Skip to main content
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance logoLink to JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
. 2022 Mar 28;8(3):e31033. doi: 10.2196/31033

Geosocial Networking Smartphone App Use and High-Risk Sexual Behaviors Among Men Who Have Sex With Men Attending University in China: Cross-sectional Study

Song Fan 1,2,#, Peiyang Li 2,#, Yuqing Hu 3,#, Hui Gong 4, Maohe Yu 4, Yi Ding 5, Zhenzhou Luo 5, Guohui Wu 6, Lin Ouyang 6, Huachun Zou 3,7,8,
Editor: Travis Sanchez
Reviewed by: Xueying Yang, Meiqi Xin
PMCID: PMC9002592  PMID: 35343911

Abstract

Background

Gay apps are smartphone-based geosocial networking apps where many men who have sex with men (MSM) socialize and seek sex partners. Existing studies showed that gay app use is associated with greater odds of high-risk sexual behaviors and potentially more HIV infections. However, little is known about this behavior among young MSM.

Objective

We conducted this study to understand gay app use and its influencing factors among MSM attending university in China.

Methods

From January to March 2019, participants were recruited from 4 regions with large populations of college students in China: Chongqing, Guangdong, Shandong, and Tianjin. The eligibility criteria were MSM aged 16 years or older, self-identified as a university student, and being HIV negative. A self-administered online structured questionnaire was used to collect data on sociodemographic information, sexual behaviors, gay app use, substance use, and HIV testing history. We performed multivariable log-binomial regression to assess correlates of seeking sex partners via gay apps.

Results

A total of 447 MSM attending university with an average age of 20.4 (SD 1.5) years were recruited. Almost all participants (439/447, 98.2%) reported gay app use at some point in their life, and 240/439 (53.7%) reported ever seeking sex partners via gay apps. Blued (428/439, 97.5%) was the most popular gay app. Higher proportions of sexual risk behaviors (including seeking sex partners via apps [P<.001], engaging in group sex [P<.001], having multiple sex partners [P<.001], unawareness of sex partners’ HIV status [P<.001], and using recreational drugs during sex [P<.02]) were positively associated with the increase in the frequency of gay app use. In multivariable analysis, participants who used gay apps to seek sex partners might be more likely to have multiple sex partners in the past 3 months (adjusted prevalence ratio [APR] 1.53, 95% CI 1.33-1.76; P<.001), engage in group sex in the past 3 months (APR 1.55, 95% CI 1.35-1.78; P<.001), and have sex partners with unknown or positive HIV status (APR 1.72, 95% CI 1.46-2.01; P<.001).

Conclusions

Seeking sex partners via gay apps may associate with the increased high-risk sexual behaviors among MSM attending university. The causality between seeking sex partners via gay apps and increased high-risk sexual behaviors should be further investigated so as to inform potential policies for HIV prevention.

Trial Registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1900020645; http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=34741

Keywords: gay app, men who have sex with men, student, China, smartphone, mobile phone

Introduction

Gay apps are smartphone-based geosocial networking apps where men who have sex with men (MSM) socialize. In recent years, gay apps have gained increasing popularity in the MSM community. Grindr has more than 3 million daily users in nearly 200 countries [1,2]. Blued is the first gay app originating from China and has more than 40 million registered users worldwide [3]. Gay apps have become the main platform for seeking sex partners and romantic relationships among MSM [4,5] thanks to the geo-positioning function, which facilitates MSM to socialize with nearby partners [5,6].

The widespread use of gay apps brings about challenges to HIV prevention in MSM. Existing studies showed that gay app users reported more sex partners than nongay app users [7,8]. Gay app users had more frequent sexual behaviors and were more likely to engage in unprotected sex with partners met via gay apps [8,9]. Moreover, MSM who have used gay apps for over 1 year were more likely to drink alcohol, use illicit drugs, and abuse substances, making them more vulnerable to HIV [10]. However, some studies found gay apps might be conducive to HIV control, as gay apps could be used to disseminate HIV knowledge [11] and promote HIV testing [12].

MSM attending university in China have become a key population of HIV/AIDS transmission [13,14]. The number of annual newly diagnosed HIV cases among students is over 3000 since 2017, which is mostly attributable to homosexual behavior among men [15]. High-risk behaviors such as condomless sex, group sex, and drug use during anal intercourse are prevalent among MSM attending university, and these behaviors may render this population more vulnerable to HIV [16]. Compared with nonstudent MSM, it is more difficult to approach and investigate this young group. This is largely because most of them only recently realized their sexual orientation and are not ready to disclose their sexuality. They are also concerned about stigma from peers if they disclose their sexuality [17]. Their discrete status is a barrier to timely access to HIV prevention and care services.

Previous studies have found that MSM using gay apps tend to be younger and better educated [1], raising concerns about potential effects of gay app use on MSM attending university. However, literature on gay app use in MSM attending university is scarce and the following aspects are not well understood: (1) the characteristics of MSM attending university who use gay apps. (2) Does the use of gay apps facilitate risky sex behaviors, thus leading to an increased risk of HIV infection? (3) Can gay apps be utilized to promote sexual health among this young population? Therefore, this study aims to understand (1) the relationship between frequency of gap app use and engagement in sexual risk behaviors, (2) the relationship between seeking sex partners via gay apps and engagement in sexual risk behaviors.

Methods

Participants

From January to April 2019, the study was conducted in 4 regions with large populations of college students in China, including Chongqing in southwest China, Guangdong in south China, Shandong in east China, and Tianjin in north China. Individuals were eligible for participation if they were male; aged 16 years or older; university student (technical diploma and undergraduate students); MSM (having sexual behaviors including mutual masturbation, oral sex, or anal sex with male partners); HIV negative or unknown; and willing to provide informed consent. Each participant received free HIV testing services and 50 Chinese Yuan (~US $7.9) as compensation after enrollment. All data were stored anonymously in encrypted storage space, and personally identifiable information was stored separately from other behavioral and test result data.

Ethical Approval

The study has been approved by the Ethics Review Board of Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU-SPH2018044) and registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration number: ChiCTR1900020645).

Procedure and Measurements

For sampling and recruitment, the methodology has previously been published elsewhere [18]. Briefly, recruitment of participants was promoted both online and offline. For online recruitment, study advertising campaigns were placed on the social network. For offline recruitment, the study advertisement was distributed to the collaboration of community-based organizations (CBOs), health clinics, and student associations. After reading study advertisements online or offline, participants could make an appointment to join the study at a preferred CBO. After scanning the QR code on a smartphone, participants finished the online questionnaire at the CBO site. A self-administrated online structured questionnaire was used to collect each participant’s sociodemographic information (including age, ethnicity, educational status, involvement in class leadership, academic performance, student loans, sexual orientation, and gender of sex partner in lifetime), sexual behaviors (including the age at first anal intercourse, commercial sex in lifetime, forced sex in lifetime, group sex in the past 3 months, number of sex partners in the past 3 months, condomless sex in the past 3 months, and HIV serostatus of sex partners in the past 3 months), gay app use, recreational drug use, and HIV testing. Gay app use was assessed by the question, “Have you ever used any gay app?”, and subsequent questions about specific gay app use behaviors, including preference, duration, frequency, and purpose. We also assessed seeking sex partners via gay apps by the question “During the past 3 months, have you ever used gay apps to seek sex partners?”, and subsequent questions including the number of sex partners, group sex, condomless sex, and HIV serostatus of sex partners. Recreational drug use was assessed by asking “Have you ever used any of the below-listed recreational drugs during sex? Popper (alkyl nitrites), ecstasy, crystal methamphetamine, and ketamine.” The HIV testing was conducted with rapid HIV testing (Alere Determine HIV-1/2; Alere Medical Co., Ltd.) at the location of CBOs; those who tested positive were referred to the local Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for confirmation testing and subsequent treatment services [19]. HIV infections in this study were confirmed results.

Statistical Analysis

We used mean and SD to describe continuous variables, and proportions to describe categorical variables. Chi-square test for trend was used to test the linear trend in the proportion of engaging in sexual risk behaviors with the increase in the frequency of app use. Univariable log-binomial regressions were performed to assess correlates (sociodemographic variables, sexual behaviors) of seeking sex partners via gay apps. Multivariable log-binomial regressions were conducted to use seeking sex partners via the gay apps as the independent variable and sexual behavior in past 3 months (including group sex, number of sex partners, condomless sex, and HIV status of sex partners) as the dependent variable. Each variable of sexual behaviors was examined independently in separate regression models, adjusted for sociodemographic variables. Variables with P<.05 were retained in the final model. Results were presented with an adjusted prevalence ratio (APR) and 95% CI. All data were analyzed using R (version 3.6.1; R Foundation).

Results

Participants

A total of 447 MSM attending university with an average age of 20.4 (SD 1.5) years were recruited in the study (Table 1). The majority of participants self-identified as gay (382/447, 85.5%). Most participants were undergraduate (355/447, 79.4%) students and self-reported academic performance above the average (354/447, 79.2%).

Table 1.

Characteristics and gay app use among men who have sex with men attending university in China (N=447)

Variables Values, n (%)
Age (years)

≤20 236 (52.8)

≥21 211 (47.2)
Education

Undergraduate 355 (79.4)

Junior college 92 (20.6)
Academic performance

Below average 93 (20.8)

Average and above 354 (79.2)
Sexual orientation

Homosexual 382 (85.5)

Bisexual 44 (9.8)

Other 21 (4.7)
Gay apps useda

Blued 428 (97.5)

Aloha 226 (51.5)

Jack’d 38 (8.7)

Grindr 37 (8.4)

Others 33 (7.5)
The most frequently used apps (past 3 months; n=439)

Blued 318 (72.4)

Aloha 84 (19.1)

Others 37 (8.4)
Number of gay apps used (n=439)

1 393 (89.5)

≥2 46 (10.5)
Length of gay app use (months; n=439)

≤5 55 (12.5)

6-12 30 (6.8)

≥13 354 (80.6)
Frequency of gay app use (past 3 months; n=439)

Monthly 125 (28.5)

Weekly 173 (39.4)

Daily 141 (32.1)
Time (hours) spent on gay app per day (past 3 months; n=439)

≤0.5 362 (82.5)

1 38 (8.7)

≥2 39 (8.9)
Purpose of gay app use (past 3 months; n=439)a

Relationships 199 (45.3)

Following others’ updates 185 (42.1)

Making friends 171 (39.0)

Hooking up with sex partners 161 (36.7)

Chatting 119 (27.1)

Watching live streaming 56 (12.8)
Type of sexual behavior with sex partners known via gay apps (past 3 months; n=240)a

Anal sex 197 (82.1)

Oral sex 164 (68.3)

Masturbation 97 (40.4)
HIV status of last sex partners known via gay apps (past 3 months; n=240)

Negative 93 (38.8)

Positive 6 (2.5)

Unknown 141 (58.8)

aMultiple choice.

Gay App Use

Among MSM attending university enrolled in the study, 439/447 (98.2%) reported ever using gay apps (Table 1). The most popular gay apps were Blued (428/439, 97.5%) and Aloha (226/439, 51.5%); likewise, the most frequently used gay apps in the past 3 months were also Blued (318/439, 72.4%) and Aloha (84/439, 19.1%). Most participants reported using only 1 type of app (393/439, 89.5%), over 12 months of usage time (354/439, 80.6%), and using less than 1 hour per day (362/439, 82.5%). The top 3 purposes for using gay apps were looking for a romantic relationship (199/439, 45.3%), following others’ updates (185/439, 42.1%), and making friends (171/439, 39.0%). The majority of participants (197/240, 82.1%) reported engaging in anal sex with sex partners met via apps and over half (141/240, 58.8%) did not know the HIV status of last sex partner.

The frequencies of gay app use were months (125/439, 28.5%), weeks (173/439, 39.4%), and days (141/439, 32.1%) in the past 3 months among MSM attending university (Table 1). Chi-square test for trend showed that higher proportions of sexual behaviors, including seeking sex partners via apps (P<.001), engaging in group sex (P<.001), having multiple sex partners (P<.001), unknown sex partners’ HIV status (P<.001), and using recreational drugs during sex (P<.02), were positively associated with the increase in the frequency of gay app use (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Behavioral changes over increasing frequency of gay app use among MSM attending university: (A) seeking sex partners with gay apps use frequency; (B) group sex with gay apps use frequency in past 3 months; (C) having two or more sex partners with gay apps use frequency in past 3 months; (D) unprotected anal intercourse with gay apps use frequency in past 3 months; (E) unaware of sex partners’ HIV status with gay apps use frequency in past 3 months; (F) recreational drug use during anal sex ever. P3M: Past 3 months.

Seeking Sex Partner via Gay Apps

Table 2 shows the characteristics of seeking sex partners via gay apps among MSM attending university. As many as 240 reported using gay apps to seek sex partners. In multivariable analysis, participants who used gay apps to seek sex partners were more likely to have multiple sex partners in the past 3 months (APR 1.53, 95% CI 1.33-1.76, P<.001), engage in group sex in the past 3 months (APR 1.55, 95% CI 1.35-1.78, P<.001), and have sex partners with unknown or positive HIV status (APR 1.72, 95% CI 1.46-2.01, P<.001).

Table 2.

Correlates of seeking sex partner via gay apps among men who have sex with men attending university in China for past 3 months.

Variables N Seeking sex partner via gay apps
n (%) Univariate prevalence ratio (95% CI) Adjusted prevalence ratio (95% CI)
Age (years)




≤20 236 122 (51.7) 1

≥21 211 118 (55.9) 1.08 (0.91-1.29)
Education




Undergraduate 355 193 (54.4) 1

Junior college 92 47 (51.1) 0.94 (0.75-1.17)
Academic performance




Below average 93 48 (51.6) 1

Average and above 354 192 (54.2) 0.95 (0.77-1.18)
Sexual orientation




Other 21 10 (47.6) 1

Bisexual 44 23 (52.3) 1.21 (0.43-3.41)

Homosexual 382 207 (54.2) 1.30 (0.54-3.14)
Gender of sex partner




Only male 423 231 (54.6) 1

Both male and female 13 6 (46.2) 1.18 (0.65-2.14)
Age at first anal intercourse (years)


≤17 113 65 (57.5) 1

≥18 323 172 (53.3) 1.08 (0.90-1.30)
Commercial sex (lifetime)




No 420 220 (52.4) 1

Yes 27 20 (74.1) 1.84 (0.96-3.50)
Forced sex (lifetime)




No 418 231 (55.3) 1

Yes 18 9 (50.0) 0.92 (0.57-1.47)
Group sex (past 3 months)




No 364 170 (46.7) 1 1

Yes 83 70 (84.3) 3.40 (2.05-5.66) 1.55 (1.35-1.78)
Number of sex partners (past 3 months)


≤2 365 166 (45.5) 1 1

≥3 82 74 (90.2) 5.59 (2.87-10.87) 1.53 (1.33-1.76)
Condomless sex (past 3 months)




No 306 144 (47.1) 1 1

Yes 141 96 (68.1) 1.24 (0.98-1.57) 0.98 (0.84-1.14)
HIV status of sex partners (past 3 months)



Negative 281 111 (39.5) 1 1

Positive or unknown 166 129 (77.7) 1.97 (1.67-2.32) 1.72 (1.46-2.01)
Recreational drug usea during sex



No 317 154 (48.6) 1

Yes 130 86 (66.2) 1.52 (1.17-1.98)
HIV testing




No 49 25 (51.0) 1

Yes 398 215 (54.0) 1.07 (0.79-1.45)
HIV infection




Negative 437 234 (53.5) 1

Positive 10 6 (60.0) 1.16 (0.54-2.50)

aRecreational drug includes popper (alkyl nitrites), ecstasy, crystal methamphetamine, and ketamine.

Discussion

Principal Findings

To our knowledge, this is the first study to characterize gay app use among MSM attending university in China. We found that almost all MSM attending university used gay apps, and those who used gay apps to seek sexual partners were likely to be more engaging in high-risk sexual behaviors, including multiple sexual partners, group sex, commercial sex, and recreational drug use during sex.

We found a high prevalence (439/447, 98.2%) of gay app use among MSM attending university, which was much higher than that in nonstudent MSM (ranging from 40% [20] to 60% [21,22]). Previous studies have shown the differences in age distribution for app use among MSM, with younger age groups using them more frequently [21,23]. The mean age of participants in our study was 20 (SD 1.5) years, indicating that MSM attending university were a younger subgroup of MSM. Therefore, they are more likely to use gay apps compared with nonstudent MSM.

The popularity of gay app use among MSM attending universities was accompanied by some high-risk behaviors. Our study found that high-risk behaviors, including engaging in group sex in the past 3 months, having 2 or more sex partners in the past 3 months, failing to know sex partners’ HIV status in the past 3 months, and using recreational drugs during sex, increased with the frequency of gay app use. Previous studies have indicated that men using gay apps could facilitate sexually risky behaviors [7,22,24]. Moreover, MSM attending university who used gay apps to seek sex partners were more likely to have multiple sex partners, engage in group sex and commercial sex, and use recreational drugs. This is consistent with previous studies among nonstudent MSM in China that found gay app users had more sex partners and more group sex compared with those who did not use apps to seek sex partners [20,22,25]. Notably, high-risk behaviors, including multiple sex partners, group sex, and commercial sex, could increase the risk of infection with HIV or other sexually transmitted infections. Therefore, additional interventions are needed to address the sexual risk behaviors associated with seeking sex partners via apps.

Literally all MSM attending university have used gay apps at some point, which points to the potential feasibility of using gay app–based platforms to engage them in HIV prevention and care programs. Barriers, such as stigma, discrimination, and disclosure of sexuality, prevent young MSM from seeking traditional venue–based HIV prevention services. Because social networking apps are very popular among young people [26,27], there may be opportunities to facilitate HIV prevention efforts via these apps. Some app-based HIV interventions achieved desirable results. For example, since an HIV testing campaign using app push messages to promote HIV testing has been launched on Blued in 2015, over 15,000 MSM have tested for HIV, of whom over 2000 self-identified as university students. The number of those who tested for HIV increased substantially from 836 in 2013 before the campaign to 7315 in 2017 after the campaign [12]. Given that gay apps can instantly reach millions of targeted individuals, app-based interventions include information on HIV self-testing, pre-exposure prophylaxis, post-exposure prophylaxis, and HIV treatment as prevention, and thus may benefit a broad group in the MSM community.

We found Blued and Aloha were the most popular gay apps among MSM attending university, and the majority of those reported using only 1 app (393/439, 89.5%). There were 43 brands of gay apps in China in 2018 [28], and among nonstudent MSM 65.9% used only 1 app, and 23.2% used 2 apps [21]. Currently, there are regional differences in gay app use. While English language–based gay apps such as Grindr and Jack’d have subscribers from many countries, the gay app market in China is dominated by local apps such as Blued and Aloha. Those differences in gay app choices may be attributed to linguistic and cultural differences among MSM. Blued and Aloha are also platforms for HIV care services.

Limitations

There were limitations. First, there may be a selection bias in the study population. Participants were recruited mainly through online advertisements and enrolled offline for HIV testing at CBO site, which may exclude student MSM who hide their sexual orientation and were not willing to attend on-site testing at CBO. This deeply hidden population may be frequent users of gay apps, and the lack of such a population among participants may limit the generalizability of the study. Second, the study results may be affected by social desirability reporting bias because sensitive private information was based on self-reporting by participants. Third, the design of the cross-sectional study prevents making causal inferences between using an app to seek sex partners and risk behaviors.

Conclusions

Our study suggests high gay app use among MSM attending university and using apps to seek sex partners may be associated with increased high-risk sexual behaviors. The causality between seeking sex partners via gay apps and increased high-risk sexual behaviors should be further investigated so as to inform potential policies for HIV prevention.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China Excellent Young Scientists Fund (Grant Number 82022064), Natural Science Foundation of China International/Regional Research Collaboration Project (Grant Number 72061137001), Natural Science Foundation of China Young Scientist Fund (Grant Number 81703278), the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (Grant Number 2018ZX10721102), the Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen (Grant Number SZSM201811071), the High Level Project of Medicine in Longhua, Shenzhen (Grant Number HLPM201907020105), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Number 2020YFC0840900), the Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission Basic Research Program (Grant Number JCYJ20190807155409373), Special Support Plan for High-Level Talents of Guangdong Province (Grant Number 2019TQ05Y230), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant Number 58000-31620005). The funding parties did not have any role in the design of the study or in the explanation of the data. We thank our partners, including Lingnan (Guangzhou), Pengyou (Foshan), the Nanshan Center for Chronic Disease Control (Shenzhen), Chongqing CDC (Chongqing), Tianjin CDC (Tianjin), Shenlan (Tianjin), and Qingai (Qingdao). We also thank all participants who made this research possible.

Abbreviations

APR

adjusted prevalence ratio

CBO

community-based organization

CDC

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

MSM

men who have sex with men

Footnotes

Authors' Contributions: This study was conceived and designed by HZ and SF in consultation with the other authors. SF and PL were responsible for field study, data compilation, and data analysis. All authors have contributed to the interpretation of data and study findings. SF, PL, and YH drafted the manuscript with all authors critically reviewing the paper.

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

References

  • 1.Grindr turns 10: How a decade with GPS 'dating' apps changed us all. National Broadcasting Company. 2019. [2019-10-29]. https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/grindr-turns-10-how-decade-gps-dating-apps-changed-us-n986666 .
  • 2.Tom Faber Grindr has transformed gay life, but is it for the better? . The Face. 2019. Jun 27, [2019-10-29]. https://theface.com/life/grindr-has-transformed-gay-life-but-is-it-for-the-better .
  • 3.Blued official website. Blued. [2019-09-24]. https://www.blued.com/en/index.html .
  • 4.Wu S, Ward J. The mediation of gay men's lives: A review on gay dating app studies. Sociology Compass. 2018 Jan 15;12(2):e12560. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12560. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zou H, Fan S. Characteristics of Men Who Have Sex With Men Who Use Smartphone Geosocial Networking Applications and Implications for HIV Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Sex Behav. 2017 May;46(4):885–894. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0709-3.10.1007/s10508-016-0709-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Choi EPH, Wong JYH, Fong DYT. The use of social networking applications of smartphone and associated sexual risks in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender populations: a systematic review. AIDS Care. 2017 Feb;29(2):145–155. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2016.1211606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Holloway IW, Pulsipher CA, Gibbs J, Barman-Adhikari A, Rice E. Network Influences on the Sexual Risk Behaviors of Gay, Bisexual and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men Using Geosocial Networking Applications. AIDS Behav. 2015 Jun;19 Suppl 2:112–22. doi: 10.1007/s10461-014-0989-3. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/25572832 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Grosskopf NA, LeVasseur MT, Glaser DB. Use of the Internet and mobile-based "apps" for sex-seeking among men who have sex with men in New York City. Am J Mens Health. 2014 Nov;8(6):510–20. doi: 10.1177/1557988314527311. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1557988314527311?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed .1557988314527311 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Winetrobe H, Rice E, Bauermeister J, Petering R, Holloway IW. Associations of unprotected anal intercourse with Grindr-met partners among Grindr-using young men who have sex with men in Los Angeles. AIDS Care. 2014;26(10):1303–8. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2014.911811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Holloway IW. Substance use homophily among geosocial networking application using gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. Arch Sex Behav. 2015 Oct;44(7):1799–811. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0581-6. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26216146 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shrestha R, Lim SH, Altice FL, Copenhaver M, Wickersham JA, Saifi R, Ab Halim MA, Naning H, Kamarulzaman A. Use of Smartphone to Seek Sexual Health Information Online Among Malaysian Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM): Implications for mHealth Intervention to Increase HIV Testing and Reduce HIV Risks. J Community Health. 2020 Feb;45(1):10–19. doi: 10.1007/s10900-019-00713-x. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/31375976 .10.1007/s10900-019-00713-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wang L, Podson D, Chen Z, Lu H, Wang V, Shepard C, Williams JK, Mi G. Using Social Media To Increase HIV Testing Among Men Who Have Sex with Men - Beijing, China, 2013-2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 May 31;68(21):478–482. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6821a3. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6821a3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zou H, Tucker JD, Fan S, Xu J, Yu M, Luo Z, Cai W, Grulich AE. Learning about HIV the hard way: HIV among Chinese MSM attending university. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Jan;18(1):16–18. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30711-9.S1473-3099(17)30711-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Li G, Jiang Y, Zhang L. HIV upsurge in China's students. Science. 2019 May 24;364(6442):711. doi: 10.1126/science.aay0799.364/6442/711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.National Health Commission: About 3,000 students are infected with AIDS each year, mainly through homosexual transmission. China Central Television. 2018. Nov 24, [2019-11-05]. http://m.news.cctv.com/2018/11/24/ARTIDHOYaWXWizf84obxG3ws181124.shtml .
  • 16.Yang Z, Huang Z, Dong Z, Zhang S, Han J, Jin M. Prevalence of high-risky behaviors in transmission of HIV among high school and college student MSM in China: a meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2015 Dec 21;15:1272. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2614-4. https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-015-2614-4 .10.1186/s12889-015-2614-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhao Y, Ma Y, Chen R, Li F, Qin X, Hu Z. Non-disclosure of Sexual Orientation to Parents Associated with Sexual Risk Behaviors Among Gay and Bisexual MSM in China. AIDS Behav. 2016 Jan;20(1):193–203. doi: 10.1007/s10461-015-1135-6.10.1007/s10461-015-1135-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fan S, Liu Z, Luo Z, Yu M, Ouyang L, Gong H, Ding Y, Li P, Yuan T, Zhou Y, Wu G, Zou H. Effect of availability of HIV self-testing on HIV testing frequency among men who have sex with men attending university in China (UniTest): protocol of a stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial. BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Feb 18;20(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-4807-4. https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-020-4807-4 .10.1186/s12879-020-4807-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Regulations on the Prevention and Control of AIDS. The State Council of the people's Republic of China. 2006. Feb 12, [2019-04-04]. http://www.gov.cn/flfg/2006-02/12/content_186324.htm .
  • 20.Cao B, Liu C, Stein G, Tang W, Best J, Zhang Y, Yang B, Huang S, Wei C, Tucker JD. Faster and Riskier? Online Context of Sex Seeking Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in China. Sex Transm Dis. 2017 Apr;44(4):239–244. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000575. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28282651 .00007435-201704000-00009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wei L, Chen L, Zhang H, Yang Z, Zou H, Yuan T, Xiao Y, Liu S, Tan W, Xie W, Liu L, Cheng J, Zhao J. Use of gay app and the associated HIV/syphilis risk among non-commercial men who have sex with men in Shenzhen, China: a serial cross-sectional study. Sex Transm Infect. 2019 Nov;95(7):496–504. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2018-053902.sextrans-2018-053902 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tang W, Tang S, Qin Y, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Liu C, Tso LS, Wei C, Yang L, Huang S, Yang B, Tucker J. Will Gay Sex-Seeking Mobile Phone Applications Facilitate Group Sex? A Cross-Sectional Online Survey among Men Who Have Sex with Men in China. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0167238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167238. https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167238 .PONE-D-16-30987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Badal HJ, Stryker JE, DeLuca N, Purcell DW. Swipe Right: Dating Website and App Use Among Men Who Have Sex With Men. AIDS Behav. 2018 Apr;22(4):1265–1272. doi: 10.1007/s10461-017-1882-7.10.1007/s10461-017-1882-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hull P, Mao L, Prestage G, Zablotska I, de Wit J, Holt M. The use of mobile phone apps by Australian gay and bisexual men to meet sex partners: an analysis of sex-seeking repertoires and risks for HIV and STIs using behavioural surveillance data. Sex Transm Infect. 2016 Nov;92(7):502–507. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2015-052325.sextrans-2015-052325 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bien CH, Best JM, Muessig KE, Wei C, Han L, Tucker JD. Gay Apps for Seeking Sex Partners in China: Implications for MSM Sexual Health. AIDS Behav. 2015 Jun;19(6):941–6. doi: 10.1007/s10461-014-0994-6. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/25572834 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kaveri S, David S. Digital Youth: The Role of Media in Development. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Michikyan M, Suárez-Orozco C. Adolescent Media and Social Media Use. Journal of Adolescent Research. 2016 Apr 27;31(4):411–414. doi: 10.1177/0743558416643801. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yang G, Long J, Luo D, Xiao S, Kaminga AC. The Characteristics and Quality of Mobile Phone Apps Targeted at Men Who Have Sex With Men in China: A Window of Opportunity for Health Information Dissemination? JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Mar 27;7(3):e12573. doi: 10.2196/12573. https://mhealth.jmir.org/2019/3/e12573/ v7i3e12573 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JMIR Public Health and Surveillance are provided here courtesy of JMIR Publications Inc.

RESOURCES