Skip to main content
Cellular and Molecular Immunology logoLink to Cellular and Molecular Immunology
. 2022 Jan 7;19(4):456–457. doi: 10.1038/s41423-021-00819-0

Microbial symphony orchestrated by mucosal IgA

Alejandra Reyes-Ruiz 1,✉, Jordan D Dimitrov 1,✉
PMCID: PMC8975962  PMID: 34992277

The ability of an organism to handle the beauty and cruelty of existence is largely due to a complex network of molecular and cellular interactions and processes named the immune system. Important components of this network are antibodies (Abs) that have key roles in immune defense and regulation. Typical biological functions of Abs include neutralizing pathogens by blocking functionally important molecules and/or to eliciting lethal effector functions by bridging the recognition of pathogens with binding to different innate immune receptors. However, Abs also promote alternative strategies known as noncanonical functions. For instance, Abs exhibit catalytic activities, act as chaperons and carriers for hormones, and regulate cell signaling [1]. The past decade has been marked by enormous interest in studies of mucosal Ab immune responses. This interest resulted in the discovery of various novel biological functions of secretory immunoglobulin A (SIgA). In a recent article published in Nature, Rollenske et al. [2] reveal an important biological role of intestinal SIgA, namely, the ability to shape microbial fitness by exerting in parallel a set of different functional activities on bacteria.

IgA typically exists in two forms: monomeric, which circulates in serum, and oligomeric (mostly dimeric), which is present at mucosal surfaces. The complex of an epithelial-derived glycoprotein called the secretory component (SC), two IgA molecules and the J chain is known as SIgA. One of the main tasks of SIgA is to protect the intestinal epithelium from enteric pathogens and toxins [3]. Hence, given the belief that everything happens for a reason, it is not surprising that IgA Abs are abundant at mucosal surfaces where two different types of humoral immunity coexist: one implicated in protection against pathogens and another required for homeostatic interactions with commensal bacteria [4]. SIgA evokes multiple processes for neutralization of pathogens, including (1) blocking the attachment of microbes to the epithelium by binding to receptor-binding domains and (2) immune exclusion through the induction of agglutination, entrapment or clearance of microbes [3, 4]. Uncovering how these pathways function is of paramount importance to obtain new insights from the evolutionary point of view as well as the treatment of enteric pathologies.

In their study, Rollenske et al. [2] exposed germ-free mice to the commensal bacteria Escherichia coli strain HA107. After a short-term bacterial exposure (21 days), the authors cloned the V region of immunoglobulin genes isolated from mucosal IgA+ plasma cells and expressed them as 91 recombinant IgG1 as well as in their original form, i.e., SIgA. Furthermore, the reactivity of these Abs was studied, and 17/91 of the Abs were found to bind to elicit bacterial strains. The E. coli HA107-reactive Abs had no or only a few somatic mutations in their V regions. These Abs target only the membrane fraction of bacteria. Using a high-throughput approach with mutant strains of E. coli, the authors identified the target antigens on the bacterial surface of different monoclonal Abs. Among the identified targets were type I fimbriae, and the outer membrane porin proteins OmpW and OmpC. Importantly, using kinetic analyses, it was estimated that two SIgAs bound to OmpC with modest but physiologically relevant affinity (KD values of 128 and 250 nM), implying that short bacterial exposure is sufficient for a rapid recruitment of specific B cells and their differentiation in plasma cells.

One of the most important and innovative aspect of the work of Rollenske et al. is the assessment of the functional activity of monoclonal SIgA targeting E. coli. Interestingly, the exposure of E. coli HA107 bacteria to a recombinant monoclonal SIgA resulted in changes in the expression of >9% of the bacterial genes. This Ab targets the outer membrane pore OmpC, and its binding causes downregulation of the expression of genes involved in metabolic pathways and the transport of ions and carbohydrates. On the other hand, it upregulated stress-induced genes (genes induced by osmotic shock and those responsible for iron transport and storage). Moreover, the study demonstrated that the functional outcome of different monoclonal SIgAs depends on the binding context given that Abs targeting the same Ag (OmpC) but not able to bind to most live bacteria did not trigger the same effects on the microbial transcriptome induced by SIgA capable of coating live cells. Nonetheless, the effects on the microbial transcriptome were independent of the ability of SIgA to coat the bacterial surface, as different surface-binding SIgA evoked diverse modulation of gene transcription in bacteria. An important finding of this study is that different monoclonal SIgAs binding to the same protein (OmpC) but with different fine epitope specificities caused distinct patterns of gene expression in bacteria, resulting in different functional consequences.

The capacity of some Abs to directly modulate the gene expression of microbes was demonstrated more than one decade ago. McClelland et al. discovered a new mode of action for Ab-mediated immunity by demonstrating that after binding, IgG and IgM Abs induced divergent changes in the gene expression of the pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans, affecting its metabolism [5]. Later, it was found that nonopsonic Abs that are highly protective against Streptococcus pneumoniae alter the expression of genes related to quorum sensing [6]. This alteration led to competence increases and fratricide events as consequences. Hence, the direct alteration of gene expression was proposed as another mechanism involved in Ab-mediated immunity.

In addition to SIgA-induced changes in the gene expression patterns of bacteria, Rollenske et al. showed that binding of some monoclonal Abs caused other important functional effects for bacteria, such as increased aggregation, higher resistance to bacteriophages, and increased resistance to the bactericidal effect of bile acids. These results strongly suggest that SIgA Abs regulate microbial colonization through several mechanisms that act in parallel. These concerted actions of SIgA influence microbial fitness, ultimately resulting in adaptation of the bacteria to establish mutualistic equilibrium with the host (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The challenge of mice with model intestinal bacteria results in rapid recruitment of plasma cells and production of SIgA. These Abs bind to different antigens on the bacterial membrane (here denoted Ag A and Ag B), resulting in changes in gene expression and resistance to bacteriophages. Of note, binding of SIgA with different fine specificities to a single antigen resulted in differences in gene expression patterns. Ultimately, the interaction of bacteria with SIgA results in functional changes that modulate the fitness of the microbe that might be favorable for colonization of the intestine

If we consider IgA-mediated immunity to a single microbe as a set of parallel responses with different functional outcomes, one may wonder about the effects of the binding of several Abs with different Ag specificities to the same microbe. Will these Abs evoke synergic or antagonistic effects? Will they trigger a new pathway of signaling different from the one triggered by an individual type of Ab? The answers to these questions may provide a better perspective of the events occurring in life between IgA and microbes, as different Abs can bind to the same microbe simultaneously. Another interesting aspect will be assessment of the effects of SIgA in the modulation of the human cell transcriptome given that this information could decipher the crosstalk between human cells, SIgA and microbes in the context of their coexistence.

Certain Abs referred to as polyreactive can bind multiple structurally diverse antigens. Mucosal B cells express a higher proportion of polyreactive Abs than B cell populations in other locations in organisms, and these Abs contribute to priming the immune system for the generation of highly specific immune Abs [7, 8]. Polyreactivity may influence antibody-mediated immunoselection of the microbiota. Rollenske and colleagues did not observe an increase in the proportion of polyreactive Abs targeting the model bacteria. Moreover, based on analysis of gene expression modulation induced by two different polyreactive monoclonal SIgAs, these studies found that only one common gene set was influenced by the two polyreactive Abs. Hence, there was no consistent effect on polyreactivity per se on the transcriptome of bacteria.

In conclusion, the work of Rollenske et al. further extends our understanding of how mucosal immune responses can influence microbial fitness and result in the establishment of homeostatic relationships between hosts and microbes [9, 10]. In addition to demonstrating novel noncanonical functions of Abs, this study paves the way for the development of novel therapeutics for modulation of the intestinal microbiome in different diseases.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM, France). A.R.R. is the recipient of a fellowship from an Innovative Training Network (ITN) funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Program under grant agreement No 859974, project EDUC8.

Author contributions

ARR and JDD builded the concept of the article, wrote the text of the article, and drew the figure.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Contributor Information

Alejandra Reyes-Ruiz, Email: reyesrz.alejandra@gmail.com.

Jordan D. Dimitrov, Email: jordan.dimitrov@sorbonne-universite.fr

References

  • 1.Dimitrov JD, Lacroix-Desmazes S. Noncanonical functions of antibodies. Trends Immunol. 2020;41:379–93. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2020.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rollenske T, Burkhalter S, Muerner L, von Gunten S, Lukasiewicz J, Wardemann H, et al. Parallelism of intestinal secretory IgA shapes functional microbial fitness. Nature. 2021;598:657–61. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03973-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mantis NJ, Rol N, Corthesy B. Secretory IgA’s complex roles in immunity and mucosal homeostasis in the gut. Mucosal Immunol. 2011;4:603–11. doi: 10.1038/mi.2011.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Macpherson AJ, Yilmaz B, Limenitakis JP, Ganal-Vonarburg SC. IgA function in relation to the intestinal microbiota. Annu Rev Immunol. 2018;36:359–81. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-042617-053238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McClelland EE, Nicola AM, Prados-Rosales R, Casadevall A. Ab binding alters gene expression in Cryptococcus neoformans and directly modulates fungal metabolism. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:1355–61. doi: 10.1172/JCI38322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yano M, Gohil S, Coleman JR, Manix C & Pirofski LA. Antibodies to Streptococcus pneumoniae capsular polysaccharide enhance pneumococcal quorum sensing. mBio. 2011;2. 10.1128/mBio.00176-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 7.Fransen F, Zagato E, Mazzini E, Fosso B, Manzari C, El Aidy S, et al. BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice differ in polyreactive IgA abundance, which impacts the generation of antigen-specific IgA and microbiota diversity. Immunity. 2015;43:527–40. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bunker JJ, Erickson SA, Flynn TM, Henry C, Koval JC, Meisel M, et al. Natural polyreactive IgA antibodies coat the intestinal microbiota. Science. 2017;358. 10.1126/science.aan6619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 9.Kubinak JL, Round JL. Do antibodies select a healthy microbiota? Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16:767–74. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Donaldson GP, Ladinsky MS, Yu KB, Sanders JG, Yoo BB, Chou WC, et al. Gut microbiota utilize immunoglobulin A for mucosal colonization. Science. 2018;360:795–800. doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cellular and Molecular Immunology are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES