Skip to main content
The Neurohospitalist logoLink to The Neurohospitalist
. 2022 Jan 3;12(2):366–370. doi: 10.1177/19418744211068913

5-Fluorouracil Neurotoxicity in the Absence of Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Deficiency Case Report

Rebecca Jules 1,*, Arushi Thaper 2,*, Ryan Foster 2, Pouya Ameli 3, Christopher Robinson 3, Michael Pizzi 3, Marc-Alain Babi 3, Carolina B Maciel 3, Katharina M Busl 3, Raju Reddy 4, William Roth 3,
PMCID: PMC8995622  PMID: 35419161

Abstract

5 fluorouracil (5-FU)-related neurotoxicity is a rare and severe complication of 5-FU administration. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency is associated with an increased risk of serious adverse reactions due to its role in 5-FU metabolism. We report a case of acute reversible neurotoxicity with global areas of diffusion restriction in a patient with colorectal adenocarcinoma being treated with leucovorin calcium, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) without DPD deficiency following uridine triacetate administration.

Keywords: status epilepticus, neurotoxicity, 5 fluorouracil, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, case report

Introduction

5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is a pyrimidine metabolite commonly used to treat solid malignancies including gastrointestinal, breast, head, and neck cancers. 5-FU-related neurotoxicity is rare and often presents with confusion, agitation, ataxia, seizure, and coma.1-3 Treatment regimens incorporating 5-FU may be given intravenously as a bolus or as a continuous infusion. While intravenous medication is rapidly metabolized by the liver in 15–20 minutes, continuous infusion may increase the risk of 5-FU toxicity and in particular, neurotoxicity, due to errors in device programming and device malfunction. 1 Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency has also been associated with an increased risk of serious adverse reactions following 5-FU administration as the enzyme is responsible for metabolizing the drug.4,5 Characteristic brain MRI findings in 5-FU neurotoxicity include diffuse high-intensity T2 lesions that exhibit diffusion restriction in the deep cerebral white matter and corpus callosum. 6 Herein, we report a case of acute reversible neurotoxicity with global areas of diffusion restriction in a patient with colorectal adenocarcinoma being treated with leucovorin calcium, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) in the absence of DPD deficiency. We obtained informed consent from the patient’s surrogate decision-maker for this case report.

Results

A 67-year-old woman with stage III chronic kidney disease and newly diagnosed stage III colorectal cancer presented to the emergency department (ED) with generalized tonic-clonic (GTC) seizures. One day before admission, she started FOLFOX, a chemotherapy regimen containing oxaliplatin (98 mg), leucovorin (600 mg), and 5-FU (400 mg/m2). She was prescribed a 48 hour continuous 5-FU home infusion (total dose 3600 mg). Within 24 hours of the infusion, she became restless and complained of chest pressure and a headache. Shortly after the onset of symptoms, she developed generalized convulsions and her husband brought her to the ED.

Emergency Department Course and Admission

On presentation to the ED, our patient was normotensive, normoxic, tachycardic with a heart rate of 147, and tachypneic with a respiratory rate of 29. On physical exam, her eyes opened spontaneously and exhibited a left gaze deviation. She made incomprehensible noises and her level of responsiveness fluctuated between a Glasgow coma scale 3 and 10. There was no ataxia present on her exam. She otherwise had no focal neurological deficits. Shortly after her initial exam, her tachypnea worsened, she became hypoxic, and experienced a GTC seizure. She received 4 mg of intravenous midazolam and was intubated for airway protection. Subsequently, she was given 2 g of levetiracetam and started on continuous infusions of midazolam and propofol. Initial labs showed mild anemia with a hemoglobin of 11.7 g/dL, metabolic acidosis with a bicarbonate 13 mmol/L, worsening kidney function with blood urea nitrogen of 37 mg/dL and creatinine 2.21 mg/dL (patient’s baseline 2.00 mg/dL). The remainder of the metabolic panel, liver function tests, cardiac enzymes, procalcitonin, and coagulation studies were unremarkable. A non-contrast computed tomography (CT) scan of her head revealed no acute intracranial abnormalities. Her chest X-ray showed multifocal infiltrates; therefore, she was started on vancomycin, cefepime, and metronidazole out of concern for aspiration pneumonia. She was admitted to the intensive care unit for further management for further work-up for seizures.

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) studies, including paraneoplastic panel and viral polymerase chain reaction testing for varicella-zoster virus, herpes-simplex virus, human herpesvirus 6, Epstein–Barr virus, and enterovirus were negative (Table 1). Vitamin B12 and folate levels were normal. Autoimmune testing revealed a normal cyclic citrullinated peptide, anti-nuclear antibody and complement 4 (C4), a marginally elevated rheumatoid factor 19 IU/ml, and slightly decreased complement 3 (C3) at 82 mg/dL. Continuous EEG demonstrated non-convulsive status epilepticus characterized by frequent evolving left occipital lateralized periodic discharges and >2.5 Hz multifocal epileptiform discharges in the frontopolar, frontotemporal, and posterior temporal leads. MRI of the brain showed multifocal areas of restricted diffusion and high T2 signal in the bilateral frontal cortices, corpus callosum, bilateral corticospinal tracts, and deep white matter of centrum semiovale consistent with a toxic etiology (Figure 1(A)). Genetic testing was negative for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase mutation.

Table 1.

Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Studies.

CSF Cell Count Appearance Clear
WBCs 1
RBC 0
Xanthochromia Xanthochromia absent
CSF chemistries Protein 27 (15–45 MG/DL)
Glucose 108 (40–70 MG/DL)
CSF culture and Gram stain Culture result No Growth
Gram stain No organisms seen
CSF meningitis encephalitis panel PCR panel Negative
Escherichia coli K1
Haemophilus influenzae
Listeria monocytogenes
Neisseria meningitidis
Streptococcus agalactiae
Streptococcus pneumoniae
Cytomegalovirus
Enterovirus
Herpes simplex virus 1
Herpes simplex virus 2
Human herpesvirus 6
Human parechovirus
Varicella zoster virus
Cryptococcus neoformans/gattii
Enterovirus
Other studies CSF St Louis IgM Negative
CSF aspergillus galactomannan Not detected
HSV 1/2 DNA PCR .02 (.00-<.50)
CSF cytology No evidence of malignancy in this specimen Not detected
CSF flow cytometry Limited flow cytometric analysis detects 54.35% lymphocytes by CD45 expression and side light scatter
Rare CD19/CD20 (+) B cells are detected (1.3% of viable leukocytes) with polyclonal kappa/lambda light chain expression

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

A. Diffusion-weighted imaging sequence showing areas of diffusion restriction in the centrum semiovale, thalami, and corpus callosum. B. Diffusion-weighted imaging sequence demonstrating resolution of diffusion restricting lesions.

Differential Diagnoses

Common causes of seizures include central nervous system infections, electrolyte abnormalities, alcohol withdrawal, and acute intracranial processes such as cerebral hemorrhage, ischemic strokes, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, and medication toxicity. Uncommon etiologies include thrombotic events secondary to hypercoagulable disorders, such as cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, autoimmune conditions, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, or paraneoplastic processes. Given her history, MRI findings, and negative work-up for other etiologies, 5-FU neurotoxicity was determined the likeliest possibility.

Treatment

The patient remained in super-refractory non-convulsive status epilepticus for several days despite aggressive medical management with anesthetics and anti-seizure drugs (ASDs). She required 7 ASDs for seizure control including lacosamide, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, pregabalin, and continuous midazolam and ketamine infusions (Figure 2). On hospital day 3, she received uridine triacetate, FDA approved antidote for 5-FU toxicity and received a total of 20 doses. On hospital day 9, she started a 5-day course of high-dose methylprednisolone empirically while the paraneoplastic panel was pending. Repeat brain MRI on day 10 revealed complete resolution of areas of diffusion restriction and high T2 signal (Figure 1(B)) and resolution of status epilepticus. She was gradually weaned off ketamine, midazolam, levetiracetam, and lacosamide over several weeks with gradual but significant improvement in her level of alertness and cognition. She was discharged on oxcarbazepine, perampanel, and pregabalin (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Medications timeline during admission

Outcome and Follow Up

At 29 days, she was discharged to a skilled nursing facility to continue her physical rehabilitation. Upon discharge, she was seizure-free, awake and alert, oriented to self, date, and location. She regained her ability to speak and followed simple commands. Two days following discharge, she required brief readmission for recurrent seizure activity due to transient hyponatremia attributed to oxcarbazepine. The medical team discontinued oxcarbazepine and pregabalin and transitioned her to a regimen of levetiracetam, phenytoin, and perampanel. She was discharged back to the prior skilled nursing facility after 6-day inpatient readmission to continue her recovery.

Discussion

5-FU-associated encephalopathy is a diagnosis of exclusion and requires a temporal relationship between drug administration and the onset of symptoms. The onset of encephalopathy varies from 10 to 30 hours from the start of high-dose 5-fluorouracil infusion. 7 Our patient’s symptoms started within the first 24 hours of the start of drug infusion. An extensive work-up was performed to rule out other causes of encephalopathy.

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is responsible for breaking down over 80% of administered 5-FU. 8 Therefore, a deficiency in DPD increases the risk of fatal complications associated with 5-FU. Our patient tested negative for DPD mutations, but it remains possible she harbored a genetic variant not accounted for in the genetic testing panel. Other known risk factors include mutations in the orotate phosphoribosyltransferase and thymidylate synthase genes, high doses of 5-FU, renal failure, and concomitant use of leucovorin as it increases the intracellular concentration of 5-FU.9-11 Our patient received 400 mg/m2 of 5-FU and was discharged home on a 3600 mg infusion to be administered over the next 48 hours. We suspect her neurotoxicity resulted from concomitant leucovorin use and renal failure increasing her effective 5-FU dose.

Additionally, recognizing the imaging findings associated with 5-FU toxicity is imperative for early diagnosis and timely treatment. CT often shows symmetrical periventricular hypoattenuation. T2 weighted MRI is more sensitive, and findings include diffuse high-intensity signal in the white matter and corpus callosum, similar to this patient’s MRI findings. 6

The critical steps in managing 5-FU toxicity are prompt discontinuation of the drug and administration of uridine triacetate. Uridine triacetate inhibits fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate, an active metabolite of 5-FU, which is responsible for inducing cellular apoptosis. Uridine triacetate has emerged as a highly efficacious treatment for 5-FU toxicity.12,13 The recommended dose is 10 g orally every 6 hours for a total of 20 doses. 13 Our patient was treated within 72 hours of exposure and received 20 doses. We noted clinical improvement on day 8 when she began to follow commands.

5-FU is one of the most widely used chemotherapeutic regimens to date, and clinicians must be aware of its neurotoxicity, clinical presentation, imaging findings, and management. DPD deficiency increases the risk of 5FU toxicity but it can occur even in the presence of normal DPD levels and activity such as in cases of renal failure and concomitant use of leucovorin. Uridine triacetate should be started immediately as prompt treatment is associated with rapid recovery.

Patient’s Perspective

Excerpt from phone call with patient: “This whole experience was a shock to my system! Never in a million years would I have thought this would have happened to me. I had to learn to walk again and slowly regained all my strength. It took about 6 months to get back to my full self again after the hospitalization. I am now walking, cleaning, cooking, shopping, and doing everything I used to do. I have not had any seizures since the hospitalizations and I have been driving small distances. I feel like I even have more energy now and new perspective; I do not sweat the small stuff. I was glad to hear I did not have the DPD mutation because I have a daughter. I am hoping writing about this can help others with my condition.”

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Rebecca Jules https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4619-6673

References

  • 1.Fluorouracil Error Ends Tragically, But Application of Lessons Learned Will Save. Institute for Safe Medication Practices; 2007. Accessed November, 11, 2020 [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ki SS, Jeong JM, Kim SH, et al. A case of neurotoxicity following 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Korean J Intern Med Mar. 2002;17(1):73-77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Acharya G, Cruz Carreras MT, Rice TW. 5-FU-induced leukoencephalopathy with reversible lesion of splenium of corpus callosum in a patient with colorectal cancer. BMJ Case Rep. 2017;2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Morrison GB, Bastian A, Dela Rosa T, Diasio RB, Takimoto CH. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency: a pharmacogenetic defect causing severe adverse reactions to 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1997;24(1):83-88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Takimoto CH, Lu ZH, Zhang R, et al. Severe neurotoxicity following 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in a patient with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency. Clin Cancer Res Mar. 1996;2(3):477-481. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Akitake R, Miyamoto S, Nakamura F, et al. Early detection of 5-FU-induced acute leukoencephalopathy on diffusion-weighted MRI. Jpn J Clin Oncol Jan. 2011;41(1):121-124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yeh KH, Cheng AL. High-dose 5-fluorouracil infusional therapy is associated with hyperammonaemia, lactic acidosis and encephalopathy. Br J Cancer. 1997;75(3):464-465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Heggie GD, Sommadossi JP, Cross DS, Huster WJ, Diasio RB. Clinical pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil and its metabolites in plasma, urine, and bile. Cancer Res. Apr 15. 1987;47(8):2203-2206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ichikawa W, Takahashi T, Suto K, Sasaki Y, Hirayama R. Orotate phosphoribosyltransferase gene polymorphism predicts toxicity in patients treated with bolus 5-fluorouracil regimen. Clin Cancer Res Jul. 2006;12(13):3928-3934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang B, Walsh SJ, Saif MW. Pancytopenia and severe gastrointestinal toxicities associated with 5-fluorouracil in a patient with thymidylate synthase (TYMS) polymorphism. Cureus. Sep. 2016;8(9):e798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Danenberg PV, Gustavsson B, Johnston P, et al. Folates as adjuvants to anticancer agents: chemical rationale and mechanism of action. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016;106:118-131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ma WW, Saif MW, El-Rayes BF, et al. Emergency use of uridine triacetate for the prevention and treatment of life-threatening 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine toxicity. Cancer. 2017;123(2):345-356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ison G, Beaver JA, McGuinn WD, Jr., et al. FDA approval: uridine triacetate for the treatment of patients following fluorouracil or capecitabine overdose or exhibiting early-onset severe toxicities following administration of these drugs. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(18):4545-4549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Neurohospitalist are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES