Skip to main content
BMC Research Notes logoLink to BMC Research Notes
. 2022 Apr 5;15:126. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06015-1

Overcrowded housing increases risk for COVID-19 mortality: an ecological study

Karan Varshney 1,2,, Talia Glodjo 2,3, Jenna Adalbert 2,3
PMCID: PMC8981184  PMID: 35382869

Abstract

Objectives

Overcrowded housing is a sociodemographic variable associated with increased infection and mortality rates from communicable diseases. It is not well understood if this association exists for COVID-19. Our objective was hence to determine the association between household overcrowding and risk of mortality from COVID-19, and this was done by performing bivariable and multivariable analyses using COVID-19 data from cities in Los Angeles County.

Results

Bivariate regression revealed that overcrowded households were positively associated with COVID-19 deaths (standardized β = 0.863, p < 0.001). COVID-19 case totals, people aged 60+, and the number of overcrowded households met conditions for inclusion in the backwards stepwise linear regression model. Analysis revealed all independent variables were positively associated with mortality rates, primarily for individuals 60 + (standardized β1 = 0.375, p = 0.001), followed by overcrowded households (standardized β2 = 0.346, p = 0.014), and total COVID-19 cases (standardized β3 = 0.311, p < 0.001). Our findings highlight that residing in overcrowded households may be an important risk factor for COVID-19 mortality. Public health entities should consider this population when allocating resources for prevention and control of COVID-19 mortality and future disease outbreaks.

Keywords: COVID-19, Mortality, Housing, Inequities, Prevention

Introduction

As of November 1, 2021, over 750,000 deaths in the United States (US) have been attributed to COVID-19 infection [1]. In the US, mortality among individuals with communicable and non-communicable disease is disproportionately higher for those with poor socioeconomic circumstances [2, 3]. Household size, defined as the number of individuals occupying one household, is a key sociodemographic variable related to the spread of disease. “Household overcrowding” is a term applied to households in which the number of occupants surpasses the number of rooms, and is disproportionately prevalent among Hispanic persons, persons living in rented homes, persons not born in the US, households earning less than $25,000 per year, in the Western US, and urban areas [5]. In particular, household overcrowding has been historically associated with an increased incidence in infectious pathogens, such as helminths and tuberculosis [4].

Although larger household size and overcrowding have been associated with a greater incidence of COVID-19 infection, there has been limited research conducted on the effect that household overcrowding has on COVID-19 mortality rates [6, 7]. Critically, however, one study has demonstrated a possible link between COVID-19 mortality and total number of overcrowded households, though the evidence was limited and hence the authors suggested a need to study this association in more detail [8]. Given the paucity of research in this area and its potential impact on future research and data acquisition in a pandemic setting, the purpose of this ecological study was to analyze the association between household overcrowding and mortality from COVID-19.

Main text

Methods

Los Angeles (LA) County has the greatest population density in the US [9] and has recorded the highest number of COVID-19 cases (> 1,240,000) and deaths (> 24,000) in the nation [10]. COVID-19 data was therefore acquired for all cities in LA County [11], along with data on housing and demographics up until July 28, 2021 [9]. Institutional Review Board approval was not required, as all data used for this study is publicly available.

Overcrowded households were defined as having 1.0 + persons per room. Bivariate regression was performed between the number of overcrowded households and the number of COVID-19 deaths. Backwards stepwise linear regression was then conducted with risk factors for COVID-19 mortality, such as race, sex, level of income, and age as eligible input variables. Collinearity was assessed by considering the variance inflation factors (VIF); variables with high collinearity (VIF > 8) were removed from the model.

Results

Data was fully available for 85 of the 88 cities in LA County. Of these 85 cities, there were a total of 540,155 COVID-19 cases, 10,947 COVID-19 deaths, and 6,784 overcrowded households. Full descriptive statistics of variables considered for analysis are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics for cities of LA County

Variable Total across 85 cities Median (range)
COVID-19 cases 540,155 991 (19–25,582)
COVID-19 deaths 10,947 93 (0–633)
Overcrowded households 138,755 987 (0–6784)
Males 2,193,265 19,212 (42–103,918)
0–19 years of age 1,146,966 9722 (23–59,833)
20–59 years of age 2,467,903 22,311 (49–114,242)
60 + years of age 862,657 8316 (18–47,832)
Black race 306,691 840 (0–46,326)
Hispanic race 2,106,564 14,613 (60–109,103)
Median household income 7,159,521 71,948 (39,738–239,375)
Unemployed (above 16 years of age) 147,380 1302 (2–7566)

Bivariate regression indicated that the number of overcrowded households was positively associated with the number of COVID-19 deaths (standardized β = 0.863, p < 0.001). A stronger association was seen between COVID-19 cases and deaths (standardized β = 0.892, p < 0.001).

Of the eligible variables, three met the conditions for inclusion in the backwards stepwise linear regression model: total COVID-19 cases, the number of individuals aged 60 + , and total overcrowded households. The analysis revealed that all three of these independent variables were positively associated with the number of COVID-19 deaths. The largest effect was seen in individuals aged 60+ (standardized β1 = 0.375, p = 0.001), followed by overcrowded households (standardized β2 = 0.346, p = 0.014), and total COVID-19 cases (standardized β3 = 0.311, p < 0.001). For each of the three variables, results of the analyses are listed in Table 2.

Table 2.

Association with COVID-19 mortality* for bivariate and multivariable analysis of eligible variables

Bivariate analysis Multivariable analysis
Unstandardized β (95% CI) Standardized β p-value Unstandardized β (95% CI) Standardized β p-value
Overcrowded households 0.063 (0.54, 0.071) 0.863 p < 0.001 0.025 (0.013, 0.037) 0.346 < 0.001
COVID-19 cases* 0.017 (0.015, 0.019) 0.892 p < 0.001 0.006 (0.003, 0.009) 0.311 0.001
Individuals age 60 +  0.012 (0.010, 0.014) 0.825 p < 0.001 0.005 (0.004, 0.007) 0.375 < 0.001

*COVID-19 case and death data from as of July 28, 2021

Discussion

Per the results of our analysis, household overcrowding is a significant risk factor for COVID-19 mortality. Importantly, the results of our study revealed that in LA County, household overcrowding was an even stronger predictor of increased mortality rates than the total number of COVID-19 cases. Additionally, our findings emphasize that elderly citizens residing in overcrowded households are at a particularly elevated risk of mortality from COVID-19.

These findings suggest key implications for addressing the COVID-19 pandemic and future outbreaks of communicable disease. These findings are consistent with studies investigating COVID-19 transmissibility which found transmission to be greater in indoor congregate settings, such as jails and buses [12]. These settings share similar characteristics with overcrowded housing, including prolonged time spent with the same group of individuals, minimal ventilation, and multiple individuals occupying a limited space. While age, level of income, ethnic background, and medical co-morbidities have been frequently described as risk factors for poor outcomes associated with COVID-19 infection [13], our analyses suggest that public health measures designed to reduce mortality among persons with COVID-19 ought to make special consideration for persons living in overcrowded housing.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has suggested that infected individuals maintain six-foot distance between themselves and other household members to reduce transmission through the air by droplets and aerosols [14]. However for persons living in overcrowded housing, complying with this recommendation may be difficult or impossible. Developing recommendations that aim to specifically address the unique needs of persons living in overcrowded housing may improve the health outcomes for this group. For example, it has been previously recommended for emergency accommodations to be offered for those with unstable/unsafe housing after contraction of COVID-19 [15]. In addition, public health entities and healthcare providers should assess the prevalence of household overcrowding in the populations that they serve to inform interventions and more effectively allocate resources for COVID-19 prevention and control.

More broadly, this study underlines how this pandemic has exacerbated the detrimental effects of the housing crisis in the US on the health of the population, and the urgent need to increase access to affordable housing to reduce morbidity and mortality from COVID-19. Alongside the need to increase affordable housing, additional efforts to support those residing in overcrowded households can have a positive impact on health outcomes. Examples of such efforts may include public health agencies working with communities to improve current household conditions [16], increasing availability of social housing [17], and offering rent support to assist individuals in moving out of overcrowded households [18].

Household overcrowding may increase the risk of COVID-19 mortality. Public health agencies should recognize the importance of effectively allocating resources to areas with overcrowded housing during the COVID-19 pandemic and future disease outbreaks. Our findings emphasize an imperative for further studies to explore the association between overcrowded housing and COVID-19 mortality, as well as mortality attributed to other communicable pathogens.

Limitations

Limitations of our work include that our ecological analysis can only provide partial insights regarding the additional barriers experienced by populations in overcrowded housing, such as discrimination or social exclusion. Furthermore, we were unable to account for undocumented or homeless individuals, which are equally important populations to consider when addressing infection and mortality rates. In addition, the health status of individuals within households was not able to be accounted for; it is possible that the number of individuals with a poor health status, or a high number of comorbidities, may have served as confounding variables. Finally, while the cities in LA County encompass a large portion of the County’s population, they do not account for unincorporated areas (regions not governed by municipal corporations), which comprise a sizeable proportion of the County. Regardless of these limitations, our study emphasizes the imperative for further research and data acquisition on the association between household overcrowding and mortality due to COVID-19 infection.

Acknowledgements

The authors have no acknowledgements to be made as there were not any other contributors to this work.

Abbreviations

US

United States

LA

Los Angeles

VIF

Variance inflation factors

CDC

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Author contributions

Conceptualization: KV. Data curation: KV, TG. Formal analysis: KV, TG, JA. Funding acquisition: N/A. Methodology: KV, TG, JA. Project administration: N/A. Visualization: KV, JA. Writing—original draft: KV, JA. Writing—reviewing and editing: KV, TG, JA. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

No funding was provided to any of the authors for this work.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This project utilized publicly available data, and ethics approval was hence not required.

Consent for publication

As ethics approval was not required, participant consent for publication was not required.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest associated with the material presented in this paper.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]. COVID Data Tracker. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2021. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#datatracker-home.
  • 2.Zonderman AB, Mode NA, Ejiogu N, Evans MK. Race and poverty status as a risk for overall mortality in community-dwelling middle-aged adults. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(9):1394–1395. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.3649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Karmakar M, Lantz PM, Tipirneni R. Association of Social and Demographic Factors With COVID-19 Incidence and Death Rates in the US. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(1):e2036462. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Neiderud CJ. How urbanization affects the epidemiology of emerging infectious diseases. Infect Ecol Epidemiol. 2015;5:27060. doi: 10.3402/iee.v5.27060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Blake KS, Kellerson RL, Simic A. Measuring overcrowding in housing. Econometrica, Inc. Bethesda. 2007. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/programs-surveys/ahs/publications/Measuring_Overcrowding_in_Hsg.pdf
  • 6.Mendez AD, Escobar M, Romero M, Wojcicki JM. Overcrowding and exposure to secondhand smoke increase risk for COVID-19 infection among Latinx families in the greater San Francisco Bay Area. Tob Induc Dis. 2021;19:79. doi: 10.18332/tid/140827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Raisi-Estabragh Z, McCracken C, Bethell MS, et al. Greater risk of severe COVID-19 in Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic populations is not explained by cardiometabolic, socioeconomic or behavioural factors, or by 25(OH)-vitamin D status: study of 1326 cases from the UK Biobank. J Public Health (Oxf) 2020;42(3):451–460. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kamis C, Stolte A, West JS, Fishman SH, Brown T, Brown T, Farmer HR. Overcrowding and COVID-19 mortality across US counties: Are disparities growing over time?. SSM-Population Health. 2021. p.100845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 9.U.S. Census Bureau. Datasets. United States Census Bureau. 2021. https://www.census.gov/data/datasets.html
  • 10.Coronavirus Resource Center. COVID-19 United States Cases by County. Johns Hopkins University. 2021. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/us-map.
  • 11.County of Los Angeles Public Health [County of LA Public Health]. LA County Daily COVID-19 Data. 2021. http://publichealth.lacounty.gov/media/coronavirus/data/index.htm
  • 12.Ge Y, Martinez L, Sun S, et al. COVID-19 transmission dynamics among close contacts of index patients with COVID-19: a population-based cohort study in Zhejiang Province. China JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(10):1343–1350. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.4686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rozenfeld Y, Beam J, Maier H, et al. A model of disparities: risk factors associated with COVID-19 infection. Int J Equity Health. 2020;19(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01242-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). How to protect yourself & others. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/prevention.html
  • 15.Buckle C, et al. Marginal housing during COVID-19. Final Report. 2020 doi: 10.18408/ahuri7325501. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Krieger J, Donna LH. Housing and health: time again for public health action. Am J Public Health. 2002;925:758–768. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.5.758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Riva M, et al. Social housing construction and improvements in housing outcomes for Inuit in Northern Canada. Hous Stud. 2021;367:973–993. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2020.1739233. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Grande KM, et al. Social determinants of health in public health practice: case study of rent stipends to augment tuberculosis cluster management. J Health Care. 2014;254:1799–1809. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2014.0166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from BMC Research Notes are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES