Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Nursing Open logoLink to Nursing Open
. 2021 May 19;9(3):1815–1821. doi: 10.1002/nop2.927

Quality of life in patients with endometrial carcinoma: A Longitudinal Study

Jiebing Chen 1, Qiaojian Zou 2, Xuanmin Chen 1, Xiaochen Liu 2, Sha Ding 1, Yinglei Mo 1,✉, Shuzhong Yao 1,✉
PMCID: PMC8994958  PMID: 34009689

Abstract

Aim

To investigate the quality of life in patients with endometrial carcinoma and provide theoretical basis for nursing care.

Design

In this study, 69 patients diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma from 2016–2018 were included in the cohort.

Methods

Sixty‐nine patients from our hospital who underwent endometrial cancer surgeries were selected. The SF‐36 was used to investigate and analyse the patients’ quality of life in the first, second and third months after their operations. Questionnaires were administered to analyse the factors affecting postoperative quality of life.

Results

Quality of life for the second and third months was obviously better than that for the first month after the operation (p < .05). Based on multivariate regression analysis, we found that patients with higher family income had better quality of life after surgery(p < .05). These results can provide some guidance for daily nursing work after endometrial cancer operation.

Keywords: endometrial cancer, longitudinal study, quality of life

1. INTRODUCTION

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the sixth most common female tumour worldwide, and its incidence is increasing each year. It is currently the most common female pelvic malignant tumour in the United States now (Faria et al., 2019), and a retrospective study showed that the incidence rate of endometrial cancer in white Americans has reached 19/100,000 (Lortet‐Tieulent et al., 2018). According to data from the World Health Organization in 2018, nearly 380,000 women were diagnosed with endometrial cancer worldwide, resulting in approximately 90,000 deaths; thus, this type of cancer should receive more attention (Bray et al., 2018). Quality of life refers to people's feelings about their position inside their culture and value system, including the concept of health, which consists of the living environment, psychological health and social support (Panzini et al., 2017; Skevington, 2002). Quality of life can reflect the health status of people from multiple dimensions. To date, studies on the quality of life in patients with endometrial cancer have mostly been limited to cross‐sectional studies, and longitudinal studies in this field are extremely rare (Ferguson et al., 2018; Robertson et al., 2019; Salehi et al., 2018; Shisler et al., 2018). The 36‐item Short Form Health Survey (SF‐36) is a well‐known quantitative tool for evaluating quality of life(Ware & Sherbourne, 1992). It systematically assesses eight dimensions of psychological and physiological health and provides powerful evidence on the effect of a disease on quality of life.

In our study, we used the SF‐36 to dynamically assess the quality of life of patients with endometrial cancer at different times after their operations. Specifically, this study also used multivariate regression analysis and discovered the risk factors for low quality of life after surgery. Based on these findings, some targeted and individualized disposes can be applied in daily nursing work for different kinds of patients. This can help improve their quality of life after operations.

2. METHODS

2.1. Study design

From October 2016–December 2018, 69 patients suffering from endometrial cancer who were treated in the gynaecology department of a tertiary hospital in Guangzhou were selected. All the participants met the following inclusion criteria: (1) diagnosed with endometrial cancer by pathological results, (2) first diagnosed and performed staging operations in our hospital, (3) without a history of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy and (4) returned to the hospital regularly for follow‐up. In addition, the exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with uncontrolled primary tumours or signs of recurrence, (2) patients who suffered from other types of malignant tumours simultaneously and (3) patients with a history of mental diseases and difficulty cooperating with the follow‐up. The study adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Research Ethics Committee approval was obtained for this study. The approval included the participant information sheet and informed consent form signed by all participants.

2.2. Data collection

Questionnaires were uniformly distributed by trained investigators uniformly and collected by one‐to‐one interviews. Investigators described our research to those who met the inclusion criteria and obtained their informed consent. All participants completed the SF‐36 the first, second and third months after the operation. Participants were excluded if they stopped chemotherapy without authorization or went to another hospital for treatment at any point of the study.

2.3. Investigation tools

The questionnaire for basic information included patient age, marital status, work status, educational level, disease stages and complications. The Chinese version of the SF‐36 was adopted. This scale includes 36 items across 8 dimensions, including physical function (PF), role physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role emotional (RE) and mental health (MH). Scores for each item are counted and converted into standardized scores by (original score–lowest possible score)/ possible score range × 100, and the standardized scores of the eight dimensions are summed to obtain the SF‐36 total score. The average score of the SF‐36 ranges from 0–100 points, where 0 points and 100 points represent the worst and best health results, respectively.

2.4. Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 23.0 software. One‐way ANOVA was adopted for comparing the means of three groups, and the Bonferroni test was used for post hoc comparison. Univariate analysis was used to identify factors associated with quality of life, and those factors with a p‐value of <.10 were included in multivariate regression analysis. A p‐value of <.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. RESULTS

In our study, 69 participants completed the SF‐36 at the first, second and third months after their operations. All data were divided into three groups depending on the time since the operation. In addition, personal information from participants was collected from the first questionnaire. The general information of 69 patients is shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Description for general conditions of selected patients

Item Frequency (N) Percentage (%)
Age (mean ± standard deviation) 53.9 ± 8.45
Marital status
Unmarried 1 1.5
Married 68 98.5
Fertility condition
Have given birth 66 95.6
Have not given birth 3 4.4
Educational experience
Under high school 37 53.6
High school or more 32 46.4
Menstrual condition
Normal 10 14.5
Disorder 11 15.9
Menopause 48 69.6
Mood
Stable 22 31.9
Instable 47 68.1
Physical discomforta
No 8 11.6
Yes 61 88.4
Payment
Self‐paying 6 8.7
Health insurance or others 63 91.3
Monthly income
<5,000 yuan 27 39.1
5,000–10,000 yuan 24 34.8
>10,000 yuan 18 26.1
Employed condition
No 10 14.5
Yes 59 85.5
Chronic diseases
Yes 27 39.1
No 42 60.9
Clinical stage
I 37 53.6
II 15 21.7
III 14 20.3
IV 3 4.4
Open in a new tab
a

Including nausea, vomiting, choking sensation in chest, anhelation, palpitation, easy to tired, poor appetite and inattention. Data were analysed by SPSS.

For total SF‐36 scores, we found a statistically significant difference between the three groups. Specifically, the total scores were significantly higher in the second month and the third month than in the first month after the operation(p < .05), but no significant difference was found between the second and the third months (p > .05). (Table 2).

TABLE 2.

Scores of each dimension and total scores after operation

Time after operation PF RP BP GH VT SF RE MH Total scores (Mean ± SD)
First month 54.64 ± 25.99 35.51 ± 45.46 36.04 ± 23.92 37.87 ± 21.57 46.67 ± 18.26 44.38 ± 26.04 36.71 ± 43.96 50.26 ± 22.94 342.08 ± 126.15
Second month 68.91 ± 33.30 22.10 ± 36.52 50.19 ± 28.24 46.62 ± 22.31 56.74 ± 20.91 56.80 ± 24.67 37.68 ± 37.88 60.64 ± 23.37 396.23 ± 132.45
Third month 72.06 ± 20.83 32.72 ± 46.97 55.54 ± 31.56 44.71 ± 17.94 57.21 ± 19.91 61.40 ± 19.64 43.14 ± 37.79 60.84 ± 23.84 427.95 ± 125.74
Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: BP, Bodily pain; GH, General health; MH, Mental health; PF, Physical function; RE, Role emotional; RP, Role physical; SF, Social functioning; VT, Vitality.

Next, univariate analysis was used to identify factors that influenced the difference between the total scores of the third and first months after the operation. (Table 3) Those factors with a p‐value of<.05 were included in multivariate regression analysis, including educational experience, monthly income and physical discomfort. After excluding the confounding factor, we noticed that monthly income had a considerable impact on the quality of life after operation (both p < .05), while higher monthly income led to better postoperative quality of life. (Table 4).

TABLE 3.

Univariate analysis of total scores between the first and third month after operation

Variable Regression coefficient SE t p
Age 1.580 2.543 0.620 .537
Educational experience (control group: under high school) 110.224 41.100 2.680 .009
Menstruation condition (control group: menopause)
Normal 24.691 61.808 0.400 .691
Disorder 23.302 64.587 0.360 .719
Mood (control group: stable) −59.386 45.970 −1.290 .201
Physical discomfort (control group: no) 131.775 64.567 2.040 .045
Payment (control group: self‐paying) −56.673 75.308 −0.750 .454
Monthly income 68.865 25.977 2.650 .010
Employed condition (control group: no) 5.671 9.783 0.580 .564
Chronic diseases (control group: yes) −11.144 44.009 −0.250 .801
Clinical staging (control group: I) −24.251 23.676 −1.02 .309
Open in a new tab

TABLE 4.

Multivariate regression analysis of influence factors for life quality after operation

Variable Parameter estimation SE F p
Educational experience (control group: under high school) 72.541 43.382 1.67 .099
Physical discomfort (control group: no) 78.756 65.273 1.21 .232
Monthly income 54.537 25.903 2.11 .039
Open in a new tab

4. DISCUSSION

As one of the most common gynecological cancers, a growing number of studies have focused on the quality of life in patients with endometrial carcinoma, especially in the perioperative period, although most of them were cross‐sectional studies. Similar to our study, Ferrandina (Ferrandina et al., 2014) and Zandbergen (Zandbergen et al., 2019) have reported quality of life in endometrial carcinoma patients, with a follow‐up of up to 24 months. Nevertheless, there are no reports on short‐term postoperative quality of life in endometrial carcinoma patients. Differ from previous long‐term studies, endometrial carcinoma patients in our study would return to hospital for repeated adjuvant treatment within a short period of time after surgery. During this period, the postoperative follow‐up by interacting and communicating with doctors and nurses for appropriate intervention and guidance was beneficial to patients. In this study, we found that the quality of life in endometrial carcinoma patients within the first month postoperatively was significantly lower than that in the second and third months, and the monthly income was positively correlated with their postoperative quality of life.

Nowadays, the treatment of endometrial cancer is developing. Staging operation followed by adjuvant treatments including but not limited to chemotherapy and radiotherapy have been widely applied (Amant et al., 2018; Lu & Broaddus, 2020). Within the first month postoperatively, endometrial cancer patients not only experienced physiological pain caused by the operation itself, but also the powerlessness owing to the inability to self‐care and unknown pathological results. In some situations, adjuvant treatments especially chemotherapy are performed right after operation, usually within 1 month (Lu & Broaddus, 2020). For most of endometrial cancer patients, the sequential burden of operation and chemotherapy in a short period of time can lead to a significant decrease in quality of life, including but not limited to pain, postoperative weakness, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, myelosuppression and alopecia caused by chemotherapeutic drugs (Lorusso et al., 2017; Shiozawa et al., 2013). As a result, health education and psychological counselling are highlighted for their importance to improve quality of life. Previously, studies have thoroughly demonstrated the importance of pre‐operative education (Kruzik, 2009; O'Brien et al., 2013). Besides, the management of physical and psychological problems during the immediate postoperative phase might improve satisfaction with the surgery experience, and decrease complications and length of hospital stay (Ramesh et al., 2017). Learn from previous experiences, disease‐related knowledge and comprehensive pre‐operative education should be propagated by nurses to help patients better prepare for postoperative challenges. Additionally, nurses can encourage them to communicate with other patients and build up their confidence by telling some success stories. Moreover, comfortable physical and psychological postoperative care need to be provided by nurses to help patients recover quickly. As previously described (Knols et al., 2005; Spence et al., 2010), nurses can also schedule postoperative rehabilitative treatment regimens according to individualized self‐care abilities and encourage patients to perform appropriate physical exercises according to their own status, which can not only prevent postoperative complications, but also increase their confidence during recovery. Furthermore, family members should be actively and seriously involved in. It is demonstrated that family support is of great significance to dissipate the anxiety of the patient and enhance the outcomes of postoperative rehabilitation (Cardoso‐Moreno & Tomás‐Aragones, 2017; Fang et al., 2017). Communicating with family members is imperatively given because a close relationship to the patient helps to enhance the optimism and confidence. Family members can encourage patients to accept the actual facts about their physical health, improve their psychological status and compliance to the treatment regimen (Fang et al., 2017). Support from family members can also satisfy their physical and mental needs, contribute to a quick postoperative recovery and improve their quality of life (Zhu et al., 2018). Eventually, patients would gradually embrace the pain caused by their condition and take the resolution to start their new life, which is conductive to an immense boost in their quality of life.

We also noticed that the monthly income of patients plays an important role in their postoperative quality of life. This finding is consistent with the results reported by earlier studies (Blackburn et al., 2019; Jansen van Rensburg et al., 2017; Yilmaz et al., 2017). Endometrial cancer is a financially draining disease with a long duration, and many patients incur a tremendous economic burden while overcoming this disease. Patients with better financial conditions tend to display a greater degree of self‐determination, such as using expensive drugs with fewer side effects or choosing appropriate treatments on their own, which may remarkably improve their quality of life. Conversely, patients with poor incomes may experience more toxicity and psychological pressure, seriously reducing their quality of life (Group, 2017). Besides, poverty forces people to focus on money rather than their health and makes them miss the ideal treatment time and increase treatment‐related costs. Consequently, we need to pay more attention to patients with lower incomes. Side effects and complications should be recognized and prevented earlier to avoid unnecessary expenses. Likewise, more psychological guidance should be provided during chemotherapy to solve concerns and prompt recovery.

Agreed to previous studies (Kim & Kim, 2017; Wang et al., 2018), educational experience is also a principal factor influencing quality of life in cancer patients. In routine clinical practice, establishing a good communication with patients enables them to gain more health knowledge of their conditions and effectively reduce the psychological burden, which can obviously improve their quality of life. The educational level is positively correlated with the understanding of the disease and an active psychological construction to face the cancer. While conducting postoperative health education, doctors and nurses should adequately assess the learning and acceptance ability of patients. Postoperative health education should be performed differently for patients with low educational levels through increasing the frequency to strengthen their memory, and carrying out innovative methods such as instant messaging services or online meetings to promote their recovery. Pamphlets using simple language and comprehensible images can also be used (Wilson, 2011). The role of family members and communities should be highlighted while providing these patients’ health education (Cardoso‐Moreno & Tomás‐Aragones, 2017). Support from families and friends can further deepen the understanding of health education and help them face the disease better, which can improve their quality of life.

Similarly, univariate analysis also revealed that physical discomfort may reduce patients’ quality of life. As mentioned before, patients undergoing chemotherapy may suffer from different kinds of physical discomfort such as nausea, vomiting, choking sensation in the chest, dyspnoea and palpitation, which significantly influence their quality of life (Del Pozzo‐Magaña et al., 2015; Lorusso et al., 2017; Shiozawa et al., 2013). These physical sensations can lead to pessimism, despair and even rejection to treatment. Even though the available treatment strategies for endometrial cancer keep improving and postoperative quality of life in patients undergoing laparoscopic resection is significantly higher than in those treated by laparotomy, the physical discomfort caused by treatment still greatly affects patients’ daily life (de Boer et al., 2016). These potential adverse reactions greatly affect patients’ enthusiasm for follow‐up treatment. Doctors and nurses should give patients more information about the potential side effects before treatment such as myelosuppression or alopecia following chemotherapy. Most importantly, great changes in personal appearance will increase patients’ psychological burden and affect their daily life, especially young women. Hence, it is necessary to provide patients with detailed explanations regarding the causes and solutions to hair loss after chemotherapy. Assisting patients to prepare headscarves or wigs may equally help them to eliminate the unpleasant feeling from alopecia, reduce their anxiety and help them make through the follow‐up chemotherapy treatments. Moreover, the creation of non‐nausea and vomiting wards may alleviate patients’ anxiety and relieve their discomfort. In order to distract patients and enable them to have some fun, nurses can also utilize some individual nursing methodologies such as music therapy (Bradt et al., 2016), relaxation therapy (Sun et al., 2017) and psychological guidance.

In daily clinical work, most nurses bear a heavy working pressure. The California government signed a legislation and stipulated that in oncology wards, one nurse should be responsible for no more than four patients at the same time (Coffman et al., 2002; Spetz, 2004). However, an observation study showed that in high‐level general hospitals of China, a nurse usually takes care of eight patients during the day and even twenty‐three patients at night on average (Shen et al., 2020). Busy daily work will inevitably lead to the lack of care for every patient. In our study, we systematically analysed the postoperative quality of life of endometrial cancer patients within a short period of time. This longitudinal study for the first time helps nurses fully understand different requirements of endometrial cancer patients in different postoperative periods, and instruct nurses to provide proper and targeted care for patients. It not only effectively improves the quality of nursing care and patient satisfaction, but also enhances patients’ satisfaction and quality of life by preventing adverse events. Our results provide clinical references for practical nursing care of patients with endometrial cancer or other types of cancer.

As could be expected, this study also has some limitations. First of all, all the data were obtained via a self‐report questionnaire, and measurement errors caused by subjective factors may exist. Second, only 69 participants were included in our study. Finally, this study's participants were all from China, which implies that the results should be extrapolated cautiously. In future research, more longitudinal studies focusing on the patients’ quality of life should be conducted and more evidence for clinical care should be made available.

5. CONCLUSION

In summary, doctors and nurses should pay more attention to patients’ quality of life in the first month after endometrial cancer operation, especially patients with lower income, lower educational level and physical discomfort. We can fully utilize psychological counselling and humanistic care, help patients fully understand the disease and coordinate to treatment positively, relax patients and increase their confidence again. In addition, the important role of family members should also be taken seriously.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None declared.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Yao Shuzhong and Mo Yinglei contributed to the division of labour in the research group. Chen Jiebin contributed to the design of project. Chen Jiebin, Liu Xiaochen and Chen Minxuan contributed to the writing of draft. Ding Sha contributed to recording the content of the meeting and making a questionnaire. Zou Qiaojian contributed to data statistics.

ETHICAL APPROVAL

Research Ethics Committee approval for this study was obtained from Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat‐sen University. The approval included the participant information sheet and informed consent form signed by all participants.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank all patients who participated in this study. We also express the deepest appreciation to all colleagues giving help for data collection and proofreading the article.

Chen J, Zou Q, Chen X, et al. Quality of life in patients with endometrial carcinoma: A Longitudinal Study. Nurs Open. 2022;9:1815–1821. 10.1002/nop2.927

Jiebing Chen and Qiaojian Zou contributed equally to this work.

Funding information

Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong (No: 2015A020210041)

Contributor Information

Yinglei Mo, Email: gzmoyinglei@163.com.

Shuzhong Yao, Email: yszlfy@163.com.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to patient privacy reasons.

REFERENCES

  1. Amant, F. , Mirza, M. R. , Koskas, M. , & Creutzberg, C. L. (2018). Cancer of the corpus uteri. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 143(Suppl 2), 37–50. 10.1002/ijgo.12612 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blackburn, B. E. , Soisson, S. , Rowe, K. , Snyder, J. , Fraser, A. , Deshmukh, V. , Newman, M. , Smith, K. , Herget, K. , Kirchhoff, A. C. , Kepka, D. , Werner, T. L. , Gaffney, D. , Mooney, K. , & Hashibe, M. (2019). Prognostic factors for rural endometrial cancer patients in a population‐based cohort. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 921. 10.1186/s12889-019-7262-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bradt, J. , Dileo, C. , Magill, L. , & Teague, A. (2016). Music interventions for improving psychological and physical outcomes in cancer patients. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (8), CD006911. 10.1002/14651858.CD006911.pub3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bray, F. , Ferlay, J. , Soerjomataram, I. , Siegel, R. L. , Torre, L. A. , & Jemal, A. (2018). Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 68(6), 394–424. 10.3322/caac.21492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cardoso‐Moreno, M. J. , & Tomás‐Aragones, L. (2017). The influence of perceived family support on post surgery recovery. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 22(1), 121–128. 10.1080/13548506.2016.1153680 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Coffman, J. M. , Seago, J. A. , & Spetz, J. (2002). Minimum nurse‐to‐patient ratios in acute care hospitals in California. Health Affairs, 21(5), 53–64. 10.1377/hlthaff.21.5.53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. de Boer, S. M. , Powell, M. E. , Mileshkin, L. , Katsaros, D. , Bessette, P. , Haie‐Meder, C. , Ottevanger, P. B. , Ledermann, J. A. , Khaw, P. , Colombo, A. , Fyles, A. , Baron, M.‐H. , Kitchener, H. C. , Nijman, H. W. , Kruitwagen, R. F. , Nout, R. A. , Verhoeven‐Adema, K. W. , Smit, V. T. , Putter, H. , & Creutzberg, C. L. (2016). Toxicity and quality of life after adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for women with high‐risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC‐3): An open‐label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology, 17(8), 1114–1126. 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30120-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Del Pozzo‐Magaña, B. R. , Rieder, M. J. , & Lazo‐Langner, A. (2015). Quality of life in children with adverse drug reactions: A narrative and systematic review. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 80(4), 827–833. 10.1111/bcp.12423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fang, Y. , Tao, Q. , Zhou, X. , Chen, S. , Huang, J. , Jiang, Y. , Wu, Y. I. , Chen, L. , Tao, J. , & Chan, C. C. (2017). Patient and family member factors influencing outcomes of poststroke inpatient rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 98(2), 249–255.e2. 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Faria, S. C. , Devine, C. E. , Rao, B. , Sagebiel, T. , & Bhosale, P. (2019). Imaging and staging of endometrial cancer. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MR, 40(4), 287–294. 10.1053/j.sult.2019.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ferguson, S. E. , Panzarella, T. , Lau, S. , Gien, L. T. , Samouëlian, V. , Giede, C. , Steed, H. , Le, T. , Renkosinski, B. , & Bernardini, M. Q. (2018). Prospective cohort study comparing quality of life and sexual health outcomes between women undergoing robotic, laparoscopic and open surgery for endometrial cancer. Gynecologic Oncology, 149(3), 476–483. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.04.558 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ferrandina, G. , Petrillo, M. , Mantegna, G. , Fuoco, G. , Terzano, S. , Venditti, L. , Marcellusi, A. , De Vincenzo, R. , & Scambia, G. (2014). Evaluation of quality of life and emotional distress in endometrial cancer patients: A 2‐year prospective, longitudinal study. Gynecologic Oncology, 133(3), 518–525. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.03.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Group A. S . (2017). Health‐related quality of life and psychological distress among cancer survivors in Southeast Asia: Results from a longitudinal study in eight low‐ and middle‐income countries. BMC Medicine, 15(1), 10. 10.1186/s12916-016-0768-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jansen van Rensburg, J. J. M. , Maree, J. E. , & Casteleijn, D. (2017). An Investigation into the quality of life of cancer patients in South Africa. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing, 4(4), 336–341. 10.4103/apjon.apjon_41_17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kim, K. , & Kim, J. S. (2017). Factors influencing health‐related quality of life among Korean cancer survivors. Psycho‐Oncology, 26(1), 81–87. 10.1002/pon.4105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Knols, R. , Aaronson, N. K. , Uebelhart, D. , Fransen, J. , & Aufdemkampe, G. (2005). Physical exercise in cancer patients during and after medical treatment: A systematic review of randomized and controlled clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23(16), 3830–3842. 10.1200/jco.2005.02.148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kruzik, N. (2009). Benefits of preoperative education for adult elective surgery patients. AORN Journal, 90(3), 381–387. 10.1016/j.aorn.2009.06.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lortet‐Tieulent, J. , Ferlay, J. , Bray, F. , & Jemal, A. (2018). International patterns and trends in endometrial cancer incidence, 1978–2013. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 110(4), 354–361. 10.1093/jnci/djx214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lorusso, D. , Bria, E. , Costantini, A. , Di Maio, M. , Rosti, G. , & Mancuso, A. (2017). Patients' perception of chemotherapy side effects: Expectations, doctor‐patient communication and impact on quality of life ‐ An Italian survey. European Journal of Cancer Care, 26(2), e12618. 10.1111/ecc.12618 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lu, K. H. , & Broaddus, R. R. (2020). Endometrial Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 383(21), 2053–2064. 10.1056/NEJMra1514010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. O'Brien, L. , McKeough, C. , & Abbasi, R. (2013). Pre‐surgery education for elective cardiac surgery patients: A survey from the patient's perspective. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 60(6), 404–409. 10.1111/1440-1630.12068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Panzini, R. G. , Mosqueiro, B. P. , Zimpel, R. R. , Bandeira, D. R. , Rocha, N. S. , & Fleck, M. P. (2017). Quality‐of‐life and spirituality. International Review of Psychiatry, 29(3), 263–282. 10.1080/09540261.2017.1285553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ramesh, C. , Nayak, B. S. , Pai, V. B. , Patil, N. T. , George, A. , George, L. S. , & Devi, E. S. (2017). Effect of preoperative education on postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing, 32(6), 518–529.e2. 10.1016/j.jopan.2016.11.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Robertson, M. C. , Lyons, E. J. , Song, J. , Cox‐Martin, M. , Li, Y. , Green, C. E. , Pinto, B. M. , Carmack, C. L. , Harrison, C. , Baum, G. , & Basen‐Engquist, K. M. (2019). Change in physical activity and quality of life in endometrial cancer survivors receiving a physical activity intervention. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 17(1), 91. 10.1186/s12955-019-1154-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Salehi, S. , Brandberg, Y. , Åvall‐Lundqvist, E. , Suzuki, C. , Johansson, H. , Legerstam, B. , & Falconer, H. (2018). Long‐term quality of life after comprehensive surgical staging of high‐risk endometrial cancer ‐ results from the RASHEC trial. Acta Oncologica, 57(12), 1671–1676. 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1521987 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Shen, Y. , Jian, W. , Zhu, Q. , Li, W. , Shang, W. , & Yao, L. (2020). Nurse staffing in large general hospitals in China: An observational study. Human Resources for Health, 18(1), 3. 10.1186/s12960-020-0446-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Shiozawa, T. , Tadokoro, J.‐I. , Fujiki, T. , Fujino, K. , Kakihata, K. , Masatani, S. , Morita, S. , Gemma, A. , & Boku, N. (2013). Risk factors for severe adverse effects and treatment‐related deaths in Japanese patients treated with irinotecan‐based chemotherapy: A postmarketing survey. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 43(5), 483–491. 10.1093/jjco/hyt040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Shisler, R. , Sinnott, J. A. , Wang, V. , Hebert, C. , Salani, R. , & Felix, A. S. (2018). Life after endometrial cancer: A systematic review of patient‐reported outcomes. Gynecologic Oncology, 148(2), 403–413. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.11.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Skevington, S. M. (2002). Advancing cross‐cultural research on quality of life: Observations drawn from the WHOQOL development. World Health Organisation quality of life assessment. Quality of Life Research, 11(2), 135–144. 10.1023/a:1015013312456 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Spence, R. R. , Heesch, K. C. , & Brown, W. J. (2010). Exercise and cancer rehabilitation: A systematic review. Cancer Treatment Reviews, 36(2), 185–194. 10.1016/j.ctrv.2009.11.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Spetz, J. (2004). California's minimum nurse‐to‐patient ratios: The first few months. Journal of Nursing Administration, 34(12), 571–578. 10.1097/00005110-200412000-00007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sun, F. K. , Hung, C. M. , Yao, Y. , Lu, C. Y. , & Chiang, C. Y. (2017). The effects of muscle relaxation and therapeutic walking on depression, suicidal ideation, and quality of life in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Cancer Nursing, 40(6), E39–E48. 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000458 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wang, L. E. , Shi, J.‐F. , Zhu, J. , Huang, H.‐Y. , Bai, Y.‐N. , Liu, G.‐X. , Liao, X.‐Z. , Mao, A.‐Y. , Ren, J.‐S. , Sun, X.‐J. , Guo, L.‐W. , Fang, Y. I. , Zhou, Q. I. , Ma, H.‐M. , Xing, X.‐J. , Zhu, L. , Song, B.‐B. , Du, L.‐B. , Mai, L. , … Dai, M. (2018). Health‐related quality of life and utility scores of patients with breast neoplasms in China: A multicenter cross‐sectional survey. The Breast, 39, 53–62. 10.1016/j.breast.2018.03.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ware, J. E. Jr , & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36‐item short‐form health survey (SF‐36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wilson, L. D. (2011). Developing low‐literacy health education materials for women. MCN: the American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 36(4), 246–251. 10.1097/NMC.0b013e3182183bbd [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Yilmaz, M. S. , Piyal, B. , & Akdur, R. (2017). Social support and quality of life in a group of cancer patients (Ankara, Turkey). Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 47(3), 732–737. 10.3906/sag-1508-42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zandbergen, N. , de Rooij, B. H. , Vos, M. C. , Pijnenborg, J. M. A. , Boll, D. , Kruitwagen, R. F. P. M. , van de Poll‐Franse, L. V. , & Ezendam, N. P. M. (2019). Changes in health‐related quality of life among gynecologic cancer survivors during the two years after initial treatment: A longitudinal analysis. Acta Oncologica, 58(5), 790–800. 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1560498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhu, L. , Yao, J. , Schroevers, M. J. , Zhang, H. , Xie, J. , Liu, A. , Fleer, J. , Ranchor, A. V. , & Song, Z. (2018). Patterns of unmet supportive needs and relationship to quality of life in Chinese cancer patients. Psycho‐Oncology, 27(2), 600–606. 10.1002/pon.4554 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to patient privacy reasons.

Articles from Nursing Open are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES