Abstract
Background
Sponge microbiomes are essential for the function and survival of their host and produce biologically active metabolites, therefore, they are ideal candidates for ecological, pharmacologic and clinical research. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has revealed that many factors, including the environment and host, determine the composition and structure of these symbiotic communities but the controls of this variation are not well described. This study assessed the microbial communities associated with two marine sponges of the genera Aplysina (Nardo, 1834) and Ircinia (Nardo, 1833) in rocky reefs from Punta Arena de la Ventana (Gulf of California) and Pichilingue (La Paz Bay) in the coast of Baja California Sur, México to determine the relative importance of environment and host in structuring the microbiome of sponges.
Methods
Specimens of Aplysina sp were collected by scuba diving at 10 m and 2 m; Ircinia sp samples were collected at 2 m. DNA of sponge-associated prokaryotes was extracted from 1 cm3 of tissue, purified and sent for 16S amplicon sequencing. Primer trimmed pair-ended microbial 16S rDNA gene sequences were merged using Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) Paired-end Reads Assembler. Chao1, Shannon and Simpson (alpha) biodiversity indices were estimated, as well permutational analysis of variance (PERMANOVA), and Bray-Curtis distances.
Results
The most abundant phyla differed between hosts. Those phyla were: Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Cyanobacteria, Chloroflexi, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Planctomycetes. In Ircinia sp the dominant phylum was Acidobacteria. Depth was the main factor influencing the microbial community, as analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) showed a significant difference between the microbial communities from different depths.
Conclusion
Microbial diversity analysis showed that depth was more important than host in structuring the Aplysina sp and Ircinia sp microbiome. This observation contrast with previous reports that the sponge microbiome is highly host specific.
Keywords: Aplysina, Ircinia, Marine, Symbiont, Shallow
Introduction
Marine sponges (MS) inhabit shallow to mesophotic ecosystems and harbor on diverse symbionts (Taylor et al., 2007; Simister et al., 2012) that reach up to 50% of their total weight (Hentschel et al., 2003; Usher et al., 2004). Frequent and abundant presence of bacteria, especially within the sponge mesohyll, led authors to address these bacteria as symbionts (Vacelet, 1975; De Vos et al., 1995; Burja et al., 1999; Imhoff & Stöhr, 2003). Sponge microbiomes are essential for their host’s function (metabolic), health and survival (Lurgi et al., 2019). Furthermore, production of biologically active metabolites by sponges-associated bacteria, is an important function in this association (Imhoff & Stöhr, 2003). Therefore, they are ideal candidates for ecological, pharmacological and clinical research. Sponge tissues host many symbionts, including heterotrophic bacteria, facultative anaerobes, dinoflagellates, cyanobacteria, archaea, fungi, and viruses (Webster & Hill, 2001; Schippers et al., 2012). These microbial communities included dozens of phyla. Variation in diversity of these microbiomes is not well described (Taylor et al., 2007; Webster & Thomas, 2016; Villegas-Plazas et al., 2019).
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches to characterize marine sponge microbial communities has dramatically increased precision and quantity of surveys of the taxonomic complexity of these microbiomes (Schmitt et al., 2011; Webster & Taylor, 2012; Reveillaud et al., 2014) and revealed that sponge microbiomes are largely host-specific and stable across temporal scales under specific environmental conditions (Morrow et al., 2015; Weigel & Erwin, 2015; Morrow, Fiore & Lesser, 2016; Cleary et al., 2019). Recent research suggests that depth drivers of the structure of ocean microbiome (Sunagawa et al., 2015). However, for symbioses, one would expect a strong microbial community differentiation to emerge across host species (Lurgi et al., 2019). Sponges can inhabit from shallow to mesophotic ecosystems, in deep water they are apparently less influenced by abiotic factors (Kahng, Copus & Wagner, 2014; Olson & Kellogg, 2010). In shallow water these abiotic factors could influence the sponges, and their associated microbial communities. Some studies have determined sponge associated microbial community changes at different water depths from shallow (0–30 m) to mesophotic areas (30–150 m) (Olson & Kellogg, 2010; Lesser, Slattery & Leichter, 2009; Kahng, Copus & Wagner, 2014). Though the specificity of the sponge microbiota appears more related with host phylogeny, microbial communities in shallow and deep reefs vary (Steinert et al., 2016)
However, to our knowledge no studies are available that evaluate whether among the same shallow water sponges (0–30 m) the community varies according to its range of distribution. Although changes in abiotic factors are not as evident, as it could occur in mesophotic zones (30–150 m), the depth gradient could influence the composition of the microbial community associated with these sponges (Olson & Gao, 2013; Steinert et al., 2016).
Aplysina species are often associated with shallow rocky reefs. This species belongs to the Verongiida order and are distributed along the East Pacific from Mexico to Panama (Caballero-George et al., 2010; Cruz-Barraza et al., 2012). Ircinia, they are conspicuous and abundant in areas exposed to light in rocky-coral biotopes (Parra-Velandia & Zea, 2003) and more abundant in localities near sources of continental discharge with greater turbidity and load of organic material in suspension (Zea, 1994). In previous studies with sponges of these genera (Aplysina sp and Ircinia sp) from the Gulf of California, differences were observed in the biological activity of sponges and their associated bacteria, between sponges of the same genus and between genera (Gándara-Zamudio, 2011; Aguila-Ramírez, 2012; Ortíz-Aguirre, 2012). These differences appear related to site and depth. For this reason, this study assessed the microbial communities associated with two marine sponges of the genera Aplysina (Nardo, 1834) and Ircinia (Nardo, 1833) in rocky reefs from Punta Arena de la Ventana (Gulf of California) and Pichilingue (La Paz Bay) in the coast of Baja California Sur, México to determine the relative importance of environment and host in structuring the microbiome of sponges.
Materials and Methods
Specimens of Aplysina sp and Ircinia sp sponges previously collected to evaluate their biological activity (Gándara-Zamudio, 2011; Aguila-Ramírez, 2012; Ortíz-Aguirre, 2012) were used for this study.
Aplysina sp specimens (n = 8) were collected in triplicate by scuba diving in Punta Arena, Baja California Sur, México (24°03′40″N and 109°49′52″W) at different water depths (2–10 m). For this study, the depth of 2 m was considered shallow and 10 m as deep (Apl-S: 2 m; Apl-D: 10 m).
Three specimens in triplicate of Ircinia sp were collected in the Pichilingue locality inside La Paz Bay in Baja California Sur (24°16′08″N and 110°19′39″W) at 2 m depth (Fig. 1) (Permit SEMARNAT-08-049b Positive Ficta). Sponge samples were placed in sterile plastic bags and transferred to ice. In the laboratory, the epibiont organisms were removed and washed three times with sterile natural sea water, the outermost layer or pinacoderm was separated with a scalpel and pieces were cut from different areas of the sponges according to the suggestion by Friedrich et al. (2001), placed in tubes and frozen at −20 °C. Dr. Cristina Vega Juárez from the Bentos Laboratory of the Institute of Marine Sciences and Linmology of the Universidad Autónoma de México (UNAM), identified the sponges using dichotomous keys and published bibliography for the East Pacific on sponge taxonomy (Gómez et al., 2002; Cruz-Barraza & Carballo, 2008; Carballo-Cenizo & Cruz-Barraza, 2010).
Figure 1. Geographic localization of sponge sample collecting. Pichilingue and Punta Arena locations in Baja California Sur.
Each station is indicated in red. White bar represents 100 km. Map data © Google, Data SIO, NOAA, U.S. Navy, NGA, GEBCO, Image Landsat/Copernicus. Data LDEO-Columbia, NFS, NOAA
Total DNA extraction
Pieces of approximately 1 cm3 of sponge mesohyl were taken from each of sample and their replicates to form a composite sample; composites were then finely fragmented with a scalpel; 500 µL of TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HC1, 1 mM disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) were added and sonicated for 10 min to detach the bacteria (Bransonic 3510). Then, the mixture was centrifuged at 8,000× g for 10 min, and the supernatant was placed in another 2 ml tube for DNA extraction with phenol: chloroform: isoamyl following Sambrook & Russell (2002) and Caamal-Chan et al. (2019). Recovered DNA was resuspended in 50 µl of TE buffer (pH 8.0) and treated with RNase A (10 mg mL−1, Promega, Madison, WI, USA) at 37 °C for 30 min. The integrity of the DNA was analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Purity (λ 260 nm/280 nm ratio) and quantity were evaluated with a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). DNA samples were stored at −20 °C.
16S V4 rDNA sequencing
Purified DNA was sent to the Next Generation Sequencing Core at Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, USA for amplicon sequencing. Briefly, the microbial 16S rRNA gene V4 regions were amplified using primer set 515F (5′-GTGC CAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3′) and 806R (5′-GGAC TACHVGGG TWTCTAAT-3′) following the method described by Kozich et al. (2013). Amplicons of 16S rRNA gene V4 regions were generated using Illumina MiSeq 500-cycle kit with Illumina MiSeq sequencing platform (San Diego, CA, USA).
Sequence processing and microbial diversity analysis
Primer trimmed pair-end bacterial 16S rDNA gene sequences were merged using Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) Pair-end Reads Assembler. The assembled sequences with an expected maximum error adjusted Q score less than 25 over the entire sequence were eliminated. VSEARCH (v2.4.3, 64 bit) was used to remove chimeras de novo, followed by removing chimeras by reference using RDP 16S rDNA gene (Rognes et al., 2016). High quality and chimera-free sequences were then clustered at 97% sequence similarity by CD-HIT (4.6.1) and RPD Classifier with a confidence cutoff at 50% (Cole et al., 2014). These sequences resulted in the identification of unique operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and their abundance in each sample (Wang et al., 2007; Fu et al., 2012; Bonder et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2013). The resulting operational taxonomic unit (OTU) table was then processed to be analyzed with R programming language, using various packages and custom scripts (www.r-project.org). Chao1 and Shannon and Simpson (alpha) biodiversity indices were estimated with the package ‘iNEXT’ (Hsieh, Ma & Chao, 2016). For data normalization, the frequency of best hits to each individual taxon for each metagenome was divided by the total number of hits per sample. PERMANOVA and ANOSIM statistical analysis were performed with the ‘adonis’ and ‘anosim’ functions, respectively, with the package ‘vegan’. Bray-Curtis distance estimations were calculated using the ‘vegdist’ function, as well as principal coordinate analysis using the ‘pcoa’ function with the package ‘vegan’ (Oksanen et al., 2014).
Results
Sequencing run metrics
From all the samples sequenced, 379,392 reads were generated; after processing, 85,818 low-quality reads and chimeras were removed to keep high-quality pair-end-assembled reads, of which 146,787 reads could be assigned to prokaryotic taxa. The sequencing effort was assessed by Good’s coverage analysis with a mean value for all sample reads of 71% ± 0.1% and a completeness analysis (full coverage reached below 5,000 reads) (Fig. S1). A total of 1,102 OTUs were obtained by similarity clustering at 99% nucleotide identity and 786 OTUs after singleton removal within each sample. Raw sequence reads are deposited in NCBI BioProject Database Accession number: PRJNA760541.
Microbial communities associated with sponges
The resulting OTUs for this study showed that seven phyla were the most abundant among all mesohyl samples from Aplysina sp (10 m depth), Aplysina sp and Ircinia sp (2 m depth) with a minimal presence of Archaea (0.56–1.65% of the total classified reads). Proteobacteria represented the most abundant phylum (86%) for Aplysina sp (10 m) and was among the most abundant for Aplysina sp and Ircinia sp (2 m) samples (31% for both) (Fig. 2A).
Figure 2. Microbial assemblage of Aplysina sp and Ircinia sp at different depths.
(A) Microbial diversity structure and (B) Venn diagram for OTUs shared between Aplysina sp and Ircinia sp samples at different depths.
Acidobacteria represented the most abundant (47%) phylum for Ircinia sp samples and also the most abundant (9%) for Aplysina sp (2 m) sample (Fig. 2A). Cyanobacteria was among the most abundant (5–22%) phylum for all samples, which was the second most abundant (22%) for Aplysina sp (2 m) sample (Fig. 2A). Chloroflexi was among the most abundant (16%) phylum for Aplysina sp at shallow water depth (Fig. 2A). Actinobacteria showed a higher abundance of 2- and 3-fold than Aplysina sp (10 m) for Aplysina sp and Ircinia sp samples at shallow depth (Fig. 2A). Bacteroidetes was among the most abundant phylum for Aplysina sp (5%) and Ircinia sp samples (Fig. 2A). Planctomycetes was among the most abundant phylum for shallow Aplysina sp (5%) samples (Fig. 2A). Interestingly, 30% of the total OTUs were shared among all samples analyzed (Fig. 2B). Aplysina sp (2 m) samples showed the highest amount of specific OTUs (25%), followed by Ircinia sp 13% and Aplysina sp (10 m) 12% samples (Fig. 2B). Both Aplysina sp samples (2 and 10 m) showed the highest ratio of exclusively shared OTUs (10%) (Fig. 2B).
Microbial community diversity and depth effect on sponge species
Sampling curve analysis for Chao1 (order q = 0) (Fig. 3B), Shannon (order q = 1) (Fig. 3C), and Simpson (order q = 2) (Fig. 3D) indices showed differences due to curve clustering of the samples analyzed (Fig. 3). Furthermore, the principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) and constrained correspondence analysis (CCA) (Figs. 4A and 4B, respectively) showed two well-defined and discrete groups based on sample depth regardless of the species (Aplysina sp or Ircinia sp).
Figure 3. Rarefaction sampling curves and alpha diversity estimations for Aplysina sp and Ircinia sp samples at different depths.
(A) Rarefaction sampling curves, (B) Chao1 index estimations (q = 0), (C) Shannon index estimations (q = 1), (D) Simpson index estimations through rarefaction (interpolation) and extrapolation (R/E) sampling curves.
Figure 4. Sample clustering analysis of Aplysina sp and Ircinia sp samples at different depths.
(A) Principal coordinates analysis and (B) canonical correspondence analysis for Aplysina sp and Ircinia sp samples at different depths.
PERMANOVA analysis showed that depth was the main factor influencing the microbial community structures in the sponge samples (R2 = 0.507, P = 0.008). Sponge species did not have a significant effect (R2 = 0.184, P = 0.122). Moreover, the PERMANOVA analysis for depth interaction species showed that depth (R2 = 0.507, P = 0.004) was the main factor influencing microbial community structures regardless of sponge species (R2 = 0.110, P = 0.110). ANOSIM analysis also showed a significant difference between depths in the microbial communities (Fig. 5) and unsupervised bi-clustering analysis based on sample correlation to estimate the degree of relationship among samples supported this beta diversity analysis (PCoA and CCA) (Figs. S2, S3).
Figure 5. Analysis of similitude (ANOSIM) between sponge samples. ANOSIM analysis showed differences between Aplysina sp at 2m depth and Aplysina sp and Ircinia sp at 10 m depth samples.
Discussion
This study characterized for the first time prokaryotic communities associated with Aplysina sp and Ircinia sp mesohyl sponges from the Gulf of California. These sponges were initially collected to evaluate their potential production of bioactive compounds and to isolate the bacteria associated with them. Differences were observed in the biological activity of these sponges and cultivable bacteria isolated between the sponges of the same genera and between genera (Gándara-Zamudio, 2011; Aguila-Ramírez, 2012; Ortíz-Aguirre, 2012) appeared related to the site and depth at which they were collected, for this reason the prokaryotic communities from both sponges was characterized by high-throughput sequencing the 16S rRNA gene fragments.
Ircinia sp is only found in shallow areas without a depth slope; Aplysina sp, is distributed in a rocky reef that ranges from 2 to 10 m deep. Preliminary analysis the results of the sequencing, showed similarity between bacterial communities of sponges collected in the shallowest areas, therefore, the analysis was carried out focusing on the effect of depth on the bacterial diversity of these two genera of sponges.
Variation was found in relative abundance of the bacterial phyla associated with Aplysina sp at different depths. Archaea were present in a low abundance percentage. This low abundance could have been since specific primers for archaea were not used. Chaib De Mares et al. (2017) reported that when bacterial-specific primers were used, only 6% of the readings were classified as Archaea. On the other hand, when Archaea-specific primers were used, this proportion was 89%. The phylum Thaumarchaeota was the most abundant within archaea and was found in all samples and was most abundant in Aplysina sp samples collected at 2 m. This phylum–Thaumarchaeota–comprises nitrifying archaea and is highly abundant in sponge microbiomes (Dat et al., 2018).
The most abundant phylum at both depths were Proteobacteria (Fig. 2A). Proteobacteria are a prominent group of sponge-associated microbial communities and highly abundant in the marine in plankton organisms (Li et al., 2006; Jasmin et al., 2015; Dat et al., 2018). This phylum contributes to biogeochemical cycles through extracellular enzyme production and performs some symbiotic functions in sponges, such as nitrogen fixation and secondary metabolite production for the chemical defense of the host (Stabili et al., 2014). Furthermore, Cyanobacteria and Chloroflexi showed a high proportional abundance in the Aplysina sp samples from the shallow zone. These phyla mediate photosynthesis and carbon fixation and responsible for converting ammonia into nitrate in marine sponges (Han, Li & Zhang, 2013; Bibi & Azhar, 2021). The high proportion of these bacteria in the shallowest sponges could be explained because light intensity (Erwin et al., 2012; Souza et al., 2017; Glasl et al., 2019; Fiore et al., 2020).
As reported by Hardoim et al. (2021), prokaryotic communities associated with A. caissara and A. fulva were very similar among these two species and dominated by Chloroflexi, Proteobacteria, Crenarchaeota, and Acidobacteria. In contrast, in this study, Chloroflexi was only represented with a high relative abundance in 2-m Aplysina sp samples and Crenarchaeota did not represent an important component in any of the samples. However, these same authors (Hardoim et al., 2021) mentioned that community composition was largely different for Aplysina species. For instance, the most abundant phyla encountered in A. fulva, A. cauliformis, A. archeri, A. cavenicola, and A. aerophoba sampled in seven distinct sites were assigned to Proteobacteria, Chloroflexi, unclassified bacteria, Acidobacteria, and Actinobacteria (Thomas et al., 2016), or A. fulva collected in Brazil with the community dominated by Cyanobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Chloroflexi (Hardoim et al., 2009), which coincides with the phyla with the highest relative abundance in the 2-m Aplysina sp samples collected at Punta Arena BCS.
Global bacterial community structure for shallow samples has a similar proportion of Proteobacteria phylum (Fig. 2A). For Ircinia sp samples Acidobacteria and Proteobacteria were the most abundant phyla, which is consistent with the results of several studies (Mohamed, 2007, Schmitt et al., 2007; Schmitt et al., 2008; Lee et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2011; Hardoim et al., 2012; Pita, López-Legentil & Erwin, 2013; Pita Galán, 2014; Engelberts et al., 2020) where they report that the core bacterial community associated with this genus is made up of seven phyla Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Cyanobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes and Nitrospira. Despite being a very abundant and diverse group, the Acidobacteria phylum is not as well studied as Proteobacteria, so very little information is available on the species belonging to this phylum in marine environments. Engelberts et al. (2020) analyzed specific genes involved in metabolic pathways and biogeochemical cycles and found that some species of Acidobacteria participate in denitrification, nitrification, ammonification, metabolism of the taurine, exopolysaccharide production and synthesis of B complex vitamins. This phylum has also been found in a high percentage in sponge species, such as Xestospongia testudinaria and Luffariella variabilis, but these bacteria had not been reported as predominant in sponges of the genus Ircinia (Webster et al., 2013). In most studies of the community associated with different species of Ircinia, Proteobacteria and Cyanobacteria dominate (Hardoim & Costa, 2014). It should be noted that this study would be the first report where the abundance of Acidobacteria is greater than that of Proteobacteria for the genus Ircinia. For the shallow Aplysina sp samples, the most abundant were Proteobacteria, Cyanobacteria, Chloroflexi and Acidobacteria; deep Aplysina sp samples were dominated only by the Proteobacteria phylum. These prokaryotic taxa with a high relative abundance in this study are also abundant in other marine sponges (Moitinho-Silva et al., 2017; Dat et al., 2018).
In coral ecosystems host identity controls the sponge-associated microbial community (Steinert et al., 2016). This study found that sponges of different species (Aplysina sp and Ircinia sp) collected at different depths (2 and 10 m) share a high proportion of OTUs (Fig. 2B). Albeit the Aplysina sp samples at 10 m and those at 2 m showed characteristic and discrete OTUs distributions (Fig. S3). Environmental variability is an important factor in the sponge microbial community. Stable isotopic analysis in giant barrel sponge Xestospongia muta showed changes in the relationship 15N/13C in sponges as depth increased (transition from dependency on photoautotrophy to heterotrophy), leading to a more stable microbial community along the depth gradient (Morrow, Fiore & Lesser, 2016).
A high proportion (~30%) of shared OTUs for Aplysina sp and Ircinia sp might be due to the ecophysiological similitudes among those species, since they are inhabiting similar reef areas and face similar selective pressures (Souza et al., 2017; Pearman et al., 2019; Turon et al., 2019). However, a higher proportion of exclusively shared OTUs for Aplysina sp samples was expected for both depths (10%) since those samples belong to the same species, and because other studies have found that host-specific prokaryotic communities are stable despite geographical and temporal differences (Erwin et al., 2015; Hardoim & Costa, 2014; Dat et al., 2018). Approximately the same proportion of exclusively shared OTUs are shared between Aplysina sp at shallow and deep depths, respectively. Several phyla are stable in Aplysina sp samples collected at different depths, but their relative abundance percentage differs markedly. In the deepest samples a clear Proteobacteria predominated, while in the shallowest samples three phyla, Proteobacteria, Cyanobacteria and Chloroflexi, predominated. Although this study does not have data on environmental parameters, other studies have found that the temperature difference between shallow areas of the reef and deep sites averaged 4 °C (from 3 to 91 m deep), which was unlikely to affect sponge-microbial communities. Studies examining the effect of elevated temperatures found no change (at sub-lethal temperatures) in sponge bacterial communities during short term experiments (Webster et al., 2008; Simister et al., 2012; Steinert et al., 2016). Therefore, and due to the presence of bacteria of the phylum Cyanobacteria and Chloroflexi in greater abundance at 2 m, this might imply that light intensity plays an important role in community changes, as other authors have suggested (Lesser et al., 2010).
Alpha diversity indices for richness and evenness estimated with rarefaction (interpolation) and extrapolation (R/E) sampling curves showed the clustering for Aplysina sp deep samples and overlapping both Aplysina sp and Ircinia sp shallow samples (Fig. 3). The beta diversity PCoA and CCA analyses showed a clustering directly related with depth instead of a relationship among sponge species supported with PERMANOVA and ANOSIM analyses (Figs. 3 and 4). The clustering analyses (PCoA and CCA) showed two well-defined groups, one corresponding to Aplysina sp bacteria collected in deeper areas and the other one corresponding to Aplysina sp and Ircinia sp bacteria from the shallow area. These findings are in accordance with the variation in the bacterial community structure assemblage, which is influenced directly by environmental factors, such as depth, temperature, and light intensity and not by the host sponge species (Maldonado & Young, 1998; Thoms et al., 2003; Olson & Gao, 2013; Morrow, Fiore & Lesser, 2016; Thomas et al., 2016; Pearman et al., 2019; Souza et al., 2017). These results differ from those reported in other studies. For example, Gantt et al. (2019) reported that bacterial communities exhibited a high degree of host specificity.
Conclusions
Microbial diversity analysis showed that depth was more important than host in structuring the Aplysina sp and Ircinia sp microbiome.
Supplemental Information
(a) Good’s coverage, and (b) depth sampling coverage analysis for Aplysina sp and Ircinia sp samples
Acknowledgments
The authors thank José Borges Souza for his help in taking samples, Cristina Vega Juárez by identifying the sponges, SNI (Sistema Nacional de Investigadores) COFAA (Comisión de Operación y Fomento de Actividades Académicas del Instituto Politécnico Nacional) IPN and EDI (Estímulo al Desempeño Académico) fellows and Diana Fischer for English edition.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT), Secretaria de Educación Pública (Project SEP-CONACyT 79707) and Instituto Politécnico Nacional. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Additional Information and Declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests
Author Contributions
Bárbara González-Acosta conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Aarón Barraza conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
César Guadarrama-Analco performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.
Claudia J. Hernández-Guerrero conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Sergio Francisco Martínez-Díaz conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
César Salvador Cardona-Félix conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Ruth Noemí Aguila-Ramírez conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Field Study Permissions
The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):
The scientific collector license was requested from SEMARNAT (Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales) (Norma SEMARNAT-08-049b Positiva Ficta).
Data Availability
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The data is available at NCBI SRA: PRJNA760541.
References
- Aguila-Ramírez (2012).Aguila-Ramírez RN. Caracterización y bioactividad de bacterias asociadas a la esponja Aplysina gerardogreeni del Golfo de California. 2012. Doctoral Thesis. Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas. Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México.
- Bibi & Azhar (2021).Bibi F, Azhar EI. Analysis of bacterial communities in sponges and coral inhabiting Red Sea, using barcoded 454 pyrosequencing. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2021;28(1):847–854. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.11.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bonder et al. (2012).Bonder MJ, Abeln S, Zaura E, Brandt BW. Comparing clustering and pre-processing in taxonomy analysis. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(22):2891–2897. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burja et al. (1999).Burja AM, Webster NS, Murphy PT, Hill RT. Microbial symbionts of Great Barrier Reef sponges. Memories of the Queensland Museum. 1999;44:63–75. doi: 10.1023/A:1012713130404. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Caamal-Chan et al. (2019).Caamal-Chan MG, Loera-Muro A, Castellanos T, Aguilar-Martínez CJ, Marfil-Santana MD, Barraza A. Analysis of the bacterial communities and endosymbionts of natural populations of Bemisia tabaci in several crop fields from Mexico semi-arid zone. Annals of Microbiology. 2019;69(9):909–922. doi: 10.1007/s13213-019-01483-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Caballero-George et al. (2010).Caballero-George CJ, Bolaños EO, Carballo JL, Cruz-Barraza JA, Arnold E. Protocol to isolate sponge-associated fungi from tropical waters and an examination of their cardioprotective potential. Current Trends in Biotechnology and Pharmacy. 2010;4:881–889. [Google Scholar]
- Carballo-Cenizo & Cruz-Barraza (2010).Carballo-Cenizo JL, Cruz-Barraza JA. A revision of the genus Mycale (Poecilosclerida: Mycalidae) from the Mexican Pacific Ocean. Contributions to Zoology. 2010;79:165–191. doi: 10.1163/18759866-07904003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chaib De Mares et al. (2017).Chaib De Mares M, Sipkema D, Huang S, Bunk B, Overmann J, van Elsas JD. Host specificity for bacterial, archaeal and fungal communities determined for high- and low-microbial abundance sponge species in two genera. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2017;8:2560. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen et al. (2013).Chen W, Zhang CK, Cheng Y, Zhang S, Zhao H. A comparison of methods for clustering 16S rRNA sequences into OTUs. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(8):e70837. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cleary et al. (2019).Cleary DFR, Swierts T, Coelho FJRC, Polonia ARM, Huang YM, Ferreira MRS, Putchakarn S, Carvalheiro L, van der Ent E, Ueng JP, Gomes NCM, de Voogd NJ. The sponge microbiome within the greater coral reef microbial metacommunity. Nature Communications. 2019;10(1):1644. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09537-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cole et al. (2014).Cole JR, Wang Q, Fish J, Chai B, McGarrell DM, Sun Y, Brown CT, Porras-Alfaro A, Kuske CR, Tiedje JM. Ribosomal database project: data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Research. 2014;42(D1):D633–42. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cruz-Barraza & Carballo (2008).Cruz-Barraza JA, Carballo JL. Taxonomy of sponges (Porifera) associated with corals from the Mexican Pacific Ocean. Zoological Studies. 2008;47:741–758. [Google Scholar]
- Cruz-Barraza et al. (2012).Cruz-Barraza JA, Carballo JL, Rocha-Olivares A, Ehrlich H, Hog M. Integrative taxonomy and molecular phylogeny of genus Aplysina (Demospongiae: Verongida) from Mexican Pacific. PLOS ONE. 2012;7(8):e42049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dat et al. (2018).Dat TTH, Steinert G, Thi KCN, Smidt H, Sipkema D. Archaeal and bacterial diversity and community composition from 18 phylogenetically divergent sponge species in Vietnam. PeerJ. 2018;6(4):e4970. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Vos et al. (1995).De Vos L, Riitzler K, Boury-Esnault N, Donadey C, Vacelet J. Atlas of sponge morphology. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Engelberts et al. (2020).Engelberts JP, Robbins SJ, de Goeij JM, Aranda M, Bell SC, Webster NS. Characterization of a sponge microbiome using an integrative genome-centric approach. The ISME Journal. 2020;14(5):1100–1110. doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-0591-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Erwin et al. (2015).Erwin PM, Coma R, López-Sendino P, Serrano E, Ribes M. Stable symbionts across the HMA-LMA dichotomy: low seasonal and inter-annual variation in sponge-associated bacteria from taxonomically diverse hosts. FEMS Microbiology. 2015;91:1–11. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiv115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Erwin et al. (2012).Erwin PM, Pita L, López-Legentil S, Turon X. Stability of sponge-bacteria over large seasonal shifts in temperature and irradiance. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2012;78(20):7358–7368. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02035-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fiore et al. (2020).Fiore CL, Jarett JK, Steinert G, Lesser MP. Trait-based comparison of coral and sponge microbiomes. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1):2340. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59320-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Friedrich et al. (2001).Friedrich AB, Fischer I, Proksch P, Hacker J, Hentschel U. Temporal variation of the microbial community associated with the mediterranean sponge Aplysina aerophoba. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2001;38:105–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00888.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Fu et al. (2012).Fu L, Niu B, Zhu Z, Wu S, Li W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(23):3150–3152. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gantt et al. (2019).Gantt SE, McMurray SE, Stubler AD, Finelli CM, Pawlik JR, Erwin PM. Testing the relationship between microbiome composition and flux of carbon and nutrients in Caribbean coral reef sponges. Microbiome. 2019;7(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0739-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glasl et al. (2019).Glasl B, Bourne DG, Frade PR, Thomas T, Schaffelke B, Webster NS. Microbial indicators of environmental perturbations in coral reef ecosystems. Microbiome. 2019;7(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0705-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gándara-Zamudio (2011).Gándara-Zamudio A. Actividad antibacteriana y citotóxica de diferentes morfologías de la esponja Aplysina gerardogreeni de Punta Arena de la Ventana, BCS, México. 2011. Tesis de Licenciatura. Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur, México.
- Gómez et al. (2002).Gómez P, Carballo JL, Vázquez LE, Cruz JA. New records for the sponge fauna (Porifera, Demospongiae) of the Pacific Coast of Mexico (East Pacific Ocean) Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington. 2002;115:223–237. [Google Scholar]
- Han, Li & Zhang (2013).Han M, Li Z, Zhang F. The ammonia oxidizing and denitrifying prokaryotes associated with sponges from different sea areas. Microbial Ecology. 2013;66(2):427–436. doi: 10.1007/s00248-013-0197-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hardoim & Costa (2014).Hardoim CC, Costa R. Microbial communities and bioactive compounds in marine sponges of the family Irciniidae—a review. Marine Drugs. 2014;12(10):5089–5122. doi: 10.3390/md12105089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hardoim et al. (2009).Hardoim CCP, Costa R, Araujo FV, Hajdu E, Peixoto R, Lins U, Rosado AS, Van Elsas JD. Diversity of bacteria in the marine sponge Aplysina fulva in Brazilian coastal waters. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2009;75(10):3331–3343. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02101-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hardoim et al. (2012).Hardoim CC, Esteves AI, Pires FR, Gonçalves JM, Cox CJ, Xavier JR, Costa R. Phylogenetically and spatially close marine sponges harbour divergent bacterial communities. PLOS ONE. 2012;7(12):e53029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hardoim et al. (2021).Hardoim CCP, Lôbo-Hajdu G, Custódio MR, Hardoim PR. Prokaryotic, Fungal, and Unicellular eukaryotic core communities across three sympatric marine sponges from the Southwestern Atlantic coast are dominated largely by deterministic assemblage processes. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2021;12:1162. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.674004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hentschel et al. (2003).Hentschel U, Fieseler L, Wehrl M, Gernert C, Steinert M, Hacker J, Horn M. Microbial diversity of marine sponges. Progress in Molecular and Subcellular Biology. 2003;37:59–88. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-55519-0_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hsieh, Ma & Chao (2016).Hsieh TC, Ma KH, Chao A. iNEXT: an R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (H ill numbers) Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2016;7(12):1451–1456. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12613. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Imhoff & Stöhr (2003).Imhoff JF, Stöhr R. Sponge-associated bacteria: general overview and special aspects of bacteria associated with Halichondria panicea. Progress in Molecular and Subcellular Biology. 2003;37:35–37. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-55519-0_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jasmin et al. (2015).Jasmin C, Anas A, Nair S, Hong Y. Bacterial diversity associated with Cinachyra cavernosa and Haliclona pigmentifera, cohabiting sponges in the coral reef ecosystem of gulf of Mannar, Southeast Coast of India. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(5):e0123222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kahng, Copus & Wagner (2014).Kahng SE, Copus JM, Wagner D. Recent advances in the ecology of mesophotic coral ecosystems (MCEs) Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2014;7:72–81. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.11.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kozich et al. (2013).Kozich JJ, Westcott SL, Baxter NT, Highlander SK, Schloss PD. Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2013;79(17):5112–5120. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01043-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee et al. (2011).Lee OO, Wang Y, Yang J, Lafi FF, Al-Suwailem A, Qian P-Y. Pyrosequencing reveals highly diverse and species-specific microbial communities in sponges from the Red Sea. ISME Journal. 2011;5(4):650–664. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lesser, Slattery & Leichter (2009).Lesser MP, Slattery M, Leichter JJ. Ecology of mesophotic coral reefs. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 2009;375(1–2):1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2009.05.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lesser et al. (2010).Lesser MP, Slattery M, Stat M, Ojimi M, Gates RD, Grottoli A. Photoacclimatization by the coral Montastraea cavernosa in the mesophotic zone: light, food, and genetics. Ecology. 2010;91(4):990–1003. doi: 10.1890/09-0313.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li et al. (2006).Li ZY, He LM, Wu J, Jiang Q. Bacterial community diversity associated with four marine sponges from the South China Sea based on 16S rDNA-DGGE fingerprinting. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 2006;329(1):75–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2005.08.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lurgi et al. (2019).Lurgi M, Thomas T, Wemheuer B, Webster N, Montoya JM. Modularity and predicted functions of the global sponge-microbiome network. Nature Communications. 2019;10(1):992. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08925-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maldonado & Young (1998).Maldonado M, Young CM. Limits on the bathymetric distribution of keratose sponges: a field test in deep water. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 1998;74:123–139. doi: 10.3354/meps174123. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mohamed (2007).Mohamed NM. Ecophysiology of microbial communities associated with marine sponges Ircinia strobilina and Mycale laxissima. Maryland: University of Maryland, College Park; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Moitinho-Silva et al. (2017).Moitinho-Silva L, Steinert G, Nielsen S, Hardoim CC, Wu YC, McCormack GP, López-Legentil S, Marchant R, Webster N. Thomas T, Hentschel U. Predicting the HMA-LMA status in marine sponges by machine learning. Frontiers in microbiology. 2017;8:752. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morrow et al. (2015).Morrow KM, Bourne DG, Humphrey C, Botté ES, Laffy P, Zaneveld J, Uthicke S, Fabricius KE, Webster NS. Natural volcanic CO2 seeps reveal future trajectories for host-microbial associations in corals and sponges. The ISME Journal. 2015;9(4):894–908. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morrow, Fiore & Lesser (2016).Morrow KM, Fiore CL, Lesser MP. Environmental drivers of microbial community shifts in the giant barrel sponge, Xestospongia muta, over a shallow to mesophotic depth gradient. Environmental Microbiology. 2016;18(6):2025–2038. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oksanen et al. (2014).Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H. Vegan: community ecology package. 2014. http://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=vegan http://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=vegan R package version 2.2-0.
- Olson & Gao (2013).Olson JB, Gao X. Characterizing the bacterial associates of three Caribbean sponges along a gradient from shallow to mesophotic depths. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2013;85(1):74–84. doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olson & Kellogg (2010).Olson JB, Kellogg CA. Microbiology of corals, sponges, and algae in mesophotic coral environments. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2010;73(1):17–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00862.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ortíz-Aguirre (2012).Ortíz-Aguirre I. Actividad biológica de esponjas y su relación con la complejidad de la comunidad bentónica en la Bahía de La Paz, B.C.S., México. 2012. Master Thesis. Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas. Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México.
- Parra-Velandia & Zea (2003).Parra-Velandia FJ, Zea S. Comparación de la abundancia y distribución de algunas características de las esponjas del género Ircinia (Porifera: Demospongiae) en dos localidades contrastantes del área de Santa Marta, Caribe colombiano. Boletín de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras. 2003;32:75–91. [Google Scholar]
- Pearman et al. (2019).Pearman JK, Aylagas E, Voolstra CR, Anlauf H, Villalobos R, Carvalho S. Disentangling the complex microbial community of coral reefs using standardized autonomous reef monitoring structures (ARMS) Molecular Ecology. 2019;28(15):3496–3507. doi: 10.1111/mec.15167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pita Galán (2014).Pita Galán L. Biogeography of sponge-associated bacterial communities and resilence to anthropogenic perturbations= Biogeografía de las comunidades bacterianas asociadas a esponjas y su resiliencia frente a perturbaciones antropogénicas. 2014. PhD Thesis. Universidad de Barcelona, España.
- Pita, López-Legentil & Erwin (2013).Pita L, López-Legentil S, Erwin PM. Biogeography and host fidelity of bacterial communities in Ircinia spp. from the Bahamas. Microbial Ecology. 2013;66(2):437–447. doi: 10.1007/s00248-013-0215-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reveillaud et al. (2014).Reveillaud J, Maignien L, Eren AM, Huber JA, Apprill A, Sogin ML, Vanreusel A. Host-specificity among abundant and rare taxa in the sponge microbiome. The ISME Journal. 2014;8(6):1198–1209. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rognes et al. (2016).Rognes T, Flouri T, Nichols B, Quince C, Mahé F. VSEARCH: a versatile tool for metagenomics. PeerJ. 2016;4(17):e2584. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sambrook & Russell (2002).Sambrook J, Russell DW. Molecular cloning a laboratory manual. Third Edition. Beijing: Science Press; 2002. pp. 461–471. [Google Scholar]
- Schippers et al. (2012).Schippers KJ, Sipkema D, Osinga R, Smidt H, Pomponi SA, Martens DE, Wijffels RH. Cultivation of sponges, sponge cells and symbionts: achievements and future prospects. Advances in Marine Biology. 2012;62(Suppl. 5):273–337. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394283-8.00006-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schmitt et al. (2008).Schmitt S, Angermeier H, Schiller R, Lindquist N, Hentschel U. Molecular microbial diversity survey of sponge reproductive stages and mechanistic insights into vertical transmission of microbial symbionts. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2008;74(24):7694–7708. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00878-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schmitt et al. (2011).Schmitt S, Tsai P, Bell J, Fromont J, Ilan M, Lindquist N, Perez T, Rodrigo A, Schupp PJ, Vacelet J, Webster N, Hentschel U, Taylor MW. Assessing the complex sponge microbiota: core, variable and species-specific bacterial communities in marine sponges. The ISME Journal. 2011;6(3):564–576. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schmitt et al. (2007).Schmitt S, Weisz JB, Lindquist N, Hentschel U. Vertical transmission of a phylogenetically complex microbial consortium in the viviparous sponge Ircinia felix. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2007;73(7):2067–2078. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01944-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simister et al. (2012).Simister RL, Deines P, Botté ES, Webster NS, Taylor MW. Sponge-specific clusters revisited: a comprehensive phylogeny of sponge-associated microorganisms. Environmental Microbiology. 2012;14(2):517–524. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02664.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Souza et al. (2017).Souza DT, Genuário DB, Silva FSP, Pansa CC, Kavamura VN, Moraes FC, Taketani RG, Melo IS. Analysis of bacterial composition in marine sponges reveals the influence of host phylogeny and environment. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2017;93(1):204. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiw204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stabili et al. (2014).Stabili L, Giangrande A, Pizzolante G, Caruso G, Alifano P. Characterization of Vibrio diversity in the mucus of the polychaete Myxicola infundibulum (Annelida, Polichaeta) Microbial Ecology. 2014;67(1):186–194. doi: 10.1007/s00248-013-0312-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steinert et al. (2016).Steinert G, Taylor MW, Deines P, Simister RL, de Voogd NJ, Hoggard M, Schupp PJ. In four shallow and mesophotic tropical reef sponges from Guam the microbial community largely depends on host identity. PeerJ. 2016;4(10):e1936. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sunagawa et al. (2015).Sunagawa S, Coelho LP, Chaffron S, Kultima JR, Labadie K, Salazar G, Velayoudon D. Structure and function of the global ocean microbiome. Science. 2015;348(6237):1261359. doi: 10.1126/science.1261359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor et al. (2007).Taylor MW, Radax R, Steger D, Wagner M. Sponge-associated microorganisms: evolution, ecology, and biotechnological potential. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 2007;71(2):295–347. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00040-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomas et al. (2016).Thomas T, Moitinho-Silva L, Lurgi M, Björk JR, Easson C, Astudillo-García C, Olson JB, Erwin PM, López-Legentil S, Luter H, Chaves-Fonnegra A, Costa R, Schupp PJ, Steindler L, Erpenbeck D, Gilbert J, Knight R, Ackermann G, Lopez JV, Taylor MW, Thacker RW, Montoya JM, Hentschel U, Webster NS. Diversity structure and convergent evolution of the global sponge microbiome. Nature Communications. 2016;7(1):11870. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thoms et al. (2003).Thoms C, Horn M, Wagner M, Hentschel U, Proksch P. Monitoring microbial diversity and natural product profiles of the sponge Aplysina cavernicola following transplantation. Marine Biology. 2003;142(4):685–692. doi: 10.1007/s00227-002-1000-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Turon et al. (2019).Turon M, Cáliz J, Triado-Margarit X, Casamayor EO, Uriz MJ. Sponges and their microbiomes show similar community metrics across impacted and well-preserved reefs. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2019;10:1961. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Usher et al. (2004).Usher KM, Fromont J, Sutton DC, Toze S. The biogeography and phylogeny of unicellular cyanobacterial symbionts in selected sponges from Australia and the Mediterranean. Microbial Ecology. 2004;48(2):167–177. doi: 10.1007/s00248-003-1062-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vacelet (1975).Vacelet J. Etude en mircrosopie electronique de l’association entre bacteries et spongiaires du genre Verongia (Dictyoceratida) Journal of Microscopic Biology Cellular. 1975;23:271–288. [Google Scholar]
- Villegas-Plazas et al. (2019).Villegas-Plazas M, Wos-Oxley ML, Sanchez JA, Pieper DH, Thomas OP, Junca H. Variations in microbial diversity and metabolite profiles of the tropical marine sponge Xestospongia muta with season and depth. Microbial Ecology. 2019;78(1):243–256. doi: 10.1007/s00248-018-1285-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang et al. (2007).Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. Naive bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2007;73(16):5261–5267. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00062-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Webster & Hill (2001).Webster NS, Hill RT. The culturable microbial community of the Great Barrier Reef sponge Rhopaloeides odorabile is dominated by an α-Proteobacterium. Marine Biology. 2001;138(4):843–851. doi: 10.1007/s002270000503. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Webster et al. (2013).Webster NS, Luter HM, Soo RM, Botté ES, Simister RL, Abdo D, Whalan S. Same, same but different: symbiotic bacterial associations in GBR sponges. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2013;3:444. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Webster & Taylor (2012).Webster NS, Taylor MW. Marine sponges and their microbial symbionts: love and other relationships. Environmental Microbiology. 2012;14(2):335–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02460.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Webster & Thomas (2016).Webster NS, Thomas T. The sponge hologenome. MBio. 2016;7(2):e00135. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00135-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Webster et al. (2008).Webster NS, Xavier JR, Freckelton M, Motti CA, Cobb R. Shifts in microbial and chemical patterns within the marine sponge Aplysina aerophoba during a disease outbreak. Environmental Microbiology. 2008;10:3366–3376. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01734.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weigel & Erwin (2015).Weigel BL, Erwin PM. Intraspecific variation in microbial symbiont communities of the sun sponge, Hymeniacidon heliophila, from intertidal and subtidal habitats. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2015;82(2):650–658. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02980-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang et al. (2011).Yang J, Sun J, Lee OO, Wong YH, Qian PY. Phylogenetic diversity and community structure of sponge-associated bacteria from mangroves of the Caribbean Sea. Aquatic Microbial Ecology. 2011;62(3):231–240. doi: 10.3354/ame01473. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zea (1994).Zea S. Patterns of coral and sponge abundance in stressed coral reefs at Santa Marta, Colombian Caribbean: 257–264. In: van Soest RWM, van Kempen TMG, Braekman JC, editors. Sponges in Time and Space. Rotterdam: Balkema; 1994. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
(a) Good’s coverage, and (b) depth sampling coverage analysis for Aplysina sp and Ircinia sp samples
Data Availability Statement
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The data is available at NCBI SRA: PRJNA760541.