Skip to main content
Mediterranean Journal of Hematology and Infectious Diseases logoLink to Mediterranean Journal of Hematology and Infectious Diseases
. 2022 Mar 1;14(1):e2022021. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2022.021

The Dark Side of the COVID-19 Treatments on Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Infection

Flavio De Maio 1,2,, Delia Mercedes Bianco 2, Giovanni Delogu 2,3
PMCID: PMC8992620  PMID: 35444762

Abstract

Since the emergence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) at the end of 2019, a number of medications have been used to treat the infection and the related Coronavirus disease – 19 (COVID-19).

Some of the administered drugs were tested or used in practice only on the basis of biological plausibility; a promising strategy was to target the host immune response, with host directed therapies (HDTs), to reduce systemic hyperinflammation and hypercytokinemia responsible for additional tissue damage.

We summarize the treatments against SARS-CoV-2 and underline their possible effects on Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection. Both SARS-CoV-2 and Mtb respiratory infections impair the host’s immune response. Furthermore, little research has been conducted on the impact of medicaments used to counteract COVID-19 disease in patients with Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI). A number of these drugs may modulate host immune response by modifying LTBI dynamic equilibrium, favoring either the host or the bacteria.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, COVID-19, Tuberculosis, Host directed therapies

Introduction

COVID-19 pandemic has shown a significant disruptive impact on Tuberculosis (TB) services, with negative effects on prompt diagnosis, treatment and immunization.1,2 Pressure on laboratories and pharmaceutical industries led to the readaptation of many TB labs to detect SARS-CoV-2 as well as Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) shortages and consequent decrease of newborn vaccinations.3 Estimates indicate a 25% drop in the global BCG coverage and an increase in pediatric deaths ranging from 0.5% to 17%.4

In several countries, reports suggest a decline in case notification in the last few months due to massive cancellation of routine health services in many settings.57 Although it has been noted that many of the preventive measures implemented to reduce SARS-CoV-2 incidence also have a clear benefit on reducing Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) transmission, 2020 saw the first year-over-year increase in TB deaths from 2005, regardless of physical distancing and PPE (personal protective equipment) wearing measures.2,8

In Canada, the pandemic significantly affected latent TB infection (LTBI) and active TB treatment, leading to ineffective measures for TB elimination.9 In Spain, newly diagnosed TB patients had more extended pulmonary disease, moreover there was a rise in household transmission probably due to anti-COVID-19 measures.10 Also, in England, it has been observed a fall in rates of TB treatment initiation during the period of government-imposed lockdown (March 23–May 10, 2020), and an increase of cases of disseminated TB during the COVID-19 pandemic.11 All this makes it important to evaluate the measures against COVID-19 globally and not only considering the pathologies related to SARS-CoV-2,

The COVID-19 emergence prompted the scientific community to focus on determining the mechanisms of transmission, the identification of virulence factors of SARS-CoV-2 and the development of suitable therapies.12 Therapeutical management of COVID-19 is in constant change, and treatment guidelines are readily updated based on scientific evidence and experts’ opinion (National Institutes of Health, n.d.) as we entered in an era of “hype-based medicine”,13 the long forgotten eminence-based medicine regained importance as the number of trials on possible therapies multiplied, some of them causing overnight changes in the management of COVID-19 patients.14 The lack of antiviral therapies and the rapid spread of the infection convinced investigators and pharmaceutical companies to focus on the development of vaccines,15 able to induce neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein in naive subjects. The developed vaccines do not only trigger a humoral response against the protein, but they impact all the components of the immune response.

As most of the therapies used against COVID-19 disease therapies do not target SARS-CoV-2, but aim to regulate the host immune response16,17 it is reasonable to consider the long-term effects of these therapies on subjects with latent TB infection (LTBI).

In this commentary, we aim to summarize treatments against SARS-CoV-2 and underline their possible effects on Mtb infection highlighting likely “side” effects that could help to contain virus-mediated damage and, conversely, prompt mycobacterial replication in both early infection or during Mtb latency.

Therapies Against SARS-CoV-2 Infection

SARS-CoV-2 represents the biggest therapeutic challenge of our century. At present, approximately 2900 clinical trials have been registered,14 designing new molecules and repurposing existing drugs based on the virus biology and pathogenesis.

Therapeutical approaches range from convalescent plasma of people who have recovered from COVID-19, to medications which are commonly used to treat autoimmune or inflammatory diseases as well as drugs used to treat other infections.18,19

Pharmaceuticals used for COVID-19 target different pathogenetic mechanisms, with the aim of a) blocking viral replication, summarized in points 1–3 of the Figure 1, and b) reducing tissue damage, modulating the immune responses, and preventing over-inflammation (Figure 1, points 4–6).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic representation of the pharmaceuticals used against SARS-CoV-2 infection. The first class of molecules includes antivirals to prevent viral entry (point 1); the second class includes compounds that inhibit gene transcription (point 2) and the third class accounts molecules that prevent proteolytic processing and block viral docking (point 3). The points 4–6 described medications that reduce tissue damage, modulating the immune responses or preventing over-inflammation.

The first class includes antivirals to prevent spike-protein-mediated cell fusion, thus blocking viral entry (Figure 1, point 1), inhibit gene transcription (Figure 1, point 2) or prevent proteolytic processing and block viral docking (Figure 1, point 3), as explained in Table 1.2023 Interestingly, several agents show no effects on SARS-CoV-2 even though they were described to have activity against other infections.24

Table 1.

Summary reporting experimental evidence of the impact of drugs used against SARS-CoV-2 infection on Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection.

DRUG CLASS DRUG Mechanism of action against SARS-CoV-2 REFEERENCE Mechanism of action against M.tuberculosis REFERENCE
Anti-gout Colchicine Down regulates multiple inflammatory pathways and modulates innate immunity. Schlesinger N. et al, 2020 Not useful in TB pericarditis Liebenberg J.J. et al, 2016

Immunomodulatory drugs Statins Statins Inhibit pro-inflammatory cytokine production (TNF-α, IL-10, IL-6 and IL-8) in mononuclear, synovial and endothelial cells.
Inhibit T-cell proliferation affecting MHC-II mediated T-cell activation
Satoh M. et al, 2015 Promotes phagosome maturation and autophagy resulting in a decreased Mtb load Parihar S.P. et al. 2014

Corticosteroids Dexamethasone
Budesonide
Hydrocortisone
Theoretically suppress systemic and lung inflammation related to SARS-CoV-2 infection Martinez M.A. et al, 2019 Reduce ARDS in TB patients Hagan G. et al, 2013

Anti-fibrotic /antiinflammatory Pirfenidone Inhibits the effects mediated by IL-1 and IL-4 Vitiello A. et al, 2020 Has a detrimental effect on Mtb containment in granulomas and results in an accelerated cavitation and reduced bacterial clearance Ahidjo, Bintou A et al, 2016

Recombinant human DNase 1 Dornase alfa Improves oxygenation and ventilation by reducing Neutrophilic Extracellular Trap (NET) Weber A.G. et al, 2020 - -

Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor Acalabrutinib Regulates macrophage signaling and activation, targeting excessive host inflammation Roschewski, Mark et al, 2020 NA -

Immunomodulatory Thalidomide Attenuates exaggerated inflammation and cytokine storms Khalil A. et al, 2020 Inhibits TNF-alpha secretion promoting mycobacterial replication Wang L. et al, 2017, Tramontana J.M. et al. 1995, Verbon, A et al., 2000

IL-6 antagonist Tocilizumab Counteracts cytokine storm indirectly blocking mIL-6R and sIL-6R transduction signals Le RQ. Et al, 2018 Potential reactivation of LTBI Lim C.H. et al, 2017
Sarilumab Benucci M. et al, 2020

IL-1 blocker Anakinra Dumpers inflammatory responses Shakoory B. et al, 2016 Increases the risk of opportunistic infections Salliot C. et al, 2009

Anti-IL-1β antibody Canakinumab Magro G., 2020

Anti-IFNγ Emapalumab Proposed to reduce inflammatory response Magro G., 2020 IFNγ neutralization could potentially facilitate the development of infections caused by several pathogens including mycobacteria Merli P. et al 2020

Calcineurin inhibitors Cyclosporine A Halts the production of the pro-inflammatory molecules (TNF-α and IL-2) Pfefferle S. et al, 2011 NA -
Tacrolimus NA -

Immunomodulatory IFN-β Stimulates the immune system to blunt viral replication and eradicate offending pathogens Bakadia B.M. et al, 2021 IFN-β plays may be a useful therapeutic strategy to control Mtb infection Sabir N. et al, 2017

Anticoagulant Low molecular weight heparin Reduces clot pathway hyperactivity related to pro-inflammatory state Heng M. et al, 2020 Prevent concomitant pulmonary embolism Osorio N. et al, 2020

Antibiotics Macrolide Azythromicin Reduces production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-8, IL-6, TNF alpha, reduce oxidative stress, and modulate T-helper functions Pani A. et al, 2020 Long-term azithromycin use may predispose CF patients to NTM infection
In the acute phase, azithromycin reduces the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-8, IL-6, TNF alpha, and MMPs). In the resolution phase, it increases neutrophil apoptosis and the oxidative stress inflammation-related
Renna M. et al. 2011
Amsden GW. 2005, Lin S.J. Et al. 2016

Tetracycline Doxyclicine Exhibits anti-inflammatory effects along with in vitro antiviral activity against several RNA viruses Castro J.Z. et al, 2010 Blocks mycobacterial growth in infected macrophages suppressing MMP-1 and MMP-3 secretion
Reduces pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and suppresses
TNF-α secretion by macrophages
Walker N.F. et al. 2012
Fredeking T. et al, 2015, Walker N.F. et al, 2012

Antivirals and antiviral-like drugs Antiviral Remdevisir Inhibits viral RNA polymerase decreasing viral replication Barlow A. et al, 2020 Reduces levels of IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-18 Li Y.-N. et al, 2020
Favipavir Javorac D. et al, 2020 Decreases levels of TNF-α Tanaka T. et al, 2017
Ribavarin Inhibits viral RNA synthesis Barlow A. et al, 2019 Reactivation during therapy against HCV Decreases levels of IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6 and IFN-γ Abutidze A. et al, 2016
Liao S.et al,2017

Protease inhibitors Lopinavir/ ritonavir Inhibits 3-chymotrypsin-like protease resulting in decreased viral replication Fagone P. et al, 2015 Lopinavir reduces levels of IL-6 and TNF-α;
Ritonavir reduces levels of IFN-γ and IL-10
Fagone P. et al., 2015
Nelfinavir Inhibits cell fusion caused by the SARSCoV-2 spike (S) glycoprotein Musarrat F. et al, 2020 Nelfinavir diester derivatives shows antimycobacterial activity Sriram D et al. 2008, Brüning A. et al. 2010, Shen YUN. Et al. 2001
Atazanavir Blocks the major protease of SARS-CoV-2 Fintelman-Rodrigues N. et al, 2020 Reduces levels of IL-6 and TNF-α Fintelman-Rodrigues N. et al., 2020
Darunavir/ cobicistat Inhibits viral entry Kalil AC. Et al, 2020 NA -

Antipsychotics Chlorpromazine Decreases virus entry inhibiting clathrinmediated endocytosis Plaze M. et al, 2020 Enhance macrophagic mediated killing by promoting vacuolar acidification (M. bovis BCG) Machado D. et al, 2016

Antiparasitic Hydroxychloroquine Potentially inhibits cell entry impairing affinity between Spike protein and ACE 2 receptor Infante M. et al, 2020 Impairs Mtb growth inactivating D+ NAD+ dependent DNA ligase A
Modulates phagolysosomal pH inhbiting intracellular bacterial growth
Singh V. et al, 2010
Rolain J.M. et al, 2007
Ivermectin Modulates immune response through IFN-γ production Soboslay P.T. et al, 1994 Shows bactericidal activity against mycobacterial species Lim L. E. et al, 2013,
Nitazoxanide Potential antiviral properties (clinical trials in influenza and other virus infections) Kelleni MT et al, 2020 Inhibits the growth of diverse strains of Mtb Ranjbar S. et al, 2019;
Cavanaugh J.S. et al, 2017

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor Baricitinib
Ruxolitinib
Prevent viral entry and intracellular assembly of viral particles Lu R. et al, 2020 Affects immune cell functions with negligible risk of active TB in low endemic areas Cantini F. et al, 2020

SARS-CoV-2 infection causes an overproduction of type I interferons triggering the transcription of several genes and the recruitment of CD4+ T helper lymphocytes, responsible for the Th1/Th2 response.25 For this reason, immunomodulators (corticosteroids, interferons, monoclonal antibodies against inflammatory cytokines) have been suggested, and largely used, to reduce the over-inflammation that is responsible for several systemic disease manifestations.

However, the NHS Panel failed to evaluate the real role of some of these therapies due to insufficient evidence to recommend either for or against their use.26

Examples of drugs in this category are IL-1 inhibitors, colchicine, the antiparasitic agent ivermectin,12 and thalidomide.27 Some others are currently recommended as IL-6 inhibitors and Janus Kinase inhibitors (refer to Table 1 and Figure 1, point 4 to 6).

Although, the use of immunomodulatory treatments had an immediate impact on the care of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, their long-term effects are unknown.

Impact of the Therapies Against SARS-CoV-2 on Mycobacterium Tuberculosis

Mtb infection represents a classical model of persistent infection, a situation in which a microorganism can persist indefinitely within the host,28,29 establishing an equilibrium between the pathogen and the host immune response whose modification could increase the risk of relapse and disease. Indeed, host immune response can limit Mtb spread, after macrophages killing evasion, creating a multicellular structure known as granuloma,30 which entraps mycobacteria that persist in a heterogeneous range of states.31 In the last decades, to deal with the emergence of Mtb strains resistant anti-TB drugs (MDR/RR-Mtb and XDR-Mtb), a novel approach has been proposed targeting the host and so named host directed therapies (HDTs).3235 HDTs can support antimycobacterial host response at different stages: a) perturbating granuloma integrity to enhance drug penetration; b) modifying autophagy or phagosome maturation to increase intracellular killing; c) promoting cell-mediated response; d) inducing antimicrobial peptides and controlling inflammation response by avoiding tissue damage.36 While the use of HDTs seem to support anti-TB treatment in symptomatic individuals,37 no data nor anecdotal knowledge support the use of such therapies in people with asymptomatic or subclinical infection.38

In other words, it is undeniable that some immunomodulatory treatments may alter the host-Mtb equilibrium, favoring either the host or the bacteria. In this scenario, we cannot exclude that those immunomodulatory therapies used against COVID-19 may have a negative effect on infected individuals causing symptomatic TB.

A recent paper highlighted the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 and Mtb infection, showing that asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 seropositive individuals with a positive IGRA exhibited heightened levels of humoral, cytokine production, and systemic inflammation compared to individuals negative for Mtb infection.39 Mtb is apparently able to modulate the host immune response in SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals. Furthermore, various clinical cases describe TB reactivation following SARS-CoV-2 infection confirming the concerns that COVID-19 associated CD4+ T-cell depletion or altered T-cell function can have similar implications as HIV for TB disease progression, promoting the development of active TB.25,40 Moreover, some studies highlighted a higher probability to develop severe disease in patients with SARS-CoV-2 / Mtb co-infection compared to COVID-19 patients.41,42 Unfortunately, we have little information on TB occurrence after COVID-19 treatments.43 On the other hand, there was a delay in the onset of the pandemics in many countries endemic for TB. Moreover, those countries showed lower COVID-19’s severe cases and SARS-CoV-2 related-mortality.44 Intriguingly, one of the variables that was mathematically linked to COVID-19 low spread was BCG vaccination,45 which is known to stimulate non-specific heterologous immune responses inducing cross-protective effects toward non-tuberculosis-related diseases, included SARS-CoV-2.15,46,47 Indeed, numerous clinical trials are currently registered to update on the benefits of BCG vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 exposure.15,47

We can classify therapies used against COVID-19 based on their activity on Mtb infection in four main drug classes: a) drugs acting directly on Mtb (Figure 2, point 1); b) drugs that modify phagosome acidification (Figure 2, point 2); c) drugs with adjuvant function that can indirectly modulate the infection (Figure 2, point 3) and d) drugs with immunomodulatory activity (Figure 2, point 4). Although many anti-COVID-19 pharmaceutics appeared to impair mycobacterial growth in in vitro experiments, (Figure 2, point 1),4851 we focus our attention on their immunomodulatory effects (Table 1).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Schematic representation of the medications used against SARS-CoV-2 with effects on Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Therapies used against COVID-19 are classified based on their activity on Mtb infection in four main classes: drugs acting directly on mycobacteria (point 1) or indirectly showing ability to modify phagosome acidification (point 2), to modulate the infection with adjuvant functions (point 3) and to regulate hose immune response (point 4).

Hydroxychloroquine inactivates mycobacterial NAD+ dependent DNA ligase A52 and modulates phagolysosome, reducing intracellular mycobacterial growth.48 Similarly, chlorpromazine, an antipsychotic drug, has been observed to have antimycobacterial activity and to promote macrophagic killing by increasing phagosome acidification.53 Acidification may though differently affect phagosomes at different stages of maturation.54 Moreover, Mtb itself can influence phagosome maturation potentially counteracting these drugs.55

Nitazoxanide, which has been also suggested to modulate immune response inducing interferon-γ,50,56 inhibits intracellular Mtb growth while amplifying Mtb-induced gene expression.

Thalidomide represents a compound that has been tested against Mtb infection showing a detrimental effect on infection control due to TNF-α inhibition with consequent increase in mycobacterial replication57,58 (Figure 2 and Table 1).

Interestingly, several drugs that have been proposed against SARS-CoV-2 have not been tested in vitro against Mtb infection (Table 1). This is true for several molecules that act on the host immune system to prevent over inflammation (which has been observed as a critical point for the progression of SARS-CoV-2 infection). These compounds, that dampen pro-inflammatory cytokines, could impair the fine equilibrium between Mtb replication and the host immune system response, thus promoting active disease. Among them, monoclonal antibodies such as IL-6 antagonists and antivirals have been observed to significantly modulate host cytokine response and potentially alter host immune response versus Mtb replication.59 Interestingly, Mtb regulates IL-6 secretion to inhibit type I interferon signaling and causes disease progression which appears to be associated to sigH gene expression.60 For this reason, IL-6 antagonist could have important implications during Mtb infection.

Another example are corticosteroids that are beneficial in hospitalized COVID-19 patients,61,62 but, conversely, could increase the risk of LTBI reactivation or progression of sub-clinical TB.

Conclusions

Given the specific effect of COVID-19 on T-cells and for anti-COVID-19 treatments on LTBI, clinicians should consider monitoring patients with both previous COVID-19 infection and LTBI to rapidly identify active disease and prevent Mtb transmission.

Footnotes

Competing interests: The authors declare no conflict of Interest.

References

  • 1.Furtado I, Aguiar A, Duarte R. Getting back on the road towards tuberculosis elimination: lessons learnt from the COVID-19 pandemic. J Bras Pneumol. 2021;47(2):e20210123. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20210123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pai M, Kasaeva T, Swaminathan S. Covid-19’s Devastating Effect on Tuberculosis Care - A Path to Recovery. N Engl J Med [Internet] 2022. 0(0):null. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 3.Jain VK, Iyengar KP, Samy DA, Vaishya R. Tuberculosis in the era of COVID-19 in India. Diabetes Metab Syndr Clin Res Rev [Internet] 2020;14(5):1439–43. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.07.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shaikh N, Pelzer PT, Thysen SM, Roy P, Harris RC, White RG. Impact of COVID-19 Disruptions on Global BCG Coverage and Paediatric TB Mortality: A Modelling Study. Vaccines. 2021 Oct;9(11) doi: 10.3390/vaccines9111228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Malik AA, Safdar N, Chandir S, Khan U, Khowaja S, Riaz N, et al. Tuberculosis control and care in the era of COVID-19. Health Policy Plan. 2020;35(8):1130–2. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Louie Janice K, Rocio Agraz-Lara LR, Crespin Felix, Chen Lisa, 1, Graves S. Tuberculosis-Associated Hospitalizations and Deaths after COVID-19 ShelterIn-Place, San Francisco, California, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021;27:2227–9. doi: 10.3201/eid2708.210670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Marwah V, Peter DK, Ajai Kumar T, Bhati G, Kumar A. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in COVID-19: Double trouble. Med J Armed Forces India [Internet] 2021;77:S479–82. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2021.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Finn McQuaid C, McCreesh N, Read JM, Sumner T, Houben RMGJ, White RG, et al. The potential impact of COVID-19-related disruption on tuberculosis burden. Eur Respir J. 2020;56(2) doi: 10.1183/13993003.01718-2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Geric C, Saroufim M, Landsman D, Richard J, Benedetti A, Batt J, et al. Impact of Covid-19 on Tuberculosis Prevention and Treatment in Canada: a multicentre analysis of 10,833 patients. J Infect Dis. 2021. Dec, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 10.Aznar ML, Espinosa-Pereiro J, Saborit N, Jové N, Sánchez Martinez F, Pérez-Recio S, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tuberculosis management in Spain. Int J Infect Dis IJID Off Publ Int Soc Infect Dis. 2021 Jul;108:300–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.04.075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Barrett J, Painter H, Rajgopal A, Keane D, John L, Papineni P, et al. Increase in disseminated TB during the COVID-19 pandemic. The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease: the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease; France. 2021; pp. 160–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tu YF, Chien CS, Yarmishyn AA, Lin YY, Luo YH, Lin YT, et al. A review of sars-cov-2 and the ongoing clinical trials [Internet] International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21:2657. doi: 10.3390/ijms21072657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pearson H. How COVID broke the evidence pipeline. Nature. 2021;593(7858):182–5. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-01246-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Evidence-based medicine: how COVID can drive positive change. Nature. England. 2021;593:168. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-01255-w. No authors listed. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gong W, Aspatwar A, Wang S, Parkkila S, Wu X. COVID-19 pandemic: SARS-CoV-2 specific vaccines and challenges, protection via BCG trained immunity, and clinical trials. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2021 Jul;20(7):857–80. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2021.1938550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hu B, Guo H, Zhou P, Shi ZL. Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Nat Rev Microbiol [Internet] 2021;19(3):141–54. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-00459-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Petersen E, Koopmans M, Go U, Hamer DH, Petrosillo N, Castelli F, et al. Personal View Comparing SARS-CoV-2 with SARS-CoV and influenza pandemics. Lancet Infect Dis [Internet] 2020;20(9):e238–44. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30484-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nitulescu GM, Paunescu H, Moschos SA, Petrakis D, Nitulescu G, Ion GND, et al. Comprehensive analysis of drugs to treat SARS-CoV-2 infection: Mechanistic insights into current COVID-19 therapies (Review) Int J Mol Med. 2020;46(2):467–88. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2020.4608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Joyner MJ, Wright RS, Fairweather DL, Senefeld JW, Bruno KA, Klassen SA, et al. Early safety indicators of COVID-19 convalescent plasma in 5,000 patients. medRxiv. 2020;130(9):4791–7. doi: 10.1101/2020.05.12.20099879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sarma P, Shekhar N, Prajapat M, Avti P, Kaur H, Kumar S, et al. In-silico homology assisted identification of inhibitor of RNA binding against 2019-nCoV N-protein (N terminal domain). doi: 10.1080/07391102.2020.1753580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.O’keefe BR, Giomarelli B, Barnard DL, Shenoy SR, Chan PKS, Mcmahon JB, et al. Broad-Spectrum In Vitro Activity and In Vivo Efficacy of the Antiviral Protein Griffithsin against Emerging Viruses of the Family Coronaviridae. J Virol [Internet] 2010;84(5):2511–21. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02322-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Plaze M, Attali D, Petit AC, Blatzer M, Simon-Loriere E, Vinckier F, et al. Repurposing chlorpromazine to treat COVID-19: The reCoVery study. Encephale. 2020 Jun 1;46(3):169–72. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Infante M, Ricordi C, Alejandro R, Caprio M, Fabbri A. Hydroxychloroquine in the COVID-19 pandemic era: in pursuit of a rational use for prophylaxis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2020 doi: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1799785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kellen Mina T. Letter to the Editor Nitazoxanide/azithromycin combination for COVID-19: A suggested new protocol for early management. Pharmacol Res J [Internet] 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 25.Riou C, du Bruyn E, Stek C, Daroowala R, Goliath RT, Abrahams F, et al. Relationship of SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4 response to COVID-19 severity and impact of HIV-1 and tuberculosis coinfection. J Clin Invest [Internet] 2021;131(12) doi: 10.1172/JCI149125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.National Institutes of Health. COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Treatment Guidelines [Internet] [cited 2021 Aug 12] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chen C, Qi F, Shi K, Li Y, Li J, Chen Y, et al. Thalidomide Combined with Low-dose Glucocorticoid in the Treatment of COVID-19 Pneumonia [Internet] Preprints. 2020 [cited 2021 Aug 13]. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kane M, Golovkina T. Common Threads in Persistent Viral Infections. J Virol. 2010;84(9):4116–23. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01905-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fisher RA, Gollan B, Helaine S. Persistent bacterial infections and persister cells. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017 Aug;15(8):453–64. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Russell DG, Cardona PJ, Kim MJ, Allain S, Altare F. Foamy macrophages and the progression of the human tuberculosis granuloma. Nat Immunol. 2009;10(9):943–8. doi: 10.1038/ni.1781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Delogu G, Sali M, Fadda G. The biology of mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2013;5(1) doi: 10.4084/mjhid.2013.070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kaufmann SHE, Dorhoi A, Hotchkiss RS, Bartenschlager R. Host-directed therapies for bacterial and viral infections. Nat Rev Drug Discov [Internet] 2018;17(1):35–56. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2017.162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Palucci I, Maulucci G, De Maio F, Sali M, Romagnoli A, Petrone L, et al. Inhibition of Transglutaminase 2 as a Potential Host-Directed Therapy Against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Front Immunol. 2020;10(January):1–13. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.03042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kumar R, Kolloli A, Singh P, Vinnard C, Kaplan G, Subbian S. Thalidomide and Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors as Host Directed Therapeutics for Tuberculous Meningitis: Insights From the Rabbit Model. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019;9:450. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Costa DL, Maiga M, Subbian S. Editorial: Host-Directed Therapies for Tuberculosis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol [Internet] 2021;11:736. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.742053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kolloli A, Kumar R, Singh P, Narang A, Kaplan G, Sigal A, et al. Aggregation state of Mycobacterium tuberculosis impacts host immunity and augments pulmonary disease pathology. Commun Biol. 2021 Nov;4(1):1256. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02769-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wallis RS, Ginindza S, Beattie T, Arjun N, Likoti M, Edward VA, et al. Adjunctive host-directed therapies for pulmonary tuberculosis: a prospective, open-label, phase 2, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med [Internet] 2021;9(8):897–908. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30448-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Richards AS, Sossen B, Emery JC, Horton KC, Heinsohn T, Frascella B, et al. The natural history of TB disease-a synthesis of data to quantify progression and regression across the spectrum. medRxiv [Internet] 2021. [DOI]
  • 39.Rajamanickam A, Kumar NP, Padmapriyadarsini C, Nancy A, Selvaraj N, Karunanithi K, et al. Latent tuberculosis co-infection is associated with heightened levels of humoral, cytokine and acute phase responses in seropositive SARS-CoV-2 infection. J Infect [Internet] 2021;83(3):339–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.07.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Khayat M, Fan H, Vali Y. COVID-19 promoting the development of active tuberculosis in a patient with latent tuberculosis infection: A case report. Respir Med Case Reports. 2021 Jan 1;32:101344. doi: 10.1016/j.rmcr.2021.101344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mousquer GT, Peres A, Fiegenbaum M. Pathology of TB/COVID-19 Co-Infection: The phantom menace. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2021 Jan;126:102020. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2020.102020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gao Y, Liu M, Chen Y, Shi S, Geng J, Tian J. Association between tuberculosis and COVID-19 severity and mortality: A rapid systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of medical virology. 2021;93:194–6. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tadolini M, Codecasa LR, García-García JM, Blanc FX, Borisov S, Alffenaar JW, et al. Active tuberculosis, sequelae and COVID-19 coinfection: First cohort of 49 cases. Eur Respir J. 2020;56(1) doi: 10.1183/13993003.02328-2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lalaoui R, Bakour S, Raoult D, Verger P, Sokhna C, Devaux C, et al. What could explain the late emergence of COVID-19 in Africa? New microbes new Infect. 2020 Nov;38:100760. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zawbaa HM, El-Gendy A, Saeed H, Osama H, Ali AMA, Gomaa D, et al. A study of the possible factors affecting COVID-19 spread, severity and mortality and the effect of social distancing on these factors: Machine learning forecasting model. Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Jun;75(6):e14116. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Covián C, Retamal-Díaz A, Bueno SM, Kalergis AM. Could BCG Vaccination Induce Protective Trained Immunity for SARS-CoV-2? Front Immunol [Internet] 2020. p. 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 47.Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Tsilika M, Moorlag S, Antonakos N, Kotsaki A, Domínguez-Andrés J, et al. Activate: Randomized Clinical Trial of BCG Vaccination against Infection in the Elderly. Cell. 2020 Oct;183(2):315–323e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Rolain JM, Colson P, Raoult D. Recycling of chloroquine and its hydroxyl analogue to face bacterial, fungal and viral infections in the 21st century. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007;30(4):297–308. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.05.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lim LE, Vilchèze C, Ng C, Jacobs WR, Ramón-García S, Thompson CJ. Anthelmintic avermectins kill mycobacterium tuberculosis, including multidrug-resistant clinical strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57(2):1040–6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01696-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ranjbar S, Haridas V, Nambu A, Jasenosky LD, Sadhukhan S, Ebert TS, et al. Cytoplasmic RNA Sensor Pathways and Nitazoxanide Broadly Inhibit Intracellular Mycobacterium tuberculosis Growth. iScience [Internet] 2019;22:299–313. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2019.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sriram D, Yogeeswari P, Dinakaran M, Sowmya M. Synthesis, anti-HIV and antitubercular activities of nelfinavir diester derivatives. Biomed Pharmacother [Internet] 2008;62(1):1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2007.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Singh V, Somvanshi P. Toward the Virtual Screening of Potential Drugs in the Homology Modeled NAD+ Dependent DNA Ligase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Protein Pept Lett. 2010;17(2):269–76. doi: 10.2174/092986610790225950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Machado D, Pires D, Couto I. Ion Channel Blockers as Antimicrobial Agents, Efflux Inhibitors, and Enhancers of Macrophage Killing Activity against Drug Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. 2016. pp. 1–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 54.Romagnoli A, Petruccioli E, Palucci I, Camassa S, Carata E, Petrone L, et al. Clinical isolates of the modern Mycobacterium tuberculosis lineage 4 evade host defense in human macrophages through eluding IL-1β-induced autophagy article. Cell Death Dis [Internet] 2018;9(6) doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0640-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ramachandra L, Smialek JL, Shank SS, Convery M, Boom WH, Harding CV. Phagosomal processing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen 85B is modulated independently of mycobacterial viability and phagosome maturation. Infect Immun. 2005 Feb;73(2):1097–105. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.2.1097-1105.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Iacobino A, Giannoni F, Pardini M, Piccaro G. The Combination Rifampin-Nitazoxanide, but Not Rifampin-Isoniazid-Pyrazinamide-Ethambutol, Kills Dormant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Hypoxia at Neutral pH. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;(April):1–4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00273-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Verbon A, Juffermans NP, Speelman P, Van Deventer SJH, Ten Berge IJM, Guchelaar HJ, et al. A single oral dose of thalidomide enhances the capacity of lymphocytes to secrete gamma interferon in healthy humans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44(9):2286–90. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.9.2286-2290.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Wang L, Hong Y, Wu J, Leung YK, Huang Y. Efficacy of thalidomide therapy in pediatric Crohn’s disease with evidence of tuberculosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(43):7727–34. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i43.7727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Urdahl KB, Shafiani S, Ernst JD. Initiation and regulation of T-cell responses in tuberculosis. Mucosal Immulogy. 2011;4:288–93. doi: 10.1038/mi.2011.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Martinez AN, Mehra S, Kaushal D. Role of interleukin 6 in innate immunity to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J Infect Dis. 2013 Apr;207(8):1253–61. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.The RECOVERY Collaborative Group. Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med [Internet] 2020 Jul 17;384(8):693–704. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2021436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Liu J, Zhang S, Dong X, Li Z, Xu Q, Feng H, et al. Corticosteroid treatment in severe COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2020 Dec;130(12):6417–28. doi: 10.1172/JCI140617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mediterranean Journal of Hematology and Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Catholic University in Rome

RESOURCES