Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2022 Mar 31;17(3):e0265529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265529

Clinical characteristics, systemic complications, and in-hospital outcomes for patients with COVID-19 in Latin America. LIVEN-Covid-19 study: A prospective, multicenter, multinational, cohort study

Luis F Reyes 1,2,3,*, Alirio Bastidas 1, Paula O Narváez 1, Daniela Parra-Tanoux 1, Yuli V Fuentes 1,2, Cristian C Serrano-Mayorga 1,2, Valentina Ortíz 1, Eder L Caceres 1,2, Gustavo Ospina-Tascon 4,5, Ana M Díaz 6, Manuel Jibaja 6, Magdalena Vera 7, Edwin Silva 1,8, Luis Antonio Gorordo-Delsol 9, Francesca Maraschin 3, Fabio Varón-Vega 10, Ricardo Buitrago 1,8, Marcela Poveda 1,8, Lina M Saucedo 8, Elisa Estenssoro 11, Guillermo Ortíz 12, Nicolás Nin 13, Luis E Calderón 4, Gina S Montaño 1, Aldair J Chaar 1, Fernanda García 6, Vanessa Ramírez 6, Fabricio Picoita 6, Cristian Peláez 6, Luis Unigarro 6, Gilberto Friedman 14, Laura Cucunubo 10, Alejandro Bruhn 7, Glenn Hernández 7, Ignacio Martin-Loeches 15,16; for the LIVEN-Covid-19 Investigators
Editor: Raffaele Serra17
PMCID: PMC8970353  PMID: 35358238

Abstract

Purpose

The COVID-19 pandemic has spread worldwide, and almost 396 million people have been infected around the globe. Latin American countries have been deeply affected, and there is a lack of data in this regard. This study aims to identify the clinical characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, and factors associated with ICU admission due to COVID-19. Furthermore, to describe the functional status of patients at hospital discharge after the acute episode of COVID-19.

Material and methods

This was a prospective, multicenter, multinational observational cohort study of subjects admitted to 22 hospitals within Latin America. Data were collected prospectively. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize patients, and multivariate regression was carried out to identify factors associated with severe COVID-19.

Results

A total of 3008 patients were included in the study. A total of 64.3% of patients had severe COVID-19 and were admitted to the ICU. Patients admitted to the ICU had a higher mean (SD) 4C score (10 [3] vs. 7 [3)], p<0.001). The risk factors independently associated with progression to ICU admission were age, shortness of breath, and obesity. In-hospital mortality was 24.1%, whereas the ICU mortality rate was 35.1%. Most patients had equal self-care ability at discharge 43.8%; however, ICU patients had worse self-care ability at hospital discharge (25.7% [497/1934] vs. 3.7% [40/1074], p<0.001).

Conclusions

This study confirms that patients with SARS CoV-2 in the Latin American population had a lower mortality rate than previously reported. Systemic complications are frequent in patients admitted to the ICU due to COVID-19, as previously described in high-income countries.

Introduction

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is an RNA virus responsible for causing the new coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), declared as a pandemic on March 11, 2020 [1]. This worldwide disease has shaken healthcare systems around the globe, causing more than 396 million infections and more than 5 million deaths [2]. It is estimated that the cost of in-hospital care of COVID-19 patients in the United States was between $9.6 billion and $16.9 billion in 2020. This approximation suggests an unprecedented burden on the countries’ economies. It is known that a third of in-hospital care patients will develop severe Covid-19 and will require admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) [35]. The mortality rate of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 that require hospital admission ranges between 3% and 88%, being higher in those admitted to the ICU [6, 7]. The main characteristics of patients who develop severe COVID-19 are older age, male, obesity, and several comorbid conditions [810]. Strikingly, these clinical characteristics and outcomes have been described in high-income countries [6, 1114].

Latin America has been profoundly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. In this region, socioeconomic contrasts are quite profound, with under-resourced healthcare systems and high poverty rates [5, 15]. Currently, just a few single countries in Latin America have described patients’ clinical characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients admitted to the hospital due to COVID-19 [16]. Thus, there is scarce data describing patients with severe COVID-19, clinical features, and risk factors to develop severe illness in Latin America. Additionally, there is limited information concerning the functional status of these patients at hospital discharge. This study will attempt to provide novel data in this regard.

We hypothesize that COVID-19 has worse outcomes in the Latin American population. As a result, this study aims to describe the clinical features, systemic complications, factors associated with ICU admission due to COVID-19, and functional status at hospital discharge of patients with COVID-19 hospitalized in 8 Latin American countries.

Materials and methods

This is an observational, prospective cohort study of subjects admitted to 22 hospitals due to SARS-CoV-2 infection in eight countries in Latin America between March 2020 and January 2021. These patients were included in a voluntary registry created by the Latin American Intensive Care Network (https://www.redliven.org). Data were collected prospectively by the attending physicians through reviewing medical records, laboratory data, and radiological images.

The main goal of this study was to identify the clinical characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, and factors associated with ICU admission due to COVID-19 in patients hospitalized in eight countries in Latin America. The secondary purpose of this study is to describe the frequency of systemic complications and the functional status of patients at hospital discharge after the acute episode of COVID-19.

Participants

The cohort includes all patients hospitalized in general wards and ICU due to SARS-CoV-2 infection during the study period. All patients included in the study had confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rt-PCR) in a respiratory sample. All patients included in the cohort were analyzed in this study.

Variable definitions

The complete definitions of the variables used in the study were provided to researchers in the study protocol before data collection. The 4C score was calculated using the data provided by each center. It includes the following variables on hospital admission: age, sex, number of comorbid conditions, respiratory rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, Glasgow coma scale, urea, and C-reactive protein [17, 18]. Acute respiratory distress syndrome was defined according to the Berlin classification using the Po2/Fio2 ratio, chest x-ray, and confirming non-cardiogenic etiology of the pulmonary affection [19]. Patients were stratified as obese when the body mass index was greater than 30. Advanced ventilatory support was defined as patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, non-invasive mechanical ventilation, or high flow nasal cannula. Physiological variables and laboratory results were gathered during the first 24 hours of hospital admission. According to the World Health Organization, self-care ability is defined as the ability of individuals to promote health, prevent disease, maintain health, and cope with illness and disability with or without the support of a healthcare provider [2022]. The complete list of definitions is in the supplemental material.

