Abstract
Background
Gallbladder hemangioma is an exceptionally rare entity, with only ten cases reported in literature hitherto. The here described case is the first report of a gallbladder hemangioma coexisting with gallstones.
Case presentation
A 76-year-old male was hospitalized following repeated episodes of epigastric pain. Patient’s medical history included primary hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, obesity and hyperuricemia. Physical examination revealed marked pain in the right hypochondriac region, and laboratory workup was notable for mildly elevated glycemia (125 mg/dL) and pancreatic amylase (60 IU/L). Abdominal ultrasound showed multiple gallstones, a thickened gallbladder wall and mild edema of the perivisceral adipose tissue as well as a hepatic angioma. During surgery, an incidental subserosal nodule of about 1 cm was detected within the gallbladder fundus. After surgery, the clinical course was uneventful and the patient was discharged. Histopathological examination of the subserosal nodule showed multiple dilated vascular channels within a sclerosing matrix, a finding consistent with a cavernous hemangioma. Diffuse chronic cholecystitis was also present.
Conclusions
Gallbladder hemangiomas represent a rare, likely underdiagnosed condition which can be undetected during the preoperative workup.
Keywords: Gallbladder, Hemangioma, Gallstones
Background
Hemangiomas are the most common benign vascular tumors. Although ubiquitous, they usually occur as superficial, frequently cutaneous, lesions [1], and about 60% of these lesions are located in the head and neck region [1, 2]. In internal organs, hemangiomas have been mostly reported in liver, where they represent one of the most common benign neoplasms, occurring in 5% of the general population [3]. Conversely, gallbladder hemangiomas are exceptionally rare, with only ten cases reported in literature hitherto (Fig. 1). We here describe the first case of a gallbladder hemangioma coexisting with gallstones.
Fig. 1.
Summary of gallbladder hemangiomas reported to date. Data regarding pre-operative diagnosis, hemangioma location, associated features and macroscopic/microscopic features of all previously reported cases [9–18] are presented.
Source: Figure 1 was created using BioRender.com.
Case presentation
A 76-year-old male was hospitalized following repeated episodes of heartburn and epigastric pain. Patient’s medical history included primary hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, obesity and hyperuricemia. Physical examination revealed marked pain in the right hypochondriac region, and laboratory workup was notable for mildly elevated glycemia (125 mg/dL) and pancreatic amylase (60 IU/L). Abdominal ultrasound showed multiple gallstones, a thickened gallbladder wall with mild edema of the perivisceral adipose tissue, and a hypoechogenic area measuring 12 mm in the seventh liver segment consistent with a hepatic angioma (Fig. 2). Abdominal and chest radiographies were unremarkable. A laparoscopic cholecystectomy was thus performed. During surgery, an incidental finding of a subserosal nodule within the gallbladder fundus was made and the sample, after en-bloc removal, was submitted to our department for histopathological examination. Clinical course after surgery was uneventful and the patient was discharged.
Fig. 2.

Pre-operative abdominal ultrasound. The dimensions of the liver are at the upper limit of normal, and it presents with rounded margins and diffusely increased echogenicity, findings diagnostic for hepatic steatosis. In this background, in the seventh liver segment, there is a hypoechoic area, measuring 12 mm in diameter, suggestive of hepatic hemangioma (Panel A). The intra-hepatic and extra-hepatic biliary ducts are normal. The gallbladder contains a very small amount of liquid, and its lumen is filled by a lithiasic agglomerate, measuring 5 mm in its maximal diameter (Panel B). The gallbladder walls are mildly thickened, with a concomitant mild edema of the perivisceral adipose tissue
Macroscopically, the lesion appeared as a well-defined grayish nodule, measuring 0.8 cm × 0.5 cm, protruding from the gallbladder fundus surface. Nodule consistency was increased, without alterations of the overlying serosa. Gallstones were identified in the gallbladder lumen, but no other macroscopic alterations were found.
Random sampling of the gallbladder fundus and body showed chronic follicular inflammation, a finding consistent with chronic cholecystitis. Microscopical examination of the nodule showed multiple dilated vascular channels within a sclerosing matrix, encased in the gallbladder wall (Fig. 3). Diagnosis of a cavernous hemangioma with sclerosing features was thus made.
Fig. 3.

Histological features of the here reported gallbladder hamangioma. A Low power (H&E 20X) image of the 0.8 cm nodule within the gallbladder fundus (arrow); B Gallbladder mucosa and submucosa showing chronic follicular inflammation (H&E 100X); C The nodule consisted of multiple dilated vascular channels lined by endothelial cells arranged in a lobular fashion and admixed with a diffuse sclerosing matrix (H&E 40X); D No cytological atypias or mitotic figures were observed, a finding consistent with a benign neoplasm (H&E 200X)
Discussion
Gallbladder pathological conditions represent a wide spectrum of alterations including gallstones, the most common of all digestive diseases [4]. In comparison, other gallbladder pathologies are significantly rarer [5–7], even though some, such as gallbladder and biliary tract cancer, represent a major health burden worldwide [8]. Gallbladder hemangioma represents an exceedingly rare entity with only ten cases described in literature hitherto (Table 1 and Fig. 1) [9–18]. We here report the first case of a gallbladder hemangioma coexisting with gallstones.
Table 1.
Summary of gallbladder hemangiomas reported in literature
| Reference | Age | Gender | Symptoms | Investigation | Pre-operative findings | Pre-operative diagnosis | Operation performed | Intra-operative findings | Size (cm) | Histopathological diagnosis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PMID: 6020957 |
60 | M | Crampy epigastric pain | IV cholangiography | None | Post- cholecystectomy syndrome | Resection | Lobulated hemangiomatous mass in the gallbladder fossa | 8 × 6 | Cavernous hemangioma |
|
PMID: 5793686 |
43 | M | Vague abdominal pain | Oral cholecystogram | Intraluminal defect | Benign tumor of the fundus | Cholecystectomy | Purple tumor on the serosal surface of fundus | 2 × 1 | Cavernous hemangioma |
|
PMID: 4689894 |
57 | M | Crampy epigastric pain and obstructive jaundice | Oral cholecystogram | Non-functioning gallbladder | Cholecystitis, cholelithiasis, choledocholithiasis | Subtotal cholecystectomy | Enlarged gallbladder with intravisceral arterial bleeding associated to a gallbladder hemangioma involving the right side of the liver | 12 × 5 | Cavernous hemangioma |
|
PMID: 594053 |
62 | M | Symptoms suggestive for hepatic abscess | Post-mortem autopsy | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not reported | Cavernous hemangioma |
|
PMID: 3305129 |
11 | F | Pain in the right hypochondriac region | X-Ray, US, arteriography | Hyperechoic, lobular mass with phleboliths in lower right hepatic lobe | Cavernous hemangioma of the liver | Cholecystectomy | Large hemangioma involving the gallbladder posterior wall and hilum | 8 × 7 | Venous hemangioma |
|
PMID: 9129455 |
56 | M | Vague back pain | CT | Enhanced mass in gallbladder tail | Gallbladder adenomyomatosis vs adenocarcinoma | Extended cholecystectomy | White nodule in the gallbladder fundus within the hepatic bed | 2 × 0.8 | Arteriovenous hemangioma |
|
PMID: 9065585 |
50 | M | Pain in the right hypochondriac region, fever, nausea | CT |
Large muticystic intraperitoneal mass extending from the subhepatic region to the right iliac fossa No gallbladder detected |
Cystic mesenteric tumor | Cholecystectomy | Significant enlargement of gallbladder | 10 × 0.9 × 6 | Cavernous hemangioma |
|
PMID: 16459643 |
49 | F | None | US, CT | Echogenic, mildly enhanced mass of gallbladder fundus. Suspected invasion of the V liver segment | Gallbladder adenomyomatosis vs adenocarcinoma | Laparoscopic cholecystectomy | Purple lobulated mass within the gallbladder fundus wall involving the serosal surface with adhesion to liver | 3 | Cavernous hemangioma |
| https://doi.org/10.9738/INTSURG-D-15-00015.1 | 51 | F | None | Endoscopic US, CT | Slightly hyperdense homogeneous and not vascularized mass on gallbladder fundus | Gallbladder adenomyomatosis or submucosal tumor | Laparoscopic cholecystectomy | Dark-brown nodular lesion protruding from the gallbladder fundus | 1.8 × 1.7 | Cavernous hemangioma |
|
PMID: 31123450 |
75 | M | None | CT, MRI | Calcified mass in the gallbladder | Gallbladder carcinoma | Extended cholecystectomy | Hardened and thickened gallbladder wall, adherent to the duodenum, transverse colon and bile duct | 10 × 8 × 5.5 | Cavernous hemangioma |
| Present case | 76 | M | Heartburn and abdominal pain due to the coexistent cholelithiasis and cholecystitis | X-Ray and US | Multiple gallstones, a thickened gallbladder wall with mild edema of the perivisceral adipose tissue and a 12 mm hypoechogenic area in the liver consistent with a hepatic angioma | Cholelithiasis and cholecystitis | Laparoscopic cholecystectomy | Subserosal nodule within the gallbladder fundus | 0.8 × 0.5 | Cavernous hemangioma |
Overall, gallbladder hemangiomas have been reported to occur at a mean age of 54 ± 17 years old [range: 11–76] and predominantly in males (8/11) [9–18]. Interestingly, females tend to be younger at diagnosis than males (37 ± 23 years old vs. 60 ± 11 years old) [9–18]. Our patient is the oldest patient ever reported with this lesion.
Clinically, gallbladder hemangiomas tend to present with poorly localized abdominal pain, and often mimic other gallbladder disorders such as choledocholithiasis, cholelithiasis and cholecystitis [9–18] (Fig. 1). Whereas the symptomatology of previous reported cases has been ascribed to the mass effect exerted by the lesion [9–18], especially when of large dimensions, in our case the presence of gallstones justified the clinical presentation.
In line with the current guidelines, abdominal ultrasound was performed as a first-level exam [19], revealing multiple gallstones and a thickened gallbladder wall with mild edema of the perivisceral adipose tissue (Fig. 2). Clinical and radiological findings were suggestive of cholelithiasis with cholecystitis, and thus a cholecystectomy was planned.
However, during the surgical resection a subserosal nodule was detected in the gallbladder fundus, prompting a histopathological examination of this unexpected finding. In the present case, imaging failed to identify this nodule. This possibility is well-acknowledged and can be due to multiple factors related both to the operator and patient's characteristics like body habitus. It should also be noted that imaging of intramural lesions is so far unable to reliably distinguish an early stage gallbladder malignancy from benign conditions [20], thus, even if it had been detected, surgical resection followed by histopathological examination would have been the correct diagnostic/therapeutic approach. Considering the difficulties in detecting small intramural gallbladder lesions by ultrasound imaging, the incidence of gallbladder hemangiomas is probably underestimated, but novel techniques like high-resolution ultrasound can enhance the detection of smaller lesions, also improving the evaluation of gallbladder wall layers and helping distinguish between benign and malignant conditions [21].
Macroscopically, gallbladder hemangiomas tend to present as a purplish bosselated mass encased within the gallbladder wall and protruding inside the gallbladder lumen and/or from the serosal surface (Fig. 1). Although benign, these lesions can reach remarkable dimensions (up to 12 cm) and extend to the entire gallbladder. Other than the present, only one of the previously reported cases also presented as a well-defined grayish-whitish nodule on the serosal surface (Table 1 and Fig. 1).
At microscopical examination, gallbladder hemangiomas typically present as a mass of multiple enlarged, dilated vascular channels lined by endothelial cells and arranged in a lobular pattern, without atypia or mitoses [16, 18]. In our case, prominent sclerosis was also present, suggesting a long-standing lesion (Fig. 3).
Regarding tumor location, the here reported gallbladder hemangioma was found in the fundus, a finding in line with previously described cases [9–18] (5/11, 45%; Fig. 1). The pathophysiological mechanism leading to hemangioma development in this peculiar site is still unclear, but it is known that an hypoxic environment, such as the one in the relatively poorly vascularized gallbladder fundus, may lead to an upregulation of hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α)-responsive chemokines such as stromal cell derived factor-1α (SDF-1α) and vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF), both of which promote the recruitment and proliferation of endothelial progenitor cells [22]. The preponderance of gallbladder hemangiomas sited within the fundus [9–18] (Table 1 and Fig. 1) may support the hypothesis that hemangiomas may be a result of a homeostatic attempt to revascularize a relatively hypoxic tissue [23].
On the other hand, the frequent co-existence of gallbladder hemangiomas with additional angiomatous lesions, in multiple [12] or in a single other organ such as the vocal cords [10] or the liver [11, 16] (Fig. 1), challenges the aforementioned hypothesis and may suggest a common predisposition for the development of these lesions. In our case, the patient also presented a hepatic angioma (Fig. 2), identified by the abdominal ultrasound.
Conclusions
The here described case is the first report of a gallbladder hemangioma coexisting with gallstones. Gallbladder hemangioma represents a rare, probably underreported entity which can be undetected. A correct estimation of the incidence of gallbladder hemangiomas could help shed a light on the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, which are still unclear.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- HIF-1α
Hypoxia inducible factor-1α
- SDF-1α
Stromal cell derived factor-1α
- VEGF
Vascular endothelial growth factor
Authors' contributions
GT evaluated the case, reviewed the literature, prepared the figures and drafted the manuscript; LC and FT collected clinical/pathological data, reviewed the literature and edited the manuscript; LB conceptualized the case report, supervised manuscript preparation and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
None to report.
Availability of data and materials
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethics approval was not required for single case reports. Written consent was obtained from the patient to publish the present case report.
Consent for publication
Written consent was obtained from the patient to publish the present case report.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Goldblum J, Weiss S, Folpe AL. Enzinger and Weiss’s Soft tissue tumors. 7. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zheng JW, Zhang L, Zhou Q, Mai HM, Wang YA, Fan XD, et al. A practical guide to treatment of infantile hemangiomas of the head and neck. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2013;6:851–860. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jameson LJ, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Longo DL, Loscalzo J. Harrison’s principles of internal medicine. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Everhart JE, Ruhl CE. Burden of digestive diseases in the United States Part III: liver, biliary tract, and pancreas. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:1134–1144. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.02.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Akbulut S, Karagul S, Ertugrul I, Aydin C, Yilmaz M, Yilmaz S. Histopathologic findings of cholecystectomy specimens in patients who underwent donor hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2015;47:1466–1468. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.04.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Akbulut S, Demyati K, Ciftci F, Koc C, Tuncer A, Sahin E, et al. Ectopic liver tissue (choristoma) on the gallbladder: a comprehensive literature review. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;12:534–548. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v12.i12.534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zimmermann A. Mesenchymal tumors of the gallbladder. Tumors and Tumor-Like Lesions Hepatobiliary Tract. Gen. Surg. Pathol., Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017, p. 2779–99. 10.1007/978-3-319-26956-6_156.
- 8.Ouyang G, Liu Q, Wu Y, Liu Z, Lu W, Li S, et al. The global, regional, and national burden of gallbladder and biliary tract cancer and its attributable risk factors in 195 countries and territories, 1990 to 2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Cancer. 2021;127:2238–2250. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Arbab AA, Brasfield R. Benign tumors of the gallbladder. Surgery. 1967;61:535–540. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sewell JH, Miron MA. Benign cavernous hemangioma of the gallbladder. Arch Pathol. 1969;88:30–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Moffat JH. Cavernous hemangioma of the gallbladder and liver. Can J Surg. 1973;16:172–175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cabrera OR, Hernández Viruel JA, Colinabarranco M, Villa Fernández A. A Visceral multiple angiomatosis. Clinical case and review of the literature. Prensa Med Mex. 1977;42:325–330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jones WP, Keller FS, Odrezin GT, Kelly DR. Venous hemangioma of the gallbladder. Gastrointest Radiol. 1987;12:319–321. doi: 10.1007/BF01885171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Furukawa H, Kanai Y, Mukai K, Yamasaki S. Arteriovenous hemangioma of the gallbladder: CT and pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168:1383. doi: 10.2214/ajr.168.5.9129455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mayorga M, Hernando M, Val-Bernal JF. Diffuse expansive cavernous hemangioma of the gallbladder. Gen Diagn Pathol. 1997;142:211–215. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Crucitti A, La Greca A, Antinori A, Antonacci V, Magistrelli P. Cavernous hemangioma of the gallbladder. Case report and review of the literature. Tumori. 2005;91:432–5. doi: 10.1177/030089160509100511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Akama Y, Mizuguchi Y, Mamada Y, Shimizu T, Kanda T, Nakamura Y, et al. A case of cavernous hemangioma of the gallbladder treated with single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Int Surg. 2016;101:431–436. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-15-00015.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Funamizu N, Nakabayashi Y. Cavernous hemangioma of the gallbladder masquerading as a carcinoma. Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2019;13:219–224. doi: 10.1159/000500079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Gallstone disease: diagnosis and management 2014. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg188. Accessed 25 May 2021. [PubMed]
- 20.Patkar S, Shinde RS, Kurunkar SR, Niyogi D, Shetty NS, Ramadwar M, et al. Radiological diagnosis alone risks overtreatment of benign disease in suspected gallbladder cancer: a word of caution in an era of radical surgery. Indian J Cancer. 2017;54:681–684. doi: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_516_17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yu MH, Kim YJ, Park HS, Jung Sll. Benign gallbladder diseases: Imaging techniques and tips for differentiating with malignant gallbladder diseases. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;26:2967–86. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i22.2967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chang EI, Chang EI, Thangarajah H, Hamou C, Gurtner GC. Hypoxia, hormones, and endothelial progenitor cells in hemangioma. Lymphat Res Biol. 2007;5:237–243. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2007.1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Drolet BA, Frieden IJ. Characteristics of infantile hemangiomas as clues to pathogenesis: does hypoxia connect the dots? Arch Dermatol. 2010;146:1295–1299. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2010.1295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

