Abstract
The acidic tumor microenvironment stands as a major obstacle to the efficient elimination of tumor cells. Norcantharidin (NCTD) is a powerful antitumor agent with multiple bioactivities. However, the effect of NCTD under acidic conditions is still unclear. Here, we report that NCTD can efficiently kill bladder cancer (BC) cells in acidic culture, and more intriguingly, NCTD can induce immunogenic cell death (ICD), thereby promoting antitumor immunity. In NCTD-treated BC cells, the surface-exposed calreticulin (ecto-CALR) was significantly increased. Consistently, co-culture with these cells promoted dendritic cell (DC) maturation. The NCTD-induced ICD is autophagy dependent, as autophagy inhibition completely blocked the NCTD-induced ecto-CALR and DC maturation. In addition, the DC showed a distinct maturation phenotype (CD80high CD86low) in acidic culture, as compared to that in physiological pH (CD80 high CD86high). Finally, the NCTD-induced ICD was validated in a mouse model. NCTD treatment significantly increased the tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes in MB49 bladder cancer mice. Immunizing mice with NCTD-treated MB49 cells significantly increased tumor-free survival as compared to control. These findings demonstrate that NCTD could induce ICD in an acidic environment and suggest the feasibility to combine NCTD with anticancer immunotherapy to treat BC.
Keywords: norcantharidin, immunogenic cell death, autophagy, acidic extracellular pH, bladder cancer
1. Introduction
Bladder cancer (BC) is among the most prevalent cancers worldwide. In clinical practice, around 80% of BC patients were diagnosed as non-muscle-invasive BC, with good life expectancy [1]. However, despite advancements in research and care, the 5-year survival rate for BC has not markedly changed [1]. Chemotherapy is an important treatment for BC, but it has failed in a large proportion of patients because of the gradual chemoresistance [2]. Therefore, it is necessary to elucidate the mechanism of BC resistance and identify new drugs for BC treatment.
The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a key in tumor cell survival. Solid tumors are characterized by hypoxia and high glycolytic activity, resulting in increased production and secretion of lactate and H+ to the extracellular space. The elevated glycolysis coupled with poor vascular perfusion leads to an acidic TME, with extracellular pH ranging from 6.5 to 6.9 [3]. The acidic TME creates a physiological barrier for cellular uptake of antitumor drugs, which is termed “ion trapping”, thus leading to drug resistance [4,5]. More importantly, the acidic TME impedes immune cells’ function and contributes to the escape of tumor cells from immune surveillance [6,7]. Therefore, the acidic TME stands as a major obstacle to the efficient elimination of tumor cells. The identification of drugs retaining anticancer activity in an acidic environment may improve the efficacy of cancer therapy.
In addition to direct cytotoxicity, chemotherapeutic agents are particularly efficient when they elicit immunogenic cell death (ICD) [8]. ICD is characterized by the emission of a series of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), mainly including exposure of calreticulin (CALR) on the cell surface, secretion of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), and release of the chromatin-binding protein high mobility group B1 (HMGB1) [9]. These DAMPs can be recognized by the immune cells and trigger an antitumor immune response [8]. Substantial evidence has indicated that certain chemotherapeutic agents, such as anthracyclines or microtubule-interfering drugs (PTX), can induce ICD [10,11]. However, ICD under an acidic environment is seldom reported.
Norcantharidin (NCTD), a demethylated analog of cantharidin, has been used to treat cancer in China since 1984 [12]. NCTD has powerful and extensive anti-cancer activities towards various types of cancer cells, by inhibiting proliferation, migration and metastasis, and inducing apoptosis [13]. Moreover, NCTD can also improve anti-cancer immunity. NCTD enhanced the activity of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) against hepatocellular carcinoma, by inducing a shift from M2 to M1 polarization [14]. Recently, our research has shown that NCTD can increase the tumor infiltration of CD4+/CD8+ T in prostate cancer [15]. Therefore, NCTD has dual anti-cancer activities, namely, direct killing effects and promotion of anti-cancer immunity, implying that NCTD may induce ICD.
In this research, the anticancer activity of NCTD on BC cells was investigated in acidic culture. ICD was tested by CALR exposure and ATP secretion after NCTD treatment. The immunogenic activity of the NCTD-treated cells was valued by stimulation of dendritic cell maturate. Further, the immunogenic activity of the NCTD-treated BC cells was validated in mice. The results show that NCTD efficiently inhibits BC cells in acidic conditions, and it proves for the first time that NCTD could induce ICD of BC cells.
2. Results
2.1. NCTD Shows Enhanced Cytotoxicity on BC Cells in Acidic Culture
NCTD can inhibit proliferation and induce apoptosis of cancer cells [13]. However, most of these investigations were performed under physiological pH conditions. To mimic the acidic TME, we first tested the proliferation of human BC cell lines (EJ and UMUC3) in acidic medium (pH 6.7). In acidic culture, cells were in a slow-cycling state, as confirmed by decreased DNA replication (Figure 1A), G1 accumulation (Figure 1B), and decreased protein levels of the G1-S regulators, including E2F1, MCM7, and CDC6 (Figure 1C). However, the cells showed no apparent apoptosis (Figure 2B).
NCTD showed enhanced cytotoxicity on BC cells in acidic culture (Figure 2A). The IC50 in acidic culture (8.64 μM for EJ, 6.86 μM for UMUC3) was much lower than that in physiological pH medium (22.67 μM for EJ, 32.75 μM for UMUC3). Moreover, NCTD induced obvious apoptosis of BC cells in acidic culture (Figure 2B).
2.2. NCTD Increases Surface Exposure of CALR in Both Physiological and Acidic Culture
CALR is a major DAMP that mediates immunogenic cell death. Surface-exposed CALR (ecto-CALR) functions as an “eat me” signal for phagocytosis by dendritic cells [8]. In this study, the effect of NCTD on ecto-CALR was tested by flow cytometry, and PTX and cisplatin (DDP) were used as positive [11] and negative [16] controls, respectively. NCTD and PTX, but not DDP, significantly increased ecto-CALR in both EJ and UMUC3 cells (Figure 3A,B). Acidic culture alone slightly increased the ecto-CALR, but it reached no statistical difference compared with physiological pH (Figure 3A,B). Notably, NCTD induced more apparent ecto-CALR in acidic culture, to a more powerful potential than that in physiological pH (Figure 3A,B).
Next, the secretion of ATP after NCTD treatment was examined. NCTD did not alter the ATP content in the supernatant and cell lysis, in both physiological and acidic conditions (Figure 3C,D).
2.3. NCTD Promotes Autophagy in Both Physiological and Acidic Cultures
Autophagy is involved in the anticancer mechanism of NCTD [13] and participates in the ICD regulation. Therefore, we tested the autophagic profiles after NCTD treatment. NCTD increased the mRNA levels of autophagy-regulating genes, including atg5, atg7, and BECN1 (Figure 4A). Consistently, Western blot analysis showed increased conversion of LC3-I to LC3-II (Figure 4B). The NCTD-induced autophagy was further supported by immunofluorescence which showed obvious RFP-LC3 puncta (Figure 5A,B).
Next, NCTD-induced autophagy was tested in acidic culture. Acidic culture alone induced RFP-LC3 puncta formation (Figure 5A,B), consistent with previous reports that cancer cells upregulate autophagy as a survival mechanism against acidic stress [17,18]. Intriguingly, in acidic culture, NCTD further increased the formation of RFP-LC3 puncta (Figure 5A,B) and improved the autophagic genes expression (atg5, atg7, and BECN1) (Figure 5C). This indicates that NCTD enhances autophagy in acidic culture.
2.4. Inhibition of Autophagy Attenuates NCTD-Induced Ecto-CALR
Autophagy forms the ‘core’ of regulating pathways behind ICD [19]. However, the effect is inconsistent in different reports. On one hand, autophagy may positively regulate ICD by favoring ATP secretion [9,20]. On the other hand, autophagy negatively regulates Hyp-PDT-induced ecto-CALR (without affecting ATP secretion) by attenuating oxidative stress [21]. To elucidate the contribution of autophagy in NCTD-induced ICD, autophagy was inhibited by chemical inhibitors. It shows that chloroquine failed to inhibit autophagy in acidic culture (data not shown). This is consistent with previous research showing that chloroquine lost activity in acidic pH, possibly due to the reduced cellular uptake [18]. While, another autophagy inhibitor, 3-methyladenosine (3-MA), successfully inhibited the NCTD-induced autophagy in acidic culture (Figure 6A,B). Autophagy inhibition by 3MA completely inhibited the NCTD-induced ecto-CALR in acidic culture, as well as in physiological pH (Figure 6C,D). These results indicate that NCTD induces ecto-CALR in an autophagy-dependent manner.
2.5. NCTD-Treated BC Cells Promote Dendritic Cell Maturation
To further investigate the immunogenic properties of NCTD-treated BC cells, mouse dendritic cells (mDC) were challenged with MB49 mouse bladder cancer cells pretreated with or without NCTD, then the mDC maturation makers (CD80+/CD11c+ or CD86+/CD11c+) were analyzed by flow cytometry. As shown in Figure 7A, MB49 challenge increased the percentage of CD80+/CD11c+ cell population in both physiological and acidic cultures. As expectation, pretreatment of MB49 with NCTD further enhanced the CD80+/CD11c+ population. While, inhibition of autophagy by 3-MA abolished the NCTD pretreatment-induced CD80+/CD11c+ enhancement.
The percentage of CD86+/CD11c+ showed a similar tendency as CD80+/CD11c+ among groups in physiological pH culture (Figure 7B). However, in acidic culture, there was no significant difference among groups (Figure 7B). This indicates that the acidic pH may suppress MB49 challenge-induced CD86 expression. NCTD alone did not alter the percentages of CD80+/CD11c+ (Figure 7A) and CD86+/CD11c+ (Figure 7B), excluding the direct effect of NCTD on DC maturation. Together, these results demonstrate that NCTD-treated MB49 cells can promote DC maturation in both physiological and acidic cultures, in an autophagy-dependent manner.
2.6. NCTD Improves Antitumor Immunity in Mice
Finally, we determined the immunomodulatory activity of NCTD in the MB49 mouse bladder cancer model (Figure 8A). NCTD obviously reduced tumor growth in mice (Figure 8C). The proportions of CD4+ T and CD8+ T cells in peripheral blood were increased after NCTD treatment (Figure 8D,E). Moreover, the immunohistochemistry assay showed increased tumor-infiltrating CD4+ T and CD8+ T lymphocytes in NCTD-treated mice (Figure 8F,G).
We further validated the NCTD-induced ICD in mice by using the NCTD-treated MB49 cells as a “tumor vaccine” (Figure 8B). Our results demonstrated that the tumor-free survival among mice immunized with NCTD-treated MB49 cells was significantly increased as compared with the control (immunized with DMSO-treated MB49 cells), indicating that NCTD was a bona fide inducer of ICD in vivo (Figure 8H).
3. Discussion
Anticancer chemotherapeutic agents are particularly efficient when they induce ICD thus enhancing antitumor immune response. However, most of the ICD inducers were explored under physiological pH conditions. Since solid tumors are characterized by acidic TME, it is necessary to study the ICD in acidic conditions. In this paper, we show that NCTD is an ICD inducer in both physiological pH and acidic conditions. NCTD can efficiently increase ecto-CALR in BC cells, and co-culture with NCTD-treated BC cells promote DC maturation. Moreover, the mouse in vivo study revealed the enhancing effect of NCTD on antitumor immunity. Further, we show that the NCTD-induced ICD is autophagy dependent. Autophagy underlies the cytotoxicity of NCTD and positively regulates the NCTD-induced ICD. In addition, we reveal that DC shows a distinct maturation phenotype (CD80high CD86low) in acidic culture. Our current work not only adds new information on the ICD inducer under acidic conditions but also provides new insights into the anticancer mechanism of NCTD.
3.1. NCTD Is an ICD Inducer
It has been long recognized that NCTD has immunomodulatory activity. NCTD can facilitate the activation of macrophages against bacteria in acute peritonitis mouse models [22], decreasing the shift from M2 to M1 polarization of tumor-associated macrophages in hepatocellular carcinoma [14]. Our previous study showed that NCTD can preferentially inhibit the Treg and enhance antitumor immunity of the prostate cancer cell vaccine [15]. In this research, NCTD treatment resulted in increased surface exposure of CALR in BC cells and improved the immunogenicity of MB49 cells. In the mouse bladder cancer model, NCTD treatment increased CD4+ T and CD8+ T frequency in tumor sites and in peripheral blood. Furthermore, immunization with NCTD-treated MB49 cells can protect mice from MB49 rechallenge. Therefore, NCTD clearly represents as an ICD inducer.
Only certain anticancer agents have been reported to induce ICD. ICD inducers have been classified into two classes (type I and type II), on the basis of how they induce endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress [23]. The majority of ICD inducers are considered type I, which trigger cancer cell death by acting on different targets such as cytosolic proteins (as in the case of shikonin), plasma membrane proteins/channels (as in the case of cardiac glycosides), DNA or DNA replication and repair machinery proteins (as in the case of anthracyclines, mitoxantrone, oxaliplatin, and UVC irradiation); while the ER is affected as a ‘collateral’ effect [23]. On the contrary, type II inducers are considered to lead to cancer cell death by direct targeting ER [23]. So far, only a small number of type II inducers have been recognized, with photodynamic therapy (PDT) as a typical one [10]. NCTD has extensive antitumor effects on diverse cancer cells. However, the specific targets are not determined [13]. NCTD can affect cell growth, apoptosis, autophagy, migration, and invasion through a variety of signaling pathways [13]. There are no reports that NCTD can directly target ER. Therefore, we consider that NCTD should belong to the type I inducer.
In this research, NCTD increases the CALR exposure but does not affect ATP secretion. ICD is characterized by the emission of a series of DAMPs, mainly including CALR, ATP, and HMGB1. Besides, many other DAMPs such as type I IFN, annexin A1, cancer cell-derived nucleic acids, heat shock protein 90 (HSP90), and HSP70 are associated with ICD [8]. In this research, NCTD increases the CALR exposure but does not affect ATP secretion. In the future, the regulatory effect of NCTD on other DAMPs is warranted.
3.2. Autophagy Underlies the Cytotoxicity of NCTD and Positively Regulates the NCTD-Induced ICD
Substantial evidence shows that autophagy is involved in the antitumor effect of NCTD. NCTD can induce autophagic cell death in hepatocellular carcinoma [24], human osteosarcoma [25], and neuroblastoma [26]. As known, the acidic tumor microenvironment contributes to drug resistance by creating an “ion trapping” barrier for cellular uptake of antitumor drugs [4,5]. In this study, NCTD shows higher cytotoxicity on BC cells in acidic culture than in physiological pH medium, which indicates that NCTD can enter BC cells in acidic conditions. The enhanced cytotoxicity may arise from the fragile cell conditions in acidic culture. As our results show, in acidic culture, BC cells are in a slow-cycling state with enhanced basal autophagy; while NCTD treatment further enhances autophagy and leads to excessive autophagy. Excessive autophagy has been well documented during ischemia/reperfusion injury, where it can lead to the destruction of essential molecules and organelles, so as to favor cell death [27,28]. Excessive autophagy has also been shown to induce cell death in tumor cells [29]. In this paper, excessive autophagy was associated with enhanced cytotoxicity of NCTD on BC cells in acidic culture. Therefore, induction of autophagy underlies the antitumor activity of NCTD.
In this paper, the NCTD-induced ecto-CALT and the stimulation of NCTD-treated BC cells on DC maturation were blocked by autophagy inhibition, indicating that autophagy positively regulates the NCTD-induced ICD. Actually, reports on the role of autophagy in ICD are not consistent. Chemotherapy-induced autophagy, such as mitoxantrone or thiostrepton, positively regulates ICD by favoring ATP secretion, not altering CALT exposure [9,20]. On the contrary, ROS-induced autophagy negatively regulates CALT exposure by attenuating oxidative stress, leaving ATP secretion unaffected [21]. In our research, the NCTD-induced autophagy was associated with CALT exposure not ATP secretion. Therefore, different autophagy inducers may exert distinct effects on ICD, with autophagy itself not decisive. In addition, the different cell lines used in the study may also account for the discrepancy in the regulation of autophagy on ICD.
Together, our results suggest that induction of autophagy underlies the antitumor activity of NCTD against BC, including the ICD effect. However, although NCTD-induced autophagy is well documented in various cancer cells, the specific mechanism underlying this activity is vague and needs to be further studied [13].
3.3. DC Shows Distinct Maturation Phenotype in Acidic Culture
The acidic microenvironment is tightly related to the activation of immune cells. It has been shown that extracellular acidosis increases the expression of HLA-DR, CD40, CD80, CD86, CD83, and CCR7, and triggers the maturation of DC [30,31]. In this study, the percentage of CD80+/CD11c+ and CD86+/CD11c+ was increased in acidic culture. Therefore, the acidic microenvironment could promote DC maturation. However, the MB49 challenge-induced DC maturation showed a distinct phenotype in acidic culture. The expression of CD80 was improved by MB49 challenge in acidic culture. While, CD86 expression showed no significant change before and after MB49 challenge. It seems that the MB49 challenge-induced CD86 expression was inhibited by acidic extracellular pH. Similar results have been reported in other immune cells. The acidic environment downregulated M1-related genes including CD86 and thus promoted macrophage M2 polarization [32]. Another study showed that acidic extracellular pH could suppress CD86 augmentation in THP-1 cells exposed to allergens (2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene and imidazolidinyl urea) [33]. Therefore, the acidic extracellular pH has substantial effects on DC maturation, especially under tumor cell challenge, and should be considered in the development of antitumor immunotherapy strategies.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Cell Culture
The human bladder cancer cell lines EJ, UMUC3, and mouse bladder cancer cell line MB49 were obtained from the ATCC and maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM, Gibco, Grand Island, NE, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 U/mL streptomycin. All cells were cultured at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. To simulate the acidic tumor microenvironment, the pH value of the cell culture medium was adjusted to 6.6–6.8 by adding HEPES, NaHCO3, and HCl, and determined prior to each experiment to ensure the stability of the culture microenvironment.
4.2. EdU Incorporation Assay
To detect cell proliferation ability under an acidic environment, EJ and UMUC3 cells were incubated with 50 μM EdU for 2 h at 37 °C after being cultured in acidic medium for different days, then washed twice with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min. After incubated with 2 mg/mL glycine for 10 min, the cells were permeated by 0.5% TritonX-100 PBS and stained with Apollo Dyeing reaction solution in the dark for 30 min at room temperature. Permeated again, DNA was stained with 1× Hoechst 33342 reaction diluent in the dark for 30 min at room temperature. The images were obtained by fluorescence microscope.
4.3. Cell Cycle Analysis
Cells were collected and washed with PBS, and then fixed with 70% ethanol at −20 °C overnight. After centrifuging at 1000× g for 5 min, the cells were re-suspended in PBS for 15 min. Then, the cells were incubated with DNA staining solution containing PI and RNaseA for 30 min at room temperature. Cell cycle distribution was detected by flow cytometry and data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Ashland, OH, USA).
4.4. Western Blot
Cells were lysed with RIPA buffer containing PMSF, protease, and phosphatase inhibitors on ice and the protein concentration was determined by the BCA assay. The protein samples were separated by SDS-PAGE and then transferred to PVDF membranes after electrophoresis. After blocking with 5% skim milk in TBST for 2 h, the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. Finally, the membranes were incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature and the target bands were detected by the Chemiluminescence system. The band intensities were quantified using the ImageJ software. The primary antibodies are as follows: LC3 (Cell Signaling, 3868S); P62 (ProteinTech Group, Chicago, IL, USA, 18420-1-AP); β-actin (ProteinTech Group, Rosement, IL 60018, USA, 66009-1-Ig); E2F1 (Cell Signaling, 3742S); CDC6 (ProteinTech Group, Rosement, IL 60018, USA, 11640-1-AP); MCM7 (ProteinTech Group, Rosement, IL 60018, USA, 11225-1-AP).
4.5. Cytotoxicity Assay
The cell viability was assessed by MTS assay. EJ and UMUC3 cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 8 × 103 cells/well and cultured in a humidified chamber comprising 5% CO2 at 37 °C for 24 h. Then, the cells were treated with NCTD at a serial of 2-fold dilution (0 to 320 μM) in neutral and acidic culture medium. After incubation for 24 h, 10 μL of MTS solution was added to each well, and the cells were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. Then, the cells were placed in a microplate reader to detect the absorbance at 490 nm, cell viability could be calculated according to the following equation: cell viability = (experimental group OD − zeroing OD)/(control group OD − zeroing OD) × 100%.
4.6. Cell Apoptosis Analysis
Cells were collected and washed twice with cold PBS, and then 100 μL of 1× binding buffer was used to resuspend the cells. Next, the cells were incubated with Annexin V-FITC and PI for 15 min in the dark. Then, the cells were washed with cold PBS and resuspended in 200 μL of 1× binding buffer. Finally, the stained cells were analyzed by flow cytometry.
4.7. Flow Cytometry
Cells were harvested and washed twice with PBS and then blocked in 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 15 min. Subsequently, cells were stained with fluorescent antibodies for 30 min at 4 °C. PE-labeled anti-Calreticulin antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK, ab83220) PE-labeled anti-mouse CD80 antibody (Tonbo Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA, 50-0801-U025), FITC-labeled anti-mouse CD86 antibody (Tonbo Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA, 35-0862-U025), and APC-labeled anti-Mouse CD11c antibody (Tonbo Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA, 20-0114-U025) were used. After washing three times with PBS, the cells were resuspended with PBS and detected by flow cytometry (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA) within an hour. Data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Ashland, OH, USA).
4.8. Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Total RNA was extracted from cells using RNAiso plus. After detecting the concentration and purity of total RNA, reverse transcription was performed with the PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix Kit (TaKaRa, Kusatsu, Japan). The reverse transcription procedure was set as 37 °C for 15 min, 84 °C for 5s and 4 °C for a moderate amount of time according to the specification. mRNA expression in cells was measured with TB Green Taq (TaKaRa, Kusatsu, Japan) on the Light Cycler 480 Roche system. Gene-specific primers were listed as follow (5′-3′): β-actin (human): CATGTACGTTGCTATCCAGGC (forward) and CTCCTTAATGTCACGCACGAT (reverse); atg5 (human): AAAGATGTGCTTCGAGATGTGT (forward) and CACTTTGTCAGTTACCAACGTCA (reverse); atg7 (human): CAGTTTGCCCCTTTTAGTAGTGC (forward) and CCAGCCGATACTCGTTCAGC (reverse); BECN1 (human): GGTGTCTCTCGCAGATTCATC (forward) and TCAGTCTTCGGCTGAGGTTCT (reverse); calreticulin (human): CCTGCCGTCTACTTCAAGGAG (forward) and GAACTTGCCGGAACTGAGAAC (reverse). Expression levels of the target genes were normalized against the β-actin gene. In order to ensure the accuracy of the experiment, each experiment needed to repeat three times independently. The result was calculated with the CT value.
4.9. ATP Analysis
Extracellular ATP in conditioned medium and intracellular ATP in cell lysate following the indicated treatment were measured by the Enhanced ATP Assay Kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China), according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Fluorescence was detected by the Spark multimode microplate reader (TECAN, Switzerland). For the intracellular ATP analysis, in order to eliminate the error caused by the difference in cell numbers in sample preparation, the concentration of ATP was converted into the form of nmol/mg protein. Results of each group are presented as the ratio to control.
4.10. Immunofluorescence
Cells grown on coverslips were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) very gently and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature. After permeabilizing with 0.2% TritonX-100 for 10 min, cells were blocked in 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 h. Subsequently, staining with primary antibodies LC3 diluted 1:200 in 5% BSA was performed overnight at 4 °C and then cells were incubated with the fluorescent secondary antibody of the corresponding species (1:400) for 1 h at room temperature. After the final wash (three times for 5 min) in PBS, cells were counterstained with DAPI for 5 min. The coverslips were mounted on glass slides with mounting medium and Antifade Solution. Fluorescence images were acquired using a confocal fluorescence microscope (Zeiss LSM-880) and images were processed with ZEN software.
4.11. BMDC Culture and Stimulation
Bone marrow-derived DCs (BMDCs) were generated from the femurs and tibias of 5–7-week-old C57BL/6 mice and the bone marrow cells were harvested and treated with ACK lysis buffer for 5 min. Then, the cells were washed twice with PBS and resuspended with complete medium. In all, 2 × 106 bone marrow cells were cultured with 10 mL of complete medium supplemented with 20 ng/mL GM-CSF for 3 days. Then, an additional 10 mL of complete medium was added and supplemented with 20 ng/mL GM-CSF. On day 6, half of the medium was replaced with fresh complete medium, and the cells were maintained. On day 8, immature DC were acquired and co-cultured with MB49, NCTD-pretreated MB49, or NCTD+3MA-pretreated MB49 for 24 h. CD80+/CD11c+ or CD86+/CD11c+DCs populations were detected by flow cytometry.
4.12. Animal Experiments
All mice were maintained in pathogen-free conditions and the experiments were performed according to the guidelines of the Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee at Southern Medical University (Guangzhou, China). The ethical code is SMUL2016022. To establish the tumor model, C57BL/6/female mice (6–8 weeks, 20 ± 2 g) were injected subcutaneously with 5.0 × 106 MB49 cells in 0.1 mL of PBS. When palpable tumors were present, the mice were randomly divided into control and NCTD treatment groups. The mice in the control group were given a 0.1 mL dose of PBS solution by intraperitoneal injection, those in the treatment group were administered with NCTD at a dose of 10 mg/kg/day for 14 days. Tumor volume was measured every 3 days. On the 30th day post-inoculation, the mice were sacrificed, and the tumors were obtained to detect relevant indicators. The blood samples of each mouse were collected and mixed with ACK lysing buffer (Solarbio) to lyse red blood cells. After washing with PBS, the cells were stained with APC-Cy7-A-labeled anti-mCD4 or FITC-labeled anti-mCD8 antibody for 30 min. Then, cells were washed three times with PBS, resuspended with PBS, and detected by flow cytometry (Becton Dickinson) within an hour. Data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Ashland, OH, USA).
For tumor vaccination assay, MB49 cells were incubated with NCTD for 48 h, and those treated with DMSO were used as the control group. Next, cells were fixed in 30% ethanol (v/v) for 1 h at room temperature. Cell viability was tested by trypan blue (0.4%) staining. Then, the cells (5 × 105 cells per mouse) were injected subcutaneously to the left flank of immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice. After 7 days, the vaccinated mice were re-challenged with untreated MB49 cells (5 × 106 cells/mouse) by intraperitoneal injection. The ascitic fluid development was observed to monitor tumor growth. After 60 days, all mice were sacrificed to examine the peritoneal tumor development.
4.13. Immunohistochemical Analysis
Tumor tissues of mice were collected and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and then embedded in paraffin. Paraffin sections (5 μm) were deparaffinized, rehydrated with PBS, and incubated with 3% H2O2 for 10 min. Then, antigen retrieval was achieved by covering the slides with citrate buffer (pH 6.0) and heating for 10 min at 95 °C. The sections were blocked with 5% BSA for 30 min at room temperature and incubated with anti-mCD4 (1:700; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), and anti-mCD8 (1:1000; eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) antibody at 4 °C overnight. After washing with PBS, the sections were incubated with the secondary antibody conjugated to diaminobenzidine (DAB) for 1 h at room temperature. All tissues were counterstained with hematoxylin.
4.14. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis software SPSS 22.0 was used for data analysis and data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical comparisons between two groups were performed utilizing a two-tailed Student’s t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for multiple groups. p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Author Contributions
J.L., Z.H. designed experiments; L.X., B.S., L.M. and C.Z. carried out experiments; J.L., Z.H., Z.Z. and H.L. analyzed experiments results; J.L. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81672915), and the grants from the Shenzhen science and technology project (JCYJ20180305164655077).
Institutional Review Board Statement
The animal study protocol was approved by the Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee at Southern Medical University (Guangzhou, China).
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Tran L., Xiao J.F., Agarwal N., Duex J.E., Theodorescu D. Advances in bladder cancer biology and therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2021;21:104–121. doi: 10.1038/s41568-020-00313-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mari A., D’Andrea D., Abufaraj M., Foerster B., Kimura S., Shariat S.F. Genetic determinants for chemo- and radiotherapy resistance in bladder cancer. Transl. Androl. Urol. 2017;6:1081–1089. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.08.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wojtkowiak J.W., Verduzco D., Schramm K.J., Gillies R.J. Drug resistance and cellular adaptation to tumor acidic pH microenvironment. Mol. Pharm. 2011;8:2032–2038. doi: 10.1021/mp200292c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Taylor S., Spugnini E.P., Assaraf Y.G., Azzarito T., Rauch C., Fais S. Microenvironment acidity as a major determinant of tumor chemoresistance: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) as a novel therapeutic approach. Drug Resist. Updat. 2015;23:69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2015.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Raghunand N., Mahoney B.P., Gillies R.J. Tumor acidity, ion trapping and chemotherapeutics. II. pH-dependent partition coefficients predict importance of ion trapping on pharmacokinetics of weakly basic chemotherapeutic agents. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2003;66:1219–1229. doi: 10.1016/S0006-2952(03)00468-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang J.X., Choi S.Y.C., Niu X., Kang N., Xue H., Killam J., Wang Y. Lactic acid and an acidic tumor microenvironment suppress anticancer immunity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:8363. doi: 10.3390/ijms21218363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Huber V., Camisaschi C., Berzi A., Ferro S., Lugini L., Triulzi T., Tuccitto A., Tagliabue E., Castelli C., Rivoltini L. Cancer acidity: An ultimate frontier of tumor immune escape and a novel target of immunomodulation. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2017;43:74–89. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Galluzzi L., Vitale I., Aaronson S.A., Abrams J.M., Adam D., Agostinis P., Alnemri E.S., Altucci L., Amelio I., Andrews D.W., et al. Molecular mechanisms of cell death: Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25:486–541. doi: 10.1038/s41418-017-0012-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Michaud M., Martins I., Sukkurwala A.Q., Adjemian S., Ma Y., Pellegatti P., Shen S., Kepp O., Scoazec M., Mignot G., et al. Autophagy-dependent anticancer immune responses induced by chemotherapeutic agents in mice. Science. 2011;334:1573–1577. doi: 10.1126/science.1208347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Asadzadeh Z., Safarzadeh E., Safaei S., Baradaran A., Mohammadi A., Hajiasgharzadeh K., Derakhshani A., Argentiero A., Silvestris N., Baradaran B. Current approaches for combination therapy of cancer: The role of immunogenic cell death. Cancers. 2020;12:1047. doi: 10.3390/cancers12041047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lau T.S., Chan L.K.Y., Man G.C.W., Wong C.H., Lee J.H.S., Yim S.F., Cheung T.H., McNeish I.A., Kwong J. Paclitaxel induces immunogenic cell death in ovarian cancer via TLR4/IKK2/SNARE-dependent exocytosis. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2020;8:1099–1111. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-19-0616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang G., Dong J., Deng L. Overview of cantharidin and its analogues. Curr. Med. Chem. 2018;25:2034–2044. doi: 10.2174/0929867324666170414165253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhou J., Ren Y., Tan L., Song X., Wang M., Li Y., Cao Z., Guo C. Norcantharidin: Research advances in pharmaceutical activities and derivatives in recent years. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020;131:110755. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lu S., Gao Y., Huang X., Wang X. Cantharidin exerts anti-hepatocellular carcinoma by miR-214 modulating macrophage polarization. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2014;10:415–425. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.8002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mo L., Zhang X., Shi X., Wei L., Zheng D., Li H., Gao J., Li J., Hu Z. Norcantharidin enhances antitumor immunity of GM-CSF prostate cancer cells vaccine by inducing apoptosis of regulatory T cells. Cancer Sci. 2018;109:2109–2118. doi: 10.1111/cas.13639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang Q., Ju X., Wang J., Fan Y., Ren M., Zhang H. Immunogenic cell death in anticancer chemotherapy and its impact on clinical studies. Cancer Lett. 2018;438:17–23. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.08.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang S., Lv Y., Zhou Y., Ling J., Wang H., Gu D., Wang C., Qin W., Zheng X., Jin H. Acidic extracellular pH induces autophagy to promote anoikis resistance of hepatocellular carcinoma cells via downregulation of miR-3663-3p. J. Cancer. 2021;12:3418–3426. doi: 10.7150/jca.51849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pellegrini P., Strambi A., Zipoli C., Hagg-Olofsson M., Buoncervello M., Linder S., De Milito A. Acidic extracellular pH neutralizes the autophagy-inhibiting activity of chloroquine: Implications for cancer therapies. Autophagy. 2014;10:562–571. doi: 10.4161/auto.27901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Garg A.D., Dudek A.M., Agostinis P. Calreticulin surface exposure is abrogated in cells lacking, chaperone-mediated autophagy-essential gene, LAMP2A. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e826. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wang Y., Xie W., Humeau J., Chen G., Liu P., Pol J., Zhang Z., Kepp O., Kroemer G. Autophagy induction by thiostrepton improves the efficacy of immunogenic chemotherapy. J. Immunother. Cancer. 2020;8:e000462. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Garg A.D., Dudek A.M., Ferreira G.B., Verfaillie T., Vandenabeele P., Krysko D.V., Mathieu C., Agostinis P. ROS-induced autophagy in cancer cells assists in evasion from determinants of immunogenic cell death. Autophagy. 2013;9:1292–1307. doi: 10.4161/auto.25399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhao Q., Qian Y., Li R., Tan B., Han H., Liu M., Qian M., Du B. Norcantharidin facilitates LPS-mediated immune responses by up-regulation of AKT/NF-kappaB signaling in macrophages. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e44956. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dudek A.M., Garg A.D., Krysko D.V., De Ruysscher D., Agostinis P. Inducers of immunogenic cancer cell death. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2013;24:319–333. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2013.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sun C.Y., Zhu Y., Li X.F., Tang L.P., Su Z.Q., Wang X.Q., Li C.Y., Yang H.M., Zheng G.J., Feng B. Norcantharidin alone or in combination with crizotinib induces autophagic cell death in hepatocellular carcinoma by repressing c-Met-mTOR signaling. Oncotarget. 2017;8:114945–114955. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mei L., Sang W., Cui K., Zhang Y., Chen F., Li X. Norcantharidin inhibits proliferation and promotes apoptosis via c-Met/Akt/mTOR pathway in human osteosarcoma cells. Cancer Sci. 2019;110:582–595. doi: 10.1111/cas.13900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Han Z., Li B., Wang J., Zhang X., Li Z., Dai L., Cao M., Jiang J. Norcantharidin inhibits SK-N-SH neuroblastoma cell growth by induction of autophagy and apoptosis. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2017;16:33–44. doi: 10.1177/1533034615624583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Corsetti G., Pasini E., Romano C., Chen-Scarabelli C., Scarabelli T.M., Flati V., Saravolatz L., Dioguardi F.S. How can malnutrition affect autophagy in chronic heart failure? Focus and perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:3332. doi: 10.3390/ijms22073332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Xu D., Kong T., Zhang S., Cheng B., Chen J., Wang C. Orexin-A protects against cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury by inhibiting excessive autophagy through OX1R-mediated MAPK/ERK/mTOR pathway. Cell. Signal. 2021;79:109839. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2020.109839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.He B., Zhang W., He J. Fraxinellone has anticancer activity by inducing osteosarcoma cell apoptosis via promoting excessive autophagy flux. Front. Pharmacol. 2021;12:653212. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.653212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Martinez D., Vermeulen M., von Euw E., Sabatte J., Maggini J., Ceballos A., Trevani A., Nahmod K., Salamone G., Barrio M., et al. Extracellular acidosis triggers the maturation of human dendritic cells and the production of IL-12. J. Immunol. 2007;179:1950–1959. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.3.1950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Vermeulen M., Giordano M., Trevani A.S., Sedlik C., Gamberale R., Fernandez-Calotti P., Salamone G., Raiden S., Sanjurjo J., Geffner J.R. Acidosis improves uptake of antigens and MHC class I-restricted presentation by dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 2004;172:3196–3204. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.5.3196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wu H., Yin Y., Hu X., Peng C., Liu Y., Li Q., Huang W., Huang Q. Effects of environmental pH on macrophage polarization and osteoimmunomodulation. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2019;5:5548–5557. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mitachi T., Mezaki M., Yamashita K., Itagaki H. Acidic conditions induce the suppression of CD86 and CD54 expression in THP-1 cells. J. Toxicol. Sci. 2018;43:299–309. doi: 10.2131/jts.43.299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.