Highlights
-
•
Apple cider fermented by Kluyveromyces marxianus contained more acetic esters.
-
•
High rates of glycolysis and ethanol fermentation were observed in K. marxianus under oxygen limited conditions.
-
•
K. marxianus reduced the metabolic flux of acetate into acetyl-CoA and then into the TCA cycle, increasing syntheses of ethyl acetate and relevant esters during fermentation.
Keywords: Apple cider, Saccharomyces yeasts, Kluyveromyces marxianus, Aroma, Nonvolatile, Transcriptome
Abstract
This study explored the application of Kluyveromyces marxianus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (commercial and wild type) in the alcoholic fermentation of Fuji apple juice under static conditions. Metabolome analyses revealed that ethyl esters, including ethyl hexanoate, ethyl decanoate, ethyl octanoate, octanoic acid and decanoic acid, were the dominant components in ciders fermented by the Saccharomyces yeasts. In the K. marxianus ciders, ethyl acetate, hexyl acetate, propyl acetate and acetic acid were the most abundant volatiles, suggesting that the cider fermented by K. marxianus might have a fruitier smell. Transcriptome analyses were adapted to gain insight into the differential metabolite patterns between K. marxianus and S. cerevisiae during cider fermentation. GO and KEGG enrichments revealed that the metabolic pathways of glucose, organic acids and amino acids during cider fermentation were quite different between these two yeasts. The K. marxianus strain exhibited a higher rate of glycolysis and ethanol fermentation than did Saccharomyces yeasts under oxygen-limited conditions. It also reduced the metabolic flux of acetate into acetyl-CoA and then into the TCA cycle, increasing the syntheses of ethyl acetate and relevant esters, which may affect its cell growth under anaerobic conditions but enriched the taste and variety of aromas in apple cider.
1. Introduction
In traditional cider brewing, spontaneous fermentation performed by indigenous microbiota usually lasts for several weeks when Saccharomyces spp. are the main yeasts responsible for alcoholic fermentation during cider production (Cousin et al., 2017, Valles et al., 2007). To accelerate the fermentation process, yeast starters are often added to the must. On an industrial scale, however, ciders are commonly fermented with selected starters, such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces bayanus, to ensure reliability and minimize sensory deviations, which concurrently limits the diversity of wine styles and the complexity of their flavours (Wei, Zhang, Yuan, Dai, & Yue, 2019). In recent years, non-Saccharomyces yeasts have received greater attention due to their flavour improvement potential in wines and ciders. In particular, Hanseniaspora uvarum, Metschnikowia pulcherrima, Pichia kudriavzevii and other yeast species are selected to produce alcoholic beverages through pure, simultaneous or sequential co-fermentation with Saccharomyces yeasts (Hranilovic et al., 2020, Shi et al., 2019, Wei et al., 2020, Yan et al., 2020).
Kluyveromyces marxianus is a new alternative yeast for wine and cider making that can ferment several carbohydrate substrates into ethanol and grow rapidly (Fonseca et al., 2008, Sukhang et al., 2019, Yamahata et al., 2020). As an ethanologenic yeast, K. marxianus is one of the few species that can secrete endogenous polygalacturonase, an important pectolytic glucanase primarily implicated in the solubility of pectin (Serrat, Rodriguez, Camacho, Vallejo, Ageitos, & Villa, 2011). Recent work showed that the addition of K. marxianus increased the yield of free-run wine and clearly altered the aroma profile of wine (Rollero, Zietsman, Buffetto, Schuckel, Ortiz-Julien, & Divol, 2018). Furthermore, K. marxianus holds the potential to synthesize additional aroma compounds, such as ethyl acetate and 2-phenylethanol (Morrissey, Etschmann, Schrader, & de Billerbeck, 2015). Recently, Gschaedler et al. investigated the cider production performance of an autochthonous K. marxianus strain isolated from a spontaneous cider fermentation process and found that it produced four times more ethyl acetate than did S. cerevisiae but required a long adaptation phase (Gschaedler, Iniguez-Munoz, Flores-Flores, Kirchmayr, & Arellano-Plaza, 2021). Nevertheless, the metabolic characteristics of K. marxianus in apple cider fermentation are comparatively limited, and its contribution to the composition of apple cider aroma and nonvolatile compounds needs to be investigated.
The organoleptic characteristics of fermented beverages are the main factors influencing consumer acceptance and depend greatly on the aroma compounds and nonvolatile secondary metabolites produced during fermentation (Symoneaux et al., 2015, Vidal et al., 2004). Untargeted metabolomics based on high-resolution mass spectrometry is an effective tool for fingerprinting aroma compounds and secondary metabolites in apple ciders. The aim of the present study was to compare the volatile and nonvolatile components in ciders fermented by selected K. marxianus and traditional Saccharomyces yeasts. Transcriptome analyses were performed to track the molecular mechanisms underlying the metabolic differences.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Yeast strains and apple juices
One non-Saccharomyces yeast and two S. cerevisiae strains were used in this study. The K. marxianus (KM) strain Fim-1 was obtained from Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Industrial Microorganisms (Shanghai, China). Commercial S. cerevisiae strain SY (AQ) was purchased from Angel Yeast Co., Ltd. (Yichang, China). The widely used laboratory strain S. cerevisiae S288C (SC) was sourced from ATCC (204508). Apple juices (CK) obtained by crushing Fuji apples were filtered with diatomite (Celite, 535RV, Linjiang, China), and then the soluble solid content (SSC) was adjusted to 15.0° Brix with sucrose. After that, apple juices were pasteurized for 30 min at 68 °C.
2.2. Cider fermentations
Yeast starters were incubated in liquid YPD overnight at 30 °C with a rotation speed of 220 rpm. Yeast cells were collected by centrifugation and suspended in sterile water. For each yeast, cider fermentations were conducted in triplicate with 500 mL-flasks containing 400 mL apple juice supplemented with 50 mg/L potassium metabisulfite. The fermentations were initiated by adding yeast starters at a final optical density (OD600nm) of 0.2 and maintained at 30 °C under static conditions until the total soluble solids decreased to approximately 8.0 °Brix. The fermentation periods were 66, 72 and 216 h for the AQ, SC and KM strains, respectively. The fermented samples were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min to separate the supernatants and yeast cells for further biochemical, transcriptional and metabolomic analyses. Total titratable acids in the ciders were determined by titration with NaOH and represented as g/L malic acid. The colour index was analysed by a UV–Vis spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 420 nm. The contents of ethanol, glucose, sucrose and fructose were quantified on an Agilent 1260 Infinity HPLC (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) fitted with a refractive index detector using a MetaCarb 87H column (300 mm × 4.6 mm). The column temperature was set at 35 °C, and 5 mM H2SO4 (pH 2.0) was used as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min.
2.3. GC–MS analysis of volatile components
Volatile compounds in the apple juice and ciders were extracted according to the headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) method described previously (Villière, Arvisenet, Lethuaut, Prost, & Sérot, 2012). Briefly, 1.5-mL samples were added to the headspace bottle and equilibrated for 15 min at 50 °C. Subsequently, a 50/30 μm DVB/CAR on PDMS fibre was plugged into the headspace bottle for 30 min at 50 °C to trap the volatiles.
To analyse the volatile compounds, HS-SPME extracts were desorbed at 260 °C in the injection port of an Agilent 7890B GC (Agilent Technologies, USA) equipped with a DB-wax column (30 × 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm), a flame ionization detector, and a quadripolar mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, 5977B, USA). Helium carrier gas flowed at a constant rate of 1.0 mL/min. The column temperature was held at 40 °C for 5 min, rose to 220 °C at a rate of 5 °C/min, and then increased to 250 °C in 2.5 min. Compounds were identified by comparing their mass spectra with the standard spectra in the reference database (NIST 14). All the volatile compounds were semiquantified by the relative chromatographic peak areas using 2-octanol as the internal standard.
2.4. UPLC/MS-based metabolomics analysis
Nonvolatile compounds in the apple juice and ciders were determined by UPLC/ESI-MSn in both ESI positive and ESI negative ion modes (Hranilovic, Gambetta, Jeffery, Grbin, & Jiranek, 2020). The UPLC separations were executed on a Thermo Vanquish system (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) equipped with an ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 column (150 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.8 μm) (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) maintained at 40 °C. The mobile phases were 0.1% formic acid–water (A1) and 0.1% formic acid-acetonitrile (B1) for the positive ion mode and 5 mM aqueous ammonium formate (A2) and acetonitrile (B2) at a flow rate of 0.25 mL/min for the negative ion mode. The linear gradients for solvent B (v/v) were as follows: 1 min, 2% B1/B2; 9 min, 50% B1/B2; 12 min, 98% B1/B2 (maintained for 1.5 min); 13.5 ∼ 14 min, 2% B1/B2 (maintained for 6.0 min). The ESI-MSn determinations were conducted on a Thermo Q Exactive HF-X mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, USA) with spray voltages of 3.5 kV (positive mode) and −2.5 kV (negative mode), and the capillary temperature was maintained at 325 ℃. The mass spectra were scanned at a mass resolution of 70,000 over a mass range of m/z 81 to 1000. The data-dependent MS/MS acquisition was performed with higher energy collisional dissociation (HCD) scanned at a normalized collision energy of 30 eV.
2.5. RNA extraction, cDNA library construction and RNA sequencing
For transcriptome sequencing, yeast cells were collected after incubation for 12 h and at the end of fermentation (8.0 °Brix). Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol Reagent (Thermo Scientific, USA) following the manufacturer's protocol and quantified using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA). Then, sequencing libraries were generated using the VAHTS mRNA-seq V3 Library Prep Kit for Illumina (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, Jiangshu, China). Transcriptome sequencing was performed on a NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) by Personal Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All three independent replicates were analysed.
2.6. Bioinformatics analysis
Filtered clean reads for transcriptome sequencing were mapped to the reference K. marxianus (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/GCA_001854445.2) and S. cerevisiae (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/GCA_003086655.1) genomes using HISAT2. The gene expression levels were normalized with the FPKM (fragments per kilobase per million fragments) method. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified using the DESeq R package, and a P value < 0.05 with a twofold change was considered to be significant. DEGs were mapped to the Gene Ontology (GO) and KEGG databases to identify their functions and biological processes. The P values were calculated from the hypergeometric distribution.
2.7. Statistical analysis
All results were expressed as the mean (±standard deviation) of three replications. Data analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics version 19 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). To compare the differences in chemical compositions, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted with the Tukey test at a significance level of p < 0.05. Principal component analysis was performed using Origin 2017 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA).
3. Results
3.1. Volatile compounds in the ciders
A total of 102 kinds of volatile compounds were detected from the apple juice and the three ciders. Specifically, 48 volatile compounds were detected in apple juice, while in the ciders fermented with KM, SC and AQ, there were 48, 58 and 60, respectively, types of volatiles found. These flavour compounds were mainly classified into alcohols, acids, esters, and carbonyls (Table 1). Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to reduce the dimensionality of volatile components in different samples (Fig. 1). As shown in Fig. 1, PC1 and PC2 accounted for 52.39% and 26.02% of the total variance, respectively, and principal components in the three ciders were clearly distinguished. However, unlike the SC and AQ ciders, the principal components in the KM cider were well correlated with those of the apple juice. Of the detected volatile compounds, 1-hexanol, ethyl hexanoate, hexyl acetate, 2-phenylethanol and ethyl decanoate made large contributions to the variance of PC1.
Table 1.
Volatile compounds in different ciders.
| Compounds | Concentration (μg/L) | Odour threshold (mg/L) | Description | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | KM | SC | AQ | |||
| Alcohols | ||||||
| 1-Hexanol | 171.8 ± 2.1 | 225.0 ± 4.2 | 257.5 ± 3.5 | 204.7 ± 8.2 | 8 | Green, herb |
| 2-Methyl-1-propanol | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 201.4 ± 12.8 | 61.5 ± 14.8 | 40.0 ± 7.8 | 40 | Fusel, alcohol |
| 2-Phenylethanol | nd | 190.4 ± 10.0 | 656.4 ± 66.2 | 354.7 ± 7.4 | 14 | Green |
| 1-Propanol | nd | 23.9 ± 2.4 | 19.6 ± 5.6 | 23.7 ± 2.1 | 206 | Alcohol, pungent |
| 1-Butanol | 23.7 ± 4.0 | 20.7 ± 0.0 | nd | 23.3 ± 1.1 | 150 | Medicine, fruit |
| Fatty acids | ||||||
| Acetic acid | 7.9 ± 2.5 | 279.8 ± 30.2 | 48.3 ± 7.3 | 73.6 ± 19.2 | Sour | |
| 2-Methyl butyric acid | 38.7 ± 1.8 | 66.7 ± 3.8 | 48.9 ± 3.1 | 69.7 ± 3.3 | 0.033 | Cheese |
| Octanoic acid | nd | Nd | 268.8 ± 24.8 | 410.7 ± 48.6 | 0.5 | Rancid, harsh, cheese, fatty acid |
| Decanoic acid | nd | Nd | 170.2 ± 26.2 | 485.5 ± 60.7 | 1 | Fatty, unpleasant |
| Esters | ||||||
| Ethyl hexanoate | 9.5 ± 0.9 | Nd | 650.9 ± 50.6 | 1351.9 ± 54.2 | 0.005 | Fruity, green apple, floral, violet |
| Hexyl acetate | 44.8 ± 2.3 | 756.5 ± 28.1 | 445.4 ± 12.5 | 858.1 ± 15.1 | 1.5 | Pleasant fruity, pear |
| Ethyl decanoate | nd | Nd | 289.7 ± 30.1 | 1253.3 ± 137.6 | 0.2 | Fruity, fatty, pleasant |
| Ethyl octanoate | nd | 19.7 ± 1.9 | 280.1 ± 13.5 | 758.0 ± 99.3 | 0.002 | Fruity, pineapple, pear, floral |
| Isoamyl acetate | nd | 370.9 ± 13.2 | 196.5 ± 17.7 | 421.7 ± 52.7 | 0.03 | Banana, fruity, sweet |
| Ethyl 9-decenoate | nd | Nd | 117.8 ± 23.5 | 240.9 ± 15.2 | 0.1 | Green, fruity, fatty |
| Ethyl acetate | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 821.2 ± 67.8 | 68.6 ± 5.5 | 93.9 ± 8.5 | 7.5 | Fruity, sweet |
| Ethyl butyrate | 14.6 ± 0.2 | 13.5 ± 3.1 | 21.6 ± 3.8 | 19.4 ± 2.6 | 0.02 | strawberry, fruity |
| Ethyl 2-methylbutanoate | 24.0 ± 0.9 | 3.6 ± 0.1 | 6.4 ± 0.8 | 5.7 ± 0.3 | Apple | |
| Propyl acetate | 5.0 ± 0.4 | 720.7 ± 95.9 | nd | nd | 4.7 | Fruity, sweet |
| Aldehydes | ||||||
| (E)-2-Hexenal | 210.3 ± 0.6 | Nd | nd | nd | ||
| Hexanal | 157.1 ± 3.8 | Nd | nd | nd | Grass, fatty | |
| Benzaldehyde | 94.1 ± 1.9 | Nd | 8.2 ± 0.6 | nd | 2 | Bitter almond |
CK, apple juice; KM, SC and AQ, the ciders fermented with K. marxianus Fim-1, S. cerevisiae S288C and S. cerevisiae SY, respectively;
nd, not detected;
The odour threshold and description of volatile compounds referred to (Picinelli Lobo et al., 2021, Qin et al., 2018, Shi et al., 2019).
Fig. 1.
PCA biplot of the volatile components in the apple juice and cider samples. CK, apple juice; KM, the K. marxianus Fim-1 fermented cider; SC, the S. cerevisiae S288C fermented cider; AQ, the S. cerevisiae SY fermented cider.
Overall, fermentation of apple juice with yeast markedly increased the contents of volatile components and changed the aroma composition. The major components of apple juice were aldehydes and alcohols, which accounted for 43.6% and 29.8% of the total volatiles, respectively. In cider samples, alcohols (63.3–77.8%) and esters (17.3–30.4%) were the dominant volatiles. In addition, yeast fermentations significantly increased the contents of higher alcohols, esters and volatile acids (Table 1), indicating that the dominant aroma of the apple juices was transformed from green and fruity to bouquet, fruity and fatty. Among the three ciders, there were likewise significant differences in the compositions of esters and volatile acids. Ethyl esters (ethyl hexanoate, ethyl decanoate, and ethyl octanoate), octanoic acid and decanoic acid were the principal components in ciders fermented by the Saccharomyces yeasts SC and AQ. In the KM ciders, acetate esters (ethyl acetate, hexyl acetate, propyl acetate) and acetic acid were the most abundant volatiles. These results suggest that the cider fermented by K. marxianus might have a sweeter smell than that fermented by Saccharomyces yeasts. Compared to the laboratory Saccharomyces strain S288C, the industrial strain AQ produced markedly more fatty acids and esters during fermentation.
3.2. Nonvolatile compounds in the ciders
Some of the nonvolatile compounds detected in different samples, including flavonoids, phenolic acids, organic acids and amino acids, are listed in Table 2. Consistent with the titration of titratable acid, the contents of phenolic acids and organic acids in all cider samples apparently increased after fermentation. However, KM cider had the highest content of titratable acid (Table 3). Of the identified organic acids, the contents of isocitric acid, succinic acid, phenyl lactate and malic acid increased significantly in all ciders after fermentation. Although the profiles of nonvolatile components in the three ciders were quite similar, the contents of these nonvolatiles were significantly different. Compared with the ciders made with Saccharomyces yeasts, the KM cider had relatively higher contents of hesperetin, quercetin, caffeic acid, salicylic acid and amino acids.
Table 2.
Nonvolatile compounds determined by UPLC-MS in apple juice and ciders.
| Compounds | m/z | Peak area | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | KM vs CK | SC vs CK | AQ vs CK | ||
| Flavonoids | |||||
| Catechin | 289.07 | 1,846,641 | 0.18 | 0.70 | 1.03 |
| Phloretin | 275.09 | 750,658,765 | 0.78 | 1.05 | 1.00 |
| Naringenin | 273.08 | 3,411,617 | 0.85 | 1.18 | 0.77 |
| Isorhamnetin | 317.07 | 1,982,633 | 1.88 | 4.87 | 6.87 |
| (-)-Epigallocatechin | 306.08 | 13,525,711 | 2.36 | 5.35 | 0.63 |
| Kaempferol | 287.06 | 931,413 | 4.02 | 3.86 | 4.48 |
| Hesperetin | 302.08 | 653,032 | 10.11 | 3.86 | 1.97 |
| Quercetin | 303.05 | 2,450,348 | 34.61 | 2.41 | 3.30 |
| Phenolic acids | |||||
| Chlorogenic acid | 353.09 | 5,459,505 | 0.65 | 6.21 | 2.62 |
| trans-Ferulic acid | 195.07 | 75,598,911 | 1.84 | 2.11 | 1.61 |
| Gallic acid | 171.03 | 50,302,811 | 2.19 | 3.49 | 6.00 |
| Caffeic acid | 181.05 | 17,749,226 | 14.14 | 2.44 | 1.92 |
| Salicylic acid | 137.02 | 18,463,606 | 19.51 | 7.72 | 8.59 |
| acids | |||||
| Glutaric acid | 115.04 | 499,485,594 | 0.30 | 0.34 | 0.51 |
| 2-Oxoglutarate | 129.13 | 131,340,847 | 1.37 | 1.04 | 0.89 |
| Citric acid | 191.02 | 17,072,235 | 1.69 | 0.30 | 0.42 |
| γ-Aminobutyric acid | 104.07 | 1,807,997,231 | 1.80 | 0.08 | 0.32 |
| Butyric acid | 88.08 | 416,198,517 | 4.38 | 4.65 | 3.70 |
| L-Malic acid | 133.01 | 15,666,278 | 5.26 | 5.92 | 19.89 |
| Phenyllactate | 165.05 | 47,847,027 | 8.97 | 17.35 | 11.25 |
| Succinic acid | 117.02 | 206,668,652 | 74.30 | 31.21 | 25.22 |
| Isocitric acid | 192.03 | 1,127,666 | 169.53 | 463.64 | 10.00 |
| Amino acids | |||||
| L-Proline | 116.07 | 1,445,418,400 | 10.20 | 3.03 | 5.55 |
| L-Tryptophan | 203.08 | 70,271,875 | 1.13 | 0.94 | 0.94 |
| L-Threonine | 120.07 | 1,756,446,063 | 0.63 | 0.24 | 0.42 |
| L-Aspartic acid | 132.03 | 6,055,388,129 | 0.48 | 0.01 | 0.11 |
| L-Glutamic acid | 146.04 | 549,100,546 | 0.41 | 0.11 | 0.44 |
| L-Serine | 105.04 | 1,418,100,386 | 0.17 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| L-Valine | 118.09 | 3,185,255,281 | 0.16 | 0.07 | 0.07 |
| L-Lysine | 147.11 | 317,019,408 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.03 |
CK, apple juice; KM, SC and AQ, the ciders fermented with K. marxianus Fim-1, S. cerevisiae S288C and S. cerevisiae SY, respectively.
Table 3.
Physicochemical parameters of apple juice and apple ciders.
| Index | Groups | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | KM | SC | AQ | |
| Titratable acid/g·L-1 | 2.18 ± 0.02d | 3.77 ± 0.04a | 2.70 ± 0.03c | 2.83 ± 0.02b |
| Color (420 nm) | 0.48 ± 0.00a | 0.34 ± 0.01b | 0.24 ± 0.00d | 0.29 ± 0.00c |
| Ethanol/g·L-1 | ND | 44.96 ± 0.39a | 45.62 ± 1.19a | 45.62 ± 0.59a |
| Sucrose | 58.41 ± 0.17 | ND | ND | ND |
| Glucose | 28.54 ± 0.90a | 4.20 ± 0.43d | 6.05 ± 0.34c | 7.68 ± 0.62b |
| Fructose | 81.74 ± 1.79a | 48.07 ± 1.37c | 52.53 ± 0.79b | 48.06 ± 1.04c |
Means with different lowercase letters in the same row are significantly different (Tukey, p < 0.05).
CK, apple juice; KM, SC and AQ, the ciders fermented with K. marxianus Fim-1, S. cerevisiae S288C and S. cerevisiae SY, respectively.
In cider fermentation, amino acids in fruit juice provide the main nitrogen sources for yeast growth and are also involved in the synthesis and metabolism of volatile compounds (Callejón, Tesfaye, Torija, Mas, Troncoso, & Morales, 2007). To determine the differential metabolite profiles of amino acids between K. marxianus and S. cerevisiae during cider fermentation, all relevant metabolites detected in ciders were mapped into the metabolic pathways of organic acids and amino acids. As shown in Fig. 2, except for malate, the metabolites involved in the TCA cycle, amino acid biosynthesis and metabolism pathways were apparently higher in KM cider than in SC and/or AQ ciders. This may be because K. marxianus might have a higher metabolic flux into the TCA cycle and amino acid biosynthesis (metabolism) than do Saccharomyces yeasts, which reduced the intake and assimilation of amino acids from apple juice. The differential metabolite profile of amino acids in K. marxianus may contribute to improving the quality and nutrition of ciders.
Fig. 2.
Analysis of organic acid and amino acid metabolic pathways in different cider samples. Red colour indicates that metabolite content in the KM cider was higher than in the SC cider and/or the AQ cider. Blue colour indicates that the content in the KM cider was lower than in the SC cider and/or the AQ cider. Gray colour: not detected. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
3.3. Gene Ontology (GO) and KEGG pathway analyses of differentially expressed genes
DEGs of the three yeasts were analysed by comparing the gene expression profiles between the initial and late stages of the fermentation process. There were 1487, 631 and 932 genes that were differentially expressed in the KM, SC and AQ strains at the two fermentation stages, respectively. To determine the biological functions of these DEGs, all DEGs were subjected to GO analysis, and the major classifications are shown in Fig. 3A. In K. marxianus, the DEGs were mainly enriched in acid (carboxylic acid, organic acids and oxoacids), amino acid and organonitrogen compound metabolic processes, while the DEGs in both Saccharomyces yeasts were significantly enriched in carbohydrate metabolic, oxidation–reduction and rRNA-related processes. GO cluster analyses suggested that the higher contents of amino acids and organic acids in KM cider were closely related to its anabolic pathways.
Fig. 3.
GO (A) and KEGG (B) enrichment analyses of DEGs in the KM, SC and AQ yeasts during cider fermentation. KM, DEGs of the K. marxianus strains; SC, DEGs of S. cerevisiae S288C; AQ, DEGs of the S. cerevisiae SY strain. The colours (blue to red) represent the p values (-log10)-normalized by the z scores. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
To further specify which biological pathways differed between KM and Saccharomyces strains, the DEGs were mapped to the terms in the KEGG database. As shown in Fig. 3B, carbohydrate metabolism, amino acid metabolism and transcription were the major pathways that were significantly different among the three yeast strains. In K. marxianus, DEGs were significantly enriched in pyruvate and amino acid (lysine, glycine, aspartate, etc.) metabolic pathways. This might be a contributing factor to the higher contents of amino acids in KM-fermented cider than in Saccharomyces yeast ciders (Table 2). As indicated by the GO analyses, the DEGs in the SC and AQ strains were enriched into clusters with similar biological functions, but they were classified into different biological pathways in the KEGG pathway enrichment analyses. In particular, in the SC strain, genes for glycolysis, citrate cycle and fatty acid degradation pathways were significantly differentially expressed at the two fermentation stages. In the case of the AQ strain, however, DEGs were enriched in the RNA polymerase and ribosome biogenesis pathways.
To compare the fermentation patterns of the K. marxianus and Saccharomyces yeasts in cider brewing, the expression levels of the genes involved in central carbon metabolism and ethanol and ester syntheses were further analysed. Fig. 4 shows the fold changes in expression of the key genes involved in glycolysis and pyruvate metabolism pathways for the three yeast strains during cider fermentation. In yeast, hexokinase, 6-phosphofructokinase and pyruvate kinase are the three key rate-limiting enzymes in the glycolytic pathway. The results showed that the expression levels of these key genes coding for hexokinase HXK2 (RAG5), phosphofructokinases PFK1 and PFK2, and pyruvate kinase PYK1 were markedly higher in the KM strain than in Saccharomyces yeasts, which suggests that the KM strain might have a higher rate of glycolysis. In addition, alcohol dehydrogenase genes, including ADH1, ADH2 and ADH6, were significantly upregulated in the KM strain, while the pyruvate dehydrogenase subunit gene PDB1, aldehyde dehydrogenase genes ALD2 and ALD6, and acetyl-CoA synthetase genes ACS1 and ACS2 were apparently downregulated, indicating that K. marxianus tended to produce ethanol under anaerobic conditions rather than to produce acetyl-CoA. In contrast, in addition to ADH1, the genes involved in acetyl-CoA synthesis pathways, including PDB1, ALD2, ALD6, ACS1 and ACS2, were more highly expressed in the Saccharomyces yeasts. This result indicates that the central carbon metabolic flux in S. cerevisiae was synchronous with ethanol fermentation and acetyl coenzyme synthesis in the initial fermentation stage. In yeast, ethyl acetate is commonly synthesized by esterification of ethanol with acetyl-CoA, which is catalysed by alcohol acetyltransferase (Gethins, Guneser, Demirkol, Rea, Stanton, Ross, et al., 2015). Reducing the metabolic flux of acetyl-CoA into the TCA cycle increases the production of ethyl acetate (Loser, Urit, Forster, Stukert, & Bley, 2012). Therefore, the lower expression of citrate synthase genes CIT1 and CIT3 in the KM strain may contribute to greater accumulation of ethyl acetate in the KM cider (Table 1).
Fig. 4.
KEGG pathway analyses of the expression of genes involved in central carbon metabolism and ethanol and ester synthesis in the KM, SC and AQ strains. Red lines, mitochondrial pathways; black lines, cytoplasmic pathways. Column graphs: ordinate column, fold change of gene expression between the initial and late stages of yeast fermentation; x-coordinate, different yeast strains. The relative expression levels in the KM (blue columns), S. cerevisiae S288 (orange columns) and SY (grey column) strains are the ratios of the gene expression at the initial stage divided by that in the late stage. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
4. Discussion
A typical cider-making fermentation process includes three stages: oxidation, alcoholic fermentation and malolactic fermentation. The oxidative process is the main stage for the production of fruity and floral aromatic compounds, which dominate in cider fermented by non-Saccharomyces yeasts (Dierings, Braga, da Silva, Wosiacki, & Nogueira, 2013). Consequently, non-Saccharomyces yeasts were good choices for increasing the diversity of cider flavour.
Volatile compounds, organic acids and phenols are the principal components contributing to cider flavour (Symoneaux, Baron, Marnet, Bauduin, & Chollet, 2014). The majority of higher alcohols are byproducts of yeast amino acid and sugar catabolism via the Ehrlich pathway, while esters are produced by the esterification of alcohols with fatty acids (Lorenzini, Simonato, Slaghenaufi, Ugliano, & Zapparoli, 2019). K. marxianus or Saccharomyces yeasts were able to increase the contents of higher alcohols (fusel alcohols), fatty acids and esters during apple juice fermentation. Hexyl acetate, hexanal, 2-methylbutyl acetate and (E)-2-hexenal exhibit high odour activity values (OAVs) that contribute appreciably to the characteristic aroma of apple juice (Valppil, Fan, Zhang, Rouseff, 2009). In this study, the hexyl acetate content increased significantly after fermentation with the KM, SC or AQ strain. Ethyl acetate is the most common ester to play a key role in the perception of fruitiness in young wines (Braga, Zielinski, Silva, de Souza, Pietrowski Gde, Couto, et al., 2013). Among the three ciders, KM cider had the highest content of ethyl acetate, which suggests that the cider fermented by K. marxianus may feature a fruitier aroma.
Phenolic compounds are the main flavour compounds affecting the quality and sensory characteristics (colour and mouthfeel) of ciders (Laaksonen, Kuldjarv, Paalme, Virkki, & Yang, 2017). In cider-making, the addition of apple phenolic extracts can improve the colour and perception of the bitterness and astringency of ciders (Benvenutti, Bortolini, Nogueira, Zielinski, & Alberti, 2019). Our results showed that the chromatic value of apple juice decreased significantly after fermentation, and KM cider exhibited the darkest colour among the three ciders (Table 3). As the contents of phenolic acids and organic acids increased after yeast fermentation, the ciders became richer in taste than the unfermented apple juice (Table 2).
K. marxianus is a Crabtree-negative yeast that tends to produce ethanol when oxygen is limited (Nambu-Nishida, Nishida, Hasunuma, & Kondo, 2018). In contrast, S. cerevisiae is a Crabtree-positive model yeast using glycolysis as the terminal electron acceptor in the presence of excessive oxygen (Imura, Nitta, Iwakiri, Matsuda, Shimizu, & Fukusaki, 2020). Our transcriptome data suggested that the rate of glycolysis was higher in K. marxianus than in S. cerevisiae strains in the initial fermentation stage. However, the metabolic flux in K. marxianus was directed to ethanol fermentation rather than the acetyl-CoA synthesis that could support cell growth. In S. cerevisiae, both ethanol fermentation and acetyl-CoA synthesis pathways were highly active. This was probably why K. marxianus required a longer period for cider fermentation than did S. cerevisiae. Interestingly, two acetyl-CoA synthetase genes, ACS1 and ACS2, were downregulated in K. marxianus during cider fermentation, which contributed to the syntheses of acetate and relevant esters.
5. Conclusions
The non-Saccharomyces yeast K. marxianus, as well as the two S. cerevisiae strains S288C and SY, were used to ferment Fuji apple juice under static conditions. Yeast fermentations significantly altered the volatile and nonvolatile profiles of apple juice, with the contents of aldehydes sharply decreasing and the higher alcohols, fatty acids, esters, phenolic acids and organic acids markedly increasing. In apple juice, aldehydes and alcohols were the major aroma components. In contrast, alcohols and esters were the principal components in apple ciders. Ciders fermented with Saccharomyces yeasts, especially the AQ strain, contained more ethyl esters, octanoic acid, and decanoic acid. In contrast, K. marxianus produced more acetate esters and acetic acid during cider fermentation, which enriched the taste and variety of aromas of apple cider. Transcriptome analyses revealed the differences in activity of metabolic pathways for glucose, organic acids and amino acids during cider fermentation between K. marxianus and Saccharomyces yeasts. The K. marxianus strain exhibited a higher metabolic flux of glycolysis and ethanol fermentation than did Saccharomyces yeasts in the initial fermentation stage. In addition, it reduced the metabolic flux of acetyl-CoA synthesis from acetate and acetyl-CoA into the TCA cycle to increase synthesis of ethyl acetate and relevant esters.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by Science and Technology Research Program of Shanghai (21015800400, 19DZ2282100 and19395800600).
Contributor Information
Jungang Zhou, Email: zhoujg@fudan.edu.cn.
Hong Lu, Email: honglv@fudan.edu.cn.
References
- Benvenutti L., Bortolini D.G., Nogueira A., Zielinski A.A.F., Alberti A. Effect of addition of phenolic compounds recovered from apple pomace on cider quality. LWT - Food Science and Technology. 2019;100:348–354. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.10.087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Braga C.M., Zielinski A.A., Silva K.M., de Souza F.K., Pietrowski Gde A., Couto M.…Nogueira A. Classification of juices and fermented beverages made from unripe, ripe and senescent apples based on the aromatic profile using chemometrics. Food Chemistry. 2013;141(2):967–974. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Callejón R.M., Tesfaye W., Torija M.J., Mas A., Troncoso A.M., Morales M.L. HPLC determination of amino acids with AQC derivatization in vinegars along submerged and surface acetifications and its relation to the microbiota. European Food Research and Technology. 2007;227(1):93–102. doi: 10.1007/s00217-007-0697-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cousin F.J., Le Guellec R., Schlusselhuber M., Dalmasso M., Laplace J.M., Cretenet M. Microorganisms in Fermented Apple Beverages: Current Knowledge and Future Directions. Microorganisms. 2017;5(3) doi: 10.3390/microorganisms5030039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fonseca G.G., Heinzle E., Wittmann C., Gombert A.K. The yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus and its biotechnological potential. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2008;79(3):339–354. doi: 10.1007/s00253-008-1458-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gethins L., Guneser O., Demirkol A., Rea M.C., Stanton C., Ross R.P.…Morrissey J.P. Influence of carbon and nitrogen source on production of volatile fragrance and flavour metabolites by the yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus. Yeast. 2015;32(1):67–76. doi: 10.1002/yea.3047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gschaedler A., Iniguez-Munoz L.E., Flores-Flores N.Y., Kirchmayr M., Arellano-Plaza M. Use of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in cider fermentation: Importance of the nutrients addition to obtain an efficient fermentation. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2021;347 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2021.109169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hranilovic A., Gambetta J.M., Jeffery D.W., Grbin P.R., Jiranek V. Lower-alcohol wines produced by Metschnikowia pulcherrima and Saccharomyces cerevisiae co-fermentations: The effect of sequential inoculation timing. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2020;329 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Imura M., Nitta K., Iwakiri R., Matsuda F., Shimizu H., Fukusaki E. Comparison of metabolic profiles of yeasts based on the difference of the Crabtree positive and negative. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 2020;129(1):52–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2019.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laaksonen O., Kuldjarv R., Paalme T., Virkki M., Yang B. Impact of apple cultivar, ripening stage, fermentation type and yeast strain on phenolic composition of apple ciders. Food Chemistry. 2017;233:29–37. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.04.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leila Roseli Dierings, Cíntia Maia Braga, Karolline Marques da Silva, Gilvan Wosiacki, & Nogueira, A. (2013). Population Dynamics of Mixed Cultures of Yeast and Lactic Acid Bacteria in Cider Conditions. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 56(5), 837-847. 10.1590/s1516-89132013000500016.
- Lorenzini M., Simonato B., Slaghenaufi D., Ugliano M., Zapparoli G. Assessment of yeasts for apple juice fermentation and production of cider volatile compounds. LWT - Food Science and Technology. 2019;99:224–230. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.09.075. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Loser C., Urit T., Forster S., Stukert A., Bley T. Formation of ethyl acetate by Kluyveromyces marxianus on whey during aerobic batch and chemostat cultivation at iron limitation. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2012;96(3):685–696. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4205-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morrissey J.P., Etschmann M.M., Schrader J., de Billerbeck G.M. Cell factory applications of the yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus for the biotechnological production of natural flavour and fragrance molecules. Yeast. 2015;32(1):3–16. doi: 10.1002/yea.3054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nambu-Nishida Y., Nishida K., Hasunuma T., Kondo A. Genetic and physiological basis for antibody production by Kluyveromyces marxianus. AMB Express. 2018;8(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13568-018-0588-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Picinelli Lobo A., Pando Bedrinana R., Rodriguez Madrera R., Suarez Valles B. Aromatic, olfactometric and consumer description of sweet ciders obtained by cryo-extraction. Food Chemistry. 2021;338 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qin Z., Petersen M.A., Bredie W.L.P. Flavor profiling of apple ciders from the UK and Scandinavian region. Food Research International. 2018;105:713–723. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rollero S., Zietsman A.J.J., Buffetto F., Schuckel J., Ortiz-Julien A., Divol B. Kluyveromyces marxianus Secretes a Pectinase in Shiraz Grape Must That Impacts Technological Properties and Aroma Profile of Wine. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemisrey. 2018;66(44):11739–11747. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b03977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Serrat M., Rodriguez O., Camacho M., Vallejo J.A., Ageitos J.M., Villa T.G. Influence of nutritional and environmental factors on ethanol and endopolygalacturonase co-production by Kluyveromyces marxianus CCEBI 2011. International Microbiology. 2011;14(1):41–49. doi: 10.2436/20.1501.01.134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shi W.-K., Wang J., Chen F.-S., Zhang X.-Y. Effect of Issatchenkia terricola and Pichia kudriavzevii on wine flavor and quality through simultaneous and sequential co-fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. LWT - Food Science and Technology. 2019;116 doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108477. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sukhang S., Choojit S., Reungpeerakul T., Sangwichien C. Bioethanol production from oil palm empty fruit bunch with SSF and SHF processes using Kluyveromyces marxianus yeast. Cellulose. 2019;27(1):301–314. doi: 10.1007/s10570-019-02778-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Symoneaux R., Baron A., Marnet N., Bauduin R., Chollet S. Impact of apple procyanidins on sensory perception in model cider (part 1): Polymerisation degree and concentration. LWT - Food Science and Technology. 2014;57(1):22–27. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2013.11.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Symoneaux R., Guichard H., Le Quéré J.-M., Baron A., Chollet S. Could cider aroma modify cider mouthfeel properties? Food Quality and Preference. 2015;45:11–17. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.04.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Valles B.S., Bedrinana R.P., Tascon N.F., Simon A.Q., Madrera R.R. Yeast species associated with the spontaneous fermentation of cider. Food Microbiology. 2007;24(1):25–31. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2006.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Valppil, Z. A., Fan, X., Zhang, H. Q., & Rouseff, R. L. (2009). Impact of Thermal and Nonthermal Processing Technologies on Unfermented Apple Cider Aroma Volatiles. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 57(3), 924-929. 10.1021/jf803142d. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Vidal S., Courcoux P., Francis L., Kwiatkowski M., Gawel R., Williams P.…Cheynier V. Use of an experimental design approach for evaluation of key wine components on mouth-feel perception. Food Quality and Preference. 2004;15(3):209–217. doi: 10.1016/S0950-3293(03)00059-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Villière A., Arvisenet G., Lethuaut L., Prost C., Sérot T. Selection of a representative extraction method for the analysis of odourant volatile composition of French cider by GC–MS–O and GC×GC–TOF-MS. Food Chemistry. 2012;131(4):1561–1568. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.10.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wei J., Zhang Y., Wang Y., Ju H., Niu C., Song Z.…Yue T. Assessment of chemical composition and sensorial properties of ciders fermented with different non-Saccharomyces yeasts in pure and mixed fermentations. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2020;318 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.108471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wei J., Zhang Y., Yuan Y., Dai L., Yue T. Characteristic fruit wine production via reciprocal selection of juice and non-Saccharomyces species. Food Microbiology. 2019;79:66–74. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2018.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamahata N., Toyotake Y., Kunieda S., Wakayama M. Application of multiple sensory evaluations to produce fermented beverages made from sole whey using Kluyveromyces marxianus. International Journal of Food Science & Technology. 2020;55(4):1698–1704. doi: 10.1111/ijfs.14440. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yan G., Zhang B., Joseph L., Waterhouse A.L. Effects of initial oxygenation on chemical and aromatic composition of wine in mixed starters of Hanseniaspora vineae and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Food Microbiology. 2020;90 doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2020.103460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




