Background
Missed injuries occur in 9%–65% of trauma patients. Studies have demonstrated the benefit of a trauma tertiary survey (TS) in reducing medical errors. Our trauma service implemented a TS form, and we wanted to know if the beneficial effect of a TS was maintained.
Methods
Trauma patients with missed injuries were identified by the BC Trauma Registry over 3 periods. Separate chart reviews were performed to determine clinical significance of error and compliance with the TS form.
Results
A significant reduction in diagnostic delay and unacceptable errors was identified before and after implementation of a TS (see Table). Implementation of a TS form did not further reduce the error rate despite a 77% compliance rate. The 2 unacceptable errors in 2007 occurred when trauma patients were admitted to a nontrauma service and a TS was not completed.
Table.
Impact of a trauma tertiary survey on medical error
| Medical error | Time period; no. (%) incidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1997 No TS (n = 453) | 2004 TS no form (n = 430) | 2007 TS with form (n = 394) | |
| Diagnosis delay | 28 (6.2) | 8 (1.7) | 7 (1.7)* |
| Diagnosis error | 3 (< 1) | 7 (1.6) | 7 (1.7) |
| Total errors | 31 (6.8) | 17 (4) | 14 (3.6) |
| Unacceptable errors | 18 (4) | 3 (< 1) | 2 (< 1)* |
TS = trauma tertiary survey.
p < 0.05 (1997 v. 2007).
Conclusion
A TS reduces clinically significant diagnostic errors. Once a trauma service routinely performs a TS, the effect is long lasting. To improve patient safety, a TS should be routinely performed within 24 hours of admission regardless of the admitting service.




