Abstract
Prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) and its analogs are used to induce luteolysis in estrus synchronization programs to terminate unwanted pregnancies or to promote ovulation in certain cow subpopulations. In the past few decades, the luteolytic dose of PGF2α has remained unchanged. This review explores the clinical implications of increasing the standard dose for these applications in high-producing dairy cows. Ultrasonography may assist in selecting the most appropriate PGF2α dose and improve the results. A reference has been used for PGF2α for promoting ovulation in herds showing poor reproductive performance.
Keywords: Luteolysis failure, Multiple ovulations, Terminating pregnancy
Introduction
The corpus luteum (CL), named by Marcello Malpighi (1628–1694), because of its yellow appearance in the cow [1], was first described by Regnier De Graaf (1641–1673) in his study “The Mulierum Organis Generationi Insirvientibus” (1672). De Graaf observed that “globular bodies” appeared on the ovaries of rabbits after mating and remained there until delivery of the same number of offspring [2]. Ludwig Fraenkel, in 1901, when testing an unpublished hypothesis of his teacher, the anatomist Gustav Jacob Born, showed that pregnancy could be terminated by removing the corpora lutea from a pregnant rabbit [3]. In 1923, the first bioassay for female sex hormones was introduced [4], and in 1934, the luteal factor that maintains gestation was crystallized and named progesterone (P4) [5]. This was the beginning of early clinical research on P4 [6]. During this period, the ejaculates of both ram and man were found to induce contractility of uterine strips in vitro. The causative agent was named prostaglandin by von Euler in 1936 [7]. However, while P4 was already used in the 1950s to synchronize estrus in cows [8,9,10] and the race was on for developing the contraceptive pill for women [11,12,13], prostaglandins inspired little enthusiasm in the scientific community. It was not until 1965, during the Second Brook Lodge Workshop on problems in reproductive biology, Babcock wondered whether prostaglandins released from the uterus might be the luteolytic factor controlling regression of the CL (cited by Lauderdale [14]). This question prompted research in the late 1960s that led to the identification of prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) [15] as the uterine factor that initiates luteolysis [16,17,18,19] and its production for commercial use in domestic animals. Prostaglandin F2α or its analogs were soon used to manipulate the estrous cycle and ovarian function in cows [20,21,22], mares [22], ewes [23] and gilts [24, 25]. Since then, the role of prostaglandins in reproduction has been extensively described. Apart from luteolysis, PGF2α supports the ovulation process, favors uterine contractility and sperm transport, and induces luteinizing hormone (LH) release [26,27,28,29]. This report reviews the use of PGF2α or its analogs in dairy cattle as the basis for developing protocols for breeding management and terminating pregnancy. Wherever possible, clinical implications are discussed. The use of PGF2α as a therapeutic agent for reproductive disorders has not yet been addressed.
Improvement of Fertilization with PGF2α
The importance of prostaglandins in the process of ovulation, acting mainly on the Graafian follicle, was suggested in 1972. Independent studies showed that the treatment of rats with aspirin or indomethacin could block ovulation [30,31,32]. Granulosa cells of the pre-ovulatory follicle produce large amounts of PGF2α, besides PGE, which is considered the main trigger of ovulation, and are responsible for the overall steroidogenic effects of LH on oocyte maturation and release [26,27,28,29]. However, the full potential of PGF2α in promoting ovulation has not been fully exploited in breeding synchronization protocols.
In a study population of 390 cows and heifers, intravenous (IV) administration of a 50-μg dose of cloprostenol (a synthetic PGF2α analog) (10% of the recommended luteolytic dose of 500 μg), at the time of artificial insemination (AI), was reported to significantly increase the pregnancy rate by 15.2% [33]. An IV dose of 500 μg cloprostenol at AI in 810 lactating dairy cows showed no benefit in cows with acceptable reproductive performance, promoted ovulation under heat stress conditions (70.5%–90.9%), induced double ovulation (10.5%–23.4%), and increased the pregnancy rate in primiparous repeat breeder cows (35%–66%) and in cows inseminated at spontaneous estrus for second services (36%–53%) [34]. An intramuscular (IM) PGF2α dose at an AI of 10 mg dinoprost tromethamine (40% of the recommended luteolytic dose of 25 mg) increased the pregnancy rate (36%–45.8%; n = 451 lactating cows), but 5 mg had no such effect (n = 307 lactating cows) [35]. Body condition score and parity, factors mostly influencing reproductive parameters, did not interact with the beneficial effects on pregnancy rates of 10 mg PGF2α observed in the latter study [35]. Conversely, no improvement in pregnancy rates was observed in 404 cows [36], and 532 cows and heifers [37], using an IM dose of 25 mg of PGF2α at AI and in 220 [38] and 413 [39] cows receiving an IM dose of 500 μg and 150 μg of cloprostenol (40% of the recommended dose), respectively, or using 10 mg of PGF2α in 1828 lactating dairy cows [40]. In the latter two studies, treated cows produced more twins than control cows using cloprostenol (6.9%–15.6%) [39] or PGF2α in one herd (3.2%–11.7%) but not in an additional herd [40].
As stated above, PGF2α has multiple effects on the female reproductive system in mammals [26,27,28,29]. Thus, PGF2α treatment concurrent with AI could increase pregnancy rates not only by supporting the ovulation process, but also by inducing LH release [26, 27]. In effect, irrespective of effects on fertility, this treatment has been linked to increased double ovulation or twin pregnancy rates in only three studies providing these data [34, 39, 40]. Double ovulation is a beneficial factor in subsequent fertility [41, 42]. Further, according to the results of three of the included studies [33,34,35], it seems reasonable to suggest that the positive effects of cloprostenol or PGF2α on reproductive performance were mediated by the improved ovulation rate. The influence of follicular dynamics and development at the time of PGF2α treatment on double ovulation rate should be considered in future studies to assess this assertion. The question is why is there such a discrepancy among the results? Is it because the percentage of cows sensitive to treatment varies remarkably between studies? Alternatively, could there be marked differences among the hormones used for timed AI. For example, the average ovulation risk was greater than 90%, and in 289 cows, there were no effects of treatment [40]. This high ovulation rate precluded the possibility of demonstrating the efficacy of PGF2α treatment, contrasting sharply with its ovulation-promoting effect noted above under heat stress conditions (70.5%–90.9%) [34]. In the latter study, cloprostenol treatment had no influence on the ovulation rate during the cool period of the year in 273 cows and 89.7% of controls versus 89.8% of treated cows [34].
Insights into the effects of PGF2α on ovulation have been recently reported. Intrafollicular injection of PGF2α into pre-ovulatory follicles did not influence the time of ovulation, indicating that PGF2α alone is not able to induce ovulation locally [43]. These results suggest that inducing LH release via a luteolysis-independent mechanism might be the main mechanism of PGF2α in the ovulation process [44, 45]. Anovular cows, up to 40% of cows at the end of the waiting period [46, 47], are a valuable study population to assess the possible effects of PGF2α on the physiology of the pre-ovulatory follicle. An IM dose of 25 mg of PGF2α (n = 437 lactating anovular cows) administered 2 days before timed AI was found to increase the pregnancy rate (23.1%–43.7%) in normothermic cows (rectal temperature at AI ≤ 39ºC) but not in hyperthermic cows (> 39°C) [48]. These results could be an example of a reduction in supra-basal P4 levels. In a second experiment (n = 56 anovular cows), the LH surge was longer for treated cows, and treatment increased the diameter and volume of the pre-ovulatory follicle and concentration of estradiol [48]. Prepubertal heifers have also proven to be a useful model for examining the influential role of PGF2α in the ovulation process [49]. Fourteen prepubertal heifers were treated with an IM dose of 500 μg of cloprostenol 5 days after the emergence of a spontaneous (non-induced) follicular wave (PG group); in a further 12 heifers, a follicular wave was induced and cloprostenol was given on day 5 of the induced follicular wave (PPG group); and 14 heifers received no treatment (control group). The rates of heifers ovulating within 10 days after wave emergence were higher in PPG (10/12, 83.3%) and PG (11/14; 78.5%) than in the control group (1/14; 7.1%; P < 0.0001) [49].
The effects of PGF2α or cloprostenol used to promote ovulation appear to be influenced by the health status of the cow, timing of treatment, the administered dose, and herd. Since the IV administration of PGF2α is not practical for routine use in a herd and is off-label in some countries, 10 mg of PGF2α IM at AI could be used as a reference to promote ovulation in herds with poor reproductive performance [35]. A normal IM dose of 25 mg of PGF2α two days before AI appears to be effective for anovular cows [48]. More dose-response studies are needed for each cow subpopulation, particularly using cloprostenol. The first issue that needs to be explored is the incidence of twins after promoting ovulation with PGF2α or its analogs. The positive effects of prostaglandin-induced ovulation may be compromised by a greater risk in twin pregnancies.
Breeding Synchronization Protocols
Luteolytic treatment with PGF2α or its analogs is only effective when a functional CL exists from days 5 to 16 of a normal estrous cycle [50]. The fertility of induced estrus was already noted in the early 1970s to be similar [14, 51] or greater than [52] that of naturally occurring estrus. In fact, the luteolytic doses needed to synchronize estrus were also established in the 1970s as PGF2α, 25 mg; cloprostenol, 500 µg; and fenprostalene, 1 mg [14, 51]. These luteolytic doses have not been modified throughout the development of different estrus synchronization protocols over the past 50 years in dairy cattle. However, the clinical implications of increasing the luteolytic dose of PGF2α in dairy cattle has been recently addressed [53]. The basis for this proposal was the presence of a young CL or multiple CLs in a fixed-time AI (FTAI) protocol, or the presence of multiple CLs in pregnant cows for therapeutic abortion [53].
Because of today's large herd sizes and intensive milking and feeding rhythms, individual animal monitoring poses a problem, and breeding synchronization protocols for FTAI have become routine components of the reproductive management of dairy herds. An example is the PGF2α-based ovulation synchronization protocol denoted “OvSynch” which is extensively used for the FTAI of lactating dairy cows [54, 55]. The OvSynch method consists of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) treatment administered at random stages of the estrous cycle to synchronize a follicular wave; PGF2α administered 7 days later to lysate a CL; a second dose of GnRH administered 36 h after the PGF2α treatment to synchronize ovulation; and finally, FTAI 16 to 20 h later [54, 55]. However, around 60% of cows ovulate after the first GnRH treatment, forming a new, very young CL (5–6 days) at the time of PGF2α treatment [56]. As a result, 20% of cows subjected to the OvSynch protocol underwent delayed or incomplete CL regression [57, 58]. Incomplete luteal regression decreased fertility. In a recent meta-analysis that included data derived from seven randomized controlled experiments in a final study population of 5356 cows, additional PGF2α treatment 24 h after the first dose during the OvSynch protocol was found to offer improvements in luteal regression of 11.6% and in pregnancy per insemination of 4.6% [59]. The need to increase the PGF2α dose twice [60] or the cloprostenol dose 1.5- [61] or 2-fold [28] to promote luteolysis in cows with a 3.5-day-old [60] or 5- to 6-day-old [61, 62] CL reinforces these results. Furthermore, it was recently shown that the presence of two or more corpora lutea influenced the luteolytic response to prostaglandin F2α in a study population of 2436 lactating dairy cows: 1683 cows with a single CL (control cows) and 753 cows with two or more CLs [63]. Using a single PGF2α dose (25 mg of PGF2α), the presence of multiple CLs reduced the estrous response compared to that observed in control cows (74–15.6%), and milk production was inversely associated with this response. Importantly, an increased PGF2α dose (37.5 mg of PGF2α) improved the estrous response in cows with two or more CLs (82.9%) [63].
In herds subjected to a good estrus detection and FTAI protocol, PGF2α treatment is commonly used to provoke and synchronize estrus in those with a mature CL [54]. Single, double, or triple PGF2α treatment 11 to 14 days apart, followed by AI at the subsequently detected estrus, resulted in pregnancy rates similar to those of FTAI protocols in a meta-analysis based on the results of 71 trials consisting of control and treatment comparisons [54]. Neither pregnancy rates differed with respect to controls in response to two PGF2α doses given 12 to 14 days apart, a GnRH dose 24 to 48 h after the last PGF2α dose, and AI 16–20 h later [54]. Unfortunately, estrus is not precisely synchronized following a single PGF2α regimen. Although most cows show estrus between 3 and 5 days after treatment, estruses are generally detected between 2 and 7 days [64,65,66]. The stage of the follicular wave [66,67,68] or the presence of multiple corpora lutea [63] at treatment are factors that determine the time of estrus onset. Simultaneous treatment with PGF2α, equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG), and GnRH 48 h later followed by FTAI in cows with silent ovulation (cows with a mature CL and no signs of estrus detected in the preceding 21 days; n = 1266 cows) led to improved fertility over spontaneous estrus (n = 4615 cows) [69]. It should be noted here that eCG treatment influences both FSH and LH secretion, and simultaneous administration of eCG and PGF2α has been successfully used in FTAI protocols [70]. However, simultaneous treatment with cloprostenol and GnRH [71, 72] or FSH [73] disrupts follicular dynamics, promoting premature ovulation or ovulation failure. However, when PGF2α treatment is administered to a group of cows with no further hormone treatment, subsequent estrous behavior and detection are dramatically improved as many cows simultaneously enter estrus, promoting tighter synchrony [74]. A cow will show estrous behavior as a result of sexual stimulation by other cows in estrus [75]. In effect, each additional cow in estrus simultaneously has been associated with a 6.1% increase in walking activity [76] and with an augmented intensity and duration of estrus [77].
In single PGF2α protocols, a possible subsequent luteal deficiency should also be considered. It has been suggested that pharmacological manipulation of the estrous cycle may cause lower conception rates and impaired fertility [52, 78]. Estrus synchronization by PGF2α or its analogs may decrease P4 concentration and thus modulate steroidogenesis in the subsequent CL [79,80,81]. The consequence of disturbances in the morphology and functionality of the newly formed CL potentially decreases the sensitivity of luteotropic factors, such as LH and PGE2 [80], and may reduce the ultimate overall weight of the CL [82]. Hansen et al. [79] showed that luteal cells derived from CLs following PGF2α-induced estrus were less responsive to LH. Thus, pharmacological manipulation of the estrous cycle could impair the function of granulosa and theca cells responsible for the production of healthy oocytes, proper follicle growth and ovulation, and CL formation and function, such as disorders in P4 production by the subsequent CL. Lower P4 production and reduction of CL sensitivity to luteotropic factors may be the reason for luteal deficiency, may influence the fertility of inseminated cows, and may also decrease the pregnancy rate after embryo transfer in recipient cows.
Given the reduced effects of a single PGF2α dose on a young CL, of particular importance because of its high incidence rate in FTAI protocols, the use of two PGF2α treatments administered 24 h apart in such protocols is recommended. In single PGF2α protocols, ultrasonography procedures are commonly used to identify luteal structures and may therefore help to determine the best PGF2α dose to improve the estrus response. A young CL can be identified as a small luteal structure with a high pixel intensity of the gland, in contrast to a mature CL [83, 84]. A double PGF2α dose should be applied in the presence of a young CL, whereas a cow with multiple young CLs should be introduced in the FTAI protocol. In the remaining cows with mature CL, a single or 1.5 PGF2α dose is recommended in the presence of a single or multiple CL, respectively.
Terminating a Pregnancy
Although it is prohibited in some countries to slaughter pregnant animals, accidental breeding of a very young heifer or a valuable cow may require termination of an established pregnancy. Termination of pregnancy may also be a suitable option when there is a diagnosis of twins, as this is a costly problem for dairy herd economy [85]. It is generally accepted that pregnancy is maintained by the CL until approximately 165 days of gestation [86] and that PGF2α-induced abortions are rapid and generally without complications up to 150 days of gestation, even when using lower than standard PGF2α doses in heifers [87, 88]. Cloprostenol is considered a safe and effective abortifacient in heifers at a dose of 250 μg (50% of the recommended luteolytic dose) until day 120 of gestation, and at a dose of 500 μg from day 121 to day 150 [87]. However, in cows with a single CL, a double PGF2α dose between days 40 and 120 of gestation led to abortion in all treated cows, as opposed to a single or lower dose, which were either less effective or totally ineffective [89]. These results suggest that for terminating pregnancy, a double PGF2α dose is better in cows and a single dose in heifers. However, the impact of multiple CLs on the response to PGF2α remains unclear.
Multiple CLs may occur in over 50% of the older cows. In a study of 2173 pregnant cows in their third lactation or more, the presence of two or more CLs was recorded in 51.5% (1119/2173), of which 37.7% (422/1119) carried singletons [90]. Pregnant cows with multiple CLs probably show a reduced luteolytic response to PGF2α, particularly those carrying singletons. The presence of additional CL (number of CL exceeding the number of embryos/fetuses) has proven to be a very strong factor favoring pregnancy maintenance [91]. In a recent study, the PGF2α dose-dependent abortion response was examined in cows with two dead twins at pregnancy diagnosis 28–34 days post-AI (late embryonic period [LE] ) or at confirmation of pregnancy 49–55 days post-AI (early fetal period [EF]) [92]. The study population consisted of 615 cows, 415 receiving a single dose of PGF2α (PG1 group) and 200 receiving a 1 × 1.5 PGF2α dose (PG1.5 group). The induced abortion rate was significantly lower (P < 0.0001) in the EF cows (34.6%) than in the LE cows (88%) and was also reduced (P = 0.001) in the EF PG1 group (28%) than in the EF PG1.5 group (48.1%). After treatment, the estrus response occurred significantly (P < 0.0001) earlier in LE cows (2.8 ± 0.9 days) than EF cows (5.6 ± 0.9 days). Based on the odds ratio, the only factor influencing the induced abortion rate in LE cows was milk production, with an odds ratio of 0.2 (P < 0.0001) for high producer cows (≥ 45 kg), whereas the odds ratio for induced abortion in the EF PG1.5 group was 2.3 (P = 0.005) compared to the EF PG1 group [92]. The gradual dissolution of conceptuses during the late embryonic period could explain the rapid response to PGF2α treatment irrespective of dose, whereas the longer interval to estrus or luteolysis failure after treatment during the early fetal period may be explained by the survival of trophoblastic cells. Following cloprostenol-induced abortion, the decline in pregnancy-associated glycoproteins and placental antigens expressed in the trophectoderm cells [93, 94] is delayed as gestation advances [95]. Additionally, intrauterine infusion of embryonic homogenates [96] or trophoblast proteins [97, 98] promotes luteotropic signals and extends luteal function. Based on these findings, I recommend a double or even greater dose of PGF2α for cows carrying dead twins during the early fetal period.
Differences detected in the best way to terminate a pregnancy in heifers [87, 88] and cows [89] could be explained by the different weights of animals and stage of gestation. A single PGF2α dose is effective in heifers [87, 88, 95]. However, a double dose of PGF2α should be administered to cows with a single CL carrying singletons [89] and to cows carrying dead twins during the early fetal period [92]. The dose-response to PGF2α remains to be established in pregnant cows with multiple CL carrying live conceptuses, both in single and multiple pregnancies, and in high-producing pregnant cows.
Concluding Remarks
Over the past decades, the luteolytic doses of PGF2α and its analogs used in dairy cattle have not been modified. While there is a large body of literature supporting the recommended dose of PGF2α, a reduced response to this agent has been described in non-pregnant [63, 99] and pregnant [92] high-producing cows. These recent findings suggest the benefits of increasing the PGF2α dose in some circumstances.
Given the high incidence of cows with a young CL and the presence of cows with multiple CLs in FTAI protocols, two PGF2α treatments should be administered 24 h apart in such programs. In single PGF2α protocols and based on ultrasonography findings, a double PGF2α dose is recommended in the presence of a young CL and a 1.5 PGF2α dose in the presence of multiple CLs. To terminate a pregnancy, a single PGF2α dose is sufficient in heifers, whereas a double dose should be administered to cows. Finally, a dose of 10 mg of PGF2α at AI is a good option to promote ovulation in herds with poor reproductive performance. After promoting ovulation with PGF2α or its analogs, the increased incidence of twins should always be monitored.
Conflict of interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Ana Burton for editing the manuscript.
References
- 1.Hunter RHF. Mammalian ovaries, Graafian follicles and oocytes: selected historical landmarks. In: Physiology of the Graafian Follicle and Ovulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003: 1–23. [Google Scholar]
- 2.De Graaf R. The Mulierum Organis Generationi Insirvientibus (1672). Nieuwkoop (Holland): B. de Graaf, facsimile; 1965. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fraenkel L. Die function des corpus luteum. Arch Gynakol 1903; 68: 438–545. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Allen E, Doisy EA. An ovarian hormone. Preliminary report on its localization, extraction and partial purification, and action in test animals. J Am Med Assoc 1923; 81: 819–821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Allen WM, Wintersteiner O. Crystallin progestin. Science 1934; 80: 190–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Frobenius W. Ludwig Fraenkel: ‘spiritus rector’ of the early progesterone research. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999; 83: 115–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.von Euler US. On the specific vaso-dilating and plain muscle stimulating substances from accessory genital glands in man and certain animals (prostaglandin and vesiglandin). J Physiol 1936; 88: 213–234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ulberg LC, Christian RE, Casida LE. Ovarian response in heifers to progesterone injections. J Anim Sci 1951; 10: 752–759. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Trimberger GW, Hansel W. Conception rate and ovarian function following estrus control by progesterone injection in dairy cattle. J Anim Sci 1955; 14: 224–232. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nellor JE, Cole HH. The hormonal control of estrus and ovulation in the beef heifer. J Anim Sci 1956; 15: 650–661. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pincus G, Chang MC. The effects of progesterone and related compounds on ovulation and early development in the rabbit. Acta Physiol Lat Am 1953; 3: 177–183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pincus G, Chang MC, Hafez ES, Zarrow MX, Merrill A. Effects of certain 19-nor steroids on reproductive processes in animals. Science 1956; 124: 890–891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Garcia CR, Pincus G, Rock J. Effects of three 19-nor steroids on human ovulation and menstruation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1958; 75: 82–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lauderdale JW. ASAS centennial paper: Contributions in the Journal of Animal Science to the development of protocols for breeding management of cattle through synchronization of estrus and ovulation. J Anim Sci 2009; 87: 801–812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hunter RHF, López-Gatius F. From sperm to embryos; lessons learnt from Tim Rowson’s career. Theriogenology 2021; 172: 255–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.McCracken JA, Glew ME, Scaramuzzi RJ. Corpus luteum regression induced by prostagland in F2-α. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1970; 30: 544–546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.McCracken J. Prostaglandin F-2 α and corpus luteum regression. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1971; 180: 456–472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.McCracken JA, Carlson JC, Glew ME, Goding JR, Baird DT, Gréen K, Samuelsson B. Prostaglandin F 2 identified as a luteolytic hormone in sheep. Nat New Biol 1972; 238: 129–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Moeljono MP, Thatcher WW, Bazer FW, Frank M, Owens LJ, Wilcox CJ. A study of prostaglandin F2alpha as the luteolysin in swine: II Characterization and comparison of prostaglandin F, estrogens and progestin concentrations in utero-ovarian vein plasma of nonpregnant and pregnant gilts. Prostaglandins 1977; 14: 543–555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rowson LE, Tervit R, Brand A. The use of prostaglandins for synchronization of oestrus in cattle. J Reprod Fertil 1972; 29: 145 (abstract). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lauderdale JW, Seguin BE, Stellflug JN, Chenault JR, Thatcher WW, Vincent CK, Loyancano AF. Fertility of cattle following PGF2 alpha injection. J Anim Sci 1974; 38: 964–967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Oxender WD, Noden PA, Louis TM, Hafs HD. A review of prostaglandin F2alpha for ovulation control in cows and mares. Am J Vet Res 1974; 35: 997–1001. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Douglas RH, Ginther OJ. Luteolysis following a single injection of prostaglandin F2alpha in sheep. J Anim Sci 1973; 37: 990–993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hallford DM, Wettemann RP, Turman EJ, Omtvedt IT. Luteal function in gilts after prostaglandin F2alpha. J Anim Sci 1975; 41: 1706–1710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Guthrie HD, Polge C. Luteal function and oestrus in gilts treated with a synthetic analogue of prostaglandin F-2alpha (ICI 79,939) at various times during the oestrous cycle. J Reprod Fertil 1976; 48: 423–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Goldberg VJ, Ramwell PW. Role of rostaglandins in reproduction. Physiol Rev 1975; 55: 325–351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hanzen C. Prostaglandins and the physiology of human and animal reproduction. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 1984; 13: 351–361 (in French). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Niswender GD, Juengel JL, Silva PJ, Rollyson MK, McIntush EW. Mechanisms controlling the function and life span of the corpus luteum. Physiol Rev 2000; 80: 1–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Weems CW, Weems YS, Randel RD. Prostaglandins and reproduction in female farm animals. Vet J 2006; 171: 206–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Orczyk GP, Behrman HR. Ovulation blockade by aspirin or indomethacin—in vivo evidence for a role of prostaglandin in gonadotrophin secretion. Prostaglandins 1972; 1: 3–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Armstrong DT, Grinwich DL. Blockade of spontaneous and LH-induced ovulation in rats by indomethacin, an inhibitor of prostaglandin biosynthesis. I. Prostaglandins 1972; 1: 21–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tsafriri A, Lindner HR, Zor U, Lamprecht SA. Physiological role of prostaglandins in the induction of ovulation. Prostaglandins 1972; 2: 1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Prinzen R, Allgayer F, Bartz U, Huber E. The effect of prostaglandin PGF2α on the conception rate of cattle. Tierärztl Umchau 1991; 46: 27–35 (in German). [Google Scholar]
- 34.López-Gatius F, Yániz JL, Santolaria P, Murugavel K, Guijarro R, Calvo E, López-Béjar M. Reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows treated with cloprostenol at the time of insemination. Theriogenology 2004; 62: 677–689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ambrose DJ, Gobikrushanth M, Zuidhof S, Kastelic JP. Low-dose natural prostaglandin F2α (dinoprost) at timed insemination improves conception rate in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 2015; 83: 529–534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Archbald LF, Tran T, Massey R, Klapstein E. Conception rates in dairy cows after timed-insemination and simultaneous treatment with gonadotrophin releasing hormone and/or prostaglandin F2 alpha. Theriogenology 1992; 37: 723–731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gabriel HG, Wallenhorst S, Dietrich E, Holtz W. The effect of prostaglandin F(2α) administration at the time of insemination on the pregnancy rate of dairy cows. Anim Reprod Sci 2011; 123: 1–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kauffold J, Gommel R, Failing K, Beynon N, Wehrend A. Postinsemination treatment of primiparous and multiparous cows with cloprostenol failed to affect ovulation and pregnancy rate in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 2009; 72: 741–746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mohammadi A, Seifi HA, Farzaneh N. Effect of prostaglandin F2α and GnRH administration at the time of artificial insemination on reproductive performance of dairy cows. Vet Res Forum 2019; 10: 153–158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sauls JA, Voelz BE, Mendonça LGD, Stevenson JS. Additional small dose of prostaglandin F2α at timed artificial insemination failed to improve pregnancy risk of lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 2018; 110: 27–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Fricke PM, Wiltbank MC. Effect of milk production on the incidence of double ovulation in dairy cows. Theriogenology 1999; 52: 1133–1143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Garcia-Ispierto I, López-Helguera I, Martino A, López-Gatius F. Reproductive performance of anoestrous high-producing dairy cows improved by adding equine chorionic gonadotrophin to a progesterone-based oestrous synchronizing protocol. Reprod Domest Anim 2012; 47: 752–758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Pereira de Moraes F, Amaral D’Avila C, Caetano de Oliveira F, Ávila de Castro N, Diniz Vieira A, Schneider A, Machado Pfeifer LF, Cantarelli Pegoraro LM, Ferreira R, Germano Ferst J, Tomazele Rovani M, Nunes Correa M, Dias Gonçalves PB, Lucia T, Jr, Garziera Gasperin B. Prostaglandin F2α regulation and function during ovulation and luteinization in cows. Theriogenology 2021; 171: 30–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Randel RD, Lammoglia MA, Lewis AW, Neuendorff DA, Guthrie MJ. Exogenous PGF2α enhanced GnRH-induced LH release in postpartum cows. Theriogenology 1996; 45: 643–654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Cruz LC, do Valle ER, Kesler DJ. Effect of prostaglandin F2 α-and gonadotropin releasing hormone-induced luteinizing hormone releases on ovulation and corpus luteum function of beef cows. Anim Reprod Sci 1997; 49: 135–142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Santos JEP, Rutigliano HM, Sá Filho MF. Risk factors for resumption of postpartum estrous cycles and embryonic survival in lactating dairy cows. Anim Reprod Sci 2009; 110: 207–221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Walsh SW, Williams EJ, Evans AC. A review of the causes of poor fertility in high milk producing dairy cows. Anim Reprod Sci 2011; 123: 127–138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lopes FR, Jr, Silva LM, Zimpel R, Munhoz AK, Vieira-Neto A, Pereira MHC, Poindexter M, Gambarini ML, Thatcher WW, Vasconcelos JLM, Santos JEP. Prostaglandin F2α influences pre-ovulatory follicle characteristics and pregnancy per AI in anovular dairy cows. Theriogenology 2020; 153: 122–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Leonardi CE, Pfeifer LF, Rubin MI, Singh J, Mapletoft RJ, Pessoa GA, Bainy AM, Silva CA. Prostaglandin F2α promotes ovulation in prepubertal heifers. Theriogenology 2012; 78: 1578–1582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Beal WE, Milvae RA, Hansel W. Oestrous cycle length and plasma progesterone concentrations following administration of prostaglandin F-2 α early in the bovine oestrous cycle. J Reprod Fertil 1980; 59: 393–396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Odde KG. A review of synchronization of estrus in postpartum cattle. J Anim Sci 1990; 68: 817–830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Macmillan KL, Day AM. Prostaglandin F(2α) - A fertility drug in dairy cattle? Theriogenology 1982; 18: 245–253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.López-Gatius F. Clinical prospects proposing an increase in the luteolytic dose of prostaglandin F2α in dairy cattle. J Reprod Dev 2021; 67: 1–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Rabiee AR, Lean IJ, Stevenson MA. Efficacy of Ovsynch program on reproductive performance in dairy cattle: a meta-analysis. J Dairy Sci 2005; 88: 2754–2770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Carvalho PD, Santos VG, Giordano JO, Wiltbank MC, Fricke PM. Development of fertility programs to achieve high 21-day pregnancy rates in high-producing dairy cows. Theriogenology 2018; 114: 165–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Stevenson JS. Physiological predictors of ovulation and pregnancy risk in a fixed-time artificial insemination program. J Dairy Sci 2016; 99: 10077–10092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Moreira F, Risco C, Pires MF, Ambrose JD, Drost M, DeLorenzo M, Thatcher WW. Effect of body condition on reproductive efficiency of lactating dairy cows receiving a timed insemination. Theriogenology 2000; 53: 1305–1319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Colazo MG, Dourey A, Rajamahendran R, Ambrose DJ. Progesterone supplementation before timed AI increased ovulation synchrony and pregnancy per AI, and supplementation after timed AI reduced pregnancy losses in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 2013; 79: 833–841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Borchardt S, Pohl A, Carvalho PD, Fricke PM, Heuwieser W. Short communication: Effect of adding a second prostaglandin F2α injection during the Ovsynch protocol on luteal regression and fertility in lactating dairy cows: A meta-analysis. J Dairy Sci 2018; 101: 8566–8571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Cuervo-Arango J, García-Roselló E, García-Muñoz A, Valldecabres-Torres X, Martínez-Ros P, González-Bulnes A. The effect of a single high dose of PGF2α administered to dairy cattle 3.5 days after ovulation on luteal function, morphology, and follicular dynamics. Theriogenology 2011; 76: 1736–1743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Valldecabres-Torres X, Larrosa-Morales P, Cuervo-Arango J. The effect of dose and type of cloprostenol on the luteolytic response of dairy cattle during the Ovsynch protocol under different oestrous cycle and physiological characteristics. Reprod Domest Anim 2013; 48: 874–880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Valldecabres-Torres X, García-Roselló E, García-Muñoz A, Cuervo-Arango J. Effects of d-cloprostenol dose and corpus luteum age on ovulation, luteal function, and morphology in nonlactating dairy cows with early corpora lutea. J Dairy Sci 2012; 95: 4389–4395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.López-Gatius F. Presence of multiple corpora lutea affects the luteolytic response to prostaglandin F2α in lactating dairy cows. J Reprod Dev 2021; 67: 135–139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Macmillan KL, Henderson NV. Analysis of the variation in the interval from an injection of prostaglandin F2α to oestrous as a method of studying patterns of follicle development during diestrus in dairy cows. Anim Reprod Sci 1984; 6: 245–254. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Rosenberg M, Kaim M, Herz Z, Folman Y. Comparison of methods for the synchronization of estrous cycles in dairy cows. 1. Effects on plasma progesterone and manifestation of estrus.. J Dairy Sci 1990; 73: 2807–2816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ferguson JD, Galligan DT. Prostaglandin synchronization programs in dairy herds (Part I). Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1993; 15: 646–655. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kastelic JP, Ginther OJ. Factors affecting the origin of the ovulatory follicle in heifers with induced luteolysis. Anim Reprod Sci 1991; 26: 13–24. [Google Scholar]
- 68.Smith ST, Ward WR, Dobson H. Use of ultrasonography to help to predict observed oestrus in dairy cows after the administration of prostaglandin F2 α. Vet Rec 1998; 142: 271–274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Garcia-Ispierto I, López-Gatius F. A three-day PGF2α plus eCG-based fixed-time AI protocol improves fertility compared with spontaneous estrus in dairy cows with silent ovulation. J Reprod Dev 2013; 59: 393–397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.De Rensis F, López-Gatius F, García-Ispierto I, Techakumpu M. Clinical use of human chorionic gonadotropin in dairy cows: an update. Theriogenology 2010; 73: 1001–1008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Stevens RD, Seguin BE, Momont HW. Simultaneous injection of PGF2alpha and GnRH into diestrous dairy cows delays return to estrus. Theriogenology 1993; 39: 373–380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Rantala MH, Katila T, Taponen J. Effect of time interval between prostaglandin F(2alpha) and GnRH treatments on occurrence of short estrous cycles in cyclic dairy heifers and cows. Theriogenology 2009; 71: 930–938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Stevens RD, Momont HW, Seguin BE. Simultaneous injection of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and the prostaglandin F2alpha analog cloprostenol (PGF) disrupts follicular activity in diestrous dairy cows. Theriogenology 1993; 39: 381–387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Roelofs J, López-Gatius F, Hunter RH, van Eerdenburg FJ, Hanzen C. When is a cow in estrus? Clinical and practical aspects. Theriogenology 2010; 74: 327–344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Roelofs JB, van Eerdenburg FJCM, Soede NM, Kemp B. Pedometer readings for estrous detection and as predictor for time of ovulation in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 2005; 64: 1690–1703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Yániz JL, Santolaria P, Giribet A, López-Gatius F. Factors affecting walking activity at estrus during postpartum period and subsequent fertility in dairy cows. Theriogenology 2006; 66: 1943–1950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Hurnik JF, King GJ, Robertson HA. Estrus and related behaviour in postpartum Holstein cows. Appl Anim Ethol 1975; 2: 55–68. [Google Scholar]
- 78.Diskin MG, Austin EJ, Roche JF. Exogenous hormonal manipulation of ovarian activity in cattle. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2002; 23: 211–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Hansen TR, Randel RD, Segerson EC, Jr, Rutter LM, Harms PG. Corpus luteum function following spontaneous or prostaglandin-induced estrus in Brahman cows and heifers. J Anim Sci 1987; 65: 524–533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Skarzynski DJ, Siemieniuch MJ, Pilawski W, Woclawek Potocka I, Bah MM, Majewska M, Jaroszewski JJ. In vitro assessment of progesterone and prostaglandin e(2) production by the corpus luteum in cattle following pharmacological synchronization of estrus. J Reprod Dev 2009; 55: 170–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Korzekwa AJ, Lukasik K, Pilawski W, Piotrowska-Tomala KK, Jaroszewski JJ, Yoshioka S, Okuda K, Skarzynski DJ. Influence of prostaglandin F2α analogues on the secretory function of bovine luteal cells and ovarian arterial contractility in vitro. Vet J 2014; 199: 131–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Sartori R, Rosa GJ, Wiltbank MC. Ovarian structures and circulating steroids in heifers and lactating cows in summer and lactating and dry cows in winter. J Dairy Sci 2002; 85: 2813–2822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Townson DH, Ginther OJ. Ultrasonic echogenicity of developing corpora lutea in pony mares. Anim Reprod Sci 1989; 20: 143–153. [Google Scholar]
- 84.Singh J, Pierson RA, Adams GP. Ultrasound image attributes of the bovine corpus luteum: structural and functional correlates. J Reprod Fertil 1997; 109: 35–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Mur-Novales R, López-Gatius F, Fricke PM, Cabrera VE. An economic evaluation of management strategies to mitigate the negative effect of twinning in dairy herds. J Dairy Sci 2018; 101: 8335–8349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Estergreen VL, Jr, Frost OL, Gomes WR, Erb RE, Bullard JF. Effect of ovariectomy on pregnancy maintenance and parturition in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1967; 50: 1293–1295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Youngguist RS, Bierschwal CJ, Elmore RG, Jenkins AL, Schultz RH, Widmer JH. Induction of abortion in feedlot heifers with cloprostenol (ICI 80, 996). Theriogenology 1977; 7: 305–312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Copeland DD, Schultz RH, Kemtrup ME. Induction of abortion in feedlot heifers with cloprostenol (a synthetic analogue of prostaglandin F2alpha): a dose response study. Can Vet J 1978; 19: 29–32. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Lauderdale JW. The use of prostaglandins in cattle. Ann Biol Anim Biochim Biophys 1975; 15: 419–425. [Google Scholar]
- 90.Garcia-Ispierto I, López-Gatius F. The effects of a single or double GnRH dose on pregnancy survival in high producing dairy cows carrying singletons or twins. J Reprod Dev 2018; 64: 523–527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.López-Gatius F. Factors of a noninfectious nature affecting fertility after artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows. A review. Theriogenology 2012; 77: 1029–1041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.López-Gatius F. Response to therapeutic abortion in lactating dairy cows carrying dead twins during the late embryo/early fetal period. Animals (Basel) 2021; 11: 2508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Zoli AP, Guilbault LA, Delahaut P, Ortiz WB, Beckers JF. Radioimmunoassay of a bovine pregnancy-associated glycoprotein in serum: its application for pregnancy diagnosis. Biol Reprod 1992; 46: 83–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Wallace RM, Pohler KG, Smith MF, Green JA. Placental PAGs: gene origins, expression patterns, and use as markers of pregnancy. Reproduction 2015; 149: R115–R126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Lobago F, Gustafsson H, Bekana M, Beckers JF, Kindahl H. Clinical features and hormonal profiles of cloprostenol-induced early abortions in heifers monitored by ultrasonography. Acta Vet Scand 2006; 48: 23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Northey DL, French LR. Effect of embryo removal and intrauterine infusion of embryonic homogenates on the lifespan of the bovine corpus luteum. J Anim Sci 1980; 50: 298–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Thatcher WW, Hansen PJ, Gross TS, Helmer SD, Plante C, Bazer FW. Antiluteolytic effects of bovine trophoblast protein-1. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1989; 37(Suppl 37): 91–99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Spencer TE, Bazer FW. Conceptus signals for establishment and maintenance of pregnancy. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2004; 2: 49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Waldmann A, Kurykin J, Jaakma U, Kaart T, Aidnik M, Jalakas M, Majas L, Padrik P. The effects of ovarian function on estrus synchronization with PGF in dairy cows. Theriogenology 2006; 66: 1364–1374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]