Donor T cells for CAR T cell therapy

Abstract

Adoptive cell therapy using patient-derived chimeric receptor antigen (CAR) T cells redirected against tumor cells has shown remarkable success in treating hematologic cancers. However, wider accessibility of cellular therapies for all patients is needed. Manufacture of patient-derived CAR T cells is limited by prolonged lymphopenia in heavily pre-treated patients and risk of contamination with tumor cells when isolating T cells from patient blood rich in malignant blasts. Donor T cells provide a good source of immune cells for adoptive immunotherapy and can be used to generate universal off-the-shelf CAR T cells that are readily available for administration into patients as required. Genome editing tools such as TALENs and CRISPR-Cas9 and non-gene editing methods such as short hairpin RNA and blockade of protein expression are currently used to enhance CAR T cell safety and efficacy by abrogating non-specific toxicity in the form of graft versus host disease (GVHD) and preventing CAR T cell rejection by the host.

Background

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have shown remarkable efficacy in treating B cell malignancies such as B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), follicular lymphoma (FL) and multiple myeloma (MM), although more improvements are needed for treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) [1–19]. However, currently approved clinical treatments are expensive and complicated to manufacture, delaying patient access to treatments. This has prompted a need to investigate options for widening accessibility for all patients using donor sources to manufacture CAR T cells. Healthy donor peripheral blood (PB) is currently used to generate CAR T cells in preclinical and early phase clinical studies, but in addition to traditional uses in transplantation, umbilical cord blood (UCB) presents an untapped source of healthy donor T cells for adoptive immunotherapy and can be used to create a bank of readily available off-the-shelf CAR T cells. Both gene editing and non-gene editing approaches can be used to enhance CAR T cell function and eliminate alloreactivity from allogeneic donor-derived CAR T cells, making them safe for administration into patients and reducing their rejection by the host immune system.

CAR T cell therapy

CAR T cell immunotherapy offers potentially curative treatments for refractory leukemia and lymphomas. In the clinic, T cells isolated from patient PB can be genetically engineered to express CARs that specifically target tumor antigens [5, 6, 10, 20–25]. After ex vivo amplification to numbers suitable for adoptive cell therapy, these autologous CAR T cells are infused back into the patient, where they become living drugs that detect and kill tumor cells, even in advanced stages of disease [5, 6, 10, 20–25]. Approximately 80% of patients with relapsed or refractory B-ALL (r/r B-ALL) and 40–60% of patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) showed complete responses after anti-CD19 CAR (CAR19) T cell treatment [5, 6, 10, 20–25]. As a result, the FDA has recently approved 3 autologous anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapies: tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah, Novartis) for treating pediatric and adolescent (age 25 or under) B-ALL and adult DLBCL; axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta, Gilead) for treating DLBCL, NHL, and FL; and brexucabtagene autoleucel (Tecartus, Gilead) for treating adult relapsed or refractory (r/r) MCL [1–6, 8–19, 26–28]. The FDA has also approved idecabtagene vicleucel (Abecma, Bristol Myers Squibb), an autologous anti-BCMA CAR T cell therapy, for treating adult r/r MM [7, 29].

CARs are fusion proteins typically combining extracellular monoclonal antibody-derived targeting fragments with intracellular signaling domains that activate T cells (Fig. 1A). Variable light (VL) and heavy (VH) chains are linked by a flexible peptide to form a single chain variable fragment (scFv) that recognizes and binds to tumor antigens [30, 31]. The scFv is connected via a hinge or spacer to the transmembrane domain (TM) that anchors the CAR to the T cell membrane. The hinge provides flexibility for the scFv to reach tumor antigens and, along with the TM, provides stability for CAR expression. The hinge and TM are typically extracellular domains like CD8α (Kymriah) or CD28 (Yescarta) that avoid Fcγ receptor (FcγR) binding activity, in order to circumvent off-target effects and improve CAR T cell engraftment, persistence, and antitumor efficacy. Beneath the TM are intracellular co-stimulatory and T cell receptor (TCR) derived CD3ζ signaling domains that are crucial for CAR T cell activation, proliferation, differentiation, survival, and persistence. First-generation CARs consist only of CD3ζ while second and third-generation CARs include additionally 1 and 2 co-stimulatory domains respectively [30, 31]. Commonly used co-stimulatory domains include 4-1BB (Kymriah), CD28 (Yescarta), ICOS, OX40, or CD27.

Fig. 1.

Creating universal CAR T cells with genome editing. A Healthy donor T cells isolated from PB or UCB are genetically modified to express CAR. VL and VH chains are linked by a flexible peptide to form the scFv that recognizes tumor antigens. The hinge connects the scFv to the TM that anchors the receptor to the T cell’s membrane. TCR-derived CD3ζ and one or more co-stimulatory signaling domains activate CAR T cells. B To avoid alloreactivity, TCR-KO CAR T cells can be generated using genome editing techniques such as paired TALENs, composed of TALEs fused to FokI endonucleases for targeted DNA cleavage. C TCR KO can also be achieved using CRISPR-Cas9. Cas9 endonucleases and sgRNA form RNP complexes that cleave DNA at HNH and RuvC nuclease active sites. D DSBs from DNA cleavage are repaired via NHEJ or HDR mechanisms.

Clinical CAR T cell therapeutics such as Kymriah and Yescarta are commonly manufactured using lentiviral or gamma-retroviral vectors, respectively, to transfer CAR genes to T cells [32]. Protocols are safe and optimized, but are complicated by the time and expense needed to ensure that all viral vectors used are replication-deficient; thus production of these CAR T cells is mostly centralized [32]. Automated cell processing platforms such as the CliniMACS Prodigy® (Miltenyi Biotec) and the Cocoon® Platform (Lonza) can expedite and scale-up CAR T cell manufacture, but issues of manufacturing standardization and product characterization remain [33].

Ex vivo CAR T cell manufacture is challenged by problems in generating high enough numbers for infusion while maintaining viability and high antitumor efficacy with minimal exhaustion. The cells generated are also a mix of helper (CD4⁺) and cytotoxic (CD8⁺) T cells. Preclinical studies by Pfeiffer et al. and Agarwal et al. present an alternative solution by using lentiviral vectors to selectively generate CD8⁺ or CD4⁺ CAR T cells in vivo [34, 35]. Interestingly, Agarwal et al. showed that CD4⁺ CD19-targeting CAR T cells have higher antitumor efficacy at high tumor burden than CD8⁺ CAR T cells alone [34]. Some mice in Pfeiffer et al.’s proof-of-concept study displayed symptoms indicative of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), an acute inflammatory syndrome that can cause multi-organ dysfunction in some patients as a serious side effect of CAR T cell therapy [35]. An advantage of in vivo CAR T generation is the slower manifestation of CRS, since CAR T cell levels increase homeostatically and thus more gradually than that of adoptive cell therapy, where patients are infused with high numbers of ex vivo activated CAR T cells [35]. Another recent study by Nawaz et al. demonstrated that CAR T cells can also be generated in vivo using adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors in a similar mouse model with promising results showing high efficacy against T cell leukemia, which is immensely difficult to treat using current CAR T cell therapies [36]. Successful clinical translation of in vivo generation of CAR T cells can help significantly in solving the challenges of ex vivo CAR T cell manufacture, widen patient access to immunotherapies, and improve clinical outcomes.

Compared with viral vectors, non-viral transposon-based gene delivery systems are simpler, cheaper, have no infectious potential, and enable CAR T cells to be produced by hospitals for wider patient access to CAR T therapies [37]. Transposon-based methods have similar DNA integration profiles to viral vectors, but can carry larger cargoes (up to 200 kb) and simultaneously deliver multiple transgenes, which will be useful as future generations of CAR T cells become more sophisticated [37]. CAR T cells engineered using transposon-based systems to target CD19⁺ leukemia and lymphomas have demonstrated strong efficacy in preclinical mouse models and early phase clinical trials in USA, Australia, and China [37–40]. Recent Phase I clinical trial (ACTRN12617001579381) data showed 9 out of 10 patients achieving complete remission after treatment with donor-derived piggyBac transposon-based CAR19T cells against r/r B-ALL or aggressive lymphoma post-HSCT; however, 2 patients developed malignant CAR19T cell-derived lymphoma that resulted in the death of 1 patient while the other was successfully treated [41, 42]. Thus the risk of oncogenicity of piggyBac transposon-based CAR T manufacture presents a safety challenge that must be overcome for further clinical applications.

Healthy donor peripheral blood or umbilical cord blood as sources of allogeneic CAR T cells

Despite the aforementioned successes, autologous CAR T cell production is often not feasible for heavily pre-treated patients, as shown by interim analyses of the Phase II ELIANA trial (NCT02435849) for pediatric r/r ALL that revealed CAR T cell manufacture failed in approximately 8% of patients [43, 44]. In the setting of B cell malignancies, prolonged lymphopenia in chemotherapy-treated patients can limit the generation of potent autologous CAR T cells, with CD8⁺ T cells taking at least 3–6 months to recover post-chemotherapy and CD4⁺ T cells taking even longer [45–48]. Additionally, T cells derived from chemotherapy-treated patients are often more differentiated compared with those derived from healthy blood, and demonstrate lower ex vivo and in vivo proliferative capacity and rapid exhaustion following antigen-specific stimulation. Thus harvesting lymphocytes from patients earlier in their treatment may provide a better source of lymphocytes for CAR T cell manufacture. Alternatively, using healthy donor peripheral blood may provide high numbers of cells with stronger proliferative capacity. Other donor cell sources, such as UCB, may also be considered for CAR T cell development. The advantages and disadvantages of autologous and allogeneic CAR T cell therapies are summarized in Table 1 [49–52], with comparison of clinical trial data in Table 2.

Table 1.

Advantages and disadvantages of autologous and allogeneic CAR T cell therapies [49–52]

Autologous CAR T cells	Allogeneic CAR T cells
Manufacture is complex and expensive with variability in starting material (patient T cells) and resulting CAR T cell product. Limited T cell quality and quantity (autologous PBMCs from leukapheresis product) with risk of manufacture failure for heavily pre-treated patients (lymphopenia).	Standardized manufacture with high quality starting material (healthy donor T cells) and high quality CAR T cell product. Multiple T cell sources from many healthy donors (PB or UCB).
Low scalability (1 product per patient) with increased time to treatment and production costs due to manufacture and quality control specific for individual patient.	High scalability (1 product for many patients) with “off-the-shelf” bank of CAR T cell products, readily available (decreased time to treatment). Reduced production costs with manufacture and quality control applicable to many patients.
Risk of contamination with malignant cells in patient blood.	Minimal risks of malignant cell contamination since T cells are sourced from healthy donor blood.
Limited optimization of T cell phenotype and function with limited editable cancer targets, promising applications in B cell malignancies but limited applications in T cell malignancies.	High optimization of T cell phenotype and function to improve CAR T efficacy with multiple editable cancer targets, e.g. promising applications in both B and T cell malignancies.
Limited potency of CAR T cell product due to chemotherapy-treated patient T cells being more differentiated with lower proliferative capacity and rapid exhaustion. Increased in vivo persistence compared with allogeneic CAR T cells due to lack of immune rejection from the host.	Potent CAR T cell product from healthy donor T cells, but with decreased in vivo persistence due to higher immunogenecity (from the host against infused CAR T cells).
CRS or CRES toxicities. Low immunogenicity and minimal risk of alloreactivity or immune rejection affecting clinical outcomes.	CRS or CRES toxicities. Risk of alloreactivity factors (e.g. GVHD, immune rejection) affecting clinical outcomes.

Table 2.

Comparison of efficacy, persistence, and toxicity associated with autologous and allogeneic CAR T cell therapies in selected recent clinical trials

CAR T cell therapy	Target antigen	Malignancy	CAR expression technology	Gene editing strategy to mitigate negative alloreactivity factors	Efficacy	CAR T cell expansion and persistence	Toxicities	Phase	References
SCRI-CAR19v1 Autologous	CD19	r/r B-ALL, r/r NHL	Lentiviral transduction of CAR19 construct into activated CD4 and CD8 enriched T cells derived from autologous PBMCs in leukapheresis product.	Not applicable	Phase I: Overall 40/45 (89%) MRD– CR remission rate; 93% MRD– CR in CAR T-treated patients and 100% in patients who also had fludarabine and cyclophosphamide lymphodepletion. Phase II: Anti-tumor response in 5/6 patients at 3 weeks, with CR by Week 9 in 2 DLBCL patients but not sustained despite CAR T persistence; 1 CR patient developed new CD19+ site at 6 months but CR at 3 weeks post second CAR T infusion; 1 PR patient developed CD19– at 9 weeks.	Phase I: Functional CAR T persistence until CD19– relapse 8 months post-infusion. Phase II: All patients showed CAR T cell expansion in PB, BM, and CSF with ongoing persistence at 14 days to 9 months.	Phase I: Reversible severe CRS and/or reversible severe neurotoxicity in 23% patients; no patient deaths from toxicity. Phase II: CRS: Grade I (n = 3), Grade II CRS (n = 1), Grade III CRS (n = 1). Neurotoxicity: Grade I (n = 1), Grade 2 (n = 1), no severe neurotoxicity.	Phase I: 45 children and young adults Phase II: 8 patients (4–18 yrs): r/r DLBCL (n = 4), Burkitt's lymphoma (n = 2), gray zone B cell lymphoma (n = 1), primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (n = 1)	NCT02028455 Gardner et al. (2017) [22] Rivers et al (2018) [53]
P-BCMA-101 Autologous	BCMA	r/r MM	Non-viral piggyBac transposon delivers anti-BCMA CAR (fused with the less immunogenic Centyrin protein to CD3ζ/4-1BB) with a safety switch to autologous T cells harvested from leukapheresis, while retaining high %TSCM	Not applicable	57% ORR for 34 patients treated with single P-BCMA-101 during initial dose escalation; 4 patients treated with cyclic P-BCMA-101, rituximab, lenalidomide, or single P-BCMA-101 at lowest dose showed 100% ORR with ongoing responses and minimal CRS.	Patients treated with rituximab or lenalidomide pre- and post-lymphodepletion showed gradual TSCM expansion (peak at 2–3 weeks and detectable for up to 1.5 years) and increased T cell robustness.	CRS in 17% patients: Grade III in 1 patient, neurotoxicity in 1 patient, 3 patients treated with tocilizumab, no patients admitted to ICU admission or needed safety switch activation. No patient deaths or off-target toxicities. 79% Grade III neutropenia, 30% thrombocytopenia, 30% anemia.	Phase I/II (PRIME): 43 patients (67% male, 33% female, median age 60 yrs)	NCT03288493 Costello et al. (2019–2021) [54–56]
UCART19 Allogeneic	CD19	r/r B-ALL	Recombinant lentiviral transduction of CAR19 (4-1BB) with CD20 target mimotope for rituximab (safety switch) into healthy donor T cells.	TRAC and CD52 KO using mRNA encoding TALENs to disrupt TCRαβ expression to limit GVHD, while making the CAR T cells resistant to anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody lymphodepletion.	14/21 (67%) patients with CR or CR with incomplete hematological recovery 28 days post-infusion; patients (n = 4) not given alemtuzumab showed no UCART19 expansion or anti-leukemic activity; median duration of response 4.1 months with 10/14 (71%) responders proceeding to allo-SCT; progression-free survival 27% at 6 months; overall survival 55%.	Rapid UCART19 expansion in blood with peak at Day 14 and reduction by Day 28 with persistence in some patients; 15/17 (88%) patients treated with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and alemtuzumab showed UCART19 expansion; no UCART19 expansion in patients treated with only fludarabine and cyclophosphamide but showed indications of earlier host lymphocyte recovery; larger AUC for first 28 days post-UCART19 in responders than non-responders; UCART19 persisted past Day 42 in 3 patients with 1 patient showing detectable UCART19 at Day 120.	CRS in 19 patients (91%); Grade III–IV CRS in 3 patients (14%); neurotoxicity in 8 patients (38%); Grade I acute skin GVHD in 2 patients (10%); Grade IV prolonged cytopenia in 6 patients (32%); 1 death from neutropenic sepsis with concurrent CRS; 1 death from pulmonary hemorrhage with persistent cytopenia.	Phase I (PALL): 7 children Phase I (CALM): 14 adults	NCT02808442 NCT02746952 Benjamin et al. (2020) [57]
CTX110 Allogeneic	CD19	r/r DLBCL, LBCL, Grade 3B FL	CAR19 transgene construct inserted into TRAC locus of donor T cells using multiplex CRISPR-Cas9 editing (no lentivirus or retrovirus).	CRISPR-Cas9 mediated TRAC KO to disrupt TCR expression to mitigate GVHD, and B2M KO to disrupt β-microglobulin and remove MHC-I expression to limit rejection and enhance CAR T cell persistence.	Single CTX110 dose at level 2+ (intent-to-treat) achieved 58% ORR and 38% CR rate in LBCL; CR rate 21% at 6 months; 4/9 patients achieved CR at Day 28 and stayed in CR at 6 months (remaining 5 patients not reached 6-month evaluation yet); longest response rate at 18 months.	CTX110 expansion or persistence kinetics not yet reported.	No GVHD; only Grade I–II CRS and resolved with standard management; CTX110 re-dose did not increase CRS frequency or severity; Grade III+ ICANS in 1 patient with concurrent HHV-6 encephalitis; no ICANS at dose levels 3–4; 1 patient with pseudomonal sepsis (resolved in 4 days).	Phase I (CARBON): recruiting; treated 29 adult patients so far	NCT04035434 McGuirk et al. (2021) [58] CRISPR Therapeutics (2021) [59]

AUC: area under the curve; BM: bone marrow; CR: complete response; CRS: cytokine release syndrome; CSF: cerebrospinal fluid; GVHD: graft versus host disease; ICANS: immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome; KO: knock out; ORR: overall response rate; PB: peripheral blood; PR: partial response; T_SCM: T stem cell memory

Manufacture of CAR T cells for T cell malignancies faces unique challenges due to the similarities between normal and malignant T cells. CAR T cells that target antigens common between normal and neoplastic T cells may kill both tumor T cells and CAR T cells [60, 61]. This fratricide, or mutual killing of CAR T cells, may prevent the generation and expansion of CAR T cells during the manufacture process. However, the targeting of malignant T cells without killing normal or CAR T cells can be achieved by using CAR T cells that have been genetically edited ex vivo to prevent expression of the T cell target [60, 61].

Contamination with tumor cells is an additional concern in refractory leukemia patients, since T cells are isolated from PB that may contain malignant blasts. This has resulted in at least one case of accidental expression of CAR in leukemic B cells leading to epitope masking and relapse, but is especially problematic in T cell malignancies where selection steps in CAR T manufacture using CD3, CD4 or CD8 are also likely to enrich leukemic cells and cause manufacture failure [32, 62]. Moreover, the peripheral blood of patients suffering from T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) or T cell lymphoma (TCL) often contain neoplastic T cells that may inadvertently be harvested and transduced with CAR, which can competitively bind to the target antigens on malignant T cells. The challenges of isolating healthy T cells from the phenotypically identical neoplastic T cells can be avoided by transfecting NK cells or healthy donor T cells [60, 63–67].

CAR T cells can potentially be manufactured from the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of healthy donors that can be stored and validated before use, and infused into multiple patients immediately as needed. However, donor CAR T cell-mediated graft versus host disease (GVHD) and recipient-mediated rejection of CAR T cells needs to be eliminated to make allogeneic CAR T cells safe and effective. CAR T cells derived from a matched sibling donor have been safely used to treat patients who relapsed after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), but outside of the setting of past transplant, the identification of a suitable sibling followed by CAR T cell manufacture is even more logistically challenging than autologous CAR T cells and no less expensive [68–70].

UCB can be a new source of healthy donor T cells for developing effective immunotherapies. Compared with those derived from adult blood, UCB-derived T cells have more naïve phenotype, higher proliferative capacity, delayed exhaustion following antigen-specific stimulation, lower immunogenicity and reduced risk of inducing GVHD [71–73]. Up-regulation of T cell exhaustion markers decreases CAR T cell persistence, limiting the efficacy of CAR T cell therapy and increasing the risk of relapse [74]. We have demonstrated that CAR19 T cells up-regulated PD-1 and TIM-3 exhaustion markers in co-cultures with CD19⁺ leukemia cells and in leukemia patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse models [74]. UCB T cells generally express lower levels of T cell inhibitory receptors compared to those of adult PB [72]. Importantly, UCB T cells also mount more effective antitumor responses via faster tumor infiltration with CCR7⁺ CD8⁺ T cells and faster induction of cytotoxic CD8⁺ T cells and CD4⁺ Th1 cells in the tumor microenvironment [72]. All these factors make the readily available UCB potentially more advantageous than other T cell sources.

Studies have shown that CAR T cells can be efficiently produced from UCB. UCB-derived T cells co-expressing endogenous TCR against common viruses that affect patients post-SCT, for example, cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and adenovirus (AdV), were genetically modified with CD19-targeting CAR [75]. Allogeneic UCB-derived CAR19 T cells were infused in patients with B cell malignancies after SCT in a recently completed clinical trial (NCT01362452), showing the potential of UCB T cells for cancer immunotherapy and especially in combination with SCT [76].

Methods to reduce CAR T cell alloreactivity

Adoptive transfer of donor-derived CAR T cells can be compromised by potential risks of alloreactivity due to the diverse TCR repertoire expressed by mature T cells [77, 78]. The TCR on adoptively transferred donor T cells may recognize recipient tissues as foreign and induce a cytotoxic immune reaction known as GVHD [77, 78]. GVHD is caused by expanding alloreactive donor T cells that infiltrate and destroy host tissues such as those in the skin, liver, and gut [77, 78]. In myeloablative conditioned recipients of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as GVHD prophylaxis, grades II–IV and III–IV acute GVHD were higher after ≤ 5/8 and 6–8/8 HLA-matched UCB HSCT, while chronic GVHD was comparable between donor sources [79]. Similarly, grade III–IV acute GVHD was higher in recipients of haploidentical relative donor HSCT than in recipients of matched unrelated donor (MUD) HSCT [80]. Many variables such as conditioning, T cell depletion and GVHD prophylaxis can affect the rates of GVHD with HLA-haploidentical or UCB transplants, but most importantly, all allogeneic T cell sources carry a risk of GVHD without some form of manipulation.

Despite toxicity issues such as hypotension and fever, HLA-matched donor-derived CAR T therapy for patients with relapsed B cell malignancies [68, 81–85] post allo-HSCT have lower rates of GVHD compared to those expected with unmanipulated donor lymphocyte infusions [41, 82, 86, 87]. This does not seem to be the case in donor-derived CAR T cells for T cell malignancies, where grade I-II acute GVHD was seen in 60% of recipients of CD7-specific T cells [88]. These results are from small, early-phase studies with variation in manufacturing protocols and CAR design, but they highlight the need for further technical advances to eliminate the risk of GVHD.

GVHD is not the only alloreactivity factor affecting clinical outcomes. Recent murine studies demonstrating potent graft-versus-lymphoma (GVL) activity with reduced xenogeneic GVHD of donor-derived CAR19 T cells in allo-HSCT also highlight the importance of CAR design; while CD28-co-stimulated CAR T cells had reduced alloreactivity, 4-1BB-co-stimulated and first-generation CAR T cells retained alloreactivity and increased risk of GVHD [83].

In a recent clinical trial, 8 r/r B-ALL patients received either HLA-matched (n = 4) or HLA-haploidentical (n = 4) CAR19T cells immediately preceding an intended HSCT as a leukemia debulking strategy [84]. The haploidentical CAR T cells induced transient or no reduction in peripheral blood leukemia with no significant CAR T cell expansion which suggests rejection [84]. Patients treated with HLA-matched CAR19T cells exhibited higher complete response rates although more severe toxic side effects compared with those treated with haploidentical CAR19T cells, with no GVHD observed in either group [84]. Only 3 out of 8 patients reached complete response and only 2 of the 8 patients proceeded to transplant, with all 4 haploidentical CAR19T-treated patients dying of disease progression and 1 HLA-matched CAR19T-treated patient dying of lung infection [84]. Thus HLA-matched and HLA-haploidentical allogeneic CD19-directed CAR T cell infusions are feasible in r/r B-ALL before HSCT, but other factors besides GVHD need to be considered in clinical applications of allogeneic CAR T cell infusions.

Interestingly, the generation of CAR T cells from hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) may provide an avenue to overcome alloreactivity. Transgenic expression of CAR was shown to inhibit rearrangements of endogenous TCR during T cell differentiation from primitive HSCs [89]. Introducing CARs to HSCs or early T cell precursors should therefore provide only antigen-specific targeting while preventing non-specific allogeneic T cell activation [89–92]. We and others have shown that CD34^– CD7⁺ early T cell precursors with pro-T1 phenotype can be generated ex vivo from UCB-derived CD34⁺ stem cells using conditions that mimic the thymic microenvironment (OP9-DL1 cells) or feeder-free conditions and immobilized delta-like 4 (DL4) ligands [89–92]. We have shown that CAR19-transduced ex vivo generated CD34^– CD7⁺ T cell precursors can efficiently engraft in immunodeficient mice and generate mature T cells that express CAR19 [92, 93]. Delayed leukemia progression was seen in immunodeficient mice reconstituted with UCB-derived CAR19-modified T cell precursors and challenged with CD19⁺ leukemia cells in an allogeneic xenograft mouse model [92, 93]. Notably, CAR T cells generated from UCB-derived T cell precursors did not exhibit xenogeneic reactivity against the host in this model, suggesting that UCB-derived CAR T cell precursors can potentially be used in conjunction with HSCT [92].

Compared to PB-derived T cells, cord blood-derived T cells exhibit lower risk of GVHD but higher GVL activity [72, 83, 94]. However, the alloreactivity of UCB-derived CAR T cells must be ablated before they can be safely used as universal off-the-shelf CAR T cells, ready for administration into patients as needed. Since TCRs mediate alloreactivity, approaches to down-regulate TCR chain expression using RNA interference or removing endogenous TCRs from donor T cells using genome editing can be used [95].

Current clinical trials investigating the safety and efficacy of donor-derived CAR T cells against r/r MM (NCT04093596), r/r B cell leukemia or lymphoma (NCT03939026, NCT04416984, NCT03166878), or r/r T cell malignancies (NCT04264078) employ various strategies to minimize GVHD, and most, if not all, involve knocking out the TRAC and/or B2M genes [96–100]. Most CAR T cells are genetically engineered from αβ T cells, named for the disulfide-linked TCRα and TCRβ that form the TCR whose hypervariable or complementarity-determining regions recognize foreign antigens [101–105]. TCRα is formed via VJ recombination and TCRβ via VDJ recombination in early stages of T cell maturation to create the highly diverse repertoire of TCRs that recognize pathogenic and tumor antigens [106]. TCRαβ non-covalently associates with transmembrane protein heterodimers CD3δε and CD3γε to form a hexamer, which then associates with CD3ζζ to form the TCR-CD3 assembly or TCR complex (Fig. 1A) that enables intracellular signal transduction via phosphorylation of tyrosine residues in the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs (ITAM) of CD3 chains [101–105]. The CD3ζζ homodimer is linked by a disulfide bond and CD3 proteins are essential for TCR surface expression [101–105]. Without CD3γ, CD3δ, or CD3ε, TCRαβ cannot leave the endoplasmic reticulum and is degraded [101–105]. Without CD3ζ, the TCRαβ-CD3δε-CD3γε hexamer is transported to lysosomal degradation rather than the cell surface [101–105]. Therefore, knocking down the expression of a single TCR chain using genome editing or non-genome editing methods can result in the loss of the whole TCR complex from the cell surface, creating TCR-knockout (TCR-KO) CAR T cells which can be isolated by screening for CD3^– CAR T cells. Recent proof-of-concept studies showed that the resulting TCR-KO CAR T cells do not respond to TCR stimulation but do respond to CAR stimulation [107]. Allogeneic anti-BCMA CAR T cells, generated using short hairpin RNA (shRNA) to target CD3ζ to knock out TCR, demonstrated systemic CAR T cell engraftment with no GVHD in a recent dose-escalation phase I clinical trial with 6 r/r MM patients [108, 109].

Genome editing CAR T cells to enhance safety and efficacy

Genome editing can also be used to improve CAR T cell function and enhance antitumor responses to bypass tumor immune evasion strategies. Compared to other genome editing tools such as zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), CRISPR-Cas shows much promise in generating universal CAR T cells due to its relative ease and reasonable costs [110]. Table 2 compares and summarizes the safety and efficacy of various gene-edited CAR T cells in recent clinical trials.

TALENs are restriction enzymes comprised of transcription activator-like effectors (TALEs), derived from proteins secreted by Xanthomonas spp. bacteria, fused to FokI endonucleases via the C-terminal linker for targeted DNA cleavage [110–112]. FokI endonucleases bind to the 5’-GGATG-3’ recognition site and cleave the 5’ strand 9 base pairs away and the 3’ strand 13 base pairs away [113]. TALEs consist of central DNA-binding domains flanked by N-terminal translocation domains for binding to the target DNA preferentially at 5’ thymine [114], and C-terminal activation domains with nuclear localization signals for translocation into cell nuclei [110–112]. Within the DNA-binding domains are repeated, highly conserved 33–34 amino acid sequences with divergent amino acids at positions 12 and 13, known as the repeat variable di-residue (RVD) [110–112]. RVDs are highly variable but generally recognize specific nucleotide bases: NI (asparagine, isoleucine) for adenosine, NG (asparagine, glycine) for thymine, HD (histidine, aspartic acid) for cytosine, and NN (asparagine, asparagine) preferentially for guanine [110–112]. Thus TALENs can be designed to recognize and cut any DNA sequence by combining segments that have the suitable RVDs (Fig. 1B). Double-strand breaks (DSB) induced by TALENs are repaired by either non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homology directed repair (HDR) mechanisms [110–112].

In a recently completed phase I clinical trial (NCT02808442) conducted by Qasim et al., human infants were treated with allogeneic CD19-specific CAR T cells generated via lentiviral transduction followed by TALEN-mediated disruption of TRAC and CD52 [57, 115, 116]. TRAC disruption prevented TCRαβ cell surface expression, and residual TCRαβ⁺ cells were removed using magnetic beads. CD19⁺ r/r B-ALL patients received lymphodepleting chemotherapy, anti-CD52 serotherapy (alemtuzumab), and 1 dose of TCR^– CD52^– CAR19 T cells that established molecular remission within 28 days without GVHD which persisted until conditioning before allo-SCT [57, 115, 116]. Antitumor activity and CAR T cell persistence was dependent on receipt of alemtuzumab conditioning [117]. Persistence of CAR T cells in the peripheral blood was seen up to 80 days post-infusion, but assessment of long-term persistence was limited due to the majority of patients proceeding to allogeneic stem cell transplant. Complete response or complete response with incomplete hematological recovery was seen in 67% patients and the 6-month progression-free survival was 27% [57, 115, 116]. Despite depleting TCR⁺ cells from the product, GVHD was seen in conjunction with expansion of CAR⁺ TCR⁺ T cells in 10% patients. While the results in B-ALL are inferior to those seen with autologous products, they provide a reference point for future products to improve upon [22, 53].

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins are part of bacterial adaptive immunity against bacteriophage infections and work by digesting invading DNA [118–120]. Although many variants of CRISPR-Cas exist, the type II CRISPR-Cas9 system found in Streptococcus pyogenes is the simplest and most often used in genome editing (Fig. 1C). To cut DNA, the Cas9 endonuclease forms a ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex with a synthetic single guide RNA (sgRNA) consisting of a CRISPR RNA (crRNA) joined to a trans-activating CRISPR RNA (tracrRNA) by a linker loop [118–120]. The crRNA provides the specificity for Cas9 and has a 20-nucleotide sequence complementary to the target sequence [118–120]. At the HNH and RuvC nuclease active sites in Cas9, blunt-ended double-strand breaks (DSB) are created in the target DNA approximately 3 nucleotides upstream of the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM, 5’-NGG-3’ for SpCas9 where N is any nucleotide) [118–120]. DSB are repaired by either NHEJ or HDR mechanisms (Fig. 1D). NHEJ is favored but error-prone, and creates insertions or deletions (indels) in target DNA. This results in frameshift mutations that disrupt gene function and can be used to knock out genes. HDR is more precise but requires single-stranded or double-stranded DNA donor templates containing genes of interest (GOI) flanked on both sides by homology arms (HA) that match the sequences next to the genomic target [118–120]. HDR is used to knock in genes since it replaces the target sequence with the sequence in the donor template. Genome editing of mammalian cells by CRISPR-Cas9 requires longer tracrRNA sequences and additional nuclear localization signals to enable Cas9 to access cell nuclei [118–120].

Pitfalls of genome editing include off-target mutations that can potentially be oncogenic depending on the sequences involved [121]. CRISPR-Cas9 induces DSB repair that can result in large deletions and complex rearrangements [121]. Partial mismatching is tolerated by Cas9 which can inadvertently allow cutting of DNA despite the match being several nucleotides different to the exact target sequence [121]. With mammalian DNA being much longer than the prokaryotic DNA that Cas originated in, chances of off-target effects are increased when editing mammalian cells [121]. CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing also induces p53-mediated DNA damage responses [122]. In human pluripotent stem cells (PSCs), p53 inhibits CRISPR-Cas9 engineering, leading to selection against cells with functional p53 pathways [122]. p53 inhibition prevents the damage response and increases the rate of HDR from donor templates. Taken together, the results suggest that CRISPR-Cas9 engineering in human cells may lead to accumulation of genome edited cells with dysfunctional p53 and increased risk of neoplastic transformation [122]. This, along with other clinical toxicities like CRS, prompts the need to carefully modulate CAR T cell levels for patient safety without reducing antitumor efficacy. One effective strategy is to incorporate pharmacologically inducible suicide genes into CAR constructs as safety switches; for example, inducible caspase-9 (iC9 or iCasp9) which consists of fused domains modified from human caspase-9 and FK506-binding protein-12 (FKBP12) [123–126]. Small-molecule chemical inducers of dimerization (CID), such as rimiducid (AP1903) or the B/B homodimerizer (AP20187), can then be used to eliminate excess iC9-transduced CAR T cells by cross-linking FKBP domains to synthetically activate caspase-9 and initiating intrinsic apoptotic pathways for rapid cell death [123–126].

Although the issue of off-target mutagenesis has been largely improved due to recent advances in CRISPR-Cas base editing and prime editing, potential effects of off-target gene editing are still largely unknown and unpredictable, especially in approaches that target multiple genes at once [127–129]. Whole-genome sequencing is important to accurately assess off-target effects and develop algorithms for predicting single and multiplex off-target cleavage sites. One possible solution is to generate CAR T cells from PB-derived induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) lines that have been genome edited to enhance antitumor properties or modify TCR and HLA genes to reduce alloreactivity and graft rejection [130]. While iPSC lines can be screened and validated under GMP conditions before use, the lack of clinically compatible feeder-free or serum-free differentiation methods to generate enough mature T cells for subsequent CAR modification poses a significant challenge [130]. However, with extensive preclinical analyses to assess the safety and efficacy of genome edited anti-cancer immunotherapy products, banks of TCR-KO CAR T cells can be made in advance from common HLA-expressing blood donors for a broad cohort of patients and be readily used to treat hematologic cancers.

T-ALL comprises 20–25% of cases of all adult ALL and is notoriously difficult to treat due to its complexity and quick progression [131, 132]. CD7 is expressed on more than 95% of T-ALL but also expressed on normal T cells, which complicates the development of CD7-targeting CAR T cells due to potential contamination by T-ALL cells, and target-driven T cell fratricide which limits adequate CAR T cell production [131, 132]. It is encouraging that donor-derived anti-CD7 CAR T cells achieved efficient expansion with high complete remission rates and manageable safety profile in a recent phase I trial of 20 r/r T-ALL patients [131]. However, the value of genome-edited CAR T cells is demonstrated in another recent early-phase clinical trial of 5 adult r/r T-ALL patients where Universal CAR T therapy (TruUCART™ GC027) was shown to be safe and effective [132]. TruUCART™ GC027 was generated using lentiviral vectors to deliver second-generation CAR onto T cells sourced from HLA-mismatched healthy donors, with CRISPR-Cas9-mediated knockout of TCRα and CD7 to minimize GVHD and T cell fratricide [132]. Preclinical testing in CCRF-CEM xenograft mouse models showed strong antitumor activity and prolonged survival in all treated groups, and 80% of human patients treated with a single infusion of TruUCART™ GC027 without preconditioning showed robust CAR T cell expansion and persisting MRD^– complete responses [132]. Updates to this trial showed 5 out of 6 patients achieving MRD^– remission at 1 month which was maintained in 3 patients at 6 months [133]. The authors reported robust early expansion of the CAR T cells, but no information was provided regarding long-term persistence. Further promising results from Georgiadis et al. showed that base-edited CAR T cells exhibit no chromosomal translocations or off-target mutations that may affect CAR T cell specificity in preclinical studies using Jurkat and patient T-ALL cells and NSG mice [134]. Activated donor T cells were electroporated with sgRNA targeting TRBC and CD7 and codon optimized BE3 mRNA, followed by lentiviral transduction with 3CAR and 7CAR [134]. Precise multiplexed CRISPR base-editing was used to disrupt TRBC1/2 and CD7 to create TCRαβ/CD3^– and CD7^– CAR T cells, with shared antigens CD3 and CD7 removed to prevent T cell fratricide [134]. Fratricide-resistant TCR^– CD3^– CD7^– CAR T cells showed high antitumor activity against T-ALL targets in vitro and in vivo [134].

Other phase I clinical trials (NCT03399448) demonstrate the safety and feasibility of CRISPR-Cas9 multiplex editing [135, 136]. Adult patients (age 62–66 yrs) were treated with autologous T cells generated by electroporation of CRISPR-Cas9 RNP complexes (containing 3 sgRNAs targeting TRAC, TRBC1, TRBC2, PDCD1) and lentiviral transduction of NY-ESO-1 and LAGE-1 cancer-specific TCR into patient T cells [135, 136]. Multiplex CRISPR-Cas9 editing was used to delete TRAC, TRBC, and PD-1 encoding genes. Endogenous TCR were deleted before replacement with transgenic TCR (specific for NY-ESO-1 and LAGE-1) to minimize transgenic and endogenous mixed-dimer formation. Endogenous PD-1 knockout enhances T cell persistence and antitumor immunity [135, 136]. Durable engraftment of transgenic T cells was achieved with genomic edits at all 3 loci and minimal chromosomal translocations that decreased after infusion into patients. T cells trafficked to tumor sites and persisted for 9 months with minimal immunogenicity, and biopsies showed residual tumors but reduced NY-ESO-1 and/or LAGE-1 in refractory myeloma patients [135, 136].

Another important application of multi-targeted gene editing is in creating CAR T cells that mitigate the antigen escape responsible for CD19^– relapses in B cell malignancies. A potential strategy is to also target CD22, which is highly expressed by lymphoid blasts in 60–90% of B-ALL [137]. Hu et al. showed this in a dose-escalation phase I clinical trial on adult r/r ALL patients treated with universal CD19/CD22 dual-targeting CAR T cells (CTA101) [138]. Activated CD3⁺ T cells were transduced with lentiviral constructs consisting of CD19 and CD22 scFv with 4-1BB co-stimulatory and CD3ζ signaling domains, followed by electroporation for CRISPR-Cas9 mediated knockout of TRAC and CD52 genes and depletion of TCR/CD3⁺ cells [138]. Patients treated with CTA101 did not exhibit GVHD, neurotoxicity, or gene editing associated toxicities, but suffered from manageable levels of CRS [138]. CTA101 demonstrated robust anti-leukemic activity with 83.3% of patients achieving complete remission 28 days post-treatment, and 60% of these patients remained MRD^– 4.3 months post-treatment [138].

As more genomic tools become available, CAR constructs can be further refined by testing combinations of features in preclinical studies. Experiments by Eyquem et al. on CD19⁺ cell lines and NSG mice demonstrated that, compared to conventional CAR T cells, TRAC-CAR T cells had uniform CAR expression and higher anti-leukemic potency in vivo [139]. Activated T cells were electroporated with Cas9 mRNA and guide RNA (gRNA) and then transduced with rAAV6 (containing the CAR cassette, TRAC-1928z, flanked by HA) for CRISPR/Cas9 mediated CAR19 gene knock-in to the TRAC locus. Integration of CAR into the TRAC locus mitigates tonic signaling, promotes CAR expression on antigen exposure, and delays effector T cell differentiation and exhaustion [139].

Kagoya et al. tested triple knockout (tKO) CAR T cells in leukemia and melanoma cell lines and in NSG mice [140]. T cells were electroporated with Cas9/sgRNA RNPs and retrovirally transduced with CAR19 to generate CRISPR-Cas9 mediated HLA-I, HLA-II, and TCR tKO CAR T cells (using targeted sgRNA to simultaneously knock out B2M, CIITA, and TRAC genes) [140]. After expansion, HLA and TCR KO cells were isolated using FACS or magnetic beads. Multiplexed gene KO did not affect CAR T cell function and tKO CAR19 T cells had high anti-leukemic activity but did not induce GVHD [140]. Deletion of HLA-II, TCR, and B2M abrogated alloreactivity in tKO CAR T cells [140]. It is relevant that both HLA-I and HLA-II needed to be ablated for efficient donor T cell persistence. Compared with TRAC and B2M double-KO T cells, tKO CAR T cells retained antitumor responses, showed better persistence, and did not exhibit alloreactivity when cultured with allogeneic PBMCs [140]. These results demonstrate the benefits of HLA-I, HLA-II, and TCR deletion for enabling donor T cells to be used as off-the-shelf adoptive immunotherapy [140].

Unlike the previous studies, Kamiya et al. did not use genome editing but instead used anti-CD3ε protein expression blockers (PEBLs) to block surface expression of CD3/TCRαβ [141]. MSCV retroviral vectors containing anti-CD19-41BB-CD3ζ and PEBL constructs and mRNA were electroporated into T cells [141]. Compared to CD3/TCRαβ⁺ CAR T cells, anti-CD3ε PEBL CAR T cells induced similar or higher cytokine secretion, proliferation, and anti-leukemic activity but with greatly reduced xenogeneic GVHD potential in NSG mice [141].

The general approach of removing HLA or TRAC expression in CAR T cells described above demonstrates promising results in reducing GVHD while maintaining high antitumor efficacy [139–141]. However, this may not be the case depending on the method used to remove TCR expression, as shown by Stenger et al. who used CRISPR-Cas9 mediated KO of endogenous TCRβ to create TCR^– CAR T cells [142]. T cells were retrovirally transduced with second-generation CAR19 (containing CD8 transmembrane and 4-1BB co-stimulatory domains), then electroporated with Cas9/gRNA RNP [142]. These TCR^– CAR T cells showed strong activation and proliferation with significantly lower alloreactivity but shorter persistence and lower anti-leukemic activity than TCR⁺ CAR T cells [142]. Our recent experiments with transposon-based TCR^– CAR19 T cells, generated via CRISPR-Cas9-mediated CD3γ knockout, showed equally high antitumor activity but lesser persistence than TCR⁺ CAR19 T cells based on the same construct (unpublished data). This may lead to reduced duration of remission induced by TCR^– CAR T cells compared to TCR⁺ CAR T cells, and aligns with the reduced persistence reported by Stenger et al. [142].

Interestingly, Roth et al. showed that non-viral multiplexed genome editing can also provide a fast, simple, and cost-effective method of engineering T cells [143]. Human T cells were co-electroporated with CRISPR-Cas9 RNP and dsDNA HDR templates for non-viral CRISPR-Cas9 genome targeting of endogenous TRAC exon 1 on T cells, replacing it by integrating HDR templates with NY-ESO-1 antigen-specific TCR [143]. NY-ESO-1 TCR knock-in T cells trafficked to tumors, where they persisted and proliferated to produce effective antitumor responses comparable to lentiviral-transduced T cells in NSG mice and in melanoma cell lines [143].

Modifications by genome editing on the genomic level provide opportunities to modulate inhibitory signals to enhance antitumor effects. Initial results have shown that multiple genomic modifications of T cells are feasible, and it is expected that this will lead to more multiplexed genome-edited anti-cancer cellular products. However, there is still much to be done before allogeneic CAR T cells can fully replace autologous CAR T cells, since most of the current clinical trials to confirm high efficacy and long-term safety are done with autologous cellular therapies [1–19]. Despite encouraging results, most studies with sophisticated allogeneic products are still in the preclinical stage due to design and/or production challenges, particularly those manufactured using non-viral vectors or involving genome editing, since potential oncogenicity or off-target mutagenesis must first be eliminated before progression to clinical use. An example is the FDA’s recent temporary hold on several phase I/II AlloCAR T clinical trials: ALPHA [98], ALPHA-2 [100], IGNITE [144], TRAVERSE [145], and UNIVERSAL [97]. An abnormality on chromosome 14 (location of the TRAC locus) was detected in the bone marrow biopsy of a patient treated with ALLO-501A CAR T cells during the ALPHA-2 trial [146, 147]. Testing is needed to determine if the abnormality arose from the gene edits, if this presents a risk for other CAR T cells that use similar gene editing techniques, and how effects may change as CAR T cell levels rise then drop during the course of therapy [146, 147]. The FDA clinical hold has since been lifted from all AlloCAR T clinical trials, since the chromosomal abnormality was clinically insignificant and only occurred in this particular patient due to rearrangement of TCR and immunoglobulin gene regions during T or B cell maturation, and not due to the AlloCAR T manufacture process or TALEN gene editing [148].

Conclusion

T cell immunotherapy using donor T cells appears promising in aiming for better disease control in patients with malignant indications. However, improvements are needed before it can be developed into standard therapeutics. Applications of genome editing techniques to donor T cells should be explored for safety, feasibility, and whether it can lead to better next-generation treatments for hematologic malignancies and other cancers.

Abbreviations

AAV6

adeno-associated virus serotype 6

AdV

adenovirus

AR

antigen receptor

AUC

area under the curve

B2M

beta-2 microglobulin

BCMA

B cell maturation antigen

B-ALL

B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

CAR

chimeric antigen receptor

CAR19

anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor

Cas

CRISPR-associated

CCR7

C–C chemokine receptor type 7

CD

cluster of differentiation

CID

chemically induced dimerization

CIITA

class II major histocompatibility complex transactivator

CLL

chronic lymphocytic leukemia

CMV

cytomegalovirus

CR

complete response

CRES

CAR T cell associated encephalopathy syndrome

CRISPR

clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats

crRNA

CRISPR RNA

CRS

cytokine release syndrome

CTAG1B

cancer-testis antigen 1B

dKO

double knockout

DLBCL

diffuse large B cell lymphoma

DSB

double-strand break

dsDNA

double-stranded DNA

EBV

Epstein-Barr virus

FACS

fluorescence-activated cell sorting

FKBP12

FK506-binding protein-12

FL

follicular lymphoma

GMP

good manufacturing practice

GOI

gene of interest

gRNA

guide RNA

GVHD

graft versus host disease

GVL

graft versus lymphoma

HA

homology arm

haplo-HSCT

haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

HDR

homology directed repair

HLA

human leukocyte antigen

HPC

hematopoietic progenitor cell

HSC

hematopoietic stem cell

HSCT

hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

iC9

inducible caspase-9 (aka iCasp9)

ICANS

immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome

IFN

interferon

IL

interleukin

IL2RA

interleukin-2 receptor alpha chain

indel

insertion/deletion polymorphism

iPSC

induced pluripotent stem cell

ITAM

immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif

KO

knockout

LAGE-1

L antigen family member 1 (aka NY-ESO-2)

LBCL

large B cell lymphoma

LCL

lymphoblastoid cell line

MCL

mantle cell lymphoma

MM

multiple myeloma

MRD

minimal residual disease

MSCV

murine stem cell virus

MUD

matched unrelated donor

NHEJ

non-homologous end joining

NHL

non-Hodgkin lymphoma

NSG

NOD scid gamma (NOD.Cg-Prkdc^scidIl2rg^tm1Wjl/SzJ)

nt

nucleotide

NY-ESO-1

New York esophageal squamous cell carcinoma-1 (aka CTAG1B)

ORR

overall response rate

PAM

protospacer adjacent motif

PB

peripheral blood

PBMC

peripheral blood mononuclear cell

PD-1

programmed cell death protein 1

PD-L1

programmed death-ligand 1

PDX

patient-derived xenograft

PEBLs

protein expression blockers

PR

partial response

PTCy

post-transplant cyclophosphamide

PSC

pluripotent stem cells

r/r

relapsed or refractory

rAAV6

recombinant adeno-associated virus serotype 6

RNP

ribonucleoprotein

RVD

repeat variable di-residue

scFv

single chain variable fragment

SCT

stem cell transplantation

sgRNA

single guide RNA

shRNA

short‑hairpin RNA

SpCas9

Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9

ssDNA

single-stranded DNA

TALENs

transcription activator-like effector nucleases

TALEs

transcription activator-like effectors

T-ALL

T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

TCL

T cell lymphoma

TCR

T cell receptor

tgTCR

transgenic T cell receptor

tKO

triple knockout

TM

transmembrane domain

TNF

tumor necrosis factor

TRAC

T cell receptor alpha constant chain

tracrRNA

trans-activating CRISPR RNA

TRBC

T cell receptor beta constant chain

T_SCM

T stem cell memory

UCB

umbilical cord blood

VH

variable heavy

VL

variable light

ZFNs

zinc finger nucleases

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed to, read, and approved the final manuscript, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from The Kids’ Cancer Project, Anthony Rothe Memorial Trust, Tour de Cure, and Inner Wheel Foundation. T.C.Y.T. is supported by the Australian Government Research Training Program and UNSW Women in Engineering Scholarship Program.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.