Skip to main content
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery logoLink to Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
editorial
. 2022 Mar 15;25(1):7–8. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2022.25.1.7

One-stage versus two-stage approach for concomitant gallbladder and common bile duct stones: which one is more proper in patients over 80 years old?

Seung Eun Lee 1,
PMCID: PMC8977501  PMID: 35603342

Abstract

At present, the optimal treatment for common bile duct (CBD) stones combined with gallstones is still controversial. The two most widely accepted techniques are one-stage laparoscopic CBD exploration plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and two-stage preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy plus LC. Considering that all current evidence comes from nonrandomized controlled trials, multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to further establish the treatment strategy for elderly patients with CBD stones combined with gallstones.

Keywords: Gallstones, Common bile duct, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Endoscopic sphincterotomy


Since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), the optimal treatment for common bile duct (CBD) stones combined with gallstones, a condition known as cholecysto-choledocholithiasis (CCL), remained controversial for years despite the results of several randomized controlled trials comparing one-stage laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) plus LC (LCBDE + LC) and two-stage preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with sphincterotomy plus LC (pre-ERCP + LC) [18]. In general, the one-stage procedure is expected to reduce the overall hospital stay and cost, albeit being highly technically demanding. Especially, elderly patients had higher incidences of cardiovascular disease and pulmonary disease, as well as higher grades of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, implying that they might have greater potential risks for laparoscopic surgery and general anesthesia than young patients. The two-stage procedure is associated with a higher CBD stone clearance and lower postoperative bile leakage, while a higher rate of pancreatitis is associated with endoscopic procedure. In addition, ERCP-caused dysfunction of the sphincter of Oddi can be permanent, leading to damage of the sphincter barrier and duodenobiliary reflux.

For elderly patients, choosing the best treatment strategy between two procedures is a more difficult process than young patients because elderly patients typically have underlying chronic diseases and age-specific deterioration of organ function. Consequently, they are classified as a high-risk group for surgery under general anesthesia. Furthermore, elderly patients are associated with high morbidity during the perioperative period, so endoscopic alternatives may be preferred. However, the risk of ERCP-associated complications also increases in elderly patients, and their cooperation can be limited due to physical or mental impairments and anatomical complexities, such as periampullary diverticula, which increase the failure rate of endoscopic procedures.

This study compared one-stage LCBDE + LC and two-stage pre-ERCP + LC for patients with CCL over 80 years of age [9]. The results showed no significant difference between these approaches in terms of treatment safety and efficacy such as postoperative morbidity and hospital stay. However, in the one-stage LCBDE + LC group, there were more patients with previous gastrectomy, multiple large (≥15 mm) CBD stones, or the inability to cooperate with endoscopic procedures. Importantly, this study indicates that the one-stage LCBDE + LC is a better treatment option for elderly patients with these conditions.

NOTES

Conflict of interest

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding/support

None.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Cuschieri A, Lezoche E, Morino M, et al. E.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:952–957. doi: 10.1007/s004649901145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sgourakis G, Karaliotas K. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus endoscopic stone extraction and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis. A prospective randomized study. Minerva Chir. 2002;57:467–474. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Noble H, Tranter S, Chesworth T, Norton S, Thompson M. A randomized, clinical trial to compare endoscopic sphincterotomy and subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with primary laparoscopic bile duct exploration during cholecystectomy in higher risk patients with choledocholithiasis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009;19:713–720. doi: 10.1089/lap.2008.0428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rogers SJ, Cello JP, Horn JK, et al. Prospective randomized trial of LC+LCBDE vs ERCP/S+LC for common bile duct stone disease. Arch Surg. 2010;145:28–33. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bansal VK, Misra MC, Garg P, Prabhu M. A prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage versus single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1986–1989. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0891-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Koc B, Karahan S, Adas G, Tutal F, Guven H, Ozsoy A. Comparison of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis: a prospective randomized study. Am J Surg. 2013;206:457–463. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bansal VK, Misra MC, Rajan K, et al. Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage endoscopic stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with concomitant gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:875–885. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3237-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ding G, Cai W, Qin M. Single-stage vs. two-stage management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones: a prospective randomized trial with long-term follow-up. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:947–951. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2467-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lee SJ, Choi IS, Moon JI, Choi YW, Ryu KH. Comparison of one-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus cholecystectomy and two-stage endoscopic sphincterotomy plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for concomitant gallbladder and common bile duct stones in patients over 80 years old. J Minim Invasive Surg. 2022;25:11–17. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2022.25.1.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery are provided here courtesy of Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery

RESOURCES