SUMMARY
Central pacemaker neurons regulate circadian rhythms and undergo diurnal variation in electrical activity in mammals and flies1,2. Circadian variation in the intracellular chloride concentration of mammalian pacemaker neurons has been proposed to influence the response to GABAergic neurotransmission through GABAA receptor chloride channels3. However, results have been contradictory4–9, and a recent study demonstrated circadian variation in pacemaker neuron chloride without an effect on GABA response10. Therefore, whether and how intracellular chloride regulates circadian rhythms remains controversial. Here, we demonstrate a signaling role for intracellular chloride in the Drosophila small ventral lateral (sLNv) pacemaker neurons. In control flies, intracellular chloride increases in sLNvs over the course of the morning. Chloride transport through sodium-potassium-2-chloride (NKCC) and potassium-chloride (KCC) cotransporters is a major determinant of intracellular chloride concentrations11. Drosophila melanogaster with loss-of-function mutations in the NKCC encoded by Ncc69 have abnormally low intracellular chloride six hours after lights on, loss of morning anticipation, and a prolonged circadian period. Loss of kcc, which is expected to increase intracellular chloride, suppresses the long-period phenotype of Ncc69 mutant flies. Activation of a chloride-inhibited kinase cascade, consisting of WNK (With No Lysine (K)) kinase and its downstream substrate, Fray, is necessary and sufficient to prolong period length. Fray activation of an inwardly rectifying potassium channel, Irk1, is also required for the long-period phenotype. These results indicate that the NKCC-dependent rise in intracellular chloride in Drosophila sLNv pacemakers restrains WNK-Fray signaling and overactivation of an inwardly rectifying potassium channel to maintain normal circadian period length.
Keywords: circadian rhythm, chloride signalling, WNK, SPAK, Fray, Drosophila, potassium channel, SLC12, NKCC, KCC
eTOC
Schellinger et al. demonstrate intracellular chloride oscillations in the Drosophila sLNv central pacemaker neurons regulate morning anticipation and circadian period. Chloride has a signaling role via the chloride-inhibited WNK kinase, which controls activity of an inwardly rectifying potassium channel via the intermediary kinase, Fray.
Graphical Abstract

RESULTS
Intracellular chloride increases in sLNv pacemakers during the morning in an NKCC-dependent manner
Na+/K+-ATPase activity results in low intracellular sodium and high intracellular potassium in most cells, generating an inward driving force for chloride through NKCCs and an outward driving force through KCCs11. These transporters are expressed in mammalian suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) clock neurons, where they determine intracellular chloride and the GABA reversal potential4,5,7,9,10,12. We used the transgenic sensor, ClopHensor, to measure intracellular chloride ex vivo in the small LNv neurons (sLNvs), which are Drosophila central brain pacemaker cells13. sLNvs from controls and from flies with strong loss-of-function mutations in Ncc69, which encodes an NKCC14–16, were tested in parallel every 4 hours after lights on (ZT0). ClopHensor couples chloride-sensitive GFP to chloride-insensitive dsRed for ratiometric chloride measurement17–20, with the cyan/red ratio inverse to chloride (Figure S1). Intracellular pH, which influences chloride measurement17, was measured simultaneously, and was similar over time and between genotypes (Table S1). In controls, chloride rose during daytime, fell, and then rose again during nighttime (Figures 1A, S1D). Brains were exposed to light during dissection and imaging, which could confound nighttime measurements. However, these results suggest that intracellular chloride varies in sLNv pacemakers over the day/night cycle, as in the mammalian SCN3,4,9,10.
Figure 1. Intracellular chloride increases in sLNv pacemakers during the morning in an NKCC-dependent manner.

A) Cyan/red ratios, which are the inverse of intracellular chloride concentrations (Figure S1), were measured using the transgenic sensor ClopHensor. The cyan/red ratios vary over time in sLNv pacemaker neurons. Mean ± SEM shown. ZT0, lights on. p<0.0001 for time, p=0.8495 for genotype, two-way ANOVA. Intracellular pH from the same neurons and numbers of neurons analyzed is shown in Table S1. Control and Ncc69 mutant flies were analyzed in parallel, with different timepoints measured on different days. B) Cyan/red ratios, measured in the same sLNvs over time, 2 and 6 hours after lights-on. Mean ± SEM shown. Table S2 lists genotypes and numbers of flies analyzed here and subsequently. Significant effects of time (p=0.0004) and genotype (p=0.0042), two-way repeated measures ANOVA. ***, p=0.0010 for cyan/red ratio in control vs. Ncc69r2 mutant, Šidák’s multiple comparison test. ZT6 was significantly different from ZT2 in control (p=0.0007) but not Ncc69r2 mutants (p=0.2577), Šidák’s multiple comparison test. NS, not significant.
Intracellular chloride appeared to increase from ZT2 to ZT6 in controls, but not in Ncc69 mutants (Figures 1A, S1D). Since the ZT2 and ZT6 measurements were made in different neurons, we next performed repeated measurements in the same neurons at ZT2 and ZT6. Although the cyan/red ratios were slightly lower in this experiment, this experiment also showed that intracellular chloride rose from ZT2 to ZT6 in controls, but remained constant in Ncc69 mutants, with lower chloride concentrations in Ncc69 mutants compared to controls at ZT6 (Figures 1B, S1E). This indicates that intracellular chloride increases in sLNvs over the course of the morning in an NKCC-dependent manner.
The Ncc69 NKCC is required in sLNv pacemakers for normal circadian behavior
To test the functional consequences of loss of NKCC activity on circadian rhythms, we examined locomotor activity in Drosophila activity monitors. sLNvs regulate morning anticipation, the increase in locomotor activity that occurs prior to the onset of daylight in light-dark conditions21–23. Morning anticipation was abolished in Ncc69 mutants, whereas evening anticipation, which is regulated by other clock neurons21–23, was not affected (Figures 2A, B).
Figure 2. The Ncc69 NKCC is required in sLNv pacemakers for normal circadian behavior.

A) Actograms showing locomotor activity during lights off (grey bars) and lights on (white bars) in control and Ncc69r2 mutants. The arrow indicates increasing locomotor activity (morning anticipation) prior to lights on. Morning anticipation is abolished in Ncc69r2 mutants. Mean + SEM (dots) shown. B) Morning and evening anticipation index. An anticipation index of 0.5 (see Methods) indicates no anticipation, whereas a value of greater than 0.5 indicates anticipation. Median and 95th percentile confidence intervals graphed for behavioral data in this and subsequent figures, with individual data points shown. ****, p<0.0001; NS, not significant, unpaired t-test. C) Circadian period is prolonged in Ncc69 mutants. Locomotor activity was measured in constant darkness for 7 days here and subsequently. ****, p<0.0001. Statistical tests used in C and D are listed in Table S3. D) Expression of wild-type Ncc69 in the LNv pacemakers, under the control of pdf-GAL4, rescues the long-period phenotype of Ncc69 mutant flies. ****, p<0.0001. Right, representative actograms showing average activity across 7 days of subjective day (grey bars) and night (dark bars) in constant darkness. E) LNv morphology is intact in Ncc69 mutants. PDF neuropeptide-expressing pacemaker neurons were visualized using α-PDF antibodies. Immunostaining in Ncc69 mutants and controls was performed in parallel. Scale bar, 100 μm.
sLNvs also regulate the free-running clock24,25. Ncc69r2 mutants had a prolonged period in constant darkness that was rescued by LNv-specific expression of wild-type Ncc69 (Figure 2C, D). Although the pdf-GAL4 driver is expressed in both small and large LNv neurons (lLNvs)24, the latter have been implicated in sleep and arousal and likely do not contribute to the period-length phenotype26–28.
Prolonged period was observed in Ncc69r2 homozygous mutants and in flies with Ncc69r2 over a deficiency deleting Ncc69, but not in heterozygotes (Figure 2C). LNv morphology24,29 was intact in Ncc69r2 mutants (Figure 2E). We observed weaker rhythmicity in Ncc69r2 homozygotes. This phenotype was not rescued by LNv Ncc69 expression, and was not observed in Ncc69r2/Df (Table S3). Therefore, the reduced rhythm strength may be due to mutation in a different gene, or Ncc69 activity outside the LNvs, and was not pursued further. Roles for Ncc69 have been demonstrated in glia, including decreased rhythmicity with glial Ncc69 knockdown14,30–32. However, glial expression of wild-type Ncc69 did not rescue the long-period phenotype or decreased rhythmicity of mutants (Table S3). Thus, Ncc69 is specifically required in sLNvs for the maintenance of normal circadian period.
Period lengthening in Ncc69 mutants is due to low chloride activation of the WNK-Fray kinase cascade
We reasoned that decreasing KCC activity, which is expected to increase intracellular chloride, might reverse the Ncc69 mutant phenotype. kcc heterozygous mutation or LNv knockdown resulted in period lengths similar to, or slightly longer than, controls (Table S3). However, both maneuvers suppressed the long-period phenotype of Ncc69 mutants (Figure 3A, B), further indicating that dysregulated intracellular chloride in sLNvs drives the long-period phenotype of Ncc69 mutants.
Figure 3. Period lengthening in Ncc69 mutants is due to low chloride activation of the WNK-Fray kinase cascade.

Heterozygous loss of kcc (A) or knockdown of kcc in LNv pacemakers (B) suppresses the long-period phenotype of Ncc69 mutants. LNv knockdown of the chloride-inhibited WNK kinase (C) or its downstream target, Fray (D), suppresses the long-period phenotype of Ncc69 mutants. LNv overexpression of Cl−-insensitive, but not wild-type, Drosophila WNK (E) or human WNK3 (F) results in lengthening of circadian period. G) Overexpression of activated FrayT206E, but not kinase-dead FrayD185A,T206E, increases period length. **, p=0.0026; ***, p=0.0007; ****, p<0.0001. See Table S3 for statistical tests used.
The Ncc69 NKCC is activated by the Drosophila WNK-Fray kinase cascade, homologs of the WNK-SPAK/OSR1 (Ste20-related proline alanine rich kinase/oxidative stress response) kinases that activate mammalian NKCCs33,34. In addition, chloride inhibits WNK signaling through direct effects on mammalian and Drosophila WNKs19,35,36. We first tested the hypothesis that LNv loss of WNK or Fray would phenocopy the Ncc69 loss-of-function phenotype, i.e. circadian period lengthening, due to loss of positive regulation by the kinases. We observed only a slight increase (9–36 minutes) in period length in WNK knockdown flies, and there was no effect of Fray knockdown (Table S4), suggesting that WNK and Fray do not act upstream of Ncc69 in circadian period regulation.
The prolonged circadian period of Ncc69 mutants could also be due to decreased late-morning sLNv intracellular chloride and excess WNK-Fray activation. Consistent with this hypothesis, LNv knockdown of either WNK (Figure 3C) or Fray (Figure 3D) suppressed the Ncc69r2 long-period phenotype. Conversely, LNv overexpression of the Cl−-insensitive WNKL421F mutant19,35 caused period lengthening, phenocopying Ncc69 mutants (Figure 3E). Overexpressing wild-type WNK had no effect, emphasizing the importance of chloride regulation of WNK in circadian period regulation (Figure 3E). Mammalian WNK3 is expressed in SCN pacemaker neurons12. LNv overexpression of chloride-insensitive, but not wild-type, human WNK3L295F also resulted in circadian period lengthening, indicating phylogenetically conserved effects of this signaling pathway (Figure 3F and Table S3). Thus, sLNv loss of WNK chloride inhibition is sufficient to prolong period length.
WNK kinases phosphorylate the T-loop threonine of SPAK/OSR1 kinases to activate them37,38. Mutation of the Fray T-loop threonine, T206, to a phosphomimicking glutamate results in WNK-independent Fray activation, and rescues the ion transport defect in renal tubules with Drosophila WNK knockdown39. The Fray D185A mutation abolishes kinase activity39. LNv overexpression of FrayT206E increased period length in a kinase activity-dependent manner, mirroring the phenotype of loss of Ncc69 or expression of chloride-insensitive WNK (Figure 3G, Table S3). Thus, loss of Ncc69 results in failure of intracellular chloride to rise during the morning hours, and, as a consequence, WNK and Fray overactivation, initiating a signaling cascade that prolongs circadian period.
Fray activates the inwardly rectifying potassium channel Irk1 to prolong circadian period
To identify possible Fray targets required for circadian period prolongation, we queried the Drosophila proteome for putative Fray RFXV/I binding motifs40 and identified 127 candidates using an optimized motif (see Methods) (Data S1A). We pursued the inwardly rectifying potassium channel, Irk1 (also known as Ir), for three reasons. First, LNv Irk1 knockdown affects circadian period41. Second, Irk1 transcript is highly enriched in LNvs, and exhibits transcriptional and translational cycling42,43. Third, the mammalian Fray homolog, OSR1, regulates mammalian inwardly rectifying potassium channels containing RFXV-related motifs (i.e., RXFXV)44.
To examine whether Fray regulates Irk1 channel activity, we performed whole-cell patch clamp recordings of S2-R+ cultured Drosophila cells transfected with Irk1, with or without FrayT206E co-expression from a multi-cistronic plasmid. Irk1 activity was determined from barium-sensitive currents (Figure S2). FrayT206E expression increased Irk1 channel activity. Mutation of the putative Irk1 Fray-binding RFXV motif to RFXA (Irk1V306A) decreased channel activity relative to wild-type Irk1 in the absence of co-transfected FrayT206E. Fray is endogenously expressed in S2-R+ cells45, so this could represent decreased stimulation by endogenous Fray, although we cannot rule out direct effects of the mutation on the channel. The Irk1 RFXA mutation also blunted stimulation by FrayT206E, with no significant difference in Irk1 current density with or without FrayT206E co-expression at a holding potential of −150 mV (Figure 4A, B). Together, these results indicate a stimulatory effect of FrayT206E on wild-type, but not RFXA mutant Irk1.
Figure 4. Fray activates the inwardly rectifying potassium channel Irk1 to prolong circadian period.

FrayT206E expression increases activity of wild-type Irk1, but not Irk1V306A, carrying a mutation in the predicted Fray-binding RFXV motif. A) Current-voltage curves from S2-R+ Drosophila cultured cells transfected with wild-type Irk1 or Irk1V306A, with or without co-expression of constitutively active FrayT206E. B) Current density at −150 mV. **, p<0.01, ****, p<0.0001, two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. n=12–16 cells analyzed/genotype. C) Irk1V306A suppresses the long-period phenotype of FrayT206E. Irk1 was knocked down in the LNv pacemakers using RNAi, and replaced with Irk1WT or Irk1V306A transgenes with silent mutations in the RNAi target sites. ****, p<0.0001. See Table S3 for statistical tests used.
We next assessed the in vivo role of Fray stimulation of Irk1. We designed Irk1WT and Irk1V306A transgenes to be resistant to a previously-validated short hairpin Irk1 RNAi46, allowing replacement of endogenous pacemaker neuron Irk1 with either the wild-type or V306A mutant. LNv Irk1 knockdown and replacement with either Irk1WT or Irk1V306A had no effect on period length (Figure 4C), consistent with the lack of phenotype with Fray knockdown (Table S4). Expressing FrayT206E in the pacemaker neurons increased period length in wild-type flies and in flies with endogenous Irk1 replaced with Irk1WT, while replacement of Irk1 with Irk1V306A suppressed the long-period phenotype (Figure 4C). This suggests that Fray stimulation of Irk1 is required for the long-period phenotype observed with loss of Ncc69 and activation of the WNK-Fray kinase cascade.
DISCUSSION
Intracellular chloride oscillates in central pacemaker neurons of the mammalian SCN3,4,9,10, but the functional significance of this oscillation has remained unclear. Here, we demonstrate an NKCC-dependent increase in intracellular chloride in Drosophila sLNv pacemaker neurons over the course of the morning, which constrains activity of the chloride-sensitive WNK kinase, its downstream substrate, Fray, and an inwardly rectifying potassium channel, Irk1, to maintain normal circadian periodicity. Loss of the Ncc69 NKCC in LNv pacemaker neurons results in loss of morning anticipation and lengthening of the circadian period in free-running conditions. Our observations are consistent with studies in the SCN implicating NKCC in the determination of intracellular chloride in mammalian pacemaker neurons4,5,7,9,10,12, and connects intracellular chloride to behavioral circadian phenotypes.
Diurnal variations in intracellular chloride have been proposed to influence the effect of GABAergic neurotransmission on clock neurons in mammals3–9, but a recent study challenged this idea10. Existing data indicate a minor role for sLNv ligand-gated chloride channels in the regulation of circadian period27,28,47–49. Rather, we demonstrate a signaling role for chloride in sLNvs, via inhibition of WNK-Fray signaling. As chloride-sensitive kinases, WNKs are poised to interpret changes in intracellular chloride and initiate downstream signal transduction cascades35,50,51. This has been studied in transepithelial ion transport in Drosophila and mammalian renal epithelia19,52,53, as well as in the clearance of apoptotic corpses54. Our findings further extend this concept to circadian pacemaker neurons.
KCC and another cation-chloride cotransporter, encoded by the NKCC gene, have been linked to the electrophysiological response to GABA in lLNvs, which express GABAA receptor chloride channels27,28,55 (Eick et al, this issue). The transport activity of the NKCC-encoded transporter has not been characterized, but may differ from the Ncc69 NKCC, as suggested by sequence differences and the transport activity of an Aedes aegypti ortholog56,57. Expression of Ncc69 and NKCC may also differ. Consistent with this idea, broad clock neuron knockout of NKCC has no effect on morning anticipation or period length, but leads to abnormal rhythmicity in constant light, as does NKCC overexpression or loss or gain of kcc55 (Eick et al, this issue). Thus, intracellular chloride likely affects clock neurons both by affecting the driving force for chloride through neurotransmitter-gated chloride channels, and via inhibition of WNK-Fray signaling. Interestingly, knocking down WNK and Fray broadly in clock neurons phenocopies loss of kcc and NKCC in the same neurons (Eick et al., this issue), suggesting that WNK and Fray act in their usual regulatory roles upstream of the transporters in this case, and further highlighting distinct actions of this pathway in different subpopulations of Drosophila clock neurons.
Pacemaker neurons in flies and mammals undergo cell-autonomous, molecular clock-controlled circadian variation in electrical activity1,2,13,58–60, and altering the excitability of the LNv pacemakers disrupts circadian rhythms41,61–65. Two voltage-gated potassium channels have been implicated in LNv neuron electrical oscillations66, and a sodium leak current and potassium channels contribute to the day/night cycling of resting membrane potential in Drosophila dorsal clock neurons67. Because inwardly rectifying potassium channels play an important role in determining cellular membrane potential68, which is thought to be a determinant of circadian variation in electrical activity1,2, chloride regulation of Irk1 activity could also contribute to the diurnal variation in sLNv excitability. Specifically, Irk1 activation at ZT6 due to low intracellular chloride and activation of the WNK-Fray pathway in Ncc69 mutants may disrupt the usual circadian pattern of membrane depolarization and hyperpolarization in sLNvs69, thereby altering period length.
Could intracellular chloride play a signaling role in SCN pacemaker neurons? NKCC1, KCCs and WNK3 are expressed in the rat SCN12. The repertoire of ion channels regulating pacemaker neuron excitability is complex and incompletely understood, but large-conductance Ca2+-activated potassium channels have been implicated, and are regulated by mammalian WNKs2,70–75. Whether oscillating intracellular chloride observed in SCN neurons regulates these or other ion channels modulating pacemaker neuron electrical properties will be of interest for future investigation.
STAR METHODS
RESOURCE AVAILABILITY
Lead Contact
Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Aylin Rodan (aylin.rodan@hsc.utah.edu).
Materials Availability
All materials generated for this study, such as plasmids and fly lines, are available upon request from the Lead Contact.
Data and Code Availability
All data reported in this paper will be shared by the lead contact upon request. This paper does not report original code. Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.
EXPERIMENTAL MODEL AND SUBJECT DETAILS
Drosophila Strains and Fly Husbandry
Drosophila melanogaster strains used are shown in the Key Resources Table and the genotypes used for each experiment are shown in Table S2. w; pdf-GAL4, w; UAS-WNKRNAi, w; UAS-FrayRNAi, w; UAS-Irk1RNAi, w; UAS-kccRNAi, w; UAS-FrayT206E, w; UAS-WNKWT, w; UAS-WNKL421F, w; UAS-WNK3WT, w; UAS-WNK3L295F, w; UAS-FrayD185A,T206E and w; UAS-dcr-2 were outcrossed for 5 generations to wBerlin, which was also used for generating heterozygous controls (e.g., w; pdf-GAL4/+). Except for w; UAS-FrayRNAi (Vienna), and w; UAS-kccRNAi, knockdown of the targeted genes has previously been validated by qRT-PCR, as referenced in the Key Resources Table. Recombinant chromosomes and combinations of transgenes were generated by standard genetic techniques. Generation of new transgenic strains is described below. Flies were reared on a standard cornmeal-yeast-molasses medium prepared in a central kitchen at UT Southwestern or the University of Utah. Flies were reared at room temperature (22–23 °C) or at 25 °C. Young adult (<2 week old) male flies were used in all assays. Males were used to avoid female egg-laying and the emergence of larvae in Drosophila activity monitors.
Key resources table.
| REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
|---|---|---|
| Antibodies | ||
| Mouse monoclonal anti-PDF C7 antibody | Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank | Cat#PDF C7; RRID: AB_760350 |
| Goat anti-mouse polyclonal IgG (H+L) cross-adsorbed secondary antibody, Alexa Fluor 488 | Thermo Fisher | Cat#A-11001 |
| Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins | ||
| CellFectin | Thermo Fisher | Cat#10362100 |
| tributyltinchloride | Sigma | Cat#T50202 |
| nigericin | Thermo Fisher | Cat#N1495 |
| carbonyl cyanide 3-chlorophenylhydrazone | Sigma | Cat#C2759 |
| valinomycin | Sigma | Cat#V0627 |
| TransIT-Insect transfection reagent | Mirus Bio | Cat#6104 |
| Critical commercial assays | ||
| LR Clonase II | Thermo Fisher | Cat#11791020 |
| Phusion high-fidelity DNA polymerase | New England Biolabs | Cat#M0530 |
| QIAquick | Qiagen | Cat#28104 |
| pENTR/D-TOPO cloning kit | Thermo Fisher | Cat#K240020 |
| QuikChange II XL | Agilent | Cat#200521 |
| NEBuilder HiFi DNA Assembly | New England Biolabs | Cat#E2621 |
| Experimental models: Cell lines | ||
| D. melanogaster: Cell line S2-R+ | Krämer; Drosophila Genomics Resource Center | Cat#150; RRID:CVCL_Z831 |
| Experimental models: Organisms/strains | ||
| D. melanogaster: control: wBerlin | Rothenfluh | N/A |
| D. melanogaster: LNv driver: w; pdf-GAL4 | Rosbash24 | N/A |
| D. melanogaster: Ncc69 mutant: w; Ncc69r2 | Leiserson14 | N/A |
| D. melanogaster: Ncc69 rescue: w; Ncc69r2 UAS-HA-Ncc692–3 | Leiserson14 | N/A |
| D. melanogaster: Glial Ncc69 rescue: w; gli-GAL4; Ncc69r2 UAS-HA-Ncc692–3 | Leiserson14 | N/A |
| D. melanogaster: kcc mutant: w; kccDHS1 | Hekmat-Scafe86 | N/A |
| D. melanogaster: RNAi targeting kcc: w; UAS-kccRNAi | Vienna Drosophila Resource Center | ID 101742; RRID: FlyBase_FBst0473615 |
| D. melanogaster: Ncc69 deficiency: w1118;Df(3L)ED4475, p{3’.RS5+3.3’}ED4475/TM6C, cu1 Sb1 | Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center | RRID: BDSC_8069 |
| D. melanogaster: Dicer transgene: w; UAS-dcr-2 | Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center | RRID: BDSC_24651 |
| D. melanogaster: RNAi targeting WNK: w; UAS-WNKRNAi | Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center; validated in [19] | RRID: BDSC_42521 |
| D. melanogaster: RNAi targeting WNK: w; UAS-WNKRNAi (Vienna) | Vienna Drosophila Resource Center; validated in [39] | ID 106928; RRID: FlyBase_FBst0478751 |
| D. melanogaster: Wild-type WNK: w; UAS-WNKWT | Rodan19 | N/A |
| D. melanogaster: Chloride-insensitive WNK: w; UAS-WNKL421F | Rodan19 | N/A |
| D. melanogaster: Human WNK3: w; UAS-WNK3WT | Rodan31 | N/A |
| D. melanogaster: Chloride-insensitive human WNK3: w; UAS-WNK3L295F | Rodan20 | N/A |
| D. melanogaster: RNAi targeting Fray: w; UAS-frayRNAi | Rodan39 | N/A |
| D. melanogaster: RNAi targeting Fray: w; UAS-frayRNAi (Vienna) | Vienna Drosophila Resource Center | ID 106919; RRID: FlyBase_FBst0478742 |
| D. melanogaster: Activated Fray: w; UAS-FrayT206E | Rodan39 | N/A |
| D. melanogaster: Kinase-dead activated Fray: w; UAS-FrayD185A,T206E | This paper | N/A |
| D. melanogaster: RNAi targeting Irk1: w; UAS-Irk1RNAi | Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center; validated in [46] | RRID: BDSC_25823 |
| D. melanogaster: WT Irk1 (RNAi-resistant): w; UAS-Irk1WT-RR | This paper | N/A |
| D. melanogaster: V306A mutant Irk1 (RNAi-resistant): w; UAS-Irk1V306A-RR | This paper | N/A |
| D. melanogaster: pH/chloride sensor: w; UAS-ClopHensor c202 | Krämer19 | N/A |
| D. melanogaster: injection strain for UAS-FrayD185A,T206E: y1M{vas-int.Dm}ZH-2A w*; M{3xP3-RFP.attP′}ZH-22A | Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center | RRID: BDSC_24481 |
| D. melanogaster: injection strain for UAS-Irk1WT-RR and UAS-Irk1V306A-RR: M{vas-int.Dm}ZH-2A, M{3xP3-RFP.attP}ZH- 51D | Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center | RRID: BDSC_24483 |
| Oligonucleotides | ||
| See Table S6 | N/A | N/A |
| Recombinant DNA | ||
| FrayD185A,T206E ORF in Gateway donor plasmid: pENTR-FrayD185A,T206E | Rodan39 | N/A |
| Gateway destination vector: pUASg.attB | Bischof and Basler77 | N/A |
| Irk1 ORF: FI16807 | Drosophila Genomics Resource Center | Cat#1644763; Flybase_FBcl0742744 |
| Gateway donor plasmid: pENTR | Thermo Fisher | Cat#K240020 |
| Irk1WT ORF in Gateway donor plasmid: pENTR-Irk1WT | This paper | N/A |
| Irk1V306A ORF in Gateway donor plasmid: pENTR-Irk1V306A | This paper | N/A |
| RNAi-resistant Irk1WT ORF in Gateway donor plasmid: pENTR-Irk1WT-RR | This paper | N/A |
| RNAi-resistant Irk1V306A ORF in Gateway donor plasmid: pENTR-Irk1V306A-RR | This paper | N/A |
| RNAi-resistant Irk1WT in pUAS plasmid: pUASg.attB-Irk1WT-RR | This paper | N/A |
| RNAi-resistant Irk1V306A in pUAS plasmid: pUASg.attB-Irk1V306A-RR | This paper | N/A |
| Source for ClopHensor cDNA: pcDNA3-ClopHensor | Addgene17 | Cat#25938; RRID: Addgene_25938 |
| pIB plasmid | Thermo Fisher | Cat#V802001 |
| pH/chloride sensor in S2 cell expression plasmid: pIB-ClopHensor | This paper | N/A |
| pAc5 source plasmid: pAc5 STABLE2 Neo | Addgene85 | Cat#32426; RRID: Addgene_32426 |
| Irk1WT in S2 cell expression plasmid: pAc5-Irk1WT | This paper | N/A |
| Irk1V306A in S2 cell expression plasmid: pAc5-Irk1V306A | This paper | N/A |
| FrayT206E ORF in Gateway donor plasmid: pENTR-FrayT206E | Rodan39 | N/A |
| Irk1WT and FrayT206E in multi-cistronic S2 cell expression plasmid: pAc5-Irk1WT-FrayT206E | This paper | N/A |
| Irk1V306A and FrayT206E in multi-cistronic S2 cell expression plasmid: pAc5-Irk1V306A-FrayT206E | This paper | N/A |
| Software and algorithms | ||
| Software: Fly activity analysis suite (FAASx) | Boudinot and Rouyer, https://neuropsi.cnrs.fr/en/departments/cnn/group-leader-francois-rouyer/ | N/A |
| Software: ClockLab, version 6 | Actimetrics | RRID: SCR_014309 |
| Software: FIJI | Image J, NIH, https://fiji.sc/ | RRID: SCR_002285 |
| Software: GraphPad Prism, version 9 | GraphPad | RRID: SCR_002798 |
| Software: Pulse | Molecular Devices | N/A |
| Software: pClamp, version 9.2 | Molecular Devices | RRID: SCR_011323 |
| Other | ||
| DAM2 Drosophila activity monitors | Trikinetics | N/A |
| 35 mm glass bottom dishes with 14 mm microwell/#1.5 cover glass | CellVis | Cat#D35-14-1.5-N |
| NCBI protein database | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/ | RRID:SCR_003257 |
Cell lines
S2-R+ cultured Drosophila cells were obtained from Helmut Krämer (UT Southwestern) or the Drosophila Genomics Resource Center (stock #150) and cultured at 25 °C in Schneider’s medium (Thermo Fisher Cat #21720001) with 10% FBS (Thermo Fisher Cat #10082139). S2-R+ cells are male76. Cells were not authenticated prior to use.
METHOD DETAILS
Generation of Drosophila transgenics
The open reading frame encoding FrayD185A,T206E was recombined from pENTR-FrayD185A,T206E 39 into the pUASg.attB Gateway-compatible destination vector, obtained from Johannes Bischof and Konrad Basler (Zürich, Switzerland)77, using LR Clonase II (Thermo Fisher Cat #11791020). After sequence confirmation, midiprep DNA was injected into stock #24481 (y1M{vas-int.Dm}ZH-2A w*; M{3xP3-RFP.attP′}ZH-22A) by Rainbow Transgenic Flies (Camarillo, CA). Single male transformants were isolated by the presence of ‘mini white’ and confirmation of the UAS-transgene was performed by PCR with sequence-specific primers.
A plasmid (FI16807, stock #1644763) containing the open reading frame of Irk1 was obtained from the Drosophila Genomics Resource Center (Indiana University, Bloomington, IN). The open reading frame was PCR-amplified (Phusion high-fidelity DNA polymerase, New England Biolabs Cat #M0530) using primers Irk1-F and Irk1-R (primers and plasmids are listed in the Key Resources Table and Table S6). After gel extraction (Qiagen QIAquick Cat #28104), the PCR product was cloned into pENTR using the pENTR/D-TOPO cloning kit (Thermo Fisher Cat #K240020) and the sequence confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Next, a mutation was introduced into pENTR-Irk1WT to generate a mutation in the putative Fray-binding motif, in which Val 306 in the “RFXV” motif is mutated to Ala. The corresponding “GTG” was mutated to “GCG” using QuikChange II XL (Agilent Cat #200521) and primers Irk1-V306A-F and Irk1-V306A-R to generate pENTR-Irk1V306A. Next, mutations were introduced into pENTR-Irk1WT and pENTR-Irk1V306A to render the transgenes resistant to knockdown by co-expression of the Irk1 RNAi. Every third nucleotide in the twenty base pairs targeted by the RNAi was mutated in order to introduce five silent mutations (i.e., CTAAAGGAACGCTTC was mutated to CTGAAAGAGCGTTTT), using QuikChange II XL (Agilent Cat #200521) and primers Irk1-RR-F and Irk1-RR-R. The resulting plasmids were called pENTR-Irk1WT-RR and pENTR-Irk1V306A-RR. Irk1 sequences in all plasmids were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. The open reading frames of Irk1WT-RR and Irk1V306A-RR were then recombined into pUASg.attB using LR Clonase II (Thermo Fisher Cat #11791020) to generate pUASg.attB-Irk1WT-RR and pUASg.attB-Irk1V306A-RR. Midiprep DNA was injected into stock #24483 (M{vas-int.Dm}ZH-2A, M{3xP3-RFP.attP}ZH- 51D), transformants isolated, and UAS-transgenes confirmed as above.
Circadian rhythm analysis
Male flies were collected within 72 hours of eclosion and kept on standard food for 3–5 days in a 12-hour oscillating light/dark incubator. After the entrainment period, individual flies were placed into 5 mm diameter glass cuvettes with standard medium at one end and a tissue plug at the other, allowing the flies free movement throughout the cuvette. Beam breaking by locomotor activity was recorded in 30 minute increments (bins) using Drosophila Activity Monitors (TriKinetics) in constant darkness over a period of 7 days. Activity data were then analyzed using FAASx software (Paris-Saclay Institute of Neuroscience). Cycle p analyses provided period length (tau) and rhythmic strength (power) for individual flies. Settings used were: Minimum period peak power 20, Minimum period peak width 0200. Output was restricted to flies with period lengths of 26 hours ± 10 hours (minimum tau 16, maximum 36). Flies that did not survive the full 7 days (168 hours) or were arrhythmic (power less than 20) were not included in tau analysis.
For experiments in light:dark (LD) conditions, individual flies were loaded into cuvettes 24–72 hours after eclosion and remained in the Drosophila Activity Monitors in LD at room temperature (~22–23 °C) for 6 days. Data from the final 3 days, after 3 days of entrainment, was used for analysis. Morning and evening anticipation index was calculated according to the methods of Schlichting et al.78: morning anticipation index = sum of activity ZT21-ZT0/sum of activity ZT18-ZT0, and evening anticipation index = sum of activity ZT9-ZT12/sum of activity ZT6 – ZT12.
For the Irk1 experiment, analysis was performed in ClockLab version 6 (Actimetrics, Wilmette, IL), using the chi squared periodogram function. Settings used were: Start Day 1, End Day 9, type chi squared, start 16 hours (minimum tau), end 36 hours (maximum tau), significance 0.01. In order to classify rhythmic strength, cutoffs were determined by assaying wBerlin control flies. Flies that did not survive the full 8 days or were arrhythmic (power less than 2500) were not included in tau analysis.
PDF neuron immunohistochemistry
Brains were dissected from adult flies in PBS (phosphate-buffered saline, in mM: 137 NaCl, 2.7 KCl, 8.1 Na2HPO4, 1.5 KH2PO4, pH 7.3–7.4) and fixed for 20–40 minutes in 4% formaldehyde. Brains were then rinsed in PBS, followed by PBT (PBS+0.3% Triton X-100) 4–5 times. Brains were incubated in mouse anti-PDF (PDF C7 from Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Iowa City, IA79), 1:800 in 10% normal goat serum in PBT, overnight at 4°C, then rinsed 4–5 times in PBT and 2–3 times in PBS. Brains were then incubated in 1:800 goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 secondary antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat #A-11001) overnight, rinsed in PBT and PBS, and then mounted in 80% glycerol in PBS. Imaging was performed using a Zeiss LSM510 confocal microscope.
Measurement of intracellular Cl−
The transgenic sensor ClopHensor, which contains a chloride-sensitive enhanced GFP variant (E2GFP, carrying a T203Y mutation) coupled to a chloride-insensitive monomeric dsRed, allows ratiometric measurement of chloride based on emission after excitation at 458 nm (chloride-sensitive) and 543 nm (chloride-insensitive). ClopHensor is less prone to bleaching compared to other chloride sensors, and provides stable and long-lasting readouts of intracellular chloride, making it suitable for the measurements over time described below. Simultaneous measurement of pH can be accomplished due to the pH-dependent E2GFP signal after excitation at 488 nm and the pH-independent E2GFP signal after excitation at 458 nm, providing a ratiometric measurement of pH17,18.
pH calibration
pcDNA3-ClopHensor (Addgene plasmid #25938) was cut with HindIII (New England Biolabs Cat #R3104) and NotI (New England Biolabs Cat #R3189) and the resulting product ligated into pIB (Thermo Fisher Cat #V802001) to generate pIB-ClopHensor. pIB-ClopHensor was transiently transfected into S2-R+ cultured Drosophila cells obtained from Helmut Krämer (UT Southwestern) using CellFectin reagent (Thermo Fisher Cat #10362100). 48 hours after transfection, cells were bathed in pH-varied solution containing: 38 mM Na gluconate, 100 mM K gluconate, 0.6 mM MgSO4, 20 mM HEPES (varied pH), 10 μM tributyltinchloride (Sigma Cat #T50202), 5 μM nigericin (Thermo Fisher Cat #N1495), 5 μM carbonyl cyanide 3-chlorophenylhydrazone (Sigma Cat # C2759) and 5 μM valinomycin (Sigma Cat # V0627). After equilibration for at least 1 hour, cells were imaged using a Zeiss LSM510 confocal microscope, with excitation at 488 nm (green emission) and 458 nm (cyan emission). Individual cells (19–25 cells for each pH) were then outlined and pixel intensity measured using ImageJ without image manipulation. The ratios of green/cyan vs. pH were entered into GraphPad Prism, and a sigmoidal curve interpolated using the function “sigmoidal, 4PL, X is log(concentration).” This provided the values for the following equation, used to calculate intracellular pH (pHi) in the pacemaker neurons18:
where RpH is the experimentally derived green/cyan ratio, pKa = 7.254, p = power (Hill slope, 1.668), and B1 (0.2603) and B2 (1.915) are the minimum and maximum asymptotic values of RpH.
Cl− calibration
Brains expressing ClopHensor in the pacemaker neurons (w/Y; pdf-GAL4 UAS-ClopHensor c202) were dissected from 3–5 day old flies in Drosophila saline, consisting of (in mM): NaCl 117.5, KCl 20, CaCl2 2, MgCl2 8.5, NaHCO3 10.2, NaH2PO4 4.3, HEPES 15, and glucose 20, pH 7.0. Brains were attached to the bottom of 35 mm glass bottom dishes with 14 mm microwell/#1.5 cover glass (Cellvis) coated with poly-lysine, and the solution exchanged to the chloride calibration solution, consisting of (in mM): 100 mM Na-Cl/gluconate, 50 mM K-Cl/gluconate, 2 mM Ca-Cl/gluconate, 8.5 mM Mg-Cl/gluconate, 20 mM glucose, 15 mM HEPES pH 7.1, 10 μM tributyltinchloride, 5 μM nigericin, 5 μM carbonyl cyanide 3-chlorophenylhydrazone and 5 μM valinomycin. Cl/gluconate anions were adjusted to achieve varying chloride concentrations. After 1 hour equilibration, brains were imaged using a Zeiss LSM510 confocal microscope, with excitation at 543 nm (red emission) and 458 nm (cyan emission). Individual neuron cell bodies (10 per Cl− concentration, from multiple brains) were outlined and pixel intensity measured in ImageJ without image manipulation. The ratios of cyan/red vs Cl− were entered into GraphPad Prism, and a sigmoidal curve interpolated using the function “sigmoidal, 4PL, X is log(concentration).” This provided the values for the following equation, used to calculate intracellular Cl− ([Cl−]i)18:
where RCl is the experimentally derived cyan/red ratio, Kd = 53.49, p = power (set to 1 per methods of18), and A1 (1.538) and A2 (0.597) are the maximum and minimum asymptotic values of RCl.
Measurement of RpH and RCl
Male flies were entrained in 12:12 LD conditions at room temperature (~22–23 °C) for 4 days. Brains expressing ClopHensor in the pacemaker neurons were removed from the incubator at specific ZT times (time after lights on), after which they were exposed to ambient daytime light, and dissected in the following solution, adapted from solutions used for two-photon calcium imaging of fly brain neuronal activity80: in mM, NaCl 108, KCl 5, CaCl2 2, MgCl2 8.2, NaHCO3 4, NaH2PO4 1, trehalose 5, sucrose 10, HEPES 5, pH 7.5. Dissected brains were attached to the bottom of 35 mm glass bottom dishes with 14 mm microwell/#1.5 cover glass (Cellvis) coated with poly-lysine, and then bathed in the above solution for about 60 minutes prior to imaging using a Zeiss LSM510 confocal microscope, with excitation at 543 nm (red emission), 488 nm (green emission), and 458 nm (cyan emission). Individual sLNv neuronal cell bodies (distinguished from lLNv neurons based on position and size) were outlined in ImageJ and pixel intensity captured for each emission channel. The ratios of green/cyan and cyan/red were used to calculate pH and Cl− as described above. pH and Cl− were measured for each individual neuron. For practical reasons, measurements on brains removed at different ZT times across 24 hours were performed on separate days, but control and Ncc69 mutant brains were always tested in parallel. In order to specifically examine the effect of time of day in each genotype, we performed paired measurements in the same brains, as we performed previously in Malpighian tubule epithelial cells19. Flies were removed from the incubator at ZT2, and brains were dissected and imaged as above. The dishes were then sealed with parafilm to prevent evaporation and returned to the incubator (in which lights were still on) for four hours. The same brains were re-imaged 4 hours later.
Proteome-wide search for Fray binding motifs
The Drosophila proteome was searched for putative Fray binding motifs, using the methods of Delpire and Gagnon40. First, the NCBI protein database was searched for Drosophila melanogaster and results were saved to a FASTA text file. Duplicate results and results from organisms other than D. melanogaster were eliminated. This list was then searched for two motifs. One motif, [S/G/V]RFx[V/I]xx[I/V/T/S], was derived from Delpire and Gagnon40, and is called the “Gagnon motif” in (Data S1B). However, this screen failed to identify Ncc69, which we have previously validated as a Fray target39. It also failed to identify KCC, which is a validated mammalian SPAK/OSR1 target81–84. We therefore performed sequence alignment of the Drosophila homologs of three of the best-known families of mammalian SPAK/OSR-interacting proteins: WNKs, NKCCs/NCC, and KCCs (Drosophila WNK, Ncc69, and Drosophila KCC, respectively). From this we derived a second motif, referred to as the “Drosophila motif” (Data S1A): [D/E/N/Q/S/T/Y]RFx[V/I]xxxx[D/E/G/P]. A second list of proteins was generated using this motif.
Patch clamp analysis of Irk1
Generation of plasmids for S2 cell expression
To generate plasmids for cellular expression of Irk1WT and Irk1V306A, with or without FrayT206E co-expression, the Irk1WT and Irk1V306A open reading frames were amplified from pENTR-Irk1WT or pENTR-Irk1V306A by PCR (Phusion high-fidelity DNA polymerase, New England Biolabs Cat #M0530). Primers pAc5-Irk1-F and pAc5-Irk1-R included additional sequence for subsequent Gibson assembly cloning into the multi-cistronic vector, pAc5 STABLE2 Neo (Addgene Cat #3242685), which uses T2A sequences to generate multiple polypeptides off of a single transcript, and also contains a GFP cassette. The pAc5 plasmid backbone was PCR-amplified using primers pAc5-F and pAc5-R. The products were then assembled using NEBuilder HiFi DNA Assembly (New England Biolabs Cat #E2621) to generate plasmids pAc5-Irk1WT and pAc5-Irk1V306A. Irk1 inserts were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Then, the open reading frame encoding FrayT206E was amplified from an existing pENTR-FrayT206E plasmid39, using primers pAc5-Fray-F and pAc5-Fray-R, and the pAc5-Irk1WT or pAc5-Irk1V306A plasmid backbones were amplified using primers pAc5-Irk1-Fray-F and pAc5-Irk1-Fray-R. Using this strategy, the NeoR cassette was replaced by the open reading frame encoding FrayT206E, while the GFP cassette was retained to allow for identification of successfully transfected cells. After Gibson assembly, inserts were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. However, the Irk1 ORF contained a stop codon at the end, which would prevent expression of the downstream FrayT206E. The stop codon was removed using QuikChange II XL (Agilent Cat #200521) and primers Irk1-TGA-F and Irk1-TGA-R.
Patch clamp of Irk1-expressing S2-R+ cells
S2-R+ Drosophila cultured cells were obtained from the Drosophila Genomics Resource Center (stock #150) and cultured at 25 °C in Schneider’s medium (Thermo Fisher Cat #21720001) with 10% FBS (Thermo Fisher Cat #10082139). Cells were seeded at a density of 1.7 × 106 cells/ml in 12 well dishes for 24 hours and resuspended in serum-free medium prior to transfection. Cells were transfected with 1 μg plasmid DNA (pAc5-Irk1WT, pAc5-Irk1V306A, pAc5-Irk1WT-FrayT206E, or pAc5-Irk1V306A-FrayT206E) in 100 μL Opti-MEM (Thermo Fisher Cat #31985088) using 2 μL of TransIT-Insect transfection reagent (Mirus Bio Cat #6104). Medium was replaced with serum-containing medium 5 hours after transfection. Irk1 activity was measured in GFP+ cells 48–72 hours after transfection. Cells were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in fresh medium. They were then plated on cover slips coated with poly-L-lysine (Sigma P8920). Ruptured whole cell recordings were performed at room temperature in a bath solution containing (in mM) 135 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 2 CaCl2, 15 glucose, 10 HEPES, 15 sucrose, pH 7.4 with Tris. Patch pipettes were pulled from borosilicate glass capillaries (Sutter Instruments) and heat-polished to give input resistances of 2–3 megaohms. The pipette recording solution contained (in mM) 135 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 2 ATP-Mg, 0.1 GTP-Na, 5 EGTA, 10 HEPES, pH 7.2 with Tris. Cells were held at 0 mV and stimulated for 400 ms with step pulses from −150 mV to +90 mV with 20 mV steps. Currents were recorded with an Axopatch 200B patch-clamp amplifier and Pulse software (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). 0.5 mM Ba2+ inhibited inward currents with 135 mM K+, and washing with Ba2+-free 135 mM K+ recovered the currents. Ba2+-sensitive current was therefore analyzed. Data acquisition and analysis were performed using pClamp v.9.2 (Molecular Devices).
QUANTIFICATION AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Statistical testing was performed using GraphPad Prism, version 9. Data sets were analyzed for normality using the D’Agostino & Pearson normality test. Normally distributed data were compared using t-test or ANOVA and non-normally distributed data were compared using Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis test. Multiple comparisons testing was performed as indicated in the figure legends or Table S3. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Number of flies or cells examined and statistical parameters are indicated in the figure legends or Tables S1–S4.
Supplementary Material
Data S1. List of proteins with putative Fray binding sites. Related to STAR Methods and Figure 4. A) Drosophila proteins with binding sites identified using the Drosophila motif, [D/E/N/Q/S/T/Y]RFx[V/I]xxxx[D/E/G/P]. B) Drosophila proteins with binding sites identified using the Gagnon motif, [S/G/V]RFx[V/I]xx[I/V/T/S].
Highlights.
Intracellular chloride oscillates in Drosophila sLNv pacemaker neurons.
The morning increase in chloride restrains activity of the WNK-Fray kinase cascade
Fray activates an inwardly rectifying potassium channel, Irk1
Chloride inhibition of the WNK-Fray-Irk1 pathway maintains normal circadian period
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to thank Billy Leiserson, Michael Rosbash and Daria Hekmat-Scafe for fly lines, Johannes Bischof and Konrad Basler for plasmids, Helmut Krämer for S2-R+ cells, and Diana Lim for assistance with figures. Stocks obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (NIH P40OD018537) and the Vienna Drosophila Resource Center were used in this study. Plasmids and S2-R+ cells were obtained from the Drosophila Genomics Research Center (Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, supported by NIH grant 2P40OD010949). The PDF C7 antibody, developed by Justin Blau (New York University), was obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, created by the NICHD of the NIH and maintained at The University of Iowa, Department of Biology, Iowa City, IA 52242. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health: DK091316, DK106350 and DK110358 to A.R.R.; DK111542 to C.L.H.; and AA019526, AA026818 and DA049635 to A.R.
Footnotes
DECLARATION OF INTERESTS
The authors declare no competing interests.
INCLUSION AND DIVERSITY STATEMENT
One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as an underrepresented ethnic minority in science. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of the LGBTQ+ community. One of more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as living with a disability.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
REFERENCES
- 1.Allen CN, Nitabach MN, and Colwell CS (2017). Membrane Currents, Gene Expression, and Circadian Clocks. Csh Perspect Biol 9, a027714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Harvey JRM, Plante AE, and Meredith AL (2020). Ion Channels Controlling Circadian Rhythms in Suprachiasmatic Nucleus Excitability. Physiol Rev 100, 1415–1454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wagner S, Castel M, Gainer H, and Yarom Y (1997). GABA in the mammalian suprachiasmatic nucleus and its role in diurnal rhythmicity. Nature 387, 598–603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Alamilla J, Perez-Burgos A, Quinto D, and Aguilar-Roblero R (2014). Circadian Modulation of the Cl – Equilibrium Potential in the Rat Suprachiasmatic Nuclei. Biomed Res Int 2014, 1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Choi HJ, Lee CJ, Schroeder A, Kim YS, Jung SH, Kim JS, Kim DY, Son EJ, Han HC, Hong SK, et al. (2008). Excitatory actions of GABA in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. J Neurosci Official J Soc Neurosci 28, 5450–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gribkoff VK, Pieschl RL, Wisialowski TA, Park WK, Strecker GJ, Jeu M.T.G. de, Pennartz CMA, and Dudek FE (1999). A Reexamination of the Role of GABA in the Mammalian Suprachiasmatic Nucleus. J Biol Rhythm 14, 126–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Irwin RP, and Allen CN (2009). GABAergic signaling induces divergent neuronal Ca 2+ responses in the suprachiasmatic nucleus network. Eur J Neurosci 30, 1462–1475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jeu MD, and Pennartz C (2002). Circadian Modulation of GABA Function in the Rat Suprachiasmatic Nucleus: Excitatory Effects During the Night Phase. J Neurophysiol 87, 834–844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shimura M, Akaike N, and Harata N (2002). Circadian rhythm in intracellular Cl – activity of acutely dissociated neurons of suprachiasmatic nucleus. Am J Physiol-cell Ph 282, C366–C373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Klett NJ, and Allen CN (2017). Intracellular Chloride Regulation in AVP+ and VIP+ Neurons of the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus. Sci Rep-uk 7, 10226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kaila K, Price TJ, Payne JA, Puskarjov M, and Voipio J (2014). Cation-chloride cotransporters in neuronal development, plasticity and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci 15, 637–654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Belenky MA, Sollars PJ, Mount DB, Alper SL, Yarom Y, and Pickard GE (2010). Cell-type specific distribution of chloride transporters in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus. Neuroscience 165, 1519–1537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.King AN, and Sehgal A (2020). Molecular and circuit mechanisms mediating circadian clock output in the Drosophila brain. Eur J Neurosci 51, 268–281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Leiserson WM, Forbush B, and Keshishian H (2010). Drosophila glia use a conserved cotransporter mechanism to regulate extracellular volume. Glia 59, 320–332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sun Q, Tian E, Turner RJ, and Hagen KGT (2009). Developmental and functional studies of the SLC12 gene family members from Drosophila melanogaster. Am J Physiology Cell Physiology 298, C26–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rodan AR, Baum M, and Huang C-L (2012). The Drosophila NKCC Ncc69 is required for normal renal tubule function. Am J Physiol-cell Ph 303, C883–C894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Arosio D, Ricci F, Marchetti L, Gualdani R, Albertazzi L, and Beltram F (2010). Simultaneous intracellular chloride and pH measurements using a GFP-based sensor. Nat Methods 7, 516–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mukhtarov M, Liguori L, Waseem T, Rocca F, Buldakova S, Arosio D, and Bregestovski P (2013). Calibration and functional analysis of three genetically encoded Cl−/pH sensors. Front Mol Neurosci 6, 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sun Q, Wu Y, Jonusaite S, Pleinis JM, Humphreys JM, He H, Schellinger JN, Akella R, Stenesen D, Krämer H, et al. (2018). Intracellular Chloride and Scaffold Protein Mo25 Cooperatively Regulate Transepithelial Ion Transport through WNK Signaling in the Malpighian Tubule. J Am Soc Nephrol 29, 1449–1461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pleinis JM, Norrell L, Akella R, Humphreys JM, He H, Sun Q, Zhang F, Sosa-Pagan J, Morrison DE, Schellinger JN, et al. (2021). WNKs are potassium-sensitive kinases. Am J Physiol-cell Ph 320, C703–C721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Stoleru D, Peng Y, Agosto J, and Rosbash M (2004). Coupled oscillators control morning and evening locomotor behaviour of Drosophila. Nature 431, 862–868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Grima B, Chélot E, Xia R, and Rouyer F (2004). Morning and evening peaks of activity rely on different clock neurons of the Drosophila brain. Nature 431, 869–873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Guo F, Cerullo I, Chen X, and Rosbash M (2014). PDF neuron firing phase-shifts key circadian activity neurons in Drosophila. Elife 3, e02780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Renn SCP, Park JH, Rosbash M, Hall JC, and Taghert PH (1999). A pdf Neuropeptide Gene Mutation and Ablation of PDF Neurons Each Cause Severe Abnormalities of Behavioral Circadian Rhythms in Drosophila. Cell 99, 791–802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yao Z, and Shafer OT (2014). The Drosophila Circadian Clock Is a Variably Coupled Network of Multiple Peptidergic Units. Science 343, 1516–1520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nitabach MN, and Taghert PH (2008). Organization of the Drosophila circadian control circuit. Curr Biology Cb 18, R84–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Parisky KM, Agosto J, Pulver SR, Shang Y, Kuklin E, Hodge JJL, Kang K, Kang K, Liu X, Garrity PA, et al. (2008). PDF Cells Are a GABA-Responsive Wake-Promoting Component of the Drosophila Sleep Circuit. Neuron 60, 672–682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chung BY, Kilman VL, Keath JR, Pitman JL, and Allada R (2009). The GABAA Receptor RDL Acts in Peptidergic PDF Neurons to Promote Sleep in Drosophila. Curr Biol 19, 386–390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Park JH, Helfrich-Forster C, Lee G, Liu L, Rosbash M, and Hall JC (2000). Differential regulation of circadian pacemaker output by separate clock genes in Drosophila. Proc National Acad Sci 97, 3608–3613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rusan ZM, Kingsford OA, and Tanouye MA (2014). Modeling Glial Contributions to Seizures and Epileptogenesis: Cation-Chloride Cotransporters in Drosophila melanogaster. Plos One 9, e101117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Stenesen D, Moehlman AT, Schellinger JN, Rodan AR, and Krämer H (2019). The glial sodium-potassium-2-chloride cotransporter is required for synaptic transmission in the Drosophila visual system. Sci Rep-uk 9, 2475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ng FS, Sengupta S, Huang Y, Yu AM, You S, Roberts MA, Iyer LK, Yang Y, and Jackson FR (2016). TRAP-seq Profiling and RNAi-Based Genetic Screens Identify Conserved Glial Genes Required for Adult Drosophila Behavior. Front Mol Neurosci 9, 146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Alessi DR, Zhang J, Khanna A, Hochdorfer T, Shang Y, and Kahle KT (2014). The WNK-SPAK/OSR1 pathway: Master regulator of cation-chloride cotransporters. Sci Signal 7, re3–re3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Rodan AR (2018). WNK-SPAK/OSR1 signaling: lessons learned from an insect renal epithelium. Am J Physiology Ren Physiology 315, F903–F907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Piala AT, Moon TM, Akella R, He H, Cobb MH, and Goldsmith EJ (2014). Chloride Sensing by WNK1 Involves Inhibition of Autophosphorylation. Sci Signal 7, ra41–ra41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Terker AS, Zhang C, Erspamer KJ, Gamba G, Yang C-L, and Ellison DH (2016). Unique chloride-sensing properties of WNK4 permit the distal nephron to modulate potassium homeostasis. Kidney Int 89, 127–134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Vitari AC, Deak M, Morrice NA, and Alessi DR (2005). The WNK1 and WNK4 protein kinases that are mutated in Gordon’s hypertension syndrome phosphorylate and activate SPAK and OSR1 protein kinases. Biochem J 391, 17–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Anselmo AN, Earnest S, Chen W, Juang Y-C, Kim SC, Zhao Y, and Cobb MH (2006). WNK1 and OSR1 regulate the Na+, K+, 2Cl− cotransporter in HeLa cells. Proc National Acad Sci 103, 10883–10888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wu Y, Schellinger JN, Huang C-L, and Rodan AR (2014). Hypotonicity Stimulates Potassium Flux through the WNK-SPAK/OSR1 Kinase Cascade and the Ncc69 Sodium-Potassium-2-Chloride Cotransporter in the Drosophila Renal Tubule. J Biol Chem 289, 26131–26142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Delpire E, and Gagnon KBE (2007). Genome-wide analysis of SPAK/OSR1 binding motifs. Physiol Genomics 28, 223–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ruben M, Drapeau MD, Mizrak D, and Blau J (2012). A Mechanism for Circadian Control of Pacemaker Neuron Excitability. J Biol Rhythm 27, 353–364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kula-Eversole E, Nagoshi E, Shang Y, Rodriguez J, Allada R, and Rosbash M (2010). Surprising gene expression patterns within and between PDF-containing circadian neurons in Drosophila. P Natl Acad Sci Usa 107, 13497–502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Huang Y, Ainsley JA, Reijmers LG, and Jackson FR (2013). Translational Profiling of Clock Cells Reveals Circadianly Synchronized Protein Synthesis. Plos Biol 11, e1001703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Taylor CA, An S-W, Kankanamalage SG, Stippec S, Earnest S, Trivedi AT, Yang JZ, Mirzaei H, Huang C-L, and Cobb MH (2018). OSR1 regulates a subset of inward rectifier potassium channels via a binding motif variant. P Natl Acad Sci Usa 115, 3840–3845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Cherbas L, Willingham A, Zhang D, Yang L, Zou Y, Eads BD, Carlson JW, Landolin JM, Kapranov P, Dumais J, et al. (2011). The transcriptional diversity of 25 Drosophila cell lines. Genome Res 21, 301–314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wu Y, Baum M, Huang C-L, and Rodan AR (2015). Two inwardly rectifying potassium channels, Irk1 and Irk2, play redundant roles in Drosophila renal tubule function. Am J Physiology-regulatory Integr Comp Physiology 309, R747–R756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hong S-T, Bang S, Paik D, Kang J, Hwang S, Jeon K, Chun B, Hyun S, Lee Y, and Kim J (2006). Histamine and Its Receptors Modulate Temperature-Preference Behaviors in Drosophila. J Neurosci 26, 7245–7256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Dahdal D, Reeves DC, Ruben M, Akabas MH, and Blau J (2010). Drosophila Pacemaker Neurons Require G Protein Signaling and GABAergic Inputs to Generate Twenty-Four Hour Behavioral Rhythms. Neuron 68, 964–977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Collins B, Kaplan HS, Cavey M, Lelito KR, Bahle AH, Zhu Z, Macara AM, Roman G, Shafer OT, and Blau J (2014). Differentially Timed Extracellular Signals Synchronize Pacemaker Neuron Clocks. Plos Biol 12, e1001959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lüscher BP, Vachel L, Ohana E, and Muallem S (2020). Cl− as a bona fide signaling ion. Am J Physiol-cell Ph 318, C125–C136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Rodan AR (2019). Intracellular chloride: a regulator of transepithelial transport in the distal nephron. Curr Opin Nephrol Hy 28, 360–367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Terker AS, Zhang C, McCormick JA, Lazelle RA, Zhang C, Meermeier NP, Siler DA, Park HJ, Fu Y, Cohen DM, et al. (2015). Potassium Modulates Electrolyte Balance and Blood Pressure through Effects on Distal Cell Voltage and Chloride. Cell Metab 21, 39–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Chen J-C, Lo Y-F, Lin Y-W, Lin S-H, Huang C-L, and Cheng C-J (2019). WNK4 kinase is a physiological intracellular chloride sensor. Proc National Acad Sci 116, 4502–4507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Perry JSA, Morioka S, Medina CB, Etchegaray JI, Barron B, Raymond MH, Lucas CD, Onengut-Gumuscu S, Delpire E, and Ravichandran KS (2019). Interpreting an apoptotic corpse as anti-inflammatory involves a chloride sensing pathway. Nat Cell Biol 21, 1532–1543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Buhl E, Bradlaugh A, Ogueta M, Chen K-F, Stanewsky R, and Hodge JJL (2016). Quasimodo mediates daily and acute light effects on Drosophila clock neuron excitability. Proc National Acad Sci 113, 13486–13491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Piermarini PM, Akuma DC, Crow JC, Jamil TL, Kerkhoff WG, Viel KCMF, and Gillen CM (2017). Differential expression of putative sodium-dependent cation-chloride cotransporters in Aedes aegypti. Comp Biochem Physiology Part Mol Integr Physiology 214, 40–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kalsi M, Gillen C, and Piermarini P (2019). Heterologous Expression of Aedes aegypti Cation Chloride Cotransporter 2 (aeCCC2) in Xenopus laevis Oocytes Induces an Enigmatic Na+/Li+ Conductance. Insects 10, 71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Jeu M. de, Hermes M, and Pennartz C (1998). Circadian modulation of membrane properties in slices of rat suprachiasmatic nucleus. Neuroreport 9, 3725–3729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Michel S, Geusz M, Zaritsky J, and Block G (1993). Circadian rhythm in membrane conductance expressed in isolated neurons. Science 259, 239–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Welsh DK, Logothetis DE, Meister M, and Reppert SM (1995). Individual neurons dissociated from rat suprachiasmatic nucleus express independently phased circadian firing rhythms. Neuron 14, 697–706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Nitabach MN, Blau J, and Holmes TC (2002). Electrical Silencing of Drosophila Pacemaker Neurons Stops the Free-Running Circadian Clock. Cell 109, 485–495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Wu Y, Cao G, and Nitabach MN (2008). Electrical silencing of PDF neurons advances the phase of non-PDF clock neurons in Drosophila. J Biol Rhythm 23, 117–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Mizrak D, Ruben M, Myers GN, Rhrissorrakrai K, Gunsalus KC, and Blau J (2012). Electrical activity can impose time of day on the circadian transcriptome of pacemaker neurons. Curr Biology Cb 22, 1871–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Depetris-Chauvin A, Berni J, Aranovich EJ, Muraro NI, Beckwith EJ, and Ceriani MF (2011). Adult-Specific Electrical Silencing of Pacemaker Neurons Uncouples Molecular Clock from Circadian Outputs. Curr Biol 21, 1783–1793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Nitabach MN, Wu Y, Sheeba V, Lemon WC, Strumbos J, Zelensky PK, White BH, and Holmes TC (2006). Electrical Hyperexcitation of Lateral Ventral Pacemaker Neurons Desynchronizes Downstream Circadian Oscillators in the Fly Circadian Circuit and Induces Multiple Behavioral Periods. J Neurosci 26, 479–489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Smith P, Buhl E, Tsaneva-Atanasova K, and Hodge JJL (2019). Shaw and Shal voltage-gated potassium channels mediate circadian changes in Drosophila clock neuron excitability. J Physiology 597, 5707–5722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Flourakis M, Kula-Eversole E, Hutchison AL, Han TH, Aranda K, Moose DL, White KP, Dinner AR, Lear BC, Ren D, et al. (2015). A Conserved Bicycle Model for Circadian Clock Control of Membrane Excitability. Cell 162, 836–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Hibino H, Inanobe A, Furutani K, Murakami S, Findlay I, and Kurachi Y (2010). Inwardly Rectifying Potassium Channels: Their Structure, Function, and Physiological Roles. Physiol Rev 90, 291–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Cao G, and Nitabach MN (2008). Circadian control of membrane excitability in Drosophila melanogaster lateral ventral clock neurons. J Neurosci Official J Soc Neurosci 28, 6493–501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Zhuang J, Zhang X, Wang D, Li J, Zhou B, Shi Z, Gu D, Denson DD, Eaton DC, and Cai H (2011). WNK4 kinase inhibits Maxi K channel activity by a kinase-dependent mechanism. Am J Physiol-renal 301, F410–F419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Yue P, Zhang C, Lin D-H, Sun P, and Wang W-H (2013). WNK4 inhibits Ca(2+)-activated big-conductance potassium channels (BK) via mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent pathway. Biochim Biophys Acta 1833, 2101–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Wang Z, Subramanya AR, Satlin LM, Pastor-Soler NM, Carattino MD, and Kleyman TR (2013). Regulation of large-conductance Ca 2+ -activated K + channels by WNK4 kinase. Am J Physiol-cell Ph 305, C846–C853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Webb TN, Carrisoza-Gaytan R, Montalbetti N, Rued A, Roy A, Socovich AM, Subramanya AR, Satlin LM, Kleyman TR, and Carattino MD (2016). Cell-specific regulation of L-WNK1 by dietary K +. Am J Physiol-renal 310, F15–F26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Liu Y, Song X, Shi Y, Shi Z, Niu W, Feng X, Gu D, Bao H-F, Ma H-P, Eaton DC, et al. (2014). WNK1 activates large-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels through modulation of ERK1/2 signaling. J Am Soc Nephrol Jasn 26, 844–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Ray EC, Carrisoza-Gaytán R, Al-bataineh MM, Marciszyn AL, Nkashama LJ, Chen J, Winfrey A, Griffiths SE, Lam T, Flores D, et al. (2021). L-WNK1 is required for BK channel activation in intercalated cells. Am J Physiol-renal. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Lee H, McManus CJ, Cho D-Y, Eaton M, Renda F, Somma MP, Cherbas L, May G, Powell S, Zhang D, et al. (2014). DNA copy number evolution in Drosophila cell lines. Genome Biol 15, R70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Bischof J, Maeda RK, Hediger M, Karch F, and Basler K (2007). An optimized transgenesis system for Drosophila using germ-line-specific C31 integrases. Proc National Acad Sci 104, 3312–3317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Schlichting M, Díaz MM, Xin J, and Rosbash M (2019). Neuron-specific knockouts indicate the importance of network communication to Drosophila rhythmicity. Elife 8, e48301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Cyran SA, Yiannoulos G, Buchsbaum AM, Saez L, Young MW, and Blau J (2005). The Double-Time Protein Kinase Regulates the Subcellular Localization of the Drosophila Clock Protein Period. J Neurosci 25, 5430–5437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Wang JW, Wong AM, Flores J, Vosshall LB, and Axel R (2003). Two-Photon Calcium Imaging Reveals an Odor-Evoked Map of Activity in the Fly Brain. Cell 112, 271–282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Piechotta K, Lu J, and Delpire E (2002). Cation Chloride Cotransporters Interact with the Stress-related Kinases Ste20-related Proline-Alanine-rich Kinase (SPAK) and Oxidative Stress Response 1 (OSR1). J Biol Chem 277, 50812–50819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Heros P. de los, Alessi DR, Gourlay R, Campbell DG, Deak M, Macartney TJ, Kahle KT, and Zhang J (2014). The WNK-regulated SPAK/OSR1 kinases directly phosphorylate and inhibit the K+–Cl− co-transporters. Biochem J 458, 559–573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Zhang J, Gao G, Begum G, Wang J, Khanna AR, Shmukler BE, Daubner GM, Heros P. de L., Davies P, Varghese J, et al. (2016). Functional kinomics establishes a critical node of volume-sensitive cation-Cl(−) cotransporter regulation in the mammalian brain. Sci Rep-uk 6, 35986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Melo Z, Heros P. de los, Cruz-Rangel S, Vázquez N, Bobadilla NA, Pasantes-Morales H, Alessi DR, Mercado A, and Gamba G (2013). N-terminal serine dephosphorylation is required for KCC3 cotransporter full activation by cell swelling. J Biological Chem 288, 31468–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.González M, Martín-Ruíz I, Jiménez S, Pirone L, Barrio R, and Sutherland JD (2011). Generation of stable Drosophila cell lines using multicistronic vectors. Sci Rep-uk 1, 75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Hekmat-Scafe DS, Lunday MY, Ranga R, and Tanouye MA (2006). Mutations in the K+/Cl− cotransporter gene kazachoc (kcc) increase seizure susceptibility in Drosophila. J Neurosci 35, 8943–8954 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data S1. List of proteins with putative Fray binding sites. Related to STAR Methods and Figure 4. A) Drosophila proteins with binding sites identified using the Drosophila motif, [D/E/N/Q/S/T/Y]RFx[V/I]xxxx[D/E/G/P]. B) Drosophila proteins with binding sites identified using the Gagnon motif, [S/G/V]RFx[V/I]xx[I/V/T/S].
Data Availability Statement
All data reported in this paper will be shared by the lead contact upon request. This paper does not report original code. Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.
