Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Apr 4;17(4):e0266163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266163

The role of eCIRP in bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice

Siavash Bolourani 1,2,3, Ezgi Sari 1, Max Brenner 1,3,4,‡,*, Ping Wang 1,2,3,4,‡,*
Editor: Manjula Karpurapu5
PMCID: PMC8979429  PMID: 35377906

Abstract

Objective and design

We examined the role of eCIRP in the pathogenesis of bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis (PF).

Material and methods

Publicly available gene expression omnibus datasets were analyzed for the expression of CIRP in lung samples from patients with PF. Wild type (WT) or CIRP-/- mice received daily injections of 10 μg/g bleomycin for 10 days. A subset of bleomycin-injected WT mice was treated with the eCIRP antagonist C23 (8 μg/g/day) from day 10 to day 19. At three weeks, transthoracic echocardiography was performed to measure the degree of pulmonary hypertension, and lung tissues were collected and analyzed for markers of fibrosis.

Results

Analysis of the mRNA data of human lung samples showed a significant positive correlation between CIRP and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), an important marker of fibrosis. Moreover, the expression of CIRP was higher in patients with acute exacerbation of PF than in patients with stable PF. CIRP-/- mice showed attenuated induction of α-SMA and collagens (Col1a1, Col3a1), reduced hydroxyproline content, decreased histological fibrosis scores, and improved pulmonary hypertension as compared to WT mice. WT mice treated with C23 also had significant attenuation of the above endpoint measure.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that eCIRP plays a key role in promoting the development of PF, and blocking eCIRP with C23 can significantly attenuate this process.

Introduction

Pulmonary fibrosis (PF), characterized by unrestrained production and accumulation of extracellular matrix components, is a pathology common in many chronic lung diseases such as idiopathic PF (IPF), sarcoidosis, and systemic sclerosis. Chronic inflammation caused by inhalation of foreign particles and autoimmune disease often results in PF [1, 2], although a causal role for inflammation has not been determined in IPF [3]. Irrespective of its etiology, PF is associated with high morbidity and mortality [46].

It has been long known that inflammation plays a key role in the triggering and persistence of fibrotic processes in the lungs [7]. To this end, many inflammatory mediators such as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and proinflammatory cytokines have been found to play a role in the exacerbation of fibrosis [812]. Extracellular cold-inducible RNA-binding protein (eCIRP) is a novel DAMP discovered by our lab to play a key role in sepsis, hemorrhagic shock, acute lung injury, renal and intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injuries, and ischemic stroke [1317]. eCIRP induces these effects through its binding to the toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and specifically TLR4-myeloid differentiation 2 (MD2) complex [18].

While the effect of eCIRP in acute inflammation and acute lung injury has been studied, little is known about its role in chronic inflammatory diseases of the lungs, especially the development of PF. During the past decade, evidence has emerged that DAMPs play a key role in promoting exacerbation, remodeling, and silent progression of PF [8]. Furthermore, laboratory and genome-wide association studies have implicated the TLR4-MD2 complex to be a critical mediator of pulmonary fibrosis [1922]. Hence, we decided to examine whether eCIRP plays any role in the pathogenesis of PF and whether blocking this effect by a small molecule can ameliorate the development of PF in a mouse model.

Materials and methods

Analysis of gene expression omnibus datasets

The expression datasets were obtained directly from the gene expression omnibus website (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo) using the getGEO function of R (http://www.r-project.org/) 4.0.3 library called GEOquery [23]. After obtaining the datasets for both GSE98925 and GSE10667, they were each normalized to the median value across all samples using package limma workflow [24]. To correlate the normalized mRNA count of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and CIRP in gene expression data of GSE98925, ggscatter function of library ggpubr library was used by setting the correlation method to Pearson correlation, and the coefficient was obtained. To compare the difference between the normalized count of CIRP among stable IPF patients and those with acute exacerbation of IPF in gene expression data of GSE10667, an unpaired Student’s t-test was used.

Experimental animals and model of fibrosis

Wild type (WT) C57BL/6 mice (Jackson Laboratory) and CIRP-/- mice with C57BL/6 background originally obtained from Kumamoto University, Japan and maintained at the Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research [25] were used in this study. Ten to twelve week-old male WT and CIRP-/- mice (n = 10 mice per group) received subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of bleomycin (Gold Biotechnology, St. Louis, MO; 10 μg/g/day, 100 μl of 1 mg/ml solution per injection of a ~20 g mouse) (identified as WT Bleomycin and CIRP-/- Bleomycin group) or PBS (identified as WT Control and CIRP-/- Control group) daily for 10 non-consecutive days (five times per week for two weeks) as described [26]. Animals were monitored daily for changes in health and behavior. The ultrasound imaging was obtained at three weeks. Animals require no special housing and no special handling. Since pulmonary fibrosis is painless, no analgesics or anesthetics were used. Two WT Bleomycin mice developed two or more predetermined humane endpoints (minimal or absent activity, weight loss of ≥ 20%, hunched or recumbent posture, minimal or no response to stimuli, grimace score = 2, body condition score ≤ 2, and labored breathing or respiratory distress) on day 18 and were immediately euthanized and excluded from the analysis. No mice died before meeting criteria for euthanasia. The remaining mice were sacrificed on day 22, when the lungs were collected. The left lung was fixed in formalin for histological assessment; the right lung was used for qPCR (superior and middle lobes) and measurement of hydroxyproline content (inferior and post-caval lobes).

C23 peptide

C23 peptide (GRGFSRGGGDRGYGG) was synthesized by GenScript (Piscataway, NJ). C23 is a short 15-mer peptide derived from CIRP with a high affinity to the TLR4-MD2 complex [13]. This peptide has been shown to antagonize eCIRP on TLR4-MD2 complex and attenuate sepsis, hemorrhagic shock, lung injury, and renal and intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury [2730]. For the WT Bleomycin+C23 group, in addition to the bleomycin injection described above, mice were also s.c. injected with C23 peptide (8 μg/g/day) as previously described [14, 28] starting on day 10 from the start of the initial bleomycin injection until day 19.

Isolation and analysis of real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction

At the end of the experiments, total RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and reverse transcribed to cDNA using M-MLV (Moloney murine leukemia virus) reverse transcriptase (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were carried out in a final volume of 10.5 μl which included 5 μl SYBR Green PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems), and 0.031 μM of both reverse and forward primer. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA was used to normalize the amplification data and fold changes were calculated in comparison with WT Control mice using the 2(-ΔΔCt) method. The sequence of forward and reverse primers used were as follows: GAPDH; 5’-CATCACTGCCACCCAGAAGACTG-3’ (forward) and 5’-ATGCCAGTGAGCTTCCCGTTCAG-3’(reverse). α-SMA; 5’-TGACCCAGATTATGTTTGA-3’ (forward) and 5’-GCTGTTATAGGTGGTTTCG-3’ (reverse). Collagen type 1 alpha 1 (Col1a1); 5’-GCAAGAGGCGAGAGAGGTTT-3’ (forward) and 5’-GACCACGGGCACCATCTTTA-3’ (reverse). Collagen type 3 alpha 1 (Col3a1); 5’-AGGCTGAAGGAAACAGCAAA-3’ (forward) and 5’-TAGTCTCATTGCCTTGCGTG-3’ (reverse).

Hydroxyproline assay

Colorimetric hydroxyproline assay kit (Cambridge, UK—catalog number: ab222941) was used to measure hydroxyproline content from samples prepared from ~100 mg of lung tissue lysates from each mouse.

Pulmonary hypertension and echocardiography

At the end of experiments, prior to the collection of lung tissue from mice, pulmonary hypertension data was obtained using transthoracic echocardiography. Prior to performing echocardiography, mice were sedated using minimal isoflurane and maintained on a heated table. Echocardiography was conducted using a 40 MHz center frequency transducer coupled to a Vevo®3100 Imaging System (Fujifilm VisualSonics, Toronto, ON, Canada). Pulmonary acceleration time (PAT) and pulmonary ejection time (PET) were obtained and used to calculate the PAT/PET ratio, which correlates with inverse right ventricular pressure–an indicator of pulmonary hypertension [31, 32].

Lung histology and fibrosis scores

Lung tissues were obtained at the end of the experiment and were cut into 5-μm fragments, preserved in paraffin, and later stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Hübner’s modification of the Ashcroft method was used to calculate the fibrosis score [33]. Briefly, we used the following gradings: (0), normal lung; (1), isolated alveolar septa with minor fibrotic changes; (2), fibrotic changes of alveolar septa with knot-like formations; (3), continuous fibrotic walls of alveolar septa; (4), non-confluent fibrotic masses; (5), confluent fibrotic masses; (6), large continuous fibrotic masses; (7), air bubbles; (8) fibrous obliteration. The sections were reviewed under light microscopy (Nikon ECLIPSE Ti-S) at 200x magnification. For each staining section, four random sites were observed and scored; the mean score of four sites was used as the fibrosis score of each lung section. The sections were assessed by an investigator blinded to the study groups.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed in the bar graphs as mean and standard deviation (SD), with individual values shown by colored points. The comparisons of WT and CIRP-/- mice’s molecular and physiological markers were performed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test with the factors of two-way ANOVA being CIRP gene expression status (WT vs. CIRP-/-) and bleomycin exposure status (Bleomycin vs. Control). The comparison for those with the C23 treatment group was done via one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Differences between the experimental groups reaching a p-value of 0.05 or less were considered statistically significant.

Ethics

The expression dataset comparisons used deidentified data publicly available at the gene expression omnibus website and, therefore did not require IRB approval. All experiments involving live animals were carried out in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals [34] and were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research.

Results

The positive correlation of CIRP with α-SMA, and upregulated CIRP expression in the lungs of IPF patients during exacerbation

We examined two publicly available gene expression omnibus (GEO) profiles: GSE98925, containing the array profile of microdissection from multiple fibroblastic foci from the lung tissues of 13 IPF patients either during a biopsy or after lung explant, and GSE10667, containing the array profile of whole lung tissue samples from IPF patients either with biopsy or after lung explant. This included 23 stable IPF patients (UIP) and 8 patients with acute exacerbation (AEx). We sought a correlation between the normalized mRNA count of CIRP and α-SMA levels in GSE98925 data of fibroblastic foci. The analysis showed a positive correlation between CIRP and α-SMA levels (R = 0.39, p = 0.0017) (Fig 1). It is important to note that the correlation held even after we removed the samples that were two standard deviations from the mean of each expression. Furthermore, we looked at the expression of CIRP mRNA in the tissue samples profile obtained from GSE10667, which showed a significant increase in the normalized CIRP mRNA in the lung samples during exacerbation (p<0.05) (Fig 1 insert). This analysis showed that not only does the expression of CIRP correlate with α-SMA in IPF patients, the levels of CIRP increases during acute exacerbation of IPF.

Fig 1. CIRP mRNA expression correlates with α-SMA in IPF patients and is increased during acute exacerbation of IPF.

Fig 1

Examinations of two publicly available gene expression omnibus (GEO) profiles: GSE98925 and GSE10667 (insert): After obtaining mRNA expression data using the getGEO function, expressions were normalized across all samples using the package limma workflow. The figure shows Pearson correlation and the coefficient (R = 0.39) obtained between mRNA expression of CIRP and α-SMA, along with p-value (p = 0.0017) shown for GSE98925, which is the mRNA array profile of microdissection from multiple fibroblastic foci from the lung tissues of 13 IPF patients either from the biopsy or after lung explantation. The insert shows the difference between the normalized CIRP mRNA in stable IPF patients (UIP) vs. those with acute exacerbation of IPF (AEx) in data from GSE10667. Unpaired Student’s t-test was used to determine the significance. * p<0.05 vs. UIP. The sample GSM269765 was removed due to normalized CIRP mRNA for that sample being more than 3 standard deviations away from the means.

Molecular markers of fibrosis are ameliorated in CIRP-/- mice

To examine the fibrotic role of eCIRP, we examined the mRNA expression of α-SMA, Col1a1, and Col3a1, and the corresponding hydroxyproline content in the lung tissue of WT Control, WT Bleomycin, CIRP-/- Control, and CIRP-/- Bleomycin mice. Our analysis showed that there was a 10.65- and 4.27-fold increase in α-SMA and Col3a1 expressions respectively in WT mice when comparing Bleomycin vs. Control group (p = 0.0180 for α-SMA mRNA p = 0.0002 for Col3a1 mRNA), however, there was no significant increase seen in CIRP-/- mice. Furthermore, mRNA expressions of α-SMA and Col3a1 were attenuated by 89% and 64% (p = 0.0030 for α-SMA, p = 0.003 for Col3a1) in CIRP-/- Bleomycin mice compared to WT Bleomycin (Fig 2A, 2C). There was a 72.24-fold increase (p = 0.0208) seen in Col1a1 mRNA expression of WT mice when comparing Control with the Bleomycin group, however, no significant increase was seen in CIRP-/- mice. While Col1a1 mRNA expression level was not significantly different between CIRP-/- Bleomycin mice compared to WT Bleomycin (due to large standard deviation of Col1a1 mRNA expression in Bleomycin WT mice), there was a 64% decrease in the mean of Col1a1 mRNA expression in CIRP-/- Bleomycin mice (Fig 2B). Additionally, there was a 2.08-fold increase (p = 0.0003) seen in hydroxyproline content of WT mice when comparing Control with Bleomycin group and was not seen in CIRP-/- mice. The hydroxyproline content CIRP-/- Bleomycin group was attenuated by 40% (p = 0.0049) as compared to WT Bleomycin mice (Fig 2D).

Fig 2. Deficiency in CIRP attenuates molecular markers of lung fibrosis in mice exposed to bleomycin.

Fig 2

For α-SMA (A), Col1a1 (B), and Col3a1 (C) mRNA expression data, total RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent and reverse transcribed to cDNA using M-MLV (Moloney murine leukemia virus) reverse transcriptase. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) RNA was used to normalize the amplification data and fold changes were calculated in comparison with WT Control mice using the 2(-ΔΔCt) method. For the hydroxyproline assay, a calorimetric Hydroxyproline assay kit was used to measure hydroxyproline content from samples prepared from ~100 mg of lung tissue lysates from each mouse (D). * p<0.05 vs. Wild Type (WT) Control, # p<0.05 vs. WT Bleomycin. Data were analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test with factors of two-way ANOVA being CIRP gene expression status (WT vs. CIRP-/-) and bleomycin exposure status (Bleomycin vs. Control).

Physiological and histological markers of fibrosis are ameliorated in CIRP-/- mice

We examined the PAT/PET ratio (a surrogate for pulmonary artery flow) using echocardiography in WT Control, WT Bleomycin, CIRP-/- Control, and CIRP-/- Bleomycin mice. Our analysis showed a decrease of 32.5% (p<0.0001) in the PAT/PET ratio of WT mice when comparing the Bleomycin vs. Control group. Furthermore, there was an increase of 30% (p = 0.0011) seen in the PAT/PET ratio when we compared WT Bleomycin with the CIRP-/- Bleomycin group (Fig 3A). When comparing the histological effects (Fig 3B) there was a 5.93-fold (p<0.0001) increase in the fibrosis score of WT mice when we compared the Bleomycin and Control group, while this increase was only 1.76-fold (p = 0.0001) in CIRP-/- mice. Furthermore, there was a significant decrease of 37% (p<0.0001) in the fibrosis score when comparing CIRP-/- Bleomycin compared to WT Bleomycin mice (Fig 3C).

Fig 3. Deficiency in CIRP ameliorates physiological markers of fibrosis in mice exposed to bleomycin.

Fig 3

Pulmonary acceleration time (PAT)/pulmonary ejection time (PET) ratio (A) was obtained which correlates with inverse right ventricular pressure (a surrogate for pulmonary hypertension). 5-μm lung tissue fragments preserved in paraffin, and later stained with hematoxylin and eosin (B) were evaluated using Hübner’s modification of the Ashcroft fibrosis score (C). Four random sites were observed and scored under light microscopy at 200x magnification; the mean score of four sites was used as the fibrosis score of each lung section. Representative samples for the lung sections are shown at 400x from Wild Type (WT) Control, WT Bleomycin, CIRP-/- Control, and CIRP-/- Bleomycin mice (B). * p<0.05 vs. WT Control, # p<0.05 vs. WT Bleomycin.

eCIRP antagonist C23 attenuates lung fibrosis

In order to determine the effect of eCIRP antagonist C23 on bleomycin-treated WT mice, we examined the mRNA expression of α-SMA, Col1a1, and Col3a1, and hydroxyproline content in the lung tissues. Our analysis showed that while there was a 10.65-, 72.24-, 4.27-, and 2.08-fold increases in mRNA expression of α-SMA, Col1a1, and Col3a1, and hydroxyproline content respectively when comparing WT Bleomycin and WT Control group (as seen in Fig 2), these increases were not seen when we compared WT Bleomycin+C23 to WT Control mice. Furthermore, α-SMA, Col1a1, and Col3a1 mRNA expressions, and hydroxyproline content were decreased by 96.5, 97.4, 57.8, and 54.6% (p = 0.0277 for α-SMA, p = 0.0190 for Col1a1, and p = 0.0046 for Col3a1 mRNA and p = 0.0002 for hydroxyproline content) when we compared WT Bleomycin+C23 to WT Bleomycin (Figs 4A–4D).

Fig 4. The eCIRP antagonist C23 ameliorates molecular markers of fibrosis in mice exposed to bleomycin.

Fig 4

For α-SMA (A), Col1a1 (B), and Col3a1 (C) mRNA expression data, total RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent and reverse transcribed to cDNA using M-MLV (Moloney murine leukemia virus) reverse transcriptase. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) RNA was used to normalize the amplification data and fold changes were calculated in comparison with WT Control mice, using the 2(-ΔΔCt) method. For the hydroxyproline assay, the calorimetric Hydroxyproline assay was used to measure hydroxyproline content (D) from samples prepared from ~100 mg of lung tissue lysates from each mouse. * p<0.05 vs. Wild Type (WT) Control, # p<0.05 vs. WT Bleomycin. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. WT Bleomycin and WT Control groups are identical to that of Fig 2.

Our analysis showed that while there was a 32.5% decrease in PAT/PET ratio when comparing WT Bleomycin to WT Control mice (as seen in Fig 3A), this decrease was not seen when comparing WT Bleomycin+C23 with WT Control mice. Furthermore, there was an increase of 45% (p<0.0001) in the PAT/PET ratio when we compared WT Bleomycin+C23 with WT Bleomycin mice (Fig 5A). When we looked at the histological effects of the C23 treatment, there was a 5.93-fold (p<0.0001) increase in fibrosis score when we compared WT Bleomycin with WT Control (as seen in Fig 3C), this increase was only 3.44 fold (p<0.0001) when we compared WT WT Bleomycin+C23 with WT Control (Fig 5B). Furthermore, we saw an attenuation of 42% (p<0.0001) when we compared concurrent C23 treatment as compared to those with bleomycin alone (WT Bleomycin+C23 vs. Bleomycin).

Fig 5. The eCIRP antagonist C23 ameliorates physiological markers of fibrosis in mice exposed to bleomycin.

Fig 5

PAT/PET ratio (A) was calculated which correlates with inverse right ventricular pressure (a surrogate for pulmonary hypertension). 5-μm lung tissue fragments preserved in paraffin and later stained with hematoxylin and eosin (B) were evaluated using Hübner’s modification of the Ashcroft fibrosis score (C). Four random sites were observed and scored under light microscopy at 200x magnification; the mean score of four random sites was used as the fibrosis score of each lung section. The representative sample for the lung sections is shown at 400x from Wild Type (WT) Control, WT Bleomycin, and WT Bleomycin+C23 mice (B). * p<0.05 vs. WT Control, # p<0.05 vs. WT Bleomycin. WT Bleomycin and WT Control groups are identical to that of Fig 3.

Discussion

Pulmonary fibrosis is a devastating sequela of many chronic inflammatory diseases characterized by a progressive decline in lung volume capacity and resulting in high mortality [35, 36]. Currently, the few therapeutics developed to ameliorate PF only modestly alter its rapid progression [37]. Estimated mortality from pulmonary fibrosis is between 46.8 to 102.6 deaths per million and there has been an increase in recent decades [38, 39]. The elevated morbidity and mortality associated with PF underline the urgent need for more effective therapeutic approaches. Studies on the role of immune cells in PF indicate that while immune cells are prominent in the early phases of the fibrotic process, the factors released by these cells within the microenvironment have a long-lasting effect [4042]. Specifically, uncontrolled activation of macrophages and fibroblasts by DAMPs starts an inflammatory cascade that further damages pulmonary tissues, causing the further release of more DAMPs in the tissue microenvironment creating a vicious cycle that culminates in fibrosis. DAMPs exert their effect on macrophages and fibroblasts mainly through TLRs [43]. The seminal work of Bhattacharyya et al. further specified that the effects attributed to PF are largely mediated through the TLR4-MD2 pathway [20, 42, 44].

One way to mitigate the effects of the fibrosis vicious cycle described above is to stop DAMPs with high affinity and efficacy in activating the TLR4-MD2 complex. Using surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analysis, our lab had previously shown that CIRP binds to the TLR4-MD2 complex, as well as to TLR4 and MD2 individually, with high affinity, suggesting that blocking eCIRP can ameliorate TLR4-MD2 complex signal activation [13]. Indeed, our investigation on the GEO GSE98925 mRNA profiles of samples from IPF patients’ fibroblastic foci showed that there is a correlation between the expression of CIRP and α-SMA. The progression of PF is characterized at the cellular level by the differentiation of fibroblastic cells into myofibroblasts, and α-SMA is a critical marker of myofibroblast differentiation [45]. Moreover, our analysis of GEO GSE10667 showed that the expression of CIRP is particularly elevated during exacerbation of IPF in lung tissue (Fig 1). These findings are in line with the proposition that repetitive injury caused by acute exacerbation worsens PF not only in IPF patients but also in other chronic diseases affecting the lung [4652]. Furthermore, in spite the lack of evidence for a causative effect of inflammation in IPF, a recent study has shown that IPF patients with elevated serum eCIRP levels had increased disease progression and all-cause mortality [53]. Taken together, these clinical observations lend support to further investigating eCIRP in a mouse model of PF as a potential target in ameliorating the fibrotic process.

The release of proinflammatory cytokines like TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 in the lung tissue microenvironment by stimulated macrophages and fibroblasts contributes to the persistence of lung fibrosis by activating fibroblasts in an autocrine/paracrine fashion [10, 5458]. Our lab has previously shown that eCIRP is a potent inducer of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 in macrophages in a TLR4 dependent manner, and that CIRP-/- mice have an ameliorated response to the acute injury brought on by the storm of these proinflammatory cytokines [13, 15, 18, 59]. In our recently published observations, we have seen that eCIRP is a powerful inducer of these cytokines in pulmonary fibroblasts as well [60]. Therefore, we conjectured that eCIRP can promote the persistent autocrine/paracrine activation of fibroblasts by inducing the release of proinflammatory cytokines from macrophages and fibroblasts. We focused our attention on CIRP-/- mice to determine if there is an attenuated response to the chronic inflammatory models of murine PF.

Rampant collagen deposition, marked by an increase in expression of Col1a1 and Col3a1, is the hallmark of fibrosis in the lung tissue extracellular microenvironment [6164]. In addition, hydroxyproline, a major component of all types of fibrillar collagen, correlates well with the amount of stable collagen in the lung tissue and is widely used to assess the degree of PF [65, 66]. One of the devastating complications of chronic diseases causing fibrosis in the lungs is the development of pulmonary hypertension [6769]. We measured pulmonary hypertension by PAT/PET ratio, which is one of the most accurate non-invasive surrogates for pulmonary artery flow correlating with the inverse of pulmonary hypertension [31, 32]. As postulated, CIRP-/- mice lung showed ameliorated fibrotic response to bleomycin-induced PF shown by a reduction in mRNA expression of α-SMA, Col1a1, and Col3a1, and hydroxyproline content levels in the lung tissue as compared to WT mice (Fig 2). We also showed that this effect is not limited to molecular markers as the physiologic impact of PF is also attenuated in CIRP-/- mice by having an ameliorated pulmonary hypertension, and fibrosis score (Fig 3).

The inflammatory effect of eCIRP is caused in an extracellular milieu partially through a TLR4-MD2 complex [18] and we have shown that the CIRP-derived peptide C23 acts as a competitive antagonist inhibiting the binding of eCIRP to the TLR4-MD2 complex [13]. Since we have demonstrated that treatment with C23 attenuates inflammation and ameliorates clinically relevant endpoints in various animal models shown to be aggravated by eCIRP [28, 30, 70], we ventured to see if blocking eCIRP using C23 peptide on TLR4-MD2 complex can ameliorate the bleomycin-induced fibrotic response in the lung. We have already shown that the inflammatory pathways and cytokines are at their peak of expression on day 14 after the start of bleomycin injection and there is a drop in expression of these pathways and cytokines on day 21 [60]. This is in line with Raventti et al., who showed there is an increase in infiltration of total white blood cells, neutrophils, and macrophages in lung tissue at day 14 of bleomycin injection that decreases on day 21 [71]. Therefore, we hypothesized that by blocking eCIRP around this day, we can reduce the inflammatory phase of bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis and ameliorate the fibrotic response. Indeed, our results show that molecular and physiological markers of PF can be ameliorated in the murine model of bleomycin-induced PF by treatment of C23 from day 10 to day 19 after the first injection of bleomycin (Figs 4 and 5). Not much is known about C23 other than its sequence, the affinity of its binding to TLR4, and its efficacy in reducing eCIRP-mediated inflammation. Future studies should focus on C23’s pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and possible pharmacotoxicity, as well as its potential administration by inhalation.

However, we realize this study has some limitations. The bleomycin model of PF is widely used for studies of the pathogenesis of the fibrotic process and of new treatments for PF, but it is not adequate for investigating the etiology of PF in humans. While we have shown that blocking eCIRP’s effect on the TLR4-MD2 complex attenuates the fibrotic effect of bleomycin, we have not directly assessed whether this comes as a result of blocking the inflammatory phase of bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis as speculated. While studies using CIRP-/- mice cannot determine whether the attenuated PF phenotype is due to the intra- or extracellular effects of CIRP, we have shown that blocking eCIRP with C23 ameliorates the bleomycin-induced PF, thus demonstrating the relevance of the extracellular effects of eCIRP. However, given that the injections were not done in parallel between the groups, there is a potential for a cage effect that can introduce bias into our comparisons. While we have evaluated mRNA expression of CIRP in IPF patients in publicly available GEO datasets, we could not measure eCIRP protein level in the lung tissue interstitial fluid. Nonetheless, our previous studies showed a strong correlation between increased mRNA expression of CIRP and increased eCIRP protein in serum and cell culture supernatants [13, 7274]. Future studies obtaining eCIRP levels in the lung tissue and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of patients with pulmonary fibrosis during exacerbations should provide further evidence that the contribution of CIRP to pulmonary fibrosis is at the extracellular level.

In conclusion, we here demonstrate for the first time that CIRP plays a crucial role in PF. We demonstrate that eCIRP contributes to PF through its effect in the extracellular microenvironment. Furthermore, we showed that the eCIRP competitive antagonist C23 can ameliorate the fibrotic response. Although the precise molecular mechanism by which eCIRP contributes to PF remains to be elucidated, we hypothesize that it is likely by dampening the inflammatory phase of fibrotic response in tissue macrophages and fibroblasts, which results in the halting of autocrine/paracrine activation to myofibroblasts. Therapeutically targeting eCIRP not only shows promise in the treatment of exacerbations of PF in chronic inflammatory diseases of the lung but also attenuating the overall progression of PF.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Fig 1 data and statistical analysis.

This table contains the data and statistical analysis used in Fig 1.

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Fig 2 data and statistical analysis.

This table contains the data and statistical analysis used in Fig 2.

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Fig 3 data and statistical analysis.

This table contains the data and statistical analysis used in Fig 3.

(XLSX)

S4 Table. Fig 4 data and statistical analysis.

This table contains the data and statistical analysis used in Fig 4.

(XLSX)

S5 Table. Fig 5 data and statistical analysis.

This table contains the data and statistical analysis used in Fig 5.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Michael Diao, MD PhD and Serdar Akkol, MD for their assistance and Monowar Aziz, PhD, for valuable discussions.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) grant R01HL076179 (PW), and National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) grant R35GM118337 (PW). The funding agencies played no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. NHLBI: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/ NIGMS: https://www.nigms.nih.gov/.

References

  • 1.Cottin V. Significance of connective tissue diseases features in pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir Rev. 2013;22(129):273–80. doi: 10.1183/09059180.00003013 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mossman BT, Churg A. Mechanisms in the pathogenesis of asbestosis and silicosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157(5 Pt 1):1666–80. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.5.9707141 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Velagacherla V, Mehta CH, Nayak Y, Nayak UY. Molecular pathways and role of epigenetics in the idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Life Sci. 2022;291:120283. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.120283 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Champtiaux N, Cottin V, Chassagnon G, Chaigne B, Valeyre D, Nunes H, et al. Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema in systemic sclerosis: A syndrome associated with heavy morbidity and mortality. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019;49(1):98–104. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.10.011 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Barratt SL, Creamer A, Hayton C, Chaudhuri N. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF): An overview. J Clin Med. 2018;7(8). doi: 10.3390/jcm7080201 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6111543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kirkil G, Lower EE, Baughman RP. Predictors of mortality in pulmonary sarcoidosis. Chest. 2018;153(1):105–13. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.07.008 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wilson MS, Wynn TA. Pulmonary fibrosis: pathogenesis, etiology and regulation. Mucosal Immunol. 2009;2(2):103–21. doi: 10.1038/mi.2008.85 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2675823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ellson CD, Dunmore R, Hogaboam CM, Sleeman MA, Murray LA. Danger-associated molecular patterns and danger signals in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2014;51(2):163–8. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2013-0366TR . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ge X, Arriazu E, Magdaleno F, Antoine DJ, Dela Cruz R, Theise N, et al. High mobility group box-1 drives fibrosis progression signaling via the receptor for advanced glycation end products in mice. Hepatology. 2018;68(6):2380–404. doi: 10.1002/hep.30093 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6240507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pilling D, Vakil V, Cox N, Gomer RH. TNF-alpha-stimulated fibroblasts secrete lumican to promote fibrocyte differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(38):11929–34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1507387112 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4586854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gasse P, Mary C, Guenon I, Noulin N, Charron S, Schnyder-Candrian S, et al. IL-1R1/MyD88 signaling and the inflammasome are essential in pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis in mice. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(12):3786–99. doi: 10.1172/JCI32285 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2066195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mi S, Li Z, Yang HZ, Liu H, Wang JP, Ma YG, et al. Blocking IL-17A promotes the resolution of pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis via TGF-beta1-dependent and -independent mechanisms. J Immunol. 2011;187(6):3003–14. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1004081 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Qiang X, Yang WL, Wu R, Zhou M, Jacob A, Dong W, et al. Cold-inducible RNA-binding protein (CIRP) triggers inflammatory responses in hemorrhagic shock and sepsis. Nat Med. 2013;19(11):1489–95. Epub 2013/10/08. doi: 10.1038/nm.3368 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3826915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhang F, Brenner M, Yang WL, Wang P. A cold-inducible RNA-binding protein (CIRP)-derived peptide attenuates inflammation and organ injury in septic mice. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):3052–62. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13139-z ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5809586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cen C, Yang WL, Yen HT, Nicastro JM, Coppa GF, Wang P. Deficiency of cold-inducible ribonucleic acid-binding protein reduces renal injury after ischemia-reperfusion. Surgery. 2016;160(2):473–83. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.04.014 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4938765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cen C, McGinn J, Aziz M, Yang WL, Cagliani J, Nicastro JM, et al. Deficiency in cold-inducible RNA-binding protein attenuates acute respiratory distress syndrome induced by intestinal ischemia-reperfusion. Surgery. 2017;162(4):917–27. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.06.004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jacob A, Ma Y, Nasiri E, Ochani M, Carrion J, Peng S, et al. Extracellular cold inducible RNA-binding protein mediates binge alcohol-induced brain hypoactivity and impaired cognition in mice. Mol Med. 2019;25(1):24–38. doi: 10.1186/s10020-019-0092-3 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6543653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Aziz M, Brenner M, Wang P. Extracellular CIRP (eCIRP) and inflammation. J Leukoc Biol. 2019;106(1):133–46. doi: 10.1002/JLB.3MIR1118-443R ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6597266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bhattacharyya S, Wang W, Qin W, Cheng K, Coulup S, Chavez S, et al. TLR4-dependent fibroblast activation drives persistent organ fibrosis in skin and lung. JCI Insight. 2018;3(13). doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.98850 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6124522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bhattacharyya S, Kelley K, Melichian DS, Tamaki Z, Fang F, Su Y, et al. Toll-like receptor 4 signaling augments transforming growth factor-beta responses: a novel mechanism for maintaining and amplifying fibrosis in scleroderma. Am J Pathol. 2013;182(1):192–205. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.09.007 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3538029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bhattacharyya S, Tamaki Z, Wang W, Hinchcliff M, Hoover P, Getsios S, et al. FibronectinEDA promotes chronic cutaneous fibrosis through Toll-like receptor signaling. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(232):232ra50. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008264 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4414050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bhattacharyya S, Varga J. Emerging roles of innate immune signaling and toll-like receptors in fibrosis and systemic sclerosis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2015;17(1):474. doi: 10.1007/s11926-014-0474-z . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Davis S, Meltzer PS. GEOquery: A bridge between the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and BioConductor. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(14):1846–7. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm254 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, Shi W, et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(7):e47. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv007 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4402510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sakurai T, Itoh K, Higashitsuji H, Nonoguchi K, Liu Y, Watanabe H, et al. Cirp protects against tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced apoptosis via activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1763(3):290–5. Epub 2006/03/30. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.02.007 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhu Z, Godana D, Li A, Rodriguez B, Gu C, Tang H, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function in experimental pulmonary hypertension. Pulm Circ. 2019;9(2):2045894019841987. doi: 10.1177/2045894019841987 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6566495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.McGinn J, Zhang F, Aziz M, Yang WL, Nicastro J, Coppa GF, et al. The protective effect of a short peptide derived from cold-inducible RNA-binding protein in renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Shock. 2018;49(3):269–76. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000988 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5809308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.McGinn JT, Aziz M, Zhang F, Yang WL, Nicastro JM, Coppa GF, et al. Cold-inducible RNA-binding protein-derived peptide C23 attenuates inflammation and tissue injury in a murine model of intestinal ischemia-reperfusion. Surgery. 2018;164(6):1191–7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.06.048 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6261788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.McGinn JT, Aziz M, Ode Y, Wang P. Small molecule C23 inhibits CIRP-induced pro-inflammatory ICAM-1 expressing neutrophils in sepsis. J Am Coll Surg. 2018;227. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhang F, Yang WL, Brenner M, Wang P. Attenuation of hemorrhage-associated lung injury by adjuvant treatment with C23, an oligopeptide derived from cold-inducible RNA-binding protein. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83(4):690–7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001566 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5654615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Thibault HB, Kurtz B, Raher MJ, Shaik RS, Waxman A, Derumeaux G, et al. Noninvasive assessment of murine pulmonary arterial pressure: validation and application to models of pulmonary hypertension. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(2):157–63. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.887109 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3075498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kohut A, Patel N, Singh H. Comprehensive echocardiographic assessment of the right ventricle in murine models. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2016;24(3):229–38. doi: 10.4250/jcu.2016.24.3.229 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5050312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hubner RH, Gitter W, El Mokhtari NE, Mathiak M, Both M, Bolte H, et al. Standardized quantification of pulmonary fibrosis in histological samples. Biotechniques. 2008;44(4):507–11, 14–7. doi: 10.2144/000112729 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Academies NRCotN. Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (The Guide). 8th ed: The National Academies Press; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lassenius MI, Toppila I, Pontynen N, Kasslin L, Kaunisto J, Kilpelainen M, et al. Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) decline, mortality and healthcare resource utilization in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Clin Respir J. 2020;7(1):1702618. doi: 10.1080/20018525.2019.1702618 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6968594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Reichmann WM, Yu YF, Macaulay D, Wu EQ, Nathan SD. Change in forced vital capacity and associated subsequent outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. BMC Pulm Med. 2015;15:167. doi: 10.1186/s12890-015-0161-5 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4696269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Maher TM, Strek ME. Antifibrotic therapy for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Time to treat. Respir Res. 2019;20(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1161-4 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6731623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Olson AL, Swigris JJ, Lezotte DC, Norris JM, Wilson CG, Brown KK. Mortality from pulmonary fibrosis increased in the United States from 1992 to 2003. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;176(3):277–84. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200701-044OC . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hutchinson J, Fogarty A, Hubbard R, McKeever T. Global incidence and mortality of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review. Eur Respir J. 2015;46(3):795–806. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00185114 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bhattacharyya S, Midwood KS, Yin H, Varga J. Toll-like receptor-4 signaling drives persistent fibroblast activation and prevents fibrosis resolution in scleroderma. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2017;6(10):356–69. doi: 10.1089/wound.2017.0732 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5649394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Desai O, Winkler J, Minasyan M, Herzog EL. The role of immune and inflammatory cells in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2018;5:43. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00043 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5869935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kolahian S, Fernandez IE, Eickelberg O, Hartl D. Immune mechanisms in pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2016;55(3):309–22. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2016-0121TR . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kovach MA, Standiford TJ. Toll like receptors in diseases of the lung. Int Immunopharmacol. 2011;11(10):1399–406. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2011.05.013 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3575025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bhattacharyya S, Wang W, Morales-Nebreda L, Feng G, Wu M, Zhou X, et al. Tenascin-C drives persistence of organ fibrosis. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11703. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11703 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4895803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhang HY, Gharaee-Kermani M, Zhang K, Karmiol S, Phan SH. Lung fibroblast alpha-smooth muscle actin expression and contractile phenotype in bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Pathol. 1996;148(2):527–37. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1861697. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Juarez MM, Chan AL, Norris AG, Morrissey BM, Albertson TE. Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis-a review of current and novel pharmacotherapies. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7(3):499–519. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.01.17 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4387423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Baughman RP, Lower EE. Frequency of acute worsening events in fibrotic pulmonary sarcoidosis patients. Respir Med. 2013;107(12):2009–13. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.10.014 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Panselinas E, Judson MA. Acute pulmonary exacerbations of sarcoidosis. Chest. 2012;142(4):827–36. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-1060 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tomiyama F, Watanabe R, Ishii T, Kamogawa Y, Fujita Y, Shirota Y, et al. High prevalence of acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease in Japanese patients with systemic sclerosis. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2016;239(4):297–305. doi: 10.1620/tjem.239.297 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wells AU, Margaritopoulos GA, Antoniou KM, Denton C. Interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;35(2):213–21. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1371541 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Tachikawa R, Tomii K, Ueda H, Nagata K, Nanjo S, Sakurai A, et al. Clinical features and outcome of acute exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia: collagen vascular diseases-related versus idiopathic. Respiration. 2012;83(1):20–7. doi: 10.1159/000329893 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Yasuoka H. Recent treatments of interstitial lung disease with systemic sclerosis. Clin Med Insights Circ Respir Pulm Med. 2015;9(Suppl 1):97–110. doi: 10.4137/CCRPM.S23315 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4720185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hozumi H, Kataoka K, Kondoh Y, Isayama T, Okada J, Sugiura K, et al. Clinical significance of cold-inducible RNA-binding protein in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest. 2021;160(6):2149–57. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.06.067 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Epstein Shochet G, Brook E, Israeli-Shani L, Edelstein E, Shitrit D. Fibroblast paracrine TNF-alpha signaling elevates integrin A5 expression in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Respir Res. 2017;18(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12931-017-0606-x ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5477311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kolb M, Margetts PJ, Anthony DC, Pitossi F, Gauldie J. Transient expression of IL-1beta induces acute lung injury and chronic repair leading to pulmonary fibrosis. J Clin Invest. 2001;107(12):1529–36. doi: 10.1172/JCI12568 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC200196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Gossart S, Cambon C, Orfila C, Seguelas MH, Lepert JC, Rami J, et al. Reactive oxygen intermediates as regulators of TNF-alpha production in rat lung inflammation induced by silica. J Immunol. 1996;156(4):1540–8. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Le TT, Karmouty-Quintana H, Melicoff E, Le TT, Weng T, Chen NY, et al. Blockade of IL-6 trans signaling attenuates pulmonary fibrosis. J Immunol. 2014;193(7):3755–68. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302470 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4169999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Moodley YP, Scaffidi AK, Misso NL, Keerthisingam C, McAnulty RJ, Laurent GJ, et al. Fibroblasts isolated from normal lungs and those with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis differ in interleukin-6/gp130-mediated cell signaling and proliferation. Am J Pathol. 2003;163(1):345–54. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63658-9 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1868172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Godwin A, Yang WL, Sharma A, Khader A, Wang Z, Zhang F, et al. Blocking cold-inducible RNA-binding protein protects liver from ischemia-reperfusion injury. Shock. 2015;43(1):24–30. Epub 2014/09/05. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000251 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4270919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Bolourani S, Sari E, Brenner M, Wang P. Extracellular CIRP induces an inflammatory phenotype in pulmonary fibroblasts via TLR4. Front Immunol. 2021;12:721970. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.721970 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8342891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Willis BC, Liebler JM, Luby-Phelps K, Nicholson AG, Crandall ED, du Bois RM, et al. Induction of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in alveolar epithelial cells by transforming growth factor-beta1: potential role in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Pathol. 2005;166(5):1321–32. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)62351-6 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1606388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gu L, Zhu YJ, Yang X, Guo ZJ, Xu WB, Tian XL. Effect of TGF-beta/Smad signaling pathway on lung myofibroblast differentiation. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2007;28(3):382–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7254.2007.00468.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Zhou Y, Li P, Duan JX, Liu T, Guan XX, Mei WX, et al. Aucubin alleviates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in a mouse model. Inflammation. 2017;40(6):2062–73. doi: 10.1007/s10753-017-0646-x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Shi J, Zhou LR, Wang XS, Du JF, Jiang MM, Song Z, et al. KLF2 attenuates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis and inflammation with regulation of AP-1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;495(1):20–6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.10.114 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ask K, Labiris R, Farkas L, Moeller A, Froese A, Farncombe T, et al. Comparison between conventional and "clinical" assessment of experimental lung fibrosis. J Transl Med. 2008;6:16. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-6-16 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2365932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Engel J, Bächinger HP. Structure, Stability and Folding of the Collagen Triple Helix. In: Brinckmann J, Notbohm H, Müller PK, editors. Collagen: Primer in Structure, Processing and Assembly. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2005. p. 7–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Smith JS, Gorbett D, Mueller J, Perez R, Daniels CJ. Pulmonary hypertension and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a dastardly duo. Am J Med Sci. 2013;346(3):221–5. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e31827871dc . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Saygin D, Domsic RT. Pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis: challenges in diagnosis, screening and treatment. Open Access Rheumatol. 2019;11:323–33. doi: 10.2147/OARRR.S228234 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6939800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Duong H, Bonham CA. Sarcoidosis-associated pulmonary hypertension: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Clin Pulm Med. 2018;25(2):52–60. doi: 10.1097/CPM.0000000000000252 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6168942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Linders J, Madhi R, Rahman M, Morgelin M, Regner S, Brenner M, et al. Extracellular cold-inducible RNA-binding protein regulates neutrophil extracellular trap formation and tissue damage in acute pancreatitis. Lab Invest. 2020;100(12):1618–30. doi: 10.1038/s41374-020-0469-5 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ravanetti F, Ragionieri L, Ciccimarra R, Ruscitti F, Pompilio D, Gazza F, et al. Modeling pulmonary fibrosis through bleomycin delivered by osmotic minipump: a new histomorphometric method of evaluation. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2020;318(2):L376–L85. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00311.2019 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7052681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Khan MM, Yang WL, Brenner M, Bolognese AC, Wang P. Cold-inducible RNA-binding protein (CIRP) causes sepsis-associated acute lung injury via induction of endoplasmic reticulum stress. Sci Rep. 2017;7:41363–75. doi: 10.1038/srep41363 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5269663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Yang WL, Sharma A, Wang Z, Li Z, Fan J, Wang P. Cold-inducible RNA-binding protein causes endothelial dysfunction via activation of Nlrp3 inflammasome. Sci Rep. 2016;6:26571. doi: 10.1038/srep26571 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4877585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Ode Y, Aziz M, Wang P. CIRP increases ICAM-1(+) phenotype of neutrophils exhibiting elevated iNOS and NETs in sepsis. J Leukoc Biol. 2018;103(4):693–707. doi: 10.1002/JLB.3A0817-327RR ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6139256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Manjula Karpurapu

16 Feb 2022

PONE-D-21-22312

The Role of eCIRP in Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis in Mice

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Brenner

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by June 7th 2022. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Manjula Karpurapu

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf".

2. In your Methods section, please provide additional details regarding bleomycin and C23 peptide used in your study and ensure you have described the source. For more information regarding PLOS' policy on materials sharing and reporting, see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/materials-and-software-sharing#loc-sharing-materials.

3. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match.

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

4. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

5. Please include your full ethics statement in the ‘Methods’ section of your manuscript file. In your statement, please include the full name of the IRB or ethics committee who approved or waived your study, as well as whether or not you obtained informed written or verbal consent. If consent was waived for your study, please include this information in your statement as well.

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

_______________________________________________________________________

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This is an interesting and well-designed combination of human data and murine work. The authors show that eCIRP contributes to pathological manifestations of bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice and that small molecule blockade attenuates bleomycin effects.

The following is needed:

1) Clarify the established finding that no clear causal role is known for active inflammation in IPF.

2) Remove discussion of Covid-19 unless it is directly relevant here.

3) State that the assessment of fibrosis in mice was performed by persons blinded to the treatment/conditions. If not, then this assessment should be performed again in blinded fashion.

4) Make it very clear that studies in this mouse model cannot be used to make conclusions about human PF etiopathogenesis.

Minor: In "Materials and Methods" The expression datasets were was obtained - please fix: The expression datasets were obtained

Bottom of page 6: Ten to twelve weeks-old male - please fix: Ten to twelve week-old male

Page 11: that not only the expression of CIRP correlates - please fix: that not only does the expression of CIRP correlate

Reviewer #2: This paper is very straight forward and easy to follow. Some minor revisions include:

1. There is a duplicate sentence in the abstract. Please edit.

2. Clarify the results section of the abstract, expression of CIRP increased during exacerbation of PF in human lung tissues. Unless you also tracked CIRP expression in mice over the course of bleo treatment and not just at day 22.

3. Clarify in methods what was harvested for qPCR, mouse lung and what lobes since portions were taken for histology and hydroxyproline assays?

4. Did you notice any heterogeneity in the histological sections of mouse lung tissue? Could this variability account for the wide spread in your WT Bleo mice? Could you speak to why you might see such variability in these samples? Also was the scoring of the fibrotic lung tissue blinded?

5. I would be curious to see if preemptive treatment or co-treatment with C23 with the bleo could further reduce or prevent the development of the fibrotic phenotype observed.

6. I recommend including a section in the discussion about the application of C23 in patient treatment, potential issues, clinical use etc. to frame what is known and still needs to be understood.

The authors clearly defined their study, did not overreach their claims, and did a nice job of laying out the limitations and next steps for this line of work.

********** 

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Apr 4;17(4):e0266163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266163.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


28 Feb 2022

Reviewer #1:

1) Clarify the established finding that no clear causal role is known for active inflammation in IPF.

- Thank you for this suggestion. As recommended, we have included statements in the Introduction (line 54) and in the Discussion (lines 335-337) sections indicating that no clear causal role is known for active inflammation in IPF.

2) Remove discussion of Covid-19 unless it is directly relevant here.

- The discussion related to Covid-19 has been deleted from the revised manuscript.

3) State that the assessment of fibrosis in mice was performed by persons blinded to the treatment/conditions. If not, then this assessment should be performed again in blinded fashion.

- The histological assessment was performed in a blinded fashion. This information has been added to the Materials and Methods section (lines 153-154).

4) Make it very clear that studies in this mouse model cannot be used to make conclusions about human PF etiopathogenesis.

- We have added a sentence clearly indicating that the bleomycin mouse model is not adequate for investigating the etiology of PF in humans (Discussion, lines 389-391).

Minor: In "Materials and Methods" The expression datasets were was obtained - please fix: The expression datasets were obtained.

- The change has been made (line 76).

Bottom of page 6: Ten to twelve weeks-old male - please fix: Ten to twelve week-old male

- The change has been made (line 89).

Page 11: that not only the expression of CIRP correlates - please fix: that not only does the expression of CIRP correlate

- The change has been made. Thank you! (line 187).

Reviewer #2:

1. There is a duplicate sentence in the abstract. Please edit.

- Thank you for identifying this duplication! The change has been made.

2. Clarify the results section of the abstract, expression of CIRP increased during exacerbation of PF in human lung tissues. Unless you also tracked CIRP expression in mice over the course of bleo treatment and not just at day 22.

- Thank you for this observation. The sentence was modified to “the expression of CIRP was higher in patients with acute exacerbation of PF than in patients with stable PF” (lines 38-39).

3. Clarify in methods what was harvested for qPCR, mouse lung and what lobes since portions were taken for histology and hydroxyproline assays?

- The left lung was fixed in formalin for histological assessment and the right lung was used for qPCR (superior and middle lobes) and hydroxyproline content measurement (inferior and post-caval lobes). This information has been added to the Materials and Methods section (lines 102-104).

4. Did you notice any heterogeneity in the histological sections of mouse lung tissue? Could this variability account for the wide spread in your WT Bleo mice? Could you speak to why you might see such variability in these samples? Also was the scoring of the fibrotic lung tissue blinded?

- The histological assessment was performed in a blinded fashion; this information has been added to the Materials and Methods section (lines 153-154). We did not observe histological heterogeneity that might explain the overall variability of the averaged Hübner-modified Ashcroft scores.

5. I would be curious to see if preemptive treatment or co-treatment with C23 with the bleo could further reduce or prevent the development of the fibrotic phenotype observed.

- We would like to thank the reviewer for this insightful comment. At the design stage of this project, we did consider an arm of pre-treatment with C23. However, our group is more interested in new treatments for PF than in its etiology. As such, since pre-treatment is not a realistic therapeutic approach for PF patients, we decided not to proceed with this arm in the current project. Nonetheless, we will consider the Reviewer’s suggestion in our future studies.

6. I recommend including a section in the discussion about the application of C23 in patient treatment, potential issues, clinical use etc. to frame what is known and still needs to be understood.

- Thank you very for that excellent recommendation. We have now included the sequence and source of C32 (Materials and Methods, line 106) and included the knowledge gaps that need to be addressed in reference to C23 (Discussion, lines 383-387).

Attachment

Submitted filename: Respose to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Manjula Karpurapu

16 Mar 2022

The Role of eCIRP in Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis in Mice

PONE-D-21-22312R1

Dear Dr. Brenner,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Manjula Karpurapu

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: The authors have addressed my comments where they could and answered my questions where they could not. This study leaves a lot to be investigated but the authors do not over reach on their claims or conclusions of their studies so far.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Manjula Karpurapu

25 Mar 2022

PONE-D-21-22312R1

The Role of eCIRP in Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis in Mice

Dear Dr. Brenner:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Manjula Karpurapu

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Fig 1 data and statistical analysis.

    This table contains the data and statistical analysis used in Fig 1.

    (XLSX)

    S2 Table. Fig 2 data and statistical analysis.

    This table contains the data and statistical analysis used in Fig 2.

    (XLSX)

    S3 Table. Fig 3 data and statistical analysis.

    This table contains the data and statistical analysis used in Fig 3.

    (XLSX)

    S4 Table. Fig 4 data and statistical analysis.

    This table contains the data and statistical analysis used in Fig 4.

    (XLSX)

    S5 Table. Fig 5 data and statistical analysis.

    This table contains the data and statistical analysis used in Fig 5.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Respose to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES