Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2000 Apr;44(4):879–884. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.4.879-884.2000

Comparative Pharmacodynamics of Gatifloxacin and Ciprofloxacin in an In Vitro Dynamic Model: Prediction of Equiefficient Doses and the Breakpoints of the Area under the Curve/MIC Ratio

Sergey N Vostrov 1, Olga V Kononenko 1, Irene Y Lubenko 1, Stephen H Zinner 1,, Alexander A Firsov 1,*
PMCID: PMC89786  PMID: 10722485

Abstract

To demonstrate the impact of the pharmacokinetics of gatifloxacin (GA) relative to those of ciprofloxacin (CI) on the antimicrobial effect (AME), the killing and regrowth kinetics of two differentially susceptible clinical isolates each of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae were studied. With each organism, a series of monoexponential pharmacokinetic profiles of GA (half-life [t1/2], 7 h) and CI (t1/2 = 4 h) were simulated to mimic different single doses of GA and two 12-h doses of CI. The respective eightfold ranges of the ratios of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) to the MIC were 58 to 466 and 116 to 932 (μg · h/ml)/(μg/ml). The species- and strain-independent linear relationships observed between the intensity of AME (IE) and log AUC/MIC were not superimposed for GA and CI (r2 = 0.99 in both cases). The predicted AUC/MIC ratio for GA that might be equivalent to a clinically relevant AUC/MIC breakpoint for CI was estimated to be 102 rather than 125 (μg · h/ml)/(μg/ml). The respective MIC breakpoints were 0.32 μg/ml (for a 400-mg dose of GA) and 0.18 μg/ml (for two 500-mg doses of CI). On the basis of the IE-log AUC/MIC relationships, equiefficient 24-h doses (D24hs) of GA and CI were calculated for hypothetical strains of S. aureus, E. coli, and K. pneumoniae for which the MICs were equal to the MICs at which 50% of isolates are inhibited. To provide an “acceptable” IE equal to 200 (log CFU/ml) · h, i.e., the IE provided by AUC/MIC of 125 (μg · h/ml)/(μg/ml) for ciprofloxacin, the D24hs of GA for all three organisms were much lower (115, 30, and 60 mg) than the clinically proposed 400-mg dose. Although the usual dose of CI (two doses of 500 mg) would be in excess for E. coli and K. pneumoniae (D24h = two doses of 40 mg and two doses of 115 mg, respectively), even the highest clinical dose of CI (two doses of 750 mg) might be insufficient for S. aureus (D24h, > two doses of 1,000 mg). The method of generalization of data obtained with specific organisms to other representatives of the same species described in the present report might be useful for prediction of the AMEs of new quinolones.


We recently described a new approach to the in vitro comparison of fluoroquinolones on the basis of an analysis of relationships between the intensity of the antimicrobial effect (IE; the area between control growth and bacterial killing and regrowth curves [4, 8]) and the ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) to the MIC as established over a wide range of AUC/MIC ratios (9). This approach allowed accurate comparisons of the antimicrobial effects of trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin in terms of the IE versus log AUC/MIC relationships. On the basis of these relationships that were bacterial species and strain independent but that were specific for each quinolone, the equiefficient AUC/MIC breakpoint of trovafloxacin relative to that of ciprofloxacin was predicted (9). Later, the described approach was expanded to generalize the data obtained with specific bacterial strains to predict the equiefficient doses of the quinolones adjusted by the MIC at which 50% of isolates are inhibited (MIC50) (7).

A similar approach was applied in the present study to compare the antimicrobial effects of gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin on Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Also, an attempt to predict a clinical equiefficient dose of the newer quinolone was conducted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Antimicrobial agents.

Gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin lactate powders (kindly provided by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Bayer Corporation, respectively) were used in the study.

Bacterial strains.

Two clinical isolates each of S. aureus (methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA] strains), E. coli, and K. pneumoniae were selected for the study. The MICs for these organisms were determined as described elsewhere (6) and are presented in Table 1. For the prediction of the antimicrobial effects of the quinolones on hypothetical representatives of the species mentioned above (see the Results section), weighted geometric means of the reported MIC50s of gatifloxacin (1) and ciprofloxacin (1, 3, 15, 16; D. Adam, Proc. 20th Int. Congr. Chemother., abstr. 2237, 1997; S. Kocagoz, D. Gur, A. Karademir, H. Akalin, and S. Unal, Abstract 1st Eur. Congr. Chemother. and 7th Biennial Conf. Antiinfective Agents Chemother., abstr. F 148, 1997; M. Takahata, J. Mitsuyama, Y. Yamashiro, M. Yonezawa, H. Araki, H. Yamada, Y. Todo, S. Minami, Y. Watanabe, and H. Narita, Abstr. 37th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F 159, p. 173, 1997; M. Visali, M. Jacobs, and P. Appelbaum, Proc. 20th Int. Congr. Chemother., abstr. 2233, 1997) were calculated. Since the MIC50s for MRSA reported in one study (3) differed substantially from the estimates reported in five other studies (1, 15; Adam, Proc., 20th Int. Congr. Chemother., 1997; Kocagoz et al., Abstr. 1st Eur. Congr. Chemother and 7th Biennial Conf. Antiinfective Agents Chemother., 1997; Takahata et al., 37th ICAAC), only MIC50s for methicillin-susceptible strains reported in the study of Felmingham et al. (3) were considered. The respective geometric mean values of the MIC50s of gatifloxacin for S. aureus, E. coli, and K. pneumoniae were 0.08, 0.02, and 0.04 μg/ml, respectively, and those of ciprofloxacin were 0.52, 0.01, and 0.03 μg/ml, respectively.

TABLE 1.

MICs of gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin

Bacterial strain MIC (μg/ml)
Gatifloxacin Ciprofloxacin
S. aureus 944 0.15 0.3
S. aureus 916 1.25 1.25
E. coli 11557 0.2 0.05
E. coli 37 0.3 0.2
K. pneumoniae 56 0.2 0.12
K. pneumoniae 128 0.32 0.4

In vitro dynamic model and simulated pharmacokinetic profiles.

A previously described dynamic model (8) was used in the study. The operation procedure, reliability of simulations of the quinolone pharmacokinetic profiles, and the high degree of reproducibility of the time-kill curves provided by the model have been reported elsewhere (6).

A series of monoexponential profiles that mimic single-dose administration of gatifloxacin and twice-daily dosing of ciprofloxacin were simulated. The simulated half-lives (7 h for gatifloxacin and 4.0 h for ciprofloxacin) were consistent with values reported for humans: 6.0 to 8.4 h (1012) and 3.2 to 5.0 h (2, 13, 17), respectively. The respective rates of fresh nutrient medium influx into the 40-ml central compartment and antibiotic- and bacterium-containing medium efflux from this compartment were 4 ml/h (gatifloxacin) and 7 ml/h (ciprofloxacin).

With both strains of S. aureus and with E. coli 37, the simulated AUC/MIC ratios for gatifloxacin were 58, 116, 233, and 466 (μg · h/ml)/(μg/ml) and those for ciprofloxacin were 116, 233, 466, and 932 (μg · h/ml)/(μg/ml). With E. coli 11557 or K. pneumoniae 56, the respective AUC/MIC ratios were 58, 116, and 233 and 116, 233, and 466 (μg · h/ml)/(μg/ml). With K. pneumoniae 128, the AUC/MIC ratios for gatifloxacin were 58 and 233 (μg · h/ml)/(μg/ml), and those for ciprofloxacin were 116 and 466 (μg · h/ml)/(μg/ml). To provide comparable AUC/MIC ratios for gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin, the latter of which has a shorter half-life, the sum of the peak concentration/MIC ratios produced by the two doses of ciprofloxacin was higher than the respective value for gatifloxacin at the same simulated AUC/MIC ratio. The overall range of the simulated peak concentration-to-MIC ratios for gatifloxacin was 5.8 to 46.4, and that for ciprofloxacin was 10.2 to 81.3 (Fig. 1). For ciprofloxacin, the designed AUC/MIC ratios reflect the sum of two AUC/MIC ratios provided by the two doses of the quinolone administered at 12-h intervals.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1

In vitro simulated pharmacokinetic profiles of gatifloxacin (bold line) and ciprofloxacin (thin line). The simulated AUC/MIC ratios [in (μg · h/ml)/(μg/ml)] are indicated by the boxed numbers.

Quantitation of time-kill curves and antimicrobial effect.

In each experiment multiple samples of bacterium-containing media from the central compartment were obtained throughout the observation period. The duration of the experiments was defined in each case as the time until regrowing antibiotic-exposed bacteria reached the maximum numbers observed in the absence of antibiotic (≥1010 CFU/ml). The procedure used for quantitation of viable counts has been reported elsewhere (6).

As described earlier (8), the antimicrobial effect (E) at each time point (t) was expressed by the difference between logarithms of the respective viable counts in the control growth curve (Nc) and in the time-kill curve (NA): E(t) = log Nc − log NA (Fig. 2). As seen in Fig. 2, either the area between the log Nc-t and log NA-t curves (Fig. 2A) or the area under the E-t curve (Fig. 2B) describes the total antimicrobial effect as expressed by IE. The upper limit of bacterial numbers, i.e., the cutoff level on the regrowth and control growth curves used to determine the IE, was 1011 CFU/ml. In case of lower counts, they were extrapolated to the cutoff level by using a logistic function (STATISTICA software, version 4.3; StatSoft, Inc.).

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2

Determination of IE: S. aureus 944 was exposed to gatifloxacin at an AUC/MIC of 116 (μg · h/ml)/(μg/ml). IE describes the dashed area between the control growth and time-kill curves (A) or under the E-t curves (B).

Relationships between effect and AUC/MIC or dose.

The IE-versus-log AUC/MIC data sets obtained with each quinolone against S. aureus, E. coli, and K. pneumoniae were fitted by the equation IE = a + b log AUC/MIC (equation 1).

When predicting the AUC/MIC breakpoint for gatifloxacin, the reported breakpoint value for ciprofloxacin, 125 (μg · h/ml)/(μg/ml), that correlated with bacterial eradication in patients with respiratory tract infections (14) was used. This reference breakpoint reflects the critical value of the area under the inhibitory curve that is very similar to the AUC/MIC.

To express the antimicrobial effects as a function of quinolone dose (D), the AUC in the linear relationship between IE and log AUC that corresponds to equation 1 written for a given quinolone-pathogen pair was replaced by D according to the polynomial equation AUC = c + dD + eD2 (equation 2). The values of c, d, and e for gatifloxacin (0, 7.0 × 10−2, and 3.6 × 10−5, respectively) and for ciprofloxacin (0.10, 1.4 × 10−2, and 7.5 × 10−6, respectively) were calculated by considering the curvilinear pattern of the AUC-D plots constructed from pharmacokinetic data for gatifloxacin (AUCs at Ds from 100 to 600 mg [1012]) and ciprofloxacin (AUCs at Ds from 100 to 1,000 mg [2]).

Correlation and regression analyses of the relationships between IE and log AUC/MIC for each quinolone were performed at a level of significance of P equal to 0.05.

RESULTS

The time courses of viable counts that reflect killing and regrowth of S. aureus, E. coli, and K. pneumoniae exposed to monoexponentially decreasing concentrations of gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin yielded similar patterns. At the AUC/MIC ratios studied, regrowth followed a rapid and considerable reduction in bacterial numbers. The rapid onset of the antimicrobial effect is reflected by steep ascending branches of the E-t curves (Fig. 3). As a rule, the maximal Es (Emaxs) produced by both quinolones were greater at higher AUC/MIC ratios, although the AUC/MIC-induced differences in Emaxs were less pronounced than those in the descending branches of the E-t curves. As seen in Fig. 3, these shifts were distinctly dependent on the simulated AUC/MIC: the higher the AUC/MIC, the later the disappearance of the antimicrobial effect.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3

Kinetics of the antimicrobial effect of gatifloxacin (left panels) and ciprofloxacin (right panels). The simulated AUC/MIC ratio [in (μg · h/ml)/(μg/ml)] is indicated by the number on each curve.

The respective IEs correlated well with log AUC/MIC ratios for both gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin (Fig. 4). The IE-log AUC/MIC plots fitted by equation 1 were linear, bacterial species and strain independent, but quinolone specific. As seen in Fig. 4, at AUC/MIC ratios of >75 (μg · h/ml)/(μg/ml), the effects produced by gatifloxacin were greater than those produced by ciprofloxacin at the same AUC/MIC ratio. For example, at an AUC/MIC ratio of 250 (μg · h/ml)/(μg/ml), the IE of gatifloxacin was 14% higher than that of ciprofloxacin. Furthermore, an equivalent AUC/MIC ratio for gatifloxacin which corresponds to a clinically established AUC/MIC ratio of 125 (μg · h/ml)/(μg/ml) for ciprofloxacin (14) and which produces the same IE of 200 (log CFU/ml) · h was lower, 102 (μg · h/ml)/(μg/ml). This estimated value might be proposed as an equivalent AUC/MIC breakpoint that in turn might be used to predict the MIC breakpoint of gatifloxacin. As follows from equation 2, a clinically accepted dose of gatifloxacin (400 mg) provides an AUC of 33 μg · h/ml. So, the MIC breakpoint is equal to 33/102, which is equal to 0.32 μg/ml. The respective value for two 500-mg doses of ciprofloxacin estimated by using equation 2 is lower: 22/125, which is equal to 0.18 μg/ml. As shown in Fig. 5, the MIC ranges limited from above by the respective MIC50s for E. coli and K. pneumoniae are lower than the MIC breakpoint lines for both gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin. Unlike the two gram-negative bacteria, the usual clinical dose of ciprofloxacin (two 500-mg doses) might be insufficient to kill many strains of S. aureus, including those for which the MIC is less than the MIC50, whereas the proposed dose of gatifloxacin (400 mg) might kill any strain for which the MIC is less than or equal to the MIC50.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4

AUC/MIC-dependent antimicrobial effects of gatifloxacin (bold line) and ciprofloxacin (thin line) on S. aureus, E. coli, and K. pneumoniae as fitted by equation 1, in which a is equal to −190 and b is equal to 194 for gatifloxacin and a is equal to −53 and b is equal to 121 for ciprofloxacin. The transparent numbers indicate the equivalent AUC/MIC.

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5

MIC50s for S. aureus (S.a.), E. coli (E.c.), and K. pneumoniae (K.p.) compared with the MIC breakpoints of gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin as predicted in this study.

DISCUSSION

This comparative study demonstrating a bacterial species- and strain-independent but quinolone-specific pattern of the IE-log AUC/MIC relationships is consistent with our earlier findings for trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin (7, 9). A similar strain-independent AUC/MIC-response relationship can be derived from another dose-range study with gatifloxacin (A. Bauernfeind, E. Eberlein, and I. Schneider, Abstr. 2nd Eur. Congr. Chemother. and the 7th Biennial Conf. Antiinfective Agents Chemother., poster T 135, 1996). To establish the respective relationship, on the basis of reported data (Bauernfeind et al., Abstr. 2nd Eur. Congr. Chemother. and 7th Biennial Conf. Antiinfective Agents Chemother, 1996), the antimicrobial effects of gatifloxacin against three differentially susceptible strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae (MICs, 0.25, 0.5, and 1 μg/ml) were expressed by areas between the control growth and time-kill curves (ABBC) (5), i.e., by IE determined within 24 h, when regrowth may or may not be seen. The AUC/MIC ratios that correspond to the doses used in the study by Bauernfeind et al. (Abstr. 2nd Eur. Congr. Chemother. and 7th Biennial Conf. Antiinfective Agents Chemother., 1996), from 100 to 800 mg, were calculated by using equation 2. As seen in Fig. 6, ABBC correlates well with log AUC/MIC in a strain-independent fashion. So, these data confirm the interstrain predictability of the antimicrobial effects of gatifloxacin in terms of the AUC/MIC-response relationship.

FIG. 6.

FIG. 6

AUC/MIC-dependent antimicrobial effects of gatifloxacin on S. pneumoniae constructed from reported data (Bauernfeind et al., Abstr. 2nd Eur. Congr. Chemother. and 7th Biennial Conf. Antiinfective Agents Chemother., 1996). The data obtained with three strains of S. pneumoniae are indicated by different symbols.

Due to the strain-independent pattern of the IE-log AUC/MIC relationships that were established in the present study with gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin, equation 1 may be applied to any strain of a given species, including a hypothetical strain for which the MIC is equal to the MIC50. In this case equation 1 may be rearranged as follows: IE = a′ + b log AUC (equation 3), where a′ is ab log MIC50. With the MIC50s specified in the Materials and Methods section, a specific a′ can be calculated and the respective species-specific AUC/MIC relationship of IE can be obtained for each quinolone-bacterial species pair. Then, by combining equations 3 and 2, the respective MIC50-adjusted dose-response relationships, IE = a′ + b log (c + dD + eD2) (equation 4), can be derived. The plots of the dose-dependent IEs that might be produced by gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin for hypothetical representatives of the three bacterial species for which MICs are equal to the respective MIC50s are shown in Fig. 7.

FIG. 7.

FIG. 7

Dose-dependent antimicrobial effects of gatifloxacin (bold curves) and ciprofloxacin (thin curves) on hypothetical strains of E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and S. aureus. The doses that provided the same IE are indicated by the transparent symbols.

As seen in Fig. 7, the IE-log D plots for gatifloxacin are positioned to the left of those for ciprofloxacin, showing that the same antimicrobial effect might be provided by much lower absolute doses of the new quinolone. For example, to provide an IE of 200 (log CFU/ml) · h that corresponds to an AUC/MIC of 125 (μg · h/ml)/(μg/ml) for ciprofloxacin for the gram-negative organisms, the 24-h doses (D24hs) of gatifloxacin might be 2.7-fold (E. coli) and 3.9-fold (K. pneumoniae) lower than the respective D24hs of ciprofloxacin. Due to the more striking contrast between the intrinsic activities of the quinolones against S. aureus (MIC50s, 0.08 μg/ml for gatifloxacin and 0.52 μg/ml for ciprofloxacin), the difference between the equiefficient D24hs is even more pronounced: 115 mg versus two doses of 1,080 mg, respectively. On the other hand, to provide the IE of 314 (log CFU/ml) · h produced by the clinically accepted 400-mg D24h of gatifloxacin against S. aureus, a D24h of two doses of 3,700 mg of ciprofloxacin would be necessary, and this dose exceeds the ciprofloxacin D24hs that might be given clinically. As the extrapolated relationship between D and AUC of ciprofloxacin, two doses of 3,700 mg, which is equal to a D24h of 7,400 mg, is out of the actual D range in the AUC-D set fitted by equation 2, the latter estimate is more conditional than the estimates for the other organisms. However, it does reflect the order of difference between the quinolone doses that might be necessary to provide the same antimicrobial effect.

The MIC50-adjusted relationships between IE and D24h may be useful for the generalization of the findings obtained with specific representatives of a given species. However, they may or may not predict a clinical D24h of the newly developed quinolone that should be at least as efficient as a clinically accepted D24h of the older quinolone against similarly susceptible species, i.e., against gram-negative bacteria. Indeed, the estimated equiefficient D24hs of gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin against E. coli and K. pneumoniae strains for which the MICs are equal to the MIC50s appeared to be much lower (Fig. 7) than, for example, the clinical D24h of ciprofloxacin. With E. coli, the gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin equiefficient D24hs were 30 mg and two doses of 40 mg, respectively, and with K. pneumoniae they were 60 mg and two doses of 115 mg, respectively, which are much lower than a 400-mg dose for the D24h of gatifloxacin or two doses of 500 mg for the D24h of ciprofloxacin. Moreover, even if the D24hs were compared at the highest level of IE observed in our experiments [ca. 300 (log CFU/ml) · h for ciprofloxacin], they would still be lower, i.e., 100 mg of gatifloxacin and two doses of 220 mg of ciprofloxacin for E. coli and 190 mg of gatifloxacin and two doses of 520 mg of ciprofloxacin for K. pneumoniae, than the clinically relevant D24hs, at least of gatifloxacin. These differences are so substantial that any extrapolation of the estimated equiefficient D24hs to the clinical D24hs would be quite speculative.

To avoid incorrect extrapolations, the antimicrobial effects of the quinolones might be compared by using bacteria for which the MIC50s are comparable to the established MIC breakpoint for ciprofloxacin (0.18 μg/ml). Among the organisms studied, E. coli 37 (MIC50s, 0.3 and 0.2 μg/ml for gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin, respectively) and K. pneumoniae 56 (MIC50s, 0.2 and 0.12 μg/ml for gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin, respectively) meet this requirement most easily. On the basis of the respective dose-response curves, the predicted D24hs of gatifloxacin (354 mg with E. coli 37 and 330 mg with K. pneumoniae 56) that might produce the same effects [IEs of 194 and 221 (log CFU/ml) · h, respectively] as two doses of 500 mg for the D24h of ciprofloxacin are close to the proposed 400-mg dose for the D24h of the new quinolone. A similar analysis might also be applied not only to the specific strains studied but also to a more representative organism for which the MIC50 meets the requirement described above. Serratia marcescens may be an appropriate example: susceptibility testing performed with both quinolones in the same experimental setting (1) reported MIC50s of gatifloxacin (0.25 μg/ml) and ciprofloxacin (0.13 μg/ml) which are comparable to ciprofloxacin's MIC breakpoint (0.18 μg/ml). By assuming species-independent patterns of the IE-log AUC/MIC relationships, the D24h of gatifloxacin that might produce the same effect [IE = 217 (log CFU/ml) · h] as two doses of 500 mg for the D24h of ciprofloxacin is also close to the proposed 400-mg dose for the D24h of the new quinolone (380 mg). Perhaps the estimated D24hs of trovafloxacin, equivalent to two doses of 500 mg for the D24h of ciprofloxacin, appeared to be so close to the clinically accepted trovafloxacin D24h, 199, 226, and 203 mg versus 200 mg (9), because for the three gram-negative strains studied the MICs were comparable (0.18 μg/ml). However, the apparent similarity of the predicted and clinically accepted quinolone doses may only be a chance observation, as the results depend highly on the MICs for arbitrarily selected organisms. Additional in vitro-in vivo correlations are needed to verify the clinical relevance of these predictions.

It should be noted in the present study that greater antimicrobial effects of gatifloxacin were demonstrated both in terms of D-response and AUC/MIC-response relationships. As with trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin (7, 9), a given AUC/MIC ratio of the longer-acting quinolone (gatifloxacin) provided a more pronounced antimicrobial effect than the same AUC/MIC ratio of the shorter-acting quinolone (ciprofloxacin). These data highlight the important role of the longer half-lives of the newer extended-spectrum quinolones whose pharmacokinetic profiles result in a greater antimicrobial effect.

In conclusion, this study supports the applicability of our approach to the prediction of equivalent AUC/MIC breakpoints and equiefficient doses of quinolones on the basis of the species- and strain-independent AUC/MIC relationships of the antimicrobial effect over a wide range of in vitro simulated AUC/MIC ratios (7, 9). Further studies with other pharmacokinetically different quinolones are needed to verify this approach.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

We are grateful to Yury A. Portnoy for assistance with computer presentation of the data.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bauernfeind A. Comparison of the antibacterial activities of the quinolones Bay 12-8039, gatifloxacin (AM 1155), trovafloxacin, clinafloxacin, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997;40:639–651. doi: 10.1093/jac/40.5.639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bergan T, Thorsteinsson S B. Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of ciprofloxacin. In: Neu H C, Weuta H, editors. Proceedings of the 1st International Ciprofloxacin Workshop, Current Clinical Practice series 34. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (Excerpta Medica); 1986. pp. 111–121. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Felmingham D, Robbins M J, Ingley K, Mathias I, Bhogal H A, Leakey G L, Ridgway G L, Grüneberg R N. In-vitro activity of trovafloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone, against recent clinical isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997;39(Suppl. B):43–49. doi: 10.1093/jac/39.suppl_2.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Firsov A A, Chernykh V M, Navashin S M. Quantitative analysis of antimicrobial effect kinetics in an in vitro dynamic model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991;34:1312–1317. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.7.1312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Firsov A A, Savarino D, Rubble M, Gilbert D, Manzano B, Medeiros A A, Zinner S H. Predictors of effect of ampicillin-sulbactam against TEM-1 β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in an in vitro dynamic model: enzyme activity versus MIC. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:734–738. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.3.734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Firsov A A, Shevchenko A A, Vostrov S N, Zinner S H. Inter- and intraquinolone predictors of antimicrobial effect in an in-vitro dynamic model: new insight into a widely used concept. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:659–665. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.3.659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Firsov A A, Vostrov S N, Kononenko O V, Lubenko I Y, Zinner S H. Prediction of the antimicrobial effects of trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin on staphylococci using an in-vitro dynamic model. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999;43:483–490. doi: 10.1093/jac/43.4.483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Firsov A A, Vostrov S N, Shevchenko A A, Cornaglia G. Parameters of bacterial killing and regrowth kinetics and antimicrobial effect examined in terms of area under the concentration-time curve relationships: action of ciprofloxacin against Escherichia coli in an in-vitro dynamic model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:1281–1287. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.6.1281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Firsov A A, Vostrov S N, Shevchenko A A, Zinner S H, Portnoy Y A. A new approach to in vitro comparisons of antibiotics in dynamic models: equivalent area under the curve/MIC breakpoints and equiefficient doses of trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin against bacteria of similar susceptibilities. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:2841–2847. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.11.2841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Grasela D M, Nakashima M, Uematsu T, et al. Pharmacokinetics of BMS-206584; 200 mg oral dose with concurrent probenecid in humans. Report no. 910058296. Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Grasela D M, Nakashima M, Uematsu T, et al. Phase I trial of a single intravenous infusion of BMS-206584 (AM-1155) in healthy male volunteers. Report no. 910058297. Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Grasela D M, Uematsu T, Nakashima M, et al. Oral dose phase I study of AM-1155 (BMS-206584). Report no. 910058295. Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hoffken G, Lode H, Prinzing C, Borner K, Koeppe P. Pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin after oral and parenteral administration. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985;27:375–379. doi: 10.1128/aac.27.3.375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schentag J J, Nix D E, Forrest A. Pharmacodynamics of the fluoroquinolones. In: Hooper D C, Wolfson J S, editors. Quinolone antimicrobial agents. 2nd ed. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology; 1993. pp. 259–271. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Seftone A M, Maskell J P, Rafay A M, Whiley A, Williams J D. The in-vitro activity of trovafloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone, against gram-positive bacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997;39(Suppl. B):57–62. doi: 10.1093/jac/39.suppl_2.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Seifert H. Comparative in-vitro activities of trovafloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and fleroxacin against gram-negative blood isolates. Clin Microbiol Infect. 1997;3(Suppl. 2):91. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wise R, Lister D, McNulty C A M, Griggs D, Andrews J M. The comparative pharmacokinetics of five quinolones. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1986;18(Suppl. D):71–81. doi: 10.1093/jac/18.supplement_d.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES