Skip to main content
Food Chemistry: Molecular Sciences logoLink to Food Chemistry: Molecular Sciences
. 2022 Feb 14;4:100088. doi: 10.1016/j.fochms.2022.100088

Unravelling the neuroprotective mechanisms of carotenes in differentiated human neural cells: Biochemical and proteomic approaches

Kasthuri Bai Magalingam a, Sushela Devi Somanath b, Nagaraja Haleagrahara c, Kanga Rani Selvaduray d, Ammu Kutty Radhakrishnan a,
PMCID: PMC8991711  PMID: 35415676

Highlights

  • Total mixed carotenes (TMC) protect differentiated human neural cells against 6-hydroxydopamine-induced toxicity.

  • TMC elevated the antioxidant enzymes activities and suppressed generation of reactive oxygen species.

  • TMC augmented the dopamine and tyrosine hydroxylase levels.

  • TMC exerted differential protein expression in human neural cells.

Abbreviations: 6-OHDA, 6-hydroxydopamine; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; BCM, beta-carotene-15,15′-monooxygenase; CAT, catalase; DRD2, dopamine receptor D2; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; GO, gene ontology; HSP, Heat shock protein; HSPA9, Heat shock protein family A (HSP70) member 9; HSPD1, Heat shock protein family D (HSP60) member 1; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; LC-MS/MS, liquid chromatography-double mass spectrometry; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; MCODE, minimal common oncology data elements; MS, mass spectrometry; PD, Parkinson's disease; PDI, protein disulphide isomerases; PHB2, prohibitin 2; PPI, protein–protein interaction; RAN, Ras-related nuclear protein; ROS, reactive oxygen species; RPs, ribosomal proteins; SOD, superoxide dismutase; TH, tyrosine hydroxylase; TMC, total mixed carotene complex

Keywords: Mixed carotene, 6-hydroxydopamine, SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells, Dopamine

Abstract

Carotenoids, fat-soluble pigments found ubiquitously in plants and fruits, have been reported to exert significant neuroprotective effects against free radicals. However, the neuroprotective effects of total mixed carotenes complex (TMC) derived from virgin crude palm oil have not been studied extensively. Therefore, the present study was designed to establish the neuroprotective role of TMC on differentiated human neural cells against 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-induced cytotoxicity. The human neural cells were differentiated using retinoic acid for six days. Then, the differentiated neural cells were pre-treated for 24 hr with TMC before exposure to 6-OHDA. TMC pre-treated neurons showed significant alleviation of 6-OHDA-induced cytotoxicity as evidenced by enhanced activity of the superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) enzymes. Furthermore, TMC elevated the levels of intra-neuronal dopamine and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) in differentiated neural cells. The 6-OHDA induced overexpression of α-synuclein was significantly hindered in neural cells pre-treated with TMC. In proteomic analysis, TMC altered the expression of ribosomal proteins, α/β isotypes of tubulins, protein disulphide isomerases (PDI) and heat shock proteins (HSP) in differentiated human neural cells. The natural palm phytonutrient TMC is a potent antioxidant with significant neuroprotective effects against free radical-induced oxidative stress.

1. Introduction

Carotenoids are orange, yellow and red pigments found in plants and microorganisms like algae, fungi and bacteria. These tetraterpenoids, which are C40 hydrocarbons with isoprenoids as building units, can be divided into two groups based on their polarity, i.e. xanthophylls (polar) and carotene (non-polar) (Park, Hayden, Bannerman, Jansen, & Crowe-White, 2020). The polar xanthophylls such as astaxanthin, β-cryptoxanthin, lutein and zeaxanthin are commonly located across lipid bilayer membranes, while the non-polar carotenoids such as α-carotene, β-carotene and lycopene usually reside in the inner part of a cell membrane (Augustynska, 2015) (Widomska, Zareba, & Subczynski, 2016). The daily recommended dietary intake (RDI) of the three primary forms of carotenoids are: α-carotene more than 0.6 mg/day, β-carotene more than 4.0 mg/day and lutein more than 3.3 mg/day (Institute of Medicine (US) Panel on Dietary Antioxidants and Related Compounds, 2000).

The human brain, particularly the frontal cortex, is reported to be rich in sixteen carotenoids such as anhydrolutein, α-carotene, α-cryptoxanthin, β-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin, lycopene, lutein and zeaxanthin; and an age-related decline in total carotenoids was observed in the frontal lobe (Craft, Haitema, Garnett, Fitch, & Dorey, 2004). In addition, low levels of α-carotene, β-carotene and lycopene were detected in the serum of patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) with advanced stage compared to those with early disease onset (Kim et al., 2017). In this regard, the low level of serum carotenoids in PD patients may be caused by increased uptake of carotenes by brain neuronal cells rather than lacking them in the first place. Therefore, carotenes are potent antioxidants that may contribute to the longevity of neurons in the human brain and carotene deficiency may contribute to the development of neurodegenerative disease. A great deal of attention has been committed to delineating the molecular actions of carotene on neuronal cells, and one long-standing theory is its antioxidant effects against free radicals.

The reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging activity of β-carotene has been demonstrated using the highly sensitive and selective chemiluminescence pyrogallol-luminol and luminol-hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) assays (Chang, Chang, & Lai, 2013). A recent report showed that the administration of β-carotene provided neuroprotective effects in a controlled cortical impact model by suppressing the ROS levels, which reduced brain oedema following a traumatic brain injury (Chen et al., 2019). This study revealed that β-carotene augmented cognitive performance and neural functions by modulating the Nrf2/Keap1-mediated antioxidant pathway.

Lycopene, the non-polar derivative of carotene provides vegetables and fruits’ red-pink colour. Some of the beneficial activities of lycopene include superior bioavailability (Basu & Imrhan, 2006), heat stability during food processing (Colle, Lemmens, Van Buggenhout, Van Loey, & Hendrickx, 2010) and the ability to cross the blood-brain-barrier (Guo et al., 2019). Several neurodegenerative diseases are caused by dysregulation in Ca2+ signalling that impairs neurons’ electrical potential and synaptic loss (Pchitskaya, Popugaeva, & Bezprozvanny, 2018). However, a proper dietary intake of lycopene, β-carotene and astaxanthin have been shown to improve Ca2+ homeostasis in the brain (Rzajew, Radzik, & Rebas, 2020). Furthermore, Huang et al have demonstrated that lycopene protects neural stem cells by preventing apoptosis by inhibiting expression of Bax/Bcl-2, cytochrome C and caspase 3 and reducing intracellular build-up of hydrogen peroxide, oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation. This study also suggested that lycopene may be capable of stimulating nerve growth factor (NGF), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) from neural stem cells (Huang et al., 2018).

It is crucial to explore the cellular and molecular changes implicated by carotenes on human neural cells to better undertand the neuroprotective actions of these bioactive compounds. The proteomic approach using label-free mass spectrometry (MS) has enormous potential to provide a robust basis of the molecular mechanism on how natural phytonutrients modulate protein expressions in various cellular processes, including metabolism, respiration, cytoskeletal organisation, protein folding and ribosome biogenesis. The protein network interaction and pathway analysis of the altered biological, molecular and signalling pathways can be acquired through a statistical framework integrated with online bioinformatics tools such as Metascape (Zhou, Zhou, Pache, Chang, Khodabakhshi, Tanaseichuk, Benner, & Chanda, 2019), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) (Kanehisa, 2019) and DAVID TOOL (Wu, Hasan, & Chen, 2014). In the present study, we investigated the neuroprotective actions of TMC on differentiated SH-SY5Y human neural cells in relation to antioxidant activity, alteration in dopamine biosynthesis, expression of the dopamine receptor 2 (DRD2) gene as well as identification of proteins that are differentially expressed in these cells following exposure to TMC.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Materials

2.1.1. Total mixed carotene extract

The palm fruit-derived total mixed carotene (TMC) extract used in this study contained α-, β-, γ-carotenes and lycopene. It was a kind gift from ExcelVite Sdn. Bhd (Chemor, Malaysia).

2.1.2. Reagents and instrument

Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Media (DMEM) was purchased from Corning Incorporated (NY, USA), fetal bovine serum (FBS) was obtained from Biosera (Nuaille, France), non-essential amino acid (NEAA) and penicillin-streptomycin (P/S) were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (San Jose, USA) and 6-OHDA, levodopa, retinoic acid and WST cell proliferation (WST-1 reagent Cat. No. 11644807001) were purchased from MilliporeSigma (Burlington, USA). The LDH assay kit (Cat. No. 601170), ROS Detection Cell-Based Assay Kit (Cat. No. 601520), SOD assay kit (Cat. No. 706002) and Catalase Assay kit (Cat. No. 707002) were procured from Cayman chemical (Ann Arbor, USA). The Dopamine ELISA Kit assay kit (Cat. No. KA3838) was obtained from Abnova (Taipei city, Taiwan), ELISA Kit for Tyrosine Hydroxylase (Cat. No. SEB438Hu) was acquired from Cloud-Clone Corp (Katy, USA) and α-Synuclein (SNCA) (Human) assay kit (Cat. No. K4261) was bought from BioVision Incorporated (Milpitas, USA). The RNeasy® Plus Mini Kit (Cat. No. 74134) was obtained from Qiagen (Hilden, Germany), 2x qPCRBIO SyGreen 1-Step Mix and 20x RTase with RNase inhibitor (Cat. No. PB25.11-01) was procured from PCR Biosystems (London, UK) and human primers: All-in-One™ qPCR Primer for Human DRD2 [NM_016574.2] and All-in-One™ qPCR Primer for Human GAPDH [NM_002046.6] were acquired from Genecopoeia Inc (Rockville, USA). The EasyPrep Mini MS Sample Prep kit (Cat. No. A40006) was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (San Jose, USA). The absorbance was taken using the SpectramaxM microplate reader that was obtained from Molecular Devices (San Jose, USA), The CT values were generated from the iQ5 Optical Module PCR Detection System provided by Bio-Rad (Hercules, USA) and the proteomic data were collected from the Agilent 1200 HPLC-Chip/MS Interface connected with Agilent 6550 iFunnel Q-TOF LC/MS provided by Agilent (Santa Clara, USA).

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Differentiation and culture of the SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells

The SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells (CRL-2266, ATCC, VA, USA) were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% NEAA and 1% P/S at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% carbon dioxide. The SH-SY5Y cells were differentiated to matured homogenous dopaminergic neurons as previously described (Magalingam, Radhakrishnan, Somanath, Md, & Haleagrahara, 2020). Briefly, the SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells were adjusted to 1x105 cells/mL in complete medium and seeded in various culture flasks at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator for 24 hr. The cell density was varied based on the culture vessels used for the different assays. For instance, for 96-well plates, 100 μL/well of the 1x105 cells/mL cell suspension was used, making it 1x104 cells/well; for 6-well plates, 4 mL of cell suspension was used (4x105 cells/well); for T75 flask, 10 mL of cell suspension was used (1x106 cells/flask). After 24 hr, the culture medium was replaced with a differentiating medium, which was similar to the culture medium except that it contained low serum (3% FBS) and 10 μM retinoic acid. The SH-SY5Y cells were maintained in the differentiating medium for three (3) days. The spent medium was replaced on the fourth day, and the plates/culture vessels were returned to the incubator. The cells were allowed to differentiate for 6 days. On day 7, prominent changes on the SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells that resemble human dopaminergic neural cells were observed. These cells were used to investigate the neuroprotective effect of TMC against 6-OHDA -induced toxicity. For cell viability and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assays, 96-well plates were used and for the antioxidant and dopamine biosynthesis assays, 6-well plates were used. Finally, the cells were cultured in T75 flasks for gene expression and proteomic studies.

2.2.2. Experimental protocol

The differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells were pre-treated with TMC (0.1 μg/mL) for 24 h at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator. The TMC concentration of 0.1 μg/mL was selected based on the preliminary cytotoxicity assessment, which used a wider range of TMC concentrations (0–20 μg/mL) (data not shown). After 24 h of exposure to TMC, the neurotoxin 6-OHDA was added to the differentiated neural cells. This chemical induces selective cytotoxic damage on human neural cells. The neuroprotective potential of the TMC on the differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells was evaluated using various biochemical assays. Levodopa (0.1 μg/mL), a standard drug used in the treatment of PD, was included in this study as a drug control.

In proteomics assay, the differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells were treated with TMC or 6-OHDA for 24 h, and total protein was extracted from the cell lysate and digestion prior to analysis using the liquid chromatography with double mass spectrophotometry (LC-MS/MS). The alteration in the protein expression following TMC or 6-OHDA treatment on the differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells was compared with the protein expression in untreated control cells.

2.2.3. Biochemical study

2.2.3.1. Cell viability assay

The differentiated SH-SY5Y human neural cell were pre-treated with TMC at 37 °C for 24 hr in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator before they were exposed to 6-OHDA. To perform the cell viability assay, 10 μL of the WST-1 cell proliferation reagent was added to each well. The culture plate was mixed thoroughly for 1 min using an orbital shaker and returned to the incubator for 2 hr. The developed formazan dye was quantified by measuring the absorbance at the wavelength of 450 nm (reference wavelength of 630 nm) using a spectrophotometer. The percentage (%) of viable cells was calculated using the formula shown below:

Absorbance of test – background*
X 100%
Absorbance of negative control – background*
*Background: blank i.e. well with no cells
2.2.3.2. Lactate dehydrogenase assay

The differentiated SH-SY5Y cells were pre-treated with TMC for 24 hr and subsequently exposed to 6-OHDA for another day. For this experiment, wells with 20 μL of Triton X-100 (provided with the kit) and 20 μL of assay buffer (provided with the kit) were included as controls. At the end of the treatment period, the culture supernatant was harvested by centrifugation (1500 g for 10 min at 4 °C) and stored at −80 °C prior to analysis. To perform the LDH assay, 100 μL of the sample was placed in each 96-well plate with 100 μL of LDH Reaction Solution (provided with the kit). Then, the culture plate was incubated for 30 min on an orbital shaker. The absorbance was read at 490 nm using the microplate reader. The Triton X-100 treated wells were regarded as “maximum release” and other test samples as “spontaneous release samples”. The background reading was subtracted from all wells and the % cytotoxicity was calculated as follows:

% Cytotoxicity of test sample =

(Experimental Value A490) – (Spontaneous release)
X 100%
(Maximum Release A490) – (Spontaneous release)
* Background was subtracted from all wells
2.2.3.3. Reactive oxygen species assay

The SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells were seeded on a black tissue culture-treated 96-well plate, differentiated and treated according to the experimental set-up. The ROS assay was performed at the end of the treatment procedure using the ROS Detection Cell-Based Assay Kit. Briefly, the culture medium was aspirated from the 96-well culture plate, and ROS staining buffer (provided with the kit) was added to the wells. Then, the plate was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Following the incubation, the ROS staining buffer was aspirated, and cell-based assay buffer (provided with the kit) was added to the wells. The intensity of the fluorescence dye was measured using 490 nm excitation and 525 nm emission wavelengths using the microplate reader.

2.2.3.4. Superoxide dismutase assay

The TMC treated neural cells were homogenized, and cell lysates were prepared. As recommended in the SOD assay kit, the cell lysates were mixed with the diluted radical detector (provided with the kit). The reaction was triggered by adding the diluted xanthine oxidase (provided with the kit) with the precise time taken. The plate was incubated on a shaker for 30 min at room temperature, and the absorbance was recorded at 450 nm using the microplate reader.

2.2.3.5. Catalase assay

Cell lysates were prepared for all treated samples as recommended in the Catalase Assay kit. The experiment was performed by mixing the cell lysates with diluted Assay buffer and methanol (provided with the kit). The peroxidatic reaction was triggered by adding the hydrogen peroxide (provided with the kit) and subsequently incubating the plate for 20 min on a shaker. Then, the reaction was ceased by adding the potassium hydroxide followed by the addition of the catalase purpald (provided with the kit) and the plate was incubated for 10 min. Finally, catalase potassium periodate (provided with the kit) was added and the plate was incubated for 5 min. The colorimetric changes were quantitated at 540 nm wavelength using the plate reader.

2.2.3.6. Dopamine assay

The dopamine level in homogenized neuronal cell lysates was estimated using the Dopamine ELISA Kit assay kit in three key steps – extraction, acylation and enzymatic assay. In the extraction step, cell lysates were placed into the respective wells of the extraction plate (provided with the kit). Ultrapure water and TE buffer (provided with the kit) were added to the respective wells, and the plate was incubated for 60 min at room temperature (RT) on a shaker (approx. 600 rpm). Following the incubation, the plate was thoroughly rinsed using wash buffer (provided with the kit) and blotted to remove the remnants of the buffer. In the acylation step, Acylation buffer (provided with the kit) and Acylation reagent (provided with the kit) were added to the extraction plate and incubated for 15 min. Then, the plate was vigorously washed with wash buffer (provided with the kit) and blotted before adding hydrochloric acid into the wells and incubated for 10 min on a shaker. The acylated samples (from the extraction plate) were transferred into the 96-well microtiter plate, followed by adding enzyme solution. Next, the microtiter plate was incubated for 2 h at 37 °C on a shaker. Then, the supernatant was transferred into the pre-coated dopamine microtiter strips (provided with the kit). The dopamine antiserum (provided with the kit) was added into the wells before incubating for 15–20 h at 2–8 °C. Following the incubation step, the plate was thoroughly rinsed with wash buffer (provided with the kit). After the washing step, enzyme conjugate (provided with the kit) was pipetted into the wells and incubated for 30 min on a shaker. The plate was washed and blotted before adding substrate (provided with the kit) and further incubated for 25 min on a shaker. Finally, the stop solution (provided with the kit) was added, and absorbance of dye development was measured using a microplate reader at 450 nm with reference wavelength at 630 nm.

2.2.3.7. Tyrosine hydroxylase assay

The tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) assay was performed as instructed in the ELISA Kit for Tyrosine Hydroxylase. Briefly, the homogenized cell lysates were added into the pre-coated strip plate accordingly and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. Subsequently, the plate was emptied by blotting the plate before adding the detection reagent A (provided with the kit) and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. Then, the strip plate was thoroughly rinsed before adding the reagent B (provided with the kit), and the plate was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Following this, a substrate solution (provided with the kit) was added and further incubated for 20 min at 37 °C. Finally, the stop solution (provided with the kit) was added, and the development of the dye was estimated at 450 nm using the microplate reader.

2.2.3.8. Alpha synuclein assay

The level of alpha-synuclein in treated differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells was estimated using the α-Synuclein (SNCA) (Human) assay kit. Firstly, culture supernatants were added into the ELISA plate (provided with the kit) and incubated for 1.5 h at 37 °C. Following the incubation, the plate was rinsed with 1X wash solution (provided with the kit), added with biotin-detection antibody (provided with the kit) and incubated at 37 °C for 60 min. After the incubation, the plate was washed thoroughly with 1X wash solution (provided with the kit). The horseradish peroxidase-streptavidin conjugate (SABC) (provided with the kit) was added into the wells and the plate was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Subsequently, the plate was vigorously washed with 1X wash solution (provided with the kit) before adding the 3,3′,5,5′-Tetramethylbenzidine or TMB substrate (provided with the kit). Next, the plate was further incubated for 30 min. Finally, the stop solution (provided with the kit) was added, and the colour development was quantitated at 450 nm using a microplate reader.

2.2.3.9. DRD2 gene expression

The treated differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells were isolated and RNA extraction was performed according to the manufacturer’s instruction in the RNeasy® Plus Mini Kit. The quality and concentration of the extracted RNA were estimated via the NanoQuantTM technique using the spectrophotometer. The RNA samples were stored at −80 °C prior to real-time (RT)-PCR analysis. The RT-PCR analysis was performed on 20 μL of reagent volume consisting of 10 pg of RNA template prepared in PCR grade distilled water, 2 ng/μL All-in-One™ qPCR Primer for Human DRD2, 2x qPCRBIO SyGreen 1-Step Mix and 20x RTase with RNase inhibitor. For normalization of RT-PCR data, All-in-One™ qPCR Primer for Human GAPDH gene was included as the housekeeping gene. The instrument condition was set at 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 5 s, followed by annealing and extension steps, each at 60 °C for 30 s. All experiments were performed in triplicates. A dissociation curve analysis was performed at the end of the 40 cycles to ascertain the amplification specificity using the iQ5 Optical Module PCR Detection System. The difference in gene expression of the DRD2 (target gene [TG]) and GAPDH (reference gene [RG]) was compared between TMC + 6-OHDA (target sample [TS]) and 6-OHDA alone (reference sample [RS]) using the formulae: 2^(−ΔΔCt) {ΔCt = Ct[TG] – Ct[RG]; ΔΔCt = ΔCt[TS] – ΔCt[RS]} (Rao, Huang, Zhou, & Lin, 2013)

2.2.4. Proteomic study

2.2.4.1. Protein extraction, reduction and alkylation

After the treatment protocol, cells were harvested and recovered by centrifugation (1000 g for 10 min at 4 °C). The pellet was collected, and the total protein extraction was performed using the EasyPrep Mini MS Sample Prep kit. Briefly, lysis buffer (provided with the kit) and universal nuclease (provided with the kit) were added to the cell pellets and mixed until the sample's viscosity was lessened. The extracted protein samples were stored at − 80 °C until further use. In the protein reduction step, the protein samples were thawed and 100 µg of protein was transferred into microtubes. A final volume for each sample was adjusted to 100 µL with lysis solution (provided with the kit). Then, a reduction solution (provided with the kit) was added and mixed gently. Following this, alkylation solution (provided with the kit) was added to the tubes. These tubes were incubated at 95 °C using a heat block for 10 min to allow the reduction and alkylation reactions to occur. Then, samples were cooled and subjected to Trypsin/Lys-C protein digestion procedure.

2.2.4.2. Protein digestion and clean-up

The enzyme for the digestion step was prepared by mixing the enzyme reconstitution solution (provided with the kit) with Trypsin/Lys-C-Protease mix (provided with the kit). Subsequently, the reconstituted Trypsin/Lys-C-Protease mix was added to each tube containing the samples. The tubes were incubated at 37 °C with shaking for 3 h to allow protein digestion to occur. Following the 3 h, the digestion stop solution (provided with the kit) was added to each tube to terminate the digestion process. After the peptide digestion, peptide cleaning was carried out using the peptide clean-up column (provided with the kit) to eliminate any contaminants present in the samples. The digested peptides were transferred into the peptide clean-up column and centrifuged. The flow-through from the column was discarded. Next, wash solution A (provided with the kit) was added into the column and centrifuged with flow-through discarded after the spin. This step was repeated using wash solution B (provided with the kit). Finally, the column was placed on sterile collection tubes, and elution solution (provided with the kit) was added to each column. The eluted peptide samples were collected by centrifugation, dried using a vacuum centrifuge and stored at −80 °C before LC-MS/MS analysis.

2.2.4.3. Liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry analysis

The Trypsin/Lys-C-Protease digested peptides were loaded into the Agilent 1200 HPLC-Chip/MS Interface connected with Agilent 6550 iFunnel Q-TOF LC/MS. The column was equilibrated with 0.1% formic acid in water (solution A). The peptides were eluted from the column with 90% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid in water (solution B). Quadrupole-time of flight (Q-TOF) polarity was set at positive with capillary and fragmenter voltage at 1900 V and 360 V, respectively, and 5 L/min of gas flow with a temperature of 325 °C. The collision energy was determined at 3.7 V (100 Da), and reference masses with positive polarity was set at 299.294457 and 1221.990637. The peptide spectrum was analysed in auto MS mode ranging from 110 to 3000 m/z for MS scan and 50–3000 m/z for MS/MS scan.

2.2.4.4. Data calculation and bioinformatic analysis

The raw data were obtained and processed using PEAKS X software (Bioinformatics Solutions Inc., Waterloo, ON, Canada) using Uniprot, Swissprot and TrEMBL databases. The PEAKS X software allows for the determination of the protein abundance using the following search parameters: retention time lower bound: ≥ 0, retention time upper bound: ≤ 55, average area: ≥ 0, charge lower bound: ≥ 1, confident number samples per group: ≥ 1, peptide identification count: ≥ 1, protein significance: ≥ 20, used peptides: ≥ 1, fixed modification: Carbamidomethylation of cysteine residues and false discovery rate (FDR): 1% in three biological replicate injections. The obtained peptide/protein list was exported to Microsoft Excel for further downstream computation. Proteins expressed in at least 2 biological samples were filtered out, while proteins that only existed in one biological replicate were eliminated from the data set. The TMC or 6-OHDA implicated proteins were compared independently with proteins regulated in untreated SH-SY5Y neural cells. Proteins expressing statistically significant (p<0.05) differences were identified and further scrutinized for function-relevant gene annotations and protein-protein interaction networks using the Metascape tool (https://metascape.org/gp/index.html). The TMC and 6-OHDA implicated significant protein sets were imputed into the Metascape interface with the default parameter set. The process and pathway enrichment analysis for each protein set were carried out using the gene ontology sources, including GO Biological Processes, KEGG pathway, Reactome Gene Sets, Canonical Pathways, PANTHER Pathway CORUM and WikiPathways. According to Metascape analysis, all genes in the genome have been used as the enrichment background. Terms with a p < 0.01, a minimum count of 3, and an enrichment factor >1.5 (the enrichment factor is the ratio between the observed counts and the counts expected by chance) are collected and grouped into clusters based on their membership similarities. More specifically, p-values are calculated based on the accumulative hypergeometric distribution, and q-values are calculated using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure to account for multiple tests. Kappa scores are used as the similarity metric when performing hierarchical clustering on the enriched terms, and sub-trees with a similarity of >0.3 are considered a cluster. The most statistically significant term within a cluster is chosen to represent the cluster. In order to capture the relationships between the terms, a subset of enriched terms have been selected and rendered as a network plot, where terms with a similarity >0.3 are connected by edges. We selected the terms with the best p-values from each of the 20 clusters, with the constraint that there are no more than 15 terms per cluster and no more than 250 terms in total. Subsequently, the protein-protein interaction enrichment analysis for each protein set (6-OHDA or TMC) was executed using STRING, BioGrid, OmniPath, InWeb_IM databases. The generated PPI network contains the subset of proteins that form physical interactions with at least one other member in the list. If the network contains between 3 and 500 proteins, the Molecular Complex Detection (MCODE) algorithm has been applied to identify densely connected network components. The independent MCODE component analysis was performed, and the three best-scoring terms by p-values have been identified as the functional description of the corresponding component. The Metascape analysis enabled the identification of significantly overexpressed functional protein clusters, PPI network and PPI MCODE components (unit) associated with PD.

2.2.4.5. Venn diagram analysis

We cross-checked with the gene sets present in PD databases to identify the important TMC modulated PD associated genes in the set of 87 differentially regulated genes. For this objective, we queried three PD-specific databases, namely: Beegle, a disease-gene discovery database that narrows down the high-probability of disease-causing genes obtained from gene sequencing, linkage analysis and association studies (http://beegle.esat.kuleuven.be/) (ElShal et al., 2016); DisGeNet, a discovery platform that contains collections of data from expert-curated repositories, GWAS catalogues, animal model and scientific literature (https://www.disgenet.org/) (Piñero et al., 2017); Gene4PD, an integrative genomic database and analytic platform for PD (http://genemed.tech/gene4pd/home). Using the keyword “(Parkinson’s disease)”, a total of 194 PD-associated genes were retrieved from Beegle, 1515 genes from DisGeNet and 3222 genes from Gene4PD databases. Then, we matched the differentially regulated genes by TMC on neural cells to the PD associated genes in these three databases. The TMC implicated genes that matched the PD-causing genes in these databases were identified, and a Venn diagram was constructed to illustrate the overlapping of these genes. A histogram was also constructed to visualize some of the genes/proteins that exhibited a significant (p < 0.05) difference in expression between 6-OHDA and TMC treatments.

2.2.5. Statistical analysis

For the biochemical study, the experiments were repeated three times in triplicates and data from one experiment was shown as mean ± SEM. The differences between the treatment groups were determined using one-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test. In proteomic data analysis, differentially expressed proteins implicated by TMC or 6-OHDA were compared with untreated neural cells using a two-tailed Student's t-test. The analysis for biochemical and proteomic studies was conducted using SPSS Ins. Software (SPSS Statistics, V22.0.0). A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. TMC enhanced differentiated human neural cells viability in 6-OHDA induced toxicity

Before investigating the neuroprotective effect of TMC, we evaluated the dose-response of 6-OHDA on differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells to identify the concentration of 6-OHDA that induces approximately 50% cell death. After 24 h exposure with 6-OHDA, there was a marked reduction in cell viability compared to untreated control. The decline in cell viability, which started at 7.5 μg/mL 6-OHDA, peaked around 15.0 μg/mL 6-OHDA (Fig. 1A). The concentration of 6-OHDA that caused 50% cell death or IC50 (58.23 ± 4.0; p < 0.01) was determined to be 10 μg/mL (Fig. 1A). Hence, this concentration of 6-OHDA was used in the subsequent assays. We also assessed the effects of treating the differentiated SH-SY5Y cells with different concentrations (0.01 μg/mL to 20 μg/mL) of TMC and levodopa (data not shown) and from these preliminary studies, we identified that a low concentration (0.1 μg/mL) of TMC or levodopa provided neuroprotective effects within 24 h of the pre-treatment. There was a marked reduction in the viability of the differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells when exposed to 6-OHDA [59.8% ± 1.4, (p < 0.05)] compared to untreated cells (Fig. 1B). However, pre-treatment with TMC prior to exposure to 6-OHDA, caused a significant increase in cell viability [83.52% ± 1.1 (p < 0.001)] (Fig. 1B). A similar increase in cell viability was observed when the cells were pre-treated with levodopa (85.8% ± 1.1) prior to exposure to 6-OHDA (Fig. 1B). In addition, pre-treatment with TMC or levodopa prior to exposure to 6-OHDA, cause a marked decrease (p < 0.01) in the levels of LDH produced (Fig. 1C).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

(A) The effects of exposing the differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells to different concentrations of 6-OHDA (0–20 μg/mL) for 24 hr to identify the IC50 concentration of 6-OHDA. Cell viability was determined using WST-1 cell proliferation assay and is expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 3). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (6-OHDA treatment (2.5–20 μg/mL) vs untreated control. The effects of pre-treating the differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells to TMC (0.1 μg/mL) for 24 hr prior exposure to IC50 concentration of 6-OHDA (10 μg/mL) for a further 24 hr (B) cell viability analysis and (C) LDH release. In both (B) and (C), pre-treatment with levodopa (0.1 μg/mL) was included as positive control; while cells pre-treated with just culture medium served as negative control. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 3). #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 (6-OHDA vs control & compound alone vs control); **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (TMC + 6-OHDA vs 6-OHDA & levodopa + 6-OHDA vs 6-OHDA).

3.2. TMC suppressed ROS generation and augmented antioxidant enzymes

To study the antioxidant effects of TMC, we examined the ROS generation (Fig. 2A) and activities of two endogenous antioxidant enzymes, namely SOD (Fig. 2B) and CAT (Fig. 2C). Our study showed a marked upsurge in ROS generation by the differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells exposed to 6-OHDA for 24 hr compared to untreated cells. However, pre-treating neuronal cells with TMC for 24 hr prior to exposure to 6-OHDA caused a significant reduction in ROS generation with p < 0.05. The treatment of differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells with 6-OHDA for 24 hr resulted in a marked decline in SOD and CAT enzyme activities compared to the untreated control group. However, the SOD and CAT enzyme activities were significantly increased in differentiated SH-SY5Y pre-treated with TMC (p < 0.01) prior to treatment with 6-OHDA compared to 6-OHDA alone group.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Alterations in (A) ROS generation, (B) SOD levels and (C) CAT levels in the differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells following pre-treatment with TMC (0.1 μg/mL) or levodopa (0.1 μg/mL) prior to exposure to 6-OHDA (10 μg/mL). The effect of treating the differentiated SH-SY5Y cells with TMC (0.1 μg/mL) or levodopa (0.1 μg/mL) in the absence of 6-OHDA are included for comparison. Pre-treatment with levodopa was included as positive control; while cells pre-treated with just culture medium served as negative control. Results are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 3). #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 (6-OHDA vs control & test compound alone vs control]; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 (TMC + 6-OHDA vs 6-OHDA).

3.3. TMC altered dopamine, TH, α-synuclein levels and DRD2 mRNA fold change in differentiated human neural cells

To evaluate the influence of TMC on the dopamine biosynthesis pathway, we quantitated the levels of dopamine (Fig. 3A), TH (Fig. 3B) and α-synuclein (Fig. 3C) produced by the differentiated SH-SY5Y cells treated 6-OHDA in the absence or presence of TMC treatment. Our study revealed that exposure of human neural cells to 6-OHDA significantly attenuated the intraneuronal dopamine and TH levels but overexpressed the α-synuclein level. However, pre-treating the differentiated human neural cells with TMC for 24 hr prior to 6-OHDA exposure, caused a significant elevation in dopamine (p < 0.01) and TH (p < 0.001) levels when compared to cells treated with 6-OHDA alone. Moreover, TMC also blocked the 6-OHDA induced overexpression of α-synuclein (p < 0.001) from these cells. Similar neuroprotective effects were also observed with levodopa pre-treatment and subsequent 6-OHDA exposure on dopamine, TH and α-synuclein levels. The expression of the DRD2 mRNA fold change in the differentiated SH-SY5Y cells treated with 6-OHDA in the absence or presence of TMC or levodopa was analysed using quantitative real time PCR assay. The gene expression results were normalized with the Ct values of the GAPDH housekeeping gene (Fig. 3D). Pre-treatment with TMC increased the DRD2 mRNA fold change [2.88 ± 0.0 (p < 0.01)] in differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells compared to cells treated with 6-OHDA (1.60 ± 0.0). In contrast, no significant change in DRD2 fold change was noted in differentiated neural cells pre-treated with levodopa.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

The effects of treating the differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells to TMC (0.1 μg/mL) in the absence and presence of exposure to 6-OHDA (10 μg/mL) on (A) dopamine levels; (B) TH levels; (C) α-synuclein levels and (D) expression of the DRD2 mRNA fold change. The levels of dopamine, TH and α-synuclein were quantified using commercial kits using the respective manufacturer recommended protocol while the expression of the DRD2 gene was determine using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Pre-treatment with Levodopa was included as positive control; while cells pre-treated with just culture medium served as negative control. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 3). #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 (6-OHDA vs control & treatment compound vs control); **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (TMC + 6-OHDA vs 6-OHDA).

3.4. Label-free mass spectrophotometry quantification of differentially expressed protein

The alteration in protein expression following 24 hr exposure of differentiated neural cells to 6-OHDA (10 μg/mL) or TMC (0.1 μg/mL) was performed using label-free tandem liquid mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). These proteins were compared against untreated differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells. The PEAKS X + software was used to filter the data according to the set criteria. Only proteins with at least one confidence peptide with false discovery rate (FDR) less than or equal to 0.01 (FDR ≤ 0.01) in all three biological replicates per treatment condition were included in analysis.

A total of 3636 proteins were identified in the triplicates of differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells treated with 6-OHDA. Out of these proteins, 687 proteins were common in the three biological replicates of the 6-OHDA treated cells. When compared with the untreated control, there was a total of 188 proteins that were common between 6-OHDA treated and untreated SH-SY5Y neural cells. Among these 188 proteins, 100 proteins displayed a significant difference with p < 0.05 between 6-OHDA treatment and untreated controls: with 61 upregulated and 39 downregulated proteins with p < 0.05. The top three proteins that were markedly upregulated in the differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells treated with 6-OHDA were histone H2B type 2-F (HIST2H2BF), Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) and histone H2B type 1-H (HIST1H2BH) while the top three proteins that were down-regulated were histone H2B type 1-N (HIST1H2BN), heat shock protein beta-1 (HSPB1) and Histone H2B type 1-D (HIST1H2BD) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Proteins that were (A) up or (B) down-regulated proteins in differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells following exposure to 6-OHDA.

(A) Upregulated proteins
Accession Protein description Gene symbol Average mass p value **Fold change
Q5QNW6 Histone H2B type 2-F HIST2H2BF 27,840 2.00E-02 2.062
P14174 Macrophage migration inhibitory factor MIF 24,952 1.33E-02 2.062
Q93079 Histone H2B type 1-H HIST1H2BH 27,784 1.80E-02 1.925
P12277 Creatine kinase B-type CKB 85,288 4.29E-02 1.880
P11021 Endoplasmic reticulum chaperone BiP HSPA5 144,666 3.32E-02 1.696
Q14103 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein D0 HNRNPD 76,868 1.03E-02 1.695
P63104 14-3-3 protein zeta/delta YWHAZ 55,490 2.31E-03 1.638
P68431 Histone H3.1 HIST1H3A 30,808 3.61E-02 1.539
Q13509 Tubulin beta-3 chain TUBB3 100,866 3.10E-03 1.479
O15240 Neurosecretory protein VGF VGF 134,516 5.50E-07 1.425
Q9P0M6 Core histone macro-H2A.2 H2AFY2 80,116 3.38E-03 1.377
P60709 Actin cytoplasmic 1 ACTB 83,474 4.43E-04 1.356
P52565 Rho GDP-dissociation inhibitor 1 ARHGDIA 46,414 2.74E-04 1.343
P24752 Acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase mitochondrial ACAT1 90,400 9.43E-03 1.268
P08758 Annexin A5 ANXA5 71,874 6.85E-03 1.252
P25705 ATP synthase subunit alpha mitochondrial ATP5F1A 119,502 5.29E-03 1.240
P57053 Histone H2B type F-S H2BFS 27,888 7.78E-03 1.233
P14625 Endoplasmin HSP90B1 184,938 4.45E-02 1.228
P0DP25 Calmodulin-3 CALM3 33,676 5.93E-03 1.208
Q16555 Dihydropyrimidinase-related protein 2 DPYSL2 124,588 2.02E-02 1.198
P06899 Histone H2B type 1-J HIST1H2BJ 27,808 1.13E-04 1.186
P61978 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K HNRNPK 101,952 3.08E-02 1.175
P05141 ADP/ATP translocase 2 SLC25A5 65,704 4.21E-02 1.173
P33778 Histone H2B type 1-B HIST1H2BB 27,900 2.00E-02 1.156
P45880 Voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 2 VDAC2 63,134 3.02E-05 1.133
P60174 Triosephosphate isomerase TPI1 61,582 3.45E-02 1.126
P49327 Fatty acid synthase FASN 546,848 2.43E-04 1.126
P06733 Alpha-enolase ENO1 94,338 1.53E-04 1.122
Q9UJZ1 Stomatin-like protein 2 mitochondrial STOML2 77,068 3.50E-02 1.116
P06744 Glucose-6-phosphate isomerase GPI 126,294 2.12E-02 1.116
P30153 Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A 65 kDa regulatory subunit A alpha isoform PPP2R1A 130,618 4.75E-02 1.108
Q9Y277 Voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 3 VDAC3 61,318 7.24E-03 1.104
P21796 Voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 1 VDAC1 61,546 1.45E-02 1.103
P27824 Calnexin CANX 135,136 6.53E-04 1.100
Q9BUF5 Tubulin beta-6 chain TUBB6 99,714 1.81E-02 1.093
P16104 Histone H2AX H2AFX 30,290 4.24E-02 1.093
P63261 Actin cytoplasmic 2 ACTG1 83,586 2.54E-02 1.092
P62249 40S ribosomal protein S16 RPS16 32,890 4.78E-02 1.080
P0DP23 Calmodulin-1 OS = Homo sapiens CALM1 33,676 1.13E-02 1.078
O75367 Core histone macro-H2A.1 H2AFY 79,234 1.13E-02 1.078
P23527 Histone H2B type 1-O HIST1H2BO 27,812 1.13E-02 1.078
Q71U36 Tubulin alpha-1A chain TUBA1A 100,272 1.13E-02 1.078
P30041 Peroxiredoxin-6 PRDX6 50,070 1.98E-02 1.076
P40939 Trifunctional enzyme subunit alpha mitochondrial HADHA 166,000 4.01E-03 1.071
P68032 Actin alpha cardiac muscle 1 ACTC1 84,038 1.19E-02 1.067
P10809 60 kDa heat shock protein mitochondrial HSPD1 122,110 1.19E-02 1.067
P61604 10 kDa heat shock protein mitochondrial HSPE1 21,864 1.19E-02 1.067
Q06830 Peroxiredoxin-1 PRDX1 44,220 1.19E-02 1.067
P68363 Tubulin alpha-1B chain TUBA1B 100,304 1.19E-02 1.067
Q9BVA1 Tubulin beta-2B chain TUBB2B 99,906 1.19E-02 1.067
P49411 Elongation factor Tu mitochondrial TUFM 99,084 1.19E-02 1.067
P55072 Transitional endoplasmic reticulum ATPase VCP 178,644 1.19E-02 1.067
P07195 L-lactate dehydrogenase B chain LDHB 73,278 4.58E-04 1.066
P36578 60S ribosomal protein L4 RPL4 95,394 1.59E-03 1.066
P07437 Tubulin beta chain TUBB 99,342 6.86E-03 1.065
P62841 40S ribosomal protein S15 RPS15 34,080 2.39E-03 1.062
P62851 40S ribosomal protein S25 RPS25 27,484 2.94E-04 1.061
P27797 Calreticulin CALR 96,284 2.66E-02 1.058
P62081 40S ribosomal protein S7 RPS7 44,254 2.25E-03 1.049
P62753 40S ribosomal protein S6 RPS6 57,362 2.15E-03 1.037
Q15084 Protein disulfide-isomerase A6 PDIA6 96,242 5.39E-03 1.009
(B) Down-regulated proteins
Accession Protein description Gene symbol Average mass p value **Fold change
Q99877 Histone H2B type 1-N HIST1H2BN 27,844 2.19E-02 0.523
P04792 Heat shock protein beta-1 HSPB1 45,566 1.29E-02 0.573
P58876 Histone H2B type 1-D HIST1H2BD 27,872 3.09E-02 0.623
P31150 Rab GDP dissociation inhibitor alpha GDI1 101,166 1.56E-02 0.638
P62805 Histone H4 HIST1H4A 22,734 3.50E-03 0.643
Q99879 Histone H2B type 1-M HIST1H2BM 27,978 1.97E-02 0.694
Q12905 Interleukin enhancer-binding factor 2 ILF2 86,124 1.97E-02 0.694
P23284 Peptidyl-prolyl cis–trans isomerase B PPIB 47,486 2.45E-02 0.712
P13639 Elongation factor 2 EEF2 190,676 3.02E-02 0.716
P32119 Peroxiredoxin-2 PRDX2 43,784 1.48E-02 0.730
P00338 L-lactate dehydrogenase A chain LDHA 73,378 2.52E-02 0.732
P07355 Annexin A2 ANXA2 77,208 1.66E-02 0.734
Q00610 Clathrin heavy chain 1 CLTC 383,226 9.96E-08 0.736
P29373 Cellular retinoic acid-binding protein 2 CRABP2 31,386 9.96E-08 0.736
Q08211 ATP-dependent RNA helicase A DHX9 281,916 9.96E-08 0.736
Q13263 Transcription intermediary factor 1-beta TRIM28 177,100 2.66E-02 0.744
P07602 Prosaposin PSAP 116,226 2.58E-03 0.751
P23246 Splicing factor proline- and glutamine-rich SFPQ 152,300 3.01E-04 0.752
P0DP24 Calmodulin-2 CALM2 33,676 2.98E-02 0.767
P35232 Prohibitin PHB 59,608 2.24E-02 0.767
P09936 Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase isozyme L1 UCHL1 49,648 1.03E-03 0.783
P62304 Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein E SNRPE 21,608 1.22E-03 0.784
P62318 Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein Sm D3 SNRPD3 27,832 8.24E-03 0.789
P06576 ATP synthase subunit beta mitochondrial ATP5F1B 113,120 7.24E-04 0.792
Q99714 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase type-2 HSD17B10 53,846 4.07E-03 0.795
P62807 Histone H2B type 1-C/E/F/G/I HIST1H2BC 27,812 3.38E-02 0.797
P68104 Elongation factor 1-alpha 1 EEF1A1 100,282 1.49E-02 0.809
O60814 Histone H2B type 1-K HIST1H2BK 27,780 3.98E-02 0.815
P38646 Stress-70 protein mitochondrial HSPA9 147,362 4.18E-03 0.816
P30049 ATP synthase subunit delta mitochondrial ATP5F1D 34,980 2.18E-02 0.818
P62829 60S ribosomal protein L23 RPL23 29,730 4.51E-02 0.877
P37802 Transgelin-2 TAGLN2 44,782 6.85E-03 0.878
P62826 GTP-binding nuclear protein Ran RAN 48,846 6.19E-04 0.883
P46782 40S ribosomal protein S5 RPS5 45,752 2.69E-02 0.883
Q16778 Histone H2B type 2-E HIST2H2BE 27,840 2.79E-03 0.889
P30101 Protein disulfide-isomerase A3 PDIA3 113,564 4.50E-02 0.912
P19338 Nucleolin NCL 153,230 4.36E-02 0.926
Q99623 Prohibitin-2 PHB2 66,592 2.65E-03 0.950
Q05639 Elongation factor 1-alpha 2 EEF1A2 100,940 7.45E-04 0.954

**Compared to untreated cells.

A total of 3715 proteins were differentially expressed in the differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells treated with TMC, with 838 proteins sharing the common data sets. When the protein profiles from the TMC treatment were compared with that of the untreated differentiated SH-SY5Y cells, a total of 202 proteins were found to match both protein data sets with a total of 87 proteins exhibiting differential expression that were statistically significant (p < 0.05); of which 53 proteins were upregulated, and 34 proteins were downregulated. The top three proteins that were markedly upregulated in the differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells treated with TMC were dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase mitochondrial (DLD), neuroblast differentiation-associated protein (AHNAK) and vimentin (VIM). While the top three proteins that were down-regulated include citrate synthase mitochondrial (CS), calnexin (CANX) and transcription intermediary factor-1 beta (TRIM28) were the top 3 down-regulated proteins (Table 2).

Table 2.

Proteins that were (A) up or (B) down-regulated proteins in differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells following exposure to TMC.

(A) Upregulated proteins
Accession Protein description Gene symbol Average mass p value fold change
P09622 Dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase mitochondrial DLD 54,177 1.26E-03 2.48
Q09666 Neuroblast differentiation-associated protein AHNAK 629,114 7.64E-03 2.46
P08670 Vimentin VIM 53,652 5.78E-04 2.46
Q07021 Complement component 1 Q subcomponent-binding protein mitochondrial C1QBP 31,362 2.16E-02 1.72
P07355 Annexin A2 ANXA2 38,604 2.64E-05 1.68
P35637 RNA-binding protein FUS FUS 53,426 5.42E-03 1.65
P07237 Protein disulfide-isomerase P4HB 57,116 1.13E-02 1.62
P21796 Voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 1 VDAC1 30,773 2.74E-02 1.61
P38646 Stress-70 protein mitochondrial HSPA9 73,681 3.03E-02 1.45
P37108 Signal recognition particle 14 kDa protein SRP14 14,570 3.54E-03 1.40
P35232 Prohibitin PHB 29,804 2.77E-02 1.38
P18669 Phosphoglycerate mutase 1 PGAM1 28,804 4.96E-02 1.36
P14174 Macrophage migration inhibitory factor MIF 12,476 8.71E-03 1.35
P24752 Acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase mitochondrial ACAT1 45,200 8.80E-03 1.34
Q16658 Fascin FSCN1 54,530 1.52E-03 1.33
P61981 14-3-3 protein gamma YWHAG 28,303 3.12E-02 1.29
P25705 ATP synthase subunit alpha mitochondrial ATP5F1A 59,751 3.61E-02 1.29
P62424 60S ribosomal protein L7a RPL7A 29,996 2.58E-02 1.29
Q9UL46 Proteasome activator complex subunit 2 PSME2 27,402 1.22E-02 1.28
P10809 60 kDa heat shock protein mitochondrial HSPD1 61,055 1.60E-02 1.26
P49327 Fatty acid synthase FASN 273,424 3.85E-03 1.26
P14618 Pyruvate kinase PKM PKM 57,937 5.24E-06 1.25
P62841 40S ribosomal protein S15 RPS15 17,040 1.25E-02 1.23
P30101 Protein disulfide-isomerase A3 PDIA3 56,782 3.88E-04 1.22
P37802 Transgelin-2 TAGLN2 22,391 4.85E-02 1.22
Q9BVA1 Tubulin beta-2B chain TUBB2B 49,953 8.60E-03 1.21
Q96AG4 Leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 59 LRRC59 34,930 4.98E-05 1.20
P09429 High mobility group protein B1 HMGB1 24,894 4.97E-02 1.20
P08238 Heat shock protein HSP 90-beta HSP90AB1 83,264 4.33E-03 1.19
P07195 L-lactate dehydrogenase B chain LDHB 36,639 1.47E-03 1.17
Q13509 Tubulin beta-3 chain TUBB3 50,433 2.28E-03 1.15
P68371 Tubulin beta-4B chain TUBB4B 49,831 3.03E-02 1.15
P68032 Actin alpha cardiac muscle 1 ACTC1 42,019 1.10E-03 1.15
P29401 Transketolase TKT 67,878 3.07E-02 1.14
Q15084 Protein disulfide-isomerase A6 PDIA6 48,121 1.14E-02 1.14
P23246 Splicing factor proline- and glutamine-rich SFPQ 76,150 3.38E-02 1.14
P0C0S5 Histone H2A.Z H2AFZ 13,553 8.00E-03 1.14
Q9P0M6 Core histone macro-H2A.2 H2AFY2 40,058 3.71E-02 1.14
Q99623 Prohibitin-2 PHB2 33,296 1.26E-02 1.13
P09936 Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase isozyme L1 UCHL1 24,824 2.16E-02 1.12
Q9BUF5 Tubulin beta-6 chain TUBB6 49,857 3.45E-02 1.11
P40926 Malate dehydrogenase mitochondrial MDH2 35,503 6.29E-03 1.10
P00558 Phosphoglycerate kinase 1 PGK1 44,615 2.61E-02 1.10
P15121 Aldose reductase AKR1B1 35,853 5.42E-03 1.09
P06748 Nucleophosmin NPM1 32,575 2.26E-02 1.08
P06733 Alpha-enolase ENO1 47,169 3.04E-02 1.08
P22626 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins A2/B1 HNRNPA2B1 37,430 1.77E-02 1.08
P68363 Tubulin alpha-1B chain TUBA1B 50,152 4.30E-02 1.07
P36578 60S ribosomal protein L4 RPL4 47,697 3.20E-02 1.06
P23284 Peptidyl-prolyl cis–trans isomerase B PPIB 23,743 3.08E-02 1.06
P62906 60S ribosomal protein L10a RPL10A 24,831 2.18E-03 1.04
P62826 GTP-binding nuclear protein Ran RAN 24,423 7.09E-03 1.03
P52209 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase decarboxylating PGD 53,140 4.33E-02 1.02
(B) Down-regulated proteins
Accession Protein description Gene symbol Average mass p value fold change
O75390 Citrate synthase mitochondrial CS 51,712 1.46E-02 0.39
P27824 Calnexin CANX 67,568 6.57E-03 0.55
Q13263 Transcription intermediary factor 1-beta TRIM28 88,550 3.77E-02 0.56
P46781 40S ribosomal protein S9 RPS9 22,591 1.19E-03 0.58
P08758 Annexin A5 ANXA5 35,937 2.08E-02 0.59
P0DP23 Calmodulin-1 CALM1 16,838 7.20E-03 0.63
P0DP24 Calmodulin-2 CALM2 16,838 7.20E-03 0.63
P0DP25 Calmodulin-3 CALM3 16,838 7.20E-03 0.63
Q99714 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase type-2 HSD17B10 26,923 1.61E-02 0.64
Q15366 Poly(rC)-binding protein 2 PCBP2 38,580 8.92E-03 0.64
P62701 40S ribosomal protein S4 X isoform RPS4X 29,598 1.31E-03 0.70
P40227 T-complex protein 1 subunit zeta CCT6A 58,024 3.96E-05 0.71
Q14194 Dihydropyrimidinase-related protein 1 CRMP1 62,184 2.19E-02 0.75
P12277 Creatine kinase B-type CKB 42,644 6.30E-03 0.75
P62269 40S ribosomal protein S18 RPS18 17,719 2.63E-04 0.78
O75367 Core histone macro-H2A.1 H2AFY 39,617 5.91E-03 0.79
P45880 Voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 2 VDAC2 31,567 1.66E-02 0.8
P62249 40S ribosomal protein S16 RPS16 16,445 2.52E-02 0.86
P52272 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein M HNRNPM 77,516 1.41E-02 0.86
P39019 40S ribosomal protein S19 RPS19 16,060 4.19E-02 0.86
P40939 Trifunctional enzyme subunit alpha mitochondrial HADHA 83,000 4.54E-02 0.88
P55072 Transitional endoplasmic reticulum ATPase VCP 89,322 1.25E-03 0.88
P83731 60S ribosomal protein L24 RPL24 17,779 1.41E-03 0.88
P20962 Parathymosin PTMS 11,530 4.32E-02 0.91
P19338 Nucleolin NCL 76,615 2.31E-02 0.91
P14625 Endoplasmin HSP90B1 92,469 7.57E-03 0.92
P60842 Eukaryotic initiation factor 4A-I EIF4A1 46,154 1.81E-02 0.92
O75531 Barrier-to-autointegration factor BANF1 10,059 1.12E-03 0.93
P06744 Glucose-6-phosphate isomerase GPI 63,147 1.70E-03 0.96
P61978 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K HNRNPK 50,976 1.87E-02 0.96
Q99832 T-complex protein 1 subunit eta CCT7 59,367 2.32E-02 0.96
P30041 Peroxiredoxin-6 PRDX6 25,035 1.25E-02 0.97
P09211 Glutathione S-transferase P GSTP1 23,356 2.02E-02 0.98

**Compared to untreated cells.

3.5. Functional enrichment analysis

Among the 100 proteins significantly regulated by 6-OHDA, 98 proteins were unique proteins and were included in the over-representation functional annotations analysis (Fig. 4A and B; Supplementary Table 1) using the Metascape bioinformatics tool. The analysis revealed 20 GO-biological terms; of which the top five most significant were cellular responses to stress (32 proteins); non-56p-associated pre-rRNA complex (15 proteins), RHO GTPases activate IQGAPs (9 proteins), haemostasis (18 proteins) and H2AX complex II (5 proteins) (Fig. 4B).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Functional enrichment analysis using Metascape of differentially expressed proteins in the differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells exposed to 6-OHDA (10 μg/mL) compared to untreated cells. (A) Histogram of clustered enrichment ontology categories (GO and KEGG terms) across input gene list, coloured by p-values; (B) Network of enriched term of 98 genes that were entered in to this system for analysis. Each term is represented by circle node and the node size is directly proportional to the number of input proteins grouped into each term. The nodes colour denotes its cluster identity. GO terms with a similarity score >0.3 are connected by an edge and the edge thickness represents the similarity score. (C) 6-OHDA implicated protein-protein interaction network in differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells visualized using MCODE algorithm where vicinity densely connected proteins were identified from clustered enrichment ontology terms (D) PPI MCODE components identified in the gene lists. Each MCODE network was derived from GO enrichment analysis (details provided in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2).

Within the KEGG-enriched pathways, we discovered the pathways of neurodegeneration-multiple diseases (hsa02022) was associated with 19 proteins that topped the hit list. The minimal common oncology data elements (MCODE) and protein-protein interaction (PPI) enrichment analysis revealed eight PPI units consisting 59 proteins from which five proteins with respective MCODE scores – VDAC2 (15.5), TUBB2B (10.9), SNRPD3 (5.6), EEF1A2 (6.2) and CALM2 (3.0) – were termed as seed proteins (Fig. 4C and D; Supplementary Table 2). The two major GO-biological processes enriched for the red unit (28 proteins) includes nucleosome assembly (GO:0051170) and nucleosome (GO:0034728); and one KEGG pathway, which was systemic lupus erythematosus (hsa05322).

In the differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells treated with TMC, 87 proteins that were significantly (p < 0.05) regulated were included in the GO-biological process analysis (Fig. 5A and B; Supplementary Table 3). The top five overexpressed protein clusters included the establishment of protein localisation to organelle (23 proteins), carbon metabolism (12 proteins), activation of AMPK downstream of NMDARs (8 proteins), protein binding (12) and interleukin-12 family signalling (7 proteins). When analysed within the KEGG database, the metabolic pathway (hsa01100) was highly enriched and this involved 21 proteins. The MCODE and PPI enrichment analysis resulted in a network with six PPI units that included 57 proteins from which four seed proteins were identified; which were RPL10A (11.0), PGD (6.8), P4HB (4.4), TUBB6 (8.6) (Fig. 5C and D; Supplementary Table 4). The top three pathway clusters in the red unit (18 proteins) that were overexpressed among 83 GO-BP terms with 2 major GO-BP categories include SRP-dependent co-translational protein targeting to membrane (GO:0006614) and co-translational protein targeting to membrane (GO:0006613); and a Reactome pathway, i.e., L13a-mediated translational silencing of Ceruloplasmin expression (R-HSA-156827).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Functional enrichment analysis using Metascape of differentially expressed proteins in the differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells exposed to TMC (0.1 μg/mL) compared to untreated cells. (A) Histogram of clustered enrichment ontology categories (GO and KEGG terms) across input gene list, coloured by p-values; (B) Network of enriched term of 87 genes that were entered into this system for analysis. Each term is represented by circle node and the node size is directly proportional to the number of input proteins grouped into each term. The nodes colour denotes its cluster identity. GO terms with a similarity score >0.3 are connected by an edge and the edge thickness represents the similarity score. (C) TMC implicated protein-protein interaction network in differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells visualized using MCODE algorithm where vicinity densely connected proteins were identified from clustered enrichment ontology terms (D) PPI MCODE components identified in the gene lists. Each MCODE network was derived from GO enrichment analysis (details provided in Supplementary Tables 3 and 4).

3.6. Venn diagram analysis

The proteins that were significantly regulated in the differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells following exposure to TMC or 6-OHDA were compared against three online PD gene-disease repositories (Beegle, DisGeNet and Gene4PD), which contains patient data of genes/proteins that were reported to be involved in the onset or progression of PD. Among the 87 proteins that were significantly regulated in the differentiated SH-SY5Y cells by TMC, eight proteins (FUS, VCP, SMN2, HNRNPA2B1, HSD17B10, ACAT1, UCHL1, GSTP1) matched to the Beegle database; 22 proteins (FUS, CRMP1, GSTP1, HMGB1, HNRNPA2B1, HSD17B10, HSP90AB1, HSPA9, HSPD1, MIF, NCL, P4HB, PCBP2, PDIA3, RAN, RPS4X, TKT, TUBA1B, UCHL1, VCP, VDAC1, VIM) corresponded with the DisGenet database and 21 proteins (AKR1B1, CS, DLD, GSTP1, LRRC59, PDIA6, PHB, PHB2, PTMS, SFPQ, SRP14, TUBB6, VCP, VDAC1, VDAC2, VIM, ACTC1, CKB, MIF, RPS9, HSP90B1) matched the Gene4PD database (Fig. 6A). Two proteins (VCP and GSTP1) were reported in the three databases. Four proteins (FUS, HNRNPA3B1, HSD17B10, UCHl1 were detected in at least two databases, i.e., Beegle & DisGeNet whilst another three proteins (MIF, VDAC1 and VIM) were found in another two databases (DisGeNet & Gene4PD) (Fig. 6A). Some of these proteins exhibited significant differences (p < 0.05) following 6-OHDA treatment (Fig. 6B). Proteins that displayed significant (p < 0.05) expression in the differentiated SH-SY5Y cells following exposure to TMC or 6-OHDA include HSP90AB1, HSPA9, PDIA3, PHB, PHB2, RAN, SFPQ, VCP, UCHL1, MIF, CKB and VDAC2 (Fig. 6B). The proteins modulated by TMC in the differentiated SH-SY5Y cells that correspond to these three PD-associated gene-disease databases were considered significant in PD progression and explored in great detail.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Comparison between PD-associated genes that were differentially expressed in the differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells following exposure to TMC (0.1 μg/mL) and 6-OHDA (10 μg/mL) using three online PD-gene disease databases (Beegle, DisGeNet and Gene4PD). Forty (40) out of the 87 proteins were found in these three databases. (A) Three-set Venn diagram showing the overlap of genes amongst the TMC implicated proteins in the three databases. (B) Compares the expression 12 PD-associated genes in the differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells following exposure to 6-OHDA (black) or TMC (yellow). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

4. Discussion

Carotenoids are lipid-soluble and highly unsaturated plant pigments that possess a great ability to cross the blood-brain-barrier. Along with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, carotenoids have a promising role in reducing the risk of neurodegenerative diseases (Lakey-Beitia, Jagadeesh Kumar, Hegde, & Rao, 2019). This study presents the various protective mechanisms of palm derived-TMC on differentiated SH-SY5 Y neural cells exposed to neurotoxin 6-OHDA. The 6-OHDA treatment resulted in a dose-dependent neurotoxicity on differentiated neural cells (Storch, Kaftan, Burkhardt, & Schwarz, 2000). However, TMC attenuated 6-OHDA-induced neurotoxicity, as evidenced by increased cell viability (Fig. 1B) and decreased LDH release (Fig. 1C) from differentiated neural cells. A similar finding was reported by Yi et al, whereby lycopene preincubated dopaminergic SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells challenged with 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium iodide (MPP+), increased cell viability and decreased apoptotic rate (Yi, He, & Wang, 2013). Moreover, lycopene treatment on rat primary hippocampal neurons has been associated with inhibition of mitotic apoptotic pathway and increased viability under neurotoxic condition (Qu et al., 2011a).

Intracellular antioxidant defence enzymes such as SOD and CAT stabilise and deactivate toxic free radicals to stable non-toxic molecules before attacking cellular components (Krishnamurthy & Wadhwani, 2012). The SOD enzyme catalyses the dismutation of superoxide oxygen radicals to less toxic oxygen and hydrogen peroxide molecules (Altobelli, Van Noorden, Balato, & Cimini, 2020), while CAT neutralises hydrogen peroxide generated in cells to water and oxygen products (Glorieux & Calderon, 2017). Our data suggest that TMC exerts its antioxidant mechanisms via two routes: (1) suppression of ROS generation via neutralizing of free radical and (2) upregulation of antioxidant enzyme activity (Fig. 2A–C). These two mechanisms attenuate oxidative stress at the cellular level hence preventing neuronal loss. However, it is crucial to understand if these mechanisms are initiated following the penetration of carotenoids into the cell membrane or at the extracellular region. A previous permeability study revealed that carotenoids interact with membrane lipid bilayer and makes the membrane thicker and solider. These structural changes consequently reduce the membrane permeability to peroxyl and oxygen molecules which protect cells from oxidative stress and cell death (Mostofian, Johnson, Smith, & Cheng, 2020). Besides, the scavenging capacity of carotenoids has been delineated by Liu et al. using the stable free radical 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) method. According to this report, lycopene or β-carotene in solution demonstrated a significant scavenging capacity. Interestingly, lycopene and β-carotene displayed a synergistic effect in their scavenging capacity when combined with vitamin E and vitamin C compared with individual antioxidant (Liu, Shi, Colina Ibarra, Kakuda, & Jun Xue, 2008). In an experimental model involving ethanol-induced toxicity in embryonic rat hippocampal culture, β-carotene supplementation notably increased neuronal survival via antioxidant activity (Mitchell, Paiva, & Heaton, 1999). We suggest that combining more than one antioxidant like in TMC complex may provide an enhanced antioxidant effectiveness that offers neuroprotective effects in neurons. However, more future studies are needed to understand the underlying mechanism of antioxidant enzyme activation by carotenoids.

Dopamine is a crucial neurotransmitter produced in several areas of the brain, including substantia nigra, hypothalamus and ventral tegmental area (Juárez Olguín, Calderón Guzmán, Hernández García, & Barragán Mejía, 2016). It is a chemical that mediates the “feel-good” feelings (reward, motivation, love) in the brain and motor control and cognitive functions. Degeneration of dopamine-producing neurons, typically the nigral neurons, results in depletion of dopamine, which causes motor problems such as resting tremor, muscle rigidity, loss of postural reflexes, and freezing phenomenon (feet temporarily glued to the ground) (Fahn & Sulzer, 2004). There is compelling data from animal studies that suggest pre-treatment with β-carotene decreases striatal dopamine loss in the substantia nigra in C57 black mice treated with N-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) (Perry et al., 1985).

Chu and Kordower have revealed the interconnection between dopamine, TH and α-synuclein. According to this report, the increased expression of α-synuclein was associated with reduced levels of TH and dopamine in sub-threshold degeneration of nigral striatal neurons (Chu & Kordower, 2007). Likewise, the present study displayed that TMC increased the levels (p < 0.05) of dopamine (Fig. 3A) and TH (Fig. 3B) in differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells. In addition, there was a marked reduction of 6-OHDA-induced overexpression of α-synuclein in TMC pre-treated human neural cells (Fig. 3C) (Perez et al., 2002). These findings suggest that the elevated dopamine level in the TMC-treated differentiated SHT-SY5Y cells in the present study may be associated with inhibition of α-synuclein and increased TH levels. Although our findings correlated with Chu and Kordower, we could not confirm if dopamine increase was due to upsurge in dopamine production or reduced catabolism. Hence, future studies should be directed to understand the direct effect of carotenoids on the dopamine biosynthesis pathway.

The DRD2 is a member of the seven-transmembrane and trimeric GTPR (GTP-binding protein-coupled receptor) family and is primarily found in the pre-and post-synaptic dopaminergic neurons at the basal ganglia (striatum and substantia nigra). DRD2 regulates the phosphorylation state of dopamine and TH activity in the synaptic terminals of the substantia nigral. Several studies have reported the connection between polymorphisms in the DRD2 gene with PD and Schizophrenia (Costa-Mallen et al., 2000, Tan et al., 2000). Our findings revealed that pre-treatment of neural cells with TMC upregulated the DRD2 mRNA fold change compared to 6-OHDA alone (Fig. 3D). Samad et al., Samad, Krezel, Chambon, and Borrelli (1997) have demonstrated a direct mechanistic relationship between DRD2 receptor regulation and retinoids. According to this report, the promoter of the DRD2 gene contains a functional retinoic acid response element that can be activated with external exposure of retinoids (TA, W, P, & E, 1997). In a subsequent study, Chichili et al. have detected the significant upregulation of the beta-carotene-15,15′-monooxygenase (BCM) enzyme in human retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cell line (D407) treated with β-carotene (Chichili, Nohr, Schäffer, von Lintig, and Biesalski, 2005). The BCM is crucial in converting the β-carotene into retinoids. The increase in BCM mRNA in the RPE cells following exposure to β-carotene suggests the existence of a vitamin A biosynthetic pathway, which may ensure retinoid supply to these cells. Thus, the upregulation of the DRD2 gene observed in present study following pre-treatment with TMC may be related to the generation of retinoid via the vitamin A pathway that directly affects the expression of the DRD2 gene. However, more studies are required to confirm this notion.

The expression of many proteins was altered in the differentiated SH-SY5Y cells treated with 6-OHDA or TMC. These changes correlated with over-expression of several molecular and biological processes, as shown in the functional GO analysis (Fig. 4A and A). Forty out of the 87 proteins that were differentially expressed in the differentiated SH-SY5Y cells treated with TMC, were reported to have a close association with the pathogenesis of PD as these were reported in three repositories containing PD gene-diseases, namely Beegle, DisGenet and Gene4PD (Fig. 6A). Twelve of these proteins demonstrated an opposite trend in the 6-OHDA treated neural cells (Fig. 6B). The crucial proteins that TMC mediated caused an overexpression of biological pathways as curated by Metascape.

The top overexpressed functional GO term modulated by TMC on differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells was the establishment of protein localisation to organelles, which contained 23 proteins. Interestingly, 12 out of these 23 proteins were ribosomal proteins (RPs) (RPL10A, RAN, RPL4, RPL7A, RPL24, RPS4X, RPS9. RPS15, RPS16, RPS18, RPS19, SRP14). The majority of the RPs involved in the ribosome pathway were also present in MCODE1 network proteins (Fig. 4D). The RPs are integral elements of the ribosome machinery responsible for protein synthesis from messenger RNAs (mRNA). The RPs play a pivotal role in ribosome biogenesis (Zhou, Liao, Liao, Liao, & Lu, 2015). Differential regulation of RPs in ribosome biogenesis has been associated with cell differentiation (Bevort & Leffers, 2000), growth (Jorgensen et al., 2004) and proliferation (Volarevic et al., 2000). In addition, inhibition of RPS9 resulted in diminished production of 18S ribosomal RNA and remarkably enhanced p53-dependent morphological differentiation of U343Mga C12:6 glioma cells (Lindström & Nistér, 2010). In the present study, we found TMC caused a statistically significant downregulation of RPS9, RPS4X, RPS16 and RPS19 in human neural cells. The RPs downregulation is directly correlated with increased differentiation in SH-SY5Y cells and this finding is well correlated report by Bevort and Leffers (Bevort & Leffers, 2000).

Moreover, The RAN (Ras-related nuclear protein), a member of the Ras superfamily of small GTPases, was modulated in differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells treated with TMC. RAN plays a pivotal role in nucleocytoplasmic transport mechanism in both directions by carrying proteins and macromolecules through the nuclear pore complex. The disruption of nucleocytoplasmic transport accompanied by reduced expression of RAN are important leads to the oligomeric Aβ42 formation in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (Mastroeni et al., 2013). Yasuda, Miyamoto, Saiwaki, and Yoneda (2006) have described that oxidative stress in cells causes a collapse in the RAN gradient and nuclear accumulation of importin alpha that is consequent in either necrotic or apoptotic cell death (Y. Y et al., 2006). Consistent with this report, our data showed that 6-OHDA treatment on neural cells caused significant suppression of RAN, but TMC treatment significantly upregulated the expression of RAN protein. The upregulation of RAN protein mediated by TMC signifies this lipophilic antioxidant's ability to improve the nucleocytoplasmic transport system, which allows the continuous exchange of molecules between nucleus and cytoplasm.

Another critical protein enriched in the establishment of protein localisation to organelle GO term category was the prohibitin 2 (PHB2), which plays a vital role in mitophagy. Mitophagy is a normal cellular physiological process for eliminating dysfunctional or unwanted mitochondria in eukaryotic cells. It maintains cellular homeostasis via coordinating metabolic demand, orchestrating quality control, and protecting cells against impaired mitochondria's destructive effects (Tatsuta & Langer, 2008). A recent study has described the role of PHB2, a highly conserved mitochondria inner membrane scaffold protein, in mediating mitophagy. According to this report, during aggregation of misfolded protein in mitochondria, PHB2 depletion destabilizes PTEN induced kinase 1 (PINK1) and inhibits the mitochondria recruitment of E3 ubiquitin ligase (PRKN), ubiquitin and optineurin, leading to inhibition of mitophagy and cellular apoptosis (Yan et al., 2020). PINK1 and PRKN proteins remove toxic misfolded proteins from mitochondria, and mutations in these genes have been associated with PD (Pickrell & Youle, 2015). Our data showed that TMC treatment on differentiated neural cells tremendously elevated the PHB2, that was significantly suppressed in 6-OHDA exposed cells. These findings indicate that failure in mitophagy may be one of the mechanisms that caused apoptosis in neural cells exposed to 6-OHDA. The elevation of PHB2 by TMC augments proper cellular energy homeostasis regulation by removing damaged mitochondria via mitophagy.

The proteomic analysis also revealed a significant overexpression of α/β isotypes of tubulins (TUBA1B, TUBB3, TUBB4B, TUBB6, TUBB2B) in TMC treated differentiated neural cells compared to untreated control cells. Tubulins are α/β subunit proteins of microtubules that function in cellular division and maintain morphology, intracellular transport, and differentiation (Binarová & Tuszynski, 2019). A substantial body of evidence suggests a marked difference in the functions between tubulin βI, βII and βIII. Using the specific siRNA to inhibit the expression of each tubulin isotype in neuronal cells, this study showed that tubulin βI is vital for cell viability and βII for neurite outgrowth. In comparison, tubulin βIII was important in protecting neural cells against reactive oxygen species and free radical-induced oxidative stress (Guo, Walss-Bass, & Ludueña, 2010). Nevertheless, compelling data from a recent study has suggested that mutations of αβ-tubulin dimers are behind the cognitive impairment in neurodegenerative diseases such as PD and AD (Keays et al., 2007). Moreover, reduced microtubule mass, a higher fraction of unpolymerized tubulin and disruption in microtubule-mediated signalling pathway were indicated in fibroblasts collected from familial and idiopathic PD patients (Cartelli, Goldwurm, Casagrande, Pezzoli, & Cappelletti, 2012). Hence, the significant upregulation of tubulin α/β heterodimer by TMC in neural cells may promote a continuously stable cytoskeletal structure, neurite outgrowth and increase cell viability. These alterations may pave the way to a prolonged life span of neural cells and prevent neurodegenerative diseases from setting in.

Protein disulphide isomerase (PDI) is a versatile redox chaperone located at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The critical function of PDI chaperone protein is isomerisation, formation and rearrangement of protein disulphide bonds which offer an additional pathway to maintain the native protein conformation (Perri, Thomas, Parakh, Spencer, & Atkin, 2016). PDI is stimulated during ER stress and is accountable for cellular defence against general protein misfolding via chaperone activity. PDI progressively degrades the accumulated misfolded proteins by translocating to the cytosol via ER association degradation (ERAD). Subsequently, these toxic proteins are destined to be eliminated by the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) (Lee et al., 2010). Besides that, PDI is also necessary in maintaining the cellular redox environment of ER by catalysing the disconnection of non-native disulphide bonds (reduction) and subsequently establishing a correct pairing of cysteines (oxidation) in order to shape the native disulphide bonds (Schwaller, Wilkinson, & Gilbert, 2003). Interestingly, we found that the PDI family proteins such as P4HB (PDIA1), PDIA3 and PDIA6 were strikingly upregulated in differentiated neural cells following treatment with TMC. The increased expression of these PDI chaperone proteins may have contributed to the increased folding capacity in ER and essential effect on regulating the cytoskeleton reorganization of the neuronal cells. An expanding body of evidence has reported that PDI controls cytoskeletal reorganization via forming a disulphide bond with β-actin during adhesion of MEG-01 cells to the extracellular matrix by the integrin-dependent signalling response (Sobierajska et al., 2014). Moreover, a previous microarray study has shown that TMC treatment on HUVECs (human umbilical vein endothelial cells) significantly regulated genes involved in rapid remodelling of protein cytoskeleton, cell-matrix adhesion and matrix reorganization (Dembinska-Kiec et al., 2005). Considering the published data and our findings, we suggest that TMC mediated PDI proteins in neural cells may profoundly affect cell structure and morphology maintenance via cytoskeleton reorganization and cell-cell adhesion.

Heat shock proteins (HSP) are critical regulators of neurons' physiological processes, including protein chaperone and folding, synaptic transmission, ER stress response and cell death response (Bross & Fernandez-Guerra, 2016). Emerging studies have associated the depletion HSPs in neurons with the destruction of brain tissues in PD and AD (Dukay et al., 2019, Stetler et al., 2010). Our study showed a striking overexpression of HSPA9 (HSP70), HSPD1 (HSP60) and HSP90AB1 (HSP90β) in differentiated neural cells following overnight treatment with TMC. The HSPA9 or Mortalin is a mitochondrial chaperone protein that functions as a neuronal sensor and plays a vital role as a quality regulator of proteins translocated into the mitochondria (Ferré, Thouard, Bétourné, Belenguer, Miquel, Peyrin, & Szelechowski, 2020). The association of HSPA9 with imported precursor proteins found in the import channel into the mitochondria implied that HSPA9 is accountable for the unfolding of proteins during their transportation (Jebara, Weiss, & Azem, 2017). This process is crucial as the import channel is narrow (approximately between 20A and 26A) for the movement of folded proteins into the mitochondria (Schwartz & Matouschek, 1999). Nevertheless, convincing data from recent studies suggested that the increased level of HSPA9 contributed to significant neuroprotective effects via upkeeping the mitochondria membrane potential (Qu et al., 2012), and protection against ROS induced lipid peroxidation (Qu et al., 2011b). In light of this, we have also shown that 6-OHDA induced oxidative stress on differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells demonstrated significant suppression of the HSPA9 (Fig. 6b). As such, oxidative stress-induced neuronal death may be the consequence of suppressing mitochondrial respiration and mitochondrial targeting to synapses exacerbated by depletion of HSPA9 (Zhu et al., 2013). Hence, the effect of TMC in upregulating the HSPA9 expression confers the preservation of mitochondria dynamics and functions in the synapses and axons that promote neuronal survival. On the other hand, the HSPD1, in conjunction with HSP10, is responsible for folding the nascent polypeptide from the unfolded liner chain form following the translocation from the cytoplasm into the mitochondria (Vabulas, Raychaudhuri, Hayer-Hartl, & Hartl, 2010). In humans, a mutation in gene encoding HSPD1-HSP10 chaperonin complex has been found to impair the folding of mitochondrial superoxide dismutase (SOD2) protein despite unchanged SOD2 transcription level (Bie et al., 2016). Indeed, mild deficiency of HSPD1 mainly affects myelination of neurons, whereas more severe decreases in HSPD1 would predominantly affect all tissue and not be compatible with life (Bross, Magnoni, & Sigaard, 2012). The HSP90AB1 (heat chock protein 90 kDa alpha, class B, member 1) is a molecular chaperone of HSP multifamily that is involved in the binding of client proteins, support in efficient protein folding, and maintaining protein stability (Csermely, Schnaider, Soti, Prohászka, & Nardai, 1998). The client proteins interact sequentially with HSP90, HSP70/HSP40 complex and several other co-chaperones, including p23, immunophilins, and HSP 90 ATPase inhibitor Hop dependent on the type of protein or type of damage (Haase & Fitze, 2016). Several studies have pointed out that HSP90 forms crosslinks with actin filaments (KoYASU et al., 1986) and interacts with cytoskeleton structures of neuronal cells to maintain stability and utilize for transport purposes (Quintá, Maschi, Gomez-Sanchez, Piwien-Pilipuk, & Galigniana, 2010). HSP90 promotes the tight packing of the branched actin filaments via induction of N-WASP (neuronal Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome Protein) and Arp2/3 complex (Park, Suetsugu, Sagara, & Takenawa, 2007). The upregulation of HSP proteins in differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells in the present cell-based study shows that TMC has many molecular pathways to execute its neuroprotective effects.

5. Conclusions

Differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cell pre-treated with TMC and subsequently exposed to 6-OHDA restored the cell viability, LDH enzyme and endogenous antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT). Moreover, TMC ameliorated the dopamine biosynthesis and upregulated the DRD2 gene expression in the differentiated neural cells compared to the controls. In proteomic studies, TMC exhibited substantial changes on crucial proteins, such as ribosomal proteins, α/β isotypes of tubulins, protein disulphide isomerases (PDI) and heat shock proteins (HSP) in differentiated human neural cells. We propose that TMC is a potent antioxidant pigment with multiple neuroprotective effects on differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Ammu Kutty Radhakrishnan reports financial support was provided by Malaysian Palm Oil Board. KR is employed by the Malaysian Palm Oil Board, who provided the research grant to carry out this study.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Malaysian Palm Oil Board (grant number: IMU R 194 2016) for supporting this research. We are deeply grateful to ExcelVite for supplying the TMC extract for this study.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochms.2022.100088.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following are the Supplementary data to this article:

Supplementary data 1
mmc1.zip (290.4KB, zip)
Supplementary data 2
mmc2.pdf (2MB, pdf)

References

  1. Altobelli G.G., Van Noorden S., Balato A., Cimini V. Copper/Zinc Superoxide Dismutase in Human Skin: Current Knowledge. Frontiers in Medicine. 2020:183. doi: 10.3389/FMED.2020.00183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Augustynska, D., Jemioła-Rzemiå ska, M., Burda, K., & Strzałka, K. (2015). Influence of polar and nonpolar carotenoids on structural and adhesive properties of model membranes. Chemico-Biological Interactions, 239, 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CBI.2015.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed]
  3. Basu, A., & Imrhan, V. (2006). Tomatoes versus lycopene in oxidative stress and carcinogenesis: conclusions from clinical trials. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2007 61:3, 61(3), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602510. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Bevort M., Leffers H. Down regulation of ribosomal protein mRNAs during neuronal differentiation of human NTERA2 cells. Differentiation. 2000;66(2–3):81–92. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-0436.2000.660203.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bie A.S., Fernandez-Guerra P., Birkler R.I.D., Nisemblat S., Pelnena D., Lu X.…Bross P. Effects of a Mutation in the HSPE1 Gene Encoding the Mitochondrial Co-chaperonin HSP10 and Its Potential Association with a Neurological and Developmental Disorder. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences. 2016;(OCT):65. doi: 10.3389/FMOLB.2016.00065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Binarová P., Tuszynski J. Tubulin: Structure, Functions and Roles in Disease. Cells. 2019;8(10) doi: 10.3390/CELLS8101294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bross P., Fernandez-Guerra P. Disease-Associated Mutations in the HSPD1 Gene Encoding the Large Subunit of the Mitochondrial HSP60/HSP10 Chaperonin Complex. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences. 2016;(AUG):49. doi: 10.3389/FMOLB.2016.00049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bross P., Magnoni R., Sigaard Bie A. Molecular chaperone disorders: defective Hsp60 in neurodegeneration. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry. 2012;12(22):2491–2503. doi: 10.2174/1568026611212220005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cartelli D., Goldwurm S., Casagrande F., Pezzoli G., Cappelletti G. Microtubule Destabilization Is Shared by Genetic and Idiopathic Parkinson’s Disease Patient Fibroblasts. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(5) doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0037467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chang C. Sen, Chang C.L., Lai G.H. Reactive oxygen species scavenging activities in a chemiluminescence model and neuroprotection in rat pheochromocytoma cells by astaxanthin, beta-carotene, and canthaxanthin. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences. 2013;29(8):412–421. doi: 10.1016/J.KJMS.2012.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen P., Li L., Gao Y., Xie Z., Zhang Y., Pan Z., Tu Y., Wang H., Han Q., Hu X., Xin X. β-carotene provides neuro protection after experimental traumatic brain injury via the Nrf2-ARE pathway. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience. 2019;18(2):153–161. doi: 10.31083/J.JIN.2019.02.120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chichili G.R., Nohr D., Schäffer M., von Lintig J., Biesalski H.K. Beta-Carotene conversion into vitamin A in human retinal pigment epithelial cells. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2005;46(10):3562–3569. doi: 10.1167/IOVS.05-0089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chu Y., Kordower J.H. Age-associated increases of α-synuclein in monkeys and humans are associated with nigrostriatal dopamine depletion: Is this the target for Parkinson’s disease? Neurobiology of Disease. 2007;25(1):134–149. doi: 10.1016/J.NBD.2006.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Colle I., Lemmens L., Van Buggenhout S., Van Loey A., Hendrickx M. Effect of thermal processing on the degradation, isomerization, and bioaccessibility of lycopene in tomato pulp. Journal of Food Science. 2010;75(9) doi: 10.1111/J.1750-3841.2010.01862.X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Compounds, I. of M. (US) P. on D. A. and R. (2000). β-Carotene and Other Carotenoids. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK225469/.
  16. Costa-Mallen P., Costa L.G., Smith-Weller T., Franklin G.M., Swanson P.D., Checkoway H. Genetic polymorphism of dopamine D2 receptors in Parkinson’s disease and interactions with cigarette smoking and MAO-B intron 13 polymorphism. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. 2000;69(4):535–537. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.69.4.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Craft N., Haitema T., Garnett K.M., Fitch K., Dorey C. Undefined; 2004. Carotenoid, tocopherol, and retinol concentrations in elderly human brain. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Csermely P., Schnaider T., Soti C., Prohászka Z., Nardai G. The 90-kDa Molecular Chaperone Family: Structure, Function, and Clinical Applications. A Comprehensive Review. Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 1998;79(2):129–168. doi: 10.1016/S0163-7258(98)00013-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dembinska-Kiec A., Polus A., Kiec-Wilk B., Grzybowska J., Mikolajczyk M., Hartwich J., Razny U., Szumilas K., Banas A., Bodzioch M., Stachura J. Proangiogenic activity of beta-carotene is coupled with the activation of endothelial cell chemotaxis. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2005;1740(2):222–239. doi: 10.1016/J.BBADIS.2004.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dukay B., Csoboz B., Tóth M.E. Heat-Shock Proteins in Neuroinflammation. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2019;(JULY):920. doi: 10.3389/FPHAR.2019.00920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fahn S., Sulzer D. Neurodegeneration and Neuroprotection in Parkinson Disease. NeuroRx. 2004;1(1):139. doi: 10.1602/NEURORX.1.1.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ferré, C., Thouard, A., Bétourné, A., Belenguer, P., Miquel, M. C., Peyrin, J. M., … Szelechowski, M. (2020). HSPA9/Mortalin Mediates Axo-Protection by Modulating Mitochondrial Dynamics in Neurons. https://doi.org/10.21203/RS.3.RS-119629/V1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  23. Glorieux C., Calderon P.B. Catalase, a remarkable enzyme: targeting the oldest antioxidant enzyme to find a new cancer treatment approach. Biological Chemistry. 2017;398(10):1095–1108. doi: 10.1515/HSZ-2017-0131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Guo Y., Mao X., Zhang J., Sun P., Wang H., Zhang Y., Ma Y., Xu S., Lv R., Liu X. Oral delivery of lycopene-loaded microemulsion for brain-targeting: preparation, characterization, pharmacokinetic evaluation and tissue distribution. Drug Delivery. 2019;26(1):1191–1205. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2019.1689312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Guo J., Walss-Bass C., Ludueña R.F. The β isotypes of tubulin in neuronal differentiation. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken, N.J.) 2010;67(7):431. doi: 10.1002/CM.20455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Haase M., Fitze G. January 10). HSP90AB1: Helping the good and the bad. Gene. 2016;575:171–186. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.08.063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Huang C., Gan D., Fan C., Wen C., Li A., Li Q.…Lu D. The secretion from neural stem cells pretreated with lycopene protects against tert-butyl hydroperoxide-induced neuron oxidative damage. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2018;2018 doi: 10.1155/2018/5490218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Jebara F., Weiss C., Azem A. Hsp60 and Hsp70 Chaperones: Guardians of Mitochondrial Proteostasis. ELS. 2017;1–9 doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.A0027152. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Jorgensen P., Rupeš I., Sharom J.R., Schneper L., Broach J.R., Tyers M. A dynamic transcriptional network communicates growth potential to ribosome synthesis and critical cell size. Genes & Development. 2004;18(20):2491–2505. doi: 10.1101/GAD.1228804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Juárez Olguín H., Calderón Guzmán D., Hernández García E., Barragán Mejía G. The role of dopamine and its dysfunction as a consequence of oxidative stress. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2016 doi: 10.1155/2016/9730467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kanehisa M. Toward understanding the origin and evolution of cellular organisms. Protein Science. 2019 doi: 10.1002/pro.3715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Keays D.A., Tian G., Poirier K., Huang G.J., Siebold C., Cleak J., Oliver P.L., Fray M., Harvey R.J., Molnár Z., Piñon M.C. Mutations in alpha-tubulin cause abnormal neuronal migration in mice and lissencephaly in humans. Cell. 2007;128(1):45–57. doi: 10.1016/J.CELL.2006.12.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kim J.H., Hwang J., Shim E., Chung E.J., Jang S.H., Koh S.B. Association of serum carotenoid, retinol, and tocopherol concentrations with the progression of Parkinson’s Disease. Nutrition Research and Practice. 2017;11(2) doi: 10.4162/nrp.2017.11.2.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. KoYASU S.H., Nishida E., Kadowaki T., Matsuzaki F., Iida K., Harada F., Kasuga M., Sakai H., Yahara I. Two mammalian heat shock proteins, HSP90 and HSP100, are actin-binding proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1986;83(21):8054–8058. doi: 10.1073/PNAS.83.21.8054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Krishnamurthy P., Wadhwani A. Antioxidant Enzymes and Human Health. Antioxidant Enzyme. 2012 doi: 10.5772/48109. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lakey-Beitia J., Jagadeesh Kumar D., Hegde M.L., Rao K.S. Carotenoids as Novel Therapeutic Molecules Against Neurodegenerative Disorders: Chemistry and Molecular Docking Analysis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019;20(22) doi: 10.3390/IJMS20225553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lee S.O., Cho K., Cho S., Kim I., Oh C., Ahn K. Protein disulphide isomerase is required for signal peptide peptidase-mediated protein degradation. The EMBO Journal. 2010;29(2):363–375. doi: 10.1038/EMBOJ.2009.359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lindström M.S., Nistér M. Silencing of Ribosomal Protein S9 Elicits a Multitude of Cellular Responses Inhibiting the Growth of Cancer Cells Subsequent to p53 Activation. PLOS ONE. 2010;5(3) doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0009578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Liu D., Shi J., Colina Ibarra A., Kakuda Y., Jun Xue S. The scavenging capacity and synergistic effects of lycopene, vitamin E, vitamin C, and β-carotene mixtures on the DPPH free radical. LWT – Food Science and Technology. 2008;41(7):1344–1349. doi: 10.1016/J.LWT.2007.08.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Magalingam K.B., Radhakrishnan A.K., Somanath S.D., Md S., Haleagrahara N. Influence of serum concentration in retinoic acid and phorbol ester induced differentiation of SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cell line. Molecular Biology Reports. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s11033-020-05925-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Mastroeni D., Chouliaras L., Grover A., Liang W.S., Hauns K., Rogers J., Coleman P.D. Reduced RAN Expression and Disrupted Transport between Cytoplasm and Nucleus; A Key Event in Alzheimer’s Disease Pathophysiology. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(1) doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0053349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Mitchell J.J., Paiva M., Heaton M.B. The Antioxidants Vitamin E and β-Carotene Protect Against Ethanol-Induced Neurotoxicity in Embryonic Rat Hippocampal Cultures. Alcohol. 1999;17(2):163–168. doi: 10.1016/S0741-8329(98)00051-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Mostofian B., Johnson Q.R., Smith J.C., Cheng X. Carotenoids promote lateral packing and condensation of lipid membranes. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. PCCP. 2020;22(21):12281–12293. doi: 10.1039/D0CP01031F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Park H.-A., Hayden M.M., Bannerman S., Jansen J., Crowe-White K.M. Anti-Apoptotic Effects of Carotenoids in Neurodegeneration. Molecules. 2020;25(15) doi: 10.3390/MOLECULES25153453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Park S.J., Suetsugu S., Sagara H., Takenawa T. HSP90 cross-links branched actin filaments induced by N-WASP and the Arp2/3 complex. Genes to Cells : Devoted to Molecular & Cellular Mechanisms. 2007;12(5):611–622. doi: 10.1111/J.1365-2443.2007.01081.X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Pchitskaya E., Popugaeva E., Bezprozvanny I. Calcium signaling and molecular mechanisms underlying neurodegenerative diseases. Cell Calcium. 2018;70:87–94. doi: 10.1016/J.CECA.2017.06.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Perez R.G., Waymire J.C., Lin E., Liu J.J., Guo F., Zigmond M.J. A Role for α-Synuclein in the Regulation of Dopamine Biosynthesis. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2002;22(8):3090. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-08-03090.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Perri E.R., Thomas C.J., Parakh S., Spencer D.M., Atkin J.D. The Unfolded Protein Response and the Role of Protein Disulfide Isomerase in Neurodegeneration. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 2016;(JAN):80. doi: 10.3389/FCELL.2015.00080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Perry T.L., Yong V.W., Clavier R.M., Jones K., Wright J.M., Foulks J.G., Wall R.A. Partial protection from the dopaminergic neurotoxin N-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine by four different antioxidants in the mouse. Neuroscience Letters. 1985;60(2):109–114. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(85)90229-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Pickrell A.M., Youle R.J. The Roles of PINK1, Parkin and Mitochondrial Fidelity in Parkinson’s Disease. Neuron. 2015;85(2):257. doi: 10.1016/J.NEURON.2014.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Qu M., Zhou Z., Chen C., Li M., Pei L., Chu F.…Wang D. Lycopene protects against trimethyltin-induced neurotoxicity in primary cultured rat hippocampal neurons by inhibiting the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. Neurochemistry International. 2011;59(8):1095–1103. doi: 10.1016/J.NEUINT.2011.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Qu M., Zhou Z., Chen C., Li M., Pei L., Yang J.…Wang D. Inhibition of mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening is involved in the protective effects of mortalin overexpression against beta-amyloid-induced apoptosis in SH-SY5Y cells. Neuroscience Research. 2012;72(1):94–102. doi: 10.1016/J.NEURES.2011.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Qu M., Zhou Z., Xu S., Chen C., Yu Z., Wang D. Mortalin overexpression attenuates beta-amyloid-induced neurotoxicity in SH-SY5Y cells. Brain Research. 2011;1368:336–345. doi: 10.1016/J.BRAINRES.2010.10.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Quintá H.R., Maschi D., Gomez-Sanchez C., Piwien-Pilipuk G., Galigniana M.D. Subcellular rearrangement of hsp90-binding immunophilins accompanies neuronal differentiation and neurite outgrowth. Journal of Neurochemistry. 2010;115(3):716–734. doi: 10.1111/J.1471-4159.2010.06970.X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Rao X., Huang X., Zhou Z., Lin X. An improvement of the 2̂(-delta delta CT) method for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction data analysis. Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomathematics. 2013;3(3):71–85. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25558171 Retrieved from. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Rzajew J., Radzik T., Rebas E. Calcium-Involved Action of Phytochemicals: Carotenoids and Monoterpenes in the Brain. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21(4) doi: 10.3390/IJMS21041428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Samad T.A., Krezel W., Chambon P., Borrelli E. Regulation of dopaminergic pathways by retinoids: activation of the D2 receptor promoter by members of the retinoic acid receptor-retinoid X receptor family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1997;94(26):14349–14354. doi: 10.1073/PNAS.94.26.14349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Schwaller M., Wilkinson B., Gilbert H.F. Reduction-reoxidation cycles contribute to catalysis of disulfide isomerization by protein-disulfide isomerase. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2003;278(9):7154–7159. doi: 10.1074/JBC.M211036200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Schwartz M.P., Matouschek A. The dimensions of the protein import channels in the outer and inner mitochondrial membranes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1999;96(23):13086–13090. doi: 10.1073/PNAS.96.23.13086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Sobierajska K., Skurzynski S., Stasiak M., Kryczka J., Cierniewski C.S., Swiatkowska M. Protein Disulfide Isomerase Directly Interacts with β-Actin Cys374 and Regulates Cytoskeleton Reorganization. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2014;289(9):5758. doi: 10.1074/JBC.M113.479477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Stetler R.A., Gan Y., Zhang W., Liou A.K., Gao Y., Cao G., Chen J. October). Heat shock proteins: Cellular and molecular mechanisms in the central nervous system. Progress in Neurobiology. 2010;92:184–211. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Storch A., Kaftan A., Burkhardt K., Schwarz J. 6-Hydroxydopamine toxicity towards human SH-SY5Y dopaminergic neuroblastoma cells: Independent of mitochondrial energy metabolism. Journal of Neural Transmission. 2000;107(3):281–293. doi: 10.1007/s007020050023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Tan E.K., Khajavi M., Thornby J.I., Nagamitsu S., Jankovic J., Ashizawa T. Variability and validity of polymorphism association studies in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology. 2000;55(4):533–538. doi: 10.1212/WNL.55.4.533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Tatsuta T., Langer T. Quality control of mitochondria: protection against neurodegeneration and ageing. The EMBO Journal. 2008;27(2):306–314. doi: 10.1038/SJ.EMBOJ.7601972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Vabulas R.M., Raychaudhuri S., Hayer-Hartl M., Hartl F.U. Protein Folding in the Cytoplasm and the Heat Shock Response. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2010;2(12) doi: 10.1101/CSHPERSPECT.A004390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Volarevic S., Stewart M.J., Ledermann B., Zilberman F., Terracciano L., Montini E., Grompe M., Kozma S.C., Thomas G. Proliferation, but not growth, blocked by conditional deletion of 40S ribosomal protein S6. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2000;288(5473):2045–2047. doi: 10.1126/SCIENCE.288.5473.2045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Widomska J., Zareba M., Subczynski W. Can Xanthophyll-Membrane Interactions Explain Their Selective Presence in the Retina and Brain? Foods. 2016;5(4):7. doi: 10.3390/foods5010007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Wu X., Hasan M. Al, Chen J.Y. Pathway and Network Analysis in Proteomics. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2014:44. doi: 10.1016/J.JTBI.2014.05.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Yan C., Gong L., Chen L., Xu M., Abou-Hamdan H., Tang M.…Song Z. PHB2 (prohibitin 2) promotes PINK1-PRKN/Parkin-dependent mitophagy by the PARL-PGAM5-PINK1 axis. Autophagy. 2020;16(3):419–434. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2019.1628520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Yasuda Y., Miyamoto Y., Saiwaki T., Yoneda Y. Mechanism of the stress-induced collapse of the Ran distribution. Experimental Cell Research. 2006;312(4):512–520. doi: 10.1016/J.YEXCR.2005.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Yi F., He X., Wang D. Lycopene protects against MPP(+)-induced cytotoxicity by maintaining mitochondrial function in SH-SY5Y cells. Neurochemical Research. 2013;38(8):1747–1757. doi: 10.1007/S11064-013-1079-Z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Zhou Y, Zhou B, Pache L, Chang M, Khodabakhshi AH, Tanaseichuk O, Benner C, Chanda SK (2019). Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets. Nature communications, 2019;10(1):1-0 Nature Communications, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/S41467-019-09234-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  73. Zhou X., Liao W.-J., Liao J.-M., Liao P., Lu H. Ribosomal proteins: functions beyond the ribosome. Journal of Molecular Cell Biology. 2015;7(2):92. doi: 10.1093/JMCB/MJV014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Zhu J., Vereshchagina N., Sreekumar V., Burbulla L.F., Costa A.C., Daub K.J.…Rasse T.M. Knockdown of Hsc70-5/mortalin Induces Loss of Synaptic Mitochondria in a Drosophila Parkinson’s Disease Model. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(12) doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0083714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data 1
mmc1.zip (290.4KB, zip)
Supplementary data 2
mmc2.pdf (2MB, pdf)

Articles from Food Chemistry: Molecular Sciences are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES