The association between sarcopenia or low muscle quality and bone health, such as osteoporosis and fractures has been studied. 1 , 2 However, controversial results were reported because of the differences in populations or definition of sarcopenia. We have recently read the interesting article entitled ‘Body composition and osteoporotic fracture using anthropometric prediction equations to assess muscle and fat masses’ which showed the association between predicated lean body mass index (pLBMI), appendicular skeletal muscle index (pASMI), and body fat mass index (pBFMI) and fractures. 3 This prospective study observed 2350 and 6175 fractures in men and women during a 3 year follow‐up. They found that pASMI was associated with total osteoporotic fracture risk. Interestingly, they also found that high pASMI was related to a decrease of spine fracture in both men and women. To the best of our knowledge, few studies independently observed the role of muscle quality on vertebral fracture. These data indicated that intervention on muscle quality may be a potential preventive strategy for reducing the risk of vertebral fracture.
There may be a couple of critical issues that were not considered in their analysis. In the multivariate cox model, many confounders were adjusted, such as age and physical activity. However, bone mass or bone mineral density or status of osteoporosis at baseline which was one critical determinant for fracture was not included. 4 It is still unknown whether muscle quality, pLBMI, or pASMI is an independent risk factor for total fracture or spine fracture in their study. In addition, fasting serum glucose was considered as a confounder. Diabetes may be a better choice than glucose level because some diabetic subjects may have normal glucose level when they take anti‐diabetes drugs.
We also performed a prospective study in a Chinese population who underwent computed tomography (CT) scanning for lung cancer screening and had none spine fractures during 2016–2019. They were followed up for 1–5 years (median 2 years). We identified 72 subjects (17 men and 55 women) with new vertebral compression fractures and 212 age and gender matched control subjects. Muscle area and density of erector spinae at intermediate level of thoracic spine 8, 10, and 12 were determined as biomarkers of muscle quality. The muscle density and area of subjects with fractures were significantly lower than those without fracture (Figure 1). Then, the muscle area and density were divided into three groups based on the interquartile range (<Q1, Q1–Q3, >Q3). The cumulative hazard of adjusted hazard ratio (adjusted for age, gender, body mass index, bone mass, diabetes, and renal functions) for muscle area was 0.58 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.34–0.98] for Q1–Q3 (9.2–12.3 cm2) and was 0.20 (95%CI: 0.1–0.49) for Q3 (>12.3 cm2) compared with the first quartile (<9.2 cm2). Similar results were found in women. The cumulative hazard curves in total population and women were shown in Figure 2. The subjects with low muscle density (<36 Hounsfield unit, HU) also had higher risk of VCF (Figure 2C). However, it seemed that no significant difference was found between those subjects with muscle density of 36–48 HU and >48 HU. Moreover, if bone mass was added into the cox model, the association between muscle density and risk of fracture became no strong. Recent studies showed that muscle density may have better ability than hip areal bone mineral density in discriminating hip fracture 5 and muscle density was also well associated with muscle strength. 6 The association between muscle density and spine fractures needed further investigation.
Figure 1.
The muscle area and muscle density in subjects with and without vertebral compression fractures.
Figure 2.
Cumulative hazards of vertebral compression fracture in total population (A) and women (B) stratified by muscle area and muscle density (C) during the follow‐up. Threshold of muscle area was set at <9.2 cm, 9.2–12.3 cm2, and >12.3 cm2. The threshold muscle density was set at <36 HU, 36–48 HU, >48 HU.
In conclusion, Hong et al. and our study showed that muscle quality is associated with risk of spine fracture. Our data also showed that this association was independent of bone mass. Intervention on muscle quality may be a helpful approach for reducing the risk of VCF. Excise on trunk muscle is welcome for the prevention of VCF in elders.
Conflict of interest
None.
Funding
This study was received supports from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81773460, 81102148) and Educational Commission of Jiangsu Province (KYCX21_1632).
Acknowledgements
The authors of this manuscript certify that they comply with the ethical guidelines for authorship and publishing in the Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle. 7
Wang M., Liu J., Chen X., Wang X., and Chen X. (2022) Muscle quality and spine fractures; 10.1002/jcsm.12850, Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, 13, 1426–1428,
Miaomiao Wang and Jingjing Liu contributed equally to this work.
References
- 1. Yeung SSY, Reijnierse EM, Pham VK, Trappenburg MC, Lim WK, Meskers CGM, et al. Sarcopenia and its association with falls and fractures in older adults: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2019;10:485–500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Edwards MH, Dennison EM, Aihie Sayer A, Fielding R, Cooper C. Osteoporosis and sarcopenia in older age. Bone 2015;80:126–130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Hong C, Choi S, Park M, Park SM, Lee G. Body composition and osteoporotic fracture using anthropometric prediction equations to assess muscle and fat masses. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2021;12:2247–2258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Trajanoska K, Morris JA, Oei L, Zheng HF, Evans DM, Kiel DP, et al. Assessment of the genetic and clinical determinants of fracture risk: genome wide association and mendelian randomisation study. BMJ 2018;362:k3225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Wang L, Yin L, Zhao Y, Su Y, Sun W, Liu Y, et al. Muscle density discriminates hip fracture better than computed tomography X‐ray absorptiometry hip areal bone mineral density. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2020;11:1799–1812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Wang L, Yin L, Zhao Y, Su Y, Sun W, Chen S, et al. Muscle density, but not size, correlates well with muscle strength and physical performance. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2021;22:751–759.e2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. von Haehling S, Morley JE, Coats AJ, Anker SD. Ethical guidelines for publishing in the Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle: update 2019. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2019;10:1143–1145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]