Data collection

Investigators from the eight countries collected prospective data using the case report form (CRF) built for this study on Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap, version 8.11.11, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn.) [23] hosted by the Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia. The following variables were recorded in the CRF: age, gender, ethnicity, symptoms, comorbid conditions, physiological variables collected during the first 24 hours of hospital admission, chronic medications and treatments initiated in the ICU during the first 24 hours of hospital admission (e.g., requirement of advanced ventilatory support, vasopressor/inotropes usage), systemic complications, organ failure, and country of recruitment. Only patients with a reported hospital discharge date were included in calculating the hospital length of stay and mortality rates.

Statistical analysis

Discrete variables are expressed as frequencies and percentages. Continuous variables with normal distribution are expressed as means (standard deviation); variables with no normal distribution are expressed as median (interquartile ranges). Categorical variables are presented in counts (percentages) and were evaluated through the Chi-square test. For continuous variables with normal distribution, the t Student test was performed, and for variables with no normal distribution Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was used. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine those factors associated with ICU admission due to COVID-19. To apply this model, variables that had supporting literature, biological plausibility, and a p-value of <0.2 in the bivariate analysis were included in the model. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. All statistical analysis was carried out in IBM SPSS 27 for MAC.

Results

A total of 3008 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were included in the study. Most patients were enrolled from lower-middle-income countries (90.2%, 2715/3008). Most patients were enrolled in Colombia (67%, 2027/3008), followed by Ecuador (15.4%, 465/3008) and Chile (9.7%, 293/3008) (Fig 1). A total of 64.3% (1934/3008) were admitted to the ICU (Table 1).

Fig 1. Older patients get sicker and have a higher cumulative frequency of ICU admission.

Fig 1

(A) The proportion of patients enrolled in the study per country. (B) The figure presents the cumulative number of cases included in the study; in purple, patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and patients with no admission to the ICU in blue. (C) The age distribution of subjects in the study is shown in this figure. Age ranges are listed down the center of the graph, and sex distribution is displayed on each side.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection that developed severe COVID-19 stratified by patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

Patients admitted to the ICU
Characteristic All No Yes p-value
n = 3008 n = 1074 n = 1934
Demographics
 Age, median (IQR) 56.0 (43–75) 47.9 (17.5) 58.7 (14.6) <0.001
 Female, n (%) 1191 (39.6%) 547 (50.9%) 644 (33.3%) <0.001
Chronic comorbid conditions, n (%)
 Cardiovascular Disease 277 (9.2) 62 (5.8) 215 (11.1) <0.001
 Chronic Arterial Hypertension 1041 (34.6) 216 (20.1) 825 (42.7) <0.001
 Chronic Pulmonary Disease 232 (7.7) 58 (5.4) 174 (9.0) <0.001
 Asthma 47 (1.6) 26 (2.4) 21 (1.1) 0.005
 Non-Complicated Diabetes Mellitus 445 (14.8) 57 (5.3) 388 (20.1) <0.001
 Complicated Diabetes Mellitus 182 (6.2) 21 (2.0) 164 (8.5) <0.001
 Obesity 748 (24.9) 106 (9.9) 642 (33.2) <0.001
 Chronic Neurological Disorder 73 (2.4) 25 (2.3) 48 (2.5) 0.792
 Chronic Kidney Disease 191 (6.3) 28 (2.6) 163 (8.4) <0.001
 Malignant neoplasm 80 (2.7) 22 (2.0) 58 (3.0) 0.121
 AIDS/HIV 15 (0.5) 8 (0.7) 7 (0.4) 0.153
Past medical history, n (%)
 Pregnancy 17 (1.2) 13 (2.5) 4 (0.5) <0.001
 Smoking 235 (7.8) 52 (4.8) 183 (9.5) <0.001
 Healthcare worker 133 (4.4) 102 (9.5) 31 (1.6) <0.001
Symptoms on admission, n (%)
 Fever 1861 (61.9) 546 (50.8) 1315 (68.0) <0.001
 Cough—productive 618 (20.5) 115 (10.7) 503 (26.0) <0.001
 Rhinorrhea 260 (8.6) 131 (12.2) 129 (6,7) <0.001
 Wheezing 80 (2.7) 9 (0.8) 71 (3.7) <0.001
 Chest Pain 381 (12.7) 142 (13.2) 239 (12.4) 0.495
 Myalgia 938 (31.2) 290 (27.0) 648 (33.5) <0.001
 Joint pain-arthralgia 662 (22.0) 153 (14.2) 509 (26.3) <0.001
 Shortness of breath 1776 (59.0) 342 (31.8) 1434 (74.1) <0.001
 Chest wall drawing 100 (3.3) 8 (0.7) 92 (4.8) <0.001
 Headache 876 (29.1) 395 (36.8) 481 (24.9) <0.001
Physiological parameters on admission, mean (SD)
 Systolic blood pressure, mmHg 123.8 (29.9) 123.4 (16.7) 124 (23.1) 0.441
 Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg 72.0 (13.7) 74.77 (1.7) 70.38 (14.6) <0.001
 Glasgow 11.9 (5.0) 14 (0.8) 9 (5.6) <0.001
Laboratories on hospital admission, mean (SD)
Arterial gases n = 2214 n = 474 n = 1738
 Fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), % 48.3 (29.7) 22 (6.4) 63 (26.9.) <0.001
 Bicarbonate (HCO3), mmol/L 21.4 (4.2) 20.99 (3.53) 21.53 (4.49) 0.016
 Lactate, mmol/L 1.7 (1.3) 1.44 (1.1) 1.84 (1.4) <0.001
Complete Blood Count n = 2258 n = 507 n = 1751
 Leucocytes, x103 cells 10.5 (5.3) 8.0 (3.5) 11.2 (5.5) <0.001
 Lymphocytes, % 12.4 (11.4) 18.5 (12.8) 10.5 (10.2) <0.001
 Neutrophiles, % 69.4 (24.9) 71.6 (16.4) 68.6 (27.1) 0.018
 Hematocrit, % 41.2 (6.8) 42.8 (6.0) 40.7 (7.0) <0.001
 Hemoglobin, g/dL 13.7 (2.4) 14.5 (2.1) 13.5 (2.4) <0.001
 Platelets, x103 cells 251.4 (106.2) 233.0 (95.5) 256.7 (108.5) <0.001
Liver function tests n = 1658 n = 310 n = 1348
 Bilirubin, mg/dL 0.8 (1.0) 0.7 (0.7) 0.84 (1) 0.115
 Alanine Transaminase (ALT), U/L 52.3 (37.0) 45 (32.2) 54.1 (37.8) <0.001
 Aspartate Transaminase (AST), U/L 56.5 (37.1) 48.1 (31.1) 58.5 (38.1) <0.001
Renal function tests n = 2192 n = 455 n = 1737
 Ureic nitrogen, mg/dL 26.8 (20.3) 18.9 (12.6) 28.9 (21.5) <0.001
 Serum creatinine, mg/dL 1.35 (1.8) 1 (1.41) 1.4 (1.9) <0.001
Metabolic tests n = 1924 n = 312 n = 1612
 Sodium (Na), mEq/L 136.9 (5.0) 136.7 (4.6) 137 (5.1) 0.427
 Potassium (K), mEq/L 4.3 (0.7) 4.26 (0.65) 4.3 (0.7) 0.362
Coagulation times n = 1347 n = 85 n = 1262
 Prothrombin Time (PT), s 14.9 (8.5) 14.1 (6.5) 15.0 (8.6) 0.348
 Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT), s 33.1 (10.9) 32.1 (9.6) 33.2 (11.0) 0.376
 International Normalized Ratio (INR) 1.1 (0.3) 1.1 (0.51) 1.1 (0.3) 0.463
AcutePhase Reactants n = 1672 n = 1293 n = 379
 C-reactive protein, mg/L 68.3 (71.8) 68.3 (62.2) 68.3 (74.4) 0.991
Disease severity
 4C Score, mean (SD) 9.2 (3.7) 7 (3) 10 (3) <0.001

IQR, interquartile range; AIDS, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; HIV, Human Immunodeficiency Virus; IQR, Interquartile Range; SD, Standard Deviation.

Demographic and clinical characteristics

Patients were mainly male (60.4%, 1817/3008), with a median (IQR) age of 56 (43–67) years old. Many patients included in the study had comorbid conditions, arterial hypertension being the most frequently identified (34.6%, 1041/3008), followed by obesity (24.9%, 748/3008), non-complicated diabetes mellitus (14.8%, 445/3008), and chronic pulmonary disease (7.7% 232/3008), among others (Table 1). Several differences were observed between patients admitted to the ICU and those treated in general wards. For instance, the cumulative frequency of ICU admission increased in direct proportion to age (median [IQR]) (47.9 [17.5] vs 58.7 [14.6] p = 0.001) (Fig 1). Other common comorbidities seem more frequently in ICU patients were chronic arterial hypertension (42.7% [825/1934] vs. 20.1% [210/1074], p<0.001), obesity (33.2% [642/1934] vs. 9.9% [106/1074], p<0.001), chronic pulmonary disease (9.0% [174/1934] vs. 5.4% [58/1074], p<0.001), and chronic kidney disease (8.4% [163/1934] vs. 2.6% [28/1074], p<0.001), among others (Table 1).

The most commonly reported clinical symptoms on hospital admission were cough (76,9%, 2314/3008), fever (61,9%, 1861/3008), shortness of breath (59%, 1776/3008), and myalgia (31.2%, 938/3008) (Table 1). When comparing the symptoms of patients admitted to the ICU vs non-ICU patients, we found ICU patients more frequently presented with shortness of breath (74% [1434/1934] vs. 31.8% [342/1074], p<0.001), fever (68% [1315/1934] vs. 50.8% [546/1074], p<0.001), myalgia (33.5% [648/1934] vs. 27.0% [290/1074], p<0.001), arthralgias (26.3% [509/1934] vs. 14.2% [153/1074], p<0.001), and productive cough (26% [503/1934] vs. 10.7% [115/1074], p<0.001) (Table 1).

Disease severity, in-hospital treatments, and systemic complications

When assessing disease severity, the 4C score was used. In patients admitted to the ICU, the Mean (SD) 4C score was higher than in non-ICU patients (10[3] vs. 7[3] p< 0.001) (Table 1). A direct correlation between a higher 4C score and ICU admission rate was observed in Fig 2. The most commonly administered treatments in all cohorts were corticosteroids (54.5%, 1578/3008), systemic antibiotics (48.4%, 1456/3008), and vasopressors or inotropic agents (36.9%, 1111/3008). Invasive mechanical ventilation rate was higher in ICU admitted patients (71% [1391/1934] vs. 1.5% [16/1074], p<0.001) as expected. Tracheostomy was performed in 21% (293/1407) of the patients treated with invasive mechanical ventilation. ICU patients were recurrently treated with corticosteroids (69% [1334/1934] vs. 22.7% [244/1074], p<0.001) antibiotics (61.2% [1183/1934] vs. 25.4% [273/1074], p<0.001), vasopressors or inotrope agents (57% [1100/1934] vs. 1% [11/1074], p<0.001) and dialysis (17.4% [337/1934] vs. 0.8% [9/1074], p<0.001) more than non-ICU patients (S1 Table).

Fig 2.

Fig 2

(A) Correlation between the 4C score and the ICU admission rate. This figure compares the number of patients admitted to the ICU (Y-axis) and their punctuation in the 4C score (X-axis). In purple, the patients were admitted to the ICU, and in blue, patients were not admitted. The ICU admission rate increases as the 4C score do. In contrast, most patients rated with 4C scores of 6 or less were more frequently treated outside the ICU. (B) Comparison between PaO2/FiO2 ratio and the number of patients admitted to ICU. This figure compares the number of patients admitted to ICU in purple columns the number of patients who were not admitted to the ICU in blue columns. Patients with a low PaO2/FiO2 ratio were the most admitted to ICU.

Pulmonary complications were the most identified complications in our cohort. A total of 39.1% (1179/3008) of patients developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This was significantly higher in patients admitted to the ICU (56.2% [1087/1934] vs. 8.6% [92/1074], p<0.001). Additionally, 23.0% (692/3008) of patients developed acute kidney injury, 15.8% (476/3008) anemia, and 7.5% (225/3008) a cardiac arrhythmia; all these complications were repeatedly found more frequently in patients admitted to the ICU (S2 Table).

Clinical outcomes

The in-hospital mortality reported in our cohort was 24.1% (725/3008). The in-hospital mortality rate in patients admitted to the ICU was 35,1% (678/1934) and 4,4% [(47/1074) p<0.001] in non-ICU patients with COVID-19. Regarding hospital length of stay (LOS), we only include 2823 patients because a total of 185 patients has missing data of discharge date; the overall median (IQR) observed in the cohort was 10 (4–19); when stratified by ICU admission, we found that ICU admitted patients had significantly longer hospital LOS (15 [9–26] vs. 3 [0–7], p<0.001). Finally, self-care at hospital discharge was evaluated. The majority of patients had equal self-care ability at discharge (43.8%, 1319/3008); however, patients admitted to the ICU had worse self-care ability at discharge when compared with non-ICU patients (25.7% [497/1934] vs. 3.7% [40/1074], p<0.001) (Table 2).

Table 2. Clinical outcomes.

Patients admitted to the ICU
Outcomes All No Yes p-value
n = 3008 n = 1074 n = 1934
 Mortality, n (%) 725 (24.1) 47 (4.4) 678 (35.1) <0.001
 Referred to another hospital, n (%) 243 (8.1) 61 (5.7) 182 (9.4) 0.109
 Referred to palliative care Program, n (%) 4 (0.1) 2 (0.2) 2 (0.1) 0.550
 Ambulatory dialysis, n (%) 20 (0.7) 5 (0.5) 15 (0.8) 0.316
Length of stay All No Yes
n = 2823 n = 1028 n = 1795
 Hospital LOS, median (IQR) 10 (4–19) 3 (0–7) 15 (9–26) <0.001
Self-care at discharge
 Worst Self-care ability at discharge, n (%) 537 (17.9) 40 (3.7) 497 (25.7) <0.001
 Equal Self-care ability at discharge, n (%) 1319 (43.8) 910 (84.7) 409 (21.2) <0.001
 Better Self-care ability at discharge, n (%) 70 (2.3) 36 (1.9) 34 (3.2) 0.023

LOS, length of stay in days

Risks factors associated with ICU admission on COVID–19 patients: A multivariate analysis

After performing the multivariate analysis, we found an OR [95%CI], age (1.02 [1.00–1.03] p = 0.019), shortness of breath (3.04 [2.02–4.58] p<0.001), obesity (2.43 [1.45–4.07] p = 0.001), increased serum lactate (1.74 [1.24–2.47] p = 0.002), and leukocytosis (1.10 [1.05–1.17] p<0.001) were independently associated with ICU admission (Table 3).

Table 3. Logistic binary multivariate analysis fitted to assess the factors associated with admission to the intensive unit (ICU).

95% CI
Variable OR Lower Upper p-value
Age 1.02 1.00 1.03 0.019
Sex 1.10 0.72 1.68 0.659
Healthcare worker 0.51 0.14 1.96 0.330
Number of comorbid conditions 0.99 0.83 1.21 0.983
Shortness of breath 3.04 2.02 4.58 <0.001
Glasgow 0.71 0.63 0.8 <0.001
Obesity 2.43 1.45 4.07 0.001
Smoking 1.47 0.72 3.03 0.290
Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg 0.98 0.97 1.00 0.015
SaO2, % 1.02 1.00 1.05 0.103
Lactate, mmol/L 1.74 1.24 2.47 0.002
Leucocytes, x103 cells 1.10 1.05 1.17 <0.001
Lymphocytes, % 0.96 0.95 0.98 <0.001
Hematocrit, % 0.95 0.93 0.99 0.003
Platelets, x103 cells 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.765
Ureic nitrogen, mg/dL 1.01 0.99 1.02 0.272
Alanine transaminase, U/L 1.01 1.00 1.02 0.149
Aspartate transaminase, U/L 1.00 0.99 1.01 0.593
C-reactive protein, mg/L 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.055

Discussion

This study describes the clinical characteristics, systemic complications, and outcomes from a prospective, multinational cohort of hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19 from eight countries in Latin America. In our cohort, we found that age, shortness of breath, obesity, leukocytosis, and increased serum lactate were independently associated with ICU admission due to COVID-19. The most common complications in this cohort were ARDS, shock, and acute kidney injury. We identified that mortality rates and length of hospital stay were significantly higher in patients admitted to the ICU than those hospitalized in the general wards. Patients admitted to the ICU due to COVID-19 were found to have lower self-care capacity at hospital discharge, which might indicate long-term COVID-19 consequences.

Lower respiratory tract infections range from mild to severe, with varying degrees of systemic complications and COVID-19 is not the exception [8, 24, 25]. There are robust data linking older age, male sex, and obesity with a greater risk of developing severe COVID-19 [13, 2628]. These risk factors have also been associated with mutations in the innate immune system in males, limiting the host capacity to generate a robust immune response when encountering the SARS-CoV-2 virus [2931]. Our study also found that shortness of breath and elevated serum concentrations of lactate were independently associated with ICU admission. This is concordant with what is reported in the literature, as only severe COVID-19 patients are admitted to ICU [32, 33]. These factors are essential because they are easily identifiable by physicians on hospital admission and might guide them to early detection of patients at risk of developing severe disease.

COVID-19 patients develop systemic complications in up to 68% of cases. A metanalysis of 44 peer-reviewed studies, most of them from China and other Asian countries, including 14866 patients, found a prevalence of ARDS of 14%, acute cardiac injury (15%), and venous thromboembolism (15%) as the most frequent complications [34]. Another metanalysis that included 2874 patients described an ARDS frequency of 32.8% [35]. In our cohort, ARDS was the most common complication observed in 56.2% of subjects. Furthermore, cardiac injury in COVID-19 has also been described as showing higher mortality rates when present [36, 37]. Despite not being one of the most regularly seen complications in our study, we found a similar prevalence. In COVID-19 patients, the most described thrombotic complications are pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis, as Shah et al. observed in a multicenter retrospective observational study. Thrombotic complications were documented in 47.7% of cases, 22.5% with pulmonary embolism, and 11.8% with deep vein thrombosis; the rest were arterial complications, including myocardial infarction [38]. Our study documented a very low frequency of documented pulmonary embolism, less than 1%. We believe that this low prevalence of pulmonary embolism could be associated with our study’s real-world data, meaning that patients were not systematically screened for pulmonary embolism unless high clinical and laboratory suspicion. Only patients with radiological confirmation and clinical symptoms consistent with pulmonary embolism were reported.

In this multicenter study, acute kidney injury (AKI) has also been regularly documented. As previously described in several studies, it is a clear marker of worse clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Silver et al. showed AKI prevalence is up to 46% of ICU patients [39]. Potere et al. reported a much lower prevalence (6%) in their metanalysis from mostly Asian studies [34]. Here, AKI was observed in 23% of patients in general wards and 34.2% of patients in the ICU. This difference in proportions could be attributed to the higher percentage of patients hospitalized in ICU than those in a regular ward.

Several studies have evaluated hospital and ICU mortality as a primary outcome in COVID-19 patients [40, 41]. The COVID-19 Lombardy ICU network reported an ICU mortality of 48.7% in a retrospective observational cohort including 3988 patients [27]. Petrilli et al. reported overall mortality in critically ill patients of 57% in a prospective cohort including 5279 patients from New York City [42]. Moreover, a meta-analysis including 37 articles revealed that the pool prevalence of ICU mortality in patients with COVID-19 was 32%. This meta-analysis did a subgroup analysis by the country where the highest mortality rates were reported in China (42%), followed by the USA (36%) [43]. Our cohort found an ICU mortality rate of 35%, similar to the overall mortality presented on the metanalysis [43], though relatively lower when compared to the United States and the Italian cohorts. This is important because even though Latin American countries did not have robust ICU capacity before the COVID-19 pandemic, countries had almost three months to prepare after the pandemic began in China. Thus, we hypothesize that this lack of time might play a crucial role in this lower reported mortality.

Recently, there has been growing concern about the potential long-term complications in COVID-19 patients that survive acute infection [22, 44, 45]. The COMEBACK study group studied long-term complications using telephone interviews in a cohort of 478 COVID survivors in France. They found that approximately half of the patients remained with at least one symptom that was not present before the COVID-19 infection [46]. Moreover, Garrigues et al. conducted a single-center study including 120 patients hospitalized due to COVID-19. After a mean of 110.9 days following admission, found that persistent symptoms and lower health-related quality of life [47]. We found that self-care ability at discharge in our cohort significantly decreased in ICU admitted patients. However, it is unknown whether this lower functional capacity was exclusively associated with COVID-19 or post-ICU syndrome. However, these findings should alert healthcare providers to the potential necessity of creating follow-up clinics for COVID-19 survivors. The importance of long-term monitoring of patients after infection by SARS-CoV2 lies in the impact of persistent symptoms, worse quality of life, ability to work, and the possible need for rehabilitation programs. This should alert countries to the potential burden that COVID-19 could impose on healthcare systems and economies after the pandemic.

Our study has several strengths and limitations that are important to explore. Although we enrolled patients in more than twenty hospitals in eight Latin American countries, there were several Latin American countries that we did not include. Therefore, these results might not be generalizable to all of Latin America. Secondly, despite comparing ICU patients to those in general wards, our cohort was composed of patients with severe COVID-19. Thus, further studies including a more considerable proportion of patients with non-severe COVID-19 are essential. Finally, this study was not designed to assess the potential implications of long-COVID-19; thus, we cannot provide robust conclusions regarding this critical problem. However, we found that patients did have lower functional status at hospital discharge, which might serve as a hypothesis for future studies.

Conclusions

Patients with COVID-19 admitted to ICU included in our Latin American multicenter study had a lower mortality rate than previously reported in the literature. Age, obesity, elevated serum lactate, leukocytosis, and shortness of breath on admission were independently associated with ICU admission in patients with COVID-19. Systemic complications are frequent in patients admitted to the ICU due to COVID-19, as previously described in high-income countries. Finally, patients admitted to ICU due to COVID-19 infection had lower self-care capacity than those not admitted to ICU. This might have significant long-term implications for Latin American countries.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Treatments stratified by patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Patients with severe COVID-19 that developed complications stratified by patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

(CSV)

S1 File. Data set with the information recollected for this study.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

^LIVEN-Covid-19 Investigators (To be included in PubMed as collaborators):

Elsa D. Ibañez-Prada, Laura Bravo, Paula Ramirez, Ingrid G. Bustos, Julian Lozada, Manuela Saenz-Valcarcel, Enrique Gamboa, Salome Gomez, Esteban Garcia-Gallo, Alfonso José Arango, Álvaro Aguilar, Andrea Lizeth Ayala, Andrea Viviana Bayona, Angelica Rodríguez, Carol Viviana Aponte, Carolina Forero-Carreño, Conny Stefanny Muñoz, Cristian Augusto Estrada, Cristopher Romero, Cristian Peláez, Danilo Trujillo, Diego Holguin, Fabricio Picoita, Jesús Chávez-Villegas, Faure Rodríguez, Francisco Franco, Fernanda García, Hernan Sánchez, Janett Vanessa Moncayo, Jennifer A. Pinedo, Jesica Valeria Bravo, José David Cruz, José Miguel Angel, Jovany Castro-Lara, Karen Andrea Mantilla, Lorena García, Lorena Pabón, Luis Arturo López-Reveles, Luis Fernando Mamani, Maria Gabriela Saenz, Cecilia Loudet, Nahuel Rubatto Birri, Luis Unigarro, Marisa Lucrecia Yupa, Valeria Catalina Quevedo, Vanessa Ramírez, Paola Sánchez, Hernán Sánchez, Jorge Antonio Caamaño Solis, Edgar Segundo Espinosa Morales, Edgar Segundo Espinosa Morales, Marco Antonio Jiménez Espinosa, Luis Eduardo Males Vinueza, Luis Fernando Martinez Arias, Juan Pablo Monge Casanova, Jose Andres Moreno Troya, Diego Rolando Morocho Tutillo, Hector Homero Moya, Ximena Alexandra Noboa Gallegos, Nelson Gustavo Remache Vargas, Milton Alfredo Tobar Galindo, Freddy Rogelio Sanchez, Liliana Elizabeth Torres Martinez, Amparo Rocío Basantes Sánchez, Monica Viviana Medina Cabrera, Diego Andres Mora Palma, Verónica Elizabeth Paredes Carvajal, Hernan Andres Sanchez Freire, Sayra de los Angeles Caiza Mosquera.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate: This research is categorized as risk-free. It is a study where clinical data were obtained from an anonymized database. Thus, the informed consent was waived. The Institutional Review Board approved this study at Clinica Universidad de La Sabana and Universidad de La Sabana (MED-311-2021).

Consent for publication: All authors reviewed this manuscript and consented to its publication.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Coopersmith CM, Antonelli M, Bauer SR, Deutschman CS, Evans LE, Ferrer R, et al. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Research Priorities for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Critical Illness. Critical care medicine. 2021;49(4):598–622. Epub 2021/02/17. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004895 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Organization WH. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard https://covid19.who.int/ [cited 2022 8 February 2022]. https://covid19.who.int/.
  • 3.Quah P, Li A, Phua J. Mortality rates of patients with COVID-19 in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of the emerging literature. Critical care. 2020;24(1):285. Epub 2020/06/06. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03006-1 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Xie J, Wu W, Li S, Hu Y, Hu M, Li J, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of critically ill patients with novel coronavirus infectious disease (COVID-19) in China: a retrospective multicenter study. Intensive care medicine. 2020;46(10):1863–72. Epub 2020/08/21. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06211-2 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cifuentes-Faura J. COVID-19 Mortality Rate and Its Incidence in Latin America: Dependence on Demographic and Economic Variables. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(13). Epub 2021/07/03. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136900 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Grasselli G, Zangrillo A, Zanella A, Antonelli M, Cabrini L, Castelli A, et al. Baseline Characteristics and Outcomes of 1591 Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2 Admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy Region, Italy. Jama. 2020;323(16):1574–81. Epub 2020/04/07. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.5394 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Grasselli G, Pesenti A, Cecconi M. Critical Care Utilization for the COVID-19 Outbreak in Lombardy, Italy: Early Experience and Forecast During an Emergency Response. Jama. 2020;323(16):1545–6. Epub 2020/03/14. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4031 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Group ICC. COVID-19 symptoms at hospital admission vary with age and sex: results from the ISARIC prospective multinational observational study. Infection. 2021;49(5):889–905. Epub 2021/06/26. doi: 10.1007/s15010-021-01599-5 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Koupaei M, Naimi A, Moafi N, Mohammadi P, Tabatabaei FS, Ghazizadeh S, et al. Clinical Characteristics, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Mortality Rate of TB/COVID-19 Coinfectetd Patients: A Systematic Review. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:740593. Epub 2021/12/21. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.740593 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Reyes LF, Murthy S, Garcia-Gallo E, Irvine M, Merson L, Martin-Loeches I, et al. Clinical characteristics, risk factors and outcomes in patients with severe COVID-19 registered in the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium WHO clinical characterisation protocol: a prospective, multinational, multicentre, observational study. ERJ Open Res. 2022;8(1). Epub 2022/02/17. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00552-2021 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Richards-Belle A, Orzechowska I, Gould DW, Thomas K, Doidge JC, Mouncey PR, et al. COVID-19 in critical care: epidemiology of the first epidemic wave across England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Intensive care medicine. 2020;46(11):2035–47. Epub 2020/10/10. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06267-0 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sinha P, Calfee CS, Cherian S, Brealey D, Cutler S, King C, et al. Prevalence of phenotypes of acute respiratory distress syndrome in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a prospective observational study. The Lancet Respiratory medicine. 2020;8(12):1209–18. Epub 2020/08/31. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30366-0 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, Crawford JM, McGinn T, Davidson KW, et al. Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the New York City Area. Jama. 2020;323(20):2052–9. Epub 2020/04/23. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6775 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ferrando C, Suarez-Sipmann F, Mellado-Artigas R, Hernandez M, Gea A, Arruti E, et al. Clinical features, ventilatory management, and outcome of ARDS caused by COVID-19 are similar to other causes of ARDS. Intensive care medicine. 2020;46(12):2200–11. Epub 2020/07/31. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06192-2 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Estenssoro E, Alegria L, Murias G, Friedman G, Castro R, Nin Vaeza N, et al. Organizational Issues, Structure, and Processes of Care in 257 ICUs in Latin America: A Study From the Latin America Intensive Care Network. Critical care medicine. 2017;45(8):1325–36. Epub 2017/04/25. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002413 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ranzani OT, Bastos LSL, Gelli JGM, Marchesi JF, Baiao F, Hamacher S, et al. Characterisation of the first 250,000 hospital admissions for COVID-19 in Brazil: a retrospective analysis of nationwide data. The Lancet Respiratory medicine. 2021;9(4):407–18. Epub 2021/01/19. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30560-9 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gupta RK, Harrison EM, Ho A, Docherty AB, Knight SR, van Smeden M, et al. Development and validation of the ISARIC 4C Deterioration model for adults hospitalised with COVID-19: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2021. Epub 2021/01/15. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30559-2 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Knight SR, Ho A, Pius R, Buchan I, Carson G, Drake TM, et al. Risk stratification of patients admitted to hospital with covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: development and validation of the 4C Mortality Score. BMJ. 2020;370:m3339. Epub 2020/09/11. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3339 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Force ADT, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. Jama. 2012;307(23):2526–33. Epub 2012/07/17. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5669 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Organization WH. What do we mean by self-care? https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/self-care-interventions/definitions/en/ [cited 2022 8 February 2022]. https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/self-care-interventions/definitions/en/.
  • 21.BMJ T. Self care interventions for sexual and reproductive health and rights https://www.bmj.com/selfcare-srhr [cited 2022 8 February 2022]. https://www.bmj.com/selfcare-srhr.
  • 22.Munblit D, Nicholson TR, Needham DM, Seylanova N, Parr C, Chen J, et al. Studying the post-COVID-19 condition: research challenges, strategies, and importance of Core Outcome Set development. BMC medicine. 2022;20(1):50. Epub 20220204. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02222-y . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Moreno G, Carbonell R, Martin-Loeches I, Sole-Violan J, Correig IFE, Gomez J, et al. Corticosteroid treatment and mortality in mechanically ventilated COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients: a multicentre cohort study. Ann Intensive Care. 2021;11(1):159. Epub 2021/11/27. doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00951-0 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Reyes LF, Rodriguez A, Bastidas A, Parra-Tanoux D, Fuentes YV, Garcia-Gallo E, et al. Dexamethasone as risk-factor for ICU-acquired respiratory tract infections in severe COVID-19. J Crit Care. 2022;69:154014. Epub 2022/02/27. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.154014 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Olivas-Martinez A, Cardenas-Fragoso JL, Jimenez JV, Lozano-Cruz OA, Ortiz-Brizuela E, Tovar-Mendez VH, et al. In-hospital mortality from severe COVID-19 in a tertiary care center in Mexico City; causes of death, risk factors and the impact of hospital saturation. PloS one. 2021;16(2):e0245772. Epub 2021/02/04. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245772 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Grasselli G, Greco M, Zanella A, Albano G, Antonelli M, Bellani G, et al. Risk Factors Associated With Mortality Among Patients With COVID-19 in Intensive Care Units in Lombardy, Italy. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(10):1345–55. Epub 2020/07/16. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3539 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bouziotis J, Arvanitakis M, Preiser JC, Group ICC. Association of body mass index with COVID-19 related in-hospital death. Clin Nutr. 2022. Epub 20220129. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.01.017 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.van der Made CI, Simons A, Schuurs-Hoeijmakers J, van den Heuvel G, Mantere T, Kersten S, et al. Presence of Genetic Variants Among Young Men With Severe COVID-19. Jama. 2020;324(7):663–73. Epub 2020/07/25. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.13719 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhang Q, Bastard P, Liu Z, Le Pen J, Moncada-Velez M, Chen J, et al. Inborn errors of type I IFN immunity in patients with life-threatening COVID-19. Science. 2020;370(6515). Epub 2020/09/26. doi: 10.1126/science.abd4570 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bastard P, Rosen LB, Zhang Q, Michailidis E, Hoffmann HH, Zhang Y, et al. Autoantibodies against type I IFNs in patients with life-threatening COVID-19. Science. 2020;370(6515). Epub 2020/09/26. doi: 10.1126/science.abd4585 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Oliveira E, Parikh A, Lopez-Ruiz A, Carrilo M, Goldberg J, Cearras M, et al. ICU outcomes and survival in patients with severe COVID-19 in the largest health care system in central Florida. PLoS One. 2021;16(3):e0249038. Epub 2021/03/26. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249038 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ospina-Tascon GA, Calderon-Tapia LE, Garcia AF, Zarama V, Gomez-Alvarez F, Alvarez-Saa T, et al. Effect of High-Flow Oxygen Therapy vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Invasive Mechanical Ventilation and Clinical Recovery in Patients With Severe COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Jama. 2021;326(21):2161–71. Epub 2021/12/08. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.20714 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Potere N, Valeriani E, Candeloro M, Tana M, Porreca E, Abbate A, et al. Acute complications and mortality in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Critical care. 2020;24(1):389. Epub 2020/07/04. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03022-1 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Cardona-Ospina JA, Gutierrez-Ocampo E, Villamizar-Pena R, Holguin-Rivera Y, Escalera-Antezana JP, et al. Clinical, laboratory and imaging features of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020;34:101623. Epub 2020/03/18. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101623 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shi S, Qin M, Shen B, Cai Y, Liu T, Yang F, et al. Association of Cardiac Injury With Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(7):802–10. Epub 2020/03/27. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0950 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cho JH, Namazi A, Shelton R, Ramireddy A, Ehdaie A, Shehata M, et al. Cardiac arrhythmias in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A prospective observational study in the western United States. PloS one. 2020;15(12):e0244533. Epub 2020/12/29. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244533 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Shah A, Donovan K, McHugh A, Pandey M, Aaron L, Bradbury CA, et al. Thrombotic and haemorrhagic complications in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a multicentre observational study. Critical care. 2020;24(1):561. Epub 2020/09/20. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03260-3 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Silver SA, Beaubien-Souligny W, Shah PS, Harel S, Blum D, Kishibe T, et al. The Prevalence of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Kidney Med. 2021;3(1):83–98.e1. Epub 2020/12/16. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2020.11.008 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Azoulay E, Fartoukh M, Darmon M, Geri G, Voiriot G, Dupont T, et al. Increased mortality in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted within seven days of disease onset. Intensive care medicine. 2020;46(9):1714–22. Epub 2020/08/12. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06202-3 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rieg S, von Cube M, Kalbhenn J, Utzolino S, Pernice K, Bechet L, et al. COVID-19 in-hospital mortality and mode of death in a dynamic and non-restricted tertiary care model in Germany. PloS one. 2020;15(11):e0242127. Epub 2020/11/13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242127 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Petrilli CM, Jones SA, Yang J, Rajagopalan H, O’Donnell L, Chernyak Y, et al. Factors associated with hospital admission and critical illness among 5279 people with coronavirus disease 2019 in New York City: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2020;369:m1966. Epub 2020/05/24. www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Abate SM, Ahmed Ali S, Mantfardo B, Basu B. Rate of Intensive Care Unit admission and outcomes among patients with coronavirus: A systematic review and Meta-analysis. PloS one. 2020;15(7):e0235653. Epub 2020/07/11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235653 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sigfrid L, Cevik M, Jesudason E, Lim WS, Rello J, Amuasi J, et al. What is the recovery rate and risk of long-term consequences following a diagnosis of COVID-19? A harmonised, global longitudinal observational study protocol. BMJ Open. 2021;11(3):e043887. Epub 2021/03/12. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043887 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rello J, James A, Reyes LF. Post-acute COVID-19 Syndrome (PACS): A public health emergency. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2021;40(3):100882. Epub 2021/05/10. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2021.100882 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Writing Committee for the CSG, Morin L, Savale L, Pham T, Colle R, Figueiredo S, et al. Four-Month Clinical Status of a Cohort of Patients After Hospitalization for COVID-19. Jama. 2021. Epub 2021/03/18. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.3331 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Garrigues E, Janvier P, Kherabi Y, Le Bot A, Hamon A, Gouze H, et al. Post-discharge persistent symptoms and health-related quality of life after hospitalization for COVID-19. The Journal of infection. 2020;81(6):e4–e6. Epub 2020/08/28. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.08.029 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Ezio Lanza

2 Feb 2022

PONE-D-21-34973

Clinical Characteristics, Systemic Complications, and In-Hospital Outcomes for Patients with COVID-19 in Latin America. LIVEN-Covid-19 Study: A Prospective, Multicenter, Multinational, Cohort Study.

PLOS ONE

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 19 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ezio Lanza, M.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf  and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

3. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please move it to the Methods section and delete it from any other section. Please ensure that your ethics statement is included in your manuscript, as the ethics statement entered into the online submission form will not be published alongside your manuscript.

4. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

5. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In this prospective study, authors investigated the risk factors associated with ICU admission in COVID-19 patients and the outcomes (systemic complications, mortality, functional status at discharge) in hospitalized patients in 8 Latin American countries. Overall, the manuscript is sound and clearly written, and data are clearly presented in tables; however, authors could improve the manuscript according to the following suggestions.

Introduction:

- Add recent references in the first paragraph to update data about the mortality rate and main characteristics associated to severe COVID-19

Methods:

- Lines 120-122: add reference

- Lines 132-133: why did you consider only treatment initiated in the ICU during the first 24 hours of hospital admission in your analysis?

Results:

- Lines 200-202: specify how many patients you included in the LOS evaluation, according to the sentence in the Methods section (lines 134-135). Data should also be reported in a table.

Discussion

- Line 231: add references

- Line 268: add references

Table

- Table 1: Add CRP in the section of laboratories test on hospital admission

- Table 1: remove LOS from the acronym list because it is not reported in the table

- Table 2: In the line “Referred to another hospital”, remove bold from p-value if not significant

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Mar 31;17(3):e0265529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265529.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


16 Feb 2022

Reviewer #1: In this prospective study, authors investigated the risk factors associated with ICU admission in COVID-19 patients and the outcomes (systemic complications, mortality, functional status at discharge) in hospitalized patients in 8 Latin American countries. Overall, the manuscript is sound and clearly written, and data are clearly presented in tables; however, authors could improve the manuscript according to the following suggestions.

Author’s response: We thank the reviewer for the detailed revision and positive feedback. We will answer your comments on the following pages.

Comment 1- Add recent references in the first paragraph to update data about the mortality rate and main characteristics associated to severe COVID-19

Author’s response: Dear reviewer, we appreciate your advice. Following your recommendation, we have updated the data about the burden of COVID-19 and mortality rate worldwide reported and added the following references:

WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard [Internet]. Covid19.who.int. 2022 [cited 8 February 2022]. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/

Cifuentes-Faura J. COVID-19 Mortality Rate and Its Incidence in Latin America: Dependence on Demographic and Economic Variables. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health [Internet]. 2021 [cited 8 February 2022];18(13):6900. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34199070/

Koupaei M, Naimi A, Moafi N, Mohammadi P, Tabatabaei F, Ghazizadeh S et al. Clinical Characteristics, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Mortality Rate of TB/COVID-19 Coinfectetd Patients: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Medicine. 2021;8.

Comment 2- Lines 120-122: add reference

Author’s response: Dear reviewer, we appreciate your advice; we have added the following references to that section:

What do we mean by self-care? [Internet]. World Health Organization. 2022 [cited 8 February 2022]. Available from: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/self-care-interventions/definitions/en/

Self care interventions for sexual and reproductive health and rights | The BMJ [Internet]. Bmj.com. 2022 [cited 8 February 2022]. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/selfcare-srhr

Comment 3- Lines 132-133: why did you consider only treatment initiated in the ICU during the first 24 hours of hospital admission in your analysis?

Author’s response: We thank the reviewer for asking for this necessary clarification. We only consider the treatment initiated during the first 24 hours of admission because we aim to identify the characteristics of the COVID-19 patients and the factors associated with clinical outcomes directly related to the acute disease. Patients admitted to the ICU due to COVID-19 frequently develop systemic complications and require a diverse array of treatments that might impact their outcomes but are not directly related to the acute infection. Moreover, severely ill patients generally express their clinical and paraclinical characteristics during the first 24 hours of ICU admission, and these are the factors that might be treated early. Also, identifying the factors associated with worse clinical outcomes based on the characteristics gathered during the first 24 hours of admission might help clinicians identify patients who would benefit the most from being admitted to the ICU.

Comment 4- Lines 200-202: specify how many patients you included in the LOS evaluation, according to the sentence in the Methods section (lines 134-135). Data should also be reported in a table.

Author’s response: We appreciate your comment. Following the reviewer’s comment, we have included these data in the text and table 2. It now reads as follows:

“Regarding hospital length of stay (LOS), we only include 2823 patients because a total of 185 patients has missing data of discharge date; the overall median (IQR) observed in the cohort was 10 (4-19); when stratified by ICU admission, we found that ICU admitted patients had significantly longer hospital LOS (15 [9-26] vs. 3 [0-7], p<0.001).”

Comment 5- Line 231: add references

Author’s response: We have added the following reference to the sentence pointed out by the reviewer:

Oliveira E, Parikh A, Lopez-Ruiz A, Carrilo M, Goldberg J, Cearras M et al. ICU outcomes and survival in patients with severe COVID-19 in the largest health care system in central Florida. PLOS ONE [Internet]. 2021 [cited 8 February 2022];16(3):e0249038. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33765049/

Comment 6- Line 268: add references

Author’s response: We have modified the text to make it clear that we were talking about the same manuscript mentioned before. It now reads: “Moreover, a meta-analysis including 37 articles revealed that the pool prevalence of ICU mortality in patients with COVID-19 was 32%. This meta-analysis did a subgroup analysis by the country where the highest mortality rates were reported in China (42%), followed by the USA (36%) [37]. Our cohort found an ICU mortality rate of 35%, similar to the overall mortality presented on the metanalysis [37], though relatively lower when compared to the United States and the Italian cohorts.”

The 37 references correspond to Abate SM, Ahmed Ali S, Mantfardo B, Basu B: Rate of Intensive Care Unit admission and outcomes among patients with coronavirus: A systematic review and Meta-analysis. PLoS One 2020, 15(7):e0235653

Comment 7

- Table 1: Add CRP in the section of laboratories test on hospital admission

- Table 1: remove LOS from the acronym list because it is not reported in the table

- Table 2: In the line “Referred to another hospital,” remove bold from p-value if not significant

Author’s response: We thank the reviewer for this comment. We have edited the tables and text accordingly.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response CCSM_LFR.docx

Decision Letter 1

Raffaele Serra

4 Mar 2022

Clinical Characteristics, Systemic Complications, and In-Hospital Outcomes for Patients with COVID-19 in Latin America. LIVEN-Covid-19 Study: A Prospective, Multicenter, Multinational, Cohort Study.

PONE-D-21-34973R1

Dear Dr. Reyes,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Prof. Raffaele Serra, M.D., Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

amended manuscript is acceptable

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In this revised version, authors improved the quality of the manuscript according to my suggestions. The bibliography is now sufficiently updated.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Acceptance letter

Raffaele Serra

21 Mar 2022

PONE-D-21-34973R1

Clinical Characteristics, Systemic Complications, and In-Hospital Outcomes for Patients with COVID-19 in Latin America. LIVEN-Covid-19 Study: A Prospective, Multicenter, Multinational, Cohort Study.

Dear Dr. Reyes:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Prof. Raffaele Serra

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Treatments stratified by patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Patients with severe COVID-19 that developed complications stratified by patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

    (CSV)

    S1 File. Data set with the information recollected for this study.

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response CCSM_LFR.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES