Skip to main content
American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology logoLink to American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology
. 2022 Mar 11;322(5):H742–H748. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00004.2022

D-dimer in Marfan syndrome: effect of obstructive sleep apnea induced blood pressure surges

Mudiaga Sowho 1,, Hartmut Schneider 2, Jonathan Jun 1, Gretchen MacCarrick 3, Alan Schwartz 4, Luu Pham 1, Francis Sgambati 5, Joao Lima 6, Philip Smith 1, Vsevolod Polotsky 1, Enid Neptune 1
PMCID: PMC8977140  PMID: 35275761

Abstract

Aortic dissection and rupture are the major causes of premature death in persons with Marfan syndrome (MFS), a rare genetic disorder featuring cardiovascular, skeletal, and ocular impairments. We and others have found that obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) confers significant vascular stress in this population and may accelerate aortic disease progression. We hypothesized that D-dimer, a diagnostic biomarker for several types of vascular injury that is also elevated in persons with MFS with aortic enlargement, may be sensitive to cardiovascular stresses caused by OSA. To test this concept, we recruited 16 persons with MFS without aortic dissection and randomized them to two nights of polysomnography, without (baseline) and with OSA treatment: continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). In addition to scoring OSA by the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), beat-by-beat systolic BP (SBP) and pulse-pressure (PP) fluctuations were quantified. Morning blood samples were also assayed for D-dimer levels. In this cohort (male:female, 10:6; age, 36 ± 13 yr; aortic diameter, 4 ± 1 cm), CPAP eliminated OSA (AHI: 20 ± 17 vs. 3 ± 2 events/h, P = 0.001) and decreased fluctuations in SBP (13 ± 4 vs. 9 ± 3 mmHg, P = 0.011) and PP (7 ± 2 vs. 5 ± 2 mmHg, P = 0.013). CPAP also reduced D-dimer levels from 1,108 ± 656 to 882 ± 532 ng/mL (P = 0.023). Linear regression revealed a positive association between the maximum PP during OSA and D-dimer in both the unadjusted (r = 0.523, P = 0.038) and a model adjusted for contemporaneous aortic root diameter (r = 0.733, P = 0.028). Our study revealed that overnight CPAP reduces D-dimer levels commensurate with the elimination of OSA and concomitant hemodynamic fluctuations. Morning D-dimer measurements together with OSA screening might serve as predictors of vascular injury in MFS.

NEW & NOTEWORTHY What is New? Surges in blood pressure caused by obstructive sleep apnea during sleep increase vascular stress and D-dimer levels in Marfan syndrome. Elevations in D-dimer can be lowered with CPAP. What is Noteworthy? D-dimer levels might serve as a marker for determining the significance of obstructive sleep apnea in persons with Marfan syndrome. D-dimer or obstructive sleep apnea screening is a potential method to identify persons with Marfan syndrome at risk for adverse cardiovascular events.

Keywords: D-dimer, Marfan syndrome, pulse pressure, sleep apnea

INTRODUCTION

Marfan syndrome (MFS) is an autosomal dominant connective tissue disease that causes vascular wall weakness leading to thoracic aortic aneurysms and eventual dissection or rupture (1, 2). Efforts to mitigate aortic morbidity have focused on early detection, inhibiting transforming growth factor-β with angiotensin II-receptor blockers and reducing factors that contribute to aortic stress such as blood pressure and pulse rate surges (3, 4).

D-dimer is a fibrin degradation product released when cross-linked fibrin is cleaved by plasmin (5, 6). Thus, D-dimer elevation reveals activation of the clotting and/or fibrinolytic system and has a diagnostic role in conditions such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and disseminated intravascular coagulation (7, 8). D-dimer has also been used as a marker for acute aortic dissection (911) and was recently shown to be elevated in patients with MFS with aortic enlargement compared with non-MFS controls without aortic enlargement (12). Another study showed that non-MFS patients with aortic aneurysm had higher D-dimer levels than age-matched controls (13). Both studies suggest that aortic structural compromise contributes to D-dimer elevation. It is not clear, however, if blood pressure swings acting on the aortic wall (14) disrupt aortic vascular integrity and thereby modulate D-dimer levels.

Because obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) frequently leads to surges in blood pressure and heart rate with each apneic or hypopneic event (1518), the disorder might be a modifiable risk factor for aortic morbidity in MFS. Moreover, OSA has been associated with adverse aortic events in MFS (19, 20), which can be mitigated by treatments such as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) (21). It is plausible that acute nocturnal cardiovascular stress from OSA contributes to aortic shear stress, as reflected by elevated markers of arterial injury such as D-dimer.

Our goal was to examine the effect of OSA-induced hemodynamic fluctuations on D-dimer levels in patients with MFS. We monitored the breathing pattern and associated blood pressure changes during sleep in patients with MFS at baseline and during a single night of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy and assayed morning D-dimer levels. We also assessed the augmentation index (AIx), an indirect indicator of arterial stiffness (22) as a measure of vascular stress, in the morning after sleep studies. We hypothesized that 1) D-dimer concentrations would be associated with hemodynamic fluctuations during OSA events at baseline; 2) elimination of OSA events with CPAP would decrease hemodynamic fluctuations and D-dimer levels; and 3) after alleviation of OSA, reduction in D-dimer would be associated with a reduction in AIx.

METHODS

Participants

We recruited consecutive self-reported snorers with MFS from the Johns Hopkins Vascular Connective Tissue Disorders Clinic and through the Marfan Foundation (Fig. 1). To be eligible for the study, the participants had to be 18 yr or older with an established diagnosis of MFS and answer “yes” to habitual snoring on the screening questionnaire. We excluded persons with aortic dissection, uncontrolled hypertension, lung disease, and other sleep disorders such as insomnia. We also excluded participants with bleeding disorders or those on long-term anticoagulation therapy. Participants also provided reports of echocardiography performed within the past year, from which we obtained their aortic root diameter. The study was approved by the Johns Hopkins Institutional Review Board, and all the participants provided written informed consent.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Participants’ consort diagram.

Polysomnography

Participants underwent overnight polysomnography while sleeping with or without CPAP in a randomized crossover fashion with washout periods of 1–7 days. Polysomnography was performed according to standard American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) guidelines (23). Parameters monitored included electroencephalogram, electrooculogram, submental and pretibial electromyogram, modified electrocardiogram, body position, airflow, pulse oximetry, esophageal pressure, and blood pressure. On CPAP nights, CPAP pressure was titrated until apneas and hypopneas (OSA events) were eliminated.

Polysomnography analyses.

Sleep architecture was summarized by calculating the total sleep time (TST), sleep efficiency, and percentages of TST spent in each sleep stage on baseline and CPAP nights. An obstructive apnea was defined as cessation of airflow for ≥10 s in the presence of continued respiratory effort. Hypopnea was defined as ≥30% drop in airflow for ≥10 s in association with ≥3% oxygen desaturation or arousal from sleep (23). The apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) was calculated by the sum of apneas and hypopneas divided by TST in hours. The respiratory rate was calculated as an overnight average from the airflow channel. Based on the AASM definition of arousals (23), we also calculated the total number of arousals and identified those related to changes in airflow, which we termed respiratory arousals.

Measurement of esophageal pressure.

To quantify respiratory effort, we monitored esophageal pressure (Pes) continuously with a balloon-tipped catheter placed in the middle third of the esophagus (2426). On a breath-by-breath basis, we identified the peak inspiratory Pes (Pespeak-insp), which is the point of maximum inspiratory effort (24, 27), and calculated the average during sleep for each participant.

Blood pressure monitoring.

We monitored beat-by-beat blood pressure during sleep with the Caretaker Medical unit (Caretaker Medical, ISO 13485, Charlottesville, VA). The device uses a low-coupling pressure finger cuff to obtain real-time blood pressure (28, 29). As OSA is known to cause surges in blood pressure and heart rate (17, 18), we quantified the degree of hemodynamic fluctuations during periods with OSA events. We identified the minimum and maximum systolic blood pressures (SBPs), pulse pressures (PPs), and heart rates (HRs) during OSA events and stable nonflow limited breathing periods with CPAP (Fig. 2). For each participant, we calculated the average for six variables of hemodynamic fluctuation, which we define below:

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Representative 3-min periods of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment. The upper tracing depicts heart rate (HR), the upper middle tracing depicts airflow, the middle tracing depicts systolic blood pressure (SBP), the lower middle tracing depicts diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and the bottom tracing depicts pulse pressure (PP). BP, blood pressure; bpm, beats/min.

  • SBPmax: maximum systolic blood pressure

  • PPmax: maximum pulse pressure

  • HRmax: maximum heart rate

  • ΔSBP: difference between maximum and minimum SBP

  • ΔPP: difference between the maximum and minimum PP

  • ΔHR: difference between the maximum and minimum HR

D-Dimer Assay and Assessment of AIx

In the morning after sleep studies, we collected venous blood to assay D-dimer levels. We also measured the AIx, an indirect indicator of arterial stiffness with the Endo-PAT2000 (Itamar Medical) (30). The EndoPAT 2000 assesses AIx by quantifying the degree of augmentation in central pressure due to wave reflection from the peripheral circulation (22). AIx measurements were calculated from 5-min averages at rest and during blood flow restriction with an arm cuff, and measurements were normalized to a heart rate of 75 beats/min (22). A detailed description of the procedure for obtaining AIx is described in previous reports (31, 32).

Statistical Analyses

All analyses were performed using R (www.r-project.org, with the regression models using the “stats” package) and a two-sided P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All values were reported as means  ±  SD or N (%).

To address our hypotheses, we examined the association of D-dimer at baseline with hemodynamic fluctuations (see Blood pressure monitoring) during OSA events with linear regression. As pulse pressure was highly collinear with aortic size in our cohort (Fig. 3), we also adjusted for aortic root diameter in our regression analyses. We then compared the mean AHI, number of arousals, Pespeak-insp, SBPmax, PPmax, HRmax, ΔSBP, ΔPP, ΔHR, O2 saturation, and other summarized sleep study characteristics between the baseline and CPAP nights using paired t tests. We also compared the morning D-dimer levels and AIx between baseline and CPAP studies with paired t tests.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Correlation of brachial pulse pressure and aortic root diameter. N = 11, participants with native aortas, since 5 participants had aortic grafts. N = 11 total sample size of n = 7 men and 4 women. r, correlation coefficient.

We also examined the correlation between D-dimer and AIx at baseline with scatterplots, and then performed the Fisher exact method to test if the reductions in D-dimer after CPAP treatment were associated with decreases in AIx.

RESULTS

Participant Characteristics

Participants’ demographic and anthropometric characteristics, as well as baseline hemodynamics, are presented in Table 1. The study population included 10 males and 6 females with an average age of 36 ± 13 yr, body mass index of 26 ± 5 kg/m2, and 81% were Caucasian. The average systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 118 ± 10 mmHg and 71 ± 6 mmHg, respectively. The average aortic root diameter was 4 ± 1 cm among those with native aortas, who made up 11 of the total sample of 16 participants. Four subjects were on an angiotensin receptor blocker, three were on a β-blocker, six were on a combination of an angiotensin receptor blocker and a β-blocker, and three were not on any blood pressure medication.

Table 1.

Participant characteristics

Characteristics N
Sex, men:women 10:6 16
Age, yr 36 ± 13 16
Race, n (%)
 Caucasian 13 (81) 13
 Asian 1 (6) 1
 Other* 2 (13) 2
Body mass index, kg/m2 26 ± 5 16
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg 118 ± 10 16
Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg 71 ± 6 16
Pulse pressure, mmHg 43 ± 10 16
Heart rate, beats/min 76 ± 13 16
Hypertension, n (%) 1 (6) 16
Aortic root diameter, cm 4 ± 1 11
Aortic root replacement, n (%) 5 (31) 5
Blood pressure medications, n (%)
 β-Blocker only 3 (19) 3
 ARB only 4 (25) 4
 β-Blocker and ARB 6 (38) 6
 None 3 (19) 3

Values are means ± SD or absolute values with frequency, n (%); N = 16 participants, total sample size. *Other: participants who did not identify as African American, Hispanic, Caucasian, or Asian. ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker.

Association of OSA-Induced Hemodynamic Fluctuations and D-Dimer

Linear regression analyses revealed a positive association between D-dimer and PPmax during OSA events in both the unadjusted model (β = 26.3, r = 0.523, P = 0.038) (Fig. 4) and a model adjusted for aortic root diameter obtained from participants with native aortas (β = 62.9, r = 0.733, P = 0.028). The association between D-dimer and other measures of hemodynamic fluctuations are shown in Table 2.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Correlation of the average maximum pulse pressure (PP) during obstructive sleep apnea events and D-dimer at baseline (A) and correlation of augmentation index (AIx) and D-dimer at baseline (B). N = 16 participants, total sample size of n = 10 men and 6 women. r, correlation coefficient.

Table 2.

Relationship between D-dimer and hemodynamic fluctuations

D-Dimer
β r P N
SBPmax
 Univariable 16.9 0.464 0.070 16
 Adjusted 20.1 0.566 0.167 16
PPmax
 Univariable 26.3 0.523 0.037 16
 Adjusted 62.9 0.735 0.028 16
HRmax
 Univariable −4.0 0.063 0.827 16
 Adjusted 7.7 0.366 0.769 16
ΔSBP
 Univariable 72.9 0.482 0.059 16
 Adjusted 105.4 0.669 0.063 16
ΔPP
 Univariable 141.7 0.472 0.065 16
 Adjusted 212.7 0.672 0.060 16
ΔHR
 Univariable −28.1 0.118 0.658 16
 Adjusted −15.9 0.358 0.844 16

N = 16 participants, total sample size of n = 10 men and 6 women. SBPmax, maximum systolic blood pressure; PPmax, maximum pulse pressure; HRmax, maximum heart rate; Δ, change; β, β-coefficient; r, correlation coefficient. Statistical method, linear regression. Boldface indicates significant P value.

Effect of CPAP on OSA, Hemodynamics, and D-Dimer

CPAP decreased the AHI, number of arousals, respiratory rate, maximum inspiratory effort (Pespeak-insp), HRmax, ΔSBP, ΔPP, and ΔHR, but did not change sleep architecture, SBPmax, PPmax, and O2 saturation (see Table 3). CPAP also decreased D-dimer levels from a mean (SD) of 1,108 ± 656 ng/mL to 882 ± 532 ng/mL (P = 0.023) and AIx from a mean (SD) of 7 ± 4% to 0 ± 5% (P = 0.117) (Fig. 5).

Table 3.

Effect of CPAP on nocturnal physiology

Baseline CPAP P N
Sleep architecture
 Total sleep time, min 371 ± 77 371 ± 49 0.970 16
 Sleep efficiency, % 82 ± 15 81 ± 10 0.635 16
 REM, % 15 ± 8 14 ± 8 0.618 16
 Sleep latency, min 19 ± 20 19 ± 16 0.958 16
 Wake after sleep onset, min 61 ± 63 70 ± 55 0.454 16
Respiratory parameters
 AHI, events/h 20 ± 17 3 ± 2 0.001 16
 NREM AHI, events/h 19 ± 17 3 ± 2 0.001 16
 REM AHI, events/h 18 ± 15 6 ± 5 0.009 16
 O2, % 96 ± 1 96 ± 2 0.937 16
 Respiratory rate, breaths/min 17 ± 3 16 ± 2 0.015 16
 Pespeak-insp cmH2O −10 ± 4 0 ± 2 <0.001 11#
Hemodynamic parameters*
 SBPmax, mmHg 126 ± 18 125 ± 16 0.857 16
 PPmax, mmHg 48 ± 13 48 ± 16 0.843 16
 HRmax, beats/min 72 ± 10 67 ± 10 0.001 16
 ΔSBP, mmHg 13 ± 4 9 ± 3 0.011 16
 ΔPP, mmHg 7 ± 2 5 ± 2 0.013 16
 ΔHR, beats/min 9 ± 3 5 ± 1 <0.001 16
Arousal and positional analyses
 Total arousals 124 ± 51 80 ± 42 0.004 16
 Respiratory arousals 64 ± 38 11 ± 8 <0.001 16
 Supine sleep, % 47 ± 22 50 ± 28 0.646 16

Values are means ± SD; N = 16 participants, total sample size of n = 10 men and 6 women. #The other 5 participants either refused esophageal catheterization or did not have usable esophageal pressure (Pes) data. *Hemodynamic fluctuations during obstructive sleep apnea events and normal breathing with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). AHI, apnea hypopnea index; REM, random eye movement; NREM, non-random eye movement; Pespeak-insp, peak inspiratory esophageal pressure (larger negative values indicate greater respiratory effort); SBPmax, maximum systolic blood pressure; PPmax, maximum pulse pressure; HRmax, maximum heart rate; Δ, change. Statistical method, paired t test. Boldface indicates significant P value.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

D-dimer levels (A) and augmentation index (AIx; B) after overnight baseline and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) studies are shown. N = 16 participants, total sample size of n = 10 men and 6 women. Statistical method, paired t test.

Association of D-Dimer and AIx

We found a significant linear relationship between D-dimer and AIx at baseline (r = 0.713, P = 0.002; see Fig. 4). In addition, the Fisher exact test revealed a significant association between the proportion of subjects with reduced D-dimer and reduced AIx after CPAP treatment (P = 0.007), suggesting that the decrease in D-dimer was dependent on a decrease in AIx.

DISCUSSION

In this randomized CPAP crossover study, we generated several novel findings that characterize the effect of OSA on D-dimer levels in our cohort of patients with MFS without overt aortic dissection. First, OSA-induced hemodynamic fluctuation manifested as pulse pressure was associated with D-dimer at baseline. Second, we found that overnight OSA treatment decreased morning D-dimer levels. Third, reduction in D-dimer after CPAP treatment was associated with a concomitant reduction in AIx. In conclusion, our data support the hypothesis that OSA is a modifiable cause of vascular stress and injury in MFS and that D-dimer may serve as a biomarker of cardiovascular stress in MFS.

Our study extends previous work on humoral changes in patients with MFS. Kornhuber et al. (12) found that patients with MFS with enlarged aortic root had elevated levels of D-dimer compared with matched non-MFS controls. Ihara et al. (13) studied non-MFS patients with aortic aneurysms and found that D-dimer and markers of collagen turnover were greater in the patients with aortic aneurysms than in controls. In our study, D-dimer was also elevated in asymptomatic, clinically stable patients with MFS. Specifically, only one-third of our participants had D-dimer levels lower than 500 ng/mL, the threshold below which acute aortic dissection is ruled out (10, 33). We also show that treatment of OSA reduces D-dimer levels, indicating a contribution of OSA to the elevated baseline values. Since D-dimer levels were also positively associated with maximum pulse pressures during OSA events (Fig. 4), and even after accounting for aortic size (Table 2), the hemodynamic fluctuations may trigger low-grade aortic injury with increased D-dimer as a precursor for overt dissection. Our findings together with those of others (12, 13) suggest that both a structurally compromised aortic wall and factors such as OSA that increase cardiovascular stress may contribute to vascular injury and increased D-dimer levels in MFS.

In patients with MFS, who already have structural aortic compromise, OSA presents an additional risk factor that may accelerate aortic morbidity. It is well recognized that OSA leads to intermittent sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activation leading to fluctuations in blood pressure and heart rate (34, 35), which increase aortic stress (14). As noted above, we found a strong association between D-dimer and OSA-induced fluctuations in pulse pressure. In addition, OSA treatment decreased blood pressure and heart rate fluxes (Table 3), with a subsequent reduction in morning D-dimer levels. In our study, therefore, higher D-dimer levels at baseline may have resulted from exaggerated hemodynamic surges increasing vascular wall stress leading to intramural microthrombosis and fibrinolysis. Our measure of vascular stress was AIx, which we found to be highly correlated with D-dimer at baseline (Fig. 4). Likewise, CPAP reduction of D-dimer was associated with CPAP reduction of AIx, suggesting AIx as a mediator for OSA-induced vascular injury. In fact, two previous studies showed that AIx was a predictor of aortic adverse events in patients with MFS (36, 37).

Other mechanisms that may contribute to OSA-induced vascular injury or explain our findings include increased inspiratory effort and hypoxia (24, 38, 39). In this study, elimination of OSA with CPAP significantly reduced the maximum inspiratory effort (Pespeak-insp) (Table 3), which would decrease the aortic transmural pressure (24, 40), thereby potentially mitigating aortic injury (14, 24). On the other hand, the mean oxygen saturation did not change with CPAP, probably because our participants were not hypoxic at baseline (Table 3), which also implies that hypoxia did not contribute to our findings.

The main strength of this study is the randomized crossover design. Our study is also the first to conduct comprehensive monitoring of nocturnal hemodynamic physiology in patients with MFS. From a practical standpoint, overnight studies that quantify cardiovascular stress and incorporate biochemical readouts may offer a useful platform to test interventions for vascular injury in MFS. Whether this structure works better for biomechanical interventions such as CPAP rather than pharmacological interventions is unknown but should be explored. Our limitation was the small sample size, which prevented multivariable analyses to determine whether blood pressure medication and MFS subgenotype modifies the effect of OSA on D-dimer levels. The sample size along with the short-term protocol may also explain the lack of a statistical change in mean AIx after CPAP treatment but highlights the sensitivity of D-dimer to acute nocturnal cardiovascular stress in MFS.

In conclusion, our study invokes OSA as a modifiable contributor to vascular injury and increased D-dimer in MFS. OSA screening along with D-dimer assay in patients with MFS may help with monitoring cardiovascular stress and identification of those with the greatest risk for aortic adverse events. Future studies are still needed to validate our findings and determine if OSA-induced D-dimer increase is a precursor for aortic disease progression in patients with MFS.

GRANTS

The study was funded by the Victor McKusick Marfan Foundation Fellowship Award, the NIH T32 Multi-Institutional Training Program in Sleep and Genetics (HL 110952‐6), and the Johns Hopkins Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Inspire Award.

DISCLOSURES

No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

M.S., H.S., and E.N. conceived and designed research; M.S. performed experiments; M.S. and F.S. analyzed data; M.S., H.S., J.J., A.S., L.P., P.S., V.P., and E.N. interpreted results of experiments; M.S. and F.S. prepared figures; M.S. and E.N. drafted manuscript; M.S., H.S., J.J., G.M., A.S., L.P., F.S., J.L., P.S., V.P., and E.N. edited and revised manuscript; M.S., H.S., J.J., G.M., A.S., L.P., F.S., J.L., P.S., V.P., and E.N. approved final version of manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We acknowledge the Johns Hopkins Vascular Connective Tissue Disorders Clinic and the Marfan Foundation for support and providing access for participant recruitment.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Judge DP, Dietz HC. Marfan’s syndrome. Lancet 366: 1965–1976, 2005. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67789-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pyeritz RE. Etiology and pathogenesis of the Marfan syndrome: current understanding. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 6: 595–598, 2017. doi: 10.21037/acs.2017.10.04. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mullen M, Jin XY, Child A, Stuart AG, Dodd M, Aragon-Martin JA, Gaze D, Kiotsekoglou A, Yuan L, Hu J, Foley C, Van Dyck L, Knight R, Clayton T, Swan L, Thomson JDR, Erdem G, Crossman D, Flather M; AIMS Investigators. Irbesartan in Marfan syndrome (AIMS): a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial. Lancet 394: 2263–2270, 2019. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32518-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lacro RV, Dietz HC, Sleeper LA, Yetman AT, Bradley TJ, Colan SD, Pearson GD, Selamet Tierney ES, Levine JC, Atz AM, Benson DW, Braverman AC, Chen S, De Backer J, Gelb BD, Grossfeld PD, Klein GL, Lai WW, Liou A, Loeys BL, Markham LW, Olson AK, Paridon SM, Pemberton VL, Pierpont ME, Pyeritz RE, Radojewski E, Roman MJ, Sharkey AM, Stylianou MP, Wechsler SB, Young LT, Mahony L; Pediatric Heart Network Investigators. Atenolol versus losartan in children and young adults with Marfan’s syndrome. N Engl J Med. 371: 2061–2071, 2014. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1404731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Weitz JI, Fredenburgh JC, Eikelboom JW. A test in context: D-dimer. J Am Coll Cardiol 70: 2411–2420, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tripodi A. D-dimer testing in laboratory practice. Clin Chem 57: 1256–1262, 2011. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.166249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bates SM, Kearon C, Crowther M, Linkins L, O'Donnell M, Douketis J, Lee AYY, Weitz JI, Johnston M, Ginsberg JS. A diagnostic strategy involving a quantitative latex d-dimer assay reliably excludes deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 138: 787–794, 2003. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-10-200305200-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Stein PD, Hull RD, Patel KC, Olson RE, Ghali WA, Brant R, Biel RK, Bharadia V, Kalra NK. D-dimer for the exclusion of acute venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 140: 589–602, 2004. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-8-200404200-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Suzuki T, Bossone E, Sawaki D, Jánosi RA, Erbel R, Eagle K, Nagai R. Biomarkers of aortic diseases. Am Heart J 165: 15–25, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nazerian P, Mueller C, Soeiro ADM, Leidel BA, Salvadeo SAT, Giachino F, Vanni S, Grimm K, Oliveira MT Jr, Pivetta E, Lupia E, Grifoni S, Morello F; ADvISED Investigators. Diagnostic accuracy of the aortic dissection detection risk score plus D-dimer for acute aortic syndromes: the ADvISED prospective multicenter study. Circulation 137: 250–258, 2018. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Suzuki T, Distante A, Zizza A, Trimarchi S, Villani M, Salerno Uriarte JA, De Luca Tupputi Schinosa L, Renzulli A, Sabino F, Nowak R, Birkhahn R, Hollander JE, Counselman F, Vijayendran R, Bossone E, Eagle K; IRAD-Bio Investigators. Diagnosis of Acute Aortic Dissection by D-Dimer: the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection Substudy on Biomarkers (IRAD-Bio) experience. Circulation 119: 2702–2707, 2009. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.833004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kornhuber KTI, Seidel H, Pujol C, Meierhofer C, Röschenthaler F, Pressler A, Stöckl A, Nagdyman N, Neidenbach RC, von Hundelshausen P, Halle M, Holdenrieder S, Ewert P, Kaemmerer H, Hauser M. Hemostatic abnormalities in adult patients with Marfan syndrome. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 9, Suppl2: S209–S220, 2019. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2019.08.09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ihara A, Kawamoto T, Matsumoto K, Kawamoto J, Katayama A, Yoshitatsu M, Izutani H, Ihara K. Relationship between hemostatic markers and circulating biochemical markers of collagen metabolism in patients with aortic aneurysm. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb 33: 221–224, 2004. doi: 10.1159/000081512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Robicsek F, Thubrikar MJ. Hemodynamic considerations regarding the mechanism and prevention of aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg 58: 1247–1253, 1994. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(94)90523-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ryan S. Mechanisms of cardiovascular disease in obstructive sleep apnoea. J Thorac Dis 10, Suppl34: S4201–S4211, 2018. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.08.56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Stoohs R, Guilleminault C. Cardiovascular changes associated with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. J Appl Physiol (1985) 72: 583–589, 1992. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1992.72.2.583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cowie MR, Linz D, Redline S, Somers VK, Simonds AK. Sleep disordered breathing and cardiovascular disease: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol 78: 608–624, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.05.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Javaheri S, Barbe F, Campos-Rodriguez F, Dempsey JA, Khayat R, Javaheri S, Malhotra A, Martinez-Garcia MA, Mehra R, Pack AI, Polotsky VY, Redline S, Somers VK. Sleep apnea: types, mechanisms, and clinical cardiovascular consequences. J Am Coll Cardiol 69: 841–858, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sowho M, MacCarrick G, Dietz H, Jun J, Schwartz AR, Neptune ER. Association of sleep apnoea risk and aortic enlargement in Marfan syndrome. BMJ Open Respir Res 8: e000942, 2021. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2021-000942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kohler M, Pitcher A, Blair E, Risby P, Senn O, Forfar C, Wordsworth P, Stradling JR. The impact of obstructive sleep apnea on aortic disease in Marfan’s syndrome. Respiration 86: 39–44, 2013. doi: 10.1159/000340008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cistulli PA, Wilcox I, Jeremy R, Sullivan CE. Aortic root dilatation in Marfan’s syndrome: a contribution from obstructive sleep apnea? Chest 111: 1763–1766, 1997. doi: 10.1378/chest.111.6.1763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Perrault R, Omelchenko A, Taylor CG, Zahradka P. Establishing the interchangeability of arterial stiffness but not endothelial function parameters in healthy individuals. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 19: 190, 2019. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1167-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Berry RB, Brooks R, Gamaldo C, Harding SM, Lloyd RM, Marcus CL, Vaughn BV. The AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events: Rules, Terminology and Technical Specifications. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sowho M, Jun J, Sgambati F, Chaney M, Schneider H, Smith P, Schwartz A, Dietz H, MacCarrick G, Neptune E. Assessment of pleural pressure during sleep in Marfan syndrome. J Clin Sleep Mod doi: 10.5664/jcsm.9920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Milic-Emili J, Mead J, Turner JM. Topography of esophageal pressure as a function of posture in man. J Appl Physiol 19: 212–216, 1964. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1964.19.2.212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Baydur A, Behrakis PK, Zin WA, Jaeger M, Milic-Emili J. A simple method for assessing the validity of the esophageal balloon technique. Am Rev Respir Dis 126: 788–791, 1982. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1982.126.5.788. [7149443] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Suzuki M, Ogawa H, Okabe S, Horiuchi A, Okubo M, Ikeda K, Hida W, Kobayashi T. Digital recording and analysis of esophageal pressure for patients with obstructive sleep apnea–hypopnea syndrome. Sleep Breath 9: 64–72, 2005. doi: 10.1007/s11325-005-0015-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Baruch MC, Kalantari K, Gerdt DW, Adkins CM. Validation of the pulse decomposition analysis algorithm using central arterial blood pressure. Biomed Eng Online 13: 96, 2014. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-13-96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gratz I, Deal E, Spitz F, Baruch M, Allen IE, Seaman JE, Pukenas E, Jean S. Continuous Non-invasive finger cuff CareTaker® comparable to invasive intra-arterial pressure in patients undergoing major intra-abdominal surgery. BMC Anesthesiol 17: 48, 2017. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0337-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Heffernan KS, Patvardhan EA, Hession M, Ruan J, Karas RH, Kuvin JT. Elevated augmentation index derived from peripheral arterial tonometry is associated with abnormal ventricular–vascular coupling. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 30: 313–317, 2010. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2010.00943.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Miyawaki Y. [Measurement of pulse wave “augmentation index (AI)” and its clinical application]. Rinsho Byori 52: 676–685, 2004. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jiménez Caballero PE, Muñoz Escudero F. Peripheral endothelial function and arterial stiffness in patients with chronic migraine: a case–control study. J Headache Pain 14: 8, 2013. doi: 10.1186/1129-2377-14-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cui J-S, Jing Z-P, Zhuang S-J, Qi S-H, Li L, Zhou J-W, Zhang W, Zhao Y, Qi N, Yin Y-J. D-dimer as a biomarker for acute aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 94: e471, 2015. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Venkataraman S, Vungarala S, Covassin N, Somers VK. Sleep apnea, hypertension and the sympathetic nervous system in the adult population. J Clin Med 9: 591, 2020. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Schneider H, Schaub CD, Andreoni KA, Schwartz AR, Smith PL, Robotham JL, O’Donnell CP. Systemic and pulmonary hemodynamic responses to normal and obstructed breathing during sleep. J Appl Physiol {1985) 83: 1671–1680, 1997. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1997.83.5.1671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mortensen K, Aydin MA, Rybczynski M, Baulmann J, Abdul Schahidi N, Kean G, Kuhne K, Bernhardt AMJ, Franzen O, Mir T, Habermann C, Koschyk D, Ventura R, Willems S, Robinson PN, Berger J, Reichenspurner H, Meinertz T, von Kodolitsch Y. Augmentation index relates to progression of aortic disease in adults with Marfan syndrome. Am J Hypertens 22: 971–979, 2009. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2009.115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nollen GJ, Groenink M, Tijssen JGP, Van Der Wall EE, Mulder BJM. Aortic stiffness and diameter predict progressive aortic dilatation in patients with Marfan syndrome. Eur Heart J 25: 1146–1152, 2004. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.04.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gaisl T, Bratton DJ, Kohler M. The impact of obstructive sleep apnoea on the aorta. Eur Respir J 46: 532–544, 2015. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00029315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Baguet J-P, Minville C, Tamisier R, Roche F, Barone-Rochette G, Ormezzano O, Levy P, Pepin J-L. Increased aortic root size is associated with nocturnal hypoxia and diastolic blood pressure in obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep 34: 1605–1607, 2011. doi: 10.5665/sleep.1406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Clarenbach CF, Camen G, Sievi NA, Wyss C, Stradling JR, Kohler M. Effect of simulated obstructive hypopnea and apnea on thoracic aortic wall transmural pressures. J Appl Physiol (1985) 115: 613–617, 2013. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00439.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology are provided here courtesy of American Physiological Society

RESOURCES