, the outward protruding means higher than the average and the inward protruding means lower than the average) and (sixth circle) GC skew (purple means less than 0, green means more than 0 respectively).

According to the results of COG annotation, 2923 proteins were classified into 25 COG families. The largest group of genes was involved in amino acid transport and metabolism (310 genes, 10.61%). In total, KEGG orthologues were found for 2556 proteins using BLAST. Furthermore, the GO annotation results revealed that the largest group of genes was involved in the biological process domain. Among these, the genes related to the metabolic process category formed the largest subgroup.

The gene clusters related to secondary metabolite synthesis were annotated using the antiSMASH 6.0 database. A total of 12 gene clusters related to secondary metabolites were identified. Among these, 6 clusters showed 100% similarity with reported secondary metabolite biosynthesis gene clusters (Table 1), which were related to the biosynthesis of compounds including macrolactin, bacillaene, fengycin, difficidin, bacillibactin and bacilysin.

Table 1.

Putative gene clusters predicted in the genome of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Cas02.

Type Size (bp) Most similar known cluster a Similarity
NRPS 63 977 Surfactin NRP: Lipopeptide 82%
PKS like 41 244 Butirosin A/butirosin B Saccharide 7%
Terpene 17 408
Lanthipeptide 28 888
transAT‐PKS 87 835 Macrolactin H Polyketide 100%
transAT‐PKS, T3PKS, transAT‐PKS‐like, NRPS 109 574 Bacillaene Polyketide + NRP 100%
NRPS, transAT‐PKS, betalactone 134 310 Fengycin NRP 100%
Terpene 21 883
T3PKS 41 100
transAT‐PKS‐like, transAT‐PKS 106 182 Difficidin Polyketide + NRP 100%
NRPS, bacteriocin 51 791 Bacillibactin NRP 100%
Other 41 418 Bacilysin Other 100%

NRPS, non‐ribosomal peptide synthetase cluster; PKS, polyketide synthetase.

a

Putative biosynthetic gene clusters were predicated by antiSMASH 6.0.

The production and secretion of secondary metabolites is a specific characteristic of biocontrol bacteria (Rückert et al., 2011). Approximately 18.92% of the B. amyloliquefaciens Cas02 genome encodes for genes involved in the production of secondary metabolites with antimicrobial properties. These antimicrobial compounds include bacillaene, fengycin, surfactin, bacilysin and macrolactin (Chen et al., 2019, 2019, 2019; Farzand et al., 2019). LC‐MS analysis revealed that strain Cas02 can produce macrolactin and iturin A. However, when using antiSMASH to predict the gene clusters of secondary metabolites, we did not find the biosynthetic cluster of iturins in the initial prediction results, which conflicted with the results of LC‐MS. In‐depth mining of the prediction results showed that the cluster responsible for ’fengycin’ was also involved in the biosynthesis of the compound ‘iturin’ in B. subtilis and ‘bacillomycin D’ in B. velezensis FZB42, suggesting that similar genes (clusters) may have different annotations among different strains. Furthermore, sequence alignment of ‘iturin’ and ‘macrolactin’ core biosynthetic genes showed high sequence identity between strain Cas02 and strain FZB42, with sequence identities of 87.65% and 98.13% respectively (Tables S3 and S4). Therefore, Cas02 was considered to encode the genes encoding macrolactin and iturins.

Conclusion

As an important biocontrol resource, Bacillus spp. play an important role in the sustainable development of agriculture. B. amyloliquefaciens strain Cas02 isolated from the plant rhizosphere exhibited significant plant growth promotion activity and antimicrobial activity against R. solanacearum both in vitro and in vivo. Future work will focus on the effect of Cas02 on the plant rhizosphere microbial population, and the plant response in the simultaneous presence of strain Cas02 and the pathogen. Overall, the use of Cas02 as a biocontrol agent seems advantageous, and need to be confirmed through further studies.

Experimental procedures

Isolation and selection of bacteria

Bacterial isolates with potential biocontrol activity were isolated from the rhizosphere soils of healthy tobacco plants in Linyi, Shandong Province (E 118.64°, N 35.85°). To obtain candidate antagonistic bacteria, 1 g of the collected soil sample was weighed and placed in a test tube containing 9 ml of sterilized distilled water. The tube was then placed on a shaker at 28°C for 30 min at 180 rpm. Tenfold serial dilutions were made, and a 100 μl aliquot of the soil suspension was spread on nutrient agar (NA) plates. The plates were incubated at 28 ± 2°C for 24 h. Individual colonies formed on the NA plates were picked with a sterilized loop and transferred to fresh NA plates for further purification. The pure cultures were stored in 20% glycerol at −80°C for further study.

In vitro screening for antagonism

The antibacterial activity of the candidate strain was evaluated using a nutrient broth yeast (NBY) plate bioassay (Wang et al., 2016). Escherichia coli FM3, Pectobacterium carotovorum EC101, Burkholderia glumae 291, Pseudomonas syringae B301D, Xanthomonas campestris MSCT1 and R. solanacearum RS10 were used as indicator strains to test the antibacterial activity. The bacterial isolates were cultured in liquid NBY for 24 h, the cells were collected and then re‐suspended in sterilized distilled water to an optical density at 420 nm of 0.3 (approximately 108 CFU ml−1). The centre of each NBY plate was inoculated with a 10 μl droplet of the bacterial suspension and incubated for 48 h at 28°C. The plates were then sprayed with a suspension of indicator bacteria (OD420 = 0.3), and after 24 h, the inhibition zones were measured from the margins of the bacterial colonies. The plate bioassays were then performed in triplicate.

Analysis of biocatalytic activity

The biocatalytic activity of the candidate strain was characterized for cellulase activity, protease activity, β‐1,3‐glucanase, catalase activity, phosphate solubilization, siderophore production and ammonia production as described in a previous study (Puri et al., 2020). Each experiment was performed in triplicate.

MLST analysis of strain Cas02

Genomic DNA of strain Cas02 was prepared with a Solarbio DNA extraction kit (Solarbio, Beijing, China). DNA concentration and purity were determined via Qubit Fluorometer and Nanodrop 2000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Primers for PCR amplification of the seven housekeeping genes (glpF, ilvD, ptA, purH, pycA, rpoD and tpiA) were described as Le (Le et al., 2019). The sequences were then used for blast analysis and concatenated into one sequence for each strain using the Geneious Prime (2019.2.1). The bootstrap consensus tree was constructed using neighbour‐joining method (Saitou and Nei, 1987). Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA X software (Kumar et al., 2018). Branch quality was assessed by the bootstrap test using 1000 replicates. Strain B. licheniformis ATCC 14580 was used as the outgroup.

Greenhouse experiment

Growth promotion effect of Cas02 on pepper seedlings

Pepper seedlings (Capsicum annuum L. cv. Chang Feng) were grown in a seedling substrate in a greenhouse at 25 ± 3°C and a relative humidity of 65% under a 16/8 h light/dark cycle. The culture of Cas02 (OD600 = 0.3) suspended in Hoagland solution was root irrigated with 20 ml per individual plant when the seedlings grew to two leaves; the sterilized Hoagland solution was used as a control. The seedlings were irrigated every 7 days for three times. Each treatment included three replicates of 15 plants per replicate. The leaf number, leaf size, stem height, fresh and dry weight and chlorophyll content of the pepper plants from each replicate were measured as described previously (Yuan et al., 2020).

Evaluation of the biocontrol efficacy of Cas02 in a greenhouse

Pepper seedlings (Chang Feng) with four leaves were root irrigated with Cas02 three times, as described above. Ralstonia solanacearum cell suspensions were prepared and adjusted to a final concentration of 108 CFU ml−1. The R. solanacearum culture was root irrigated with 20 ml per individual plant, 7 days after the final irrigation with Cas02. Wilt disease symptoms were recorded from the 7th day after inoculation with R. solanacearum. Each treatment included three replicates of 15 plants per replicate. The disease index was scored using the following scale (Hu et al., 2021):

  • Level 0: no diseased leaves;

  • Level 1: less than one‐half of the leaves withered;

  • Level 3: one‐half to two‐thirds of the leaves withered;

  • Level 5: more than two‐thirds of the leaves withered;

  • Level 7: all leaves withered;

  • Level 9: the plant is basically dead.

Disease severity and the biocontrol efficacy of Cas02 were calculated as follows:

Diseaseindex=number of diseased plant×corresonding level numbertotal number of investigated plant×9×100
Biocontrolefficacy=disease index of control groupdisease index of treatment groupdisease index of control group×100%

Field experiment

The field application of Cas02 as a biocontrol agent to suppress tobacco bacterial wilt caused by R. solanacearum was carried out in Linyi (E 118.64°, N 35.85°), Shandong Province, in 2020. The trial plot was being planted with tobacco for 10 years, and bacterial wilt disease had occurred significantly. The tobacco variety planted was NC102, a local conventional variety. The experiment adopted a single‐factor randomized block design with two treatments, CK (normal operation) and Cas02 treatment (normal operation + Cas02). Each treatment contained 400 plants, with three replicates. The culture of Cas02 was root irrigated with 500 ml (OD600 = 0.3) per individual plant 7 days after the tobacco seedlings were transplanted to the field, and watered every 7 days for a total of three times. The control group was watered with the same amount of water. Plant height, stem circumference, number of leaves, maximum leaf length and maximum leaf area were measured at 30 days after the final treatment with Cas02, and 100 plants per plot were measured. After the onset of symptoms in the field, surveys were conducted every 3 days for 1 month.

The rhizosphere soil of plants was collected 30 days after the final treatment with Cas02 for testing the soil enzyme activity and soil physical and chemical properties. The rhizosphere soil samples of the plants were naturally air‐dried and then passed through a 2 mm sieve. The available K (AK), available P (AP), NH4+ activity, CAT activity and alkaline phosphatase activity were determined using previously described methods (Zhang et al., 2011; Zheng et al., 2018).

Construction of Cas02‐GFP strain

Escherichia coli JM109 was used as a host to maintain GFP‐containing plasmid pIM1773‐PRHIII‐sfGFP‐pNW33N. Strain Cas02 carrying pIM1773‐PRHIII‐sfGFP‐pNW33N was obtained using electroporation and named Cas02‐GFP (Blanchard et al., 2014). The growth curve, colony morphology and antagonistic effect against R. solanacearum RS10 of both Cas02‐GFP and original Cas02 strains were measured (Fig. S3B–D). The results indicated that the expression of green fluorescent protein did not adversely affect the characteristics of the original strain Cas02.

Root colonization

A total of 100 tobacco seedlings with 4–5 leaves (cultivar ‘K326’) were transplanted from the seedling tray to plastic pots (10 cm diameter × 11 cm height) containing 50 g vermiculite. The pots were incubated in a greenhouse at 25 ± 3°C and a relative humidity of 65% under a 16/8 h light/dark cycle. The pots were watered every 3 days. After 10 days of incubation, 20 ml of cell suspension containing freshly cultivated Cas02 cells (OD600 = 0.3) was used for root irrigation. Tobacco seedlings were randomly sampled at different times. At each sampling, five biological samples (replicates) were collected and rinsed with sterilized water. The root samples were then cut, weighed and stored in a sterile Eppendorf tube for laser confocal microscopic imaging using a Leica TCS SP8 confocal scanning microscope (Mannheim, Germany) and cell recovery counting.

Cell recovery counting: To the tube containing the pre‐processed root, 1 ml of sterile water was added and vortexed for 10 min. The resulting suspension was serially diluted with distilled water. Cell suspensions of 100 μl from various dilutions (10−2, 10–3 or 10−4) were spread onto LB plates supplemented with 50 μg ml−1 rifampicin. The plates were then incubated overnight at 28°C. The number of colony‐forming units (cfu) per gram of roots was determined.

Purification and identification of active compounds

Purification of active compounds

Antagonistic substances were produced by fermenting the Cas02 strain in LB medium on a shaker at 37°C and 175 rpm for 48 h. The culture medium was centrifuged at 8000 rpm (4°C) for 10 min to separate the cells, and the supernatant was freeze‐dried. The fermentation extract was purified using macroporous resin as described in a previous study (Yuan et al., 2012). Briefly, 5 g of the extract was dissolved in 50 ml of water, which was then loaded onto a glass column (800 mm × 40 mm I.D.) wet‐packed with XAD‐16 macroporous adsorption resin, followed by successive elution with 600 ml of water, 40% methanol and 100% methanol. Each eluent was collected and concentrated using a rotary evaporator and dissolved in methanol at a concentration of 20 mg ml−1.

Inhibitory effect of the methanol‐dissolved extract on R. solanacearum was tested using an optimized spot‐on‐lawn assay. R. solanacearum was cultured overnight in fresh nutrient broth medium and sprayed evenly on an agar plate. After drying, a puncher was used to evenly punch three holes on the plate. Methanol‐dissolved extract of 50 μL was added to each well, and methanol was used as the control. The plates were incubated at 28°C for 24 h to observe the growth of R. solanacearum.

Identification of active compounds by HPLC‐DAD‐ESI‐MS/MS

HPLC was performed using an Agilent 1290 system equipped with a SunFire column (C18, 250 × 2.6 mm, Waters, USA). The mobile phase was 60% A [0.1% (v/v) aqueous acetic acid] and 40% B (acetonitrile) with a flow rate of 0.6 ml min−1, column temperature 30°C and injection volume 10 μl.

The LC column was connected online to the standard ESI source of LTQ Orbitrap XL (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using a T‐port valve. The spray voltage, capillary voltage and tube lens were 4.0 kV, 16 V and 35 V respectively. The capillary temperature was 300°C with a sheath gas flow rate of 40 l min−1, and an auxiliary gas flow rate of 10 l min−1. External calibration of the mass spectra routinely produced a mass accuracy of better than 3 ppm. Full mass spectra were acquired in the positive ionization mode at a resolution of 30 000 with a 100–1500 Da mass range, and followed by a data‐dependent scan in the CID mode. Data acquisition and analysis were performed using XCalibur software version 4.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Complete genome sequencing of Cas02

The genomic DNA of strain Cas02 was extracted using a DNeasy® Blood & Tissue Kit from Qiagen (Hilden, Germany; Cat # 69506), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. A NanoDrop 2000 UV–Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific) was used to ensure the DNA quality (≥ 10 µg, without degradation, OD260/OD280 ≈ 1.8–2.0). Genome sequencing of Cas02 was completed using BGI (Qingdao, China) on the Oxford Nanopore sequencing platform. Assembly of the whole genome sequence, functional gene annotation and predictive analysis were performed in accordance with the standard procedures. The complete genome sequence of strain Cas02 was accessible from NCBI with GenBank accession numbers CP071932 and CP071933.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM spss Statistics 19.0 and included analysis of variance (ANOVA) according to a random design. Duncan’s test at P < 0.05 was applied for comparing significant differences between the measured values. Adobe Illustrator CS6 was used to draw the figures.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Supporting information

Fig. S1. Biocatalytic assay of Cas02. (A). Siderophores production; (B). Cellulase activity; (C). Protease activity; (D). Ammonia production; (E). Catalase activity.

Fig. S2. MS/MS spectrums of (A) product ion of 1057.57 of peak 3; (B) product ion of 529.29 of peak 3; (C) product ion of 1057.57 of peak 4; (B) product ion of 529.29 of peak 4.

Fig. S3. Construction of green fluorescent protein labelled Cas02‐GFP strain. (A) Cas02‐GFP showed luminescence under the fluorescent microscope; (B) Growth curve of strain Cas02 and Cas02‐GFP; (C) Colony morphology of strain Cas02 and Cas02‐GFP; (D) Antagonism effect against R. solanacearum RS10 of strain Cas02 and Cas02‐GFP.

Table S1. Identification of active compounds of strain CAS02 by HPLC‐DAD‐ESI‐MS/MS.

Table S2. Chromosome statistics of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CAS02.

Table S3. The core biosynthetic genes for iturin in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain FZB42 and Cas02.

Table S4. The core biosynthetic genes for macrolactin in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain FZB42 and Cas02.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (31901937), by the China Association for Science and Technology Youth Talent Promotion Project (110201902003), West Coast Science and Technology Foundation of Qingdao (2019‐23), by the Doctor Foundation of Shandong (ZR2018BC037), by the Key Technology Project of Yunnan Provincial Company of China National Tobacco Corporation (2020530000241036), by the Key Technology of Rhizome Disease Control (201906) and by the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of China (ASTIP‐TRIC04, ASTIP‐TRIC07).

Microbial Biotechnology (2022) 15(4), 1152–1167

Funding Information

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (31901937), by the China Association for Science and Technology Youth Talent Promotion Project (110201902003), West Coast Science and Technology Foundation of Qingdao (2019‐23), by the Doctor Foundation of Shandong (ZR2018BC037), by the Key Technology Project of Yunnan Provincial Company of China National Tobacco Corporation (2020530000241036), by the Key Technology of Rhizome Disease Control (201906) and by the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of China (ASTIP‐TRIC04, ASTIP‐TRIC07).

Contributor Information

Xiaoqiang Wang, Email: wangxiaoqiang@caas.cn.

Yiqiang Li, Email: liyiqiang@caas.cn.

Yuan Yuan, Email: yuanyuan03@caas.cn.

References

  1. Álvarez, B. , and Biosca, E.G. (2017) Bacteriophage‐based bacterial wilt biocontrol for an environmentally sustainable agriculture. Front Plant Sci 8: 1218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Babalola, O.O. (2010) Beneficial bacteria of agricultural importance. Biotechnol Lett 32: 1559–1570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baćmaga, M. , Wyszkowska, J. , and Kucharski, J. (2021) Bacterial diversity and enzymatic activity in a soil recently treated with tebuconazole. Ecol Ind 123: 107373. [Google Scholar]
  4. Batista, B.D. , and Singh, B.K. (2021) Realities and hopes in the application of microbial tools in agriculture. Microb Biotechnol 14: 1258–1268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Berlanga‐Clavero, M.V. , Molina‐Santiago, C. , de Vicente, A. , and Romero, D. (2020) More than words: the chemistry behind the interactions in the plant holobiont. Environ Microbiol 22: 4532–4544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Blanchard, K. , Robic, S. , and Matsumura, I. (2014) Transformable facultative thermophile Geobacillus stearothermophilus NUB3621 as a host strain for metabolic engineering. Appl Microbiol Biot 98: 6715–6723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bumunang, E.W. , and Babalola, O.O. (2014) Characterization of Rhizobacteria from field grown genetically modified (GM) and non‐GM maizes. Braz Arch Biol Techn 57: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cao, Y.U. , Pi, H. , Chandrangsu, P. , Li, Y. , Wang, Y. , Zhou, H. , et al. (2018) Antagonism of two plant‐growth promoting Bacillus velezensis isolates against Ralstonia solanacearum and Fusarium oxysporum . Sci Rep 8: 4360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, J. , Liu, T. , Wei, M. , Zhu, Z. , Liu, W. , and Zhang, Z. (2019) Macrolactin a is the key antibacterial substance of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens D2WM against the pathogen Dickeya chrysanthemi. Eur J Plant Pathol 155: 393–404. [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, L. , Shi, H. , Heng, J. , Wang, D. , and Bian, K. (2019) Antimicrobial, plant growth‐promoting and genomic properties of the peanut endophyte Bacillus velezensis LDO2. Microbiol Res 218: 41–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen, L. , Wang, X. , and Liu, Y. (2021) Contribution of macrolactin in Bacillus velezensis CLA178 to the antagonistic activities against Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58. Arch Microbiol 203: 1743–1752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen, M.C. , Wang, J.P. , Zhu, Y.J. , Liu, B. , Yang, W.J. , and Ruan, C.Q. (2019) Antibacterial activity against Ralstonia solanacearum of the lipopeptides secreted from the Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain FJAT‐2349. J Appl Microbiol 126: 1519–1529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chowdhury, S.P. , Hartmann, A. , Gao, X.W. , and Borriss, R. (2015) Biocontrol mechanism by root‐associated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42‐a review. Front Microbiol 6: 780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chowdhury, S.P. , Hartmann, A. , Gao, X. , and Borriss, R. (2015) Biocontrol mechanism by root‐associated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 – a review. Front Microbiol 6: 780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Durairaj, K. , Velmurugan, P. , Park, J.‐H. , Chang, W.‐S. , Park, Y.‐J. , Senthilkumar, P. , et al. (2018) An investigation of biocontrol activity Pseudomonas and Bacillus strains against Panax ginseng root rot fungal phytopathogens. Biol Control 125: 138–146. [Google Scholar]
  16. Elshaghabee, F.M.F. , Rokana, N. , Gulhane, R.D. , Sharma, C. , and Panwar, H. (2017) Bacillus as potential probiotics: status, concerns, and future perspectives. Front Microbiol 8: 1490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Farzand, A. , Moosa, A. , Zubair, M. , Rashid Khan, A. , Hanif, A. , Tahir, H.A.S. , and Gao, X. (2019) Marker assisted detection and LC‐MS analysis of antimicrobial compounds in different Bacillus strains and their antifungal effect on Sclerotinia sclerotiorum . Biol Control 133: 91–102. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gu, S. , Wei, Z. , Shao, Z. , Friman, V.‐P. , Cao, K. , Yang, T. , et al. (2020) Competition for iron drives phytopathogen control by natural rhizosphere microbiomes. Nat Microbiol 5: 1002–1010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Han, T. , You, C. , Zhang, L. , Feng, C. , Zhang, C. , Wang, J. , and Kong, F. (2016) Biocontrol potential of antagonist Bacillus subtilis Tpb55 against tobacco black shank. Biocontrol 61: 195–205. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ho, T.‐H. , Chuang, C.‐Y. , Zheng, J.‐L. , Chen, H.‐H. , Liang, Y.‐S. , Huang, T.‐P. , and Lin, Y.‐H. (2020) Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain PMB05 intensifies plant immune responses to confer resistance against bacterial wilt of tomato. Phytopathology 110: 1877–1885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hu, Y. , Li, Y. , Yang, X. , Li, C. , Wang, L. , Feng, J.I. , et al. (2021) Effects of integrated biocontrol on bacterial wilt and rhizosphere bacterial community of tobacco. Sci Rep 11: 2653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jiang, G. , Wei, Z. , Xu, J. , Chen, H. , Zhang, Y. , She, X. , et al. (2017) Bacterial wilt in China: history, current status, and future perspectives. Front Plant Sci 8: 1549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kamada, M. , Hase, S. , Fujii, K. , Miyake, M. , Sato, K. , Kimura, K. , and Sakakibara, Y. (2015) Whole‐genome sequencing and comparative genome analysis of bacillus subtilis strains isolated from non‐salted fermented soybean foods. PLoS One 10: e0141369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kim, D.H. , Kim, H.K. , Kim, K.M. , Kim, C.K. , Jeong, M.H. , Ko, C.Y. , et al. (2011) Antibacterial activities of macrolactin a and 7‐O‐succinyl macrolactin a from Bacillus polyfermenticus KJS‐2 against vancomycin‐resistant enterococci and methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Arch Pharm Res 34: 147–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kumar, S. , Stecher, G. , Li, M. , Knyaz, C. , and Tamura, K. (2018) MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35: 1547–1549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kwak, M.J. , Kong, H.G. , Choi, K. , Kwon, S.K. , Song, J.Y. , Lee, J. , et al. (2018) Rhizosphere microbiome structure alters to enable wilt resistance in tomato (vol 36, pg 1100, 2018). Nat Biotechnol 36: 1117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Le, K.D. , Kim, J. , Yu, N.H. , Kim, B. , Lee, C.W. , and Kim, J.‐C. (2020) Biological control of tomato bacterial wilt, kimchi cabbage soft rot, and red pepper bacterial leaf spot using Paenibacillus elgii JCK‐5075. Front Plant Sci 11: 775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Le, X.T. , Pham, D.T. , Pham, T.A. , Tran, T.T. , Khuat, T.H. , Le, H.Q. , and Vu, U.N. (2019) Exploration of genetic diversity of Bacillus spp. from industrial shrimp ponds in Vietnam by multi‐locus sequence typing. Fish Aquat Sci 22: 17. [Google Scholar]
  29. Li, W. , Tang, X.X. , Yan, X. , Wu, Z. , Yi, Z.W. , Fang, M.J. , et al. (2016) A new macrolactin antibiotic from deep sea‐derived bacteria Bacillus subtilis B5. Nat Prod Res 30: 2777–2782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mansfield, J. , Genin, S. , Magori, S. , Citovsky, V. , Sriariyanum, M. , Ronald, P. , et al. (2012) Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology. Mol Plant Pathol 13: 614–629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mojid Mondol, M.A. , Kim, J.H. , Lee, H.‐S. , Lee, Y.‐J. , and Shin, H.J. (2011) Macrolactin W, a new antibacterial macrolide from a marine Bacillus sp. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 21: 3832–3835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Oliveira Filho, J.S. , Santos, O.A.Q. , Rossi, C.Q. , Diniz, Y.V.F.G. , Fagundes, H.S. , Pinto, L.A.S.R. , et al. (2021) Assessing the effects of harvesting with and without burning and vinasse application in sugarcane crops: evaluation of soil fertility and phosphorus pools in different ethanol production systems. Agricult Ecosyst Environ 307: 107233. [Google Scholar]
  33. Puri, A. , Padda, K.P. , and Chanway, C.P. (2020) In vitro and in vivo analyses of plant‐growth‐promoting potential of bacteria naturally associated with spruce trees growing on nutrient‐poor soils. Appl Soil Ecol 149: 103538. [Google Scholar]
  34. Rückert, C. , Blom, J. , Chen, X. , Reva, O. , and Borriss, R. (2011) Genome sequence of B. amyloliquefaciens type strain DSM7T reveals differences to plant‐associated B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42. J Biotechnol 155: 78–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Saha, M. , Sarkar, S. , Sarkar, B. , Sharma, B.K. , Bhattacharjee, S. , and Tribedi, P. (2016) Microbial siderophores and their potential applications: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23: 3984–3999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Saitou, N. , and Nei, M. (1987) The neighbor‐joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4: 406–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Salazar, F. , Ortiz, A. , and Sansinenea, E. (2020) A strong antifungal activity of 7‐O‐Succinyl Macrolactin A vs Macrolactin A from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens ELI149. Curr Microbiol 77: 3409–3413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Saravanakumar, D. , Thomas, A. , and Banwarie, N. (2019) Antagonistic potential of lipopeptide producing Bacillus amyloliquefaciens against major vegetable pathogens. Eur J Plant Pathol 154: 319–335. [Google Scholar]
  39. Tang, B. , Chen, X. , Laborda, P. , and Liu, F. (2021) Efficient direct preparation of antifungal Alteramide B from Lysobacter enzymogenes fermentation broth by macroporous resin adsorption. Bioresource Technol 319: 124220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang, X.Q. , Liu, A.X. , Guerrero, A. , Liu, J. , Yu, X.Q. , Deng, P. , et al. (2016) Occidiofungin is an important component responsible for the antifungal activity of Burkholderia pyrrocinia strain Lyc2. J Appl Microbiol 120: 607–618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang, X. , Wei, Z. , Yang, K. , Wang, J. , Jousset, A. , Xu, Y. , et al. (2019) Phage combination therapies for bacterial wilt disease in tomato. Nat Biotechnol 37: 1513–1520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Woo, P.C.Y. , Lau, S.K.P. , Teng, J.L.L. , Tse, H. , and Yuen, K.Y. (2008) Then and now: use of 16S rDNA gene sequencing for bacterial identification and discovery of novel bacteria in clinical microbiology laboratories. Clin Microbiol Infect 14: 908–934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Yuan, J. , Li, B. , Zhang, N. , Waseem, R. , Shen, Q. , and Huang, Q. (2012) Production of Bacillomycin‐ and Macrolactin‐type antibiotics by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens NJN‐6 for suppressing soilborne plant pathogens. J Agr Food Chem 60: 2976–2981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yuan, J. , Raza, W. , Huang, Q.W. , and Shen, Q.R. (2011) Quantification of the antifungal lipopeptide iturin A by high performance liquid chromatography coupled with aqueous two‐phase extraction. J Chromatogr B 879: 2746–2750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Yuan, Y. , Chu, D. , Fan, J. , Zou, P. , Qin, Y. , Geng, Y. , et al. (2020) Ecofriendly conversion of algal waste into valuable plant growth‐promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) biomass. Waste Manage 120: 576–584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhang, C. , Liu, G. , Xue, S. , and Song, Z. (2011) Rhizosphere soil microbial activity under different vegetation types on the Loess Plateau, China. Geoderma 161: 115–125. [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhang, J. , Chen, J. , Hu, L. , Jia, R. , Ma, Q. , Tang, J. , and Wang, Y. (2021) Antagonistic action of Streptomyces pratensisS10 on Fusarium graminearum and its complete genome sequence. Environ Microbiol 23: 1925–1940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhao, Y. , Mao, W. , Pang, L. , Li, R. , and Li, S. (2020) Influence of Phragmites communis and Zizania aquatica on rhizosphere soil enzyme activity and bacterial community structure in a surface flow constructed wetland treating secondary domestic effluent in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27: 26141–26152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zheng, H. , Wang, X. , Chen, L. , Wang, Z. , Xia, Y. , Zhang, Y. , et al. (2018) Enhanced growth of halophyte plants in biochar‐amended coastal soil: roles of nutrient availability and rhizosphere microbial modulation. Plant Cell Environ 41: 517–532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhou, L. , Song, C. , Li, Z. , and Kuipers, O.P. (2021) Antimicrobial activity screening of rhizosphere soil bacteria from tomato and genome‐based analysis of their antimicrobial biosynthetic potential. BMC Genom 22: 29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhou, S. , Liu, G. , Zheng, R. , Sun, C. , and Wu, S. (2020) Structural and functional insights into Iturin W, a novel lipopeptide produced by the deep‐sea bacterium Bacillus sp. strain wsm‐1. Appl Environ Microb 86: e01597‐20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Fig. S1. Biocatalytic assay of Cas02. (A). Siderophores production; (B). Cellulase activity; (C). Protease activity; (D). Ammonia production; (E). Catalase activity.

Fig. S2. MS/MS spectrums of (A) product ion of 1057.57 of peak 3; (B) product ion of 529.29 of peak 3; (C) product ion of 1057.57 of peak 4; (B) product ion of 529.29 of peak 4.

Fig. S3. Construction of green fluorescent protein labelled Cas02‐GFP strain. (A) Cas02‐GFP showed luminescence under the fluorescent microscope; (B) Growth curve of strain Cas02 and Cas02‐GFP; (C) Colony morphology of strain Cas02 and Cas02‐GFP; (D) Antagonism effect against R. solanacearum RS10 of strain Cas02 and Cas02‐GFP.

Table S1. Identification of active compounds of strain CAS02 by HPLC‐DAD‐ESI‐MS/MS.

Table S2. Chromosome statistics of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CAS02.

Table S3. The core biosynthetic genes for iturin in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain FZB42 and Cas02.

Table S4. The core biosynthetic genes for macrolactin in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain FZB42 and Cas02.


Articles from Microbial Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES