Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2022 Mar 21;7(13):11075–11081. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c07078

Introducing Lipophilicity to (Polyhydroxyalkyl)thiazolidine Carboxylic Acids Via Acylation

Olalla Novo Fernández †, Diego Oliveros ‡, Ramon Canela Garayoa †, Mercè Balcells Fluvià †,*, Jonh J Méndez Arteaga ‡, Jordi Eras Joli †,*
PMCID: PMC8991926  PMID: 35415335

Abstract

graphic file with name ao1c07078_0007.jpg

The therapeutic efficacy of bioactive compounds is related to their bioavailability. In turn, the bioavailability depends on the equilibrium between the hydrophilicity and the lipophilicity. 2(R,S)-(Polyhydroxyalkyl)thiazolidine-4(R) carboxylic acids (TCAs), obtained from the condensation of l-cysteine and an aldose, have been recognized as nontoxic precursors of glutathione with important preventive and therapeutic effects. The bioavailability of these compounds can be improved by enhancing their lipophilicity. This can be achieved by the introduction of some acyl groups derived from fatty acids via esterification of the aldose hydroxyl groups. With this purpose four new compounds were synthesized through a selective palmitoyl acylation of d-(−)-ribose and d-(+)-glucose and subsequent condensation with l-cysteine. In addition, the log P of the new compounds was calculated as a measure of the lipophilicity, and in vitro 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) tests were performed as a measure of the antioxidant capability.

Introduction

The addition of bioactive compounds, with preventive and therapeutic properties, to foods is gaining popularity. Bioactive compounds in foods have health benefits above their normal roles as nutrients.1,2 The high lipophilic character of some foods, mainly fat- or oil-rich foods, allows one to use fat-soluble bioactive compounds in food supplementation.3 Modifications of the chemical structure of bioactive compounds are usually performed with the main objectives of enhancing the solubility and bioavailability of these compounds.4 Lipophilicity contributes to the absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) characteristics of compounds.5,6 Log P is a parameter that serves to experimentally determine the lipophilicity. According to Lipinski et al. (2001),7 a limit of log P < 5 is a desirable lipophilicity range for compound absortion and permeability. Improving the bioavailability of bioactive food compounds is fundamental to improving their bioefficacy. However, high lipophilicity (log P > 5) is linked with a rapid metabolic turnover, low solubility, and poor absorption. The importance of the lipophilic partition lies in the ability of compounds to cross a cell membrane and avoid not only rapid excretion but also the hydrophilic part to enhance the solubility of those compounds in aqueous conditions and to interact with molecular targets.

Bioactive compounds must be solubilized into mixed micelles so that they are available for absorption in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). The most frequent causes of low oral bioavailability are attributed to poor solubility and low permeability;8 consequently, equilibrium between lipophilicity and hydrophilicity needs to be achieved.

Cysteine prodrugs are compounds synthesized to release l-cysteine, the rate-limiting amino acid in the synthesis of glutathione (GSH).9 Acetylation of the amino residue of l-cysteine is one approach to increase lipophilicity in l-cysteine. The resulting compound, N-acetylcysteine (NAC), is a good source of thiol groups able to stimulate GSH synthesis to promote detoxification and directly scavenge reactive oxygen species (ROS).10 However, N-acetylcysteine administration has been limited by several drawbacks, including low membrane penetration and low systemic bioavailability.11,12 Chemical modifications on the carboxyl group of l-cysteine have been performed in attempting to ameliorate the bioavailability drawbacks. New esters including alkyl esters, glycollamide esters, and acyloxymethyl esters have also been synthesized, with the thiol group protected as an S-benzoyl ester or S-benzoylcarbamate ester.13

Moreover, thiazolidine derivatives with masked sulfhydryl and amino groups of l-cysteine have been described as prodrugs. The thiazolidine prodrugs including aldoses in the 2-position have been already described.14 These compounds are highly polar, water-soluble compounds due to the presence of multiple hydroxy groups and have the advantage that they do not deliver toxic compounds in vivo by hydrolysis, as it was hypothesized that they might be rapidly excreted by the kidneys. To enhance lipid solubility, the sugar hydroxy groups were acetylated. The biological evaluation of these novel thiazolidines indicated extreme toxicity;15 this may result from the early dissociation into the respective acetylated sugars before the deacetylation took place.

The purpose of this work is the synthesis of four novel thiazolidine derivatives (1–4) with increased lipophilicity using fatty acids instead of acetic acid. The new structures are based on the partial esterification of the carbohydrate skeleton with C16 acyl chains maintaining some free hydroxyl groups. The selected aldoses were d-(−)-ribose and d-(+)-glucose, as representative aldopentose and aldohexose (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Proposed acyl (polyhydroxyalkyl)thiazolidin carboxylic acids derived from d-(−)-ribose (1, 2) and from d-(+)-glucose (3, 4).

The lipophilic part of the modified thiazolidines would come from the partial esterification of some of the sugar hydroxy groups, whereas carbohydrate and thiazolidine moieties exhibit hydrophilic characteristics. This esterification would incrementally change the lipophilicity of the modified thiazolidines, whereas the free hydroxyl groups of the carbohydrate and thiazolidine moieties will confer the hydrophilic character on the compounds.

In addition, the lipophilicity using log P values and in vitro antioxidant properties, based on a 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) test, were assessed for the four new compounds.

Results and Discussion

Synthesis of Compounds

As stated in the Introduction, the properties of thiazolidine-derived compounds are dependent on the size, functionality, and polarity of the groups of these compounds. In the present work, the synthesis of different thiazolidine ester derivatives (Figure 1) of (a) d-(−)-ribose and (b) d-(+)-glucose, an aldopentose and an aldohexose, respectively, is described. In addition to producing mixtures, the direct acylation of 2(R,S)-(polyhydroxyalkyl) thiazolidine-4(R) carboxylic acids (TCAs) would also change the thiazolidine moiety, so the sugars were peracylated before their incorporation into the thiazolidine structure.

Carbohydrate chemistry is complex due to the presence of multiple reactive hydroxy groups,16 thus requiring additional steps of protection and removal of protecting groups to modify specific hydroxyl groups. An initial protection step was performed to allow us to regioselectively esterify the hydroxyl groups, avoiding the formation of polyesters as byproducts.17 Prior to the acetylation of hydroxy groups, the aldehyde functionality was protected as a diethyl dithioacetal. The partial esterification of some hydroxy groups of the sugar was performed using palmitoyl chloride. Then the esterified sugars were unprotected, and the final thiazolidine synthesis was accomplished by a condensation step of the unprotected esterified sugars with l-cysteine. As stated above, the direct esterification of the thiazolidines was not an option if the formation of mixtures of products is to be avoided.

Synthesis of Thiazolidines Derived from d-(−)-Ribose

The first step consisted of the protection of the carbonyl group of d-(−)-ribose to avoid the reactivity of the carbonyl group while maintaining its functionality until the cyclization step with l-cysteine. The aldehyde protection was performed with ethanethiol and 37% HCl (Scheme 1) to achieve the corresponding open-chain derivative of d-(−)-ribose 5 with the free hydroxyl groups.18,19 The low yield after recrystallization from acetone was in accordance with the literature.15

Scheme 1. Carbonyl Group Protection and the Isopropylidenation of the Hydroxy Groups of d-(−)-Ribose.

Scheme 1

Open in a new tab

Conditions: (a) ethanethiol, 37% HCl, rt, 2 h; (b) dry acetone, H2SO4, rt, 16 h. The yield for each step is expressed as a percentage.

The following step consisted of a standard isopropylidenation to selectively protect the vicinal hydroxyl groups.20,21 Isomeric acetonides 6 and 7 were obtained using acetone and H2SO4 as a catalyst. These compounds have already been described.22,23

Compound 6 was the starting material for the synthesis of thiazolidine derivative 1, which contained two acyl chains. A selective 4,5-O-isopropylidene hydrolysis was performed using mild acid conditions to afford the diol 8 (Scheme 2). The reaction progress for this regioselective unprotection was followed by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) to ensure that there was no hydrolysis of the 2,3-O-isopropylidene. Acetonide 8 was obtained in a moderate yield (61%) similar to what is described in the literature.24

Scheme 2. Synthesis of Compound 1 from Compound 6.

Scheme 2

Open in a new tab

Conditions: (a) AcOH 70%, rt, 12 h; (b) C15H31COCl, dry DCM, triethanolamine (TEA), 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP), rt, 16 h; (c) 50% TFA, rt, 16 h; (d) HgO, HgCl2, acetone, H2O, rt, 2 h; (e) l-cysteine, MeOH, pyridine, reflux, 4 h. The yield for each step is expressed as a percentage.

Acylation of acetonide 8 was performed at OH-4 and OH-5 with palmitoyl chloride to obtain the diester 9, which has not previously been reported. The structure of the acylated compound 9 was confirmed by 13C NMR. The chemical shifts for the carbons of the carboxylic group appeared at δ 172.8 and 173.6. Hydrolysis of the remaining 2,3-O-isopropylidene group was performed in stronger conditions than the previous one. Compound 10 was obtained after a treatment with 50% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) at room temperature instead of 70% acetic acid.25

The cleavage of the diethyl dithioacetal group was performed using mercuric oxide (HgO) and mercuric chloride (HgCl2).26,27 The resulting aldehyde was immediately submitted to cyclization with l-cysteine. That reaction was performed using methanol and pyridine under reflux.28,29 As previously reported, the cyclization reaction implies the formation of a new chiral center at C-2 without any stereoisomeric control leading to a diastereomeric mixture.

Thiazolidine derivative 2 obtained from d-(−)-ribose was synthesized from compound 7 with a similar synthetic pathway. The first step was the selective cleavage of 2,5-O-isopropylidene in mild acid conditions to obtain compound 11 (Scheme 3). Then, a selective esterification at OH-5 performed with palmitoyl chloride (1 equiv) in dry dichloromethane (DCM) was performed.

Scheme 3. Synthesis of Compound 2 from Compound 7.

Scheme 3

Open in a new tab

Conditions: (a) 70% AcOH, rt, 12 h; (b) C15H31COCl, dry DCM, TEA, DMAP, rt, 16 h; (c) 50% TFA, rt, 1 h; (d) HgO, HgCl2, acetone, H2O, rt, 2 h; (e) l-cysteine, MeOH, pyridine, reflux, 4 h. The yield for each step is expressed as a percentage.

The following steps consisted of the unprotection of the isoproylidene and diethyl dithioacetal groups. The hydrolysis of the isopropylidene was performed in an aqueous solution of TFA, as in the previous synthetic pathway, to obtain compound 13. The cleavage of the diethyl dithioacetal and the subsequent cyclization afforded compound 14, 5-palmitoyl-d-ribofuranose, in good yield (76%). The structure of 14 was confirmed by 1H and 13C NMR spectra.30,31

The last step was the condensation with l-cysteine in the same conditions previously reported for compound 1. The thiazolidine derivative 2 was analyzed by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy, but proton identification was difficult because of overlapping signals. High-resolution mass spectra confirmed the new thiazolidine derivative compound. The ratio of diastereomers in the mixture favored the (2R,4R)-epimer (2S,4R/2R,4R, 4.5:5.5) according to the ratio of peak areas of the 1H NMR spectrum (see the Supporting Information).

A hydrolysis under mild conditions removed the 5,6-O-isopropyilidene, whereas the 2,3-O-isopropylidene remained stable. For most carbohydrates, the spiro-fused isopropylidene moiety was more stable than the terminal isopropylidene moieties.32 In the previous case (synthesis of compound 8), 2,3-O-isopropylidene was found to be more difficult to remove than 4,5-O-isopropylidene, although a great instability was observed under mild acid conditions. A chemoselective pattern was observed in di-O-isopropylidene compounds in which all terminal isopropylidenes are preferably deprotected under mild conditions. Compound 17 was obtained after a treatment with acetic acid. The spiro-fused isopropylidene was removed by a treatment with 70% TFA at 40 °C to obtain 3-palmitoyl-d-glucopyranose 18.

Compound 18 was cyclized after the acetal protection was removed to obtain a mixture of isomers.

Finally, the thiazolidine monoester derived from d-(+)-glucose 3 was obtained (Scheme 4) after the condensation of 18 with l-cysteine, yielding 41% of the desired compound. The ratio of diastereomers in the mixture favored the (2R,4R)-epimer (2S,4R/2R,4R, 4.1:5.9)) according to the ratio of peak areas of the 1H NMR spectrum (see the Supporting Information).

Scheme 4. Synthesis of Compound 3 from Compound 15.

Scheme 4

Open in a new tab

Conditions: (a) C15H31COCl, dry DCM, TEA, DMAP, rt, 16 h; (b) 70% AcOH, rt, 12 h; (c) TFA 70%, 40 °C, 16 h; (d) l-cysteine, MeOH, pyridine, reflux, 4 h. The yield for each step is expressed as a percentage.

Triester thiazolidine derivative 4 was synthesized starting from compound 17, which has already been reported.33 The diol was completely acylated with palmitoyl chloride to obtain compound 19 in good yield (71%). The unprotection of isopropylidene afforded compound 20, which maintained the furanose form due to the esterification at OH-5 (Scheme 5). The coupling constant of the protons of C-1 and C-2 was 4 Hz, indicating a cis orientation of the protons and an α-furanose conformation. In 13C NMR, the signal at δ 96.89 indicates the α-furanose conformation. Additionally, the presence of minor signals in the 13C NMR spectrum suggested some formation of a β-furanose structure.

Scheme 5. Synthesis of Compound 4 from Compound 17.

Scheme 5

Open in a new tab

Conditions: (a) C15H31COCl, dry DCM, TEA, DMAP, rt, 16 h; (b) 70% TFA, 40 °C, 16 h; (c) l-cysteine, MeOH, pyridine, reflux, 4 h. The yield for each step is expressed as a percentage.

Finally, the cyclization with l-cysteine in methanol allowed us to synthesize thiazolidine derivative 4 in a moderate yield (38%). The compound was obtained as a diastereomeric mixture, but the diastereomeric ratio could not be determined.

Measurement of Lipophilicity, Log P

To assess the lipophilicity of new compounds, log P values were measured. When log P values exceed 4, the octanol–water partitioning system cannot be applicable. In these cases, log P is estimated by using the retention time of the compounds in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and calculating the capacity factor k′, because there is a linear relationship among them.34,35Table 1 shows the values for thiazolidine derivatives based on d-(−)-ribose and d-(+)-glucose.

Table 1. Log P Values from Thiazolidines Derived from d-(−)-Ribose and d-(+)-Glucose.

compound log P
1 9.23
2 2.78
3 3.11
4 14.34
Open in a new tab

The lipophilicity of the thiazolidine derivatives depends on the acyl chains and the presence of hydroxy groups in the carbohydrate and thiazolidine moieties. As expected, larger values of log P were achieved in thiazolidine derivatives including two or more acyl chains. The log P of thiazolidine derivative 1 (9.23) was greater than that of thiazolidine derivative 2 (2.78) due to the two C16 acyl chains. Log P values for the thiazolidine compounds derived from d-(+)-glucose 3 and 4 were 3.11 and 14.34, respectively, indicating that they are also highly lipophilic. Thiazolidine derivative 4 resulted as the most lipophilic compound of all the synthesized compounds due to the incorporation of three C16 acyl chains.

On the one hand, as stated in the Introduction, highly lipophilic compounds are associated with a rapid metabolic turnover, low solubility, and poor absorption in the GIT. On the other hand, the high hydrophilicity of thiazolidine derivatives is correlated with a rapid excretion. Compounds that display a log P value between 1 and 3 appear to be optimal for achieving appropriate physicochemical characteristics.5 The log P of thiazolidine derivatives 2 and 3 is linked with this optimal range, improving the expected compound quality within desired ADMET parameters.

In Vitro Antioxidant Activity

To assess the antioxidant properties of the new compounds, two assays of the scavenging effect, namely, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and ABTS, were performed.36,37 The obtained results were compared to those for the sodium salts of the corresponding homologous compounds without acyl groups (Rib-Cys Na+ and Glu-Cys Na+) and also to the 1,3-thiazolidine-4(R)-carboxylic acid and its sodium salt (TCA-Na+). While DPPH showed incongruent values (results not shown), probably due to the low solubility of the compounds in the solvents used to perform the test, the ABTS assay revealed the conservation of radical scavenging effects to a certain extent. Table 2 shows the Half Maximal Inhibitory Concentration (IC50) of the compounds tested.

Table 2. IC50 Values from the New Compounds Compared with Nonacylated Derived Compounds.

compound IC50 (mg/L)
1 435
2 343
3 339
4 409
Rib-Cys Na+ 299
Glu-CysNa+ 440
TCA 236
TCA-Na+ >600
Open in a new tab

The acylation of the polyhydroxyalkyl thiazolidines resulted in some loss of radical scavenging capability in the ABTS test compared to TCA, used as reference. However, the values of new compounds are similar to those of the sodium salts of polyhydroxyalkyl thiazolidin carboxylic acids, being better for compounds 2 and 3. For these compounds the in vitro lower antioxidant capability may be compensated with their better liposolubility.

Conclusions

New thiazolidine-4(R)-carboxylic acid derivatives were synthesized from l-cysteine and monosaccharides with some hydroxy groups esterified with C16 acyl chains. A protocol to obtain modified thiazolidines from two aldoses, d-(−)-ribose and d-(+)-glucose, was described. Changes in the aldose moiety, in the protecting groups used and in the employed catalysts, may result in variations in the obtained compounds or modifications in the reaction steps. Here, the common C16 acyl chain was used, but the protocol can be applied to other fatty acid chains.

Since lipophilicity has long been considered a crucial physicochemical parameter that strongly influences compound absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity, log P values of the new thiazolidine derivatives were measured. As expected, log P values increased as more acyl chains were incorporated to the carbohydrate moiety. The increased hydrophobic character of these molecules would come from the incorporation of these acyl chains, whereas carbohydrate and thiazolidine moieties would contribute to the hydrophilic character. The thiazolidine compounds with one acyl chain in their structures showed suitable log P values according to those desirable for compound absorption and permeability. In addition, in vitro radical scavenging IC50 values obtained in the ABTS assay were similar to the ones corresponding to the sodium salt of the polyhydroxyalkyl thiazolidines with the same aldoses.

Experimental Section

The experimental methods, synthesis, log P measurements, antioxidant activity, characterizations, and NMR, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), and high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) spectra are thoroughly detailed in the Supporting Information.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deportes of Spain (FPU program, AP2010-1806) and to DBA Center for the UdL postdoc grant of O.N.F.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.1c07078.

  • Full experimental methods, characterization data, and 1H NMR, 13C{1H}-NMR, FTIR and HRMS spectra of the synthesized compounds (PDF)

Author Present Address

§ Ingredients & Desserts SL. Carrer del Vi, 11, 08720 Vilafranca del Penedès, Barcelona, Spain

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ao1c07078_si_001.pdf (3.7MB, pdf)

References

  1. Kuentz M. Lipid-Based Formulations for Oral Delivery of Lipophilic Drugs. Drug Discovery Today Technol. 2012, 9 (2), 1–8. 10.1016/j.ddtec.2012.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Weaver C. M. B. Proactive Foods and Ingredients for Health. Adv. Nutr. 2014, 5 (3), 306S–311S. 10.3945/an.113.005124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. McClements D. J. Utilizing Food Effects to Overcome Challenges in Delivery of Lipophilic Bioactives: Structural Design of Medical and Functional Foods. Expert Opin. Drug Delivery 2013, 10 (12), 1621–1632. 10.1517/17425247.2013.837448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Zawilska J. B.; Wojcieszak J.; Olejniczak A. B. Prodrugs: A Challenge for the Drug Development. Pharmacol. Reports 2013, 65 (1), 1–14. 10.1016/S1734-1140(13)70959-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Arnott J. A.; Planey S. L. The Influence of Lipophilicity in Drug Discovery and Design. Expert Opin. Drug Discovery 2012, 7 (10), 863–875. 10.1517/17460441.2012.714363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Waring M. J. Lipophilicity in Drug Discovery. Expert Opin. Drug Discovery 2010, 5 (3), 235–248. 10.1517/17460441003605098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lipinski C. A.; Lombardo F.; Dominy B. W.; Feeney P. J. Experimental and Computational Approaches to Estimate Solubility and Permeability in Drug Discovery and Development Settings. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2001, 46, 3–26. 10.1016/S0169-409X(00)00129-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Di L.; Kerns E. H.. Drug-Like Properties: Concepts, Structure Design and Methods from ADME to Toxicity Optimization ,2nd ed.; Elsevier B.V., 2016. 10.1016/C2013-0-18378-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Griffith O. W.; Meister A. Glutathione: Interorgan Translocation, Turnover, and Metabolism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1979, 76 (11), 5606–5610. 10.1073/pnas.76.11.5606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. De Vries N.; De Flora S. N-Acetyl-l-Cysteine. J. Cell. Biochem. 1993, 53 (S17F), 270–277. 10.1002/jcb.240531040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ates B.; Abraham L.; Ercal N. Antioxidant and Free Radical Scavenging Properties of N-Acetylcysteine Amide (NACA) and Comparison with N-Acetylcysteine (NAC). Free Radic. Res. 2008, 42 (4), 372–377. 10.1080/10715760801998638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kahns A. H.; Bundgaard H. Prodrugs as Drug Delivery Systems. 107. Synthesis and Chemical and Enzymatic Hydrolysis Kinetics of Various Mono- and Diester Prodrugs of N-Acetylcysteine. Int. J. Pharm. 1990, 62 (2–3), 193–205. 10.1016/0378-5173(90)90233-T. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cacciatore I.; Cornacchia C.; Pinnen F.; Mollica A.; Di Stefano A. Prodrug Approach for Increasing Cellular Glutathione Levels. Molecules 2010, 15 (3), 1242–1264. 10.3390/molecules15031242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schubert M. P. The Combination of Cysteine With Sugars. J. Biol. Chem. 1939, 130 (2), 601–603. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)73532-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Roberts J. C.; Nagasawa H. T.; Zera R. T.; Fricke R. F.; Goon D. J. W. Prodrugs of L-Cysteine as Protective Agents against Acetaminophen-Induced Hepatotoxicity: 2-(Polyhydroxyalkyl)- and 2-(Polyacetoxyalkyl)Thiazolidine-4(R)-Carboxylic Acids. J. Med. Chem. 1987, 30 (10), 1891–1896. 10.1021/jm00393a034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hurtley S.; Service R.; Szuromi P. Cinderella’s Coach Is Ready. Science (80-.). 2001, 291 (5512), 2337. 10.1126/science.291.5512.2337. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Descotes G.; Gagnaire J.; Bouchu A.; Thevenet S.; Giry-Panaud N.; Salanski P.; Belniak S.; Wernicke A.; Porwanski S. Preparation of Esters, Ethers and Acetals from Unprotected Sucrose. Pol. J. Chem. 1999, 73 (7), 1069–1077. [Google Scholar]
  18. Timmer M. S. M.; Stocker B. L.; Seeberger P. H. De Novo Synthesis of Aceric Acid and an Aceric Acid Building Block. Aldol. 2006, 71 (8), 8294–8297. 10.1021/jo061607m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tsutsui N.; Tanabe G.; Morita N.; Okayama Y.; Kita A.; Sugiura R.; Muraoka O. Structure-Activity Relationship Studies on Acremomannolipin A, the Potent Calcium Signal Modulator with a Novel Glycolipid Structure 3: Role of the Length of Alditol Side Chain. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2015, 23 (13), 3761–3773. 10.1016/j.bmc.2015.03.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wuts P. G. M.; Greene T. W.. Protection for the Hydroxyl Group, Including 1,2- and 1,3-Diols. In Greene’s Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis ;John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2006; pp 16–366. 10.1002/9780470053485.ch2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Clode D. M. Carbohydrate Cyclic Acetal Formation and Migration. Chem. Rev. 1979, 79 (6), 491–513. 10.1021/cr60322a002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Binder W. H.; Prenner R. H.; Schmid W. Eine Einfache Synthese Aller Vier Stereoisomeren 2,2,5-Trimethyl-1,3-Dioxolan-4-Carbaldehyde. Monatshefte für Chemie/Chem. Mon. 1994, 125 (6), 763–771. 10.1007/BF01277638. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Aslani-Shotorbani G.; Buchanan J. G.; Edgar A. R.; Shahidi P. K. The Isopropylidenation of D-Ribose Diethyl Dithioacetal and Ribitol. A New Synthesis of α- and β-d-Ribofuranosylethyne via 2,3:4,5-Di-O-Isopropylidene-Aldehydo-d-Ribose. Carbohydr. Res. 1985, 136 (C), 37–52. 10.1016/0008-6215(85)85184-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Singh P. P.; Gharia M. M.; Dasgupta F.; Srivastava H. C. Use of Ferric Chloride in Carbohydrate Chemistry. I. A Quick Method for the Preparation of O-Isopropylidene Derivatives of Carbohydrates. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 18 (5), 439–440. 10.1016/S0040-4039(01)92659-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Izquierdo I.; Plaza M. T.; Yáñez V. Polyhydroxylated Pyrrolidines: Synthesis from d-Fructose of New Tri-Orthogonally Protected 2,5-Dideoxy-2,5-Iminohexitols. Tetrahedron 2007, 63 (6), 1440–1447. 10.1016/j.tet.2006.11.070. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Arroyo-Gómez Y.; López-Sastre J. A.; Rodríguez-Amo J. F.; Santos-García M.; Sanz-Tejedor M. A. Stereoselective Preparation of O-Alkoxy d-Tetrose, d-Pentose, 2-Deoxy-d-Glycero Tetrose and 2,3-Dideoxy-d-Erythro Pentose Derivatives by an Iterative Elongation of 2,3-O-Isopropylidene-d-Glyceraldehyde. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999, 10 (5), 973–990. 10.1016/S0957-4166(99)00072-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ciardi C.; Reginato G.; Gonsalvi L.; de los Rios I.; Romerosa A.; Peruzzini M. Ruthenium(II) π-Alkyne and Vinylidene Complexes Derived from Glycoynitols: New Precursors for Water-Soluble Unsaturated Carbenes. Organometallics 2004, 23 (9), 2020–2026. 10.1021/om034299g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ferrari E.; Grandi R.; Lazzari S.; Marverti G.; Rossi M. C.; Saladini M. 1H, 13C, 195Pt NMR Study on Platinum(II) Interaction with Sulphur Containing Amadori Compounds. Polyhedron 2007, 26 (15), 4045–4052. 10.1016/j.poly.2007.05.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Yan Y.; Wan-Shun L.; Bao-Qin H.; Hai-Zhou S. Antioxidative Properties of a Newly Synthesized 2-Glucosamine-Thiazolidine-4(R)-Carboxylic Acid (GlcNH2Cys) in Mice. Nutr. Res. (N.Y.) 2006, 26 (7), 369–377. 10.1016/j.nutres.2006.06.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pal U.; Sen S.; Maiti N. C. Cα-H Carries Information of a Hydrogen Bond Involving the Geminal Hydroxyl Group: A Case Study with a Hydrogen-Bonded Complex of 1,1,1,3,3,3-Hexafluoro-2-Propanol and Tertiary Amines. J. Phys. Chem. A 2014, 118 (6), 1024–1030. 10.1021/jp411488a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ortiz P.; Fernández-Bertrán J.; Reguera E. Role of the Anion in the Alkali Halides Interaction with D-Ribose: A 1H and 13C NMR Spectroscopy Study. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2005, 61 (8), 1977–1983. 10.1016/j.saa.2004.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Vanlaldinpuia K.; Bez G. Useful Methods for the Synthesis of Isopropylidenes and Their Chemoselective Cleavage. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52 (29), 3759–3764. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2011.05.050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gouéth P. Y.; Gogalis P.; Bikanga R.; Godé P.; Postel D.; Ronco G.; Villa P. Synthesis of Monoesters as Surfactants and Drugs from D-Glucose. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 1994, 13 (2), 249–272. 10.1080/07328309408009191. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Harnisch M.; Möckel H. J.; Schulze G. Relationship between Log Pow, Shake-Flask Values and Capacity Factors Derived from Reversed-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography for n-Alkylbenzenes and Some Oecd Reference Substances. J. Chromatogr. A 1983, 282 (C), 315–332. 10.1016/S0021-9673(00)91610-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Iida T.; Moriyama T.; Kobata K.; Morita A.; Murayama N.; Hashizume S.; Fushiki T.; Yazawa S.; Watanabe T.; Tominaga M. TRPV1 Activation and Induction of Nociceptive Response by a Non-Pungent Capsaicin-like Compound, Capsiate. Neuropharmacology 2003, 44 (7), 958–967. 10.1016/S0028-3908(03)00100-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Brand-Williams W.; Cuvelier M. E.; Berset C. Use of a Free Radical Method to Evaluate Antioxidant Activity. LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 1995, 28 (1), 25–30. 10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Re R.; Pellegrini N.; Proteggente A.; Pannala A.; Yang M.; Rice-Evans C. Antioxidant Activity Applying an Improved ABTS Radical Cation Decolorization Assay. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1999, 26 (9–10), 1231–1237. 10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00315-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ao1c07078_si_001.pdf (3.7MB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES