Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2000 May;44(5):1140–1145. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.5.1140-1145.2000

Antibiotic Resistance Trends in Enteropathogenic Bacteria Isolated in 1985–1987 and 1995–1998 in Barcelona

Guillermo Prats 1,*, Beatriz Mirelis 1, Teresa Llovet 1, Carmen Muñoz 1, Elisenda Miró 1, Ferran Navarro 1
PMCID: PMC89835  PMID: 10770742

Abstract

Trends in resistance to antimicrobial agents used for therapy have been evaluated with 3,797 enteropathogenic bacteria, Campylobacter, Salmonella, Shigella, and Yersinia, between 1985–1987 and 1995–1998. The greater increase in the rate of resistance was observed in Campylobacter jejuni for quinolones (from 1 to 82%) and tetracycline (from 23 to 72%) and in gastroenteric salmonellae for ampicillin (from 8 to 44%), chloramphenicol (from 1.7 to 26%), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and nalidixic acid (from less than 0.5 to 11%). Multidrug resistance was detected in several Salmonella serotypes. In the 1995–1998 period, 76% of Shigella strains were resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 43% were resistant to ampicillin, and 39% were resistant to chloramphenicol. Seventy-two percent of Yersinia enterocolitica O3 strains were resistant to streptomycin, 45% were resistant to sulfonamides, 28% were resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and 20% were resistant to chloramphenicol.


Campylobacter and Salmonella are the bacteria most frequently isolated from patients with sporadic cases of gastroenteritis in our setting, followed, at a smaller proportion, by Shigella and Yersinia (33). These microorganisms, in particular Salmonella, are also responsible for extraintestinal pathologies, such as urinary tract infections, abscesses at diverse locations, and bacteremia (21). Most cases of bacterial gastroenteritis are self-limiting, and it has been suggested that in otherwise healthy patients, administration of antibiotics is not necessary (2); however, for enteritis in infants, elderly people, granulopenic or immunodepressed patients, and also patients with extraintestinal infections, in particular, when bacteremia is suspected, antibiotic therapy is fundamental for illness control (21). The goal of this paper is to review the antimicrobial susceptibilities of Campylobacter, Salmonella, Shigella, and Yersinia strains isolated in our hospital from 1995 to 1998 and to compare them with the susceptibilities of those isolated between 1985 and 1987.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacteria: source and identification.

The susceptibilities to antibiotics of 1,865 enteropathogenic bacteria belonging to the genera Campylobacter (957 strains), Salmonella (832 strains), Shigella (56 strains), and Yersinia (20 strains) isolated from 1995 to 1998 were evaluated. The strains were isolated in the Laboratory of Microbiology of the Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, in Barcelona, Catalonia (Spain). Ninety-five percent of the isolates (1,773 strains) were of intestinal origin, and 5% (92 strains) were from extraintestinal sources; a single isolate per patient was included.

For comparison, the susceptibilities of 660 Campylobacter jejuni, 1,075 Salmonella, 122 Shigella, and 75 Yersinia enterocolitica strains isolated in our laboratory from 1985 to 1987 were included. Isolation and identification of microorganisms were carried out by standard procedures (25). The serotype and phage type of the Salmonella strains were determined in the Servicio de Enterobacterias del Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto Carlos III, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.

Antimicrobial susceptibility.

Susceptibility was determined by the disk diffusion method, following National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) recommendations (26, 27). Mueller-Hinton agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom) was used for all strains except the Campylobacter strains, for which the agar was enriched with 5% sheep blood. The disks were purchased from Oxoid. Incubation was carried out at 35 to 37°C for 18 h in an aerobic atmosphere for all strains except Campylobacter strains, which were incubated under a microaerobic atmosphere (CampyGen; Oxoid) at 35 to 37°C for 24 h. The antibiotics tested varied according to the microorganism and included those used for therapy. In general, ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (co-amoxiclav), cefotaxime, erythromycin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, streptomycin, kanamycin, neomycin, gentamicin, tobramycin, sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, nalidixic acid, and ciprofloxacin were included. For selected strains, MICs were determined by a microdilution technique with Sensititre microtrays (Sensititre Ltd., Imberhorne, United Kingdom) or the E test (AB Biodisk NA, Piscataway, N.J.). The breakpoints used were those defined by NCCLS (26, 27) for members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. The only exception was for erythromycin, for which the breakpoints for Staphylococcus were used.

Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, E. coli ATCC 35218, and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 were used as control strains for susceptibility studies.

RESULTS

Campylobacter.

During the 1995–1998 period, 909 Campylobacter jejuni strains and 48 Campylobacter coli strains were studied; among these strains, only 15 C. jejuni strains were of extraintestinal origin (12 from blood and 3 from ascitic fluid). These two species are the enteropathogenic bacteria most frequently isolated in our laboratory and the only ones with an increased incidence relative to that in the previous decade (1985–1987).

Table 1 shows the susceptibilities to antimicrobial agents of the C. jejuni strains isolated in the two time periods evaluated. Erythromycin, co-amoxiclav, and gentamicin were active against C. jejuni, but the rates of resistance to tetracyclines and quinolones increased from 23 to 72% and from 1 to 82%, respectively, and in the later period the rate of resistance to ciprofloxacin reached 81%. Although C. coli was less frequently isolated, it was more resistant than C. jejuni. Among the 48 C. coli strains isolated during 1995–1998, 44 (92%) strains were resistant to erythromycin, 47 (98%) were resistant to tetracycline, 9 (19%) were resistant to gentamicin, and 45 (94%) were resistant to nalidixic acid and ciprofloxacin. However, all 48 strains were susceptible to co-amoxiclav.

TABLE 1.

Evolution of resistance in C. jejuni between 1985–1987 and 1995–1998a

Years No. of strains No. (%) of resistant strains
ERY TET GEN NAL CIP
1985–1987 660 31 (5) 152 (23) 0 (0) 8 (1) ND
1995–1998 909 46 (5) 655 (72) 11 (1) 743 (82) 739 (81)
a

All strains isolated during both time periods were fully susceptible to co-amoxiclav. Abbreviations: CIP, ciprofloxacin; ERY, erythromycin; GEN, gentamicin; NAL, nalidixic acid; TET, tetracycline; ND, not determined. 

Salmonella.

During the 1995–1998 period, 832 salmonellae were studied: 756 were isolated from the stools of patients with gastroenteritis, 53 were isolated from blood, 17 were isolated from urine, and 6 were isolated from other sources. The most frequent serotypes were as follows: Enteritidis, 382 (46%) strains; Typhimurium, 275 (33%) strains; Hadar, 44 (5%) strains; Virchow, 15 (2%) strains; and Brandenburg, 13 (1.6%) strains. These five serotypes represented 88% of the Salmonella strains isolated; the remaining (12%) belonged to 35 additional serotypes. During the triennium from 1985 to 1987, 1,075 salmonellae were isolated, with Enteritidis (60%), Virchow (8%), Typhimurium (7%), Blockley (3.2%), and Bredeney (2%), being the most prevalent (82%) serotypes.

Table 2 summarizes the resistance of all Salmonella isolates and the isolates of the predominant serotypes to nine antimicrobial agents during the two periods of time considered.

TABLE 2.

Evolution of antibiotic resistance in Salmonella serotypes (1985–1987 and 1995–1998)

Serotype and period No. of strains No. (%) of resistant strainsa
AMP AMC CTX CHL TET SXT GEN NAL CIP
Enteritidis
 1985–1987 648 56 (9) 3 (0.5) 0 (0) 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 0 (0) 1 (0.1) 1/435e (0.2) 0 (0)
 1995–1998 382 79 (21) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 21 (5) 3 (0.8) 6 (1.6) 21 (5) 1 (0.3)
Typhimurium
 1985–1987 79 4 (5) 1 (1.3) 0 (0) 5 (6) 1 (1.3) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 1995–1998 275 233 (85) 41 (15) 0 (0) 191 (69) 244 (89) 61 (22) 16 (6) 3 (1.1) 0 (0)
Hadar
 1985–1987 7 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 1995–1998 44 24 (55) 2 (4.5) 0 (0) 0 (0) 42 (95) 2 (4.5) 0 (0) 38 (86) 0 (0)
Virchow
 1985–1987 90 8 (9) 0 (0) 0 (0) 6 (7) 0 (0) 1 (1) 6 (7) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 1995–1998 15 2 (13) 0 (0) 1b (7) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (7) 1 (7) 7 (47) 0 (0)
Brandenburg
 1985–1987 13 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 1995–1998 13 9 (69) 0 (0) 0 (0) 10 (77) 10 (77) 10 (77) 4 (31) 8 (62) 0 (0)
Other serotypes
 1985–1987c 238 16 (7) 1 (0.4) 0 (0) 6 (2.5) 9 (4) 4 (1.7) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 1995–1998d 103 23 (22) 5 (5) 0 (0) 14 (14) 31 (30) 18 (17) 0 (0) 11 (11) 1 (1)
Total (all serotypes)
 1985–1987 1,075 84 (8) 5 (0.5) 0 (0) 18 (1.7) 11 (1) 5 (0.5) 7 (0.7) 1/684f (0.1) 0 (0)
 1995–1998 832 370 (44) 48 (6) 1b (0.1) 215 (26) 348 (42) 95 (11) 27 (3) 88 (11) 2 (0.2)
a

Abbreviations AMC, co-amoxiclav; AMP, ampicillin; CHL, chloramphenicol; CTX, cefotaxime; CIP, ciprofloxacin; GEN, gentamicin; NAL, nalidixic acid; TET, tetracycline; SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. 

b

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing strain. 

c

The number of strains of each serotype was as follows: Blockley, 35; Bredeney, 23; Infantis, 16; Heidelberg, 11; Ohio, 10; Panama, 9; Newport, 8; Goldcoast and London, 7 each; Anatum and Sofia, 4 each; Mikawasima, Montevideo, and Tilburg, 3 each; Saintpaul, Kapemba, and Livingstone, 2 each; Agona, Newbrunswik, Litchfield, Hindmarsh, Newington, Richmond, Goettingen, Muenchen, Derby, Give, and Tournai, 1 each; untypeable or not typed, 78. 

d

The number of strains of each serotype was as follows: Infantis, 9; Muenchen, 6; Ohio, 5; Newport, Heidelberg, Grumpensis, and Derby, 4 each; Bredeney, Mbandaka, and Braenderup, 3 each; Saintpaul, Litchfield, Mikawasima, Richmond, Goldcoast, Give, Bradford, Albany, Oranienburg, Toulon, Washington, Rissen, and Rideau, 2 each; Blockley, London, Agona, Anatum, Kapemba, Goettingen, Tshiongwe, Indiana, Singapore, Nima, Havana, and Tambacounda, 1 each; untypeable or not typed, 20. 

e

Only 435 of the 648 strains were tested for nalidixic acid. 

f

Only 684 of the 1,075 strains were tested for nalidixic acid. 

During the 1995–1998 period, 44% of the strains were resistant to ampicillin, 42% were resistant to tetracycline, 26% were resistant to chloramphenicol, 11% were resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and nalidixic acid, and 6% showed decreased susceptibility to co-amoxiclav. One nontypeable strain for which the ciprofloxacin MIC was intermediate (2 mg/liter) was isolated from an AIDS patient who had been receiving therapy with norfloxacin for 2 years. Another ciprofloxacin-resistant serovar Enteritidis strain (MIC, 32 mg/liter) was selected in vivo while the patient was receiving fluoroquinolone treatment.

A single strain that belonged to serotype Virchow and that was highly resistant to cefotaxime (MIC, 16 mg/liter) was detected. The strain produced an extended-spectrum beta-lactamase with an isoelectric point of about 8 and had a positive PCR result when two pairs of primers specific for CTX-M-7 were used (the sequence was obtained from GenBank, accession no. AF174129).

Ampicillin resistance was observed in all five prevalent serotypes; discrete incidences of resistance to co-amoxiclav in strains of serotypes Typhimurium (15%) and Hadar (4.5%) and to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in strains of serotypes Typhimurium (22%) and Brandenburg (77%) were observed; and a high percentage of resistance to nalidixic acid was observed in strains of serotypes Hadar (86%), Brandenburg (62%), and Virchow (47%). Nalidixic acid resistance was also detected in strains of other serotypes (Enteritidis, n = 21 strains; Typhimurium, n = 3; Blockley, n = 1; Heidelberg, n = 1; untypeable strains n = 3; and not typed, 4 strains). For most nalidixic acid-resistant strains MICs were >256 mg/liter; the exceptions were one serotype Heidelberg strain (MIC, 64 mg/liter) and all resistant serotype Brandenburg isolates, for which the MICs were in the intermediate range (16 to 32 mg/liter). All but two of these nalidixic acid-resistant strains were susceptible to ciprofloxacin according to the NCCLS criteria. However, the MICs for the strains were 5- to 80-fold those for four susceptible serotype Typhimurium strains included as controls (0.06 to 1 versus 0.008 to 0.012 mg/liter).

Besides, 18 strains of serotypes Typhimurium, Hadar, and Mikawasima had diminished susceptibilities to cefotaxime and ceftazidime (MICs, between 1 and 4 mg/liter). It is obvious from Table 2 that in the last period, serotypes Typhimurium and Brandenburg were the most resistant serotypes but similar multidrug-resistant patterns were found in serotypes Heidelberg (2 strains), Bredeney (1 strain), and Goldcoast (1 strain).

The phage types of the vast majority of serotype Enteritidis and Typhimurium strains isolated since 1996 were determined. A correlation between the phage type and the resistance phenotype was observed. In serotype Enteritidis strains, ampicillin resistance was associated with phage types 6 and 6a (25 of 27 and all 37 strains, respectively) and resistance to nalidixic acid was associated with phage type 1 (15 of 57 strains). Among the serotype Typhimurium strains the predominant pattern of multidrug resistance was ampicillin, chloramphenicol, sulfamethoxazole, tetracycline, and streptomycin resistance. This pattern was found for nearly all phage types. However, certain phage types contained a small number of strains (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Antibiotic resistance and phage types of 275 S. enterica serotype Typhimurium strains isolated from 1995 to 1998a

Phage type No. of strains No. (%) of resistant strains
AMP AMC TET SUL TMP SXT CHL STR KAN NEO GEN TOB NAL
104 48 48 (100) 3 (6) 46 (96) 46 (96) 3 (6) 2 (4) 45 (94) 46 (96) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
104 b 30 30 (100) 4 (13) 28 (93) 30 (100) 5 (17) 5 (17) 22 (73) 30 (100) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
193 30 18 (60) 4 (13) 26 (87) 24 (80) 16 (53) 16 (53) 6 (20) 25 (83) 5 (17) 5 (17) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (3.3)
120 21 21 (100) 5 (24) 21 (100) 20 (95) 4 (19) 4 (19) 13 (62) 20 (95) 4 (19) 3 (14) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
195 9 6 1 6 5 5 5 4 4 3 3 1 1 0
10 9 9 1 9 9 9 9 8 9 0 0 9 9 0
U-302 5 4 1 5 5 1 1 5 5 0 0 0 0 0
12 4 2 0 4 3 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0
124 4 3 0 3 4 2 2 3 2 1 1 0 0 1
204 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
204 c 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
161 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
197 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0
184 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
179 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
Otherb 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NSP 19 16 (84) 7 (37) 16 (84) 16 (84) 2 (11) 2 (11) 14 (74) 16 (84) 1 (5) 2 (11) 0 0 1 (5)
NT 82 73 (89) 14 (17) 76 (93) 76 (93) 12 (15) 12 (15) 67 (82) 75 (91) 0 0 6 (7) 6 (7) 0
a

All strains were susceptible to cefotaxime and ciprofloxacin. Abbreviations: AMC, co-amoxiclav; AMP, ampicillin; CHL, chloramphenicol; GEN, gentamicin; KAN, kanamycin; NAL, nalidixic acid; NEO, neomycin; STR, streptomycin; SUL, sulfonamides; TET, tetracycline; TOB, tobramycin; TMP, trimethoprim; SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; NSP, nonstandard pattern; NT, untypeable. 

b

Other phage types: 22, 23, 29, 52, and 99. 

Shigella.

Throughout the 1995–1998 period, 56 Shigella strains (30 S. sonnei, 19 S. flexneri, 3 S. boydii, 2 S. dysenteriae, and 2 Shigella strains) were isolated from patients with enteritis. Twenty-seven were from patients with traveler's diarrhea (11 S. sonnei, 9 S. flexneri, 3 S. boydii, 2 S. dysenteriae, and 2 Shigella strains), and 29 were autochthonous isolates. When comparing the susceptibilities of the indigenous strains (S. flexneri and S. sonnei) with those that were imported, no significant differences were observed. The susceptibilities of both species are shown in Table 4; data for the remaining species are not shown. Among all these strains, we did not find resistance to fluoroquinolones or broad-spectrum cephalosporins. However, they showed high rates of resistance—with variations depending on the time period and species—to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (48 to 90%), ampicillin (13 to 89%), and also chloramphenicol (1 to 95%) (Table 4). Only seven S. flexneri strains were resistant to co-amoxiclav in the two periods of evaluation (11 and 21%).

TABLE 4.

Resistance to antibiotics in S. sonnei and S. flexneri in the two periods studieda

Speciesb Years No. of strains No. (%) of resistant strains
AMP AMC CHL GEN SXT NAL
S. sonnei 1985–1987 95 48 (51) 0 (0) 1 (1) 0 (0) 54 (57) ND
1995–1998 30 4 (13) 0 (0) 1 (3.3) 0 (0) 27 (90) 1 (3)
S. flexneri 1985–1987 27 19 (70) 3 (11) 2 (7) 1 (4) 13 (48) ND
1995–1998 19 17 (89) 4 (21) 18 (95) 0 (0) 10 (53) 1 (5)
a

All strains were susceptible to cefotaxime and ciprofloxacin. Abbreviation: AMC, co-amoxiclav; AMP, ampicillin; CHL, chloramphenicol; GEN, gentamicin; SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; NAL, nalidixic acid; ND, not determined. 

b

The imported strains (traveler's diarrhea) were S. sonnei (n = 11) and S. flexneri (n = 9). 

Yersinia.

All pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica strains isolated in our laboratory belonged to serogroup O3 (biotype 4). From 1985 to 1987, we isolated 75 strains. They were all resistant to ampicillin and cephalothin but were susceptible to co-amoxiclav, cefotaxime, tetracyclines, gentamicin, and nalidixic acid. Seventy-two percent were resistant to streptomycin, 45% were resistant to sulfonamides, 28% were resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and 20% were resistant to chloramphenicol. Only 20 strains were isolated throughout the period from 1995 to 1998. All were resistant to ampicillin and cephalothin but were susceptible to co-amoxiclav, cefotaxime, gentamicin, and ciprofloxacin. The rate of resistance increased up to 90% for streptomycin and sulfonamides, 70% for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 60% for chloramphenicol, and 5% for nalidixic acid.

DISCUSSION

Campylobacter is the leading cause of bacterial enteritis in Spain and elsewhere (3, 33), and C. jejuni accounts for 95% of enteric Campylobacter infections. In 1987, C. jejuni was generally susceptible to clinically useful antimicrobial agents (Table 1). However, 8 years later most strains became resistant to tetracyclines, nalidixic acid, and the fluoroquinolones. The similar proportions of resistance to nonfluorinated and fluorinated quinolones (82 versus 81%) and the speed at which this level of resistance has been reached (23) are probably related and are due to the fact that a single mutation in either topoisomerase can confer resistance to both nonfluorinated and fluorinated quinolones (11, 13, 37, 50). Similar data have been reported from other locations in Spain (36, 39) and elsewhere (1, 10, 32, 40).

In our laboratory, ampicillin has not been tested regularly against Campylobacter because it is not recommended for therapy due to the high incidence of resistance (28), essentially by beta-lactamase production (18, 19). However, in a small number of isolates studied since 1985, an increase in the number of beta-lactamase-producing strains was observed. In 1985, 120 C. jejuni strains were tested for beta-lactamase synthesis by using the nitrocefin test and 23% were positive; in 1998, 108 of 130 (83%) strains were positive by the same method. All strains were susceptible to co-amoxiclav; clavulanic acid inhibits some beta-lactamases and has been claimed to have intrinsic antibacterial activity against campylobacter (46). Erythromycin, as well as gentamicin, which has been recommended for use in bacteremic patients (21), remained active (Table 1).

C. coli is only slightly more resistant to quinolones and tetracycline than C. jejuni but is resistant to erythromycin (92%) and gentamicin (19%). This is therefore not only a characteristic of strains isolated in developing countries (3) but is also probably a current or potential global concern. Despite differences in the incidence of resistance to macrolides and aminoglycosides in C. jejuni and C. coli, the mechanisms of resistance to these antibiotics are probably similar in both species (44, 45).

Throughout our 7-year study, we detected in salmonellae an increase in the rates of resistance to ampicillin (from 8 to 44%), tetracycline (from 1 to 42%), chloramphenicol (from 1.7 to 26%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (from 0.5 to 11%), and nalidixic acid (from 0.1 to 11%) (Table 2).

In regard to the correlation between serotypes and resistance, it is obvious that serotypes Typhimurium and Brandenburg are multidrug resistant but that other serotypes such as Bredeney, Goldcoast, and Heidelberg are also multidrug resistant. Besides, the Hadar, Brandenburg, and Virchow serotypes are associated with nalidixic acid resistance, but this resistance was also found in strains of other serotypes (data not shown).

Currently, serotype Enteritidis is the most prevalent serotype in western Europe (8). In Spain the change from a greater prevalence of serotype Typhimurium to a greater prevalence of serotype Enteritidis observed over the 1970s and the 1980s (6, 34) concerned only fully susceptible strains. At present, the prevalence of resistant serotype Typhimurium strains is increasing, but the frequency of serotype Brandenburg, another resistant serotype, has not increased.

Multidrug resistance in Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium phage type DT 104 has been the subject of many studies (1, 5, 12, 47). However, numerous phage types of serotype Typhimurium are also multidrug resistant, such as phage types 104 b, 193, 120, 195, U-302, and others (Table 3). Of particular interest is phage type 10, which is not a strictly serotype Typhimurium but which is a monophasic strain, 1,4,5,12:i:−(7). This serotype is resistant to nine antibiotics, including streptomycin, gentamicin, and tobramycin, and its ability to spread in the future remains open.

Relatively elevated co-amoxiclav MICs (16/8 to 32/16 mg/liter) have been found in only 41 serotype Typhimurium strains, 2 serotype Hadar strains, and 5 strains of other serotypes. The presence of several beta-lactamases in these strains, OXA-1, and PSE-1 and TEM-1 hyperproduction (identified by pI, PCR with specific primers, and enzyme kinetics; data not shown) account for this resistance. Some of these strains also display a slight decrease in susceptibility to broad-spectrum cephalosporins (see above). The Virchow strain with a high level of resistance to broad-spectrum cephalosporins produced an extended-spectrum beta-lactamase.

Multidrug resistance in phage type DT 104 in England includes resistance to quinolones (48), but in our study, this phage type remains susceptible to these drugs; however, besides its multidrug resistance, the three first-line treatment antibiotics (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, and cefotaxime) are active against DT 104. Similar results were reported in the United States (12). The clonal character of nalidixic acid resistance can be seen in S. enterica serotype Enteritidis phage type 1. This observation differs from what we found in E. coli of both human and animal origin, in which resistance to quinolones was not clonal (9).

At present, in developed countries the prevalent Shigella species are S. sonnei and S. flexneri (33). Roughly, about half of the shigellae (27 of 56) isolated in our laboratory over the 1995–1998 period were from travelers, and the susceptibilities of both autochthonous and imported strains were similar. This is not always the case, and various patterns of resistance have been described, depending on the country of origin, but the rates of resistance to tetracycline and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole are generally higher in imported strains (43, 49). Our autochthonous shigellae, however, were also highly resistant to the latter antimicrobial agents. Four of 19 (21%) S. flexneri strains were resistant to co-amoxiclav. The MIC of co-amoxiclav against these strains ranged from 16/8 to 24/12 mg/liter. Reduced susceptibility or resistance to co-amoxiclav in E. coli has been attributed to chromosomal beta-lactamase, TEM-1, TEM-2, or SHV-1 hyperproduction, and production of OXA-1 or an IRT (inhibitor-resistant TEM-derived beta-lactamases) (M. Sabaté, F. Navarro, C. Vergés, E. Miró, and G. Prats, Abstr. 18th Interdisciplinary Meet. Anti-Infectious Chemother., abstr. 252/C24, p. 177, 1998). The seven S. flexneri strains with diminished susceptibility to co-amoxiclav produced an OXA-1 beta-lactamase (pI 7.4 and a positive PCR result with specific primers; data not shown).

Although different resistance patterns are observed at different locations, resistance to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ampicillin, and tetracycline has been observed worldwide (16, 17, 38, 49). It is difficult to ascertain the selective pressures for maintenance of the different resistance patterns. It is worth pointing out that only 2 of 56 (3.5%) strains were resistant to nalidixic acid and none was resistant to ciprofloxacin. This is in contrast to E. coli, in which the rate of resistance to fluoroquinolones rose from 0.5 to 21% during the same period. Perhaps this is due to the fact that E. coli undergoes selective pressure by quinolones both in humans and in animals but Shigella undergoes selective pressure only in humans. Certain reports, however, show that quinolone resistance in Shigella is emerging, and great differences in the rates of resistance have been reported (from 0.3 to higher than 50%) (16).

The worldwide distribution of human pathogenic Y. enterocolitica serotypes varies. In the Mediterranean basin, O3 (biotype 4) is the prevalent serogroup (14, 24). The drug of choice for the treatment of infections caused by microorganisms of this serogroup has not been identified, but trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, tetracycline or fluoroquinolones, and gentamicin or chloramphenicol have been recommended for use in septicemic patients (4).

In the 1995–1998 period, susceptibility to tetracycline, gentamicin, and ciprofloxacin remained, but in respect to the 1985–1987 period, the rates of resistance to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (70%) and chloramphenicol (60%) rose. Also, 18 of 20 strains (90%) were resistant to both streptomycin and sulfonamides.

Several publications from 1977 to 1995 (15, 22, 30, 31, 42) that have described the results of studies with Y. enterocolitica strains of various biotypes and from different locations have reported heterogeneous results for susceptibility to beta-lactam antibiotics, but in all the studies performed Y. enterocolitica was found to be susceptible to the non-beta-lactam antibiotics, with only anecdotal resistance to sulfonamides, streptomycin, or chloramphenicol. However, the sulfonamide-streptomycin resistance association was also observed by Soriano and Vega (41) in 17% of 72 O3 strains in 1982 and by Pérez Trallero et al. (29) in 46% of 68 O3 strains in 1986. These data suggest the presence of an integron (20).

Tetracycline resistance is very common in most members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and has been considered the antibiotic to which resistance is most extended in nature (35), with the rate of resistance being greater than 70% in E. coli in our laboratory. By contrast, Y. enterocolitica remains susceptible to tetracycline, and a similar observation can be made for quinolones.

In conclusion, for nearly all enteropathogenic bacteria isolated in our laboratory the rates of resistance to the antibiotics studied increased between the periods studied.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Patrice Courvalin for critical reading of the manuscript and M. A. Usera, A. Echeita, and A. Aladueña from the Servicio de Enterobacterias del Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto Carlos III, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain, for determination of the serotypes and phage types of the Salmonella strains. We thank also R. Solé, M. del Cuerpo, P. Alvarez, and N. Vigil for excellent technical support and C. Vergés and M. Sabaté for preliminary data on resistance mechanisms.

This work was supported by grants 98/1522 and 98/1293 from the Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias de la Seguridad Social de España.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Aubry-Damon H, Courvalin P. Bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents: selected problems in France, 1996 to 1998. Emerg Infect Dis. 1999;5:315–320. doi: 10.3201/eid0503.990301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Beers M H, Berkow R, editors. The Merck manual of diagnosis and therapy. 17th ed. Whitehouse Station, N.J: Merck Research Laboratories; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Blaser M J. Campylobacter and related species. In: Mandell G L, Bennett J E, Dolin R, editors. Mandell, Douglas and Bennett's principles and practice of infectious diseases. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. pp. 2276–2285. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Butler T. Yersinia species, including plague. In: Mandell G L, Bennett J E, Dolin R, editors. Mandell, Douglas and Bennett's principles and practice of infectious diseases. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. pp. 2406–2414. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Multidrug-resistant Salmonella serotype Typhimurium—United States, 1996. Morbid Mortal Weekly Rep. 1997;46:308–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Echeita M A, Usera M A. Prevalence of Salmonella serotypes isolated in Spain from human and non human sources (1983–1987) Microbiologia SEM. 1989;5:95–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Echeita M A, Usera M A. Rapid identification of Salmonella spp. Phase 2 antigens of the H1 antigenic complex using “multiplex PCR”. Res Microbiol. 1998;149:757–761. doi: 10.1016/s0923-2508(99)80022-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fisher I S T on Behalf of the Salm-Net Participants. Salmonella enteritidis and Salmonella typhimurium in Western Europe for 1993–1995, a surveillance report from Salm-Net. Eurosurveillance. 1997;2:4–6. doi: 10.2807/esm.02.01.00191-en. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Garau J, Xercavins M, Rodríguez-Carballeira M, Gómez-Vera J R, Coll I, Vidal D, Llovet T, Ruiz-Bremon A. Emergence and dissemination of quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in the community. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:2736–2741. doi: 10.1128/aac.43.11.2736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gaudreau C, Gilbert H. Antimicrobial resistance of clinical strains of Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni isolated from 1985 to 1997 in Quebec, Canada. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:2106–2108. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.8.2106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gibreel A, Sjögren E, Kaijser B, Wretlind B, Sköld O. Rapid emergence of high-level resistance to quinolones in Campylobacter jejuni associated with mutational changes in gyrA and parC. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:3276–3278. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.12.3276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Glynn M K, Bopp C, Dewitt W, Dabney P, Mokhtar M, Angulo F J. Emergence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium DT 104 infections in the United States. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1333–1338. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199805073381901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gootz T D, Martin B A. Characterization of high-level quinolone resistance in Campylobacter jejuni. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991;35:840–845. doi: 10.1128/aac.35.5.840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gurguí M, Mirelis B, Coll P, Prats G. Yersinia enterocolitica infections and pork. Lancet. 1987;ii:234. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)90920-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hornstein M J, Jupeau A M, Scavizzi M R, Philippon A M, Grimont P A D. In vitro susceptibilities of 126 clinical isolates of Yersinia enterocolitica to 21 β-lactam antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985;27:806–811. doi: 10.1128/aac.27.5.806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kelly P, Farthing M J G. Infections of the gastro-intestinal tract. In: O'Grady F, Lambert H P, Finch R G, Greenwood D, editors. Antibiotics and chemotherapy. 7th ed. New York, N.Y: Churchill Livingstone; 1997. pp. 708–720. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Keusch G T, editor. Workshop on invasive diarrheas, shigellosis and dysentery. Rev Infect Dis. 1991;13(Suppl. 4):S219–S365. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kucers A, Crowe S M, Grayson M L, Hoy J F, editors. The use of antibiotics. 5th ed. Oxford, United Kingdom: Butterworth Heinemann; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lachance N, Gaudreau C, Lamothe F, Turgeon F. Susceptibilities of beta-lactamase positive and negative strains of Campylobacter coli to beta-lactam agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37:1174–1176. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.5.1174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lévesque C, Piché L, Larose C, Roy P H. PCR mapping of integrons reveals several novel combinations of resistance genes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:185–191. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.1.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mandell G L, Bennett J E, Dolin R, editors. Mandell, Douglas and Bennett's principles and practice of infectious diseases. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Matthew M, Cornelis G, Wauters G. Correlation of serological and biochemical groupings of Y. enterocolitica with the β-lactamases of the strains. J Gen Microbiol. 1977;102:55–59. doi: 10.1099/00221287-102-1-55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mirelis B, Miró E, Navarro F, Ogalla C A, Bonal J, Prats G. Increased resistance to quinolone in Catalonia, Spain. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993;16:137–139. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(93)90009-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mollaret H H, Bercovier H, Alonso J M. Summary of the data received at the WHO Reference Center for Yersinia enterocolitica. Contrib Microbiol Immunol. 1979;5:174–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Murray P R, Baron E J, Pfaller M A, Tenover F C, Yolken R H, editors. Manual of clinical microbiology. 7th ed. Washington, D.C.: ASM Press; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests, 3th ed. Approved standard. NCCLS Document M2-A3. Wayne, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1984. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; sixth informational supplement. NCCLS Document M100-S6. Wayne, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Navarro F, Miró E, Mirelis B, Prats G. Campylobacter spp. antibiotic susceptibility. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993;32:906–907. doi: 10.1093/jac/32.6.906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pérez Trallero E, Zigorraga C, Cilla G, Idigoras P, López Lopategui C, Solaun L. Animal origin of the antibiotic resistance of human pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica. Scand J Infect Dis. 1988;20:573. doi: 10.3109/00365548809032510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pham J N, Bell S M, Hardy M J, Martin L, Guiyoule A, Carniel E. Susceptibility to β-lactam agents of Yersinia enterocolitica biotype 4, serotype O3 isolated in various parts of the world. J Med Microbiol. 1995;43:9–13. doi: 10.1099/00222615-43-1-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pham J N, Bell S M, Lanzarone J Y M. A study of the β-lactamases of 100 clinical isolates of Yersinia enterocolitica. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991;28:19–24. doi: 10.1093/jac/28.1.19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Piddock L J V. Quinolone resistance and Campylobacter. Clin Microbiol Infect. 1999;5:239–243. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Prats G, Llovet T, Muñoz C, Solé R, Mirelis B, Izquierdo C, Rodriguez P, Sabanés M E, Rabella N, Pericas R, Sanchez F, Margall N, Navarro F, Coll P. Etiología de las enteritis en un hospital general universitario en Barcelona (1992–1995) Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 1997;15:349–356. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pumarola A, Prats G, Rodriguez-Torres A, Beltrán M. Consideraciones sobre el aislamiento e identificación de diversos serotipos del género “salmonella” en coprocultivos. Rev Diagn Biol. 1973;XXII:299–301. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Quintiliani R, Sham D F, Courvalin P. Mechanisms of resistance to antimicrobial agents. In: Murray P R, Baron E J, Pfaller M A, Tenover F C, Yolken R H, editors. Manual of clinical microbiology. 7th ed. Washington, D.C.: ASM Press; 1999. pp. 1505–1525. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Reina J, Ros M J, Serra A. Susceptibilities to 10 antimicrobial agents of 1220 Campylobacter strains isolated from 1987 to 1993 from feces of pediatric patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:2917–2920. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.12.2917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ruiz J, Goñi P, Marco F, Gallardo F, Mirelis B, Jimenez de Anta M T, Vila J. Increased resistance to quinolones in Campylobacter jejuni: a genetic analysis of gyrA gene mutations in quinolone-resistant clinical isolates. Microbiol Immunol. 1998;42:223–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1998.tb02274.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sack R B, Rahman M, Yunus M, Khan E H. Antimicrobial resistance in organisms causing diarrheal disease. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24(Suppl. 1):S102–S105. doi: 10.1093/clinids/24.supplement_1.s102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sánchez R, Fernández Baca V, Díaz M D, Muñoz P, Rodríguez Créixems M, Bouza E. Evolution of susceptibilities of Campylobacter spp. to quinolones and macrolides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:1879–1882. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.9.1879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Smith K E, Besser J M, Hedberg C W, Leano F T, Bender J B, Wicklund J H, Johnson B P, Moore K A, Osterholm M T The Investigation Team. Quinolone-resistant Campylobacter jejuni infections in Minnesota, 1992–1998. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1525–1532. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199905203402001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Soriano F, Vega J. The susceptibility of Yersinia to eleven antimicrobials. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1982;10:543–547. doi: 10.1093/jac/10.6.543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Stock I, Wiedemann B. An in-vitro study of the antimicrobial susceptibilities of Yersinia enterocolitica and the definition of a database. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999;43:37–45. doi: 10.1093/jac/43.1.37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tauxe R V, Puhr N D, Well J G, Hargrett-Bean N, Blake P A. Antimicrobial resistance of Shigella isolates in the USA: the importance of international travelers. J Infect Dis. 1990;162:1107–1111. doi: 10.1093/infdis/162.5.1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Taylor D E. Antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli to tetracycline, chloramphenicol and erythromycin. In: Nachamkin I, Blaser M J, Tompkins L S, editors. Campylobacter jejuni. Current status and future trends. Washington, D.C.: ASM Press; 1992. pp. 4–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Taylor D E, Courvalin P. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988;32:1107–1112. doi: 10.1128/aac.32.8.1107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tenover F C, Baker C N, Fennell C L, Ryan C A. Antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter species. In: Nachamkin I, Blaser M J, Tompkins L S, editors. Campylobacter jejuni. Current status and future trends. Washington, D.C.: ASM Press; 1992. pp. 66–73. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Threlfall E J, Frost J A, Ward L R, Rowe B. Increasing spectrum of resistance in multiresistant Salmonella typhimurium. Lancet. 1996;347:1052–1053. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90199-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Threlfall E J, Ward L R, Rowe B. Resistance to ciprofloxacin in nontyphoidal salmonellas from humans in England and Wales—the current situation. Clin Microbiol Infect. 1999;5:130–134. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.1999.tb00525.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Vila J, Gascón J, Abdalla S, Gómez J, Marco F, Moreno A, Corachan M, Jimenez de Anta M T. Antimicrobial resistance of Shigella isolates causing traveler's diarrhea. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:2668–2670. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.11.2668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wang Y, Huang W M, Taylor D E. Cloning and nucleotide sequence of the Campylobacter jejuni gyrA gene and characterization of quinolone resistance mutations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37:457–463. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.3.457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES