Abstract
Human peripheral neuropathies are poorly understood, and the availability of experimental models limits further research. The PeriTox test uses immature dorsal root ganglia (DRG)-like neurons, derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC), to assess cell death and neurite damage. Here, we explored the suitability of matured peripheral neuron cultures for the detection of sub-cytotoxic endpoints, such as altered responses of pain-related P2X receptors. A two-step differentiation protocol, involving the transient expression of ectopic neurogenin-1 (NGN1) allowed for the generation of homogeneous cultures of sensory neurons. After >38 days of differentiation, they showed a robust response (Ca2+-signaling) to the P2X3 ligand α,β-methylene ATP. The clinical proteasome inhibitor bortezomib abolished the P2X3 signal at ≥5 nM, while 50–200 nM was required in the PeriTox test to identify neurite damage and cell death. A 24 h treatment with low nM concentrations of bortezomib led to moderate increases in resting cell intracellular Ca2+ concentration but signaling through transient receptor potential V1 (TRPV1) receptors or depolarization-triggered Ca2+ influx remained unaffected. We interpreted the specific attenuation of purinergic signaling as a functional cell stress response. A reorganization of tubulin to form dense structures around the cell somata confirmed a mild, non-cytotoxic stress triggered by low concentrations of bortezomib. The proteasome inhibitors carfilzomib, delanzomib, epoxomicin, and MG-132 showed similar stress responses. Thus, the model presented here may be used for the profiling of new proteasome inhibitors in regard to their side effect (neuropathy) potential, or for pharmacological studies on the attenuation of their neurotoxicity. P2X3 signaling proved useful as endpoint to assess potential neurotoxicants in peripheral neurons.
Keywords: nociceptors, purinergic receptor P2X3, peripheral nervous system diseases, bortezomib, proteasome inhibitors
1. Introduction
Models of the human peripheral nervous system are required to better understand why proteasome inhibitors (PIs) cause neuropathies. These drugs target a ubiquitous cellular function (protein degradation via the ubiquitin–proteasome system) and are used clinically to treat multiple myeloma [1,2]. Adverse effects related to sensory neurons and nociceptors are frequent. Clinical and pathological findings include neurite damage [3,4,5,6,7]. However, they are also associated with several neurofunctional defects, including an altered pain regulation [8,9]. Cell culture models for functional impairments are still very scarce.
The first proteasome inhibitor that entered clinics was bortezomib (BTZ). The boronic acid peptide reversibly blocks the chymotrypsin-like protease of the 20S proteasome [10], and it is known to induce severe adverse events in the majority of patients. Peripheral neuropathy is one of the most significant BTZ-related toxicities and affects up to 64% of patients [11,12,13,14]. BTZ-induced peripheral neuropathy (BIPN) affects long sensory neurons and the pain associated with it leads to therapy modification in up to 30% of the patients [12,13,14,15]. Examples for second generation PIs are delanzomib (DLZ), which also belongs to the class of peptide boronic acids, and carfilzomib (CFZ), which is epoxyketone-based. Both PIs exhibit improved neurotoxic profiles, but peripheral neuropathies are still commonly experienced [16,17,18,19,20,21].
Several classes of ion channels (e.g., purinergic (P2X) and transient receptor potential (TRP)) interact to regulate sensory neurons. Purinergic signaling is triggered by the binding of ATP, causing ion channels to open. The subsequent influx of cations, such as Ca2+ and Na+, leads to the depolarization of the cell membrane and the generation of action potentials. In particular, signaling via the purinoceptor P2X3 plays a role in pain perception and neuropathic pain [22,23,24]. P2X3, which is specifically located on the nociceptive neurons of the sensory nervous system [25,26], contributes to the sensation of many types of pain: (i) injury-induced mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia, (ii) inflammation-induced thermal hyperalgesia, and (iii) chemical (formalin)-induced pain behaviour [22,23,27]. A highly complex involvement of P2X3 ion channels in pain perception is suggested by the differential effects of antagonists in various pain models [22,23].
The study of the initial mechanisms and steps leading to BIPN requires human-relevant experimental models of the peripheral nervous system. Some test methods are based on human peripheral neurons derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). They have been mostly used to investigate drug effects on neurite morphology or cell viability [28,29,30,31]. Endpoints like these correlate with events during full-blown BIPN, such as loss of intra-epidermal nerve fibres, alterations in cytoskeletal structure, and impairment of axonal transport [3,4,5,6,7]. The early effects of BTZ are less characterized, but they include aggresome formation (perinuclear accumulation of protein aggregates) [4] and a reorganization of the cytoskeleton in the cell somata [5]. Alterations in sensory signaling may also occur at initial stages. Despite the obvious link between neuropathic pain and abnormalities in nociceptor ion channels, only a few studies have focused on the BTZ-induced impairments of ion channels and signaling [32,33,34]. It is not clear whether such findings from rodent models can be related to clinical situations, as the sensory neurons of humans and other model organisms differ [35,36,37,38]. The use of human cell-based models of neuronal function may bridge this species-extrapolation gap and provide new clues on the mechanisms underlying the initial development of peripheral neuropathies in humans. New insights such as these may allow for the design of targeted drugs for the treatment of peripheral neuropathies. Recent research on neuropathic pain and its pharmacological treatment resulted in the suggestion that compounds such as palmitoylethanolamide (and its derivatives), acetyl-l-carnitine, and berberine may be beneficial [39,40,41,42,43]. Hypotheses such as these may be complemented and advanced by experimental approaches based on human peripheral neurons.
Taking a step in this direction, here we established human iPSC-derived sensory neurons suitable for the study of altered ion channel function. We asked how well human iPSC lines are differentiated towards peripheral neurons and we explored whether transient expression of an NGN1-transgene improved the expression of functional P2X3 receptors. The usefulness of iPSC-derived sensory neuron cultures to assess PI-induced early alterations in signaling and morphology was then investigated. We focused on purinergic signaling as a sensitive endpoint affected by PIs in vitro. In parallel, the microtubule arrangement in cell somata was studied as an indicator of initial morphological stress responses. Our study used a panel of five PIs to study multiple functional adaptations and to identify readouts of cell changes occurring well before signs of general cytotoxicity or a general breakdown of membrane signaling.
2. Results
2.1. Human iPSC-Derived Peripheral Neurons for Toxicity Testing
Three different iPSC lines were differentiated towards peripheral neurons. The objective was to test the general applicability and robustness of a previously established two-step protocol [28,44]. Neuronal precursors were generated and cryopreserved from the iPSC lines SBAD2, Si28, and mciPSC. After thawing and further differentiation, all cells exhibited similar neuronal morphology, neurite growth, and expression of peripheral neuron marker proteins, such as the transcription factors BRN3A and Islet-1 (ISL1), as well as the intermediate filament peripherin (PRPH). Data are displayed here for SBAD2- and Si28-derived neurons, while the process for mciPSC has been previously documented [28] (Figure 1A and Figure S1). Whole transcriptome analysis of three early differentiation stages (day of differentiation (DoD) 1, 4, and 7 after thawing) revealed a development of both SBAD2- and Si28-derived neurons that was highly conserved between replicates, batches, and cell lines (Figure 1B,C). Moreover, the pattern was similar to other pluripotent stem cell lines described previously [28]. The 50 most regulated genes were selected and clustered into: (i) the genes that were upregulated during differentiation, comprising the peripheral markers PRPH, SCN9A, and RET, and (ii) the genes that were downregulated, including markers for neural crest cells (PAX3, TLX2) (Figure 1B). In a principal component analysis (PCA) of the 500 most variable genes, samples of the same differentiation stage clustered closely together, irrespective of their iPSC line origin (Figure 1C). These results confirmed that the protocol originally developed for embryonic stem cells can be broadly applied to generate peripheral neurons. In order to test whether also functional properties were similar, we investigated toxicant sensitivity. The PeriTox test, a well-established screening assay [45,46,47], was used to assess the effects on the neurite area and the cell viability of immature neurons on DoD0. The peripheral neurons of all three iPSC line origins were equally sensitive to a diverse set of peripheral neurotoxicants (taxol, bortezomib, colchicine, and acrylamide) (Figure 1D). The importance of functional testing became evident when so-called peripheral neurons were obtained from a commercial supplier. These cells reacted to colchicine and acrylamide, but they were insensitive to taxol and bortezomib (Figure S2). Thus, these cells showed a neuronal response, as previously described for central neurons [28]. The failure to detect specific peripheral toxicants (taxol, bortezomib) would make such cells unsuitable for many toxicological applications. Taken together, the two-step differentiation protocol evaluated here was found to work for a variety of iPSC lines. The high reproducibility of peripheral neuron differentiation represents an important basis for the reliable identification of neurotoxicants in the PeriTox test. The transcriptome data obtained here provide evidence that the differentiation towards peripheral neurons continues for at least seven days after thawing and would allow for an extension of the test period or a shift of the test window towards a more mature state.
2.2. Need for Novel Test Strategies to Further Improve Sensitivity
Although the PeriTox test has been successfully used to screen for environmental chemicals, an increased sensitivity is desirable for the pre-clinical testing of drugs. To refine the standard PeriTox test, scenarios of prolonged exposure to toxicants at different time points of differentiation were investigated (Figure 2A and Figure S3A). First, a prolonged toxicant exposure time (48 h and 72 h, for DoD0-2 and DoD0-3, respectively) was explored. The sensitivity of neurites to acrylamide, colchicine, and taxol did not change significantly; however, the rate of cell death increased with prolonged incubation time (Figure S3B,D). For bortezomib, the neurite area was more affected by longer exposure times. However, this effect was attributable to the concomitant decrease in cell viability (Figure 2B and Figure S3E). Taken together, these findings meant that the assay became less specific for neurite toxicants. The prediction model for the standard PeriTox test [28,47] requires the specific toxicants to affect neurites at concentrations three times lower than cell viability. This requirement was not met in the prolonged assay (Figure 2C,D).
Next, we explored whether shifting the time window of exposure to a later time point (DoD4-7) would result in more potent neurite toxicity. This was not the case (Figure 2B,D and Figure S4A,B). Moreover, any specificity for neurite effects (relative to general cell death) was lost. Altogether, these results suggest that prolonged toxicant exposure is not a suitable measure to improve the PeriTox test. We concluded that other approaches and new functional endpoints are required for a more sensitive assay for compounds that may trigger peripheral neuropathies.
2.3. Purinergic Signaling as a Functional Feature of iPSC-Derived Sensory Neurons
One of the most important functional changes during peripheral neuropathy is altered pain perception. This suggests that the assessment of pain-related neuronal signals might be a suitable endpoint for peripheral neurotoxicity testing in vitro. To explore this possibility, we set out to generate cultures of peripheral neurons that allowed for the quantification of nociceptor function.
Our preliminary experiments showed that peripheral neurons could be cultured and further matured for at least two months. However, we did not succeed in obtaining robust nociceptor responses suitable for drug screening. For this reason, we introduced an inducible NGN1-transgene into the iPSC line Si28 to generate Si28-NGN1 cells. This strategy has been previously described to enhance nociceptor differentiation [48]; indeed, we found that our two-step protocol, enhanced by induction of NGN1 for a defined time period, led to an improved differentiation. The neurons generated by this protocol (Figure 3A) were already found to be post-mitotic on DoD1 after thawing (Figure 3B and Figure S5A,B). They could be cultured for at least 42 days as a stable neuronal network suitable for single cell observations (Figure 3C and Figure S5C). To characterize the Si28-NGN1-derived neurons, we tested them for the expression of the nociceptor-specific receptors P2X3 and TRPV1. Immunostaining showed that most cells (>80%) were P2X3 and peripherin double positive (Figure 3D and Figure S5D). Moreover, we used differentiated neurons in Ca2+ imaging experiments. Cells were generated from the iPSC lines SBAD2, Si28, as well as Si28-NGN1 and used after at least 38 days of differentiation. Only < 15% of neurons from standard iPSCs responded to the P2X3-specific agonist α,β-methylene ATP (α,β-meATP). More than 80% of the neurons generated from Si28-NGN1 revealed increased intracellular Ca2+ concentration upon application of an α,β-meATP stimulus (Figure 3E). The transient signal in continued presence of the ligand was typical for self-inactivating P2X3 ion channels (Figure 3F). The application of the TRPV1-specific agonist capsaicin hardly stimulated neurons from SBAD2 or Si28. About 40% of all neurons in cultures from Si28-NGN1 showed a clear response. This was specifically blocked by a TRPV1 antagonist (Figure S6). The subpopulation responding to ATP (a general agonist for all P2X receptors) was of similar size to the P2X3-responsive neuronal sub-population. Moreover, the strong efficacy of a P2X3-specific antagonist to block ATP responses suggested that the majority of functional P2X receptors was of the P2X3 subtype (Figure 3E,F). The receptors TRPA1 and TRPM8, which are expressed in DRG neuron subtypes, were not expressed at the investigated differentiation stages (data not shown).
For experimental logistics, it is important to know how long cells need to be differentiated to reach good functionality. Therefore, neurons were tested after increasing differentiation times: at DoD7, already >90% of neurons showed a Ca2+ response upon depolarization (KCl), but no response to P2X3 stimulation. The latter response started to increase at DoD20–30 and reached its saturation level at >DoD35 (Figure 3F).
Taken together, the overexpression of NGN1 during early differentiation steps allowed for the generation of peripheral neurons with enhanced nociceptor features (PNN). PNN were found suitable to quantitatively evaluate functional P2X3 responses of single cells in Ca2+ imaging experiments. Next, a full transcriptomic characterization of this promising drug discovery model was performed.
2.4. Transcriptomics Profile of Si28-NGN1-Derived Sensory Neurons
The expression levels of approximately 19,000 genes were determined for six differentiation stages of sensory neurons generated from Si28-NGN1 cells (Supplementary File S2). A PCA on the whole set of genes provided a first overview on the dynamics of gene expression and showed a continuous progression of cell differentiation until DoD42. Furthermore, the PCA demonstrated the good reproducibility of the differentiation protocol, as three independent differentiations clustered closely together (Figure S7A). Transcriptome changes continued until late differentiation stages (DoD35-42), as shown by the upregulated gene expression of, e.g., plexin C1 (PLXNC1), which is involved in axon guidance, and the serotonin receptor 2A (HTR2A) [49,50], and the downregulation of growth cone-related genes, such as ROBO2, and the netrin receptor UNC5B [51,52] (Figure S7B).
To generate a condensed overview of the expression profile for Si28-NGN1-derived PNN, a small panel of 122 genes characteristic of neural cell types and signaling pathways was assembled (Figure 4). Most pan-neuronal markers included in this panel were found to be already expressed on DoD1 and remained highly expressed over 6 weeks (e.g., neurofilaments (NEFL/M/H), acetylcholine esterase (ACHE), and microtubule associated protein tau (MAPT)). The sensory neuronal marker genes ISL1, POU4F1 (BRN3A), and PRPH, the nociceptor markers SCN9A and RET, as well as various pre- and post-synaptic markers showed high expression levels throughout the monitored time of differentiation. Neural crest-specific genes (i.e., those related to PNN precursors), such as PAX3 and MSX1, were downregulated over time. These data confirm that the newly established differentiation protocol yields peripheral neurons with many features expected from nociceptors. Relatively few indications of other cell types were found, as only a subset of potentially glial genes was expressed, and there was little evidence for non-neural cell types.
In particular, the pattern of receptor subtypes was highly distinct, as indicated by three examples: (i) amongst dopamine receptors, the D2 subtype (DRD2, DRD4), which is known to be expressed in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons [53] was dominant, whereas DRD3 and DRD5 transcripts were absent; (ii) genes encoding the metabotropic glutamate receptors 2 and 3 (GRM2/3), both expressed in human DRG neurons [54,55], were found to be expressed, but not GRM1; and (iii) among the P2X receptors, only the nociceptor characteristic P2X3 transcripts were measured at all differentiation stages.
In a last step, we picked a limited set (n = 17) of highly expressed genes (Figure 4A). We felt that these genes could be suitable for differentiation control through PCR for further use of the cultures or for inter-laboratory method transfer. A brief overview of the broad biological functions covered was assembled (Figure 4B). In this context, it was interesting to see that RBFOX3 mRNA levels were relatively low. This gene codes for the pan-neuronal marker NeuN that is very frequently used for the immunostaining of CNS neurons by the community [56,57,58]. The low gene expression in PNN was consistent with our finding that these cells very poorly stain for NeuN (not shown), compared to all our other central neuronal cultures [44,59,60].
The transcriptome analysis confirmed that even after more than 30 days of PNN cultivation, the differentiation processes were not fully completed. Ongoing alterations at the level of gene expression may explain why P2X3 responses of PNN were observed only at ≥DoD28 (Figure 3G). For documentation of late transcriptome changes, we compiled exemplary genes that are clearly (>4-fold) and significantly regulated at late time points (DoD35-42) relative to DoD7 (Figure S7B). These observations supported our decision to use PNN for further functional studies at late stages of differentiation, i.e., at >DoD35, to ensure the best possible maturation.
2.5. Purinergic Signaling as Test Endpoint to Assess Peripheral Neurotoxicity
To explore the usefulness of Ca2+ imaging as a readout for disturbed pain signaling, we first investigated two clinically used proteasome inhibitors (PIs) known to cause peripheral neuropathy: bortezomib and carfilzomib. Pre-screening of the compounds in the PeriTox test indicated a cytotoxicity threshold of 200 nM for bortezomib and 66 nM for carfilzomib (Figure 5A, left, middle). PNN were exposed on DoD ≥ 38 to sub-cytotoxic concentrations (5 and 20 nM) for 24 h. After drug treatment, we tested whether the neurons were still able to show purinergic signaling. Bortezomib concentrations of 5 nM and higher resulted in a complete shutdown of P2X3 signaling, as indicated by Ca2+ imaging experiments (Figure 5B, left, Figure S8B). Carfilzomib induced a similar non-responsiveness at ≥20 nM (Figure 5B, middle). In order to make sure that neurons were not made generally nonresponsive by a cytotoxic response missed in the PeriTox test, they were exposed to a membrane depolarizing KCl stimulus after the α,β-meATP stimulation. The cells still showed Ca2+ flux at PI drug concentrations that had blunted P2X3 signaling (Figure S9A). Thus, neurons were still able to respond with Ca2+ signaling, and we suggest that PI treatment specifically impairs purinergic signaling. As further control, we investigated signaling through pain-related TRPV1 receptors. PI-treated neurons did not differ from control cells in this measurement (Figure S9B). These results further confirm that the attenuation of P2X3 signaling was not attributable to generally decreased cell viability, or an overall loss of signaling function.
On closer inspection, we observed that pre-treatment with bortezomib or carfilzomib led to a mild deregulation of intracellular Ca2+ in the unstimulated state (Figure 5C and Figure S8A). This may explain the unresponsiveness of P2X3, possibly as a counter-regulation or tachyphylaxis mechanism.
To address the question of whether also a non-PI peripheral neurotoxicant would attenuate P2X3 signaling, we repeated several of the above experiments with taxol. The chemotherapeutic drug group of taxanes (including taxol) alters microtubule dynamics but does not affect the proteasome’s function. Exposure to taxol in the PeriTox test showed no effect on cell viability at concentrations up to 75 nM, but neurites were strongly affected at concentrations ≥ 1 nM (Figure 5A, right). We chose pre-treatment conditions of 15 and 60 nM to test for functional impairments of P2X3 or TRPV1 receptors and of depolarization-induced Ca2+ influx. None of the endpoints were affected (Figure 5B, right, Figure S9). These findings suggest that impaired P2X3 signaling is a sensitive and specific endpoint for early PI-induced functional impairments.
2.6. PI-Associated Reorganization of the Microtubule Structure in Cell Somata
We used several structural endpoints to potentially identify additional features of mild cell stress that would parallel the impaired P2X3 signaling in the low nM range. We hypothesized that such findings would give additional evidence for early non-cytotoxic changes that precede full-blown neuropathies. Staining of PNN for the cytoskeletal protein βIII-tubulin confirmed that the neurite network was fully intact (no neurite fragmentation or blebbing). However, we observed a conspicuous ring-like tubulin accumulation in the periphery of cell somata of bortezomib- and carfilzomib-treated cells (Figure 6A and Figure S10). To follow up on this, cells exhibiting such a circular tubulin structure were quantified. Distinctive microtubule reorganization occurred in >80% of the cells pre-treated with PI concentrations that also resulted in the attenuation of P2X3 signaling (Figure 6B). Further experiments showed that the accumulation in ring structures was a tubulin-specific phenomenon, as such structures were not found in stains of the same cells for the cytoskeletal intermediate filament peripherin (Figure S10). However, peripherin also showed a mild reorganization phenotype: while its structure in neurites was not altered, PI-treated cells showed some peripherin clustering in the somata. This was mainly seen in cytosolic areas (outside the nucleus, but not ring shaped under the plasma membrane). For comparison, PNN were also treated with taxol (60 nM). A small number of cells presented with tubulin accumulations (Figure 6B). Closer examination revealed that these structures were more diffuse than the very sharp rings triggered by PIs (Figure 6A and Figure S10). Thus, sharp tubulin rings correlated with P2X3 impairment. These findings are in good agreement with observations in primary dorsal root ganglia that the accumulation of cytoskeletal proteins in the cell somata is a specific indicator of early PI-induced neuronal stress [5,61].
While we studied the accumulation of cytoskeletal elements in somata, we wondered whether PNN nuclei were also affected by PIs. The neurons were examined in more detail for signs of condensed or fragmented chromatin, indicative of apoptotic cells. No changes in the size of neuronal nuclei or the intensity of the DNA stain were observed. However, the nuclei had an altered (more bean-shaped) morphology (Figure S11). This may be a consequence of protein accumulations in the cytosol exerting pressure on the normally more rounded nuclei.
Taken together, these data show that P2X3 impairment was accompanied by a structural change, i.e., cytoskeletal protein accumulation in somata. This occurred at concentrations that did not alter any other endpoint investigated in this study. In the next step, we investigated whether our findings applied to PIs in general.
2.7. Blunted P2X3 Signaling and Tubulin Reorganization as PI Class-Effects
To explore whether the impairment of P2X3 signaling in PNN and somatic tubulin accumulation are class effects of PIs, we examined three additional compounds: (i) delanzomib, a peptide boronic acid similar to bortezomib that has been tested in clinical trials; (ii) epoxomicin, an epoxyketone similar to carfilzomib; and (iii) the peptide aldehyde MG-132. Delanzomib neither affected the viability nor the neurite growth in the PeriTox at test concentrations of up to 10 µM (Figure 7A). Pre-treatment of PNN (>DoD38) with concentrations as low as 5 nM led to the attenuation of Ca2+ signaling upon P2X3 stimulation (Figure 7B), while TRPV1 signaling was not impaired (Figure S9B). As previously observed with bortezomib, a slight increase in resting intracellular Ca2+ concentration was detected at delanzomib concentrations that were associated with the inhibition of P2X3 signaling (Figure 7C). Thus, delanzomib, which inhibits the proteasome with a similar Ki as bortezomib [62], also showed similar in vitro effects as the PIs studied earlier.
Pre-screening of the experimental PIs epoxomicin and MG-132 in the PeriTox test revealed high cytotoxicity thresholds of ≥1000 nM (Figure 7D). For both compounds, test concentrations were chosen that did not alter any PeriTox test endpoint (100 nM epoxomicin and 300 nM MG-132). Pre-treatment of PNN with such conditions resulted in a complete blunting of P2X3 responses, accompanied by elevated intracellular Ca2+ concentration in resting cells (Figure 7E,F). For all three PIs, we found that the neurite network remained intact upon exposure to P2X3-attenuating concentrations. As expected, we found that the inhibition of the P2X3 responses again correlated with the emergence of sharp annular βIII-tubulin accumulations in the cell somata (Figure 7G and Figure S12A,B).
These results suggest that attenuation of P2X3 signaling and βIII-tubulin reorganization are indeed class effects of PIs.
3. Discussion
Here, we have developed and documented a robust differentiation protocol that yields human PNN that are useful to address various biomedical questions. The cultures generated in this way have many nociceptor characteristics, and they can be used reproducibly after 6 weeks of differentiation (without cell detachment, with no signs of de-differentiation, and completely without any overgrowth of unwanted cells) for single cell Ca2+ imaging of P2X3 receptors. The cells maintain their original network of individual somata, connected by long neurites. This is noteworthy, as many other culture protocols designed to yield peripheral neurons tend to generate cells that cluster together over time, making imaging of intracellular Ca2+ concentration in individual cells nearly impossible. These PNN allowed us to study very early adverse effects of PIs at clinically-relevant low nanomolar concentrations [63,64]. All five compounds that were investigated behaved similarly in that they induced a pronounced downregulation of P2X3 responses and a clustering of tubulin in ring-like structures around the somata at concentrations that were non-cytotoxic and that did not damage any of the neurite network features.
The PeriTox test is a well-established in vitro screening assay using human iPSC-derived peripheral neurons to identify peripheral neurotoxicants [28]. It has been successfully used to identify environmental neurotoxicants by assessing their effects on the neurite structures [45,46,47]; however, for pre-clinical drug testing, an increased sensitivity in detecting the potential neurotoxicity of chemotherapeutics is desirable. To achieve this, we pursued different strategies:
First, we explored whether longer exposure times would decrease the toxicity threshold concentrations [65,66,67]. We found that prolonged exposure to toxicants increased the sensitivity for cytotoxicity, but the specificity for neurite effects was lost. This is in good agreement with the fact that in many neuronal cultures, neurite damage is followed by general cell death or apoptosis if given sufficient incubation time [68,69,70]. The sequence of neurite damage triggering cell death may be particularly pronounced in still differentiating iPSC-derived neurons, while in vivo matured neurons that are functionally integrated in regulatory circuits are known to separate the neurite pruning program from downstream death of the somata [71,72].
As a second approach, we explored whether functional changes in sensory receptors would allow for more sensitive readouts. Indeed, signaling through P2X3 receptors proved to be highly sensitive to proteasome inhibitors. The measurement of such responses required a new culture setup, using cells differentiated for ≥5 weeks. The detection of PI-induced effects by the new approach at ≥10-fold higher sensitivity than in the PeriTox test suggests that alterations at the functional level of signaling may often precede structural impairments.
The further examination of timing aspects appears to be highly relevant. It would be interesting to learn whether P2X3 signaling remains a specifically altered endpoint upon prolonged exposure (48–72 h) to low nanomolar concentrations or whether specificity is lost, as was already observed in the extended PeriTox test. Additionally, repeated exposure scenarios are of interest, as they might model a possible accumulation of PIs in the DRG [63,73].
Although we used the pronounced regulation of P2X3 here mainly as indicator of dysregulation, we wondered whether this may also play a pathophysiological role. Indeed, P2X3 is part of several complex pain regulation circuits, e.g., the acid sensing ion channel ASIC3, which is also involved in pain signaling and can lead to the inhibition of P2X3 responses [74,75]. Since bortezomib induces aerobic glycolysis and thus extracellular acidification, the above process may play a role in tissues [76]. Whether an interaction of P2X3 and ASIC3 is relevant in PNN needs to be clarified. Our results further showed that P2X3 responses and intracellular baseline Ca2+ levels are deregulated at identical toxicant concentrations. Thus, blunted P2X3 responses could be caused by or function as an indicator of Ca2+ deregulation [77,78].
Coinciding with the functional effect of P2X3 attenuation, we detected a somatic accumulation of tubulin in PI-treated PNN. Our conclusion that tubulin accumulation is a PI class effect is further supported by a study on the PI lactacystin (not used here), which elicited the same pattern of tubulin reorganization into sharp rings [5]. Furthermore, somatic accumulation of cytoskeletal proteins upon PI treatment was also reported in mouse in vivo studies, suggesting that tubulin reorganization observed in vitro also occurs in animals [61]. It would be interesting to study the potential association of tubulin accumulation and changes in axonal transport. Since Ca2+ is also known to be a regulator of the cytoskeleton [79], deregulation of intracellular Ca2+ may be a common cause of P2X3 signaling impairments and morphological changes observed in PI-treated PNN.
When taxol was compared to the class of PIs, we neither observed P2X3 inactivation, nor tubulin rings. Thus, different initial processes may be involved in the development of taxol peripheral neuropathies. Future experiments should test more classes of neuropathy-inducing cytostatics, such as platinum compounds or vinca alkaloids. Moreover, co-culture approaches, e.g., by introducing Schwann cells, may allow for the investigation of further neuropathy-relevant aspects since glia may take important roles in neuropathic diseases [80].
Overall, this study demonstrates the feasibility of developing target cell-specific test methods that are based on human cells. Using neuronal cultures other than peripheral neurons for research on chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy can miss functional effects only detectable in the relevant target cells [28,29]. Moreover, the use of high toxicant concentrations and blunt endpoints (such as cell death) may make it very difficult to identify compounds that would attenuate the toxicity. We suggest that insights on specifically-impaired processes are important for the development of pharmacological countermeasures for peripheral neuropathies.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Differentiation of Human iPSCs to Peripheral Neurons
We used the human iPSC line mciPS (model no. SC301A-1; System Biosciences, Palo Alto, CA, USA), SBAD2 [81], Sigma iPSC0028 (Si28) (EPITHELIAL-1, #IPSC0028, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and the transgenic iPSC line Si28-NGN1. IPSC cultures were maintained under xeno-free conditions (see Supplementary Methods) [82].
The differentiation procedure for all iPSC lines is detailed in the Supplementary Methods (see also Table S1). In brief, iPSCs were neuralized by dual SMAD inhibition followed by the direction of the differentiation towards the sensory neuron fate using small molecule inhibitors [83]. After 9–12 days of differentiation, immature peripheral neurons were frozen in 90% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). After thawing, further maturation was driven by the growth factors glia-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF, 25 ng/mL), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF, 12.5 ng/mL), and nerve growth factor (NGF, 25 ng/mL) (all from Bio-Techne, Minneapolis, MN, USA). For the differentiation of peripheral neurons with nociceptor features, doxycycline (2 µg/mL) exposure from DoD4’-9’ and DoD1-14 was integrated as the basis of the small molecule differentiation protocol, starting from Si28-NGN1 iPSC.
Peri.4U cells were provided by Axiogenesis (Cologne, Germany) and maintained according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
4.2. Generation of the Gene-Edited iPSC Line Si28-NGN1
Analogous to Boisvert et al. [48], an iPSC line with inducible NGN1 overexpression was created. A lentiviral sequence was designed to express the human NGN1 gene under control of a Tet-responsive element (TRE), which is dependent on the presence of doxycycline (Dox). The expression of NGN1 was linked to the expression of turboRFP to monitor the induction. For selection, a hygromycin resistance gene was included. The vector and the principle of the fusion construct was previously published [84]. The cell line was authenticated by short tandem repeat DNA typing and pluripotency was confirmed (data not shown) [85].
4.3. Toxicity Testing by Assessment of Neurite Area and Cell Viability
Immature peripheral neurons were thawed and seeded at a density of 100,000 cells/cm2. For initial toxicity assessment, cells were left to attach for 1 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2 followed by treatment with the test compounds. Cells were exposed to the compounds for 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h and readout was performed on DoD1, 2, and 3, respectively.
For delayed toxicity assessment, cells were cultured until DoD4. On DoD4, test compounds were added to the cells together by performing a half-medium exchange. Readout was performed after 72 h (on DoD7).
For the readout, neurons were stained with 1 µg/mL HOECHST-33342 (H-33342) and 1 µM calcein-AM (both from Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) 1 h prior to the imaging. After incubation for 1 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2, images were acquired automatically using an ArrayScan VTI HCS microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Images were analyzed for neurite area and cell viability as previously described [86].
4.4. Immunofluorescence Staining
Protein expression was assessed qualitatively via immunofluorescence staining and microscopy. All samples were prepared and analyzed exactly as previously described [44,87], using antibodies as detailed in the Supplementary Methods (Table S2).
The quantification of somata with βIII-tubulin circles was performed manually by independent observers. The criteria for quantification were sharply defined, intense, and circular βIII-tubulin staining with presumably sub-membranous location covering at least 50% of a full circle.
To quantify the nuclear area, images of H-33342 stains were converted into binary images and an area of randomly chosen H-33342-objects was measured using the software Fiji.
4.5. Transcriptome Data Generation and Analysis
Sample lysates were prepared by medium removal, followed by a wash with 50 µL of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and instant addition of 33 µL 1x Biospyder lysis buffer (BioSpyder Tech., Glasgow, UK) [44,88]. After incubation at RT for 10 min, the sample plates were stored at −80 °C up to the time of dry ice shipping to Bioclavis (BioSpyder Tech., Glasgow, UK). Measurement of the whole transcriptome set was performed via the TempO-Seq targeted sequencing technology [89]. The analyzed gene set and the read data are detailed in Supplementary File S2 (organized as an Excel workbook). For data processing, the R package DESeq2 (v1.32.0) was used for quality control and normalization [90]. Further details on data analysis are given in the Supplementary Methods.
4.6. Measurement of Changes in Intracellular Ca2+ Concentration
Sensory neurons were cultured in 96-well plates for at least 35 days after thawing. One day before Ca2+ imaging experiments were performed, cells were optionally pre-treated with the test compounds. One hour before the experiment, cells were loaded with the Ca2+ indicator Fluo-4 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Pre-treatment with antagonists was performed together with Fluo-4 loading. Monitoring of intracellular Ca2+ concentration was performed using an ArrayScan VTI HCS microscope equipped with an automated pipettor and an incubation chamber providing an atmosphere with 5% CO2 and a temperature of 37 °C. Cells were imaged as fast as possible for 45 s. Test compounds were automatically applied after baseline recording (10 s). In a standard experiment with 4 stimuli applied to one well (e.g., negative control, P2X3 agonist, TRPV1 agonist, and KCl), the cells were imaged 4 times for 45 s with one stimulus applied at a time.
The images were exported as .avi video files and analyzed with the CaFFEE software [91]. In brief, the timepoint of peak fluorescence was identified. Fluorescence data for the ground state (F0) and the peak timepoint (F1) were assessed automatically for all cells. The difference between the two fluorescence levels, ΔF = F1 − F0, was used for further data processing [44]. The noise level-based threshold (mean(ΔF) + 3 × SD(ΔF)) of each well was determined by the application of a negative control stimulus (Hanks’ balanced salt solution (HBSS)), with an upper threshold limit set to ΔF = 18. According to this threshold, cells were defined as reactive (ΔFstimulus > threshold) or non-reactive (ΔFstimulus ≤ threshold).
4.7. Statistics
If not stated otherwise, experiments were performed on 3 or more independent cell preparations (here called biological replicates). In each cell preparation at least three different wells (here called technical replicates) were measured.
Information concerning descriptive statistics and experimental variability is included in the figure legends or the figures themselves. GraphPad Prism 7 software (Version 7.04, Graphpad Software, Inc, San Diego, USA) was used for significance testing and data display. Data were evaluated by ANOVA plus the appropriate post-hoc testing method or by t-test for binary comparisons. p-values < 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to M. Kapitza for invaluable experimental support.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23073734/s1.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.-K.H., C.K. and M.L.; data curation, A.-K.H. and I.S.; formal analysis, A.-K.H.; funding acquisition, M.L.; investigation, A.-K.H. and T.G.; methodology, A.-K.H., I.S. and C.K.; project administration, M.L.; resources, A.-K.H. and C.K.; software, C.K.; supervision, M.L.; validation, A.-K.H. and I.S.; visualization, A.-K.H.; writing—original draft, A.-K.H. and M.L.; writing—review and editing, A.-K.H., I.S., C.K., T.G. and M.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by CEFIC, the BMBF, EFSA, and the DK-EPA (MST-667-00205). It has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreements No. 681002 (EU-ToxRisk), No. 964537 (RISK-HUNT3R), No. 964518 (ToxFree) and No. 825759 (ENDpoiNTs).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Raw data can be requested from the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Kane R.C., Bross P.F., Farrell A.T., Pazdur R. Velcade: U.S. FDA approval for the treatment of multiple myeloma progressing on prior therapy. Oncologist. 2003;8:508–513. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.8-6-508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Richardson P.G., Barlogie B., Berenson J., Singhal S., Jagannath S., Irwin D., Rajkumar S.V., Srkalovic G., Alsina M., Alexanian R., et al. A phase 2 study of bortezomib in relapsed, refractory myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003;348:2609–2617. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa030288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zheng H., Xiao W.H., Bennett G.J. Mitotoxicity and bortezomib-induced chronic painful peripheral neuropathy. Exp. Neurol. 2012;238:225–234. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Csizmadia V., Raczynski A., Csizmadia E., Fedyk E.R., Rottman J., Alden C.L. Effect of an experimental proteasome inhibitor on the cytoskeleton, cytosolic protein turnover, and induction in the neuronal cells in vitro. Neurotoxicology. 2008;29:232–243. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2007.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Staff N.P., Podratz J.L., Grassner L., Bader M., Paz J., Knight A.M., Loprinzi C.L., Trushina E., Windebank A.J. Bortezomib alters microtubule polymerization and axonal transport in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. Neurotoxicology. 2013;39:124–131. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2013.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Poruchynsky M.S., Sackett D.L., Robey R.W., Ward Y., Annunziata C., Fojo T. Proteasome inhibitors increase tubulin polymerization and stabilization in tissue culture cells: A possible mechanism contributing to peripheral neuropathy and cellular toxicity following proteasome inhibition. Cell Cycle. 2008;7:940–949. doi: 10.4161/cc.7.7.5625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Meregalli C., Chiorazzi A., Carozzi V.A., Canta A., Sala B., Colombo M., Oggioni N., Ceresa C., Foudah D., La Russa F., et al. Evaluation of tubulin polymerization and chronic inhibition of proteasome as citotoxicity mechanisms in bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy. Cell Cycle. 2014;13:612–621. doi: 10.4161/cc.27476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Argyriou A.A., Cavaletti G., Bruna J., Kyritsis A.P., Kalofonos H.P. Bortezomib-induced peripheral neurotoxicity: An update. Arch. Toxicol. 2014;88:1669–1679. doi: 10.1007/s00204-014-1316-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Carozzi V.A., Renn C.L., Bardini M., Fazio G., Chiorazzi A., Meregalli C., Oggioni N., Shanks K., Quartu M., Serra M.P., et al. Bortezomib-induced painful peripheral neuropathy: An electrophysiological, behavioral, morphological and mechanistic study in the mouse. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e72995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Adams J., Palombella V.J., Sausville E.A., Johnson J., Destree A., Lazarus D.D., Maas J., Pien C.S., Prakash S., Elliott P.J. Proteasome inhibitors: A novel class of potent and effective antitumor agents. Cancer Res. 1999;59:2615–2622. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jagannath S., Barlogie B., Berenson J., Siegel D., Irwin D., Richardson P.G., Niesvizky R., Alexanian R., Limentani S.A., Alsina M., et al. A phase 2 study of two doses of bortezomib in relapsed or refractory myeloma. Br. J. Haematol. 2004;127:165–172. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.05188.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.San Miguel J.F., Schlag R., Khuageva N.K., Dimopoulos M.A., Shpilberg O., Kropff M., Spicka I., Petrucci M.T., Palumbo A., Samoilova O.S., et al. Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008;359:906–917. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0801479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Velasco R., Petit J., Clapés V., Verdú E., Navarro X., Bruna J. Neurological monitoring reduces the incidence of bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma patients. J. Peripher. Nerv. Syst. 2010;15:17–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8027.2010.00248.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Richardson P.G., Xie W., Mitsiades C., Chanan-Khan A.A., Lonial S., Hassoun H., Avigan D.E., Oaklander A.L., Kuter D.J., Wen P.Y., et al. Single-agent bortezomib in previously untreated multiple myeloma: Efficacy, characterization of peripheral neuropathy, and molecular correlations with response and neuropathy. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009;27:3518–3525. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.3087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Richardson P.G., Briemberg H., Jagannath S., Wen P.Y., Barlogie B., Berenson J., Singhal S., Siegel D.S., Irwin D., Schuster M., et al. Frequency, characteristics, and reversibility of peripheral neuropathy during treatment of advanced multiple myeloma with bortezomib. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006;24:3113–3120. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.7779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yong K., Gonzalez-McQuire S., Szabo Z., Schoen P., Hajek R. The start of a new wave: Developments in proteasome inhibition in multiple myeloma. Eur. J. Haematol. 2018;101:220–236. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Schlafer D., Shah K.S., Panjic E.H., Lonial S. Safety of proteasome inhibitors for treatment of multiple myeloma. Expert Opin. Drug. Saf. 2017;16:167–183. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2017.1259310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Siegel D.S. From clinical trials to clinical practice: Single-agent carfilzomib adverse events and their management in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Ther. Adv. Hematol. 2013;4:354–365. doi: 10.1177/2040620713511176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Siegel D., Martin T., Nooka A., Harvey R.D., Vij R., Niesvizky R., Badros A.Z., Jagannath S., McCulloch L., Rajangam K., et al. Integrated safety profile of single-agent carfilzomib: Experience from 526 patients enrolled in 4 phase II clinical studies. Haematologica. 2013;98:1753–1761. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.089334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kortuem K.M., Stewart A.K. Carfilzomib. Blood. 2013;121:893–897. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-10-459883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Vogl D.T., Martin T.G., Vij R., Hari P., Mikhael J.R., Siegel D., Wu K.L., Delforge M., Gasparetto C. Phase I/II study of the novel proteasome inhibitor delanzomib (CEP-18770) for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Leuk. Lymphoma. 2017;58:1872–1879. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1263842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Honore P., Kage K., Mikusa J., Watt A.T., Johnston J.F., Wyatt J.R., Faltynek C.R., Jarvis M.F., Lynch K. Analgesic profile of intrathecal P2X3 antisense oligonucleotide treatment in chronic inflammatory and neuropathic pain states in rats. Pain. 2002;99:11–19. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00032-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jarvis M.F., Burgard E.C., McGaraughty S., Honore P., Lynch K., Brennan T.J., Subieta A., van Biesen T., Cartmell J., Bianchi B., et al. A-317491, a novel potent and selective non-nucleotide antagonist of P2X3 and P2X2/3 receptors, reduces chronic inflammatory and neuropathic pain in the rat. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:17179–17184. doi: 10.1073/pnas.252537299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bleehen T., Keele C.A. Observations on the algogenic actions of adenosine compounds on the human blister base preparation. Pain. 1977;3:367–377. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(77)90066-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cook S.P., Vulchanova L., Hargreaves K.M., Elde R., McCleskey E.W. Distinct ATP receptors on pain-sensing and stretch-sensing neurons. Nature. 1997;387:505–508. doi: 10.1038/387505a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chen C.C., Akopian A.N., Sivilotti L., Colquhoun D., Burnstock G., Wood J.N. A P2X purinoceptor expressed by a subset of sensory neurons. Nature. 1995;377:428–431. doi: 10.1038/377428a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Souslova V., Cesare P., Ding Y., Akopian A.N., Stanfa L., Suzuki R., Carpenter K., Dickenson A., Boyce S., Hill R., et al. Warm-coding deficits and aberrant inflammatory pain in mice lacking P2X3 receptors. Nature. 2000;407:1015–1017. doi: 10.1038/35039526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hoelting L., Klima S., Karreman C., Grinberg M., Meisig J., Henry M., Rotshteyn T., Rahnenführer J., Blüthgen N., Sachinidis A., et al. Stem Cell-Derived Immature Human Dorsal Root Ganglia Neurons to Identify Peripheral Neurotoxicants. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2016;5:476–487. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2015-0108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wing C., Komatsu M., Delaney S.M., Krause M., Wheeler H.E., Dolan M.E. Application of stem cell derived neuronal cells to evaluate neurotoxic chemotherapy. Stem Cell Res. 2017;22:79–88. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2017.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Schinke C., Fernandez Vallone V., Ivanov A., Peng Y., Körtvelyessy P., Nolte L., Huehnchen P., Beule D., Stachelscheid H., Boehmerle W., et al. Modeling chemotherapy induced neurotoxicity with human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) -derived sensory neurons. Neurobiol. Dis. 2021;155:105391. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wang M., Wang J., Tsui A.Y.P., Li Z., Zhang Y., Zhao Q., Xing H., Wang X. Mechanisms of peripheral neurotoxicity associated with four chemotherapy drugs using human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived peripheral neurons. Toxicol. In Vitro. 2021;77:105233. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2021.105233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Trevisan G., Materazzi S., Fusi C., Altomare A., Aldini G., Lodovici M., Patacchini R., Geppetti P., Nassini R. Novel therapeutic strategy to prevent chemotherapy-induced persistent sensory neuropathy by TRPA1 blockade. Cancer Res. 2013;73:3120–3131. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-4370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Li C., Deng T., Shang Z., Wang D., Xiao Y. Blocking TRPA1 and TNF-α Signal Improves Bortezomib-Induced Neuropathic Pain. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2018;51:2098–2110. doi: 10.1159/000495828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tomita S., Sekiguchi F., Deguchi T., Miyazaki T., Ikeda Y., Tsubota M., Yoshida S., Du Nguyen H., Okada T., Toyooka N., et al. Critical role of Cav3.2 T-type calcium channels in the peripheral neuropathy induced by bortezomib, a proteasome-inhibiting chemotherapeutic agent, in mice. Toxicology. 2019;413:33–39. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2018.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Serrano A., Mo G., Grant R., Paré M., O’Donnell D., Yu X.H., Tomaszewski M.J., Perkins M.N., Séguéla P., Cao C.Q. Differential expression and pharmacology of native P2X receptors in rat and primate sensory neurons. J. Neurosci. 2012;32:11890–11896. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0698-12.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chen J., Zhang X.-F., Kort M.E., Huth J.R., Sun C., Miesbauer L.J., Cassar S.C., Neelands T., Scott V.E., Moreland R.B., et al. Molecular determinants of species-specific activation or blockade of TRPA1 channels. J. Neurosci. 2008;28:5063–5071. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0047-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Davidson S., Copits B.A., Zhang J., Page G., Ghetti A., Gereau R.W. Human sensory neurons: Membrane properties and sensitization by inflammatory mediators. Pain. 2014;155:1861–1870. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.06.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.de La Roche J., Eberhardt M.J., Klinger A.B., Stanslowsky N., Wegner F., Koppert W., Reeh P.W., Lampert A., Fischer M.J.M., Leffler A. The molecular basis for species-specific activation of human TRPA1 protein by protons involves poorly conserved residues within transmembrane domains 5 and 6. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:20280–20292. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.479337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Meregalli C., Maricich Y., Cavaletti G., Canta A., Carozzi V.A., Chiorazzi A., Newbold E., Marmiroli P., Ceresa C., Diani A., et al. Reversal of Bortezomib-Induced Neurotoxicity by Suvecaltamide, a Selective T-Type Ca-Channel Modulator, in Preclinical Models. Cancers. 2021;13:5013. doi: 10.3390/cancers13195013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yardim A., Gur C., Comakli S., Ozdemir S., Kucukler S., Celik H., Kandemir F.M. Investigation of the effects of berberine on bortezomib-induced sciatic nerve and spinal cord damage in rats through pathways involved in oxidative stress and neuro-inflammation. Neurotoxicology. 2022;89:127–139. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2022.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ardizzone A., Fusco R., Casili G., Lanza M., Impellizzeri D., Esposito E., Cuzzocrea S. Effect of Ultra-Micronized-Palmitoylethanolamide and Acetyl-l-Carnitine on Experimental Model of Inflammatory Pain. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:1967. doi: 10.3390/ijms22041967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hasan M.M., Starobova H., Mueller A., Vetter I., Lewis R.J. Subcutaneous ω-Conotoxins Alleviate Mechanical Pain in Rodent Models of Acute Peripheral Neuropathy. Mar. Drugs. 2021;19:106. doi: 10.3390/md19020106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Campolo M., Lanza M., Paterniti I., Filippone A., Ardizzone A., Casili G., Scuderi S.A., Puglisi C., Mare M., Memeo L., et al. PEA-OXA Mitigates Oxaliplatin-Induced Painful Neuropathy through NF-κB/Nrf-2 Axis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:3927. doi: 10.3390/ijms22083927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Klima S., Brüll M., Spreng A.-S., Suciu I., Falt T., Schwamborn J.C., Waldmann T., Karreman C., Leist M. A human stem cell-derived test system for agents modifying neuronal N-methyl-D-aspartate-type glutamate receptor Ca2+-signalling. Arch. Toxicol. 2021;95:1703–1722. doi: 10.1007/s00204-021-03024-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Delp J., Gutbier S., Klima S., Hoelting L., Pinto-Gil K., Hsieh J.-H., Aichem M., Klein K., Schreiber F., Tice R.R., et al. A high-throughput approach to identify specific neurotoxicants/ developmental toxicants in human neuronal cell function assays. ALTEX. 2018;35:235–253. doi: 10.14573/altex.1712182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Klose J., Pahl M., Bartmann K., Bendt F., Blum J., Dolde X., Förster N., Holzer A.-K., Hübenthal U., Keßel H.E., et al. Neurodevelopmental toxicity assessment of flame retardants using a human DNT in vitro testing battery. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 2021:1–27. doi: 10.1007/s10565-021-09603-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Masjosthusmann S., Blum J., Bartmann K., Dolde X., Holzer A.-K., Stürzl L.-C., Keßel E.H., Förster N., Dönmez A., Klose J., et al. Establishment of an a priori protocol for the implementation and interpretation of an in-vitro testing battery for the assessment of developmental neurotoxicity. EFSA Support. Publ. 2020;17:1938E. doi: 10.2903/sp.efsa.2020.EN-1938. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Boisvert E.M., Engle S.J., Hallowell S.E., Liu P., Wang Z.-W., Li X.-J. The Specification and Maturation of Nociceptive Neurons from Human Embryonic Stem Cells. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:16821. doi: 10.1038/srep16821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Usoskin D., Furlan A., Islam S., Abdo H., Lönnerberg P., Lou D., Hjerling-Leffler J., Haeggström J., Kharchenko O., Kharchenko P.V., et al. Unbiased classification of sensory neuron types by large-scale single-cell RNA sequencing. Nat. Neurosci. 2015;18:145–153. doi: 10.1038/nn.3881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.van Steenwinckel J., Noghero A., Thibault K., Brisorgueil M.-J., Fischer J., Conrath M. The 5-HT2A receptor is mainly expressed in nociceptive sensory neurons in rat lumbar dorsal root ganglia. Neuroscience. 2009;161:838–846. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.03.087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhang H.Y., Zheng L.F., Yi X.N., Chen Z.B., He Z.P., Zhao D., Zhang X.F., Ma Z.J. Slit1 promotes regenerative neurite outgrowth of adult dorsal root ganglion neurons in vitro via binding to the Robo receptor. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 2010;39:256–261. doi: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2010.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Mondal B., Jin H., Kallappagoudar S., Sedkov Y., Martinez T., Sentmanat M.F., Poet G.J., Li C., Fan Y., Pruett-Miller S.M., et al. The histone deacetylase complex MiDAC regulates a neurodevelopmental gene expression program to control neurite outgrowth. Elife. 2020;9:e57519. doi: 10.7554/eLife.57519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Almanza A., Segura-Chama P., León-Olea M., Luis E., Garduño-Gutiérrez R., Mercado-Reyes J., Simón-Arceo K., Coffeen U., Hernández-Cruz A., Pellicer F., et al. Cellular Mechanism for Specific Mechanical Antinociception by D2-like Receptor at the Spinal Cord Level. Neuroscience. 2019;417:81–94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sheahan T.D., Valtcheva M.V., McIlvried L.A., Pullen M.Y., Baranger D.A.A., Gereau R.W. Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 2/3 (mGluR2/3) Activation Suppresses TRPV1 Sensitization in Mouse, But Not Human, Sensory Neurons. eNeuro. 2018;5 doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0412-17.2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Carlton S., Hargett G., Coggeshall R. Localization of metabotropic glutamate receptors 2/3 on primary afferent axons in the rat. Neuroscience. 2001;105:957–969. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00238-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Duan W., Zhang Y.-P., Hou Z., Huang C., Zhu H., Zhang C.-Q., Yin Q. Novel Insights into NeuN: From Neuronal Marker to Splicing Regulator. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016;53:1637–1647. doi: 10.1007/s12035-015-9122-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Jeon I., Lee N., Li J.-Y., Park I.-H., Park K.S., Moon J., Shim S.H., Choi C., Chang D.-J., Kwon J., et al. Neuronal properties, in vivo effects, and pathology of a Huntington’s disease patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells. 2012;30:2054–2062. doi: 10.1002/stem.1135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Sanchez-Ramos J., Song S., Cardozo-Pelaez F., Hazzi C., Stedeford T., Willing A., Freeman T.B., Saporta S., Janssen W., Patel N., et al. Adult bone marrow stromal cells differentiate into neural cells in vitro. Exp. Neurol. 2000;164:247–256. doi: 10.1006/exnr.2000.7389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Scholz D., Pöltl D., Genewsky A., Weng M., Waldmann T., Schildknecht S., Leist M. Rapid, complete and large-scale generation of post-mitotic neurons from the human LUHMES cell line. J. Neurochem. 2011;119:957–971. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07255.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Smirnova L., Harris G., Delp J., Valadares M., Pamies D., Hogberg H.T., Waldmann T., Leist M., Hartung T. A LUHMES 3D dopaminergic neuronal model for neurotoxicity testing allowing long-term exposure and cellular resilience analysis. Arch. Toxicol. 2016;90:2725–2743. doi: 10.1007/s00204-015-1637-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Alé A., Bruna J., Herrando M., Navarro X., Udina E. Toxic effects of bortezomib on primary sensory neurons and Schwann cells of adult mice. Neurotox. Res. 2015;27:430–440. doi: 10.1007/s12640-014-9514-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Berkers C.R., Leestemaker Y., Schuurman K.G., Ruggeri B., Jones-Bolin S., Williams M., Ovaa H. Probing the specificity and activity profiles of the proteasome inhibitors bortezomib and delanzomib. Mol. Pharm. 2012;9:1126–1135. doi: 10.1021/mp2004143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Papandreou C.N., Daliani D.D., Nix D., Yang H., Madden T., Wang X., Pien C.S., Millikan R.E., Tu S.-M., Pagliaro L., et al. Phase I trial of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in patients with advanced solid tumors with observations in androgen-independent prostate cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2004;22:2108–2121. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.02.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Reece D.E., Sullivan D., Lonial S., Mohrbacher A.F., Chatta G., Shustik C., Burris H., Venkatakrishnan K., Neuwirth R., Riordan W.J., et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of two doses of bortezomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2011;67:57–67. doi: 10.1007/s00280-010-1283-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Flury F. Über kampfgasvergiftungen I. Über reizgase. Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Experimentelle Medizin. 1921;13:1–15. doi: 10.1007/BF02998607. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Haber F. Zur Geschichte des Gaskrieges. In: Haber F., editor. Fünf Vorträge Aus Den Jahren 1920–1923. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 1924. pp. 76–92. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Macko P., Palosaari T., Whelan M. Extrapolating from acute to chronic toxicity in vitro. Toxicol. In Vitro. 2021;76:105206. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2021.105206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Herkenham M., Little M.D., Bankiewicz K., Yang S.-C., Markey S.P., Johannessen J.N. Selective retention of MPP+ within the monoaminergic systems of the primate brain following MPTP administration: An in vivo autoradiographic study. Neuroscience. 1991;40:133–158. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(91)90180-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Volbracht C., Leist M., Nicotera P. ATP controls neuronal apoptosis triggered by microtubule breakdown or potassium deprivation. Mol. Med. 1999;5:477–489. doi: 10.1007/BF03403541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Berliocchi L., Fava E., Leist M., Horvat V., Dinsdale D., Read D., Nicotera P. Botulinum neurotoxin C initiates two different programs for neurite degeneration and neuronal apoptosis. J. Cell Biol. 2005;168:607–618. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200406126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Geden M.J., Deshmukh M. Axon degeneration: Context defines distinct pathways. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2016;39:108–115. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2016.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Geden M.J., Romero S.E., Deshmukh M. Apoptosis versus axon pruning: Molecular intersection of two distinct pathways for axon degeneration. Neurosci. Res. 2019;139:3–8. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2018.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Carozzi V.A., Renn C., Peter R., Gallop D., Marmiroli P., Cavaletti G., Dorsey S. Abstract 934: Electrophysiological, behavioural and molecular characterization of the neuropathic pain in bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy. Cancer Res. 2012;72:934. doi: 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2012-934. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Stephan G., Huang L., Tang Y., Vilotti S., Fabbretti E., Yu Y., Nörenberg W., Franke H., Gölöncsér F., Sperlágh B., et al. The ASIC3/P2X3 cognate receptor is a pain-relevant and ligand-gated cationic channel. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:1354. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03728-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Deval E., Noël J., Lay N., Alloui A., Diochot S., Friend V., Jodar M., Lazdunski M., Lingueglia E. ASIC3, a sensor of acidic and primary inflammatory pain. EMBO J. 2008;27:3047–3055. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2008.213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Ludman T., Melemedjian O.K. Bortezomib-induced aerobic glycolysis contributes to chemotherapy-induced painful peripheral neuropathy. Mol. Pain. 2019;15:1744806919837429. doi: 10.1177/1744806919837429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Cook S.P., Rodland K.D., McCleskey E.W. A Memory for Extracellular Ca 2+ by Speeding Recovery of P2X Receptors from Desensitization. J. Neurosci. 1998;18:9238–9244. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-22-09238.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Ishchenko Y., Shakirzyanova A., Giniatullina R., Skorinkin A., Bart G., Turhanen P., Määttä J.A., Mönkkönen J., Giniatullin R. Selective Calcium-Dependent Inhibition of ATP-Gated P2X3 Receptors by Bisphosphonate-Induced Endogenous ATP Analog ApppI. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2017;361:472–481. doi: 10.1124/jpet.116.238840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Mattson M.P. Calcium as sculptor and destroyer of neural circuitry. Exp. Gerontol. 1992;27:29–49. doi: 10.1016/0531-5565(92)90027-W. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Yan W., Wu Z., Zhang Y., Hong D., Dong X., Liu L., Rao Y., Huang L., Zhang X., Wu J. The molecular and cellular insight into the toxicology of bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021;142:112068. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Snijders K.E., Fehér A., Táncos Z., Bock I., Téglási A., van den Berk L., Niemeijer M., Bouwman P., Le Dévédec S.E., Moné M.J., et al. Fluorescent tagging of endogenous Heme oxygenase-1 in human induced pluripotent stem cells for high content imaging of oxidative stress in various differentiated lineages. Arch. Toxicol. 2021;95:3285–3302. doi: 10.1007/s00204-021-03127-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Chen G., Gulbranson D.R., Hou Z., Bolin J.M., Ruotti V., Probasco M.D., Smuga-Otto K., Howden S.E., Diol N.R., Propson N.E., et al. Chemically defined conditions for human iPSC derivation and culture. Nat. Methods. 2011;8:424–429. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Chambers S.M., Qi Y., Mica Y., Lee G., Zhang X.-J., Niu L., Bilsland J., Cao L., Stevens E., Whiting P., et al. Combined small-molecule inhibition accelerates developmental timing and converts human pluripotent stem cells into nociceptors. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012;30:715–720. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Schildknecht S., Karreman C., Pöltl D., Efrémova L., Kullmann C., Gutbier S., Krug A., Scholz D., Gerding H.R., Leist M. Generation of genetically-modified human differentiated cells for toxicological tests and the study of neurodegenerative diseases. ALTEX. 2013;30:427–444. doi: 10.14573/altex.2013.4.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Dirks W.G., Drexler H.G. STR DNA typing of human cell lines: Detection of intra- and interspecies cross-contamination. Methods Mol. Biol. 2013;946:27–38. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-128-8_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Stiegler N.V., Krug A.K., Matt F., Leist M. Assessment of chemical-induced impairment of human neurite outgrowth by multiparametric live cell imaging in high-density cultures. Toxicol. Sci. 2011;121:73–87. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfr034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Dreser N., Madjar K., Holzer A.-K., Kapitza M., Scholz C., Kranaster P., Gutbier S., Klima S., Kolb D., Dietz C., et al. Development of a neural rosette formation assay (RoFA) to identify neurodevelopmental toxicants and to characterize their transcriptome disturbances. Arch. Toxicol. 2020;94:151–171. doi: 10.1007/s00204-019-02612-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Loser D., Hinojosa M.G., Blum J., Schaefer J., Brüll M., Johansson Y., Suciu I., Grillberger K., Danker T., Möller C., et al. Functional alterations by a subgroup of neonicotinoid pesticides in human dopaminergic neurons. Arch. Toxicol. 2021;95:2081–2107. doi: 10.1007/s00204-021-03031-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.House J.S., Grimm F.A., Jima D.D., Zhou Y.-H., Rusyn I., Wright F.A. A Pipeline for High-Throughput Concentration Response Modeling of Gene Expression for Toxicogenomics. Front. Genet. 2017;8:168. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2017.00168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Love M.I., Huber W., Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Karreman C., Klima S., Holzer A.-K., Leist M. CaFFEE: A program for evaluating time courses of Ca2+ dependent signal changes of complex cells loaded with fluorescent indicator dyes. ALTEX. 2020;37:332–336. doi: 10.14573/altex.2003191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Raw data can be requested from the corresponding author.