Abstract
Community water fluoridation (CWF) has been a public health measure against tooth decay since 1945. Strong evidence supports the use of CWF in reduction in caries risk in the pediatric population, and numerous studies also show benefit in adults. CWF remains an important contributor to oral health despite the availability and widespread use of other fluoride-containing dental products. The efficacy, safety, and optimal use of CWF will be discussed.
Keywords: fluoride, fluoridated water, oral health, dental caries
Even though tooth decay can be reduced with fluoridated mouth rinses and toothpaste, fluoridated water is cost effective and provides complementary benefits to such products
Introduction
Dental caries is a pathologic process that occurs when lactic acid is produced by bacterial digestion of the fermentable carbohydrates in one’s diet. 1 Lactic acid is the primary end-product made by Streptococcus mutans, a bacterial species commonly found in the human oral cavity. Lactic acid diffuses into the tooth where mineral ions such as calcium are removed from the hard tissues of teeth in a process known as demineralization. 2 Fluoride is an ion known to help prevent and reverse demineralization. 3 The primary mechanism of action of fluoride in reducing dental caries is topical. Fluoride promotes remineralization and inhibits demineralization of dental enamel during the caries process by contacting tooth surfaces. Fluoride can be found in various dental care products such as toothpastes, gels, mouth rinses, and varnishes. Before these products were available, fluoride was added to public drinking water, known as community water fluoridation (CWF). CWF has been named one of the greatest public health measures of the 20th century by the CDC. 4 The following will describe efficacy, safety, and optimal use of fluoridated water.
Efficacy of Fluoridated Water
The effectiveness of fluoridated water in reducing dental carries is well documented.4-14 Grand Rapids, Michigan, was the first community to add fluoride to public drinking water in 1945. 14 Eleven years after adding fluoride to drinking water, a 60-65% reduction in the prevalence of dental caries in the permanent teeth of children born after 1945 in Grand Rapids was demonstrated. 14 These beneficial effects led the cities of Newburgh, New York, and Evanston, Illinois, to fluoridate their public drinking water.15,16 Children who consumed fluoridated water throughout their lives in Newburgh had a 58% lower rate of decayed, missing, and/or filled teeth compared to children of the same age in neighboring Kingston, New York—a community without fluoridated water. 15 Even older children of Newburgh who were not exposed to fluoridated water all of their lives had a 41-52% lower risk of dental caries compared with Kingston children of matched ages. A similar risk reduction (57%) in dental caries was demonstrated in children from Evanston, Illinois, after just 71 to 82 months of consuming fluoridated water. 16 A 2015 Cochrane Review evaluated the effects of consuming fluoridated water in children and found a 35% decreased risk of tooth decay, fillings, and premature loss of primary teeth in children who consumed fluoridated water compared to those who did not. 17 The same review also found a 26% risk reduction in the loss of permanent teeth and 15% increase in the percentage of caries-free children in the group consuming fluoridated water. 17
These benefits of CWF are not just limited to children. Numerous studies in adults have also shown significant reduction in dental caries.11-13 Results demonstrate that fluoridated water may reduce the risk of dental caries by up to 27% in adults of all ages. 11
Safety of Fluoridated Water
The safety of fluoridated water has been reviewed and endorsed by several scientific and public health organizations.18-20 A number of high-quality studies did not find any significant association between the consumption of CWF and increased risk for cancer, heart disease, osteoporosis, bone fractures, Down syndrome, immune disorders, low intelligence, kidney disorders, allergic reactions, or Alzheimer’s disease.6,19 Regarding children, the documented risk of consuming fluoridated water is limited to dental fluorosis, which presents as white streaks visible on dental enamel and in rare cases, presents as pitting of the teeth. 21 Dental fluorosis is caused by consuming excessive amounts of fluoride while the teeth are still forming prior to eruption. In 2015, in an effort to reduce the risk of fluorosis while maintaining the beneficial reduction in dental caries, The U.S. Public Health Service narrowed their recommended fluoride concentration from .7 mg/L-1.2 mg/L to .7 mg/L (.7 parts per million, ppm) as the optimal fluoride concentration to maintain in public drinking water.20,22
Cost Effectiveness of Fluoridated Water
When compared to the cost of other prevention programs, water fluoridation is the most cost-effective means of preventing tooth decay for both children and adults in the United States. 23 In fact, the CDC has identified CWF as the most cost-effective method of delivering fluoride to all members of the community regardless of age, educational attainment, or income level. 23 Studies have shown that for water systems that serve over 1000 people, the economic benefit of water fluoridations exceeds cost and the benefit-cost ratio increases with the size of the population. 24 In a study conducted in 2016, researchers found that the annual savings associated with individuals avoiding tooth decay as a result of water fluoridation were estimated at US$6.8 billion, or US$32.19 per person, for the more than 211 million people who had access to fluoridated water through community water systems serving more than 1000 people. 24
Benefiting From Fluoride at Home
As of 2018, 73% of the US population had access to optimum levels of fluoridated water. 25 However, not all with access choose to drink CFW. Jadav et al conducted a study to determine the source of water consumed by pediatric patients. 26 The survey indicated that most (58%) patients use non-filtered tap water for cooking, but only 10% reported using non-filtered tap water as their primary source of drinking water. Most respondents consumed bottled or vending water as their primary source of drinking water. A second study found the number of US children and adults who do not consume tap water increased from 40% in 2013-2014 to 63% in 2017-2018. 27 Approximately 13% of Americans consume bottled water as their primary source of drinking water and another 45.4% report often consuming bottled water. 28 Distilled, purified, and spring/artesian bottled waters have an average fluoride content between .01-.08ppm, suggesting those who rely on bottled water as their primary source of drinking water are missing out on the caries-protective effects of water fluoridation. 29
If filtered water is preferred, consuming the recommended fluoride level can be achieved by drinking tap water using a home water filter with an activated charcoal/carbon or hollow-fiber membrane filter.30,31 Although a small reduction in fluoride content may be seen in the first few liters filtered, the change in fluoride concentration beyond this amount is insignificant.30,31
The CDC has declared that consuming fluoridated drinking water in addition to using fluoridated products such as toothpaste provide important and complementary benefits. 33 Fluoridated water keeps a low level of fluoride in saliva and dental plaque all day. The much higher concentration of fluoride in toothpaste offers additional benefit. Fluoride also slows the activity of the bacteria that causes decay and combines with enamel on the tooth surface to make it stronger and better able to resist decay. Together, the 2 sources offer more protection than using either one alone. A 2016 systematic review of the effects of terminating CWF, which includes data as recent as 2003, concluded there is an increase in dental caries when CWF is ceased. 34 This study suggests that CWF remains beneficial despite the availability and widespread use of fluoride-containing dental care products such as toothpastes, gels, mouth rinses, and varnishes.
Conclusion
Available evidence establishes the relationship between consumptions of fluoridated water and reduction in dental caries. Even though tooth decay can be reduced with fluoridated mouth rinses and toothpaste, fluoridated water is cost effective and provides complementary benefits to such products. Consuming fluoridated water on a consistent basis is a safe and effective way for both preventing and remineralize carious lesions. It must be emphasized, however, that tooth decay is not caused by a lack of consuming fluoridated water. Other methods of good oral hygiene such as tooth brushing and flossing should be used along with the consumption of fluoridated water to help decrease the occurrence of dental carries.
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
- 1.Dashper SG, Reynolds EC. Lactic acid excretion by streptococcus mutans. Microbiology. 1996;142(1):33-39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Abou Neel E, Aljabo A, Strange A, et al. Demineralization–remineralization dynamics in teeth and bone. Int J Nanomed. 2016. 2016 Sep 19;Volume 11:4743-4763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Clarkson JJ, McLoughlin J. Role of fluoride in oral health promotion. Int Dent J. 2000;50(3):119-128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . From the centers for disease control and prevention. achievements in public health, 1900-1999: fluoridation of drinking water to prevent dental caries. JAMA. 2000;283(10):1283-1286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.From the Centers for Disease Control . From the centers for disease control. public health service report on fluoride benefits and risks. JAMA. 1991;266(8):1061-1067. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.McDonagh MS, Whiting PF, Wilson PM, et al. Systematic review of water fluoridation. BMJ. 2000;321(7265):855-859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health . The use of fluorides in Australia: guidelines. Aust Dent J. 2006;51(2):195-199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Koulourides T. Summary of session II: fluoride and the caries process. J Dent Res. 1990;69(2Suppl l):558. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Featherstone JDB. Prevention and reversal of dental caries: role of low level fluoride. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1999;27(1):31-40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Truman BI, Gooch BF, Sulemana I, et al. Reviews of evidence on interventions to prevent dental caries, oral and pharyngeal cancers, and sports-related craniofacial injuries. Am J Prev Med. 2002;23(Suppl):21-54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Griffin SO, Regnier E, Griffin PM, Huntley V. Effectiveness of fluoride in preventing caries in adults. J Dent Res. 2007;86(5):410-415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Slade GD, Sanders AE, Do L, Roberts-Thomson K, Spencer AJ. Effects of fluoridated drinking water on dental caries in Australian adults. J Dent Res. 2013;92(4):376-382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Crocombe L, Brennan D, Slade G, Stewart J, Spencer A. The effect of lifetime fluoridation exposure on dental caries experience of younger rural adults. Aust Dent J. 2015;60(1):30-37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Arnold FA., Jr. Grand rapids fluoridation study-results pertaining to the eleventh year of fluoridation. Am J Public Health Nation's Health. 1957;47(5):539-545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ast DB, Smith DJ, Wachs B, Cantwell KT. Newburgh-Kingston caries-nuorine study XIV. combined clinical and roentgenographic dental findings after ten years of fluoride experience. J Am Dent Assoc. 1956;52(3):314-325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hill IN, Blayney JR, Wolf W. The evanston dental caries study. J Dent Res. 1957;36(2):208-219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Iheozor-Ejiofor Z, Worthington HV, Walsh T, et al. Water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. 2015 Jun 18;2015(6):CD010856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.US. Community Preventive Services Task Force . Oral Health: Preventing Dental Caries (Cavities): Community Water Fluoridation. Task Force Finding and Rationale Statement; 2013. https://www.thecommunityguide.org/findings/dental-caries-cavities-community- water-fluoridation. Accessed September 24, 2021 [Google Scholar]
- 19.American Dental Association . Fluroridation facts. Available at: https://www.ada.org/∼/media/ADA/Files/Fluoridation_Facts.pdf?la=en https://www.ada.org/∼/media/ADA/Files/Fluoridation_Facts.pdf?la=en Accessed October 18, 2021
- 20.U.S. Department . U.S. public health service recommendation for fluoride concentration in drinking water for the prevention of dental caries. Publ Health Rep. 2015;130(4):318-331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Beltrán-Aguilar ED, Barker L, Dye BA. Prevalence and Severity of Dental Fluorosis in the United States, 1999-2004. NCHS Data Brief No. 53. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2010. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db53 Accessed September 25, 2021. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.American Dental Association . ADA Applauds USPHS Final Recommendation on Optimal Fluoride Level in Drinking Water. https://www.ada.org/en/public-programs/advocating-for-the-public/fluoride-and-fluoridation/ada-applauds-hhs-final-recommendation-on-optimal-fluoride-level-in-drinking-water. Accessed October 2, 2021 [Google Scholar]
- 23.Center for Disease Control . A cost-saving Intervention. https://www.cdc.gov/fluoridation/guidelines/cdc-statement-on-community-water-fluoridation.html. https://www.cdc.gov/fluoridation/guidelines/cdc-statement-on-community-water-fluoridation.html Accessed October 20, 2021
- 24.O'Connell J, Rockell J, Ouellet J, Tomar SL, Maas W. Costs and savings associated with community water fluoridation in the United States. Health Aff. 2016;35(12):2224-2232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Center for Disease Control . Water fluoridation data & statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/fluoridation/statistics/index.htm. Accessed October 17, 2021
- 26.Jadav UG, Acharya BS, Velasquez GM, Vance BJ, Tate RH, Quock RL. Sources of drinking water in a pediatric population. Pediatr Dent. 2014;36(7):474-477. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rosinger AY, Patel AI, Weaks F. Examining recent trends in the racial disparity gap in tap water consumption: NHANES 2011-2018. Publ Health Nutr. 2021;11:1-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hu Z, Morton LW, Mahler R. Bottled water: United States consumers and their perceptions of water quality. Int J Environ Res Publ Health. 2011;8(2):565-578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Quock RL, Chan JT. Fluoride content of bottled water and its implications for the general dentist. Gen Dent. 2009;57(1):29-33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Konno H, Yaegaki K, Tanaka T, et al. Neither hollow-fibre membrane filters nor activated-charcoal filters remove fluoride from fluoridated tap water. Journal (Canadian Dental Association). 2008;74(5):443. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ong YS, Williams B, Holt R. The effect of domestic water filters on water fluoride content. Br Dent J. 1996;181(2):59-63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Center for Disease Control . Community Water Fluoridation. https://www.cdc.gov/fluoridation/faqs/community-water-fluoridation.html. Accessed October 18, 2021 [Google Scholar]
- 33.McLaren L, Singhal S. Does cessation of community water fluoridation lead to an increase in tooth decay? A systematic review of published studies. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016;70:934-940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]