Are dopamine agonists still the first-choice treatment for prolactinoma in the era of endoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Xiangming Cai; Junhao Zhu; Jin Yang; Chao Tang; Zixiang Cong; Chiyuan Ma

doi:10.1186/s41016-022-00277-1

. 2022 Apr 8;8:9. doi: 10.1186/s41016-022-00277-1

Are dopamine agonists still the first-choice treatment for prolactinoma in the era of endoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Xiangming Cai ¹, Junhao Zhu ², Jin Yang ², Chao Tang ³, Zixiang Cong ³, Chiyuan Ma ^1,^2,^3,^4,^✉

PMCID: PMC8994364 PMID: 35395837

Abstract

Background

For prolactinoma patients, dopamine agonists (DAs) are indicated as the first-line treatment and surgery is an adjunctive choice. However, with the development of surgical technique and equipment, the effect of surgery has improved. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of surgery versus DAs in patients with different types of prolactinomas.

Methods

A systematic search of literature using Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Clinical Trial databases was conducted until July 12, 2019. Prolactinoma patients treated with DAs (bromocriptine or cabergoline) or surgery (microscopic or endoscopic surgery) were included. Outcomes included the biochemical cure rate, recurrence rate, prolactin level, improvement rates of symptoms, and incidence rates of complications. A random-effects model was used to pool the extracted data. Qualitative comparisons were conducted instead of quantitative comparison.

Results

DAs were better than surgery in terms of the biochemical cure rate (0.78 versus 0.66), but surgery had a much lower recurrence rate (0.19 versus 0.57). Full advantages were not demonstrated in improvement rates of symptoms and incidence rates of complications with both treatment options. In microprolactinoma patients, the biochemical cure rate of endoscopic surgery was equal to the average cure rate of DAs (0.86 versus 0.86) and it surpassed the biochemical cure rate of bromocriptine (0.86 versus 0.76). In macroprolactinoma patients, endoscopic surgery was slightly higher than bromocriptine (0.66 versus 0.64) in terms of the biochemical cure rate.

Conclusion

For patients with clear indications or contraindications for surgery, choosing surgery or DAs accordingly is unequivocal. However, for patients with clinical equipoise, such as surgery, especially endoscopic surgery, in microprolactinoma and macroprolactinoma patients, we suggest that neurosurgeons and endocrinologists conduct high-quality clinical trials to address the clinical equipoise quantitatively.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41016-022-00277-1.

Keywords: Prolactinoma, Dopamine agonists, Bromocriptine, Cabergoline, Microscopic surgery, Endoscopic surgery

Background

Prolactinomas are the most common type of hormone-secreting pituitary tumors and they represent 40% of all pituitary tumors [1]. Dopamine agonists (DAs), including bromocriptine and cabergoline, are recommended as the first-line treatment for most prolactinomas. Surgery is only an adjunctive choice when resistance or intolerance to DAs occurs or severe complications, such as pituitary apoplexy or cerebrospinal fluid leak, develop [2].

However, with the development of surgical technique and equipment, especially endoscopic surgery, it is time to reassess the relationship between DAs and surgery. Only few retrospective studies [3–8] have compared the efficacy and safety between surgery and DAs in some specific subgroups of prolactinoma patients. And few meta-analyses discussed the difference among treatments for prolactinoma in some outcomes, mostly remission rates and recurrence rates [9–11]. As far as we know, no meta-analysis discussed comprehensive efficacy (remission and symptom relief) and safety (relapse and complications) for various treatments of a full spectrum of prolactinoma patients. Because of the lack of a large sample-sized study comparing these two methods in all prolactinoma patients, we conducted this meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of surgery versus DAs in all prolactinoma patients with a focus on the following outcomes: biochemical cure rate, recurrence rate, symptom improvement rates, and incidence rates of complications.

Methods

This study was conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) [12].

Literature research

Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Clinical Trial databases were independently searched until September 3, 2019, by Cai and Zhu. Search strategy combined MESH terms including “Prolactinoma,” “Dopamine Agonists,” “Microscopy,” and “Endoscopy” with free-text words including “Microprolactinoma,” “Macroprolactinoma,” “Giant prolactinoma,” “Bromocriptine,” “Cabergoline,” and “Surgery” (Supplementary file 1). Studies were restricted to the English language in this research.

Inclusion criteria

The eligibility criteria consisted of the following items: (1) only studies that included patients who had been diagnosed with prolactinoma. Prolactinomas are classified by the size of the tumor as microprolactinoma (< 10 mm), macroprolactinoma (≥ 10 mm), and giant prolactinoma (> 40 mm) [13]; (2) required treatments included surgery (microscopic surgery or endoscopic surgery) or DAs (bromocriptine or cabergoline). Patients in the DAs group only received DAs, but patients in the surgery group may have received DAs before surgery; (3) included studies reported the data of at least one available outcome that was assessed in this study.

Exclusion criteria

We excluded the following studies: (1) papers that assessed other pituitary tumors; (2) studies that utilized other DAs, gamma knife surgery, or radiation therapy; (3) studies that included less than 10 patients.

Extraction of data

Following data were extracted from each paper: author, year of publication, subtype of prolactinoma, intervention, size of sample, gender proportion, mean age, and mean follow-up duration. We also assessed the biochemical cure rate, recurrence rate, and the following variables before and after treatment: prolactin level, visual impairment, headache, menstrual disturbance, galactorrhoea, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) insufficiency, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) deficiency, hypopituitarism (one or more deficiencies), and diabetes insipidus. Recurrence was defined as the observation of hyperprolactinemia after a period of normalization after surgery and withdrawal of DAs. The assessment of hormonal deficiencies was performed by calculating the presence of hormonal deficiencies after treatment. The extraction of data was independently carried out by Cai and Zhu.

Quality assessment

The same two reviewers (Cai and Zhu) assessed risk of bias for included studies independently. ROB 2 Cochrane risk of bias tool was used for the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized controlled trials (non-RCTs) [14, 15]. As no available text-book quality guidelines for case-series studies, we used a tool developed by Moga et al. to assess case-series studies [16]. No cutoff scores were provided within this tool, so we gave one point to each “yes” answer and zero to each “no” and “unclear” answer.

Statistical analysis

To conduct a meta-analysis of single rates, STATA Version 12.0 and MetaAnalyst Beta 3.13 were applied separately for assessing the biochemical cure rate, recurrence rate, and other parameters. A RE (random-effects) model using Mantel-Haenszel heterogeneity method was also used in these two programs. RevMan Version 5.0 was used to evaluate the pooled mean difference between pre- and post-treatment prolactin levels using the RE model. With this procedure, I-squared values were calculated to assess the heterogeneity of pooled results. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression analysis of mean age, gender, publication year, subtypes of prolactinoma, subtypes of surgery, and drug species were conducted to discover the sources of heterogeneity. A funnel plot was used to evaluate the publication bias. As the indications for surgery and DAs were significantly different from each other, we only conducted qualitative comparison instead of formal quantitative comparison in the meta-analysis.

Results

Included studies

Based on our search strategy, 4373 papers were identified in the databases. From these 4373 papers, 4174 papers were excluded after screening the titles and abstracts (Fig. 1). The remaining 199 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. During this process, 53 articles were excluded because of differences in the population, interventions, outcomes, or type of articles compared with inclusion criteria.

Finally, a total of 146 articles were included in this meta-analysis. Further, 82 of these 146 articles provided data for the DAs group [3–8, 13, 17–91] and 72 articles provided data for the surgery group [3–8, 13, 68, 92–155]. Details of these 146 studies are presented in Table 1 and Supplementary Tables 1 and 2 separately. The meta-analysis included 9007 patients with no restriction on age and gender. Most studies reported the biochemical cure rates after treatment, but the recurrence rates were provided only in most studies on surgery and few studies on DAs focusing on withdrawal of medicine.

Table 1.

Basic characteristics of the included studies

Study name	I/A/G^a	Intervention^b	No.	Male/female	Meanage/y	Biochemical cure rate^c	Recurrent rate^d	Duration 1	Duration 2	Duration 3	Study type
Adam 2013	mixed_p	endoscopic_s	17	NA	NA	8/17	NA	40			Case-series
Akira 2006	mixed_p	mixed_s	13	3/10	NA	NA	NA	NA			Case-series
Albert 1992	0/29/0	BRC	29	14/15	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	Non-RCT
Alessandro 2013	mixed_p	CAB	43	8/35	33.65	24/43	NA	NA	12	NA	Case-series
Alexander 2018	60/0/0	endoscopic_s	60	10/50	33.5	40/60	NA	37			Non-RCT
Amir 2007	12/13/0	endoscopic_s	25	NA	NA	21/25	NA	19			Case-series
Amit 2015	0/71/0	CAB	71	71/0	44.7	51/71	NA	80.3	NA	NA	Case-series
Andreja 2012	39/22/0	endoscopic_s	61	NA	NA	54/61	NA	NA			Case-series
Annamaria1 2004	mixed_p	CAB	20	20/0	34	20/20	NA	NA	NA	NA	Non-RCT
Annamaria2 2004	10/41/0	CAB	51	51/0	32.9	39/51	NA	24			Non-RCT
Annamaria 2007	115/79/0	CAB	194	NA	NA	NA	81/194	68.6	42.6	45.8	Case-series
Annamaria 1997	8/19/0	mixed_DA	27	NA	NA	23/27	NA	NA	NA	NA	Case-series
Annamaria 2000	0/45/0	mixed_DA	45	17/45	NA	40/45	NA	NA	NA	NA	Non-RCT
Antonell 2001	44/28/0	mixed_DA	188	NA	NA	138/188	NA	8.3	NA	NA	Non-RCT
Antonio 2007	mixed_p	mixed_s	65	20/45	36	42/65	6/42	56			Case-series
Arafah 1986	mixed_p	microscopic_s	120	0/120	27.9	96/120	NA	NA			Case-series
Archer 1982	17/0/0	BRC	17	0/17	NA	16/17	NA	24	24	NA	Case-series
Arijit 2005	0/15/14	BRC	29	29/0	31.9	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	Case-series
Arimantas 2012	32/0/0	microscopic_s	32	0/32	31	19/32	NA	50.4			Case-series
Arturo 1979	mixed_p	BRC	14	0/14	29.71	10/14	NA	NA	NA	NA	Case-series
Asano 2001	mixed_p	mixed_t	13	NA	37.3	NA	NA	NA			Non-RCT
Ashu 2013	0/38/0	CAB	38	21/17	34.2	33/38	NA	16.1	NA	NA	RCT
Ashu 2012	0/38/0	CAB	38	NA	NA	30/38	NA	6	NA	NA	RCT
Barbara 2017	mixed_p	BRC	28	0/28	26	13/28	NA	NA	NA	NA	Case-series
Barbosa 2014	mixed_p	mixed_DA	21	NA	NA	17/21	NA	NA	6	NA	Non-RCT
Berezin 1995	mixed_p	mixed_t	75	75/0	NA	36/52	NA	NA	NA	NA	Case-series
Bevan 1987	mixed_p	mixed_s	67	19/48	32.4	34/67	NA	NA			Case-series
Bhansali 2010	0/15/0	CAB	15	NA	31.7	14/15	NA	NA	NA	NA	Case-series
Biswas 2005	89/0/0	mixed_DA	89	NA	NA	NA	57/89	37.2	37.2	21.6	Non-RCT
Cannavo 1999	26/11/0	CAB	37	5/32	NA	34/37	NA	NA	24	NA	Case-series
Carlo 1992	mixed_p	CAB	127	3/124	NA	114/127	NA	NA	14	NA	Case-series
Catarina 2018	0/67/0	mixed_DA	67	34/33	43	58/67	NA	NA	NA	NA	Case-series
Charpentier 1985	mixed_p	mixed_s	212	NA	NA	96/212	12/70	52.8			Case-series
Christine 2016	0/57/0	mixed_DA	57	30/27	37.5	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	Non-RCT
Cintia 2011	mixed_p	mixed_DA	22	NA	NA	17/22	NA	NA	6	NA	Non-RCT
Coculescu 1983	mixed_p	BRC	22	NA	NA	19/22	NA	NA	10.1	NA	Case-series
Corsello 2003	0/0/10	CAB	10	NA	NA	5/10	NA	NA	38.9	NA	Case-series
Der-Yang 2002	mixed_p	mixed_s	44	1/43	46	32/44	NA	NA			RCT
Diane 2017	27/50/0	mixed_s	77	NA	NA	40/77	8/36	12			Case-series
Dogan 2015	42/0/0	CAB	42	NA	NA	NA	34/42	12	NA	NA	Non-RCT
Elise 1984	42/23/0	mixed_s	65	NA	NA	46/65	6/46	50			Case-series
Emir 2018	mixed_p	mixed_DA	25	18/7	39.96	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	Non-RCT
Enrica 1989	mixed_p	mixed_s	22	1/21	NA	NA	NA	NA			Case-series
Erika1 2007	mixed_p	mixed_DA	31	0/31	33.0	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	Non-RCT
Erika2 2007	mixed_p	mixed_DA	45	0/45	34.5	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	Non-RCT
Esposito 2004	mixed_p	mixed_s	42	14/26	33.2	25/42	5/21	31			Case-series
Essais 2002	0/29/0	BRC	29	10/19	NA	27/29	NA	NA	NA	NA	Case-series
Etienne 1996	mixed_p	mixed_DA	10	2/8	NA	8/9	NA	NA	NA	NA	Non-RCT
Etienne 2009	0/122/0	CAB	122	50/72	NA	115/122	NA	NA	NA	NA	Case-series
Etual 2016	0/152/47	mixed_DA	199	114/85	40.9	145/199	NA	NA	NA	NA	Non-RCT
Eun-Hee 2009	0/10/0	CAB	10	10/0	37	6/10	NA	NA	19	NA	Case-series
Fadi 1996	mixed_p	mixed_s	64	NA	NA	59/64	25/59	147.6			Case-series
Ferrari 1997	0/85/0	CAB	85	NA	NA	52/85	NA	NA	NA	NA	Case-series
Frederick 2018	mixed_p	endoscopic_s	79	22/57	35.8	65/79	NA	NA			Non-RCT
Fritz 1985	13/11/0	mixed_s	24	0/24	29.7	NA	14/24	NA			Case-series
Giorgio 2006	28/38/0	endoscopic_s	66	NA	NA	50/66	NA	NA			Case-series
Giulio 1989	mixed_p	mixed_s	119	0/119	NA	73/119	5/40	NA			Case-series
Hae-Dong 2001	mixed_p	endoscopic_s	35	NA	NA	24/35	NA	NA			Case-series
Hae-Dong 1997	mixed_p	endoscopic_s	15	2/13	32.2	10/15	NA	NA			Case-series
Hamilton 2005	mixed_p	mixed_s	79	NA	NA	34/79	NA	NA			Non-RCT
Hancock 1980	mixed_p	BRC	36	NA	NA	28/36	NA	NA	NA	NA	Case-series
Helen 1999	32/0/0	mixed_s	32	0/32	NA	25/32	1/25	70			Case-series
Hidemitsu 2001	mixed_p	microscopic_s	13	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA			Case-series
Hidetoshi 2013	mixed_p	mixed_s	138	NA	NA	105/138	5/81	144			Case-series
Hildebrandt 1989	0/10/0	BRC	10	NA	NA	3/10	NA	NA	1	NA	Case-series
Hildebrandt 1992	mixed_p	mixed_DA	14	NA	NA	10/14	NA	NA	NA	NA	Non-RCT
Hofstetter 2011	32/53/0	endoscopic_s	85	NA	NA	51/85	NA	NA			Case-series
Huda 2010	40/0/0	mixed_DA	40	1/39	NA	NA	31/40	58	108	58	Case-series
Ilan 2007	0/0/10	CAB	10	10/0	38.2	9/10	NA	NA	NA	NA	Case-series
Ilan 2016	0/0/18	mixed_DA	18	16/2	36.3	11/18	NA	NA	NA	NA	Case-series
Ilan 2019	mixed_p	mixed_DA	28	28/0	71.3	24/27	NA	NA	NA	NA	Case-series
Ivan 2015	40/38/0	mixed_t	78	23/55	39.8	44/78	NA	NA	25	NA	Non-RCT
Jackson 2010	7/34/0	endoscopic_s	41	NA	NA	34/41	3/35	NA			Case-series
Jae 2009	mixed_p	mixed_t	117	31/86	35.1	103/117	NA	NA	NA	NA	Case-series
Johanna 1991	0/12/0	BRC	12	8/4	42.2	NA	11/12	12	58.8	4.3	Case-series
Johanna 1990	0/19/0	BRC	19	12/7	NA	16/19	NA	40.8	40.8	NA	Case-series
Jonathan 1992	mixed_p	mixed_s	82	7/75	30.5	65/82	5/65	51.7			Case-series
Katarina 2011	mixed_p	mixed_DA	14	6/8	39.7	14/14	NA	NA	6	NA	Case-series
Kharlip 2009	mixed_p	CAB	46	NA	NA	NA	25/46	NA	NA	3	Case-series
Kiyoshi 1984	mixed_p	mixed_s	12	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA			Case-series
Kreutzer 2008	mixed_p	mixed_s	212	133/79	36	102/212	17/91	NA			Non-RCT
Kristof 2002	mixed_p	mixed_s	37	16/21	31	10/37	2/10	44.4			Case-series
Kyung 2013	mixed_p	BRC	23	17/6	48	16/23	NA	NA	30	NA	Case-series
Liang 2018	0/0/42	mixed_t	42	NA	NA	21/42	NA	NA	NA	NA	Non-RCT
Lukas 2017	mixed_p	mixed_t	107	0/107	34	65/107	NA	NA	NA	NA	Non-RCT
Marco 2002	mixed_p	mixed_s	120	27/93	29.7	77/120	13/77	50.2			Case-series
Margarida 2017	mixed_p	mixed_DA	50	5/45	35.1	NA	14/50	NA	119.3	NA	Non-RCT
Maria 2015	mixed_p	mixed_DA	29	NA	NA	29/29	NA	NA	NA	NA	Case-series
María Martín 2013	47/0/0	mixed_DA	47	NA	30	39/47	NA	NA	NA	NA	Case-series
Mario 2017	24/0/0	mixed_s	24	5/19	34.8	8/24	1/8	NA			Non-RCT
Masami 2010	mixed_p	CAB	85	NA	NA	85/85	NA	NA	NA	NA	Case-series
Mia-Maiken 2013	mixed_p	mixed_DA	12	5/7	39.7	8/12	NA	NA	NA	NA	Case-series
Michael 2009	mixed_p	mixed_s	176	20/156	31	NA	NA	NA			Non-RCT
Miguel 1982	mixed_p	microscopic_s	100	NA	NA	68/100	5/68	NA			Case-series
Moon 2011	mixed_p	BRC	36	25/11	NA	29/36	NA	NA	NA	NA	Case-series
Muratori 1997	26/0/0	CAB	26	0/26	NA	25/26	13/19	12	12	NA	Case-series
Muriel 2011	24/10/0	microscopic_s	34	4/30	NA	32/34	2/32	33.5			Case-series
Mussa 2015	0/0/16	CAB	16	10/6	34.9	6/16	NA	NA	NA	NA	Case-series
Myoung 2017	30/59/0	mixed_DA	89	27/62	33.7	NA	51/89	25.8	28.9	NA	Case-series
Na 2018	31/32/0	mixed_s	63	NA	57	48/63	3/48	53			Case-series
Naguib 1986	mixed_p	mixed_t	190	0/190	28.6	NA	NA	NA	28.8	NA	Non-RCT
Nazir 2015	mixed_p	CAB	19	1/18	27.3	18/19	NA	NA	NA	NA	Non-RCT
Niki 2013	0/12/0	CAB	12	11/1	40.5	11/12	NA	NA	NA	NA	Case-series
Nissim 1982	0/7/0	BRC	7	NA	NA	4/7	NA	NA	NA	NA	Case-series
Oksana 2018	0/0/68	mixed_t	68	60/8	41.5	35/68	NA	NA	104.7	NA	Case-series
Oluwaseun 2019	mixed_p	mixed_DA	69	NA	NA	29/69	NA	6	NA	NA	Case-series
Omar 1983	28/16/0	mixed_s	44	0/44	26.8	29/44	16/29	41.5			Case-series
Paepegaey 2017	0/260/0	CAB	260	135/125	36.2	157/260	14/35	NA	NA	NA	Case-series
Paluzzi 2013	11/42/0	endoscopic_s	53	NA	NA	42/53	NA	NA			Case-series
Panagiotis 2011	mixed_p	mixed_DA	79	17/62	35.3	NA	11/26	49	79	NA	Case-series
Paul 1983	mixed_p	mixed_s	40	0/40	NA	25/40	9/25	23			Case-series
Pelkonen 1981	mixed_p	mixed_s	60	15/45	NA	NA	NA	NA			Case-series
Pietro 2005	mixed_p	mixed_s	151	NA	NA	93/151	NA	NA			Case-series
Raverot 2010	mixed_p	mixed_s	94	32/62	37.8	60/94	19/60	138			Case-series
Renata 2013	mixed_p	CAB	61	13/48	34.4	57/61	NA	60	60	NA	Case-series
Renata 2015	mixed_p	CAB	32	32/0	42	31/32	NA	24	24	NA	Non-RCT
Ronald 1982	22/14/0	mixed_s	36	NA	NA	NA	1/35	NA			Case-series
Rudolf 1985	27/0/0	microscopic_s	27	NA	NA	19/27	NA	NA			Case-series
Safak 2016	0/113/0	endoscopic_s	113	NA	NA	51/113	NA	36			Case-series
Safak 2016	19/0/10	endoscopic_s	29	NA	NA	15/29	NA	36
Sandhya 2018	mixed_p	mixed_DA	28	0/28	NA	16/18	5/16	12	216	36	Case-series
Sandhya 2017	mixed_p	mixed_DA	16	0/16	NA	15/16	NA	NA	NA	NA	Case-series
Schlechte 1985	mixed_p	microscopic_s	68	0/68	NA	37/68	12/37	60.00			Case-series
Sema 2016	mixed_p	mixed_DA	67	17/50	NA	NA	31/67	108.8	76.9	16.1	Non-RCT
Sema 2018	mixed_p	mixed_DA	308	NA	71	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	Non-RCT
Shigetoshi 2009	17/12/0	endoscopic_s	29	NA	NA	21/29	NA	NA			Case-series
Shrikrishna 2009	mixed_p	mixed_DA	39	9/30	NA	14/39	NA	NA	NA	NA	Case-series
Shrikrishna 2010	0/0/10	CAB	10	5/5	36.1	8/10	NA	NA	NA	NA	Case-series
Steven 1996	11/23/0	mixed_s	34	8/26	23.3	9/34	NA	NA			Case-series
Taizo 1991	mixed_p	mixed_s	35	0/35	NA	22/35	NA	NA			Case-series
Takakazu 2002	mixed_p	mixed_s	32	12/20	32	14/32	NA	NA			Case-series
Tevfik 2001	mixed_p	mixed_DA	34	4/30	33.1	24/34	NA	NA	NA	NA	RCT
Thomas 2011	45/15/0	mixed_DA	60	NA	NA	NA	43/60	65	59	6	Case-series
Thomson 1985	mixed_p	microscopic_s	77	NA	NA	53/77	NA	NA			Case-series
Timothy 2015	mixed_p	endoscopic_s	66	22/44	36.7	45/66	NA	12			Case-series
Vanessa 2012	mixed_p	mixed_s	63	18/45	31	29/63	10/29	36			Case-series
Verena 2017	mixed_p	CAB	53	31/22	40	NA	NA	NA	9	NA	Case-series
Wang 1987	mixed_p	BRC	24	NA	NA	NA	19/24	40.8	58.8	NA	Case-series
Wang 2015	132/176/0	endoscopic_s	308	NA	NA	261/308	NA	NA			Case-series
Winnie 2018	mixed_p	mixed_s	31	31/0	40.8	NA	NA	41.9			Case-series
Wolfsberger 2003	0/11/0	mixed_s	11	11/0	41	8/11	NA	84			Case-series
Xin 2011	mixed_p	mixed_s	87	87/0	38	46/87	9/45	45			Case-series
Yan 2015	mixed_p	mixed_s	99	NA	NA	71/99	NA	NA			Case-series
Yang 2015	mixed_p	mixed_s	9	5/4	NA	NA	NA	NA			Case-series
Yan-Long 2018	mixed_p	endoscopic_s	52	14/38	37.69	40/52	6/40	13.5			Case-series
Yi 2018	mixed_p	mixed_s	36	11/25	NA	34/36	NA	NA			Case-series
Yi-Jun 2017	mixed_p	microscopic_s	184	184/0	36.3	57/187	NA	NA			Case-series
Youichi 1986	mixed_p	microscopic_s	98	16/82	31	45/98	NA	NA			Case-series
Youngki 2014	0/44/0	mixed_DA	44	28/16	36.8	34/44	NA	NA	NA	NA	Case-series

Open in a new tab

^aI/A/G: numbers of patients with microprolactinoma/macroprolactinoma/giant prolactinoma; mixed_p: mixed_prolactinoma, data of this part is inseparable, which includes patients with macroprolactinoma, microprolactinoma, and giant prolactinoma; ^bmixed_t: mixed treatment,treatments within this study include DAs and surgery and data of each treatment is available; mixed_s: mixed_surgery, data include patients with microscopic surgery and endoscopic surgery; microscopic_s: microscopic_surgery; endoscopic_s: endoscopic_surgery; DAs: dopamine agonists; BRC: bromocriptine; CAB: cabergoline; ^c cured/treated; ^d replased/cured; ^e mean follow up duration months; NA not applicable, because the data was not provided by included studies. Duration 1: follow up duration (month); Duration 2: DAs treatment duration (month), only for studies with DAs; Duration 3: follow-up duration after DAs withdrawal (month), only for studies with DAs; No.: sample size of included study

Quality assessments showed some concern for most RCTs because of their unclear description about random process and prespecified analysis plan. The assessments also found 18.8% (6/32) high, 21.9% (7/32) moderate, and 59.4% (19/32) low overall bias for non-RCTs, and the main bias was confounding and excluding patients due to missing data. The average score for case series studies was 11.9 [4–16], and the main bias came from study design (Q2–4) and unclear description of statistical analysis (Q14). The summary of risk of bias within studies was provided in Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Tables 3, 4 and 5.

Biochemical cure rate

A total of 81 studies [4–8, 13, 68, 84, 92–97, 99–112, 114, 118, 120–123, 125, 127–133, 135–137, 139, 141–156] comprising 4397 patients who received surgery and 74 studies [3–6, 8, 13, 17–21, 25, 26, 28–36, 38, 42–46, 48–51, 54–58, 60, 61, 65–73, 76, 79–81, 85–87, 89, 91] comprising 2659 patients who used DAs were included in this part of the research. The pooled prolactin normalization rates were 0.66 (0.62, 0.71) (I² = 93.8%, p = 0.000) in the surgery group and 0.78 (0.75, 0.82) (I² = 89.4%, p = 0.000) in the DAs group, respectively (Fig. 2). Because of high heterogeneity, subgroup analysis and meta-regression analysis were conducted to detect the source of high heterogeneity. In the surgery group, although no significant decrease in heterogeneity was found in the subgroup analysis (Supplementary Fig. 2), meta-regression analysis detected that gender (p = 0.019) and macroprolactinoma (p = 0.001) were statistically significant factors causing heterogeneity. In the subgroup analysis, macroprolactinoma patients showed a lower biochemical cure rate (0.57 versus 0.66) compared with total surgery-treated patients, but in macroprolactinoma patients, the biochemical cure rate was higher (0.79 versus 0.66) than total surgery-treated patients (Supplementary Fig. 2). And regression analysis identified that female patients showed a positive trend in the rates compared with male patients. Because the surgery group included patients with or without DAs treatment history, we conducted subgroup analysis based on DAs treatment history to explore the normalization rate of surgery treated population without DAs treatment history. Results showed similar normalization rates in without DAs treatment history subgroup (0.69 (0.44,0.94); I² = 94.5%, p = 0.000) with that in the whole surgery treated population (Supplementary Fig. 8). In the DAs group, subgroup analysis was carried out based on decades, subtypes of prolactinoma, and drug species (Supplementary Fig. 2), and the giant prolactinoma (I² = 62.3%, p = 0.010) subgroup showed a decrease in important heterogeneity (Table 2). Meta-regression analysis of the DAs group also showed that giant prolactinoma (p = 0.029) and bromocriptine (p = 0.024) were important sources of heterogeneity (Table 4), and their rates were lower than the rates in all patients (0.62 versus 0.78; 0.70 versus 0.78). The funnel plot for the surgery group (Supplementary Fig. 3A) showed a symmetric distribution on either side of the middle line, but an asymmetric distribution for the DAs group. Based on the funnel plot, some degree of publication bias was found in the DAs group (Supplementary Fig. 3B).

Fig. 2 — Forest plot for biochemical cure rate in prolactinoma patients treated with DAs (a) and patients treated with surgery (b)

Table 2.

Subgroup analysis of the biochemical cure rate in patients treated with DAs and surgery treatment

	DAs			Surgery
	Pooled result	Number of studies	Number of patients	Pooled result	Number of studies	Number of patients
Total	0.78 (0.75, 0.82)	74	2659	0.66 (0.62, 0.71)	81	4397
Microprolactinoma	0.86 (0.78, 0.94)	9	238	0.79 (0.72, 0.85)	23	686
Macroprolactinoma	0.77 (0.72, 0.83)	27	1228	0.57 (0.46, 0.68)	15	666
Giant prolactinoma	0.62 (0.51, 0.74)	8	176	0.35 (0.08, 0.62)	3	55
1980–1989	0.74 (0.59, 0.89)	6	106	0.63 (0.52, 0.73)	15	1134
1990–1999	0.83 (0.75, 0.90)	11	397	0.64 (0.46, 0.83)	7	262
2000–2009	0.79 (0.72, 0.86)	18	605	0.69(0.60, 0.78)	20	947
2010–2019	0.77 (0.71, 0.82)	39	1551	0.67 (0.60, 0.74)	39	2054
Bromocriptine	0.70 (0.60, 0.80)	14	330	NA	NA	NA
Cabergoline	0.83 (0.78, 0.87)	32	1368	NA	NA	NA
Microscopic surgery	NA	NA	NA	0.68 (0.56, 0.80)	14	1043
Endoscopic surgery	NA	NA	NA	0.72 (0.65, 0.79)	29	1156

Open in a new tab

Das dopamine agonists, NA not applicable, because the data was not discussed or calculated in the meta-analysis

Table 4.

Meta-regressiosn analysis of the biochemical cure rate and recurrence rate of DAs and surgery

	Biochemical cure rate		Recurrence rate
	Surgery	DAs	Surgery	DAs
Gender	0.019	0.601	0.479	NA^a
Year	0.154	0.103	0.479	NA^a
Age	0.065	0.495	0.999	0.313
Microprolactinoma	0.880	0.578	0.350	0.732
Macroprolactinoma	0.001	0.235	0.068	0.836
Giant prolactinoma	0.482	0.029	NA^a	NA^a
Microscopic surgery	0.843	NA^b	NA^a	NA^b
Endoscopic surgery	0.199	NA^b	0.773	NA^b
Bromocriptine	NA^b	0.024	NA^b	0.248
Cabergoline	NA^b	0.935	NA^b	0.520

Open in a new tab

Das dopamine agonists, NA^a not applicable, because the data was not provided by included studies or enough to be included in the meta-regression analysis. NA^b not applicable, because the data was not discussed or calculated in the meta-analysis

Cumulative meta-analysis was also conducted to detect the changes in the biochemical cure rate over time. Results showed an overall increasing trend of the biochemical cure rate of surgery, and after the year 2000, the biochemical cure rate of endoscopic surgery was consistently higher than that of bromocriptine (Fig. 4A).

Fig. 4 — Cumulative meta-analysis of the biochemical cure rate (a) and recurrence rate (b) in prolactinoma patients subgrouped by the treatment methods

Recurrence rate

This part consisted of 36 studies [4, 6, 93, 100, 102, 105, 111, 112, 114, 116, 120–122, 125, 127, 128, 132, 135, 138, 139, 141, 142, 145, 146, 148, 150, 154–156] comprising 1215 patients who underwent surgery and 19 studies [24, 27, 34, 39, 41, 47, 59, 62, 64, 68, 75, 82, 84, 85, 87] comprising 835 patients who used DAs. The recurrence rate of surgery was 0.19 (0.15, 0.24) (I² = 83.7%, p = 0.000) and 0.57 (0.48, 0.67) (I² = 89.2%, p = 0.000) for DAs (Fig. 3). Because of the high heterogeneity in surgery and DAs, subgroup analysis was carried out based on decades, subtypes of prolactinoma, subtypes of surgery, and drug species (Table 3; Supplementary Fig. 4). The following significant decreases in heterogeneity were detected: 2000–2009 (I² = 47.1%, p = 0.093), microprolactinoma (I² = 65.6%, p = 0.002), microscopic surgery (I² = 65.7%, p = 0.020), and endoscopic surgery (I² = 0.0%, p = 0.865) for surgery and bromocriptine (I² = 15.5%, p = 0.277) for DAs (Table 3). Meta-regression analysis did not detect any important factors with respect to heterogeneity sources (Table 4).

Fig. 3 — Forest plot for recurrence rate in prolactinoma patients treated with DAs (a) and patients treated with surgery (b)

Table 3.

Subgroup analysis of the recurrence rate in patients treated with DAs and surgery treatment

	DAs			Surgery
	Pooled result	Number of studies	Number of patients	Pooled result	Number of studies	Number of patients
Total	0.57 (0.48, 0.67)	19	835	0.19 (0.15, 0.24)	36	1215
Microprolactinoma	0.63 (0.49, 0.78)	7	380	0.10 (0.04, 0.17)	10	206
Macroprolactinoma	0.60 (0.39, 0.81)	6	226	0.34 (0.11, 0.56)	8	112
Giant prolactinoma	NA^a	NA^a	NA^a	NA^a	NA^a	NA^a
1980–1989	0.79	1	24	0.28 (0.16, 0.39)	13	374
1990–1999	0.81 (0.58, 1.04)	2	31	0.17 (− 0.01, 0.35)	3	149
2000–2009	0.51 (0.37, 0.65)	4	329	0.15 (0.09, 0.21)	6	278
2010–2019	0.54 (0.41, 0.67)	12	451	0.15 (0.09, 0.20)	14	414
Bromocriptine	0.86 (0.73, 0.98)	2	36	NA^b	NA^b	NA^b
Cabergoline	0.55 (0.39, 0.70)	6	336	NA^b	NA^b	NA^b
Microscopic surgery	NA^b	NA^b	NA^b	0.13 (0.05, 0.21)	5	177
Endoscopic surgery	NA^b	NA^b	NA^b	0.13 (0.05, 0.21)	3	75

Open in a new tab

Das dopamine agonists, NA^a not applicable, because the data was not provided by included studies, NA^b not applicable, because the data was not discussed or calculated in the meta-analysis

Cumulative meta-analysis of recurrence rates was carried out. Results showed that the recurrence rate of DAs decreased from 0.86 (0.73, 1.00) in 1991 to 0.57 (0.48, 0.67) in 2018. In the surgery group, the recurrence rate consistently reduced from 0.29 (0.15, 0.43) in 1985 to 0.18 (0.14, 0.21) in 2018 (Fig. 4B).

Prolactin level

A total of 8 studies [7, 98, 124, 134, 150] comprising 555 patients in the surgery group and 27 studies [7, 31, 33, 38, 40, 42–44, 46, 48, 54, 55, 59, 78, 81, 83, 84, 90] comprising 954 patients in the DAs group were included in this part of research. Based on the pooled results, the mean differences in the prolactin levels between pre- and post-treatment were 396.80 ng/ml (222.33, 571.27) (I² = 99%, p < 0.001) for surgery and 375.26 ng/ml (316.21, 434.31) (I² = 98%, p < 0.001) for DAs (Supplementary Fig. 5). Sensitive analysis was conducted to find the source of heterogeneity, but no notable decrease in heterogeneity was detected.

Symptom improvement rate

Improvement rate for vision impairment

In the surgery group, 114 patients from 11 studies [13, 95, 97, 124, 132, 137, 141, 143, 156] were included, and the pooled improvement rate for vision impairment was 0.68 (0.51, 0.82) (I² = 34.8%, p = 0.018) (Table 5) with moderate heterogeneity. In the DAs group, 14 studies [5, 13, 29, 30, 33, 43, 46, 48, 71, 79] comprising 176 patients provided the required data, and the pooled improvement rate for vision impairment was 0.57 (0.38, 0.74) (I² = 42.4%, p = 0.000) (Table 5; Supplementary Fig. 6A,7A) with moderate heterogeneity.

Table 5.

The pooled estimated rate of symptom relief and the incidence rate of complications in DAs- and surgery-treated patients

	DAs			Surgery
	Pooled result	Number of studies	Number of patients	Pooled result	Number of studies	Number of patients
Vision impairment improvement rate	0.57 (0.38, 0.74)	14	176	0.68 (0.51, 0.82)	11	114
Headache improvement rate	0.86 (0.72, 0.94)	4	35	0.80 (0.32, 0.97)	3	95
Menstrual disturbance improvement rate	0.71 (0.16, 0.97)	6	123	0.68 (0.62, 0.74)	3	226
Galactorrhoea improvement rate	0.89 (0.72, 0.96)	6	29	0.33 (0.01, 0.94)	3	176
Incidence rate of ACTH insufficiency	0.10 (0.06, 0.16)	9	286	0.25 (0.13, 0.43)	11	387
Incidence rate of TSH deficiency	0.19 (0.12, 0.28)	7	194	0.24 (0.14, 0.38)	12	475
Incidence rate of hypopituitarism	0.29 (0.13, 0.54)	4	99	0.17 (0.06, 0.38)	11	709
Incidence rate of diabetes insipidus	NA	NA	NA	0.17 (0.12, 0.25)	27	1616

Open in a new tab

Das dopamine agonists, NA not applicable, because the data was not provided by included studies

Headache improvement rate

A total of 3 studies [95, 98, 132] comprising 95 patients treated with surgery were included, and the pooled headache improvement rate was 0.80 (0.32, 0.97) (I² = 46.9%, p = 0.000). Meta-analysis of this part was conducted for DAs using 35 patients from 4 studies [5, 30, 32, 46]. The pooled headache improvement rate of DAs was 0.86 (0.72, 0.94) (I² = 0%, p = 0.416) with low heterogeneity (Table 5; Supplementary Fig. 6B,7B).

Improvement rate for menstrual disturbance

A total of 3 studies [94, 141, 154] comprising 226 patients treated with surgery and 6 studies [20, 28, 30, 71] comprising 123 patients who used DAs were included, and the pooled improvement rates for menstrual disturbance were 0.68 (0.62, 0.74) (I² = 0%, p = 0.327) and 0.71 (0.16, 1.00) (I² = 47.5%, p = 0.000), respectively (Table 5; Supplementary Fig. 6C,7C).

Galactorrhoea improvement rate

This research included 3 studies [124, 132, 141] comprising 176 patients treated with surgery and 6 studies [30, 32, 43, 71] comprising 29 patients who used DAs to assess the galactorrhoea improvement rate after these treatments. The pooled galactorrhoea improvement rates were 0.33 (0.01, 0.94) (I² = 47.1%, p = 0.000) after surgery and 0.89 (0.72, 0.96) (I² = 0%, p = 0.493) after DAs, respectively (Table 5; Supplementary Fig. 6D,7D).

Complications

Incidence rate of ACTH insufficiency

A total of 387 patients from 11 studies [3, 5, 6, 13, 93, 98, 121, 151, 152, 154] that applied surgery and 286 patients from 9 studies [3, 5, 13, 33, 45, 73, 78] that utilized DAs were included, and the pooled incidence rates of ACTH insufficiency were 0.25 (0.13, 0.43) (I² = 46.7%, p = 0.000) for surgery and 0.10 (0.06, 0.16) (I² = 26.0%, p = 0.121) for DAs, respectively (Table 5; Supplementary Fig. 6E,7E).

Incidence rate of TSH deficiency

In this part, 12 studies [3–6, 13, 93, 98, 151, 152, 154] comprising 475 patients who underwent surgery and 7 studies [3, 5, 13, 23, 61, 73, 88] comprising 194 DAs-treated patients were included, and the pooled estimated rates were 0.24 (0.14, 0.38) (I² = 45.4%, p = 0.000) and 0.19 (0.12, 0.28) (I² = 26.4%, p = 0.134) after surgery and DAs, respectively (Table 5; Supplementary Fig. 6F,7F).

Incidence rate of hypopituitarism

A total of 709 surgery-treated patients from 11 studies [5, 6, 97, 124, 141, 147, 148, 156] and 99 DAs-treated patients from 4 studies [5, 48] were included to assess the incidence rate of hypopituitarism. The pooled incidence rates were 0.17 (0.06, 0.38) (I² = 48.4%, p = 0.000) for surgery and 0.29 (0.13, 0.54) (I² = 41.6%, p = 0.015) for DAs, respectively (Table 5; Supplementary Fig. 6G,7G).

Incidence rate of diabetes insipidus

Because of the lack of studies that used DAs and reported the incidence rate of diabetes insipidus, only 1616 surgery-treated patients from 27 studies [3–5, 93, 98, 99, 115, 117, 124, 126, 132, 138, 140, 141, 143, 145, 147–154, 156] were included to detect the pooled incidence rate. The estimated incidence rate of diabetes insipidus after surgery was 0.17 (0.12, 0.25) (I² = 47.1%, p = 0.000) (Table 5; Supplementary Fig. 6H).

Discussion

DAs are the preferred choice in the current guideline, and they are used for treating symptomatic microprolactinomas and macroprolactinomas [157]. Compared with DAs, surgery has very limited indications, which include the following: (1) intolerance or resistance to DAs; (2) acute complications such as pituitary apoplexy and cerebrospinal fluid leak [157]. Some new indications have been discussed in other papers, which include the following: (3) Young patients with high complete resection rate; (4) unwillingness to take long-term medication; (5) cystic prolactinoma; (6) partial resistance to treatment; and (7) requirement of high dose of cabergoline [158]. The reasons for these limited indications are a reported high recurrence rate (7–50%), possible complications, and requirement of experienced neurosurgeons [157].

Over the past 5 decades, the endoscope has developed from a diagnostic tool to a mature surgical technique with concepts of minimally invasive surgery and key-hole surgery [159]. An increasing number of neurosurgeons have accepted this vivifying technique and have promoted its indications. Based on our results, surgery, especially endoscopic surgery, has already shown satisfactory efficacy and safety in some subgroups of prolactinoma patients, and it is time to re-evaluate the surgical indications of prolactinoma.

DAs versus surgery for microprolactinoma

Symptomatic microprolactinoma patients are recommended to receive DAs in the current guideline [157], although a microprolactinoma rarely grows. But the pooled estimated biochemical cure rate of endoscopic surgery was the same as that of DAs (0.86 versus 0.86) and it was slightly higher than that of bromocriptine (0.86 versus 0.76). Furthermore, the recurrence rates of surgery, both microscopic and endoscopic surgery, were much lower than those of DAs (0.10 versus 0.63). In another meta-analysis conducted by Ma et al. [10], the reported long-term remission rates for microprolactinoma were 56% (medication) versus 91% (surgery). The difference between their results and our results may have arisen from different inclusion criteria, as they excluded patients utilizing DAs before surgery. Zamanipoor et al. also conducted a meta-analysis and found the long-term remission rates were 36% versus 83% for medication and surgery separately(9). This may be due to that they only include patients with medicine withdrawal. It is notable that some countries like China do not allow the use of cabergoline, and patients living in such countries may consider surgery to be a better choice than bromocriptine.

DAs versus surgery for macroprolactinoma

All macroprolactinoma patients with or without symptoms are recommended to use DAs [157]. The same preference was detected in our results, which showed that DAs had a higher biochemical cure rate than surgery (0.77 versus 0.57). However, some interesting results were also found in the subgroup analysis. The only one included microscopic study in the microsurgery group reported the highest biochemical cure rate. Furthermore, endoscopic surgery and bromocriptine were at the same level in terms of the biochemical cure rate (0.66 versus 0.64) and endoscopic surgery was lower than bromocriptine in terms of the recurrence rate (0.11 versus 0.92). Results for the long-term remission rates in the study by Ma et al. [10] showed a similar tendency to that in our study (77% versus 44%). But the results from Zamanipoor et al. showed that the long-term remission rates were 28% versus 60% for medication and surgery separately [9]. The difference between their results and ours may come from that they only include patients with medication withdrawal.

DAs versus surgery for giant prolactinoma

For giant prolactinoma, we failed to include studies reporting the biochemical cure rate after microscopic surgery or bromocriptine and the recurrence rate after any treatment. This may be because of our strict inclusion criteria, as we excluded studies with less than 10 patients or studies using another treatment like radiotherapy. In our results, DAs showed a higher biochemical cure rate than surgery (0.62 versus 0.35). Similar but exaggerated results were reported by Lv et al. [13] (0.48 versus 0, DAs versus surgery). Hamidi et al. also detected similar remission rates (58.8% versus 53.6%, DAs versus surgery). Because of the lack of data from giant prolactinoma patients, no recommendations are found in the current guidelines. Further researches should address this question and verify our results in future guidelines.

Comparison of relief of symptoms between DAs and surgery

A large prolactinoma can compress the surrounding structures and can cause severe vision impairment and headache [160], which are also the indications for surgery. Lv et al. [13] reported that DAs and surgery had a similar recovery rate for visual impairment. However, it is interesting that the current research reported a slightly higher improvement rate for vision impairment in surgery-treated patients (0.68 versus 0.57) and a comparable headache improvement rate in DAs-treated patients (0.80 versus 0.86); thus, showing that surgery and DAs may have a similar ability in relieving nerve compression.

We found preference of DAs in terms of the improvement rate for menstrual disturbance (0.71 versus 0.68) and galactorrhea (0.89 versus 0.33). Nayan et al. [11] conducted a meta-analysis on the fertility after surgery in prolactinoma patients, and they reported a significant decrease in the pooled prevalence of galactorrhea from 84 to 29%. The reduction was greater than that in our study, which may have been caused by gender restriction in the inclusion criteria.

Comparison of the rate of complications between DAs and surgery

A low rate of complications was noted for both treatments. Our results revealed a preference for DAs in ACTH insufficiency (0.10 versus 0.25) and TSH deficiency (0.19 versus 0.24) but a higher incidence rate of hypopituitarism (0.29 versus 0.17) after DAs. Oksana et al. [5] reported similar results in ACTH insufficiency and TSH deficiency but a contrary result in hypopituitarism, and all of the results from their study were higher than our results (ranging from 27 to 69%). A different population, as they only included giant prolactinoma cases, may explain this discrepancy.

The incidences of diabetes insipidus in different studies range from 2.5 to 100%, with the pooled result being 0.174 (0.118, 0.251). Because no studies on DAs-treated patients with diabetes insipidus were included, we failed to compare the outcome between DAs and surgery.

Comparison of the cost of therapy between DAs and surgery

The cost of DAs and surgery is a complex consideration, and contrary results have been reported. Lian et al. [161] reported that for microprolactinoma patients, the estimated costs of surgery and DAs were ¥22,527 and ¥20,555. For macroprolactinoma patients, the estimated costs were ¥42,357/¥44,094 in males/females for surgery and ¥31,461/¥27,178 in males/females for DAs. Similar results were found by Zhen et al. [162]. But Corinna et al. [163] reported different results; they reported that the lifetime costs of surgery, bromocriptine, and cabergoline were $40,473, $41,601, and $70,696, respectively. Further studies are needed to determine which method is more cost-effective.

DAs treatment before surgery?

In the current research, we conducted subgroup analysis for surgery treated population based on DAs treatment history and found similar normalization rates between patients with DAs treatment history (0.66) and without DAs treatment history (0.69; Supplementary Fig. 8). This result showed that DAs treatment before surgery may not influence the efficiency of surgery. Because all included researches for the safety analysis only discussed patients with DAs treatment history or provided inseparable data of these two situations, we did not explore the difference of surgery safety between patients with or without DAs treatment history.

Duration of medication

The mean duration of medication treatment in the DAs treatment group was 44.5 months. But most studies defined resistance to DA as a lack of PRL normalization and a failure to decrease tumor size despite an adequate dose of DA treatment for 3 or 6 months [99, 127]. For patients who were resistant to DAs treatment, they were recommended to increase the dose to maximal tolerable doses [157]. And for patients who have no response to DAs, they were recommended to accept transsphenoidal surgery [157].

Advantages and limitations

As this was the first study to compare the efficacy and safety between DAs and surgery in patients with all types of prolactinomas, we included a large sample size of up to 6162 patients.

The major limitation of the present research was that we could not perform a two-arm meta-analysis due to the lack of prospective randomized controlled trials. We could only collect the data from single-arm studies. And because of the different indications for surgery and DAs, the patient groups differed significantly between each other. So, we conducted qualitative comparison between treatments instead of a quantitative comparison in the current meta-analysis. Randomized controlled trials of DAs and surgery are expected in the future.

Another limitation was the high heterogeneity of the biochemical cure rate and the recurrence rate. Although we conducted a subgroup analysis and a meta-regression analysis to identify the source of heterogeneity, we only found that giant prolactinoma and bromocriptine could partially explain the heterogeneity. We failed to collect the following data and proceed with a comparison of the following parts: biochemical cure rate in giant prolactinoma patients using microscopic surgery or bromocriptine, recurrence rate in all giant prolactinoma patients, recurrence rate in microprolactinoma patients treated with bromocriptine, and incidence rate of diabetes insipidus in DAs-treated patients. The lack of data may have arisen from our inclusion criteria of patient size limitation. Most DAs withdrawal studies focused on cabergoline, and few studies on bromocriptine were excluded from this research because of our exclusion criteria. Further clinical researches on these patients are needed.

The present study did not include the radiological parameters of prolactinoma. Further researches are needed to verify our results.

Conclusion

The present meta-analysis serves as the first study to compare the efficacy and safety between DAs and surgery in microprolactinoma and macroprolactinoma patients. We concluded that for patients with clear indications or contraindications for surgery, choosing surgery or DAs accordingly is unequivocal. However, for patients with clinical equipoise, further controlled clinical trials are expected to address it. In this meta-analysis, we discovered that surgery, especially endoscopic surgery, showed comparable efficacy and safety in microprolactinoma and macroprolactinoma patients with a considerable biochemical cure rate, lower recurrence rate, and similar improvement rates of symptoms and incidence rates of complications. With the development of surgical technique and equipment, the efficacy and safety of surgery have greatly improved. Therefore, we suggest that neurosurgeons and endocrinologists conduct high-quality clinical trials to address the clinical equipoise quantitatively.

Supplementary Information

41016_2022_277_MOESM1_ESM.pdf^{(391.4KB, pdf)}

Additional file 1: Supplementary Figure 1. A. Summary of Risk of bias assessment for randomized controlled trials using ROB.2 tool. B. Summary of Risk of Bias assessment for non-randomized controlled trials using ROBINS-I tool.

41016_2022_277_MOESM2_ESM.pdf^{(972.2KB, pdf)}

Additional file 2: Supplementary Figure 2. Forest plots for subgroup analysis of biochemical cure rates in surgery-treated patients subgrouped by patients type (A), publication years (B), surgery types (C); and in DAs-treated patients subgrouped by patients type (D), publication years (E), DAs types (F).

41016_2022_277_MOESM3_ESM.pdf^{(412.1KB, pdf)}

Additional file 3: Supplementary Figure 3. Funnel plots for biochemical cure rate of patients treated with surgery (A) and DAs (B).

41016_2022_277_MOESM4_ESM.pdf^{(750.3KB, pdf)}

Additional file 4: Supplementary Figure 4. Forest plots for subgroup analysis of recurrence rates in surgery-treated patients subgrouped by patients type (A), publication years (B), surgery types (C); and in DAs-treated patients subgrouped by patients type (D), publication years (E), DAs types (F).

41016_2022_277_MOESM5_ESM.pdf^{(2.1MB, pdf)}

Additional file 5: Supplementary Figure 5. Forest plots for prolactin level of patients applying surgery (A) and DAs (B).

41016_2022_277_MOESM6_ESM.pdf^{(2.1MB, pdf)}

Additional file 6: Supplementary Figure 6. Forest plots for improvement rates for vision impairment (A), headache (B), menstrual disturbance (C), galactorrhoea (D) and incidence rates of ACTH insufficiency (E), TSH deficiency (F), hypopituitarism (G), diabetes insipidus (H) of patients applying surgery.

41016_2022_277_MOESM7_ESM.pdf^{(1.8MB, pdf)}

Additional file 7: Supplementary Figure 7. Forest plots for improvement rates for vision impairment (A), headache (B), menstrual disturbance (C), galactorrhoea (D) and incidence rates of ACTH insufficiency (E), TSH deficiency (F), hypopituitarism (G) of patients applying DAs.

41016_2022_277_MOESM8_ESM.pdf^{(512.6KB, pdf)}

Additional file 8: Supplementary Figure 8. Forest plots for subgroup analysis of biochemical cure rates in surgery-treated patients subgrouped by DAs treatment history.

41016_2022_277_MOESM9_ESM.docx^{(42.6KB, docx)}

Additional file 9: Supplementary Table 1. Basic characteristics of the included studies with surgery treatment.

41016_2022_277_MOESM10_ESM.docx^{(43.1KB, docx)}

Additional file 10: Supplementary Table 2. Basic characteristics of the included studies with DAs treatment.

41016_2022_277_MOESM11_ESM.docx^{(15.3KB, docx)}

Additional file 11: Supplementary Table 3. Summary table of risk of bias for RCT.

41016_2022_277_MOESM12_ESM.docx^{(20.4KB, docx)}

Additional file 12: Supplementary Table 4. Summary table of risk of bias for non-RCT.

41016_2022_277_MOESM13_ESM.docx^{(53.4KB, docx)}

Additional file 13: Supplementary Table 5. Summary table of risk of bias for case-series study.

41016_2022_277_MOESM14_ESM.docx^{(14.3KB, docx)}

Additional file 14: Supplementary file 1. Literature research strategy.

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Peiqing Cai and Wenjing Gou for their support in this research.

Funding

No grant supported this study.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

Chiyuan Ma conceived and designed the investigation. Xiangming Cai analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. Junhao Zhu, Jin Yang, Chao Tang, and Zixiang Cong conducted statistical analyses. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Abbreviations

ACTH: Adrenocorticotropic hormone
TSH: Thyroid-stimulating hormone
DAs: Dopamine agonists
RE: Random-effects
CAB: Cabergoline
BRC: Bromocriptine
NA: Not applicable

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1.Wong A, Eloy JA, Couldwell WT, Liu JK. Update on prolactinomas. Part 1: Clinical manifestations and diagnostic challenges. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22:1562–1567. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.03.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2.Faje A, Nachtigall L. Current treatment options for hyperprolactinemia. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2013;14:1611–1625. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2013.806488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3.Berezin M, Shimon I, Hadani M. Prolactinoma in 53 men: Clinical characteristics and modes of treatment (male prolactinoma) J Endocrinol Invest. 1995;18:436–441. doi: 10.1007/BF03349742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4.Samaan NA, Schultz PN, Leavens TA, Leavens ME, Lee YY. Pregnancy after treatment in patients with prolactinoma: Operation versus bromocriptine. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986;155:1300–1305. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90164-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.Hamidi O, Van Gompel J, Gruber L, Kittah NE, Donegan D, Philbrick KA, et al. Management and outcomes of giant prolactinoma: a series of 71 patients. Endocr Pract. 2019;25:340–352. doi: 10.4158/EP-2018-0392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6.Hong JW, Lee MK, Kim SH, Lee EJ. Discrimination of prolactinoma from hyperprolactinemic non-functioning adenoma. Endocrine. 2010;37:140–147. doi: 10.1007/s12020-009-9279-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.Asano S, Ueki K, Suzuki I, Kirino T. Clinical features and medical treatment of male prolactinomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2001;143:465–470. doi: 10.1007/s007010170075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8.Andereggen L, Frey J, Andres RH, El-Koussy M, Beck J, Seiler RW, et al. 10-year follow-up study comparing primary medical vs. surgical therapy in women with prolactinomas. Endocrine. 2017;55:223–230. doi: 10.1007/s12020-016-1115-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9.Zamanipoor Najafabadi AH, Zandbergen IM, de Vries F, Broersen LHA, van den Akker-van Marle ME, Pereira AM, et al. Surgery as a Viable Alternative First-Line Treatment for Prolactinoma Patients. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10.Ma Q, Su J, Li Y, Wang J, Long W, Luo M, et al. The chance of permanent cure for micro- and macroprolactinomas, medication or surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol. 2018;9:1–10. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11.Lamba N, Noormohamed N, Simjian T, Alsheikhb MY, Jamalb A, Doucetteb J, et al. Fertility after transsphenoidal surgery in patients with prolactinomas: A meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019;176:53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.11.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12.Hutton B, Wolfe D, Moher D, Shamseer L. Reporting guidance considerations from a statistical perspective: overview of tools to enhance the rigour of reporting of randomised trials and systematic reviews. Evid Based Ment Health. 2017;20:46–52. doi: 10.1136/eb-2017-102666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13.Lv L, Hu Y, Yin S, Zhou P, Yang Y, Ma W, et al. Giant prolactinomas: Outcomes of multimodal treatments for 42 cases with long-term follow-up. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2019;127:295. doi: 10.1055/a-0597-8877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14.Sterne JA, Hernan MA, Reeves BC, Savovic J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15.Sterne JAC, Savovic J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16.Guo B, Moga C, Harstall C, Schopflocher D. A principal component analysis is conducted for a case series quality appraisal checklist. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;69(199-207):e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17.Zarate A, Canales ES, Alger M, Forsbach G. The effect of pregnancy and lactation on pituitary prolactin-secreting tumours. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1979;92:407–412. doi: 10.1530/acta.0.0920407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18.Coculescu M, Simionescu N, Oprescu M, D. A. Bromocriptine treatment of pituitary adenomas. Evaluation of withdrawal effect. Endocrinologie. 1983;21:157–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19.Nissim M, Ambrosi B, Bernasconi V, Giannattasio G, Giovanelli MA, Bassetti M, et al. Bromocriptine treatment of macroprolactinomas: studies on the time course of tumor shrinkage and morphology. J Endocrinol Invest. 1982;5:409–415. doi: 10.1007/BF03350542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20.Archer DF, Lattanzi DR, Moore EE, Harger JH, Herbert DL. Bromocriptine treatment of women with suspected pituitary prolactin-secreting microadenomas. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;143:620. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(82)90106-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21.Hancock KW, Scott JS, Lamb JT, Gibson RM, Chapman C. Conservative management of pituitary prolactinomas ; evldence for bromocriptine-induced regression. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1980;87:523–529. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1980.tb04590.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22.Hildebrandt G, Bauer T, Stracke H, Fassbender WJ, Mueller HW, Agnoli AL, et al. Surgery, dopamine agonist therapy of combined treatment--results in prolactinoma patients after a 12 month follow-up. Zentralbl Neurochir. 1992;53:123–134. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23.Beckers A, Petrossians P, Abs R, Flandroy P, Stadnik T, De Longueville M, et al. Treatment of macroprolactinomas with the long-acting and repeatable form of bromocriptine: a report on 29 cases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992;75:275–280. doi: 10.1210/jcem.75.1.1619019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24.van T, Verlaat JW, Croughs RJ. Withdrawal of bromocriptine after long-term therapy for macroprolactinomas; effect on plasma prolactin and tumour size. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1991;34:175–178. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1991.tb00289.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25.Verlaat JWV, Croughs RJM, Hendriks MJ, Bosma NJ. Results of primary treatment with bromocriptine of prolactinomas with extrasellar extension. Can J Neurol Sci. 1990;17:71–73. doi: 10.1017/S0317167100030079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26.Hildebrandt G, Zierski J, Christophis P, Laun A, Schatz H, Lancranjan I, et al. Rhinorrhea following dopamine agonist therapy of invasive macroprolaetinoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1989;96:107–113. doi: 10.1007/BF01456167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27.Wang C, Lam KSL, Ma JTC, Chan T, Liu MY, Yeung RTT. Long-term treatment of hyperprolactinaemia with bromocriptine: effect of drug withdrawal. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1987;27:363–371. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1987.tb01163.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28.Ferrari C, Paracchi A, Mattei AM, de Vincentiis S, D'Alberton A, Crosignani P. Cabergoline in the long-term therapy of hyperprolactinemic disorders. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1992;126:489–494. doi: 10.1530/acta.0.1260489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29.Sarno AD, Landi ML, Cappabianca P, Salle FD, Rossi FW, Pivonello R, et al. Resistance to cabergoline as compared with bromocriptine in hyperprolactinemia: Prevalence, clinical definition, and therapeutic strategy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:5256–5261. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.11.8054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30.Colao A, Di Sarno A, Landi ML, Scavuzzo F, Cappabianca P, Pivonello R, et al. Macroprolactinoma shrinkage during cabergoline treatment is greater in naive patients than in patients pretreated with other dopamine agonists: A prospective study in 110 patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:2247–2252. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.6.6657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31.Cannavò S, Curtò L, Squadrito S, Almoto B, Vieni A, Trimarchi F. Cabergoline: A first-choice treatment in patients with previously untreated prolactin-secreting pituitary adenoma. J Endocrinol Invest. 1999;22:354–359. doi: 10.1007/BF03343573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32.Colao A, Di Sarno A, Sarnacchiaro F, Ferone D, Di Renzo G, Merola B, et al. Prolactinomas resistant to standard dopamine agonists respond to chronic cabergoline treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82:876–883. doi: 10.1210/jcem.82.3.3822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33.Ferrari CI, Abs R, Bevan JS, Barbant G, Ciccarelli E, Motta T, et al. Treatment of macroprolactinoma with cabergoline: a study of 85 patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1997;46:409–413. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.1997.1300952.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34.Muratori M, Arosio M, Gambino G, Romano C, Biella O, Faglia G. Use of cabergoline in the long-term treatment of hyperprolactinemic and acromegalic patients. J Endocrinol Invest. 1997;20:537–546. doi: 10.1007/BF03348016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35.Delgrange EDM, Donckier J. Effects of the dopamine agonist cabergoline in patients with prolactinoma intolerant or resistant to bromocriptine. Eur J Endocrinol. 1996;134:454–456. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1340454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36.Sabuncu T, Arikan E, Tasan E, Hatemi H. Comparison of the effects of cabergoline and bromocriptine on prolactin levels in hyperprolactinemic patients. Intern Med. 2001;40:857–861. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.40.857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37.Naliato ECO, Violante AHD, Caldas D, Filho AL, Loureiro CR, Fontes R, et al. Body fat in nonobese women with prolactinoma treated with dopamine agonists. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2007;67:845–852. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02973.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38.Shimon I, Benbassat C, Hadani M. Effectiveness of long-term cabergoline treatment for giant prolactinoma: study of 12 men. Eur J Endocrinol. 2007;156:225–231. doi: 10.1530/EJE-06-0646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39.Colao A, Di Sarno A, Guerra E, Pivonello R, Cappabianca P, Caranci F, et al. Predictors of remission of hyperprolactinaemia after long-term withdrawal of cabergoline therapy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2007;67:426–433. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02905.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40.Chattopadhyay A, Bhansali A, Masoodi SR. Long-term efficacy of bromocriptine in macroprolactinomas and giant prolactinomas in men. Pituitary. 2005;8:147–154. doi: 10.1007/s11102-005-5111-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41.Biswas M, Smith J, Jadon D, McEwan P, Rees DA, Evans LM, et al. Long-term remission following withdrawal of dopamine agonist therapy in subjects with microprolactinomas. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2005;63:26–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2005.02293.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42.Colao A, Vitale G, Di Sarno A, Spiezia S, Guerra E, Ciccarelli A, et al. Prolactin and prostate hypertrophy: A pilot observational, prospective, case-control study in men with prolactinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:2770–2775. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-032055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43.Corsello SM, Ubertini G, Altomare M, Lovicu RM, Migneco MG, Rota CA, et al. Giant prolactinomas in men: efficacy of cabergoline treatment. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2003;58:662–670. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2003.01770.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44.Essas O, Bouguerra R, Hamzaoui J, Marrakchi Z, Hadjri S, Chamakhi S, et al. Efficacy and safety of bromocriptine in the treatment of macroprolactinomas. Annales d'Endocrinologie. 2002;63:524–531. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45.Dos Santos Silva CM, Barbosa FRP, Lima GAB, Warszawski L, Fontes R, Domingues RC, et al. BMI and metabolic profile in patients with prolactinoma before and after treatment with dopamine agonists. Obesity. 2010;19:800–805. doi: 10.1038/oby.2010.150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46.Bhansali A, Walia R, Dutta P, Khandelwal N, Sialy R, Bhadada S. Efficacy of cabergoline on rapid escalation of dose in men with macroprolactinomas. Indian J Med Res. 2010;131:530–535. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
47.Huda MSB, Athauda NB, Teh MM, Carroll PV, Powrie JK. Factors determining the remission of microprolactinomas after dopamine agonist withdrawal. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2010;72:507–511. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03657.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48.Acharya S, Gopal R, Menon P, Bandgar TR, Shah NS. Giant prolactinoma and effectiveness of medical management. Endocr Pract. 2010;16:42–46. doi: 10.4158/EP09221.OR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
49.Ono M, Miki N, Amano K, Kawamata T, Seki T, Makino R, et al. Individualized high-dose cabergoline therapy for hyperprolactinemic infertility in women with micro- and macroprolactinomas. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2010;65:702–704. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e31820220ab. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
50.Delgrange E, Daems T, Verhelst J, Abs R, Maiter D. Characterization of resistance to the prolactin-lowering effects of cabergoline in macroprolactinomas: a study in 122 patients. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;160:747–752. doi: 10.1530/EJE-09-0012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
51.Acharya SV, Gopal RA, Bandgar TR, Joshi SR, Menon PS, Shah NS. Clinical profile and long term follow up of children and adolescents with prolactinomas. Pituitary. 2009;12:186–189. doi: 10.1007/s11102-008-0149-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
52.Cho E, Lee SA, Chung JY, Koh EH, Cho YH, Kim JH, et al. Efficacy and safety of cabergoline as first line treatment for invasive giant prolactinoma. J Korean Med Sci. 2009;24:874. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2009.24.5.874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
53.Naliato ECDO, Violante AHD, Caldas D, Farias MLF, Bussade I, Filho AL, et al. Bone density in women with prolactinoma treated with dopamine agonists. Pituitary. 2008;11:21–28. doi: 10.1007/s11102-007-0064-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
54.Auriemma RS, Galdiero M, Vitale P, Granieri L, Lo Calzo F, Salzano C, et al. Effect of cabergoline on metabolism in prolactinomas. Neuroendocrinology. 2013;98:299–310. doi: 10.1159/000357810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
55.Ciresi A, Amato MC, Guarnotta V, Lo Castro F, Giordano C. Higher doses of cabergoline further improve metabolic parameters in patients with prolactinoma regardless of the degree of reduction in prolactin levels. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2013;79:845–852. doi: 10.1111/cen.12204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
56.Martin DSYL, Andia MV, Jara AA. Long-term evolution and outcomes of microprolactinoma with medical treatment. Endocrinol Nutr. 2013;60:489–494. doi: 10.1016/j.endonu.2013.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
57.Kallestrup M, Kasch H, Østerby T, Nielsen E, Jensen TS, Jørgensen JOL. Prolactinoma-associated headache and dopamine agonist treatment. Cephalalgia. 2013;34:493–502. doi: 10.1177/0333102413515343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
58.Rastogi A, Walia R, Dutta P, Bhansali A. Efficacy and safety of rapid escalation of cabergoline in comparison to conventional regimen for macroprolactinoma: A prospective, randomized trial. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;16:S294–S296. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.104064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
59.Anagnostis P, Adamidou F, Polyzos SA, Efstathiadou Z, Karathanassi E, Kita M. Long term follow-up of patients with prolactinomas and outcome of dopamine agonist withdrawal: a single center experience. Pituitary. 2012;15:25–29. doi: 10.1007/s11102-011-0303-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
60.Yang MS, Hong JW, Lee SK, Lee EJ, Kim SH. Clinical management and outcome of 36 invasive prolactinomas treated with dopamine agonist. J Neurooncol. 2011;104:195–204. doi: 10.1007/s11060-010-0459-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
61.Berinder K, Nyström T, Höybye C, Hall K, Hulting A-L. Insulin sensitivity and lipid profile in prolactinoma patients before and after normalization of prolactin by dopamine agonist therapy. Pituitary. 2011;14:199–207. doi: 10.1007/s11102-010-0277-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
62.Barber TM, Kenkre J, Garnett C, Scott RV, Byrne JV, Wass JAH. Recurrence of hyperprolactinaemia following discontinuation of dopamine agonist therapy in patients with prolactinoma occurs commonly especially in macroprolactinoma. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2011;75:819–824. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04136.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
63.Nishio H, Fujii T, Kameyama K. Abdominal radical trachelectomy as a fertility-sparing procedure in women with early stage cervical cancer in a series of 61 women. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2010;65:19–20. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e3181c87c0f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
64.Aycicek Dogan B, Arduc A, Tuna MM, Nasıroğlu NI, Işık S, Berker D, et al. Evaluation of atherosclerosis after cessation of cabergoline therapy in patients with prolactinoma. Anatol J Cardiol. 2015;16:440–447. doi: 10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2015.6416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
65.Almalki MH, Buhary B, Alzahrani S, Alshahrani F, Alsherbeni S, Alhowsawi G, et al. Giant prolactinomas: clinical manifestations and outcomes of 16 Arab cases. Pituitary. 2015;18:405–409. doi: 10.1007/s11102-014-0588-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
66.Pala NA, Laway BA, Misgar RA, Dar RA. Metabolic abnormalities in patients with prolactinoma: response to treatment with cabergoline. Diabetology Metab Syndr. 2015;7:1–6. doi: 10.1186/1758-5996-7-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
67.Tirosh A, Benbassat C, Shimon I. Short-term decline in prolactin concentrations can predict future prolactin normalization, tumor shrinkage, and time to remission in men with macroprolactinomas. Endocr Pract. 2015;21:1240–1247. doi: 10.4158/EP15804.OR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
68.Kruljac I, Kirigin LS, Strinović M, Marinkovic J, PeTina HI, Herina V, et al. Treatment of prolactinomas in low-income countries. Int J Endocrinol. 2015;0:1–5. doi: 10.1155/2015/697065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
69.Lee Y, Ku CR, Kim E, Hong JW, Lee EJ, Kim SH. Early prediction of long-term response to cabergoline in patients with macroprolactinomas. Endocrinol Metab. 2014;29:280. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2014.29.3.280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
70.Barbosa FRP, Dos Santos Silva CM, Lima GAB, Warszawski L, Domingues RC, Dominic M, et al. Prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea in patients with prolactinoma before and after treatment with dopamine agonists. Pituitary. 2014;17:441–449. doi: 10.1007/s11102-013-0524-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
71.Rastogi A, Bhansali A, Dutta P, Singh P, Vijaivergiya R, Gupta V, et al. A comparison between intensive and conventional cabergoline treatment of newly diagnosed patients with macroprolactinoma. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2013;79:409–415. doi: 10.1111/cen.12149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
72.Cho KR, Jo K, Shin HJ. Bromocriptine therapy for the treatment of invasive prolactinoma: The single institute experience. Brain Tumor Res Treat. 2013;1:71–77. doi: 10.14791/btrt.2013.1.2.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
73.Karavitaki N, Dobrescu R, Byrne JV, Grossman AB, Wass JAH. Does hypopituitarism recover when macroprolactinomas are treated with cabergoline? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2013;79:217–223. doi: 10.1111/cen.12124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
74.Araujo B, Belo S, Carvalho D. Pregnancy and tumor outcomes in women with prolactinoma. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2017;125:642. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-112861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
75.Teixeira M, Souteiro P, Carvalho D. Prolactinoma management: predictors of remission and recurrence after dopamine agonists withdrawal. Pituitary. 2017;20:464–470. doi: 10.1007/s11102-017-0806-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
76.Santharam S, Tampourlou M, Arlt W, Ayuk J, Gittoes N, Toogood A, et al. Prolactinomas diagnosed in the postmenopausal period: Clinical phenotype and outcomes. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2017;87:508–514. doi: 10.1111/cen.13399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
77.Schwetz V, Librizzi R, Trummer C, Theiler G, Stiegler C, Pieber TR, et al. Treatment of hyperprolactinaemia reduces total cholesterol and LDL in patients with prolactinomas. Metab Brain Dis. 2017;32:155–161. doi: 10.1007/s11011-016-9882-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
78.Yedinak CG, Cetas I, Ozpinar A, McCartney S, Dogan A, Fleseriu M. Dopamine agonist therapy induces significant recovery of HPA axis function in prolactinomas independent of tumor size: a large single center experience. Endocrine. 2016;54:191–197. doi: 10.1007/s12020-016-1042-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
79.Shimon I, Sosa E, Mendoza V, Greenman Y, Tirosh A, Espinosa E, et al. Giant prolactinomas larger than 60 mm in size: a cohort of massive and aggressive prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas. Pituitary. 2016;19:429–436. doi: 10.1007/s11102-016-0723-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
80.Espinosa E, Sosa E, Mendoza V, Ramırez C, Melgar V, Mercado MS. Giant prolactinomas: are they really different from ordinary macroprolactinomas? Endocrine. 2016;52:652–659. doi: 10.1007/s12020-015-0791-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
81.Mallea-Gil MS, Manavela M, Alfieri A, Ballarino MC, Chervin A, Danilowicz K, et al. Prolactinomas: evolution after menopause. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2016;60:42–46. doi: 10.1590/2359-3997000000138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
82.Dogansen SC, Selcukbiricik OS, Tanrikulu S, Yarman S. Withdrawal of dopamine agonist therapy in prolactinomas: In which patients and when? Pituitary. 2016;19:303–310. doi: 10.1007/s11102-016-0708-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
83.Auriemma RS, Galdiero M, Vitale P, Granieri L, Calzo FL, Salzano C, et al. Effect of chronic cabergoline treatment and testosterone replacement on metabolism in male patients with prolactinomas. Neuroendocrinology. 2015;191:66–81. doi: 10.1159/000371851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
84.Ji MJ, Kim JH, Lee JH, Lee JH, Kim YH, Paek SH, et al. Best candidates for dopamine agonist withdrawal in patients with prolactinomas. Pituitary. 2017;20:578–584. doi: 10.1007/s11102-017-0820-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
85.Paepegaey A, Salenave S, Kamenicky P, Maione L, Brailly-Tabard S, Young J, et al. Cabergoline tapering is almost always successful in patients with macroprolactinomas. J Endocrine Soc. 2017;1:221–230. doi: 10.1210/js.2017-00038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
86.Akinduro OO, Lu VM, Izzo A, Biase GD, Vilanilam G, Gompel JJV, et al. Radiographic and hormonal regression in prolactinomas: An analysis of treatment failure. World Neurosurg. 2019;249:e1–e9. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
87.Santharam S, Fountas A, Tampourlou M, Arlt W, Ayuk J, Gittoes N, et al. Impact of menopause on outcomes in prolactinomas after dopamine agonist treatment withdrawal. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2018;89:346–353. doi: 10.1111/cen.13765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
88.Celik E, Ozkaya HM, Poyraz BC, Saglam T, Kadioglu P. Impulse control disorders in patients with prolactinoma receiving dopamine agonist therapy: a prospective study with 1 year follow-up. Endocrine. 2018;62:692–700. doi: 10.1007/s12020-018-1744-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
89.Araújo C, Marques O, Almeida R, Santos MJ. Macroprolactinomas: longitudinal assessment of biochemical and imaging therapeutic responses. Endocrine. 2018;62:470–476. doi: 10.1007/s12020-018-1703-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
90.Dogansen SC, Cikrikcili U, Oruk G, Kutbay NO, Tanrikulu S, Hekimsoy Z, et al. Dopamine agonist-induced impulse control disorders in patients with prolactinoma: A cross-sectional multicenter study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104:2527–2534. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-02202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
91.Shimon I, Hirsch D, Tsvetov G, Robenshtok E, Akirov A, Fraenkel M, et al. Hyperprolactinemia diagnosis in elderly men: a cohort of 28 patients over 65 years. Endocrine. 2019;65:656–661. doi: 10.1007/s12020-019-01962-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
92.Marić A, Kruljac I, Čerina V, Pećina HI, Šulentić P, Vrkljan M. Endocrinological outcomes of pure endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery: A croatian referral pituitary center experience. Croat Med J. 2012;53:224–233. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2012.53.224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
93.Kristof RA, Schramm J, Redel L, Neuloh G, Wichers M, Klingmu¨ller D. Endocrinological outcome following first time transsphenoidal surgery for GH-, ACTH-, and PRL-secreting pituitary adenomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2002;144:555–561. doi: 10.1007/s00701-002-0938-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
94.Yan Z, Wang Y, Shou X, Su J, Lang L. Effect of transsphenoidal surgery and standard care on fertility related indicators of patients with prolactinomas during child-bearing period. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:21557–21564. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
95.Smith TR, Hulou MM, Huang KT, Gokoglu A, Cote DJ, Woodmansee WW, et al. Current indications for the surgical treatment of prolactinomas. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22:1785–1791. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
96.Yoo F, Chan C, Kuan E, Bergsneider M, Wang MB. Comparison of male and female prolactinoma patients requiring surgical intervention. J Neurol Surg. 2018;79:394–400. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1615748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
97.Cho D, Liau W. Comparison of endonasal endoscopic surgery and sublabial microsurgery for prolactinomas. Surg Neurol. 2002;58:371–376. doi: 10.1016/S0090-3019(02)00892-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
98.Liu W, Zahr RS, McCartney S, Cetas JS, Dogan A, Fleseriu M. Clinical outcomes in male patients with lactotroph adenomas who required pituitary surgery: a retrospective single center study. Pituitary. 2018;21:454–462. doi: 10.1007/s11102-018-0898-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
99.Zhao Y, Jin D, Lian W, Xing B, Feng M, Liu X, et al. Clinical characteristics and surgical outcome of prolactinoma in patients under 14 years old. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98:e14380. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
100.Santoro A, Minniti G, Ruggeri A, Esposito V, Jaffrain-Rea M-L, Delfini R. Biochemical remission and recurrence rate of secreting pituitary adenomas after transsphenoidal adenomectomy: long-term endocrinologic follow-up results. Surg Neurol. 2007;68:513–518. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2007.05.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
101.Bevan JS, Adams CBT, Burke CW, Morton KE, Molyneux AJ, Moore RA, et al. Factors in the outcome of transsphenoidal surgery for prolactinoma and non-functioning pituitary tumour, including pre-operative bromocriptine therapy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1987;26:541–556. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1987.tb00809.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
102.Nelson PB, Goodman M, Maroon JC, Martinez AJ, Moossy J, Robinson AG. Factors in predicting outcome from operation in patients with prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas. Neurosurgery. 1983;13:634–641. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198312000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
103.Micko A, Vila G, Höftberger R, Knosp E, Wolfsberger S. Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery of microprolactinomas: A reappraisal of cure rate based on radiological criteria. Neurosurgery. 2018;0:1–8. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
104.Jho H. Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurooncol. 2001;54:187–195. doi: 10.1023/A:1012969719503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
105.Gondim JA, Schops M, de Almeida JPC, Albuquerque LAF, Gomes E, Tn F, et al. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: surgical results of 228 pituitary adenomas treated in a pituitary center. Pituitary. 2010;13:68–77. doi: 10.1007/s11102-009-0195-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
106.Jho HD, Carrau RL. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: experience with 50 patients. J Neurosurg. 1997;87:44–51. doi: 10.3171/jns.1997.87.1.0044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
107.Wang F, Zhou T, Wei S, Zhang J, Hou Y, Sun G. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery of 1,166 pituitary adenomas. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:1270–1280. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3815-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
108.Hofstetter CP, Shin BJ, Mubita L, Huang C, Anand VK, Boockvar JA, et al. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for functional pituitary adenomas. Neurosurg Focus. 2011;30:E10–E1E. doi: 10.3171/2011.1.FOCUS10317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
109.Yano S, Kawano T, Kudo M, Makino K, Nakamura H, Kai Y, et al. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach through the bilateral nostrils for pituitary adenomas. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2009;49:1–7. doi: 10.2176/nmc.49.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
110.Paluzzi A, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Stefko ST, Challinor S, Snyderman CH, Gardner PA. Endoscopic endonasal approach for pituitary adenomas: a series of 555 patients. Pituitary. 2014;17:307–319. doi: 10.1007/s11102-013-0502-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
111.Webster J, Page MD, Bevan JS, Richards SH, Douglas-Jonest AG, Scanlon MF. Low recurrence rate after partial hypophysectomy for prolactinoma: the predictive value of dynamic prolactin function tests. Clin Eadocrinol. 1992;36:35–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1992.tb02900.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
112.Rodman EF, Molitch ME, Post KD, Biller BJ, Reichlin S. Long-term follow-up of transsphenoidal selective adenomectomy for prolactinoma. J Am Med Assoc. 1984;252:921–924. doi: 10.1001/jama.1984.03350070039020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
113.Ciccarelli E, Ghigo E, Miola C, Gandini G, Muller EE, Camanni F. Long-term follow-up of ‘cured’ prolactinoma patients after successful adenomectomy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1990;32:583–592. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1990.tb00901.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
114.Schlechte JA, Sherman BM, Chapler FK, Van Gilder J. Long term follow-up of women with surgically treated prolactin- secreting pituitary tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1986;62:1296–1301. doi: 10.1210/jcem-62-6-1296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
115.Nakagawa H, Iwatsuki K, Yamada M, Hagiwara Y, Moriuchi S, Kadota T. Latent prolactinoma on MRI-selective venous sampling and trans-sphenoidal microsurgical treatment. Neurol Res. 2001;23:691–696. doi: 10.1179/016164101101199199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
116.Parl FF, Cruz VE, Cobb CA, Bradley CA, Aleshire SL. Late recurrence of surgically removed prolactinomas. Cancer. 1986;57:2422–2426. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19860615)57:12<2422::AID-CNCR2820571229>3.0.CO;2-B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
117.Sata A, Hizuka N, Kawamata T, Hori T, Takano K. Hyponatremia after transsphenoidal surgery for hypothalamo-pituitary tumors. Neuroendocrinology. 2006;83:117–122. doi: 10.1159/000094725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
118.Arafah BUM, Brodkey JS, Pearson OH. Gradual recovery of lactotroph responsiveness following surgical removal of prolactinomas. Metabolism. 1986;35:905–912. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(86)90052-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
119.Hirohata T, Uozumi T, Mukada K, Arita K, Kurisu K, Yano T, et al. Influence of pregnancy on the serum prolactin level following prolactinoma surgery. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1991;125:259–267. doi: 10.1530/acta.0.1250259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
120.Massoud F, Serri O, Hardy J, Somma M, Beauregard H. Transsphenoidal adenomectomy for microprolactinomas 10 to 20 years of follow-up. Surg Neurol. 1996;45:341–346. doi: 10.1016/0090-3019(95)00430-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
121.Fraioli MF, Umana G, Pagano A, Fraioli B, Lunardi P. Prolactin secreting pituitary microadenoma: Results of transsphenoidal surgery after medical therapy with dopamine agonist. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28:992–994. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
122.Raverot G, Wierinckx A, Dantony E, Auger C, Chapas G, Villeneuve L, et al. Prognostic factors in prolactin pituitary tumors: Clinical, histological, and molecular data from a series of 94 patients with a long postoperative follow-up. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:1708–1716. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-1191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
123.Fahlbusch R, Buchfelder M. Present status of neurosurgery in the treatment of prolactinomas. Neurosurg Rev. 1985;8:195–205. doi: 10.1007/BF01815444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
124.Sughrue ME, Chang EF, Tyrell JB, Kunwar S, Wilson CB, Jr, LSB. Pre-operative dopamine agonist therapy improves post-operative tumor control following prolactinoma resection. Pituitary. 2009;12:158–164. doi: 10.1007/s11102-008-0135-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
125.Babey M, Sahli R, Vajtai I, Andres RH, Seiler RW. Pituitary surgery for small prolactinomas as an alternative to treatment with dopamine agonists. Pituitary. 2011;14:222–230. doi: 10.1007/s11102-010-0283-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
126.Pelkonen R, Grahne B, Hirvonen E, Karonen S-L, Salmi J, Tikkanen M, et al. Pituitary function in prolactinoma. effect of surgery and postoperative bromocriptine therapy. Clin Eadocrinol. 1980;14:335–348. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1981.tb00618.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
127.Primeau V, Raftopoulos C, Maiter D. Outcomes of transsphenoidal surgery in prolactinomas: improvement of hormonal control in dopamine agonist-resistant patients. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012;166:779–786. doi: 10.1530/EJE-11-1000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
128.Kreutzer J, Buslei R, Wallaschofski H, Hofmann B, Nimsky C, Fahlbusch R, et al. Operative treatment of prolactinomas: indications and results in a current consecutive series of 212 patients. Eur J Endocrinol. 2008;158:11–18. doi: 10.1530/EJE-07-0248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
129.Kawamata T, Iseki H, Ishizaki R, Hori T. Minimally invasive endoscope-assisted endonasal trans-sphenoidal microsurgery for pituitary tumors: Experience with 215 cases comparing with sublabial trans-sphenoidal approach. Neurol Res. 2002;24:259–265. doi: 10.1179/016164102101199882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
130.Wolfsberger S, Czech T, Vierhapper H, Benavente R, Knosp E. Microprolactinomas in males treated by transsphenoidal surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2003;145:935–941. doi: 10.1007/s00701-003-0134-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
131.Mamelak AN, Carmichael J, Bonert VH, Cooper O, Melmed S. Single-surgeon fully endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: outcomes in three-hundred consecutive cases. Pituitary. 2013;16:393–401. doi: 10.1007/s11102-012-0437-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
132.Han Y, Chen D, Zhang C, Pan M, Yang X-P, Wu Y-G. Retrospective analysis of 52 patients with prolactinomas following endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97:e13198. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
133.Mortini P, Losa M, Barzaghi R, Boari N, Giovanelli M. Results of transsphenoidal surgery in a large series of patients with pituitary adenoma. Neurosurgery. 2005;56:1222–1233. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000159647.64275.9D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
134.Koizumi K, Aono T, Koike K, Kurachi K. Restoration of LH pulsatility in patients with prolactinomas after trans-sphenoidal surgery. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1984;107:433–438. doi: 10.1530/acta.0.1070433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
135.Serri O, Rasio E, Beauregard H, Hardy J, Somma M. Recurrence of hyperprolactinemia after selective transsphenoidal adenomectomy in women with prolactinoma. N Engl J Med. 1983;309:280–283. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198308043090505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
136.Akin S, Isikay I, Soylemezoglu F, Yucel T, Gurlek A, Berker M. Reasons and results of endoscopic surgery for prolactinomas: 142 surgical cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016;158:933–942. doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-2762-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
137.Dehdashti AR, Ganna A, Karabatsou K, Gentili F. Pure endoscopic endonasal approach for pituitary adenomas early surgical results in 200 patients and comparison with previous microsurgical series. Neurosurgery. 2007;62:1006–1017. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000325862.83961.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
138.Woosley RE, King JS, Talbert L. Prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas: neurosurgical management of 37 patients. Fertil Steril. 1982;37:54. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)45977-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
139.Maira G, Anile C, De Marinis L. Prolactin-secreting adenomas: surgical results and long-term follow-up. Neurosurgery. 1989;24:736–743. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198905000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
140.Liu Y, Yao Y, Xing B, Lian W, Deng K, Feng M, et al. Prolactinomas in children under 14. Clinical presentation and long-term follow-up. Childs Nerv Syst. 2015;31:909–916. doi: 10.1007/s00381-015-2679-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
141.Faria JMA, Tindall GT. Transsphenoidal microsurgery for prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas. J Neurosurg. 1982;56:33. doi: 10.3171/jns.1982.56.1.0033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
142.Esposito V, Santoro A, Minniti G, Salvati M, Innocenzi G, Lanzetta G, et al. Transsphenoidal adenomectomy for GH-, PRL- and ACTH-secreting pituitary tumours: outcome analysis in a series of 125 patients. Neurol Sci. 2004;25:251–256. doi: 10.1007/s10072-004-0351-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
143.Soule SG, Farhi J, Conway GS, Jacobs HS, Powell M. The outcome of hypophysectomy for prolactinomas in the era of dopamine agonist therapy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1996;44:711–716. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.1996.738559.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
144.Frank G, Pasquini E, Farneti G, Mazzatenta D, Sciarretta V, Grasso V, et al. The endoscopic versus the traditional approach in pituitary surgery. Neuroendocrinology. 2006;83:240–248. doi: 10.1159/000095534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
145.Losa M, Mortini P, Barzaghi R, Gioia L, Giovanelli M. Surgical treatment of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas: Early results and long-term outcome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:3180–3186. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.7.8645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
146.Charpentier G, de Plunkett T, Jedynak P, Peillon F, Le Gentil P, Racadot J, et al. Surgical treatment of prolactinomas short- and long-term results, prognostic factors. Horm Res Paediatr. 1985;22:222–227. doi: 10.1159/000180098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
147.Song Y, Chen M, Lian W, Xing B, Yao Y, Feng M, et al. Surgical treatment for male prolactinoma A retrospective study of 184 cases. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e5833. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
148.Donegan D, Atkinson JLD, Jentoft M, Natt N, Nippoldt TB, Erickson B, et al. Surgical outcomes of prolactinomas in recent era: Results of a heterogenous group. Endocr Pract. 2017;23:37–45. doi: 10.4158/EP161446.OR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
149.Hamilton DK, Vance ML, Boulos PT, Laws ER. Surgical outcomes in hyporesponsive prolactinomas: Analysis of patients with resistance or intolerance to dopamine agonists. Pituitary. 2005;8:53–60. doi: 10.1007/s11102-005-5086-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
150.Qu X, Wang M, Wang G, Han T, Mou C, Han L, et al. Surgical outcomes and prognostic factors of transsphenoidal surgery for prolactinoma in men: a single-center experience with 87 consecutive cases. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;164:499–504. doi: 10.1530/EJE-10-0961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
151.Saitoh Y, Mori S, Arita N, Nagatani M, Hayakawa T, Koizumi K, et al. Treatment of prolactinoma based on the results of transsphenoidal operations. Surg Neurol. 1986;26:338–344. doi: 10.1016/0090-3019(86)90133-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
152.Thomson JA, Teasdale GM, Gordon D, Mccruden DC, Davies DL. Treatment of presumed prolactinoma by transsphenoidal operation: early and late results. Br Med J. 1985;291:1550–1553. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6508.1550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
153.Tamasauskas A, Sinkunas K, Bunevicius A, Radziunas A, Skiriute D, Deltuva VP. Transsphenoidal surgery for microprolactinomas in women: results and prognosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012;154:1889–1893. doi: 10.1007/s00701-012-1450-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
154.Turner HE, Adams CB, Wass JA. Trans-sphenoidal surgery for microprolactinoma: an acceptable alternative to dopamine agonists? Eur J Endocrinol. 1999;140:43–47. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1400043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
155.Ikeda H, Watanabe K, Tominaga T, Yoshimoto T. Transsphenoidal microsurgical results of female patients with prolactinomas. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013;115:1621–1625. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
156.Yi N, Ji L, Zhang Q, Zhang S, Liu X, Shou X, et al. Long-term follow-up of female prolactinoma patients at childbearing age after transsphenoidal surgery. Endocrine. 2018. [DOI] [PubMed]
157.Melmed S, Casanueva FF, Hoffman AR, Kleinberg DL, Montori VM, Schlechte JA, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia: An endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:273–288. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-1692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
158.Maiter D, Primeau V. 2012 update in the treatment of prolactinomas. Annales d'Endocrinologie. 2012;73:90–98. doi: 10.1016/j.ando.2012.03.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
159.Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Solari D. Transsphenoidal surgery: A journey of 50 years. World Neurosurg. 2013;79:253–254. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.10.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
160.Maiter D, Delgrange E. Therapy of endocrine disease: the challenges in managing giant prolactinomas. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014;170:R213–R227. doi: 10.1530/EJE-14-0013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
161.Duan L, Yan H, Huang M, Zhang Y, Gu F. An economic analysis of bromocriptine versus trans-sphenoidal surgery for the treatment of prolactinoma. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28:1046–1051. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
162.Jingran Z, Qi Y, Yuhui Z. Cost-effectiveness analysis of two therapeutic methods for prolactinoma. Chin J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;43:257–261. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
163.Zygourakis CC, Imber BS, Chen R, Han SJ, Blevins L, Molinaro A, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of surgical versus medical treatment of prolactinomas. J Neurol Surg. 2017;78:125–131. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1608635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

41016_2022_277_MOESM1_ESM.pdf^{(391.4KB, pdf)}

41016_2022_277_MOESM2_ESM.pdf^{(972.2KB, pdf)}

41016_2022_277_MOESM3_ESM.pdf^{(412.1KB, pdf)}

Additional file 3: Supplementary Figure 3. Funnel plots for biochemical cure rate of patients treated with surgery (A) and DAs (B).

41016_2022_277_MOESM4_ESM.pdf^{(750.3KB, pdf)}

41016_2022_277_MOESM5_ESM.pdf^{(2.1MB, pdf)}

Additional file 5: Supplementary Figure 5. Forest plots for prolactin level of patients applying surgery (A) and DAs (B).

41016_2022_277_MOESM6_ESM.pdf^{(2.1MB, pdf)}

41016_2022_277_MOESM7_ESM.pdf^{(1.8MB, pdf)}

41016_2022_277_MOESM8_ESM.pdf^{(512.6KB, pdf)}

Additional file 8: Supplementary Figure 8. Forest plots for subgroup analysis of biochemical cure rates in surgery-treated patients subgrouped by DAs treatment history.

41016_2022_277_MOESM9_ESM.docx^{(42.6KB, docx)}

Additional file 9: Supplementary Table 1. Basic characteristics of the included studies with surgery treatment.

41016_2022_277_MOESM10_ESM.docx^{(43.1KB, docx)}

Additional file 10: Supplementary Table 2. Basic characteristics of the included studies with DAs treatment.

41016_2022_277_MOESM11_ESM.docx^{(15.3KB, docx)}

Additional file 11: Supplementary Table 3. Summary table of risk of bias for RCT.

41016_2022_277_MOESM12_ESM.docx^{(20.4KB, docx)}

Additional file 12: Supplementary Table 4. Summary table of risk of bias for non-RCT.

41016_2022_277_MOESM13_ESM.docx^{(53.4KB, docx)}

Additional file 13: Supplementary Table 5. Summary table of risk of bias for case-series study.

41016_2022_277_MOESM14_ESM.docx^{(14.3KB, docx)}

Additional file 14: Supplementary file 1. Literature research strategy.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

[CR1] 1.Wong A, Eloy JA, Couldwell WT, Liu JK. Update on prolactinomas. Part 1: Clinical manifestations and diagnostic challenges. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22:1562–1567. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.03.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR2] 2.Faje A, Nachtigall L. Current treatment options for hyperprolactinemia. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2013;14:1611–1625. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2013.806488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR3] 3.Berezin M, Shimon I, Hadani M. Prolactinoma in 53 men: Clinical characteristics and modes of treatment (male prolactinoma) J Endocrinol Invest. 1995;18:436–441. doi: 10.1007/BF03349742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR4] 4.Samaan NA, Schultz PN, Leavens TA, Leavens ME, Lee YY. Pregnancy after treatment in patients with prolactinoma: Operation versus bromocriptine. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986;155:1300–1305. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90164-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR5] 5.Hamidi O, Van Gompel J, Gruber L, Kittah NE, Donegan D, Philbrick KA, et al. Management and outcomes of giant prolactinoma: a series of 71 patients. Endocr Pract. 2019;25:340–352. doi: 10.4158/EP-2018-0392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR6] 6.Hong JW, Lee MK, Kim SH, Lee EJ. Discrimination of prolactinoma from hyperprolactinemic non-functioning adenoma. Endocrine. 2010;37:140–147. doi: 10.1007/s12020-009-9279-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR7] 7.Asano S, Ueki K, Suzuki I, Kirino T. Clinical features and medical treatment of male prolactinomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2001;143:465–470. doi: 10.1007/s007010170075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR8] 8.Andereggen L, Frey J, Andres RH, El-Koussy M, Beck J, Seiler RW, et al. 10-year follow-up study comparing primary medical vs. surgical therapy in women with prolactinomas. Endocrine. 2017;55:223–230. doi: 10.1007/s12020-016-1115-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR9] 9.Zamanipoor Najafabadi AH, Zandbergen IM, de Vries F, Broersen LHA, van den Akker-van Marle ME, Pereira AM, et al. Surgery as a Viable Alternative First-Line Treatment for Prolactinoma Patients. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

[CR10] 10.Ma Q, Su J, Li Y, Wang J, Long W, Luo M, et al. The chance of permanent cure for micro- and macroprolactinomas, medication or surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol. 2018;9:1–10. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR11] 11.Lamba N, Noormohamed N, Simjian T, Alsheikhb MY, Jamalb A, Doucetteb J, et al. Fertility after transsphenoidal surgery in patients with prolactinomas: A meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019;176:53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.11.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR12] 12.Hutton B, Wolfe D, Moher D, Shamseer L. Reporting guidance considerations from a statistical perspective: overview of tools to enhance the rigour of reporting of randomised trials and systematic reviews. Evid Based Ment Health. 2017;20:46–52. doi: 10.1136/eb-2017-102666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR13] 13.Lv L, Hu Y, Yin S, Zhou P, Yang Y, Ma W, et al. Giant prolactinomas: Outcomes of multimodal treatments for 42 cases with long-term follow-up. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2019;127:295. doi: 10.1055/a-0597-8877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR14] 14.Sterne JA, Hernan MA, Reeves BC, Savovic J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR15] 15.Sterne JAC, Savovic J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR16] 16.Guo B, Moga C, Harstall C, Schopflocher D. A principal component analysis is conducted for a case series quality appraisal checklist. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;69(199-207):e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR17] 17.Zarate A, Canales ES, Alger M, Forsbach G. The effect of pregnancy and lactation on pituitary prolactin-secreting tumours. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1979;92:407–412. doi: 10.1530/acta.0.0920407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR18] 18.Coculescu M, Simionescu N, Oprescu M, D. A. Bromocriptine treatment of pituitary adenomas. Evaluation of withdrawal effect. Endocrinologie. 1983;21:157–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR19] 19.Nissim M, Ambrosi B, Bernasconi V, Giannattasio G, Giovanelli MA, Bassetti M, et al. Bromocriptine treatment of macroprolactinomas: studies on the time course of tumor shrinkage and morphology. J Endocrinol Invest. 1982;5:409–415. doi: 10.1007/BF03350542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR20] 20.Archer DF, Lattanzi DR, Moore EE, Harger JH, Herbert DL. Bromocriptine treatment of women with suspected pituitary prolactin-secreting microadenomas. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;143:620. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(82)90106-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR21] 21.Hancock KW, Scott JS, Lamb JT, Gibson RM, Chapman C. Conservative management of pituitary prolactinomas ; evldence for bromocriptine-induced regression. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1980;87:523–529. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1980.tb04590.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR22] 22.Hildebrandt G, Bauer T, Stracke H, Fassbender WJ, Mueller HW, Agnoli AL, et al. Surgery, dopamine agonist therapy of combined treatment--results in prolactinoma patients after a 12 month follow-up. Zentralbl Neurochir. 1992;53:123–134. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR23] 23.Beckers A, Petrossians P, Abs R, Flandroy P, Stadnik T, De Longueville M, et al. Treatment of macroprolactinomas with the long-acting and repeatable form of bromocriptine: a report on 29 cases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992;75:275–280. doi: 10.1210/jcem.75.1.1619019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR24] 24.van T, Verlaat JW, Croughs RJ. Withdrawal of bromocriptine after long-term therapy for macroprolactinomas; effect on plasma prolactin and tumour size. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1991;34:175–178. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1991.tb00289.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR25] 25.Verlaat JWV, Croughs RJM, Hendriks MJ, Bosma NJ. Results of primary treatment with bromocriptine of prolactinomas with extrasellar extension. Can J Neurol Sci. 1990;17:71–73. doi: 10.1017/S0317167100030079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR26] 26.Hildebrandt G, Zierski J, Christophis P, Laun A, Schatz H, Lancranjan I, et al. Rhinorrhea following dopamine agonist therapy of invasive macroprolaetinoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1989;96:107–113. doi: 10.1007/BF01456167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR27] 27.Wang C, Lam KSL, Ma JTC, Chan T, Liu MY, Yeung RTT. Long-term treatment of hyperprolactinaemia with bromocriptine: effect of drug withdrawal. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1987;27:363–371. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1987.tb01163.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR28] 28.Ferrari C, Paracchi A, Mattei AM, de Vincentiis S, D'Alberton A, Crosignani P. Cabergoline in the long-term therapy of hyperprolactinemic disorders. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1992;126:489–494. doi: 10.1530/acta.0.1260489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR29] 29.Sarno AD, Landi ML, Cappabianca P, Salle FD, Rossi FW, Pivonello R, et al. Resistance to cabergoline as compared with bromocriptine in hyperprolactinemia: Prevalence, clinical definition, and therapeutic strategy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:5256–5261. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.11.8054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR30] 30.Colao A, Di Sarno A, Landi ML, Scavuzzo F, Cappabianca P, Pivonello R, et al. Macroprolactinoma shrinkage during cabergoline treatment is greater in naive patients than in patients pretreated with other dopamine agonists: A prospective study in 110 patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:2247–2252. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.6.6657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR31] 31.Cannavò S, Curtò L, Squadrito S, Almoto B, Vieni A, Trimarchi F. Cabergoline: A first-choice treatment in patients with previously untreated prolactin-secreting pituitary adenoma. J Endocrinol Invest. 1999;22:354–359. doi: 10.1007/BF03343573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR32] 32.Colao A, Di Sarno A, Sarnacchiaro F, Ferone D, Di Renzo G, Merola B, et al. Prolactinomas resistant to standard dopamine agonists respond to chronic cabergoline treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82:876–883. doi: 10.1210/jcem.82.3.3822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR33] 33.Ferrari CI, Abs R, Bevan JS, Barbant G, Ciccarelli E, Motta T, et al. Treatment of macroprolactinoma with cabergoline: a study of 85 patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1997;46:409–413. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.1997.1300952.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR34] 34.Muratori M, Arosio M, Gambino G, Romano C, Biella O, Faglia G. Use of cabergoline in the long-term treatment of hyperprolactinemic and acromegalic patients. J Endocrinol Invest. 1997;20:537–546. doi: 10.1007/BF03348016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR35] 35.Delgrange EDM, Donckier J. Effects of the dopamine agonist cabergoline in patients with prolactinoma intolerant or resistant to bromocriptine. Eur J Endocrinol. 1996;134:454–456. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1340454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR36] 36.Sabuncu T, Arikan E, Tasan E, Hatemi H. Comparison of the effects of cabergoline and bromocriptine on prolactin levels in hyperprolactinemic patients. Intern Med. 2001;40:857–861. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.40.857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR37] 37.Naliato ECO, Violante AHD, Caldas D, Filho AL, Loureiro CR, Fontes R, et al. Body fat in nonobese women with prolactinoma treated with dopamine agonists. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2007;67:845–852. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02973.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR38] 38.Shimon I, Benbassat C, Hadani M. Effectiveness of long-term cabergoline treatment for giant prolactinoma: study of 12 men. Eur J Endocrinol. 2007;156:225–231. doi: 10.1530/EJE-06-0646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR39] 39.Colao A, Di Sarno A, Guerra E, Pivonello R, Cappabianca P, Caranci F, et al. Predictors of remission of hyperprolactinaemia after long-term withdrawal of cabergoline therapy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2007;67:426–433. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02905.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR40] 40.Chattopadhyay A, Bhansali A, Masoodi SR. Long-term efficacy of bromocriptine in macroprolactinomas and giant prolactinomas in men. Pituitary. 2005;8:147–154. doi: 10.1007/s11102-005-5111-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR41] 41.Biswas M, Smith J, Jadon D, McEwan P, Rees DA, Evans LM, et al. Long-term remission following withdrawal of dopamine agonist therapy in subjects with microprolactinomas. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2005;63:26–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2005.02293.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR42] 42.Colao A, Vitale G, Di Sarno A, Spiezia S, Guerra E, Ciccarelli A, et al. Prolactin and prostate hypertrophy: A pilot observational, prospective, case-control study in men with prolactinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:2770–2775. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-032055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR43] 43.Corsello SM, Ubertini G, Altomare M, Lovicu RM, Migneco MG, Rota CA, et al. Giant prolactinomas in men: efficacy of cabergoline treatment. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2003;58:662–670. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2003.01770.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR44] 44.Essas O, Bouguerra R, Hamzaoui J, Marrakchi Z, Hadjri S, Chamakhi S, et al. Efficacy and safety of bromocriptine in the treatment of macroprolactinomas. Annales d'Endocrinologie. 2002;63:524–531. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR45] 45.Dos Santos Silva CM, Barbosa FRP, Lima GAB, Warszawski L, Fontes R, Domingues RC, et al. BMI and metabolic profile in patients with prolactinoma before and after treatment with dopamine agonists. Obesity. 2010;19:800–805. doi: 10.1038/oby.2010.150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR46] 46.Bhansali A, Walia R, Dutta P, Khandelwal N, Sialy R, Bhadada S. Efficacy of cabergoline on rapid escalation of dose in men with macroprolactinomas. Indian J Med Res. 2010;131:530–535. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR47] 47.Huda MSB, Athauda NB, Teh MM, Carroll PV, Powrie JK. Factors determining the remission of microprolactinomas after dopamine agonist withdrawal. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2010;72:507–511. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03657.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR48] 48.Acharya S, Gopal R, Menon P, Bandgar TR, Shah NS. Giant prolactinoma and effectiveness of medical management. Endocr Pract. 2010;16:42–46. doi: 10.4158/EP09221.OR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR49] 49.Ono M, Miki N, Amano K, Kawamata T, Seki T, Makino R, et al. Individualized high-dose cabergoline therapy for hyperprolactinemic infertility in women with micro- and macroprolactinomas. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2010;65:702–704. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e31820220ab. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR50] 50.Delgrange E, Daems T, Verhelst J, Abs R, Maiter D. Characterization of resistance to the prolactin-lowering effects of cabergoline in macroprolactinomas: a study in 122 patients. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;160:747–752. doi: 10.1530/EJE-09-0012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR51] 51.Acharya SV, Gopal RA, Bandgar TR, Joshi SR, Menon PS, Shah NS. Clinical profile and long term follow up of children and adolescents with prolactinomas. Pituitary. 2009;12:186–189. doi: 10.1007/s11102-008-0149-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR52] 52.Cho E, Lee SA, Chung JY, Koh EH, Cho YH, Kim JH, et al. Efficacy and safety of cabergoline as first line treatment for invasive giant prolactinoma. J Korean Med Sci. 2009;24:874. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2009.24.5.874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR53] 53.Naliato ECDO, Violante AHD, Caldas D, Farias MLF, Bussade I, Filho AL, et al. Bone density in women with prolactinoma treated with dopamine agonists. Pituitary. 2008;11:21–28. doi: 10.1007/s11102-007-0064-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR54] 54.Auriemma RS, Galdiero M, Vitale P, Granieri L, Lo Calzo F, Salzano C, et al. Effect of cabergoline on metabolism in prolactinomas. Neuroendocrinology. 2013;98:299–310. doi: 10.1159/000357810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR55] 55.Ciresi A, Amato MC, Guarnotta V, Lo Castro F, Giordano C. Higher doses of cabergoline further improve metabolic parameters in patients with prolactinoma regardless of the degree of reduction in prolactin levels. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2013;79:845–852. doi: 10.1111/cen.12204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR56] 56.Martin DSYL, Andia MV, Jara AA. Long-term evolution and outcomes of microprolactinoma with medical treatment. Endocrinol Nutr. 2013;60:489–494. doi: 10.1016/j.endonu.2013.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR57] 57.Kallestrup M, Kasch H, Østerby T, Nielsen E, Jensen TS, Jørgensen JOL. Prolactinoma-associated headache and dopamine agonist treatment. Cephalalgia. 2013;34:493–502. doi: 10.1177/0333102413515343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR58] 58.Rastogi A, Walia R, Dutta P, Bhansali A. Efficacy and safety of rapid escalation of cabergoline in comparison to conventional regimen for macroprolactinoma: A prospective, randomized trial. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;16:S294–S296. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.104064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR59] 59.Anagnostis P, Adamidou F, Polyzos SA, Efstathiadou Z, Karathanassi E, Kita M. Long term follow-up of patients with prolactinomas and outcome of dopamine agonist withdrawal: a single center experience. Pituitary. 2012;15:25–29. doi: 10.1007/s11102-011-0303-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR60] 60.Yang MS, Hong JW, Lee SK, Lee EJ, Kim SH. Clinical management and outcome of 36 invasive prolactinomas treated with dopamine agonist. J Neurooncol. 2011;104:195–204. doi: 10.1007/s11060-010-0459-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR61] 61.Berinder K, Nyström T, Höybye C, Hall K, Hulting A-L. Insulin sensitivity and lipid profile in prolactinoma patients before and after normalization of prolactin by dopamine agonist therapy. Pituitary. 2011;14:199–207. doi: 10.1007/s11102-010-0277-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR62] 62.Barber TM, Kenkre J, Garnett C, Scott RV, Byrne JV, Wass JAH. Recurrence of hyperprolactinaemia following discontinuation of dopamine agonist therapy in patients with prolactinoma occurs commonly especially in macroprolactinoma. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2011;75:819–824. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04136.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR63] 63.Nishio H, Fujii T, Kameyama K. Abdominal radical trachelectomy as a fertility-sparing procedure in women with early stage cervical cancer in a series of 61 women. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2010;65:19–20. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e3181c87c0f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR64] 64.Aycicek Dogan B, Arduc A, Tuna MM, Nasıroğlu NI, Işık S, Berker D, et al. Evaluation of atherosclerosis after cessation of cabergoline therapy in patients with prolactinoma. Anatol J Cardiol. 2015;16:440–447. doi: 10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2015.6416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR65] 65.Almalki MH, Buhary B, Alzahrani S, Alshahrani F, Alsherbeni S, Alhowsawi G, et al. Giant prolactinomas: clinical manifestations and outcomes of 16 Arab cases. Pituitary. 2015;18:405–409. doi: 10.1007/s11102-014-0588-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR66] 66.Pala NA, Laway BA, Misgar RA, Dar RA. Metabolic abnormalities in patients with prolactinoma: response to treatment with cabergoline. Diabetology Metab Syndr. 2015;7:1–6. doi: 10.1186/1758-5996-7-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR67] 67.Tirosh A, Benbassat C, Shimon I. Short-term decline in prolactin concentrations can predict future prolactin normalization, tumor shrinkage, and time to remission in men with macroprolactinomas. Endocr Pract. 2015;21:1240–1247. doi: 10.4158/EP15804.OR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR68] 68.Kruljac I, Kirigin LS, Strinović M, Marinkovic J, PeTina HI, Herina V, et al. Treatment of prolactinomas in low-income countries. Int J Endocrinol. 2015;0:1–5. doi: 10.1155/2015/697065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR69] 69.Lee Y, Ku CR, Kim E, Hong JW, Lee EJ, Kim SH. Early prediction of long-term response to cabergoline in patients with macroprolactinomas. Endocrinol Metab. 2014;29:280. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2014.29.3.280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR70] 70.Barbosa FRP, Dos Santos Silva CM, Lima GAB, Warszawski L, Domingues RC, Dominic M, et al. Prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea in patients with prolactinoma before and after treatment with dopamine agonists. Pituitary. 2014;17:441–449. doi: 10.1007/s11102-013-0524-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR71] 71.Rastogi A, Bhansali A, Dutta P, Singh P, Vijaivergiya R, Gupta V, et al. A comparison between intensive and conventional cabergoline treatment of newly diagnosed patients with macroprolactinoma. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2013;79:409–415. doi: 10.1111/cen.12149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR72] 72.Cho KR, Jo K, Shin HJ. Bromocriptine therapy for the treatment of invasive prolactinoma: The single institute experience. Brain Tumor Res Treat. 2013;1:71–77. doi: 10.14791/btrt.2013.1.2.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR73] 73.Karavitaki N, Dobrescu R, Byrne JV, Grossman AB, Wass JAH. Does hypopituitarism recover when macroprolactinomas are treated with cabergoline? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2013;79:217–223. doi: 10.1111/cen.12124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR74] 74.Araujo B, Belo S, Carvalho D. Pregnancy and tumor outcomes in women with prolactinoma. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2017;125:642. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-112861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR75] 75.Teixeira M, Souteiro P, Carvalho D. Prolactinoma management: predictors of remission and recurrence after dopamine agonists withdrawal. Pituitary. 2017;20:464–470. doi: 10.1007/s11102-017-0806-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR76] 76.Santharam S, Tampourlou M, Arlt W, Ayuk J, Gittoes N, Toogood A, et al. Prolactinomas diagnosed in the postmenopausal period: Clinical phenotype and outcomes. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2017;87:508–514. doi: 10.1111/cen.13399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR77] 77.Schwetz V, Librizzi R, Trummer C, Theiler G, Stiegler C, Pieber TR, et al. Treatment of hyperprolactinaemia reduces total cholesterol and LDL in patients with prolactinomas. Metab Brain Dis. 2017;32:155–161. doi: 10.1007/s11011-016-9882-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR78] 78.Yedinak CG, Cetas I, Ozpinar A, McCartney S, Dogan A, Fleseriu M. Dopamine agonist therapy induces significant recovery of HPA axis function in prolactinomas independent of tumor size: a large single center experience. Endocrine. 2016;54:191–197. doi: 10.1007/s12020-016-1042-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR79] 79.Shimon I, Sosa E, Mendoza V, Greenman Y, Tirosh A, Espinosa E, et al. Giant prolactinomas larger than 60 mm in size: a cohort of massive and aggressive prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas. Pituitary. 2016;19:429–436. doi: 10.1007/s11102-016-0723-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR80] 80.Espinosa E, Sosa E, Mendoza V, Ramırez C, Melgar V, Mercado MS. Giant prolactinomas: are they really different from ordinary macroprolactinomas? Endocrine. 2016;52:652–659. doi: 10.1007/s12020-015-0791-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR81] 81.Mallea-Gil MS, Manavela M, Alfieri A, Ballarino MC, Chervin A, Danilowicz K, et al. Prolactinomas: evolution after menopause. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2016;60:42–46. doi: 10.1590/2359-3997000000138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR82] 82.Dogansen SC, Selcukbiricik OS, Tanrikulu S, Yarman S. Withdrawal of dopamine agonist therapy in prolactinomas: In which patients and when? Pituitary. 2016;19:303–310. doi: 10.1007/s11102-016-0708-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR83] 83.Auriemma RS, Galdiero M, Vitale P, Granieri L, Calzo FL, Salzano C, et al. Effect of chronic cabergoline treatment and testosterone replacement on metabolism in male patients with prolactinomas. Neuroendocrinology. 2015;191:66–81. doi: 10.1159/000371851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR84] 84.Ji MJ, Kim JH, Lee JH, Lee JH, Kim YH, Paek SH, et al. Best candidates for dopamine agonist withdrawal in patients with prolactinomas. Pituitary. 2017;20:578–584. doi: 10.1007/s11102-017-0820-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR85] 85.Paepegaey A, Salenave S, Kamenicky P, Maione L, Brailly-Tabard S, Young J, et al. Cabergoline tapering is almost always successful in patients with macroprolactinomas. J Endocrine Soc. 2017;1:221–230. doi: 10.1210/js.2017-00038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR86] 86.Akinduro OO, Lu VM, Izzo A, Biase GD, Vilanilam G, Gompel JJV, et al. Radiographic and hormonal regression in prolactinomas: An analysis of treatment failure. World Neurosurg. 2019;249:e1–e9. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR87] 87.Santharam S, Fountas A, Tampourlou M, Arlt W, Ayuk J, Gittoes N, et al. Impact of menopause on outcomes in prolactinomas after dopamine agonist treatment withdrawal. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2018;89:346–353. doi: 10.1111/cen.13765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR88] 88.Celik E, Ozkaya HM, Poyraz BC, Saglam T, Kadioglu P. Impulse control disorders in patients with prolactinoma receiving dopamine agonist therapy: a prospective study with 1 year follow-up. Endocrine. 2018;62:692–700. doi: 10.1007/s12020-018-1744-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR89] 89.Araújo C, Marques O, Almeida R, Santos MJ. Macroprolactinomas: longitudinal assessment of biochemical and imaging therapeutic responses. Endocrine. 2018;62:470–476. doi: 10.1007/s12020-018-1703-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR90] 90.Dogansen SC, Cikrikcili U, Oruk G, Kutbay NO, Tanrikulu S, Hekimsoy Z, et al. Dopamine agonist-induced impulse control disorders in patients with prolactinoma: A cross-sectional multicenter study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104:2527–2534. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-02202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR91] 91.Shimon I, Hirsch D, Tsvetov G, Robenshtok E, Akirov A, Fraenkel M, et al. Hyperprolactinemia diagnosis in elderly men: a cohort of 28 patients over 65 years. Endocrine. 2019;65:656–661. doi: 10.1007/s12020-019-01962-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR92] 92.Marić A, Kruljac I, Čerina V, Pećina HI, Šulentić P, Vrkljan M. Endocrinological outcomes of pure endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery: A croatian referral pituitary center experience. Croat Med J. 2012;53:224–233. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2012.53.224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR93] 93.Kristof RA, Schramm J, Redel L, Neuloh G, Wichers M, Klingmu¨ller D. Endocrinological outcome following first time transsphenoidal surgery for GH-, ACTH-, and PRL-secreting pituitary adenomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2002;144:555–561. doi: 10.1007/s00701-002-0938-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR94] 94.Yan Z, Wang Y, Shou X, Su J, Lang L. Effect of transsphenoidal surgery and standard care on fertility related indicators of patients with prolactinomas during child-bearing period. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:21557–21564. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR95] 95.Smith TR, Hulou MM, Huang KT, Gokoglu A, Cote DJ, Woodmansee WW, et al. Current indications for the surgical treatment of prolactinomas. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22:1785–1791. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR96] 96.Yoo F, Chan C, Kuan E, Bergsneider M, Wang MB. Comparison of male and female prolactinoma patients requiring surgical intervention. J Neurol Surg. 2018;79:394–400. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1615748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR97] 97.Cho D, Liau W. Comparison of endonasal endoscopic surgery and sublabial microsurgery for prolactinomas. Surg Neurol. 2002;58:371–376. doi: 10.1016/S0090-3019(02)00892-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR98] 98.Liu W, Zahr RS, McCartney S, Cetas JS, Dogan A, Fleseriu M. Clinical outcomes in male patients with lactotroph adenomas who required pituitary surgery: a retrospective single center study. Pituitary. 2018;21:454–462. doi: 10.1007/s11102-018-0898-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR99] 99.Zhao Y, Jin D, Lian W, Xing B, Feng M, Liu X, et al. Clinical characteristics and surgical outcome of prolactinoma in patients under 14 years old. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98:e14380. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR100] 100.Santoro A, Minniti G, Ruggeri A, Esposito V, Jaffrain-Rea M-L, Delfini R. Biochemical remission and recurrence rate of secreting pituitary adenomas after transsphenoidal adenomectomy: long-term endocrinologic follow-up results. Surg Neurol. 2007;68:513–518. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2007.05.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR101] 101.Bevan JS, Adams CBT, Burke CW, Morton KE, Molyneux AJ, Moore RA, et al. Factors in the outcome of transsphenoidal surgery for prolactinoma and non-functioning pituitary tumour, including pre-operative bromocriptine therapy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1987;26:541–556. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1987.tb00809.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR102] 102.Nelson PB, Goodman M, Maroon JC, Martinez AJ, Moossy J, Robinson AG. Factors in predicting outcome from operation in patients with prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas. Neurosurgery. 1983;13:634–641. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198312000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR103] 103.Micko A, Vila G, Höftberger R, Knosp E, Wolfsberger S. Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery of microprolactinomas: A reappraisal of cure rate based on radiological criteria. Neurosurgery. 2018;0:1–8. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR104] 104.Jho H. Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurooncol. 2001;54:187–195. doi: 10.1023/A:1012969719503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR105] 105.Gondim JA, Schops M, de Almeida JPC, Albuquerque LAF, Gomes E, Tn F, et al. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: surgical results of 228 pituitary adenomas treated in a pituitary center. Pituitary. 2010;13:68–77. doi: 10.1007/s11102-009-0195-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR106] 106.Jho HD, Carrau RL. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: experience with 50 patients. J Neurosurg. 1997;87:44–51. doi: 10.3171/jns.1997.87.1.0044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR107] 107.Wang F, Zhou T, Wei S, Zhang J, Hou Y, Sun G. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery of 1,166 pituitary adenomas. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:1270–1280. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3815-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR108] 108.Hofstetter CP, Shin BJ, Mubita L, Huang C, Anand VK, Boockvar JA, et al. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for functional pituitary adenomas. Neurosurg Focus. 2011;30:E10–E1E. doi: 10.3171/2011.1.FOCUS10317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR109] 109.Yano S, Kawano T, Kudo M, Makino K, Nakamura H, Kai Y, et al. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach through the bilateral nostrils for pituitary adenomas. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2009;49:1–7. doi: 10.2176/nmc.49.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR110] 110.Paluzzi A, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Stefko ST, Challinor S, Snyderman CH, Gardner PA. Endoscopic endonasal approach for pituitary adenomas: a series of 555 patients. Pituitary. 2014;17:307–319. doi: 10.1007/s11102-013-0502-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR111] 111.Webster J, Page MD, Bevan JS, Richards SH, Douglas-Jonest AG, Scanlon MF. Low recurrence rate after partial hypophysectomy for prolactinoma: the predictive value of dynamic prolactin function tests. Clin Eadocrinol. 1992;36:35–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1992.tb02900.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR112] 112.Rodman EF, Molitch ME, Post KD, Biller BJ, Reichlin S. Long-term follow-up of transsphenoidal selective adenomectomy for prolactinoma. J Am Med Assoc. 1984;252:921–924. doi: 10.1001/jama.1984.03350070039020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR113] 113.Ciccarelli E, Ghigo E, Miola C, Gandini G, Muller EE, Camanni F. Long-term follow-up of ‘cured’ prolactinoma patients after successful adenomectomy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1990;32:583–592. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1990.tb00901.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR114] 114.Schlechte JA, Sherman BM, Chapler FK, Van Gilder J. Long term follow-up of women with surgically treated prolactin- secreting pituitary tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1986;62:1296–1301. doi: 10.1210/jcem-62-6-1296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR115] 115.Nakagawa H, Iwatsuki K, Yamada M, Hagiwara Y, Moriuchi S, Kadota T. Latent prolactinoma on MRI-selective venous sampling and trans-sphenoidal microsurgical treatment. Neurol Res. 2001;23:691–696. doi: 10.1179/016164101101199199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR116] 116.Parl FF, Cruz VE, Cobb CA, Bradley CA, Aleshire SL. Late recurrence of surgically removed prolactinomas. Cancer. 1986;57:2422–2426. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19860615)57:12<2422::AID-CNCR2820571229>3.0.CO;2-B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR117] 117.Sata A, Hizuka N, Kawamata T, Hori T, Takano K. Hyponatremia after transsphenoidal surgery for hypothalamo-pituitary tumors. Neuroendocrinology. 2006;83:117–122. doi: 10.1159/000094725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR118] 118.Arafah BUM, Brodkey JS, Pearson OH. Gradual recovery of lactotroph responsiveness following surgical removal of prolactinomas. Metabolism. 1986;35:905–912. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(86)90052-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR119] 119.Hirohata T, Uozumi T, Mukada K, Arita K, Kurisu K, Yano T, et al. Influence of pregnancy on the serum prolactin level following prolactinoma surgery. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1991;125:259–267. doi: 10.1530/acta.0.1250259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR120] 120.Massoud F, Serri O, Hardy J, Somma M, Beauregard H. Transsphenoidal adenomectomy for microprolactinomas 10 to 20 years of follow-up. Surg Neurol. 1996;45:341–346. doi: 10.1016/0090-3019(95)00430-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR121] 121.Fraioli MF, Umana G, Pagano A, Fraioli B, Lunardi P. Prolactin secreting pituitary microadenoma: Results of transsphenoidal surgery after medical therapy with dopamine agonist. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28:992–994. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR122] 122.Raverot G, Wierinckx A, Dantony E, Auger C, Chapas G, Villeneuve L, et al. Prognostic factors in prolactin pituitary tumors: Clinical, histological, and molecular data from a series of 94 patients with a long postoperative follow-up. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:1708–1716. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-1191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR123] 123.Fahlbusch R, Buchfelder M. Present status of neurosurgery in the treatment of prolactinomas. Neurosurg Rev. 1985;8:195–205. doi: 10.1007/BF01815444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR124] 124.Sughrue ME, Chang EF, Tyrell JB, Kunwar S, Wilson CB, Jr, LSB. Pre-operative dopamine agonist therapy improves post-operative tumor control following prolactinoma resection. Pituitary. 2009;12:158–164. doi: 10.1007/s11102-008-0135-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR125] 125.Babey M, Sahli R, Vajtai I, Andres RH, Seiler RW. Pituitary surgery for small prolactinomas as an alternative to treatment with dopamine agonists. Pituitary. 2011;14:222–230. doi: 10.1007/s11102-010-0283-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR126] 126.Pelkonen R, Grahne B, Hirvonen E, Karonen S-L, Salmi J, Tikkanen M, et al. Pituitary function in prolactinoma. effect of surgery and postoperative bromocriptine therapy. Clin Eadocrinol. 1980;14:335–348. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1981.tb00618.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR127] 127.Primeau V, Raftopoulos C, Maiter D. Outcomes of transsphenoidal surgery in prolactinomas: improvement of hormonal control in dopamine agonist-resistant patients. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012;166:779–786. doi: 10.1530/EJE-11-1000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR128] 128.Kreutzer J, Buslei R, Wallaschofski H, Hofmann B, Nimsky C, Fahlbusch R, et al. Operative treatment of prolactinomas: indications and results in a current consecutive series of 212 patients. Eur J Endocrinol. 2008;158:11–18. doi: 10.1530/EJE-07-0248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR129] 129.Kawamata T, Iseki H, Ishizaki R, Hori T. Minimally invasive endoscope-assisted endonasal trans-sphenoidal microsurgery for pituitary tumors: Experience with 215 cases comparing with sublabial trans-sphenoidal approach. Neurol Res. 2002;24:259–265. doi: 10.1179/016164102101199882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR130] 130.Wolfsberger S, Czech T, Vierhapper H, Benavente R, Knosp E. Microprolactinomas in males treated by transsphenoidal surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2003;145:935–941. doi: 10.1007/s00701-003-0134-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR131] 131.Mamelak AN, Carmichael J, Bonert VH, Cooper O, Melmed S. Single-surgeon fully endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: outcomes in three-hundred consecutive cases. Pituitary. 2013;16:393–401. doi: 10.1007/s11102-012-0437-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR132] 132.Han Y, Chen D, Zhang C, Pan M, Yang X-P, Wu Y-G. Retrospective analysis of 52 patients with prolactinomas following endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97:e13198. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR133] 133.Mortini P, Losa M, Barzaghi R, Boari N, Giovanelli M. Results of transsphenoidal surgery in a large series of patients with pituitary adenoma. Neurosurgery. 2005;56:1222–1233. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000159647.64275.9D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR134] 134.Koizumi K, Aono T, Koike K, Kurachi K. Restoration of LH pulsatility in patients with prolactinomas after trans-sphenoidal surgery. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1984;107:433–438. doi: 10.1530/acta.0.1070433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR135] 135.Serri O, Rasio E, Beauregard H, Hardy J, Somma M. Recurrence of hyperprolactinemia after selective transsphenoidal adenomectomy in women with prolactinoma. N Engl J Med. 1983;309:280–283. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198308043090505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR136] 136.Akin S, Isikay I, Soylemezoglu F, Yucel T, Gurlek A, Berker M. Reasons and results of endoscopic surgery for prolactinomas: 142 surgical cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016;158:933–942. doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-2762-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR137] 137.Dehdashti AR, Ganna A, Karabatsou K, Gentili F. Pure endoscopic endonasal approach for pituitary adenomas early surgical results in 200 patients and comparison with previous microsurgical series. Neurosurgery. 2007;62:1006–1017. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000325862.83961.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR138] 138.Woosley RE, King JS, Talbert L. Prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas: neurosurgical management of 37 patients. Fertil Steril. 1982;37:54. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)45977-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR139] 139.Maira G, Anile C, De Marinis L. Prolactin-secreting adenomas: surgical results and long-term follow-up. Neurosurgery. 1989;24:736–743. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198905000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR140] 140.Liu Y, Yao Y, Xing B, Lian W, Deng K, Feng M, et al. Prolactinomas in children under 14. Clinical presentation and long-term follow-up. Childs Nerv Syst. 2015;31:909–916. doi: 10.1007/s00381-015-2679-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR141] 141.Faria JMA, Tindall GT. Transsphenoidal microsurgery for prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas. J Neurosurg. 1982;56:33. doi: 10.3171/jns.1982.56.1.0033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR142] 142.Esposito V, Santoro A, Minniti G, Salvati M, Innocenzi G, Lanzetta G, et al. Transsphenoidal adenomectomy for GH-, PRL- and ACTH-secreting pituitary tumours: outcome analysis in a series of 125 patients. Neurol Sci. 2004;25:251–256. doi: 10.1007/s10072-004-0351-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR143] 143.Soule SG, Farhi J, Conway GS, Jacobs HS, Powell M. The outcome of hypophysectomy for prolactinomas in the era of dopamine agonist therapy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1996;44:711–716. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.1996.738559.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR144] 144.Frank G, Pasquini E, Farneti G, Mazzatenta D, Sciarretta V, Grasso V, et al. The endoscopic versus the traditional approach in pituitary surgery. Neuroendocrinology. 2006;83:240–248. doi: 10.1159/000095534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR145] 145.Losa M, Mortini P, Barzaghi R, Gioia L, Giovanelli M. Surgical treatment of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas: Early results and long-term outcome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:3180–3186. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.7.8645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR146] 146.Charpentier G, de Plunkett T, Jedynak P, Peillon F, Le Gentil P, Racadot J, et al. Surgical treatment of prolactinomas short- and long-term results, prognostic factors. Horm Res Paediatr. 1985;22:222–227. doi: 10.1159/000180098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR147] 147.Song Y, Chen M, Lian W, Xing B, Yao Y, Feng M, et al. Surgical treatment for male prolactinoma A retrospective study of 184 cases. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e5833. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR148] 148.Donegan D, Atkinson JLD, Jentoft M, Natt N, Nippoldt TB, Erickson B, et al. Surgical outcomes of prolactinomas in recent era: Results of a heterogenous group. Endocr Pract. 2017;23:37–45. doi: 10.4158/EP161446.OR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR149] 149.Hamilton DK, Vance ML, Boulos PT, Laws ER. Surgical outcomes in hyporesponsive prolactinomas: Analysis of patients with resistance or intolerance to dopamine agonists. Pituitary. 2005;8:53–60. doi: 10.1007/s11102-005-5086-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR150] 150.Qu X, Wang M, Wang G, Han T, Mou C, Han L, et al. Surgical outcomes and prognostic factors of transsphenoidal surgery for prolactinoma in men: a single-center experience with 87 consecutive cases. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;164:499–504. doi: 10.1530/EJE-10-0961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR151] 151.Saitoh Y, Mori S, Arita N, Nagatani M, Hayakawa T, Koizumi K, et al. Treatment of prolactinoma based on the results of transsphenoidal operations. Surg Neurol. 1986;26:338–344. doi: 10.1016/0090-3019(86)90133-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR152] 152.Thomson JA, Teasdale GM, Gordon D, Mccruden DC, Davies DL. Treatment of presumed prolactinoma by transsphenoidal operation: early and late results. Br Med J. 1985;291:1550–1553. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6508.1550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR153] 153.Tamasauskas A, Sinkunas K, Bunevicius A, Radziunas A, Skiriute D, Deltuva VP. Transsphenoidal surgery for microprolactinomas in women: results and prognosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012;154:1889–1893. doi: 10.1007/s00701-012-1450-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR154] 154.Turner HE, Adams CB, Wass JA. Trans-sphenoidal surgery for microprolactinoma: an acceptable alternative to dopamine agonists? Eur J Endocrinol. 1999;140:43–47. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1400043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR155] 155.Ikeda H, Watanabe K, Tominaga T, Yoshimoto T. Transsphenoidal microsurgical results of female patients with prolactinomas. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013;115:1621–1625. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR156] 156.Yi N, Ji L, Zhang Q, Zhang S, Liu X, Shou X, et al. Long-term follow-up of female prolactinoma patients at childbearing age after transsphenoidal surgery. Endocrine. 2018. [DOI] [PubMed]

[CR157] 157.Melmed S, Casanueva FF, Hoffman AR, Kleinberg DL, Montori VM, Schlechte JA, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia: An endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:273–288. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-1692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR158] 158.Maiter D, Primeau V. 2012 update in the treatment of prolactinomas. Annales d'Endocrinologie. 2012;73:90–98. doi: 10.1016/j.ando.2012.03.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR159] 159.Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Solari D. Transsphenoidal surgery: A journey of 50 years. World Neurosurg. 2013;79:253–254. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.10.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR160] 160.Maiter D, Delgrange E. Therapy of endocrine disease: the challenges in managing giant prolactinomas. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014;170:R213–R227. doi: 10.1530/EJE-14-0013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR161] 161.Duan L, Yan H, Huang M, Zhang Y, Gu F. An economic analysis of bromocriptine versus trans-sphenoidal surgery for the treatment of prolactinoma. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28:1046–1051. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR162] 162.Jingran Z, Qi Y, Yuhui Z. Cost-effectiveness analysis of two therapeutic methods for prolactinoma. Chin J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;43:257–261. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR163] 163.Zygourakis CC, Imber BS, Chen R, Han SJ, Blevins L, Molinaro A, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of surgical versus medical treatment of prolactinomas. J Neurol Surg. 2017;78:125–131. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1608635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

Are dopamine agonists still the first-choice treatment for prolactinoma in the era of endoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Xiangming Cai

Junhao Zhu

Jin Yang

Chao Tang

Zixiang Cong

Chiyuan Ma

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Supplementary Information

Background

Methods

Literature research

Inclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Extraction of data

Quality assessment

Statistical analysis

Results

Included studies

Fig. 1.

Table 1.

Biochemical cure rate

Fig. 2.

Table 2.

Table 4.

Fig. 4.

Recurrence rate

Fig. 3.

Table 3.

Prolactin level

Symptom improvement rate

Improvement rate for vision impairment

Table 5.

Headache improvement rate

Improvement rate for menstrual disturbance

Galactorrhoea improvement rate

Complications

Incidence rate of ACTH insufficiency

Incidence rate of TSH deficiency

Incidence rate of hypopituitarism

Incidence rate of diabetes insipidus

Discussion

DAs versus surgery for microprolactinoma

DAs versus surgery for macroprolactinoma

DAs versus surgery for giant prolactinoma

Comparison of relief of symptoms between DAs and surgery

Comparison of the rate of complications between DAs and surgery

Comparison of the cost of therapy between DAs and surgery

DAs treatment before surgery?

Duration of medication

Advantages and limitations

Conclusion

Supplementary Information

Acknowledgements

Funding

Availability of data and materials

Authors’ contributions

Abbreviations

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Consent for publication

Competing interests

References

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases