Skip to main content
Molecular Medicine Reports logoLink to Molecular Medicine Reports
. 2022 Mar 17;25(5):171. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2022.12687

Insights into the role of STAT3 in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Ranzhiqiang Yang 1,*, Yinghui Song 1,2,*, Kashif Shakoor 1, Weimin Yi 1, Chuang Peng 1,, Sulai Liu 1,2,
PMCID: PMC8971913  PMID: 35302174

Abstract

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a primary malignant liver tumour whose incidence is second only to that of hepatocellular carcinoma. ICC is a highly heterogeneous disease arising from neoplastic transformation of intrahepatic biliary epithelial cells (cholangiocytes), and it is characterized by a very poor prognosis. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) is an important oncogene that is widely expressed in numerous cancers. STAT3 is a candidate target for the treatment of ICC. However, studies on STAT3 and the occurrence and development of ICC require improvements. Therefore, the present review summarized the mechanism of STAT3 in ICC and provided a theoretical basis for STAT3 to become an effective target for determining the prognosis and treatment of ICC.

Keywords: signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

1. Introduction

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a malignant tumour originating from the intrahepatic bile duct epithelium that accounts for ~10-15% of primary liver cancer cases (1,2), and its morbidity and mortality rates are increasing. At present, the molecular mechanism of ICC is not clear. Previous studies have shown that various cytokines produced during chronic inflammation cause abnormalities in oncogenes, DNA mismatch repair genes/proteins, and tumour suppressor genes. Genetic and epigenetic changes in cholangiocytes may promote proto-oncogene activation and tumour suppressor gene inactivation. These cumulative effects eventually lead to malignant transformation. In addition, cytokines also play important roles in promoting cell growth, inhibiting cell apoptosis, increasing cell invasiveness and promoting tumour angiogenesis (3,4). Currently, adjuvant treatments such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy have not significantly improved the overall survival (OS) rate of patients with ICC (57). Surgery is the only effective treatment for ICC. However, ICC is characterized by atypical clinical symptoms and early metastasis, leading to the diagnosis of advanced cancer and a lost opportunity for surgery. It is also prone to recurrence after surgery, and the overall 5-year survival rate after surgery is only 14–40% (6). With further research on the pathogenesis of ICC, an increasing number of molecular targets have been discovered. As the convergence point of numerous oncogenic signalling pathways, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) plays a prominent role in regulating antitumour immune responses. In the tumour ecosystem, STAT3 is extensively overactivated in tumour cells to promote tumor growth. Moreover, STAT3 is also extensively overactivated in non-tumour cells to suppress the expression of key regulators of immune cell activation and promote the production of immunosuppressive factors (8). Therefore, drugs targeting the STAT3 signalling pathway have become a promising therapeutic strategy. Multiple studies (911) have shown that STAT3 expression is associated with several clinicopathological features, including tumour size, pathological satellites, vascular invasion, undifferentiated histology, lymph node metastasis and TNM stage. Patients with high STAT3 levels have a poor prognosis in terms of OS and disease-free survival (DFS). A multivariate survival analysis showed that STAT3 was an independent prognostic factor for OS and DFS. Furthermore, it was observed that STAT3 overexpression promoted the invasion, metastasis and proliferation of ICC cells in vitro and in vivo and promoted STAT3 phosphorylation (12,13). STAT3 expression may become a new target for the treatment of patients with ICC.

2. Structure and function of STAT3

STATs are DNA-binding proteins consisting of 750–850 amino acids, and their molecular weight is 84–113 kDa. STATs play a key role in cytokine signal transduction. The STAT family members expressed in mammalian cells mainly include STAT1, STAT2, STAT3, STAT4, STAT5 and STAT6, which are encoded by different genes. As one of the earliest discovered oncogenes, STAT3 has become an important gene that must not be ignored in tumour research and is involved in regulating cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis as well as other processes (14). STAT3 is a highly conserved protein consisting of ~770 amino acids (only one amino acid difference exists between mouse and human STAT3), that is expressed as three isoforms: STAT3 ‘alpha’ ‘beta’ and STAT3 gamma. It contains an amino terminal domain, a DNA binding domain and a C-terminal transcription activation domain. The amino terminal domain forms a coil structure. The structure of the DNA binding domain is an Src homology 2 (SH2) domain. The C-terminal domain adopts the transcription activation domain structure and is located between the two aforementioned domains. The SH2 domain plays an important role in signal transduction and specifically identifies phosphorylated tyrosine residues. It is activated by phosphorylation (15). The key tyrosine associated with dimer formation is located in the SH2 domain. STAT3 activity is regulated by the phosphorylation of serine 727, and phosphorylated STAT3 quickly enters the nucleus in the form of monomers. Homodimers or heterodimers of transcription factors are activated and interact with the promoters of their transcriptional target genes (Fig. 1). STAT3 is widely expressed in certain types of cells and tissues. STAT3 plays an indispensable role in early embryonic development and bone marrow cell differentiation in a STAT3-deficient mouse model (16). Under normal circumstances, STAT3, the main regulator that balances cell proliferation and apoptosis, participates in maintaining the growth and development of embryonic stem cells. Concurrently, it also participates in processes such as antigen tolerance. STAT3 activation is strictly regulated by a negative feedback mechanism, and it is inactivated and transported to the cytoplasm after transducing specific signals. However, upon stimulation with carcinogenic signals, STAT3 is continuously activated, exists in the nucleus in a constant activation state, and continuously activates target genes to promote tumour progression (17).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Structure of the STAT3 protein. STAT3, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3.

3. STAT3 signalling pathway is involved in the occurrence and development of ICC

Interleukin (IL)-6/Janus kinase (JAK)/STAT3 pathway

The JAK/STAT pathway is closely related to inflammatory factors. IL-6 binds to the soluble IL-6 receptor (SIL-6R) to activate the IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 signalling pathway (18). Briefly, SIL-6R recognizes and binds to IL-6 to form the SIL-6R/IL-6 complex, and activates glycoprotein 130 (GP130) on the surface of the cell membrane. Activated GP130 activates receptor tyrosine kinase and binds to the STAT3 protein, which phosphorylates and activates the nuclear transcription factor (19). STAT3 enters the nucleus and regulates the expression of inflammatory cytokines. The IL-6 family mainly includes IL-6, IL-11, ciliary neurotrophic factor, leukaemia inhibitory factor, oncostatin M (OSM), cardiac trophic factor 1, cardiac trophic protein-like cytokine and cardiac trophic protein 2 (20). For example, IL-6 expressed in T cells, B cells or macrophages further promotes STAT3 phosphorylation and activation by activating JAK1, and STAT3 subsequently enters the nucleus to initiate downstream gene transcription (8), participating in the malignant process of ICC. Due to the continuous stimulation of upstream molecules, the abnormally and continuously activated IL-6/JAK/STAT3 pathway leads to resistance to apoptosis and further promotes tumour development. A study has shown that almost all cytokines in the IL-6 family activate the STAT3 protein. STAT3 is also considered the most important transcription factor mediating IL-6 function (8). Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) activates the IL-6/STAT3 signalling pathway in normal hepatic bile duct epithelial cells (21). LPS induces activation of the IL-6/STAT3 signalling pathway by not only activating this signalling pathway but also by increasing the expression of C-MYC and MCL-1, suggesting that the IL-6/STAT3 signalling pathway may be an important hub mediating inflammation and ICC (22). Both OSM and IL-11 are IL-6 family cytokines expressed in inflammatory and cancer processes. Tumour-associated neutrophils (TANs) and tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) produce higher levels of OSM and IL-11 in coculture, respectively (23). Both of these cytokines activate the STAT3 signalling pathway in ICC cells. STAT3 knockout eliminates the tumour-promoting effects of TANs and TAMs on ICC, and increased levels of TANs and TAMs are related to the increased levels of p-STAT3 in tumour samples from patients with ICC (24). Researchers concluded that the effects of TANs and TAMs on ICC mainly depend on OSM- and IL-11-mediated activation of the STAT3 signalling pathway (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

STAT3 is involved in signal transduction pathways associated with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; STAT3 is activated by the cytokine IL-6 and other growth factors, including EGFR, fibroblast growth factor receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor, through tyrosine phosphorylation. After dimerization, STAT3 translocates into the nucleus, where it induces gene transcription. STAT3 signalling mediates cell growth, proliferation, inflammatory cytokine production, cell invasion and migration. STAT3, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; IL, interleukin; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor.

IL-10/JAK/STAT3 pathway

IL-10 is a cytokine encoded by the IL-10 gene. In humans, IL-10 is produced mainly by immune cells, including monocytes, type 2 T helper cells and regulatory T cells (Tregs). IL-10 may play a role by regulating the JAK2/STAT3 signalling pathway and the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 pathway to alter the expression of downstream genes (25,26). The role of the JAK1/STAT3 pathway in tumours has attracted increasing attention. The JAK1/STAT3 pathway is an important pathway mediating cytokine signal transduction and is involved in various cell functions, such as differentiation, survival, proliferation and apoptosis, as well as pathological immune and inflammatory processes (27). According to previous studies (28,29), IL-10 induces STAT3 phosphorylation in Tregs. Although STAT3-deficient Tregs inhibit the proliferation of CD4+ T cells in vitro, their number in inflamed tissues is reduced, and their ability to inhibit the inflammatory activity of TH17 is also reduced (30). Thus, the mechanism by which IL-10 inhibits tumour-associated inflammation may be related to STAT3 phosphorylation and its downstream effects on cytokine receptors or subsequent gene expression. After the successful polarization of M2 macrophages in vitro, IL-10 levels in the supernatant of M2 macrophages were significantly increased compared with untreated THP1 cells, and IL-10 was suggested to promote ICC cell migration, invasion and epithelial transformation via the STAT3 pathway (31) (Fig. 2).

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and STAT3 pathways

EGFR, with a molecular weight of 170 kDa, is a member of the epidermal growth factor receptor family. EGFR is mainly located on the surface of human epithelial cells, fibroblasts, glial cells and other cells, and its signal transduction pathway plays an important role in promoting cell growth, differentiation, as well as other physiological processes. Loss of EGFR protein tyrosine kinase function or abnormal activity of key factors in related signalling pathways may lead to the development of tumours, immune deficiencies and cardiovascular diseases. Upon binding of the ligand to its extracellular ligand binding domain, EGFR is phosphorylated and forms either a homodimer or heterodimer, initiating an extensive intracellular signalling cascade (3234). STAT3, one of the most important downstream effectors, is phosphorylated at Tyr705 by activated EGFR and is then translocated to the nucleus for transcriptional regulation, contributing to cell proliferation, resistance to apoptosis and angiogenesis (35,36). At present, EGFR overexpression or abnormal expression has been detected in various tumours, leading to the activation of downstream signalling pathways, particularly the continuous activation of STAT3 that causes its nuclear translocation and the transcription of downstream genes. Numerous in vitro and in vivo experiments have shown that the continuous expression and abnormal activation of the EGFR/STAT3 pathway are closely related to the occurrence and development of ICC (37). The overactivated EGFR/STAT3 signalling pathway is closely related to the development of ICC, based on an immunohistochemical analysis of ICC samples. EGFR-STAT3 overactivation promotes the growth of ICC cells (38,39) (Fig. 2).

Leucine-rich repeat containing G protein-coupled receptor 5 (LGR5) activates the STAT3 pathway

LGR5 is a member of the G protein-coupled receptor subfamily, also known as HG38 and GPR49. It is a large protein composed of 18 leucine-rich repeat units and 7 transmembrane regions. The structure of the protein is characterized by an extracellular region containing a signal peptide, 17 leucine-rich repeats and a highly conserved 7 α-helix transmembrane region (40). Previous studies (4143) have detected increased expression of LGR5 in gastrointestinal, ovarian, liver, basal cell carcinoma and other tumour tissues to varying degrees (44). IκB kinase α upregulates the expression of LGR5 by activating the STAT3 signalling pathway and accelerates tumour progression in skin basal cell carcinoma cells (45). LGR5 is essential for Wnt signalling-induced activation of β-catenin, and by further activating STAT3, it enhances CSC-like features and the EMT, leading to aggressive tumour progression and a poor prognosis for patients with ICC (Fig. 2).

FAP/STAT3/CCL2 pathway

Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is a membrane-bound glycoprotein that belongs to the serine protease family. It is a dimer composed of FAPα and β subunits with a molecular weight of 170 kDa (46). It has endopeptidase and weak dipeptidase activity, degrades a variety of dipeptides and type I collagen and is selectively expressed in cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) of a variety of human solid tumours (47). FAP is expressed in embryonic cells, injured tissues and mesenchymal fibroblasts of >90% of malignant epithelial tumours, but it is rarely expressed in benign tumours and normal tissues; it is associated with extracellular matrix remodelling, tumour proliferation and metabolism (48,49).

A previous study showed that FAP induces inflammatory phenotypes and inflation-related gene expression signatures in CAFs (50). Inducing the expression of FAP in normal fibroblasts produces an inflammatory phenotype similar to that of CAFFAP+ cells. In addition, FAP continuously activates STAT3 in fibroblasts in mouse liver tumour models, and CAFFAP+ is the main source of CCL2. STAT3-CCL2 signalling increases the recruitment of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and thus promotes tumour growth from CAFFAP+ cells. Moreover, FAP, p-STAT3, and CCL2 levels are positively correlated with adverse pathological features of ICC, and increased FAP levels predict low survival rates. Recently, accumulating evidence has shown that CAFs participate in the progression of ICC by affecting tumour cells (5154). Additionally, a previous study has shown that CAFFAP+ is the main source of CCL2 in the ICC microenvironment (55). In addition, the tumorigenic function of FAP mediated by CCL2 in ICC depends on its intracellular activation of STAT3 signalling in CAFs. FAP recruits MDSCs in a CCL2-dependent manner in ICC. In addition to mediating immunosuppression, MDSCs promote tumour progression by enhancing angiogenesis through a paracrine pathway, suggesting that approaches specifically targeting CAFFAP+ may be a more effective and safer treatment strategy for ICC (Fig. 2).

4. STAT3-related targets in ICC

Approximately 70% of malignant tumours present abnormally increased STAT3 activity, including acute myeloid leukaemia, multiple myeloma, bladder, breast and colon cancer and ICC (5664). Phosphorylated STAT3 levels have been revealed to be associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with these cancers. Therefore, extensive effort has been devoted to identifying and developing STAT3 inhibitors for cancer treatment. However, given the wide range of intracellular functions of STAT3, possible inhibitors have been difficult to develop. However, numerous phase I, phase II, and even phase III trials of drugs targeting STAT3 have been conducted. A number of these treatments are only used as research tools due to their shortcomings, such as limited bio-absorption, utilization, drug resistance, and poor stability, but other drugs achieve favourable effects through oral bio-absorption and by binding to the STAT3 SH2 domain (6568). Numerous nonpeptide SH2 domain inhibitors have also been identified and shown to inhibit STAT3 activity, including STA-21, IL-6, STAT, TIC, c188-9, OPB31121/51602, WP1066, S3I-201, BP-1-102, STX-0119 and HJC0123 (6976). The application of these agents in ICC requires further confirmation. In addition to the function of STAT3 inhibitors, another method to inhibit STAT3 activity is to inhibit the interaction of STAT3 with target gene promoter elements. AZD9150 is the second generation of previous iterations optimized by merger, 2′, 4′ constraints of ethyl STAT3 antisense oligonucleotide-modified residues, which have been shown to prevent STAT3 from binding DNA in a variety of tumours after intravenous injections to inhibit tumour growth (7783) (Fig. 3). AZD9150 is expected to achieve favourable efficacy in ICC treatment.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

STAT3-associated target proteins in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and numerous domain-specific inhibitors have also been identified. STAT3, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3.

5. Summary and prospects

According to previous studies, tumour proliferation, invasion and metastasis, angiogenesis, drug resistance and prognosis are all related to tobacco, alcohol, diet, stress, infection, and chronic inflammation (84,85). Inflammatory factors such as intrahepatic bile duct stones with chronic cholangitis, a high incidence of viral hepatitis B, and biliary parasite infection are considered high-risk factors for ICC (86). STAT3 is located at the intersection of multiple oncogenic signalling pathways and is abnormally activated in malignant tumour tissues, including ICC. STAT3 is mainly activated by various kinases through phosphorylation (87). Activated STAT3 transduces signals from various cytokines and growth factors into the nucleus and participates in regulating the transcription of corresponding target genes, thereby participating in modulating cell survival, proliferation, angiogenesis as well as other processes (88). This inflammatory cascade activates STAT3, leading to the overproduction of bile duct epithelium growth factor, thus promoting CCA initiation. Due to the role of STAT3 in inflammation and cancer development, targeting STAT3 is a rational treatment strategy for ICC. Numerous studies have shown that STAT3 activation is closely related to the prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma, gastric cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, lung and laryngeal cancer and ICC (8992). STAT3 is associated with the development of malignant tumours mainly through STAT3-mediated expression of key target genes that regulate cell proliferation, apoptosis inhibition and the hypoxia response (93). Activated STAT3 also induces the expression of VEGF, which promotes invasive and metastatic angiogenesis (94). In addition, STAT3 binds to the IL-6 promoter, creating a positive feedback loop that leads to increased IL-6 expression. VEGF and IL-6 also exert immunosuppressive effects that may promote the immune escape of tumour cells following STAT3 overactivation, thus forming a vicious cycle of the occurrence, metastasis, and invasion of ICC (95). STAT3 is often used as an important indicator to distinguish ICC from extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Studies (9698) have shown significantly higher STAT3 expression in ICC than in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Downregulated STAT3 expression was revealed to significantly reduce the proliferation of ICC cell lines, such as RBE and ICC-9810 cells, and significantly increase the apoptotic rate of RBE and ICC-9810 cells. However, when STAT3 expression was upregulated, the opposite results were obtained. STAT3 promoted the proliferation and inhibited the apoptosis of intrahepatic bile duct cancer cells (99).

STAT3 expression and activation are currently known to be regulated by various mechanisms. Certain cytokines and growth factors activate STAT3 by binding to specific receptors and participate in the pathophysiological process of diseases. Under physiological conditions, STAT3 activation is rapid and transient, lasting only minutes to hours. In the tumour microenvironment, dysregulation of growth factors, cytokines, and co-stimulators leads to continued phosphorylation of STAT3 tyrosine residues. Excessive or constitutive activation of STAT3 alters cell proliferation and apoptosis, promotes invasion and metastasis, and exacerbates immunosuppression in the microenvironment, directly affecting the prognosis and quality of life of patients (100).

Considering the important association between the high STAT3 expression and the malignancy and prognosis of ICC, STAT3 is expected to become a molecular marker for clinical disease staging and may become a new therapeutic target. Based on certain preclinical studies that have identified the potential therapeutic effects of drugs targeting the STAT signal transduction pathway, the development of highly effective and well-tolerated drugs is anticipated in the future. The molecular mechanism of ICC requires further exploration (101), which will facilitate the application of specific genes and signalling pathways to the classification of ICC molecular subtypes and the development of targeted therapeutic drugs. Further studies are required to take advantage of multidisciplinary comprehensive treatment, including surgery, chemotherapy and targeted therapy, according to the molecular characteristics of ICC in order to improve the quality of life and prolong the survival time of patients.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding Statement

The present study was supported by grants from the following organizations: The Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 2020JJ5610), the Hunan Natural Science Fund for Excellent Young Scholars (grant no. 2021JJ20003), the Youth Talent of Hunan (grant no. 2020RC3066), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grant no. 2020M68115/2021T140197) and the Natural Science Foundation of Changsha (grant no. kq2007023/kq2004115).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors' contributions

RY and YS contributed to the analysis and manuscript preparation. KS revised the review. CP, WY and SL contributed to the conception of the study. YS and SL helped perform the analysis and participated in constructive discussions. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Razumilava N, Gores GJ. Cholangiocarcinoma. Lancet. 2014;383:2168–2179. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61903-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Saha SK, Zhu AX, Fuchs CS, Brooks GA. Forty-year trends in cholangiocarcinoma incidence in the U.S.: Intrahepatic disease on the rise. Oncologist. 2016;21:594–599. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cucchetti A, Cappelli A, Mosconi C, Zhong JH, Cescon M, Pinna AD, Golfieri R. Improving patient selection for selective internal radiation therapy of intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A meta-regression study. Liver Int. 2017;37:1056–1064. doi: 10.1111/liv.13382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yang XW, Yuan JM, Chen JY, Yang J, Gao QG, Yan XZ, Zhang BH, Feng S, Wu MC. The prognostic importance of jaundice in surgical resection with curative intent for gallbladder cancer. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:652. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Esnaola NF, Meyer JE, Karachristos A, Maranki JL, Camp ER, Denlinger CS. Evaluation and management of intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer. 2016;122:1349–1369. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ben-Menachem T. Risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;19:615–617. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328224b935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yang XW, Li L, Hou GJ, Yan XZ, Xu QG, Chen L, Zhang BH, Shen F. STAT3 overexpression promotes metastasis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and correlates negatively with surgical outcome. Oncotarget. 2017;8:7710–7721. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yu H, Lee H, Herrmann A, Buettner R, Jove R. Revisiting STAT3 signalling in cancer: New and unexpected biological functions. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14:736–746. doi: 10.1038/nrc3818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang Y, Shen Y, Wang S, Shen Q, Zhou X. The role of STAT3 in leading the crosstalk between human cancers and the immune system. Cancer Lett. 2018;415:117–128. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.To SQ, Dmello RS, Richards AK, Ernst M, Chand AL. STAT3 signaling in breast cancer: Multicellular actions and therapeutic potential. Cancers (Basel) 2022;14:429. doi: 10.3390/cancers14020429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yu H, Kortylewski M, Pardoll D. Crosstalk between cancer and immune cells: Role of STAT3 in the tumour microenvironment. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7:41–51. doi: 10.1038/nri1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mohassab AM, Hassan HA, Abdelhamid D, Gouda AM, Youssif BGM, Tateishi H, Fujita M, Otsuka M, Abdel-Aziz M. STAT3 transcription factor as target for anti-cancer therapy. Pharmacol Rep. 2020;72:1101–1124. doi: 10.1007/s43440-020-00156-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zimmers TA, Fishel ML, Bonetto A. STAT3 in the systemic inflammation of cancer cachexia. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2016;54:28–41. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.02.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bromberg JF, Wrzeszczynska MH, Devgan G, Zhao Y, Pestell RG, Albanese C, Darnell JE., Jr Stat3 as an oncogene. Cell. 1999;98:295–303. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81959-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jin LL, Wybenga-Groot LE, Tong J, Taylor P, Minden MD, Trudel S, McGlade CJ, Moran MF. Tyrosine phosphorylation of the Lyn Src homology 2 (SH2) domain modulates its binding affinity and specificity. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2015;14:695–706. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M114.044404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gutiérrez M. Activating mutations of STAT3: Impact on human growth. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2020;518:110979. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2020.110979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wang SW, Sun YM. The IL-6/JAK/STAT3 pathway: Potential therapeutic strategies in treating colorectal cancer (Review) Int J Oncol. 2014;44:1032–1040. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Montero P, Milara J, Roger I, Cortijo J. Role of JAK/STAT in interstitial lung diseases; Molecular and cellular mechanisms. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:6211. doi: 10.3390/ijms22126211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Banerjee S, Biehl A, Gadina M, Hasni S, Schwartz DM. JAK-STAT Signaling as a target for inflammatory and autoimmune diseases: Current and future prospects. Drugs. 2017;77:521–546. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0772-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Xin P, Xu X, Deng C, Liu S, Wang Y, Zhou X, Ma H, Wei D, Sun S. The role of JAK/STAT signaling pathway and its inhibitors in diseases. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020;80:106210. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yokoyama T, Komori A, Nakamura M, Takii Y, Kamihira T, Shimoda S, Mori T, Fujiwara S, Koyabu M, Taniguchi K, et al. Human intrahepatic biliary epithelial cells function in innate immunity by producing IL-6 and IL-8 via the TLR4-NF-kappaB and -MAPK signaling pathways. Liver Int. 2006;26:467–476. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2006.01254.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bode JG, Ehlting C, Häussinger D. The macrophage response towards LPS and its control through the p38(MAPK)-STAT3 axis. Cell Signal. 2012;24:1185–1194. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2012.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhou Z, Wang P, Sun R, Li J, Hu Z, Xin H, Luo C, Zhou J, Fan J, Zhou S. Tumor-associated neutrophils and macrophages interaction contributes to intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma progression by activating STAT3. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9:e001946. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shaul ME, Fridlender ZG. Tumour-associated neutrophils in patients with cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019;16:601–620. doi: 10.1038/s41571-019-0222-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tam WY, Chi H. Bipolar/rod-shaped microglia are proliferating microglia with distinct M1/M2 phenotypes. Sci Rep. 2014;4:7279. doi: 10.1038/srep07279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Leticia P, Font-Nieves M, Van den Haute C, Baekelandt V, Planas AM, Pozas E. IL-10 regulates adult neurogenesis by modulating ERK and STAT3 activity. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015;9:57. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wu X, Pan T, Quan Z, Li J, Yu Z, Wang X, Li J, Li C, Yan M, Zhu Z, et al. IL-6 secreted by cancer-associated fibroblasts promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis of gastric cancer via JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway. Oncotarget. 2017;8:20741–20750. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ju JH, Heo YJ, Cho ML, Jhun JY, Park JS, Lee SY, Oh HJ, Moon SJ, Kwok SK, Park KS, et al. Modulation of STAT-3 in rheumatoid synovial T cells suppresses Th17 differentiation and increases the proportion of Treg cells. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:3543–3552. doi: 10.1002/art.34601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang XQ, Hu GH, Kou W, Shen Y, Kang HY, Hong SL. Reciprocal roles of STAT3 and STAT5 in nasal polyposis. Am J Otolaryngol. 2012;33:741–752. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2012.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zheng Y, Wang Z, Deng L, Zhang G, Yuan X, Huang L, Xu W, Shen L. Modulation of STAT3 and STAT5 activity rectifies the imbalance of Th17 and Treg cells in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Clin Immunol. 2015;157:65–77. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2014.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yuan H, Lin Z, Liu Y, Jiang Y, Liu K, Tu M, Yao N, Qu C, Hong J. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma induced M2-polarized Tumor-associated macrophages facilitate tumor growth and invasiveness. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:586. doi: 10.1186/s12935-020-01687-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gao Y, Chen J C, ZHU Z Y, et al. Research progress of EGFR gene mutation and its detection methods. Mol Diagn Ther. 2011;3:51–57. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Roskoski R., Jr ErbB/HER protein-tyrosine kinases: Structures and small molecule inhibitors. Pharmacol Res. 2014;87:42–59. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2014.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bi WW, Zhang WH, Yin GH, Luo H, Wang SQ, Wang H, Li C, Yan WQ, Nie DZ. Analysis of indoleamine 2–3 dioxygenase (IDO) and EGFR co-expression in breast cancer tissue by immunohistochemistry. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:5535–5538. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.14.5535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhao X, Sun X, Li XL. Expression and clinical significance of STAT3, p-STAT3, and VEGF-C in small cell lung cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13:2873–2877. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.6.2873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fang B. Genetic Interactions of STAT3 and Anticancer Drug Development. Cancers (Basel) 2014;6:494–525. doi: 10.3390/cancers6010494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chan KS, Carbajal S, Kiguchi K, Clifford J, Sano S, DiGiovanni J. Epidermal growth factor receptor-mediated activation of Stat3 during multistage skin carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2004;64:2382–2389. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhang C, Xu H, Zhou Z, Tian Y, Cao X, Cheng G, Liu Q. Blocking of the EGFR-STAT3 signaling pathway through afatinib treatment inhibited the intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Exp Ther Med. 2018;15:4995–5000. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.6038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhang F, Li L, Yang X, Wang B, Zhao J, Lu S, Yu X. Expression and activation of EGFR and STAT3 during the multistage carcinogenesis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma induced by 3′-methyl-4 dimethylaminoazobenzene in rats. J Toxicol Pathol. 2015;28:79–87. doi: 10.1293/tox.2014-0047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kumar KK, Burgess AW, Gulbis JM. Structure and function of LGR5: An enigmatic G-protein coupled receptor marking stem cells. Protein Sci. 2014;23:551–565. doi: 10.1002/pro.2446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Katoh M. WNT signaling in stem cell biology and regenerative medicine. Curr Drug Targets. 2008;9:565–570. doi: 10.2174/138945008784911750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Katoh M, Katoh M. STAT3-induced WNT5A signaling loop in embryonic stem cells, adult normal tissues, chronic persistent inflammation, rheumatoid arthritis and cancer (Review) Int J Mol Med. 2007;19:273–278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Katoh M, Katoh M. WNT signaling pathway and stem cell signaling network. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:4042–4045. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gregorieff A, Clevers H. Wnt signaling in the intestinal epithelium: From endoderm to cancer. Genes Dev. 2005;19:877–890. doi: 10.1101/gad.1295405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kawasaki K, Kuboki S, Furukawa K, Takayashiki T, Takano S, Ohtsuka M. LGR5 induces β-catenin activation and augments tumour progression by activating STAT3 in human intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Liver Int. 2021;41:865–881. doi: 10.1111/liv.14747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Chung KM, Hsu SC, Chu YR, Lin MY, Jiaang WT, Chen RH, Chen X. Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is essential for the migration of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells through RhoA activation. PLoS One. 2017;9:e88772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Park JE, Lenter MC, Zimmermann RN, Garin-Chesa P, Old LJ, Rettig WJ. Fibroblast activation protein, a dual specificity serine protease expressed in reactive human tumor stromal fibroblasts. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:36505–36512. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.51.36505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hamson EJ, Keane FM, Tholen S, Schilling O, Gorrell MD. Understanding fibroblast activation protein (FAP): substrates, activities, expression and targeting for cancer therapy. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2014;8:454–463. doi: 10.1002/prca.201300095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Huber MA, Kraut N, Park JE, Schubert RD, Rettig WJ, Peter RU, Garin-Chesa P. Fibroblast activation protein: Differential expression and serine protease activity in reactive stromal fibroblasts of melanocytic skin tumors. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;120:182–188. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12035.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Yang X, Lin Y, Shi Y, Li B, Liu W, Yin W, Dang Y, Chu Y, Fan J, He R. FAP Promotes immunosuppression by cancer-associated fibroblasts in the tumor microenvironment via STAT3-CCL2 signaling. Cancer Res. 2016;76:4124–4135. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-2973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Fingas CD, Bronk SF, Werneburg NW, Mott JL, Guicciardi ME, Cazanave SC, Mertens JC, Sirica AE, Gores GJ. Myofibroblast-derived PDGF-BB promotes Hedgehog survival signaling in cholangiocarcinoma cells. Hepatology. 2011;54:2076–2088. doi: 10.1002/hep.24588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ohira S, Sasaki M, Harada K, Sato Y, Zen Y, Isse K, Kozaka K, Ishikawa A, Oda K, Nimura Y, Nakanuma Y. Possible regulation of migration of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cells by interaction of CXCR4 expressed in carcinoma cells with tumor necrosis factor-alpha and stromal-derived factor-1released in stroma. Am J Pathol. 2006;168:1155–1168. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.050204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Claperon A, Mergey M, Aoudjehane L, Ho-Bouldoires TH, Wendum D, Prignon A, Merabtene F, Firrincieli D, Desbois-Mouthon C, Scatton O, et al. Hepatic myofibroblasts promote the progression of human cholangiocarcinoma through activation of epidermal growth factor receptor. Hepatology. 2013;58:2001–2011. doi: 10.1002/hep.26585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Claperon A, Mergey M, Nguyen Ho-Bouldoires TH, Vignjevic D, Wendum D, Chrétien Y, Merabtene F, Frazao A, Paradis V, Housset C, et al. EGF/EGFR axis contributes to the progression of cholangiocarcinoma through the induction of an epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Hepatol. 2014;61:325–332. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.03.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lin Y, Li B, Yang X, Cai Q, Liu W, Tian M, Luo H, Yin W, Song Y, Shi Y, He R. Fibroblastic FAP promotes intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma growth via MDSCs recruitment. Neoplasia. 2019;21:1133–1142. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2019.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Chen CL, Cen L, Kohout J, Hutzen B, Chan C, Hsieh FC, Loy A, Huang V, Cheng G, Lin J. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 activation is associated with bladder cancer cell growth and survival. Mol Cancer. 2008;7:78. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-7-78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sonnenblick A, Shriki A, Galun E, Axelrod JH, Daum H, Rottenberg Y, Hamburger T, Mali B, Peretz T. Tissue microarray-based study of patients with lymph node-positive breast cancer shows tyrosine phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (tyrosine705-STAT3) is amarker of good prognosis. Clin Transl Oncol. 2012;14:232–236. doi: 10.1007/s12094-012-0789-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Schaefer LK, Ren Z, Fuller GN, Schaefer TS. Constitutive activation of Stat3alpha in brain tumors: Localization to tumor endothelial cells and activation by the endothelial tyrosine kinase receptor (VEGFR-2) Oncogene. 2002;21:2058–2065. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Takemoto S, Ushijima K, Kawano K, Yamaguchi T, Terada A, Fujiyoshi N, Nishio S, Tsuda N, Ijichi M, Kakuma T, et al. Expression of activated signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 predicts poor prognosis in cervical squamous-cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2009;101:967–972. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Zhang HF, Chen Y, Wu C, Wu ZY, Tweardy DJ, Alshareef A, Liao LD, Xue YJ, Wu JY, Chen B, et al. The opposing function of STAT3 as an oncoprotein and tumor suppressor is dictated by the expression status of STAT3β in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:691–703. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Geiger JL, Grandis JR, Bauman JE. The STAT3 pathway as a therapeutic target in head and neck cancer: Barriers and innovations. Oral Oncol. 2016;56:84–92. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.11.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Li S, Priceman SJ, Xin H, Zhang W, Deng J, Liu Y, Huang J, Zhu W, Chen M, Hu W, et al. Icaritin inhibits JAK/STAT3 signaling and growth of renal cell carcinoma. PLoS One. 2013;8:e81657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Wang Y, Qu A, Wang H. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 4 in liver diseases. Int J Biol Sci. 2015;11:448–455. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.11164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Suh YA, Jo SY, Lee HY, Lee C. Inhibition of IL-6/STAT3 axis and targeting Axl and Tyro3 receptor tyrosine kinases by apigenin circumvent taxol resistance in ovarian cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2015;46:1405–1411. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Turkson J, Ryan D, Kim JS, Zhang Y, Chen Z, Haura E, Laudano A, Sebti S, Hamilton AD, Jove R. Phosphotyrosyl peptides block Stat3-mediated DNA binding activity, gene regulation, and cell transformation. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:45443–45455. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M107527200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Turkson J, Kim JS, Zhang S, Yuan J, Huang M, Glenn M, Haura E, Sebti S, Hamilton AD, Jove R. Novel peptidomimetic inhibitors of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 dimerization and biological activity. Mol Cancer Ther. 2004;3:261–269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Mandal PK, Gao F, Lu Z, Ren Z, Ramesh R, Birtwistle JS, Kaluarachchi KK, Chen X, Bast RC, Jr, Liao WS, McMurray JS. Potent and selective phosphopeptide mimetic prodrugs targeted to the Src homology 2 (SH2) domain of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3. J Med Chem. 2011;54:3549–3563. doi: 10.1021/jm2000882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Auzenne EJ, Klostergaard J, Mandal PK, Liao WS, Lu Z, Gao F, Bast RC, Jr, Robertson FM, McMurray JS. A phosphopeptide mimetic prodrug targeting the SH2 domain of Stat3 inhibits tumor growth and angiogenesis. J Exp TherOncol. 2012;10:155–162. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Hayakawa F, Sugimoto K, Harada Y, Hashimoto N, Ohi N, Kurahashi S, Naoe T. A novel STAT inhibitor, OPB-31121, has a significant antitumor effect on leukemia with STAT-addictive oncokinases. Blood Cancer J. 2013;3:e166. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2013.63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kim MJ, Nam HJ, Kim HP, Han SW, Im SA, Kim TY, Oh DY, Bang YJ. OPB-31121, a novel small molecular inhibitor, disrupts the JAK2/STAT3 pathway and exhibits an antitumor activity in gastric cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2013;335:145–152. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Bendell JC, Hong DS, Burris HA, III, Naing A, Jones SF, Falchook G, Bricmont P, Elekes A, Rock EP, Kurzrock R. Phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation, and pharmacokinetic study of STAT3 inhibitor OPB-31121 in subjects with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014;74:125–130. doi: 10.1007/s00280-014-2480-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Oh DY, Lee SH, Han SW, Kim MJ, Kim TM, Kim TY, Heo DS, Yuasa M, Yanagihara Y, Bang YJ. Phase I study of OPB-31121, an oral STAT3 inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Res Treat. 2015;47:607–615. doi: 10.4143/crt.2014.249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Okusaka T, Ueno H, Ikeda M, Mitsunaga S, Ozaka M, Ishii H, Yokosuka O, Ooka Y, Yoshimoto R, Yanagihara Y, Okita K. Phase 1 and pharmacological trial of OPB-31121, a signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 inhibitor, in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res. 2015;45:1283–1291. doi: 10.1111/hepr.12504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Wong AL, Soo RA, Tan DS, Lee SC, Lim JS, Marban PC, Kong LR, Lee YJ, Wang LZ, Thuya WL, et al. Phase I and biomarker study of OPB-51602, a novel signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 3 inhibitor, in patients with refractory solid malignancies. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:998–1005. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Ogura M, Uchida T, Terui Y, Hayakawa F, Kobayashi Y, Taniwaki M, Takamatsu Y, Naoe T, Tobinai K, Munakata W, et al. Phase I study of OPB-51602, an oral inhibitor of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, in patients with relapsed/refractory hematological malignancies. Cancer Sci. 2015;106:896–901. doi: 10.1111/cas.12683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Bharadwaj U, Eckols TK, Xu X, Kasembeli MM, Chen Y, Adachi M, Song Y, Mo Q, Lai SY, Tweardy DJ. Small-molecule inhibition of STAT3 in radioresistant head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2016;7:26307–26330. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Xi S, Gooding WE, Grandis JR. In vivo antitumor efficacy of STAT3 blockade using a transcription factor decoy approach: Implications for cancer therapy. Oncogene. 2005;24:970–979. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Shen J, Li R, Li G. Inhibitory effects of decoy-ODN targeting activated STAT3 on human glioma growth in vivo. In Vivo. 2009;23:237–243. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Sun Z, Yao Z, Liu S, Tang H, Yan X. An oligonucleotide decoy for Stat3 activates the immune response of macrophages to breast cancer. Immunobiology. 2006;211:199–209. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2005.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Zhang X, Zhang J, Wang L, Wei H, Tian Z. Therapeutic effects of STAT3 decoy oligodeoxynucleotide on human lung cancer in xenograft mice. BMC Cancer. 2007;7:149. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-7-149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Zhang X, Liu P, Zhang B, Mao H, Shen L, Ma Y. Inhibitory effects of STAT3 decoy oligodeoxynucleotides on human epithelial ovarian cancer cell growth in vivo. Int J Mol Med. 2013;32:623–628. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2013.1431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Chan KS, Sano S, Kiguchi K, Anders J, Komazawa N, Takeda J, DiGiovanni J. Disruption of Stat3 reveals a critical role in both the initiation and the promotion stages of epithelial carcinogenesis. J Clin Invest. 2004;114:720–728. doi: 10.1172/JCI200421032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Zhang Q, Hossain DM, Duttagupta P, Moreira D, Zhao X, Won H, Buettner R, Nechaev S, Majka M, Zhang B, et al. Serum-resistant CpG-STAT3 decoy for targeting survival and immune checkpoint signaling in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2016;127:1687–1700. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-08-665604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Sun XJ, Jiang TH, Zhang XP, Mao AW. Role of the tumor microenvironment in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 2016;21:31–41. doi: 10.2741/4374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Eggert T, Greten TF. Tumor regulation of the tissue environment in the liver. Pharmacol Ther. 2017;173:47–57. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Peng NF, Li LQ, Qin X, Guo Y, Peng T, Xiao KY, Chen XG, Yang YF, Su ZX, Chen B, et al. Evaluation of risk factors and clinicopathologic features for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Southern China: A possible role of hepatitis B virus. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1258–1266. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1458-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Jarnicki A, Putoczki T, Ernst M. Stat3: Linking inflammation to epithelial cancer-more than a ‘gut’ feeling? Cell Div. 2010;5:14. doi: 10.1186/1747-1028-5-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Liu Y, Liao S, Bennett S, Tang H, Song D, Wood D, Zhan X, Xu J. STAT3 and its targeting inhibitors in osteosarcoma. Cell Prolif. 2021;54:e12974. doi: 10.1111/cpr.12974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Bharti AC, Shishodia S, Reuben JM, Weber D, Alexanian R, Raj-Vadhan S, Estrov Z, Talpaz M, Aggarwal BB. Nuclear factor-kappaB and STAT3 are constitutively active in CD138+ cells derived from multiple myeloma patients, and suppression of these transcription factors leads to apoptosis. Blood. 2004;103:3175–3184. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-06-2151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Kanda N, Seno H, Konda Y, Marusawa H, Kanai M, Nakajima T, Kawashima T, Nanakin A, Sawabu T, Uenoyama Y, et al. STAT3 is constitutively activated and supports cell survival in association with survivin expression in gastric cancer cells. Oncogene. 2004;23:4921–4929. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Haura EB, Zheng Z, Song L, Cantor A, Bepler G. Activated epidermal growth factor receptor-Stat-3 signaling promotes tumor survival in vivo in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:8288–8294. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Liu B, Ren Z, Shi Y, Guan C, Pan Z, Zong Z. Activation of signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 and overexpression of its target gene CyclinD1 in laryngeal carcinomas. Laryngoscope. 2008;118:1976–1980. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31817fd3fa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Bournazou E, Bromberg J. Targeting the tumor microenvironment: JAK-STAT3 signaling. JAKSTAT. 2013;2:e23828. doi: 10.4161/jkst.23828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Yu H, Jove R. The STATs of cancer-new molecular targets come of age. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:97–105. doi: 10.1038/nrc1275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Schmidt-Arras D, Rose-John S. IL-6 pathway in the liver: From physiopathology to therapy. J Hepatol. 2016;64:1403–1415. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Liu Z, Zhang M, Li Y, Zhang Y, She Z. Effect of small interfering RNA targeting p63 on the proliferation and invasiveness of human cholangiocarcinoma cells in vitro. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2012;32:207–210. (In Chinese) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Sia D, Tovar V, Moeini A, Llovet JM. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Pathogenesis and rationale for molecular therapies. Oncogene. 2013;32:4861–4870. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Montal R, Sia D, Montironi C, Leow WQ, Esteban-Fabró R, Pinyol R, Torres-Martin M, Bassaganyas L, Moeini A, Peix J, et al. Molecular classification and therapeutic targets in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol. 2020;73:315–327. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Liu S, Xiu P, Liu N, et al. Effects of STAT3 on proliferation and apoptosis of human intrahepatic bile duct carcinoma cells. Shandong Med J. 2015;55:5–7. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Dong J, Cheng XD, Zhang WD, Qin JJ. Recent update on development of Small-Molecule STAT3 inhibitors for cancer therapy: From phosphorylation inhibition to protein degradation. J Med Chem. 2021;64:8884–8915. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Tang Y, Tang Z, Yang J, Liu T, Tang Y. MicroRNA-7-5p Inhibits Migration, Invasion and Metastasis of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma by Inhibiting MyD88. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2021;9:809–817. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2021.00021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.


Articles from Molecular Medicine Reports are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES