Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Phys Chem Lett. 2021 Nov 8;12(45):11035–11041. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02660

Structurally Distinct Polymorphs of Tau Aggregates Revealed by Nanoscale Infrared Spectroscopy

Siddhartha Banerjee 1, Ayanjeet Ghosh 1,*
PMCID: PMC8967399  NIHMSID: NIHMS1782034  PMID: 34747175

Abstract

Aggregation of the tau protein plays a central role in several neurodegenerative diseases collectively known as tauopathies, including Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. Tau misfolds into fibrillar beta sheet structures that constitute the paired helical filaments found in Neurofibrillary tangles. It is known that there can be significant structural heterogeneities in tau aggregates associated with different diseases. However, while structures of mature fibrils have been studied, the structural distributions in early stage tau aggregates is not well understood. In the present study, we use AFM-IR to investigate nanoscale spectra of individual tau fibrils at different stages of aggregation and demonstrate the presence of multiple fibrillar polymorphs that exhibit different secondary structures. We further show that mature fibrils contain significant amounts of antiparallel beta sheets. Our results are the very first application of nanoscale infrared spectroscopy to tau aggregates and underscore the promise of spatially resolved infrared spectroscopy for investigating protein aggregation.

Keywords: Tau, aggregation, Alzheimer’s disease, AFM-IR, nanoscale IR spectroscopy, AFM, fibril structure, antiparallel beta sheets

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1782034-f0001.jpg


The misfolding and aggregation of tau proteins into fibrillar aggregates is the pathological hallmark of many neurodegenerative diseases called tauopathies, including Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease1-5. Tau is a microtubule (MT)-associated protein that misfolds into insoluble cellular deposits called Neurofibrillary Tangles (NFTs)1-2, 5-6. While early evidence pointed to the potential neurotoxicity of NFTs, it is now believed that prefibrillar oligomeric assemblies are the main neurotoxic species3, 5-6. Elucidation of specific tau fibrillization pathways may provide insights into disease mechanisms and reveal potential therapeutic targets for drug discovery. Significant efforts have been invested to understand the aggregation of tau and the role of different factors that modulate the aggregation1-2, 7-18. The role of other amyloid proteins e.g., amyloid beta in altering tau conformation has also been investigated19-21. It is known that tau filaments in NFTs have a cross beta structure similar to amyloid plaques. However, comprehensively elucidating the structural evolution of tau that results in fibril formation remains a challenge. In the human brain, six different tau isoforms have been identified that differ with respect to the number of amino acid residues2, 5, 22. The dominant isoform and fibrillar structure can vary with disease2, 22. All the tau isoforms are large polypeptides, and therefore exhibit structural flexibility. Hence a significant amount of research interest has been focused on short peptides representing the microtubule binding domains, which are critical for tau aggregation23-25 instead of the full-length proteins. Furthermore, tau and its isoforms exhibit polymorphism: essentially the same peptide aggregates into different fibrillar structures, that differ not only with respect to morphology but also with respect to molecular arrangement8-9, 26-27. All of the above factors make isolation and structural analysis of specific tau aggregates formed at different stages of the aggregation a difficult task. The nature of amyloid aggregation in general is such that it generates a plethora of aggregated species which are transient in nature and are in equilibrium with each other. Recently cryo-EM has been successfully applied for solving tau fibrillar structures; however its applications remain limited to essentially mature fibrils that are the end point of aggregation, and not intermediates9-10. In particular, the structural aspects of early-stage tau intermediates are not well understood. The gold-standard for determining secondary structure of amyloid-like aggregates in general are spectroscopic techniques like solid state Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (ssNMR) and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)15, 28-31. However, none of these techniques are capable of providing spatial resolution on the scale of individual aggregates, and without spatial resolution, it is difficult to unequivocally attribute spectral features to specific aggregates or morphologies or determine which transient species evolve into a particular morphology. Essentially it is not possible to determine if observed spectral features arise from a particular aggregation state or a statistical mixture of different conformations. As a result, only average structures of oligomers and fibrils are known, and structural variations heterogeneities within each state, if any, are not well understood. To advance our knowledge of aggregation of tau and other amyloidogenic proteins under different conditions, it is imperative to understand the structure of each member of the conformational ensemble at different stage of aggregation. The past decade has seen the development of novel approaches for improving the spatial resolution of vibrational spectroscopy that combine infrared spectroscopy to AFM to achieve nanometer scale resolution. One of the most recently developed AFM-based approaches takes advantage of photothermal-induced resonance (PTIR), where the local thermal expansion resulting from infrared absorption by a sample is sensed by an AFM tip32-35. Photothermal AFM-IR thus bypasses resolution limits in conventional IR microscopy by using the tip of an AFM probe to measure infrared absorption. Absorption of radiation through resonant excitation of an infrared mode leads to a thermal expansion of the sample, producing an impulsive force on the AFM cantilever. The resultant AFM probe response is proportional to the infrared absorbance, and scanning the wavelength yields an infrared absorption spectrum that corresponds to a nanoscale region of the sample (Figure 1). Thus, unlike conventional optical techniques, AFM-IR can examine nanoscale structures at unprecedented chemical detail and combines the best of both worlds: the spatial resolution of AFM and the chemical resolution of infrared. While AFM-IR has been employed to study aggregates of amyloidogenic peptides like beta amyloid and alpha synuclein35-38, it has never been applied to study aggregation of tau. In this study, we leverage the capabilities of AFM-IR and investigate fibrils of the tau-441 isomer at different stages of aggregation to show that at early stages of aggregation, there is significant heterogeneity in fibrillar structure even without any significant variations in morphology. Our results demonstrate for the very first time that there can be underlying differences in secondary structure of fibrils that exhibit the same morphology. Multiple structurally distinct fibril polymorphs are observed; one more structurally ordered than the others, which is also transient in nature and is not found in mature fibrils. Furthermore, we also demonstrate that tau fibrils can contain antiparallel beta sheets, which is typically not associated with fibrillar morphologies.

Figure 1: Schematic representation of AFM-IR experiment.

Figure 1:

Nanoscale IR measurements are performed on the same tau fibril which are visualized by AFM imaging, providing both morphological and structural information. Thermal expansions arising from resonant infrared excitation is sensed by the AFM cantilever, generating nanoscale IR spectra.

To understand the structural evolution of fibrils with time, we investigated fibrils at different time points of aggregation, namely after 3, 5, 10 and 15 days of aggregation. For each measurement, aliquots were deposited on gold substrates and dried under nitrogen. AFM topographic images of tau fibrils after 3 days of incubation at 37°C are shown in Figure 2. Figure 2A shows a representative fibril cluster. More AFM images of individual fibrils at all the different aggregation stages is shown in the Figure S1-S5. To obtain the overall height distribution of the fibrils in the sample, height values of the individual fibrils were measured and plotted as a histogram (Figure 2B). The data was fitted with a Gaussian to determine the mean height value of 6.3±0.7 nm. AFM images of 5-day fibrils and corresponding height analysis is shown in Figure 2C-D. Individual fibrils along with fibril clusters are observed. The height of the fibrils is 6.5±0.9 nm which remains close to that of 3-day fibril sample. Next, tau fibrils with 10-day incubation were probed (Figure 2E-F). Individual fibrils were observed on the gold surface (Figure 2E). The average height of 10-day fibrils have been found to be 7.2±1.0 nm. Mature tau fibrils, generated after 15 days of aggregation, are shown in Figure 2G. The 15-day fibrils are long and tangled with each other generating a network like morphology. At this stage of aggregation, separate fibrils are no longer visible. The average fibril height is 42.5±40.5 nm (Figure 2H) which is significantly higher compared to the other fibrils those has been generated at the earlier time points. The broad distribution of fibrils height indicates that mature fibrils have varied height values, as opposed to the narrow distribution of earlier fibrils. The fibrillar structures observed here are consistent with previous AFM reports of tau aggregation11, 39-40. Another important observation from the AFM measurements is that the tau fibrils generated in solution are homogeneous in their morphology.

Figure 2: AFM imaging of tau fibrils.

Figure 2:

Tau fibrils have been characterized at different time periods of 3 days (A-B), 5 days (C-D), 10 days (E-F) and 15 days (G-H). AFM topographic images of the fibrils for 3 days (A), 5 days (C), 10 days (E) and 15 days (G) show the fibril morphologies. The height values, as indicated by the color bars, are in nanometers. The height value of the fibrils was measured from several fibrils from each time periods of 3 days (B), 5 days (D), 10 days (F), 15 days (H) and plotted as a histogram. The distributions are fitted with a Gaussian to determine the peak height value in each case. The fibril height for 3 days, 5 days, 10 days and 15 days are 6.3±0.7 nm, 6.5±0.9 nm, 7.2±1.0 nm and 42.5±40.5 nm, respectively.

They are straight, lacking any kind of branching or twisted conformations, with minimal height changes within one fibril. With fibril maturation, we see an increase in fibril height, but no new morphologies develop. This can be clearly visualized in Figure S5, where 3-day and 10-day fibril morphologies are shown in a rainbow color map, demonstrating that they have minimal height changes within one fibril. While the fibrils do not exhibit any significant morphological differences, the nanoscale IR spectra of fibrils contain significant differences. Specifically, for the 3-day fibrils we observe three different fibril polymorphs with distinct spectra. For 5-day, 10-day and 15-day matured fibrils, we observe only one conformation. We note that typically polymorphism is used to signify morphologically distinct fibrils that can also be different with respect to molecular structure2, 26; in our case the morphology is invariant, but the fibrils can be categorized into three distinct subtypes based on their spectra. For clarity, we refer to these structures/polymorphs as Type 1, Type 2 and Type 3 respectively for the rest of this article. Representative infrared spectra in the amide-I range are shown in Figure 3. The spectra are the average of multiple measurements taken along the length of the fibrils. More spectra are provided in the Supporting Information (Figure S6). The spectrum of 3-day fibril type-1 contains a prominent peak at ~1628cm−1 and a smaller shoulder at ~1670cm−1. Additionally, a weak band can be seen at ~1740cm−1. The spectrum of fibril type-2 is significantly different and contains a broadened asymmetric amide-I band centered at ~1650cm−1. No significant intensity is observed above 1700cm−1. For fibril type-3, we observe an amide-I spectrum that is very similar to type-2, with one major exception: presence of a prominent band at ~1738cm−1. It is interesting to note that the fibril spectra, with the exception of the type-1 polymorph, do not contain a sharp peak at typical beta sheet frequencies of ~1630cm−1, even though fibrillar aggregates are known to be in-register parallel beta sheets. The broader linewidth observed for type 2 and type 3 fibrils, in addition to the lack of a sharp peak at beta sheet frequencies would indicate presence of structural disorder. Interestingly, we did not find any major variance in spectra along a single fibril (Figure S5), indicating that the fibrils are well defined structures, and have intrinsic structural disorder. It should be noted in this context that there are variations in spectra along fibrils, in particular for type-3 fibrils as evidenced by larger spectral standard deviation (Figure 3). However, the main difference between the three fibril subtypes is in terms of intensities of bands at 1628cm-1 and 1738cm-1. The variations noted above do not affect the classification of fibrils into one subtype or the other.

Figure 3: Infrared spectra of tau fibrils.

Figure 3:

Mean IR spectra of tau fibrils were measured at along the length of different fibrils at time periods of 3 days, 5 days, 10 days and 15 days. Different 3-day fibrils exhibit distinctly unique spectra, labeled as type-1, type-2 and type-3. The shaded areas represent the standard deviation of spectral intensity.

The 5-day, 10-day and 15-day mature fibrils do not exhibit any spectral heterogeneity, and a single polymorph is observed for each case (Figure 3). The 5-day fibril spectrum is slightly shifted (~6cm−1) to higher wavenumbers compared to the type 2 and type 3 fibrils and also exhibits increased linewidth. The 10-day and 15-day matured fibrils have spectra that are similar to that of the type 2 fibrils, with the latter shifted to higher wavenumbers by ~4cm−1. All of the 5-day, 10-day and 15-day fibrils lack a distinct peak above 1700cm−1.

The key insight from the fibril spectra is that during early stages of maturation, there can be significant heterogeneity in fibril structure, and upon maturation the fibrils evolve into a single structure. However, it is difficult to precisely understand the exact underlying structural changes from inspection of the spectra alone. Therefore, to gain further insights into the spectral and structural variations between the polymorphs observed, the spectra were deconvoluted through spectral fitting. Amide I spectra of proteins usually contain contributions from different secondary structures41-42. Since the secondary structure contributing to each of the observed spectra is not exactly known a priori, we turned to the second derivative spectra to determine the number of peaks (Figure S8). Using the second derivative of spectral data to determine underlying peaks is a well-known practice in spectroscopy43-44. We used the number of peaks in the second derivative spectra and their corresponding frequencies as a starting point for spectral fitting. The fit results for the mean spectra of the 3-day, 5-day, 10-day and 15-day mature fibrils is shown in Figure 4A-F. The percent contributions of the fitted peaks to the overall spectra are shown in Figure 4G-L. The spectra are normalized to maximum intensity, but that scales every sub-band equally for a given spectrum. Hence the relative populations of the bands, as shown in Figures 4G-L, are not affected by normalization. The fit parameters are provided as Supporting Table 1. For the type-1 3-day fibrils, three Gaussian bands fit both spectra with high fidelity, with center frequencies at 1628cm−1, 1659cm−1 and 1670cm−1. The type-2 3-day fibril spectrum fits to five underlying bands, with frequencies 1626cm−1, 1642cm−1, 1662cm−1, 1680cm−1 and 1694cm−1. As expected from the spectral similarity, the type-3 fibril fits to the same five bands but also requires an additional peak at 1736cm−1. Extending our spectral deconvolution analysis to more mature fibrils, we see that 5-day, 10-day and 15-day fibrils all essentially contain the same distribution of secondary structures. The 5-day, 10-day and 15-day fibril spectra all require six bands for optimal fitting, wherein the high wavenumber peak shifts to ~1725cm−1 and the other five peaks are similar to the type-2 fibrils.

Figure 4: Deconvolution of fibril spectra.

Figure 4:

Spectral fitting was performed for the different spectrally unique types of tau fibrils identified at different aggregation times. A. 3-day fibril type-1, B. 3-day fibril type-2, C. 3-day fibril type-3, D. 5-day fibril, E. 10-day fibril and F. 15-day fibril. The fit parameters are provided in the Supporting Information. The measured spectra are shown as filled circles, while the dashed lines represent the fits. The individual bands contributing to the overall spectra are shown as shaded peaks. The percent contributions of each sub-band to the overall peak are shown for the different fibrils in: G. 3-day fibril type-1, H. 3-day fibril type-2, I. 3-day fibril type-3, J. 5-day fibril, K. 10-day fibril and L. 15-day fibril.

The 1626-1628cm−1 peak in all of the fits can be attributed to beta sheets, indicating that all fibrillar polymorphs contain beta sheet structure28, 30, 41-42. The1642cm−1 peak typically arises from random coils, while the peaks at ~1660cm−1 and 1682cm−1 are typically assigned to beta turns41-42. Taken together, the spectral deconvolution indicates that upon maturation, there is more disorder in the fibril structure, as evidenced by the increase in the random coil peak relative to the beta sheet peak. The presence of beta turns and their relative increase, evidenced by the intensity of the 1660cm−1 fitted peak, is consistent with the expected cross beta structure of the fibrils. Presence of bands at ~1694cm−1 and ~1725cm−1, however, are somewhat unexpected. The former has been typically attributed to antiparallel beta sheets41-42, 45 and has been observed in beta amyloid45-46 and alpha synuclein oligomers38. While antiparallel beta sheet structures are known for oligomeric amyloid assemblies, their existence in fibrils has been rarely observed. 2D IR studies have identified antiparallel beta sheet signatures in synuclein fibrils47; specific mutants of beta amyloid also exhibit antiparallel beta sheet structure47. Our results, to the best of our knowledge, are the very first observation of antiparallel beta sheets for tau aggregates. The antiparallel beta sheet peak is conspicuously absent in the type-1 polymorph. This suggests that fibrils can adopt either a rigid well-ordered structure (polymorph type-1) that is primarily parallel beta sheets but increased structural flexibility and/or disorder can lead to formation of antiparallel beta sheets. However, it is important to note that the ~1626cm−1 peak does not typically shift significantly between parallel and antiparallel beta sheets. Our results therefore do not preclude the possibility of parallel beta sheets in any of the fibrils where the ~1694cm−1 peak is observed. The peak at ~1725cm−1 cannot be attributed to a backbone amide vibration, and most likely arises from COOH stretch of sidechain carboxylic acids41-42. Recent work from Pinto and coworkers has demonstrated strategies for computing the IR spectrum of carbonyl band of COOH group of aspartic acid using hybrid quantum/classical computational methods48. Their findings have shown that the protonated sidechain appears in the region of 1700-1780 cm−1 and frequency shift of 5-10 cm−1 can be used as a probe for the interaction between side chain and the backbone. The Tau 441 peptide sequence has multiple carboxylic acids, including in the microtubule binding repeat domains, which have been shown to have high propensity for forming beta sheets5-6. In fact, AFM-IR measurements of other amyloid aggregates have identified similar peaks36, which have been attributed to carboxylic acids. However, this carboxylic acid band is more prominent in some fibrils than others: its contribution to the overall peak most significant only for the type-3 3-day fibril and the 5-day fibril, as can be seen from Figure 4. In infrared spectroscopy, dipolar alignment in ordered structures often leads to increased intensity of absorption bands; a relevant example is the formation of ordered beta sheets from unordered peptide, leading to sharp intense bands at ~1625cm−1. Thus, the presence of intense carboxylic acid bands possibly arises from structural ordering of glutamic and aspartic acid sidechains. However, there are multiple carboxylate side chains in tau-446, and their specific molecular interactions and orientations are not precisely known for the structures observed herein. Furthermore, the intensity in AFM-IR spectra is proportional to FTIR32-33, but the numerical correlation factor between AFM-IR and FTIR has not been reported for carboxylic acid vibrations. Hence, correlating the peak intensity to specific carboxylic side chains would need theoretical calculations/considerations of the AFM-IR response that are beyond the scope of this work. It is also important to note in this context that AFM-IR measurements are different from isotropic infrared spectra acquired in solution, and the spectra measured in AFM-IR is a convolution of laser polarization and illumination configuration49-50. Therefore, it is difficult to precisely identify the structural underpinnings of this peak, and more research is necessary to determine their exact origins. We aim to address this in future work.

The aggregation of tau isomers in vitro has been investigated in detail; however, the structure of early and/or transient intermediates is not very well known. Oligomeric species in amyloid protein aggregation have been identified to be either on or off pathway towards fibril formation. Since fibrils are believed to be the endpoint of aggregation, fibril structures, including different polymorphs thereof, are not generally thought of as transient or off pathway. Heterogeneity in fibrillar structure is known to exist but has been known to present itself concurrently with morphological variations2, 8, 26, 51. Our results are unique in that they point to variations in secondary structure of fibrils even when there are no perceptible morphological differences. We note that with the exception of fibril type-1, all the fibrillar spectra contain the same set of underlying bands, indicating that the type-1 fibril is a transient intermediate that eventually undergoes structural reorganization with maturation. Another possibility is that these ordered parallel beta sheet polymorphs represent an ‘off-pathway’ structure, it must disintegrate into monomeric or prefibrillar aggregates to be reintegrated into ‘on-pathway’ fibrils. We did not find any significant presence of non-fibrillar deposits in the specimens studied; however, the ones present did have a spectrum that resemble the disordered fibrils more (Figure S9). This is in agreement with the off-pathway hypothesis and would thus suggest that the other 3-day polymorphs observed can be viewed upon as on pathway aggregates. However, it must be noted that the fibril spectra reported herein do not necessarily capture the entire conformation ensemble that prevails during the aggregation of tau. To precisely elucidate the structural evolution of early-stage aggregates into mature fibrils, more detailed analysis of aggregation kinetics is necessary, which we aim to address in future. The other intriguing observation enabled by AFM-IR is the identification of antiparallel beta sheets in matured fibrils. It is generally believed, and has been evidenced by many studies, that early-stage amyloid aggregates can contain antiparallel structure, which gets converted to parallel beta sheet secondary structure in mature aggregates. We observe an opposite trend: early-stage aggregates can contain ordered parallel beta sheets while more mature fibrils contain antiparallel beta sheet structure, as evidenced by the relative populations of the corresponding peak (Figures 4G-L).

In summary, we have demonstrated using nanoscale AFM-IR spectroscopy that tau fibrils can have significant structural variations, particularly in early stages in aggregation. The heterogeneity is manifested in the form of structurally distinct polymorphs, which exhibit similar morphology but different secondary structure. Specifically, we identify a transient ordered parallel beta sheet structure in early-stage fibrils, which upon maturation evolves into a more disordered fibril structure that contains antiparallel beta sheets. These results underscore the need to couple spectroscopy with a spatially resolved technique like AFM, as it is not possible to unequivocally make this determination from spatially averaged techniques like FTIR. The experimental results described in this study show that the tau fibrillar aggregates are heterogeneous and future work will address whether these polymorphs persist under different aggregation conditions and in seeded aggregation from brain lysates to understand their significance in the context of different tauopathies.

Supplementary Material

34747175_SI

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (Award 1 R35 GM138162 to A.G.).

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supporting Information.

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02660

Experimental methods, AFM image gallery of tau fibrils at different time periods of 3 days, 5 days, 10 days and 15 days, AFM image of fibrils with rainbow color scale showing the similarities in morphology, IR spectral variations along fibrils, spatial location of spectral data acquisition along fibrils, second derivatives of amide-I region, IR spectra of tau oligomer, a table showing spectral fitting parameters and additional reference (PDF)

REFERENCES

  • 1.Šimić G; Babić Leko M; Wray S; Harrington C; Delalle I; Jovanov-Milošević N; Bažadona D; Buée L; de Silva R; Di Giovanni G; Wischik C; Hof PR Tau Protein Hyperphosphorylation and Aggregation in Alzheimer's Disease and Other Tauopathies, and Possible Neuroprotective Strategies. Biomolecules 2016, 6 (1), 6–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Li D; Liu C Hierarchical chemical determination of amyloid polymorphs in neurodegenerative disease. Nature Chemical Biology 2021, 17 (3), 237–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kametani F; Hasegawa M Reconsideration of Amyloid Hypothesis and Tau Hypothesis in Alzheimer's Disease. Frontiers in Neuroscience 2018, 12 (25). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Iadanza MG; Jackson MP; Hewitt EW; Ranson NA; Radford SE A new era for understanding amyloid structures and disease. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 2018, 19 (12), 755–773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ballatore C; Lee VMY; Trojanowski JQ Tau-mediated neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease and related disorders. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2007, 8 (9), 663–672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kolarova M; Garc; #00ED; a-Sierra F; Bartos A; Ricny J; Ripova D Structure and Pathology of Tau Protein in Alzheimer Disease. International Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease 2012, 2012, 13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tapiola T; Alafuzoff I; Herukka S-K; Parkkinen L; Hartikainen P; Soininen H; Pirttilä T Cerebrospinal Fluid β-Amyloid 42 and Tau Proteins as Biomarkers of Alzheimer-Type Pathologic Changes in the Brain. JAMA Neurology 2009, 66 (3), 382–389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mukrasch MD; Bibow S; Korukottu J; Jeganathan S; Biernat J; Griesinger C; Mandelkow E; Zweckstetter M Structural Polymorphism of 441-Residue Tau at Single Residue Resolution. PLOS Biology 2009, 7 (2), e1000034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Scheres SHW; Zhang W; Falcon B; Goedert M Cryo-EM structures of tau filaments. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2020, 64, 17–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fitzpatrick AWP; Falcon B; He S; Murzin AG; Murshudov G; Garringer HJ; Crowther RA; Ghetti B; Goedert M; Scheres SHW Cryo-EM structures of tau filaments from Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 2017, 547 (7662), 185–190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Makky A; Bousset L; Madiona K; Melki R Atomic Force Microscopy Imaging and Nanomechanical Properties of Six Tau Isoform Assemblies. Biophysical Journal 2020, 119 (12), 2497–2507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Metrick MA; Ferreira NDC; Saijo E; Kraus A; Newell K; Zanusso G; Vendruscolo M; Ghetti B; Caughey B A single ultrasensitive assay for detection and discrimination of tau aggregates of Alzheimer and Pick diseases. Acta Neuropathologica Communications 2020, 8 (1), 22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Haili Z; Meng S-R; Fan J-B; Chen J; Liang Y Fibrillization of Human Tau Is Accelerated by Exposure to Lead via Interaction with His-330 and His-362. PloS one 2011, 6, e25020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Von Bergen M; Barghorn S; Li L; Marx A; Biernat J; Mandelkow EM Mutations of Tau Protein in Frontotemporal Dementia Promote Aggregation of Paired Helical Filaments by Enhancing Local β-Structure. The Journal of biological chemistry 2002, 276, 48165–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Frost B; Ollesch J; Wille H; Diamond MI Conformational Diversity of Wild-type Tau Fibrils Specified by Templated Conformation Change. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2009, 284 (6), 3546–3551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Liu W; Hu X; Zhou L; Tu Y; Shi S; Yao T Orientation-Inspired Perspective on Molecular Inhibitor of Tau Aggregation by Curcumin Conjugated with Ruthenium(II) Complex Scaffold. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2020, 124 (12), 2343–2353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Prokopovich DV; Whittaker JW; Muthee MM; Ahmed A; Larini L Impact of Phosphorylation and Pseudophosphorylation on the Early Stages of Aggregation of the Microtubule-Associated Protein Tau. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2017, 121 (9), 2095–2103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Arya S; Ganguly P; Arsiccio A; Claud SL; Trapp B; Schonfeld GE; Liu X; Lazar Cantrell K; Shea J-E; Bowers MT Terminal Capping of an Amyloidogenic Tau Fragment Modulates Its Fibrillation Propensity. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2020, 124 (40), 8772–8783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rojas AV; Maisuradze GG; Scheraga HA Dependence of the Formation of Tau and Aβ Peptide Mixed Aggregates on the Secondary Structure of the N-Terminal Region of Aβ. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2018, 122 (28), 7049–7056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Qi R; Luo Y; Wei G; Nussinov R; Ma B Aβ “Stretching-and-Packing” Cross-Seeding Mechanism Can Trigger Tau Protein Aggregation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2015, 6 (16), 3276–3282. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Do TD; Economou NJ; Chamas A; Buratto SK; Shea J-E; Bowers MT Interactions between Amyloid-β and Tau Fragments Promote Aberrant Aggregates: Implications for Amyloid Toxicity. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2014, 118 (38), 11220–11230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Buée L; Bussière T; Buée-Scherrer V; Delacourte A; Hof PR Tau protein isoforms, phosphorylation and role in neurodegenerative disorders. Brain Research Reviews 2000, 33 (1), 95–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Luo Y; Ma B; Nussinov R; Wei G Structural Insight into Tau Protein’s Paradox of Intrinsically Disordered Behavior, Self-Acetylation Activity, and Aggregation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2014, 5 (17), 3026–3031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Dong X; Bera S; Qiao Q; Tang Y; Lao Z; Luo Y; Gazit E; Wei G Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation of Tau Protein Is Encoded at the Monomeric Level. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2021, 12 (10), 2576–2586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Goux WJ; Kopplin L; Nguyen AD; Leak K; Rutkofsky M; Shanmuganandam VD; Sharma D; Inouye H; Kirschner DA The Formation of Straight and Twisted Filaments from Short Tau Peptides. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2004, 279 (26), 26868–26875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fändrich M; Nyström S; Nilsson KPR; Böckmann A; LeVine H 3rd; Hammarström P Amyloid fibril polymorphism: a challenge for molecular imaging and therapy. J Intern Med 2018, 283 (3), 218–237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Härd T Amyloid Fibrils: Formation, Polymorphism, and Inhibition. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2014, 5 (3), 607–614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Martial B; Lefèvre T; Auger M Understanding amyloid fibril formation using protein fragments: structural investigations via vibrational spectroscopy and solid-state NMR. Biophys Rev 2018, 10 (4), 1133–1149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Eisenberg DS; Sawaya MR Structural Studies of Amyloid Proteins at the Molecular Level. Annual Review of Biochemistry 2017, 86 (1), 69–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Moran SD; Zanni MT How to Get Insight into Amyloid Structure and Formation from Infrared Spectroscopy. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2014, 5 (11), 1984–1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tycko R Solid-State NMR Studies of Amyloid Fibril Structure. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 2011, 62 (1), 279–299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dazzi A; Prater CB AFM-IR: Technology and Applications in Nanoscale Infrared Spectroscopy and Chemical Imaging. Chemical Reviews 2017, 117 (7), 5146–5173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dazzi A; Prater CB; Hu Q; Chase DB; Rabolt JF; Marcott C AFM-IR: Combining Atomic Force Microscopy and Infrared Spectroscopy for Nanoscale Chemical Characterization. Appl. Spectrosc. 2012, 66 (12), 1365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kenkel S; Mittal S; Bhargava R Closed-loop atomic force microscopy-infrared spectroscopic imaging for nanoscale molecular characterization. Nature Communications 2020, 11 (1), 3225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ruggeri FS; Mannini B; Schmid R; Vendruscolo M; Knowles TPJ Single molecule secondary structure determination of proteins through infrared absorption nanospectroscopy. Nature Communications 2020, 11 (1), 2945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ruggeri FS; Longo G; Faggiano S; Lipiec E; Pastore A; Dietler G Infrared nanospectroscopy characterization of oligomeric and fibrillar aggregates during amyloid formation. Nature Communications 2015, 6 (1), 7831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ruggeri FS; Habchi J; Chia S; Horne RI; Vendruscolo M; Knowles TPJ Infrared nanospectroscopy reveals the molecular interaction fingerprint of an aggregation inhibitor with single Aβ42 oligomers. Nature Communications 2021, 12 (1), 688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhou L; Kurouski D Structural Characterization of Individual α-Synuclein Oligomers Formed at Different Stages of Protein Aggregation by Atomic Force Microscopy-Infrared Spectroscopy. Analytical Chemistry 2020, 92 (10), 6806–6810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kaniyappan S; Tepper K; Biernat J; Chandupatla RR; Hübschmann S; Irsen S; Bicher S; Klatt C; Mandelkow E-M; Mandelkow E FRET-based Tau seeding assay does not represent prion-like templated assembly of Tau filaments. Molecular Neurodegeneration 2020, 15 (1), 39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kumar S; Tepper K; Kaniyappan S; Biernat J; Wegmann S; Mandelkow E-M; Müller DJ; Mandelkow E Stages and Conformations of the Tau Repeat Domain during Aggregation and Its Effect on Neuronal Toxicity. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2014, 289 (29), 20318–20332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Barth A Infrared spectroscopy of proteins. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics 2007, 1767 (9), 1073–1101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Barth A; Zscherp C What vibrations tell us about proteins. Q Rev Biophys 2002, 35 (4), 369–430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Rieppo L; Saarakkala S; Närhi T; Helminen HJ; Jurvelin JS; Rieppo J Application of second derivative spectroscopy for increasing molecular specificity of fourier transform infrared spectroscopic imaging of articular cartilage. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2012, 20 (5), 451–459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Baldassarre M; Li C; Eremina N; Goormaghtigh E; Barth A Simultaneous Fitting of Absorption Spectra and Their Second Derivatives for an Improved Analysis of Protein Infrared Spectra. Molecules 2015, 20 (7), 12599–622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cerf E; Sarroukh R; Tamamizu-Kato S; Breydo L; Derclaye S; Dufrêne Yves F.; Narayanaswami V; Goormaghtigh E; Ruysschaert J-M; Raussens V Antiparallel β-sheet: a signature structure of the oligomeric amyloid β-peptide. Biochemical Journal 2009, 421 (3), 415–423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ahmed M; Davis J; Aucoin D; Sato T; Ahuja S; Aimoto S; Elliott JI; Van Nostrand WE; Smith SO Structural conversion of neurotoxic amyloid-β1–42 oligomers to fibrils. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 2010, 17 (5), 561–567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Roeters SJ; Iyer A; Pletikapić G; Kogan V; Subramaniam V; Woutersen S Evidence for Intramolecular Antiparallel Beta-Sheet Structure in Alpha-Synuclein Fibrils from a Combination of Two-Dimensional Infrared Spectroscopy and Atomic Force Microscopy. Scientific Reports 2017, 7 (1), 41051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Vieira Pinto SM; Tasinato N; Barone V; Amadei A; Zanetti-Polzi L; Daidone I Modeling amino-acid side chain infrared spectra: the case of carboxylic residues. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2020, 22 (5), 3008–3016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Waeytens J; Mathurin J; Deniset-Besseau A; Arluison V; Bousset L; Rezaei H; Raussens V; Dazzi A Probing amyloid fibril secondary structures by infrared nanospectroscopy: experimental and theoretical considerations. Analyst 2021, 146 (1), 132–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hinrichs K; Shaykhutdinov T Polarization-Dependent Atomic Force Microscopy–Infrared Spectroscopy (AFM-IR): Infrared Nanopolarimetric Analysis of Structure and Anisotropy of Thin Films and Surfaces. Applied Spectroscopy 2018, 72 (6), 817–832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Tycko R Amyloid polymorphism: structural basis and neurobiological relevance. Neuron 2015, 86 (3), 632–645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

34747175_SI

RESOURCES