Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 6.
Published in final edited form as: Food Chem Toxicol. 2019 Oct 22;135:110896. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2019.110896

Intra-amniotic Administration (Gallus gallus) of TiO2, SiO2, and ZnO Nanoparticles Affect Brush Border Membrane Functionality and Alters Gut Microflora Populations

Nikolai Kolba 1, Zhongyuan Guo 2, Fabiola Moreno Olivas 2, Gretchen J Mahler 2, Elad Tako 1,*
PMCID: PMC8985309  NIHMSID: NIHMS1543976  PMID: 31654707

Abstract

Metal oxide nanoparticles (NP) are increasingly used in the food and agriculture industries, making human consumption nearly unavoidable. The goal of this study was to use the Gallus gallus (broiler chicken) intra-amniotic administration of physiologically relevant concentrations of TiO2, SiO2, and ZnO to better understand the effects of NP exposure on gut health and function. Immediately after hatch, blood, cecum, and small intestine were collected for assessment of iron (Fe)-metabolism, zinc (Zn)-metabolism, brush border membrane (BBM) functional, and pro-inflammatory related proteins gene expression; blood Fe and Zn levels; cecum weight; and the relative abundance of intestinal microflora. NP type, dose, and the presence or absence of minerals was shown to result in altered mineral transporter, BBM functional, and pro-inflammatory gene expression. Metal oxide NP also altered the abundance of intestinal bacterial populations. Overall, the data suggest that the in vivo results align with in vitro studies, and that NP have the potential to negatively affect intestinal functionality and health.

Keywords: ingestion, nanotoxicity, microbiota, iron, zinc, cecum

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1543976-f0005.jpg

1. Introduction

Nanotechnology involves engineering, manufacturing, and using materials at a nanoscale to achieve specific properties, and nanomaterials are increasingly used in the food and agriculture industries. Nanoparticles (NP) are added to food to enhance texture, flavor, color, consistency, stability or nutrient bioavailability, and NP in food packaging can improve packaging flexibility, gas barrier properties, temperature and moisture stability, and act as antimicrobials or sensors for microorganism detection and identification (Chaudhry et al.,2008; Nanotechnology Applications in the Food Industry, 2018). In agriculture, nanomaterials are being developed for novel agrochemicals such as fertilizers and pesticides, and nanotechnology is being used to develop sensors for applications such as water or nutrient detection (Nanotechnologies in Food and Agriculture, 2015; Kah et al., 2018). Nanomaterial production and distribution for all applications results in emissions to the environment and landfills ( Keller et al., 2013, Keller et al., 2014). Human ingestion of nanomaterials though food, agricultural residue, or the environment is nearly unavoidable, which highlights the importance of understanding the effects of NP on gastrointestinal function.

Studies by Lomer et al. estimated that the average person in a developed country consumes 1012-1014 engineered fine (0.1–1 μm diameter) to ultrafine (<100 nm diameter) particles per day, primarily from the ingestion of nanosized titanium dioxide (TiO2), silicates, and aluminosilicates (Lomer et al., 2002; Lomer et al., 2004). Titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles, primarily the anatase form, are often added to processed food as whitening and brightening agents ( McClements et al., 2017). More recent studies on TiO2 nanoparticle consumption from Weir at al. (Weir et al., 2012) and Rompelberg et al. (Rompelberg et al., 2016), have estimated TiO2 intake to be 0.2 – 0.7 mg/kg body weight/day for US adults and nano-TiO2 intake to be 0.55 μg/kg body weight/day for Dutch adults, respectively. Both studies estimated a higher intake in children when compared with adults, due to an increased intake of products with a high level of TiO2 such as candy, gum, and toothpaste (Weir et al., 2012; Rompelberg et al., 2016). SiO2 nanoparticles, generally amorphous solid spheres, are primarily used as a thickening agent, as an anticaking agent in powdered foods to maintain flow properties, and as a carrier for fragrances or flavors (Dekkers et al., 2011; Peters et al., 2012). Dekkers et al. have estimated nano-SiO2 intake at 1.8 mg/kg body weight/day (Dekkers et al., 2011). Nano-sized zinc oxide (ZnO) is used as a source of zinc in supplements and functional foods, in food packaging as antimicrobial agents, in canned food lining to prevent food staining, and as an ultraviolet (UV) light absorber to protect foods sensitive to UV light (Wang et al., 2014; Sirelkhatim et al., 2015; Robertson et al., 2016; Espitia et al., 2016; The Wiley encyclopedia of packaging technology, 2009; Onwulata, 2014). Estimates for ZnO nanoparticle ingestion are sparse, but Moreno-Olivas et al. have estimated that approximately 2 mg of Zn is consumed from a canned food meal (Moreno-Olivas et al., 2019).

The increasing volume of nanomaterial production and the diversity of applications also result in environmental emissions during the nanomaterial life cycle. Keller et al. have estimated that TiO2 NP emissions are 15,600 metric tons/year to water systems and 32,600 metric tons/year to landfills, SiO2 NP emissions are 2,100 metric tons/year to water systems and 81,200 metric tons/year to landfills, and ZnO NP emissions are estimated to be 3,700 metric tons/year to water systems and 21,100 metric tons/year to landfills (Keller et al., 2013).

Our previous work with an in vitro model of the intestinal epithelium has shown that exposure to TiO2, SiO2, and ZnO NP changes the functionality of the intestinal cells (Moreno-Olivas et al., 2019; Guo et al., 2017; Gou et al., 2018; Pereira et al., 2018; Richter et al., 2018). Exposure to TiO2 NP at physiologically realistic doses significantly decreased intestinal barrier function following chronic (5 day) exposure. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, pro-inflammatory signaling, and intestinal alkaline phosphatase activity, which regulates the absorption of fatty acids across the apical intestinal epithelial membrane, all showed increases in response to nano-TiO2. Iron, zinc, and fatty acid transport were significantly decreased following exposure to TiO2 nanoparticles (Guo et al., 2017). SiO2 NP exposure significantly affected iron, zinc, glucose, and lipid nutrient absorption (Guo et al., 2018). The brush border membrane intestinal alkaline phosphatase activity was increased in response to nano-SiO2. The barrier function of the intestinal epithelium, as measured by transepithelial electrical resistance, was significantly decreased in response to chronic nano-SiO2 exposure. Gene expression and oxidative stress formation analysis showed SiO2 NP altered the expression levels of nutrient transport proteins, generated reactive oxygen species, and initiated pro-inflammatory signaling (Guo et al., 2018). Exposure of the intestinal in vitro model to ZnO NP can resulted in a significant decrease in glucose transport (Moreno-Olivas et al., 2019). TiO2, SiO2, and ZnO NP all damaged the physical structure of absorptive cells, which significantly decreased the surface of the absorptive cells covered with microvilli. The effects of TiO2 NP on microvilli were ameliorated in the presence of beneficial bacteria (Richter et al., 2018), and the decreases in barrier function were eliminated when TiO2 NP exposure was within a food matrix (Pereira et al., 2018).

In the current study, the intestinal effects of TiO2, SiO2, and ZnO ingestion were studied in vivo and by using the intra amniotic administration approach in Gallus gallus. The Gallus gallus is a fast-growing model, receptive to dietary manipulations, and sensitive to dietary deficiencies in trace minerals such as iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) (Tako et al., 2010; Tako et al., 2014; Tako et al., 2014; Tako et al., 2015). There is >85% homology between human and Gallus gallus intestinal gene sequences for mineral transporters such as DMT1, DcytB, ZnT1, and Ferroportin (Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution, 2004). The broiler chicken gut microbiota is complex, dynamic, heavily influenced by the host’s genetics, environment, and diet, and there is considerable similarity at the phylum level between the gut microbiota of broilers chickens and humans (Yegani et al., 2008; Backhed et al., 2005). Further, in recent years, the the intra amniotic administration approach (in ovo feeding) was further developed and currently is widely applied in the evaluation process of the effects of functional foods and dietary factors on the functionality of the intestinal brush border membrane, as well as potential prebiotic properties and interactions with the intestinal microbial populations (Hou and Tako, 2018).

The goal of this work is to understand how exposure of metal oxide nanomaterials at physiologically relevant doses affects the expression of Fe and Zn metabolism-related genes, brush border membrane (BBM) development and functionality, and the relative abundance of probiotic populations of bacteria such as Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus versus those of potentially pathogenic bacteria such as E. coli and Clostridium. Previous studies have demonstrated that in ovo feeding using intra-amniotic fluid administration is a fast and cost effective method to evaluate plant-origin prebiotic and bioactive compound effects on intestinal health and function, including mineral absorption, brush border membrane expression, and microflora populations (Hou and Tako, 2018). This will be the first study, however, to assess the effects of nanomaterials on gut health and function using in vivo, and by using the intra-amniotic administration approach.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and and Study Design

Cornish cross-fertile broiler chicken eggs (n = 180) were obtained from a commercial hatchery (Moyer’s chicks, Quakertown, PA, USA). The eggs were incubated under optimal conditions at the Cornell University Animal Science poultry farm incubator. All animal protocols were approved by Cornell University Institutional Animal Care and Use committee.

TiO2 (30 nm anatase, US Research Nanomaterials, Inc., Houston, TX), SiO2 (20–30 nm amorphous, US Research Nanomaterials, Inc., Houston, TX), and ZnO (10 nm, Meliorum Technologies, Inc., Rochester, NY) NP were used in this study. All particles have previously been characterized with electron microscopy and dynamic light scattering (DLS) in 18 MΩ resistivity deionized (DI) water (Moreno-olivas et al., 2019; Guo et al., 2017; Guo et al., 2018). Physiologically relevant NP concentrations were chosen for this study based on previous results in vitro and to mimic potential human NP ingestion exposures. Nanoparticle formulations were prepared in sterile 18 MΩ DI water. The osmolality of all solutions was measured using a VAPRO Vapor Pressure Osmometer (Wescor, Logan, UT, USA) to ensure the osmolality was less than 320 OSM, which is necessary to prevent the chicken embryos dehydration upon injection of the solution. Doses were the following: 1.4×10−6 mg TiO2 NP/mL (medium) and 1.4×10–4 mg TiO2 NP/mL (high), 2.0×10−5 mg SiO2 NP/ml (medium) and 2.0×10−3 mg SiO2 NP/ml (high), and 9.7×10−4 mg ZnO NP/mL (medium) and 9.7×10−2 mg ZnO NP/mL (high). NP injection solutions with 58Fe or 67Zn were prepared identically to previously publish in vitro studies (Moreno-olivas et al., 2019; Guo et al., 2017; Guo et al., 2018).

The intra-amniotic administration procedure was previously described by Tako et al. (Tako et al., 2014). On Day 17 of embryonic incubation, eggs with viable embryos were weighed and divided into 18 groups (n = 10) with an approximately equal weight distribution. The intra-amniotic injection solution (1 mL per egg) was injected with a 21-guage needle into the amniotic fluid, which was identified by candling. Following the injection, the injection sites were sealed with cellophane tape. Eggs were then placed in hatching baskets, with each treatment equally represented at each incubator location.

2.2. Blood and Tissue Collection

Immediately following hatching (Day 21, hatchability rate was 92%), birds were weighed and euthanized with CO2 exposure. Blood was collected using micro-hematocrit heparinized capillary tubes (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The small intestines, ceca, and livers were then quickly removed from the carcasses and placed in separate sterile cryovials (Simport, Beloeil, QC, Canada) for storage. Ceca were weighed before storage. The samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until analysis. Blood sample 58Fe and 67Zn concentrations were determined with Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS, ICAP Model 61E Trace Analyser; Thermo Jarrell Ash Corporation, Franklin, MA, USA).

2.3. Isolation of Total RNA From Chicken Duodenum

Total RNA was extracted from 30 mg proximal duodenal tissue using a Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen Inc., Germantown, MD) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Total RNA was eluted in 50 μL of RNase-free water. All steps were carried out under RNase free conditions. RNA was quantified with a NanoDrop 2000 (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) at A 260/280. RNA was stored at −80°C until use.

2.4. Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

The primers used in the real-time polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCR) were designed using Real-Time Primer Design Tool software (IDT DNA, Coralvilla, IA) based on 11 gene sequences from GenBank database. The sequences are shown in Table 1. The amplicon length was limited to 90 to 150 bp, the length of the primers was from 17- to 25- mer, and the GC content was between 41 and 55%. The specificity of the primers was tested by performing a BLAST search against the genomic NCBI database.

Table 1:

Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) primer sequences.

Gene Forward Primer (5′-3′) Reverse Primer (5′-3′) Base Pairs GI Identifier

DcytB CATGTGCATTCTCTTCCAAAGTC CTCCTTGGTGACCGCATTAT 103 20380692
Ferroportin CTCAGCAATCACTGGCATCA ACTGGGCAACTCCAGAAATAAG 98 61098365
DMT-1 TTGATTCAGAGCCTCCCATTAG GCGAGGAGTAGGCTTGTATTT 10l 2.07E+08
Zip1 TGCCTCAGTTTCCCTCAC GGCTCTTAAGGGCACTTCT 144 XM_015298606.1
ZnT1 GGTAACAGAGCTGCCTTAACT GGTAACAGAGCTGCCTTAACT 105 54109718
SGLT-1 GCATCCTTACTCTGTGGTACTG TATCCGCACATCACACATCC 106 8346783
IL-8 TCATCCATCCCAAGTTCATTCA GACACACTTCTCTGCCATCTT 105 Y14971.1
TNF-α GACAGCCTATGCCAACAAGTA TTACAGGAAGGGCAACTCATC 109 53854909
SI CCAGCAATGCCAGCATATTG CGGTTTCTCCTTACCACTTCTT 95 2246388
NFκBI CACAGCTGGAGGGAAGTAAAT TTGAGTAAGGAAGTGAGGTTGAG 100 2130627
18S GCAAGACGAACTAAAGCGAAAG TCGGAACTACGACGGTATCT 100 7262899

DcytB, Duodenal cytochrome B; DMT1, Divalent metal transporter 1; ZIP1, Zinc Transporter 1; ZnT1, Zinc Transporter 1; SGLT-1, Sodium-glucose transporter 1; IL-8, Interleukin 8; TNF-α, Tumor necrosis factor-alpha; SI, Sucrose isomaltase; NFΚB1, Nuclear factor Kappa B Subunit 1; 18S rRNA, 18S Ribosomal subunit.Isolation of DNA from Chicken Cecum.

cDNA was generated using a C1000 Touch thermocycler (Biorad, Hercules, CA) and a Promega-Improm-II Reverse Transcriptase Kit (Catalog #A1250) 20 μL reverse transcriptase reaction. The reverse transcriptase reaction consisted of 1 μg total RNA template, 10 μM random hexamer primers, and 2 mM of oligo-dT primers. All reactions were performed under the following conditions: 94°C for 5 minutes, 60 minutes at 42°C, 70°C for 15 minutes, and then hold at 4°C. The concentration of cDNA obtained was determined with a NanoDrop 2000 at A 260/280 with an extinction coefficient of 33 for single stranded DNA.

RT-PCR was performed with a Bio-RadCFX96 Touch (Hercules, CA, USA). The 10 μL RT-PCR mixtures consisted of cDNA (2 μg), 2X BioRad SSO Advanced Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Cat #1725274, Hercules, CA, USA), forward and reverse primers, and nuclease-free water (for the no template control). The no template control of nuclease-free water was included to exclude DNA contamination in the PCR mix. All reactions were performed in duplicates and under the following conditions: initial denaturing at 95°C for 30 seconds, 40 cycles of denaturing at 95°C for 15 seconds, various annealing temperatures according to IDT for 30 seconds and elongating at 60°C for 30 seconds. After the cycling process was completed, melting curves was determined from 65.0°C to 95.0°C with increments of 0.5°C for 5 seconds to ensure amplification of a single product. RT-PCR efficiency values for the eleven genes were as follows: DcytB, 1.046; Ferroportin, 1.109; DMT1, 0.998; Zip1, 0.921; ZnT1, 1.09; SGLT1, 0.994; IL-8, 0.998; TNF-α, 1.046; SI, 1.032; NK-κβ1, 1.113; 18s rRNA, 0.934. Gene expression levels were obtained from Ct values based on the ‘second derivative maximum’ as computed by the Biorad CFX Maestro Software (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). Gene expression was normalized to the expression of 18S.

The contents of the ceca were placed into a sterile 50 mL tube (Corning, Corning, NY, USA) containing 9 mL of sterile 1X phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and homogenized by vortexing with glass beads (3mm diameter) for 3 minutes. Debris was removed by centrifugation at 700 x g for 1 minute, and the supernatant was collected and centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 5 minutes. The pellet was washed twice with 1X PBS and stored at −20°C until DNA extraction.

To extract DNA, the pellet was re-suspended in 50 mM EDTA and treated with 10 mg/mL lysozyme (Sigma Aldrich CO., St. Louis, MO) for 45 min at 37°C. The bacterial genomic DNA was then isolated using a Wizard Genomic DNA purification kit (Promega Corp., Madison, WI) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.5. PCR Amplification of Bacterial 16s rDNA

Primers for Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium, and E. coli were designed according to previously published data by Zhu et al. (Zhu et al., 2002). The universal primers, which identify all known strains of bacteria in the intestine, were prepared with the invariant region in the 16S rRNA of bacteria and used as internal standard to normalize the results. PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and quantified using the Quantity One 1-D analysis software (BioRad, Hercules, Ca, USA).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Results are expressed as mean ± standard error, n ≥ 8. Results were analyzed by one-way multiple analysis of variance (ANOVA) using JMP software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).Differences between treatments were compared with Tukey’s post hoc test, and results were considered statistically different at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Body Weight, Cecum Weight, and Cecum –to-Body Weight Ratio

There were no significant differences in body weight across all treatment groups (Figure 1A). For groups with NP and 58Fe, the high TiO2 and mid SiO2 groups had a cecum weight and cecum weight/body weight ratio that was significantly higher than the non-injected controls (Figure 1B, D). For groups injected with NP and 67Zn, the mid TiO2 and high TiO2 groups had a cecum weight and cecum weight/body weight ratio that was significantly higher than the non-injected controls (Figure 1C, E). Based on these results, only medium and high TiO2 and medium SiO2 treatments were further analyzed.

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

Effects of day 17 intra-amniotic in ovo injections on day 0 chick body weight, cecum weight, or cecum weight/body weight ratio. Day 17 embryos were exposed to water, stable isotope (58Fe or 67Zn), or medium or high doses of TiO2, SiO2, or ZnO nanoparticles (NP) with 58Fe or 67Zn via in ovo, intra-amniotic injections and day 0 chicks were assessed for body weight (A), cecum weight (B, C), and cecum weight to body weight ratio (D, E). Values are mean ± SEM. Bars that do not share any letters are significantly different according to a one-away ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (p ≤ 0.05).

3.2. 58Fe and 67Zn Absorption

Figure 2A shows 58Fe detected via ICP-MS in the chick bloodstream, and Figure 2B shows 67Zn detected in the chick blood. There are no statistically significant differences in 58Fe or 67Zn absorption from the amniotic fluid into the bloodstream for all conditions tested.

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

Effects of day 17 intra-amniotic in ovo injections on day 0 chick 58Fe or 67Zn absorption. 58Fe (A) or 67Zn (B) in the day 0 chick bloodstream following day 17 in ovo injections with water, stable isotope (58Fe or 67Zn), or medium or high doses of TiO2, SiO2, or ZnO nanoparticles (NP) with 58Fe or 67Zn. Values are mean ± SEM. There are no statistically significant differences between means according to a one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (p ≤ 0.05).

3.3. Nutrient Transport, Enzyme Function, and Pro-Inflammatory Gene Expression

Figure 3 shows intestinal gene expression results. The relative expression of Zn metabolism genes (ZnT1, ZIP1) were assessed in response to the intra-amniotic injections. ZnT1 was significantly upregulated (p < 0.05) in response to medium SiO2 + Zn when compared with water injected controls. ZIP1 was significantly upregulated (p < 0.05) in response to high TiO2 + Fe, high TiO2 + Zn, and a medium dose of TiO2 NP when compared 255 with water injected controls.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Effects day 17 intra-amniotic in ovo injections on day 0 chick intestinal gene expression. Values are means ± SEM. Per gene, treatments groups that do not share any letters are significantly different according to a one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (p ≤ 0.05). SI = Sucrose isomaltase.

The relative expressions of Fe metabolism genes (DcytB, DMT1, and ferroportin) were assessed in response to injection with water, minerals, and/or NP. DMTI and ferroportin were significantly upregulated (p < 0.05) in the presence of high TiO2 + Fe, high TiO2 + Zn, medium SiO2 + Fe, and medium SiO2 + Zn when compared with water injected controls. DcytB was significantly upregulated (p < 0.05) following exposure to high TiO2 + Zn, 261 medium SiO2 + Fe, and medium SiO2 + Zn when compared with water injected controls.

The relative expressions of BBM functional genes (SI and SGLT1) were significantly (p < 0.05) upregulated in the presence of high TiO2 + Fe, high TiO2 + Zn, medium SiO2 + Fe, and medium SiO2 + Zn when compared with water injected controls. Finally, the expression of gut inflammatory genes (TNF-α, IL-8, NF-κβ) were assessed. Exposure to high TiO2 + Fe and medium SiO2 + Zn significantly upregulated (p < 0.05) TNF-α expression when compared with water injected controls. Exposure to high TiO2 + Fe, high TiO2 + Zn, medium SiO2 + Fe, and medium SiO2 + Zn significantly upregulated (p < 0.05) IL-8 expression when compared with water injected controls. Exposure to medium SiO2 + Fe or medium SiO2 + Zn significantly upregulated (p < 0.05) NF-κβ expression when compared with water injected controls.

3.4. Intestinal Content Bacterial Genera- and Species-Level Analysis

Figure 4 shows the chick cecal genera and species-level bacterial populations. The relative abundance of Bifidobacterium or Lactobacillus, which are considered to be probiotics, significantly increased (p < 0.05) in the presence of medium TiO2 + Zn, high TiO2 + Zn, and medium SiO2 + Zn when compared with non-injected or water injected controls. Bifidobacterium or Lactobacillus abundance was significantly decreased (p < 0.05) by medium TiO2 + Fe, high TiO2 + Fe, and medium doses of TiO2 NP or SiO2 NP only when compared with non-injected or water injected controls. Bifidobacterium abundance was significantly decreased (p < 0.05) following exposure to water + Zn and medium SiO2 + Fe when compared with non-injected controls.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Effects day 17 intra-amniotic in ovo injections on cecal genera and species-level bacterial populations (day of hatch). Values are means ± SEM. Per bacterial category, treatments groups that do not share any letters are significantly different according to a one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (p ≤ 0.05).

Clostridium, which is an opportunistic or potentially pathogenic bacteria, was significantly increased (p < 0.05) in the presence of medium doses of SiO2 NP when compared with non-injected or water injected controls. E. coli, which is also considered opportunistic and potentially pathogenic, was significantly increased (p < 0.05) following exposure to medium SiO2 + Zn when compared with water injected controls. Clostridium and E. coli were not significantly decreased by any of the water, mineral, or NP treatments.

4. Discussion

The intra amniotic administration procedure (“In ovo feeding”) of fertilized Gallus gallus eggs has recently become an accepted method for evaluating how ingestion of functional, plant-origin compounds affects the functionality of the small intestine and resident microbial populations (Hou and Tako, 2018), as previous work has demonstrated that broiler chickens are an appropriate in vivo model for human iron and zinc dietary bioavailability (25, 34). The current study used the in ovo Gallus gallus model to assess the effect of metal oxide nanoparticles, a common food additive, on the animal model body weight, ceca weigh, blood iron and zinc content, BBM gene expression (used as a biomarker of tissue functionality), and the relative abundance of representative microbial species immediately after hatch. The results show that intra-amniotic-delivered metal oxide NP affected cecum size, BBM functional gene expression, and cecum bacterial populations.

The gastro intestinal (GI) tract of poultry is composed of the esophagus, crop, proventriculus, gizzard, small intestine (duodenum, jejunum, and ileum), cecum, colon, and cloaca (Pan and Yu, 2014). The ratio of GI length: body length in poultry is shorter than in mammals, and this results in a faster passage of digesta in poultry and selection for fast growing or mucosal-layer adherent bacteria (Pan and Yu, 2014)). The exception is the ceca, which are two blind pouches with a much slower passage rate (Pan and Yu, 2014)). There is a diverse, well-studied microbiome within the ceca that has been shown to effect host nutrition and health (Pan and Yu, 2014). As shown in Figure 1, the ceca of animals that received 58Fe and high TiO2 or mid SiO2, or 67Zn and mid TiO2 or high TiO2 groups had a significant increase in cecum weight and cecum weight/body weight ratio. As was previously demonstrated, an increase in cecal weight indicates an overall increase in the bacterial content (Wang et al., 2019). Unlike germfree rodents, which display an enlarged cecum (Gustafsson et al., 1971), germfree chickens have lower cecum weights with a cecal thinner wall than conventional birds (Rolls et al., 1977). Gut microbiota can affect the intestinal morphology of poultry, germ free broilers have shorter intestinal villi and shallower crypts when compared with conventionally-raised birds (Forder et al., 2007; Gabriel et al., 2006), but an overabundance of bacteria could also compete for nutrients in the developing animals (Wang et al., 2019). In the current study the larger cecum size, and the higher bacterial loads, did not affect Fe or Zn absorption (Figure 2).

Zn is a charged, hydrophobic ion, and cannot cross biological membranes by simple diffusion. Specialized protein transporters exist to move Zn across the plasma membrane for cellular uptake and release. ZIP1 mediates Zn uptake from the gut lumen, and overexpression of ZIP1 results in upregulated enterocyte uptake of Zn (Michalczyk and Ackland, 2013). ZnT1 codes for a basolateral intestinal epithelial Zn transporter that shows differential mRNA expression in response to the amount of zinc in the diet (McMahon et al., 1998a,b). The intra-amniotic administration of TiO2, SiO2 and/or Fe or Zn led to the significant upregulation of duodenal Zn transport genes when compared with water-injected controls (Figure 3). ZIP1 was significantly upregulated in response to TiO2 + Fe, TiO2 + Zn, or TiO2 NP alone when compared with water injected controls. Similar to our previous results in vitro (Guo et al., 2018), ZnT1 in was upregulated in vivo, and in response to a medium dose of SiO2 + Zn exposure. Exposure to TiO2, SiO2, and/or Zn or Fe generally upregulated the pro-inflammatory genes TNF-α, IL-8, and NF-κβ (Figure 3). The changes in Zn metabolism gene expression are likely due to the pro-inflammatory conditions, which have previously been shown to increase Zn absorption ( Pekarek et al., 1975; Sas et al., 1979).

Similar to Zn, Fe requires specialized protein transporters to pass biological membranes. DMT1, the primary apical intestinal enterocyte Fe transporter, DcytB, Fe reductase, and Ferroportin, the primary basolateral intestinal enterocyte Fe transporter were generally upregulated by TiO2, SiO2, and/or Zn or Fe exposure. In previous intra amniotic administration studies, treatment groups with improved Fe status showed a downregulation of Fe metabolism genes (Tako et al., 2011). These results suggested that increased Fe bioavailability led to Fe sufficient conditions, resulting in an environment where additional Fe transporters were not required as a compensatory mechanism. Although 58Fe levels were unchanged in the bloodstream of NP-exposed chicks (Figure 2), the upregulation of Fe metabolism genes suggests that NP exposure could lead to Fe insufficient luminal conditions. The decrease in Fe metabolism genes with in ovo administration of NP mirrors previous results with TiO2 and SiO2 in vitro (Guo et al., 2017; Guo et al., 2018).

The intestinal functional proteins that were analyzed in the current study, were sucrase-isomaltase (SI) which is an intestinal BBM glucosidase (Gericke et al., 2016), and sodium glucose transporter 1 (SGLT1) which is an intestinal enterocyte apical glucose transporter (Gorboulev et al., 2012). The gene expression of these BBM functional genes was used as a biomarker of tissue functionality, including BBM digestive and absorptive capabilities (Reed et al., 2015; Uni et al., 2003). SI and SGLT1 were significantly upregulated in the presence of TiO2, SiO2 with Fe or Zn (Figure 3). Prior to hatching, Gallus gallus embryos have low intestinal expression of SI and SGLT1 and a limited ability to digest and absorb nutrients (Uni and Ferket, 2003). Feeding immediately post hatch is critical for broiler chicken intestinal development (Noy and Sklan, 1998), and nutrients that are supplied in ovo can support intestinal development during embryonic development (Kadam et al., 2013). An increase in BBM functional gene expression suggests an improvement in Gallus gallus hatchling intestinal development, digestive capabilities, and the potential for increased absorption of nutrients as Fe or Zn. The upregulation of BBM functional genes with exposure to NP could support intestinal development, or could be a compensatory mechanism to improve absorption due to intestinal damage.

The intestinal microbiota are becoming recognized as a key aspect in human and animal nutrition. A number of recent studies have also shown that adult and embryonic Gallus gallus cecal microbial populations are a useful indicator of gut and host overall health (Hou and Tako, 2018). Frequent exposure to metal oxide NP that are incorporated into consumer products or released into the environment has led to a number of studies focused on understanding how NP can change the composition and function of intestinal microbial communities. Many of these studies investigating the effects of metal oxide NP on individual species or communities of bacteria have reported conflicting results, most likely due to complex experimental factors such as such as the model microbiome community or animal model used, the experimental microenvironment, or the differing physicochemical properties of the NP (54).

Previous in vitro studies have shown that TiO2 NP display photocatalytic-mediated toxicity in both Gram positive and Gram negative bacterial species (Qui et al., 2018), and can inhibit the growth of commensal intestinal bacteria such as lactobacillus in the absence of light (Liu et al., 2016). In vitro microbiome models or in vivo studies with exposure to TiO2 NP have shown that food grade TiO2 NP can significantly shift the abundance of bacterial species (specifically Bacteroides and Clostridium) (Dudefoi et al, 2017). Although these compositional changes did not result in measurable physiological changes to the GI tract in one study, a separate study showed that TiO2 NP did alter the release of bacterial metabolites in vivo, promote biofilm formation of commensal bacterial in vitro, alter intestinal epithelial mucin gene expression, and promote inflammatory colon conditions (Dudefoi et al., 2017; Pinget et al., 2019). A third study found no obvious disturbance of gut microbiota in mice that ingested TiO2 NP for 7 days (Chen et al., 2017). SiO2 NP have been shown to induce reactive oxygen species (ROS) and to adsorbed to bacterial membranes, both of which caused bacterial toxicity in vitro (Zhang et al., 2013; Jiang et al., 2009). SiO2 NP fed to mice for 7 days increased colon pro-inflammatory cytokine expression, and increased the abundance of Lactobacillus (Chen et al., 2017).

As shown in Figure 4, doses of medium TiO2 + Zn, high TiO2 + Zn, and medium SiO2 + Zn significantly increased the relative abundance of the probiotics Bifidobacterium or Lactobacillus. Water + Zn, medium TiO2 + Fe, high TiO2 + Fe, medium SiO2 + Fe, and medium doses of TiO2 NP or SiO2 NP significantly decreased the relative abundances of Bifidobacterium or Lactobacillus, however. The potentially opportunistic Clostridium or E. coli were significantly increased following exposure to medium SiO2 + Zn or SiO2 NP only. Previous work with TiO2 and SiO2 NP have shown that these particles possess antibacterial properties (Qui et al., 2018), and Zn is also a known, concentration-dependent antimicrobial (Seiler et al., 2012). Gram positive bacteria, such as Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Clostridium have been shown to be more susceptible to metal oxide NP toxicity; bacterial NP toxicity is thought to result from oxidative stress via the generation of ROS on surfaces of the nanoparticles (Azam et al., 2012; Dizaj et al., 2014). In the current study, gene expression results (Figure 3) showed an increase in pro-inflammatory gene expression, which may also be due to ROS generation. The data additionally show that combinations of TiO2, SiO2, and Fe or Zn resulted in a significant increase in cecal bacterial populations. The combined antibacterial and inflammatory effects of the NP and heavy metals may foster “blooms” of otherwise low-abundance, opportunistic bacteria (Zeng et al., 2016). Enterobacterial blooms, for example, are commonly observed in gut dysbiosis related to inflammation in the gut (Zeng et al., 2016).

5. Conclusions

The results of this study show that NP type, dose, and the presence or absence of minerals can affect broiler chicken intestinal functional gene expression, inflammatory gene expression, cecum bacterial content and abundance. Overall, the data suggest that TiO2 and SiO2 NP have the potential to negatively affect intestinal function and health. The results obtained with intra-amniotic administration of NP and minerals also overlaps well with previous in vitro studies with the same types and concentrations of NP, which validates the use of these methods as a relatively fast and low-cost screening method for NP-biological interactions in the gut following ingestion.

  • NP type, dose, and the presence or absence of minerals altered mineral transporter, BBM functional, and pro-inflammatory gene expression.

  • Metal oxide NP altered the abundance of intestinal bacterial populations.

  • TiO2 and SiO2 NP have the potential to negatively affect intestinal function and health.

Acknowledgments:

Funding: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [grant number 1R15ES022828] and the CONACyT Fellowship (FMO).

Abbreviations:

BBM

Brush Border Membrane

DMT1

Divalent Metal Transporter 1

Fe

Iron

SGLT1

Sodium Glucose Transporter 1

SI

Sucrose Isomaltase

SiO2

Silicon Dioxide

TiO2

Titanium Oxide

Zn

Zinc

ZnO

Zinc Oxide

Footnotes

Supplementary Materials: None.

Declaration of interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

6. References

  1. Azam A, Ahmed AS,, Oves M, Khan MS, Habib SS, Memic A. 2012. Antimicrobial activity of metal oxide nanoparticles against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria: a comparative study. Int J Nanomedicine. 7:6003–9. Epub 2012/12/05. doi: 10.2147/ijn.s35347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Backhed F, Ley RE, Sonnenburg JL, Peterson DA, Gordon JI 2005. Host-bacterial mutualism in the human intestine. Science. 307(5717):1915–20. Epub 2005/03/26. doi: 10.1126/science.1104816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chaudhry Q, Scotter M, Blackburn J, Ross B, Boxall A, Castle L. 2008. Applications and implications of nanotechnologies for the food sector. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 25. doi: 10.1080/02652030701744538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen H, Zhao R, Wang B, Cai C, Zheng L, Wang H, Wang M, Ouyang H, Zhou X, Chai Z, Zhao Y, Feng W. 2017. The effects of orally administered Ag, TiO2 and SiO2 nanoparticles on gut microbiota composition and colitis induction in mice. NanoImpact. 8:80–8. doi: 10.1016/j.impact.2017.07.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dekkers S, Krystek P, Peters RJ, Lankveld DP, Bokkers BG, van Hoeven-Arentzen PH, Bouwmeester H, Oomen AG 2011. Presence and risks of nanosilica in food products. Nanotoxicology.5(3):393–405. doi: 10.3109/17435390.2010.519836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dudefoi W, Moniz K, Allen-Vercoe E, Ropers MH, Walker VK 2017. Impact of food grade and nano-TiO2 particles on a human intestinal community. Food Chem Toxicol. 106(Pt A):242–9. Epub 2017/06/01. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.05.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dizaj SM, Lotfipour F, Barzegar-Jalali M, Zarrintan MH, Adibkia K. 2014. Antimicrobial activity of the metals and metal oxide nanoparticles. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 44:278–84. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.08.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Espitia PJP, Otoni CG, Soares NFF 2016. Chapter 34 - Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles for Food Packaging Applications. In: Barros-Velázquez J, editor. Antimicrobial Food Packaging. San Diego: Academic Press. p. 425–31. [Google Scholar]
  9. Forder RE., Howarth GS., Tivey DR., Hughes RJ. 2007. Bacterial modulation of small intestinal goblet cells and mucin composition during early posthatch development of poultry. Poult Sci. 86(11):2396–403. Epub 2007/10/24. doi: 10.3382/ps.2007-00222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gabriel I, Lessire M, Mallet S, Guillot JF 2006. Microflora of the digestive tract: critical factors and consequences for poultry. World’s Poultry Science Journal. 62(3):499–511. Epub 2006/09/01. doi: 10.1017/s0043933906001115. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gericke B, Amiri M, Naim HY (2016). The multiple roles of sucrase-isomaltase in the intestinal physiology. Molecular and Cellular Pediatrics. 3(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40348-016-0033-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Guo Z, Martucci NJ, Moreno-Olivas F, Tako E, Mahler GJ 2017. Titanium dioxide nanoparticle ingestion alters nutrient absorption in an in vitro model of the small intestine. NanoImpact. 5:70–82. doi: 10.1016/j.impact.2017.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Guo Z, Martucci NJ, Liu Y, Yoo E, Tako E, Mahler GJ 2018. Silicon dioxide nanoparticle exposure affects small intestine function in an in vitro model. Nanotoxicology.12(5):485–508. doi: 10.1080/17435390.2018.1463407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gorboulev V, Schurmann A, Vallon V, Kipp H, Jaschke A, Klessen D, Friedrich A, Scherneck S, Rieg T, Cunard R, Veyhl-Wichmann M, Srinivasan A, Balen D, Breljak D, Rexhepaj R, Parker HE, Gribble FM, Reimann F, Lang F, Wiese S, Sabolic I, Sendtner M, Koepsell H. 2012. Na(+)-D-glucose cotransporter SGLT1 is pivotal for intestinal glucose absorption and glucose-dependent incretin secretion. Diabetes. 61(1):187–96. Epub 2011/11/30. doi: 10.2337/db11-1029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gustafsson BE., Maunsbach AB. 1971. Ultrastructure of the enlargec cecum in germfree rats. Zeitschrift fur Zellforschung und mikroskopische Anatomie (Vienna, Austria : 1948). 120(4):555–78. Epub 1971/01/01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hou T, Tako E. 2018. The In Ovo Feeding Administration (Gallus Gallus)-An Emerging In Vivo Approach to Assess Bioactive Compounds with Potential Nutritional Benefits. Nutrients. 10(4). Epub 2018/03/31. doi: 10.3390/nu10040418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jiang W, Mashayekhi H, Xing B. 2009. Bacterial toxicity comparison between nano- and micro-scaled oxide particles. Environ Pollut. 157(5):1619–25. Epub 2009/02/03. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2008.12.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kah M, Kookana RS, Gogos A, Bucheli TD 2018. A critical evaluation of nanopesticides and nanofertilizers against their conventional analogues. Nat Nanotechnol. 3(8):677–84. Epub 2018/05/08. doi: 10.1038/s41565-018-0131-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kadam MM, Barekatain MR, Bhanja SK, Iji PA 2013. Prospects of in ovo feeding and nutrient supplementation for poultry: the science and commercial applications--a review. J Sci Food Agric. 93(15):3654–61. Epub 2013/07/13. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Keller AA, McFerran S, Lazareva A, Suh S. 2013. Global life cycle releases of engineered nanomaterials. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 15(6):1692. doi: 10.1007/s11051-013-1692-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Keller AA., Lazareva A. 2014. Predicted Releases of Engineered Nanomaterials: From Global to Regional to Local. Environmental Science & Technology Letters. 1(1):65–70. doi: 10.1021/ez400106t. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu LY, Sun L, Zhong ZT, Zhu J, Song HY 2016. Effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on intestinal commensal bacteria. Nuclear Science and Techniques. 27(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s41365-016-0011-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lomer MCE, Thompson RPH, Powell JJ 2002. Fine and ultrafine particles of the diet: influence on the mucosal immune response and association with Crohn’s disease. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 61(1):123–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lomer MCE, Hutchinson C, Volkert S, Greenfield SM, Catterall A, Thompson RPH, Powell JJ 2004. Dietary sources of inorganic microparticles and their intake in healthy subjects and patients with Crohn’s disease. British Journal of Nutrition. 92(6). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. McMahon RJ, Cousins RJ 1998. Regulation of the zinc transporter ZnT-1 bydietary zinc. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95(9):4841–6. Epub 1998/06/06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. McMahon RJ, Cousins RJ Mammalian zinc transporters. 1998. J Nutr.;128(4):667–70. Epub 1998/05/16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. McClements DJ, Xiao H. 2017. Is nano safe in foods? Establishing the factors impacting the gastrointestinal fate and toxicity of organic and inorganic food-grade nanoparticles. npj Science of Food. 1(1):6. doi: 10.1038/s41538-017-0005-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Michalczyk AA, Ackland ML 2013.hZip1 (hSLC39A1) regulates zinc homoeostasis in gut epithelial cells. Genes Nutr. 8(5):475–86. Epub 2013/02/02. doi: 10.1007/s12263-013-0332-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Moreno-Olivas F, Tako E, Mahler GJ 2017. Titanium dioxide nanoparticle ingestion alters nutrient absorption in an in vitro model of the small intestine. NanoImpact. 5:70–82. doi: 10.1016/j.impact.2017.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Moreno-Olivas F, Tako E, Mahler GJ 2019. ZnO nanoparticles affect nutrient transport in an in vitro model of the small intestine. Food Chem Toxicol. 124:112–27. Epub 2018/12/07. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.11.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Nanotechnology Applications in the Food Industry. 1st ed. Rai V, Bai J, editors. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  32. Nanotechnologies in Food and Agriculture. 1st ed. Rai M, Ribeiro C, Mattoso L, Duran N, editors. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  33. Noy Y, Sklan D. 1998. Yolk utilisation in the newly hatched poult. British poultry science. 39(3):446–51. Epub 1998/08/07. doi: 10.1080/00071669889042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Onwulata CI Food Packaging Principles and Practice, 3rd Edition. Editor: edited by Robertson Gordon L., CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Rotan, FL: 33487–2742. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. 2014;38(4):2055-. doi: 10.1111/jfpp.12167. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Pan D, Yu Z. 2014. Intestinal microbiome of poultry and its interaction with host and diet. Gut Microbes. 5(1):108–19. Epub 2013/10/31. doi: 10.4161/gmic.26945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Pekarek RS, Evans GW 1975. Effect of acute infection and endotoxemia on zinc absorption in the rat. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. 150(3):755–8. Epub 1975/12/01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Pereira MT, Malik M, Nostro JA, Mahler GJ, Musselman LP 2018. Effect of dietary additives on intestinal permeability in both Drosophila and a human cell co-culture. Dis Model Mech. 11(12). Epub 2018/12/07. doi: 10.1242/dmm.034520. PubMed PMID: 30504122; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Peters R, Kramer E, Oomen AG, Rivera ZE, Oegema G, Tromp PC, Fokkink R, Rietveld A., Marvin HJ., Weigel S., Peijnenburg AA., Bouwmeeste H.2012. Presence of nano-sized silica during in vitro digestion of foods containing silica as a food additive. ACS Nano. 6(3):2441–51. Epub 2012/03/01. doi: 10.1021/nn204728k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Pinget G, Tan J, Janac B, Kaakoush NO, Angelatos AS, O’Sullivan J, Koay YC, Sierro F, Davis J, Divakarla SK, Khanal D, Moore RJ, Stanley D, Chrzanowski W, Macia L. 2019. Impact of the Food Additive Titanium Dioxide (E171) on Gut Microbiota-Host Interaction. Front Nutr. 6:57-. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2019.00057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Qiu K, Durham PG, Anselmo AC 2018. Inorganic nanoparticles and the microbiome. Nano Research. 11(10):4936–54. doi: 10.1007/s12274-018-2137-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Reed S, Neuman H, Moscovich S, Glahn RP, Koren O, Tako E. 2015. Chronic Zinc Deficiency Alters Chick Gut Microbiota Composition and Function. Nutrients. 7(12):9768–84. doi: 10.3390/nu7125497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Richter JW, Shull GM, Fountain JH, Guo Z, Musselman LP, Fiumera AC, Mahler GJ 2018. Titanium dioxide nanoparticle exposure alters metabolic homeostasis in a cell culture model of the intestinal epithelium and Drosophila melanogaster. Nanotoxicology. 12(5):390–406. Epub 2018/03/31. doi: 10.1080/17435390.2018.1457189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Rompelberg C., Heringa MB., van Donkersgoed G., Drijvers J., Roo A., Westenbrink S., Peters R., van Bemmel G., Brand W., Oomen AG. 2016. Oral intake of added titanium dioxide and its nanofraction from food products, food supplements and toothpaste by the Dutch population. Nanotoxicology. 10(10):1404–14. Epub 2016/09/14. doi: 10.1080/17435390.2016.1222457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Robertson GL 1977. Food packaging: principles and practice: CRC press; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  45. Rolls BA. Inorganic ions in the intestinal and caecal contents of germ-free and conventional chickens. Laboratory animals. 11(2):99–104. Epub 1977/04/01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sas B, Bremner I. 1979. Effect of acute stress on the absorption and distribution of zinc and on Zn-metallothionein production in the liver of the chick. Journal of inorganic biochemistry. 1(1):67–76. Epub 1979/08/01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sirelkhatim A, Mahmud S, Seeni A, Kaus NHM, Ann LC, Bakhori SKM, Hasan H, Mohamad D. 2015. Review on Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles: Antibacterial Activity and Toxicity Mechanism. Nano-micro letters. 7(3):219–42. Epub 2015/01/01. doi: 10.1007/s40820-015-0040-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Seiler C, Berendonk TU 2012. Heavy metal driven co-selection of antibiotic resistance in soil and water bodies impacted by agriculture and aquaculture. Frontiers in microbiology. 3:399. Epub 2012/12/19. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. 2004. Nature. 432(7018):695–716. Epub 2004/12/14. doi: 10.1038/nature03154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. The Wiley encyclopedia of packaging technology. 3rd ed. Yam KL, editor: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  51. Tako E, Rutzke MA, Glahn RP Using the domestic chicken (Gallus gallus) as an in vivo model for iron bioavailability. 2010. Poultry Sci. 89(3):514–21. doi: 10.3382/ps.2009-00326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Tako E, Beebe SE, Reed S, Hart JJ, Glahn RP 2014. Polyphenolic compounds appear to limit the nutritional benefit of biofortified higher iron black bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Nutr J. 13:28. Epub 2014/03/29. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-13-28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Tako E, Glahn RP, Knez M, Stangoulis JCR 2014. The effect of wheat prebiotics on the gut bacterial population and iron status of iron deficient broiler chickens. Nutrition Journal. 13:58-. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-13-58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Tako E, Reed SM, Budiman J, Hart JJ, Glahn RP 2015. Higher iron pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) provides more absorbable iron that is limited by increased polyphenolic content. Nutrition Journal. 14:11. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-14-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Tako E, Glahn RP 2010.White Beans Provide More Bioavailable Iron than Red Beans: Studies in Poultry (Gallus gallus) and an in vitro Digestion/Caco-2 Model. Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 80(6):416–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Tako E, Glahn RP 2011. Iron Status of the Late Term Broiler (Gallus gallus) Embryo and Hatchling. International Journal of Poultry Science. 10(1):42–8. [Google Scholar]
  57. Uni Z, Tako E, Gal-Garber O, Sklan D. 2003. Morphological, molecular, and functional changes in the chicken small intestine of the late-term embryo. Poult Sci. 82(11):1747–54. Epub 2003/12/05. doi: 10.1093/ps/82.11.1747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Uni Z, Ferket PR inventors; Enhancement of development of oviparous species by in ovo feeding. U.S.Patent 6,592,878, July 15, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  59. Wang Y, Yuan L, Yao C, Ding L, Li C, Fang J, Sui K, Liu Y, Wu M. 2014. A combined toxicity study of zinc oxide nanoparticles and vitamin C in food additives. Nanoscale. 6(24):15333–42. Epub 2014/11/12. doi: 10.1039/c4nr05480f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Wang X., Kolba N., Liang J., Tako E. 2019. Alterations in gut microflora populations and brush border functionality following intra-amniotic administration (Gallus gallus) of wheat bran prebiotics extracts. Food & Function. Jul 19. doi: 10.1039/c9fo00836e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Weir A, Westerhoff P, Fabricius L, von Goetz N. 2012. Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles in Food and Personal Care Products. Environmental science & technology. 46(4):2242–50. doi: 10.1021/es204168d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Yegani M, Korver DR 2008. Factors affecting intestinal health in poultry. Poult Sci. 87(10):2052–63. Epub 2008/09/24. doi: 10.3382/ps.2008-00091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Zeng MY, Inohara N, Nuñez G. 2016. Mechanisms of inflammation-driven bacterial dysbiosis in the gut. Mucosal Immunology. 10:18. doi: 10.1038/mi.2016.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Zhang W, Li Y, Niu J, Chen Y. 2013. Photogeneration of reactive oxygen species on uncoated silver, gold, nickel, and silicon nanoparticles and their antibacterial effects. Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids. 29(15):4647–51. Epub 2013/04/03. doi: 10.1021/la400500t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Zhu XY, Zhong T, Pandya Y, Joerger RD 2002. 16S rRNA-Based Analysis of Microbiota from the Cecum of Broiler Chickens. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 68(1):124–37. doi: 10.1128/aem.68.1.124-137.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES