Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 14.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Nutr. 2020 Dec 14;126(7):1100–1109. doi: 10.1017/S0007114520005061

Association between dairy product intake and body composition among South Asian adults from the Mediators of Atherosclerosis in South Asians Living in America (MASALA) study

Bridget Murphy 1,2, Sameera A Talegawkar 3, Joyce O’Connor 1, Namratha R Kandula 4, Alka M Kanaya 5, Matthew A Allison 6, Niyati Parekh 1,7,*
PMCID: PMC8985169  NIHMSID: NIHMS1783656  PMID: 33308330

Abstract

South Asians, who are at a disproportionately greater risk of atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD), represent a rapidly growing population in the USA. The relationship between dairy products, a major component of South Asian diets, and body composition an established risk factor for ASCVD, is unclear. The aim of the present study was to examine associations between dairy intake and multiple measures of body composition (BMI, waist and hip circumference, waist:hip ratio, abdominal lean mass, subcutaneous, visceral, and intermuscular fat areas) among South Asian adults in the USA. A baseline analysis was conducted using existing data from the Mediators of Atherosclerosis in South Asians Living in America cohort. In women, the highest (>1·9 servings/d) v. lowest (<1 serving/d) tertile of dairy intake was associated with 53 % lower odds of a waist circumference >80 cm (95 % CI 0·25, 0·89, Pfor trend<0·05). No associations were observed between dairy intake and measures of body composition. However, >3 servings of low-fat yogurt/week was associated with a 9·9 cm2 lower visceral fat area (95 % CI 19·07, 0·72, P<0·05) and 2·3 cm2 lower intermuscular fat area (95 % CI 3·76, 0·79, P<0·05) as compared with those with three servings/week. Milk and cheese were not associated with body composition measures. These analyses suggest that higher consumption of low-fat yogurt is associated with lower visceral and intermuscular fat in the whole sample, and women with higher dairy intake have lower waist circumference. Our study supports dietary incorporation of dairy products, and recognises the utility of multidimensional measures of central adiposity.

Keywords: Dairy product intake, Body composition, Anthropometric measures, Computed tomography scans, South Asians


South Asians, one of the fastest growing immigrant groups in the USA(1), remain understudied and underrepresented in large epidemiological studies(2). Consequently, dietary and clinical guidelines for this population are not distinct, despite the disproportionately higher prevalence of non-communicable disease burden, particularly atherosclerotic CVD, among South Asians in the USA(2,3). South Asians are described as experiencing the Asian paradox, defined as high incidence and prevalence of non-communicable disease despite BMI in the normal range(4). BMI continues to be the most widely used measure to screen for weight category and risk for overweight and obesity(5), despite a growing body of research that advocates for the implementation of complementary body measures that would more accurately approximate central body fatness(6), rather than reliance on a height:weight ratio. Central obesity is characterised by visceral fat mass, the type of fat that surrounds abdominal organs and impairs their function, commonly associated with non-communicable disease(7). Moreover, South Asians tend to have higher intermuscular fat area(8), a type of ectopic fat that is implicated in metabolic dysfunction and insulin resistance(9). Recent evidence suggests that waist circumference, hip girth and waist:hip ratio (WHR) serve as better indicators of central obesity(10), specifically in South Asians(11,12). Therefore, clear definitions of central obesity measures are needed to better identify early disease risk.

Dietary intake has a modifiable influence on body composition. Published evidence documents that South Asian immigrants, regardless of region of origin, experience dietary acculturation in their new country(13), with a particular shift towards increased dairy product consumption(14). Research has also found that dairy product is a central component among South Asians who are vegetarian(15). Previous research on dairy product intake and body composition is inconsistent, with six systematic reviews noting conflicting findings(1621), underscoring the need for additional research in order to generate robust evidence examining this relationship. Moreover, the majority of studies relied on one or two anthropometric measures of body composition. Thus, the relationship between dairy product intake and comprehensive measures of body composition that comprise of both anthropometric measurements and computed tomography (CT) body mass imaging has not been examined together, and it needs further investigation.

Using data from the Mediators of Atherosclerosis in South Asians Living in America (MASALA) study(22), the present analysis addresses two key gaps in the literature: to examine the relationship between dairy product consumption and (1) body adiposity and (2) multidimensional measures of body composition in a cohort of middle- to older-aged South Asian adults in the USA. The study utilises CT imaging, an advanced technology that more accurately distinguishes body composition fat type (subcutaneous, visceral and intermuscular) contributing to central adiposity among participants. We hypothesise that a higher intake of dairy products is associated with a lower waist circumference and visceral fat mass.

Materials and methods

Study population

We cross-sectionally examined baseline data from the MASALA study, a community-based cohort study. A detailed description of the study rationale, design and methods has been described elsewhere(22). Briefly, the community-based sample was recruited between 2010 and 2013 in the greater Chicago area near Northwestern University (NWU) and the San Francisco Bay area at University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) using telephone-based methods, with targeted census tracts from commercial mailing list companies and recruiters bilingual in English and Hindi or Urdu to facilitate communication with limited-English-proficiency participants(22). Adults who self-identified as South Asians with three grandparents or more born in Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan or Sri Lanka and who were free of CVD were eligible to participate. A total of 3053 individuals were reached, of which 906 participants were enrolled. Participants were middle- to older-aged adults (average 55·3 ± 9·4 years), 47·1 % female and 98 % immigrants to the USA. The protocol was approved by both the NWU and UCSF Institutional Review Boards(22), and the present analyses were approved by the New York University Institutional Review Board.

Data collection

Dietary data.

Dietary intake data were collected at baseline between 2010 and 2013 by MASALA study staff using the Study of Health Assessment and Risk in Ethnic (SHARE) groups FFQ, an interviewer-administered 163-item tool validated for use to study the habitual dietary intake of South Asians in North America(23). Total consumption of foods was computed by validated measures from the SHARE research group by assessing frequency of consumption (intake of items per d, per week, per month or per year) and average serving size (cups, tablespoons and ounces) to determine average daily quantity with total energy intake (kJ/d) calculated based on FFQ report by SHARE validated measures(23). A participant was classified as vegetarian if they reported no consumption of meat, poultry or fish on the FFQ in the previous 12-month period. The FFQ queried sources of dairy products, including milk, yogurt, raita (yogurt dip), paneer (cottage cheese) and cheese (Western varieties), which were used to compute a summary variable of total dairy product intake(23).

Body composition measures.

The MASALA study personnel measured participant weight using a digital scale and height measured using a stadiometer(22). Waist and hip circumference were measured by study personnel using a flexible tape measure, using standard clinical methods(22). BMI was calculated by dividing weight in kg by height in metres squared. WHR was calculated dividing the waist circumference by the hip circumference.

CT scans of the abdomen were used to calculate abdominal skeletal muscle (abdominal lean mass area) and abdominal subcutaneous, visceral and intermuscular fat areas (Philips Medical Systems; Toshiba Medical Systems; Siemens Medical Solution)(22). A CT technician obtained an image of the abdomen positioned between the L4 and L5 vertebrae. Medical Image Processing, Analysis and Visualization (MIPAV) software(24) was used to measure the fat area at the University of California, San Diego, body composition reading centre. Abdominal subcutaneous fat was defined as tissue outside the visceral cavity and inside the body contour. Four abdominal and back muscle groups (the psoas, paraspinous, oblique and rectus muscles) were summed together to measure intermuscular fat.

Other covariates.

Sociodemographic information, including age, sex, percentage of life lived in the USA, educational attainment, annual family income, smoking status and physical activity levels, were assessed by structured interview questions and study questionnaires conducted at the MASALA baseline examination(22). Percentage of life lived in the USA was based on years lived in the USA divided by the participants age. The Typical Weeks Physical Activity Questionnaire was used to assess exercise including walking, dance, activities and other sports, calculating total metabolic equivalent min per week and divided based on validated tool measures into ordered categories of low (600 to less than 4000 metabolic equivalent min per week), moderate (4000 to less than 8000 metabolic equivalent min per week) and high (greater than 8000 metabolic equivalent min per week)(25).

Analytical sample

A total of 906 South Asian adults participated in the MASALA community-based cohort. We excluded participants with missing dietary intake data and those not reporting dairy product intake (n 9) and twelve additional participants who did not meet criteria for daily energy ranges of 334710 042 kJ/d for men and 209214 644 kJ/d for women(26). A total of 885 participants were included in the dataset for the present analyses (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Creation of the analytical sample using Mediators of Atherosclerosis in South Asians Living in America (MASALA) baseline data, 2010–2020.

Variable definitions

Exposure variables.

Using the composite dairy product intake servings per d provided from the FFQ, we categorised daily dairy product consumption into tertiles of intake, using the lowest tertile as the referent group. We additionally analysed dairy food intake from the FFQ responses, computing average servings of milk, yogurt/raita and cheese/paneer based on the respondents reported frequency of consumption (per d, week, month or year/never) and multiplied by average serving in ounces. Items reported as less than average were weighted by 0·5, and items reported as more than average were weighted by 1·5. Furthermore, the associations of high-fat and low-fat dairy foods and body composition measures were examined in exploratory analyses. Whole-fat and low-fat dairy products were analysed based on median intake. For the purpose of these analyses, the authors did not consider dessert items that may contain dairy products.

Outcome variables.

Waist circumference was dichotomised by sex based on cut-off points (<102 cm v. ≥102 cm in men; <88 cm v. ≥88 cm in women), established by the WHO(6). We also dichotomised the waist circumference for men and women based on the International Diabetes Federation criteria for South Asians (<90 cm v. ≥90 cm in men; <80 cm v. ≥80 cm in women). We additionally dichotomised WHR based on the WHO cut-off points for risk of metabolic complications for men and women, separately (<0·9 v. ≥0·9 in men; <0·85 v. ≥0·85 cm in women)(6). BMI, waist circumference, hip girth, WHR, abdominal skeletal mass area, and subcutaneous, visceral, and intermuscular fat areas were assessed as continuous outcomes.

Other covariates.

Educational attainment was dichotomised as bachelors degree or higher and less than bachelors degree. Annual family income was collected categorically as less than $40 000 per year, $40 000$75 000 per year, $75 000$100 000 per year and greater than $100 000 per year. Smoking status was assessed as never, former or current smoker. Alcohol intake was categorised based on average consumption per week, including no consumption, one to seven drinks per week and greater than seven drinks per week.

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics (means, standard deviations for continuous variables and percentages for discrete variables) for demographic and clinical characteristics of the sample were computed for the whole population by dairy product intake. Trends were reported for body composition measurements, with additional reporting separately for men and women, where appropriate, based on established sex differences in waist circumference and WHR(6). For continuous outcomes, variables were not normally distributed and test of linear trends across tertiles was assessed using ANOVA. For categorical variables, between-group differences were evaluated using Pearsons χ2.

We evaluated the associations of dairy product intake and CT skeletal mass and fat area using linear regression, including age-adjusted multiple linear regression models and multivariable models that adjusted for age, sex, education attainment, smoking status, physical activity and vegetarian diet. We similarly evaluated associations of dairy product intake and anthropometric measures, both for linear regression for continuous variables and logistic regression, as appropriate in the whole population and by sex. Models include age-adjusted and multivariable-adjusted. We adjusted the full model for kJ/d using the standard multivariable model for energy adjustment(27), which did not change the final model associations. Daily energy intakes were highly correlated (P < 0·05) with dairy product intake and were not included in the final multi-variable model. Dietary covariates including animal protein intake, fat intake, egg intake and green leafy vegetable servings per d were tested in the model but not retained during the model selection process.

Finally, we evaluated the associations of dairy product intake (i.e. milk, yogurt and cheese) and body composition measurements with linear regression, age-adjusted models and multivariable-adjusted models. Tests for trends were performed based on the continuous dairy products variable. Variables were singly added and retained in the multivariable model if they changed the relationship between dairy product intake and the body composition outcome by more than 10 %. We used multiple linear regression to generate the β-coefficient, standard error and 95 % CI to examine the relationship between tertiles of dairy product intake and fat measurements performed by CT imaging (visceral, subcutaneous and inter-muscular fat measurements). We used logistic regression to generate OR and 95 % CI to examine the association between tertiles of dairy product intake and body composition anthropometric measures(6). We tested for interactions for the relationship between dairy product intake and sex, age group divided at median age (<55 years and ≥55 years), and smoking status with a priori significance set at P < 0·1. There were no significant interactions at each level of dairy product intake. However, we stratified analyses by sex due to consistently documented biological differences of body composition between men and women, based on available international sex-based waist circumference and WHR thresholds(6). Analyses were performed using the statistical software package STATA version 16.1, and all statistical tests were two-sided with significance level set at P < 0·05(28).

Results

Characteristics of study population

Sociodemographic characteristics by tertile of dairy product intake are reported in Table 1. The average age of participants was 55 years (±9·4 years) with approximately 47 % women. The majority of participants held a bachelors degree or higher (87·7 %) and had an annual household income greater than $100 000 per year (63·7 %). On average, participants had lived in the USA for about half their lives. Notably, percentage of life lived in the USA was inversely related to tertile of dairy products consumption (P < 0·05). Total dairy product intake ranged from 0·005 to 10·25 servings per d with average intake of 1·67 servings per d. Approximately 38 % of participants were vegetarians, though being vegetarian was not associated with dairy product consumption (P = 0·334).

Table 1.

Participant characteristics by tertiles of dairy consumption, among South Asian adults aged 40–83 in the MASALA Study, 2010–2013. (N=885)

Total Study Population ≤1 serving/day (n=293) >1–1.89 serving/day (n=293) ≥1.9 servings/day (n=299) p

Characteristics Percentage/
mean (SD)
Percentage/
mean (SD)
Percentage/
mean (SD)
Percentage/
mean (SD)
Demographic Information

Age (y) (mean (SD)) 55.3 (9.4) 55.5 (8.9) 54.9 (8.9) 55.4 (10.2) 0.690
Female (%) 47.1 47.4 43 50.8 0.160
Percent of life lived in US (mean (SD)) 49.3 (17.9) 50.4 (18.8) 50.6 (17.2) 46.9 (17.5) 0.017*
Bachelor’s Degree or Higher (%) 87.7 81.9 91.1 90 0.001*
Income Category (%) 0.733
 <$40K 12.9 15.4 11.6 11.7
 $40–75K 13.5 13.3 14.4 12.8
 $75–100K 9.9 9.8 10.9 9
>$100K 63.7 61.4 63 66.6

Diet and Lifestyle

Energy Intake (kcal/d) (mean (SD)) 1,688.8 (510.5) 1,455 (404.1) 1,676.6 (499.9) 1,929.9 (506.1) <0.001*
Vegetarian (%) 37.6 35.8 35.8 40.9 0.334
Alcohol - drinks/week (%) 0.217
  No consumption 67.1 65.2 64.2 71.9
  1–7 drinks/week 28.3 29.4 31.7 23.8
  >7 drinks/week 4.6 5.5 4.1 4.4
Smoking Status (%) 0.489
 Never 83.3 80.6 83.3 86
 Former 13.6 15.4 13.7 11.7
 Current 3.2 4.1 3.1 2.3
Physical Activity (MET/wk) (%) 0.020*
 Low (600 to <4000) 2.7 3.8 0.7 3.7
 Moderate (4000 to <8000) 28.6 32.1 29.7 24.1
 High (≥8000) 68.7 64.2 69.6 72.2
a

BMI: Body Mass Index; SD: Standard Deviation

P-values were estimated by ANOVA for continuous variables and Pearson’s chi-square for categorical variables

*

p<0.05

Characteristics of body composition measurements

We examined the associations between tertile of average servings per d of dairy product intake and anthropometric measures reported both as a continuous outcome and categorically stratified by sex-based thresholds (Table 2). While WHR was associated with dairy product intake as a continuous variable (P < 0·05) for the overall cohort, the association disappeared when dichotomised by sex. There was no significant difference in BMI among participants across tertiles of dairy product intake (P = 0·488), nor was there a significant relationship between dairy product intake and overall waist circumference (P = 0·101), hip girth (P = 0·897), subcutaneous fat area (P = 0·760), visceral fat area (P = 0·527) and intermuscular fat area (P = 0·848).

Table 2.

Descriptive body composition distribution, by tertiles of dairy consumption, among South Asian adults aged 40–83 in the MASALA Study, 2010–2013. (N=885).

Characteristics Total Study Population ≤1 serving/day (n=293) >1–1.89 serving/day (n=293) ≥1.9 servings/day (n=299) P
Anthropometric Measures Whole population

BMI (kg/m2)a 26 (4) 26.2 (4.2) 26 (3.9) 25.8 (4) 0.488
Waist Circumference (cm) 92.8 (10.3) 92.9 (10) 93.7 (10.6) 91.9 (10.3) 0.101
Hip Girth (cm) 102.9 (8.5) 102.7 (8.5) 102.8 (7.9) 103 (9.1) 0.897
Waist-Hip Ratio 0.90 (0.07) 0.90 (0.07) 0.91 (0.07) 0.89 (0.07) 0.005*
Total Subcutaneous Fat Area (cm2) 237.5 (93.9) 236.4 (103) 240.9 (93.5) 235.2 (84.7) 0.760
Total Visceral Fat Area (cm2) 134.5 (56.1) 136.7 (53.6) 135.4 (58.8) 131.6 (55.7) 0.527
Total Intermuscular Fat Area (cm2) 21.4 (8.7) 21.3 (8.2) 21.6 (9.2) 21.2 (8.5) 0.848
Total Abdominal Skeletal Mass Area (cm2) 93.2 (25) 92.9 (25) 95.7 (25.8) 90.2 (24) 0.035*

Males

Waist Circumference (cm) 95.9 (9.5) 95.3 (9.5) 97.2 (10.2) 95.3 (8.9) 0.128
Waist Circumference >90 cmb (%) 74.6 70.1 78.4 74.8 0.231
Waist-to-Hip Ratio >0.9c (%) 75.9 72.7 80.2 74.2 0.246

Females

Waist Circumference (cm) 89.2 (10) 90.1 (9.9) 89.1 (9.2) 88.5 (10.6) 0.379
Waist Circumference >80 cmb (%) 83 87.8 84.9 77 0.039*
Waist-to-Hip Ratio >0.85c (%) 59 63.3 60.3 54 0.251
a

BMI: Body Mass Index (kg/m2)

b

International Diabetes Federation criteria for South Asian values for waist circumference

c

World Health Organization cut-off points and risk of metabolic complications

p-values were estimated by ANOVA for continuous variables and Pearson’s chi-square for categorical variables

*

p<0.05

Association between dairy product intake and waist circumference

Given biological differences for body fat distribution by sex(6), associations for waist circumference and WHR were examined by total population and subgroups of sex in Table 3. Men had an average intake of 1·6 servings of dairy products per d (±1·2) and women had an average intake of 1·7 servings of dairy products per d (±1·3). There was not a significant difference in average daily intake of dairy products between men and women (P = 0·210). There was no association between total dairy product intake and waist circumference cut-off threshold (P = 0·370) or WHR cut-off threshold (P = 0·126) in the whole population. Among men, there was a significant association between dairy product intake and both waist circumference and WHR, but the overall relationship was not significant (Pfor trend = 0·451 and Pfor trend = 0·674, respectively). For women, we observed a protective relationship between the highest tertile of dairy product intake and waist circumference (95 % CI 0·25, 0·89, Pfor trend < 0·05). Compared with those who consumed less than one serving of dairy products per d, women who consumed greater than 1·9 servings of dairy products per d had a 53 % lower odds of having a waist circumference greater than 80 cm, after controlling for age, percentage of life lived in the USA, educational attainment, smoking status, physical activity and vegetarian diet.

Table 3.

Age-adjusted and multivariable analyses of the association between tertiles of dietary intake (servings/day) and indicators of body composition, by whole population and by sex, among South Asian adults aged 40–83 in the MASALA Study, 2010–2013. (N=885)

Tertile 1
<1 serving/day
Tertile 2
1–1.89 serving/day
Tertile 3
≥1.9 servings/day

OR (reference) OR 95% CI OR 95% CI p trend
Whole Population a ,b

Waist Circumference 1.00 1.19 0.79, 1.78 0.85 0.58, 1.24 0.240
 Age Adjusted 1.18 0.79, 1.77 0.85 0.58, 1.24 0.247
 Multivariable+ 1.35 0.89, 2.04 0.92 0.62, 1.36 0.370
Waist-to-Hip Ratio 1.00 1.18 0.83, 1.68 0.82 0.58, 1.16 0.065
 Age Adjusted 1.19 0.84, 1.70 0.82 0.58, 1.16 0.062
 Multivariable+ 1.24 0.86, 1.79 0.89 0.62, 1.26 0.126

Males

Waist Circumference >90 cm 1.00 1.55 0.94, 2.57 1.27 0.76, 2.10 0.900
 Age Adjusted 1.53 0.92, 2.53 1.27 0.77, 2.12 0.878
 Multivariable+ 1.84 1.09, 3.12 1.61 0.94, 2.75 0.451
Waist-to-Hip Ratio >0.9 1.00 1.52 0.90, 2.56 1.08 0.64, 1.79 0.738
 Age Adjusted 1.55 0.92, 2.62 1.07 0.64, 1.79 0.746
 Multivariable+ 1.78 1.04, 3.04 1.19 0.70, 2.03 0.674

Females

Waist Circumference >80 cm 1.00 0.78 0.39, 1.59 0.47 0.25, 0.88 0.056
 Age Adjusted 0.78 0.39, 1.59 0.47 0.25, 0.88 0.053
 Multivariable+ 0.81 0.40, 1.65 0.47 0.25, 0.89 0.044*
Waist-to-Hip Ratio >0.85 1.00 0.88 0.54, 1.45 0.68 0.42, 1.09 0.016*
 Age Adjusted 0.88 0.53, 1.45 0.68 0.43, 1.09 0.014*
 Multivariable+ 0.90 0.54, 1.50 0.69 0.43, 1.12 0.013*
a

Waist circumference greater than recommended threshold, per International Diabetes Federation criteria for South Asian values (>90 cm for men, >80 cm for women)

b

Waist-to-Hip Ratio greater than recommended threshold, per World Health Organization cut-off points and risk of metabolic complications (>0.9 for men, >0.85 for women)

+

Adjusted for age (years), percent of life lived in the US, educational attainment (less than bachelors/bachelors degree or higher), smoking status (never, former, current), physical activity (low, medium, high) vegetarian diet (lacto-ovo vegetarian, yes/no)

*

p<0.05

Dairy products and anthropometric measures

As presented in Table 4, greater than one serving per d of yogurt or raita was associated with a 0·01 unit lower WHR when compared with participants who reported three or fewer servings per week (Pfor trend < 0·05) after controlling for age, sex, percentage of life lived in the USA, educational attainment, smoking status, physical activity and vegetarian diet. No associations were observed for yogurt or raita intake and other body composition measurements. No associations were found between milk product consumption and body composition measurements, nor between cheese consumption and body composition measurements. Similarly, no associations were found when assessing fat content of milk and cheese products (whole fat and low fat) and BMI, waist circumference, hip girth, WHR, and abdominal skeletal mass area, subcutaneous, visceral, and intermuscular fat area (Supplementary Table 1).

Table 4.

Multivariable analyses of the association between type of dairy intake (servings/day) and anthropometric measurements among South Asian adults aged 40–83 in the MASALA Study, 2010–2013

Milka n=849

<3 serving per week (n=284) 1 serving per day (n=234) >1 serving per day (n=331)

β (Reference) β (SE) 95% CI β (SE) 95% CI p Trend
 BMI (kg/m2) −0.21 (0.36) −0.91, 0.50 −0.31 (0.33) −0.96, 0.33 0.526
 Waist Circumference (cm) −0.63 (0.88) −2.35, 1.09 −0.74 (0.80) −2.31, 0.83 0.434
 Hip Girth (cm) 0.07 (0.76) −1.42, 1.57 −0.15 (0.70) −1.52, 1.21 0.949
 Waist-to-Hip Ratio −0.01 (0.01) −0.02, 0.004 −0.01 (0.01) −0.02, 0.004 0.276
 Total Subcutaneous Fat Area (cm2) −9.63 (8.59) −26.48, 7.23 −2.72 (7.85) −18.12, 12.69 0.859
 Total Visceral Fat Area (cm2) 1.09 (4.68) −9.10, 10.28 −1.77 (4.27) −10.15, 6.61 0.405
 Total Intermuscular Fat Area (cm2) −0.52 (0.76) −2.02, 0.99 −0.003 (0.70) −1.37, 1.37 0.815
 Total Abdominal Skeletal Mass Area (cm2) 0.43 (1.52) −2.55, 3.41 −1.41 (1.38) −4.13, 1.31 0.852

Yogurt/Raitab n=854

<3 serving per week (n=322) 1 serving per day (n=269) >1 serving per day (n=263)

β (Reference) β (SE) 95% CI β (SE) 95% CI p Trend

 BMI (kg/m2) 0.20 (0.33) −0.45, 0.85 0.24 (0.34) −0.43, 0.90 0.960
 Waist Circumference (cm) 0.48 (0.81) −1.11, 2.08 0.90 (0.83) −0.72, 2.52 0.483
 Hip Girth (cm) 0.75 (0.71) −0.65, 2.14 1.75 (0.73) 0.33, 3.18* 0.259
 Waist-to-Hip Ratio −0.002 (0.05) −0.01, 0.01 −0.01 (0.01) −0.02, 0.004 0.012*
 Total Subcutaneous Fat Area (cm2) −5.23 (8.01) −20.95, 10.48 2.61 (8.18) −13.44, 18.67 0.670
 Total Visceral Fat Area (cm2) −0.86 (4.37) −9.44, 7.71 0.03 (4.44) −8.69, 8.75 0.221
 Total Intermuscular Fat Area (cm2) 0.70 (0.71) −0.69, 2.08 0.61 (0.72) −0.80, 2.02 0.212
 Total Abdominal Skeletal Mass Area (cm2) −0.60 (1.41) −3.38, 2.17 0.17 (1.44) −2.66, 3.00 0.780


Cheese/Paneerc n=778

<1 serving per week (n=284) 1–2 servings per week (n=231) >2 servings per week (n=263)

β (Reference) β (SE) 95% CI β (SE) 95% CI p trend

 BMI (kg/m2) −0.64 (0.36) −1.35, 0.07 −0.22 (0.35) −0.92, 0.47 0.805
 Waist Circumference (cm) 0.13 (0.86) −1.57, 1.83 −0.23 (0.85) −1.90, 1.43 0.795
 Hip Girth (cm) 0.07 (0.78) −1.45, 1.60 0.18 (0.76) −1.32, 1.68 0.306
 Waist-to-Hip Ratio 0.0005 (0.01) −0.01, 0.01 −0.005 (0.01) −0.02, 0.01 0.386
 Total Subcutaneous Fat Area (cm2) −14.19 (8.61) −31.09, 2.72 −10.09 (8.48) −26.73, 6.55 0.801
 Total Visceral Fat Area (cm2) −6.09 (4.58) −15.08, 2.91 −2.19 (4.50) −11.02, 6.64 0.946
 Total Intermuscular Fat Area (cm2) −0.29 (0.76) −1.78, 0.70 0.87 (0.74) −0.59, 2.33 0.511
 Total Abdominal Skeletal Mass Area (cm2) −0.001 (1.51) −2.97, 2.97 −2.11 (1.48) −5.01, 0.79 0.125

BMI = Body Mass Index (kg/m2)

Adjusted for age (years), percent of life lived in the US, educational attainment (less than bachelors/bachelors degree or higher), smoking status (never, former, current), physical activity (low, medium, high) vegetarian diet (lacto-ovo vegetarian, yes/no)

*

p<0.05

a

One serving of milk is equal to eight ounces of whole, low-fat, or non-fat milk

b

One serving of yogurt is equal to eight ounces of a yogurt drink, six ounces of full-fat, low-fat, or fruit-flavored yogurt, or four ounces of raita

c

One serving of cheese is equal to a one ounce slice of full-fat or low-fat cheese or four ounces of paneer or ricotta

Greater than three servings per week of low-fat yogurt was associated with a 9·9 cm2 reduction in visceral fat area (95 % CI −19·07, 10·72, P < 0·05) and a 2·3 cm2 reduction in intermuscular fat area (95 % CI −3·76, −0·79, P < 0·05) compared with those consuming three or fewer servings of low-fat yogurt per week, after controlling for age, sex, percentage of life lived in the USA, educational attainment, smoking status, physical activity and vegetarian diet. There were no associations between whole-fat yogurt and visceral fat area (P = 0·448) or intermuscular fat area (P = 0·461).

Discussion

In this cohort of middle- to older-aged South Asians living in the USA, greater than 1·9 servings of dairy products per d was associated with waist circumference of 80 cm or less among women. We also observed that intakes of greater than three servings of low-fat yogurt per week were associated with lower visceral and intermuscular fat area. Associations were not observed for the dairy products combined (milk, yogurt and cheese), whole-fat yogurt, or for whole- or low-fat milk and cheese and body composition.

The results of the present study are consistent with two previous meta-analyses(20,21). A meta-analysis of twenty-two cohort studies examining dairy product consumption and anthropometric measures of body adiposity found that the highest dairy product intake category was associated with a reduced risk of abdominal obesity(20). Similarly, a meta-analysis of thirty-seven randomised control trials studying the effect of dairy product intake on body weight and composition found that increased dairy product consumption was associated with decreases in body weight, body fat and waist circumference(21). Furthermore, a cross-sectional study of Korean adults (n 13 692) found that higher intake of dairy products was associated with reduced prevalence of obesity (defined by BMI) among women, but not in men(29). A previous longitudinal study observed that males with high dairy product intake were at lower risk for central obesity at the end of a 12-year follow-up period(30). A review of prospective cohort studies also noted similar findings among men(17). This previous research supports our finding of sex-specific differences in body composition outcomes.

Our findings may be explained by multiple possible mechanisms that underpin the dairy products and body composition connection. Dairy products are considered a rich source of protein, which helps promote lean body mass(31); low-fat and full-fat dairy products contain dietary fat, which can increase satiety(32) to help mitigate energy over-consumption(16) and supports the absorption of fat-soluble essential vitamins(33); and the carbohydrate from dairy products provide a modest amount of natural sugar that cells metabolise(34) and is hypothesised to support the fermentation process for healthy gut microbiota(35). To this end, a recent longitudinal study found that fermented dairy products help to reduce central weight gain(36), which is further supported by a randomised controlled trial finding probiotic yogurt decreased body fat percentage in overweight and obese adults(37), possibly explained through reduced energy effects from macronutrients and influence of gastrointestinal hormones(38). Moreover, fermented or cultured dairy products, such as yogurt, contain probiotic bacterial cultures(39) that are hypothesised to lower the production of trimethylamine-N-oxide(40), a metabolite that is an early predictor of the metabolic syndrome, implicated as a cause of atherosclerosis and CVD(41). The healthier waist circumference observed in older women is supported by previous research that documents how middle- to older-aged women derive greater benefit from dairy product intake that may help to mitigate muscle wasting and weight redistribution related to changes in hormones(42). Previous research has hypothesised the role of Ca in body composition and insulin resistance(43). However, there may be several other mechanisms contributing to sex differences that are not fully understood(44).

The results of the study must be interpreted in light of some limitations. One limitation is that the data are susceptible to information bias as dietary intake is self-reported and participants may over- or under-report dietary habits due to informed interest to include more or less of certain food groups, which is a known limitation of FFQ in general(45,46). Further, the FFQ did not query processing level of dairy products or proportion of added sugar, which are established risks for increased obesity and CVD(47). Additionally, only participants weighing less than 300 pounds were included in the study cohort due to weight restrictions of the CT machine(22). However, this was not a significant limitation as the data captured a range of BMI from 15·9 (underweight) to 47·7 (class III obesity). Both limitations risk biasing the results towards the null. Another limitation of the present analyses is the cross-sectional nature of the baseline data used. It is well recognised that body composition changes with age due to loss of muscle mass and increased fat mass(48). Therefore, planned follow-up waves of data collection that are currently underway in the MASALA study sample(22,49) will facilitate longitudinal analyses and allow use to decipher possible age-related body composition changes. The MASALA cohort is comprised of middle- to older-aged adult participants with high educational attainment and income levels that may limit the generalisability to South Asians who have less educational attainment, have lower income or are younger(50).

The MASALA study has several strengths. It is the first multi-centre community cohort to study South Asians living in the USA, incorporating culturally competent practices in their recruitment and data collection(22,49). South Asians remain underrepresented in large epidemiological studies(2) and are often inappropriately aggregated in heterogeneous subgroups, a key factor identified in the misrepresentation of South Asian disease risk profile, as acknowledged by the American Heart Association(3). The data were collected by trained personnel through in-person interviews during the study visits. The data are unique in their inclusion of CT imaging, a nuanced measure of body adiposity that enhances data accuracy and minimises measurement error, providing specific information on fat area distribution that are associated with disease risks(7,51). Moreover, the FFQ, validated against a 7-d food record, was specifically developed for South Asian adults living in North America, which allowed us to perform nuanced analyses of dairy product intake(23). The FFQ additionally queried various yogurt products, which enabled us to indirectly assess fermented dairy food intake, which is hypothesised to play a role in body composition(36,38). The present study has important practice and public health implications. Our findings that daily servings of dairy product intake are associated with body composition measures are consistent with reduced disease risk. This aligns with the position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics that recommends inclusion of dairy products in dietary pattern-based changes for control of excess adiposity(52). Furthermore, the US 20152020 dietary guidelines recommend incorporation of moderate quantities of dairy products as part of a healthy diet(53).

Our study has important clinical and public health implications. Researchers should continue to study alternative measures of body composition to assess central obesity, rather than exclusively rely on BMI(11). Currently, waist circumference is seldom examined and not utilised appropriately in clinical settings for assessing disease risk(54), despite the validation of waist circumference as a reliable measure of obesity and better indicator of disease risk than BMI(55). Our findings suggest the re-assessment of currently used anthropometric measures in a clinical setting, which would better identify individuals experiencing the Asian Paradox. Similarly, the present analyses utilise CT imaging that are typically not feasible to use in large cohort studies. This imaging provides more reliable estimates quantifying the associations of dairy product intake and body composition. Finally, South Asians remain underrepresented in large research studies(2). Clinicians are increasingly seeking evidence-based clinical guidelines that are culturally competent for population subgroups in the USA(56), and South Asians are specifically noted by the American Heart Association as one such subgroup suffering from unique disease risk factors, warranting tailored research efforts(3). The MASALA study provides for this growing demand in research, with planned longitudinal study that will enable investigation of the temporal associations between dairy product intake and multidimensional measures of body composition, which are warranted in an ageing population to confirm these findings.

Conclusion

The present analysis suggests that, among South Asians in the USA, higher consumption of low-fat yogurt is associated with lower visceral and intermuscular fat area for the whole study population, and women with higher dairy product intake had lower waist circumference. The present study uniquely provides evidence about the growing South Asian population in the USA and adds to the accrual of research that supports the establishment of comprehensive body composition measures that are better able to identify individuals at risk for non-communicable disease.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Table 1

Acknowledgements

The MASALA cohort study project described was supported by Grant Number R01HL093009 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through UCSF-CTSI Grant Number UL1 RR024131. Body composition measures in MASALA were supported by grant K24 HL112827. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute or the National Institutes of Health. The authors thank the other investigators, the staff and the participants of the MASALA study for their valuable contributions.

There was no financial support for this secondary data analysis.

B. M. conceptualised the statistical analyses within the existing data set, performed the statistical analyses, and took the lead in writing the manuscript. S. A. T. and J. O. provided substantial intellectual contributions to the manuscript content. N. R. K. and A. M. K. designed the survey and data collection strategy and have oversight of the MASALA study. M. A. A. supervised the collection of the body composition data from the computed tomography scans in the collection of the data and assisted in outcome variable selection and interpretation. N. P. supervised the manuscript and analysis development.

Abbreviations:

CT

computed tomography

MASALA

Mediators of Atherosclerosis in South Asians Living in America

WHR

waist:hip ratio

Footnotes

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  • 1.SAALT (South Asians Learning Together) (2015) A demographic snapshot of South Asians in the United States http://saalt.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Demographic-Snapshot-updated_Dec-2015.pdf (accessed November 2020).
  • 2.Ardeshna DR, Bob-Manuel T, Nanda A, et al. (2018) Asian-Indians: a review of coronary artery disease in this understudied cohort in the United States. Ann Transl Med 6, 12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Volgman AS, Palaniappan LS, Aggarwal NT, et al. (2018) Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in South Asians in the United States: epidemiology, risk factors, and treatments: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 138, e1–e34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tunstall-Pedoe S, Starkey C, Mathews B, et al. (2003) Prevention of coronary artery disease: the south Asian paradox. Lancet 361, 79–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gutin I (2018) In BMI we trust: reframing the body mass index as a measure of health. Soc Theory Health 16, 256–271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.World Health Organization (2008) Waist Circumference and Waist-Hip Ratio: Report of a WHO Expert Consultation Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Matsuzawa Y, Shimomura I, Nakamura T, et al. (1995) Pathophysiology and pathogenesis of visceral fat obesity. Obesity Res 3, 187s–194s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shah AD, Kandula NR, Lin F, et al. (2016) Less favorable body composition and adipokines in South Asians compared with other US ethnic groups: results from the MASALA and MESA studies. Int J Obes (Lond) 40, 639–645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Addison O, Marcus RL, Lastayo PC, et al. (2014) Intermuscular fat: a review of the consequences and causes. Int J Endocrinol 2014, 309570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lee CM, Huxley RR, Wildman RP, et al. (2008) Indices of abdominal obesity are better discriminators of cardiovascular risk factors than BMI: a meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 61, 646–653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Araneta MR, Kanaya AM, Hsu WC, et al. (2015) Optimum BMI cut points to screen Asian Americans for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 38, 814–820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Flowers E, Lin F, Kandula NR, et al. (2019) Body composition and diabetes risk in South Asians: findings from the MASALA and MESA studies. Diabetes Care 42, 946–953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Khan SA, Jackson RT & Momen B (2016) The relationship between diet quality and acculturation of immigrated South Asian American adults and their association with metabolic syndrome. PLOS ONE 11, e0156851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Holmboe-Ottesen G & Wandel M (2012) Changes in dietary habits after migration and consequences for health: a focus on South Asians in Europe. Food Nutr Res 56, 10.3402/fnr.v56i0.18891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jaacks LM, Kapoor D, Singh K, et al. (2016) Vegetarianism and cardiometabolic disease risk factors: differences between South Asian and US adults. Nutrition 32, 975–984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Abargouei AS, Janghorbani M, Salehi-Marzijarani M, et al. (2012) Effect of dairy consumption on weight and body composition in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Int J Obes (Lond) 36, 1485–1493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Louie JC, Flood VM, Hector DJ, et al. (2011) Dairy consumption and overweight and obesity: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies. Obes Rev 12, e582–e592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Crichton GE, Bryan J, Buckley J, et al. (2011) Dairy consumption and metabolic syndrome: a systematic review of findings and methodological issues. Obes Rev 12, e190–e201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stonehouse W, Wycherley T, Luscombe-Marsh N, et al. (2016) Dairy intake enhances body weight and composition changes during energy restriction in 18–50-year-old adults – a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutrients 8, 394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Schwingshackl L, Hoffmann G, Schwedhelm C, et al. (2016) Consumption of dairy products in relation to changes in anthropometric variables in adult populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. PLOS ONE 11, e0157461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Geng T, Qi L & Huang T (2018) Effects of dairy products consumption on body weight and body composition among adults: an updated meta-analysis of 37 randomized control trials. Mol Nutr Food Res 62, 1700410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kanaya AM, Kandula N, Herrington D, et al. (2013) Mediators of Atherosclerosis in South Asians Living in America (MASALA) study: objectives, methods, and cohort description. Clin Cardiol 36, 713–720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kelemen LE, Anand SS, Vuksan V, et al. (2003) Development and evaluation of cultural food frequency questionnaires for South Asians, Chinese, and Europeans in North America. J Am Diet Assoc 103, 1178–1184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.McAuliffe M (2009) Medical Image Processing, Analysis, and Visualization (MIPAV) Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, et al. (2000) Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32, 9 Suppl., S498–S504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gadgil MD, Anderson CA, Kandula NR, et al. (2015) Dietary patterns are associated with metabolic risk factors in South Asians living in the United States. J Nutr 145, 1211–1217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hu FB, Stampfer MJ, Rimm E, et al. (1999) Dietary fat and coronary heart disease: a comparison of approaches for adjusting for total energy intake and modeling repeated dietary measurements. Am J Epidemiol 146, 531–540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Stata (2020) Stata Version 16.1, v. 16.1 College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lee KW & Cho W (2017) The consumption of dairy products is associated with reduced risks of obesity and metabolic syndrome in Korean women but not in men. Nutrients 9, 630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Holmberg S & Thelin A (2013) High dairy fat intake related to less central obesity: a male cohort study with 12 years’ follow-up. Scand J Prim Health Care 31, 89–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Trichia E, Imamura F, Brage S, et al. (2019) Associations of types of dairy consumption with adiposity: cross-sectional findings from over 12 000 adults in the Fenland Study, UK. Br J Nutr 122, 928–935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hirahatake KM, Astrup A, Hill JO, et al. (2020) Potential cardiometabolic health benefits of full-fat dairy: the evidence base. Adv Nutr 11, 533–547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dawson-Hughes B, Harris SS, Lichtenstein AH, et al. (2015) Dietary fat increases vitamin D-3 absorption. J Acad Nutr Diet 115, 225–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Grom LC, Rocha RS, Balthazar CF, et al. (2020) Postprandial glycemia in healthy subjects: which probiotic dairy food is more adequate? J Dairy Sci 103, 1110–1119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ohlsson JA, Johansson M, Hansson H, et al. (2017) Lactose, glucose and galactose content in milk, fermented milk and lactose-free milk products. Int Dairy J 73, 151–154. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Trichia E, Luben R, Khaw KT, et al. (2020) The associations of longitudinal changes in consumption of total and types of dairy products and markers of metabolic risk and adiposity: findings from the European Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Norfolk study, United Kingdom. Am J Clin Nutr 111, 1018–1026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zarrati M, Salehi E, Nourijelyani K, et al. (2014) Effects of probiotic yogurt on fat distribution and gene expression of proinflammatory factors in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in overweight and obese people with or without weight-loss diet. J Am Coll Nutr 33, 417–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Borgeraas H, Johnson LK, Skattebu J, et al. (2018) Effects of probiotics on body weight, body mass index, fat mass and fat percentage in subjects with overweight or obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obes Rev 19, 219–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Aryana KJ & Olson DW (2017) A 100-year review: Yogurt and other cultured dairy products. J Dairy Sci 100, 9987–10013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Burton KJ, Kruger R, Scherz V, et al. (2020) Trimethylamine-N-oxide postprandial response in plasma and urine is lower after fermented compared to non-fermented dairy consumption in healthy adults. Nutrients 12, 234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Barrea L, Annunziata G, Muscogiuri G, et al. (2018) Trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) as novel potential biomarker of early predictors of metabolic syndrome. Nutrients 10, 1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ilich JZ, Kelly OJ, Liu PY, et al. (2019) Role of calcium and low-fat dairy foods in weight-loss outcomes revisited: results from the randomized trial of effects on bone and body composition in overweight/obese postmenopausal women. Nutrients 11, 1157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Shalileh M, Shidfar F, Haghani H, et al. (2010) The influence of calcium supplement on body composition, weight loss, and insulin resistance in obese adults receiving low calorie diet. J Res Med Sci 15, 191–201. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chan Z, Chooi YC, Ding C, et al. (2019) Sex differences in glucose and fatty acid metabolism in Asians who are nonobese. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 104, 127–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Subar AF, Kushi LH, Lerman JL, et al. (2017) Invited commentary: the contribution to the field of nutritional epidemiology of the landmark 1985 publication by Willett et al. Am J Epidemiol 185, 1124–1129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kirkpatrick SI, Baranowski T, Subar AF, et al. (2019) Best practices for conducting and interpreting studies to validate self-report dietary assessment methods. J Acad Nutr Diet 119, 1801–1816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Srour B, Fezeu LK, Kesse-Guyot E, et al. (2019) Ultra-processed food intake and risk of cardiovascular disease: prospective cohort study (NutriNet-Sante). BMJ 365, l1451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Al-Sofiani ME, Ganji SS & Kalyani RR (2019) Body composition changes in diabetes and aging. J Diabetes Complications 33, 451–459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kanaya AM, Chang A, Schembri M, et al. (2019) Recruitment and retention of US South Asians for an epidemiologic cohort: experience from the MASALA study. J Clin Transl Sci 3, 97–104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Pew Research Center (2018) Income Inequality in the U.S. is Rising Most Rapidly Among Asians https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2018/07/12/income-inequality-in-the-u-s-is-rising-most-rapidly-among-asians/?utm_source=AdaptiveMailer&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=18-7-12%20Income%20Inequality&org=982&lvl=100&ite=2866&lea=634564&ctr=0&par=1&trk= (accessed January 2021).
  • 51.Mongraw-Chaffin M, Kanaya AM, Kandula NR, et al. (2017) The relationship between anthropometry and body composition from computed tomography: the mediators of atherosclerosis in South Asians living in America study. Ethn Health 22, 565–574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Raynor HA & Champagne CM (2016) Position of the academy of nutrition and dietetics: interventions for the treatment of over-weight and obesity in adults. J Acad Nutr Diet 116, 129–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture (2015) 2015–2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans 8th Edition. http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/guidelines/ (accessed January 2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gaynor B, Habermann B & Wright R. (2018) Waist circumference measurement diffusion in primary care. J Nurse Pract 14, 683–688.e681. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Schulze MB, Heidemann C, Schienkiewitz A, et al. (2006) Comparison of anthropometric characteristics in predicting the incidence of type 2 diabetes in the EPIC-Potsdam study. Diabetes Care 29, 1921–1923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.McCabe CF, O’Brien-Combs A & Anderson OS (2020) Cultural competency training and evaluation methods across dietetics education: a narrative review. J Acad Nutr Diet 120, 1198–1209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1

RESOURCES