Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2021 Mar 16;62(2):346–353. doi: 10.1007/s12016-021-08857-2

Long-term Outcome of Children Born to Women with Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases: A Multicentre, Nationwide Study on 299 Randomly Selected Individuals

Laura Andreoli 1,2,✉,#, Cecilia Nalli 2,#, Maria Grazia Lazzaroni 1,2, Chiara Carini 1, Francesca Dall’Ara 1, Rossella Reggia 1, Marília Rodrigues 3, Carolina Benigno 4, Elena Baldissera 5, Elena Bartoloni 6, Fabio Basta 7, Francesca Bellisai 8, Alessandra Bortoluzzi 9, Corrado Campochiaro 5, Francesco Paolo Cantatore 10, Roberto Caporali 11,12, Angela Ceribelli 13, Cecilia B Chighizola 14, Paola Conigliaro 15, Addolorata Corrado 10, Maurizio Cutolo 16, Salvatore D’Angelo 17, Elena De Stefani 9, Andrea Doria 18, Maria Favaro 18, Colomba Fischetti 19, Rosario Foti 20, Armando Gabrielli 19, Elena Generali 13, Roberto Gerli 6, Maria Gerosa 11,12, Maddalena Larosa 18, Armin Maier 21, Nazzarena Malavolta 22, Marianna Meroni 23, Pier Luigi Meroni 14, Carlomaurizio Montecucco 24, Marta Mosca 25, Melissa Padovan 9, Giuseppe Paolazzi 26, Giulia Pazzola 27, Susanna Peccatori 26, Roberto Perricone 15, Giorgio Pettiti 28, Valentina Picerno 17, Immacolata Prevete 29, Véronique Ramoni 24, Nicoletta Romeo 28, Amelia Ruffatti 18, Carlo Salvarani 27, Gian Domenico Sebastiani 29, Carlo Selmi 13, Francesca Serale 28, Luigi Sinigaglia 11, Chiara Tani 25, Marica Trevisani 22, Marta Vadacca 7, Eleonora Valentini 6, Guido Valesini 30, Elisa Visalli 20, Ester Vivaldelli 21, Lucia Zuliani 19, Angela Tincani 1,2
PMCID: PMC8994724  PMID: 33725262

Abstract

The concern about the offspring’s health is one of the reasons for a reduced family size of women with rheumatic diseases (RD). Increased risk of autoimmune diseases (AD) and neurodevelopmental disorders (ND) has been reported in children born to patients with RD. Within a nationwide survey about reproductive issues of women with RD, we aimed at exploring the long-term outcome of their children. By surveying 398 patients who received their diagnosis of RD during childbearing age (before the age of 45), information about the offspring were obtained from 230 women who declared to have had children. A total of 148 (64.3%) patients were affected by connective tissue diseases (CTD) and 82 (35.7%) by chronic arthritis. Data on 299 children (156 males, 52.1%; mean age at the time of interview 17.1 ± 9.7 years) were collected. Twelve children (4.0%), who were born to patients with CTD in 75% of the cases, were affected by AD (8 cases of celiac disease). Eleven children had a certified diagnosis of ND (3.6%; 6 cases of learning disabilities); 9 of them were born to mothers with CTD (5 after maternal diagnosis). No association was found between ND and prenatal exposure to either maternal autoantibodies or anti-rheumatic drugs. Absolute numbers of offspring affected by AD and ND were low in a multicentre cohort of Italian women with RD. This information can be helpful for the counselling about reproductive issues, as the health outcomes of the offspring might not be an issue which discourage women with RD from having children.

Keywords: Rheumatic diseases, Reproductive issues, Offspring, Neurodevelopmental disorders, Counselling

Introduction

Rheumatic diseases (RD) are chronic/inflammatory conditions that can affect women of childbearing age. Counselling about reproductive issues should be a key point of the physician–patient communication [13]-

The family size of women with RD is reduced as compared with the general population [4]. Patients reported several reasons for having less children than desired or not having children at all, including the fear that the disease or the medications could harm the foetus, or the concern of not being able to take care of the baby, or that the child could develop the same disease as the mother [5].

Studies available about the long-term outcome of children born to mothers with RD have different design and sample size and are focused on specific conditions and maternal diseases [6], such as neurodevelopmental disorders (ND) in children born to mothers with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [79]. Autoimmune diseases (AD) rarely arise during infancy; therefore, only studies covering decades of follow-up of children would be informative. The literature is still lacking long-term studies about this issue. As a whole, it is no easy task to counsel a woman with RD about the long-term outcome of her offspring.

This multicentre, nationwide study aimed at collecting data about the long-term health conditions of children born to women with RD in Italy, with particular focus on the development of AD and ND, in order to gain information for the counselling of patients.

Methods

This study was part of a multicentre, retro-prospective, patient-based study aimed at exploring the unmet needs of women of childbearing age with RD. As previously described [5], patients with a confirmed diagnosis of RD who were in follow-up at 24 centres affiliated with the Italian Society for Rheumatology (SIR) were invited to participate in the study. The study was approved by the ethical committee (EC) of coordinating centre in Brescia (ASST Spedali Civili). Subsequently, it was approved by the local EC at each centre.

The interviews were conducted in September 2015 by means of a self-reported questionnaire that was proposed to 20 non-selected, consecutive patients attending the outpatient clinic of each centre. The questionnaire comprised 65 multiple-choice and 12 open-answer questions covering six main sections: (1) counselling about contraception and pregnancy, (2) knowledge of RD’s implications for reproductive matters, (3) family size and desire for pregnancy, (4) pregnancy outcomes before and after RD diagnosis, (5) patients’ awareness of the use of drugs during pregnancy, (6) children’s follow-up.

This paper focuses on the follow-up of children born to patients with RD, as the other themes have already been the subject of a previous paper [5]. For the purpose of statistical analysis, patients were subdivided into two groups: connective tissues diseases (CTD) and chronic arthritis (CA). The CTD group comprised systemic lupus erythematosus and/or antiphospholipid syndrome (SLE/APS), dermato-polymyositis (DM-PM), undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD), mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), primary Sjögren’s syndrome (SS), and systemic sclerosis (SSc). The CA group comprised: rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and seronegative spondyloarthropathies (SpA).

Out of 398 patients, 230 (57.8%) had children. Children’s diagnoses of AD and/or ND reported by the mothers were checked through a second round of interview, and only cases certified by a medical specialist were considered.

The chi-square test for categorical data (or Fisher’s exact when appropriate) and Student’s t-test for continuous data were used for statistical analysis. Significance was set at a p ≤ 0.05.

Results

Data were collected for 299 children born to 230 patients with a diagnosis of CA (82, 35.7%; 56 RA, 26 SpA; 58 patients with 1 child, 24 patients with 2 children) or CTD (148, 64.3%; 70 SLE/APS, 6 DM-PM, 18 UCTD, 2 MCTD, 13 SS, 39 SSc; 101 patients with 1 child, 47 with 2 children). Children were male in 156 cases (52.2%) and female in 143 cases (47.8%), with a mean age of 17.1 years (± 9.7) at the time of interview. Fifty-six (18.7%) children were born before the 37th week of gestation; premature birth before the 34th week occurred in 17 cases (5.6%). One case of Trisomy 21 and one perinatal death due to respiratory distress were reported.

No significant differences were observed in the developmental milestones (age at sitting position, walking, first speech, discontinuation of diaper) between children born from mothers with CA or CTD and born before or after maternal diagnosis. Sleep disturbances (pavor nocturnus, somnambulism, insomnia) and feeding problems (food allergy/intolerance) were observed in less than 10% of children.

Regarding school performance, 12 children (4.5% of children of school-age) repeated 1 year of school, in 7 cases for indolence, in 3 for learning disabilities (LD)/health problems, and in 2 for family problems. Eleven of these children were born before maternal diagnosis.

Twelve children (4.0%; 4 males, 8 females; mean age of 12.2 years at the time of interview) were affected by AD. Children’s and maternal characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Characteristics of children with and without autoimmune diseases. Autoimmune diseases were as follows: 1 juvenile idiopathic arthritis, 1 diabetes mellitus type 1, 1 autoimmune thyroiditis, 1 recurrent fever, and 8 celiac disease (CD). Among the 8 children with CD, 3 had a mother affected by CD and 2 had affected family members from the paternal side. The HLA typing was performed in 3 children and their parents: the DQ2/DQ8 haplotype was found in 2 mothers affected by CD and in one asymptomatic father

Children with autoimmune diseases (n = 12) Children without autoimmune diseases (n = 287) p-value
Characteristics of children
  Sex (male) 4 (33.3%) 162 (56.4%) 0.2437
  Child’s age at the time of interview (years, mean ± SD) 12.2 ± 6.94 17.3 ± 9.78 0.0742
  Overall preterm birth (≤ 37 weeks) 4 (33.3%) 52 (18.1%) 0.2445
  Late preterm birth (34.1–36.6 weeks) 3 (25.0%) 36 (12.5%) 0.7359
  Early preterm birth (≤ 34 weeks) 1 (8.3%) 16 (5.6%) 0.3975
  Mean weight at birth—male (kg, mean ± SD) 2.984 ± 0.469 3.277 ± 0.493 0.0439
  Mean weight at birth—female (kg, mean ± SD) 2.975 ± 0.457 3.127 ± 0.515 0.3148
Maternal diagnosis
  Children born from CA mothers 3 (25%) 103 (35.8%)
  CA diagnosed before the pregnancy 1 (33.3%) 23 (22.3%) > 0.9999
  CA diagnosed after the pregnancy 2 (66.67%) 80 (77.6)
  Children born from CTD mothers 9 (75%) 184 (64.12%)
  CTD diagnosed before the pregnancy 4 (44.4%) 55 (29.8%) 0.4594
  CTD diagnosed after the pregnancy 5 (55.6%) 129 (70.2%)

Eleven children (3.7%; 7 males, 4 females, mean age of 11.9 years at the time of interview) had a certified ND and had been diagnosed as learning disabilities (LD) such as dyslexia, dyscalculia, and dysgraphia (n = 6); attention deficiency and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (n = 2); autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (n = 1); ADHD + LD; and 1 “slow learner” (a girl who was born at term but small for gestational age) (n = 1).

Table 2 reports on children’s and maternal characteristics with regard to foetal exposure to autoantibodies and drugs, as factors potentially impacting on the foetal neurodevelopment.

Table 2.

Children with and without neurodevelopmental disorders: characteristics at birth, maternal diagnosis, exposure in utero to autoantibodies, and/or anti-rheumatic or anti-thrombotic drugs. As autoantibodies may be positive many years prior to the onset of symptoms and clinical diagnosis, [10] we performed an additional analysis by considering as exposed in utero to autoantibodies those children who were born within 5 years of maternal diagnosis of RD

Children with ND (n = 11) Children without ND (n = 288) p-value
Characteristics of children
  Sex (male) 7 (63.6%) 148 (51.4%) 0.5455
  Child’s age at the time of interview (years, mean ± SD) 11.9 ± 4.35 17.1 ± 9.86 0.0842
  Overall preterm birth (≤ 37 weeks) 3 (27.2%) 53 (18.4%) 0.4375
  Late preterm birth (34.1–36.6 weeks) 1 (9%) 38 (13.1%) 0.7264
  Early preterm birth (≤ 34 weeks) 2 (18.1%) 15 (5.2%) 0.3426
  Mean weight at birth—male (kg, mean ± SD) 3.0393 ± 0.562 3.29 ± 0.475 0.0890
  Mean weight at birth—female (kg, mean ± SD) 2.8175 ± 0.517 3.1349 ± 0.513 0.0451
Maternal diagnosis
  Children born from CA mothers 2 (18.2%) 104 (36.1%) 0.3387
  Pregnancy after the diagnosis of CA 0 (0%) 27 (26.0%) > 0.9999
  Pregnancy before the diagnosis of CA 2 (100%) 77 (74.0%)
  Children born from CTD mothers 9 (81.2%) 184 (63.9%)
  Pregnancy before the diagnosis of CTD 5 (55.6%) 56 (30.4%) 0.1443
  Pregnancy before the diagnosis of CTD 4 (44.4%) 128 (69.6%)
In utero exposure to drugs
  Exposure to at least one drug 5 (45.5%) 69 (24.0%) 0.1477
  Oral prednisone/methylprednisolone (CS) 5 (45.5%) 49 (17.0%) 0.0311
  Azathioprine (AZA) 1 (9.1%) 2 (0.7%) 0.1067
  Cyclosporin-A (CyA) 0 (0%) 1 (0.3%) > 0.9999
  Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) 0 (0%) 2 (0.7%) > 0.9999
  Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) 0 (0%) 26 (9.0%) 0.6073
  Heparin (LMWH) 0 (0%) 14 (4.9%) > 0.9999
  Low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (LDA) 2 (18.2%) 26 (9.0%) 0.2751
  Leflunomide (LEF) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) > 0.9999
  Sulfasalazine (SSZ) 0 (0%) 1 (0.3%) > 0.9999
  Methotrexate (MTX) 0 (0%) 1 (0.3%) > 0.9999
In utero exposure to autoantibodiesa
  Exposure to at least one autoantibody 5 (100.0%) 59 (71.1%) 0.3172
  Antiphospholipid antibodies (at least one positive test) 2 (40.0%) 19 (22.9%) 0.5891
  Anti-cardiolipin antibodies (aCL) 2 (40.0%) 16 (19.3%) 0.2698
  Anti-Beta2glycoprotein I antibodies (aB2GPI) 0 (0.0%) 13 (15.7%) > 0.9999
  Lupus anticoagulant (LA) 0 (0.0%) 9 (10.8%) > 0.9999
  Anti-Ro/SS-A 2 (40.0%) 25 (30.1%) 0.6403
  Anti-La/SS-B 1 (20.0%) 9 (10.8%) 0.4611
  Anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) 4 (80.0%) 52 (62.7%) 0.6490
  Anti-dsDNA antibodies 3 (60.0%) 16 (19.3%) 0.0652
  Other autoantibodies 0 (0.0%) 10 (12.0%) > 0.9999
In utero exposure to autoantibodiesb
  Exposure to at least one autoantibody 5 (100.0%) 92 (67.6%) 0.7161
  Antiphospholipid antibodies (at least one positive test) 2 (40.0%) 24 (17.6%) 0.6356
  Anti-cardiolipin antibodies 2 (40.0%) 21 (15.4%) 0.6140
  Anti-Beta2glycoprotein I antibodies 0 (0.0%) 16 (11.8%) 0.5980
  Lupus anticoagulant 0 (0.0%) 15 (11.0%) > 0.9999
  Anti-Ro/SS-A 2 (40.0%) 36 (26.5%) > 0.9999
  Anti-La/SS-B 1 (20.0%) 12 (8.8%) 0.5402
  Anti-nuclear antibodies 5 (100.0%) 82 (60.3%) > 0.9999
  Anti-dsDNA antibodies 3 (60.0%) 23 (16.9%) 0.1565
  Other autoantibodies 0 (0.0%) 22 (16.2%) 0.6083

aThis section considers all the live-birth pregnancies occurred after the diagnosis of RD (88 children, including 5 children with ND and 83 children without ND)

bThis section considers all the live-birth pregnancies occurred in the 5 years prior to the diagnosis of RD and all the pregnancies occurred afterwards (144 children, including 8 children with ND and 136 children without ND)

Details about the children with AD and ND and their mothers are reported in Table 3.

Table 3.

Children affected by autoimmune diseases (AD) or neurodevelopmental disorders (ND): characteristics of mothers and offspring.

Sex Age at the time of the interview Disease Birth before/after maternal disease onset Gestational week at birth Maternal disease In utero exposure to maternal autoantibodies In utero exposure to drugs
Autoimmune diseases (AD)
1 M 25 Type 1 diabetes Before 32 RA NA No
2 F 26 Juvenile idiopathic arthritis Before 41 RA NA No
3 F 5 Celiac disease After 38 RA No HCQ
4 F 14 Celiac disease Before 38 UCTD NA No
5 F 13 Autoimmune hypothyroidism Before 41 DM/PM NA No
6 M 9 Celiac disease Before 36 SS NA No
7 F 11 Celiac disease Before 39 UCTD NA No
8 F 8 Celiac disease Before 38 SLE ANA, a-dsDNA, aCL, aB2GPI, anti-Ro/SSA* No
9 M 4 Celiac disease After 36 UCTD Anti-Ro/SSA, LA, ANA CS, IvIg
10 M 8 Celiac disease After 41 SLE ANA, a-dsDNA HCQ, LDA
11 F 10 Celiac disease After 35 SSc ANA, anti-Scl70, anti-RNP CS, LMWH
12 F 13 Recurrent fever After 36 SLE Anti-Ro/SSA, LA, ANA, a-dsDNA CS, HCQ
Neurodevelopmental disorders (ND)
1 M 17 ADHD + LD Before 37 RA NA No
2 F 16 Slow learner Before 38 RA NA No
3 M 12 ADHD + ASD Before 28 SSc ANA, a-TPO, a-TG IgA** CS, LDA, LMWH**
4 M 17 LD (dyslexia) Before 39 SSc NA No
5- F 18 LD (dyscalculia) Before 40 SSc NA No
6 F 7 ADHD Before 38 SLE ANA* No
7 F 10 LD (dyslexia, dyscalculia) After 40 SLE Anti-Ro/SSA, aCL CS
8 M 7 ADHD After 36 SLE ANA, aCL CS, AZA, LDA
9 M 8 ADHD + LD (dyslexia, dyscalculia) After 42 SLE ANA, a-dsDNA No
10 F 8 LD (dysnomia) After 34 SLE ANA, a-dsDNA CS
11 M 12 LD (dyslexia) After 38 SLE Data not available CS

aB2GPI anti-beta2glycoprotein I antibodies, aCL anti-cardiolipin antibodies, ADHD attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, a-dsDNA anti-dsDNA antibodies, ANA anti-nuclear antibodies, anti-RNP anti-ribonucleoprotein antibodies, ASD autism spectrum disorders, a-TG anti-transglutaminase antibodies, a-TPO anti-thyroperoxidase antibodies(, AZA azathioprine, CS oral prednisone/methylprednisolone, DM/PM dermato-polymyositis, HCQ hydroxychloroquine, IVIG intravenous immunoglobulins, LA lupus anticoagulant, LD learning disabilities, LDA low-dose acetylsalicylic acid, LMWH low molecular weight heparin, NA not applicable, RA rheumatoid arthritis, SLE systemic lupus erythematosus, SS Sjögren’s syndrome, SSc systemic sclerosis, UCTD undifferentiated connective tissue disease

*As the pregnancy occurred within the 5 years prior to diagnosis, it is possible to assume that autoantibodies were already present during pregnancy

**This patient was tested for autoantibodies because of infertility and was treated by obstetric indication for favouring better outcomes of a spontaneous pregnancy

Discussion

This study aimed at assessing the long-term outcome of children born to mothers with a definite diagnosis of RD. To our knowledge, this is the only study comprising young adults (mean age of 17.1 years), i.e. the age of possible onset of AD.

We found that AD, mainly organ-specific, were present in 3.8% of the offspring, while a systemic disease was present in 2 cases (0.6%). This figure can be considered as comparable with the recently published study of children born to mothers with SLE in Canada [12], in which the frequency of AD was 1.1%, while it was 0.5% in the control group. Interestingly, no cases of celiac disease (CD) were reported in SLE offspring and only one case was found in the controls. In our cohort, 8 out of the 12 children with AD were affected by CD. This difference highlights that variability in genetic heritage and exposome may account for different frequency of specific AD in different populations [11]. The frequency of CD found in our study (2.5%) does not seem to be significantly higher than that reported more than 10 years ago in the general paediatric population (0.33–1.25%) [13]. The increasing disease awareness and diagnostic sensitivity of AD and in particular of CD, which lately seems to have become “epidemic,” [14] cannot support a hint toward an increased risk of CD in our cohort. As a matter of fact, one fourth of the affected children had family members with CD on the paternal side (data not shown).

The observed frequency of ND was 3.7%. Despite absolute numbers are rather low, there was a clustering in children born to mothers with CTD (81%), particularly after maternal diagnosis (66.6%). This observation is in line with the reports of the last 30 years suggesting that children born to mothers with SLE seem to be more prone to ND [9]. Children with ND were more frequently exposed in utero to corticosteroids and maternal anti-dsDNA antibodies. However, the placental enzymes physiologically inactivate prednisone/methylprednisolone and only about 10% can reach the foetus limiting their pathogenic potential. On the other hand, the trend toward an increased frequency of exposure to maternal anti-dsDNA is consistent with an animal model showing that a subset of anti-dsDNA called anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate-receptor antibodies were able to induce foetal neuronal apoptosis and ND in the offspring [6]. Both corticosteroids and anti-dsDNA can point at active maternal disease during pregnancy, which is in turn a risk factor for premature birth. ND are multifactorial in origin; therefore, the in utero environment is just one of the risk factors. Prematurity can be indeed a major risk factor for ND. Although there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of pre-term birth between children with and without ND, the frequency of pre-term birth in our cohort (18.4%) was higher than that of the Italian general obstetric population (12%) [15]. The causes of pre-term birth were not collected in our survey. However, it is possible that some of these pre-term births were iatrogenic, as in the past women with RD were not let to deliver at full term because of the fear of maternal disease flares.

LD were the most common ND in our cohort with a frequency of 1.8%, similar to that of 2.5–3.5% described in Italian school-children [16]. The occurrence of LD was not associated with the in utero exposure to maternal antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), but none of the patients carried a triple aPL positivity, which was the common feature of children with LD, as recently reported [17].

Only one case of ASD was found in our cohort. The possible association between ASD and maternal RD should not be emphasized in our opinion as no solid causative explanation has been elaborated yet. The fact that ASD were found in children born to mothers with different RD such as RA, [7, 18] SLE [8], and APS [19] may reflect their sporadic occurrence rather than a biologically supported association.

We acknowledge that this study has some limitations: (i) it was not designed as a case-control study; however, it carries the relevant information for future parents that the chance of occurrence AD and NP in their offspring is low [6]; (ii) the survey did not collect information about Caesarean section, linked to an increased risk of non-rheumatic autoimmune diseases [12]; and (iii) a national cohort does not allow to generalize the counselling to women with a different ethnic background.

There are also some strengths in this study: (a) it provides data regarding the long-term outcome of children born to women with RD other than RA, SLE, APS; (b) the enrolment of consecutive patients attending the out-patient clinics of 24 centres across the country during the same time period allowed random inclusion of children; (c) the direct contact with the patients allowed us to retrieve validated data about children’s outcomes and exposures during pregnancy, while administrative sources can misclassify the diagnosis and do not allow precise information about drugs [20]; and (d) the mean age of 17 years accounts for the longest follow-up of children born to mother with RD available in the literature, allowing a better assessment of AD as their onset is usually during adulthood.

In conclusion, according to our data, a link between maternal disease (particularly CTD) and ND cannot be excluded, suggesting the need of attention by the healthcare providers to explore any possible concern of the mother. However, our study found a low frequency of AD and ND in a large randomly selected cohort of children born to mothers with RD. This is a valuable information for the counselling of patients of childbearing age that was lacking in clinical practice.

Key Messages

  • Knowledge about the long-term outcome of children born to mothers with rheumatic diseases (RD) is an unmet need in the counselling about reproductive issues.

  • Some studies suggested that the offspring of women with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus may be at increased risk of autoimmune diseases (AD) and neurodevelopmental disorders (ND).

  • We collected information about 299 randomly selected individuals born to mothers with RD with a mean age of 17 years at the time of the survey, in 24 rheumatology centres across Italy.

  • Absolute numbers of offspring affected by AD and ND were low; a possible link between maternal connective tissue diseases and ND needs to be further investigated, although we did not find any association with the in utero exposure to maternal autoantibodies and anti-rheumatic drugs.

  • Concerns regarding the health outcomes of the offspring might not be an issue discouraging women with RD from having children.

Acknowledgements

Statistical analysis was supported by an unrestricted grant by UCB (Brussels, Belgium). The authors wish to thank the Patient Representatives from three different Italian patient associations who contributed to the development of the questionnaire and all the patients who participated in the survey. The Italian Society for Rheumatology (SIR) facilitated the network by creating a study group on gender medicine.

Author Contribution

All authors were involved in drafting the article or revising it critically for intellectual content. LA, CN, MGL, CC, and AT had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study conception and design: LA, CN, MGL, CC, AD, GV, and AT. Acquisition of data: all the authors. Analysis and interpretation of data: LA, CN, MGL, CC, AD, GV, and AT.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Brescia within the CRUI-CARE Agreement.

Data Availability

Data are available on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics Approval

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee in each participating centre.

Consent to Participate

Each patient signed a written informed consent before filling out the questionnaire.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Laura Andreoli and Cecilia Nalli contributed equally to this work.

References

  • 1.Østensen M. Preconception counseling. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2017;43(2):189–199. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2016.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hunt N, Talabi MB. Family planning and rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2019;21(5):16. doi: 10.1007/s11926-019-0816-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Andreoli L, Bertsias GK, Agmon-Levin N, Brown S, Cervera R, Costedoat-Chalumeau N, et al. EULAR recommendations for women's health and the management of family planning, assisted reproduction, pregnancy and menopause in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and/or antiphospholipid syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(3):476–485. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Østensen M. Sexual and reproductive health in rheumatic disease. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017;13(8):485–493. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2017.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Andreoli L, Lazzaroni MG, Carini C, Dall'Ara F, Nalli C, Reggia R, et al. “Disease knowledge index” and perspectives on reproductive issues: a nationwide study on 398 women with autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Joint Bone Spine. 2019;86(4):475–481. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vinet É, Bernatsky S. Outcomes in children born to women with rheumatic diseases. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2017;43(2):263–273. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2016.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wojcik S, Bernatsky S, Platt RW, Pineau CA, Clarke AE, Fombonne É, et al. Risk of autism spectrum disorders in children born to mothers with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017;69(12):1926–1931. doi: 10.1002/acr.23235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Vinet É, Pineau CA, Clarke AE, Scott S, Fombonne É, Joseph L, et al. Increased risk of autism spectrum disorders in children born to women with systemic lupus erythematosus: results from a large population-based cohort. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67(12):3201–3208. doi: 10.1002/art.39320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yousef Yengej FA, van Royen-Kerkhof A, Derksen RHWM, Fritsch-Stork RDE. The development of offspring from mothers with systemic lupus erythematosus. A systematic review Autoimmun Rev. 2017;16(7):701–711. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2017.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Arbuckle MR, McClain MT, Rubertone MV, Scofield RH, Dennis GJ, James JA, et al. Development of autoantibodies before the clinical onset of systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(16):1526–1533. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Floreani A, Leung PS, Gershwin ME. Environmental Basis of Autoimmunity. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2016;50(3):287–300. doi: 10.1007/s12016-015-8493-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Couture J, Bernatsky S, Scott S, Pineau CA, Vinet E. Brief report: Risk of childhood rheumatic and nonrheumatic autoimmune diseases in children born to women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(11):1796–1800. doi: 10.1002/art.40570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hill ID, Dirks MH, Liptak GS, Colletti RB, Fasano A, Guandalini S, et al. Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of celiac disease in children: recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005;40(1):1–19. doi: 10.1097/00005176-200501000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Caio G, Volta U, Sapone A, Leffler DA, De Giorgio R, Catassi C, et al. Celiac disease: a comprehensive current review. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1380-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Taraborelli M, Ramoni V, Brucato A, Airò P, Bajocchi G, Bellisai F, et al. Brief report: successful pregnancies but a higher risk of preterm births in patients with systemic sclerosis: an Italian multicenter study. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(6):1970–1977. doi: 10.1002/art.34350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Barbiero C, Lonciari I, Montico M, Monasta L, Penge R, Vio C, et al (2012) The submerged dyslexia iceberg: how many school children are not diagnosed? Results from an Italian study. PLoS One 7(10t a):e48082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 17.Nalli C, Iodice A, Andreoli L, Galli J, Lojacono A, Motta M, et al. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of children born to prospectively followed pregnancies of women with systemic lupus erythematosus and/or antiphospholipid syndrome. Lupus. 2017;26(5):552–558. doi: 10.1177/0961203317694960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rom AL, Wu CS, Olsen J, Jawaheer D, Hetland ML, Mørch LS. Parental rheumatoid arthritis and autism spectrum disorders in offspring: a Danish Nationwide cohort study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018;57(1):28–32.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2017.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mekinian A, Lachassinne E, Nicaise-Roland P, Carbillon L, Motta M, Vicaut E, et al. European registry of babies born to mothers with antiphospholipid syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(2):217–222. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-201167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vinet E, Chakravarty EF, Simard JF, Clowse M. Use of administrative databases to assess reproductive health issues in rheumatic diseases. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2018;44(2):327–336. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2018.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on reasonable request.


Articles from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES